biological (2)

The New Jihad

In recent days the actions of the U.S. government have been remarkable.  After an amazing list of unilateral actions by the executive branch, Congress and U.S. citizens seem comfortable with the idea that allowing diseased aliens into the country is somehow normal and acceptable.  Maybe the sheer number of attacks on freedom and sovereignty have desensitized the public to the seriousness of these actions.

To put things into perspective, imagine allowing individuals with explosive vests to come across the border and into airports with no restraints.  This gives a new meaning to extermination by pandemic means.  No expensive explosives or extensive planning sessions are required.  The effectiveness is remarkable.  Just allow the biological agent in the individual to follow its course. The carrier can infect masses of people by traveling extensively throughout the country.

The number of carriers is unlimited by anything other than the physical resources required to move them from infected areas to the U.S.  If necessary one can add extra planes to ensure full exposure and dispersal of the diseases. The actors don't have to be fully indoctrinated into Islam to be effective. This is ingenious and simple.  Add to this the tendency of most Americans to be accepting of the politically correct doctrine.

The public seems to accept that public officials are doing their jobs and protecting them from dangers within our country and from outside our borders.  This is a perfect scenario for such a plan.

Another outcome of such a plan is ridding the country of older people whose immune systems are not as effective as the younger population.  The younger people, who do not have a good understanding of democracy and are easier to manipulate, make good recipients of socialist ideology. The older population includes more educated individuals and military veterans who are not as easily indoctrinated.

Our current administration is apparently trying to weaken our military capability.  Why not send our soldiers and national guard into hot zones to become infected and use them as carriers when they return to the country?  When seen from a subversion perspective, it makes perfect sense.  It serves multiple purposes and is accepted by the target groups as legitimate.

While this may sound like a script for "The Twilight Zone", it is happening now.  We must stand against this serious threat in every way possible.  This means voting the perpetrators out and pushing Congress to do their job by acting to protect us.

Read more…
In a sparkling example of utter naivete, Barak Obama unilaterally pledged America not to counter-attack with nuclear warfare against non-nuclear nations that use biological or chemical weapons of mass destruction or initiate a crippling cyber attack against the United States . . . Neville Chamberlain must be proud. No nation in history has shown consistently more benevolence for our fellow world citizens; no nation in history has revealed itself more restrained and responsibly self-controlled in the use of weapons of mass destruction . . . so why, Rajjpuut asks, would any sane statesman take any potentially reasonable response to attacks against Americans or America off the table?
Even if this was just another example of an Obama lie, why would he give encouragement to potential enemies, why? Last time Rajjpuut examined the matter philosophically, even greater than all other war crimes is the crime of losing. It seems likely that people like Winston Churchill and members of the American leadership and intelligentsia and top military personnel would have all been rounded up and received summary judgment against some wall somewhere, if the Nazis and Japanese Empire won World War II. Given that sad truth, why on earth ever tie your own hands?

Which brings us to another Obamanation . . . it’s just never a good idea to tell one’s enemies one’s intentions . . . in this separate case giving a draw-down date for beginning to pull out of Iraq is a horrible miscalculation of the will and intelligence of the terrorists in that country. Just a couple months ago, Joe Biden claimed that victory in Iraq will prove to be one of the greatest successes of this administration. Granted the Veep sometimes speaks semi-idiotically off-the-cuff. Presumably he meant closing out the war in Iraq successfully and getting the trooops home quickly would be some sort of worthy accomplishment. Presumably Joe B. knows that everyone with a memory remembers that he and particularly Obama were the sternest opponents to the war in Iraq and to the “surge” which seemingly won the war. They were clearly wrong.

Now, however, Obama appears prepared to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory in Iraq. In a phrase, just coined by Rajjpuut, Obama has decided to “de-surge”way, way too quickly and he’s thus given aid and comfort to Iraq’s enemies internal and external. Already Americans are transporting “materiel” to Afghanistan and yet . . . the War in Iraq is definitely NOT won. Al Queda in Iraq, Sunni death squads and Iranian supported Shiite militias are reaappearing on the scene now that it appears America was not after all “in it to win it.” What’s going on? Clearly more of “Obama naivete.” His predecessor G.W. Bush made a stupid speech titled "Mission Accomplished!" about six and a half years ago. The terrorists in Iraq may be crazy fundamentalist maniacs . . . but they are NOT stupid and they are not lacking in courage and resilience and determination . . . it appears we are underestimating them for the second and most fatal time . . . Nice work, Joe; nice work, Barak!

When Rajjpuut was in college in our semantics class the very first rule you learned was “The word is not the thing.” Mr. Obama from the git-go has gone out of his way to prove he’s never taken a semantics or economics or business or history or strategic thinking class in his life or at least he's never really learned anything valuable from any such class . . . . Of these four areas his biggest failing is in the realm of semantics. Obama has been acting since day one after the election as if all he has to do is say something and presto that something is achieved. No leadership, no hard work, no logistical balances, no fiscal considerations, no reality check, no real consideration of the pluses and minuses involved, no advice from those who actually understand the area in question, no need to consult with real experts outside of his Marxist coterie . . . just another simple silver-tongued speech and all live happily ever after (quite reminiscent of Jimmy Carter, eh?) in a socialist utopia called Barakville.

When, NOT if, the U.S. loses in Iraq and it becomes obvious, say about a year from now that he’s given Iraq over to terrorists and/or Iran or both . . . Mr. Obama will at that moment have proven himself to be the utter worst president in the nation’s history to a good 70% of the voters. And you can count on both the cause and effect by next May at the latest. Makes one proud to be an American . . . .

Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,

Rajjpuut

Read more…