ACTION

IT'S THE GUNS?????

LIBERALS ARE TOO STUPID TO SEE THE IDIOCY OF THEIR IDEAS

I saw a promo for the Samantha Bee talk show on tv that said the violence problem in our nation is guns. This puke is a looney libtard moron who is so full of hate for God, America, and the American way (liberty) that she can't be even remotely rational. She also hates President Trump with a passion that is just as evil as it is irrational. Liberals want all of us defenseless in the face of evil despite the abundance of examples that prove their premise not only incorrect but downright stupid. Baltimore, Maryland and Chicago, Illinois are famous for being "gun free zones", cities where no one is allowed to possess any kind of firearm yet are the gun murder meccas of America. Liberals contend only police and military should have access to firearms. That plan has worked out well in Nazi Germany, Soviet Russia, and Communist China hasn't it????? Take a look at who is committing mass murder with guns, every one of them a liberal demonkrat. None of my guns has ever committed mass murder nor have I used one of my guns to commit any crime, much less mass murder. Guns ARE NOT the problem in America, never have been and never will be, unless of course, We the People lose the ability to defend ourselves from lunatic liberals or a despotic government such as demonkrats desire to impose on us. Sadly, many Americans have bought into the liberal lies and are not intelligent enough to see where the liberal agenda will take them. What America needs is a large dose of God back in the public forum. Since any reference to Jehovah or Jesus Christ have been outlawed by libtard morons we have seen evil explode. Liberals throw a hissy fit any time a Christian even thinks about speaking aloud about our beliefs but moslems can openly spout about their "god", allah, without so much as a raised eyebrow. The moslem major that murdered more than a dozen soldiers at Ft. Hood, Texas a few years ago, as in all school shootings, succeeded because there was no one who could stop it because "guns aren't allowed " in those areas. If gun free zones are so safe why does EVERY mass murder occur in one? I can't wait for a liberal to explain that one rationally. They won't even try because they know there is no intelligent explanation so they revert to their "ban guns" claptrap. I often wonder why liberals don't demand that police and military also give up guns, that way only Godless liberal crazies would have guns and they could murder anyone and everyone whenever they want to. I like a lot of the programs on TNT but am no longer going to watch that network because it is blatantly left wing and totally against liberty.

"Getting rid of guns" will not only not work, it wouldn't solve the problem of violence and murder if it could be done. Murder comes from a lack of moral direction not from access to guns. Libtards decry gun violence yet have condoned the mass murder of tens of millions of unborn children through abortion. Calling the murder of an unborn child under the lie of "a woman's right to choose" has severely cheapened life in liberal circles. Liberals have no respect for God given life but rather demand the exclusive right to decide who lives, who dies, and under what circumstances those decisions are made. Realistically, liberals expect everyone to bow to their demands no matter how ridiculous or how evil. Only returning to honoring Almighty God, Jehovah, will solve our nation's violence woes but liberals go into conniption fits at the idea of honoring the Creator of all things, including this nation. Our founders, or at least most of them, were devout Christians who sought God as they waged the military and political battles that resulted in the formation of our nation as a Constitutional Representative Republic. The USA IS NOT a democracy as some erroneously claim, it is a representative republic based on a Constitution that liberals hate because it guarantees the God-given rights listed for the benefit of all citizens, rights that liberals seek to deny to anyone not on their team. Other factors liberals refuse to acknowledge are the glorification of violence, especially as related to guns, in movies and video games

Solving the nation's slide into gun violence is an easy two-step process, first repent and turn to God, and second stop the incessant glorification of violence in movies and video games. It is sad that such simple solutions are beyond the capability of liberals to comprehend. One day Jesus is going to come back and rescue believers from the insanity imposed by liberals and leave them to stew in their own insanity while their "god", satan, torments them. . I pray daily asking God to remove the blinders on the eyes and hearts of liberals and to touch their hearts so they will turn to Him and save themselves and the nation from destruction.

I submit this in the name of the Most Holy Trinity, in faith, with the responsibility given to me by Almighty God to honor His work and not let it die from neglect.

Bob Russell

Claremore, Oklahoma

September 1, 2019

The Answer To This Question Has Been Right In Front Of Our Faces For A Long Long Time. See If You Agree!
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
October 5, 2015
Method for Stopping Shooting Rampages Emerges
by Alan Korwin
The Uninvited Ombudsman

Hard evidence -- not doctor theories, news commentary, conjecture, hyperbole, rumor, innuendo or any other proposals -- clearly shows that the only known way to actually stop spree murderers is to shoot them -- or scare them into shooting themselves. Time and again society has found this works.

According to the evidence, every mass murder in recent times has been halted, in the final analysis, by shooting the murderers, or threatening to shoot them, with guns. Members of the press corps continue to debate the subject, despite the evidence. Sources speaking privately say the media consciously reject this fact. In stark contrast, self-defense incidents using guns are suppressed, by news-media policy, and do not appear on the public stage.

An excellent write up about the censorship of firearms used in self defense appears here --
http://www.wnd.com/2014/07/usa-today-ad-campaign-features-armed-heroes

and here --
http://dailycaller.com/2014/07/09/since-usa-today-wont-publish-good-gun-news-author-alan-korwin-publishes-advertorial-of-good-gun-news

Multiple reports of self-defense, accomplished by shooting criminals, appear as paid space in USA Today, which otherwise censors such reports:
http://www.gunlaws.com/TheFirstRespondersReport.htm

Although knowledgeable commentators are still debating the merits of shooting murderers, the visible evidence clearly demonstrates that shooting the perpetrators does take care of the problem. No other solutions have worked.

The only problem identified is the relative slowness of this effective remedy, due mainly to the delay in getting guns to the scene where innocent victims are assaulted. The scenes have virtually always been in supposed "gun-free zones," with posted signs flatly rejected by the perpetrators.

President Barack Hussein Obama, whose middle name is not supposed to be used, went on national TV, twice in the past week, to propose other solutions, which he announced as "politicized." He promised to "continue talking."

Further analysis conducted by The Uninvited Ombudsman, has determined that background checks, or newly proposed additional background checks, recommended by Mr. Obama and others, would be pointless for people who already own guns, since they already own guns. The best estimates indicate this is about 100 million armed Americans.

And in other analysis conducted by The Uninvited Ombudsman, waiting periods have no meaning whatsoever for Americans who already own guns, when they go shopping for guns, since they already own guns. That is also 100 million Americans.

Waiting periods have one additional drawback overlooked in mainstream reports. They require the public to trust psychotic individuals who wait five days to get their first gun, to remain calm for the balance of their lives. Somehow, the five-day waiting period doesn't seem like a long enough "cooling off" period, but this has not made it into nightly "news" reports, or the President's commentaries, for reasons that were unclear at press time.

The murderer in Oregon who sparked the recent repetitive debates owned more than a dozen guns, according to early reports, all legally acquired. While Hillary, Mr. Obama and others are still calling for more background checks, they have apparently failed to notice these obvious errors in their plan.

Only new, or "virgin" gun buyers would be affected, most of whom would pass checks anyway, according to leading experts and past experience. The point of adding even more checks, when current checks are not used to take criminals off the streets, was not clear as this report was prepped for release.

"News" commentators have also failed to make this connection, so far, and have repeated the calls from politicians on both sides of the aisle, who are discussing background checks and waiting periods.

The role of ultra-violent body-rending video games, horrific grizzly blood and all gore movies on nightly TV and a debasement of popular American culture at every level has not figured prominently into the president's prolific pronouncements.

The public -- not some famous vilified "the gun lobby" -- rises up loudly to condemn the assault on their fundamental civil and human rights. This is the same 100 million armed Americans mentioned earlier. Some reports suggest it is "only" 80 million armed Americans. The NRA, often cited as "the gun lobby," has only 5 million members.

Counter-Intuitive Man Says:

Referring to murderers as "gun men" is offensive to men, a violation of journalism ethics, due to its biased and prejudicial nature, and sexist.

Calling murderers "gun men" is virtually propaganda against men and firearms.

It denigrates men, it is derogatory, defamatory and it is discriminatory.

What would media and pundits say if a woman was the criminal perpetrator?

The correct terms include murderer, killer, villain, criminal, assailant and perpetrator, without gratuitously singling out gender.

By using the propaganda term "gun man," the media vilifies a tool they frequently demonstrate hatred for, along with men, which agenda-driven political groups seek to demean or belittle. That's simply wrong, and unethical.

Murderers should be called murderers, not gun men. This would help remove the glorification many mass murderers seek, which encourages others to copy their behavior.

By encouraging such behavior, the media shares responsibility for these acts, according to leading national experts, who are speaking out against such behavior in increasing numbers.
Alan Korwin
The Uninvited Ombudsman
Author of ten books on gun law
Publisher, Bloomfield Press

P.S. My previous request to the President, to have him call me for common-sense solutions he is not getting from his side of the aisle, has gone unanswered so far. I patiently await. The ideas coming from the TV set are so off base it is hard to imagine they are actually on the air. Has anyone considered education in the schools yet? Schools are currently an empty hole of ignorance on the subject.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/conservativeoasis/

Message From The GOA (Gun Owners of America)
They call it “Misstatements”, the rest of us refer to it a lousy pile of lies one on top of another. You really have to read this in detail, remember it, and share it. The GOA pushes his lies right back into his face. Every time we have something called a "mass shooting", this clown comes out of his office before anyone knows any of the details and starts talking "mass gun control laws".
Response to the President
Created: Friday, 02 October 2015
GOA Responds to the President on the Oregon Shooting
-- Top Ten misstatements made by Obama
http://www.gunowners.org/response-to-the-president.htm

Shared From: https://www.facebook.com/groups/conservativeoasis

It’s everything you’d expect from All In With Chris Hayes, and so much less … less common sense, less intellectually honest, and less respectful of faith. Renowned Jesuit author Fr. James Martin looks at times like he’d accidentally wandered into a lunatic asylum during this segment, and after watching five minutes of Chris Hayes and Harvard’s Christopher Robichaud treat the now-cancelled “black mass” event like an actual religious practice rather than a hate-speech mockery of the Catholic Mass, Fr. Martin will not be alone in that confusion:

Martin offers a very close analogy when he suggests that Harvard wouldn’t have tolerated the burning of a Koran, even if wrapped in pseudo-religious practice. Muslims see that as a desecration of their religion, just as Catholics see the “black mass” — and given the nearly step-by-step mockery of Catholic liturgy in the latter, Catholics have a much better case to make. The entire point of this “service” is hatred towards Catholics in particular. Instead of addressing this point, though, both Hayes and Robichaud accuse Martin of spouting “false equivalencies” and start moaning over the power of “major religions” to keep the “marginalized” out of the debate.

POLL: Has the Obama Administration turned its back on Israel?

Father Martin is not some finger-wagging, down-shouter of a shepherd (all-pulpit-no-pasture and forever on the harangue), and because that is true, and because his easygoing manner is well-known, you would think that his sobriety, here — his stark refusal to budge on the subject of Satanism, and the offensiveness inherent to any Black Mass being “re-enacted” in the public — would make an unusually strong impression on the host, Chris Hayes, and other guest.

You might think it, but sadly, you’d be wrong. No one in this video clip is thinking, “gee, Martin is no lunatic, and his gravity is palpable, so maybe there’s more to this than I know…” Rather, Hayes seems incapable of fully masking his amused condescension toward Martin’s concerns, and is willfully choosing not to hear his words; the two men prefer to travel campus-comfortable tracks, ranging from the predictable to the bigoted to the silly, with a side-trip to pick up a straw man. …

Notice, Martin addresses the “Black Mass” situation on Harvard Extension’s own terms. That body characterized the insult as a “cultural” event and compared it to a re-enactment of a Shinto Tea Ceremony; Father Martin suggests that a similar “re-enactment” of an anti-semitic or racial horror, like a lynching or a cross-burning, would quite rightly be a denounced as having no place on any campus or indeed in any public place. Why, then, would the mockery of the Catholic Mass be an acceptable insensitivity?

The answer does not come. Instead Hayes and Harvard’s Christopher Robichaud tries to rebut with overarching smugness. Unable to admit “rem acu tetigisti”, Robichaud suggests that Martin is intellectually “sloppy” and risks credibility by rejecting the priest’s very accurate question as a “false equivalency”; his argument essentially boils down to this: “marginalized communities” deserve sensitivity protections and respect, but “big powerful religions” do not. I wonder if he’d be fine, then, with a public burning of the Koran, since Islam, claiming a billion members, is a “big powerful religion.”

He and Harvard would most certainly not be fine with that. They would chalk that up as oppression of a marginalized community too, although the true motives would almost certainly be a little more in line with their survival instincts.

The chief absurdity, though, comes from the religious-liberty equivalency argument Hayes and Robichaud make in regard to the Satanists and the “Pastafarians,” a juvenile and tiresome satirical group of atheists mocking religious practice in general. The event was not staged as a religious event but a cultural event, and in any case the controversy wasn’t about the rights of Satanists to do what they do on their own property. It was about Harvard’s decision to host and sponsor the event, directly and indirectly, while claiming to be opposed to hate speech, marginalization, etc etc etc. Religious freedom wasn’t the issue at all, but that was the dodge Hayes and Robichaud used.

SEE VIDEO AT:  http://hotair.com/archives/2014/05/16/msnbc-panel-mulls-the-rights-of-satanists-as-a-marginalized-community-or-something/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0EwIvy1GXRU&list=PLEC70437FC0A27241&index=3

if the link does not work, google sandy hook and mark howitt, then look at the video with a picture

of the patsy on front. If anyone knows how to upload this video to this site, please do so. If anyone

knows how to spread this video, please do so. upon seeing the entire video, you will find evidence

that perhaps as many six shooters were involved, that adam lanza was a patsy, and that it has been

part of a series of mass killings going back to fast and furious, the purpose of which was to

brainwash americans into supporting "gun control," which is necessary before obama takes over

the country. as to adam lanza doing this, it is patently ridiculous. he was autistic. autistic children

cannot get a driver's license. they can't focus enough to do this. there has never never been an autistic

murderer, let alone a mass murderer. he was 115 pounds and could not bench press ten pounds, yet he

carried his weight in weapons and bullets. how stupid have americans become? how evil is obama?

even pravda has warned america that obama is another hitler or stalin. how do we take our country back

from this mass murdering psychopahic muslim?

Author: Brian D. Hill

Source: USWGO Alternative News

Could the very reason why the elite have been causing massive rises in disabilities including cancer, diabetes, autism, and otherproblems so that many will be forced to turn to Government assistanceprograms such as medicaid, medicare, Disability insurance, tricare, andothers is to then just decide to end those programs and then kill allof those on the programs and call them bad guys.

I bet your wondering why would I think something so preposterous well it happenedbefore and the last time something like that happened was NAZI Germanywhen at first under the Socialist German Workers Party (Which becamethe NAZI Party after Hitler) they get everyone dependent on thegovernment and then start putting out ads to kill the elderly with theT4 Euthanasia Program.

It translates as:

60,000 Reichsmarks is what this person suffering from a hereditarydisease costs the People's community during his lifetime. Comrade,that is your money too. Read '[A] New People', the monthly magazine ofthe Bureau for Race Politics of the NSDAP

So if Germany's Government pulled this after getting people reliant on Government assistance Programs could the same thing be pulled here?

Well the Georgia Guide stones said that the population shouldn't go beyond 500,000,000 so in order to achieve that goal the elite mustengage in genocide so this means getting rid of over 6 billion peopleworldwide.

So how is people on government assistance programs going to be killed well continue reading and I'llget to that part.

Well as peoples health problems are on the increase including Autism,food is being taintedwith GMO, Vitamins and Herbal supplements havebeen tainted which means they can cause further Health problemsregular Corporate Insurance likely won't cover, water being tainted withFluoride, not to mention there's a constantrise in Social Security Applicants on a yearly basis, politicianshad been attempting to attack people on Government Welfare, Obamaplotted last year to cutveteran care and Obama is looking more and more like Hitlereveryday.

Also more and more pro communist movements and Pro Socialist groups are giving Obama the support heneeds to turn America into a dictatorship just like Nazi Germany. AlsoObamas new Health Czar in charge of Medicare and Medicaid said about RedistributingWealth.

A past Article by Paul J. Watson spoke of the fact that the Bilderberg group which has caused political corruption for theworld is not only wanting us disarmed but want us to be Dependenton the Government.

So what if the plan by the Bilderbergs was to make a majority of Americans have Healthproblems so they can't fight back, are reliant on Prescription drugscontrolled by thew DEA (Drug Enforcement Agency) and ICE (ImmigrationEnforcement Agency), and the elite along with Big Pharma get so manyreliant on Government Welfare programs, then put out Ad Campaigns (akaPSAs) against those dependent on Government Programs like the T4Euthanasia Program started by Hitler under his plan for The FinalSolution then start killing all the Veterans, Disabled people thatcan't work that receive disability checks, Military that lost theirlimbs during active duty, and start throwing millions that receive foodstamps in Concentration camps.

In fact that is a great idea for dictators to force people to be reliant on Government financialassistance programs and then punish them. Get or even force people tobeg the government for food is the way to end the Constitution forever.That is why Health Insurance has got worse and why health problemshave been on the rise is to force people on Government Programs thendrop the programs all together forcing people that can't afford HealthInsurance to die while suppressing cures and inexpensive treatmentsunder Corporate patents and Mob gangs (Drug Gangs).