ACTION

IN  A  FEW  YEARS  WE  SHOULD  BE  ABOUT  EVEN IN   THE  DOLLARS  OB  MISS  SPENT  AND  RECEIVED  NOTHING.   THEN  CUT  OFF  ALL   AID  TO  ALL COUNTRYS.   THAT WILL SAVE US  A  BUNDLE.  JUST  UNTIL  WE  GET OUR  I REPETE  OUR  COUNTRY  ON  ITS  FEET  AGAIN.

IN  A  FEW  YEARS  WE  SHOULD  BE  ABOUT  EVEN IN   THE  DOLLARS  OB  MISS  SPENT  AND  RECEIVED  NOTHING.   THEN  CUT  OFF  ALL   AID  TO  ALL COUNTRYS.   THAT WILL SAVE US  A  BUNDLE.  JUST  UNTIL  WE  GET OUR  I REPETE  OUR  COUNTRY  ON  ITS  FEET  AGAIN.

John Boehner has been the worst, most ineffective Speaker of the House EVER.  IF the Republicans of the House were truly concerned about the direction of our Country, they would never allow the investigation and "prosecution" of the Atty General Eric Holder to be swept under the rug.  I say get rid of John Boehner and elect someone with the principles of a Constitutionalist and true Republican. He is a weak, coddler of the president and his horrible policies.  He gets up once in a while and shouts "we are not going to increase the debt ceiling," yet, just watch and see how quickly HE DOES EXACTLY THAT!   He is worthless.

JMC, Houston, Texas

Dear Fellow Patriots:

What follows is another letter that I forwarded to our NM Governor Susana Martinez today requesting the removal of President Obama from the NM 2012 Presidential Election Ballot, which I again am taking the liberty of sharing with you for informational purposes.

Please note that I have included excerpts from the letter that I sent to our NM U.S. Senator Tom Udall today, which I believe relate to and/or further support my numerous requests for the removal of President Obama from the NM 2012 Presidential Election Ballot:

Letter to Governor Martinez:

June 10, 2012

Dear Governor Martinez:

On May 26, 2012, I wrote to you and shared excerpts from a letter that I had forwarded to Senator Udall on that same date, which I believed supported my numerous requests for the removal of President Obama from the New Mexico 2012 Presidential Primary Election Ballot because he is Constitutionally ineligible to hold the office of President and Commander-In-Chief.

I again would be remiss if I didn’t share excerpts from a letter that I sent to Senator Udall today in support of my request for the conduct of an investigation by both houses of Congress into the allegations made, on March 1, 2012, by Sheriff Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse, which I am also taking the liberty of sharing with you because I believe they relate to and/or further support my numerous requests to have President Obama removed from the NM 2012 Presidential Election Ballot:

Excerpts From Senator Udall’s Letter:

“On or about May 18, 2012, it was revealed that President Obama’s literary agent billed him as being born in Kenya back in 1991 and this continued until on or about 2007.

What follows are pertinent excerpts from the article and/or bog post that revealed the details of this disturbing issue, which I am taking the liberty of sharing with you in its entirety for effect:

“While some quickly dismissed as an anomaly yesterday’s explosive revelation that Barack Obama’s former literary agency billed him as “born in Kenya” back in 1991 in connection with a book he never wrote, WND has discovered much later published references – some dated as recently as 2007 – used to promote his highly touted book “Dreams from My Father.”

{…}

As WND reported, Breitbart News originally found a brochure from two decades ago in which literary agency Acton & Dystel promoted Obama as the author of the never-produced “Journeys in Black and White” by declaring Obama was “born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii.”Twelve years later, however, the Dystel of Acton & Dystel was busy promoting Obama’s new book, “Dreams from My Father,” and still touting the author as “born in Kenya.”

Through the Internet archive Wayback Machine, WND found an August 2003 listing of Dystel & Goderich’s author bios, including the following: “Barack Obama was the first black president of the Harvard Law Review. He was born in Kenya to an American anthropologist and a Kenyan finance minister, and was raised in Indonesia, Hawaii and Chicago. His first book is ‘Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance.”

Even if the original 1991 brochure’s listing of Kenya as Obama’s birthplace was in error, as the agency has since claimed, it apparently was an error Obama allowed his publicist to persist in for over a decade, right until after he was running for president.

In April 2007, two months after Obama had launched his presidential bid, Dystel was still touting the then-Democratic senator from Illinois as “born in Kenya.”

Another trip to the Internet’s Wayback Machine shows Dystel & Goderich describing Obama this way: “Barack Obama is the junior Democratic senator from Illinois and was the dynamic keynote speaker at the 2004 Democratic National Convention. He was also the first African-American president of the Harvard Law Review. He was born in Kenya to an American anthropologist and a Kenyan finance minister and was raised in Indonesia, Hawaii, and Chicago. His first book, DREAMS FROM MY FATHER: A STORY OF RACE AND INHERITANCE, has been a long time New York Times bestseller.”

Only a few weeks later, the Internet archive reveals, the publicist had changed Obama’s birthplace to Hawaii.

The text of Obama’s biography in the brochure Breitbart reported on, created by Acton & Dystel in 1991, states:

“Barack Obama, the first African-American president of the Harvard Law Review, was born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii. The son of an American anthropologist and a Kenyan finance minister, he attended Columbia University and worked as a financial journalist and editor for Business International Corporation. He served as project coordinator in Harlem for the New York Public Interest Research Group, and was Executive Director of the Developing Communities Project in Chicago’s South Side. His commitment to social and racial issues will be evident in his first book, Journeys in Black and White.”

{…}

“Regardless of the reason for Obama’s odd biography, the Acton & Dystel booklet raises new questions as part of ongoing efforts to understand Barack Obama – who, despite four years in office remains a mystery to many Americans, thanks to the mainstream media,” the report says.

Yet the biographies are just a few of numerous published reports – as well as personal claims – that Obama was born abroad, including the recent testimony of a Chicago-area postal worker who reported he was told by the parents of Bill Ayers that Obama was a foreigner.

Allen Hulton, a retired Chicago-area mailman, has come forward with his first-person recollection of a clean-cut young man he identified as Obama who approached him and told him he was going to be president.

Hulton delivered mail to Tom and Mary Ayers in a Chicago suburb in the late 1980s and early 1990s and claims to have met Obama in front of the Ayers home.

He has given a sworn affidavit to investigators commissioned by Maricopa County, Ariz., Sheriff Joe Arpaio to determine whether Obama is eligible for Arizona’s 2012 election ballot. Hulton has recorded about three hours of video interviews with WND.

Hulton says that in conversations with Mary Ayers while on his route he learned of the couple’s enthusiasm and support for a black foreign student. One bright, warm Chicagoland day, he recounts, he met the student who fit Mary Ayers’ description in front of the Ayers home in Glen Ellyn, Ill. That young man, Hulton is convinced, was Barack Obama.

Hulton delivered mail to the Ayers, who are both deceased, when he was stationed at the post office in Glen Ellyn, an upper-middle class suburb 25 miles west of downtown Chicago, from late 1986 to 1997. He was a Postal Service employee from March 28, 1962, through March 30, 2001.

As WND reported, Obama’s relationship with Bill Ayers – whom he dismissed in a 2008 debate as “just a guy who lives in my neighborhood” – plagued him in the 2008 presidential campaign and could resurface in this year’s election, as many questions remain.

Young Obama

Over a period of years in the late 1980s and early 1990s, Hulton estimates he spoke with Mary Ayers about 18 to 20 times and once to Tom Ayers, who died in 2007. Mary Ayers died in 2000.

“Sometimes Mary would be out when I delivered the mail, and we would exchange a few words on occasion,” he says, recalling that she liked to talk about her family.

“One day, Mary came to the door when I came up to the house with the mail,” he remembers. “After a greeting, she started enthusiastically talking to me about this young black student they were helping out, and she referred to him as a foreign student.”

Hulton assumed that by “helping” the student, Mary Ayers meant she and her husband were financially supporting the black foreign-exchange student with his education.

See excerpts of Jerome Corsi’s interviews with Allen Hulton:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xkHezo_iDDE

He says that Mary Ayers told him the student’s name, but that it was a “strange name” that he could not remember, even though at the time it sounded African to him.

“I was taken aback by how enthusiastic she was about him,” Hulton says. “And I believe she said he was from either Kenya or Indonesia, and I favor Indonesia in my recollection.”

WND has reported that when Obama was in Indonesia with his Indonesian stepfather and his mother from ages 6 to 10, he was registered in school as an Indonesian citizen and a Muslim. He went by the name Barry Soetoro, adopting the surname of his Indonesian stepfather. His mother’s passport listed him with the surname Soebarkah.

‘I’m going to be president of the United States’

About a year after discussing with Mary Ayers the foreign student she and her husband were supporting, Hulton recalls meeting a young black male on the sidewalk in front of the Ayers home.

Hulton describes the man as being in his early 20s, noting that he was tall, thin, had a light complexion and that his ears stuck out.

“He greeted me,” Hulton says. “He was very polite, dressed nicely, but informally – slacks and a dress shirt – and he spoke with no accent. Immediately this young black man entered into conversation with me. He told me he had taken the train out from Chicago and had come to thank the Ayers family personally for having helped him with his education.”

Hulton remembers asking the young man what his plans were for the future.

“He looked right at me and told me he was going to be president of the United States,” Hulton says.

“There was a little bit of a grin on his face when he said it – he sounded sure of himself, but not arrogant. I know how people will say things because they have an ambition, but it did not come across that way,” Hulton says. “It came across as if this young black male was telling me he was going to be president, almost as if it were the statement of a scientific fact that had already been determined, as if his being president had been already pre-arranged.”

There also was an internal bulletin from the Kenyan National Security Intelligence Service, or NSIS, that states that the Kenyan government in 2009 commissioned a cultural museum in the Obama home village of Kogelo to honor the “birthplace of President Barack Obama” and rededicate the tomb of his father, Barack Obama Sr.

The 2009 NSIS bulletin report said:

“The ministry of national heritage this month hosted a cultural festival in Kogelo and commissioned a cultural museum on a plot donated by a member of the Kogelo community. The cultural festival was attended by the minister for national heritage, William ole Ntimama and U.S. ambassador, Michael Ranneberger.

This was to honour the birthplace of President Obama and re-dedicate the tomb of Barack Hussein Obama, Sr., the president’s late father. But the project had been delayed because of ownership wrangles surrounding the plot.”

According to an article in the Kenyan Daily Nation newspaper July 5, 2010, the Kenyan government’s plans to build a 112 million Kenyan Schilling ($1.3 million) cultural center at Kogelo was locked in a dispute over who should donate land to the government for the project.

The Daily Nation, which published an artist’s sketch of the proposed Kogelo cultural center, referred to it as Obama’s “ancestral home.”

The NSIS memo suggests the Kenyan intelligence agency kept a close watch on the Obama family in Africa.

It noted the Kenyan government provided assistance to Obama’s step-grandmother, Sarah Hussein Obama, in the form of additional security and a government stipend of 50,000 Kenyan Schillings ($575) per month.

A Kenyan blog, “Jaluo,” reported that Grandmother Sarah caused family conflict when she visited Moammar Gadhafi in Libya “to the surprise and chagrins of the White House in Washington, D.C.,” and “without a proper delegation and approval of the entire family.”

The NSIS bulletin echoed the concern that Sarah Obama was visiting Muslim countries on her own initiative, commenting, “Mama Sarah had requested government assistance to travel to Mecca, Saudi Arabia for Hajj pilgrimage,” but “the Saudi Arabia government through its Nairobi embassy has come to her aid” by announcing “she will be a state guest in Saudi Arabia during her time there.”

WND also reported Kenyan MP James Orengo at one point asked the nation’s parliament, “How could a young man born here in Kenya, who is not even a native American, become the president of America?”

On the day after Obama’s election, MP Boni Khalwale asked fellow members, “Could we allow … a Motion for Adjournment so that we could also continue the celebrations of having a Kenyan ruling the USA?”

In addition, a number of media sources – including National Public Radio – reported Obama’s birthplace as Kenya prior to his election as president.

Another reference was made in 2008 in the Nigerian Observer.

Under a Washington dateline, Solomon Asowata wrote, “Americans will today go to the polls to elect their next president with Democratic Party candidate, Senator Barack Obama largely favoured to win. The Kenyan-born Senator will, however, face a stiff competition from his Republican counterpart.”

{…}

An African Travel Magazine once reported, “As Kenyan born U.S. Senator Barack Obama jets into Kenya today as part of his African tour, concerns have once again been raised on the security preparations for other visitors and residents.”

An article in the Sunday Standard in Kenya begins, “Kenyan-born US Senate hopeful, Barrack (sic) Obama, appeared set to take over the Illinois Senate seat after his main rival, Jack Ryan, dropped out of the race on Friday night amid a furor over lurid sex club allegations.”

The article is credited to the wire service Associated Press. However, it could not be found either in the AP archives online or the African newspaper’s website.

Also, an African news site and an MSNBC broadcaster referred to President Obama’s birthplace as being outside of the United States.

A report by Modern Ghana posted in advance of the president’s visit stated his birthplace was on the continent of Africa.

“For Ghana, Obama’s visit will be a celebration of another milestone in African history as it hosts the first-ever African-American President on this presidential visit to the continent of his birth,” the report said.

{…}

Even a video of Michelle Obama herself created a stir of new questions when she spoke of her husband visiting “his home country in Kenya”:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6M7Rp_Ghv6k&feature=player_embedded

Source:

http://www.wnd.com/2012/05/shocker-obama-was-still-kenyan-born-in-2003/

On or about December 12, 2009, the following article and/or blog post revealed the foreign influences of George Soros on the Obama campaign in detail, to include who ran cover of Obama’s Islamic background and the connections and players in the campaign of misinformation waged by Obama supporters during the 2008 Election:

Who ran cover for Obama’s Islamic background? ‘Tracing The Politics And The Money Behind Obama’s Campaign!’-Posted on Post & Email-by John Charlton-On December 12, 2009:

http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/12/look-who-ran-cover-for-obamas-islamic-background/

Continue Reading More On This Issue:

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/11/godfather-of-the-islamic-revolution/

On or about June 7, 2012, it was revealed that President Obama was caught in a lie regarding his being a member of and signing a contract with the “New Party”, which sought to elect members to public office with the aim of moving the Democratic Party far leftward to ultimately form a new political party with a socialist agenda.

What follows are pertinent excerpts from the article and/or bog post that revealed the details of this disturbing issue, which I am taking the liberty of sharing with you in its entirety for effect:

“Has Barack Obama been caught in a lie that could become a major issue in the upcoming election?

During the 2008 presidential election campaign, Obama’s camp categorically denied he was ever a member of the New Party, which sought to elect members to public office with the aim of moving the Democratic Party far leftward to ultimately form a new political party with a socialist agenda.

The denial came amid reports of Obama’s participation with the party, including several articles by WND.

WND previously reported on newspaper evidence showing Obama was listed as a member of the New Party in the group’s own literature.

WND also conducted an exclusive interview with Marxist activist Carl Davidson, a founder of the New Party, who recounted Obama’s participation.

In 2010, John Nichols, Washington correspondent for The Nation magazine, recalled speaking with Obama at New Party events in the 1990s.

“When we spoke together at New Party events in those days, he was blunt about his desire to move the Democratic Party off the cautious center where Bill Clinton had wedged it,” wrote Nichols in a January 2009 piece published at Progressive.org.

Now, researcher and author Stanley Kurtz, writing at National Review Online today, reports on documentation from the updated records of Illinois ACORN at the Wisconsin Historical Society that “definitively establishes” that Obama was a member of the New Party.

Kurtz reported Obama also signed a “contract” promising to publicly support and associate himself with the New Party while in office.

In 2008, Obama’s Fight the Smears campaign website quoted Carol Harwell, who managed Obama’s 1996 campaign for the Illinois Senate, as stating: “Barack did not solicit or seek the New Party endorsement for state senator in 1995.”

Fight the Smears conceded the New Party did support Obama in 1996 but denied that Obama had ever joined.

According to documents from the Democratic Socialists of America, the New Party worked with ACORN to promote its candidates. ACORN, convicted in massive, nationwide voter fraud cases, was a point of controversy for Obama during his 2008 campaign for president.

Becoming a New Party member requires some effort on behalf of the politician. Candidates must be approved by the party’s political committee and, once approved, must sign a contract mandating they will have a “visible and active relationship” with the party.

If Obama indeed signed the contract, not only would his campaign be caught in a lie but it could prove highly embarrassing for him at a time when he is fighting claims, including from Mitt Romney’s camp, that his policies are socialist.

Also, Obama’s 2012 campaign slogan of “Forward” has been criticized for its use of a historic socialist slogan.

Socialist goals:

The socialist-oriented goals of the New Party were enumerated on its old website.

Among the New Party’s stated objectives were “full employment, a shorter work week and a guaranteed minimum income for all adults; a universal ‘social wage’ to include such basic benefits as health care, child care, vacation time and lifelong access to education and training; a systematic phase-in of comparable worth; and like programs to ensure gender equity.”

The New Party stated it also sought “the democratization of our banking and financial system – including popular election of those charged with public stewardship of our banking system, worker-owner control over their pension assets [and] community-controlled alternative financial institutions.”

Many of the New Party’s founding members were Democratic Socialists of America leaders and members of Committees of Correspondence, a breakaway of the Communist Party USA.

Last month, WND reported on a 1996 print advertisement in a local Chicago newspaper that shows Obama was the speaker at an event sponsored and presented by the Democratic Socialists of America, the DSA.

WND first reported on the event in 2008.

Obama listed as New Party member:

While Obama’s campaign in 2008 denied the then–presidential candidate was ever an actual member of the New Party, print copies of the New Party News, the party’s official newspaper, show Obama posing with New Party leaders, listing him as a New Party member and printing quotes from him as a member.

The party’s spring 1996 newspaper boasted: “New Party members won three other primaries this Spring in Chicago: Barack Obama (State Senate), Michael Chandler (Democratic Party Committee) and Patricia Martin (Cook County Judiciary).”

The paper quoted Obama saying, “These victories prove that small ‘d’ democracy can work.”

The newspaper lists other politicians it endorsed who were not members but specifies Obama as a New Party member.

New Ground, the newsletter of Chicago’s Democratic Socialists of America, reported in its July/August 1996 edition that Obama attended a New Party membership meeting April 11, 1996, in which he expressed his gratitude for the group’s support and “encouraged NPers (New Party members) to join in his task forces on voter education and voter registration.”

The New Party, established in 1992, took advantage of what was known as electoral “fusion,” which enabled candidates to run on two tickets simultaneously, attracting voters from both parties. But the New Party disbanded in 1998, one year after fusion was halted by the Supreme Court.”

Source:

http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/obama-just-caught-in-big-lie/

On or about June 7, 2012, it was revealed how the American public was deceived regarding President Obama’s membership and contract with the “New Party.”

What follows are pertinent excerpts from the article and/or bog post that revealed the details of this disturbing issue, which I am taking the liberty of sharing with you in its entirety for effect:

“In 2008, National Review’s Stanley Kurtz got BenSmithed. He didn’t just get BenSmithed, though, he got BenSmithed by the BenSmithiest BenSmither in the history of BenSmithing—Ben Smith himself.

Oh, I remember it well. We were this close to election day, the wind was squarely at Barack Obama’s back, the media was refusing to vet the history and background of anyone in Obama’s past (besides, most every investigative reporter in the free world was in a place called Wasilla), and then along came the news that while in Chicago, as a grown man in his 30s, Barack Obama had joined something called The New Party—a radical, socialist organization whose political endorsement he had sought.

The story threatened to become a late-October surprise, the kind of story that would not only once again prove Obama’s disturbingly radical not-so-distant past, but also tie together just who this man really was (and is). It would also damage Obama’s credibility, and prove that he had been covering up his radical associations, and worse, lying about it.

The corrupt media, naturally, was hoping to run out the clock and was therefore willfully ignoring the story. Online, however, things were heating up. Right-of-center blogs were pushing the story as much as they could and like the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth in 2004, it threatened to spill over into the mainstream media and damage—gasp—a Democrat.

Well, this is why The Media Devil invented Ben Smith and his dark art of BenSmithing.

Jumping into the line of fire to protect his Precious One, Smith wrote this:

“Popping up in my inbox lately, and on some conservative blogs, is the allegation that Barack Obama was once a member of the Communist/Socialist/secretive/evil New Party, which is based (reasonably) on a New Party publication describing him in passing as a member.

When this first emerged, I called up the founder of the New Party, a University of Wisconsin professor named Joel Rogers, who objected both to the characterization of the party and Obama’s relationship to it.

On the first point, the New Party was a attempt to build a model of political fusion. It dissolved after losing a Supreme Court ruling aimed at making fusion—a system under which more than one party can run the same candidate, which exists in some states—universal.”

And blah, blah, blah.

This is classic BenSmithing—in which he takes on a controversial subject that might damage Obama, pretends to play investigative journalist, assumes the role of the writer of a “definitive” piece that finally answers all the questions, and then sends the story to sleep with the fishes.  

The corrupt media, of course, loves this. Smith allows them to point to his work and rationalize to themselves that there’s “nothing to see here”—so let’s move along and elect a man no one knows anything about.

Kurtz knew he had been BenSmithed and immediately responded with this piece, but to no avail. When you were BenSmithed in 2008, you stayed BenSmithed.

Truth has nothing to do with BenSmithing. Ben Smith knows this and so does the media that found him so useful. BenSmithing is a political tactic that disguises itself as journalism in order to protect Democrats, most specifically our failed president. The way it works is really quite simple:

1. Something happens or is discovered that might hurt Obama.

2. That something is discovered in the alternative media and uncovered.

3. Ben Smith (or the equally dishonest PolitiFact and Media Matters) pretend to investigate it, write something up disguised as “definitive,” and then hand the complicit media an excuse to ignore it.

Though he’s probably in the top ten-percent, Smith isn’t the most dishonest journalist out there, he’s just the smartest. I’ve been watching this guy and trying to sound the alarm about him for going on four years now. He’s a Journalistic Super-Villain—a genius who has done more to protect Barack Obama and assure the American people never learn the truth than any other individual reporter.

Here are some specific and notable examples:

In February of 2008, Smith wrote the “definitive “nothing-to-see-here” piece covering Obama’s relationship with domestic terrorist Bill Ayers. The headline itself was a lie: “Obama once visited ‘60s radicals,” and Smith even buried his own lead:

“As Bloomberg News reported recently, Obama and Ayers have crossed paths repeatedly in the last decade. In 1997, Obama cited Ayers’ critique of the juvenile justice system in a Chicago Tribune article on what prominent Chicagoans were reading. He and Ayers served together on the board of the Woods Fund of Chicago for three years starting in 1999. In 2001, Ayers also gave $200 to Obama’s state Senate reelection campaign.

Many details of the 1995 meeting are shrouded by time and by Obama’s and Ayers’ refusals to discuss it.”

Real journalists would follow that up, but until New Media came of age a couple of years later, there were no real journalists available.

There are more 2008 election-year examples, including, of course, the New Party cover up. But let’s fast-forward to July of 2010. Ben Smith was no longer protecting a “historic” candidate, he was now protecting Power, with a “nothing to see here” piece about a scandal that threatened to swamp Obama’s burgeoning presidency.

Eric Holder’s Justice Department had just dropped a slam-dunk case involving the New Black Panther Party, whose members had been notoriously caught on video menacing voters during the 2008 election. There was even a whistleblower, J. Christian Adams, who had testified before Congress that the Justice Department was practicing racial bias.

To the rescue came Smith with this non-story. One conservative dismisses the charges, Smith blows it up into a major feature piece, and now the corrupt media has what they need to move along and pretend there is no story.

Which is exactly what the media did.

Earlier this year, Smith made the mistake of trying to BenSmith us. The day after Andrew Breitbart’s funeral, we all woke up to discover that Smith (who had by then moved to BuzzFeed) had thought he scooped Breitbart News by releasing a 1991 video from Obama’s days at Harvard. In order to control the explosion of this video, Smith spun it into a positive for Obama. Thankfully, because it’s not 2008 anymore, this time his BenSmithing blew up in Ben Smith’s face.

You can read the full story of that sorry episode here.  

If you read the examples linked above, what you’ll discover is that Smith is only disguising himself as a reporter, but what he’s really doing is killing stories and narratives potentially damaging to Barack Obama. If you read the stories, you’ll see that he is either the most incurious reporter ever created or the most easily duped into believing anything.

Believe me, Smith is nobody’s dupe. Because he’s a left-wing operative disguised as a reporter, he simply writes on these subjects without ever doing what real reporters do: asking follow-up questions, raising questions, or demanding proof.   

But acting like a real reporter would give the story life, extend the narrative, and therefore hurt His Precious One—something BenSmithing is designed to ensure never happens.

By the way, Ben Smith owes Stanley Kurtz an apology, but I suspect Smith has known that all along.

“The nice thing about the new-media space is how quickly it self-corrects. Breitbart’s sites now have a growing credibility problem.” Smith added: “And for all the talk of the speed of the Internet, online, like offline, reporting is a long, endless game, and with fewer and fewer trusted institutions to dispense it at will, credibility is a scarce and extremely valuable commodity. - Ben Smith

Source:

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2012/06/07/Art-Bensmithing-Obama-New-Party?utm_source=e_breitbart_com&utm_medium=email&utm_content=Breitbart+News+Round+Up%2C+June+7%2C+2012&utm_campaign=Breitbart+News+Round+Up%2C+June+7%2C+2012&utm_term=More

Continue Reading More On This Issue:

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/obama-just-caught-in-big-lie-documents-confirm-he-was-member-of?xg_source=activity

As I’ve mentioned to you, although I am a registered democrat, on election day of 2008 I decided not to vote for President Obama because I had numerous concerns and/or unanswered questions regarding what I saw as his lack of executive experience and seemingly shady background, to include his association with radical individuals and/or organizations, which were revealed during the process of conducting my own extensive research and/or investigation into each Presidential candidate’s personal, professional and political background with the intent of determining who they were, where they came from and, most important, what they stood for, as a means of educating myself prior to casting my ballot. After having some time to experience and/or evaluate his governing of our country for approximately three and a half years, I am now convinced that my concerns back then were valid as substantiated by the above revelations and numerous others that I have shared with you in the recent past.”

End of Excerpts.

For your information, in my letters of April 26, 2012, May 1, 2012 and May 26, 2012, I graciously requested an opportunity to visit with you for a few minutes regarding this extremely disturbing and time sensitive matter, but to date I have not received a response from your office to said requests.

Please feel free to contact me at my email or home address should you have any questions and/or need any additional information from me.

Thank you again for the excellent job that you’re doing as our state’s Governor.

God Bless You and God Bless America.

Respectfully yours,

Jake L. Martinez

Automatic Electronic Response Received From Governor Martinez’s Office Regarding My Email Above:

Thank you for taking the time to share your comments and concerns with my office. A constituent service representative will be in contact with you regarding your issue.

Sincerely, Susana Martinez”

Note: Americans are waking up!

Thanks again to WND, Obama Ballot Challenge Staff and Sheriff Arpaio and his Cold Case Posse for their unwavering commitment and fortitude to continue the fight.

Americans across the country are waking up to the fact that President Obama is constitutionally ineligible to hold the office of President, as substantiated by his newly released long-form Certificate of Live Birth, which shows that his father was in fact born in Kenya in 1936. At the time, Kenya was a British colony. Therefore Obama Senior was a British subject by birth (due to the fact that he was born within British-controlled territory). When President Obama was born in 1961, he acquired British nationality by descent, because his father was a British subject by birth. When Kenya gained its independence from Great Britain in 1963, President Obama became a citizen of the newly-formed nation.

Sources:

http://www.wnd.com/2011/12/375625/#f2cd597738

http://constitutionalreset.ning.com/video/atty-dr-herb-titus-obama-not-a-natural-born-citizen

http://people.mags.net/tonchen/birthers.htm

http://obamaballotchallenge.com/natural-born-citizenship-and-history-timeline

Additionally, several new organizations, to include active websites, were established to educate and mobilize the American public on the significance of “natural born Citizen” and the 2012 Election, along with an initiative to assist ordinary registered voting citizens wishing to challenge President Obama’s constitutional eligibility and name placement on their state’s 2012 primary presidential ballot. The team that established and maintains this website is currently compiling election laws from all 50 states and in the near future will be providing forms, along with sample letters that registered voters can use to file a complaint. Also included is pertinent information regarding those lawsuits and/or complaints that have been filed by state, to include my own.

Sources:

http://obamaballotchallenge.com/superpac-founder-explains-mission-of-natural-born-citizen-pac

http://obamaballotchallenge.com/obama-ballot-challenge-founder-interviewed-by-post-email

http://obamaballotchallenge.com/request-that-president-obama-be-removed-from-the-new-mexico-2012-presidential-primary-election-ballot

http://obamaballotchallenge.com/nm-former-marine-writes-senator-to-demand-arpaio-cold-case-posse-findings-investigation

Word of Caution:  Although its great that many Americans are now beginning to wake up and are actively taking some action to have President Obama taken off the 2012 Presidential Election Ballots we need to keep in mind that those individuals with unlimited sources and/or resources, to include the deep pockets of anti-American George Soros, our own local and national elected officials and others, with the help of the MSM, who have spent years planning and successively perpetrating what I now believe could be the greatest fraud in American history are not going to go down without a fight and thus, as a result, I also believe that now more than ever we need to stick together as Americans (it's no longer Democrat or Republican) at this crucial time when our country and/or Republic needs us more than ever to see this thru. A Republic for which so many Americans have and continue to give their all to uphold and defend.

So the question is: Are you going to be part of the problem by continuing to keep your head in the sand hoping this issue goes away by itself or are you going to be part of the solution by stepping up to the plate and doing what ever it takes to uphold and defend our Republic before its too late?-You Decide:

YOUR TURN: TELL CONGRESS TO PROBE ELIGIBILITY: ‘Not to resolve this monumental, unprecedented constitutional issue intolerable’!-Posted on WND.com-On April 10, 2012:

http://www.wnd.com/2012/04/your-turn-tell-congress-to-probe-eligibility/

Continue Reading:

The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetrated-in-american-history/

Could the President’s newly released COLB be a forgery?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/04/29/could-the-president’s-newly-released-colb-be-a-forgery/

Godfather of The Islamic Revolution!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/11/godfather-of-the-islamic-revolution/

The Audacity of Socialism!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/28/the-audacity-of-socialism/

Who owns our supposedly fair and balanced airwaves and news outlets?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/21/who-owns-our-supposedly-fair-and-balanced-airwaves-and-news-outlets/

Extensive Research Into Senator Obama’s Background Completed on November 3, 2008:

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/04/26/extensive-research-into-senator-obama’s-background-completed-on-november-10-2008/

Where Is America Today?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/26/where-is-america-today-2/

Note: The following videos wholeheartedly share my sentiments and hopefully yours-You Decide:

A Republic, If You Can Keep It!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGL8CiUtXF0

We The People:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVAhr4hZDJE&feature=player_embedded

The Fightin Side of Me!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32-OyyLJzHw&feature=player_embedded#

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Dear Fellow Patriots:

What follows is my eighth follow-up letter that I forwarded to our NM U.S. Senator Tom Udall today respectfully requesting that a full-scale investigation be conducted by both houses of Congress into the allegations made on March 1, 2012 by Sheriff Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse, which I again am taking the liberty of sharing with you for informational purposes.

Please note that I’ve included the following new revelations that have transpired and/or that I failed to mention in my last letter to him of May 26, 2012:

On or about May 18, 2012, it was revealed that President Obama’s literary agent billed him as being born in Kenya back in 1991 and this continued until on or about 2007.

On or about December 12, 2009, the foreign influences of George Soros on the Obama campaign were revealed in detail, to include who ran cover of Obama’s Islamic background and the connections and players in the campaign of misinformation waged by Obama supporters during the 2008 Election.

On or about June 7, 2012, it was revealed that President Obama was caught in a lie regarding his being a member of and signing a contract with the “New Party”, which sought to elect members to public office with the aim of moving the Democratic Party far leftward to ultimately form a new political party with a socialist agenda.

Finally, on or about June 7, 2012, it was revealed how the American public was deceived regarding President Obama’s membership and contract with the “New Party.”

For your information, I will also be forwarding similar letters to our other NM U.S. Representatives and our Governor.

Letter To NM U.S. Senator Tom Udall:

June 10, 2012

The Honorable Tom Udall

United States Senate

110 Hart Senate Office Building

Washington, DC 20510-3101

Dear Senator Udall:

On May 26, 2012, I wrote my seventh letter to you respectfully requesting that a full-scale investigation be conducted by both houses of Congress into the allegations made, on March 1, 2012, by Sheriff Arpaio’s legal investigative team, known as the Cold Case Posse, which are supported by a preponderance of undisputable/credible evidence, to include sworn statements from witnesses around the world indicating an INTERNATIONAL CONSPIRACY TO DECEIVE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, along with an abundance of additional questions that have been raised regarding President Obama’s eligibility to be our President and Commander-In-Chief of our armed forces.

For your information, to date I have not received a response from your office to said requests.

But be that as it may, what follows are disturbing revelations that have transpired since my last letter to you, which I am taking the liberty of sharing with you because I believe they relate to this extremely disturbing and time sensitive issue:

On or about May 18, 2012, it was revealed that President Obama’s literary agent billed him as being born in Kenya back in 1991 and this continued until on or about 2007.

What follows are pertinent excerpts from the article and/or bog post that revealed the details of this disturbing issue, which I am taking the liberty of sharing with you in its entirety for effect:

“While some quickly dismissed as an anomaly yesterday’s explosive revelation that Barack Obama’s former literary agency billed him as “born in Kenya” back in 1991 in connection with a book he never wrote, WND has discovered much later published references – some dated as recently as 2007 – used to promote his highly touted book “Dreams from My Father.”

{…}

As WND reported, Breitbart News originally found a brochure from two decades ago in which literary agency Acton & Dystel promoted Obama as the author of the never-produced “Journeys in Black and White” by declaring Obama was “born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii.”Twelve years later, however, the Dystel of Acton & Dystel was busy promoting Obama’s new book, “Dreams from My Father,” and still touting the author as “born in Kenya.”

Through the Internet archive Wayback Machine, WND found an August 2003 listing of Dystel & Goderich’s author bios, including the following: “Barack Obama was the first black president of the Harvard Law Review. He was born in Kenya to an American anthropologist and a Kenyan finance minister, and was raised in Indonesia, Hawaii and Chicago. His first book is ‘Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance.”

Even if the original 1991 brochure’s listing of Kenya as Obama’s birthplace was in error, as the agency has since claimed, it apparently was an error Obama allowed his publicist to persist in for over a decade, right until after he was running for president.

In April 2007, two months after Obama had launched his presidential bid, Dystel was still touting the then-Democratic senator from Illinois as “born in Kenya.”

Another trip to the Internet’s Wayback Machine shows Dystel & Goderich describing Obama this way: “Barack Obama is the junior Democratic senator from Illinois and was the dynamic keynote speaker at the 2004 Democratic National Convention. He was also the first African-American president of the Harvard Law Review. He was born in Kenya to an American anthropologist and a Kenyan finance minister and was raised in Indonesia, Hawaii, and Chicago. His first book, DREAMS FROM MY FATHER: A STORY OF RACE AND INHERITANCE, has been a long time New York Times bestseller.”

Only a few weeks later, the Internet archive reveals, the publicist had changed Obama’s birthplace to Hawaii.

The text of Obama’s biography in the brochure Breitbart reported on, created by Acton & Dystel in 1991, states:

“Barack Obama, the first African-American president of the Harvard Law Review, was born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii. The son of an American anthropologist and a Kenyan finance minister, he attended Columbia University and worked as a financial journalist and editor for Business International Corporation. He served as project coordinator in Harlem for the New York Public Interest Research Group, and was Executive Director of the Developing Communities Project in Chicago’s South Side. His commitment to social and racial issues will be evident in his first book, Journeys in Black and White.”

{…}

“Regardless of the reason for Obama’s odd biography, the Acton & Dystel booklet raises new questions as part of ongoing efforts to understand Barack Obama – who, despite four years in office remains a mystery to many Americans, thanks to the mainstream media,” the report says.

Yet the biographies are just a few of numerous published reports – as well as personal claims – that Obama was born abroad, including the recent testimony of a Chicago-area postal worker who reported he was told by the parents of Bill Ayers that Obama was a foreigner.

Allen Hulton, a retired Chicago-area mailman, has come forward with his first-person recollection of a clean-cut young man he identified as Obama who approached him and told him he was going to be president.

Hulton delivered mail to Tom and Mary Ayers in a Chicago suburb in the late 1980s and early 1990s and claims to have met Obama in front of the Ayers home.

He has given a sworn affidavit to investigators commissioned by Maricopa County, Ariz., Sheriff Joe Arpaio to determine whether Obama is eligible for Arizona’s 2012 election ballot. Hulton has recorded about three hours of video interviews with WND.

Hulton says that in conversations with Mary Ayers while on his route he learned of the couple’s enthusiasm and support for a black foreign student. One bright, warm Chicagoland day, he recounts, he met the student who fit Mary Ayers’ description in front of the Ayers home in Glen Ellyn, Ill. That young man, Hulton is convinced, was Barack Obama.

Hulton delivered mail to the Ayers, who are both deceased, when he was stationed at the post office in Glen Ellyn, an upper-middle class suburb 25 miles west of downtown Chicago, from late 1986 to 1997. He was a Postal Service employee from March 28, 1962, through March 30, 2001.

As WND reported, Obama’s relationship with Bill Ayers – whom he dismissed in a 2008 debate as “just a guy who lives in my neighborhood” – plagued him in the 2008 presidential campaign and could resurface in this year’s election, as many questions remain.

Young Obama

Over a period of years in the late 1980s and early 1990s, Hulton estimates he spoke with Mary Ayers about 18 to 20 times and once to Tom Ayers, who died in 2007. Mary Ayers died in 2000.

“Sometimes Mary would be out when I delivered the mail, and we would exchange a few words on occasion,” he says, recalling that she liked to talk about her family.

“One day, Mary came to the door when I came up to the house with the mail,” he remembers. “After a greeting, she started enthusiastically talking to me about this young black student they were helping out, and she referred to him as a foreign student.”

Hulton assumed that by “helping” the student, Mary Ayers meant she and her husband were financially supporting the black foreign-exchange student with his education.

See excerpts of Jerome Corsi’s interviews with Allen Hulton:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xkHezo_iDDE

He says that Mary Ayers told him the student’s name, but that it was a “strange name” that he could not remember, even though at the time it sounded African to him.

“I was taken aback by how enthusiastic she was about him,” Hulton says. “And I believe she said he was from either Kenya or Indonesia, and I favor Indonesia in my recollection.”

WND has reported that when Obama was in Indonesia with his Indonesian stepfather and his mother from ages 6 to 10, he was registered in school as an Indonesian citizen and a Muslim. He went by the name Barry Soetoro, adopting the surname of his Indonesian stepfather. His mother’s passport listed him with the surname Soebarkah.

‘I’m going to be president of the United States’

About a year after discussing with Mary Ayers the foreign student she and her husband were supporting, Hulton recalls meeting a young black male on the sidewalk in front of the Ayers home.

Hulton describes the man as being in his early 20s, noting that he was tall, thin, had a light complexion and that his ears stuck out.

“He greeted me,” Hulton says. “He was very polite, dressed nicely, but informally – slacks and a dress shirt – and he spoke with no accent. Immediately this young black man entered into conversation with me. He told me he had taken the train out from Chicago and had come to thank the Ayers family personally for having helped him with his education.”

Hulton remembers asking the young man what his plans were for the future.

“He looked right at me and told me he was going to be president of the United States,” Hulton says.

“There was a little bit of a grin on his face when he said it – he sounded sure of himself, but not arrogant. I know how people will say things because they have an ambition, but it did not come across that way,” Hulton says. “It came across as if this young black male was telling me he was going to be president, almost as if it were the statement of a scientific fact that had already been determined, as if his being president had been already pre-arranged.”

There also was an internal bulletin from the Kenyan National Security Intelligence Service, or NSIS, that states that the Kenyan government in 2009 commissioned a cultural museum in the Obama home village of Kogelo to honor the “birthplace of President Barack Obama” and rededicate the tomb of his father, Barack Obama Sr.

The 2009 NSIS bulletin report said:

“The ministry of national heritage this month hosted a cultural festival in Kogelo and commissioned a cultural museum on a plot donated by a member of the Kogelo community. The cultural festival was attended by the minister for national heritage, William ole Ntimama and U.S. ambassador, Michael Ranneberger.

This was to honour the birthplace of President Obama and re-dedicate the tomb of Barack Hussein Obama, Sr., the president’s late father. But the project had been delayed because of ownership wrangles surrounding the plot.”

According to an article in the Kenyan Daily Nation newspaper July 5, 2010, the Kenyan government’s plans to build a 112 million Kenyan Schilling ($1.3 million) cultural center at Kogelo was locked in a dispute over who should donate land to the government for the project.

The Daily Nation, which published an artist’s sketch of the proposed Kogelo cultural center, referred to it as Obama’s “ancestral home.”

The NSIS memo suggests the Kenyan intelligence agency kept a close watch on the Obama family in Africa.

It noted the Kenyan government provided assistance to Obama’s step-grandmother, Sarah Hussein Obama, in the form of additional security and a government stipend of 50,000 Kenyan Schillings ($575) per month.

A Kenyan blog, “Jaluo,” reported that Grandmother Sarah caused family conflict when she visited Moammar Gadhafi in Libya “to the surprise and chagrins of the White House in Washington, D.C.,” and “without a proper delegation and approval of the entire family.”

The NSIS bulletin echoed the concern that Sarah Obama was visiting Muslim countries on her own initiative, commenting, “Mama Sarah had requested government assistance to travel to Mecca, Saudi Arabia for Hajj pilgrimage,” but “the Saudi Arabia government through its Nairobi embassy has come to her aid” by announcing “she will be a state guest in Saudi Arabia during her time there.”

WND also reported Kenyan MP James Orengo at one point asked the nation’s parliament, “How could a young man born here in Kenya, who is not even a native American, become the president of America?”

On the day after Obama’s election, MP Boni Khalwale asked fellow members, “Could we allow … a Motion for Adjournment so that we could also continue the celebrations of having a Kenyan ruling the USA?”

In addition, a number of media sources – including National Public Radio – reported Obama’s birthplace as Kenya prior to his election as president.

Another reference was made in 2008 in the Nigerian Observer.

Under a Washington dateline, Solomon Asowata wrote, “Americans will today go to the polls to elect their next president with Democratic Party candidate, Senator Barack Obama largely favoured to win. The Kenyan-born Senator will, however, face a stiff competition from his Republican counterpart.”

{…}

An African Travel Magazine once reported, “As Kenyan born U.S. Senator Barack Obama jets into Kenya today as part of his African tour, concerns have once again been raised on the security preparations for other visitors and residents.”

An article in the Sunday Standard in Kenya begins, “Kenyan-born US Senate hopeful, Barrack (sic) Obama, appeared set to take over the Illinois Senate seat after his main rival, Jack Ryan, dropped out of the race on Friday night amid a furor over lurid sex club allegations.”

The article is credited to the wire service Associated Press. However, it could not be found either in the AP archives online or the African newspaper’s website.

Also, an African news site and an MSNBC broadcaster referred to President Obama’s birthplace as being outside of the United States.

A report by Modern Ghana posted in advance of the president’s visit stated his birthplace was on the continent of Africa.

“For Ghana, Obama’s visit will be a celebration of another milestone in African history as it hosts the first-ever African-American President on this presidential visit to the continent of his birth,” the report said.

{…}

Even a video of Michelle Obama herself created a stir of new questions when she spoke of her husband visiting “his home country in Kenya”:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6M7Rp_Ghv6k&feature=player_embedded

Source:

http://www.wnd.com/2012/05/shocker-obama-was-still-kenyan-born-in-2003/

On or about December 12, 2009, the following article and/or blog post revealed the foreign influences of George Soros on the Obama campaign in detail, to include who ran cover of Obama’s Islamic background and the connections and players in the campaign of misinformation waged by Obama supporters during the 2008 Election:

Who ran cover for Obama’s Islamic background? ‘Tracing The Politics And The Money Behind Obama’s Campaign!’-Posted on Post & Email-by John Charlton-On December 12, 2009:

http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/12/look-who-ran-cover-for-obamas-islamic-background/

Continue Reading More On This Issue:

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/11/godfather-of-the-islamic-revolution/

On or about June 7, 2012, it was revealed that President Obama was caught in a lie regarding his being a member of and signing a contract with the “New Party”, which sought to elect members to public office with the aim of moving the Democratic Party far leftward to ultimately form a new political party with a socialist agenda.

What follows are pertinent excerpts from the article and/or bog post that revealed the details of this disturbing issue, which I am taking the liberty of sharing with you in its entirety for effect:

“Has Barack Obama been caught in a lie that could become a major issue in the upcoming election?

During the 2008 presidential election campaign, Obama’s camp categorically denied he was ever a member of the New Party, which sought to elect members to public office with the aim of moving the Democratic Party far leftward to ultimately form a new political party with a socialist agenda.

The denial came amid reports of Obama’s participation with the party, including several articles by WND.

WND previously reported on newspaper evidence showing Obama was listed as a member of the New Party in the group’s own literature.

WND also conducted an exclusive interview with Marxist activist Carl Davidson, a founder of the New Party, who recounted Obama’s participation.

In 2010, John Nichols, Washington correspondent for The Nation magazine, recalled speaking with Obama at New Party events in the 1990s.

“When we spoke together at New Party events in those days, he was blunt about his desire to move the Democratic Party off the cautious center where Bill Clinton had wedged it,” wrote Nichols in a January 2009 piece published at Progressive.org.

Now, researcher and author Stanley Kurtz, writing at National Review Online today, reports on documentation from the updated records of Illinois ACORN at the Wisconsin Historical Society that “definitively establishes” that Obama was a member of the New Party.

Kurtz reported Obama also signed a “contract” promising to publicly support and associate himself with the New Party while in office.

In 2008, Obama’s Fight the Smears campaign website quoted Carol Harwell, who managed Obama’s 1996 campaign for the Illinois Senate, as stating: “Barack did not solicit or seek the New Party endorsement for state senator in 1995.”

Fight the Smears conceded the New Party did support Obama in 1996 but denied that Obama had ever joined.

According to documents from the Democratic Socialists of America, the New Party worked with ACORN to promote its candidates. ACORN, convicted in massive, nationwide voter fraud cases, was a point of controversy for Obama during his 2008 campaign for president.

Becoming a New Party member requires some effort on behalf of the politician. Candidates must be approved by the party’s political committee and, once approved, must sign a contract mandating they will have a “visible and active relationship” with the party.

If Obama indeed signed the contract, not only would his campaign be caught in a lie but it could prove highly embarrassing for him at a time when he is fighting claims, including from Mitt Romney’s camp, that his policies are socialist.

Also, Obama’s 2012 campaign slogan of “Forward” has been criticized for its use of a historic socialist slogan.

Socialist goals:

The socialist-oriented goals of the New Party were enumerated on its old website.

Among the New Party’s stated objectives were “full employment, a shorter work week and a guaranteed minimum income for all adults; a universal ‘social wage’ to include such basic benefits as health care, child care, vacation time and lifelong access to education and training; a systematic phase-in of comparable worth; and like programs to ensure gender equity.”

The New Party stated it also sought “the democratization of our banking and financial system – including popular election of those charged with public stewardship of our banking system, worker-owner control over their pension assets [and] community-controlled alternative financial institutions.”

Many of the New Party’s founding members were Democratic Socialists of America leaders and members of Committees of Correspondence, a breakaway of the Communist Party USA.

Last month, WND reported on a 1996 print advertisement in a local Chicago newspaper that shows Obama was the speaker at an event sponsored and presented by the Democratic Socialists of America, the DSA.

WND first reported on the event in 2008.

Obama listed as New Party member:

While Obama’s campaign in 2008 denied the then–presidential candidate was ever an actual member of the New Party, print copies of the New Party News, the party’s official newspaper, show Obama posing with New Party leaders, listing him as a New Party member and printing quotes from him as a member.

The party’s spring 1996 newspaper boasted: “New Party members won three other primaries this Spring in Chicago: Barack Obama (State Senate), Michael Chandler (Democratic Party Committee) and Patricia Martin (Cook County Judiciary).”

The paper quoted Obama saying, “These victories prove that small ‘d’ democracy can work.”

The newspaper lists other politicians it endorsed who were not members but specifies Obama as a New Party member.

New Ground, the newsletter of Chicago’s Democratic Socialists of America, reported in its July/August 1996 edition that Obama attended a New Party membership meeting April 11, 1996, in which he expressed his gratitude for the group’s support and “encouraged NPers (New Party members) to join in his task forces on voter education and voter registration.”

The New Party, established in 1992, took advantage of what was known as electoral “fusion,” which enabled candidates to run on two tickets simultaneously, attracting voters from both parties. But the New Party disbanded in 1998, one year after fusion was halted by the Supreme Court.”

Source:

http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/obama-just-caught-in-big-lie/

On or about June 7, 2012, it was revealed how the American public was deceived regarding President Obama’s membership and contract with the “New Party.”

What follows are pertinent excerpts from the article and/or bog post that revealed the details of this disturbing issue, which I am taking the liberty of sharing with you in its entirety for effect:

“In 2008, National Review’s Stanley Kurtz got BenSmithed. He didn’t just get BenSmithed, though, he got BenSmithed by the BenSmithiest BenSmither in the history of BenSmithing—Ben Smith himself.

Oh, I remember it well. We were this close to election day, the wind was squarely at Barack Obama’s back, the media was refusing to vet the history and background of anyone in Obama’s past (besides, most every investigative reporter in the free world was in a place called Wasilla), and then along came the news that while in Chicago, as a grown man in his 30s, Barack Obama had joined something called The New Party—a radical, socialist organization whose political endorsement he had sought.

The story threatened to become a late-October surprise, the kind of story that would not only once again prove Obama’s disturbingly radical not-so-distant past, but also tie together just who this man really was (and is). It would also damage Obama’s credibility, and prove that he had been covering up his radical associations, and worse, lying about it.

The corrupt media, naturally, was hoping to run out the clock and was therefore willfully ignoring the story. Online, however, things were heating up. Right-of-center blogs were pushing the story as much as they could and like the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth in 2004, it threatened to spill over into the mainstream media and damage—gasp—a Democrat.

Well, this is why The Media Devil invented Ben Smith and his dark art of BenSmithing.

Jumping into the line of fire to protect his Precious One, Smith wrote this:

“Popping up in my inbox lately, and on some conservative blogs, is the allegation that Barack Obama was once a member of the Communist/Socialist/secretive/evil New Party, which is based (reasonably) on a New Party publication describing him in passing as a member.

When this first emerged, I called up the founder of the New Party, a University of Wisconsin professor named Joel Rogers, who objected both to the characterization of the party and Obama’s relationship to it.

On the first point, the New Party was a attempt to build a model of political fusion. It dissolved after losing a Supreme Court ruling aimed at making fusion—a system under which more than one party can run the same candidate, which exists in some states—universal.”

And blah, blah, blah.

This is classic BenSmithing—in which he takes on a controversial subject that might damage Obama, pretends to play investigative journalist, assumes the role of the writer of a “definitive” piece that finally answers all the questions, and then sends the story to sleep with the fishes.  

The corrupt media, of course, loves this. Smith allows them to point to his work and rationalize to themselves that there’s “nothing to see here”—so let’s move along and elect a man no one knows anything about.

Kurtz knew he had been BenSmithed and immediately responded with this piece, but to no avail. When you were BenSmithed in 2008, you stayed BenSmithed.

Truth has nothing to do with BenSmithing. Ben Smith knows this and so does the media that found him so useful. BenSmithing is a political tactic that disguises itself as journalism in order to protect Democrats, most specifically our failed president. The way it works is really quite simple:

1. Something happens or is discovered that might hurt Obama.

2. That something is discovered in the alternative media and uncovered.

3. Ben Smith (or the equally dishonest PolitiFact and Media Matters) pretend to investigate it, write something up disguised as “definitive,” and then hand the complicit media an excuse to ignore it.

Though he’s probably in the top ten-percent, Smith isn’t the most dishonest journalist out there, he’s just the smartest. I’ve been watching this guy and trying to sound the alarm about him for going on four years now. He’s a Journalistic Super-Villain—a genius who has done more to protect Barack Obama and assure the American people never learn the truth than any other individual reporter.

Here are some specific and notable examples:

In February of 2008, Smith wrote the “definitive “nothing-to-see-here” piece covering Obama’s relationship with domestic terrorist Bill Ayers. The headline itself was a lie: “Obama once visited ‘60s radicals,” and Smith even buried his own lead:

“As Bloomberg News reported recently, Obama and Ayers have crossed paths repeatedly in the last decade. In 1997, Obama cited Ayers’ critique of the juvenile justice system in a Chicago Tribune article on what prominent Chicagoans were reading. He and Ayers served together on the board of the Woods Fund of Chicago for three years starting in 1999. In 2001, Ayers also gave $200 to Obama’s state Senate reelection campaign.

Many details of the 1995 meeting are shrouded by time and by Obama’s and Ayers’ refusals to discuss it.”

Real journalists would follow that up, but until New Media came of age a couple of years later, there were no real journalists available.

There are more 2008 election-year examples, including, of course, the New Party cover up. But let’s fast-forward to July of 2010. Ben Smith was no longer protecting a “historic” candidate, he was now protecting Power, with a “nothing to see here” piece about a scandal that threatened to swamp Obama’s burgeoning presidency.

Eric Holder’s Justice Department had just dropped a slam-dunk case involving the New Black Panther Party, whose members had been notoriously caught on video menacing voters during the 2008 election. There was even a whistleblower, J. Christian Adams, who had testified before Congress that the Justice Department was practicing racial bias.

To the rescue came Smith with this non-story. One conservative dismisses the charges, Smith blows it up into a major feature piece, and now the corrupt media has what they need to move along and pretend there is no story.

Which is exactly what the media did.

Earlier this year, Smith made the mistake of trying to BenSmith us. The day after Andrew Breitbart’s funeral, we all woke up to discover that Smith (who had by then moved to BuzzFeed) had thought he scooped Breitbart News by releasing a 1991 video from Obama’s days at Harvard. In order to control the explosion of this video, Smith spun it into a positive for Obama. Thankfully, because it’s not 2008 anymore, this time his BenSmithing blew up in Ben Smith’s face.

You can read the full story of that sorry episode here.  

If you read the examples linked above, what you’ll discover is that Smith is only disguising himself as a reporter, but what he’s really doing is killing stories and narratives potentially damaging to Barack Obama. If you read the stories, you’ll see that he is either the most incurious reporter ever created or the most easily duped into believing anything.

Believe me, Smith is nobody’s dupe. Because he’s a left-wing operative disguised as a reporter, he simply writes on these subjects without ever doing what real reporters do: asking follow-up questions, raising questions, or demanding proof.   

But acting like a real reporter would give the story life, extend the narrative, and therefore hurt His Precious One—something BenSmithing is designed to ensure never happens.

By the way, Ben Smith owes Stanley Kurtz an apology, but I suspect Smith has known that all along.

“The nice thing about the new-media space is how quickly it self-corrects. Breitbart’s sites now have a growing credibility problem.” Smith added: “And for all the talk of the speed of the Internet, online, like offline, reporting is a long, endless game, and with fewer and fewer trusted institutions to dispense it at will, credibility is a scarce and extremely valuable commodity. - Ben Smith

Source:

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2012/06/07/Art-Bensmithing-Obama-New-Party?utm_source=e_breitbart_com&utm_medium=email&utm_content=Breitbart+News+Round+Up%2C+June+7%2C+2012&utm_campaign=Breitbart+News+Round+Up%2C+June+7%2C+2012&utm_term=More

Continue Reading More On This Issue:

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/obama-just-caught-in-big-lie-documents-confirm-he-was-member-of?xg_source=activity

As I’ve mentioned to you, although I am a registered democrat, on election day of 2008 I decided not to vote for President Obama because I had numerous concerns and/or unanswered questions regarding what I saw as his lack of executive experience and seemingly shady background, to include his association with radical individuals and/or organizations, which were revealed during the process of conducting my own extensive research and/or investigation into each Presidential candidate’s personal, professional and political background with the intent of determining who they were, where they came from and, most important, what they stood for as a means of educating myself prior to casting my ballot. After having some time to experience and/or evaluate his governing of our country for approximately three and a half years, I am now convinced that my concerns back then were valid as substantiated by the above revelations and numerous others that I have shared with you in the recent past.

Accordingly, I again am hereby respectfully requesting that a full-scale investigation be conducted by both houses of Congress into the allegations made on March 1, 2012 by Sheriff Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse for the sake of the preservation of our United States of America that I love dearly and for which so many brave and courageous Americans have made the ultimate sacrifice for.

Please feel free to contact me at my email or home address should you have any questions regarding my request.

I look forward to hearing from you regarding this disturbing and time sensitive matter.

Thank you again for all you continue to do for our Veterans, our state and our country.

God Bless You and God Bless America.

Respectfully,

Jake L. Martinez

Captain-USMC-Retired

Automatic Electronic Response Received From Senator Udall’s Office Regarding My Email Above:

Thank you for your message!

I look forward to reviewing your comments and questions.

Before you leave, I hope you'll explore my website. On this page, you can learn more about the work that I've been doing on important issues and legislation as your U.S. Senator.”

Note: Americans are waking up!

Thanks again to WND, Obama Ballot Challenge Staff and Sheriff Arpaio and his Cold Case Posse for their unwavering commitment and fortitude to continue the fight.

Americans across the country are waking up to the fact that President Obama is constitutionally ineligible to hold the office of President, as substantiated by his newly released long-form Certificate of Live Birth, which shows that his father was in fact born in Kenya in 1936. At the time, Kenya was a British colony. Therefore Obama Senior was a British subject by birth (due to the fact that he was born within British-controlled territory). When President Obama was born in 1961, he acquired British nationality by descent, because his father was a British subject by birth. When Kenya gained its independence from Great Britain in 1963, President Obama became a citizen of the newly-formed nation.

Sources:

http://www.wnd.com/2011/12/375625/#f2cd597738

http://constitutionalreset.ning.com/video/atty-dr-herb-titus-obama-not-a-natural-born-citizen

http://people.mags.net/tonchen/birthers.htm

http://obamaballotchallenge.com/natural-born-citizenship-and-history-timeline

Additionally, several new organizations, to include active websites, were established to educate and mobilize the American public on the significance of “natural born Citizen” and the 2012 Election, along with an initiative to assist ordinary registered voting citizens wishing to challenge President Obama’s constitutional eligibility and name placement on their state’s 2012 primary presidential ballot. The team that established and maintains this website is currently compiling election laws from all 50 states and in the near future will be providing forms, along with sample letters that registered voters can use to file a complaint. Also included is pertinent information regarding those lawsuits and/or complaints that have been filed by state, to include my own.

Sources:

http://obamaballotchallenge.com/superpac-founder-explains-mission-of-natural-born-citizen-pac

http://obamaballotchallenge.com/obama-ballot-challenge-founder-interviewed-by-post-email

http://obamaballotchallenge.com/request-that-president-obama-be-removed-from-the-new-mexico-2012-presidential-primary-election-ballot

http://obamaballotchallenge.com/nm-former-marine-writes-senator-to-demand-arpaio-cold-case-posse-findings-investigation

Word of Caution:  Although its great that many Americans are now beginning to wake up and are actively taking some action to have President Obama taken off the 2012 Presidential Election Ballots we need to keep in mind that those individuals with unlimited sources and/or resources, to include the deep pockets of anti-American George Soros, our own local and national elected officials and others, with the help of the MSM, who have spent years planning and successively perpetrating what I now believe could be the greatest fraud in American history are not going to go down without a fight and thus, as a result, I also believe that now more than ever we need to stick together as Americans (it's no longer Democrat or Republican) at this crucial time when our country and/or Republic needs us more than ever to see this thru. A Republic for which so many Americans have and continue to give their all to uphold and defend.

So the question is: Are you going to be part of the problem by continuing to keep your head in the sand hoping this issue goes away by itself or are you going to be part of the solution by stepping up to the plate and doing what ever it takes to uphold and defend our Republic before its too late?-You Decide:

YOUR TURN: TELL CONGRESS TO PROBE ELIGIBILITY: ‘Not to resolve this monumental, unprecedented constitutional issue intolerable’!-Posted on WND.com-On April 10, 2012:

http://www.wnd.com/2012/04/your-turn-tell-congress-to-probe-eligibility/

Continue Reading:

The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetrated-in-american-history/

Could the President’s newly released COLB be a forgery?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/04/29/could-the-president’s-newly-released-colb-be-a-forgery/

Godfather of The Islamic Revolution!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/11/godfather-of-the-islamic-revolution/

The Audacity of Socialism!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/28/the-audacity-of-socialism/

Who owns our supposedly fair and balanced airwaves and news outlets?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/21/who-owns-our-supposedly-fair-and-balanced-airwaves-and-news-outlets/

Extensive Research Into Senator Obama’s Background Completed on November 3, 2008:

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/04/26/extensive-research-into-senator-obama’s-background-completed-on-november-10-2008/

Where Is America Today?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/26/where-is-america-today-2/

Note: The following videos wholeheartedly share my sentiments and hopefully yours-You Decide:

A Republic, If You Can Keep It!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGL8CiUtXF0

We The People:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVAhr4hZDJE&feature=player_embedded

The Fightin Side of Me!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32-OyyLJzHw&feature=player_embedded#

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

I hope you all read my message. It is very imortant. I’ve received the final proof  of my book In Earth as It Is in Heaven2012.  After carefully reading the first thirty pages, I decided I’ve taken too much for granted. My book doesn’t properly communicate the message intended.

When I got to the time in my book, when I went in business with my father, I realized that you people would not know enough in what I wrote to know my message.  I wanted to be concise. People lose interest when one is too detailed.  In being concise I didn’t make my point. This is generally the problem. Writers explain the details and miss the point.  I’ve a lot of work to do to make the point by writing the details that count. 

The following revision in my book is to make the point I missed when I went into business with my father.

After World War II, lumber was in great demand. My father was in the lumber business. He offered to put me in business.  New family owned lumber mills not on a railroad were experiencing difficulty in getting their products to big markets, like our market in Dallas. The Texas Railroad Commission was in charge of issuing for-hire truck permits. It was the doing of bought and paid for Texas politicians,

My father offered to buy a truck and give me ownership. He knew me.  He knew I wouldn’t work for him. I’m too independent. I could pay for the truck with the fees I earned for hauling lumber from mill to market.

We provded a needed service. Some call free enterprise greed. It’s a play on words politicians use to encourage votes from “the poor and needy.”

The competition didn’t like what we were doing. They informed the IRS that we were hauling for hire. The IRS examined our books and saw that we were making more money hauling than selling. We were not making any profit on the haul. The books showed that all the money we received for hauling went to expenses.

The IRS claimed we were operating a subterfuge and left an Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) ruling to substantiate the IRS position. Because we owed a lot of transportation tax we had not paid, plus penalty and interest, the IRS employed deceit to collect a tax we did not owe. I checked out the ICC ruling. It was based on the fact that company owned trucks were backhauling for hire. We were not.

I learned from the IRS that contract unloaders were paying transportation tax. Transportation tax was imposed during World War II. This was years after the war ended. Said contractors, poor uneducated blacks with a junk heap truck, were unloading boxcars of lumber a block or two from the final destination. Ninety-nine percent was labor. Transportation tax was imposed on full payment. This was not help for the poor and needy. This was government’s big foot crushing the life out of free enterprise—making the poor and needy dependent on government.

The magic words to the IRS: “I’ll see you in court.” The IRS disappeared and was not heard from again on  this matter. But how many would dare to tell the IRS that they were going to be challenged in court?  We accept authority as knowing more that we know. It dates back to cavemen.  

“For the good of all,” the IRS dishonestly robs Peter to pay Paul. The IRS takes orders from the Secretary of Treasury. He takes orders from the President. Based on how much he can do for them, the voters elect the President. The resourceful, who risk their efforts and capital, are being cheated by self-serving politicians. 

This unconstitutional element, government giving to the individual, is incorporated in New Deal law. My book is dedicated toward making the American people aware that group rights do not point the nation toward good will, peace of mind, or prosperity. The majority vote does not replace rights written into the Bill of Rights. This is especially important for America’s youth to know. You are now responsible for the six trillion dollar national debt preceding generations have left for you to pay, ostensibly, “for the good of all.” 

We, the American people, have not taken responsibility for the politicians we elect. America’s original politicians knew this problem. That’s why we have the Bill of Rights.  

By leaving politicians in control, we, the voters, have left our children with an unconscionable debt to pay. Do I make my point?  Hopefully, you will take the time to read my revised message.  I hope to have my longer version ready in a month or two.

http://blackroberegimentpastor.blogspot.com/2012/06/romney-or-obama-calamity-and-islam-will.html

Biblical and spiritual matters my friends... It's time to wake up and wake up now. Those who are arrogant and prideful will reject what I and others like me are “shouting from the roof tops.” You know, I mentioned the prophet Jeremiah earlier. Biblical history shows us that Israel was not right away destroyed and her people led off as captives to foreign lands at first when the people of Israel rejected God(Jeremiah 16:13 “Therefore will I cast you out of this land into a land that ye know not, neither ye nor your fathers; and there shall ye serve other gods day and night , where I will not shew you favour.”), No--- the Bible tells us that there were warnings from God's men(and sometimes women also) that warned the people to disengage from evil, then repent and return to the Lord. When Israel of old refused to do so, their national borders were invaded with raiding parties and eventually Israeli’s were killed. Soon after when Israel refused to listen to God's messengers to repent and return to God's ways, the land was invaded by foreign armies and finally by God's own hand, Israel was conquered and many Israeli’s were killed. Today, God has sent Islamists to invade our land. They are the curse and plague upon us for rejecting God's Word. Islam and Sharia Law are evil and those who promote the evil of Islam are indeed increasingly invading our nation. Islamic ways are  even growingly accepted by our own American Courts and Government. Obama has widely opened that door to allow Islamic Sharia Law and Islamic ways into our nation and Romney will continue that practice, for he has no room in his own cultic beliefs to condemn such wickedness as Islam. Perhaps you believe my last statement was a bit too strong, if so... then why did this past week as matter of fact, Romney visit a Muslim School ? http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/romney-pushes-education-plan-at-islamist-owned-school/. If Romney is so concerned about America and it's Founding Father's beliefs as we have all heard so often from his Republican Party Presidential debates and campaign speeches(http://blogs.reuters.com/talesfromthetrail/2012/02/01/why-did-romney-quote-thomas-paine/ ), then what the heck is Romney doing in a Muslim School and promoting Islam ?

By Ion Mahai Pacepa ;   History usually repeats itself, and if you have lived two lives, as I have done, you have a good chance of seeing that re-enactment with your own eyes. In 1978, I paid with two death sentences from my native Romania for helping her people rid themselves of their Marxist dictatorship, carefully disguised as socialism. Thirty years later I witnessed how the same Marxism, camouflaged as socialism, began infecting the shores of my adoptive country, the United States, which had just won a 44-year Cold War against Marxism and against its earthly incarnation, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.

The Socialist Mask of Marxism

President Barack Obama’s deputies are holding “hundreds” of closed-door meetings with a jihad-linked lobbying group that is widely derided by critics as a U.S. arm of the theocratic Muslim Brotherhood.

The admission of meetings with the Council on American-Islamic Relations came from George Selim, the White House’s new director for community partnerships, which was formed in January to ensure cooperation by law enforcement and social service agencies with Muslim identity groups in the United States.

http://conservativebyte.com/2012/06/obama-administration-admits-to-hundreds-of-meetings-with-jihad-linked-group/

Fractally Wrong - The state of being wrong at every conceivable scale of resolution. That is, from a distance, a fractally wrong person's worldview is incorrect; and furthermore, if you zoom in on any small part of that person's worldview, that part is just as wrong as the whole worldview. http://www.ihateobama.com/ 

Could Obama really be on the verge of making our worst conspiracy theory nightmares about a “new world order” come true, under the radar, while most people are focused on the primaries?                        http://nicedeb.wordpress.com/2012/02/03/obama-poised-to-betray-america-through-4-un-treaties-video/  

FAITH IN ACTION

Blessings beloved children of The Living God. Paul writes: Lord, who shall believe our report?! Yes, a question, Yet an Exclamation. And why? Because, God is expecting of us what He alone has endowed us with, Our Faith. Jesus says: Your own Faith has made you whole. We OWN our Faith, Hallelujah! He tells us: Seek Ye FIRST: The Kingdom of Heaven and His Righteousness! And ALL these things shall be added unto you.
They are the Fruits, Virtues, and Gifts of His Holy Spirit. We are saved by GRACE. We live by FAITH. We do not ask Him for anything we already own. Faith is among these things which He filled us with when we became Born Again. Many there are in the Clergy who do not give this information out, let alone teach it unto understanding to the mass. And why not? They have a Paycheck to protect.
Did you ask God, Jesus, or His Holy Spirit of Truth to use your own bathroom? Or, did you ask them to Blink? Breathe? Sneeze? This list goes on infinitesimally. We do not ask Him to use things we already own. Oh, Yes and assuredly we thank Him so reverently for them and that we have them to use and utilize, but they are ours and we do own them only by His Grace. And what is His Grace?
It is reported by many in the Clergy that Gods Grace is unmerited Favor. Hmm?! Where so ever in the scripture or the Gospels does it refer or even speak of such a thing? I have been given to know, acknowledge, work in, and exercise through this word of Glory as I share it now with you as well the viewers’.
It is a long story, but one well worth the time to read, consume, and put into a reality base within each and every heart the world over.
In Matthew 18:11 and John 19:10 is written: The Son of Man is come to SEEK and to SAVE "That!" which WAS lost.
What was the "THAT" which was lost? Our INNOCENCE!
Well, beloved, it was that "WHICH WAS" that was lost. OUR INNOCENCE!
Many equate this to the meaning and the subversive conniving of the brainstorming crowd as: We, Us. ‎"NOPE" When we read His Word, and as Paul also writes: Comparing Spiritual things with Spiritual things! We find a new order of thinking. He also writes: by the renewing of the mind! So, at and by this we find that our conventional ways of thinking must take on a whole new way of processing our information about His Word. Not to dispel any or all that He is about, NO WAY!
It is by the Order (or COMMAND) unto our very Souls that we understand ALL that He has given us from the very beginning unto forever, amen.
So, what was "That which was LOST?!
Our Innocence. As individuals, nations, tribes, peoples, Souls.
In Psalms 88, (and please read it again, this time understanding it is the very spoken words of Jesus as He died on that Cross at Calvary) we read: 6) You have laid me in the Lowest Pit, in Darkness, in the depths.
While Jesus was alive on the face of Planet Earth, He Prophesied upon His very own life and the life of His eternal Soul, even upon the face of His very own Faith: I lay down my life, for I have power to take it up again.
‎:12) Shall Your wonders be known in the dark? And Your righteousness in the Land of Forgetfulness?
As we continue to read and discover all that Jesus did just walking in this life on Earth, we are more profoundly Amazed by His completed work at Calvary and that His real work came at that point of death. For His Journey at that point had just begun.
‎:18) Loved one and friend, You have put far from me, and my acquaintances into darkness. He became Literally "NOTHING!" as in Never was. As if God had never even thought of creating Him to begin with. I know this sounds odd, but Truth never fails. And please do not ask me to explain how this word has come to
In Psalms 88, (and please read it again, this time understanding it is the very spoken words of Jesus as He died on that Cross at Calvary) we read: 6) You have laid me in the Lowest Pit, in Darkness, in the depths.
While Jesus was alive on the face of Planet Earth, He Prophesied upon His very own life and the life of His eternal Soul, even upon the face of His very own Faith: I lay down my life, for I have power to take it up again.
‎:12) Shall Your wonders be known in the dark? And Your righteousness in the Land of Forgetfulness?
As we continue to read and discover all that Jesus did just walking in this life on Earth, we are more profoundly Amazed by His completed work at Calvary and that His real work came at that point of death. For His Journey at that point had just begun.
‎:18) Loved one and friend, You have put far from me, and my acquaintances into darkness. He became Literally "NOTHING!" as in Never was. As if God had never even thought of creating Him to begin with. I know this sounds odd, but Truth never fails. And please do not ask me to explain how this word has come to me other than by faith and obedience unto Him who knows and does all things, amen.
For, In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth, and the earth was without form (order, total chaos) and void (no presence of His Majesty, Love, and Kindness). And Darkness was upon the face of the Deep.
When Lucifer fell and 1/3 of the Angels with him, God needed a place apart from Heaven to send them to. Bamm! Creation.
The whole idea is revealed in the message: And God would that NONE should perish! And this meant even Lucifer and the angels. Hoping upon the Soul of those whom made their choice at that time, that they would miss Heaven and Repent and return back unto God for forgiveness and be rightfully restored into Heaven for the eternal home they'd once knew. But that did not happen. They were having too much fun creating the Dinosaur and Cro-Magnon man after their idealist ways. And we clearly see what happened to them.
For, yes there were planets and moons, earthquakes, volcanoes and all sorts of things going BUMP in the night. But, there were neither Stars nor Suns to give light.
Gen 1:2b-3: And the Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters. Then God said, "Let there be light!" and there was Light. 4) And God saw the light that it was good and God divided the Light from the Darkness.
So, when LIGHT finally hit the scene, all that (then known) Satan had created, all turned to Stone in an instant, so that God could do His Creativity upon the face of Planet Earth. Hence, why it took Him 6 days to create all that we know of today. Amen.
So, why are we here, existing upon this earth?
Because, Satan (total personality) did not repent, nor did his angels. Remember, God would that NONE should perish.
Gen 2:5c: And there was no man to till the ground
God created man in His image, so that every time Satan and the fallen ones would see them, that when they were wrong and seeking Favor from God, repenting and God forgiving, that someway they (Satan and all those) would see, realize, and repent and be redeemed. Yet, all for naught
The first fall of man, in the Garden of Eden, Eve was Beguiled, tempted, lied to, and manipulated into thinking and believing the lie.
Adam, also believing in the lie, for who was Eve, but his better half, amen, why would she lie? They both ate of the same fruit.
The fruit was the Knowledge. Hmm. Apples, Oranges, Peanut Butter? Oh grow up, you get my drift.
The fruit of the Tree of the KNOWLEGE of Good and Evil, was the Knowledge. Think about how when you burned yourself from the stove or stumped your toe in the night, you hold yourself accountable to this knowledge, a certain level of conscious thought that this will never happen again, right?
OK then. This tree was on a Need to Know basis, and Adam and Eve had no NEED to know of these things. Yet, they believed the lie that they did, and BAMM! Here we are.
It was at this very moment in time that Innocence for all mankind was lost. For God asked them: Who told you - you were naked? (3:11) Until this time, they had been 100% innocent, perfect, holy, and righteous in Gods eyes.
Satan, not remembering what all took place in Heaven before his fall, saw something Golden fall from them at that time. And he (Satan) still seeking to One-Up on God, swooped her (Innocence) up and thrust her into the Land of Forgetfulness. A very real place which does exist. Thinking that if he forgot about her, so would God.
At the time of the fall of Lucifer and the Angels, being slam-dunked into this time/space continuum, God kept their total recall of remembrance unto Himself, so they would not know any of the hidden secrets which only God knew. Hence, this is why Satan, when tempting Jesus in the desert for 40 days, did not recognize Him.
So, for all this time and space which had come and gone, Before man, quite possibly eons of millennia of time, then since man unto the time of Calvary another 4-6,000 years, wow! A long time to remember a password to a FB acct, huh?
Back to Calvary: Jesus, just like Innocence, had been thrust into the Lowest Pit of hell, into the Land of Forgetfulness. Being crushed by the stressors and such in that place is like the Black Hole that Scientists speak of now that produces this event known as total annihilation of particle matter, bodies, etc.
Key point: Revelation 8:1) When he opened the 7th Seal, there was SILENCE in Heaven "About The Space" of half an hour.
Nothing in all creation, time, and space had ever happened. Jesus, The Be-Gotten Son of The Living God, because of the exactness of the Mysteries of God, had become Absolute Nothing, as in Never was. All of Heaven stood in silence about the Space which had been created because of Jesus' Divine work to be accomplished, to REDEEM Innocence from the Lowest Pit of hell.
For, if this would not have happened, Innocence would not have been found, redeemed, and the struggle over the Souls of men would have been put to naught, and the end of all existence as we know it would have happened right then.
This is why all of Heaven was Silent about the space; they all waited to hear the sound of that still small voice from the Abyss, of Innocence herself crying out to Jesus: MY LORD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
At this point, Jesus (taking up His most Holy Faith) comes back unto Himself, and seeing Innocence with His own eyes, thrusts her into His bosom and makes His trek with her back to the surface of the Earth.
Yet, on His way out of there, Stops and gives the greatest grave-side call of redemption ever known, to all who had lived before Him, to understand the fulfillment of the promise: Though you be dead, Yet shall you live!
Then, as His Imperical Right of Authority over all of Heaven and Earth, Death, Hell, and The Grave, Stands upon the Face of the earth. This is when in that Garden, Mary Magdalene sees Him. And He tells her: WOMAN! Touch ME not, for I have not yet ascended unto the Father. Go! Tell the Disciples of seeing Me and meet Me in the Upper Room. And off to Heaven He goes with Innocence, Placing Her upon the Mercy Seat of God, Adorning Her and hearing the words of the Father, Well done my good and Faithful Son.
Aw, Yes, one little point needs to be placed between the 2 previous posts, And there was a War in Heaven. Revelation 12:7-8) And WAR broke out in Heaven: Michael and his Angels fought with the Dragon, and the dragon and his angels fought. But they did not prevail, nor was a place found for them in heaven any longer.
All of Heaven had to be completely cleared from the Accuser of the brethren, Satan, the dragon, that old serpent and anything like him. For as described in Job 1:6-7) Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan also came among them. And the Lord said to Satan:"From where do you come?" So Satan answered the Lord and said "From going to and fro on the earth and from walking back and forth on it"
For as Jesus speaks with Peter: Simon Bar-Jonah, this day I call you Peter, See this day, I give you the Keys to the Kingdom, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it (like in Eden). Upon this Rock of INNOCENCE Build MY Church!
Yet, the scripture says: we are born into sin.
Hold it right there!
The words here, as Paul writes: Study to show yourself APPROVED unto God! A workman, not ashamed, Rightly dividing the word of Truth. Here is where we discern the comparison of Spiritual things.
We are born! Stop right there, shut the book and call it good.
We are born, in this life as new born innocent babies. Pure as the driven snow. For, until the individual point of Age of Accountability (and it is different with everyone) we are innocent. Until we are able to form our own individual thought by ourselves and realizing the difference between right and wrong, even about the thought itself, we are innocent. The rule of Ignorance (Leviticus, you'll find it) applies. For, once enlightened (understanding the exactness of right and wrong) you have no excuse Romans 2:1.
We are born. (Stop) Into Sin! Hmm. OK, we are innocent unto a certain point in our lives. But, after that (between that time {rebellion or whatever} we are catapulted into believing lies from all angles of this life. Known as Learned Behaviors/ Character Defects.
But, at the point of Born Again, we are to be given this information about receiving back our Innocence, where in lies the formidable Wisdom and discernment of the Living God within us, come alive and dwell within us for His Right Righteousness and purpose.
If anyone has never heard of such a thing until now (and I'm sure there are many) then please follow these few instructions to achieve and enter into the place He Father God and Jesus the Son has created for you to do:
Hold out both hands. For the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand.
With your left index finger Point to the thumb on your Right hand and proclaim with a Loud Voice: My Father
Next finger, My Jesus. Next, My Holy Spirit Next, My Kingdom of Heaven Next (Pinky) ME
NOW, Reach towards Heaven and proclaim: I Receive back my Innocence, in Jesus' name.
Place your hand upon your heart. This is the Kingdom of God within you.
Guard your Heart and your Innocence with all you know how to do. Hold it closely and dearly.
For our Innocence is Gods Grace, The Holy Grail, our most Holy Faith, and our First Love.
We are Born Again children of Peace. We have no right to accept anyone else's blame, shame, nor guilt.
We command our gifts, fruits, and virtues of His Holy Spirit of Truth to Come Forth, GO! Before us, and make Straight the Path of The Lord of Glory, Hallelujah!
Blessings to one and all.

   THEN  GET  THE HELL  OUT OF  AFGH ANISTAN  AND  CUT  OFF ALL  AID  TO  THEM,  OF  COURSE  OB WILL  DO  JUST  THE  OPPOSITE  ALL I  CAN  SAY  IS VOTE  FOR MITT  ROMNEY  IN  NOVEMBER.

Obama asks for African-American Vote.
Media Happy Happy Happy!
If Romney asked for Caucasian Vote Media would soil themselves in haste to respond negatively!

I just posted the comment below to the TPP Administrator's comments in "The War On Coal" on the TPP Homepage:

Below is part of an article,May 11, 2012, on "The Foundry" site:

After coming under fire for its consistent hostility to the coal industry, the Obama campaign quietly adjusted its energy policy website to include “clean coal” among the president’s energy initiatives.

The energy policy page of BarackObama.com now includes a section for “clean coal,” claiming the stimulus package “invested substantially in carbon capture and sequestration research.”

But until recently, that page made no mention of coal. Its Google cache shows a section for “energy efficiency” where “clean coal” now appears.

The change comes mere days after Obama lost 41% of the vote in the Democratic primary in West Virginia – a state heavily reliant on the coal industry – to a convicted felon and current federal inmate.

The chairman of the WV Democratic Party blamed Obama’s poor showing on his stance on coal energy. “A lot of folks here have real frustration with this administration’s stance on coal and energy,” said state Democratic chairman Larry Puccio. “They are frustrated and they are upset, and they wanted to send Obama a message.”

My Okla Senior Sen.Inhofe  is behind the Res..S.J.Res.37 and he's right...get your Sen to vote YES to Res 37

combatting Obama's War On Coal!...

  THATS  ANOTHER  LIER  LIER  PANTS  ON  FIRE.  OBAMA.   REMBER  TO  GO TO  YOUR  CHURCH   AND  PRAY  FOR THIS  ONCE  FINE  COUNTRY   THIS SATURDAY OR SUNDAY.

More on Obama:
7. The former Constitutional Senior Lecturer (Obama) cited the US.
Constitution the other night during his State of the Union Address.
Unfortunately, the quote he cited was from the Declaration of Independence
… not the Constitution.

9. Free Republic: In the State of the Union Address, President Obama said:
”We find unity in our incredible diversity, drawing on the promise enshrined
in our Constitution: the notion that we are all created equal.

10. Um, wrong citing, wrong founding document there Champ, I mean Mr.
President. By the way, the promises are not a notion, our founders named
them unalienable rights. The document is our Declaration of Independence and
it reads:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,
that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that
among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

11. And this is the same guy who lectured the Supreme Court moments later in
the same speech?
…I asked my dog if he liked the Constitution the way it was and he said ”Yes Sir!” (he’s a retired German Shepard Vet who sings country music sometimes on talent shows) and I took this as a more valid answer than Obama’s claim to being a Constitutional Lawyer?Professor!