All Posts (28398)
Sort by
By John W. Lillpop
Alabama’s new immigration law combines common sense and rule of law in a manner that protects the rights and property of American citizens against assault by foreign illegal aliens. The measure is based on legitimate concerns involving home land security, unemployment among U.S. citizens, financial crisis in America, and preservation of American culture and language.
Those are not reason enough for some religious leaders who play the J word—Jesus—in opposing the law.
As reported, in part, at the reference:
“Some church groups are speaking out against Alabama's new law against illegal immigration, which they say violates Christian principles.
Would Jesus support the invasion and occupation of a sovereign nation by millions of foreign aliens, invasions which cost taxpayers dearly, and which lead to deterioration of the established culture and language?
Did Jesus not counsel, “Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s, and unto God the things that are God’s”?
Is there not a Commandment among the Big 10 which forbids stealing?
Further, why are the churches not directly funding health care, education, etc. for illegal aliens rather than having those costs dumped on the back of taxpayers, where said cost exceeds $100 billion a year?
Question to those self-righteous hypocrites who oppose rule of law and basic fairness: What if legislation was passed to revoke the tax-exempt status of your institutions to fund the care and nurturing of illegal aliens?
Would your crying bleeding hearts be so compassionate if your pocket books were involved?
MSNBC host Chris Matthews recently used the term “culturally-backward Christians” to describe those whom were most bothered by the Anthony Weiner scandal.
His was dead wrong on that score, but his question may have application to how certain faiths come down on the side of invading criminals.
The question, “Are religious leaders who oppose common sense and rule of law when it comes to illegal aliens ‘Culturally backward’?”
Just asking.
Are Religious Leaders Who Oppose Alabama’s New Immigration Law 'Culturally Backward'?
http://www.necn.com/06/16/11/Churches-speaking-out-against-Ala-immigr/landing_politics.html?&blockID=3&apID=eb73ee282055466fae188d4fbb6df47b
Alabama’s new immigration law combines common sense and rule of law in a manner that protects the rights and property of American citizens against assault by foreign illegal aliens. The measure is based on legitimate concerns involving home land security, unemployment among U.S. citizens, financial crisis in America, and preservation of American culture and language.
Those are not reason enough for some religious leaders who play the J word—Jesus—in opposing the law.
As reported, in part, at the reference:
“Some church groups are speaking out against Alabama's new law against illegal immigration, which they say violates Christian principles.
Leaders of the United Methodist Church, the Episcopal Church, the Lutheran Church and the Roman Catholic Church have all criticized the law as running counter to the Bible's teaching about loving others. Episcopal Bishop Henry N. Parsley of Birmingham calls its passage "a sad moment for our state."Where, in the name of Jesus Christ, is concern for American citizens? Illegal aliens violate our borders, steal public services such as education, medical care, food, and shelter intended to provide a safety net for citizens.
The state's largest denomination, the Alabama Baptist Convention, hasn't taken a position publicly. But the latest edition of its widely read state newspaper, The Alabama Baptist, includes a front-page story that features Hispanic worries about the new law.
The Nevada-based Mormons issued a statement saying they are worried about tough state immigration statutes the day after Alabama Gov. Robert Bentley signed the law.”
Would Jesus support the invasion and occupation of a sovereign nation by millions of foreign aliens, invasions which cost taxpayers dearly, and which lead to deterioration of the established culture and language?
Did Jesus not counsel, “Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s, and unto God the things that are God’s”?
Is there not a Commandment among the Big 10 which forbids stealing?
Further, why are the churches not directly funding health care, education, etc. for illegal aliens rather than having those costs dumped on the back of taxpayers, where said cost exceeds $100 billion a year?
Question to those self-righteous hypocrites who oppose rule of law and basic fairness: What if legislation was passed to revoke the tax-exempt status of your institutions to fund the care and nurturing of illegal aliens?
Would your crying bleeding hearts be so compassionate if your pocket books were involved?
MSNBC host Chris Matthews recently used the term “culturally-backward Christians” to describe those whom were most bothered by the Anthony Weiner scandal.
His was dead wrong on that score, but his question may have application to how certain faiths come down on the side of invading criminals.
The question, “Are religious leaders who oppose common sense and rule of law when it comes to illegal aliens ‘Culturally backward’?”
Just asking.
Are Religious Leaders Who Oppose Alabama’s New Immigration Law 'Culturally Backward'?
http://www.necn.com/06/16/11/Churches-speaking-out-against-Ala-immigr/landing_politics.html?&blockID=3&apID=eb73ee282055466fae188d4fbb6df47b
This is from our friends at Personal Liberty;
Who Shot The Dollar?
June 15, 2011 by John Myers
PHOTOS.COM
President Barack Obama delivered the deathblow to the dollar.
Who killed the U.S. dollar? This question will be debated by future historians. Already, more people are asking that question than tuned in to find out who shot J.R. on Dallas. The lineup of suspects is long, but it ends with Barack Obama, the triggerman who killed the buck.
The first wound came from Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who expanded the Federal government’s influence far beyond what the writers of the Constitution ever imagined. He devalued the price of gold and made it impossible for ordinary Americans to convert currency to bullion. But FDR was also crucial during America’s World War II victory, a pivotal event that set the stage for America to become the world’s largest creditor and greatest superpower.
LBJ Chooses Guns And Butter
Another suspect is Democrat Lyndon B. Johnson. When I was in college studying economics, our professor made us read history. This seemed counterintuitive until we read about the guns-and-butter policies of the Johnson Administration.
And while Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama make Johnson look like a penny-pincher, Johnson was the first to take a shot at the dollar.
Johnson pressed forward his vision with major spending programs for education, medical care, crime and transportation. He wanted to transform America the way FDR had. And he had a war to fight in Vietnam.
Gold demand rose, creating a drawdown on America’s gold reserves. The root of it all was a growing trade deficit that the United States owed to the rest of the world.
The Administration of John F. Kennedy knew America’s gold standard was in trouble. In January 1961, Kennedy’s Undersecretary of the Treasury, Robert Roosa, suggested the U.S. and Europe pool their gold to prevent a private marketplace for gold in which the price would exceed the mandated price of $35 per ounce. French President Charles de Gaulle reneged on the deal and began to redeem dollars for gold instead of U.S. Treasuries. The drain on U.S. gold became severe.
The 1960s marked a gigantic increase in Federal spending. Johnson’s two-front war was being fought at a prohibitive cost. In 1968, for the first time since 1893, the United States ran a deficit in its balance of trade. Federal debt began to soar. By the end of the 1960s, the U.S. faced the stark choice of eliminating trade deficits or devaluing the dollar.
Gold On Nixon’s Enemies List
On Aug. 15, 1971, President Richard Nixon cut the final link between gold and the dollar. Other nations could no longer redeem rapidly depreciating greenbacks for bullion.
In February 1973, the world’s currencies “floated.” By the end of 1974, the price of gold had soared from $35 to $195 an ounce. The U.S. could suddenly pump dollars without constraint. It was a period during which red flags were being raised for paper investors, few of whom paid any notice.
The majority of investors would pay a steep price for their ignorance. Over the next decade, they suffered through the worst bear market in stocks since the Great Depression and the worst bond market of the 20th century.
A Democrat Gives The Dollar A Reprieve
It is ironic that another Democrat would breathe life into the buck, but that is what President Bill Clinton did.
During the Clinton Administration — with the help of innovative accounting — the dollar stormed back. The disgrace Clinton brought to the Oval Office over the Monica Lewinsky affair seems almost forgivable since his Administration presided over a growing economy and what underpinned it, a strong dollar. More than a decade ago, the world had confidence in the U.S. dollar.
If you do not believe me, check the chart below.
As you can see, the greenback has been experiencing an unprecedented decline since 2001. No doubt much of the weakness in the dollar was caused by another guns-and-butter President: George W. Bush.
Just 2½ years into office, Obama is pushing the value of the dollar even lower. It’s so low that the value of the U.S. dollar now threatens to undermine our future and our children’s future.
To read the rest of the article go here:
The notion of bad deeds, specifically curses, coming back to haunt their originator is long established in the English language and was expressed in print as early as 1390, when Geoffrey Chaucer used it in The Parson's Tale: And ofte tyme swich cursynge wrongfully retorneth agayn to hym that curseth, as a bryd that retorneth agayn to his owene nest.
The Center for Media and Democracy's Real Economy Project is now assessing the total cost to taxpayers of the Wall Street bailout. Multiple federal agencies have disbursed $4.6 trillion dollars in support of the financial sector since the meltdown in 2007-2008. Of that, $2 trillion is still outstanding. Our assessment demonstrates that the Federal Reserve has provided by far the bulk of the funding for the bailout in the form of loans amounting to $3.8 trillion. Little information has been disclosed about what collateral taxpayers have received in return for these loans. CMD also concludes that the bailout is far from over, as the government has active programs authorized to cost up to $2.9 trillion, and still has $2 trillion in outstanding investments and loans.
You are looking at the tip of the iceberg—two ideas in play, one, independence—life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, calling for self-governance; the other, dependence—for the good of all. The above stated assessment tells you that for the good of all the world’s leadership, through the systematic theft of the individual’s property, is striping the individual of his life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. What to do about it is the problem. Hundreds of millions of people are caught between a rock and a hard place.
The answer to the problem is clear enough, but it doesn’t fit the world’s current reality. Sociologist Robert K. Merton’s self-fulfilling prophecy: “in the beginning, a false definition of the situation evoking a new behavior which makes the original false conception come 'true'. This specious validity of the self-fulfilling prophecy perpetuates a reign of error. For the prophet will cite the actual course of events as proof that he was right from the very beginning.”
The universe is both quantitative and qualitative. Everyone understands the difference. Quantity applies to space and time. Quantitatively, the planet Earth compares to one grain of sand on all the beaches in the world. Qualitatively, one can be completely dependent on others. Why are millions of Indians living on the street? Why was the World Trade Center destroyed and thousands of innocents killed? Why do millions of Middle-East Muslims see Jews as a threat and want to kill them all?
The quality of life is terrible for the majority of the world’s population. Millions of the miserable in Americans are on the Yellow Brick Road with Dorothy, the Tin Man, without a heart, the Cowardly Lion, and the Man of Straw, without a brain, all on their way to see the Wonderful Wizard of Oz. The dream ends back where we were, at square one.
This fairy tale would be true were it not for the Mayan calendar. The world turns; it transits around the sun; the sun around the galaxy. We are about to reach the tipping point of a galactic change. Thousands of responses to my blogs at www.mymiraclemessage.com say a groundswell of new thought is building that is going to break and sweep the world.
I’m thinking about Woodrow Wilson’s progressive inspired depression. It didn’t last but a year. President Harding took care of Wilson’s progressive attempt to make socialist slaves of us. And then there was Jimmy Carter’s progressive inspired stagflation, which didn’t last either, not after Ronald Reagan took office and changed directions. The change coming with the end of Barack Obama’s economic disaster, according to the Mayan calendar, on December 21, 2012—be ready for astounding news—is going be an evolvement that happens once in many thousands of years. But, ah, this change I’m speaking of, “the progressive order of the divine dealings of God with humanity, ‘the increasing purpose’ which runs through and links together the ages, from the beginning of the life of man to the end in eternity,” says Rev. C.I. Scofield, Editor of the Scofield Reference Bible, makes it clear to me this one is going to be the big change the world is waiting for. Welcome to the Age of Aquarius.
Rev. Scofield: “The appointed mission of Israel was (1) to be a witness to the unity of God in the midst of universal idolatry; (2) to illustrate to the nations the greater blessedness of serving the one true God; (3) to receive and preserve the Divine revelation; (4) to produce the Messiah, earth’s Savior and Lord,” Jesus told us, “in earth as it is in heaven . . .But seek ye first the kingdom of God.” There is a distinction. Are you of the earth, an insignificant part of a mere grain of sand—for the good of all—or, are you an inextricable part of the consciousness of the universe? It is your choice, but if you accept Jesus, who said that you and God are one, you got nothing to worry about. You are about to become the person you were meant to be.
Ricardo Thach’s comment today to my post, “Everything is in Divine Order” http://www.mymiraclemessage.com/?p=104 “It’s like you read my mind! You seem to know a lot about this, like you wrote the book on it or something.”
I didn’t write a book. Voices of the past are speaking through me.
After taking some time to view Leah’s recent powerful video regarding “Conversational Hypnosis”, I wanted to share my following blog post with you that I drafted on or about March 12, 2009, which I believe relates to this issue-You Decide:
Are We Witnessing Conversational Hypnosis At Work?
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/17/are-we-witnessing-conversational-hypnosis-at-work/
Question: Does President Obama covertly use a little known and highly deceptive and manipulative form of conversational hypnosis techniques in his speeches and how does that affect the way he governs our country?
The following document contains over 60 pages of evidence and analysis, which seem to make a good case that President Obama uses a little known and highly deceptive and manipulative form of “hack” hypnosis on millions of unaware Americans and reveals what only a few psychologists and hypnosis/NLP experts know-You Decide:
An Examination Of Obama’s Use Of Hidden Hypnosis Techniques In His Speeches: “Exposing Obama’s Deception May Be The Only Way To Protect Democracy”:
http://www.pennypresslv.com/Obama's_Use_of_Hidden_Hypnosis_techniques_in_His_Speeches.pdf
These are pertinent excerpts from this document:
“Barack Obama’s speeches contain the hypnosis techniques of Dr. Milton Erickson, M.D. who developed a form of “conversational” hypnosis that could be hidden in seemingly normal speech and used on patients without their knowledge for therapy purposes.
Obama’s speeches intentionally contain:
- Trance Inductions
- Hypnotic Anchoring
- Pacing and Leading
- Pacing, Distraction and Utilization
- Critical Factor Bypass
- Stacking Language Patterns
- Preprogrammed Response Adaptation
- Linking Statements/ Causality Bridges
- Secondary Hidden Meanings/Imbedded Suggestions
- Emotion Transfer
- Non-Dominant Hemisphere Programming
Obama’s techniques are the height of deception and psychological manipulation, remaining hidden because one must understand the science behind the language patterns in order to spot them. This document examines Obama’s speeches word by word, hand gesture by hand gesture, tone, pauses, body language, and proves his use of covert hypnosis intended only for licensed therapists on consenting patients.
Obama’s mesmerized, cult-like, grade-school-crush-like worship by millions is not because “Obama is the greatest leader of a generation” who simply hasn’t accomplished anything, who magically “inspires” by giving speeches.
Obama is committing perhaps the biggest fraud and deception in American history.
Obama is not just using subliminal messages, but textbook covert hypnosis and neuro-linguistic programming techniques on audiences that are intentionally designed to sideline rational judgment and implant subconscious commands to think he is wonderful and elect him President.
Obama is eloquent. However, Obama’s subconscious techniques are shown to elicit powerful emotion from his audience and then transfer those emotions onto him, to sideline rational judgment, and implant hypnotic commands that we are unaware of and can’t even consciously question.
The polls are misleading because some of Obama’s commands are designed to be triggered only in the voting booth on November 4th.
Obama is immune to logical arguments like Wright, Ayers, shifting every position, character, and inexperience, because hypnosis affects us on an unconscious and emotional level.
To many people who see this unaccomplished man’s unnatural and irrational rise to the highest office in the world as suspicious and frightening and to those who welcome it, this document uncovers, explains, and proves the deceptive tactics behind true “Obama Phenomenon” including why younger people are more easily affected.”
Note: For more information relating to Dr. Milton Erickson, M.D., please refer to the following web sites:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milton_H._Erickson
http://www.erickson-foundation.org/drerickson.html
Note: The following articles and/or blog posts are examples of how President Obama used video games as a deceptive tactic to get to our young people in this country during his 2008 Presidential election campaign-You Decide:
Obama Mind Control Operation Targets The Young:
http://transformatum.com/2008/10/03/were-gonna-change-the-world/
Obama buys first video game campaign ads:
http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSTRE49EAGL20081016?sp=true
Obama Ads Invade Video Games:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,437763,00.html
Note: The following web site, along with articles and videos give us some undisputable examples of how President Obama’s use of hypnosis affects us on an unconscious and emotional level as a means of covertly accomplishing his hidden agenda to destroy our country-You Decide:
http://bornatthecrestoftheempire.blogspot.com/2007_12_30_archive.html
The Truth About Obama:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vkrWo-BdKrc&feature=related
Warning: Controversial Video! Did Obama Use Covert Conversational Hypnosis To Seduce America?
Obama’s Use of Hidden Hypnosis Techniques in His Speeches:
http://www.infowars.com/obama’s-use-of-hidden-hypnosis-techniques-in-his-speeches/
Obama’s Hypnotic Effect:
http://www.brutallyhonest.org/brutally_honest/2008/10/obamas-hypnotic.html
Beware Of Charismatic Men Who Preach ‘Change’:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L0GeVdrPxSw&feature=PlayList&p=08775E81DA24CA66&index=38
Barack Obama inauguration: this Emperor has no clothes, it will all end in tears:
Note: This web site gives you a series of videos that show you how hidden hypnosis works with great examples-You Decide:
Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed on the above blog post may have been removed since 2009 by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial. Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered to be too controversial by this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.
Have A Great Day & God Bless-Keep The Faith.
God Bless the U.S.A.!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related
Semper Fi!
Jake
The order covers 16% of the American population who lives in rural counties because they “supply our food, fiber, and energy, safeguard our natural resources, and are essential in the development of science and innovation.”
“Strong, sustainable rural communities are essential in winning the future and ensuring American competitiveness in the years ahead.” What kind of future are we supposed to win? Are we losers right now? This is very vague, what years ahead?
“To enhance the Federal Government’s efforts to address the needs of rural America, this order establishes a council to better coordinate Federal programs and maximize the impact of Federal investment to promote economic prosperity and quality of life in our rural communities.” As a world traveler, I can attest that Americans already have the highest standard of living in rural areas, prosperity, and excellent quality of life when compared to anybody else.
A recent article in Washington Post appeared with the innocuous title, “What we need: Smarter growth plans.” The author is Roger K. Lewis, a practicing architect and professor emeritus at the University of Maryland. Who can possibly object to “smarter growth plans?” Except that “smart growth plans” is the euphemism used by the United Nations for its Agenda 21, a direct assault on private property rights and American sovereignty.
Roger K. Lewis suggests that “smart growth” was designed by market forces driven by “green building.” He makes no mention of Agenda 21 and ICLEI objectives and intrusion into our society since the early 1970s or the agreement signed in 1992 that went under the radar of the American people’s understanding of the complex negative ramifications for our economy and our liberties.
I have not met Americans who think, “sprawl-producing planning, zoning and mortgage templates are obsolete” as the author claims. Would Americans willingly give up their land and homes with or without compensation in exchange for a move to a densely populated high-rise, with no parking garages, no access to cars, like rats fenced in a grey concrete maze?
Communist “social engineering” confiscated land and homes for agriculture. People were forced to move into many-storied, tiny cinder block apartments without any compensation for the land or homes bulldozed. They were forced to commute by bicycles or public transit.
Lewis deems subdivision developments with low-density, detached, single-family homes as outdated. He calls the areas educationally dysfunctional and unsafe. American suburbia was built, he says, on four assumptions that have lost validity today:
Unlimited supply of land
Inexpensive and inexhaustible supply of oil
Homogenous land use
The American dream to own and inhabit a mortgaged house.
I am not sure on what research Lewis based his conclusions, but we have huge domestic oil reserves if permits were issued to drill. We also have a vast land mass. Some areas have 70 or less inhabitants per square mile. Americans still want to own their own home and want to live in a homogeneous community of other homeowners. Just because power hungry bureaucrats at the United Nations have decided to “preserve” land and the environment for the future of the planet and its animals, neglecting the future of humans, does not mean Americans agree to this vision.
“Much of America’s land cannot and should not be developed.” Who are you to decide for us, Mr. Lewis and why? Last time I checked we were free people who determined their own life choices.
“Dependency on oil and limitless use of cars pose daunting environmental, economic, and geopolitical problems.” Who is going to decide the limit to our car use? Is it going to be done by law, more regulations, or executive order?
A handful of environmentalists, the EPA, and the United Nation’s dictators, using faulty debunked data from the University of East Anglia or phony research are trying to separate Americans from their land use, cars, trucks, and the open-wide roads.
Lewis continues his Agenda 21 fallacy. “The traditional nuclear family—mom, dad, two to three kids and one or two pets—is now a minority of America’s households.” I am positive that this man is not describing America that I know and see every day. His statements continue, “Today a majority of households are people, young or old, living alone; couples or sets of unrelated individuals of various ethnicities, ages and tastes.”
Agenda 21 and Mr. Lewis suggest building high-rises in “designated areas within municipalities where new development and re-development is feasible and desirable.” Affordable housing is a priority and so are environmental standards.
It is obvious that “smart growth plans” or Agenda 21 designed by United Nations will affect our future choices in how we live and where. EPA will be involved and will twist the arms of those who do not adopt “smart growth plans,” denying grants to states and cities and levying other penalties. By the time Americans realize the implications of Agenda 21“smart growth,” they will lose their homes and lands with no compensation. At least people who lost property under Eminent Domain have been compensated.
The International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) is a conglomerate of 600 national, regional, and local government associations who promote “sustainable development” and protection of the environment because of man-made global warming that does not exist.
“Sustainable development” is the United Nations effort to contain and limit economic development in developed countries and thus control population growth. It is “sustainable de-growth,” plain and simple. The focus is “low-income agriculture” and to set limits on the developed world.
United Nations and its affiliates believe that first world countries polluted significantly during their development while urging third world countries to reduce pollution thus impeding their growth. Implementation of “sustainable development” would revert our society to a pre-modern lifestyle.
ICLEI wants to keep the environment as pristine as possible through “ideal-seeking behavior.” These euphemisms are not clearly defined in terms of what or who will evaluate or set the standards for this “ideal-seeking behavior.”
Agenda 21 sets up the global infrastructure to manage, count, and control assets. It is not concerned with protecting the environment or the world’s resources. Agenda 21 wants change from old sector-centered ways of doing business to new approaches. The “desired future state” should be to pursue “economic prosperity, environmental quality, and social equity.”
“Social equity” is the new euphemism for “social justice” the Marxists in our government have been using a lot lately. Who gave them the authority and the mandate to initiate such change? I do not remember the American people being asked through a referendum whether we wanted our way of life to be fundamentally changed according to mandates set up by the United Nations. How will population growth control be achieved in order to protect the precious environment?
There are four tiers to UN’s “sustainable development” plan:
Environmental sustainability
Economic sustainability
Socio-political sustainability
Cultural diversity.
In 2001 UNESCO, in The Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity, stated that cultural diversity is as important as biodiversity in the sense of a more satisfactory, intellectual, emotional, moral, and spiritual existence. Who is to decide the level and quality of the population’s satisfaction, intellectual, emotional, moral, and spiritual existence? Human needs must be met while preserving the environment for the future. Again, who will decide what our needs are in order to preserve the future?
In February 2011 in Nairobi, Kenya, ICLEI attended a United Nations conference as representative of the interests of local governments. “In collaboration with partners such as UN-Habitat, Cities Alliance and ICLEI, UNEP (United Nations Environmental Protection) is working to make cities more livable, better prepared for the multiple environmental challenges they are facing, as well as giving them a stronger voice in the international climate negotiations.” Last time I checked, global warming has been debunked as a hoax and UN rapidly changed its name to climate change, continuing the attempt to fleece developed countries. In addition, who decides these international climate negotiations and why? What are we negotiating? Carbon credits?
In October 2009 in Bangkok, ICLEI stated, “local governments are offering national governments our partnership in the fight against climate change.” ICLEI wants local governments to collaborate with national governments to fight against climate change, the very change that has been scientifically debunked.
Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution states clearly, “No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation, ...No State shall,... enter into an Agreement or Compact with another State or with a foreign power…” The counties and cities that are members of ICLEI in the U.S. through its national organization are attempting to implement foreign policy, which our Constitution forbids. What mayors and municipal governments are doing is plain unconstitutional.
“Mayors and local governments set forth the following commitments to implement sub-national, national, and international frameworks by providing resources, authority, and mandate to carry forward climate protection roles and responsibilities.”
There is no law or act of Congress to authorize the aiding and abetting of foreign policy globalism by state and local governments. We have to protect our sovereignty by banning cities and counties to be members of ICLEI, an organization that promotes United Nation’s Agenda 21/“smart growth” which is detrimental to American economic interests, liberty, and sovereignty.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By John Lillpop
Anthony Weiner IS a sick, sick man.
To prove it, while giving his resignation speech, which brought to an end a scandalous career involving debauchery, exhibitionism, distribution of pornographic materials over the Internet, possible violations of law with respect to underage girls, and lord knows how many other federal, state, and local laws he may have violated, the deranged little man said:
“And I want to thank my mother and father for instilling in me the values that brought me this far .” (Paraphrase)
Thank them?
Good heavens, this wacko has just been forced to give up a position in the U.S. House, is headed for rehabilitation and may face felony charges and prison time!
A more appropriate response would have been for Weiner to Tweet Erick Holder and demand that his parents be arrested for child abuse! Attach those crotch shots as hard evidence, Mr. Weiner!
By John W. Lillpop
Why is it that so many Hispanics refuse to assimilate into American culture, even refusing to speak English?
Hispanics often deny that that is the case, but as stated at the link, in part, one Texas Congressman grew very angry at one Hispanic's Spanish testimony:
State Sen. Chris Harris (R-Arlington) spoke for many Americans when he interrupted the Spanish-language testimony of a citizen of 23 years against the Sanctuary Cities ban (SB9), to say it was "insulting" for the man not to speak English. This goes right to the heart of everything that is wrong with those who advocate for illegals and La Raza. The seperatism. The sense of entitlement. The contempt for our common language that prior immigrants always hurried to adopt. God bless you Sen. Harris for speaking for all of us!"
Indeed he does. Thank you Senator Harris.
America needs to make English the official language of the nation. Period!
Dear Fellow Patriots:
For informational purposes, I wanted to take the liberty of sharing the email that I forwarded to our New Mexico U.S. Congressman Martin Heinrich on June 12, 2011, his response of June 15, 2011, and my response to him on June 16, 2011:
I. Email Forwarded to Congressman Heinrich on June 12, 2011- Ref: “The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!
“June 12, 2011
The Honorable Martin T. Heinrich
U.S. House of Representatives
336 Cannon House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515-3101
Dear Congressman Heinrich:
The story of whom and what Barack Hussein Obama II really is - is a forty-year story that requires a book, not a column, to tell. Strong evidence suggests that he was being groomed from a very young age for the moment in history that would end American supremacy in the world, and usher in a new era of Global Marxist Governance.
But there was a major hurdle that had to be overcome - the U.S. Constitution, in this case, Article II - Section I - Clause V specifically, which requires that "no person except a natural-born citizen of the United States" can hold the office of President. - Obama is not a natural-born citizen of the United States...and may not even be a legal citizen of the United States. So, how can he be President?
http://thepatriotsnews.com/indx.php/content/163
This column focuses upon the period 2003-2008 and the political maneuvers that took place in order to make way for America's first unconstitutional resident of the White House.
Sincerely,
Jake Martinez
Albuquerque, NM 87123-3798”
II. Email Received From Congressman Martin Heinrich on June 15, 2011, in response to my letter of June 12, 2011. Ref: “The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!”
“Responding to your message
Wednesday, June 15, 2011 3:40 PM
From: "Congressman Martin Heinrich" nm01mhima@mail.house.gov
June 15, 2011
Dear Mr. Martinez,
This short note is to let you know that I received your email about the citizenship status of United States President Barack Obama, and the legitimacy of his presidency.
President Barack Obama was born in Honolulu, Hawaii, on August 4, 1961. For your reference, a pdf copy of his long-form birth certificate can be found here: http://whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf.
Again, thank you for contacting me. For more information and additional details about legislation, please visit my website, http://heinrich.house.gov. While you are there, you can also sign up to receive periodic updates on my work in Congress.
As always, I value your input and hope you will continue to keep me informed of the issues important to you.
Sincerely,
Martin Heinrich
Member of Congress
Web Site: http://Heinrich.house.gov
Subscribe to my e-newsletter.
Look for me on Facebook and YouTube”
III. Email Forwarded to Congressman Martin Heinrich on June 16, 2011, in response to his letter of June 15, 2011. Ref: “The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!”
"June 16, 2011
Congressman Martin Heinrich
Capitol Office
336 Cannon HOB
Washington, D.C. 20515
Phone: (202) 225-6316
Fax: (202) 225-4975
Dear Congressman Heinrich:
Thank you for your speedy response to my recent correspondence regarding the “The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!” and for providing me with the White House’s pdf copy of President Obama’s long-form birth certificate, which is include below:
http://whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf.
By now you are probably aware that President Obama’s recently released “Certificate of Live Birth”, which you provided to me above has been found to be fraudulent by an international expert on scanners and document-imaging software and he has recently filed a 22-page criminal complaint with the FBI to that effect.
For your information, I have included some information regarding subject criminal complaint below:
On or about May 31, 2011, Mr. Doug Vogt, an international expert on scanners and document-imaging software filed a 22-page criminal complaint with the FBI charging that the long-form birth certificate released by the White House, on or about April 27, 2011, is criminally fraudulent.
Background on Mr. Doug Vogt:
Since 1993, Vogt has owned Archive Index Systems Inc., in Bellevue, Wash., a company that sells a wide variety of document scanners worldwide and develops document-imaging software.
Before that, Vogt owned Nova Typesetting for 11 years.
Mr. Vogt stated the following in the Criminal Complaint:
“What the Obama administration released is a PDF image that they are trying to pass off as a Certificate of Live Birth Long Form printed on green security paper by the Hawaiian Health Department,” Doug Vogt writes, “but this form is a created forgery.”
Mr. Vogt’s criminal complaint asserted:
“I have irrefutably proven that the Certificate of Live Birth that President Obama presented to the world on April 27, 2011, is a fraudulently created document put together using the Adobe Photoshop or Illustrator programs, and the creation of this forgery of a public document constitutes a class B felony in Hawaii and multiple violations under U.S. Code section Title 18, Part 1, Chapter 47, Sec.1028, and therefore an impeachable offense.”
“It is a logical conclusion,” he says, “that since President Barack Obama felt it necessary to have a Certificate of Live Birth forged for himself then we must conclude that there is in fact no birth certificate in Hawaii and therefore he was not born inside the United States, as the Constitution requires, and he knew it and others also knew it but wanted him in office for whatever reason.”
When the Obama birth certificate “forgery” comes to the public’s attention, Vogt continues, “It will surpass all previous scandals including the Watergate scandal of the Nixon administration.”
Sources:
Criminal complaint charges Obama birth record ‘forged’! (Part 1)-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On May 31, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=305705
Criminal complaint details birth-certificate ‘forgery’! (Part 2)-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On June 5, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=306953
Why did Obama release electronic birth certificate? (Part 3)-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On June 7, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=308277
On or about June 2010, Mr. Tim Adams, a college instructor, who worked as a senior elections clerk for the city and county of Honolulu from May 2008 through September 2008, made a stunning claim that President Obama was definitely not born in Hawaii as the White House maintains, and that a long-form, hospital-generated birth certificatefor him did not even exist in the Aloha State.
Source:
Hawaii Elections Clerk: Obama birth not here – Official who oversaw ballots in 2008 race says long-form birth certificate non-existent!-Posted on WND.com-By Joe Kovacs-On June 10, 2010:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=165041
On or about January 20, 2011, Mr. Adams, a former Hawaii elections clerk signed an affidavit swearing he was told by his supervisors in Hawaii that no long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate existed for Barack Obama Jr. in Hawaii and that neither Queens Medical Center nor Kapi’olani Medical Center in Honolulu had any record of Obama having been born in their medical facilities.
Source:
Hawaii official now swears: No Obama birth certificate!-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On January 24, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=254401#ixzz1PT0rwcGl
On or about June 13, 2011, Retired Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely, stated that the “Certificate of Live Birth” released, on or about April 27, 2011, by the White House as “proof positive” of President Obama’s Hawaiian birth is a forgery, but the FBI is covering the fraud and no one in Congress is willing to tackle the situation because of fears of a “black backlash”if the failings of the nation’s first black president are revealed. He revealed this during an interview that was aired on the Terry Lakin Action Fund Radio Show on June 13, 2011.
Source:
Ex-CIA: ‘Forged document’ released as birth certificate!-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On June 15, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=311433
On June 12, 2011: The following eye-opening article and/or blog post revealed overwhelming evidence that we in fact have a fraud and a usurper that resides in the people’s White House, despite the overt lack of journalistic investigating on the part of the American press. The new evidence indicates that the conspiracy to carry out that fraud was much broader than originally thought, which includes a forty-year story that requires a book, not a column, to tell because the evidence suggests that our President was being groomed from a very young age for the moment in history that would end American supremacy in the world, and usher in a new era of Global Marxist Governance.
The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!-Posted on The Post & Email-By JB Williams-On June 12, 2011:
http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/06/07/evidence-broadens-obama-natural-born-conspiracy/
I will be looking forward to hearing from you on this disturbing and time sensitive issue.
Thank you again for all you continue to do for our Veterans, our state and our country.
God Bless You and God Bless America.
Respectfully,
Jake L. Martinez
Captain-USMC-Retired"
Automatic Electronic Response Received From Congressman Heinrich's Office Regarding My Email Above:
"Thank You
Thank you for starting the conversation. I am honored to represent you in Congress and am here to help in any way possible.
I will send a reply via email and want to make sure you receive it. Therefore, please add the following email address to your address book or your spam filter’s list of approved email addresses: NM01MHIMA@mail.house.gov.
I hope that you have also visited the Briefing Room, and Agenda sections of my website where you will find an abundance of information to answer any question you may have regarding my work in the United States House of Representatives.
In light of the critical legislative debates we'll be facing this year over health care, climate change, clean energy, and the economy, please consider signing up for my e-newsletter, The Heinrich Headliner, delivered right to your inbox.
Thank you for visiting my Congressional Web site.
Regards,
MARTIN HEINRICH”
P.S.: I will be providing you with periodic updates as I receive other responses to my emails that I forwarded to the President and other NM State Officials regarding this issue, as a means of providing all of you with an example of what peaceful and legal action you could take regarding this disturbing and time sensitive issue-You Decide.
Have A Great Day & God Bless.
God Bless the U.S.A.!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related
Semper Fi!
Jake
By John W. Lillpop
Huma Abedin, the beautiful, sophisticated woman who is married to ex-Congressman Anthony Weiner, simply does not deserve the heartbreak and humiliation heaped upon her by as a result of the errant behavior of her perverted spouse.
Thank goodness Huma did not “stand by her man” as Weiner announced his resignation. This was to be Weiner’s day of judgment, at least two weeks late, and he deserved to stand alone in his moment of ultimate shame and defeat.
The U.S. House is better without Weiner and he deserves no pity or sympathy from anyone.
Huma Abedin, however, deserves all the support and help she can get, including prayer and sympathy.
May her God bless and keep her get through this tragic betrayal. And may the same blessings apply to the unborn baby that Huma carries in her womb.
Undeserved Heartbreak, Humiliation for Huma Abedin
Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On June 15, 2011:
“Retired Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely, the chief of Stand Up America, a national security expert and Fox News contributor, says the “Certificate of Live Birth” released in April by the White House as “proof positive” of President Obama’s Hawaiian birth is a forgery, but the FBI is covering the fraud and no one in Congress is willing to tackle the situation because of fears of a “black backlash” if the failings of the nation’s first black president are revealed.
In an interview today with Greg Corombos for WND, Vallely, who previously has expressed concerns about whether the Obama administration is in violation of the U.S. Constitution, said, “His actual birth certificate has never been found in Hawaii nor released from Hawaii hospital there, Kapiolani hospital there, if it in fact did exist.”
“We’ve had three CIA agents, retired, and some of their analytical associates look at it, and all came to the same conclusion, that even the long-form was a forged document,” Vallely said.
Get the New York Times best-seller “Where’s the Birth Certificate? The Case that Barack Obama Is Not Eligible to be President,” autographed by Jerome Corsi, Ph.D.
“No members of Congress will take this on. The word I get out of Washington is that they don’t want to challenge this because it would be in fact a felony offense and in some cases may be even treasonous and [they are] afraid of a black backlash from some of the urban areas,” Vallely said.
“But that’s a very poor excuse for not taking necessary steps to make sure this president in fact is a legitimate president under Article 2 and he is a born U.S. citizen.”
The departments of government designed to uncover wrongdoing, in this case, are on the wrong side, he said.
“I think they’re (the FBI) covering for this administration. I think the corruption within this administration is so proliferated through the agencies of government now, we’re just in a bad situation here. I think the lack of confidence in our government is growing and many feel that not only all the members of Congress but even our courts are corrupted at this time,” he said.
The questions over Obama’s eligibility to occupy the Oval Office under the requirements in the Constitution that call for a “natural born citizen” have been raised since before he was elected.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCQDhOR2Y7o&feature=player_embedded
Numerous lawsuits have been filed and challenges organized but none have uncovered Obama’s documentation. For most of the past few years, his supporters relied on an online image of a Hawaiian short-form “Certification of Live Birth” as proof of his Hawaiian birth, claiming it was the only documentation available from the state.
However, just as the New York Times best-seller, “Where’s the Birth Certificate: The Case that Barack Obama is not Eligible to be President,” by Jerome Corsi, Ph.D., was about to be released, Obama dispatched a private attorney to Hawaii to fetch the supposed long-form “Certificate of Live Birth” and explained that the record now would include the full documentation available from Hawaii.
The original hard-copy birth document, whatever it actually is, has never been seen by the public.
http://whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf
Corsi told WND, “The list is growing of those openly acknowledging the Obama long-form birth certificate released by the White House on April 27 is a forgery.
“That former CIA agents are beginning to weigh in on the White House forgery is important. Too many experts remain afraid to speak out about what is an obvious forgery, fearful that openly speaking out against Obama will hurt their income. That Gen. Vallely has now spoken out shows the cracks are widening around the White House façade that the Obama birth certificate is a legitimate document.”
He said, “Vallely is right in saying that millions of Americans are still trying to find out who Barack Obama is.
“The cover-up in Hawaii is still continuing. Every professional forensic document examiner knows the best evidence of the Obama long-form birth certificate is not the electronic Adobe file released on the White House website, but the original document the Hawaii DOH is still hiding in its vault, unwilling to let the public see it with their own eyes. Why won’t the White House allow a team of independent professional forensic document examiners inspect and authenticate the original birth certificate document? It makes no sense — unless of course there is no long-form birth certificate in the Hawaii DOH vault.”
When Obama released the purported long-form certificate, officials in the Hawaii Department of Health and governor’s office refused to simply confirm to WND that the image being presented by Obama was an accurate representation of the records maintained by the state.
Vallely said the document should “thoroughly be analyzed by resident FBI officials and analysts to determine if in fact and validate whether it’s forged or real.”
“One of the apparent flaws in that document was they listed Kenya as the place of birth of Obama’s father, but Kenya was not an established country at that time,” he noted.
“There’s still a lot of controversy about it, and some of us would just like to have this thing clearly authenticated.”
He also cited one of the many issues raised by document experts who have challenged the “birth certificate’s” authenticity – the layering in the Adobe computer file.
And Vallely said he knows some would not be satisfied with anything the Obama administration would release, which is a problem, in itself, for the White House.
“That’s true, because they don’t believe he is eligible. You have a fairly growing contingent out there.”
Vallely also made similar statements in an online radio program in which he supported Lakin, the Army doctor who refused orders because neither the military nor the White House would document Obama’s eligibility. He spent five months in Fort Leavenworth and only recently was released. His comments start at about 3:30 of the YouTube video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTMv2XAUHP4&feature=player_embedded
There, Vallely said, “Obama’s birth certificate – I’ve had retired CIA agents and other investigators go over the birth certificate that was produced and by far, 10 out of 10 have said it’s a forgery. So we still have that corruptness going on in the White House. There’s a great number of organizations and people still trying to find out who Barack Obama is, where he was born, what his legitimacy is as president of the United States. We know for sure that the Constitution has been violated in Article 2, particularly when you look at the natural-born status.”
Only one day earlier, officials in the state of Hawaii claimed that the original of the Obama ‘birth certificate’ document – the document posted online by the White House – remains “confidential” and cannot be produced in response to a subpoena in a lawsuit over Obama’s legitimacy.
The image released by Obama has been challenged by a number of document imaging analysts as a fraud, and it doesn’t align with descriptions of it by Obama supporters.
For instance, two weeks before Obama finally released his “long-form birth certificate,” Hawaii’s former Health Department chief Chiyome Fukino – the one official who claimed to have examined the original birth document under lock and key in Hawaii – was interviewed by NBC News’ national investigative correspondent Michael Isikoff, who reported that Fukino told him she had seen the original birth certificate and that it was “half typed and half handwritten.”
However, the document released by the White House was entirely typed. Only the signatures and two dates at the very bottom were “handwritten.” What Fukino described apparently is a different document from what Obama released to the public.”
Source:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=311433
Note: The following articles and/or blog posts relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
I. Obama was never eligible to run for the office: ‘He will Resign and for Good Reason’!-Posted on Canada Free Press-By Alan Caruba-On June 19, 2011:
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/37677II. Hawaii claims Obama 'birth certificate' is 'confidential'!-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On June 14, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=311113
III. Why did Obama release electronic birth certificate? (Part 3)-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On June 7, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=308277
IV. Google clamps down on Obama's Social Security story!-Posted on WND.com-On May 15, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=153901
V. ‘White House officials involved in rewriting nation’s founding document’!-Posted on WND.com-By Aaron Klein-On March 27, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=280277
VI. The Judas Media-Posted on Floyd Reports-Guest Writer-On April 27, 2011:
http://floydreports.com/the-judas-media/?utm_source=Expose+Obama&am...
Note: The following eye-opening article and/or blog post reveals overwhelming evidence that we in fact have a fraud and a usurper that resides in the people’s White House, despite the overt lack of journalistic investigating on the part of the American press. The new evidence indicates that the conspiracy to carry out that fraud was much broader than originally thought, which includes a forty-year story that requires a book, not a column, to tell because the evidence suggests that our President was being groomed from a very young age for the moment in history that would end American supremacy in the world, and usher in a new era of Global Marxist Governance-You Decide:
The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!-Posted on The Post & Email-By JB Williams-On June 12, 2011:
http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/06/07/evidence-broadens-obama-natu...
Note: My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
Could the President’s newly released COLB be a forgery?
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/04/29/could-the-president’s-newl...
Why Obama is ineligible – regardless of his birthplace!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/07/why-obama-is-ineligible-–-...
Hawaii Elections Clerk: Obama birth not here!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/06/13/hawaii-elections-clerk-oba...
Clearing the Smoke on Obama’s Eligibility!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/19/clearing-the-smoke-on-obama’s-eligibility/
Another General Supports LtCol. Lakin!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/09/06/another-general-supports-ltcol-lakin/
JAGs Protecting President Obama Have Committed Treason!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/09/25/jags-protecting-president-obama-have-committed-treason/
The Military Pays the Price for Obama’s Agenda!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/08/11/the-military-pays-the-price-for-obama’s-agenda/
Congress report concedes Obama eligibility unvetted!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/congress-report-concedes-o...
DC knows that Obama is ineligible for office!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/27/dc-knows-that-obama-is-ine...
Obama's paltry paper trail raises serious questions!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/11/21/obamas-paltry-paper-trail-...
Was there a conspiracy to put Obama in the White House?
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/03/03/was-there-a-conspiracy-to-...
Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts, please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered controversial is being censored-what happened to free speech?-You Decide.
“Food For Thought”
“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”
Semper Fi!
Jake
Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On June 7, 2011:
“This is the third and last of three articles explaining the criminal complaint that scanner expert Doug Vogt filed last week with the FBI.
NEW YORK – The White House’s release of an electronic copy of Obama’s long-form birth certificate instead of a certified paper copy raises questions in a 22-page criminal complaint with the FBI filed by an international expert in scanners and document-imaging software.
Doug Vogt’s complaint charges that individuals within the Hawaii Department of Health, Obama political operatives and an unidentified graphic artist worked in a multi-state conspiracy to create a fraudulent long-form birth certificate for Barack Obama.
Vogt’s complaint asserts: “I have irrefutably proven that the Certificate of Live Birth that President Obama presented to the world on April 27, 2011 is a fraudulently created document put together using the Adobe Photoshop or Illustrator programs.”
He claims the long-form birth certificate the White House released April 27 as an electronic document in PDF format was forged from a composite of legitimate birth certificates obtained from the Hawaii DOH archives and manipulated to replace the original information with a fraudulent Obama birth record.
The birth certificate the White House released consists of an electronic file that when opened as a PDF file in Adobe Illustrator reveals nine different layers that corresponded to different sections of the form, including the signatures.
“I also opened up the White House PDF file in WordPad so I could see the codes and headers in the file. There I discovered the evidence for the nine layers embedded in the code,” Vogt writes. “The big surprise I discovered was that the file was finished or created on April 27, 2011, and the copy I had downloaded from the White House web site was modified on April 28, 2011, at 9:58 a.m., the day after the news conference.”
Vogt sees a discrepancy between the electronic PDF file released on the White House website and the White House-released correspondence with the Hawaii Department of Health, including a letter from DOH Director Loretta J. Fuddy, that clearly states she released in Hawaii to White House outside counsel Perkins Coie two certified copies of Obama’s original Certificate of Live Birth.
“The whole White House story that the President had his Seattle-based lawyer fly to Hawaii and pick up a signed and stamped paper Certificate of Live Birth and fly directly to Washington, D.C., is obviously not the document the public has been shown,” Vogt concludes.
“In other words the whole story is not true,” he said. “The Press Secretary proudly stated that he personally put up the PDF on the White House web site and that’s probably all they got, was the PDF by e-mail.”
Vogt also questions why the Obama birth certificate was shown by the White House as a positive document, black printing on a white background (covered by green hash-marked official Hawaii DOH document paper), while the Nordyke twins’ birth certificates from the same era were obviously archived as microfilm, with photostatic copies clearly showing the white printing on black background characteristic of positive copies made from records preserved on microfilm.
To make the point, Vogt displayed a TIFF image of the Obama birth certificate issued by the White House and the photo static copy issued to the Nordyke twins by the Hawaii DOH in 1966:
{…}
The White House has not explained how the copy of the Obama birth certificate released to the press in the White House press room was produced without the green hash-mark background that supposedly represented the document as officially issued by the Hawaii DOH.
The figure below shows the photocopy the White House released to the press at the same time the electronic birth certificate was posted on the White House website:
{…}
The Hawaii DOH has refused to show the original document in its vault to the public, to compare with the White House-released versions. The agency also has not explained the apparent discrepancy of retaining Obama’s 1961 long-form birth certificate as a paper document, while the Nordyke twins’ birth certificates issued within days of Obama’s are maintained as microfilm records, not paper documents.
Multiple Layers:
Vogt notes that the multiple layers in the PDF file released by the White House have been widely demonstrated by various experts in numerous videos posted on Internet sites.
He provides a rebuttal to Jean-Claude Tremblay, a Canadian graphic artist who argued on the Fox News Channel on April 29 that the layers were a natural result of the Hawaii DOH scanning the original document while leaving OCR (Optical Character Recognition) software operative within the scanner.
Tremblay told Fox News that scanner OCR software tries to translate characters or words in a photograph into text, producing multiple layers in the resulting PDF file.
Tremblay further maintained that in the scanning process, layers were created when the OCR software was unable to separate text fully from background, resulting in the creation of a separate layer within the document.
Vogt charges that Tremblay “knows nothing about OCR engines and how they work and their file structure.”
Vogt notes the Obama PDF birth certificate file was supposed to have come directly from the Hawaii DOH office.
He maintains that the Hawaii DOH would have absolutely no reason to use OCR features when making the scan, and if the Hawaii DOH were asked to give the White House a PDF image, “it would be from their existing TIFF image stored in their document imaging program on the server.”
“My qualifications on OCR programs are considerable,” Vogt asserts.
He provides the following technical explanation:
“Our own document imaging program, TheRepository, has an OCR option from Expervision that is called TypeReader. We integrated TypeReader into our program but to do this we had to sign a non-disclosure statement with them and then we got their Took Kit and API. When an OCR program saves a file as a searchable PDF, the file contains three main files within it. The first file is an image file, usually a compressed Group4 TIFF. The second file is a ASCII text file and the last file is a matrix file that contains the X and Y coordinates of all the words in the document. The Starting point for the image file and the matrix file is usually the upper left hand corner of the image measured in pixels. The text file and matrix files would never be seen as separate layers and there is certainly no nine layers. The three files would be in a PDF ‘wrapper’ and that’s all. All OCR programs work on the same principle.”
Put simply, Vogt explains, OCR technology is typically used to read into a word processing program text from a typed or printed document that is translated into electronic format by a scanner.
If the Hawaii DOH produced the PDF file for the White House, a flat TIFF image would have been sufficient, as the Hawaii DOH had no reason to think the White House or U.S. citizens would manipulate the document in a word processer, either before or after the document had been released.
Instead, Vogt asserts, the White House released, perhaps by mistake, a nine-layer Adobe Illustrator file that had been used to forge the document.
As of this writing, the Obama birth certificate placed on the White House website can still be viewed and downloaded.”
Source:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=308277
Note: The following articles and/or blog posts relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
I. Ex-CIA: 'Forged document' released as birth certificate!-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On June 15, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=311433
II. Criminal complaint charges Obama birth record 'forged'! (Part 1)-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On May 31, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=305705
III. Criminal complaint details birth-certificate 'forgery'! (Part 2)-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On June 5, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=306953
IV. Obama forgers admit they produced phony documents: ‘Radical supporters of president 'punked birthers'!-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On June 13, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=310949#ixzz1PGLLcgnv
Note: What follows is a video that explains why the newly released "Certificate of Live Birth" is irrelevant because the President does not meet the constitutional requirements to be our President-You Decide:
The video that will END the Obama Presidency! Birthers Get Last Laugh & Demand Formal Apology!-Posted on YouTube.com-By KenyanBornObamAcorn-On May 1, 2011:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1DHZmeMXyE&feature=player_embedded
Note: The following eye-opening article and/or blog post reveals overwhelming evidence that we in fact have a fraud and a usurper that resides in the people’s White House, despite the overt lack of journalistic investigating on the part of the American press. The new evidence indicates that the conspiracy to carry out that fraud was much broader than originally thought, which includes a forty-year story that requires a book, not a column, to tell because the evidence suggests that our President was being groomed from a very young age for the moment in history that would end American supremacy in the world, and usher in a new era of Global Marxist Governance-You Decide:
The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!-Posted on The Post & Email-By JB Williams-On June 12, 2011:
http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/06/07/evidence-broadens-obama-natural-born-conspiracy/
Note: My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
Could the President’s newly released COLB be a forgery?
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/04/29/could-the-president’s-newl...
Why Obama is ineligible – regardless of his birthplace!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/07/why-obama-is-ineligible-–-...
Hawaii Elections Clerk: Obama birth not here!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/06/13/hawaii-elections-clerk-oba...
Congress report concedes Obama eligibility unvetted!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/congress-report-concedes-o...
DC knows that Obama is ineligible for office!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/27/dc-knows-that-obama-is-ine...
Obama's paltry paper trail raises serious questions!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/11/21/obamas-paltry-paper-trail-...
Was there a conspiracy to put Obama in the White House?
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/03/03/was-there-a-conspiracy-to-...
Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts, please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered controversial is being censored-what happened to free speech?-You Decide.
“Food For Thought”
“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”
Semper Fi!
Jake
How Has Big Government
Stuck It to Us Lately?
Stuck It to Us Lately?
Are the following statements True or False? Be careful, some are “tricky.” All false statements are explained below.
#1 Barack Obama on the Today Show yesterday announced his suspicion that ATMs and airport shoeshine machines are a big part of the reason that his $787 Billion stimulus failed to prevent America’s unemployment (now at 9.1%) from exceeding his promised 8.0%.
#2 The LBJ “War on Poverty” was implemented in 1968 with 13% of Americans rated as “POOR people.” Social welfare payments increased to 500% of former levels (a 400% increase) so that by 1980 13% of Americans were still classified as poor .
#3 “Capitalism is leading humanity and the planet to extinction,” according to the prime minister of France.
#4 In Sweden where a cradle-to-grave nanny state supplies free health care; free education; welfare programs and unemployment programs covering 76% of their people at some time in their lives; not to mention big retirement packages . . . the enterprise minister and the government refused to bail out the Saab automobile company.
#5 Federal government employees are restricted in many ways even when they belong to unions. However, thanks to the U.S. Postal Service unions, the post office despite heading for bankruptcy is not being allowed to stop Saturday delivery a step that would immediately alleviate the problem because of their union’s clout in Washington, D.C. As a temporary band-aid, the post office is issuing a new series of 40 American Union Leaders stamps to raise needed money from philatelists (stamp collectors).
#6 541 clean air, water, and waste programs are found in 28 separate government agencies not including the monstrously redundant EPA.
#7 President Obama’s trademark legislation Obamacare actually created a few more federal agencies in just one law then Franklin Delano Roosevelt created in over a dozen years in office.
#8 In Texas, they have a part-time citizen legislature that works for about six months then goes back to real jobs for about 18 months. Our full-time federal law makers (Congress) have put some 62,000 new regulations on the books since GHW Bush left office in January, 1993. Any doubt why business is having such a nasty time creating new jobs?
#9 In 1956 President Eisenhower and Congress passed a 293- page bill authorizing a federal highway act which created our present interstate highway system. When the act was updated in 1991 it was only 28 pages long but the end result cost one third as much for 3% of the highway mileage.
#10 Ronald Reagan’s 1982 Grace Commission came up with 2,478 separate ways to “get the government off the backs of the American people designed to eliminate the deficits and national debt by 1990 in the face of $10.2 TRillion of inefficiency, stagnation, and smothering of the free market IF they were not acted upon. Virtually none of these was acted upon by the four progressive Democratic congresses and despite creating 21 million jobs, Reagan ran up huge deficits while in office.
#11 President Obama’s ‘Trickle-up Economic” ideas have been derided as “Trickle-up Poverty,” but compared to the utterly socialistic French, we are still led by a capitalism-inspired administration.
#12 It takes the average Estonian less than 12 minutes to fill out their income tax forms thanks to a national FLAT tax of 18%. Since the country escaped the clutches of the old USSR, they’ve been known as the “Baltic Tiger” for their incredible national productivity and “a sort of Silicon Valley on the Baltic Sea.” These things will happen when Soviet tanks stop patrolling your streets and communism is left in the dust. Mr. Obama is taken our country in the opposite direction and now wants to create a national police force answerable to him alone.
#13 One of the most succinct criticisms of Barack Obama is that “. . . he doesn’t understand that wealth must first be allowed to be created, before it can be shared.”
Answers: Only the even numbers are true. Here are the explanations for the odd numbered false statements:
#1 Actually shoe shine machines were not the guilty party according to Obama, but rather airport ticket kiosks. However, the real fallacy is Obama’s premise about “automation” in general: When bank ATMs rose by 150% over one ten year period, the number of bank tellers increased by 160%. Similarly, virtually all insurance companies and financial companies in the mid- and late-70’s added EDP (electronic data processing) a.k.a. computer departments on the promise of eliminating huge amounts of clerical staffing. When Rajjpuut worked for Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas the company’s employment jumped from roughly 340 to 790 in four and a half years with 85% of the newly hired fitting into either the EDP or the clerical job description.
#2 TRUE
#3 Actually, this was many years ago. At the time the statement was made -- a combined statement from presiding leaders of six countries that could then be considered the armpits of the world: Cuba, Bolivia, Venezuela, Honduras, the Dominican Republic, and Nicaragua -- all of which of kept or flirted with communism or abject near-communist socialism. Six countries that needed capitalism to boost their anemic economies were blaming capitalism for all the ills of the world.
#4 TRUE
#5 Only false because of the Union Leader Stamps unless they decided to create them today.
#6 TRUE
#7 Sorry, not just a “few” more but roughly 9.6 times as many new government agencies were created by Obamacare (one law) as FDR created in all his years in office . . . 384 new federal agencies from Obamacare. That’s why it took 2,770 pages . . . it’s not about providing health care, it’s about controlling every aspect of health care, hospitals and doctors and nurses.
#8 TRUE
#9 The original 1956 bill was the shorter one, 28 pages long. The 1991 bill was 293 pages long. And the final cost was close to the same (in constant dollars taking account of inflation) for only 3% of the mileage. In fairness: putting four-lane highways through places like Glenwood Canyon in Colorado does take a lot more effort than flat roads over the Great Plains. However, the strictly environmental considerations; as well as those related to mass transit; auto-pollution; seat belt use; motorcycle helmet use; preservation of historic sites; erosion control; billboard regs; women’s issues; Native American issues; disadvantaged individuals’ issues; use of recycled rubber in road bed asphalt; requirements for specific iron and steel; etc. etc. probably accounted for 66% of the total cost.
#10 TRUE
#11 President Obama in February 2009 weeks after taking office made his infamous “Trickle-up” speech. A month later French President Sarkozy said, “I was not elected to raise taxes (but) to reconcile France with the workplace and factory.” So even the French have turned their backs on redistribution of wealth as an answer to economic problems.
#12 TRUE
#13 Even thought the criticism would suit Barack Obama and 95% of progressive politicians to a “T,” it was actually aimed at the “archaic socialism” of France. Hope you enjoyed the quiz and understand a bit more about the connection between “small minds and big government.”
Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,
Rajjpuut
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/06/12/article-2002729-0C86D66400000578-156_634x628.jpg
What’s wrong with this picture?
Posted on The New York Times-By CHARLIE SAVAGE-On June 15, 2011:
“WASHINGTON — The White House is telling Congress that President Obama has the legal authority to continue American participation in the NATO-led air war in Libya, even though lawmakers have not authorized it.
In a broader package of materials the Obama administration is sending to Congress on Wednesday defending its Libya policy, the White House, for the first time, offers lawmakers and the public an argument for why Mr. Obama has not been violating the War Powers Resolution since May 20.
On that day, the Vietnam-era law’s 60-day deadline for terminating unauthorized hostilities appeared to pass. But the White House argued that the activities of United States military forces in Libya do not amount to full-blown “hostilities” at the level necessary to involve the section of the War Powers Resolution that imposes the deadline.
“We are acting lawfully,” said Harold Koh, the State Department legal adviser, who expanded on the administration’s reasoning in a joint interview with White House Counsel Robert Bauer.
The two senior administration lawyers contended that American forces have not been in “hostilities” at least since April 7, when NATO took over leadership in maintaining a no-flight zone in Libya, and the United States took up what is mainly a supporting role — providing surveillance and refueling for allied warplanes — although unmanned dronesoperated by the United States periodically fire missiles as well.
They argued that United States forces are at little risk in the operation because there are no American troops on the ground and Libyan forces are unable to exchange meaningful fire with American forces. They said that there was little risk of the military mission escalating, because it is constrained by the United Nations Security Counsel resolution that authorized use of air power to defend civilians.
“We are not saying the president can take the country into war on his own,” Mr. Koh said. “We are not saying the War Powers Resolution is unconstitutional or should be scrapped, or that we can refuse to consult Congress. We are saying the limited nature of this particular mission is not the kind of ‘hostilities’ envisioned by the War Powers Resolution.”
The administration unveiled its argument at a time when members of Congress have shown increasing skepticism about the Libya operation. On June 3, the House of Representatives passed a resolution declaring that the mission had not been authorized.
On Wednesday, the Speaker of the House, John Boehner, Republican of Ohio, sent Mr. Obama a letter pointing out that even under a flexible interpretation of War Powers Resolution that would allow hostilities to last 90 days without Congressional authorization, Mr. Obama was out of time. Mr. Boehner demanded a legal explanation by Friday.
“Given the mission you have ordered to the U.S. Armed Forces with respect to Libya and the text of the War Powers Resolution, the House is left to conclude that you have made one of two determinations: either you have concluded the War Powers Resolution does not apply to the mission in Libya, or you have determined the War Powers Resolution is contrary to the Constitution,” Mr. Boehner wrote. “The House, and the American people whom we represent, deserve to know the determination you have made.”
It remains to be seen whether majorities in Congress will accept the administration’s argument, defusing the confrontation, or whether the White House’s response will instead fuel greater criticism. Either way, because the War Powers Resolution does not include a definition of “hostilities” and the Supreme Court has never ruled on the issue, the legal debate is likely to be resolved politically, said Rick Pildes, a New York University law professor.
“There is no clear legal answer,” he said. “The president is taking a position, so the question is whether Congress accepts that position, or doesn’t accept that position and wants to insist that the operation can’t continue without affirmative authorization from Congress.”
Ten members of Congress — led by Rep. Dennis Kucinich, Democrat of Ohio, and Rep. Walter Jones, Republican of North Carolina — filed a lawsuit on Weednesday asking a judge to order Mr. Obama to stop the air war. The suit asserts that the operation is illegal because Congress did not authorize it. That lawsuit faces steep challenges, however, because courts in the past have dismissed similar cases on technical grounds.
The administration had earlier argued that Mr. Obama could initiate the intervention in Libya on his own authority as commander-in-chief because it was not a “war” in the constitutional sense. It also released a memorandum by the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel agreeing that he could do so unilaterally because he anticipated that its nature, scope, and duration would be limited.
Since then, the conflict in Libya has dragged on longer than expected, and the goal of the NATO allies has all but openly shifted from merely defending civilians to forcing the Libyan dictator, Col. Muammar Qaddafi, from power. But Mr. Koh and Mr. Bauer said that while regime change in Libya may be a diplomatic goal, the military mission is separate, and remains limited to protecting civilians.
The administration legal team considered other approaches, including a proposal to stop the use of armed drones after May 20 in order to bolster the case that United States forces were no longer engaged in hostilities. But the White House ultimately decided not to make any changes in the military mission.
While many presidents have challenged the constitutionality of other aspects of the War Powers Resolution — which Congress enacted over President Nixon’s veto — no administration has said that the section imposing the 60-day clock was unconstitutional. In 1980,the Office of Legal Counsel concluded that it was within Congress’s constitutional power to enact such a limit on unauthorized hostilities.
Mr. Bauer and Mr. Koh said the 1980 memorandum remains in force, but that their legal argument does not invoke any constitutional challenge to the act.
It was not clear whether the Office of Legal Counsel has endorsed the White House’s interpretation of what “hostilities” means. Mr. Bauer declined to say whether the office had signed off on the theory, saying he would not discuss inter-agency deliberations.
Mr. Koh argued that the administration’s interpretation of the word was not unprecedented, noting that there have been previous disputes about whether the 60-day-clock portion of the War Powers Resolution applied to deployments where — unlike the Libya operation — there were troops on the ground and Americans suffered casualties.
Still, such previous cases typically involved peacekeeping missions in which the United States had been invited to take part, and there were only infrequent outbreaks of violence, like those in Lebanon, Somalia and Bosnia. Libya, by contrast, is an offensive mission involving sustained bombardment of a government’s forces.
The closest precedent was the NATO-led air war over Kosovo in 1999. In that case, the Clinton administration’s legal team characterized the campaign, which involved many piloted American warplanes, as “hostilities” even though there was little exchange of fire from Serb forces after their air defenses were destroyed and there were no United States casualties.
In Kosovo, however, Congress appropriated specific funds for the mission before 60 days had passed. The Clinton administration decided that by providing the money, Congress had satisfied the requirements of the War Powers Resolution.”
Source:
Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and video relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
I. Obama Kills the War Powers Act!-Posted on National Review Online-By RICH LOWRY-On June 7, 2011:
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/268973/obama-kills-war-powers-laugh-rich-lowry
II. Obama’s Contempt for War Powers Act Earns Him Bipartisan Rebuke from U.S. House!-Posted Canada Free Press-By John Lillpop-On June 4, 2011:
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/37227
III. Obama is Impeachable over Libya!-Posted on AIM-BY CLIFF KINCAID-On June 2, 2011:
http://www.aim.org/aim-column/forget-weinergate-obama-is-impeachable-over-libya/
IV. Congress Has War Powers, Too!-Posted on National Review Online-By ANDREW C. McCARTHY-On June 1, 2011:
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/268503/congress-has-war-powers-too-andrew-c-mccarthy
V. Video: Biden States That Obama Could be Impeached over Libya!-Posted on YouTube.com-Byradiofriendly-On Mar 22, 2011:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Adpa5kYUhCA
VI. ‘White House officials involved in rewriting nation’s founding document’!-Posted on WND.com-By Aaron Klein-On March 27, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=280277
VII. The Judas Media-Posted on Floyd Reports-Guest Writer-On April 27, 2011:
Note: My following blog post contains numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
Godfather of The Islamic Revolution!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/11/godfather-of-the-islamic-revolution/
Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts, please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered controversial is being censored-what happened to free speech?-You Decide.
“Food For Thought”
God Bless the U.S.A.!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related
Semper Fi!
Jake
While America Faces Economic Armageddon, Harry Reid Wants To Spend More on ILLEGALS!
By John W. Lillpop
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nevada) is reputed to have been quite the pugilist is his youth. Perhaps that explains his inexplicable obsession with rewarding people who have invaded our nation with special treatment and perks?
Harry Reid, friend of millions of illegal aliens with no moral or legal basis for being here. Harry Reid, enemy of U.S. sovereignty, the rule of law, secure borders and American citizens.
Was it a right-hook to the forehead that did you in Senator? A devastating knock-out punch that caused you to become a liberal Democrat and blithering malcontent who champions illegals over American citizens?
As reported at reference 1, Senator Reid is again stoking the fire of controversy by pandering to illegal aliens, especially Hispanics, for future votes.
At a time when America is on the brink on financial crisis, what with unsustainable deficit spending, high unemployment, record levels of bankruptcy and foreclosures, and a housing market more collapsed than during the Great Depression, why in the hell in this Democrat leader working on behalf of people who do even not belong here, and who already cost American taxpayers more than $110 billion a year?
Let’s be clear: Illegal aliens are ILLEGAL. They should not be here! America owes these people nothing except a one-way ticket back to Mexico or other third-world nation of origin!
Reid’s latest punch to the groin of American citizens is in marked contrast to what Reid was saying back in 1993 when
his office released the following statements (in bold) concerning illegal immigration:
“In response to increased terrorism and abuse of social programs by aliens, (I) today introduced the first and only comprehensive immigration reform bill in Congress. Currently, an alien living illegally in the United States often pays no taxes but receives unemployment, welfare, free medical care, and other federal benefits. Recent terrorist acts, including the World Trade Center bombing, have underscored the need to keep violent criminals out of the country.”
Reid’s bill, titled the “Immigration Stabilization Act,” overhauls the nation's immigration laws, and calls for a massive scale-down of immigrants allowed into the country. The bill also changes asylum laws to prevent phony asylum seekers.
Reid said the U.S. open door policy is being abused at the expense of honest, working citizens.
The senator continued:
"We are a country founded upon fairness and justice. An individual in real threat of torture or long-term incarceration because of his or her political beliefs can still seek asylum. But this bill closes the door to those who want to abuse America's inherent generosity and legal system.”
"Our borders have overflowed with illegal immigrants placing tremendous burdens on our criminal justice system, schools and social programs. The Immigration and Naturalization Service needs the ability to step up enforcement. Our federal wallet is stretched to the limit by illegal aliens getting welfare, food stamps, medical care, and other benefits often without paying any taxes.”
“Safeguards like welfare and free medical care are in place to boost Americans in need of short-term assistance. These programs were not meant to entice freeloaders and scam artists from around the world. Even worse, Americans have seen heinous crimes committed by individuals who are here illegally.”
Specific provisions proposed by the senator in the Immigration Stabilization Act include:
* Reduces annual legal immigration levels. Relatives other than spouse or minor children admitted only if already on immigration waiting lists and their admission does not raise annual immigration levels above approved level.
* Reforms asylum rules to prevent aliens from entering the United States illegally under phony "asylum" claims.
* Expands list of felonies considered "aggravated" felonies requiring exclusion and deportation of criminal aliens. Allows courts to order deportation at time of sentencing.
* Increases penalties for failing to depart or re-entering the United States after a final order of deportation order. Increases maximum penalties for visa fraud from five years to 10 years.
* Curtails alien smuggling by authorizing interdiction and repatriation of aliens seeking to enter the United States unlawfully by sea. Increases penalties for alien smuggling.
* Adds "alien smuggling" to the list of crimes subject to sanctions under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act.
* Expands the categories of property that are forfeited when used to facilitate the smuggling or harboring of illegal aliens.
* Clarifies that a person born in the United States to an alien mother who is not a lawful resident is not a U.S. citizen. This will eliminate incentive for pregnant alien women to enter the United States illegally, often at risk to mother and child, for the purpose of acquiring citizenship for the child and accompanying federal financial benefits.
* Mandates that aliens who cannot demonstrably support themselves without public or private assistance are excludable. This will prevent admission of aliens likely to be dependent on public financial support. This requirement extends to the sponsor of any family sponsored immigrant.
* Increases border security and patrol officer positions."
Senator Harry Reid (D-Nev.) introduced the Immigration Stabilization Act in the United States Senate in 1993. The statements quoted above are from a press release issued by Reid’s office on August 5, 1993.
How is it that Harry Reid was exactly right more than 18 years ago, but is so completely wrong now? Why does Reid oppose programs he once sponsored now that the problem is seven times greater after 9/11?
In the spring of 2006, while the U.S. Senate was debating legislation to make English the official U.S. language, Reid even saw fit to drag out the R word to slander those who supported the English bill.
And, of course, Reid has voted for Mexico and against America every time the U.S. Senate has considered amnesty.
Harry Reid: Against illegal immigration, before he was for it!
Why?
Reference 1
http://thehill.com/special-reports/immigration-june-2011/166425-senates-dream-act-is-win-win-for-immigrants-us
Ref 2: http://levin.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NjJmNzE3MTg5MDJhYzM4OTM5OGMwOGM5ZTNhYzJlYmE
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nevada) is reputed to have been quite the pugilist is his youth. Perhaps that explains his inexplicable obsession with rewarding people who have invaded our nation with special treatment and perks?
Harry Reid, friend of millions of illegal aliens with no moral or legal basis for being here. Harry Reid, enemy of U.S. sovereignty, the rule of law, secure borders and American citizens.
Was it a right-hook to the forehead that did you in Senator? A devastating knock-out punch that caused you to become a liberal Democrat and blithering malcontent who champions illegals over American citizens?
As reported at reference 1, Senator Reid is again stoking the fire of controversy by pandering to illegal aliens, especially Hispanics, for future votes.
At a time when America is on the brink on financial crisis, what with unsustainable deficit spending, high unemployment, record levels of bankruptcy and foreclosures, and a housing market more collapsed than during the Great Depression, why in the hell in this Democrat leader working on behalf of people who do even not belong here, and who already cost American taxpayers more than $110 billion a year?
Let’s be clear: Illegal aliens are ILLEGAL. They should not be here! America owes these people nothing except a one-way ticket back to Mexico or other third-world nation of origin!
Reid’s latest punch to the groin of American citizens is in marked contrast to what Reid was saying back in 1993 when
his office released the following statements (in bold) concerning illegal immigration:
“In response to increased terrorism and abuse of social programs by aliens, (I) today introduced the first and only comprehensive immigration reform bill in Congress. Currently, an alien living illegally in the United States often pays no taxes but receives unemployment, welfare, free medical care, and other federal benefits. Recent terrorist acts, including the World Trade Center bombing, have underscored the need to keep violent criminals out of the country.”
Reid’s bill, titled the “Immigration Stabilization Act,” overhauls the nation's immigration laws, and calls for a massive scale-down of immigrants allowed into the country. The bill also changes asylum laws to prevent phony asylum seekers.
Reid said the U.S. open door policy is being abused at the expense of honest, working citizens.
The senator continued:
"We are a country founded upon fairness and justice. An individual in real threat of torture or long-term incarceration because of his or her political beliefs can still seek asylum. But this bill closes the door to those who want to abuse America's inherent generosity and legal system.”
"Our borders have overflowed with illegal immigrants placing tremendous burdens on our criminal justice system, schools and social programs. The Immigration and Naturalization Service needs the ability to step up enforcement. Our federal wallet is stretched to the limit by illegal aliens getting welfare, food stamps, medical care, and other benefits often without paying any taxes.”
“Safeguards like welfare and free medical care are in place to boost Americans in need of short-term assistance. These programs were not meant to entice freeloaders and scam artists from around the world. Even worse, Americans have seen heinous crimes committed by individuals who are here illegally.”
Specific provisions proposed by the senator in the Immigration Stabilization Act include:
* Reduces annual legal immigration levels. Relatives other than spouse or minor children admitted only if already on immigration waiting lists and their admission does not raise annual immigration levels above approved level.
* Reforms asylum rules to prevent aliens from entering the United States illegally under phony "asylum" claims.
* Expands list of felonies considered "aggravated" felonies requiring exclusion and deportation of criminal aliens. Allows courts to order deportation at time of sentencing.
* Increases penalties for failing to depart or re-entering the United States after a final order of deportation order. Increases maximum penalties for visa fraud from five years to 10 years.
* Curtails alien smuggling by authorizing interdiction and repatriation of aliens seeking to enter the United States unlawfully by sea. Increases penalties for alien smuggling.
* Adds "alien smuggling" to the list of crimes subject to sanctions under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act.
* Expands the categories of property that are forfeited when used to facilitate the smuggling or harboring of illegal aliens.
* Clarifies that a person born in the United States to an alien mother who is not a lawful resident is not a U.S. citizen. This will eliminate incentive for pregnant alien women to enter the United States illegally, often at risk to mother and child, for the purpose of acquiring citizenship for the child and accompanying federal financial benefits.
* Mandates that aliens who cannot demonstrably support themselves without public or private assistance are excludable. This will prevent admission of aliens likely to be dependent on public financial support. This requirement extends to the sponsor of any family sponsored immigrant.
* Increases border security and patrol officer positions."
Senator Harry Reid (D-Nev.) introduced the Immigration Stabilization Act in the United States Senate in 1993. The statements quoted above are from a press release issued by Reid’s office on August 5, 1993.
How is it that Harry Reid was exactly right more than 18 years ago, but is so completely wrong now? Why does Reid oppose programs he once sponsored now that the problem is seven times greater after 9/11?
In the spring of 2006, while the U.S. Senate was debating legislation to make English the official U.S. language, Reid even saw fit to drag out the R word to slander those who supported the English bill.
And, of course, Reid has voted for Mexico and against America every time the U.S. Senate has considered amnesty.
Harry Reid: Against illegal immigration, before he was for it!
Why?
Reference 1
http://thehill.com/special-reports/immigration-june-2011/166425-senates-dream-act-is-win-win-for-immigrants-us
Ref 2: http://levin.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NjJmNzE3MTg5MDJhYzM4OTM5OGMwOGM5ZTNhYzJlYmE
In America, you are innocent until proven guilty. It goes back to English common law. It is fundamental to America’s law only in theory, not in practice. “For the good of all” and the majority vote overrides fundamental law in today’s American courts. We are witness to the results, for instance, in Wisconsin where judges are remaking the law, of course “for the good of all.”
For instance, if the IRS says you owe federal income tax, you are judged guilty until you prove yourself innocent in a court of law. If you exist by the fruits of your own labor and the IRS says you owe $500 in federal income tax you have no choice but to pay it. The cost of taking your case to court would far exceed the $500 the IRS says you owe. No judge would award you the $10,000 in legal costs to prove that you did not owe the $500 in tax. If judges ruled that government paid all the costs of proving you did not owe the tax, the IRS would not make so many mistakes. It is “for the good of all” that you pay a tax you don’t owe, but obviously not good for you. Let’s think about that. It is unconstitutional.
“For the good of all,” in the judgment of Nazi courts of law, German Jews were exterminated. Chairman Mao, “for the good of all,” believed that China could afford to kill millions of Chinese. It was “for the good of all” that the Founding Fathers allowed white people to own black slaves. The Taney Court found that the escaped slave Dred Scott was owned, the same as a mule or a cow. Scott was returned to his master. The decision sparked the Civil War. “For the good of all,” federal income tax can put a worker on the street. Government entitlement overrides the right to exist on the fruits of one’s own labor. America’s courts refer to the policy as a “preferred freedom.” “For the good of all,” you see, might makes right, which brings me to Jesus, who said, Blessed are they who do hunger and thirst after righteousness: for they shall be filled.
Because I believe in Jesus, might makes right does not apply to me. The IRS called me a “Fifth Amendment freak.” Why? I believed what the Constitution said. Strangely, no judge backed me. The IRS ignored court orders—lawlessly confiscated my property. The United States had been issuing reports to the press of what happens to tax protesters. They go to jail. I possessed irrefutable proof that the United States of America was lawless. The United States didn’t think about this. I went public with my court record. Our keepers of the law could not deny it. The IRS was forced to eat crow but nobody went to jail, “for the good of all.” But for believing in the Constitution—actually believing in myself—I’ve been empowered. If you don’t believe me, you don’t believe Jesus, who said, Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake.
There is magic in the Constitution. Mysteriously, after I studied the Constitution, I felt a bigger than life calling, challenged the IRS—and beat them. Naturally, I felt empowered.
America became that greatest nation in history, and now, since watering down our basic law, we’re going bankrupt morally, spiritually, and fiscally.
Why was I picked? The universe is nothing like people think. Without consciousness, nothing could exist. It has been proven in lab experiments. We humans have the ability of making nature serve us, in fact to the extent that we’ve placed the material things we’ve created ahead of our reason for being.
We are here with increasing purpose, but currently witness to the world we know going down the tube.
Jesus’ prophecy is coming true. We are leaving the Age of Pisces, whose symbol is two attached fish swimming in opposite directions—entering the Age of Aquarius, whose symbol is the water-bearer.
The Tea Party wants constitutional government. The Constitution supports self government, which means personal responsibility and self-reliance. It means government is one’s servant, not one’s master. It means the individual is not government entitled to anything. But it is foolish to believe government would ever give the individual back his personal responsibility and self-reliance, no matter who is elected.
Why are so many Americans of the mindset that they could not make it on their own? They are good people—good citizens—and don’t make waves. They do their thing and don’t complain. Then there are the wolves in sheep’s clothing Jesus referred to, the “false prophets,” the “raving wolves.”
We’re reminded that Jesus said to his disciples that before the cock crowed they would deny him three times. Jesus came at the beginning of the Age of Pisces. The characteristics of Pisces: extremely responsive to others thoughts and feelings; unconsciously absorb the vogue; desperate to do the right thing; lacking in willpower; influenced by external factors; duality of emotions. Jesus, who had ideas of his own, was crucified. Fits like a hand in a glove.
We are now at the dawn of the Age of Aquarius. The characteristics of Aquarius: determined and stubborn; annoyed by people who disagree; hate hypocrisy; operate as equals among equals; independent and self-reliant.
The Age of Pisces has for its symbol two attached fish swimming in opposite directions. Pisceans need to stand alone. The Age of Aquarius has for its symbol the water-bearer. We are entering an age of brotherhood and fraternity. The water-bearer spills out spiritual energy.
Mysteriously, these astrological findings came long ago. I’m Aquarius rising. In The Rising Sign, under Aquarius Rising, Jean Avery said, “He becomes the water-bearer by walking to the beat of a different drummer. He may be the person to bring back information that has been lost to civilization for centuries.”
Jean Avery says “the planet Uranus is on the ascendant of the chart of the United States. Freedom of speech and opportunity was the cornerstone of the Constitution.” The planet Uranus is on the ascendant of my chart. When Uranus had transited on my chart to a position opposed to itself, in my forties, that’s when I had my bigger than life calling. That’s when my life drastically changed—and for the better.
I departed my old life in Texas on Good Friday, 1975, the day Jesus was hung from a cross. Sunday, the first day of my new life, was spent in Miami, Florida. My first date with the love of my life was on May 18, 1980. We hiked in the mountains near Mt. St. Helens, the day she erupted, symbolizing after the calamity hope and renewal.
Summarizing: born with Aquarius on the rise, believing in the Constitution and my God-given rights; departing on Good Friday, 1975 to make a new life; near Mt. St. Helens with my future wife on the day she erupted; we are entering the Age of Aquarius.
In my chart, Saturn is trine Pluto, the very best of alignments. By the way, in the month and year that Barack Obama was elected president, November 2008, Saturn was square Pluto, the very worst of alignments. This trine gives me the ability to understand the laws by which subtle forces are organized. We are currently witnessing what Obama’s alignment gave us.
My alignment gives me the ability to dig quantum physics. “It has only been with the advent of quantum theory that we have discovered proof that we exist as something more than pieces of matter. In the development of quantum theory, the observer emerges as a co-equal in the foundry of creation.” Quantum physicist Evan Harris Walker.
We now have proof that objective reality, as it has been conceived, is not reality at all. The observer interacts with matter. Conscious awareness defines the observer. There is no limit. Where is your mind? There are immutable laws of motion and other laws that come from the state of consciousness and human will. You exist in a state of mind. To understand the basics of quantum theory is to understand that it all leads to the fact that there has be a superconsciousness of the universe to which we are inextricably attached. We humans, the only life form on the planet with the ability, have the power to receive or block awareness.
With Saturn trine Pluto in my chart, I’ve been able to make fundamental changes in my life and others lives. After I studied the Constitution and had my bigger than life calling, I got on my path of destiny—learned our karmic mission. Through the cycles of our lives we learn and share a love for all. We can have reason to doubt, but the doubting Thomases are about to be left in a cloud of dust. Welcome to the Age of Aquarius.
Hello Patriots,
Read, Take Action, Repost and Resend!
In the House is a bill that will be considered on the floor before the full house, in the next few days. It is H.R. 1249 "America Invents Act", you can see it here http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h112-1249 , Although introduced by Republican Lamar Smith (TX) and some provisions may be worthwhile, the net outcome of the bill with its provision to change Patent office registering of patents from "First to Invent" to "First to File" would undermine the protections given to inventors in the Constitution. It would in practice be more like "First to Steal" a patent. The real danger is the risk of American Intellectual property, being stolen by the likes of multi-national corporations in China and other countries.
An argument is made that it would put us more in line with the patent rules of other countries, but then who in America really cares. It is our empowering of the people that has made us so prosperous, this is not the time to allow another blow against the Constitution and our rights, for the sake of being like others. We started out different!!
I personally revel in our American exceptionalism, how about you? Read below what Congressman Dana Rohrbacher had to say in a press release to counter this hideous bill. Then please call your Congressman at (202)-224-3121 or Toll Free (877)-762-8762 or email http://www.congress.org/congressorg/dbq/officials/ and urge them to vote no on this bill when it comes up. If you have time please call these Co-sponsors and ask them to review the Constitutionality of the bill and please withdraw as Co-sponsors.
Steven Chabot [R-OH1] John Duncan [R-TN2] Elton Gallegly [R-CA24] Robert Goodlatte [R-VA6]
No savings, no changes in procedure, no legislation should ever come at the expense of the Rights guaranteed under the Constitution!
***PRESS RELEASE*** Reps. Rohrabacher, Kaptur Lead Bipartisan Opposition to Patent Reform Bill
Letter Signed by 50 Members Asking for Constitutionality Debate Unveiled
Washington, Jun 1 -
Today, Reps. Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA) and Marcy Kaptur (D-OH) expressed their opposition to H.R. 1249, the America Invents Act, citing constitutional concerns and listing several provisions they consider detrimental to American innovation and harm the average inventors ability to secure patents. The lawmakers were joined by two former House Judiciary Committee Chairmen, Reps. John Conyers (D-MI) and Jim Sensenbrenner (R-WI) to unveil a letter signed by 50 bipartisan Members, addressed to the House Rules Committee, requesting time for the constitutionality of the bill to be adequately debated.
“If H.R. 1249 is passed into law, we will have weaker protections for our inventors and we can expect American innovation to be easily stolen not only domestically but by foreign entities overseas,” said Rohrabacher. “Perhaps the worst aspect of this bill, that hurts the American people the most, is the harmonization of our laws with those internationally in terms of the fundamental way we issue patents.
“The bottom line is this,” Rohrabacher stated. “In our Constitution, the words make it very clear that the original inventor should be the one who receives the patent, not the global standard of whoever files first. That would be very damaging to American innovators and would change the way we do business.”
According to the House Committee on Rules, if a threshold of 50 Member signatures is reached “in a letter addressed to the Chair of the Committee on Rules requesting a separate period of debate to discuss the constitutionality of a measure considered under a rule, the Chair shall include such a period of separate debate, not to exceed 20 minutes, evenly divided and controlled between a Member specified in the letter and a Member defending the committee position.”
Reps. Rohrabacher and Kaptur also called for H.R. 1249 to be rejected outright by the House of Representatives and replaced with a bill that straightens out the current mess of backlogs, delays, and inadequate funding at the US Patent and Trademark Office.
Lawmakers expressed concerns that several of the bill’s provisions are not only unconstitutional, but a “jobs-killer” that harms the main source of new jobs in the economy, small businesses and start-ups. In its current form, H.R. 1249 greatly increases costs on the “little guy” inventors seeking patents making it a cost prohibitive venture in many cases and increases the likelihood any patents that are granted will be infringed upon and subsequently tied up for years in the bureaucracy under the new procedures.
In addition to Reps. Rohrabacher (R-CA), Kaptur (D-OH), Conyers (D-MI), Sensenbrenner (R-WI) and Manzullo (R-IL), Kevin Kearns from the U.S. Business and Industry Council, patent expert David Boundy, and constitutional scholars Jonathan Massey and Adam Mossoff, also participated in the press conference.
H.R. 1249 is expected to be brought for a vote later this month. Thank You!
For Liberty's Sake,
Tom Whitmore
How do we get our message out to more than just our little circle?
There are many Conservative talk shows and blogs that we can listen to or respond to. But the readership, viewership is limited. In many cases we end up preaching to the choir. How can we expand our message? If we can do that it will make world of difference.
