All Posts (29795)
Posted on Pajamas Media-By Matt Patterson-On June 3, 2011:
“Americans are accustomed to thinking of themselves as the freest people on Earth. Except that according to the Heritage Foundation’s 2011 Index of Economic Freedom, the United States stands at a dismal 9th in international rankings for economic liberty, embarrassingly behind social democracies like New Zealand (4th) and Canada (6th) and well behind Asian powerhouses Hong Kong and Singapore (first and second, respectively).
It is safe to say that these depressing stats would come as no surprise to the higher-ups at Boeing, who had the temerity to act as if they were a private company operating in a free market when they decided to relocate the company’s 787 Dreamliner assembly from Washington state to a new production facility in South Carolina.This new relationship was poised to be mutually beneficial — South Carolina would get about 1,000 new jobs, Boeing a less regulated, less unionized — read: cheaper — business climate in which to operate.
But it was not to be. In April, Barack Obama’s National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) filed a complaint against Boeing to block the move and thwart the South Carolina relocation, charging that Boeing’s decision constitutes an unlawful retaliation against the unionized workers of Washington state.
Boeing contends it simply cannot afford the constant work stoppages of the Washington unions (roughly one every three years over the past decade), and no wonder: In 2008 alone, a strike instigated by the International Association of Machinists (IAM) lasted 39 days and accrued roughly 1,053,000 in lost work days for some 27,000 employees in Washington, Oregon, and Kansas. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), “Some analysts have estimated that the shutdown of jet production during the work stoppage cost Boeing more than $2 billion in profits.” Ouch. One can hardly blame the company for looking toward the warmer climes and more attractive labor market of South Carolina, one of the 22 states with so-called “right-to-work” laws forbidding the compulsory unionization of workers.
But the Obama administration has, through the NLRB, sided with the unions, in essence affirming Big Labor’s self-assumed right to blackmail and bankrupt private industry. The decision against Boeing (which the company is set to challenge in a June hearing) is indeed a dark and ominous sign: As Arthur Laffer and Stephen Moore poignantly put it in the Wall Street Journal, “It’s the first time a federal agency has intervened to tell an American company where it can and cannot operate a plant within the U.S.” It’s as if a government agent blocked your way while you were fleeing a mugger and ordered you to go back and hand over your wallet.
Of course, Obama is under tremendous pressure to deliver some favors to the unions, who have spent hundreds of millions to put him and other Democrats into power. Having failed to deliver labor’s long-cherished “card check” legislation before last November’s GOP tide swept over Congress, and seeing unions withering under the assault of Republican governors like Wisconsin’s Scott Walker and New Jersey’s Chris Christie, the White House undoubtedly felt it had to give its money masters something.
So it has, and only at the expense of liberty, economic growth, and common sense. So much for land of the free.
- Matt Patterson is senior editor at the Capital Research Center and contributor to Proud to be Right: Voices of the Next Conservative Generation. His email is mpatterson.column@gmail.com.”
Source:
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/how-free-is-america/?singlepage=true
Note: These recent articles and/or blog posts relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
I. As Gov’t Plays ‘Father,’ ‘Black Males Have Become Dispensable’!-Posted on The Daily Caller-By Jeff Poor-The Daily Caller-On June 4, 2011:
“It’s perhaps not the most politically correct take on welfare in America’s black community, but an interesting one nonetheless.
Walter E. Williams, a George Mason economist and author of “Race and Economics: How Much Can Be Blamed on Discrimination?” is not a fan of the welfare state that exists in the country. In an appearance on Thursday night’s “Stossel” on the Fox Business Network, Williams argued that welfare has done more damage to black society than slavery or Jim Crow.
“[T]he welfare state has done to black Americans what slavery could not have done, the harshest Jim Crow laws and racism could not have done, namely break up the black family,” Williams said.
“That is, today, just slightly over 30 percent of black kids live in two parent families. Historically, from 1870s on up to about 1940s, and depending on the city, 75 to 90 percent of black kids lived in two parent families. Illegitimacy rate is 70 percent among blacks where that is unprecedented in our history.”
But this isn’t just relegated to the American welfare state, but is seen in European welfare states as well.
“Now, it’s not just a matter of a racial thing. Sweden is the mother of the welfare state and illegitimacy in Sweden is 54 percent,” he said.
Williams explained to host John Stossel that this is a natural effect of welfare policies.
“Well, because, look, if you subsidize anything, you’re going to get surpluses of it, and if you tax something you’re going to get less of it,” he said. “If you did not get welfare, then people would decide, I’m going to go out and get a job, I’m going to live more responsibly.”
And with these policies, they have taken a toll on the black family, specifically the black father.”
Source:
II. General Motors not eager to be political talking point in 2012-Posted on The Daily Caller-By Amanda Carey-On June 3, 2011:
http://dailycaller.com/2011/06/03/general-motors-not-eager-to-be-po...
III. Economy adds paltry 54K jobs, raising fears for recovery!-Posted on The Hill’s On The Money-By Ian Swanson and Bernie Becker-On June 3, 2011:
http://thehill.com/blogs/on-the-money/801-economy/164575-may-jobs-report-meets-low-expectations
IV. Half of Last Month's New Jobs Came from a Single Employer — McDonald's!-Posted on The Weekly Standard-By MARK HEMINGWAY-On June 3, 3011:
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/half-last-months-jobs-came-single-employer-mcdonalds_573220.html
V. New World Powers Move to Shove Dollar Aside!-Posted on Investment Watch-By MarketWatch-On April 18, 2011:
http://investmentwatchblog.com/new-world-powers-make-move-to-shove-dollar-aside/VI. China Has Divested 97 Percent of Its Holdings in U.S. Treasury Bills!-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Terence P. Jeffrey-On June 3, 2011:
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/china-has-divested-97-percent-its-holdin
Note: My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
Is the Fed’s concept of buying $600 billion of Treasuries just a smokescreen?
Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?
Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts, please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered controversial is being censored-what happened to free speech?-You Decide.
“Food For Thought”
“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”
Semper Fi!
Jake
There is a huge percentage of public who has no clue about Obama because they spend time watching American Idol, Simposns, etc. If you do not educte them, no one will and Obama will get re-elected.
Talk to people who are "NOT" in the know. Time is running out.
1) Marxist Democrats still do not know what is in the Marxist Obamacare Healthplan.
2) Democrats did not read plan before or after they voted for it.
3) Democrats did not write the Obamacare Bill. Not one Democrat had any part of writing the Bill. Not one.
4) The Entire Healthcare Bill was Written by George Soros Special Interests groups.
5) Congress was told by Pelosi to Shutup and "VOTE" for it or they would not get Election Campaign Funding.
6) So, Marxist Democrats knowlingly Voted for Obamacare without one clue what was in the bill.
7) They still do not have a clue what is in it.
8) Ask one Democrat Congressman what is in the bill, and not one knows or can tell you.
9) Marxist Democrat do not read bills before they vote in it.
10) They are told to "VOTE" Yea or Nea and they do what they are told.
11) And every Marxist Democrat must go and cunsult with their "Lobbyists" to make sure Lobbyist are OK with them voting for or against the Bill.
12) Feel like you have no input? You don't. NONE!
13) Congress just shows up, votes the way Pelosi wants them to and then goes out to lunch. Every day.
Posted on Judicial Watch-June 2011:
“Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that it has uncovered documents from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) that indicate officials at the FCC colluded with the leftist Free Press organization to publicly push a new plan to regulate the Internet under the FCC’s so-called “net neutrality” program.
Judicial Watch obtained the documents pursuant to a December 27, 2010, Freedom of Information Act request.
In December 2010, the FCC voted 3-2 to advance its “net neutrality program.” This decision seems to fly in the face of an April, 2010 federal appeals court ruling that the FCC had exceeded its authority in seeking to regulate the Internet and enforce “net neutrality” rules.
The supporters of “net neutrality,” including Free Press, argue that high-speed Internet access is a “civil right,” and are recommending new government regulations to provide taxpayer-funded broadband Internet access to all populations, especially those deemed “underserved.” Opponents of “net neutrality” argue the program is designed to impose greater government control over the Internet and will result in less access, not more. Moreover, opponents of “net neutrality,” also dispute the claim that Internet access is a basic civil right protected by the U.S. Constitution.
Judicial Watch uncovered internal correspondence showing unusual coordination by some officials at the FCC and Free Press in pushing the “net neutrality” agenda in the run up to the controversial FCC vote in December:
- On November 2, 2010, Free Press Associate Outreach Director Misty Perez Truedson sent an email to John Giusti, Chief of Staff to FCC Commissioner Michael Copps asking if Copps would write an op-ed for the Albuquerque Journal in advance of a November 16 hearing on Internet access: “Would Commissioner Copps be interested in drafting an Op-ed in advance of the hearing? It’s a great way to get the word out and to spark conversations in advance of the event,” Truedson wrote. “We’re working on the op ed,” Giusti wrote back on November 9.
- The documents also include a series of emails sent to set up meetings between Copps and former Free Press President John Silver. “We are starting to get a good sense of how we’d like to proceed during the next three tricky months on NN [net neutrality]…” Silver wrote in the same October 8, 2010, email: “I think it may make sense for us to get together next week when I’m in town.” The documents also include a written summary of a phone call between Silver and Copps on November 28, 2010, just prior to the FCC vote in December: “Silver emphasized that a strong net neutrality rule is critical to preserving the Internet as a vibrant forum for speech, commerce, innovation and cultural expression…” the summary noted.
- One set of documents includes correspondence between FCC Special Counsel David Tannenbaum and Free Press Policy Director Ben Scott establishing lists of speakers for FCC “internet workshops.” Among the speakers proposed by Scott: “Joe Respars (ran online activism for the Obama campaign – he’s at Blue State Digital);” “Alex Nogales – National Hispanic Media Coalition;” “Jay Stanley – ACLU;” and “Clothilde de Coz [redacted] Reporters without Borders.”
- When Tannenbaum asked Scott about inviting a speaker from Color for Change in a November 17, 2010 email, Scott writes: “Yes – we know them well. I should have put James Rucker on my list. He’s very good. Up and coming civil rights leader. They are awesome. However, you should be aware that Color of Change is rather highly politicized. They are lead on the campaign to strip Glenn Beck of advertisers. And Van Jones is one of the founders. Not that these things should dissuade you from inviting them – I just wanted you to know.” (Van Jones was forced to resign from his position as Obama’s “Green Jobs czar,” in part because he had signed a petition in support of the 9/11 “Truther” movement, which believes the Bush administration masterminded the 9/11 terrorist attacks.)
Free Press has deep ties to radical leftists and socialists.
Robert McChesny, former editor of the socialist magazine Monthly Review, is the co-founder and president of Free Press. Kim Gandy, the Chairman of the Free Press Board of Directors, served as the President of the National Organization for Women from 2001-2009. Craig Aaron, Free Press’s President and CEO, formerly worked as managing editor of the socialist tabloid In These Times.
Free Press is financially supported by George Soros’s Open Society Institute and other hard-left groups such as the Ford Foundation and Democracy Alliance.
“Net neutrality is just another Obama power grab. This is nothing less than the Obama administration’s attempt to stage a government takeover of the Internet under the guise of ‘net neutrality.’ So it should come as no surprise that Free Press, the hard left organization with socialist ties, is improperly driving the so-called net neutrality agenda from inside the Obama administration. The FCC is supposed to be an independent agency that follows the law,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “The American people should be deeply troubled by the fact that the Obama administration, on issue after issue, seems to be run by shadowy leftist organizations. Our government is supposed to be ‘of the people, by the people, and for the people’, not ‘of the Left, by the Left, and for the Left.’”
To access the FCC-Free Press net neutrality documents uncovered by Judicial Watch, please click here.”
Source:
Note: The following video relates to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
Former Soviet KGB Operative Talks About Communist Takeover of USA!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvcZiNt6ypI&NR=1
Note: What follows is a YouTube web site that contains a series of videos that bring to light a most startling revelation, which is that the collapse of Soviet Communism was in fact a staged deception to mislead the West and open the way for Russia’s domination of the free world. Since the fate of Western Civilization hangs in the balance, I suggest you ‘play all’, go to full screen and sit back and watch all of these videos. It’s important for freedom’s sake-You Decide:
The Untold Story About The Collapse of Communism!-Posted on YouTube.com-By TheSpiritOfTruth-On May 19, 2006:
https://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=F37A04E836694EF6&annotation_id=annotation_972225&feature=iv
Note: The following recent articles and/or blog posts and videos relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
Video: Former Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney Admits She Wants Gaddafi-Style Government In USA!-Posted on The Blaze-By Naked Emperor News-On June 3, 3011:
Who Is Behind Adam Kokesh and Russia Today Television?-Posted on America’s Survival-By Cliff Kincaid-On June 1, 2011:
http://www.usasurvival.org/ck06.01.2011.html
Russian TV and Code Pink Disrupt Memorial Day Activities-Posted on America’s Survival-By Cliff Kincaid-On May 30, 2011:
http://www.usasurvival.org/ck05.30.2011.html
SEIU drops mask, goes full commie-Posted on Pajamas Media-By Zombie-On May 6, 2011:
http://pajamasmedia.com/zombie/2011/05/06/seiu-drops-mask-goes-full...
Communist Party Predicts Huge May Day Rallies Across America – Left Exploits Immigrants-Posted on TrevorLoudon.com-By Trevor-On April 28, 2011:
http://trevorloudon.com/2011/04/communist-party-predicts-huge-may-d...
Video: Revolutionary Socialist Group Planing to Recruit Children in JR High School!-Posted on The Blaze-By Naked Emperor News-On April 24, 2011:
Happy Easter from the Communists-Posted on Conservative Byte-On April 22, 2011:
http://conservativebyte.com/2011/04/happy-easter-from-the-communists/
ACLU: 'Communism is the Goal'-Posted on Town Hall-By Matt Barber-On March 25, 2011:
http://townhall.com/columnists/mattbarber/2011/03/25/aclu_communism...
FBI Files: Ted Kennedy Met With Communist Traitor-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Guest Writer-On March 24, 2011:
http://floydreports.com/fbi-files-ted-kennedy-met-with-communist-tr...
Socialist Mantra Hidden In Grade School Chants-Posted on The Blaze-By Mike Opelka-On March 2, 2011:
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/socialist-mantra-hidden-in-grade-sc...
Judicial Watch Obtains Previously Redacted Material from the FBI File of the Late Senator Ted Kennedy-Posted on Judicial Watch-On February 25, 2011:
http://www.judicialwatch.org/news/2011/feb/judicial-watch-obtains-p...
The Judas Media-Posted on Floyd Reports-Guest Writer-On April 27, 2011:
http://floydreports.com/the-judas-media/?utm_source=Expose+Obama&am...Note: My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
The FCC Should Not Interfere With The Internet!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/13/the-fcc-should-not-interfere-with-the-internet/
Who owns our supposedly fair and balanced airwaves and news outlets?
Progressives and Communists Are Out of the Closet Together!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/05/progressives-and-communists-are-out-of-the-closet-together/
Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?
Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts, please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered controversial is being censored-what happened to free speech?-You Decide.
“Food For Thought”
“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”
Semper Fi!
Jake
If Barack Obama were caught on camera raping . . . how much support, if any, would he lose in the liberal mainstream-lamestream media? Would the headlines read: “Obama Makes Outreach to . . . ?”
The Economic Collapse: 24 signs of economic decline in America
To understand the full picture, consider this: Barack Obama’s puppet-master, George Soros (the “man who broke the Bank of England” and chief funder of some 52 progressive-foundations that have been working to undermine the U.S. economy for the last nine years as well as funding Barack Obama’s campaigns) is openly calling for the Chinese Yuan to replace the Dollar as the world’s reserve currency. Soros, who has been called responsible for the destruction of at least six other currencies, is now heavily invested in the Dollar’s destruction. Every day that we refuse to emulate the British and adopt severe austerity measures, the closer Mr. Soros gets to adding another few hundred billion dollars worth of profit to his net worth. However, it’s not likely that Barack Obama will cut his own strings and act for the good of the American people over George Soros.
After seeing the video, it reminded me of an incident that happened to me on 911. I was driving to work, then before 0800 hours. Pulling into a local 711 for fuel there was no attendant to help with turning on the pumps. In the back office I could hear a radio or television. I went back and the two middle east attendants were yelling and cheering over what had to be the first aircraft into the Trade Center.
One of the men got up and said, "oh, I'm sorry, can I help you?", I got my fuel and went on my way. Listening to local talk radio, I learned this was an unknown but thought to be terrorist attack.
My thoughts often go back to those two men, who claim to be Americans, cheering at the death of 3,000 innocent American citizens, knowing they were cheering for the success of the Muslim Religion against what they call the great Satin.
If two gasoline attendants, whom I've never met before, could feel as they did; then, how many American Muslims felt pride and celebration for the deaths of over 3,000 innocent Americans that fateful day, September 11, 2001?
I'm sorry guys. Every time you flood me with emails attempting to convince me Palin can not win; is too toxic, not smart enough, a hypocrite and is only in it for the money, the courageous woman boldly does another extraordinary interview that makes me stand up and cheer, “Sarah Palin, you go girl! I love you!”
On the Hannity show, Palin launched another “in your face” attack on Obama, the GOP and the liberal media. I LOVE IT! http://fxn.ws/cxt8dv
Nothing frustrates me more than GOP candidates walking on eggs cautious not to offend or anger the despicable, lying, agenda driven and evil liberal media. Why should we show respect for characterless people who are committed to lying and putting a negative spin on everything we say and do? The liberal media's mission is to politically “kill” the tea party. Get it?
Sarah Palin gets it. Palin does not give a rat's behind about what the liberal media thinks of her.
On numerous occasions, without the slightest hint of reservation or FEAR, Palin has attacked Obama “the man”; his lies, his anti-American associations, his socialist agenda, his assault on our freedom, liberty and culture and his horrific record, thus far. Thank You Sarah Palin! God bless you!
I realize I sound like a broken record, but I can not express the following point strongly enough. To beat Obama and “his media” in 2012, our candidate MUST embrace Palin's aggressive fearless battle plan.
It has been said, only a fool brings a knife to a gunfight. Without restraint or mercy, Obama, the democrats and Obama's liberal media gang will show up at the 2012 DC fight for the White House with mega guns firing at the tea party and the republican presidential candidate.
Any republican presidential candidate who is timid due to the historical context of Obama's presidency saying, “God bless Obama's heart. He meant well, but his policies have failed” is like entering this crucial battle for our country with a butter knife. Such a restrained effort would insure political death to our side and the end of America as we know it.
Patriots, we need a fearless political gunslinging hero. And so far, our heroic pistol packin' mama is Sarah Palin.
Lloyd Marcus, Proud Unhyphenated American
Vice Chair, www.CampaignToDefeatObama.com
Posted Canada Free Press-By John Lillpop-On June 4, 2011:
“President Obama continues to commit high crimes and misdemeanors by ignoring the rule of law while making a mockery of the U.S. Constitution.
The president’s latest impeachable offense involves his unilateral decision and order to fire more than 150 Tomahawk missiles into Libya in his failed attempt to oust Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi.
The initial missile attack was executed on March 18, more than 60 days ago.
Apparently, the President with the Law degree from Harvard overlooked (chose to ignore?) the provisions of the War Powers Resolution summarized below.
The War Powers Resolution of 1973 (50 U.S.C. 1541-1548) is a federal law intended to check the power of the President in committing the United States to an armed conflict without the consent of Congress.
The resolution was adopted in the form of a United States Congress joint resolution; this provides that the President can send U.S. armed forces into action abroad only by authorization of Congress or in case of “a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.”
The War Powers Resolution requires the President to notify Congress within 48 hours of committing armed forces to military action and forbids armed forces from remaining for more than 60 days, with a further 30 day withdrawal period, without an authorization of the use of military force or a declaration of war. The resolution was passed by two-thirds of Congress, overriding a presidential veto.
In ordering the missile attack, Obama was quoted as saying,
“I want the American people to know that the use of force is not our first choice and it’s not a choice I make lightly,” Obama said. “But we cannot stand idly by when a tyrant tells his people that there will be no mercy.”
The obvious question: What about Iran and Syria, sir?
Back to Obama’s most recent impeachable offense.
As reported at the reference, Obama has decided to treat the War Powers Resolution with the same disdain he has shown for border security, enforcement of immigration laws, health care legislation, and other important issues:
In an effort to satisfy those arguing he needs to seek congressional authorization to continue US military activity in accordance with the War Powers Resolution, President Obama wrote a letter to congressional leaders this afternoon suggesting that the role is now so “limited” he does not need to seek congressional approval.
“Since April 4,” the president wrote, “U.S. participation has consisted of: (1) non-kinetic support to the NATO-led operation, including intelligence, logistical support, and search and rescue assistance; (2) aircraft that have assisted in the suppression and destruction of air defenses in support of the no-fly zone; and (3) since April 23, precision strikes by unmanned aerial vehicles against a limited set of clearly defined targets in support of the NATO-led coalition’s efforts.”
A senior administration official told ABC News that the letter is intended to describe “a narrow US effort that is intermittent and principally an effort to support to support the ongoing NATO-led and UN-authorized civilian support mission and no fly zone.”
Obama’s latest transgression makes clear his cynical mindset.
Namely, If the law or resolution conflicts with Obama’s leftist agenda or reelection strategy, he simply ignores the offending law or resolution.
In a sign that cojones may be making a comeback in the U.S. House, that esteemed body delivered a message to the renegade president reminding him of the fact that America is subject to the rule of law and the U.S. Constitution, both of which presidents are obligated to follow, regardless of how brilliant said president may be.
As reported http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/jun/3/bipartisan-congress-rebuffs-obama-libya-mission/” title=“in part”>in part, the House took Obama to the wood shed a delivered a much-needed scalding to our wayward president:
“Crossing party lines to deliver a stunning rebuke to the commander in chief, the vast majority of the House voted Friday for resolutions telling President Obama he has broken the constitutional chain of authority by committing U.S. troops to the international military mission in Libya.
In two votes — on competing resolutions that amounted to legislative lectures of Mr. Obama — Congress escalated the brewing constitutional clash over whether he ignored the founding document’s grant of war powers by sending U.S. troops to aid in enforcing a no-fly zone and naval blockade of Libya.
The resolutions were non-binding, and only one of them passed, but taken together, roughly three-quarters of the House voted to put Mr. Obama on notice that he must explain himself or else face future consequences, possibly including having funds for the war cut off.”
What rich irony! The recipient of the most fraudulent Nobel Peace award in history is chastened by the U.S. Congress, including Democrat members, for violating U.S. law pertaining to war.”
Source:
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/37227
Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and videos relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
Obama is Impeachable over Libya!-Posted on AIM-BY CLIFF KINCAID-On June 2, 2011:
http://www.aim.org/aim-column/forget-weinergate-obama-is-impeachable-over-libya/
Obama Kills the War Powers Act!-Posted on National Review Online-By RICH LOWRY-On June 7, 2011:
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/268973/obama-kills-war-powers-laugh-rich-lowry
Boehner Wimps Out on Libya!-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Ben Johnson-On June 3, 2011:
http://floydreports.com/boehner-wimps-out-on-libya/
House calls off vote on Libya resolution!-Posted on Reuters-On June 1, 2011:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/06/01/us-libya-usa-congress-idUSTRE75061J20110601
Is Obama above the law?-Posted on The Washington Post-By George Will-On May 27, 2011:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/is-obama-above-the-law/2011/05/26/AGL5zyCH_story.html
Video: Congressman Nadler Compares President Obama To A King!-Posted on YouTube.com-ByMOXNEWSd0tCOM-On Jun 3, 2011:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5JqejdiZLfQ&feature=player_embedded#at=50
Video: Biden States That Obama Could be Impeached over Libya!-Posted on YouTube.com-Byradiofriendly-On Mar 22, 2011:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Adpa5kYUhCA
Note: My following blog post contains numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
Godfather of The Islamic Revolution!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/11/godfather-of-the-islamic-revolution/
Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts, please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered controversial is being censored-what happened to free speech?-You Decide.
“Food For Thought”
“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”
Semper Fi!
Jake
Beyond the blue sky, in the blackness of the universe, lies a state of consciousness, as from nothing you get nothing. An example of nothing is the mirage Washington, D.C. has made America. Pin a rose on America’s political establishment for being the world’s foremost knuckleheads.
The subatomic particles, atoms, molecules, and cells that give humans form and substance, science has finally realized, begins with a state of consciousness. Bell’s theorem proves that once connected, subatomic particles on up communicate.
Einstein, with numbers logic, proved that all things can be reduced to vibrations. So many vibrations per second can be reduced to numbers, but Einstein could not see that basic to all things is consciousness. To Einstein, numbers logic ended with the physical universe. Both the ancients and cutting edge of science apply numbers to consciousness. Without consciousness, nothing could exist.
What I’m mentioning is problematic for the makers and keepers of the law, so they deny, deny, deny. It is all for the sake of convenience, and the same for theocrats. For this reason alone, you are not likely to know the full truth about the power that lies within you. You are more likely to believe that the authorities know what is best for you. To those trained to jump through authority’s hoops, there is nothing beyond blue sky. Out of the blue jumped Barack Obama.
Einstein and all the other disconnected folks, without the power to observe the infinite state that exists before things become real, out of which state humans things become real, nevertheless, leave some of us with the power of observation. The ability allows us to turn the aspects of matter into our reality—such things as computers and atom bombs. You can surely understand that with this ability it is essential that we expand our conscious awareness.
Applying the above thoughts to our creation, in Gen. 1:26 “And God said, Let us make man in our image,” connected with Mt. 6:10, “in earth as it is in heaven,” connected with Mt. 6:22, “But seek ye first the kingdom of God,” our reality depends, you see, on how far-reaching is our awareness. Most cannot see the power to transform a thought into reality, but what makes some more able than others? More lately, as did our ancestors, we Americans have not been trained to think for ourselves.
Europeans came to America, a wilderness, with little more than people had 5,000 years ago, and in less than 200 years transformed America into an industrial giant. It took individual self-reliance and personal responsibility.
But this American independence was not good for authority. Authority was the very reason said Europeans came to America. But, alas, for the good of all, wolves in sheep’s clothing brought us the duty of government to see that, individually, we are properly cared for. The rugged individual be damned. The meek and poor are the preferred. Rob Peter to pay Paul. Government entitlement was accepted by the meek and poor, the very thing that is today bankrupting America. The meek and poor can’t find work, naturally, because they depend on government for their existence, not on the private sector that makes jobs.
Are we so cruel that we are willing to throw grandma over a cliff? We’re missing the point. The form of law can be anything, but the substance is based on long-standing principles that cannot be broken without dire consequences. It isn’t up to the vote to decide who receives and who pays. In Nazi Germany, Jews didn’t have a right to exist. Their executors were merely obeying the law. Am I the reason others are poor and needy? If you believe this, your logic and reason has been replaced by political rationalization. You are trapped—destined to be a slave of the high and mighty.
My good fortune can be attributed to the ability to reason, to do what my inner-self directs. I’ve made it my business to know the law. Jesus said his kingdom was not of this world. In Mt. 7:8, Jesus said, “For every one that asketh receiveth, and he that seeketh findeth. . .” In Mt 12:1 Jesus said, “Come unto me, all that labour and are heavenly laden, and I will give you rest.” You’ve got the choice of looking within or looking to government for help. I look at government as taking that which it is not privileged to take and giving back little.
Hitler determined what the law would be in Germany. Natural law does not originate in Washington, D.C. It is not the duty of government to provide one individual and in order to do so robbing another of his rights. Moreover, nobody is smart enough to know what is best for hundreds of millions of individuals. What is good for all can be and has been seen to deny some individuals of the right to exist. Chairman Mao said China could afford to snuff out the lives of millions.
After listening to the politicians yesterday on TV, and at this late hour all they could do is blow smoke, this duty of government they support, which began with Roosevelt, and is currently bankrupting America, find me one politician in Washington who is against government entitlement. It was politicians who established entitlements; it is politicians who lawlessly cling to government entitlement, and promise us cake while we eat it. I was here before Roosevelt’s New Deal Law—the duty of government to eliminate the individual’s self-reliance and personal responsibility. Before New Deal Law, the American people were not going morally, spiritually, and fiscally bankrupt. Don’t kid yourself. The debt government has created will never be paid. The politicians are whistling Dixie.
The family was America’s cornerstone. The law coming from Washington, D.C. is “out of the blue,” without substance, in principle no better than Nazi law. Our representatives, whether they be Republican or Democrat, are obviously committed to a mess they created and have no idea of how to fix. No, we’re not so cruel that we would push grandma over a cliff. In America, we are fair and just. We’re going to prove it, like most of the rest of the world, by becoming equally penniless.
America’s environmentalists should jump for joy, but then there is China’s emerging capitalism. I wonder how history will judge America.
WAKE UP AMERICA BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE!
Abortion -This is a Dismemberment Abortion by Father Frank Pavone
Understand what an abortion really is:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=us_y9GP_-DA&playnext=1&list=PL1D719AEF8790CA52
WAKE UP AMERICA BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE!
To anyone who pays the slightest amount of attention to the on-going battle over the debt, debt-ceiling, Paul Ryan's budget proposal vs. Obummer's budget abortion, and the ancillary debates on both sides, it is clear that we have a real problem in this nation...and it goes deeper than the financial crisis we are in.
It should be clear that, in order (just for example) for Chris van Hollen (ranking Senate Democrat) to be able to go on Fox News and distort Paul Ryan's proposal to save Medicare, while at the same time lying through his teeth about the "Affordable Care Act", or ObamaCare, there must be enough people that will bite into this cowpie pudding for it to be worth his time (van Hollen).
With a stack of charts in front of him, and Fox News host Chris Baer asking the questions, (pointedly or not is a matter of debate), van Hollen uses states from the CBO and other government accounting agencies to mis-represent Ryan's proposal, and completely distort what the actual consequences of Obummercare will be.
Paul Ryan had fairly equal time, although van Hollen did an admirable job of talking WAY more than he should, which is one of the tactics of the far-left from time immemorial. Talking-points is all these libs have got, because the actual facts belay their lies, and they know that.
What should be of concern, or at least is to me, is that at the end, after all the distortions, and Ryan not really having the time to counter the slight-of-hand involved in van Hollens "charts" from "actual government accounting agencies"---(let's all move along...nothing to see here...) these two are laughing it up, they after all are just old friends who have "differences of opinion."
"Differences of opinion" that also happen to be "matters of life and death."
Not a laughing matter, in my book. I don't think I would have been as charitable as Ryan, although I somewhat understand the protocols that go with the office.
Screw protocol. These bastards are liars, thieves, and wolves at the door. The only humane thing to do is to get rid of them in the most humane and fastest way possible before they EAT US ALL ALIVE.
How disgusting is it to know you mean nothing because you don't give them themoney the Lobbyist do?
What follows are three articles and/or blog posts that reveal what occurred during a SWAT Team raid that was conducted while serving a warrant at the home of a former Marine’s home in Tucson, AZ on May 5, 2011, which begs to question whether or not we are beginning to witness actions by this President and his minions that normally take place in a police state, especially when we find that the individual responsible for said raid was no one other than the infamous Pima County Sheriff that was also in the spot-light during the fatal shootings that took place in Tucson, AZ in January 2011-You Decide:
I. Former Marine killed by SWAT was acting in defense, family says-Posted on KGun9.com-By Joel Waldman-Updated on May 27, 2011:
http://www.kgun9.com/story/14621212/marine-killed-by-swat-was-acting-in-defense-says-family
“TUCSON (KGUN9-TV) - New details are emerging about Jose Guerena, the man killed last Thursday in a SWAT incident at his Tucson home. He was gunned down by SWAT members while his wife and young child hid in a closet.
Now, the Pima County Sheriff’s Department has taken responsibility for the fatal shooting. The SWAT team said it was just executing a narcotics search warrant when Guerena threatened officers with a military rifle.
But the Sheriff’s Department has changed its story on whether Guerena actually fired at anyone.
On Tuesday, candles and tributes to Guerena could be seen outside his home. Family members said the 26-year-old former Marine served two tours of duty in Iraq.
A smashed window and a barrage of bullet holes might be the type of scene a battle-hardened Marine would find in a war zone but not the Tucson home he shared with his two children and wife. Guerena’s wife, Vanessa, said her husband died thinking he was protecting his family from an invasion.
“I saw this guy pointing me at the window. So, I got scared. And, I got like, ‘Please don’t shoot, I have a baby.’ I put my baby (down). (And I) put bag in window. And, I yell ‘Jose! Jose! Wake up!’” she explained.
Jose had just come home from working at the mine. Vanessa said he had fallen asleep two hours before, only to wake up to chaos in his house.
It was Pima County SWAT executing a narcotics conspiracy search warrant, but according to her, neither she nor her husband knew it was the authorities until it was too late.
“You’re saying only (they) yelled SWAT after the shootout?” asked KGUN9 reporter Joel Waldman.
“Oh, yes! Yes,” said Guerena.
Vanessa said Jose grabbed a gun to protect himself from what he thought were home invaders.
The Pima County Sheriff’s Office denies that officers failed to identify themselves. Lt. Michael O’Connor told KGUN9’s Joel Waldman that the SWAT team has a standard procedure when serving high-risk search warrants of this nature designed to prevent the suspect from confusing officers with criminal home invaders.
“We will have a lot police vehicles there, with their lights and their sirens on. In this case... because it was a narcotics high risk type of a search warrant, we had our large armored vehicle there with the markings on it. It also has lights and sirens, it was going. So we do everything we can to portray the image that we are law enforcement, we are not home invaders.”
O’Connor also said emphatically that this was not a “no knock” raid. “This case was, we came in very high profile, lights and sirens. We go to the door, we pound on the door. We wait approximately 15 seconds. If no one answers the door, we breach the door with a heavy tool and open the door.”
The officer said that when the SWAT team got the door open, they found Guerena crouched in the hall pointing an assault rifle at them.
According to O’Connor, Guerena said, “”I have something for you!” He said that Guerena “brought this all on himself by presenting himself the way he did.”
Guerena’s relatives disagree. “Now, they’re saying this now that they admitted for him not shooting back (SIC). They want to throw more dirt on him,” said cousin Oscar Garcia.
Garcia is referring to the issue the change story about whether Guerena fired his gun. Initially investigators reported that he had, but then later, they corrected that statement and said that Guerena had not gotten off a shot. Deputies confirmed that Guerena’s safety was still on when his gun was recovered. Also, officials said that reports that some SWAT officers’ shields were riddled with bullets are also untrue.
SWAT gunned Jose down with 71 rounds fired in just about seven seconds; officials said they did not expect Vanessa to be home with their four-year-old son, Joel, who ended up witnessing his dad’s death. Now he has questions about what happened, like so many others.
“The only thing he asked me, ‘Mom, my dad a bad guy? They killed my dad! Police killed my dad? Why? What did my dad do?’” explained Ms. Guerena.
Jose’s relatives want his children to know he did his best to be a great husband, dad and patriot.
Authorities told KGUN9 that three other neighborhood homes were targeted Thursday, all tied to a narcotics conspiracy. They say a large amount of cash was found at one of the homes. But, not at the Guerena house; all they said they found there was “evidence pertinent to the case.” At this time, officials aren’t saying anything more. However, Vanessa Guerena has insisted there were no drugs or money in their home.”
Source:
http://www.kgun9.com/story/14621212/marine-killed-by-swat-was-acting-in-defense-says-family
II. Ex-Marine's lawyer opens up about SWAT, questions Sheriff-Posted on KGun9.com-By Joel Waldman-Updated on May 19, 2011:
http://www.kgun9.com/story/14674077/marines-lawyer-opens-up-about-swat-questions-dupnik
“TUCSON (KGUN9-TV) - The same day the Pima County Sheriff’s Department issued a letter blasting the media’s coverage of the SWAT shooting death of Jose Guerena, the Guerena family’s attorney is demanding even more answers from authorities.
The May 5 shooting lasted only ten seconds. SWAT burst into a Tucson man’s home on a drug search warrant, fired more than 70 rounds, and left the Iraq and Afghanistan war veteran lying on the floor, fighting for his life.
Guerena’s wife, Vanessa, emerged from the closet she was hiding in with her young son and called for help. She was left alone in the house with her dying husband for about ten minutes after the shooting.
Christopher Scileppi, the family’s attorney, wants to know where SWAT was during that time, and why they didn’t seek medical help for Guerena. He said he understands that law enforcement usually won’t let paramedics run into a potential crime scene until the area has been secured, but he feels that SWAT should have cleared the home within minutes of the shooting.
“Is it your understanding that protocol would call for SWAT to go through the home, clear it, and bring Vanessa and the child out, and not let them linger in there for ten minutes?” asked 9 On Your Side reporter Joel Waldman.
“It is my understanding, and considering what happened and the size of the house, that wouldn’t have taken very long at all,” Scileppi said, adding that his biggest concern is that Guerena wasn’t given medical care after he’d been shot.
“I think it’s tragic on so many levels. On a human, level, it’s tragic. My biggest question is, why was he denied medical attention?”
Paramedics were standing by, but were not allowed to enter the home, despite Vanessa’s pleas to a 911 operator. After an hour and 14 minutes of waiting, emergency responders received word that Guerena was deceased.
“His last thoughts were, ‘I’m defending my home, my wife and children from a home invasion.’”Scileppi told KGUN9.
The search warrants remain sealed, but Sheriff Clarence Dupnik did open up. The Sheriff’s office released a statementWednesday, calling out the media’s “irresponsibility” in asking questions about this case, saying “it is unacceptable and irresponsible to couch those questions with implications of secrecy and a cover-up.”
Scileppi said he took issue with the letter and said the media has helped open the door in answering some puzzling questions. He is expected to announce his collaboration Thursday with a prestigious law firm to help litigate the case.
KGUN9 On Your Side has also learned that the SWAT team has also brought aboard its own attorney, Mike Storey. He represents many law enforcement unions throughout southern Arizona. He declined to speak to KGUN9, but did promise to give some answers on Thursday.”
III. SWAT raid draws criticism of Sheriff Dupnik-Posted on KGun9.com-By Claire Doan-Updated on June 2, 2011:
http://www.kgun9.com/story/14823433/swt-raid-draws-criticism-of-sheriff-dupnik
“TUCSON (KGUN9-TV) – The raid on former Marine Jose Guerena’s home has garnered national and international attention, raising numerous questions about excessive force and proper SWAT protocol, with Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik at the center on an increasingly heated and political debate.
The Pima County Sheriff’s Department released limited information on the debate, including yielding hundreds of documents, granting an interview with a lieutenant and raw video on the raid. Meanwhile, Dupnik has refused interviews, citing the need to maintain the integrity of the investigation.
However, the raw video has not quelled the debate over the SWAT raid or stopped questions about Guerena’s death, and it certainly has not ended the growing number of calls for Dupnik to come forward and justify what happened.
“It shows they were a bit overzealous. It shows that the Pima County Sheriff’s Office has got to readdress their entire SWAT usage,” said Richard Mack, former Graham County Sheriff, who is not the only one compelled to speak out.
Brian Miller, chairman of the Pima County Republican Party, said it’s not a matter of political affiliation, but the need to examine larger issues surrounding SWAT policies – not just locally, but nationally.
“Are you telling me that after 20 months of looking at this case, this option was the best they could come up with?”Miller asked, adding that SWAT had safer options, including stopping Guerena on the side of the road or serve the search warrant when he isn’t home. Miller expects the Sheriff to eventually explain why SWAT chose a more confrontational method.
“I obviously ultimately hold him responsible for this. The buck stops with him. He is the chief law enforcement officer of Pima County. The swat answers to him and so the tactics and techniques are used are eventually his call,” Miller said.
Also Dupnik’s calls: releasing as stack of documents and disclosing to the Arizona Daily Star that the raid resulted from a 20-month probe, while confirming there is an informant – all the while, stating that more details would jeopardize the investigation. And that seeming contradiction is giving critics more fuel for the fire.
“I think the hypocrisy exemplified by Sheriff Dupnik since the January 88 shooting. Now I find this one absolutely astonishing. I served with the Sheriff and I though he was smarter than this,” Mack said. “Now, everything is his fault on this one. He’s totally responsible for this entire fiasco.”
KGUN9 News requested an interview with Dupnik, but he was unavailable for comment Wednesday.”
Note: What follows are several blog posts that do a meticulous job of revealing that the SWAT Team raid may have demonstrated some tactical incompetence-You Decide:
I. The Jose Guerena Raid: A Demonstration of Tactical Incompetence-Posted on Captain’s Journal-By HERSCHEL SMITH-On May 27, 2011:
“Helmet camera footage of the SWAT team raid on the home of Jose Guerena has been released.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XP0f00_JMak&feature=player_embedded
Bob Owen noticed the same thing I did. One of the team members fell in the doorway upon breaching and entering the home. The video speaks for itself, but by way of summary, let’s observe the following.
First, Mr. Guerena’s weapon, contrary to initial accounts by the SWAT team, was never taken off of safety. The team took no shots from him. Second, the team mills around for a while before breaching the home. Third, they don’t form into a stack. Fourth, absurdly, they knock and allow only four seconds for a response. Fifth, one of the members falls in the doorway. Sixth, upon shots being fired (by the SWAT team), more than one team member begins backing away from the incident. Seventh, one of the team members who initially backed away moves forward to fire shots over the heads of other team members who are in the home (it’s a wonder that SWAT team members didn’t get shot by their own team). All the while, several team members are standing aimlessly outside the home, doing nothing. Then to top it all off, even though medical responders arrived within minutes, they weren’t allowed into the home for one hour and fourteen minutes.
The Sheriff may as well have sent the Keystone Cops to raid the home. These clowns shouldn’t be allowed anywhere near weapons.
UPDATE: Thanks to Glenn Reynolds for the LINK.
UPDATE #2: So I asked a certain former Marine I know (combat tour of Fallujah in 2007) what he thought about this particular raid. Here are his thoughts. This would be hilarious if a man hadn’t died in the process. Tactically speaking, their raid was foolish, and they are guilty of murder. So this SWAT team wanted to “get some?” Great. Go join the Marine Corps and deploy to a foreign country and fight insurgents. You’re supposed to be peace officers, to prevent things like this from happening. As it was, Mr. Guerena thought his home was being invaded, and so what would you do in this circumstance? Well, you go get a weapon and post up. You send rounds down range to protect your family. Mr. Guerena even had the good discipline not to do that. This whole incident was evil.
UPDATE #3: I’ve had a chance to talk with my son about this some more, and a good summary of what this raid was like is to say that “It looks like the Iraqi Army raiding a house.” I had known that the ISF wasn’t present during much of his time in Fallujah (most of the security forces were Marines and IPs), so I asked him, “Why do you say that? Have you seen the Iraqi Army raiding a house?” He said yes, and I responded by asking him what it looked like? He said “It looks like that. Just like that. People falling all over each other, emptying their weapons, shooting at everything, and shooting at nothing.”
II. Further Analysis of the Jose Guerena Raid-Posted on Captain’s Journal-By HERSCHEL SMITH-On May 29, 2011:
http://www.captainsjournal.com/2011/05/29/further-analysis-of-the-jose-guerena-raid/
III. New Details on the Jose Guerena Raid-Posted on Captain’s Journal-By HERSCHEL SMITH-On June 2, 2011:
http://www.captainsjournal.com/2011/06/02/new-details-on-the-jose-guerena-raid/
Note: What follows is a touching article and/or blog, which also includes a video, that reveals an organized march that took place on Memorial Day in Tucson, AZ by members of Oath Keepers to honor former Marine Jose Guerena:
Walking A Mile In Freedom’s Shoes: Oath Keepers Muster * Tucson * Memorial Day, May 30, 2011:
Note: The following article and/or blog post seems to relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
No right to resist unlawful police entry, rules Indiana Supreme Court: ‘Decision says resisting officers would increase risk of violence.’-Posted on News Sentinal-Fort Wayne IN-By The Associated Press-Updated on May 14, 2011:
http://www.news-sentinel.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/SE/20110514/NEWS/105140339
Note: We, as God, family and country loving Americans, must remain vigilant and keep our eyes on the ball, which is to take back our country, and not be distracted by the relentless propaganda being fed to us on a daily basis as part of this President and his minion’s transformation strategy.
My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
Daily Kos ‘Bull’s-Eyed’ Gabrielle Giffords for Defeat in 2008!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/25/daily-kos-‘bull’s-eyed’-gabrielle-giffords-for-defeat-in-2008/It’s Getting Very Serious Now!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/15/it’s-getting-very-serious-now/
Shocking New Report! Obama’s Real Terrorists: Targeting Patriots and The Right!
Veterans and members of our Armed Forces under attack!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/23/veterans-and-members-of-our-armed-forces-under-attack/
The Congressional Assault on Criminal Justice!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/05/the-congressional-assault-on-u-s-criminal-justice/
Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?
Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts, please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered controversial is being censored-what happened to free speech?-You Decide.
“Food For Thought”
God Bless the U.S.A.!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related
Semper Fi!
Jake
I guess you could call me a Jew. My mother was Jewish. More importantly, I’m Aquarius rising. Aquarius is the sign of the water-bearer. “When this sign is on the ascendant, the individual has a unique approach to life that makes him somehow ‘different’ from other people. He may have a most unusual personality, or be so far ahead of his time that he is accused of being eccentric,” says astrologer Jeanne Avery.
Why is the word “Jew” antagonistic to so many people? There has to be a reason, one that goes way back in time. Jew applies to a religion. Religion is a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, especially with regard to the creation of a particular god, in the Jewish religion’s case, a god that conveniently allowed those of the Jewish faith, who were wandering around in the wilderness with Moses for 40 years, a Promised Land. Just go in and take another’s land and call it God’s will. It was Joshua’s will. The Promised Land was an act of desperation and is today an act of desperation by a people married to a past. The “Promised Land” turned out to be Canaan. The Jews invaded Canaan, and all in the name of their religion, killed every man, woman, and child. Explain that to people with reason and logic. Never accuse me of being religious.
One big holy war—just create a supernatural god that does your bidding, a sure way of control. One Holocaust calls for another. In their awesome spender, with their meaningless babble, it is amusing to observe the rituals of holy men casting their spells over the faithful, and not so amusing to see the results. What better way to cause war than to call another’s god evil and murder everyone of another faith?
Weep no more Glenn Beck. The U. S. Constitution neither states nor implies that America was God’s promise to European Christians. We Americans believe in separation of church and state. Is making America vulnerable to religious attack over something America’s Constitution has no connection the right thing to do? What a pity that America no longer adheres to our Constitution. Getting involved in the Promised Land conflict is divisive. Obama takes the Muslim side. He threw Israel under the bus. Such stupidity! Osama bin Laden blamed America, an America that threw their Constitution under the bus. The very reason that people are blowing themselves to bits to kill “God’s enemies” is religious inspiration.
Hitler blamed Germany’s economic woes on Jews. The Jewish question is the reason I was sucked into World War II. Hundreds of millions of innocent people have suffered and died over religious humbug. Time to lay this nonsense to rest! It is not the Promised Land for Jews. It is all man’s doing. There is now a scientifically proven God of all who loves his creation. Wise up and learn about the new age God.
The Old Testament ends with this: “And he shall turn the heart of the fathers to the children, and the heart of the children to their fathers, lest I come and smite the earth with a curse.” Who is “he?” When I read The Gospel According to St. Matthew, I get a completely different story than the one I learned as a Christian. Every Christian is familiar with the Lord’s Prayer. In the Lord’s Prayer, Jesus said, “in earth as it is in heaven. . .But seek ye first the kingdom of God.” There is a distinction. The kingdom of God is internal. In God’s kingdom, “he” is you. Once you find your internal God-self, Jew, Christian, or Muslim, you see things differently than the orthodoxy would have you believe. You find the real you and your destiny. Your life becomes immeasurably better and so goes the world. Welcome to the Age of Aquarius.
If we go down as a country, there is a growing number of people who will not rest to Soros's os removed from this earth. We will find you. You can't hide like a coward that you are anymore. Think of your self as a Pork Chop.