All Posts (27629)

Sort by
http://www.forbes.com/2002/07/25/accountingtracker.html

If Ol’ Rajjpuut were to visit the web link above and take the top twenty-two corporate scandals before 2003 and then throw in our present financial Armageddon’s corporate misdeeds and add them all together . . . that is, all the Wall Street, all the Bank and lending institutions, and AIG insurance malfeasance dropped into the mix already created . . . and stack all that money in a pile of George Washingtons, one-dollar bills. We’re talking about a stack reaching roughly the distance from the earth to the moon and back down and once around the earth’s equator . . . a truly significant stack of money -- so far, so good.

IF now in a separate pile we take the full cost of federal government malfeasance from just nine sources including both debt and unfunded obligations: Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid’s federal component, the two separate stimulus bills in late 2008 and early 2009, and the cost of the government’ three mortgage-guarantee bills (‘1977 Community Re-investment act; 1992 expansion forcing Fanny and Freddy to join the CRA ’77; and Clinton’s 1998 mortgage-guarantee on steroids expansion of the two earlier bills) and finally the so-called health care ‘reform’ law popularly known as “Obamacare.” In the government stack let’s use Ulysses S. Grant, fifty-dollar bills. And, lo and behold the government’s stack of fifties is roughly the same size as the stack of ones . . . oooooops, maybe we shouldn’t be giving government all this control of our lives.

Now Rajjpuut isn’t saying financial reform isn’t needed. True reform is, indeed needed. But “Barack Banking” as contained in the 3,137 pages of the bill before the House of Representatives is just a ploy to expand government control and also a subterfuge to allow all the ACORN-clones now operating under different names to receive renewed funding from the federal government. This is quadruple-dangerous because all Rajjpuut’s loyal readers now realize that ACORN and lawyers like Barack Obama were the agents provacateur abusing the three poorly-written and poorly-conceived mortgage-guarantee laws to force banks and lending-institutions to grant ridiculously unwise loans to people without jobs; people without I.D.; people with abysmal credit ratings; people without home addresses; and especially undocumented illegal aliens. These Cloward-Piven actions by ACORN are the single-most exacerbating events responsible for the creation of the housing bubble and the sub-prime lending crisis that brought this country to its knees.

Given all the evidence, let us just say this: government is ever trending toward becoming more and more government-centric and it’s becoming more and more difficult if not impossible to get government to pay attention to the Constitution, the people and the states . . . in today’s world government only listens to government and the itch to build more government is their main rallying point. This Barack Banking bill is just one more example of a GIB/GSB (government interference boondoggle/government spending boondoggle) that is truly aimed at giving government more power and corrupt ACORN a brand new lease on life with our tax money.

Ya’ll live long, strong and ornery,

Rajjpuut

Read more…

OBAMA'S HEALTHCARE BUREAUCRAT

Now that obama has put his little signature on his healthcare bill itis up to the bureaucracy to really screw it up...remember obamaknocking the US Mail Service?

Bureaucratic heads make up the rules of the game to attempt to meet the goals and intent of the legislation.

Chosen as bureaucratic head of the Medicare and Medicaid services unit of thefederal government and thus a major portion of obamacare is DonaldBerwick.

Like many on obama's team, Berwick comes from the private sector as head of a non-profit in MA (Institute For HealthcareImprovement) that consults with hospitals and such on how they cancontain costs.

He has received criticisms as head of this organization for apparently not worrying about containing his ownsalary...which I assume is passed onto hospitals who hire hisconsulting firm.

The medical journal Modern Healthcare criticized Berwick for making $769,000 in 2003, $630,000 in 2004, andtax filings for 2008 show he earned $637,000 (so reported the BostonGlobe 3/31/2010).

Facts released by his consulting non-profit but personally profitable institute have also been criticized.

In 2006 researches found problems with his institutes claim that they had"averted" 122,000 deaths through a program focusing on better controlof hospital errors and infections.

The researches allege that 14% of hospitals never submitted data about the program and not all ofthe data submitted was audited (same Globe story).

If you listen to the 2008 documentary Money Driven Medicine you will hear Berwickbemoaning the culture of competition in the healthcare industry...he'sagainst competition in the healthcare field.

Has obama not repeatedly told us that his healthcare plan would promote competition?

If Berwick sets the rules according to this ideology then how willnon-competitive Medicare/Medcaid progams look to future members?

Berwick likes to take a business approach to medical care; such as qualitycontrol programs, "lean manufacturing," and "optimizing flow" ...whichmeans sort of like having checkout times from a hospital like they doin motels.

Berwick was made an honorary knight from the UK for his great help in revamping their healthcare system.

The HealthCare Economist on 4/28/2008 did a piece on healthcare plansaround the world and included this information on the Berwick-revampedGreat Britain system based on the Michael Tanner book, The Grass Is NotAlways Greener: A Look at Healthcare Systems Around the World:

- Great Britian spends 7.5% of GDP on healthcare (at what cost?);

- long waiting lists for treatment are "endemic;" there are 750,000people on admissions waiting lists; 40% of cancer patients never see anoncologist; "minimum" waiting times are mandated so that hospitals willcut costs and must be followed or they lose funding;

- rationing "pervades" the system; rationing is "explicit" for services such askidney dialysis, open heart surgery and terminal ill care;

- patients have little choice of providers;

-there is little access to specialists;

- physicians and nurses are basically government employees;

- due to contract negotiations over pay and work hours, few physicians are available nights and weekends;

- due to low pay there is a shortage of specialists.

Berwick must be confirmed by the Senate.
Call your Senator today.
Read more…

CHARLIE CRIST MULLING INDEPENDENT BID

It goes without saying, the November 2010 elections are critical. One of the races that has been exciting to watch is the battle between my hero, Marco Rubio, and the sleezy Charlie Crist. Crist had such a lead in the beginning, some 30 points, and he wallowed in it with his cocky I-can't-be-beat attitude. Now that the wheels have fallen off, we can see his true colors.

CHARLIE CRIST MULLING INDEPENDENT BID
When liberals lose, they take their footballs, go home...
http://bit.ly/9g3cwV

Read more…
In 1964, Ronald Reagan delivered a powerful speech, "A Time for Choosing". The speech is about the some of the same issues we face today. Big government, intrusive government, overspending, and aristocracy seem to be a reoccurring problem throughout our history. If you watch the video of this speech on youtube, it's almost like Ronald Reagan is reaching out from the grave to save us. I would like to share a few of the excerpts that really hit home from that speech.

I used this excerpt in a speech I gave in a public speaking class about the need for term limits in congress.... “This idea that government is beholden to the people, that it has no other source of power except the sovereign people, is still the newest and the most unique idea in all the long history of man's relation to man. This is the issue of this election: Whether we believe in our capacity for self-government or whether we abandon the American Revolution and confess that a little intellectual elite, in a far-distant capital can plan our lives for us better than we can plan them ourselves. You and I are told increasingly, "We have to choose between a left or right." Well, I'd like to suggest there is no such thing as a left or right. There's only an up or down: (1) Man's age-old dream, the ultimate in individual freedom consistent with law and order, or (2) down to the ant heap of totalitarianism.”

This was another hard hitting excerpt... "In this vote-harvesting time, they use terms like the "Great Society," or as we were told a few days ago by the President, we must accept a greater government activity in the affairs of the people. But they've been a little more explicit in the past and among themselves; and all of the things I now
will quote have appeared in print. These are not Republican accusations. For example, they have voices that say, "The cold war will end through our acceptance of a not undemocratic socialism." Another voice says, "The profit motive has become outmoded. It must be replaced by the incentives of the welfare state." Or, "Our traditional system of individual freedom is incapable of solving the complex problems of the 20th century." Senator Fullbright has said at Stanford University that the Constitution is outmoded. He referred to the President as "our moral teacher and our leader," and he says he is "hobbled in his task by the restrictions of power imposed on him by this antiquated document." He must "be freed," so that he "can do for us" what he knows "is best." And Senator Clark of Pennsylvania, another articulate spokesman, defines liberalism as "meeting the material needs of the masses through the full power of centralized government. Well, I, for one, resent it when a representative of the people refers to you and me, the free men and women of this country, as "the masses." This is a term we haven't applied to ourselves in America. But beyond that, "the full power of centralized government"—this was the very thing the Founding Fathers sought to minimize. They knew that governments don't control things. A government can't control the economy without controlling people. And they know when a government sets out todo that, it must use force and coercion to achieve its purpose. They also knew, those Founding Fathers, that outside of its legitimate functions, government does nothing as well or as economically as the private sector of the economy.
How scarily similar that sounds!

This final excerpt goes BEYOND where we are headed!... "But seriously, what are we doing to those we seek to help? Not too long ago, a judge called me here in Los Angeles. He told me of a young woman who'd come before him for a divorce. She had six children, was pregnant with her seventh. Under his questioning, she revealed her husband was a laborer earning 250 dollars a month. She wanted a divorce to get an 80 dollar raise. She's eligible for 330 dollars a month in the Aid to Dependent Children Program. She got the idea from two women in her neighborhood who'd already done that very thing. Yet anytime you and I question the schemes of the do-gooders, we're denounced as being against their humanitarian goals. They say we're always "against" things—we're never "for" anything. Well, the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so." That says it all!

I believe Reagan's speech sheds a good light on the spirit of our cause.
Read more…

An awful lot of Republican incumbents as well as Democrats are feeling a bit nervous these days. Attribute that situation to the existence of the recently created TEA (taxed enough already) Party. From the git-go, Democrats have reacted with undisguised hostility and sought to besmirch and marginalize the TEA Partiers and dismiss their concerns with constitutionality and fiscal responsibility as the ravings of racist extremists. That policy is not only ignorant and loathsome, it also hasn’t worked and has only served to highlight just how out of touch the Obama administration and Democratic leadership as a whole has become.

Republicans are also “edgy” about the future created by this new activist force. Blogs are springing up all over conservative websites saying some version of this . . . “The tea party seems to be thinking they can pick our candidates for us, and they openly prefer candidates that are not incubents or not already “part of the establishment . . . of course, they’ll want us to fund the campaigns for these newcomers. This doesn’t make any sense to me . . . “ Republicans are treating this situation as a quagmire when they should be embracing it as raw opportunity. If Rajjpuut were named Head #1 Republican Honcho tomorrow here’s how he’d approach the “problem.” It’s been said, there is none so blind as he who will not see. It seems that Republicans canNOT see the future clearly because they don’t know their own history? Allow Rajjpuut to refresh some memories . . . .

Sixteen years after the Dixiecrats walked out (at the Democratic National Convention that nominated Harry Truman) during Hubert Humphrey’s speech in favor of civil rights legislation, they found a home in 1964 favoring Republican conservative Barry Goldwater. To be blunt, they were about the only truly enthusiastic voters for Barry. Four years later, Nixon courted them as the “Silent Majority” and the Republican Party stopped being the “Party of Lincoln” in the eyes of many minorities and that condition still exists today. Times have changed, but perceptions haven't. For example, Obama received more White votes and a higher percentage of White votes (almost 48%) than either Kerry or Gore, but McCain only received 4.3% of the Black votes . . . so the Democrats could fairly be excused of having the most racist party. In any case, politically there was an enormous plus for Nixon and many Republicans . . . the G.O.P. was now a much more conservative party and since in any given year, 65-70% of the voters describe themselves as “fiscal-conservatives” Republicans since Nixon’s days have had a natural advantage that has led them to winning seven of the last eleven presidential elections.

With those numbers in their favor, Republicans are a natural “slam-dunk.” Frankly, however, the G.O.P., from the standpoint of Conservative Democrats and Independents (a good percentage of the 65% fiscal-conservatives in America) especially, has gone so far out of the way to make itself UN-attractive that in local, state and national elections they have largely squandered their birthright and continually snatched defeat from the jaws of victory. Four key perceptions in many voters’ eyes have cemented inside them the picture of numerous Republicans as Racists, Old-Fashioned, generally intolerant and an even “ugly” group because . . . .

• They believe that the party is “wagged” by its tail, that is, they believe that former Dixiecrats control the party to this day and they are still racists.

• They disagree with the party’s UNcompromising Stand on abortion even when the woman’s life is in danger, or in cases of rape and incest or for retarded mothers.

• They abhor demands for teaching Creationism in public school science classes and teaching Christian songs in public schools. This is why God created private schools . . . and the founding fathers created Separation of Church and State! This is the TEA Party’s only constitutional beef with Republicans but it is a big one. However, they believe that the Democrats are trying to destroy the Constitution.

• Their perception is that the Republican Party is a sectional (southern) party and not really involved in national issues . . . even for people who don’t regard the G.O.P. as “racists” this view is widely-held.

(Setting aside the detractions mentioned above perceived as “Republican” weaknesses,) here’s what observation and common sense tell us about the TEA Party movement. It is a fiscally-conservative movement. It is a constitutionally-conservative movement. The members of the TEA Party are somewhat older, somewhat wealthier, and somewhat better educated than the average Republican and much moreso than the average Democrat. In short, the TEA Partiers are naturally aligned with the Republican Party, but oooops -- there is that “Republican ugliness” to contend with. So they are definitely an anti-Obama group; anti-progressive group; anti-socialist group and much, much more likely to vote against a Democrat than for one. The problem Republicans are really worried about, however, is that many Republicans feel as threatened by the TEA Party as the Democrats do. They could split the conservative vote for many years to come and ensure a long continuation of Democrats in power nationally and on the state and local levels as well.

Let’s bring our history lesson up closer in time: three potentially great things have happened relatively recently:

1) the TEA Party came into existence and is threatening to hold ALL incumbent politicians’ feet to the fire . . . and isn’t that about time? Big spending irresponsible Republicans should face the same ignominious fate as big spending irresponsible Democrats. Our nation is in a constitutional and fiscal crisis and the voters must solve the problem.

2) The Republican Party finally wised up. They abandoned their old ugly-right “litmus testing.” Instead they took to heart Ronald Reagan’s words, “If a fellow votes with me eight times out of ten, I regard him as a friend.” They created the “Republican Purity Test”:

http://uscommonsense.net/blog/2009/11/25/republican-purity-test/

You’ll remember that the need for such a test arose when the Republican Party chose a candidate to run for a seat in Upper New York and funded her with over a million dollars. It was a conservative region and the locals had not wanted her and were hopping mad. Their ire increased when it came to light that this was a candidate possibly to the left of Barak Obama and that the Democrat running against her was far more conservative. A real conservative entered the race as an Independent Conservative against them both and almost won after the TEA Party money and fury; and national contributions forced the FAKE Republican to withdraw with only about 7% of the voters committed to her. Her parting shot was to ask her supporters to support the Democrat who won by roughly 2.5%. Unfortunately, the G.O.P. as a whole has not acknowledged the purity test and as far as I know has not enforced the purity test before the primaries. So it appears that this very good idea is just lying dormant.

3) The TEA Party released its “Contract From America” as part of their rambunctious “Tax Day” protests on April 15th:

http://www.contractfromamerica.com/Idea.aspx

Looking closely at the two documets with Reagan’s jelly beans over his eyes, Rajjpuut suggests that if the G.O.P. Purity Test rates an 8.2 on a scale of ten, then the TEA Party document deserves an 11.0!

So, in answer to the worries about the TEA Party. How exactly does the Republican Party respond to their presence and even exploit the common ground between the two political entities?

Rajjpuut (as #1 Head Honcho Republican would suggest the following ACTION PLAN for exploiting the common ground existing between the TEA Party and the Republican Party. What should the nominees and candidates do?

1. Ignore the TEA Party. Don’t kowtow to them; don’t treat them as special. Don’t go out of your way to welcome them as likely-Republican-voters or to exaggerate the commonalities. In other words, don’t be political at all. Treat all voters and all campaign contributors the same (with respect but without debasing yourself).

2. Look over their “Contract From America” and see if 8, 9 or 10 of these items can be adopted/adapted for the G.O.P.

3. Look over the “Republican Purity Test” and seriously consider leaving items #9 and #10 out of the picture. 9 is redundant and 10, while important, is about 30th on any sensible list of crucial items for dealing with the crisis year 2010.

4. Using the phraseology of the “Republican Purity Test” modify and combine the two lists and with big drumming and fanfare announce the “Finalized Republican Purity Test” of about fifteen items. Then see which Republican primary candidates meet the purity test and which do not and let the party faithful know who had 15/15; who had 14/15/; who scored 13/15; who had 12/15 and who did NOT pass the test.

5. Ignore the TEA Party and set about fielding a slate of true statesmen and true stateswomen who meet the new Republican standards at least 12/15 and emphasize the key fifteen points at every step of the campaign.

6. Impress the TEA Party and all voters by seeking NOT to impress anyone, but steadfastly and seriously approaching the challenge ahead without pause until voted into office (Then take a break for about three weeks to refresh body, mind and spirit. Read the Constitution and start planning for your swearing in and beyond).

7. Defeat every possible Obama sycophant across the board and start repealing all his garbage. Consider impeaching the communist SOB for not upholding his oath of office and constantly attacking the U.S. Constitution.

Ya’ll live long, strong and ornery,

Rajjpuut
ps: the strategy outlined here was what Bill Clinton did in response to the Republican sweep (in 1994 aligned with their "Contract With America") that derailed all his leftist initiatives. Republicans might not be able to pass a bill or might even pass a bill which Clinton would veto. Then he'd take basically the same bill and move it five or ten degrees to the left with a few deft changes and this time have his Democrats initiate it or bi-partisan sponsors. Wonder of wonders the bills would all pass with large majorities. If the Republican Party co-opts the wisdom of the TEA Party and makes it part of the Republican "planking" for 2010 . . . similar results will occur.

Read more…

The New Pledge of Allegiance

As I sat and watched the socialists pass the government take over of health care this came to me:

"I pledge allegiance to the United Socialist States of America, and to the commune for which it stands, one nation under god knows what, with collectivism and sameness for all".

Two years ago I was totally A political. I was a registered independent who had voted both sides of the aisle my entire life. But, in the spring before the 2008 General/Presidential elections I knew something did not smell right. As I looked further into Barrack Obama's credentials I had an epiphany. This guy is the "Manchurian Candidate". I changed my affiliation to Republican and have been trying to sound the alarm everywhere I can and to whomever will listen. It is truly amazing how many people have responded including my mother who is a Democrat. The November 2010 elections are THE defining moment in our Republic. If we cannot stem the tide of socialism so prevalent in a significant percentage of our population, we are doomed to a slow decay of the lofty ideals of our founding fathers, who were obviously far more intelligent than any group of idiots gathered in DC now.

We are the great human experiment, and have achieved more than anyone could have expected, but the self haters, and ignorant and lazy among us threaten our existence and our future.If the Bozo's in charge now had been in power 230 years ago we would still be the original 13 colony's because no one would have the "can do spirit" to go hack their place out of the wilderness.

Not to be overly dramatic, but I can imagine how those 189 brave and patriotic souls felt at the Alamo when they where faced with such daunting odds. America is and can remain great. We are the best of the best with no apologies to anyone. Most countries on this planet, including our chief rivals, have us to thank for their existence, and I am not ashamed or apologetic to say so!

GOD BLESS AMERICA!
Read more…

Socialism vs. Capitalism

I'd like to say to the lady who just blogged and said she is a broke College student ,along with her friends, and they want to help out. I am a post-grad in the exact same boat and see what's coming. The whole thing is something we do not recognize, and we know isn't the truth. I just started walking up to people at my son's baseball game and the number of people talking, about this is resonating everywhere. I put my faith in god , because as you know we are just average people wanting to build our own lives and be able to be proud. The debt is phenomenol and you gotta believe that good always prevails, along with the truth. I have been able easily to approach people and casually bring up in conversation "where ya working?" and it will generate a conversation, and I spoke to alot of unemployed people who had voted for President Obama , and they all in their gut they'd been had and are voting them out. They're were also some temps but everyone was on the same page. And this is Wisconsin. I also talked with my son and his friends going off to college about and if they understood the Constituion and Bill of Rights. I then said remember to keep or memorize them and don't let anyone else influence you in any other way. (The new indoctrination of the dep't of ed.) Teapartier's aren't crazy, racist, or violent, there is always gonna be someone, at any rally that's gonna act foolish, but not everyone these days are being treated, and may have some mental illnes or addiction or even anger, and that's it can turn ugly, but haven't seen any of that her in Green Bay. We are seeking the truth, because we know the truth. It's in the bigbook.
Read more…

THE, NOT SO SUBTLE, RACISM OF THE LEFT

In another attempt to portray the Tea Party Movement as racist, the Sunday news programs were peppered with racism all day, using identical talking points. Wonder where they all get them. Hmmmm. There never has been and there is no room in this movement for racism, or violence, or anti-americanism. In fact, it's just the opposite. We love our country, and want it to succeed. We want all people to succeed. We want everyone to be happy and have the opportunity to enjoy the fruits of their labor, be free to speak their mind, to pray or not to pray.

THE, NOT SO SUBTLE, RACISM OF THE LEFT
Read more…

America's Destiny

Don’t be angry; don’t be afraid. The destiny of America is the destiny of the individual. This has been known since time immemorial. It was incorporated into the U. S. Constitution and ordained, made sacred by the American people. The government of the United States is of the people for the people. Therefore, for the individual, my Constitution does not favor one individual over another. Every individual has equal opportunity. We, the people, hold this God-given right sacred. Government has the duty to make laws that guarantee equal opportunity. You have been diverted from your rightful destiny. So what happened to change things?

In the Supreme Court of the United States October term, 1980, in Joseph W. Smith, Jr. vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, we read: “While it isn’t written in the Constitution,” declared FDR in 1933, “nevertheless, it is the inherent duty of the Federal Government to keep its citizens from starvation. In 1937, FDR said: “The balance of power between the three great branches of the Federal Government has been tipped out of balance by the Court in direct contradiction of the high purposes of the framers of the Constitution. We have reached the point,” he declared, “where we must take action to save the Constitution from the Court.”

Roosevelt’s claim was totally false. It was Roosevelt’s political expedience. Government does not have the constitutional authority to favor organized labor over non-union labor, nor government workers over private sector workers, nor one state over another, nor the authority to redistribute wealth according to government’s notion of what ought to be, nor to entitle certain individuals over other individuals, nor to claim the law is based on what the majority votes for. If that were the case, the majority could vote that robbery and rape is lawful. None of the above, under my Constitution, is constitutional. Roosevelt’s New Deal law was all unconstitutional, and prolonged the Great Depression.

The destiny of the individual has been transferred to government, government for the good of all, the individual naught: Obama’s “transformation.” The Supreme Court refused to hear my cause by reason that Roosevelt threatened the Court and it capitulated. Legal precedence has been established that the individual taxpayer has zero right to the fruits of his labor. Harry Reid claims the taxpayer has “volunteered” to pay income tax (up to 100 percent of his income). I have that in writing from my Director of Internal Revenue. The Supreme Court held for this outrage by refusing to hear my case, with the IRS having ignored the tax court’s order and confiscating, lawlessly, my property. If I don’t volunteer to pay a lawless income tax, I go to jail. I took my case to court, to no avail. It isn’t constitutional. It’s the law of might makes right. The United States doesn’t have a legal leg to stand on.

Under the “higher law,” the background of America’s Constitution, every individual comes to this world with a unique destiny. Mine is that of messenger. We are free to live according to our individual destinies, but it is by choice. Additionally, we don’t have the choice, Senator Reid, of forcing other individuals, through the law, Roosevelt’s law, to conform to your notions of how we should live. We differ from other life forms in that we have choice. We are not here to be trained to jump government hoops. A government that does not recognize choice is tyrannous.

The strong-willed, however, are equipped to overcome tyrannous government. I did. In the end, the IRS ate crow on the front page of The Palm Beach Post.

The nature of Pisces is weak willed. The nature of Aquarius is strong willed. The Age of Pisces is fading into the past as the Age of Aquarius moves in. Make a note of that. Obama’s, Pelosi’s and Reid’s days are numbered.

We all go through cycles of development, the first of which is the pioneer seeking to find an identity. The Piscean can’t make up his or her mind. He or she desperately wants to do the right thing. He or she is strongly influenced by what other people think. The Aquarian, on the other hand, is stubborn in his or her belief, and argumentative—can’t stand hypocrisy. The Aquarian operates as equal with equal. The Aquarian is the bane of authority. The Aquarian’s symbol, the water-bearer to humanity, is for brotherhood and fraternity and against coercive government. I’m Aquarius rising, which means that as I travel life’s road I become more and more the Aquarian personality.

These cycles I mention are essential to our individual development—imperative to getting on our individual path of destiny. When I studied my Constitution and had my bigger than life calling, I was at a low point in my life, from trying to do the right thing. I was misunderstood, a Piscean, a pitiful person with no sense of direction. Frankly, I was weak willed. I had not yet developed my Aquarian personality. Can you believe that by studying my Constitution at mid-life, and believing in it, I was bought to seek and find my real identity? My ruling planet is Uranus. At mid-life, Uranus was opposing itself when I was born. It means pressure to change. Can you believe that after discovering who I really was, I found the right life partner for me—after three former failures in marriage? By the way, the paring is the second cycle in our development.

Once on my path of destiny, everything started going right. Everything was in divine order, but as I traveled life’s road, a weakness in my character showed itself. I’m impulsive. I got off my path of destiny and paid dearly. Having learned the hard way (the Saturn influence), I returned to my path of destiny and everything started going right again, to the end that all of my dreams have come true.

I’m now in my ninth and final cycle of development. From Numerology and The Devine Triangle, we read: the ninth cycle is “selflessness and compassion. Encompassing a love for all, it desires to apply its energy to universal service. . .This is the artist, the thinker who develops skills through the previous cycles and is now ready to share his or her knowledge with the rest of the world.”

Incidentally, the Aquarian, according to Jeanne Avery in The Rising Sign, under “Aquarius Rising,” “The person with Aquarius on the rise can be very avant-garde. He is the forerunner in setting style, discovering new methods, and showing the rest of humanity the way. . .He knows where the fruit grows and where the spotlight can hit. He is not one to hide his light under a bushel.”

According to cultural historian and philosopher Richard Tarnas in Cosmos and Psyche, we are now enduring the closing of an epoch, with Saturn, the learning planet, in its worst alignment with Pluto, the generational planet. Coincidentally, this bad alignment ends with the Mayan calendar’s end of the world. And—incidentally, the beginning of this bad alignment started with the election of Obama as president, and ends at the end of his term of office.

And—it just so happens that at my birth, this omen I’m bringing you: on September 17, 1925, Saturn was in its most favorable alignment. With Saturn trine Pluto, in Astrologer’s Handbook, we read: “This trine gives the natives (me) the ability to understand the laws by which subtle forces are organized. . . The natives have tremendous willpower (I’m now Aquarian) and are relentless in working toward a goal (brotherhood). . . They are able to work slowly and make fundamental and irrevocable changes in their own and others’ lives. Often there is a sense of destiny or a peculiar karmic mission which they must fulfill. This is one of the most profound of aspects.”

Add this: In numerology, my life lesson number is “7”. “You are here to use and to develop your mind. Your words should be full of wisdom when you decide to talk. . . You should learn to spend time by yourself, in the woods or by the seashore, where you can get in touch with your inner self and your deepest thoughts because your destiny is to use your mind.” I’m retired. Can you believe I’m living in my dream home in the tall timber, the life I was destined to live, with little direct contact with the outside world. How much does it take to convince you that you are more than you think you are?

Something my ability to understand the cosmos tells me should cause goose flesh: In quantum physicist Evan Harris Walker’s The Physics of Consciousness, we read: “it has only been with the advent of quantum theory that we have discovered proof that we exist as something more than pieces of matter. In the development of quantum theory, the observer emerges as a co-equal in the foundry of creation. . . The tests of Bell’s theorem have shown us that objective reality as it has been conceived is not the true fabric of reality. The observer interacts with matter. Consciousness, the substance of this new-found reality that defines the observer, has fundamental existence. It is the quantum mind that is the basic reality.” Using my mind, refusing to be diverted by external authority, using my own mind, looking within for answers, the signs I see, the biggest news of all times, is that we’re at the end of an era, at the end of this world we’ve known throughout the ages, and at the threshold of a quantum leap into our galactic future! You have no idea of the power that lies within you.

Read more…

Americans should be angry and afraid

Americans should be angry and afraid

I have lived through Korea, the Cuban missile crisis, the war in Vietnam, bothGulf wars, and many other threats to our way of life, but I have never fearedfor our country as I do now. The so called main stream media who worship at thealter of Obama, I believe they have been and are a fifth column, who’s ambitionis to take this nation apart. The most dangerous activity as I see it is notwhat the media tells you, it’s what they don’t tell you that poses the greatestdanger to our country and our liberties. While Obama was in Russia signing thisvery dangerous nuclear treaty, Vladimir Putin was in Venezuela signing anagreement with the firebrand dictator Hugo Chavez, to set up missile launchingsites in Venezuela, sounds like the Cuban missile crisis all over again. Obamawill sit back and say nothing. The American media as far as I know have noteven reported it. Also as long as I am on my soap box, when did our greatestally in the Middle East, Israel become our enemy? Israel is the only free country in the MiddleEast, yet the Obama administration has turned its back on a free people whohave been persecuted and enslaved for centuries, while bowing to the king ofSaudi Arabia. What’s going on here, America in 1948 was the first nation on theplanet to recognize Israel as a nation. Since 1948 America has shared a greatfriendship with Israel, they have on many occasions shared the bestintelligence concerning the war on terrorism with America, and now Obama hasplaced enmity between our two great countries, why? Let me end my rant bysaying this, I’m mad as hell, and I am not going to take it anymore.

Notpoliticallycorrect


Read more…

April 19, 1775 is important event because it marked the beginning of the American Revolution. Also it had siganled freedom for the Americans from British rule.

What happen on that day? Why the Battle of Lexington and Concord took place. A battle that we won!

But to the liberals want you to know about this event? No, thay only want you to know about the bombing ofAlfred P. Murrah Federal Building at Oklahoma City! Did it happen? Hell yes it did, but I am not going to let this event that took place 15 years ago to wipe out an event that took over 200 years ago!

So I am ask my brothers and sisters of America rise up an tell these jerks, "Yes we know of the bombing, but why are you refusing to honor the start of the American Revolution!"

It is time to take back out country!

Read more…