All Posts (28843)

Sort by

Just unreal. No one to chose from.

I do not know what is worse in this article!

The fact that the Texas Governor is blowing through so much to rent a house. Not even building equity or trying to with tax dollars!

Or the statement by Bill White that he would be willing to pay himself tax payer dollars to live in his own house.

I have a novel idea why not use your salary to pay for a residence or a portion of it like any normal American does? I am sure everyone including the security detail can come to a reasonable compromise on a suitable location.

So that leaves us with nobody as of now to vote for.

Read more…
According to the Jerusalem Post website article linked above, Rahm Emanuel is eating crow for the Obama Administration. In the wake of Obama’s nomination of Elena Kagan (a Jew) to serve as a justice on the United States Supreme Court, Emanuel (also Jewish) attempted a song-and-dance for proponents of Israel including a group of Rabbis called together for a meeting at the White House. Obama, of course, did NOT attend the meeting but sent David Ross to allay the rabbi’s fears. Ross who is not religious (his mother was Jewish, father Catholic) showed more guts at the meeting in calling for Israel to abandon its nukes, if they actually have them as the U.S. is convinced) as part of a 'Nuke-free Middle East' than Obama did in feigning pressure on Iran’s nuclear development. The headline for the JP article read “Emanuel to rabbis: US 'screwed up' “ which told about 1/10 the story in Rajjpuut’s line of thinking.
This has been an important mainstream story for fourteen months now, nay, has been a mainstream story since at least the moment when Barack Obama won the Democratic nomination for president in 2008. Like the Climate-Gate Story; like the CCX-Scandal story and like Obama’s denial of a Muslim background (he was a “prize student” while attending Muslim school in Jakarta), information about Barack Obama or his policies that Barack Obama doesn’t wish to become matters of public debate are routinely sloughed-aside without further adieu by the mainstream Obama-worshipping media. Rajjpuut will digress briefly:
(The ultra-liberal London Times has run several stories exploring what all Europe already knows: “global-warming” is a hoax. Therefore any policies, especially economy-crippling, expensive policies like “cap and trade” (now they’re calling it “America’s Power Act”) which is now being debated in the U.S. Senate are hoaxes in themselves.
http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1732518,00.html (The American magazine Time online ran a BS article here on Richard Sandor treating him as if he were the Mother Teresa of environmental-capitalism. The truth is, however, begun to be found here in the four expandable charts near the bottom (just click on the ¼ arrow to see all of them one at a time): http://www.stopliberallies.com/more-on-the-ccx-carbon-trading-scandal-633.htmland the full truth is here:
and one last aim to get truth out in the case of Barack’s Muslim schooling, here’s the Muslim elementary school he attended for parts of three years 1969-71; he also attended other Muslim indoctrination earlier; Obama has said repeatedly he’s ALWAYS and only been a Christian and that he has NEVER practiced Islam or attended Muslim schooling):
http://article.wn.com/view/2010/02/05/Indonesia_to_move_Jakartas_Barack_Obama_statue/ So Obamamessiah and his administration have told us lies and are seeking to rob the American people in a ploy that will destroy our economy by raising prices of all commodities in America 67% soon after Cap and Trade becomes law and yet the mainstream American media covers not 3%, not 2%, not even 1% of these issues . . . but 0%. Back to the Jerusalem Press story which is yet another that the mainstream media are also choosing every single day NOT to cover . . . .
The larger story, of course, is how Obama has mis-treated our allies while running around bowing and scraping and apologizing to America’s enemies. Emanuel tried to bridge the gap with worldwide proponents of Israel at the meeting, saying that Obama’s administration has “screwed up the messaging” about its support for Israel over the past 14 months, and it will take “more than one month to make up for 14 months. . .” Right, they didn't express themselves as carefully as they should have . . . No, Mr. Emanuel, No Mr. Obama . . . it's NOT your words, but your actions that are causing this situtation . . . .
After Obama disowned him, in the wake of his “God-damn, America!” comment, Wright stated in a June 10, 2009 interview that he had still voted for Obama for President, despite the raging controversy. He said,"them [sic] Jews" within the administration are keeping us form speaking to each other. Wright also according to Wikipedia suggested that Obama did not send a delegation to the Durban Review Conference in Geneva, because of Jewish pressure, saying: "[T]he Jewish vote, the A-I-P-A-C vote, that’s controlling him, that would not let him send representation to the Darfur Review Conference, that’s talking this craziness on this trip, cause they’re Zionists, they would not let him talk to someone who calls a spade what it is."
Under attack immediately from the Anti-Defamation League, Wright modified his statements the next day, saying that "I’m not talking about all Jews, all people of the Jewish faith, I’m talking about Zionists." Wright also took that opportunity and endorsed the anti-Zionist books “Judaism Does Not Equal Israel” and “The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine” and said, “ethnic cleansing the Zionist is considered a sin and a crime against humanity, and they don't want Barack talking like that"
The Jewish proclivity for voting liberal has got them into problems here. On the one hand, Barack Obama appears to be willfully erasing his Muslim background and many Muslims are anti-Israel. On the other Obama has denied hearing any Anti-Semitism from Wright, even though the hate-words seem to spring unbidden to the man’s lips repeatedly. On yet another hand, Obama willfully embarrassed the Israeli Prime Minister in Washington, D.C. and both his Vice-President and Secretary of State claimed offense at Israeli policies. On yet another hand, Obama’s seemingly deliberate shilly-shallying on Iran has accomplished nothing except allowing fourteen months to pass rapidly while Iran builds its A-bomb and practices hitting targets with its missiles. On the fifth hand, Ross is telling them at the meeting that Obama is against Israel having the bomb and will seek to eliminate that capability (more stridently than he‘s thus far opposed Iranian activity in the nuke field? hmmmm).
“During the elections there were doubts about President Obama’s support for Israel, and now they have resurfaced,” Emanuel said, “But concerning policy, we have done everything that we can that is in Israel’s security – and long-range interests. Watch what the administration does.” Rajjpuut demurs . . . what Obama’s already done says it all. He has deliberately embarrased and discomfited an ally and given them severe doubts about where his ultimate sympathies lie. But truly the issue goes deeper, it goes back to Obama’s lies about his Muslim background and it goes back to the Anti-American and Anti-semetic rhetoric of Reverend Jeremiah Wright, Obama’s pastor for twenty years and yet Obama says he never heard any Anti-American or Anti-Jewish attacks in the church ever. Amazing how Reverend Wright put on his worst behavior when the cameras were on him, but never before . . . .
These things happen when you get into bed with a progressive who wants to destroy the U.S. Constitution (to “progress well beyond" that f"lawed document”) which he vowed “to preserve, protect and defend.” The token Jewish presence belies the truth, Obama is Anti-Israel at his core. Just as he hides the truth by hiding from words of truth such as “Jihad” “Terrorism,” “Radical-Islam” and “Muslim-extremists” when dealing with “incidents” threatening or taking American lives, he is hiding the truth from Jews who desperately want to believe he’s a good man and on their sides. Hitler, to his credit at least, told the truth about his anti-semetic beliefs openly . . . .
Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,
Rajjpuut
Email It
Read more…

DO YOU KNOW WHO IS REPRESENTING YOU?

How many members of the U.S. Congress are also members of the DSA?

How many of the DSA members sit on the Judiciary Committee?

How Many Members Of The U.S. Congress
Are Self-Declared Socialists?

Updated for the 111th Congress

The following FAQ will help clarify a few facts:

Q: What is the Socialist International?

A: It is the worldwide organization of socialist, social democratic and labor parties. It currently brings together 131 political parties and organizations from all continents. Its origins go back to the early international organizations of the labor movement of the last century.* It has existed in its present form since 1951, when it was re-established at the Frankfurt Congress. They are now headquartered in London, England.

* In 1864, representatives of English and French industrial workers founded the International Workingmen's Association in London. Karl Marx, who was living in London at the time, became the First International's dominant figure. Marx's doctrines were revived in the 20th century by Russian revolutionary Vladimir Ilich Lenin, who developed and applied them – and we all know that what was started as a labor movement ended up as the biggest totalitarian/communist state, i.e., the USSR.

Q: What is the Democratic Socialists of America [DSA]?

A: It is the largest socialist organization in the United States, and the principal U.S. affiliate of the Socialist International. Their website is http://www.dsausa.org/dsa.html

Q: What are seven principles behind what the DSA's calls it's "Progressive Challenge?"

Dignified Work
Environmental Justice
Economic Redistribution
Democratic Participation
Community Empowerment
Global Non-Violence
Social Justice.

Never mind their soothing-sounding leftist doublespeak like 'Environmental Justice' (whatever that is supposed to mean) or the soft & fuzzy 'Global Non-Violence' (a euphemism for unilateral disarmament) — the DSA's self-declared principle of 'Economic Redistribution' clearly shows where these folks are coming from and exactly where they plan to take America.

Q: How many members of the U.S. Congress are also members of the DSA?

A: Seventy!

Q: How many of the DSA members sit on the Judiciary Committee?

A: Eleven: John Conyers [Chairman of the Judiciary Committee], Tammy Baldwin, Jerrold Nadler, Luis Gutierrez, Melvin Watt, Maxine Waters, Hank Johnson, Steve Cohen, Barbara Lee, Robert Wexler, Linda Sanchez [there are 23 Democrats on the Judiciary Committee of which eleven, almost half, are now members of the DSA].

Q: Who are these members of Congress?

A: See the listing below





Co-Chairs
Hon. Raúl M. Grijalva (AZ-07)
Hon. Lynn Woolsey (CA-06)
Vice Chairs
Hon. Diane Watson (CA-33)
Hon. Sheila Jackson-Lee (TX-18)
Hon. Mazie Hirono (HI-02)
Hon. Dennis Kucinich (OH-10)
Senate Members
Hon. Bernie Sanders (VT)
House Members
Hon. Neil Abercrombie (HI-01)
Hon. Tammy Baldwin (WI-02)
Hon. Xavier Becerra (CA-31)
Hon. Madeleine Bordallo (GU-AL)
Hon. Robert Brady (PA-01)
Hon. Corrine Brown (FL-03)
Hon. Michael Capuano (MA-08)
Hon. André Carson (IN-07)
Hon. Donna Christensen (VI-AL)
Hon. Yvette Clarke (NY-11)
Hon. William “Lacy” Clay (MO-01)
Hon. Emanuel Cleaver (MO-05)
Hon. Steve Cohen (TN-09)
Hon. John Conyers (MI-14)
Hon. Elijah Cummings (MD-07)
Hon. Danny Davis (IL-07)
Hon. Peter DeFazio (OR-04)
Hon. Rosa DeLauro (CT-03)
Rep. Donna F. Edwards (MD-04)
Hon. Keith Ellison (MN-05)
Hon. Sam Farr (CA-17)
Hon. Chaka Fattah (PA-02)
Hon. Bob Filner (CA-51)
Hon. Barney Frank (MA-04)
Hon. Marcia L. Fudge (OH-11)
Hon. Alan Grayson (FL-08)
Hon. Luis Gutierrez (IL-04)
Hon. John Hall (NY-19)
Hon. Phil Hare (IL-17)
Hon. Maurice Hinchey (NY-22)
Hon. Michael Honda (CA-15)
Hon. Jesse Jackson, Jr. (IL-02)
Hon. Eddie Bernice Johnson (TX-30)
Hon. Hank Johnson (GA-04)
Hon. Marcy Kaptur (OH-09)
Hon. Carolyn Kilpatrick (MI-13)
Hon. Barbara Lee (CA-09)
Hon. John Lewis (GA-05)
Hon. David Loebsack (IA-02)
Hon. Ben R. Lujan (NM-3)
Hon. Carolyn Maloney (NY-14)
Hon. Ed Markey (MA-07)
Hon. Jim McDermott (WA-07)
Hon. James McGovern (MA-03)
Hon. George Miller (CA-07)
Hon. Gwen Moore (WI-04)
Hon. Jerrold Nadler (NY-08)
Hon. Eleanor Holmes-Norton (DC-AL)
Hon. John Olver (MA-01)
Hon. Ed Pastor (AZ-04)
Hon. Donald Payne (NJ-10)
Hon. Chellie Pingree (ME-01)
Hon. Charles Rangel (NY-15)
Hon. Laura Richardson (CA-37)
Hon. Lucille Roybal-Allard (CA-34)
Hon. Bobby Rush (IL-01)
Hon. Linda Sánchez (CA-47)
Hon. Jan Schakowsky (IL-09)
Hon. José Serrano (NY-16)
Hon. Louise Slaughter (NY-28)
Hon. Pete Stark (CA-13)
Hon. Bennie Thompson (MS-02)
Hon. John Tierney (MA-06)
Hon. Nydia Velazquez (NY-12)
Hon. Maxine Waters (CA-35)
Hon. Mel Watt (NC-12)
Hon. Henry Waxman (CA-30)
Hon. Peter Welch (VT-AL)
Hon. Robert Wexler (FL-19)

Source: Congressional Progressive Caucus

DSA Members of Congress: http://bit.ly/96bzwc

What is the Democratic Socialists of America [DSA]? http://www.dsausa.org/dsa.html

Share Twitter Facebook

Read more…
"Tea and
Coffee - Finding Common Ground on Changing the Political Culture"

The Conventional wisdom is that the Tea Party represents the far right and the
Coffee Party Movement the left. This makes it easy to categorize and pre-judge
their respective opinions, but this over-generalization is not accurate. Two of
us, from seemingly different sides of the track, sat down to discover that what
brings us together far exceeded what divides us: Dale Robertson, the Founder of
the Modern Day Tea Party. And Paul Silver, a member of the Coffee Party
Movement and other campaign reform groups. The core beliefs of the Tea Party
are Fiscal Responsibility, Limited Government, and Free Markets. The Coffee
Party wants to promote cooperation in government, recognizing that the federal
government is not the enemy of the people, but the expression of our collective
will. The principles are quite general.

We found each other when Dale was mentioned in an article on possible common ground with
Democrats We started talking after that and this piece represents our personal
conversation and doesn't necessarily represent our colleagues.

First, we agreed that the inflammatory conflicts between conservatives and liberals are
mostly a proxy war promoted by special interests (insurance companies, banks,
trial lawyers, unions, etc) aiming to manipulate public opinion and public
policy. A predatory special interest cannot admit that it wants to dilute air
and water regulations, so it backs a candidate willing to carry their cause
with the well-funded argument that over-regulation is hurting our national
competitiveness and ability to create jobs. Unions might make similar
arguments.

After laying a foundation of common ground we found that we were not that far apart on most
other issues. To be sure, there were areas of disagreement, but we think there
are areas where reasonable people can disagree and the appropriate grist for a
representative government free of special interest manipulation can exist. As
our conversation meandered, we saw some level of consensus on many
things—nonpartisan redistricting, the need for comprehensive immigration
reform, sensible gun control laws, deficit reduction.

We agree that the solution is a new campaign system that helps to neutralize the financial influence
of predatory special interests--the Fair Elections Now Act. With Fair
Elections, public office is more accessible to citizens without wealth or
connections to it. We want to expand speech and replace a handful of bundlers
with thousands of small contributors. Fair Elections would allow members of
Congress to focus on the needs of their constituents, instead of worrying about
their next campaign check.

We share distress at the Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United v. FEC that threw out
decades of common sense restrictions on corporate and union electioneering.
Members of Congress already spend too much time raising campaign cash, giving
constituents and the policy-making process short shrift. Now with the added
fear of political reprisal from deep-pocketed special interests, the
fundraising pressure will only increase. Congress’ first response, the DISCLOSE
Act, doesn’t go nearly far enough to fix this broken system.

No doubt we will find more areas of agreement as we continue to talk.

Our country faces many challenges and there are differing views on they should be
confronted. We may come from different backgrounds, but we both agree that
members of Congress must start doing the work for which they were elected—to
represent us. That won’t happen as long as they have to spend so much of their
time dialing for dollars.

This is what two average citizens, looking from what at first seemed like different points
on the political spectrum, discovered about ourselves when we looked past first
impressions and simplistic media analyses. We were both relatively centrist
when we got into the meat of the issues - sometimes liberal sometimes
conservative. But certainly more aligned than the media would lead you to
believe.

Read more…

What Liberals Need to Understand about Exactly

What Progressives are Threatening to Take From All of Us


On the national scene are three classes of people proving themselves most important right now within the wide-ranging debate tearing our government and our nation apart and the “scorekeeping within this public debate as resolved at the ballot boxes. These three major classes are the Constitutionalist or Conservative; the Liberal; and the Progressive. The formerly important “Moderate” has all but disappeared. At present it appears the Conservative force is attracting a huge national following in fiscal-matters owing to the nation’s runaway spending, deficits, and national debt and the growing opposition to Progressive programs to expand government. The Progressives seemingly (having the votes in the House and Senate) are calling all or virtually all the shots in law-making and spending. The important law-making they control includes burdensome taxes; expAnsive new expEnsive programs that impinge upon individual freedom and the free markets and place the government into the dominant realm of our nation’s activities rather than in its naturally-expected realm of being subservient to the people’s wishes. The feeling of the Conservative element is that the Progressives are running roughshod over the country and the Constitution. Where formerly there was a Moderate element, now tinges of Moderation are found in the tiny proportion of liberals who vote bi-partisan opposition to the President’s sweeping programs but no real moderation is found, mainly polarity. The Democratic Party under the gross and ill-advised Progressive leadership of Pelosi, Reid and Obama and their loyal followers has unquestionably moved the nation into deep socialist waters. The underpinnings of this socialism is a powerful forcible re-distribution of wealth: that is, THEFT.

A. The most basic principle of our American government is freedom. The American experience, the American constitution and the spirit of America are tied to freedom. That means the citizen is in charge of the government and not the other way around. Liberals tend to see the citizen as the always available FUNDING Source for the federal legislators. Progressives see the citizen as an obstruction, a bump in the road to their efforts to create (their version of) a perfect world. There are only 17 specific powers allotted to the federal government by the government and there are ten amendments (the Bill of Rights) limiting the power of the federal government over both the states and the individuals. All too often lost in the nonsensical arguments raised by Progressives (those who see the Constitution as “flawed” and who say we “MUST PROGRESS BEYOND” the Constitution), is that there is a gross difference between rights and needs. We all have needs and it is our own responsibility as individuals to employ our rights and our self-will to take care of those needs. The “NANNY-STATE” advocated by Progressives sees an unending number of basic needs (they call them rights) which the Federal Government is OBLIGATED to fulfill . . . the cost of fulfilling this cradle-to-grave catalog of needs is the loss of our real rights and our real freedoms to the increasingly powerful all-controlling federal government.

B. Rights are not negotiable they come to us from God and not from the government; they belong to the individual as our basic inheritance for being human. Rights are NOT needs, however. For example, there is no natural right to health care; no natural right to have the government bail you out if your business fails; no natural right to the resources of others just because you are needy. Taking resources such as money and labor or goods by legal force from the individuals and the individual states** is theft. It is power from the barrel of a gun used to hold up some citizens for the benefit of others. The federal government has no right to deny freedoms to any group of people to advance the well-being or to benefit others. There is NO natural right to EQUALITY, except the equality of opportunity. The Federal Government has an obligation to defend the freedoms of each and every one of us and to protect us when our rights are violated but no right to force all of us into equality of means. Freedom means equality of opportuntiy to be free, it does not mean forced equality.

C. The most basic rights and freedoms protected by our Constitution against the infringement of the Federal Government are the freedoms guaranteed by the 10th Amendment, the last Amendment within the Bill of Rights and clearly the most important. The Obama administration has willfully stomped all over the 10th Amendment while stomping all over the American Dream on the one hand and willfully ignored their obligations under the Constitution. In other words, they have done everything that they shouldn’t do, and very little (for example, protecting our borders) that they are required to do. In fact, according to a leaked document in the news today, they are plotting to within nine months make 13 million illegal aliens into citizens because they believe that they will receive 80-85% of those new citizens’ votes and will be permanently locked-into the halls of power. This cynical attempt at permanent power, they say, is based upon the fact that our Immigration laws are “broken.” Over 220 years our immigration and naturalization laws have faithfully served the nation. They cannot be changed willy-nilly to benefit one political party over another, they must be amended in the Constitution and only in that may they be changed. The cynicism and Marxist grab for power of Barack Obama constitutes the single most damming threat to our nation in its 221 year history.

That is the most important thing that Liberals need to understand and that Progressives want to steal from all of us: our American freedom and the Constitutional American traditions that have made this the greatest most powerful and most just nation on earth by eternally defending and renewing our freedoms to pull from each of us the intrinsic strength that Americans has thrived upon for over two centuries.

Ya’ll live long, strong and ornery,

Rajjpuut

** right now Obamacare will temporarily ease the Medicaid burden upon the individual states, however, that changes quickly and the increasing share of Medicaid forced upon the states by Federal Medicaid requirements commanded by federal law will in due course bankrupt each and every one of them.

Read more…
But CALIFORNIA seems to have this TeaParty stuff figured out!!Not saying other states don't, but if they do they need to tell theirstory like California is doing here:_____________________________________________________Over 90 unique, local groups (and growing daily!) here in the Golden Staterepresent one of the largest cohesive coalitions of state/local tea partyorganizations nationwide. The Tea Party Movement in California is a dynamicforce in this grassroots revolution. With weekly conference calls for organizersand coordinated efforts on issues and initiatives, the taxpayers of Californiahave found a platform to battle the issues on our own terms.This video represents a short history of how we got to this place,how much we've accomplished, and how we have nothing but momentumat our backs heading into the 2010 election.

California Tax Day Tea Party from Lipstick Underground on Vimeo.

Read more…



So the next step for me was to put together a platform on what I stood for and willing to fight for. I came up with the following:


text-autospace:none""> God13.0pt;font-family:Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana""> is Love. “In God We Trust.” “Do to others as you would have others do to you,” Promoting God in theSacramento Equation. Family, “One Man, One Woman,” is the “Core of American Society.” Freedom is Personal Power “Under God” to Determine Direction and Destiny. Republic is “Of the People, by the People, and for the People”. Constitution is the Operating Law of the Republic. Limited Government is Opposite of Socialism, Marxism, & Fascism where Government has total control over everything: life, land, business, water, & servitude. Justice13.0pt;font-family:Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana""> = Punish Criminals, not Law Abiding; Impeach Special Interest Judges. People's Grand Jury indictment only. All three elements of crime present - Act, Intent & Damage. Free Market = Right to Succeed or Fail in Business; No Bail-outs; No Favoritism; No Socialism. Business Friendly = Jobs coming into the State, Not Jobs leaving the State, Small Business = Responsible for 99.4% of all of the jobs in California, therefore create a business friendly environment for small business through tax restructuring. Large Business = Crucial to the Economy, the creation of jobs and the building of GNP. Lower Taxes Now = Lower Personal & Property Taxes Now! No Estate Tax!

Balanced Budget Now = Balance the Budget Now! Private

text-autospace:none"">

Property = The American Dream. The opposite of Socialism, Marxism, and Fascism where the State and the Elite own all the land. Right to Bear Arms = Second Amendment right; for the protection of Self, Family, Property, State,and Hunting for Conservation. Rule of Law = Order in Government, Society, and Culture.





Read more…

Most of the other TP's are afraid to make such a powerful stand. We tell the world we have Core Beliefs!

We don't step on toes, we step on necks! Hahahaha! :-)

Illegal Aliens Are Here illegally.
Pro-Domestic Employment Is Indispensable.
Stronger Military Is Essential.
Special Interests Eliminated.
Gun Ownership Is Sacred.
Government Must Be Downsized.
National Budget Must Be Balanced.
Deficit Spending Will End.
Bail-out And Stimulus Plans Are Illegal.
Reduce Personal Income Taxes A Must.
Reduce Business Income Taxes Is Mandatory.
Political Offices Available To Average Citizens.
Intrusive Government Stopped.
English As Core Language Is Required.
Traditional Family Values Are Encouraged.

Common Sense Constitutional
Conservative Self-Governance

Read more…

The Universe's Energy

(The Associated Press) “We The People demand the best candidate.” In my view, “We the People” don’t yet know whether we are afoot or horseback. Of course, when I read the same stuff you people read I march to the beat of a different drummer. Consider this:

After my departure from my old life in the spring of 1975, and after my two year sabbatical on Bold Venture, my 37 foot sloop, after my two years in the South Atlantic Ocean, my astrological chart began to fit. It didn’t before my departure. I’m going to explain why. First of all, I’m Aquarius Rising. That means I’m seen as eccentric—stubborn in my far out of the mainstream beliefs. Before my departure, I went with the flow. Now, I’ve been told, I’m a rock in the stream. Who needs my kind?

My second marriage failed and my 25 year business enterprise, as well. There was nothing left but to change. Coincidentally, my astrological chart indicated that at the time of my change that the pressure would be great to change.

I knew nothing about astrology when I made my change. Since then, I’ve learned that one’s Rising Sign is an astrological term for when the sun rises on one’s life. It is calculated by taking the place and exact time of one’s birth, for the sun travels across the earth’s surface and approximately 900 m.p.h. Because I was born at 4:51 P.M. C.S.T. in Houston, Texas, astrologers calculate I’m Aquarius Rising.

I bought Jeanne Avery’s The Rising Sign and turned to “Aquarius Rising.” Avery wrote that I may be “the person to bring back information that has been lost to civilization for centuries.” In an earlier blog, I mentioned that my sailing experience was in the Bermuda Triangle. I’m reading Time-Life’s Mystic Places. I read about an individual’s time warp experience in the Triangle. I wrote about my time warp experience. I’m thinking about what Avery wrote about me—bringing back information lost to civilization.

Mystic Places tells about megaliths, massive upright stone monuments, the most famous of which is Stonehenge, near London. Megaliths are pre-historic. Not only is what they represent a mystery, but how they were moved. They are often placed over high radiation areas, and as well in areas of high magnetism. Our planet is surrounded by a magnetic field, part of the universe’s electromagnetic force. Occultists visiting said sites are prone to experience mild hallucinations. It is thought that pre-historic people marked said sites as having healing power. In fact, medical science treats broken bones with electromagnetism. Said sites are thought to be markers for astronomical events. Stonehedge is known to be lined up with six other megaliths, it is thought for astronomical purposes. Not one word, though, about my thought. Pre-historic people were conscious of more than modern people of the workings of the universe.

It is well known that if we are without one of our senses the other senses are enhanced. My aunt was stone deaf for years. An operation restored her hearing. The world of sound was unbearable to her. She had to wear earplugs for a time. My father told me he had rheumatism so badly when he was a young man that he was walking with the aid of crutches. His landlady hid his crutches. He was forced to go to work without them. He never used them again. With all of our contrivances, are we not dulled to the workings of the universe in our ability to cope?

In America, all those contrivances give us a chance to do more than work most of our lives for a bare existence. In our leisure time, we watch TV and play computer games. We entertain ourselves. Encouraged by government, we go deeply into debt buying racy cars, boats, gadgets, twice the home we can afford. It is all good for the economy, we’re told. Who is going to pay the bill? Something's wrong. It doesn't add up.

But if it isn’t fun, it’s not worth doing; it isn't worth thinking about. Perhaps, unconsciously, environmentalists want us to get along without so much, but unfortunately they are being manipulated by self-serving politicians, the same politicians that give us all manner of crutches. Environmentalists just don’t get it. They are looking for external answers. I reason that instead of being so things oriented, we should be looking within and doing what we know is best for us. Who with a public voice is saying that? I don't hear it.

This brings me to my awakening in 1975. My anger at my government caused me to read Edward S. Corwin’s The “Higher Law” Background of American Constitutional Law.Corwin’s essay caused me to go to the county law library and study my Constitution, and the procedure for taking the IRS to court. I had a personal stake in the outcome. But wouldn't you know, everyone I knew at the time thought I’d lost my mind. Where have you heard that you have a personal stake in the outcome and you, yourself, can take the IRS to court? To the world, I was a lousy tax protester, a nutcake.

The IRS made a mistake. I was overtaxed and the IRS refused to correct its obvious mistake. The law your representatives wrote says you have to go to the U.S. Tax Court to get the mistake corrected. Most people don’t. It raises a lot of revenue. To many, anything that raises revenue is good. It gives government more money to hand out. I went to Tax Court and got the mistake corrected. In violation of the Tax Court order, the IRS once again mistakenly confiscated my property. Understand that the government is always mistaken. We, the people, break the law. To many, it is good that government can do no wrong, especially bureaucrats. Both the U. S. Court of Appeals and the U.S. Supreme Court saw nothing unconstitutional in the repeating IRS mistakes. The federal judiciary is activist. The Constitution is whatever they say it is. To many, that’s, good, those who feel they are benefitting at another’s expense.

I filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court on the IRS’s repeating mistakes. The court decided to hear me. The government admitted that it had “wrongfully” taken my property. My property was dutifully returned to me. The IRS then went to my bank and took every cent in my checking account. The IRS is permitted to make limitless mistakes. The U.S. District Court refused to reopen the case. I was told I’d have to file a new complaint.

The “law” in the United States, with the consent of the majority of the American people, those who feel they are benefitting at another’s cost, allow the IRS to make limitless mistakes. I took the court record to The Palm Beach Post. The Post was ignorant of that fact. The Post had not thought about it. I showed a reporter my court record. With my court record in hand, the reporter went to the IRS and said, “how come?” The IRS was forced to admit on the front page that it had made numerous mistakes against me. There was not one peep from anyone, proof that many Americans think it is good what the IRS is doing to taxpayers; that is, the half who pay no taxes. All the IRS admission of limitless mistakes did was to make taxpayers more afraid of the IRS. To many, that’s good. And who wants to hear “my problem.” Thanks to the American people, it took the IRS only two years to make a mistake against my wife, and refuse to correct it. To many, just think good and everything will be alright. Just give the politicians a chance. They will make everything right.

Have the American people fully awakened to the fact that their government is a gangster in disguise? I think the American people are burying their heads in the sand. Think of the world you people are leaving your children. What are your children going to think of you when the day of reckoning comes? We’ve a long way to go and a short time to get there.

Read more…


So the next step for me was to put together a platform on what I stood for and willing to fight for. I came up with the following:


text-autospace:none"">God13.0pt;font-family:Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana""> is Love. “In God We Trust.” “Do to others as you would have others do to you,” Promoting God in theSacramento Equation.


text-autospace:none"">Family, “One Man, One Woman,” is the “Core of American Society.”


text-autospace:none"">Freedom is Personal Power “Under God” to Determine Direction and Destiny.


text-autospace:none"">Republic is “Of the People, by the People, and for the People”.


text-autospace:none"">Constitution is the Operating Law of the Republic.


text-autospace:none"">Limited Government is Opposite of Socialism, Marxism, & Fascism where Government has total control of everything: land, business, life, water, & servitude.


text-autospace:none"">Justice13.0pt;font-family:Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana""> = Punish Criminals,
not Law Abiding; Impeach Special Interest Judges. People's Grand Jury indictment only. All three elements of crime present - Act, Intent & Damage.


text-autospace:none"">Free Market =
Right to Succeed or Fail in Business; No Bail-outs; No Favoritism; No Socialism.


text-autospace:none"">Business Friendly = Jobs coming into the State, Not Jobs leaving the State


text-autospace:none"">Small Business = Responsible for 99.4% of all of the jobs in California, therefore create a business friendly environment for small business through tax restructuring.


text-autospace:none"">Large Business =
Crucial to the Economy, the creation of jobs and the building of GNP.


text-autospace:none"">Lower Taxes Now = Lower Personal & Property Taxes Now! No Estate Tax!


text-autospace:none"">Balanced Budget Now = Balance the Budget Now!


text-autospace:none"">Private Property =
The American Dream. The opposite of Socialism, Marxism, and Fascism where the State and the Elite own all the land.


text-autospace:none"">Right to Bear Arms = Second Amendment right; for the protection of Self, Family, Property, State,and Hunting for Conservation.


text-autospace:none"">Rule of Law = Order in Government, Society, and Culture.





Read more…

Warren Willis Platform

text-autospace:none"">font-family:Verdana;mso-fareast-font-family:Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">1. Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">God13.0pt;font-family:Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana""> normal"">is Love. “In God We Trust.”“Do to others as you would have others do to you,” Promoting God in theSacramento Equation.

text-autospace:none"">font-family:Verdana;mso-fareast-font-family:Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">2. Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">Family, “OneMan, One Woman,” is the “Core of American Society.”

text-autospace:none"">font-family:Verdana;mso-fareast-font-family:Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">3. Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">Freedom mso-bidi-font-weight:bold"">is font-family:Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">Personal Power “Under God” toDetermine Direction and Destiny.

text-autospace:none"">font-family:Verdana;mso-fareast-font-family:Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">4. Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">Republic is“Of the People, by the People, and for the People”.

text-autospace:none"">font-family:Verdana;mso-fareast-font-family:Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">5. Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">Constitution isthe Operating Law of the Republic.

text-autospace:none"">font-family:Verdana;mso-fareast-font-family:Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">6. Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">Limited Government isOpposite of Socialism, Marxism, & Fascism where Government has totalcontrol of everything: land, business, life, water, & servitude.

text-autospace:none"">font-family:Verdana;mso-fareast-font-family:Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">7. Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">Justice13.0pt;font-family:Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana""> = Punish Criminals,not Law Abiding; Impeach Special Interest Judges. People's Grand Juryindictment only. All three elements of crime present - Act, Intent &Damage.

text-autospace:none"">font-family:Verdana;mso-fareast-font-family:Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">8. Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">Free Market =Right to Succeed or Fail in Business; No Bail-outs; No Favoritism; NoSocialism.

text-autospace:none"">font-family:Verdana;mso-fareast-font-family:Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">9. Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">Business Friendly =Jobs coming into the State, Not Jobs leaving the State

text-autospace:none"">font-family:Verdana;mso-fareast-font-family:Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">10. Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">Small Business =Responsible for 99.4% of all of the jobs in California, therefore create abusiness friendly environment for small business through tax restructuring.

text-autospace:none"">font-family:Verdana;mso-fareast-font-family:Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">11. Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">Large Business =Crucial to the Economy, the creation of jobs and the building of GNP.

text-autospace:none"">font-family:Verdana;mso-fareast-font-family:Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">12. Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">Lower Taxes Now =Lower Personal and Property Taxes Now! No Estate Tax!

text-autospace:none"">font-family:Verdana;mso-fareast-font-family:Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">13. Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">Balanced Budget Now =Balanced Budget Now!

text-autospace:none"">font-family:Verdana;mso-fareast-font-family:Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">14. Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">Private Property =The American Dream. The opposite of Socialism, Marxism, and Fascism where theState and the Elite own all the land.

text-autospace:none"">font-family:Verdana;mso-fareast-font-family:Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">15. Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">Right to Bear Arms =Second Amendment right; for the protection of Self, Family, Property, State,and Hunting for Conservation.

text-autospace:none"">font-family:Verdana;mso-fareast-font-family:Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">16. Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">Rule of Law =Order in Government, Society, and Culture.

Read more…
I soon found out out that recruiting candidates to run for office is not such an easy task, for after 3 weeks we had only recruited 2 candidates with our presuppositions. So, with one week to go before the filing deadline, I decided that I ought to run and find out first hand what everyone was so apprehensive about. Again, with the permission of the California School Project Board, I filed to run for the California State Senate in the 30th District where I live (La Mirada, Whittier, Norwalk, Santa Fe Springs, Montebello, East LA, etc) to run against Ron Calderon, the Head of the State Banking and Finance Committee. By March 12 my name was qualified to be placed on the June 8 California Primary ballot.

Amazing! Retired missionary, now running for the CA State Senate. Am I qualified? I certainly know how to vote "No" on an unbalanced budget, so maybe in the view of the Liberals, I am not qualified, but then that one thing makes me more than qualified then all of them in my mind.

This is a very interesting education and a much bigger undertaking than I had imagined. No wonder most express reluctance to run for an office. And then there are are the two formerly unknown big questions that suddenly loom....(smile) "What if I don't win?" and the other (even bigger smile) "What if I do win?"


Read more…

color:black"">George Washingtonyes""> from theChairmanmso-bidi-font-family:Arial;color:black"">

Political Action Committeeyes""> font-family:Arial;mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;color:black;mso-bidi-font-weight:bold">16177 Whittier Blvd,12.0pt;font-family:Arial;mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;color:black""> color:black;mso-bidi-font-weight:bold"">Whittier, CA 90603

yes""> Email.georgewashingtonpac@gmail.com

web: www.georgewashingtonpac.com

Tel. 562-902-1945; Fax 562-902-1940

CA ID #1323680; Last Edit: Feb 2, 2010

An Open Letter to Concerned Christian and Conservative Citizens

of California of any Party or Ethnic Background:

My name is Warren Willis. My wife of 46 years passed away and I have recently remarried. We have 20 grandchildrenbetween us and I have two that are fifth generation native Californians. Igrew up in LA and taught school here for several years and then joinedCampus Crusade for Christ. After 44 years, 25 as a missionary in othercountries, ten in Outer Mongolia, I recently retired.

I am presently president and founder of the California School Project. Our purpose is to promote God, theBible and Prayer in the California public school system. You can see ourwebsite at "californiaschoolproject.com." I have put togetherthe following with the permission of our CSP Governing Board.

It seems to me that the crisis in the State of California has reached mammoth proportions. There is an enormousfiscal crisis, a dire directional crisis, an alarming moral crisis, and acritical cultural crisis. The State has come under the control of a majority ofmen and women who have pushed the government to the brink of bankruptcy, havetaken God and the Bible out of the schools and polluted generations of studentswith decadent dictums, and have turned the hearts of the people and our culturefar from the Living God of the Bible, from America’s Founding Fathers andfrom the U.S. Constitution.

Responding to the web letter of the lady in Arizona, “Will someone please stand up!," We dedicate this3-week old PAC to her. I believe that it is time for us to take action and toget into this arena. Obviously we have neglected our civic duties long enough.

I believe that the present situation calls for Biblically dedicated, politically conservative, characterproven, special interest unconnected, Christian men and women to stand up andto run for the available seats in the California State Assembly and Senate inthe 2010 election. In order to simply balance the budget, we believe thatnearly all of the present incumbents would need to be replaced.

If God has been speaking to you about running and you agree with our standards, we would love to have you tojoin our team. If you can't run now, who do you know that would be a goodcandidate. Please call them and forward them this material. February 25this the final day to register. That is 20 days from today! We will help youregister and run. Remember……. Daniel 4:17b.

Very Sincerely,

Warren Willis, Chairman

Read more…

The Tea Party Needs You NOW!

If not us, then who? If not now, then when? These are reasonable questions for everyone who has eyes to see the state of our country. We have a chance to do something here that has not been done for nearly two hundred years and no one has to fight and die, or even shed one drop of blood. Even though our "Tree of Liberty" does indeed thirst, we are the logical choice for change in Washington and if we don't make that change, we have no reason to shout fowl play, or ever again say we are fed up with the same old, same old in Washington. Oh sure, we can sit on our laurels and allow a do nothing congress continue to reek havoc with our Rights and our Liberty, but if we continue to do so we have no one to blame but ourselves. And in the end ask yourself this one question: After all is said and done in this and future Novembers, if I had picked up the phone and made just one or two phone calls, could this have made the difference? Could I have spoken to my friends about helping to make a change? And when we look way off into the future and see where America is, believing you are safe in your bed at night, and you will be for a time, until you hear the thugs coming to drag you away because you dared to speak against the government. Then look between this time and that, with your Rights gone and your Liberty no more and repeat the words "If not us, who? If not now, when?" and ask yourself if it is possible to change the course of history in these United States? Then look to your children and grand-children and ask yourself if the "American Dream" is theirs to know and love as it was when you could have helped to make a difference and didn't.

As I sit and watch the different news broadcast and hear them call the members of the Tea Party all sorts of names like racist, bigots and extremists, knowing full well that these hurtful words are spoken at the behest of the congressmen and women who are afraid of losing their jobs, I have to say that we must be doing something right. When we, a grassroots movement, can put fear in the most powerful body politic in the world, can influence the outcome of elections, then we do indeed have a chance to make change that really does count for real change in Washington. And so what if we don't get it right the first go-around? Just keep in mind that we have national elections every two years and eventually we will send people to congress that has the will of the people in their minds and that we will be watching them. So lets rally the troops, talk to people, make phone calls, get people registered to vote and make sure they have a ride to the polls if need be. If not us, who? If not now, when? Remember, ONE VOTE AT A TIME MAKES CHANGE HAPPEN!!!

Read more…

Standing

For those of us who take a stand,
and I know theres only a few,
We do what all of our brothers did,
for the glory of the red, white and blue.
You may be asked to take a stand,
to see if your honor is true,
and wave old glory high and proud,
for the Republic could be calling you.
The road looks bleak and old glory looks worn,
and patriots are looked at with scorn,
but have no fear for our stand is dear,
and our Republic will ever endure!
Read more…
Obama Sells Out U.S. Borders with Secret Amnesty Deal

The Department of Homeland Security has drafted a 14-page plan through its “U.S. Citizen and Immigration Services” Division for processing thirteen million illegal alien applicants for amnesty over a 30-week period at a cost of more than a billion dollars according to information leaked to World Net Daily (wnd.com) online. The plan anticipates Democrats will succeed in passing their so-called “Comprehensive Immigration “Reform” Bill. As always the Obama administration uses the euphemism “reform” to denote some sort of slick and tawdry actions that no sane and honest person would ever contemplate. In this case, opening the floodgates from south of our borders to overwhelm our present entitlement systems and bankrupt the country. The United States has had a fair and effective system for legal immigrants becoming citizens via the naturalization process for over 220 years and now Obama wants to “fix” it. What he wants is to immediately create 13 million new Democratic voters to keep him in office in 2012, nothing more.

The leaked plan assumes a nine-month period of legalization processing. The plan anticipates that public benefits will be required by most amnesty applicants. “If the statute requires interim benefits while application pending, issue discrete variant of status document (shorter term duration than if issued after prospective immigrant status granted)," the 14-page memo states. Under the plan applicants 14 through 79 years of age would be required to submit themselves for photographing, supply a full set of fingerprints and signatures while illegal aliens outside that age range would only need a photo and single print. It remains to be seen how real American Citizens will react to this outrageous citizenship giveaway . . . . of course, there's always the possibility that this is just an Obama ploy to arouse the Hispanic voters as he did with his lying appraisal of the Arizona immigration law. The question of illegal immigrants becoming overnight citizens can't be that much of a slam-dunk can it?
Ya'll live long, strong and ornery,
Rajjpuut

Read more…
I just watched a newspost about the Tea Party and the (pardon the redunancy) Sharon Angle angle in NV. I couldn't help but notice the "cup of tea from the spout" they used as a backdrop on the story. Would it not be more indicative of our feelings if the AP and local media maybe showed a picture of say, an early settler of America with the US flag for a hat dumping a barrel reading "Lipton", or because of copyright issues just TEA, over the side of the USS Constitution or Old Ironside's? Just thought it would be more to the point...
Read more…

Just got an e-mail from a friend who taunted me with remembrances of the presumably unfounded “birther” notion; and Van Jones’ slip from power because he was discovered to be a “9/11 Truther.” He asked me “How can you be so careless as to use that Maurice Strong quotation in your otherwise wonderful and thought-provoking blogs, Bob? It makes you seem like just another conspiracy fanatic.”
OK, let’s set matters straight, a political blog is an agreement, a contract between the writer and the reader for honest and full evaluation and judgment about the state of the world as he sees it. Rajjpuut when asked for his opinion does NOT give warmed over milk:
1.
BIRTHERS: My friend and I and all loyal readers know Rajjpuut is not a birther. I have on several occasions said something akin to this (but probably NOT these exact words) to dismiss the birther line of thinking. “It’s possible that Barack Obama is NOT a U.S. citizen according to the strictest interpretation of the rules. However, no matter what else is discovered, he was born to an American citizen, no matter how much I despise her and no matter how likely it may be that she screwed up his paper-work possibilities with her shenanigans. IF he is NOT a U.S. Citizen on a technicality, I’m NOT impressed. The SPIRIT of the law is that he IS a citizen, certainly much more than any baby born to an illegal alien is a citizen. It’s not his fault his mother was a ditzy communist bi__h! My problems with Barack Obama are not cleared up by technicalities. Remove him and another progressive idiot replaces him. My problems are that Barack never used his free will and his intellect to disprove the communist crap he was spoon-fed as a boy and that he now embraces that refuted ideology with all his being and is leading our country down the road to ruin." Any questions on that?
2. 9/11 TRUTHERS: To a certain small degree, Rajjpuut himself is a 9/11 Truther. You heard me right. TO A CERTAIN small DEGREE . . . let’s explore and explain that. If you were to visit and watch:
You’d see a lot of truth and nonsense woven together . . . (one proviso here – the link is apparently NOT the original link I viewed 2-3 years back and it’s a movie, pretty long . . . but unless it’s been changed dramatically, I’m aware of what’s in it. The original movie was in three parts, before I go further I’ll describe them . . .
A. one part was an attempt to link conservativism with Christianity and then to repudiate both on some semi-damning evidence about Christianity’s origins – from my knowledge of Christianity’s origins in studying the matter from history classes and several books, I’d say that this 1/3 of the movie is about 90% accurate but about 70% corrupted as far as interpretation. Yes, Christianity has screwed us up at times, but taken to its core . . . its intentions are purely good. Certainly the same could be said of many other religions. One strong point Zeitgeist makes is tying in “fundamentalism” to much of the problems that religions cause, regardless of which religion is being talked about.
B. Another part was an attack on federal reserve banking in the United States and Britain before 1776 across history and on the Fed as it exists right now. Rajjpuut refers you to the book, “The Creature from Jekyll Island” to now say that he’s absolutely convinced that this 1/3 of the Zeitgeist link is not only 100% accurate but, far more importantly, 100% true to the spirit of the Fed’s history. Rajjpuut would say that 97% of today’s worst problems in this country arose with Jekyll Island’s secret meetings that created today's federal reserve system.
C. The third part of the movie is the one Rajjpuut has viewed the most, about seven times. It is certainly the most compelling 1/3 of the movie. At first, though quite skeptical, Rajjpuut was willing to cede the possibility that the movie could have it right . . . that 9/11 could have been an inside job. The evidence presented sounded very strong. Every time viewing, however, the doubts have grown. An incompetent FBI and CIA can explain 99% of the situation quite nicely in Rajjpuut’s view. So 9/11 Truthing is not part of Rajjpuut’s make-up. However, the possibility exists, Rajjpuut does not have the resources to say with 100% certainty the whole thing is a humbug. Besides some difficulty believing certain technicalities and the science behind them, it’s just very hard to believe that the 300 or so persons necessary to pull that monumental crime off could all keep quiet so long. Even the possibility of “just standing aside and letting the Jihadists succeed “with their plan (a huge sin of “omission” rather than an even more monstrous sin of commission) would take too much effort to be believed by too many people . . . and one good American woud have stood up before, during and/or after the event at least.

For a comparison of thinking patterns when faced with the same possible universes (conspiracy? or no conspiracy?) . . . whereas my extensive reading on the Kennedy assasination led me in 1995-6 to the conclusion that the truth was covered-up and a larger conspiracy than Oswald (who well may have been a patsy) existed and involved about a half-dozen people and that VP LBJ (who was to be dropped off the presidential-ticket in 1964 by Kennedy and benefitted most when all the corruption charges aimed at him and Baker and Sol Estes disappeared the day after the assassination; not to mention becoming President of the United States) was at its heart. I’m much more convinced that 9/11 was NOT an inside job than I am that a wider conspiracy exists in Kennedy’s death, say about 90% convinced there. But, I’m a fallible human being . . . and that fact, underlines the tiny 1% 9/11 truther in me and the meager 10% conviction that the Warren Commission got it right about Oswald. Rajjpuut does not have trouble holding these contrary notions of conspiracy-yes and conspiracy-no at the same time.
So, now, in answer to my friend’s claims that by using the Maurice Strong quote from 1990, Rajjpuut left his otherwise excellent blogs open to “conspiracy-theory” charges, let’s revisit the Maurice Strong quote in question:
“. . . What if a small group of . . . world leaders were to conclude that the principal risk to the Earth comes from the actions of the rich countries? In order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn't the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn't it our responsibility to bring this about? . . .”
The quote is valid, you can find it in a 10,000 places on the internet and in the original form which is much, much longer. The context in brief is that Strong was purportedly driving a car while giving an interview to a left-leaning journalist and the quote was later written up in the man’s magazine as part of a fairly long story, the journalist involved recently covered Strong’s tracks by saying “he was discussing a possible novel plot.”
The fuller context is that Maurice Strong (who had written no novels before 1990 and none since) is a Canadian multi-millionaire who’s been politically very active within the United Nations and among environmental groups. Today he is a man who sees himself standing to gain mightily if Cap and Trade legislation passes in the United States, because of his connection to CCX (Chicago Climate eXchange). If you’ve read Michael Crichton’s “State of Fear” than you might recognize the Strong persona clearly delineated as a character among the novel’s many environmental uh, “enthusiasts.” Crichton is the master of the Techno-thriller like “The Andromeda Strain” and “Jurassic Park” and his plot-description has been largely unvarying: technology runs amok and threatens man’s survival. Crichton did an enormous amount of research, starting out believing that global warming was the greatest threat to mankind and the planet and then . . . turning around completely by 2004 when the novel was published. Did Crichton interview Maurice Strong? Read the blog, read the novel and judge for yourself. As for Strong in the complete interview as published, he was referring originally to a yearly convocation of world leaders in business and government and environment attended by perhaps 1,000 persons. He was saying that the tone of the conference would lead virtually anyone to the conclusion that the principal risk to the earth during an upcoming catastrophic environmental collapse comes from the rich countries. Strong was then saying (in this proposed “novel” of his) that the rich countries are approached and asked to change, but of course (due to political consequences) they can NOT or will NOT. And now you have the “small group of world leaders” left to decide to bring about the collapse of the wealthy nations that will save the planet or not . . . gosh, one wonders what they’d choose. In a word, the Strong “novel” is about eco-tage or environmental- sabotage.
Strong has never written a novel, but everything about his life over at least the last twenty-five years suggests the man (who is very much into the occult as well as the environment) believes he is the protagonist in such a novel. He is greatly involved with CCX. And right now only the fact that cap and trade legislation (today given the prettier name “America’s Power Act”) is stalled in the U.S. Senate interrupts Strong’s novel reaching its denoument. If APA passes dozens of persons such as Andrew Stern, Al Gore, Barack Obama, Richard Sandor and Joel Rogers look to become hundred-billionaires; about eight progressive foundations and the AFL-CIO and SEIU unions can expect to prosper; and seven individual Goldman Sachs personalities and the 10% owning Goldman Sachs firm itself will reap the wild wind.
Michael Crichton didn’t start out researching and writing his novel believing their was a conspiracy to destroy much of today’s most civilized economies to the benefit of a power elite. He did not start out believing that global warming was a hoax. Those things arose the deeper and more deeply he looked into the matter. Up till 1998, Rajjpuut had never NOT believed in global warming. Greenhouse gasses and their ceaseless increase and danger were an ordinary unquestioned FACT taught in science classes at U.N.C. Even when slight doubts arose as to the severity of the problem and the absolute certainty of the connection to man’s activities, it wasn’t until he read Crichton’s novel and then saw a History Channel program “Little Ice Age, Big Chill” in early 2006 that his objections were firmed up. Global warming was nonsense. Rajjpuut’s been preaching strongly against the global warming lie ever since. Then last year three things happened first:
. . . first Climate-Gate occurred, as I always knew it must. Time magazine broadcast the story on the internet and I was amazed. Time online saw the story reach it’s “most popular story of the day” within fifteen hours . . .
. . . and then the next thing happened, Joel Klein of Time Magazine** took the article down and made all traces of it disappear from its online website, the story could NOT be found. Rajjpuut was aghast.
And the third thing is that after five months, the story (link above) run even by the ultra-liberal London Times (so now global warming is an Unquestioned hoax in rational European eyes) still has not been printed or broadcast in the United States by the oldest and till recently, most-trusted, sources of news (ABC, CBS, NBC, NPR, PBS, CNN). As a result we are within an eyelash of seeing APA pass and ruin our nation . . . that, my friend is why I showed the Maurice strong quote: I believe it underlies an actual conspiracy for wealth, power, and misplaced environmental concern. That quote underscores the greatest act of eco-terrorism ever contemplated and no one has to burn an SUV or drive a spike into a tree to pull it off . . . it’s all “legal.” The fact that the connections to CCX **by Gore, Obama, Strong, Joel Rogers, Richard Sandor, Valerie Jarrett, et al ad nauseum have been known for over five weeks and the mainstream media refuses to acknowledge or investigate them is that last straw on Rajjpuut’s back . . . somebody needs to speak up and it might as well be me. And no, Rajjpuut does not have trouble holding the two contrary ideas of Maurice Strong-conspiracy-yes and Maurice-Strong-conspiracy-no in a 97-3 ratio respectively in his mind . . . somebody's got to deal with uncertainty. This world is not black and white. Why make up your mind? Be strong and honor the possibilities. Who knows unlike the Kennedy assassination and 9/11 we might find out on this one . . . .
Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,
Rajjpuut
**the full story of consequences and means can be found at:
Read more…