All Posts (30875)

Sort by

Tues/Noon ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
EPA And Energy Star Teamed To Ban
REAL Energy Saving Technology
by Conor Coughlin
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Attacks On Trump At WHCD
Not Funny, Vicious, Degrading
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ CNN fake news host Ana Cabrera asks Ben Stein if he still believes that President Trump did the right thing by skipping the White House Correspondents’ Dinner... having previously defended him as being a punching bag.  From her reaction she seems genuinely surprised by her guest’s response. Stein said, “I thought that what Mr. Minhaj said was sickening, I couldn’t watch it for very long.” She responds with a child-like “Why?” Stein continues telling her exactly that, saying, “I think it’s stunning to belittle and attack and mock the President at such a base an villainous level and to describe him as a Soviet agent and Liar-in-Chief, especially to the media. The media is a joke in this situation.”...

.

‘No More Reasons Why Congress Can’t
Totally Repeal liar-nObamacare’
by Ken McIntyre
{dailysignal.com} ~ Since it was enacted into law in 2010, most Americans have opposed the Affordable Care Act, aka liar-nObamacare. In elections since then, Republicans have campaigned on the promise of total repeal of liar-nObamacare... We, political constituents and grassroots supporters, responded by giving Republicans the House, then the Senate, and, in 2016, the presidency. There are no more reasons why Congress cannot totally repeal liar-nObamacare (“What’s in the New liar-nObamacare Deal That Could Unite Conservatives, Centrists”). The new American Health Care Act, as it stands now, is not liar-nObamacare repeal.  Most Americans agree, given that only 17 percent support the bill, according to a recent Quinnipiac poll...

.

The End of Europe as We Know It?
by Yiftach Ofek
{mosaicmagazine.com} ~ In early March, European leaders were uniformly reported to have sighed in relief when the Dutch prime minister Mark Rutte defeated Geert Wilders... one of the continent’s most vocal opponents of immigration and European integration, in the country’s parliamentary elections. With Rutte’s victory and Wilders’ defeat, it seemed to many that the so-called wave of populism spreading throughout the continent might be coming to an end. Those hopes were sustained in late April when, in the latest balloting for the presidency of France, the anti-immigration and anti-EU candidate Marine Le Pen came in behind the centrist front-runner Emmanuel Macron; most forecasters are cautiously predicting an easy victory for Macron in the final May 7 runoff, and, buoyed by the results so far, are hoping for a similar outcome in September’s federal elections in Germany...

.

War Casualties in Afghanistan Hit All-Time High as Country Stands on Brink of Collapse
by Adam Kredo
{freebeacon.com} ~ As America's $117 billion war in Afghanistan enters its sixteenth year—making it the longest war in U.S. history—conflict casualties have hit an all-time high... calling into question the U.S. strategy in the country, where Taliban terrorists still control a third of the nation and corruption runs rampant. President Donald Trump will face tough decisions about how to proceed in Afghanistan, where rebuilding projects have repeatedly failed and been hindered by corruption among Afghan nationals and U.S. contractors. Military leaders have already begun calling for an increased U.S. troop presence in the country, which could anger Trump’s voting base. The United States has spent more than $11 billion so far on other weapons, communications, aircraft, and vehicles for the struggling Afghan forces. The cost to U.S. taxpayers is unlikely to diminish over the coming years, as Taliban forces continue to control a large number of key territories...http://freebeacon.com/national-security/war-casualties-afghanistan-hit-time-high-country-stands-brink-collapse/?utm_source=Freedom+Mail&utm_campaign=425fd00679-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2017_05_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_b5e6e0e9ea-425fd00679-45611665

.

You can thank Jimmy Carter and Bill
liar-Clinton for North Korea’s nukes
{nypost.com} ~ North Korea’s boast that it just detonated its first hydrogen bomb met instant doubts from the White House and arms experts. If they’re right, Pyongyang “only” has plain-old atomic bombs. What a . . . relief?... But, as one Chinese expert told The Wall Street Journal, the H-bomb claim still shows that tyrant Kim Jong-un is “marching in that direction.” For all this, thank Jimmy Carter and Bill liar-Clinton. North Korea couldn’t have done it without their gullibility...http://nypost.com/2016/01/06/you-can-thank-jimmy-carter-and-bill-clinton-for-north-koreas-nukes/
.
.
EPA And Energy Star Teamed To Ban
REAL Energy Saving Technology
by Conor Coughlin
{lidblog.com} ~ NASA Electrical Engineer Frank Nola invented a electronic motor control technology known as the Nola Controller in the late 1970’s which is employed in spacecraft and tens of millions of applications daily back here on planet Earth. Some consider Frank Nola a true genius for inventing the algorithm behind a devise which delivers the optimum amount of energy to electrical motors, but not the EPA.

The EPA considers the Nola Controller nothing more than Black Box technology, which the high priests at the temple of government innovation long ago declared to be bad JuJu. Unworthy of the attention of the “non-profit” scientist producing cost-effective products for the ENERGY STAR brand.

Nola’s invention was such a threat to government ‘certified’ energy efficiency that it was literally banned from use in America’s industrial sector, the largest electrical market on the the planet. Why was there no love available for Nola’s creation? Money, really big money!

“If it’s not ENERGY STAR, it’s not energy efficient” wasn’t just the motto for the EPA, it has been the central theme of a federal initiative known as Market Transformation since 1992. The EPA claims that ENERGY STAR brand of ‘certified’ energy efficiency has saved over $430 billion dollars, but has never been able to explain how their certified products allegedly save 25-50% more electrical energy than other identical products. Only the EPA could make such a delusional claim, because only the EPA processes the secret science behind their multi-billion dollar commodity.

Hundreds of billions of dollars were supposedly generated by EPA’s unique commodity, but try to find a single news report, government study or any evidence to support those claims. There is none. A fact well known to mainstream media, academics and environmental activist which have been the primary beneficiaries from the magical properties of ENERGY STAR. Vast fortunes were made by marketing ENERGY STAR brand as a global leader in energy efficiency, not from any actual energy-savings produced by ENERGY STAR products.

There has never been a National Standard for the measurement and verification of energy-savings in electrical technologies and products, yet lawyers somehow crafted rules mandating the exclusive use of ENERGY STAR by the government in the United States. Canada, Japan, Taiwan, New Zealand, Australia, Switzerland and the entire European Community also decided to mandate the use of EPA’s superior brand, making ‘certified’ government energy efficiency into the most lucrative commodity on the planet.

ENERGY STAR was also selected as the primary source for GHG emission reductions in the Paris Climate agreement, which placed EPA energy efficiency experts in charge of measurement and verification of energy-saving for all countries signed on to that international agreement. But you knew that, right?

All of governments multi-billion dollar claims are based on estimations by bureaucrats as directed by the EPA; Lead By Example guidelines released in 2009, in which bureaucrats are instructed to base their energy-savings estimates on the number of ENERGY STAR products purchased or Green-built buildings erected. Providing bureaucrats a financial incentive to expand their bureaucratic empires by joining EPA Partnerships profiting big-time from the new Clean Energy Economy which was controlled exclusively by the EPA Billionaires Club, a group described in a 2014 Senate Report.

EPA’s superior brand of energy efficiency represented the single largest and most expensive component in liar-nObama’s Clean Power Plan, a fact never included in debate heard before the US Supreme Court. It was also the key feature in liar-nObama’s Save Energy Now program pushing for $100 Billion in energy efficiency investments in the industrial sector, but is only available to EPA partners. Like all of EPA’s multi-billion dollar programs, the general public has never been allowed to learn about EPA efforts to bring government energy efficiency to America’s industrial sector.

The Save Energy Now boondoggle had 24 universities providing ‘free’ energy audits at the industrial facilities of large corporations in partnerships with the EPA, and claiming their audits produced billions of dollars in savings which had been missed or intentionally overlooked by real engineers and plant managers. A concept so delusional as to defy all logic, yet excepted without question by your government. This is part of the Settled Science nobody wants to talk about, and for good reason.

President Trump recently announced the ‘close out’ of the ENERGY STAR program, which effectively ends the mandate requiring government to purchase only ENERGY STAR products and services from EPA partners. Opening up a trillion dollar market for American businesses to market products and services directly to our government, the largest procurement agency in the world.

This is a secret worth keeping if you’re member of the EPA Billionaires Club or the Media Foundations raking in billions of taxpayer dollars through non-profit organizations, whose revenue is dependent of promoting the bogus energy-savings of EPA that appear to exist only in the minds of the political elites.

If EPA can claim to have saved hundreds of billions of dollars without ever identifying a single technology installed, imagine how much money could really be saved through the actual installation of real technologies by  professionals with license to engage in the electrical industry. If you’re into jobs and wealth creation, here is a topic worthy of a sober conversation.

Which brings us back to the invention of a real rocket scientist and all-round freaking genius, Frank Nola the man who created one of the most important technological breakthroughs since Nikola Tesla introduced the alternating current system and polyphase induction motor. The true reason for banning Nola technology had nothing to do with science, but the acceptance of ENERGY STAR as the sole source of energy efficiency for government leaders around the world.

The Nola Controller technology has been updated with a Digital Signal Processor, increasing the performance of its soft start features and the ability to integrate with wireless applications and participate in a wide variety of utility load-shedding and Time of Use programs of value to industrial customers. Making it one of the advanced technologies on the planet for industrial customers, and a major threat to radical professors promoting 1960’s era ideologies as cutting-edge technologies on campuses across America.

Now that the Trump Administration has ended the corrupt ENERGY STAR program and mandate, will government finally lift the ban on Nola’s invention and other advanced technologies that could actually benefit manufacturing and production operations? Thousands of highly-paid professionals in the electrical field could immediately begin treating motor loads in place, saving hundreds of billions in electric bills annually for manufacturers, which in turn would relieve stress from our ‘crumbling’ electrical gird system. A win, win, win scenario for America.

This is not some pipe dream, it is exactly what the EPA has been promising for decades and failing to deliver. Former President liar-nObama promised skyrocketing electric rates under his energy plan, and we shouldn’t act surprised by his efforts to fulfill this promise. It was precisely the results EPA expected from the adoption of the ENERGY STAR brand of ‘certified’ energy efficiency, and the main reason for the media ‘blackout’ on news related to the ENERGY STAR program for the last twenty-five years.
Read more…

Tues/Noon ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
EPA And Energy Star Teamed To Ban
REAL Energy Saving Technology
by Conor Coughlin
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Attacks On Trump At WHCD
Not Funny, Vicious, Degrading
KVaTsbgu_8N4CsmVu2iqEUj7VfW2nIA412WUxGRII6kSCNAbOFKu18DQ5K6tZJf51YZRDP4u9AcHPTGwaXp0RkgAr8O3A8JUvM1JmSIovzJVAjjtgoIxGiUmnQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ CNN fake news host Ana Cabrera asks Ben Stein if he still believes that President Trump did the right thing by skipping the White House Correspondents’ Dinner... having previously defended him as being a punching bag.  From her reaction she seems genuinely surprised by her guest’s response. Stein said, “I thought that what Mr. Minhaj said was sickening, I couldn’t watch it for very long.” She responds with a child-like “Why?” Stein continues telling her exactly that, saying, “I think it’s stunning to belittle and attack and mock the President at such a base an villainous level and to describe him as a Soviet agent and Liar-in-Chief, especially to the media. The media is a joke in this situation.”...http://rickwells.us/ben-stein-attacks-trump-whcd-not-funny-vicious-degrading-absolutely-right-skip/

.

‘No More Reasons Why Congress Can’t
Totally Repeal liar-nObamacare’
FcjvALsqIDK8FuBozmejvOEFggQh0Y9QLlIBM3WBUNOa6CMDQn7AMEBdpOumH7Exo7oLYPAOAsHu6KF_2qAa8ouL_LFw6-WSr-f5aROwICN492NPABUsfby_3sgUFmJHBXWwYvYA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Ken McIntyre
{dailysignal.com} ~ Since it was enacted into law in 2010, most Americans have opposed the Affordable Care Act, aka liar-nObamacare. In elections since then, Republicans have campaigned on the promise of total repeal of liar-nObamacare... We, political constituents and grassroots supporters, responded by giving Republicans the House, then the Senate, and, in 2016, the presidency. There are no more reasons why Congress cannot totally repeal liar-nObamacare (“What’s in the New liar-nObamacare Deal That Could Unite Conservatives, Centrists”). The new American Health Care Act, as it stands now, is not liar-nObamacare repeal.  Most Americans agree, given that only 17 percent support the bill, according to a recent Quinnipiac poll...http://dailysignal.com/2017/04/30/we-hear-you-no-more-reasons-why-congress-cant-totally-repeal-obamacare/?utm_source=TDS_Email&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=MorningBell&mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiWmpFek9EaGhaR1JtTVRnMSIsInQiOiJHak42QnlUbHhQVE8wYjZUd2haMnFSQ0Fobit1MzFQaHVhSWRFVXVxRlwvTmZIRGtNQmVzOUt1Ylwvd3RsV21uY3owV05EZDVIUXl1enVLcElcL3VkckxmR2FpY2t5MFRBY3VqaENIWGU3S29BUDVLQnFSOUhxVGZrZUJZTjY3S09GaiJ9

.

The End of Europe as We Know It?
yZ0QiIl7YKEDn8kjFAMbSV3tkdgAhuUGL5pM9e5L6PqWCIaemr9y-8OEuJ-tBrXNhxIX1hCB4P2toi9ZYUCNdsr_2SfkEKZeS7mFdaT4101YZ4DpetSOiO2LawMl=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Yiftach Ofek
{mosaicmagazine.com} ~ In early March, European leaders were uniformly reported to have sighed in relief when the Dutch prime minister Mark Rutte defeated Geert Wilders... one of the continent’s most vocal opponents of immigration and European integration, in the country’s parliamentary elections. With Rutte’s victory and Wilders’ defeat, it seemed to many that the so-called wave of populism spreading throughout the continent might be coming to an end. Those hopes were sustained in late April when, in the latest balloting for the presidency of France, the anti-immigration and anti-EU candidate Marine Le Pen came in behind the centrist front-runner Emmanuel Macron; most forecasters are cautiously predicting an easy victory for Macron in the final May 7 runoff, and, buoyed by the results so far, are hoping for a similar outcome in September’s federal elections in Germany...https://mosaicmagazine.com/observation/2017/05/the-end-of-europe-as-we-know-it/

.

War Casualties in Afghanistan Hit All-Time High
as Country Stands on Brink of Collapse
iHIGvMYoJK_WkhcJjzvDTpg891bwSdxR9l-zsYIitp6zRU66MB5MarbaAv5UrV-ajqs6Dezkaf_s6MySz8ZfhnJHk7qkFSP2-Q=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Adam Kredo
{freebeacon.com} ~ As America's $117 billion war in Afghanistan enters its sixteenth year—making it the longest war in U.S. history—conflict casualties have hit an all-time high... calling into question the U.S. strategy in the country, where Taliban terrorists still control a third of the nation and corruption runs rampant. President Donald Trump will face tough decisions about how to proceed in Afghanistan, where rebuilding projects have repeatedly failed and been hindered by corruption among Afghan nationals and U.S. contractors. Military leaders have already begun calling for an increased U.S. troop presence in the country, which could anger Trump’s voting base. The United States has spent more than $11 billion so far on other weapons, communications, aircraft, and vehicles for the struggling Afghan forces. The cost to U.S. taxpayers is unlikely to diminish over the coming years, as Taliban forces continue to control a large number of key territories...http://freebeacon.com/national-security/war-casualties-afghanistan-hit-time-high-country-stands-brink-collapse/?utm_source=Freedom+Mail&utm_campaign=425fd00679-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2017_05_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_b5e6e0e9ea-425fd00679-45611665

.

You can thank Jimmy Carter and Bill
liar-Clinton for North Korea’s nukes
{nypost.com} ~ North Korea’s boast that it just detonated its first hydrogen bomb met instant doubts from the White House and arms experts. If they’re right, Pyongyang “only” has plain-old atomic bombs. What a . . . relief?... But, as one Chinese expert told The Wall Street Journal, the H-bomb claim still shows that tyrant Kim Jong-un is “marching in that direction.” For all this, thank Jimmy Carter and Bill liar-Clinton. North Korea couldn’t have done it without their gullibility...http://nypost.com/2016/01/06/you-can-thank-jimmy-carter-and-bill-clinton-for-north-koreas-nukes/
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
EPA And Energy Star Teamed To Ban
REAL Energy Saving Technology
2j0Z4LAPAHTAe4BLCOw9GzC-0hKOfQaaPJkTRAkEuuKUqAMTf5556zh-RMs0G673SRE12RuLDMjWC7sp0oS2uMsu5pYFKCDwjGHZvWC2k42Lg4Dk7582hxEcZjHFM2Obnf1d5a2scgWZUwgb7gYj-WEJV9ixIMiaID0uXdlpNKXSiKWC9X02km_FF3m4b-rwGa_ghvG2NSqG-bUQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Conor Coughlin
{lidblog.com} ~ NASA Electrical Engineer Frank Nola invented a electronic motor control technology known as the Nola Controller in the late 1970’s which is employed in spacecraft and tens of millions of applications daily back here on planet Earth. Some consider Frank Nola a true genius for inventing the algorithm behind a devise which delivers the optimum amount of energy to electrical motors, but not the EPA.

The EPA considers the Nola Controller nothing more than Black Box technology, which the high priests at the temple of government innovation long ago declared to be bad JuJu. Unworthy of the attention of the “non-profit” scientist producing cost-effective products for the ENERGY STAR brand.

Nola’s invention was such a threat to government ‘certified’ energy efficiency that it was literally banned from use in America’s industrial sector, the largest electrical market on the the planet. Why was there no love available for Nola’s creation? Money, really big money!

“If it’s not ENERGY STAR, it’s not energy efficient” wasn’t just the motto for the EPA, it has been the central theme of a federal initiative known as Market Transformation since 1992. The EPA claims that ENERGY STAR brand of ‘certified’ energy efficiency has saved over $430 billion dollars, but has never been able to explain how their certified products allegedly save 25-50% more electrical energy than other identical products. Only the EPA could make such a delusional claim, because only the EPA processes the secret science behind their multi-billion dollar commodity.

Hundreds of billions of dollars were supposedly generated by EPA’s unique commodity, but try to find a single news report, government study or any evidence to support those claims. There is none. A fact well known to mainstream media, academics and environmental activist which have been the primary beneficiaries from the magical properties of ENERGY STAR. Vast fortunes were made by marketing ENERGY STAR brand as a global leader in energy efficiency, not from any actual energy-savings produced by ENERGY STAR products.

There has never been a National Standard for the measurement and verification of energy-savings in electrical technologies and products, yet lawyers somehow crafted rules mandating the exclusive use of ENERGY STAR by the government in the United States. Canada, Japan, Taiwan, New Zealand, Australia, Switzerland and the entire European Community also decided to mandate the use of EPA’s superior brand, making ‘certified’ government energy efficiency into the most lucrative commodity on the planet.

ENERGY STAR was also selected as the primary source for GHG emission reductions in the Paris Climate agreement, which placed EPA energy efficiency experts in charge of measurement and verification of energy-saving for all countries signed on to that international agreement. But you knew that, right?

All of governments multi-billion dollar claims are based on estimations by bureaucrats as directed by the EPA; Lead By Example guidelines released in 2009, in which bureaucrats are instructed to base their energy-savings estimates on the number of ENERGY STAR products purchased or Green-built buildings erected. Providing bureaucrats a financial incentive to expand their bureaucratic empires by joining EPA Partnerships profiting big-time from the new Clean Energy Economy which was controlled exclusively by the EPA Billionaires Club, a group described in a 2014 Senate Report.

EPA’s superior brand of energy efficiency represented the single largest and most expensive component in liar-nObama’s Clean Power Plan, a fact never included in debate heard before the US Supreme Court. It was also the key feature in liar-nObama’s Save Energy Now program pushing for $100 Billion in energy efficiency investments in the industrial sector, but is only available to EPA partners. Like all of EPA’s multi-billion dollar programs, the general public has never been allowed to learn about EPA efforts to bring government energy efficiency to America’s industrial sector.

The Save Energy Now boondoggle had 24 universities providing ‘free’ energy audits at the industrial facilities of large corporations in partnerships with the EPA, and claiming their audits produced billions of dollars in savings which had been missed or intentionally overlooked by real engineers and plant managers. A concept so delusional as to defy all logic, yet excepted without question by your government. This is part of the Settled Science nobody wants to talk about, and for good reason.

President Trump recently announced the ‘close out’ of the ENERGY STAR program, which effectively ends the mandate requiring government to purchase only ENERGY STAR products and services from EPA partners. Opening up a trillion dollar market for American businesses to market products and services directly to our government, the largest procurement agency in the world.

This is a secret worth keeping if you’re member of the EPA Billionaires Club or the Media Foundations raking in billions of taxpayer dollars through non-profit organizations, whose revenue is dependent of promoting the bogus energy-savings of EPA that appear to exist only in the minds of the political elites.

If EPA can claim to have saved hundreds of billions of dollars without ever identifying a single technology installed, imagine how much money could really be saved through the actual installation of real technologies by  professionals with license to engage in the electrical industry. If you’re into jobs and wealth creation, here is a topic worthy of a sober conversation.

Which brings us back to the invention of a real rocket scientist and all-round freaking genius, Frank Nola the man who created one of the most important technological breakthroughs since Nikola Tesla introduced the alternating current system and polyphase induction motor. The true reason for banning Nola technology had nothing to do with science, but the acceptance of ENERGY STAR as the sole source of energy efficiency for government leaders around the world.

The Nola Controller technology has been updated with a Digital Signal Processor, increasing the performance of its soft start features and the ability to integrate with wireless applications and participate in a wide variety of utility load-shedding and Time of Use programs of value to industrial customers. Making it one of the advanced technologies on the planet for industrial customers, and a major threat to radical professors promoting 1960’s era ideologies as cutting-edge technologies on campuses across America.

Now that the Trump Administration has ended the corrupt ENERGY STAR program and mandate, will government finally lift the ban on Nola’s invention and other advanced technologies that could actually benefit manufacturing and production operations? Thousands of highly-paid professionals in the electrical field could immediately begin treating motor loads in place, saving hundreds of billions in electric bills annually for manufacturers, which in turn would relieve stress from our ‘crumbling’ electrical gird system. A win, win, win scenario for America.

This is not some pipe dream, it is exactly what the EPA has been promising for decades and failing to deliver. Former President liar-nObama promised skyrocketing electric rates under his energy plan, and we shouldn’t act surprised by his efforts to fulfill this promise. It was precisely the results EPA expected from the adoption of the ENERGY STAR brand of ‘certified’ energy efficiency, and the main reason for the media ‘blackout’ on news related to the ENERGY STAR program for the last twenty-five years.
Read more…

Kim Jong Un…Hell-Bent on War

By Craig Andresen – Right Side Patriots on American Political Radio

NK-1.jpg?width=180North Korea is a hermit kingdom, run by a tin-pot dictator who is not only prone to having family members assassinated on a whim, but brutal enough to kill those of his own citizens who he suspects might be dissidents and enslave their families.

From his grandfather, to his father, and now to him, Kim Jong Un has isolated his people from the rest of the world, starved them, and murdered them.

North Korea is a nation of nothingness…and yet…

They are terrorizing their neighbors, and holding the rest of the world hostage.

How can this be?

Simple…

READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE!!!

Read more…

AWESOME! Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke is up for a position in Homeland Security and guess who is opposing it

That’s right. Designated terrorist terrorist group CAIR is protesting the appointment because Clarke supported then GOP presidential candidate Ted Cruz’s call for law enforcement to “patrol, secure, and spy on Muslim neighborhoods.”

CAIR expressed concern that such a policy would lead to religious and ethnic profiling by officers and called the policy “unworkable, unconstitutional and counterproductive.” (No, NOT profiling Muslims is what led to the several Muslim terrorist attacks we’ve had here in the past few years)

Clarke would be terrific in Homeland Security.

Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mB0n6kBuCi8

Share
Read more…

NEVER HIRE A MUSLIM Reason #171: You will get sued if other employees call a Muslim worker names

( Muslims do not assimilate, they infiltrate! )

A Muslim flight attendant from New Jersey has filed suit against American Airlines alleging his co-workers repeatedly called him a terrorist and FBI agents came to his house after he complained about the harassment to company officials. (Where there’s smoke there’s fire)

NJ.com  Farkhan Mahmood Shah, an Edison resident of Pakistani descent, claims he was targeted for religious and ethnic harassment after the attacks of Sept. 11. American Airlines failed to stop the harassment after he reported it, Shah claims in the suit filed recently in Superior Court in Middlesex County.

Shah, who started working at the airline in 1999 as a flight attendant, alleges in the suit he was called a terrorist, part of Hezbollah or Taliban, and other offense names. On one flight, he claims another flight attendant tried to convert him from Islam to Christianity.

Shah said he reported the alleged harassment in 2008 he began to notice erroneous marks on his record for lateness and missing work. The complaint escalated to the airline’s New York human resources office in 2013 following numerous complaints where he also brought up the record errors, the suit said. 

He said he was told his record would be fixed, but it was never corrected. The next year, the harassment “escalated quickly,” the suit says. In 2014, Shah and his coworkers were having a conversation about 9/11 and one of the workers said, “it was the Muslims and that Muslims are evil,” according to the suit. (They ARE!) 

Shah responded that some had said the terrorist attack was an inside job, and ISIS was created by the CIA. Weeks later, Shah claims in his suit that he was placed on a “watch list” by American Airlines, and FBI agents showed up at his Edison home. 

In 2016, he filed a complaint with U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, according to the suit. Less than two weeks later, Shah claims FBI agents showed up at his house again, asking him if he planned on hurting anyone. 

A tiny sample of the many Muslim vs Employer lawsuits:

The watchman on the wall sounding the ALARM
Share
Read more…

SCOTLAND orders military cadets NOT to wear their uniforms in public so they won’t become targets of Muslim terrorists

( Muslims do not assimilate, they infiltrate! )

What’s next? Telling police not to wear their uniforms in the streets?

UK Express (h/t VC)  Parents of youngsters in the army, air and sea cadet forces have been issued with letters outlining steps to avoid being targeted by Muslim terrorists. The letter warns of a serious risk of the cadets – mainly in their teens – being mistaken for regular airmen, sailors or soldiers. 

One letter to the parent of a Scottish cadet, reads: “Based on the latest security advice, we recommend all cadets cover up their uniform when travelling to and from cadet activity. Personnel should remain vigilant.” The parent – who did not wish to be named – said it made his “blood run cold”, adding: “It’s clearly in response to something.”

It is understood from police sources that the letter was prompted by a UK-wide tightening of security procedures following the March 22 attack on Westminster which has seen firearms officers constantly “on-call” for the Scottish Parliament building in Edinburgh.

The police source added: “At face value this letter to the parents of cadets has been sent to alert them to a raised potential for an incident. If I were a parent, of course I’d be worried. But I’d also follow the advice in the letter.”

The Ministry of Defence advised British service members not to wear military uniforms in public following the murder of Fusilier Lee Rigby, 25, in May 2013. In December 2014, police in Birmingham were told not to wear their uniforms while travelling to and from work after extremists threatened to kidnap and murder an officer. And, last July, a member of the RAF Regiment was approached by two Muslim men and threatened with a knife while out jogging near RAF Marham.

Hey, here’s an idea, why not just dress ALL the military cadets in Islamic headbags (hijabs)?

Video http://www.barenakedislam.com/

The watchman on the wall sounding the ALARM

Read more…

Canada: Parents protest Islamic prayer in public school (video)

( Muslims do not assimilate, they infiltrate! )

Source: Parents protest Islamic prayer in public school – The Rebel

The Peel District School Board (PDSB) says the debate over Muslim prayers in publicly funded schools is over. But parents from many different faiths are speaking out against public officials giving preferential treatment to one religion.

The PDSB has a charter that says they are committed to “gender equity”, yet these mini-mosques are gender segregated with boys at the front and girls at the back. Girls on their menstrual cycle are forced to sit in hall!

I tried to ask school board officials about their decision, but the cowards were all too scared to defend it.

Watch me speak with the patriots who came out to defend secular education, many of whom were freedom loving immigrants that are proud to stand up for Canadian values.   

I also found some counter-protesters who supported the PDSB’s decision, but all they had to offer were baseless claims of “Islamophobia”.

VIDEO https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ROx_aWCeYu4

Please Share & Help Wake America Up

The watchman on the wall sounding the ALARM

Read more…

Left-fascists at University of Buffalo Robert Spencer lecture refuse to allow discussion of jihad threat


( Muslims do not assimilate, they infiltrate! )

Last night I appeared at the University of Buffalo at the invitation of the courageous students of Young Americans for Freedom, who have to put up with this Left-fascist thuggery on a daily basis, while I left Buffalo this morning. I say I “appeared,” because to say “I spoke” would be exaggerating a bit. Rather, I started a few sentences, made a couple of points, in between being screamed at by Leftist and Islamic supremacist fascists who think they’re opposing fascism.

The Spectrum article below is not that bad a report from the campus newspaper, showing the Left-fascist opposition to the freedom of speech, with a few exceptions: I am not a “self-proclaimed expert on radical Islam,” as I have never proclaimed myself an expert on anything, and my work stands or falls on the basis of the evidence from the Qur’an and Sunnah, history and current events. Nor do I ever speak about “radical Islam,” which is a Western construct that does not exist in the Islamic world. And I didn’t call the fascists “uninformed fascists”; although they are indeed uninformed and think they know a great deal more than they actually do, I didn’t use that word. Finally, the reporters Ashley Inkumsah and Sarah Crowley wrote that I was “unphased” by the screaming fascists, when I was actually “unfazed.”

That said, I am grateful to Ashley Inkumsah and Sarah Crowley for a generally accurate report. Note the claims of victimhood trotted out yet again by the Muslims quoted in the article. They have hoodwinked the University of Buffalo Left-fascists into thinking that it’s “Islamophobes,” rather than jihad terrorists, who are killing people around the world. And that is one thing I said last night, although it is doubtful that the fascists heard it: the guy holding the sign “Queers Against Islamophobia” and any feminists in the audience have no idea what they’re enabling. By shutting down any discussion of the motivating ideology of the jihad threat and consigning it all to the realm of “hatred” and “bigotry,” they are only enabling that threat to grow, and one day, they may very well experience the consequences of their actions firsthand.

Meanwhile, UPD Chief of Police Gerald Schoenle “wished more university staff were present at the event to contain the disruptive crowd of students who were unable to get in.” This is disingenuous in the extreme. There were hordes of disruptive students who got in with no problem. What’s more, Schoenle overruled a plan that his subordinates had agreed to with my security team, that hecklers and screamers would be asked to be quiet and then escorted out. Schoenle actively aided and abetted the Left-fascist destruction of the event. Write him, courteously and politely, and remind him of the importance of the freedom of speech as the foundation of any free society, and the dangers of aiding and abetting Left-fascist thuggery for the future of any free society, at gws3@buffalo.edu. Also Tom Tiberi from Campus Life should was supposedly there to assist in making the event successful, but just stood by and did nothing while the Left-fascists screamed their abuse. He’s at tiberi@buffalo.edu. Remember: all messages to Schoenle and Tiberi should be polite, respectful, and courteous, sticking to the facts and calling them out for their malfeasance and allowance of Left-fascist thuggery.

Below the student paper article is the article from the Buffalo News, which is worthwhile only for capturing one thing I said: “The attempt to silence someone who has a differing viewpoint was a ‘quintessentially fascist act, and you are manifesting it in a wonderful way tonight,’ said Spencer.” There is also this: “Spencer frequently discusses terrorism by Muslims as being religiously motivated, an argument that has put him in the cross-hairs of American Muslims who say his interpretation of Islam is dangerously inaccurate and perverts their faith.”

Those American Muslims have a big problem on their hands, because in reality, I have no interpretation of Islam at all, but only report on how Muslims interpret it, which all too often involves justifications of and exhortations to violence. They are avid to silence me because they don’t want Americans to know how jihadis use the texts and teachings of Islam to justify hatred, violence, and supremacism.

And so the University of Buffalo Left-fascists abundantly signaled their virtue by screaming at me for an hour and a half. What have they accomplished by doing so? Will the jihad threat thereby go away? Alas, no.

“A campus divided: Robert Spencer’s visit met with chaos and opposition from UB community,” by Ashley Inkumsah and Sarah Crowley, The Spectrum (University of Buffalo), May 2, 2017:

Students and faculty piled into Knox 109 to both hear Robert Spencer’s speech and protest his appearance.

Robert Spencer couldn’t speak for more than 30 seconds without students shouting and cursing at him on Monday night.

Spencer planned to speak to students about “the dangers of jihad in today’s world” but constant heckling from the crowd made it near impossible for him to complete a full sentence. Spencer, a self-proclaimed expert on radical Islam, runs a website called Jihad Watch.

Students called Spencer things like a “Nazi, “Trump Jr.” and a “pseudo-intellectual,” and most of his hour-long speech was inaudible. Spencer seemed unphased [sic] as students shouted over him and he responded, calling the crowd “uninformed fascists.”

Students who were anti-Spencer and pro-Spencer attended the event. In the end, many students left feeling little had been accomplished for either side.

“I think what ends up happening in debates like this where there’s different people who feel very strongly about different things, instead of seeing the other side’s perspective is they strengthen their own perspective,” said Fiza Ali, senior finance major.

Hundreds of students and faculty were unable to get into Knox 109, which only fits 200 people. University Police said the room reached its full capacity and letting more people in would be a fire hazard.

Students banged on the door chanting “let us in” as UPD struggled to contain the rowdy students. The officers were flustered and visibly unprepared for the unruly crowd. Two officers searched their phones to find laws to cite to students about why they couldn’t get in.

But many people weren’t surprised with this outcome.

When Spencer’s visit was announced it immediately caused a firestorm across the university and posed questions about the implications of free speech.

Although Student Association did not pay for Spencer to speak, thousands of students and faculty petitioned for SA to remove its logo from flyers about Spencer’s visit and many demanded his visit be canceled all together. Young Americans for Freedom (YAF) invited Spencer for the club’s first official event.

Despite the outcries of discontent from the UB community, Spencer still spoke. He entered Knox 109 to a swarm of boos and middle fingers from the crowd.

Spencer held a thumbs up with a grin on his face and took his phone out to record people booing him.

“I was invited to speak whether you like that or not,” Spencer said.

When Spencer agreed to debate anyone, he was met with a roaring applause.

Students asked him a wide range of questions, such as, what the central tenets of Islam were, what measures the military should take to defend against terrorism and if white men contributed to U.S. terrorism.

Midway through every answer, someone interrupted.

YAF Chairwoman Lynn Sementilli repeatedly asked students to quiet down as they interrupted Spencer while he tried to answer questions.

Before Spencer’s speech, Muslim Student Association held a peaceful sit-in as students gathered on the ground floor of Knox Hall. Roughly 80 students and faculty members showed solidarity for Muslims while some prayed.

“This is our narrative, our voice being stripped from us, and we demand to take it back,” said MSA President Samiha Islam. “Spencer and his followers have never been impacted by Islamophobia, we have. More Muslims have been harmed and killed by ISIS than any other group in the world. We vociferously denounce terrorism at every junction, hundreds of times publicly and privately and declare this is not what Islam represents.”

Kadija Mohammed, a sophomore undecided major, said she was disappointed that the university allowed Spencer to speak.

“I was shocked that there weren’t any moves by the school to stop him from coming, considering he’s banned from the U.K., like you have to be pretty bad to be banned from the U.K., if the queen doesn’t want to see your face, that’s a bad day,” Mohammed said.

Spencer spent a large portion of his speech reading from the Quran.

He read a part of Quran about gays and lesbians that referred to them as “adulterers,” and the crowd erupted in boos and cursed at him.

Sementilli said she expected the crowd to ask “tough questions,” but didn’t expect the crowd to impede on the dialogue.

“They are responsible for their own actions obviously we can’t control what anybody does,” she said. “It would have been nice if they would’ve been more respectful to the speaker and participated in a more productive dialogue.”

Both Luciana Sena, a senior legal studies major and Jared Armitage, a junior political science major, feel conservative perspectives aren’t heard on campus.

“It’s kind of an ongoing discussion here with the more conservative or Republican groups on campus that our free speech is often suppressed and I think that we saw that here today by not allowing one side of the discussion to speak,” Sena said.

UPD Chief of Police Gerald Schoenle wished more university staff were present at the event to contain the disruptive crowd of students who were unable to get in. He said the university will try to hold future potentially chaotic events in bigger venues like the Student Union Theater or Alumni Arena.

“Overall, well nobody got hurt, the points were heard on both sides so from that perspective so from that point of view it went OK,” Schoenle said.

“Controversial speaker at UB shouted down, heckled,” by Jay Tokasz, Buffalo News, May 1, 2017:

It wasn’t Berkeley or Middlebury, by any stretch.

But controversial speaker Robert Spencer was repeatedly shouted down and heckled at the podium Monday inside a University at Buffalo lecture room, as he tried to give a talk on “Exposing Radical Islam: The Dangers of Jihad in Today’s World.”

Two hundred people, most of them clearly opposed to Spencer’s point of view on Islam, sat in on the talk, while another 100 or more people were kept outside the room by university police due to fire code limits inside.

University officials and police had been on alert for the potential for significant demonstrations, in light of recent havoc at other campuses across the country over conservative-leaning speakers like Spencer, an author whose books on terrorism have been widely criticized by Islamic groups as anti-Muslim.

Spencer used a microphone during his talk but was frequently drowned out by shouts and chants to let more students inside. Some students called him a Nazi, while others yelled for him to shut up.

Spencer at times pulled out his cellphone to record the boisterous crowd. The attempt to silence someone who has a differing viewpoint was a “quintessentially fascist act, and you are manifesting it in a wonderful way tonight,” said Spencer. “What you have in this room besides the manifestation of fascism is a very interesting phenomenon in that I would doubt that any one of you has read a single thing I’ve written.”

Students began showing up to demonstrate against Spencer nearly two hours before his talk.

Tension had been building on campus since the conservative student group Young Americans for Freedom announced Spencer’s visit in April.

One of the aims of the group, which has had a chapter at UB since February, is to bring conservative-minded speakers to campus.

Within days, graduate student Alexandra Prince circulated a petition condemning Spencer as a “notorious Islamophobe and hate monger” and urging that student fees not be used to give him a platform on campus for hate speech.

Spencer frequently discusses terrorism by Muslims as being religiously motivated, an argument that has put him in the cross-hairs of American Muslims who say his interpretation of Islam is dangerously inaccurate and perverts their faith.

Spencer is part of a speaker’s bureau organized by the national Young Americans for Freedom Foundation, and he frequently talks on college campuses at the invitation of local YAF chapters….

University of Iowa: Muslim student charged with making terrorist threat
The watchman on the wall ,sounding the ALARM

Filed Under: academia, free speech, Robert Spencer

Comments

  1. John A. Marre says

    May 2, 2017 at 10:27 am

    You were warned, America, and you rejected the messenger. When you are bowed down waiting for the machete to separate your head from your body, you’ll wish everyone had listened.

  2. Lookmann says

    May 2, 2017 at 10:35 am

    This is U S, the land of freedom and opportunity, to live and enjoy !

    The lefturds should learn to respect other’s views or keep quiet.

    Or better leave US.

  3. HIPS says

    May 2, 2017 at 10:36 am

    “This is our narrative, our voice being stripped from us and we demand to take it back”.

    Denying the right of freedom of expression from Mr. Spencer while demanding it for themselves.

    Thank you Robert for all your hard work.

  4. Santa Voorhees says

    May 2, 2017 at 10:37 am

    “I was shocked that there weren’t any moves by the school to stop him from coming, considering he’s banned from the U.K., like you have to be pretty bad to be banned from the U.K., if the queen doesn’t want to see your face, that’s a bad day,”

    It’s clear he doesn’t know that truth is banned in the UK.

  5. Mobuyus says

    May 2, 2017 at 10:39 am

    Invaders with iphones shutting down Americans. That’s what I see in that photo. Self absorbed smug sanctimonious brownish( political designation) nitwits in need of a beat down.

Read more…

STOP Pro-Terror Sharia “Activist” Linda Sarsour Keynote Speaker at CUNY Graduation #CancelSarsour

( Muslims do not assimilate, they infiltrate! )

23

There will be a huge protest against this sharia supporting hatemonger on June 1, Join us – RSVP here.

People have already taken to the streets.

Video “Questions for Linda Sarsour from Assemblyman Hikind”:

An Open Letter to Linda Sarsour from NYS Assemblyman Dov Hikind

NY State Assemblyman Dov Hikind (D-Brooklyn) has some questions for Linda Sarsour, who was chosen by CUNY to deliver its commencement speech at the School of Public Health on June 1. The Assemblyman’s open letter is delivered as a two-minute video message that he invites Sarsour to reply to.

“These are questions that many people are asking,” says Hikind. “I invite Linda Sarsour to publicly address these vital points about her past and her agenda.”

The video “Questions for Linda Sarsour from Assemblyman Hikind” can be seen here:

“I hope everyone who admires Sarsour’s association with the Women’s movement—which I also support—will watch this brief but important video,” said Hikind.

Sarsour has close ties with Rasmea Yousef Odeh, a member of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine convicted by an Israeli court for her role in the murder of two students, Leon Kanner and Eddie Joffe, in a Jerusalem supermarket bombing. Odeh, who has spoken alongside Sarsour, is now being deported by the United States for falsifying information when she immigrated to the U.S.

Sarsour also glorified rock throwing by Arab children at Israelis calling it “the definition of courage.”

April 27, 2017. 4:30 pm. We gathered outside CUNY’s midtown Manhattan offices because Linda Sarsour, anti-Zionist, pro-Sharia Muslim, has been announced as their Keynote speaker for the June 1, 2017 graduation of CUNY’s Graduate School of Public Health & Health Policy. THIS is an OUTRAGE

THE WATCHMAN ON THE WALL SOUNDING THE ALARM.

Read more…

WATCH the New Nazi Movement on College Campuses on Israel’s Memorial Day

( Muslims do not assimilate, the infiltrate ) 

16

This is vile. The grotesque depiction of Jews is evocative of the lead-up to the Holocaust and the vicious Jew-hatred rampant today in the Muslim world.

If Muslims weren’t entering Israel with suicide bombs on, there would be no need of checkpoints. The depiction of the Israelis, who provide the “Palestinians” with electricity, water, medical care is criminal.

BDS at Columbia having a demonstration of a mock Israeli checkpoint on Yom Hazikaron

The watchman on the wall sounding the ALARM

Read more…

Study: Muslim Migrants Become Less Integrated the Longer They Stay

( Muslims do not assimilate, they infiltrate! )

More good news about Muslim immigration.

Shock Report: Migrants Become Less Integrated the Longer They Stay in Europe

By Virginia Hale, Breitbart, May 1, 2017 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

Norwegian study has found the gap in labour participation rates between citizens born in Norway and third world migrants widens the longer newcomers have been in the country.

Researchers at the Ragnar Frisch Centre for Economic Research uncovered “encouraging signs of labour market integration during an initial period upon migrants’ admission”.

 

But after a period of just five to 10 years, according to the report, “the integration process goes into reverse with widening immigrant-native employment differentials and rising rates of immigrant social insurance dependency”.

“Basically we were very surprised by these results, because really the differences between immigrants and Norwegian-born citizens should be getting lesser and lesser the longer migrants have lived in Norway. We found that the opposite happens,” said Knut Røed, a senior researcher at the Frisch Centre.

Norway’s acting minister for immigration and integration Per Sandberg said the government is aware of problems highlighted by the report, but suggested that not everything can be solved politically.

“Even if the government went further still in delivering migrants jobs and opportunities, we mustn’t forget that politicians can’t force people to become integrated,” said the minister.

He added: “There must also be a significant commitment from individuals themselves, if they are wanting to succeed in Norway.”

Norwegian newspaper Verdens Gang described the findings of the study as “very bad news” for the nation’s welfare state.

“The conclusion is clear: if we do not succeed in getting newcomers into work, our entire welfare model will be in jeopardy,” the paper’s editorial read.

Norway’s welfare state is not the only aspect of life in the Nordic nation that mass migration threatens to disrupt, it has been warned.

Last year, the head of the Norwegian Police Security Service (PST) stated that Muslim immigrants are resistant to integration and can cause “problems” for the host nation.

“A strong increase in immigration, particularly from Muslim countries, can cause other long-term challenges. When a large number of asylum seekers come to a local community, it can have unfortunate consequences,” said PST head Marie Benedicte Bjørnland.
Last year, the head of the Norwegian Police Security Service (PST) stated that Muslim immigrants are resistant to integration and can cause “problems” for the host nation.

“A strong increase in immigration, particularly from Muslim countries, can cause other long-term challenges. When a large number of asylum seekers come to a local community, it can have unfortunate consequences,” said PST head Marie Benedicte Bjørnland.

THE WATCHMAN ON THE WALL SOUNDING THE ALARM

Read more…

S.gif

Daily reporting and analysis of current events from a biblical and prophetic perspective
 
S.gif
Bill Wilson
The ex "president's" militant arm Antifa
NOTEWhen writing about God and Jesus, The Daily Jot means YHVH as God and Yeshua Ha Mashiach as Jesus--the actual original names and the true nature and character of them.
  
Tuesday, April 25, 2017
Attorney General Jeff Sessions last week pointed his finger directly at the ex-"president's" Administration and said that the lack of border security and immigration law enforcement allowed the lethal MS13 gang to take root in the US. The Daily Jot has reported in the past how MS13 and the Islamic State have infiltrated the US and work in tandem in drug and human trafficking, death and destruction-both allowed to incubate and mature under the lawlessness promoted by the previous Administration. There is yet another group that not only the previous administration allowed to foment, but that the leftist political machine is utilizing as a militant arm of far-left liberal politics, putting American citizens in harm's way.
 
Edmond Kozak of PoliZette reports that this militant group ventured into the public in a big way during a pro-Trump free speech rally at the University of California Berkeley campus on April 15. Masked men and women wearing black violently disrupted the Trump rally by throwing bricks and M-80 explosives into the crowd and physically assaulting the Trump supporters. Some footage of the event documented one attacker hitting a peaceful Trump supporter over the head with a bicycle chain and lock. According to The Gateway Pundit, the police chief in Berkeley ordered officers to stand down and allowed the violence. Trump supporters fought back in self-defense and the group, numbering in hundreds, ran away.
 
Finally, police arrested 23 and confiscated knives, stun guns and poles from the attackers of the militant group that calls itself Antifa. Antifa stands for "anti-fascist action" and, by its own definition, is an organization of anarchists and communists fighting to end fascism. In reality, they are the militant arm of the radical leftists who are protesting President Donald Trump and his Administration. Antifa is working unofficially and deniably in collaboration with the ex-"president's" Organizing for Action, which boasts a following of protesters some 30,000 strong with 250 offices across the country. OFA is the Soros-funded $40 million front group for the ex "president's" shadow government and leads other non-profits in signaling protests across the country. Antifa shows up as the "enforcer" to violently dispirit pro-Constitutional Americans.
 
Antifa is a terrorist group similar to Hamas, which is one of the militant arms of the Palestinian Authority. The Palestinian Authority, for example, poses as the legal representative of the "Palestinian" people, but in reality, it is calling the shots on terrorism in Israel. Antifa is emerging as the shadow government's militant arm. Of course, there is plausible deniability because of the "arm's-length" association with the group. But the members are the same, the beliefs are the same, and the goal is the same-to undermine the US government and foment a socialist takeover of America. This is not a drill. It's real. Jesus said in Matthew 24:4, "Take heed that no man deceive you." Do not be deceived by denials, especially when these people justify violence in the name of protecting social justice and free speech while, in reality, they oppress both. 
Have a Blessed and Powerful Day!
Bill Wilson

PS. Please use the "Share This Email" link below to pass this on to as many people as you can!    
Read more…

Planned Parenthood Admitted Abortion ‘Kills the Life of a Baby’

Planned Parenthood touts in-facility abortions as “a very safe, simple and common procedure.” It also proclaims abortion is “one of the safest medical procedures you can get.” The abortion provider says abortion ends a pregnancy, but never refers to the new life as a baby. But Planned Parenthood once said exactly the opposite.

Abortion “Kills the Life of a Baby”

Obianuju Ekeocha, founder of Culture for Life Africa, came across two Planned Parenthood pamphlets, one of which was dated 1952. Both pamphlets declared that abortion “kills the life of a baby.”


One pamphlet answers the question, “Is [birth control] an abortion?” with “Definitely not. An abortion requires an operation. It kills the life of a baby after it has begun. It is dangerous to your life and health. It may make you sterile so that when you want a child you cannot have it. Birth control merely postpones the beginning of life.”

The pamphlet admits that, not only can an abortion make a woman sterile, but that abortion is killing a life that has already begun. Glenn Beck commented on Monday that “[w]e’re now advocating for murder of children according to their own pamphlet.”

That Was Then

That was then. Planned Parenthood’s website now says that aborting a child is easy and safe with “no risk to your future pregnancies or to your overall health.”

Multiple studies have found just the opposite. One February 2014 study found that induced abortion is linked to an increased risk of breast cancer. And that the risk increases as the number of induced abortions increase. Another study also found that there was an increase in risk for cancer with multiple abortions.

Abortion can also lead to fertility problems later, the Mayo clinic reported. Sterilization after an abortion can happen when baby body parts are not completely removed. It can happen when a woman gets an infection after an abortion. It can also happen if the woman’s cervix or uterus is damaged by an abortion.

Planned Parenthood does not tell women what happens if they choose abortion. It doesn’t tell them the risks they’ll take. Once, 65 years ago, they told the truth. (For more from the author of “Planned Parenthood Admitted Abortion ‘Kills the Life of a Baby'” please click HERE) http://joemiller.us/2017/05/planned-parenthood-admitted-abortion-kills-life-baby/

Read more…

Trump’s Agriculture Chief Tosses out Michelle Obama’s School Lunch Rules

Former first lady Michelle Obama’s dictates on school lunches were thrown out Monday by one of President Donald Trump’s Cabinet members.

Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue signed a proclamation to begin to undo federal standards that the Obama administration placed on lunches in public schools and return those decisions to local schools.

“This announcement is the result of years of feedback from students, schools, and food service experts about the challenges they are facing in meeting the final regulations for school meals,” Perdue said in prepared remarks. “If kids aren’t eating the food, and it’s ending up in the trash, they aren’t getting any nutrition—thus undermining the intent of the program.”

The announcement “begins the process of restoring local control of guidelines on whole grains, sodium, and milk,” a press release from the Agriculture Department reads.

The standards, implemented in 2012, were crafted with the heavy involvement of Michelle Obama, who made better nutrition and more exercise for children part of her agenda as first lady. The standards include directives on vastly reducing use of salt, calorie limits, restrictions on meat, prohibitions on the contents of vending machines, and increased servings of whole grains, fruits, and vegetables, as the New York Post reported.

The standards implemented provisions of a law called the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010. President Barack Obama’s wife also championed the law, Daren Bakst, a research fellow in agricultural policy at The Heritage Foundation, told The Daily Signal in an email.

The 2010 law set calorie limits, stipulated portion sizes, and required specific nutrients.

“Michelle [Obama] is a big proponent and defender of the standards,” Bakst said.

Perdue, the former governor of Georgia, said in a tweet that the rules have been counterproductive:

Perdue “took an important step to making school meals edible again,” Bakst told The Daily Signal. “The federal school meal standards implemented by the Obama administration have been a disaster, creating massive plate waste and imposing high costs on schools.”

Perdue’s action, Bakst said, is significant for both parents and kids.

“This issue isn’t about nutrition,” Bakst said Monday, adding:

It’s about whether one believes the federal government should dictate almost every aspect of what kids eat at schools, or if local communities, with the input of parents, should make these decisions. Today was certainly a big win for kids across the country, but it was also a big win for those who respect the opinions of parents more than those of federal bureaucrats.

Patricia Montague, CEO of the School Nutrition Association, a national nonprofit with more than 57,000 members that provides meals to students across the nation, praised Perdue’s leadership.

“I commend Secretary Perdue for taking this important step,” Montague said. “We have been wanting flexibility so that schools can serve meals that are both nutritious and palatable. We don’t want kids wasting their meals by throwing them away. Some of our schools are actually using that food waste as compost. That shouldn’t be happening.” (For more from the author of “Trump’s Agriculture Chief Tosses out Michelle Obama’s School Lunch Rules” please click HERE) http://joemiller.us/2017/05/trumps-agriculture-chief-tosses-michelle-obamas-school-lunch-rules/

Read more…

Trump Destroys NY Times in Harrisburg: Media Deserves a Very, Very Big Fat Failing Grade
Video

Saturday, April 29, 2017: RSBN will be in attendance with a full crew as President Donald J. Trump will…
Read more…

Northern Arizona U. prof. Heather Martel orders student to stop reading Bible *before* class

Mark Holden is a student at Northern Arizona University.

Holden is a Christian.

In February, Holden arrived early to a U.S. history class with at least five minutes to spare. So he took out his Bible to read, but was ordered by the instructor, Assistant Professor Heather Martel, to stop reading the Bible because she didn’t want him to “sit in front of her” with his Bible out.

Note: Dr. Heather Martel is an Assistant Professor of History (which means she likely is untenured) and an Associate Faculty of Women’s and Gender Studies at Northern Arizona University (NAU). She claims U.S./gender history as her specialty.

Holden refused. Martel reported him to her department chair Dr. Derek Heng. Holden was called into Heng’s office. Below is an audio recording of Holden’s meeting with Heng, provided to Campus Reform by Kevin Cavanaugh for Congress.

Here’s a transcript of the audio recording:

Dr. Heng: “So, I mean, so Prof. Martel says that she doesn’t want you sitting in front of her because you put, you know, a Bible out, right?”

Holden: “Uh huh.”

Heng: “So, um, I don’t know what dynamics is going on in the classroom. Um, I mean the real key, uh, is to make sure that, you know, the class is able to go on and that you are in the classroom. I think that’s really, sort of, my prerogative here right now.”

Holden: “So she doesn’t want me front because I have my Bible out.”

Heng: “No, I think she, I mean, well, why do you have you Bible out anyway?”

Holden: “I’m just reading before class.”

Heng: “OK”

Holden: “I mean, class isn’t even started yet. I’m reading my Bible.”

Heng: “Right. So, class is gonna start soon and … are we….”

Holden: “Ya, not for another five minutes.”

Heng: “OK. So, will you, will you, will you put your Bible away?”

Holden: “I always do, every day. And I read the Bible before class and I put it away before class starts.”

Heng: “OK. Well, let me get her out and then let’s see what we can do about it, OK?”

Holden: “Sure.”

In other words, although the student Mark Holden HAD DONE NOTHING WRONG, simply because Professor Heather Martel was bothered by seeing Holden reading the Bible, History Department Chair Professor Derek Heng asks the student to put his Bible away.

Anthony Gockowski reports for Campus Reform, April 27, 2017, that prior to the Bible incident in February, Martel had accused Holden of violating the university’s policy on disruptive classroom behavior when Holden challenged Martel’s views on cultural assimilation.

Holden told Campus Reform that he had questioned the matter of cultural assimilation by citing news reports about two Muslim immigrants who erected a sign declaring that the Koran gives them the right to commit rape.

In an email that Martel sent to Holden accusing him of disruptive classroom behavior, she claims Holden had interrupted the class multiple times and “made a scene,” only stopping after a classmate intervened. Martel wrote:

“Then you raised your hand for most of the rest of class. When I acknowledged that I saw your hand but stated we would be hearing from your classmates instead, as you had already had your input, you said in a loud voice: ‘You work for me. I pay your salary.’”

Martel then sent out a second email about the altercation, not just to Holden but to the entire class, outlining “steps to re-instate civility in the classroom” and declaring emphatically that “hate speech” would not be tolerated.

Holden told Campus Reform that he eventually withdrew from Martel’s class. Holden sees the Bible incident as Martel’s and Northern Arizona University’s restriction of his free speech, calling it “a systemic problem, not just at this university, but across the United States” because most college professors are “pushing an ideology on students and any opposition to this is refuted and slashed.” While there may be students “who want to speak up,” they don’t “feel that they can because of fear about their grades.” And it’s not just students. Conservative-leaning professors face similar concerns in relation to keeping their jobs.

Casey Mattox, Senior Counsel of the Alliance Defending Freedom, tells Campus Reform that “public universities are supposed to serve as a marketplace of ideas, and Christian students are not second class citizens on their tax-funded campuses. By singling out a student’s religious views for discriminatory treatment a professor not only violates the First Amendment, but also disserves the very purpose of a university.”

Campus Reform contacted both Martel and Heng, offering them the opportunity to address Holden’s characterization of the events and offer their own perspectives, but neither responded in time for publication.

Here’s contact information for Northern Arizona University (NAU):

  • Dr. Heather Martel, Assistant Professor of History: Email: Heather.Martel@nau.edu; phone 928-523-6993
  • Dr. Derek Heng, Chair of History Dept.: Email: Derek.Heng@nau.edu; phone 928-523-5685
  • Dr. Rita Hartung Cheng, President, ASU: Email: President@nau.edu; phone 928-523-3232

Northern Arizona University is a hotbed of leftwing tyrannical professors. See “Gender Pronoun Tyranny: Professor downgrades student’s paper for using the world ‘mankind’“.

Here’s a transcript of the audio recording:

https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2017/05/02/northern-arizona-u-prof-heather-martel-

Read more…

Democrats don't need to block President Donald J. Trump 's agenda, PAUL RYAN has already done that for them.

( In 2018 we can support our President Tramp and the polices we vote for by drawing the swamp in this 2018 election for our congress

Principles for a Free Society )
Every bill gets watered down so much it is only a token of it's former self!
With Ryan as Speaker and McConnell as Senate Majority Leader the Democrats don't need to win back the House and Senate, they already have it!

House Freedom Caucus Chairman Mark Meadows tried to implement the voters will and was attacked from all quarters.
Please don't give up President Donald Trump News, Congressmen Meadows, Congressman Jim Bridenstine, Congressman Jim Jordan, Congressman Louie Gohmert and all those that have the courage to put our nation first!

The party is exploiting Republican divisions to take control of the budget process.
washingtonpost.com|By Kelsey Snell
Read more…

( Remember there  is a election in 2018 for Congress time for the American People draw stamp!

Principles for a Free Society )

House Conservatives Won’t Pass Omnibust Without a Fight

Don’t expect conservatives in Congress to swallow the bipartisan $1 trillion spending bill, which is funding all of former President Obama’s priorities, without a fight, says Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio.

Jordan, a member of the House Freedom Caucus, said Monday he expects “lots of conservatives” to oppose the bill as written.

“Money goes to Planned Parenthood […] Money continues to go to sanctuary cities, but no money for the border wall,” Jordan explained on CNN’s “New Day.”

“I think you’re going to see a lot of conservatives be against this plan this week.”

By threatening a government shutdown, Democrats in the minority pressured the GOP to remove 160 conservative agenda items from the spending bill. They assented to the liberal demands without a fight. Rep. Jordan questioned why Republican leaders passed a short-term spending bill in the first place last fall “if we weren’t going to actually fight for the things we told the voters we were going to fight for.”

Jordan’s discontent has been matched by other House conservatives on social media. Rep. Justin Amash, R-Mich., blasted the omnibus as “another deal to grow the government.”

Representative Thomas Massie, R-Ky., a Freedom Caucus ally but not a member himself, offered up criticism for the process behind the omnibust legislation.

But Congressman Jeff Duncan, R-S.C., had the most heated words in a Facebook post, describing the spending deal as “unbelievable,” and saying Democrats have successfully done “what Speaker John Boehner refused to do in 2011 – stand FIRM in the negotiations on government funding and debt for the principals and promises we (GOP) made to the American people.”

“Now – Schumer and Company have a liberal press (MSM) to support them if they stand firm and threaten a government shutdown – the GOP didn’t,” Duncan wrote. “But we do have the White House and its ‘Bully Pulpit.’”

“But when Republicans (moderates) hide from the shadow of a government shutdown and fail to stand firm, when we have House, Senate and the White House, to defund the murder and dismemberment of babies in the womb, fund border security and defund cities which are in direct violation of Federal Immigration laws, well we get crap like this latest CR – government funding ‘Deal.’”

Though many conservatives will likely oppose this omnibust deal, moderate Republicans will betray their campaign promises once again and join with Democrats and pass it.

At this point, the only way to stop the bill is President Trump’s veto power. Now, the American people will see if the president was serious when he said he would go to Washington, D.C., and fight the big government establishment of both parties.

Will President Trump veto the omnibus spending bill and demand a bill that funds the border wall, defunds Planned Parenthood, defunds sanctuary cities as he promised? Or will Trump sign a $1 trillion deficit spending bill into law, funding Democrat priorities (like every other establishment Republican president who has come before him)? (For more from the author of “House Conservatives Won’t Pass Omnibust Without a Fight” please click HERE) http://joemiller.us/2017/05/house-conservatives-wont-pass-omnibust-without-fight/

Read more…

Underreported: How Building a Border Wall Changed San Diego

In 1986, the San Diego Border Patrol sector accounted for approximately one-third of all apprehensions along the U.S.-Mexico border. Today, it accounts for only a small fraction.

How did the region go from one of the busiest sectors for illegal border crossings to one of the most secure? In our latest edition of “Underreported,” The Daily Signal visits the U.S.-Mexico border in San Diego to find out.

(For more from the author of “Underreported: How Building a Border Wall Changed San Diego” please click HERE)

Read more…

Tuesday AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
Netanyahu's bold move against
Western diplomatic warfare
By Caroline B. Glick
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Russia's Lavrov says ready to cooperate
with U.S. on Syria: agencies
PeXbAyJJDRhiZEo24hjEVOgNz0kd_wjcgl1kz_3sT3dowyVcQbHwrKpW4h6OtJrvCO7zQiPA7f1Cxefkf6OL8xXG33bSHv8vaJK8Eq8ZR1YOwGBlHhPrOl1jer3-fMEHfv7ifv59zA4tAGUjkEFbch0iRVErLr_ElT4X_qGwiw6MKFI9SV5PQw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{reuters.com} ~ Moscow is ready to cooperate with the United States on settling the Syrian crisis, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said on Saturday, Russian news agencies reported... Russian authorities reiterate periodically that they stand ready to renew cooperation with Washington on Syria and, more globally, on fighting terrorism. Relations between the two countries, however, are seen reaching another low after U.S. fired missiles at Syria to punish Moscow's ally for its suspected use of poison gas earlier in April. Russia condemned the U.S. action. http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-syria-russia-usa-idUSKBN17V07Y?utm_campaign=trueAnthem:+Trending+Content&utm_content=5904ffff04d3013e5e0510dd&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=twitter
.
After 44 Years President Trump Restoring
American Energy, Security, Prosperity
2twZXtHCymPr-3L_mTucocemDuEHwRgqwHfJlQYJrFxDlo8svKKnq9hJUDZglzEJMpHRvqLwz0qkqEvhcPu7eX0DqYBSpDNqSQvRDuWLzO3EbIrzbKDyKiYjrTO_s2e6Am_UvHpS_f2eQjCXpy8=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ President Trump made good in part on another of his promises with the signing of an executive order on Friday that moves to once again allow the United States to develop our oil and gas resources... In the Seventies the CFR globalist establishment put America last and cut off our access to our own domestic oil through a contrived shortage. Efforts to expand our domestic production levels were denied, apparently in anticipation of future events as we were increasingly steered into a position of dependence upon imports, largely from the Persian Gulf. We were told America was running low on oil and that we had to conserve and look elsewhere for our supplies. It was an obvious farce then and it’s been proven to be one through the reserve estimates through to present day... http://rickwells.us/take-that-opec-after-44-years-president-trump-restoring-american-energy-security-prosperity/
.
Sen. Menendez Ally Dr. Salomon Melgen
Found Guilty on All 67 Counts of Medicare Fraud
7ksgheq4Xrhc5CFm3_MEa9UOkzi-VsYDb_FlFicVP5qlxVbGrSLwvfiiYh5UuJybWuODLJ3ZPePjJXLan_2Q5OBSfluzqYtStB8Y1sBl8yq2qns3KrTlM1PO8-nRnsBTLGV8prH_AGNZ-ngnvpCEevmbwc3cuyxmO6BR=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Michael Patrick Leahy
{breitbart.com} ~ “A prominent Florida eye doctor has been convicted on all counts in his Medicare fraud trial, raising the possibility he could be pressured to testify in the bribery trial of New Jersey Democratic Sen. Bob Menendez,”... Jurors announced their verdict Friday for Dr. Salomon Melgen. He effectively faces a life sentence if no deal is struck. Menendez denies any wrongdoing. Prosecutors contended that the 62-year-old Melgen stole up to $105 million from the federal insurance program between 2008 and 2013, by giving patients treatments and tests that couldn’t help them...http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/04/28/sen-menendez-ally-dr-salomon-melgen-found-guilty-on-all-76-counts-of-medicare-fraud/
.
Rice Acts Like A Guilty Defendant As She Denies Wrongdoing In Unmasking, Spy Scandal
ZndTV91e9UWggCtRyfWcJG_jtnHXo9hF3_ghS-1p3yYoc7KOVXMVz8sASGLJyr4c2rE0pn7nigKnwG3EIOfJ7G2fxnPjWJwawHWyRZZSK19y1k2JtOTtYiuzk2w=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ The two Council on Foreign Relations shadow government comrades, Fareed Zakaria and Susan Rice, put on a stage performance in what is an obvious attempt at damage control for her being caught spying on Americans... and to try to stem the tide of negative publicity that is inevitable, given her likely hearings before Congressional intelligence committees. Rice is infamous for her five network lie-fest to attempt to mislead the American people on the liar-nObama regime’s misadventures in Benghazi which resulted in the deaths of four Americans, the incident she falsely claimed to be a response to a YouTube video. She’s not doing much better with today’s little “why I’m innocent and a patriot” skit...
.
George Soros fixes eye on new enemy
hnef5S-brSJAcz547vhJTJY3PYGwjPHE5d2xmZTIrV63sgyC9S7tEBBnkb_Yq5edUDrQVwqdpPPfBCjvUCqqeg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Paul Bremmer
{wnd.com} ~ George Soros appears to have fixed his eye on a new enemy – a proposed Article V Convention... Operatives from Soros-funded organizations have been caught on camera lobbying state legislators in at least two states to oppose an Article V Convention resolution. Anthony Gutierrez of Common Cause Texas, a Soros-funded group, testified against Article V Convention legislation before the Texas legislature, and Ted Boettner of the West Virginia Center on Budget & Policy, sponsored by Soros’ Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, lobbied against such legislation in the Mountain State...
.
 G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Netanyahu's bold move against
Western diplomatic warfare
DT344UCaU-pnDqKGifWX3ahIPVcKkTBukDCkPSS5OA7PIt1i9dhmOijeAJbUaulO5c3RCSrUxUe4ID4zyqpATMmiLDqObRXytrDILYqhBovsRG0Q-50yry8XzXSfUa7bOuU_twE7Kb4kwA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
By Caroline B. Glick
{
jewishworldreview.com} ~ On Tuesday, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu adopted a new strategy for managing Israel’s diplomatic relations with the West. Long in the making and increasingly urgent, Israel’s new strategy is very simple. Foreign governments can either treat Israel in accordance with international diplomatic norms of behavior, or they can continue to discriminate against Israel.

If they act in accordance to international diplomatic norms, Israel will respond in like fashion. If they choose instead to discriminate against Israel and treat it in a manner no other democratic state is treated, Israel will abandon diplomatic convention and treat foreign governments as domestic critics.

On Monday, after his repeated requests for Germany’s visiting Foreign Minister Sigmar Gabriel to cancel his plans to meet with Breaking the Silence and B’Tselem, Netanyahu gave Gabriel an ultimatum. Gabriel could meet with Netanyahu, or he could meet with Breaking the Silence.

Gabriel refused to cancel his meeting with Breaking the Silence. So Netanyahu canceled their meeting.

To understand the strategic significance of Netanyahu’s decision and what further steps are now required to ensure the success of his strategy, it is necessary to understand what Breaking the Silence represents. It is then important to recognize how it is used by Berlin and other foreign governments.

But first, Netanyahu’s move has to be seen in a general context.

Today’s Western democracies are in a furor over the notion that foreign governments would dare to interfere in their domestic affairs. The uproar in the US over Russia and in Europe over Turkish efforts to drum up support for President Recep Tayyip Erdogan among Turkish nationals in Europe make clear how roundly democracies decry attempts by foreign governments to influence their internal politics.

This then brings us to Israel, and the unique rules that the West applies in its dealing with the Jewish state.

In the final quarter of the 20th century, European and other Western states abandoned their earlier support for Israel. From 1974 on, Europeans could be depended on to either support condemnations of Israel at the UN and other international forums, or to abstain from votes.

Whereas from 1974 to 2000, European hostility was largely limited to the diplomatic arena, beginning in 2000, the Europeans began to expand their anti-Israel policies to the Israeli domestic political sphere.

After the PLO abandoned the peace process with Israel at the July 2000 Camp David summit and initiated its terrorist war against Israel two months later, the Europeans began massively funding radical leftist groups registered as NGOs in Israel. The collapse of the peace process and the initiation of the Palestinian terrorist war all but dried up domestic support for groups like Peace Now, B’Tselem and Rabbis for Human Rights. But with millions of euros in their pockets and the unconditional diplomatic support of Europe, these groups were able to become players in Israel’s domestic politics and cause massive harm to Israel’s international standing.

As for the Europeans, their Israeli contractors gave them the ability to fend off allegations that they were antisemites engaged in systematic and prejudicial discrimination against the Jewish state.

Every time Israeli officials and others protested about their unfair treatment of Israel, the Europeans responded that they were simply restating allegations made by Israelis.

The fact that the Israelis they quoted were only able to speak because Europe paid for their microphones was entirely beside the point, as was the fact that those Israelis reflected the views of next to no one in Israel.

In the face of this assault – fronted by Israel-registered organizations staffed by Israelis, for the past 17 years, official Israel has been paralyzed. First it didn’t know how to respond. And second, when it responded, it was beset with the prospect of Europe retaliating by backing its political war against Israel with economic warfare.

As a result, time after time, Israel buckled to European pressure. Consequently, it saw its international status undermined and its very right to sovereignty questioned.

The most significant example of that buckling came in 2008, when then-prime minister Ehud Olmert agreed to transfer Israel’s postal codes to the EU and so enabled the Europeans to discriminate against Israeli products made beyond the 1949 armistice lines.

In another example, in 2013, then-minister Bennie Begin convinced the government to bow to European pressure – exerted through its Israel-registered nonprofits – to legalize Beduin settlements in the Negev built on stolen state land.

In both instances, far from placating the Europeans and their Israeli contractors, these actions convinced them to escalate their pressure against Israel and to adopt ever more prejudicial positions against the Jewish state.

The playing field between Israel and Europe has shifted in recent years. Today, the EU is fighting for its life. Donald Trump’s victory in November, Britain’s decision to exit the EU, and the growing power of anti-EU forces in Europe have all had a debilitating impact on Brussels’ ability to throw its weight around in the global arena.

Moreover, over the past several years, the government has actively promoted expanding Israeli trade to Asia. One motivation for the policy is the desire to diminish Europe’s economic leverage over Israel.

The diminishment of Europe’s power advantage over Israel set the conditions for Netanyahu’s adoption of his strategy for dealing with Europe’s war against it.

And just in a nick of time. Because as Europe becomes less powerful, Europe’s policies toward Israel become more toxic.

And this brings us to the nature of Breaking the Silence.

Breaking the Silence, which was formed in 2002, is a group dedicated to libeling the IDF and its soldiers and officers by constantly accusing them of carrying out war crimes. Since its inception, Breaking the Silence’s budget has come almost entirely from European governments. Germany is a major backer.

Germany’s interest in Breaking the Silence is understandable. As polls taken between 2011 and 2015 showed, between a third and half of Germans view Israel as the moral equivalent of Nazi Germany. The Palestinians, by their telling, are the new Jews.

Likewise, a large majority of Germans is sick of hearing about the Holocaust. And an even larger majority says that Israel is behaving unjustly toward the Palestinians.

Breaking the Silence’s work not only legitimizes these views, shielding them from condemnation as indications of the growing virulence of German Jew-hatred. It also, to a degree, justifies the Holocaust. After all, if the Jews are as evil as the Nazis, then they are illegitimate actors who deserve to be defeated.

Europe’s rapidly escalating campaign against Israel can be viewed through its rapidly escalating embrace of these groups.

According to senior Foreign Ministry officials, until very recently, European governments conducted their meetings with these organizations in private, far from the glare of television cameras.

This changed in February. During his visit to Israel, Belgian Prime Minister Charles Michel shocked Netanyahu when in defiance of Netanyahu’s request, he personally met with Breaking the Silence during his official visit to Israel.

Last month, British Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson went even further.

Johnson, who has a reputation for being a friend to Israel, surprised Netanyahu and his advisers when, during their meeting he all but refused to discuss anything but Israeli construction beyond the 1949 armistice lines.

Ahead of his meeting with Netanyahu, Johnson traveled to Judea with Peace Now and got himself photographed looking gravely at a map held by a Peace Now leader who pointed to where Jews were building in the area around metropolitan Jerusalem and Ma’aleh Adumim.

When Johnson was asked by reporters why he wasn’t meeting as well with representatives of the Israeli communities in Judea and Samaria, he scoffed. Netanyahu will give the other side of the story, he insisted.

In other words, for Johnson, Netanyahu was expected to answer the allegations launched against his government by a European-funded NGO. Johnson treated Peace Now as a more credible source of information than the government.

During his visit, Peace Now served as a general prosecutor of Israel. Johnson treated Netanyahu as the defendant. And he, whose government funds Peace Now, served as judge and jury.

Gabriel’s decision to opt for a meeting with Breaking the Silence over a meeting with Netanyahu took matters one step forward. In acting as he did, Gabriel showed that as he sees things, Israel’s elected leader is less legitimate than representatives of an organization that legitimizes German antisemitism.

By refusing to meet with Gabriel, Netanyahu made clear that new rules will now apply to Europe and other Western governments that have joined Europe’s campaign against Israel. But his move – while important – is not enough.

To ensure that his strategy of demanding that Europe treat Israel in a manner that accords with diplomatic norms, Netanyahu needs to take additional steps. Like his decision to deny Gabriel diplomatic cover for his meeting with anti-Israel groups, Netanyahu needs to deny Western governments diplomatic immunity for their other actions aimed at undermining the government’s capacity to carry out its domestic duties.

For instance, one of the major ways that European- funded groups subvert the government is by suing the government in local courts. The government must require the foreign governments that fund these groups to appear as sides in the court battles. In this manner, the government can ask the courts to compel these foreign governments to hand over documents relevant to the cases being adjudicated.

So, too, the government should require foreign government- funded groups to submit all communications between their representatives and those governments, and all internal documents of foreign governmental funders relating to their decision to fund the Israel-registered group. Given that the goal of the funding is to interfere with domestic Israeli affairs, those communications should not enjoy diplomatic immunity.

The penalty for failing to present all the required documents will be the imposition of a 100% tax on the foreign government contributions to the Israel-registered nonprofit.

Perhaps the most discouraging aspect of Netanyahu’s diplomatic gambit this week is that opposition leader MK Isaac Herzog refused to support him. Instead, Herzog sided with Gabriel. He insisted that Netanyahu harmed Israel’s relations with Germany by demanding to be treated in a manner that comports with international norms.

For decades, the political Left has claimed that it can manage Israel’s diplomatic ties better than the Right, which it castigates as inept, incompetent and dangerous to Israel’s international standing. By failing to recognize why Netanyahu’s move was vital for Israel’s international standing, or to understand that international conditions have changed sufficiently to allow Israel to stand up for itself, Herzog and his colleagues showed that their boastful claims to diplomatic capabilities are empty.

Netanyahu took a necessary first step toward implementing a constructive strategy for handling Western diplomatic warfare. More steps are still required for this strategy to succeed. But at least, for the first time in years, Israel is finally taking a constructive position in its own defense.
Read more…