Watch: What Trump Just Found in The White House Logs Secures Susan Rice Will Get Longest Prison Sentence Possible

Apr 4, 2017 by Harry Hibbs 1 Comment

This week is already turning into a nightmare for the Democrats. On Monday, bombshell information surfaced that revealed that Obama’s former national security advisor Susan Rice was the one who requested that the NSA unmask the names of Trump and his officials during the election. While that is startling in of itself, new information coming to light early Tuesday morning could send Susane Rice to prison for quite a long time.

Right now, liberals’ biggest defense was that Trump being spied upon was “incidental” and that he along with his top officials and family members were simply swept up during the request. But that assertion is utter BS. White House logs left behind by the Obama administration reveal that not only was the spying on Trump NOT an accident or “incidental,” but that Rice’s interest on gathering NSA documents on Trump only accelerated after Trump won the election, with the spying going on well into January.

We now have concrete evidence that Obama and his officials spied on Trump not only leading up to the election, but for months afterwards. The question at this point becomes, why? Obviously liberals were in shock after Trump won and were scrambling to get as much info on Trump and his transition team as possible so they could then move on to their next mission, which was to disrupt and sabotage Trump by whatever means necessary… which is HIGHLY illegal.

Just two weeks ago Rep. Devin Nunes said the Obama officials who released General Flynn transcripts face up to five years in prison. But spying on the president of the United States could carry an even BIGGER penalty!

Sara Carter via Circa reports:

Computer logs that former President Obama’s team left behind in the White House indicate his national security adviser Susan Rice accessed numerous intelligence reports during Obama’s last seven months in office that contained National Security Agency intercepts involving Donald Trump and his associates, Circa has learned.

Intelligence sources said the logs discovered by National Security Council staff suggested Rice’s interest in the NSA materials, some of which included unmasked Americans’ identities, appeared to begin last July around the time Trump secured the GOP nomination and accelerated after Trump’s election in November launched a transition that continued through January.

The intelligence reports included some intercepts of Americans talking to foreigners and many more involving foreign leaders talking about the future president, his campaign associates or his transition, the sources said. Most if not all had nothing to do with the Russian election interference scandal, the sources said, speaking only on condition of anonymity given the sensitive nature of the materials.

What makes this entire thing even more catastrophic for the Democrats that even with Rice ordering U.S spy agencies to produce “detailed spreadsheets” of Trump’s unmasked calls, they didn’t find one single negative to pin onto Trump.

“What was produced by the intelligence community at the request of Ms. Rice were detailed spreadsheets of intercepted phone calls with unmasked Trump associates in perfectly legal conversations with individuals,” diGenova told The Daily Caller News Foundation Investigative Group Monday.

“The overheard conversations involved no illegal activity by anybody of the Trump associates, or anyone they were speaking with,” diGenova said. “In short, the only apparent illegal activity was the unmasking of the people in the calls.”

This is an extremely HUGE scandal for the Democrats. Remember that Rice recently went on PBS where she asserted that she had “no idea” what Nunes was talking about when he claimed that Obama and his officials were spying on Trump during the election. But of course Rice has had plenty of practice lying on camera, as she was the one to perpetrate Obama and Hillary’s the massive lie about Benghazi, blaming the attack on a YouTube video.

Powerful Group Says to Ban Islamic Propaganda in Schools - Do You Agree?

(Muslims do no t assimilate, they infiltrate )

- The unholy alliance between liberals and extremist Muslims continues to enrage us as they unite in indoctrinating our youth. The Christian Action Network (CAN)… gopthedailydose.com Like CommentShare 16 16 1 share Comments View 3 more comments Carole Barrett Carole Barrett Absolutely, religion doesn't belong in school then ALL religion doesn't belong in school. Can't say a prayer at graduation but they can teach the devils handiwork and call it Islamic studies? Like · Reply · 1 · 13 hrs John Nelson John Nelson Teaching Islam in schools is same as teaching cult worship as that is what Islam is. No religion based on the precept of God promotes beheading, burning, stoning etc of humans. Only a demon cult promotes that. This Islamic push in our schools is the wo...See More Like · Reply · 2 · 2 hrs · Edited William Finley William Finley School should not be teaching religion, that is the parents duty! Let us not forget Muslims do not assimilate, they infiltrate! they are indoctrination our children! It's all part of the plain to take over our country and impose Islam on us all! Just look at what is happening in Europe you can see all the evidence that bears witness what the plain is!

To read more https://gopthedailydose.com/2017/04/03/powerful-group-says-ban-islamic-propaganda-schools

The watchman on the wall sounding the ALARM

MARYLAND school submits to Islam, will allow Muslim female basketball player to wear an Islamic supremacist headbag

( Muslims do not assimilate, they infiltrate! )

Under threats of legal action by designated terrorist group CAIR, Maryland changed its policy on team ‘uniforms’ to allow a Muslim woman to compete wearing the symbol of Islamic oppression of women. Apparently, they are also allowing obese Muslim women to play, as well. 

Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sLqS4KcQwwY

Bare Naked Islam

To read all articles go to http://www.barenakedislam.com/

The Watchman on the wall sounding the ALARM

I just read an interesting article re the filibuster use in congress.  The Constitution says nothing about this "rule" created in the senate.  It is designed to allow the minority to prevent the majority from passed  a law or approving a person for a public office.   This makes no sense.  The majority has always been  the deciding factor in this country.    The senate should stop allowing this devise. It has only led to a dysfunctional congress.

Minnesota: Chaos and bloodshed at Democratic caucus in Somali-dominated ward

So chaotic it had to be shut down and no delegates were selected.

As tweeted by @faiza_mahamud  Cities Reporter StarTribune:

That should read “Chaos has erupted and the Minneapolis Police Department is here.”  Video on Mahamud’s twitter feed.

Click to watch video on Twitter.https://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/2017/04/05/minn-chaos-bloodshed-dem-caucus/

And here’s how the Strib reported it in the paper: Minneapolis voters turn out in large numbers to caucus for mayor, City Council

Sixth Ward

The scene in the Somali-dominated Sixth Ward was chaotic.

Shoving matches and medical emergencies resulted from crowding at the Brian Coyle Community Center, where more than 400 people crammed into the building’s small gymnasium. Council Member Abdi Warsame, who is being challenged by Mohamud Noor, showed up to address the crowd.

“We’re winning in every precinct,” Warsame said. “My supporters, I want you to calm the situation.”

Fire officials shut down the location and sent the caucus outside to Currie Park, which is next to the Coyle Center.

Delegates for the citywide convention were not chosen in the Sixth Ward — that part of the process will be delayed.

Noor said the event was poorly organized, and that the DFL was not ready for the high turnout.

Ninth Ward

City Council Member Alondra Cano has two challengers in the race — former Council Member Gary Schiff and nonprofit director Mohamed Farah.

Somali turnout was significant, and Farah appeared to win or do well in several precincts outside of Phillips. In the Corcoran neighborhood, Farah won 24 of a possible 52 delegates, while Cano gained 15 and Schiff got seven.

All par for the Islamic sharia gentrification course:

• Minnesota: Somali Voter Fraud Uncovered in Dem Race feat Muslim Candidate
• Minnesota: Somali Muslims brawl abruptly ending Democratic caucus
• Minnesota: “Historic” Muslim Primary Winner Reportedly Married Her Brother
• Creeping Sharia
• To read all articles go to
• The watchman on the wall sounding the ALARM

Hugh Fitzgerald: “Spread Hummus Not Hate” in Beaver, Pennsylvania

( Muslims do not assimilate, they infiltrate! )

April 4, 2017 12:47 pm By Hugh Fitzgerald 73 Comments

One more example of Meet-Your-Muslim Neighbor Ninnies:

“Clearing the Air on Islam through ‘Spread Hummus, Not Hate’ events in Beaver,” by J.D. Prose, Beaver County Times, March 31, 2017:

BEAVER — If any two things bring Beaver Countians together, it’s food and religion, and Center Township resident Toni Ashfaq will incorporate both to educate residents about Islam during events in Beaver.

“There are a lot of misunderstandings, a lot of false information floating around,” said Ashfaq, a Muslim and the organizer of two Spread Hummus, Not Hate: Meet Your Muslim Neighbor gatherings Wednesday and Saturday at Beaver Area Memorial Library. “We just want people to meet us and see that we’re just like everybody else.”

“A Wisconsin native and convert from Catholicism, Ashfaq said she and two friends — Julia Chaney, a Christian, and fellow Muslim Dr. Raniah Khairy, an OB/GYN specialist at Heritage Valley Beaver hospital in Brighton Township — began brainstorming ideas “just to kind of build bridges and promote understanding” because of the “current political climate.”…

“We thought it was a pretty catchy title,” Ashfaq said with a laugh. Just one gathering was initially planned, but after receiving an “overwhelming” response, she said a second one was added.”

“Islam has been distorted by politicians and certain media, she said, not naming anyone specifically. Regardless, Ashfaq said Muslims are “not in denial” about Muslims committing violence, but “the media too often focuses solely on Islam.”

Yes, how true. What on earth could possibly be the reason for this unwonted fixation on Islam? Could it be that the media “too often focuses solely on Islam” because there have been more than 30,500 terrorist attacks by Muslims on non-Muslims, all over the world, since 9/11? Could it be that the attacks – let’s just list a few of the places that come immediately to mind, in Paris, Nice, Toulouse, in Brussels, Berlin, Wurzburg, Munich, Reutlingen, Ansbach, in Moscow and Beslan and St. Petersburg, in Amsterdam and Madrid, in New York and Washington and Boston, in Fort Hood and San Bernardino, in Orlando and Chattanooga, in St. Cloud and Little Rock, in Bali and Mumbai and New Delhi, in the Moro Islands of the Philippines, in Buenos Aires and in Beijing – are the reason why there is this “focus”on Islam? Or might it be because Muslims are engaged in so many other kinds of violence, including the sectarian conflict, pitting Sunnis against Shia, in Syria, Iraq, Bahrain, Pakistan, and Yemen, which also means that in several of these countries both Iran and Saudi Arabia are also involved, fighting proxy wars? Or could it be the continuing warfare against the Egyptian state from terrorists based in the Sinai, who are both Muslim Brotherhood and Islamic State sympathizers? Or the Muslims of Boko Haram, who have continued to kidnap Christian girls in Nigeria and use them as sex slaves? Or the attacks on Christians and Yazidis by the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria? Or the continuing wars in post-Qaddafi Libya, with Misratan militias battling the forces of the Libyan National Army, while the remnants of the the Islamic State, defeated at Sirte in December 2016, remain a once-and-future threat in Libya, a country where things are so bad that there are those nostalgic even for Qaddafi’s mad rule? Could it be the violence by Muslims who have driven 200,000 Hindu Pandits out of Kashmir, terrified Christian farmers in the Moro Islands of the Philippines, pushed Buddhists out of the Chittagong Hills tract in Bangladesh, and killed hundreds of thousands of African Christians in the southern Sudan? Could it be the murder of the Christian Shahbaz Bhatti in Pakistan, for daring to question the blasphemy laws? Could it have something to do with the grooming gangs in England? Or the fact that in Sweden 70% of the rapes are committed by Muslims, though Muslims constitute only 4% of the population? Could any, or some, or all of this, and a great deal more in the same vein, be the reason the media “focuses” — if, in fact, it does — on Islam?

Does the media, in fact, really “focus” on Islam anyway? That it should, given all of the terrorist attacks committed by Muslims, just a few of which I’ve listed above, is clear – but does it? Don’t we see the Western media doing what it can to avoid “focusing on Islam,” by reporting with a straight face on terrorism by Muslims, but often not identifying the perpetrators as such, or by misleadingly labeling them, as in the U.K., as “Asians,” and then, compounding the willful error, immediately quoting someone who forcefully denies that “Islam had anything to do with it.” The blood had hardly dried on Westminster Bridge after a Muslim attacker had struck than Theresa May announced that “it is wrong to describe this as Islamic terrorism. It is Islamist terrorism. It is a perversion of a great faith.” Those years Theresa May spent studying at Al-Azhar turn out to have been well worth it.

If it’s a single Muslim attacker, he’s a “lone wolf” acting on his own, without any discernible motivation. Or he may be a “disgruntled” employee guilty of “violence in the workplace.” That was how the Obama administration and the Pentagon first described the mass murderer Major Nidal Malik Hassan, and it took six years for his murders to finally be officially described, correctly, as “terrorism.” If there were several attackers, they may be described as a “small handful of extremists” or as those who “misunderstand” Islam, or who have somehow accepted a “perverse interpretation of Islam.” Or they are not the real Muslims, but the “radicalized” ones, though what constitutes “radicalization” is never explained.

When was the last time you saw, in a newspaper, or heard on a broadcast, simply stated, that “Muslim terrorists, following the texts and teachings of Islam such as [here would follow the quoting of a few verses] struck again at [here put in the details, the where and when and who, of the attack].” Of course you have never read nor seen any such coverage. There is no “focus on Islam,” as Toni Ashfaq claims, but quite the reverse: a constant effort to divert attention away from Islam, to convince people that Islamic terrorism “has nothing to do with Islam.” No matter how absurd, by dint of repetition, it’s having its insidious effect.

“People get the wrong idea that those people represent the whole faith, and they don’t,” Ashfaq said, recalling a recent conversation in which she told a woman that equating terrorists with Islam would be akin to equating the Ku Klux Klan with Christianity.

This is Tu Quoque with a vengeance. To wit, we all, Christians and Muslims, have our crazies. Except that the Ku Klux Klan does not cite the Bible, because it cannot, to justify its violence, while Muslim terrorists are able, and eager, to cite Qur’anic passages that justify their attacks on non-Muslims. If Toni Ashfaq, a convert to Islam, is unware of those Qur’anic passages – the four I always like to adduce first are 9:5, 9:29, 3:151, 8:12, but there are more than 100 other “violent Jihad verses” to choose from — then she needs to study her Qur’an a bit more.

It would be fascinating to know what she knew about Islam before she converted, and what, if anything, she has learned since. Has she run across anything in the Qur’an, Hadith, and Sira that has disturbed her? Any doubts, or second thoughts, about the sheer wonderfulness of Islam?

“Critics have accused President Donald Trump of fanning anti-Muslim sentiments with his proposed immigration ban, since halted by courts, that targeted Muslim-majority countries. He has argued that the ban is necessary to make sure terrorists are not entering the United States as refugees.

“Ashfaq said she has not experienced any overt discrimination, but has seen an increase in people’s curiosity about Islam and Muslims.”

“People are really starting to ask questions,” she said. “They are really wanting to understand.”

“Most questions, Ashfaq said, concern sharia, Islamic canonical law; jihad, an Arabic word meaning “struggle,” but which has taken on the connotation of “holy war”; the treatment of women in Islamic societies; and how some Muslim women dress in public, which can include wearing a hijab that covers the head and chest. Those aspects of Islam, including its basic beliefs and similarities with Christianity, and a question-and-answer session will be on the agenda Wednesday and Saturday.”

Yes, “people are really wanting to understand.” But how will these “Spread Hummus Not Hate” gatherings help non-Muslims to understand what really matters? One is not impressed by Ashfaq’s definition of “jihad” as “an Arabic word meaning ‘struggle,’” but which, she says, has “taken on the connotation of ‘holy war.’” “Taken on the connotation?” When did this happen? This year? A decade ago? The correct answer is 1,400 years ago, for it is as old as Islam itself. And it’s not “connotation” here, but “meaning” that matters. So let’s rephrase her remarks for the sake of the truth: the primary meaning of Jihad has always been that of war against the Infidels, to extend the Islamic domain, Dar al-Islam,where Muslims dominate, at the expense of Dar al-Harb, the House of War, where Unbelievers still dominate. Muslim apologists constantly tell Infidels, that “Jihad” really means an “internal struggle” to be a better human and better Muslim, and they quote a doubtful Hadith, about Muhammad returning home from war, in which he describes himself as returning from the lesser Jihad to the greater Jihad. If that is the meaning Toni Ashfaq wants to claim “Jihad” means, then one hopes that someone in her audience of Infidels will ask her, during the Q-and-A, the series of questions posed by Robert Spencer:

If Jihad is simply a spiritual struggle, why is there an entire chapter of the Qur’an entitled “Booty” or “The Spoils of War” (al-Anfal)? What spoils ensue from a spiritual struggle? If jihad is simply a spiritual struggle, how is a Muslim supposed to make Jews and Christians “pay the jizya with willing submission and feel themselves subdued” (Qur’an 9:29) spiritually? If jihad is simply a spiritual struggle, why are there thousands upon thousands of Muslims worldwide who have joined violent jihad groups? Why are there any violent jihad groups at all? Why is this misunderstanding of jihad so widespread?

And as for learning about the Sharia, do you think that the visitors to these Spread Hummus Not Hate feelgood fests will learn about the punishment, according to the Sharia, meted out to those who leave Islam for another religion – that is, death? Or will they be misleadingly reassured by being told only about Qur’an 2:256? “There is no compulsion in religion,” and naturally will take that verse at face (and in this case false) value? Do you think her visitors will be told by Toni Ashfaq about the punishments that, according to the Hudud, the criminal law part of Sharia (with its fixed penalties established by God), are prescribed for certain crimes? Will they learn about such barbarities as amputation of limbs, public crucifixions, stonings, decapitations, being thrown from a high building? And will she tell them – does she herself know? – that among those “crimes” punishable by death in Islam, along with apostasy, are not just murder, but also adultery and homosexuality? How will she explain away these cruel punishments, or justify treating as “crimes” behaviors that we in the West do not criminalize at all? She claims that among the topics her visitors most want to find out more about is the Sharia. How will she deal with the criminal law part of the Sharia? Or will she avoid that subject altogether, and stick to the most anodyne parts of the Sharia, such as laws pertaining to no-interest loans?

Ashfaq said she and her friends are hoping the events raise enough interest that others might want to organize similar gatherings to promote interfaith relationships and understanding.

“If you see somebody face-to-face, it’s harder to hate them,” she said.

Oh, I don’t know about that. If I meet someone face-to-face whom I have every reason to believe is deliberately attempting to mislead me about life-and-death matters, such as what Islam teaches, given that we non-Muslims are being undermined by the Stealth Jihad that is being conducted all over the Western world, and threatened too, by Islamic terrorists, I don’t think I would find it hard to hate that someone.

Toni Ashfaq complained that “there are a lot of misunderstandings, a lot of false information floating around,” and that she hoped to dispel at these Spread-Hummus-Not-Hate gatherings. It would be fascinating to have her list, say, ten examples of “false information” about Islam that she found particularly egregious. What one would like from Toni Ashfaq is, if not the whole truth, at least some part of it. That would include an admission that Jihad does have, as its primary meaning, the struggle to subdue Infidels and bring about the triumph of Islam everywhere in the world. And then Toni Ashfaq could suggest that Muslims such as herself are attempting to bring about “a real reformation in Islam,” beginning with a change in the accepted meaning of Jihad, so that the examples of Jihad as warfare in the Muslim texts are “contextualized” and Jihad as a “spiritual struggle” is promoted to become its main meaning. Let her admit, too, that there are unpleasant aspects of Islam which she, and other “reformers” recognize as needing to be changed, such as the misogyny and antisemitism that run through the Islamic texts, and that, too, need to be “contextualized” so that Muslims today can slough off those antiquated attitudes. And those changes, for a start, might give us all the chance, Toni Ashfaq can announce to her audience, for some sort of real convivencia, and not, Toni Ashfaq now feels compelled to admit, the “phony one made so much of by the likes of Karen Armstrong.”

No, skip that last paragraph. I was just kidding. It’s completely unthinkable. I don’t know what came over me, to entertain the thought that such an admission about Jihad would be possible. Instead, let’s try to forget the nonsense and lies we are going to have to endure, until we come to the most pleasant and least controversial aspect of these “Spread Hummus Not Hate” meetings. The part we’ve all been waiting for. The hummus. The pita. The baklava.

Jihad Watch

Please Read Part 38:

The Most Dangerous and Treacherous Times in U.S. History! (Part 38)-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On March 31, 2017:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/the-most-dangerous-and-treacherous-times-in-u-s-history-part-38

The following recent article revealed that ‘Bloomberg’s Eli Lake has a critical update on the kerfuffle involving Barack Obama, Donald Trump, Devin Nunes, U.S. intelligence and Russia,’ along with revealing that White House lawyers last month learned that the former national security adviser ‘Susan Rice requested the identities of U.S. persons in raw intelligence reports on dozens of occasions that connect to the Donald Trump transition and campaign,’ according to U.S. officials familiar with the matter.

It also revealed that the pattern of Rice’s requests was discovered in a National Security Council review of the government’s policy on ‘unmasking’ the identities of individuals in the U.S. who are not targets of electronic eavesdropping, but whose ‘communications are collected incidentally’ and that normally those names are ‘redacted from summaries of monitored conversations’ and appear in reports as something like ‘U.S. Person One.’ Surprised?-You Decide:

So, Susan Rice Was the One 'Unmasking'!-Posted on The Patriot Post-By Nate Jackson-On April 3, 2017:

Bloomberg’s Eli Lake has a critical update on the kerfuffle involving Barack Obama, Donald Trump, Devin Nunes, U.S. intelligence and Russia.

White House lawyers last month learned that the former national security adviser Susan Rice requested the identities of U.S. persons in raw intelligence reports on dozens of occasions that connect to the Donald Trump transition and campaign, according to U.S. officials familiar with the matter.

The pattern of Rice’s requests was discovered in a National Security Council review of the government’s policy on “unmasking” the identities of individuals in the U.S. who are not targets of electronic eavesdropping, but whose communications are collected incidentally. Normally those names are redacted from summaries of monitored conversations and appear in reports as something like “U.S. Person One.”

The relevant intelligence reports pertained largely to conversations between foreign leaders regarding the Trump administration’s transition, though some of those conversations involved members of Trump’s team. And, as Lake notes, Rice’s behavior highlights the issue so many Americans have with the wide net of government surveillance — trusting those who are doing the surveilling.

It doesn’t help that back in March she insisted, “I know nothing about this.”

Meanwhile, Rep. Devin Nunes, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee and the one leading the congressional investigation into the whole affair, has been embattled by controversy because of a visit to the White House to review relevant material. Unfortunately, he’s come off looking more like a Trump surrogate than an independent investigator. But Lake explains why that visit wasn’t what it seems:

The news about Rice also sheds light on the strange behavior of Nunes in the last two weeks. It emerged last week that he traveled to the White House last month, the night before he made an explosive allegation about Trump transition officials caught up in incidental surveillance. At the time he said he needed to go to the White House because the reports were only on a database for the executive branch. It now appears that he needed to view computer systems within the National Security Council that would include the logs of Rice’s requests to unmask U.S. persons.

Knowing what we know about the Obama administration, political considerations trumped all other concerns. So while Rice may have acted within the law, a legal battle may also ensue to determine where she was acting in the interest of national security or Obama’s political objectives. The overarching thing to remember is that Democrats are heavily invested in the “Russia hacked the election” narrative so as to delegitimize Donald Trump. Whatever Rice did was almost surely motivated in part by that objective. Readers will recall how adept Rice is at shaping narratives — she was the first to trot out the “YouTube video” excuse for Benghazi…

Source Link:

https://patriotpost.us/posts/48331

The following recent article revealed that ‘former President Obama’s National Security Advisor Susan Rice asked for the names of Trump transition officials to be unmasked and made public in raw intelligence files,’ according to media reports, a move apparently carried out to harm the incoming Trump administration and that as recently as March 22, 'Rice denied knowing anything about the intelligence reports,' along with revealing that in an appearance on ‘PBS Newshour,’ she said pretty definitely, ‘I know nothing about this,’ but the recent news reports paint ‘Rice as a liar’ and that the ‘evidence we know about in the Trump-Russia saga so far seems to be pointing at Obama.’ Surprised?-You Decide:

Who Asked Susan Rice to Unmask those Names? ‘Obama’s national security advisor is a liar -- and possibly a felon’!-Posted on Front Page Magazine-By Matthew Vadum-On April 4, 2017:

Former President Obama’s National Security Advisor Susan Rice asked for the names of Trump transition officials to be unmasked and made public in raw intelligence files, according to media reports, a move apparently carried out to harm the incoming Trump administration.

As recently as March 22, Rice denied knowing anything about the intelligence reports. In an appearance on “PBS Newshour,” she said pretty definitely, “I know nothing about this.” The new news reports paint Rice as a liar.

The evidence we know about in the Trump-Russia saga so far seems to be pointing at Obama.

Adam Housley of Fox News reports:

The unmasked names, of people associated with Donald Trump, were then sent to all those at the National Security Council, some at the Defense Department, then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and then-CIA Director John Brennan – essentially, the officials at the top, including former Rice deputy Ben Rhodes.

The names were part of incidental electronic surveillance of candidate and President-elect Trump and people close to him, including family members, for up to a year before he took office.

The spreading of the unmasked names was carried out for “political purposes that have nothing to do with national security” or foreign intelligence, Housley said. "It had everything to do with hurting and embarrassing Trump and his team," he said, citing his sources.

What is incidental collection, by the way?

Incidental collection “happens when an individual is in contact with the target of surveillance,” or is communicating “about” the target, according to Robyn Greene. “So if Bob were being targeted for surveillance and Alice called or emailed Bob, Alice’s communications with him would be collected incidentally.”

In this example, “if Bob is targeted for surveillance and Alice contacts him during that surveillance, resulting in the incidental collection of her communications with him, her name should be redacted or ‘masked’ unless leaving it unredacted provides foreign intelligence value.” Masking is done to protect U.S. persons (i.e. U.S. citizens, lawful permanent residents, etc.) who get inadvertently caught up in the electronic dragnet from being falsely accused of crimes or otherwise improper behavior.

If a National Security Agency analyst “believes Alice’s communications may contain evidence of any crime, the NSA can share those communications with law enforcement or other relevant agencies … even if the crimes are completely unrelated to the purpose for surveilling Bob’s communications, or to foreign intelligence or national security investigations.”

According to former Obama State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf, “if the intelligence community professionals decide that there’s some value, national security, foreign policy or otherwise in unmasking someone, they will grant those requests,”

Assuming these news reports about data that supposedly was incidentally collected are accurate, they raise a multitude of new questions about the ongoing scandal concerning alleged collaboration between the Trump team and Russia.

We still don’t know who asked then-National Security Advisor Susan Rice to unmask those names – or if she acted on her own initiative. But the most likely culprit has to be President Obama himself, along with those in his inner circle such as his Islamist CIA director John Brennan and his slimy national-security aide Ben Rhodes.

But whoever did the deed, it appears someone used America’s taxpayer-funded national security apparatus to engage in likely unlawful espionage against an opposition presidential campaign, an incoming administration, and that administration’s transition team. It’s the stuff of banana republics, which makes sense, because Obama spent eight long, lawless years trying to turn the United States into precisely that.

Those persons may have participated in a virtual fishing expedition to dig up dirt on Team Trump and cripple his administration with scandals like the still-unproven collusion between Trump’s people and Russia and the seemingly wild claim that Russia somehow “hacked” the November election.

Susan Rice has no shortage of chutzpah.

In a Washington Post op-ed two weeks ago, she scolded President Trump over supposedly making false statements:

The foundation of the United States’ unrivaled global leadership rests only in part on our military might, the strength of our economy and the power of our ideals. It is also grounded in the perception that the United States is steady, rational and fact-based. To lead effectively, the United States must maintain respect and trust. So, when a White House deliberately dissembles and serially contorts the facts, its actions pose a serious risk to America’s global leadership, among friends and adversaries alike.

In her defense, Rice knows a lot about dissembling and contorting facts, things that are her stock-in-trade. Her statements are difficult to take seriously because she is a prolific liar.

Rice’s serial dishonesty and astonishingly bad judgment calls are well-documented.

Rice embraced the 2014 deal wherein President Obama freed five senior Taliban commanders and high-value terrorists from Guantanamo Bay, in exchange for U.S. Army soldier Bowe Bergdahl who deserted in 2009 and collaborated with the Taliban for the next five years. Eight U.S. soldiers were killed in the effort to find and recover Bergdahl who emailed his father just before deserting, claiming he was “ashamed” to be American. In June 2014 Rice went on ABC TV to justify the prisoner swap, falsely stating that Bergdahl “served the United States with honor and distinction.” The next year the Army charged Bergdahl with desertion.

Rice mischaracterized the deadly terrorist assault on the U.S. facility in Benghazi, Libya, on Sept. 11, 2012, as a “spontaneous reaction” to “a hateful and offensive video that was widely disseminated throughout the Arab and Muslim world.” Five days later she went on five separate Sunday TV news programs and falsely claimed the Benghazi attack was a “spontaneous reaction” to “a hateful and offensive video that was widely disseminated throughout the Arab and Muslim world.”

Continue Reading:

http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/266314/who-asked-susan-rice-unmask-those-names-matthew-vadum

The following recent article revealed that Fox News recently reported that the unmasked names of private citizens were spread to many different agencies and given to ‘James Clapper, John Brennan and Ben Rhodes.’ Surprised?-You Decide:

Unmasked Names of Trump Private Associates Sent to Clapper, Brennan, Rhodes!-Posted on Gateway Pundit-By Cristina Laila-On April 3, 2017:

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/04/unmasked-names-trump-private-associates-sent-clapper-brennan-rhodes/

The following recent article revealed that Monday on Fox News Channel’s ‘Fox & Friends,’ Fox News senior correspondent 'Adam Housley laid out his reporting on allegations that the then-Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump and associates close to Trump were surveilled' and that their names were unmasked at the behest of those in the Obama administration, along with revealing that, according to Housley, it was done at the direction of those ‘very high up’ and was done so for ‘a significant amount of time,’ which he described as ‘unprecedented’ and ‘blockbuster.’ Surprised?-You Decide:

FNC’s Housley: Sources Say Those Who ‘Unmasked’ Trump, Associates ‘Very High Up’!-Posted on Breitbart.com-By by Jeff Poor-On April 3, 2017:

http://www.breitbart.com/video/2017/04/03/fncs-housley-sources-say-those-who-unmasked-trump-associates-very-high-up/

The following recent article revealed that it has now been reported that Obama officials, such as former United Nation’s ambassador Susan Rice, were among those in and around the former president to ‘unmask’ the names and ‘confidential information of and about President-elect Donald J. Trump and his associates from otherwise classified intelligence report,’ but that the story about ‘Obama involvement and intelligence agency illegality, in violation of the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution,’ as federal judge Richard Leon found in two lawsuits Attorney Larry Klayman brought a few years ago (see Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.,) goes far beyond the ‘actions of Rice, Clapper, Brennan and their comrades in the Obama administration.’ Surprised?-You Decide:

Susan Rice's Reported Unmaskings Point to Larger Scandal!-Posted on NewsMax.com-By Larry Klayman-On April 3, 2017:

http://www.newsmax.com/LarryKlayman/susan-rice-unmasking-trump-surveillance/2017/04/03/id/782269/

The following recent article revealed that, as the exploding scandal over the Obama administration’s apparent spy ops on the Trump transition team expands, it’s already being compared by some to ‘Watergate on steroids,’ but that there are some who apparently don’t want the information to get around, such as ‘Twitter.’

It also revealed that the Drudge Report headlined the developments in the surveillance story, including Tuesday morning’s headline ‘Rice’ ordered spy docs on Trump,’ and used Twitter to let readers know, which was allegedly way too much truth for someone at Twitter because the headline was replaced with, ‘This Tweet may include potentially sensitive content,’ along with revealing that the message continued: ‘In order to view it, you’ll need to change your sensitive media selection. You can find this under the Safety section of your Privacy and safety account settings.’ Surprised?-You Decide:

Drudge tweets spark Twitter gag on Trump: ‘President's message replaced with warning of 'potentially sensitive content'!-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On April 4, 2017:

http://www.wnd.com/2017/04/drudge-tweets-spark-twitter-gag-on-trump/#LMCR0Pq4uqEvMTIX.99

The following recent article revealed that ‘President Trump’s critics on Monday defended former Obama National Security Adviser Susan Rice,’ after the mainstream news outlet Bloomberg View confirmed Mike Cernovich’s bombshell report that ‘she was responsible for unmasking the names of Trump aides incidentally caught up in surveillance.’ Surprised?-You Decide:

Trump Haters Rush to Susan Rice’s Defense!-Posted on Breitbart.com-By Kristina Wong-On April 3, 2017:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/04/03/trump-haters-rush-susan-rices-defense/

The following recent article revealed that Monday on ‘Anderson Cooper 360,’ CNN chief national security correspondent Jim Sciutto called a report that former National Security Advisor Susan Rice was behind the unmasking of identities of members of the Trump transition team in surveillance of foreign officials to be a ‘distraction from a larger investigation of the Trump administration,’ along with revealing that, according to what Sciutto described as a ‘source,’ those allegations aimed at Rice were ‘false,’ which is what 'Sciutto based his claim of this being a distraction.' Surprised?-You Decide:

CNN’s Sciutto: Susan Rice Story Promoted By Trump Admin as a ‘Distraction’!-Posted on Breitbart.com-By Jeff Poor-On April 4, 2017:

http://www.breitbart.com/video/2017/04/04/cnns-sciutto-susan-rice-story-promoted-trump-admin-distraction/

The following recent article revealed that since news broke Monday that the Obama Administration's National Security Adviser, Susan Rice, directed the ‘unmasking’ of NSA intercepts of Trump associates, ‘CNN has raced to shoot down the blockbuster report,’ along with revealing that ‘CNN Tonight's Don Lemon went so far as to announce he would ignore the news at all costs.’ Surprised?-You Decide:

CNN Goes on Rampage Against Susan Rice Bombshell, Instructs Viewers to Ignore Story: 'We will not aid and abet the people trying to misinform you'!-Posted on Grabien News-On April 3, 2017:

https://news.grabien.com/story-cnn-goes-rampage-against-susan-rice-bombshell-instructs-view

The following recent article revealed that CNN anchor Chris Cuomo says the report that former Obama administration national security adviser Susan Rice tried to ‘unmask’ Trump campaign officials caught up in surveillance of foreign targets is ‘another fake scandal’ being pushed by the White House and conservative media. Surprised?-You Decide:

Mainstream media deems Susan Rice unmasking bombshell ‘another fake scandal’!-Posted on The Washington Times-By Bradford Richardson, The Washington Times-On April 4, 2017:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/apr/4/susan-rice-unmasking-bombshell-another-fake-scanda/

The following recent article revealed that, according to one college professor and journalist, the reaction to Susan Rice’s recently reported ‘unmasking” of Trump associates’ is racist,’ along with revealing that that’s the opinion of Jason Johnson, a professor at Morgan State University and a journalist whose work has appeared on The Root, CNN and MSBNC. Surprised?-You Decide:

Professor: Republicans Criticize Susan Rice Because They ‘Hate And Fear Black Women’!-Posted on The Daily Caller-By Justin Caruso, Contributor-On April 4, 2017:

http://dailycaller.com/2017/04/04/professor-republicans-criticize-susan-rice-because-they-hate-and-fear-black-women/#ixzz4dKM8SwiX

The following recent article revealed that 'White House press secretary Sean Spicer' suggested during the White House press briefing on Monday that the ‘media was downplaying’ the news revealing that former President Obama’s national security advisor Susan Rice unmasked the identities of Trump campaign aides during the 2016 election, by stating: ‘I’m somewhat surprised in terms of the level of interest that I’ve seen from the press corps, one set of developments versus another set of developments.’ Surprised?-You Decide:

Sean Spicer Scolds Media for ‘Lack of Interest’ in Susan Rice Story!-Posted on Breitbart.com-By Charlie Spiering-On April 4, 2017:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/04/04/sean-spicer-scolds-media-for-lack-of-interest-in-susan-rice-story/

The following recent article revealed that on Tuesday on Hugh Hewitt’s nationally syndicated radio show, ‘Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) commented on a report that former National Security Advisor Susan Rice for President Barack Obama was behind the unmasking of the identities of members of Donald Trump’s transition team,’ along with revealing that Cotton noted Rice’s involvement in this story and her involvement in what he suggested were other Obama administration foreign policy missteps and likened her to ‘Typhoid Mary.’ Surprised?-You Decide:

Tom Cotton: ‘Susan Rice Is the Typhoid Mary of the Obama Administration’!-Posted on Breitbart.com-By Jeff Poor-On April 4, 2017:

http://www.breitbart.com/video/2017/04/04/tom-cotton-susan-rice-typhoid-mary-obama-administration/

The following recent article revealed that ‘former Congresswoman Michele Bachmann’ believes the apparent surveilling of Donald Trump and his associates by the Obama administration is ‘a thousand times worse than Watergate’ and may well result in ‘jail time for those involved.’-You Decide:

Bachmann: Susan Rice Surveilling ‘1000 Times Worse Than Watergate’: ‘This is how lawless the Obama administration was’!-Posted on Western Journalism-By Randy DeSoto-On April 3, 2017:

http://www.westernjournalism.com/bachmann-susan-rice-unveiling-1000-times-worse-watergate/

The following recent article revealed that Tuesday on MSNBC’s ‘Morning Joe,’ Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) called on ‘former National Security Advisor Susan Rice to be brought in front of Congress under subpoena’ and asked questions about allegations she was behind the unmasking of American identities in raw surveillance, along with revealing that Paul also stated that ‘she should be asked about former President Barack Obama’s knowledge of these alleged activities’-You Decide:

Rand Paul: Susan Rice ‘Ought to Be Under Subpoena,’ Asked If Obama Knew About Eavesdropping!-Posted on Breitbart.com-By Jeff Poor-On April 4, 2017:

http://www.breitbart.com/video/2017/04/04/rand-paul-susan-rice-ought-to-be-under-subpoena-asked-if-obama-knew-about-eavesdropping/

The following recent article revealed that ‘former national security adviser Susan Rice denied’ Tuesday that she used her position to inappropriately spy on members of President Donald Trump’s transition and campaign teams, along with revealing that Rice told MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell, ‘The allegation is that somehow, Obama administration officials utilized intelligence for political purposes,’ along with, ‘That’s absolutely false.’ Surprised?-You Decide:

Rice Denies Doing Anything Inappropriate With Trump Team Intelligence!-Posted on Western Journalism-By Randy DeSoto-On April 4, 2017:

http://www.westernjournalism.com/rice-denies-doing-anything-inappropriate-with-trump-intelligence/

The following recent article revealed that, at the very least, ‘Susan Rice lied about what she did, what she knew and when she knew it,’ along with revealing that is by her own admission, but the question is, how big a lie was it?

It also revealed that while Speaking to MSNBC on Tuesday, Barack Obama’s former national security adviser ‘did not deny unmasking the identities of the names of President Trump’s associates collected in foreign surveillance’ and she ‘implicitly acknowledged’ and ‘explicitly defended’ unmasking, which is the revealing of names within the intelligence community of U.S. citizens gathered in foreign surveillance, by claiming: ‘It was not uncommon. It was necessary at times to make those requests.’ Surprised?-You Decide:

Susan Rice tacitly admits lying about unmasking: 'What she did is 1,000 times worse than Watergate'!-Posted on WND.com-By Garth Kant-On April 4, 2017:

http://www.wnd.com/2017/04/susan-rice-tacitly-admits-lying-about-unmasking/

The following recent article revealed that, on Tuesday on his nationally syndicated radio program, conservative talker and Fox News Channel host ‘Sean Hannity responded to reports that he may have also been spied on by the Obama administration,’ along with revealing that Hannity said he would not be shocked if the reports were true, but claimed to have ‘no knowledge’ of it.

It also revealed that later in the segment, Hannity doubled down on not having any answers but ‘said he would take legal action against former Obama administration officials, including President Barack Obama himself.’-You Decide:

Hannity: ‘No Knowledge’ If Surveilled — Threatens Lawsuit Against Obama, Ben Rhodes, Susan Rice If True!-Posted on Breitbart.com-By Jeff Poor-On April 4, 2017:

http://www.breitbart.com/video/2017/04/04/hannity-no-knowledge-if-surveilled-threatens-lawsuit-against-obama-ben-rhodes-susan-rice-if-true/

The following recent article revealed that. on Tuesday on Fox News Channel’s ‘The First 100 Days,’ Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) told fill-in host Dana Perino that he ‘backed the Senate Intelligence Committee conducting a query’ headed by Sens. Richard Burr (R-NC) and Mark Warner (D-VA) ‘into former National Security Adviser Susan Rice’s handling of raw intelligence.’ Surprised?-You Decide:

McConnell Supports Senate Intelligence Committee Investigation of Susan Rice!-Posted on Breitbart.com- By Jeff Poor-On April 4, 2017:

http://www.breitbart.com/video/2017/04/04/mcconnell-supports-senate-intelligence-committee-investigation-susan-rice/

The following recent article revealed that seemingly confirming the incriminating remarks from former Obama Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense, Evelyn Farkas, on the mad scramble by the Obama administration to collect and preserve intelligence on alleged Russian election hacking before Obama left office, ‘NBC News reports that a former Obama official admits they made a list of Russia probe documents to keep them safe.’

While most of the mainstream media has conveniently dismissed the remarks from Evenlyn Farkas that accidentally implicated the Obama White House in the surveillance of Trump's campaign staff: ‘The Trump folks, if they found out how we knew what we knew about the Trump staff dealing with Russians, that they would try to compromise those sources and methods, meaning we would no longer have access to that intelligence.’ Surprised?-You Decide:

NBC Confirms Obama Administration Officials Saved Trump-Russia Probe Docs!-Posted on Zero Hedge-By Tyler Durden-On March 31, 2017:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-03-31/nbc-confirms-obama-administration-officials-saved-trump-russia-probe-docs

The following recent video revealed that Breitbart News has found that, speaking at a conference two weeks before the 2016 presidential election, ‘Evelyn Farkas, a former top Obama administration official,’ predicted that if Donald Trump won the presidency he would ‘be impeached pretty quickly or somebody else would have to take over government.’ Surprised?-You Decide:

Video: Ex-Obama Staffer Who Urged Spying On Trump Predicted ‘Quick’ Impeachment Weeks Before Election!-Posted on Breitbart.com-By Aaron Klein-On April 4, 2017:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/04/04/video-ex-obama-staffer-who-urged-spying-on-trump-predicted-quick-impeachment-weeks-before-election/

The following recent article revealed that things are going to get interesting and, of course ‘mainstream media will say this brewing scandal is fake news,’ but, nevertheless, sources have been talking about this for months now and the Daily Caller is allegedly now reporting that ‘former U.S. Attorney Joseph diGenova is talking’ saying that Susan Rice ordered the spy agencies to produce ‘detailed spreadsheets’ of all legal phone calls involving Donald Trump and his aides when he was running for president.’

It also revealed that this is likely to be a new ‘Watergate’ because it seemed to fit with computer forecasts, which allegedly revealed that 2015 was the peak in government and that from that point onward, it would be all downhill and, yet, the Democratic Party appeared to have reached the tipping point because they lost more than 1,000 seats nationwide and they knew that they were in serious trouble and thus ‘unleashed the NSA head to go after Trump pretending this had to do with Russians’ and that this may have been the ‘reason Clapper resigned rather than work for Trump.’ Surprised?-You Decide:

Obamagate = the new Watergate? Confidence in Gov’t & Press to Decline further!-Posted on Armstrong Economics-By Martin Armstrong-On April 4, 2017:

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/politics/obamagate-the-new-watergate-confidence-in-govt-press-to-decline-further/

The following recent article revealed that conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh on Monday boiled down the complex web of surveillance stories regarding the Trump team into one simple concept: ‘the Obama administration declared a very secret war on President Donald Trump using America’s intelligence services as his weapon.’ Surprised?-You Decide:

Limbaugh: Obama ‘Weaponized’ America’s Spies Against Trump’s Team!-Posted on Western Journalism-By Jack Davis-On April 3, 2017:

http://www.westernjournalism.com/limbaugh-obama-weaponized-americas-spies-trumps-team/

The following recent article revealed that as the intelligence community's surveillance of the President Trump’s campaign continues to come to light, it is becoming increasingly obvious that the ‘deep state,’ which seems to be used to operating without any real accountability, allegedly ‘underestimated President Trump's ability to win the election’ and that, if President Trump pushes back with the full authority of his office, ‘those responsible may soon find they have underestimated him in other ways, as well.’ Surprised?-You Decide:

Trump Surveillance: Has the Deep State Finally Gone Too Far?-Posted on The New American-By C. Mitchell Shaw-On April 3, 2017:

https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/25737-trump-surveillance-has-the-deep-state-finally-gone-too-far

The following recent article revealed that the most recent release by WikiLeaks shows that the ‘CIA has developed obfuscation tools for causing its hacks to be falsely attributed to foreign powers,’ along with revealing that WikiLeaks has released not only the documents, but also the ‘source code of those tools.’-You Decide:

CIA Has Tools for Framing Russia, China, Others for Hacks!-Posted on The New American-By C. Mitchell Shaw-On April 1, 2017:

https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/computers/item/25727-cia-has-tools-for-framing-russia-china-others-for-hacks

The following recent article revealed that the ‘Democratic ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee Adam Schiff of California’ recently told CNN’s Jake Tapper that there’s still ‘no definitive evidence that there was any collusion between Russia and Trump’s campaign.’ Surprised?-You Decide:

Video: Adam Schiff Concedes: There’s no ‘Definitive’ Evidence of Russian Collusion with Trump!-Posted on Eagle Rising-By Philip Hodges-On April 3, 2017:

http://eaglerising.com/42251/adam-schiff-concedes-theres-no-definitive-evidence-of-russian-collusion-with-trump-video/

The following recent article revealed that Donald Trump won last year’s presidential election, Democrats have been desperately trying to ‘fool the American people into thinking that President Trump somehow worked hand-in-hand with the Russians to steal away the White House from Hillary Clinton,’ but thus far, after months of pseudo investigations, not a scintilla of proof has been revealed and this weekend, ‘Democrat Adam Schiff once again showed that Democrats have nothing but lies and innuendo against Trump.’ Surprised?-You Decide:

The Democrats Lies of Ties Between Russia and Trump Continue to Unravel!-Posted on Constitution.com-By Warner Todd Huston-On April 3, 2017:

http://constitution.com/democrats-lies-ties-russia-trump-continue-unravel/

The following recent video revealed that Attorney Larry Klayman recently stated that ‘House Intel Minority Co-Chairman Adam Schiff is a Hollywood hack that is bent on obstructing justice over the President Trump wiretap scandal.’-You Decide:

Video: House Intel Minority Co-Chairman Adam Schiff Is A Hollywood Hack Bent On Obstructing Justice Over Trump Wiretap Scandal: ‘Freedom Watch Filing Complaint Before House Ethics Committee’!-Posted on Freedom Watch TV-On April 3, 2017:

http://www.freedomwatchusa.org/house-intel-minority-co-chairman-adam-schiff-is-a-hollywood

The following recent article revealed that, with the ‘claims and evidence of wiretapping and surveillance by Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah by President Donald Trump,’ Democrats, including Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), are attempting to ‘deflect from such criminal activity by pushing a non-documented fantasy of Trump colluding with Russia,’ but Benghazi hero and survivor Kris Paronto, who saved over 20 lives during the September 11, 2012 Islamic jihad attacks while Barack Obama slept in his bed, has recently taken him to task ‘telling Schiff to help Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) or shut up.’-You Decide:

Benghazi Hero Kris Paronto to Adam Schiff: Help Nunes or Shut Up!-Posted on Freedom Outpost-By Tim Brown-On April 4, 2017:

http://freedomoutpost.com/benghazi-hero-kris-paronto-to-adam-schiff-help-nunes-or-shut-up/

The following recent article revealed that things are going to get interesting and, of course ‘mainstream media will say this brewing scandal is fake news,’ but, nevertheless, sources have been talking about this for months now and the Daily Caller is allegedly now reporting that ‘former U.S. Attorney Joseph diGenova is talking’ saying that Susan Rice ordered the spy agencies to produce ‘detailed spreadsheets’ of all legal phone calls involving Donald Trump and his aides when he was running for president.’

It also revealed that this is likely to be a new ‘Watergate’ because it seemed to fit with computer forecasts, which allegedly revealed that 2015 was the peak in government and that from that point onward, it would be all downhill and, yet, the Democratic Party appeared to have reached the tipping point because they lost more than 1,000 seats nationwide and they knew that they were in serious trouble and thus ‘unleashed the NSA head to go after Trump pretending this had to do with Russians’ and that this may have been the ‘reason Clapper resigned rather than work for Trump.’ Surprised?-You Decide:

Obamagate = the new Watergate? Confidence in Gov’t & Press to Decline further!-Posted on Armstrong Economics-By Martin Armstrong-On April 4, 2017:

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/politics/obamagate-the-new-watergate-confidence-in-govt-press-to-decline-further/

The following recent article revealed that on Sunday, former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich appeared on Fox News’ ‘Sunday Morning Futures,’ where he slammed the efforts of the Democrats investigating the Russian hacking scandal and suggested they should take a different approach, Fox News reported, by stating: ‘All of the real evidence of real money and real influence-buying by the Russians relates to Democrats.’ Surprised?-You Decide:

Newt Gingrich Thinks Dems Should Be Investigated for Russian Collusion!-Posted on Conservative Tribune-By Davis-On April 3, 2017:

http://conservativetribune.com/gingrich-media-russia-narrative/

The following recent article revealed that talk show host ‘Rush Limbaugh’ recently told his audience that, yes indeed, there was meddling in the 2016 presidential election, along with revealing that Limbaugh said, as he summarized the latest reports alleging former national security adviser Susan Rice led efforts to conduct surveillance on President Donald Trump and his associates: ‘So it turns out there was a government interfering in the presidential election. It was ours. It was the United States government, at the time being run by Barack Hussein O and his minions.’

It also revealed that Limbaugh also stated, ‘They have no evidence of collusion) between Trump and the Russians, but look at the evidence of collusion between elements of the United States government and the Democrat Party. It’s overwhelming,’ along with, ‘And the collusion of elements of the United States government trace all the way to the White House. This is bigger than Watergate. Certainly, it’s Watergate style. It’s in that league.’ Surprised?-You Decide:

Limbaugh: The Only Government To Meddle In The Election Was Ours!-Posted on Western Journalism-By Jack Davis-On April 4, 2017:

http://www.westernjournalism.com/limbaugh-government-meddle-election/

The following recent article revealed that since President Trump first leveled the incendiary charges in early March, there have been thousands of press articles and endless hours of speculation on cable television about the high-level accusations, along with revealing that every word, character and symbol of punctuation from Mr. Trump has been parsed and sussed and diagrammed, yet, ‘no peep from media darling Barack Obama about whom the accusations were made.’

It also revealed that this is no small thing we are talking about here because we are talking about ‘a sitting president’s administration using the terrifying powers of espionage of the United States government to conduct an intelligence operation against a political opponent before, during and after that target was elected president of the United States.’ Surprised?-You Decide:

Why the curious silence from Obama over tapped Trump Tower?-Posted on The Washington Times-By Charles Hurt, The Washington Times-On March 31, 2017:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/mar/31/why-the-curious-silence-from-barack-obama-over-tap/

The following recent article revealed that a letter from a top GOP senator to Secretary of State Rex Tillerson revealed that Democrat presidential candidate ‘Hillary Clinton was given access to classified documents at the State Department during her campaign, Fox News reports,’ along with revealing that the access continued even after ‘FBI Director James Comey said during a July 5 televised announcement’ that the FBI had determined Clinton and her staff had been ‘extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.’

It also revealed that Sen. Chuck Grassley, an Iowa Republican and chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, revealed in the March 30 letter that ‘Clinton had negotiated access to classified documents for herself and her staff after her 2013 departure from the secretary of state’s office.’ Surprised?-You Decide:

Obama Gave Hillary Classified State Dept. Access Even After She Left!-Posted on Conservative Tribune-By Wilmot Proviso-On April 4, 2017:

http://conservativetribune.com/obama-gave-hillary-election/

The following recent article revealed that when John Edwards touted the ‘Two Americas’ during his presidential campaigns before 'his political career ended in disgrace,' it was still a metaphor, but it allegedly stopped being a metaphor at the end of last year and, if you doubt that, you can watch Tom Perez, the head of the Democratic National Committee, yelling that ‘President Trump didn’t win the election’ and  that there is a huge difference between ‘opposing’ the winner of an election and ‘denying’ that he won it because it’s the difference between ‘opposition’ and ‘rebellion.’ Surprised?-You Decide:

Winning the Civil War of Two Americas: ‘America vs. Anti-America’!-Posted on Front Page Magazine-By  Daniel Greenfield-On April 4, 2017:

http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/266304/winning-civil-war-two-americas-daniel-greenfield

The following recent article revealed that ‘newly minted Republican National Committee chair Ronna McDaniel slammed her Democrat counterpart, DNC head Tom Perez,’ for comments he made in a Friday speech in which he insulted Republicans, along with revealing that, according to Fox News, Perez made the remarks at a rally hosted by the New Jersey Working Families Alliance, in a clip from a speech that acts as a cautionary tale about the deleterious effects of Red Bull abuse. Surprised?-You Decide:

RNC Chair Slams DNC Chair For Insulting All Republicans!-Posted on Conservative Tribune-By Wilmot Proviso-On April 3, 2017:

http://conservativetribune.com/rnc-chair-dnc-leader-nasty-insult/

The following recent video revealed David Horowitz (Freedom Center founder) discussing the ‘New Civil War,’ which is the ‘Left's assault on President Trump.’-You Decide:

Video: David Horowitz on the New Civil War: ‘Freedom Center founder discusses the Left's assault on Trump and his new best-seller, "Big Agenda”!-Posted on Front Page Magazine-By Frontpagemag.com-On April 3, 2017:

http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/266301/video-david-horowitz-new-civil-war-frontpagemagcom

The following recent article revealed that ‘President Trump has decided not to designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a foreign terrorist organization,’ at least for now, according to published reports citing pressure from the U.S. State Department and the King of Jordan, along with revealing that anonymous sources told the Washington Times that the administration ‘backed down from a plan to designate the Brotherhood’ after an internal State Department memo advised against it and that the State Department’s argument, which was put forth in a memo to the White House, comes down to a ‘belief that there is actually more than one Brotherhood and that one side is not as bad as the other because it works through democratic processes in the Middle East,’ the Washington Times reports.

It also revealed that ‘former Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn.,’ one of the earliest advocates of banning the Brotherhood in the U.S., describes it as ‘the mother lode of global terrorism,’ along with revealing that she told WND that ‘President Trump is unlikely to be successful in defeating Islamic terror without confronting the head of the snake.’-You Decide:

13 reasons to declare Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization: ‘Trump reportedly backing off of executive order’!-Posted on WND.com-By Leo Hohmann-On March 30, 2017:

http://www.wnd.com/2017/03/13-reasons-to-declare-muslim-brotherhood-a-terrorist-organization/#ur68yYTI73TDQmRP.99

The following recent article revealed that new reports indicate that the ‘vile and reprehensible leadership of the despicable ISIS group’ is working to organize and streamline their violent ways, along with revealing that this week, a so-called ‘kill list’ was threatened to be released by ISIS, ‘allowing lone wolf operatives around the globe to conduct their Jihad in any way possible, without the necessity of a structured group of radicals.’ Surprised?-You Decide:

ISIS “Kill List” Going Viral – Threatening 8,000 Lives in US and UK!-Posted on Constitution.com-By Andrew West-On April 3, 2017:

http://constitution.com/isis-kill-list-going-viral-threatening-8000-lives-in-us-and-uk/

The following recent video revealed that sifting through the tumultuous aftermath of President Donald Trump’s election, a ‘former clinical psychologist steeped in understanding cultural Marxism, shares his observations on how Democrats are working to distract and delegitimatize Trump,’ along with revealing that, according to Tim Daughtry, co-author of ‘Waking the Sleeping Giant,’ our elections since 2010 demonstrate ‘citizens want Washington to stop governing against the will of the people’ as it drives the nation towards ‘liberal progressive socialism’ and that the clear 2016 ballot box message, he says, was ‘change course, secure our borders, get rid of Obamacare, put in some free market reforms, get our economy going again’ with this man, who has never held elective office. Surprised?-You Decide:

Video: Psychologist Analyzes Trump’s Election And The Progressive Left!-Posted on The Daily Caller-By Ginni Thomas, Contributor-On April 1, 2017:

http://dailycaller.com/2017/04/01/psychologist-analyzes-trumps-election-and-the-progressive-left-video-amazon1/#ixzz4dKPYJyAf

The following recent article revealed that France and Germany, along with a host of up to 21 other countries, are set to ‘demand Hungary and Poland either accept migrants under the quota system or leave the European Union (EU).’ If True-What’s wrong with this picture?-You Decide:

European Union Tells Hungary and Poland To Accept Mass Migration Or Leave!-Posted on Breitbart.com-By Virginia Hale-On April 4, 2017:

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/04/04/eu-hungary-poland-take-migrants-leave/

Please Read Part 40:

The Most Dangerous and Treacherous Times in U.S. History! (Part 40)-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On April 6, 2017:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/the-most-dangerous-and-treacherous-times-in-u-s-history-part-40

I believe that the above articles and videos relate to and/or further support my following blogs-You Decide:

Nazi Collaborator Soros Continues Multi-pronged War on Trump, Calls Him “Would-be Dictator”!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On January 5, 2017:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/nazi-collaborator-soros-...

Obama: Submit to Globalism or Face War, Death, Destruction!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On November 17, 2016:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/forum/topics/obama-submit-to-globalism-...

The Left's Coming Counter-Attack!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On December 8, 2016:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/the-left-s-coming-counte...

CIA Assessment Concludes Putin Was Trying to Help Trump Win White House!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On December 10, 2016:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/cia-assessment-concludes...

Russian Election Intervention Is Nothing New: ‘The Kremlin’s history of backing the losers’!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On December 14, 2016:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/russian-election-interve...

Not Since JFK, Has a President Spit Into the Face of the Globalists, Until Now!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On November 21, 2016:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/not-since-jfk-has-a-pres...

Trump Will Declare the Muslim Brotherhood a Terrorist Organization! (Part 1)-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On November 16, 2016:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/trump-will-declare-the-m...

Saudi Arabia Implicated In Bankrolling of Extremist Terrorist Movements Around The World!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On January 16, 2017:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/saudi-arabia-implicated-...

New Report Exposes Rockefeller Dynasty's Role in 'Climate Scam'!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On January 5, 2017:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/new-report-exposes-rocke...

Why Democrats Don’t Want To Make America Great Again!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On November 30, 2016:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/why-democrats-don-t-want...

Retired Head of the FBI Tells All about Illuminati, Satanism, Pedophile Rings in U.S. Government!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On November 23, 2016:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/retired-head-of-the-fbi-...

Attention Obama: Ft. Leavenworth is Calling You For Treason!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On January 10, 2017:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/attention-obama-ft-leave...

Vote Fraud – What They Aren’t Telling You!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On November 7, 2012:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blog/show?id=4301673%3ABlogPos...

Brainwashing in America: ‘WHY FEW DARE CALL IT CONSPIRACY'! (Part 1)-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On March 21, 2014:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/brainwashing-in-america-...

Brainwashing in America: ‘WHY FEW DARE CALL IT CONSPIRACY'! (Part 3)-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On April 7, 2014:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/brainwashing-in-america-...

Faith of Our Forefathers!-Posted on WordPress.com-On May 9, 2010:

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/09/faith-of-our-forefathers/

Brainwashing in America: ‘WHY FEW DARE CALL IT CONSPIRACY'! (Part 4)-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On May 22, 2014:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/brainwashing-in-america-...

Letter to our NM U.S. Senator Tom Udall (re: Shadow Party’s alleged agenda to take down America)!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On January 30, 2015:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/letter-to-our-nm-u-s-sen...

Response from and to NM U.S. Senator Tom Udall (Re: Shadow Party’s alleged agenda to take down America)!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On February 7, 2015:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/response-from-and-to-nm-...

Letter to our NM U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (re: Shadow Party’s alleged agenda to take down America)!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On February 8, 2015:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/letter-to-our-nm-u-s-sen...

Letter to our NM U.S. Representative Michelle Lujan-Grisham (re: Shadow Party’s alleged agenda to take down America)!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On February 13, 2015:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/letter-to-our-nm-u-s-rep...

Letter to our NM Governor Martinez (re: The Shadow Party’s alleged agenda to take down America)!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On February 8, 2015:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/letter-to-our-nm-governo...

The MSM conglomerates are the most prolific and insidious "fake news" propagators in the marketplace of ideas!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On November 30, 2016:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/the-msm-conglomerates-ar...

When Protesters Knock Holes in the Free Speech Bus, They Knock Holes in the Truth About Sexuality

My situation was familiar enough: I was waiting for a bus. My circumstances were somewhat unique, though, because I’d been waiting several days.

I was waiting for the “#FreeSpeechBus.” It’s a project of the National Organization for Marriage, along with CitizenGO and the International Organization for the Family. This bus is hard to miss: It’s bright orange, emblazoned with a message calculated to garner attention. Figures of a girl and boy, marked “XX” and “XY,” stand beside the words, “Boys are boys […] Girls are girls … and always will be. It’s biology.”

Aiming to spark renewed discussion over the rush toward transgender rights, the bus launched two Thursdays ago in Manhattan with a small press event. That afternoon, the trip came screeching to a halt. Figuratively, that is: for the bus was parked, when protesters spray-painted the sides with graffiti messages about “trans liberation,” and smashed holes in its windows with a hammer.

Buzzfeed Gets It Wrong

Though little noted Thursday morning, the bus quickly made headlines following the attack. Buzzfeed proclaimed, “This Bus Is On A Road Trip To Convince You That Transgender People Aren’t Real.”

Now, as the representative quoted in that piece, I can surmise the basis for this spurious charge. Asked whether we believe a “trans woman” is a woman, I answered, “No. We believe if you were born a man, you’re a man.” I stand by that. I object, though, to the claim in the headline. The article itself reveals the unfair inference: for I am also cited saying transgender people suffer a disorder. I stand by this as well.

Buzzfeed thinks I deny the “reality” of a class of people because I think they have a disorder. By “reality” they mean a group who must be approved as they are. Of course I believe transgendered people are real. I believe they are due respect and kindness. But I have to reject the notion that a person with male genitalia and a Y chromosome who “identifies” as a woman is, in fact, a woman. That’s what upsets Buzzfeed.

Another point Buzzfeed misconstrued is one of the tour’s key goals. I expressed a hope that people would speak up — to business owners, bosses, public officials — when they feel uncomfortable with persons of the opposite sex using their locker rooms or other intimate facility. I wasn’t calling for a witch hunt, nor declaring open season for bullying.

Compassion For All

I had been asked why we don’t hear many complaints in places where transgender “bathroom bills” have been implemented. I opined that this might have to do with the fact that people are afraid to speak up.

When one is labelled a “hater” or “bigot” for daring to disagree with the trans agenda, it’s small wonder more people don’t complain. As it happens, though, plenty do complain: We just don’t hear about it.

Take, for example, the lawsuit filed last week in Pennsylvania. A high school boy, uncomfortable undressing in front of a female peer who is now allowed to use the boys’ locker-room, approached the administration. They told him to “act natural.” His parents — the school hadn’t told them about the policy, by the way — received the same airy dismissal when they complained.

The Pennsylvania case indicates another aspect of the stilted reporting on our big orange bus. Generally, the press treats our campaign as lacking compassion. But we do have compassion: we just ask it for all involved.

We are compassionate toward those suffering gender dysphoria. But we are also compassionate to that boy in Pennsylvania and the many, many people like him. His concerns — his feelings, privacy, his body image, his struggles through the turbulent time of puberty — are ignored. He doesn’t matter. He is closed-minded and should lighten up, we are told. His needs are brushed aside in favor of his biologically female peer invading his privacy.

She Doesn’t Count Either

The problem’s even worse when a man invades women’s spaces. Here may be a woman suffering trauma: who, because of past victimization from a sexually violent man has a hard enough time disrobing in front of her peers — even in front of a mirror! — who has every right to be uncomfortable with the status quo progressio.

But she doesn’t count either. She, too, is labeled hateful and bigoted if she complains. She, too, should just lighten up. That man isn’t hurting her, we are told — by those who evidently have no idea how trauma works. Yes, in fact, he is.

After a few days, the #FreeSpeechBus got back on its route, and I was aboard. I hope that the advocates of tolerance don’t respond again to an idea with which they disagree by striking it with a hammer. My greater hope is that the bus and its message won’t be missed: because it is a message of simple truth about biology, and of compassion for those whose voices have been lost in this debate. (For more from the author of “When Protesters Knock Holes in the Free Speech Bus, They Knock Holes in the Truth About Sexuality” please click HERE) http://joemiller.us/2017/04/protesters-knock-holes-free-speech-bus-knock-holes-truth-sexuality/

President Trump Defunds UN Abortion Outfit Devoted to Population Control

The State Department has said it will end U.S. funding of the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), a group that promotes abortion overseas.

In a letter to U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Corker, the State Department said it would not fund the UNFPA because it “supports, or participates in the management of, a program of coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization.”

The State Department said its decision “was made based on the fact that China’s family planning policies still involve the use of coercive abortion and involuntary sterilization, and UNFPA partners on family planning activities with the Chinese government agency responsible for these coercive policies.”

The U.N. agency has been linked with human rights abuses around the world, including forced sterilizations and abortions in China.

Forced abortions and sterilizations were uncovered by pro-life journalists in China as recently as 2009. Since Reagan, only the Obama administration has funded the population control group.

The announcement takes Trump’s move to reinstate the Mexico City Policy one step further. That policy withholds U.S. funding for international organizations that perform or promote abortions. This cut will cost the UNFPA $32.5 million. (For more from the author of “President Trump Defunds UN Abortion Outfit Devoted to Population Control” please click HERE) http://joemiller.us/2017/04/president-trump-defunds-un-abortion-outfit-devoted-population-cont

Mom Horrified After Finding Police Drone Watching Her Children — in Their Backyard

For decades, in dystopian fictions, readers and watchers alike are very familiar with the idea of state-run drones spying on the entrapped population. Luckily, however, the scenes of drones chasing down or spying on those who dare dissent against authority have been restricted to fantasy — until now.

When Texas resident Bobbie Sanchez walked out in her backyard last week, the last thing she thought she’d see was a drone — hovering — watching her kids.

“Mommy there’s a drone over our roof,” said her children.

According to Sanchez, the drone hovered there long enough for her to take multiple photos and to call the police for help.

However, when Sanchez called the Hurst police department to inform them a drone was spying on her children, the Hurst police department said it was them.

“They’re watching my children play in the backyard,” said Sanchez. “I called the Hurst Police Department and was pretty surprised to hear that it was them.”

According to NBC DFW, Hurst police and fire started using drones earlier this year. They said the day they were over Sanchez’s yard was a training exercise.
Training, in the land of the free, now involves police officers stripping citizens of their privacy and creepily watching their kids.

Dystopian, indeed.

After being caught spying on children, the department now promises that they will tighten down on when and where the drones will be deployed.

“We will not be doing any type of training exercises over houses and things like that,” said Hurst Police Assistant Chief Steve Niekamp.

According to Niekamp, the department’s drones will now only launch of crime scenes, accident scenes, to find a suspect, an active shooter, or a missing person. The fire department may also use them to strategize on fighting fires.

“We’re working for our citizens, if they have concerns then we definitely need to address it,” said Niekamp in an obvious understatement.

When Sanchez’ neighbors got news of the drone they were outraged, naturally.

“It might be legal but it’s still creepy to think that police can be saying that they’re training or looking for a criminal and still be looking at you in your backyard,” said neighbor Casey Byrnes.

Others told NBC DFW that they feel betrayed and that their trust in police is damaged.

In a truly liberty-loving tone, Sanchez stated, “I am not a person who will give up privacy for safety.”

The use of drones in policing is a slippery slope. While fears of active shooters and missing children will be used to justify them, if history is any indicator, these drones will ultimately be used to further deteriorate what little semblance of privacy left in America.

Also, guns.

As the Free Thought Project reported last week, Connecticut may be the first state in the country to allow police officers to put deadly weapons on drones. Some states have discussed equipping drones with tasers but this is the first proposal to arm them with deadly weapons. What could possibly go wrong?

The good news is, in a recent ruling, a Kentucky man has prevailed in a lawsuit he faced over shooting down a drone that entered his property.

William Meredith became known as the “drone slayer” in 2015, after he used a shotgun to dismantle a drone operated by David Boggs, that he says was flying over his property in front of himself and his daughter. Meredith initially faced felony charges of endangerment and criminal mischief for shooting down the drone. The criminal charges were dismissed by Judge Rebecca Ward in Bullitt County District Court, citing recollections from witnesses who said that the drone was flying under the tree line. Ward also said that Meredith was within his rights to shoot down the drone.

According to Meredith, that drone, like the police drone in Hurst — was also watching his children.

However, we shouldn’t rely on this case to hold up against the blue privilege associated with shooting down ‘official police property’ — even if it is watching your kids in your own backyard. (For more from the author of “Mom Horrified After Finding Police Drone Watching Her Children — in Their Backyard” please click HERE) http://joemiller.us/2017/04/mom-horrified-finding-police-drone-watching-children-backyard/

Eva Rosenberg: How Do We Prepare for Doom's Day--Tuesday, April 18, 2017, and How Should Americans Prepare If There Is No Obama-Care Repeal?

Janis Hall / J. Hal World Report: Obama, From Whom and From Where Did Syria Get the Chemicals?

THE EXCEPTIONAL CONSERVATIVE SHOW®
MONDAY THROUGH WEDNESDAY 9:05 PM ET
Make Your Voice Heard at The Euro Pacific Bank Ltd / TECN® Chat Room

THE EXCEPTIONAL CONSERVATIVE NETWORK...
SHR LIVE at https://www.spreaker.com/user/sackheadsradio/eva-rosenberg-how-do-we-prepare-for-doom
Ustream LIVE at http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/101766842

There have been multiple mass shootings of Americans by Muslims in America, but Muslims think THEY are the victims

( Muslims do not assimilate, they infiltrate! )

There have been no mass killings of Muslims in America, not even after 9/11. But to watch this video from designated terrorist group CAIR, you would think that Muslims are in the greatest danger because of a a few dozen written threats, the majority of which were fake or written by Muslims themselves for sympathy…and none carried out.

They even recruited a representative of Homeland Security, paid for by American taxpayers, to talk to them about what to do about an active shooter. I wonder how many potential Muslim active shooters were in the audience?

Now lets talk about all the active shootings and terrorist attacks that Muslims have carried out in America. For anyone keeping score:

Philadelphia: Teen convert to Islam pleads guilty to Islamic State plot to murder Pope

( Muslims do not assimilate, they infiltrate! )

April 4, 2017 5:42 am By Robert Spencer 20 Comments

Pope Francis is doubtless on his way to Philadelphia now to explain to young Ahmad Shakoor that “authentic Islam and the proper reading of the Koran are opposed to every form of violence.”

“Leave them; they are blind guides. And if a blind man leads a blind man, both will fall into a pit.” (Matthew 15:14)

“US teen pleads guilty to IS-inspired plot to kill pope,” AFP, April 3, 2017:

Washington (AFP) – A New Jersey teen pleaded guilty Monday to a plot allegedly inspired by the Islamic State group to kill Pope Francis during his 2015 visit to the United States.

The US Justice Department said Santos Colon, 15 years old at the time, sought to recruit a sniper to shoot the pope as he celebrated mass in Philadelphia on September 27, 2015. Colon also allegedly planned to set off explosives.

But the teen unwittingly recruited an undercover FBI agent for the job, and was arrested quietly 12 days before the event.

“Colon engaged someone he believed would be the sniper, but in reality was an undercover FBI employee. Colon engaged in target reconnaissance with an FBI confidential source and instructed the source to purchase materials to make explosive devices,” the Justice Department said in a statement.

Court documents said Colon sought to carry out the act in support of the Islamic State group and that he had used the adopted name Ahmad Shakoor.

In a plea bargain with prosecutors, Colon, now 17, agreed to forego trial and plead guilty as an adult to one charge of providing material support to a terror group.

With the deal, prosecutors dropped three other charges filed against him as a juvenile.

Court documents said the charges were in relation to the Islamic State group, which Washington has designated a foreign terrorist organization….

Colon faces a maximum of 15 years in prison but sentencing would likely be held off until 2021 while he undergoes psychiatric treatment in a secure facility.

In a plea statement, Colon acknowledged having been a patient in a mental institution in the past.

Jihad Watch

to read all articles go to https://www.jihadwatch.org/

The watchman on the wall sounding the ALARM