ACTION

• If you could deposit your income tax payment in a Health Savings Account, would you do it?
• If you could deposit your property tax payment in a Health Savings Account, would you do it?

• Would you like all the sales taxes collected each day by your employer to be divided equally between all the workers in the restaurant and deposited into a Health Savings Account for you?

• Would you like your employers property tax bill divided equally between all the workers and deposited in your Health Savings Account for you?
• Would you like your employers corporate income tax bill divided equally between all the workers and deposited in your Health Savings Account?

REALLY THEY ARE ALL OFFERING HERMAN SOMETHING.

WHEN ARE WE OR THE GOVERMENT GOING TO GET IT RIGHT/

ALL THIS FUSS ABOUT A 2% PAYROLL TAX CUT IS PREYING ON THOSE WHO HAVE NOT HAD ANY PERSONAL OR EXPERIENCE IN PAYROLL TAXES WHICH IS A COMPLEX TOPIC AND HAS BEEN CONVOLUTED WITH A LOT OF POLITICAL B S.  THERE ARE DIFFERENT TYPES OF PAYROLL TAX DEDUCTIONS IN THE PAYROLL SYSTEM, I HAVE BEEN DIRECTLY INVOLVED WITH PAYROLLS  FOR OVER 50 YEARS AND I RESENT THE MISREPRESENTATION THAT PREVAILS IN OUR MEDIA AND POLITICAL RHETERIC. A PRIMARY SOURCE OF INCOME FOR THE NATION IS THE INCOME TAX WITHOLDING TAX WHICH IS THE AMOUNT OF TAX EACH INDIVIDUAL PAYS INTO THE GENERAL TAX FUND WHICH IS THE FUND INTENDED TO FINANCE THE COST OF GOVERNMENT. IT WAS ORIGINALY INTENDED FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF GOVERNMENT FIRST AND OTHER THING LAST.  THE SOCIAL SECURITY TAX DEDUCTION WAS EXPLICITLY STATED IN THE ORIGINAL LAW TO BE A CONTRIBUTION INTO A GOVERNMENT MANDATED RETIREMENT FUND FOR  ALL WORKING AMERICANS ON A 50% CONTRIBUTION BASIS SHARED EQUALLY BY THE WORKER AND THE EMPLOYER. THIS IS THE PAYROLL TAX REFERRED TO IN THE CURRENT MISNOMORED PAYROLL TAX.  THE REDUCTION IN THIS TAX ONLY MEANS THAT LESS MONEY IS PUT INTO THE SOCIAL SECURITY TRUST FUND WHICH IN THE END MEANS LESS FUNDS FOR THE FEDERAL RESERVE TO ILLEGALLY TRANSFER TO THE GENERAL INCOME TAX FUND.  IT WAS NEVER INTENDED TO FUND THE GENERAL MAINTINANCE OF GOVERNMENT.  SO WHAT DOES THIS 2% PAYROLL TAX DEDUCTION DO? IT IS A DELIBERATE THEFT OF THE FUTURE RETIREMENT BENEFITS OF THOSE WORKING PEOPLE WHO ARE CURRENTLY CONTRIBUTING.  PRESIDENT OBOMA'S THREAT EARLIER THIS YEAR TO NOT SEND OUT THE SOCIAL SECURITY CHECKS WAS A STATEMENT THAT THE TRUST FUND HAD BEEN RAIDED TO A CRITICAL LEVEL AND HE COULD NOT CONTINUE TO PAY HIS INFLATED BEAUROCRATIC CRONIES AS WELL AS MEET THE LEGAL REQUIREMENTS OF SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS. SO NOW HE WANTS TO CONTINUE TO FUND HIS OVERLY INFLATED BEAUROCRATIC COLONY AT THE COST OF THE FUTURE BENEIFITS TO THOSE DESERVING WORKERS.    

IF WE DO NOT WIN IN 2012 IT WILL NOT BE OUR COUNTY ANY LONGER.

 Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined.  Patrick Henry (1736-1739)

As a frequent traveler, I want to see a better balance between personal safety and public safety.  The TSA screening uses three types of technologies, low frequency electromagnetic fields, “back scatter” X-ray, and millimeter-wave scanners.  My basic issue with the TSA screening is over personal safety being compromised by technologies that do not significantly increase public safety but increase personal risk factors.  It is my opinion that Americans should not have to be irradiated in a similar way our luggage is screened.  Across, the globe, public safety relies on safer screening technologies of electromagnetic magnetometer (metal) scanners.  More recently, new technology called “millimeter-wave” screening is also a safer alternative to backscatter X-ray scanners.

Our personal liberty is being compromised by technological developments involving X-ray screening which exposes us to potentially harmful conditions that are known to damage DNA.   Although the Transportation Safety Administration (TSA) claims the potential for dangerous radiation exposure from the backscatter machine is low and that it doesn't pose a significant risk to passengers, they should not have the right to force airline travelers to be exposed to any potential cancer causing X-rays.

According to TSA website, each scan emits less than 1/1,000 of the radiation given off in a chest X-ray.  To put in context to flying experience, this is equivalent of two minutes of high-altitude flight.  However there is a fundamental difference in the X-ray screening equipment and background environmental radiation.  The background radiation is not concentrated and is considered to be a uniformly distributed conditions   Unlike environmental radiation, the TSA X-ray screening equipment subjects the individual to a concentrated burst of energy that exposes the skin to higher levels that is possible from in flight conditions. 

We do have the right to opt of these X-ray screening devices as a personal decision.  Despite the TSA claims about howsafe and low level the X-rays are, we have to be able to address our safety concerns.  Recently, the European Union announced that it has banned the use of X-ray body scanners in all European airports "in order not to risk jeopardizing citizens' health and safety." Research shows that the X-ray scanners, which use low-level radiation to screen airline passengers for hidden explosives, slightly increase their risk of getting cancer.  The same scanners will continue to be used in the United States, according to the Transportation Security Administration. The TSA's stance is that the scanners meet its safety standards.

Approximately 250 X-ray scanners are currently being used in American airports, according to ProPublica, along with 264 millimeter-wave scanners. According the TSA, they believe they should be using both technologies in order to create competition, which keeps prices down and will ultimately lead to even better imaging technology.   Has anyone asked the American citizens if they are willing to save money using a technology that knowingly exposes people to DNA damaging X-rays?

The TSA does provide airline travelers the option to opt out and receive a physical “pat down” screening.  However, a recent New York Daily News about an 85-year-old woman who may sue TSA after being strip searched at JFK Airport raises questions about the actual implementation of TSA “pat down” policy.   According to the story reported by Nicholas Hirshon, Lenore Zimmerman, who lives in Long Beach, says she was on her way to a 1 p.m. flight to Fort Lauderdale when security whisked her to a private room and took off her clothes. 

What is infuriating is an 85 year old woman was forced to remove her clothes and TSA spokeswoman later said a review of closed circuit TV footage from the airport shows “proper procedures were followed.”   This is outrageous!

“I walk with a walker — I really look like a terrorist,” Zimmerman said sarcastically. “I’m tiny. I weigh 110 pounds, 107 without clothes, and I was strip-searched.”

When Zimmerman reached a security checkpoint, she asked if she could forgo the advanced image technology screening equipment, fearing it might interfere with her defibrillator. She said she normally gets patted down. But this time, she says that two female agents escorted her to a private room and began to remove her clothes.  What follows this next is the proverbially saying “add insult to injury”.  Zimmerman received a cut on her leg during the handling she received from the two female TSA agents.   The delays due to a medical agent administering a tetanus shot and applying a bandage on her wound resulted in Zimmerman missing her flight and spending the most of day in the airport.

IT REALLY WAS INTERESTING TO LISTEN TOO FOR ANY PERSON THAT WANTS TO SAVE AMERICA FROM   A DUME LIKE THEY WILL NEVER SEE AGAIN, WE MUST SAVE AMERICIA .  VOTE REPUBLICAN.

IT REALLY WAS INTERESTING TO LISTEN TOO FOR ANY PERSON THAT WANTS TO SAVE AMERICA FROM   A DUME LIKE THEY WILL NEVER SEE AGAIN, WE MUST SAVE AMERICIA .  VOTE REPUBLICAN.

IT REALLY WAS INTERESTING TO LISTEN TOO FOR ANY PERSON THAT WANTS TO SAVE AMERICA FROM   A DUME LIKE THEY WILL NEVER SEE AGAIN, WE MUST SAVE AMERICIA .  VOTE REPUBLICAN.

IT REALLY WAS INTERESTING TO LISTEN TOO FOR ANY PERSON THAT WANTS TO SAVE AMERICA FROM   A DUME LIKE THEY WILL NEVER SEE AGAIN, WE MUST SAVE AMERICIA .  VOTE REPUBLICAN.

DUHHH!!!

Posted on Investors.com-On December 2, 2011:

“Jobs: Americans woke up Friday to the good news that the unemployment rate had dropped sharply from 9% to 8.6%. On closer inspection, the decline is highly questionable — and doesn’t warrant a surge in optimism.

The White House hailed the news as “further evidence that the economy is continuing to health” and proving the $447 billion stimulus proposal “is the right medicine” for what ails us. Some in the media likewise saw good news, with headlines such as the Boston Globe’s “Unemployment Drops To Lowest Since 2009.”

We’re not trying to be Grinches, but the decline in the unemployment rate is highly suspect for many reasons.

The number is derived from a huge survey of 60,000 households the government takes each month. In November, the survey showed the labor force shrank by 315,000. That shrinkage makes the unemployment rate look a lot better than it is.

This is questionable because in the previous three months, the labor force increased by 323,000 workers on average. Statistically, a one-month reversal in the size of the workforce of more than 600,000 people just doesn’t make sense — unless an awful lot of people threw up their hands in disgust and quit looking.

And that’s what seems to be the case. The labor participation rate declined to 64% from 64.2% a month before. Usually, it rises when jobs are growing as people rejoin the labor force.

“Some of the decline relates to the aging of the U.S. population, but a substantial portion of the decline reflects the lack of well-paying jobs, and it (is) driving people from the labor force, discouraged,” wrote economist Anthony Crescenzi of bond giant Pimco.

That is not good news.

Looking at other data, both public and private, shows why that is true.

Take the number of net new jobs businesses create in a given month. For November, it was 120,000 — weak by any measure. Over time, we need to create 130,000 new jobs each month just to soak up new entrants into the workforce.

At the current rate, it will take until May 2016 just to regain the number of jobs we had in 2008 (see chart).

Weekly claims for unemployment benefits, another government measure, rose 6,000 to a seasonally adjusted 402,000 after remaining below 400,000 for three weeks in a row, the Labor Department said Thursday.

This is significant, since government and Wall Street economists say jobless claims must fall below 375,000 and stay there to make a real dent in unemployment.

And there are private measures of unemployment that still show deep distress across the country when it comes to jobs.

Take the Gallup “underemployment” survey, which the polling firm has been taking dutifully for decades. It shows underemployment — the share of workers without jobs plus the share working part time but wanting full-time work — hit 18.1% in November, up from 17.5% just two months ago and 17.2% a year earlier.

Our own IBD/TIPP Poll estimates that nearly 25% of all households have someone who’s unemployed and looking for work — roughly 32 million Americans.

We’re happy that 120,000 people found jobs in November. But this is no real jobs recovery.

We can do a lot better. Sadly, those in charge in the White House seem to think this is good enough.”

Source:

http://news.investors.com/article/593661/201112021605/unemployment-decline-masks-drop-in-workforce.htm

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. Obama Manipulates Numbers to Get Unemployment Headline Under 9%!-Posted on Conservative Byte-On December 3, 2011:

http://conservativebyte.com/2011/12/obama-manipulates-numbers-to-get-unemployment-headline-under-9/

II. The Fed Will Make Sure Obama Wins in 2012!-Posted on CNBC.com-By Patrick Allen, CNBC EMEA Head of News-On April 28, 2011:

http://www.cnbc.com/id/42794512

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Is the Fed’s concept of buying $600 billion of Treasuries just a smokescreen?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/11/03/is-the-fed’s-concept-of-buying-600-billion-of-treasuries-just-a-smokescreen/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

What’s wrong with this picture?

Posted on Western Journalism-By DOUG BOOK-On December 2, 2011:

“Mens rea is Latin for “guilty mind.” In legal theory acting to set up a crime before committing it indicates a guilty mind; or guilty intent.

In the spring of 2009, just a few months before the Obama Administration instructed the Phoenix ATF office to commence Operation Fast and Furious, Attorney General Eric Holder introduced and secured a curious change to United States gun legislation.

The tracing of firearm serial numbers provides information about the manufacture of a weapon, its original retail seller and buyer,  the entire known history of the weapon. For years, anti-gun rights zealots had procured these trace statistics from the Bureau of Alcohol,  Tobacco and  Firearms  for the purpose of initiating frivolous lawsuits against both gun dealers and manufacturers.

Then, in 2004, Kansas Republican Rep. Todd Tiahrt successfully added an amendment to the yearly ATF funding bill.  Known since as the Tiahrt Amendment,  the legislation prohibits the sharing of trace information for any but legitimate law enforcement purposes.  That is,  trace information on firearm serial numbers could only be provided to federal,  state and local law enforcement agencies engaged in specific,  criminal investigations.  Those responsible for left-wing fishing expeditions would no longer have access to trace statistics for the purpose of manufacturing lawsuits.

Then, although Barack Obama and Eric Holder had promised liberal supporters they would fight to overturn the Tiahrt Amendment,  in the spring of 2009 Holder lobbied Congress for a change to the Amendment,  one which would allow ATF acquired trace data to be provided to  “a foreign law enforcement agency solely in connection with or for use in a criminal investigation or prosecution.”

The Regime was just about to launch the corrupt and murderous Operation Fast and Furious.  And it must be remembered that during the year long course of that despicable gun-walking venture, no agency or official of the United States government informed the Mexican government of the scheme’s existence,  keeping all particulars concerning the deliberate smuggling across the Mexican border of thousands of firearms quite hidden from Mexican officials and law enforcement.

So former Congressman Tiahrt asks the obvious question:  “Why sign into law the Tiahrt Trace Data Amendment with clarification language to share trace data with foreign law enforcement agencies at approximately the same time that “Fast and Furious” program illegally allows firearms to cross the border into a foreign country?” 

Certainly this Holder-inspired change to Tiahrt was no coincidence. So, why did Barack Obama and Eric Holder, hardly known for their attention to details of legality, suddenly consider this detail so important?  How was the Regime to benefit from the new language?  What possibilities for deceit and abuse of power did it secure for an Administration bent upon terminating the God-given right of the American people to keep and bear arms?

It is often easy to forget that the entirety of the Fast and Furious agenda was not played out, the ultimate goal not realized, as ATF whistleblowers and citizen journalists forced a premature close to the Operation.  What would the giving of trace information to a foreign nation—presumably Mexico–have accomplished and why was it so important to the final outcome of the scheme?  It’s very revealing to note that, even at the zenith of its power, with clear majorities in both the House and Senate, the Administration apparently could not afford to lose a fight for the overthrow of Tiahrt. It had to settle for a change.

It’s quite possible that when we discover the reason for Holder’s change to the Tiahrt Amendment, we’ll finally have the rest of the pieces to the Fast and Furious puzzle.

Use this site to contact your Congressional Representative:

https://writerep.house.gov/writerep/welcome.shtml

To read more use this link:

http://www.ksraweb.net/

Further reading:

http://www.whittierdailynews.com/news/ci_18605000

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/politics/2009111078_apusholderguns.html http://www.gunweek.com/2003/tiahrt0820.html

http://www.nraila.org/issues/factsheets/read.aspx?ID=208

Related posts:

http://www.coachisright.com/title-fast-and-furious-document-release-reveals-lies-and-treachery-of-lanny-breuer-doj/

http://www.coachisright.com/lanny-breuer-presents-latest-fast-and-furious-cover-story-for-eric-holder-and-the-regime/

http://www.coachisright.com/proving-the-2nd-amendment-busting-intent-of-gun-walking-and-fast-furious-schemes/

http://www.coachisright.com/origins-of-fast-and-furious-accidentally-revealed-by-white-house/

http://www.coachisright.com/will-gunwalking-violations-of-the-arms-export-control-act-spell-doom-for-the-regime/

Source:

http://www.westernjournalism.com/fast-and-furious-only-part-of-obamaholder’s-international-plan/?utm_source=Western+Journalism&utm_campaign=34d7fe8045-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email

Note:  The following websites reveal that George Soros’ Open Society Institute (OSI) and groups that promote a variety of leftwing causes are strong advocates of gun control and fund the Arms Control Association (ACA), which outlines the UN Process on Small Arms, along with the International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA) that is a global movement against gun violence, which has lobbied the United Nations to pass a measure outlawing private gun ownership and effectively overturning the U.S. Constitution’s Second Amendment, along with the-You Decide: 


Arms Control Association (ACA):

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6924

Arms Control Association (ACA): UN Process on Small Arms:

http://www.armscontrol.org/act/2007_03/Anders

International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA): Global Movement Against Gun Violence:

http://www.iansa.org/aboutus

International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA): National Gun Laws:

http://www.iansa.org/workarea/national-gun-laws

International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA) Members:

http://www.iansa.org/region/americas

International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA): New US Government Plan to Tackle Arms Trafficking to Mexico!-Posted on July 15, 2011:

http://www.iansa.org/news/2011/07/us-new-government-plan-to-tackle-arms-trafficking-to-mexico

Note:  The following House Bill was introduced in 2009:

H.R.45 - Blair Holt's Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009:

http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h45/text

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. Breaking News on Fast and Furious: Obama Knew in May 2010?

What’s disturbing about this picture?

Posted on Big Government-By AWR Hawkins-On December 1, 2011:

“To date Barack Obama, the dispenser of hope and change and the presiding officer over the least transparent presidency in history, has claimed he only learned about Fast and Furious earlier this year. However, with each new document dump Obama’s timeframe seems to be as inaccurate (or as purposely misleading) as Attorney General Eric Holder’s.

For example, just months after he took office it was evident he was focused on a Fast and Furious-like operation, ostensibly aimed at cutting down on gun trafficking on the southern border.  Thus, on March 24, 2009, Deputy Attorney General David Ogden made the following announcement:

“The President has directed us to take action to fight [Mexican] cartels…and Attorney General Holder and I are taking several new and aggressive steps as part of the administration’s comprehensive plan.”

And the following month, April 2009, he stood beside Mexican President Felipe Calderón and uttered words we now recognize as hypocritical and duplicitous at best:

“I continue to believe that we can respect and honor the Second Amendment right in our Constitution — the rights of sportsmen and hunters and homeowners that want to keep their families safe — to lawfully bear arms, while dealing with assault weapons that, as we know here in Mexico, are used to fuel violence.”

Fast forward one year, and White House logs show that then-Deputy Attorney General Gary Grindler met personally with Obama four times between May 7 and May 19, 2010.

Just in case Grindler’s name doesn’t set off sirens in your mind, he had received an in depth briefing on Fast and Furious on March 12, 2010. (This briefing came via an ATF slideshow , which I covered in a post for Big Government earlier this year.) During this same briefing, Grindler was provided with details concerning the number of times that a straw purchaser named Uriel Patino had purchased guns during Fast and Furious. (Patino’s total weapon acquisition numbered approx. 720 guns.)

By the way, Grindler is no longer a Deputy Attorney General. Rather, he is Holder’s Chief of Staff.

So what do you figure he and Obama talked about when they met four times in May 2010?

Perhaps a better question is—do you think there’s any way they didn’t talk about Fast and Furious?

Even the LA Times admits Fast and Furious was at its height then, so I really don’t think Obama and Grindler used their meetings to plan Obama’s next vacation. Rather, I think Obama may have known about Fast and Furious nearly a year before he admits.

Looks like it’s time for Congressman Darrell Issa (R-CA) to broaden his inquiry into this mess.”

Source:

http://biggovernment.com/awrhawkins/2011/12/01/breaking-news-on-fast-and-furious-obama-knew-in-may-2010/

II. U.S. Seals Court Records Of Border Patrol’s Murder!-Posted on Judicial Watch-On November 30, 2011:

http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2011/nov/u-s-seals-court-records-border-patrol-s-murder

III. Cover-Up: Fast and Furious Documents Suddenly Sealed on Judge’s Orders!-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Doug Book-On November 23, 2011:

http://floydreports.com/cover-up-fast-and-furious-documents-suddenly-sealed-on-judges-orders/

IV. Armed illegals stalked Border Patrol: ‘Mexicans were ‘patrolling’ when agent was slain, indictment says!’-Posted on The Washington Times-On November 22, 2011:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/nov/22/armed-illegals-stalked-border-patrol/?page=all#pagebreak

V. Perry: Eric Holder must go: ‘Attorney general should resign or be fired’-Posted on The Washington Times-By Gov. Rick Perry-On November 21, 2011:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/nov/21/eric-holder-must-go/

VI. Bachmann first presidential candidate, 52nd member of Congress to demand Eric Holder’s resignation!-Posted on The Daily Caller-By Matthew Boyle, The Daily Caller-On November 19, 2011:

http://dailycaller.com/2011/11/19/bachmann-first-presidential-candidate-52nd-member-of-congress-to-demand-eric-holders-resignation/#ixzz1eI0QaSsS

VII. Are Rising Guns Sales Responsible for Declining Crime?-Posted on The Blaze-By Becket Adams-On December 1, 2011:

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/are-rising-gun-sales-responsible-for-declining-crime/

VIII. New Gun Company Advertisement Compares Obama to Hitler, Stalin!-Posted on CBS Washington-On December 1, 2011:

http://washington.cbslocal.com/2011/12/01/new-gun-company-advertisement-compares-obama-to-hitler-stalin/

IX. Liberty University OKs Concealed Guns on Campus!-Posted on Godfather Politics-By THE GODFATHER-On November 18, 2011:

http://godfatherpolitics.com/2121/liberty-university-oks-concealed-guns-on-campus/

X. Shooters Heard: Interior Will Not Ban Target Practice!-Posted on U.S. News-By Paul Bedard-On November 17, 2011:

http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/washington-whispers/2011/11/17/shooters-heard-interior-will-not-ban-target-practice

XI. Video: Stop Gun Control!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fUPDSpCcdg&feature=player_embedded

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Did ATF provide weapons to Mexican drug cartels that were subsequently used to kill one of our own?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/03/04/did-atf-provide-weapons-to-mexican-drug-cartels-that-were-subsequently-used-to-kill-one-of-our-own/

What is the true intent of the UN Small Arms Treaty?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/12/what-is-the-true-intent-of-the-un-small-arms-treaty/

New World Order By Executive Order!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/13/new-world-order-by-executive-order/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

Note: What follows is an article and/or blog post and a video (film) that exposes the real Newt Gingrich, to include who he serves by examining his actions and voting record-You Decide:

Globalist Candidate Gingrich Gets Influential Establishment Endorsement!-Posted on InfoWars-By Kurt Nimmo,
Infowars.com-On November 27, 2011:

http://www.infowars.com/globalist-candidate-gingrich-gets-influential-establishment-endorsement/

Video: The Real Newt Gingrich!-Posted on YouTube.com-By LentenlandsOn November 28, 2011:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EXVc1oxm_VQ&feature=related

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Dear Fellow Patriots:

What follows is a “must read” recently updated Obama Presidential Eligibility Introductory Primer, by Stephen Tonchen, which is different from and should not be confused with, the WorldNetDaily Obama Eligibility Primer.  The Tonchen Primer initially appeared on the Internet in June 2009, more than a year prior to the WND Primer-You Decide:

Obama Presidential Eligibility - An Introductory Primer!-Posted on PeoplesMag.net-By Stephen Tonchen-Revised on December 1, 2011:

These are pertinent excerpts from this primer:

“UPDATE (4/27/2011): Now that President Obama has released his long-form birth certificate, questions 31 through 34 in this Primer have become moot [91]. They are retained here for posterity purposes only. The other 33 questions and corresponding answers remain entirely unaffected. Those questions have acquired even greater importance and relevance, now that Obama’s newly-released long-form birth certificate has further substantiated his dual nationality at birth.

Introduction

The Philadelphia Convention adopted the U.S. Constitution on September 17, 1787 [01]. Anyone born after that date must be a natural born citizen in order to be eligible to serve as President of the United States [02].

What is a natural born citizen? Even if President Barack Obama is a U.S. citizen by birth, is he a U.S. natural born citizen?

According to an article which appeared in the Michigan Law Review in 2008, we know two things for sure about the meaning of “natural born citizen”:

• Anyone who is born in the United States, of parents who are U.S. citizens, is definitely, without doubt, a natural born citizen.
• Anyone who acquires U.S. citizenship through naturalization, after his or her birth, is definitely not a natural born citizen [03].

But what about a child born overseas to U.S.-citizen parents? And what about a U.S.-born child of an alien parent? These children are U.S. citizens by modern-day law. But are they natural born citizens? So far, Federal law, the Constitution and the courts have not answered these questions.

In 2004, Senator Don Nickles predicted that, if these questions remain unanswered, they will someday become “a real issue”:

The definition of this term [”natural born citizen”] is an issue that has been debated in legal circles for years and has never been ruled on by the courts. Clarification is needed before this becomes a real issue. (Nickles)

Senator Nickles’ prediction has come true.

Barack Obama—regardless of where he was born—acquired British/Kenyan citizenship (in addition to U.S. citizenship) at birth. His citizenship status, at birth, was “governed” by the British Nationality Act of 1948 (see Barack Obama’s “fight the smears” website). In light of these facts, an increasing number of Americans are concerned that President Obama might not be a “natural born citizen” and therefore might not be eligible, under the Constitution, to serve as president [04].

Members of the mainstream news media generally believe that all persons born in the United States are “natural born citizens”, regardless of their parents’ citizenship. Although this belief is widely held, the Supreme Court has never accepted it. On the contrary, our nation’s highest court has consistently used the term “natural born citizen” only in reference to persons born on U.S. soil, to U.S.-citizen parents.

In Scott v. Sandford (1856), the Supreme Court characterized, as unexceptionable (incapable of being criticized), the viewpoint that:

• “natural-born citizens are those born in the country of parents who are citizens” (Vattel, as quoted in the majority opinion in Scott v. Sandford, 1856)

In Minor v. Happersett (1874), the Supreme Court defined two classes of persons. One class consisted of U.S.-born children of U.S.-citizen parents. The second class consisted of all other U.S.-born children. Members of the first class were “natural born citizens”. Regarding members of the second class, the Court doubted whether they were even citizens, let alone natural born citizens. The Court distinguished “natural born citizens” from “aliens or foreigners”, suggesting that a “natural born citizen” is one who is not a “foreigner” (foreign citizen) at birth [05].

The United States has had 44 presidents (including Barack Obama). Of these 44 presidents, 34 were born after 1787 (the year the Constitution was adopted) and were therefore subject to the “natural born citizen” requirement. With only two exceptions, every one of these 34 presidents was born in the United States, of parents who were both U.S. citizens (Natural Born Presidency). The two exceptions were Chester Arthur and Barack Obama. While running for office in 1880, Chester Arthur lied to newspaper reporters about his family history (and later burned most of his family records), thereby concealing the fact that, when he was born, his father (William Arthur) was British subject, not a U.S. citizen (Historical Breakthrough - Chester Arthur).

President Obama’s “fight the smears” website, his published long-form birth certificate, and his autobiography identify his father as Barack Hussein Obama Sr., a Kenyan native who never became a U.S. citizen. President Obama is no longer a Kenyan citizen today, but when he was born, he received British/Kenyan citizenship by descent from his father (FactCheck.org: Does Barack Obama have Kenyan citizenship?). The year 2008 was the first time in history that the United States knowingly elected a post-1787-born president whose parents were not both U.S. citizens. Moreover, 2008 was the first time that the U.S. knowingly elected a post-1787-born president who was a foreign citizen (as well as a U.S. citizen) at the time of his birth [06].

Since President Obama acquired foreign nationality (in addition to U.S. citizenship) at birth, his “natural born citizen” status is in doubt [07]. This doubt is not based on the imaginings of tin-foil-hat-wearing conspiracy theorists on the lunatic fringe of society. This doubt comes from what the Supreme Court has said, as well as a variety of other historical and legal sources, which are presented and discussed here.

In the following pages, we introduce the Obama eligibility controversy, in question-and-answer format, for a non-technical general audience. We’ve double-checked the facts presented here, cited their sources, and believe them to be correct. Please contact us if you find any material in this Primer that you believe to be inaccurate.

Continue Reading:

http://people.mags.net/tonchen/birthers.htm

Question: When will Americans wake up?

On or about March 2, 2010, the following article and/or blog post revealed that Sarah P. Herlihy, an associate attorney specializing in litigation at the Chicago law firm Kirkland & Ellis LLP, which is a law firm with ties to Obama, published an essay in the Chicago-Kent Law review on February 22, 2006 entitled “Amending the Natural Born Citizen Requirement: Globalization as the Impetus and the Obstacle” that floated the idea of a “takeover” of our government by a foreign power. Herlihy’s essay was widely disseminated on the internet during the 2008 presidential campaign as rumors surfaced that Obama and possibly McCain did not meet the “natural born Citizen” requirement laid out in Article II, Section 1, paragraph 5 of the U.S. Constitution:

Was there a conspiracy to put Obama in the White House?-Posted on The Post & EMail-By Sharon Rondeau-On March 2, 2010:

http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/03/02/was-there-a-conspiracy-to-put-obama-in-the-white-house/ 

On or about June 12, 2011, the following article and/or blog post revealed overwhelming evidence that we in fact have a fraud and a usurper that resides in the people’s White House, despite the overt lack of journalistic investigating on the part of the American press. The new evidence indicates that the conspiracy to carry out that fraud was much broader than originally thought, which includes a forty-year story that requires a book, not a column, to tell because the evidence suggests that our President was being groomed from a very young age for the moment in history that would end American supremacy in the world, and usher in a new era of Global Marxist Governance:

The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!-Posted on The Post & Email-By JB Williams-On June 12, 2011:

http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/06/07/evidence-broadens-obama-natural-born-conspiracy/

On or about June 13, 2011, retired Maj. Gen. Paul Valley revealed that the “Certificate of Live Birth” that was released by the White House, on or about April 27, 2011, as “proof positive” of President Obama’s Hawaiian birth was a forgery, but that the FBI was covering the fraud and no one in Congress was willing to tackle the situation because of fears of a “black backlash,” if the failings of the nation’s first black president were revealed.

Source:

Ex-CIA: ‘Forged document’ released as birth certificate!-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On June 15, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=311433

Continue Reading:

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetrated-in-american-history/

Note:  25 U.S. Supreme Court Opinions That Defined “Natural Born Citizen” Were Sabotaged In The Run Up To The ’08 Presidential Election!

On or about October 20, 2011, Leo Donofrio, a New Jersey attorney who brought the first legal challenge to Barack Obama's occupancy in the Oval Office to the U.S. Supreme Court published a report that revealed that 25 U.S. Supreme Court Opinions that defined “Natural Born Citizen” were sabotaged in the run up to the ’08 Presidential Election.

Source:

25 U.S. Supreme Court Opinions That Defined “Natural Born Citizen” Were Sabotaged In The Run Up To The ’08 Presidential Election!-Posted on Natural Born Citizen-By Leo Donofrio, Esq.-On October 20, 2011:

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2011/10/20/justia-com-surgically-removed-minor-v-happersett-from-25-supreme-court-opinions-in-run-up-to-08-election/

On or about October 20, 2011, the following article and/or blog post revealed that someone had been incredibly busy in June 2008 working on an illegal front invisible to the public by searching and altering Supreme Court Cases published at Justia.com, which cite the only case in American history - Minor v. Happersett (1875) - to directly construe Article 2 Section 1’s natural-born citizen clause in determining a citizenship issue as part of its holding and precedent. In this unanimous decision, the Supreme Court defined a “native or natural-born citizen” as a person born in the US to parents who were both citizens, a definition that excludes President Obama from eligibility:

JustiaGate!-Posted on Examiner-By Dianna Cotter, Portland Civil Rights Examiner-On October 20, 2011:

http://www.examiner.com/civil-rights-in-portland/justiagate

On or about October 23, 2011, the following WND article and/or blog post revealed that Leo Donofrio, a New Jersey attorney who brought the first legal challenge to Barack Obama's occupancy in the Oval Office to the U.S. Supreme Court had published a report revealing that references to a U.S. Supreme Court decision addressing the definition of "natural-born citizen" were scrubbed at one of the key online resources for legal documents:

Eligibility rulings vanish from Net!-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On October 23, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=358645

Continue Reading:

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetrated-in-american-history/

Note:  Congressional Staff, to include a legislative attorney, within the Congressional Research Service (CRS) are attempting to redefine the eligibility clause in our Constitution as a means of convincing the American public that President Obama meets the eligibility requirements.

On or about November 14, 2011, it was also revealed that the Congressional Research Service (CRS), the research arm of Congress, has launched a defense of Barack Obama's presidential eligibility with a 50-page report that has been described as a "polemic aimed at convincing readers" Obama meets the requirements to be president:

Source:

Congressional staff gives Constitution new meaning: ‘Researchers target 'eligibility,' say 'native born' really is 'natural born!'-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On November 30, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=373085

Additionally, it was revealed that Jack Maskell, a legislative attorney with the Congressional Research Service (CRS), issued yet another in a series of reports on presidential eligibility that appears aimed at providing members of Congress with talking points to respond to constituents contending that Barack Hussein Obama is not a "natural born citizen" within the meaning of Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution, along with redefining the eligibility clause by equating "native born" with the constitutional "natural born" citizen:

Source:

Congressional ‘scholar’ shilling for Obama!-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On November 30, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=372977

Question:  Did a Pennsylvania District Court rule that President Obama was ineligible for Presidency in 2008 and ordered the DNC to withdraw him or is it just another distraction?

The following article and/or blog post seems to make that case-You Decide:

Pennsylvania District Court Ruled Obama ineligible for Presidency in 2008 and ordered DNC to withdraw him!-Posted on Press-By PC-On October 2, 2011:

http://presscore.ca/2011/?p=4615

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Was there a conspiracy to put Obama in the White House?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/03/03/was-there-a-conspiracy-to-put-obama-in-the-white-house-2/

The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetrated-in-american-history/

Could the President’s newly released COLB be a forgery?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/04/29/could-the-president’s-newly-released-colb-be-a-forgery/

Congress report concedes Obama eligibility unvetted!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/congress-report-concedes-obama-eligibility-unvetted/

DC knows that Obama is ineligible for office!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/27/dc-knows-that-obama-is-ineligible-for-office/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

REACTING FROM FEAR AND HATRED,   FROM POLITICATIONS INSIDER TRADEING,   AND MOST DEMOCRATS. ARE NG.

LETS MAKE IT AMERICA AGAIN,  WE CAN DO IT.  LETS DO IT FOR OUR CHILDREN.

What’s wrong with this picture?

Posted on OneNewsNow.com-By Russ Jones, OneNewsNow-On December 1, 2011:

“A conservative online media outlet is calling into question President Barack Obama’s connection with an advocacy group known for voter registration fraud, as the president is leveraging his relationship with the group more than ever and has named a campaign effort in its namesake.

J. Christian Adams, an election attorney and contributor to PJ Media, says President Obama’s re-election campaign has significant ties to Project Vote, which is an affiliate of ACORN—one of the most corrupt advocacy organizations in recent memory.

”It was actually the first, and maybe one of the only clients that President Obama had when he was an attorney in private practice,” Adams explains. “And during the 2008 election, he liked to distance himself from them. He said that he really didn’t have a real serious role with them.”


Despite the corrupt and fraudulent activities of ACORN and Project Vote, the attorney contends that President Obama has already dubbed the voter registration part of his 2012 campaign “Project Vote,” which he does not find surprising, given the president’s history with the organization.

”It is clearly an intentional, in-your-face move,” Adams decides. “They don’t care about perceptions that most Americans have regarding these election crimes.”


Adams goes on to note that according to some former employees-turned-whistleblowers, flooding election officials with an overwhelming number of new, faulty registration forms was planned conduct that was meant to cause turmoil.

Related articles:

Combating voter fraud with ID laws

Democrats vow to fight voter ID laws

Source:

http://www.onenewsnow.com/Politics/Default.aspx?id=1487470

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. 3rd state facing challenge over Obama eligibility: Alabama complaint alleges, 'We're now talking of fraud!'-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On December 1, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=373301

II. Did Obama Submit Phony Ballot Petitions in 2008?-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Ben Johnson-On October 13, 2011:

http://floydreports.com/election-fraud-watch-did-obama-submit-phony-ballot-petitions-in-2008/

III. Suspicious petitions got a stamped signature: ‘Former Gov. Kernan, 12 others come forward to say they didn’t sign!’-Posted on South Bend Tribune-By ERIN BLASKO, South Bend Tribune Staff Writer-On October 12, 2011:

http://www.southbendtribune.com/sbt-suspicious-petitions-got-a-stamped-signature-20111011,0,3946909.story

IV. Sharpton’s Atlanta HQ admits handing out possibly bogus stimulus check forms!-Posted on 11alive.com-By Paul Crawley-On September 30, 2011:

http://www.11alive.com/news/article/207668/40/Sharptons-Atlanta-HQ-admits-handing-out-possibly-bogus-stimulus-check-forms

V. Obama’s 2012 Strategy: Fear, Fraud, and a Cowardly Republican!-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Doug Book, CoachIsRight.com-On September 23, 2011:

http://floydreports.com/obamas-2012-strategy-fear-fraud-and-a-cowardly-republican/

VI. Obama’s HUD execs deliver $730,000 to ACORN spinoffs!-Posted on WND.com-On September 24, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=347313

VII. Obama’s ‘Jobs Bill’ Makes ACORN Eligible for $15 Billion in Taxpayer Money!-Posted on Pjamas Media-By Matthew Vadum-On September 15, 2011:

http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/obama’s-jobs-bill-makes-acorn-eligible-for-15-billion-in-taxpayer-money/

VIII. ACORN operative admits ‘voter fraud’: ‘Americans are sick and tired of having the votes of law-abiding citizens canceled out’!-Posted on WND.com-On September 13, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=344577

IX. GOP Push to Tighten State Voting Laws Prompts Dem Backlash!-Posted on FoxNews.com-By Judson Berger-On July 7, 2011:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/07/07/gop-push-to-tighten-state-voting-laws-prompts-dem-backlash/

X. Black Activists “Deeply Disappointed” in President Clinton’s “Disingenuous” Racial Attack on Ballot Security Measures!-Posted on The National Center for Public Policy Research-On July 7, 2011:

http://www.nationalcenter.org/P21PR-VoterID_070711.html

XI. Senators Seek to Stymie Polling Place Protections!-Posted on The National Center For Public Policy Research-On July 1, 2011:

http://www.nationalcenter.org/P21PR-VoterID_070111.html

XII. Black Activists Criticize Jesse Jackson on Voting Rights!-Posted on The Center For Public Policy Research-On June 22, 2011:

http://www.nationalcenter.org/P21PR-Jackson_062211.html

XIII. Time to Launch Operation Chaos!-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Michael Oberndorf-On June 16, 2011:

http://floydreports.com/time-to-launch-operation-chaos-2-0-12/

XIV. Election Fraud is Ruining America (And How to Fix It)-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Floyd Brown-On April 1, 2011:

http://floydreports.com/election-fraud-is-ruining-america-and-how-to-fix-it/?utm_source=Expose+Obama&utm_campaign=26b60160c8-EO_04_02_20114_2_2011&utm_medium=email

Note: The following websites reveal that George Soros’ Open Society Institute (OSI) -- has dispensed more than $5 billion to a multitude of organizations whose objectives are consistent with those of Soros and one of those organizations is Project Vote, which is the voter-mobilization arm of the notoriously corrupt ACORN, whose voter-registration drives and get-out-the-vote initiatives have been marred by massive levels of fraud and corruption-You Decide:

Guide to the George Soros Network:

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=589

Project Vote:

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6966

Note:  The following web sites and article and/or blog post reveal George Soros’s Secretary State Project (SOSP) and an education fund run by progressive labor leaders tasked with naturalizing new citizens and register new voters by using the 2010 Census as a redistributive mechanism, along with how he is using his money to help tip the elections to Democrats (Progressives) in all 50 states-You Decide:

George Soros’s Secretary Of State Project (SOSP)!-Posted on DiscoverTheNetworks.org:

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=7487

Mi Familia Vota Education Fund (MFVEF)!-Posted on DiscoverTheNetworks.org:

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=7538

George Soros’ Money Could Tip Elections in All 50 States!-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Michael Oberndorf-On July 1, 2011:

http://floydreports.com/george-soros-money-could-tip-elections-in-all-50-states/

Note:  The following website and article and/or blog post reveal that George Soros funds Leftist foundations, litigators and organizations that dominate Election Laws and crusaders that enable massive voter fraud while the DOJ turns a blind eye-You Decide:

George Soros Funds Leftist Foundations, Litigators and Organizations That Dominate Field of Election Laws!-Posted on DiscoverTheNetworks.org:

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=1431

The Left Owns the Election Law Industry!-Posted on FrontPage Magazine-By J. Christian Adams-On August 12, 2011:

http://frontpagemag.com/2011/08/12/the-left-owns-the-election-law-industry/?utm_source=FrontPage+Magazine&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=f9c5910590-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_content=Yahoo%21+Mail

On or about December 12, 2009, the following article and/or blog post revealed the foreign influences of George Soros on the Obama campaign in detail, to include who ran cover Obama’s Islamic background and the connections and players in the campaign of misinformation waged by Obama supporters during the 2008 Election:

Who ran cover for Obama’s Islamic background? ‘Tracing The Politics And The Money Behind Obama’s Campaign!’-Posted on Post & Email-by John Charlton-On December 12, 2009:

http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/12/look-who-ran-cover-for-obamas-islamic-background/

Note: I, like many other Americans, have little or no faith in polls due to our bad experiences during the final days of the 2008 Presidential Election, as substantiated by the following NewsMax article that revealed that almost every major pollster, to include the main stream media, had egg on their face after the election because most of them predicted a double-digit win for then Senator Obama, but only two pollsters were accurate and critics say that the inflated numbers helped Senator Obama by reducing enthusiasm and support for Senator McCain. Also included are other articles and/or blog posts that revealed that the same thing occurred during the 2010 mid-term elections-You Decide:

2008 Presidential Election Polls:

Pollsters Inflated Senator Obama’s Lead?

http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/polls_inflated_obama_lead/2008/11/05/147971.html?s=al&promo_code=7059-1

2010 Mid-Term Election Polls:

Don’t Believe the State-Run Polls!-Posted by Rush Limbaugh-On October 22, 2010:

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_102210/content/01125108.guest.html

About That New Poll in Alaska . . .-Posted on National Review-By Jim Geraghty-On October 28, 2010:

http://www.nationalreview.com/campaign-spot/251296/about-new-poll-alaska

AP Says Dem Early Voters Big Turnout in MD, But MD Early Voting Hasn’t Started?-Posted on Publius Forum-By Warner Todd Huston-On October 22, 2010:

http://www.publiusforum.com/2010/10/21/ap-says-dem-early-voters-big-turnout-in-md-but-md-early-voting-hasnt-started/

Note: The following article and/or blog post revealed that Media Matters, a disgusting news outlet that recently received $1 million from anti-American George Soros, was mocking anyone who claimed that there was voter fraud occurring during the 2010 mid-term elections-You Decide:

Baseless right-wing accusations of voter fraud? Must mean an election is near!-Posted on Media Matters-On October 27, 2010:

http://mediamatters.org/research/201010270031

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Massive Voter Fraud-Again!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/25/massive-voter-fraud-again/

Is ACORN Really Disbanding or Is It Just Changing Its Name Because of Scandals?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/03/23/is-acorn-really-disbanding-or-is-it-just-changing-its-name-because-of-scandals/

President Obama and ACORN Connection!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/12/29/president-obama-and-acorn-connection/

Active complaint to the FEC over President Obama’s campaign finances!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/20/active-complaint-to-the-fec-over-president-obama’s-campaign-finances/

The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetrated-in-american-history/

Who owns our supposedly fair and balanced airwaves and news outlets?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/21/who-owns-our-supposedly-fair-and-balanced-airwaves-and-news-outlets/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

OORAH!!

Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On December 1, 2011:

”A formal challenge to Barack Obama’s candidacy in the 2012 presidential election has been filed now in a third state, where a submission by a citizen, Albert Hendershot, alleges that the Democratic Party “intends to act negligently or fraudulently in a manner that will cause irreparable harm to the citizens of Alabama.”

Earlier challenges to Obama’s candidacy were filed in New Hampshire and Georgia. State officials in New Hampshire, noting that the application had been filled out and the $1,000 fee had been paid, rejected the complaint, which now is being appealed.

The complaints note that state officials are constitutionally obligated to prevent fraudulent ballots in their jurisdictions, along with concerns that the Democrats, as in 2008, are proposing a candidate that is linked to fraud through his presentation of a contested birth certificate as well as his use of a suspect Social Security number.

“This complaint does not request or require [officials] find that President Obama is not qualified to hold the office of president of the United States. Instead, this complaint simply asserts that sufficient evidence exists to make any reasonable person doubt, in light of the evidence, that Barack Obama is a ‘natural-born citizen,’” said the document, which was posted online by the BirtherReport.com.

The website, which pursues information about Obama’s background, reports that among the various documents for Obama that remain concealed are his passport records, kindergarten records, Punahou School records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, University of Chicago scholarly articles, Illinois State Bar Association records, Illinois State Senate records/schedules, medical records, Obama/Dunham marriage license, Obama/Dunham divorce documents, Soetoro/Dunham marriage license and adoption records.

The Alabama complaint, directed to Secretary of State Beth Chapman, seeks a “hearing on the validity of evidence of electoral fraud in the 2008 presidential election and the potential for the same occurrence in the 2012 presidential election in and for the state of Alabama.”

The goals include an injunction from the state prohibiting the Democratic Party from making representations about Obama “absent a showing of evidence to your office sufficient to prove that said representation is not negligent and that Barack H. Obama is eligible to be placed on the ballot.”

The document explains the state office has “sole responsibility in placing Barack H. Obama for president” on the state ballot.

“This notice and my challenge ... request he be removed from our ballot as he does not meet the minimum qualifications as set forth in Article II Section I Clause V concerning the natural born citizen status,” the complaint explains.

Yesterday, WND reported that members of the Congressional Research Service have launched a campaign arguing that Obama is qualified, even though some critics contend he wasn’t born in Hawaii (and his birth document is forged) and, therefore, would not meet the constitutional requirement that a president be a “natural born citizen,” which is not the same as being a “citizen” or a “native-born” citizen.

The CRS argued that anyone “native-born,” such as the offspring of two illegal immigrants, is the same as “natural born citizen.”

Others say that even if Obama was born in Hawaii, by requiring “natural born citizen” the Founders excluded from eligibility anyone born a dual citizen. Obama’s father, Barack Obama Sr., was a citizen of Kenya and subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at Obama’s birth.

WND has reported that there were multiple attempts in Congress during the years that Obama was building a power base and staging his bid for the White House to remove that requirement from the Constitution. A member of a law firm at which a partner served on Obama’s finance committee also lobbied to have the change made.

The Alabama document explains the jurisdiction for vetting candidates “falls squarely on the shoulders of your office as head of the voter fraud unit and it is your sworn duty as a leader of honor and public servant to protect and defend the Constitution.”

The complaint says the fraud allegations come not only from allegations regarding Obama’s birth documentation but also from his use of a “bogus” Social Security number of Connecticut.

“The SSN discrepancy is worthy of investigation. His naturalization, if it ever occurred, is another issue since he was officially adopted by Indoensian Lolo Soetoro. These additional two issues alone would constitute the need for further investigation.”

The complaint notes the significance of the approval of the state secretary of state.

“Leading Americans, including some judges, have incorrectly concluded that the voters are the final arbiters of whether an individual is qualified to hold office. This is simply not correct. America is a constitutional Republic, not a democracy without a constitution. The Constitution is an anti-majoritarian document; meaning that it protects individuals from invasions and usurpations of the majority.”

WND previously has reported that historically, in both New Hampshire and California, candidates have been removed from ballots for ineligibility. And there even was a case in North Dakota in which a chief officer, the governor, was removed from office after he was elected and installed, because of ineligibility.

That case involved Thomas H. Moodie, who was elected. But later it was revealed that he had not lived in the state the necessary five years before running for office. “Because of that ineligibility, he was removed from office and replaced by the lieutenant governor,” state records say.”

Source:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=373301

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and video relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. Ballots with Obama's name facing more legal challenges!-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On November 29, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=372849

II. Video: Crowd Reacts to NH Obama Eligibility Hearing, “Traitors!”-Posted on ImpeachObamaCampaign.com-By admin-On November 23, 2011:

http://www.impeachobamacampaign.com/video-crowd-reacts-to-nh-obama-eligibility-hearing-traitors/

III. New Hampshire wakes up to Obama's alleged Social Security fraud ...!-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On November 16, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=368645

IV. A storm is brewing on the Obama eligibility horizon!-Posted on Sonoran News-By Linda Bentley-On November 16, 2011:

http://www.sonorannews.com/archives/2011/111116/frontpage-storm.html

V. Attack Watch still obsessing over Obama’s birth certificate!-Posted on The Examiner-By Joe Newby, Spokane Conservative Examiner-On September 16, 2011:

http://www.examiner.com/conservative-in-spokane/attack-watch-still-obsessing-over-obama-s-birth-certificate

VI. Obama's ties with voter fraud!-Posted on OneNewsNow.com-By Russ Jones, OneNewsNow-On December 1, 2011:

http://www.onenewsnow.com/Politics/Default.aspx?id=1487470

Question:  When will Americans wake up?

On or about March 2, 2010, the following article and/or blog post revealed that Sarah P. Herlihy, an associate attorney specializing in litigation at the Chicago law firm Kirkland & Ellis LLP, which is a law firm with ties to Obama, published an essay in the Chicago-Kent Law review on February 22, 2006 entitled “Amending the Natural Born Citizen Requirement: Globalization as the Impetus and the Obstacle” that floated the idea of a “takeover” of our government by a foreign power. Herlihy’s essay was widely disseminated on the internet during the 2008 presidential campaign as rumors surfaced that Obama and possibly McCain did not meet the “natural born Citizen” requirement laid out in Article II, Section 1, paragraph 5 of the U.S. Constitution:

Was there a conspiracy to put Obama in the White House?-Posted on The Post & EMail-By Sharon Rondeau-On March 2, 2010:

http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/03/02/was-there-a-conspiracy-to-put-obama-in-the-white-house/ 

On or about June 10, 2010, it was revealed that Mr. Tim Adams, a college instructor, who worked as a senior elections clerk for the city and county of Honolulu from May 2008 through September 2008, made a stunning claim that President Obama was definitely not born in Hawaii as the White House maintains, and that a long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate for him did not even exist in the Aloha State.

Source:

Hawaii Elections Clerk: Obama birth not here – Official who oversaw ballots in 2008 race says long-form birth certificate non-existent!-Posted on WND.com-By Joe Kovacs-On June 10, 2010:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=165041

On or about January 24, 2011, it was also revealed that Mr. Adams had signed an affidavit, on or about January 20, 2011, swearing that he was told by his supervisors in Hawaii that no long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate existed for Barack Obama Jr. in Hawaii and that neither Queens Medical Center nor Kapi’olani Medical Center in Honolulu had any record of Obama having been born in their medical facilities.

Source:

Hawaii official now swears: No Obama birth certificate!-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On January 24, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=254401#ixzz1PT0rwcGl

On or about May 31, 2011, the following articles and/or blog posts revealed that President Obama’s “Certificate of Live Birth” that was released by the White House, on or about April 27, 2011, was found to be fraudulent by an international expert on scanners and document-imaging software who filed a 22-page criminal complaint with the FBI to that effect:

Criminal complaint charges Obama birth record ‘forged’! (Part 1)-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On May 31, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=305705

Criminal complaint details birth-certificate ‘forgery’! (Part 2)-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On June 5, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=306953

Why did Obama release electronic birth certificate? (Part 3)-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On June 7, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=308277

On or about June 3, 2011, an eye-opening interview took place and aired on TruNews Radio with attorney Stephen Pidgeon, who claimed during the interview that he had found a record that revealed that President Obama had changed his name from “Barak Mounir Ubayd” to “Barack Hussein Obama” on October 14, 1982 in Skookumchuck, British Columbia.

Source:

Video: Attorney’s Explosive Claim, Obama Changed Name in 1982!-Posted on ExposeObama.com-On June 4, 2011:

http://www.exposeobama.com/2011/06/04/video-attorneys-explosive-claim-obama-changed-name-in-1982/

On or about June 12, 2011, the following article and/or blog post revealed overwhelming evidence that we in fact have a fraud and a usurper that resides in the people’s White House, despite the overt lack of journalistic investigating on the part of the American press. The new evidence indicates that the conspiracy to carry out that fraud was much broader than originally thought, which includes a forty-year story that requires a book, not a column, to tell because the evidence suggests that our President was being groomed from a very young age for the moment in history that would end American supremacy in the world, and usher in a new era of Global Marxist Governance:

The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!-Posted on The Post & Email-By JB Williams-On June 12, 2011:

http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/06/07/evidence-broadens-obama-natural-born-conspiracy/

On or about June 13, 2011, retired Maj. Gen. Paul Valley revealed that the “Certificate of Live Birth” that was released by the White House, on or about April 27, 2011, as “proof positive” of President Obama’s Hawaiian birth was a forgery, but that the FBI was covering the fraud and no one in Congress was willing to tackle the situation because of fears of a “black backlash,” if the failings of the nation’s first black president were revealed.

Source:

Ex-CIA: ‘Forged document’ released as birth certificate!-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On June 15, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=311433

Continue Reading:

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetrated-in-american-history/

Note:  25 U.S. Supreme Court Opinions That Defined “Natural Born Citizen” Were Sabotaged In The Run Up To The ’08 Presidential Election!

On or about October 20, 2011, Leo Donofrio, a New Jersey attorney who brought the first legal challenge to Barack Obama's occupancy in the Oval Office to the U.S. Supreme Court published a report that revealed that 25 U.S. Supreme Court Opinions that defined “Natural Born Citizen” were sabotaged in the run up to the ’08 Presidential Election.

Source:

25 U.S. Supreme Court Opinions That Defined “Natural Born Citizen” Were Sabotaged In The Run Up To The ’08 Presidential Election!-Posted on Natural Born Citizen-By Leo Donofrio, Esq.-On October 20, 2011:

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2011/10/20/justia-com-surgically-removed-minor-v-happersett-from-25-supreme-court-opinions-in-run-up-to-08-election/

On or about October 20, 2011, the following article and/or blog post revealed that someone had been incredibly busy in June 2008 working on an illegal front invisible to the public by searching and altering Supreme Court Cases published at Justia.com, which cite the only case in American history - Minor v. Happersett (1875) - to directly construe Article 2 Section 1’s natural-born citizen clause in determining a citizenship issue as part of its holding and precedent. In this unanimous decision, the Supreme Court defined a “native or natural-born citizen” as a person born in the US to parents who were both citizens, a definition that excludes President Obama from eligibility:

JustiaGate!-Posted on Examiner-By Dianna Cotter, Portland Civil Rights Examiner-On October 20, 2011:

http://www.examiner.com/civil-rights-in-portland/justiagate

On or about October 23, 2011, the following WND article and/or blog post revealed that Leo Donofrio, a New Jersey attorney who brought the first legal challenge to Barack Obama's occupancy in the Oval Office to the U.S. Supreme Court had published a report revealing that references to a U.S. Supreme Court decision addressing the definition of "natural-born citizen" were scrubbed at one of the key online resources for legal documents:

Eligibility rulings vanish from Net!-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On October 23, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=358645

Continue Reading:

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetrated-in-american-history/

Question:  Who ran cover for Obama’s Islamic background during his campaign?

On or about December 12, 2009, the following article and/or blog post revealed the foreign influences of George Soros on the Obama campaign in detail, to include who ran cover Obama’s Islamic background and the connections and players in the campaign of misinformation waged by Obama supporters during the 2008 Election:

Who ran cover for Obama’s Islamic background? ‘Tracing The Politics And The Money Behind Obama’s Campaign!’-Posted on Post & Email-by John Charlton-On December 12, 2009:

http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/12/look-who-ran-cover-for-obamas-islamic-background/

Continue Reading:

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/11/godfather-of-the-islamic-revolution/

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/25/massive-voter-fraud-again/

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/20/active-complaint-to-the-fec-over-president-obama’s-campaign-finances/

Note:  All three branches of the Federal government, along with National leaders are aware that Barack Hussein Obama is ineligible for the office of President!

On or about April 24, 2010, the following article and/or blog post revealed that members from all three branches of the Federal government, to include members of the US Supreme Court, already know that Barack Hussein Obama is ineligible for the office of President.  Additionally, National leaders are also aware that he is not a “natural born citizen” of the United States of America, and therefore, is ineligible for the office he currently holds:

DC Knows that Obama is Ineligible for Office: ‘The certification of constitutional qualification for the office of president!’-Posted on CanadaFreePress.com-By JB Williams-On April 24, 2010:

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/22221

On or about November 8, 2010, the following WND article and/or blog post revealed a congressional document that was posted on the internet that confirms that no one, to include Congress, the states, or election officials bothered to check then Senator Obama’s eligibility to be our president:

Congress report concedes Obama eligibility unvetted: 'There is no specific federal agency' to review candidates for federal office!-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On November 8, 2010:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=225561

Continue Reading:

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/27/dc-knows-that-obama-is-ineligible-for-office/

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/congress-report-concedes-obama-eligibility-unvetted/

Note:  It was recently revealed that Congressional Staff, to include a legislative attorney, within the Congressional Research Service (CRS) are attempting to redefine the eligibility clause in our Constitution as a means of convincing the American public that President Obama meets the eligibility requirements.

On or about November 14, 2011, it was also revealed that the Congressional Research Service (CRS), the research arm of Congress, has launched a defense of Barack Obama's presidential eligibility with a 50-page report that has been described as a "polemic aimed at convincing readers" Obama meets the requirements to be president:

Source:

Congressional staff gives Constitution new meaning: ‘Researchers target 'eligibility,' say 'native born' really is 'natural born!'-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On November 30, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=373085

Additionally, it was revealed that Jack Maskell, a legislative attorney with the Congressional Research Service (CRS), issued yet another in a series of reports on presidential eligibility that appears aimed at providing members of Congress with talking points to respond to constituents contending that Barack Hussein Obama is not a "natural born citizen" within the meaning of Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution, along with redefining the eligibility clause by equating "native born" with the constitutional "natural born" citizen:

Source:

Congressional ‘scholar’ shilling for Obama!-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On November 30, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=372977

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Was there a conspiracy to put Obama in the White House?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/03/03/was-there-a-conspiracy-to-put-obama-in-the-white-house-2/

The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetrated-in-american-history/

Could the President’s newly released COLB be a forgery?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/04/29/could-the-president’s-newly-released-colb-be-a-forgery/

Godfather of The Islamic Revolution!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/11/godfather-of-the-islamic-revolution/

Massive Voter Fraud-Again!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/25/massive-voter-fraud-again/

Active complaint to the FEC over President Obama’s campaign finances!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/20/active-complaint-to-the-fec-over-president-obama’s-campaign-finances/

Congress report concedes Obama eligibility unvetted!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/congress-report-concedes-obama-eligibility-unvetted/

DC knows that Obama is ineligible for office!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/27/dc-knows-that-obama-is-ineligible-for-office/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

REMBER THE TEA  PARTY AT CHRISTMAS TIME.  MERRY CHRISTMAS.

OBAMA LAWYERS: Americans legitimate targets in war on terror

In numerology, the number 8 represents assuming power, for now we’ve achieved personal responsibility for our lives. In the 8 cycle of numerology, recognition and financial rewards are bestowed in business. We now have reached the point when we can reap what we’ve sown.  We’ve learned to view life in broad terms. The quality of life expands to new plateaus, giving one more drive, more perseverance to go to the very top of whatever one chooses to do.  

Exploiting the envy of the unsuccessful, called class warfare, is the favorite way the makers and keepers of the law in America accomplish their goals.  Birds-of-a-feather flock together.

As defined in Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, the individual’s soul is his immaterial essence, animating principle or actuating cause. Once you are free to think for yourself, have awakened your soul, layer upon layer of awareness released, numerology defines as cycles of development, now that we’ve arrived at the personal power cycle, it goes back to fundamental law, which significantly involves personal discipline. This is the human’s unique ability to make sense.

I began with law professor Edward S. Corwin’s The “Higher Law” Background of American Constitutional Law.  Ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle “advanced in Ethics the concept of ‘natural justice,’ ‘Of political justice,’ he wrote, ‘part is natural part legal—natural, that which everywhere has the same force and does not exist by people’s thinking this or that; legal, that which is originally indifferent. . .’ That is to say, the essential ingredient of the justice which is enforced by the state is not of the state’s own contrivance; it is a discovery from nature and a transcript of its constancy.”

The discovery that custom was neither immutable nor invariable even among the Greek city states impelled the Sophists to the conclusion that justice was either merely “the interests of the strong,” or at best a convention entered upon by men purely on considerations of expediency and terminable on like considerations. Ultimately, indeed, the two ideas boil down to the same thing, since it is impossible to regard as convenient that which cannot maintain, while that which can do so will in the long run be shaped to the interests of its sustainers.

What could be truer of America’s makers and keepers of the law?  “We are our brother’s keeper” is distorted by those who use their reasoning ability to empower themselves at everyone else’s cost. It’s as easy as falling off a log because the American people don’t know the law. This being the case, by knowing the law—and using it for my personal benefit—the powers that be were not prepared. They hung themselves with their own rope. 

Aristotle advanced this: “even the best of men in authority are liable to be corrupted by passion. We may conclude then that the law is reason without passion and it is therefore preferable to any individual.”

Never depend on the makers and keepers of the law to correct their wrongs. When you have a personal stake in the outcome, you remain with the right to be heard in a meaningful way in a meaningful place. If you want your rights to be honored, you must demand and be prepared to legally fight for them, lest you spill your blood over your rights. Count on the end result to be for the good of all—as determined by the makers and keepers of the law.

So know this: no matter what they say, they are not in their positions of power and control to protect your God-given rights.

My life is good. In my experience, God helps those who help themselves. 

A lawyer told me it would cost big money to take my $1,500 tax issue to court, and even if I won, no judge would grant the lawyer more than a small fraction of his cost.  You don’t hire a lawyer to fight your tax issue unless it is big money.

What would the makers and keepers of the law do if 10,000 working people, because they had a personal stake in the outcome, took their tax issues to court?  If they knew the law, they could afford the cost.  It takes time and study, but it doesn’t take a brain to know the law regarding tax.  Surely, 10,000 taxpayers have a personal stake in the outcome.

Do you think Congress would remain doing nothing to solve the nation’s growing out of control spending problem if 10,000 taxpayers took their individual cases to court?  Would Harry Reed and Nancy Pelosi be able to keep their fellow Democrats in line with President Obama, the Attorney General, the Secretary of Treasury, and all the other bureaucrats making life hard for the American taxpayer?   Would the Federal Reserve Bank and Wall Street be able to continue ripping off taxpayers?  Would the Republican leadership remain compromising on what they know is the wrong way to go?  Do you think the government would continue to allow illegal entrance of our land?  Do you think we would continue to keep a military presence in other nations? Do you think fraud, waste, and mismanagement would be tolerated? Do you think government workers and union workers would remain commanding far higher wages and benefits, all at the taxpayers’ expense?  Or do you think all of the above named abuses of taxpayers’ rights would turn politicians into representatives of the people if taxpayers employed the law? 

You don’t accept my thoughts? What other answer could there be?  As a student of the law, I’ve never read in the law that God guarantees you the right to be free. I’ve never seen it in practice. I can only conclude that God-given rights are yours to protect. If you don’t accept my thoughts, then you accept being used in whatever way those in control want to use you. You are a target for Obama's lawyers.  All I can say is good luck!