ACTION

EVERY AMERICAN HAS TO READ IT, THERE IS NOT MUCH TIME LEFT FOR AMERICA, THIS IS THE TRUTH,  WE SCERWED UP IN EGYPT, WE REALLY SCREWED UP IN IRAQ, WHERE IS OUR PAYMENT IN THEIR OIL//////IRAN IS NOW GOING TO COME IN AND TAKE IT..   FOUR MORE YEARS OF DEMOCRATS AND THERE IS NO MORE AMERICA, AS WE KNOW IT TODAY< WE WILL BE A SOCIALIST NATION. I PRAY TO JESUS EVERY NIGHT FOR THIS COUNTY.

Posted on Townhall-By Robert Knigh-On December 1, 2011:

“Atheists must be the most fragile peaches in the basket.

They’re always getting bruised by the slightest exposure to public displays that remind them of Christmas, God, the Ten Commandments, or worst of all, Jesus.

Just as pathetic are the atheist enablers who are complicit in doing away with any reminders of America’s Christian heritage, even secular symbols. For example, the Hollings Cancer Center in Charleston, South Carolina recently decided that a visit by Santa Claus might upset nonbelievers. Perhaps they feared that it could lead to heart attacks, an Inquisition or perhaps even inspire local militant imams to issue a fatwa (death threat). You can never be sure what kind of chaos a visit by Santa could unleash.

After the public rebelled, the center said that Santa can squeeze down the center’s chimney, but we’ll have none of that overtly religious stuff such as creches, angels, Christmas greetings – anything that brings joy to the world.

On Nov. 18, the Christian legal group Liberty Counsel sent a letter reminding Center Director Andrew S. Kraft, M.D., about how freedom of religion works in America under the Constitution and how his actions constitute viewpoint discrimination. Let’s hope Dr. Kraft will grow a big heart like the Grinch did in Whoville.

The secular virus has been spreading for years in public and private zones. Shopping malls, which would go broke without Christmas, try their best to attract Christmas shoppers without mentioning Christmas. Hence, we get generic “happy holidays” and color schemes with blue and silver snowflakes cold enough to freeze the socks off Grandfather Frost. He’s the former Soviet Union’s made-up patron saint who took over giving gifts to children after the commisars bumped off St. Nicholas. It’s rumored (just starting it now) that the Christmas-phobic ACLU tacks up portraits of Grandfather Frost in back offices to inspire them during that darned holiday season that Dare Not Tell Its Name.

Driving the whole mess is the growing fear Not to Offend. The war on Christmas, part of the ongoing trend to eradicate anything Christian in the public square, is also driven by a profound misreading of the First Amendment, which says “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”

To the ACLU and other pro-atheist groups, that means the government must be hostile to any public expressions of belief that offend atheists. That makes atheism the de facto official religion, something the Founders went out of their way to prevent.

Genuine conflicts do arise, and the courts have found ways to keep religiously themed items legal on public property – as long as they fulfill a secular purpose. In 1984, the Supreme Court in Lynch v. Donnelly ruled that the presence of a crèche amid other seasonal displays – a Santa Claus house, a Christmas tree, and a “Seasons Greetings” banner – erected by the city of Pawtuckett, R.I., was not an unconstitutional establishment of religion.

The secular purpose? Government was acknowledging the cultural significance of a traditional holiday celebrated by the vast majority of Americans. In what became the “reindeer test,” the Court said that religious elements are okay if secular elements are present. So if you dust off a Bambi, put a red nose on it and place it next to the baby Jesus, all is right with the world. Previous generations didn’t need this kind of “cover,” but we’re in a different place now.

The court also noted that, “The Constitution does not require complete separation of church and state; it affirmatively mandates accommodation, not merely tolerance, of all religions, and forbids hostility toward any.”

In early November, the Supreme Court declined to hear a case involving roadside cross memorials to fallen Utah state troopers. The American Civil Rights Union filed an amicus brief arguing for a new constitutional standard. The “Coercion Test” would evaluate whether a policy, practice, or action involves coercion in regard to religion. The framers meant to prohibit coercion, but they did not intend to prohibit voluntary, public, religious speech, or religious expression or symbolism, which do not involve coercion. This test might have helped the state-supported cancer center folks see that barring Santa was a silly idea.

In Allegheny County v. Greater Pittsburgh ACLU (1989), the Court clarified the holiday standard by forbidding stand-alone nativities but not Christmas trees or menorahs. So the National Christmas Tree is safe—for now. Wonder if the Ban Christmas crowd knows that a decorated fir is not really a Christmas tree unless crowned with a star or an angel? Hillary Clinton’s National Tree had a purple, sparkling planet atop it one year. Make of that what you will.

Please don’t tell the ACLU about the stars and angels, though. Grim-faced volunteers will be fanning out with ladders to grab them and fling them into the nearest dumpster to save us from the Reason for the Season.

Last year, atheists in Loudoun County, Virginia, upped the price of having a crèche at the county courthouse by erecting signs with diatribes against Christianity and belief in God. When you see this stuff, keep in mind that the devil can’t create anything. He can only pervert what is good. And he’s especially adept at enlisting atheists for his schemes, because, as Psalms 14 and 53 say, “the fool has said in his heart that there is no God.”

Fortunately, since we’re all prone to foolishness of one kind or another, that same God loves us anyway and gave us the ultimate gift, which is why we celebrate Christmas.”

Source:

http://townhall.com/columnists/robertknight/2011/12/01/tis_the_season_for_christmas_phobia/page/full/

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and video relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. DOJ Ignores Christians and Defends Muslims!-Posted on Godfather Politics-By GIACOMO-On November 25, 2011:

http://godfatherpolitics.com/2221/doj-ignores-christians-and-defends-muslims/

II. Obama Doesn‘t Mention ’God’ in Thanksgiving Message – Problem?-Posted on The Blaze-By Scott Baker-On November 24, 2011:

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/obama-doesnt-mention-god-in-thanksgiving-message-problem/

III. Video: Obama Doesn‘t Mention ’God’ in Thanksgiving Message – Problem?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=STsr9_VvzNA&feature=player_embedded

IV. Herman Cain: Obama’s scrubbing Christian heritage ‘intentional’ ‘The majority of people do not want God to be taken out of our culture!’-Posted on WND.com-By Drew Zahn-On March 18, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=276825

V. Why Does Religious Freedom Matter?-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-On December 20, 2010:

http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2010/12/Why-Does-Religious-Freedom-Matter?utm_source=strategicmktg&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=understandingamerica

VI. The ACLU’s Communist, Atheist Roots!-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Guest Writer-On December 16, 2010:

http://floydreports.com/the-aclus-communist-atheist-roots/?utm_source=Expose+Obama&utm_campaign=4f039851aa-EO_12_16_201012_16_2010&utm_medium=email

VII. Faith is the Source of America’s Greatness-Posted on Patriot Update-By Floyd Brown-On December 11, 2010:

http://www.patriotupdate.com/exclusives/read/292/Faith-is-the-Source-of-Americas-Greatness

VIII. Pope in the UK: Atheists Like Nazis-Posted on NewsMax.com-On September 17, 2010:

http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/PopebenedictnazisUnitedKingdom/2010/09/17/id/370610?s=al&promo_code=AC5C-1

IX. Pastors taken to task for political apathy: ‘What we have in America is a preacher problem!’-Posted on WND.com-On September 16, 2010:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=204473

Note:  The following articles and/or blog posts and reports reveal that George Soros has a pastor close to President Obama on his payroll, along with exposing the President, Soros and the Religious Left-You Decide:

Soros Has a Pastor Close to Obama On His Payroll!-Posted on American Thinker-By Ed Lasky-On August 25, 2010:

http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/08/soros_has_a_pastor_close_to_ob.html

Barack Obama, George Soros and the Religious Left!-Posted on American Thinker-By Jason Lee-On June 12, 2011:

http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/06/barack_obama_george_soros_and_the_religious_left.html

Note:  What follows are two articles and/or blog posts that reveal the connection between NBC and New York Atheists that were written by Chuck Norris-You Decide: 

Our Founders vs. NBC and New York Atheists! (Part 1 of 2)-Posted on Town Hall-By Chuck Norris-On June 28, 2011:

http://townhall.com/columnists/chucknorris/2011/06/28/our_founders_vs_nbc_and_new_york_atheists_part_1_of_2/page/full/

Our Founders vs. NBC and New York Atheists! (Part 2 of 2)-Posted on WND.com-By Chuck Norris-On July 4, 2011: 

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=318489

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Faith of Our Forefathers!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/09/faith-of-our-forefathers/

Have the “power elite” and pseudo-experts covertly sold us corruption disguised as freedom?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/09/have-the-“power-elite”-and-pseudo-experts-covertly-sold-us-corruption-disguised-as-freedom/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Does Europe have a future?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/09/does-europe-have-a-future/

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

I hope people slow down on this Newt Gingridge poll surge.
Newt is just telling people the
(Red Meat) they wish to hear.

I do not think he can even compete wth Obama.

How can he draw independants?
Do you think the youth of America will even consider him?
People who look at image will look at him and Obama and run to Obama?
Will he just be another old fogey, to youth?
Newt is smart, but those who are just average intelligence may not understand him?
He is serious gamble.
Is Newt playing us?

What’s disgusting about this?

Posted on The Heritage Foundation-By Mike Brownfield-On December 5, 2011:

“Ready to trade in your car for a bike, or maybe a subway instead? Interested in fewer choices for your home, paying more for housing, and being crammed into a denser neighborhood? You can have all this and more if radical environmentalists and “smart growth” advocates have their way and local, state, and the federal government impose the policies set forth in the United Nations’ Agenda 21.

You might have heard of this nefarious-sounding policy in a recent Republican presidential debate, but even if you haven’t, here’s some background information: Agenda 21 is a voluntary plan adopted at the 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. It calls on governments to intervene and regulate nearly every potential impact that human activity could have on the environment. The end goal? Getting governments to “rethink economic development and find ways to halt the destruction of irreplaceable natural resources and pollution of the planet.”

As adopted, Agenda 21 was described as “a comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the United Nations System, Governments, and Major Groups in every area in which human impacts on the environment.” That includes hundreds of specific goals and strategies that national and local governments are encouraged to adopt. And that translates into restrictive zoning policies that are aimed at deterring suburban growth. Ultimately, they suppress housing supply and drive up home prices, in turn imposing unnecessary costs, especially on middle- and lower-income households. These policies contributed to and aggravate the real estate bubble by putting inflationary pressures on housing prices.

But here’s the catch: Nothing about Agenda 21 is binding, and it’s not a threat in and of itself. Instead, the threat Americans need to be concerned about is the one that lies in their own backyard. In a new paper, “Focus on Agenda 21 Should Not Divert Attention from Homegrown Anti-Growth Policies,” Wendell Cox, Ronald Utt, Brett Schaefer explain:

“Opponents of Agenda 21 should not be distracted from the more tangible manifestation of the smart-growth principles outlined in that document. If they focus excessively on Agenda 21, it is much more likely that homegrown smart-growth policies that date to the early 1970s and undermine the quality of life, personal choice, and property rights in American communities will be implemented by local, state, and federal authorities at the behest of environmental groups and other vested interests.”

In the United States, smart-growth policies started in California and Oregon but then spread around the country to “deter suburban growth for all but the well-to-do,” as Cox, Utt, and Schaefer explain. They also write that those policies were not without detrimental impact:

“As they became more prevalent and restrictive, their impact on housing prices and construction likewise expanded. An explosion of exclusionary zoning throughout the U.S. encouraged many communities to adopt zoning policies to ensure that they maintained a certain demographic ‘profile.’ Such zoning limited real estate development to higher-cost homes in order to ‘price out’ moderate-income households, which included a disproportionate share of minorities.”

Where do these home-grown smart-growth policies stand today? The Obama Administration has embraced them while also increasing environmental regulations and restrictions on the use of natural resources. But the White House isn’t the only one behind the smart-growth movement. Local and state officials, along with interest groups, are promoting the policies at all levels of government.

And that’s where smart growth must also be thwarted. It’s not just a matter of standing against the implementation of Agenda 21 at the national level; it’s also about protecting our own backyards against the home-grown threat.”

Source:

http://blog.heritage.org/2011/12/05/morning-bell-agenda-21-and-the-threat-in-your-backyard/?utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Morning%2BBell

Note:  What follows are other articles and/or blog posts and videos that reveal a disturbing global land grab movement by George Soros, President Obama, elitists (both Democrat and Republican), and other hedge fund managers as part of the New World Order, which will require Americans to give up their individual freedoms, personal property and redistribute their wealth. Also included are articles and blog posts that reveal that Sheriffs around the country are rising up against the move-You Decide:

Agenda 21:

Video: Obama’s Executive Order 13575 Rural Council – Agenda 21!-Posted on Cowboy Byte-On November 29, 2011:

http://cowboybyte.com/2150/obamas-executive-order-13575-rural-council-–-agenda-21/

The U.N.’s “Agenda 21″ must be stopped now!-Posted on Vickie Goes to Washington-By Victoria Jackson-On September 15, 2011:

http://vickigoestowashington.com/2011/09/the-u-n-s-agenda-21-must-be-stopped-now/

Global Land Grab: Nervous Rulers and Hedge Fund Managers Alike Scramble for Land!-Posted on The Truth is Treason-By KEVIN HAYDEN-On August 22, 2011:

http://www.truthistreason.net/global-land-grab-nervous-rulers-and-hedge-fund-managers-alike-scramble-for-land

UN’s Agenda 21 Update: Family Farms Are Under Attack!-Posted on The Blaze-By Mike Opelka-On July 31, 2011:

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/agenda-21-update-family-farms-are-under-attack/

The CLEAR Act of a Federal Land Grab (HR 3534)-Posted on The Truth is Treason-By Cassandra Anderson, MorphCity-On July 22, 2011:

http://www.truthistreason.net/the-clear-act-of-a-federal-land-grab-hr-3534

Is The Soros-Sponsored ‘Agenda 21’ A Hidden Plan For World Government?-Posted on The Blaze-By Mike Opelka-On June 14, 2011:

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/is-the-soros-sponsored-agenda-21-a-hidden-plan-for-world-government-yes-only-it-is-not-hidden/

Video: Texans for Accountable Government Exposes Agenda 21!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3h-lTRxKu3A&feature=player_embedded

Video: John Bush Speaks On The Austin Regional Intelligence Center!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMZBV5abpLk&feature=related

Video: How your community is implementing AGENDA 21!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CEHWsdimVO4&feature=player_embedded

Cedar Falls, Iowa City Council defies citizens; says YES to the United Nations and NO to the 4th Amendment!-Posted on The Gaspee Gazette-On June 11, 2011:

http://gaspeegazette.wordpress.com/2011/06/11/cedar-falls-iowa-city-council-defies-citizens-says-yes-to-the-united-nations-and-no-to-the-4th-amendment/

Video: Wildlands Project!-Posted on You Tube.com-By skiebus-On June 28, 2008:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVTGK1uYqJo&feature=player_embedded#

For more analyses on Agenda 21, visit Cassandra Anderson’s website at www.MorphCity.com.

1.     http://lib.store.yahoo.net/lib/realityzone/UFNHR3534LandTrust.html


2.    http://lib.store.yahoo.net/lib/realityzone/UFNEPAlanduse5percnt.html

3.    http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=a2PHwqAs7BS0


4.    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/02/white-house-land-grab/


5.     http://www.takingliberty.us/TLHome.html 

Sheriffs Up-Rising Against Agenda 21:

Sheriffs Rise Up Against Feds!-Posted on American Free Press-By Pat Shannan-On November 2011:

http://www.americanfreepress.net/Issue_fronts/Issue_47_AFP_2011_1.pdf

New Mexico Law and Local Sheriff Trump the Feds in Agenda 21 Land Grab!-Posted on The Truth is Treason-By KEVIN HAYDEN-On November  8, 2011:

http://www.truthistreason.net/new-mexico-law-and-local-sheriff-trump-the-feds-in-agenda-21-land-grab

Note:  The following video reveals the impact of the Senate declaring war on Americans via the recent passage of S. 1867, the National Defense Authorization Act, and its utterly destructive attitude towards the Constitution and Bill of Rights, along with a video that contains a powerful message from a former C.I.A. Agent to all Americans-You Decide:

Video: NDAA's World Wide Declaration of War on The People!-Posted on YouTube.com-By TheAlexJonesChannel-On December 4, 2011:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vbu4SCaMEDA&feature=uploademail

Video: YOU ARE THE RESISTANCE!-Posted on YouTube.com-By in5d-On May 6, 2010:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uI0cd_aIxVg&feature=related

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

New World Order By Executive Order!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/13/new-world-order-by-executive-order/

It’s Getting Very Serious Now!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/15/it’s-getting-very-serious-now/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

Note: What follows is an article and/or blog post and a video (film) that exposes the real Newt Gingrich, to include who he serves by examining his actions and voting record-You Decide:

Globalist Candidate Gingrich Gets Influential Establishment Endorsement!-Posted on InfoWars-By Kurt Nimmo,
Infowars.com-On November 27, 2011:

http://www.infowars.com/globalist-candidate-gingrich-gets-influential-establishment-endorsement/

Video: The Real Newt Gingrich!-Posted on YouTube.com-By Lentenlands-On November 28, 2011:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EXVc1oxm_VQ&feature=related

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

• If you could deposit your income tax payment in a Health Savings Account, would you do it?
• If you could deposit your property tax payment in a Education Savings Account, would you do it?

• Would you like all the sales taxes collected each day by your employer to be divided equally between all the workers in the restaurant and deposited into a Housing Savings Account for you?

• Would you like your employers property tax bill divided equally between all the workers and deposited in your Education Savings Account for you?
• Would you like your employers corporate income tax bill divided equally between all the workers and deposited in your Retirement Savings Account?

• If you could deposit your income tax payment in a Health Savings Account, would you do it?
• If you could deposit your property tax payment in a Health Savings Account, would you do it?

• Would you like all the sales taxes collected each day by your employer to be divided equally between all the workers in the restaurant and deposited into a Health Savings Account for you?

• Would you like your employers property tax bill divided equally between all the workers and deposited in your Health Savings Account for you?
• Would you like your employers corporate income tax bill divided equally between all the workers and deposited in your Health Savings Account?

REALLY THEY ARE ALL OFFERING HERMAN SOMETHING.

WHEN ARE WE OR THE GOVERMENT GOING TO GET IT RIGHT/

ALL THIS FUSS ABOUT A 2% PAYROLL TAX CUT IS PREYING ON THOSE WHO HAVE NOT HAD ANY PERSONAL OR EXPERIENCE IN PAYROLL TAXES WHICH IS A COMPLEX TOPIC AND HAS BEEN CONVOLUTED WITH A LOT OF POLITICAL B S.  THERE ARE DIFFERENT TYPES OF PAYROLL TAX DEDUCTIONS IN THE PAYROLL SYSTEM, I HAVE BEEN DIRECTLY INVOLVED WITH PAYROLLS  FOR OVER 50 YEARS AND I RESENT THE MISREPRESENTATION THAT PREVAILS IN OUR MEDIA AND POLITICAL RHETERIC. A PRIMARY SOURCE OF INCOME FOR THE NATION IS THE INCOME TAX WITHOLDING TAX WHICH IS THE AMOUNT OF TAX EACH INDIVIDUAL PAYS INTO THE GENERAL TAX FUND WHICH IS THE FUND INTENDED TO FINANCE THE COST OF GOVERNMENT. IT WAS ORIGINALY INTENDED FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF GOVERNMENT FIRST AND OTHER THING LAST.  THE SOCIAL SECURITY TAX DEDUCTION WAS EXPLICITLY STATED IN THE ORIGINAL LAW TO BE A CONTRIBUTION INTO A GOVERNMENT MANDATED RETIREMENT FUND FOR  ALL WORKING AMERICANS ON A 50% CONTRIBUTION BASIS SHARED EQUALLY BY THE WORKER AND THE EMPLOYER. THIS IS THE PAYROLL TAX REFERRED TO IN THE CURRENT MISNOMORED PAYROLL TAX.  THE REDUCTION IN THIS TAX ONLY MEANS THAT LESS MONEY IS PUT INTO THE SOCIAL SECURITY TRUST FUND WHICH IN THE END MEANS LESS FUNDS FOR THE FEDERAL RESERVE TO ILLEGALLY TRANSFER TO THE GENERAL INCOME TAX FUND.  IT WAS NEVER INTENDED TO FUND THE GENERAL MAINTINANCE OF GOVERNMENT.  SO WHAT DOES THIS 2% PAYROLL TAX DEDUCTION DO? IT IS A DELIBERATE THEFT OF THE FUTURE RETIREMENT BENEFITS OF THOSE WORKING PEOPLE WHO ARE CURRENTLY CONTRIBUTING.  PRESIDENT OBOMA'S THREAT EARLIER THIS YEAR TO NOT SEND OUT THE SOCIAL SECURITY CHECKS WAS A STATEMENT THAT THE TRUST FUND HAD BEEN RAIDED TO A CRITICAL LEVEL AND HE COULD NOT CONTINUE TO PAY HIS INFLATED BEAUROCRATIC CRONIES AS WELL AS MEET THE LEGAL REQUIREMENTS OF SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS. SO NOW HE WANTS TO CONTINUE TO FUND HIS OVERLY INFLATED BEAUROCRATIC COLONY AT THE COST OF THE FUTURE BENEIFITS TO THOSE DESERVING WORKERS.    

IF WE DO NOT WIN IN 2012 IT WILL NOT BE OUR COUNTY ANY LONGER.

 Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined.  Patrick Henry (1736-1739)

As a frequent traveler, I want to see a better balance between personal safety and public safety.  The TSA screening uses three types of technologies, low frequency electromagnetic fields, “back scatter” X-ray, and millimeter-wave scanners.  My basic issue with the TSA screening is over personal safety being compromised by technologies that do not significantly increase public safety but increase personal risk factors.  It is my opinion that Americans should not have to be irradiated in a similar way our luggage is screened.  Across, the globe, public safety relies on safer screening technologies of electromagnetic magnetometer (metal) scanners.  More recently, new technology called “millimeter-wave” screening is also a safer alternative to backscatter X-ray scanners.

Our personal liberty is being compromised by technological developments involving X-ray screening which exposes us to potentially harmful conditions that are known to damage DNA.   Although the Transportation Safety Administration (TSA) claims the potential for dangerous radiation exposure from the backscatter machine is low and that it doesn't pose a significant risk to passengers, they should not have the right to force airline travelers to be exposed to any potential cancer causing X-rays.

According to TSA website, each scan emits less than 1/1,000 of the radiation given off in a chest X-ray.  To put in context to flying experience, this is equivalent of two minutes of high-altitude flight.  However there is a fundamental difference in the X-ray screening equipment and background environmental radiation.  The background radiation is not concentrated and is considered to be a uniformly distributed conditions   Unlike environmental radiation, the TSA X-ray screening equipment subjects the individual to a concentrated burst of energy that exposes the skin to higher levels that is possible from in flight conditions. 

We do have the right to opt of these X-ray screening devices as a personal decision.  Despite the TSA claims about howsafe and low level the X-rays are, we have to be able to address our safety concerns.  Recently, the European Union announced that it has banned the use of X-ray body scanners in all European airports "in order not to risk jeopardizing citizens' health and safety." Research shows that the X-ray scanners, which use low-level radiation to screen airline passengers for hidden explosives, slightly increase their risk of getting cancer.  The same scanners will continue to be used in the United States, according to the Transportation Security Administration. The TSA's stance is that the scanners meet its safety standards.

Approximately 250 X-ray scanners are currently being used in American airports, according to ProPublica, along with 264 millimeter-wave scanners. According the TSA, they believe they should be using both technologies in order to create competition, which keeps prices down and will ultimately lead to even better imaging technology.   Has anyone asked the American citizens if they are willing to save money using a technology that knowingly exposes people to DNA damaging X-rays?

The TSA does provide airline travelers the option to opt out and receive a physical “pat down” screening.  However, a recent New York Daily News about an 85-year-old woman who may sue TSA after being strip searched at JFK Airport raises questions about the actual implementation of TSA “pat down” policy.   According to the story reported by Nicholas Hirshon, Lenore Zimmerman, who lives in Long Beach, says she was on her way to a 1 p.m. flight to Fort Lauderdale when security whisked her to a private room and took off her clothes. 

What is infuriating is an 85 year old woman was forced to remove her clothes and TSA spokeswoman later said a review of closed circuit TV footage from the airport shows “proper procedures were followed.”   This is outrageous!

“I walk with a walker — I really look like a terrorist,” Zimmerman said sarcastically. “I’m tiny. I weigh 110 pounds, 107 without clothes, and I was strip-searched.”

When Zimmerman reached a security checkpoint, she asked if she could forgo the advanced image technology screening equipment, fearing it might interfere with her defibrillator. She said she normally gets patted down. But this time, she says that two female agents escorted her to a private room and began to remove her clothes.  What follows this next is the proverbially saying “add insult to injury”.  Zimmerman received a cut on her leg during the handling she received from the two female TSA agents.   The delays due to a medical agent administering a tetanus shot and applying a bandage on her wound resulted in Zimmerman missing her flight and spending the most of day in the airport.

IT REALLY WAS INTERESTING TO LISTEN TOO FOR ANY PERSON THAT WANTS TO SAVE AMERICA FROM   A DUME LIKE THEY WILL NEVER SEE AGAIN, WE MUST SAVE AMERICIA .  VOTE REPUBLICAN.

IT REALLY WAS INTERESTING TO LISTEN TOO FOR ANY PERSON THAT WANTS TO SAVE AMERICA FROM   A DUME LIKE THEY WILL NEVER SEE AGAIN, WE MUST SAVE AMERICIA .  VOTE REPUBLICAN.

IT REALLY WAS INTERESTING TO LISTEN TOO FOR ANY PERSON THAT WANTS TO SAVE AMERICA FROM   A DUME LIKE THEY WILL NEVER SEE AGAIN, WE MUST SAVE AMERICIA .  VOTE REPUBLICAN.

IT REALLY WAS INTERESTING TO LISTEN TOO FOR ANY PERSON THAT WANTS TO SAVE AMERICA FROM   A DUME LIKE THEY WILL NEVER SEE AGAIN, WE MUST SAVE AMERICIA .  VOTE REPUBLICAN.

DUHHH!!!

Posted on Investors.com-On December 2, 2011:

“Jobs: Americans woke up Friday to the good news that the unemployment rate had dropped sharply from 9% to 8.6%. On closer inspection, the decline is highly questionable — and doesn’t warrant a surge in optimism.

The White House hailed the news as “further evidence that the economy is continuing to health” and proving the $447 billion stimulus proposal “is the right medicine” for what ails us. Some in the media likewise saw good news, with headlines such as the Boston Globe’s “Unemployment Drops To Lowest Since 2009.”

We’re not trying to be Grinches, but the decline in the unemployment rate is highly suspect for many reasons.

The number is derived from a huge survey of 60,000 households the government takes each month. In November, the survey showed the labor force shrank by 315,000. That shrinkage makes the unemployment rate look a lot better than it is.

This is questionable because in the previous three months, the labor force increased by 323,000 workers on average. Statistically, a one-month reversal in the size of the workforce of more than 600,000 people just doesn’t make sense — unless an awful lot of people threw up their hands in disgust and quit looking.

And that’s what seems to be the case. The labor participation rate declined to 64% from 64.2% a month before. Usually, it rises when jobs are growing as people rejoin the labor force.

“Some of the decline relates to the aging of the U.S. population, but a substantial portion of the decline reflects the lack of well-paying jobs, and it (is) driving people from the labor force, discouraged,” wrote economist Anthony Crescenzi of bond giant Pimco.

That is not good news.

Looking at other data, both public and private, shows why that is true.

Take the number of net new jobs businesses create in a given month. For November, it was 120,000 — weak by any measure. Over time, we need to create 130,000 new jobs each month just to soak up new entrants into the workforce.

At the current rate, it will take until May 2016 just to regain the number of jobs we had in 2008 (see chart).

Weekly claims for unemployment benefits, another government measure, rose 6,000 to a seasonally adjusted 402,000 after remaining below 400,000 for three weeks in a row, the Labor Department said Thursday.

This is significant, since government and Wall Street economists say jobless claims must fall below 375,000 and stay there to make a real dent in unemployment.

And there are private measures of unemployment that still show deep distress across the country when it comes to jobs.

Take the Gallup “underemployment” survey, which the polling firm has been taking dutifully for decades. It shows underemployment — the share of workers without jobs plus the share working part time but wanting full-time work — hit 18.1% in November, up from 17.5% just two months ago and 17.2% a year earlier.

Our own IBD/TIPP Poll estimates that nearly 25% of all households have someone who’s unemployed and looking for work — roughly 32 million Americans.

We’re happy that 120,000 people found jobs in November. But this is no real jobs recovery.

We can do a lot better. Sadly, those in charge in the White House seem to think this is good enough.”

Source:

http://news.investors.com/article/593661/201112021605/unemployment-decline-masks-drop-in-workforce.htm

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. Obama Manipulates Numbers to Get Unemployment Headline Under 9%!-Posted on Conservative Byte-On December 3, 2011:

http://conservativebyte.com/2011/12/obama-manipulates-numbers-to-get-unemployment-headline-under-9/

II. The Fed Will Make Sure Obama Wins in 2012!-Posted on CNBC.com-By Patrick Allen, CNBC EMEA Head of News-On April 28, 2011:

http://www.cnbc.com/id/42794512

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Is the Fed’s concept of buying $600 billion of Treasuries just a smokescreen?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/11/03/is-the-fed’s-concept-of-buying-600-billion-of-treasuries-just-a-smokescreen/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

What’s wrong with this picture?

Posted on Western Journalism-By DOUG BOOK-On December 2, 2011:

“Mens rea is Latin for “guilty mind.” In legal theory acting to set up a crime before committing it indicates a guilty mind; or guilty intent.

In the spring of 2009, just a few months before the Obama Administration instructed the Phoenix ATF office to commence Operation Fast and Furious, Attorney General Eric Holder introduced and secured a curious change to United States gun legislation.

The tracing of firearm serial numbers provides information about the manufacture of a weapon, its original retail seller and buyer,  the entire known history of the weapon. For years, anti-gun rights zealots had procured these trace statistics from the Bureau of Alcohol,  Tobacco and  Firearms  for the purpose of initiating frivolous lawsuits against both gun dealers and manufacturers.

Then, in 2004, Kansas Republican Rep. Todd Tiahrt successfully added an amendment to the yearly ATF funding bill.  Known since as the Tiahrt Amendment,  the legislation prohibits the sharing of trace information for any but legitimate law enforcement purposes.  That is,  trace information on firearm serial numbers could only be provided to federal,  state and local law enforcement agencies engaged in specific,  criminal investigations.  Those responsible for left-wing fishing expeditions would no longer have access to trace statistics for the purpose of manufacturing lawsuits.

Then, although Barack Obama and Eric Holder had promised liberal supporters they would fight to overturn the Tiahrt Amendment,  in the spring of 2009 Holder lobbied Congress for a change to the Amendment,  one which would allow ATF acquired trace data to be provided to  “a foreign law enforcement agency solely in connection with or for use in a criminal investigation or prosecution.”

The Regime was just about to launch the corrupt and murderous Operation Fast and Furious.  And it must be remembered that during the year long course of that despicable gun-walking venture, no agency or official of the United States government informed the Mexican government of the scheme’s existence,  keeping all particulars concerning the deliberate smuggling across the Mexican border of thousands of firearms quite hidden from Mexican officials and law enforcement.

So former Congressman Tiahrt asks the obvious question:  “Why sign into law the Tiahrt Trace Data Amendment with clarification language to share trace data with foreign law enforcement agencies at approximately the same time that “Fast and Furious” program illegally allows firearms to cross the border into a foreign country?” 

Certainly this Holder-inspired change to Tiahrt was no coincidence. So, why did Barack Obama and Eric Holder, hardly known for their attention to details of legality, suddenly consider this detail so important?  How was the Regime to benefit from the new language?  What possibilities for deceit and abuse of power did it secure for an Administration bent upon terminating the God-given right of the American people to keep and bear arms?

It is often easy to forget that the entirety of the Fast and Furious agenda was not played out, the ultimate goal not realized, as ATF whistleblowers and citizen journalists forced a premature close to the Operation.  What would the giving of trace information to a foreign nation—presumably Mexico–have accomplished and why was it so important to the final outcome of the scheme?  It’s very revealing to note that, even at the zenith of its power, with clear majorities in both the House and Senate, the Administration apparently could not afford to lose a fight for the overthrow of Tiahrt. It had to settle for a change.

It’s quite possible that when we discover the reason for Holder’s change to the Tiahrt Amendment, we’ll finally have the rest of the pieces to the Fast and Furious puzzle.

Use this site to contact your Congressional Representative:

https://writerep.house.gov/writerep/welcome.shtml

To read more use this link:

http://www.ksraweb.net/

Further reading:

http://www.whittierdailynews.com/news/ci_18605000

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/politics/2009111078_apusholderguns.html http://www.gunweek.com/2003/tiahrt0820.html

http://www.nraila.org/issues/factsheets/read.aspx?ID=208

Related posts:

http://www.coachisright.com/title-fast-and-furious-document-release-reveals-lies-and-treachery-of-lanny-breuer-doj/

http://www.coachisright.com/lanny-breuer-presents-latest-fast-and-furious-cover-story-for-eric-holder-and-the-regime/

http://www.coachisright.com/proving-the-2nd-amendment-busting-intent-of-gun-walking-and-fast-furious-schemes/

http://www.coachisright.com/origins-of-fast-and-furious-accidentally-revealed-by-white-house/

http://www.coachisright.com/will-gunwalking-violations-of-the-arms-export-control-act-spell-doom-for-the-regime/

Source:

http://www.westernjournalism.com/fast-and-furious-only-part-of-obamaholder’s-international-plan/?utm_source=Western+Journalism&utm_campaign=34d7fe8045-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email

Note:  The following websites reveal that George Soros’ Open Society Institute (OSI) and groups that promote a variety of leftwing causes are strong advocates of gun control and fund the Arms Control Association (ACA), which outlines the UN Process on Small Arms, along with the International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA) that is a global movement against gun violence, which has lobbied the United Nations to pass a measure outlawing private gun ownership and effectively overturning the U.S. Constitution’s Second Amendment, along with the-You Decide: 


Arms Control Association (ACA):

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6924

Arms Control Association (ACA): UN Process on Small Arms:

http://www.armscontrol.org/act/2007_03/Anders

International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA): Global Movement Against Gun Violence:

http://www.iansa.org/aboutus

International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA): National Gun Laws:

http://www.iansa.org/workarea/national-gun-laws

International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA) Members:

http://www.iansa.org/region/americas

International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA): New US Government Plan to Tackle Arms Trafficking to Mexico!-Posted on July 15, 2011:

http://www.iansa.org/news/2011/07/us-new-government-plan-to-tackle-arms-trafficking-to-mexico

Note:  The following House Bill was introduced in 2009:

H.R.45 - Blair Holt's Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009:

http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h45/text

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. Breaking News on Fast and Furious: Obama Knew in May 2010?

What’s disturbing about this picture?

Posted on Big Government-By AWR Hawkins-On December 1, 2011:

“To date Barack Obama, the dispenser of hope and change and the presiding officer over the least transparent presidency in history, has claimed he only learned about Fast and Furious earlier this year. However, with each new document dump Obama’s timeframe seems to be as inaccurate (or as purposely misleading) as Attorney General Eric Holder’s.

For example, just months after he took office it was evident he was focused on a Fast and Furious-like operation, ostensibly aimed at cutting down on gun trafficking on the southern border.  Thus, on March 24, 2009, Deputy Attorney General David Ogden made the following announcement:

“The President has directed us to take action to fight [Mexican] cartels…and Attorney General Holder and I are taking several new and aggressive steps as part of the administration’s comprehensive plan.”

And the following month, April 2009, he stood beside Mexican President Felipe Calderón and uttered words we now recognize as hypocritical and duplicitous at best:

“I continue to believe that we can respect and honor the Second Amendment right in our Constitution — the rights of sportsmen and hunters and homeowners that want to keep their families safe — to lawfully bear arms, while dealing with assault weapons that, as we know here in Mexico, are used to fuel violence.”

Fast forward one year, and White House logs show that then-Deputy Attorney General Gary Grindler met personally with Obama four times between May 7 and May 19, 2010.

Just in case Grindler’s name doesn’t set off sirens in your mind, he had received an in depth briefing on Fast and Furious on March 12, 2010. (This briefing came via an ATF slideshow , which I covered in a post for Big Government earlier this year.) During this same briefing, Grindler was provided with details concerning the number of times that a straw purchaser named Uriel Patino had purchased guns during Fast and Furious. (Patino’s total weapon acquisition numbered approx. 720 guns.)

By the way, Grindler is no longer a Deputy Attorney General. Rather, he is Holder’s Chief of Staff.

So what do you figure he and Obama talked about when they met four times in May 2010?

Perhaps a better question is—do you think there’s any way they didn’t talk about Fast and Furious?

Even the LA Times admits Fast and Furious was at its height then, so I really don’t think Obama and Grindler used their meetings to plan Obama’s next vacation. Rather, I think Obama may have known about Fast and Furious nearly a year before he admits.

Looks like it’s time for Congressman Darrell Issa (R-CA) to broaden his inquiry into this mess.”

Source:

http://biggovernment.com/awrhawkins/2011/12/01/breaking-news-on-fast-and-furious-obama-knew-in-may-2010/

II. U.S. Seals Court Records Of Border Patrol’s Murder!-Posted on Judicial Watch-On November 30, 2011:

http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2011/nov/u-s-seals-court-records-border-patrol-s-murder

III. Cover-Up: Fast and Furious Documents Suddenly Sealed on Judge’s Orders!-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Doug Book-On November 23, 2011:

http://floydreports.com/cover-up-fast-and-furious-documents-suddenly-sealed-on-judges-orders/

IV. Armed illegals stalked Border Patrol: ‘Mexicans were ‘patrolling’ when agent was slain, indictment says!’-Posted on The Washington Times-On November 22, 2011:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/nov/22/armed-illegals-stalked-border-patrol/?page=all#pagebreak

V. Perry: Eric Holder must go: ‘Attorney general should resign or be fired’-Posted on The Washington Times-By Gov. Rick Perry-On November 21, 2011:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/nov/21/eric-holder-must-go/

VI. Bachmann first presidential candidate, 52nd member of Congress to demand Eric Holder’s resignation!-Posted on The Daily Caller-By Matthew Boyle, The Daily Caller-On November 19, 2011:

http://dailycaller.com/2011/11/19/bachmann-first-presidential-candidate-52nd-member-of-congress-to-demand-eric-holders-resignation/#ixzz1eI0QaSsS

VII. Are Rising Guns Sales Responsible for Declining Crime?-Posted on The Blaze-By Becket Adams-On December 1, 2011:

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/are-rising-gun-sales-responsible-for-declining-crime/

VIII. New Gun Company Advertisement Compares Obama to Hitler, Stalin!-Posted on CBS Washington-On December 1, 2011:

http://washington.cbslocal.com/2011/12/01/new-gun-company-advertisement-compares-obama-to-hitler-stalin/

IX. Liberty University OKs Concealed Guns on Campus!-Posted on Godfather Politics-By THE GODFATHER-On November 18, 2011:

http://godfatherpolitics.com/2121/liberty-university-oks-concealed-guns-on-campus/

X. Shooters Heard: Interior Will Not Ban Target Practice!-Posted on U.S. News-By Paul Bedard-On November 17, 2011:

http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/washington-whispers/2011/11/17/shooters-heard-interior-will-not-ban-target-practice

XI. Video: Stop Gun Control!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fUPDSpCcdg&feature=player_embedded

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Did ATF provide weapons to Mexican drug cartels that were subsequently used to kill one of our own?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/03/04/did-atf-provide-weapons-to-mexican-drug-cartels-that-were-subsequently-used-to-kill-one-of-our-own/

What is the true intent of the UN Small Arms Treaty?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/12/what-is-the-true-intent-of-the-un-small-arms-treaty/

New World Order By Executive Order!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/13/new-world-order-by-executive-order/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

Note: What follows is an article and/or blog post and a video (film) that exposes the real Newt Gingrich, to include who he serves by examining his actions and voting record-You Decide:

Globalist Candidate Gingrich Gets Influential Establishment Endorsement!-Posted on InfoWars-By Kurt Nimmo,
Infowars.com-On November 27, 2011:

http://www.infowars.com/globalist-candidate-gingrich-gets-influential-establishment-endorsement/

Video: The Real Newt Gingrich!-Posted on YouTube.com-By LentenlandsOn November 28, 2011:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EXVc1oxm_VQ&feature=related

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Dear Fellow Patriots:

What follows is a “must read” recently updated Obama Presidential Eligibility Introductory Primer, by Stephen Tonchen, which is different from and should not be confused with, the WorldNetDaily Obama Eligibility Primer.  The Tonchen Primer initially appeared on the Internet in June 2009, more than a year prior to the WND Primer-You Decide:

Obama Presidential Eligibility - An Introductory Primer!-Posted on PeoplesMag.net-By Stephen Tonchen-Revised on December 1, 2011:

These are pertinent excerpts from this primer:

“UPDATE (4/27/2011): Now that President Obama has released his long-form birth certificate, questions 31 through 34 in this Primer have become moot [91]. They are retained here for posterity purposes only. The other 33 questions and corresponding answers remain entirely unaffected. Those questions have acquired even greater importance and relevance, now that Obama’s newly-released long-form birth certificate has further substantiated his dual nationality at birth.

Introduction

The Philadelphia Convention adopted the U.S. Constitution on September 17, 1787 [01]. Anyone born after that date must be a natural born citizen in order to be eligible to serve as President of the United States [02].

What is a natural born citizen? Even if President Barack Obama is a U.S. citizen by birth, is he a U.S. natural born citizen?

According to an article which appeared in the Michigan Law Review in 2008, we know two things for sure about the meaning of “natural born citizen”:

• Anyone who is born in the United States, of parents who are U.S. citizens, is definitely, without doubt, a natural born citizen.
• Anyone who acquires U.S. citizenship through naturalization, after his or her birth, is definitely not a natural born citizen [03].

But what about a child born overseas to U.S.-citizen parents? And what about a U.S.-born child of an alien parent? These children are U.S. citizens by modern-day law. But are they natural born citizens? So far, Federal law, the Constitution and the courts have not answered these questions.

In 2004, Senator Don Nickles predicted that, if these questions remain unanswered, they will someday become “a real issue”:

The definition of this term [”natural born citizen”] is an issue that has been debated in legal circles for years and has never been ruled on by the courts. Clarification is needed before this becomes a real issue. (Nickles)

Senator Nickles’ prediction has come true.

Barack Obama—regardless of where he was born—acquired British/Kenyan citizenship (in addition to U.S. citizenship) at birth. His citizenship status, at birth, was “governed” by the British Nationality Act of 1948 (see Barack Obama’s “fight the smears” website). In light of these facts, an increasing number of Americans are concerned that President Obama might not be a “natural born citizen” and therefore might not be eligible, under the Constitution, to serve as president [04].

Members of the mainstream news media generally believe that all persons born in the United States are “natural born citizens”, regardless of their parents’ citizenship. Although this belief is widely held, the Supreme Court has never accepted it. On the contrary, our nation’s highest court has consistently used the term “natural born citizen” only in reference to persons born on U.S. soil, to U.S.-citizen parents.

In Scott v. Sandford (1856), the Supreme Court characterized, as unexceptionable (incapable of being criticized), the viewpoint that:

• “natural-born citizens are those born in the country of parents who are citizens” (Vattel, as quoted in the majority opinion in Scott v. Sandford, 1856)

In Minor v. Happersett (1874), the Supreme Court defined two classes of persons. One class consisted of U.S.-born children of U.S.-citizen parents. The second class consisted of all other U.S.-born children. Members of the first class were “natural born citizens”. Regarding members of the second class, the Court doubted whether they were even citizens, let alone natural born citizens. The Court distinguished “natural born citizens” from “aliens or foreigners”, suggesting that a “natural born citizen” is one who is not a “foreigner” (foreign citizen) at birth [05].

The United States has had 44 presidents (including Barack Obama). Of these 44 presidents, 34 were born after 1787 (the year the Constitution was adopted) and were therefore subject to the “natural born citizen” requirement. With only two exceptions, every one of these 34 presidents was born in the United States, of parents who were both U.S. citizens (Natural Born Presidency). The two exceptions were Chester Arthur and Barack Obama. While running for office in 1880, Chester Arthur lied to newspaper reporters about his family history (and later burned most of his family records), thereby concealing the fact that, when he was born, his father (William Arthur) was British subject, not a U.S. citizen (Historical Breakthrough - Chester Arthur).

President Obama’s “fight the smears” website, his published long-form birth certificate, and his autobiography identify his father as Barack Hussein Obama Sr., a Kenyan native who never became a U.S. citizen. President Obama is no longer a Kenyan citizen today, but when he was born, he received British/Kenyan citizenship by descent from his father (FactCheck.org: Does Barack Obama have Kenyan citizenship?). The year 2008 was the first time in history that the United States knowingly elected a post-1787-born president whose parents were not both U.S. citizens. Moreover, 2008 was the first time that the U.S. knowingly elected a post-1787-born president who was a foreign citizen (as well as a U.S. citizen) at the time of his birth [06].

Since President Obama acquired foreign nationality (in addition to U.S. citizenship) at birth, his “natural born citizen” status is in doubt [07]. This doubt is not based on the imaginings of tin-foil-hat-wearing conspiracy theorists on the lunatic fringe of society. This doubt comes from what the Supreme Court has said, as well as a variety of other historical and legal sources, which are presented and discussed here.

In the following pages, we introduce the Obama eligibility controversy, in question-and-answer format, for a non-technical general audience. We’ve double-checked the facts presented here, cited their sources, and believe them to be correct. Please contact us if you find any material in this Primer that you believe to be inaccurate.

Continue Reading:

http://people.mags.net/tonchen/birthers.htm

Question: When will Americans wake up?

On or about March 2, 2010, the following article and/or blog post revealed that Sarah P. Herlihy, an associate attorney specializing in litigation at the Chicago law firm Kirkland & Ellis LLP, which is a law firm with ties to Obama, published an essay in the Chicago-Kent Law review on February 22, 2006 entitled “Amending the Natural Born Citizen Requirement: Globalization as the Impetus and the Obstacle” that floated the idea of a “takeover” of our government by a foreign power. Herlihy’s essay was widely disseminated on the internet during the 2008 presidential campaign as rumors surfaced that Obama and possibly McCain did not meet the “natural born Citizen” requirement laid out in Article II, Section 1, paragraph 5 of the U.S. Constitution:

Was there a conspiracy to put Obama in the White House?-Posted on The Post & EMail-By Sharon Rondeau-On March 2, 2010:

http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/03/02/was-there-a-conspiracy-to-put-obama-in-the-white-house/ 

On or about June 12, 2011, the following article and/or blog post revealed overwhelming evidence that we in fact have a fraud and a usurper that resides in the people’s White House, despite the overt lack of journalistic investigating on the part of the American press. The new evidence indicates that the conspiracy to carry out that fraud was much broader than originally thought, which includes a forty-year story that requires a book, not a column, to tell because the evidence suggests that our President was being groomed from a very young age for the moment in history that would end American supremacy in the world, and usher in a new era of Global Marxist Governance:

The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!-Posted on The Post & Email-By JB Williams-On June 12, 2011:

http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/06/07/evidence-broadens-obama-natural-born-conspiracy/

On or about June 13, 2011, retired Maj. Gen. Paul Valley revealed that the “Certificate of Live Birth” that was released by the White House, on or about April 27, 2011, as “proof positive” of President Obama’s Hawaiian birth was a forgery, but that the FBI was covering the fraud and no one in Congress was willing to tackle the situation because of fears of a “black backlash,” if the failings of the nation’s first black president were revealed.

Source:

Ex-CIA: ‘Forged document’ released as birth certificate!-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On June 15, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=311433

Continue Reading:

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetrated-in-american-history/

Note:  25 U.S. Supreme Court Opinions That Defined “Natural Born Citizen” Were Sabotaged In The Run Up To The ’08 Presidential Election!

On or about October 20, 2011, Leo Donofrio, a New Jersey attorney who brought the first legal challenge to Barack Obama's occupancy in the Oval Office to the U.S. Supreme Court published a report that revealed that 25 U.S. Supreme Court Opinions that defined “Natural Born Citizen” were sabotaged in the run up to the ’08 Presidential Election.

Source:

25 U.S. Supreme Court Opinions That Defined “Natural Born Citizen” Were Sabotaged In The Run Up To The ’08 Presidential Election!-Posted on Natural Born Citizen-By Leo Donofrio, Esq.-On October 20, 2011:

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2011/10/20/justia-com-surgically-removed-minor-v-happersett-from-25-supreme-court-opinions-in-run-up-to-08-election/

On or about October 20, 2011, the following article and/or blog post revealed that someone had been incredibly busy in June 2008 working on an illegal front invisible to the public by searching and altering Supreme Court Cases published at Justia.com, which cite the only case in American history - Minor v. Happersett (1875) - to directly construe Article 2 Section 1’s natural-born citizen clause in determining a citizenship issue as part of its holding and precedent. In this unanimous decision, the Supreme Court defined a “native or natural-born citizen” as a person born in the US to parents who were both citizens, a definition that excludes President Obama from eligibility:

JustiaGate!-Posted on Examiner-By Dianna Cotter, Portland Civil Rights Examiner-On October 20, 2011:

http://www.examiner.com/civil-rights-in-portland/justiagate

On or about October 23, 2011, the following WND article and/or blog post revealed that Leo Donofrio, a New Jersey attorney who brought the first legal challenge to Barack Obama's occupancy in the Oval Office to the U.S. Supreme Court had published a report revealing that references to a U.S. Supreme Court decision addressing the definition of "natural-born citizen" were scrubbed at one of the key online resources for legal documents:

Eligibility rulings vanish from Net!-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On October 23, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=358645

Continue Reading:

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetrated-in-american-history/

Note:  Congressional Staff, to include a legislative attorney, within the Congressional Research Service (CRS) are attempting to redefine the eligibility clause in our Constitution as a means of convincing the American public that President Obama meets the eligibility requirements.

On or about November 14, 2011, it was also revealed that the Congressional Research Service (CRS), the research arm of Congress, has launched a defense of Barack Obama's presidential eligibility with a 50-page report that has been described as a "polemic aimed at convincing readers" Obama meets the requirements to be president:

Source:

Congressional staff gives Constitution new meaning: ‘Researchers target 'eligibility,' say 'native born' really is 'natural born!'-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On November 30, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=373085

Additionally, it was revealed that Jack Maskell, a legislative attorney with the Congressional Research Service (CRS), issued yet another in a series of reports on presidential eligibility that appears aimed at providing members of Congress with talking points to respond to constituents contending that Barack Hussein Obama is not a "natural born citizen" within the meaning of Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution, along with redefining the eligibility clause by equating "native born" with the constitutional "natural born" citizen:

Source:

Congressional ‘scholar’ shilling for Obama!-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On November 30, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=372977

Question:  Did a Pennsylvania District Court rule that President Obama was ineligible for Presidency in 2008 and ordered the DNC to withdraw him or is it just another distraction?

The following article and/or blog post seems to make that case-You Decide:

Pennsylvania District Court Ruled Obama ineligible for Presidency in 2008 and ordered DNC to withdraw him!-Posted on Press-By PC-On October 2, 2011:

http://presscore.ca/2011/?p=4615

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Was there a conspiracy to put Obama in the White House?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/03/03/was-there-a-conspiracy-to-put-obama-in-the-white-house-2/

The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetrated-in-american-history/

Could the President’s newly released COLB be a forgery?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/04/29/could-the-president’s-newly-released-colb-be-a-forgery/

Congress report concedes Obama eligibility unvetted!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/congress-report-concedes-obama-eligibility-unvetted/

DC knows that Obama is ineligible for office!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/27/dc-knows-that-obama-is-ineligible-for-office/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake