ACTION

               “Yeah really..........” Photo: AFP

President Obama and French President Nicolas Sarkozy are looking dumb after talking s*** about Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in front of a microphone that journalists weren't supposed to be plugged into (first rule of journalism: plug into anything a president tells you not to). According to the BBC, Sarkozy said "I can't stand him any more. He's a liar” and then Obama was like, "You're sick of him. I have to deal with him every day!" And then a journalist quietly said, “Yessss.”

What’s wrong with this picture?

Posted CBS Los Angeles-On November 7, 2011:

“SAN DIEGO (CBS) — A pair of Southland street cart vendors who were forced to shut down their businesses after “Occupy” protesters vandalized their carts are hoping to get some help from local residents.

KNX 1070′s Tom Reopelle reports a fundraiser in the Gas Lamp district in San Diego on Monday night is aimed at helping two vendors get back on their feet.

The coffee and hot dog carts were located in Civic Center Plaza, the same location as the Occupy San Diego protesters.

That group first settled in to the plaza Oct. 7 and set up a tent city which has since twice been taken down by police.

Coffee cart owner Linda Jenson and hot dog cart operators Letty and Pete Soto said they initially provided free food and drink to demonstrators, but when they stopped, the protesters became violent.

And according to one city councilman, bodily fluids were used in the attacks.

“Both carts have had items stolen, have had their covers vandalized with markings and graffiti, as well as one of the carts had urine and blood splattered on it,” said Councilman Carl DeMaio.

The damages will likely require at least a complete cleaning if not a replacement of the cart covers, DeMaio said.

In addition to the attacks, the vendors also said they recently received death threats.

Proceeds from the fundraiser will go directly to help the two business owners.

After a relatively peaceful start, the “Occupy” movement has sparked violent clashes with police in Oakland and recently saw protesters push an elderly woman down a flight of stairs in D.C.”

Source:

http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2011/11/07/socal-street-cart-vendors-hurting-after-occupy-group-splatters-blood-urine/

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. These are Obama’s Riots!

Posted on Godfather Politics-By THE GODFATHER-On November 5, 2011:

“We’ve seen social revolution before, but this is the first time a sitting president, his advisers, union supporters, and a supporting media have endorsed it with such vigor. Rudy Giuliani said it best: Obama owns Occupy Wall Street.” Here are his extended remarks:

“This is a very dangerous movement, and it’s ironic it’s happening under a president who promised to unify us. Barack Obama owns the Occupy Wall Street movement, it would not have happened but for his class warfare. . . . Barack Obama praised it, sympathizes with it. As it gets worse and worse, I believe this will be the millstone around Barack Obama’s neck that will take his presidency down.”

Irony has nothing to do with it. Obama’s goal has always been social disruption, class warfare, and institutionalized envy. The late 1960s and the early 1970s protestors hoped to bring down the government of the United States using the War in Vietnam as a catalyst. Obama and his supporters are using social and economic discontent to do the same thing.

The timeline and tactics are not new. They begin with the youngest members of society who have little to lose because they don’t any economic skin in the game. In the 1960s, Columbia University and other major universities were marked by student sit-ins. The catalyst for student rebellion that swept the nation in the tumultuous decade was the Berkeley “Free Speech Movement” (FSM). The FSM was decidedly anti-establishment, painting university personnel as “repressive autocrats lurking behind a benign mask of liberalism.”[1] Authority was questioned at every opportunity. The police were described as “pigs,” accomplices of the establishment rather than enforcers of the law that was supposed to apply to everyone without distinction.

The counter culture decade of the 1960s was described as the “decade of anger and rebellion.” While most channeled their anger in constructive ways, some went off the deep end and turned to violent measures. Sit-ins led to explosions when anti-war activists planted a fertilizer and fuel oil bomb at Sterling Hall, home of the University of Wisconsin’s Physics Department and the Army Math Research Center. The explosion killed a graduate student. Violence begat violence when four students were killed by National Guardsmen on the campus of Kent State University on May 4, 1970. Student protesters had set fire to an ROTC building and thrown bottles at police.

By the late 1960s and early 1970s, there was a resurgence of left-wing radicalism that led to further violence. On May 7, 1967, just weeks before the Newark riot, Greg Calvert, a member of Students for a Democratic Society, described its members as “post-communist revolutionaries” who “are working to build a guerrilla force in an urban environment. We are actively organizing sedition.”[2] The SDS was a growing radical movement made up of college students. The rhetoric of the SDS was at its core anti-government. “SDS organizers denounced ‘oppressors,’ ‘exploiters,’ and ‘the Al Capones who run this country.’ The university was depicted as a ‘colony’ of ‘the military-industrial complex’ and a ‘midwife to murder.’ ‘Imperialism’ was offered as a convenient scapegoat for every frustration and failure.”[3] A keynote speech at a 1962 SDS convention praised the freedom riders, not for furthering civil rights but for their “radicalizing” potential, their “clear-cut demonstration for the sterility of legalism.” The speaker continued:

It is not by . . . “learning the rules of the legislative game” that we will succeed in creating the kind of militant alliances that our struggle requires. We shall succeed through force—through the exertion of such pressure as will force our reluctant allies to accommodate to us, in their own interest.[4]

Tom Hayden, a former SDS organizer and strategist, member of the California General Assembly, and one-time husband of Jane Fonda, intoned the following in 1967: “Perhaps the only forms of action appropriate to the angry people are violent. Perhaps a small minority, by setting ablaze New York and Washington, could damage this country forever in the court of world opinion. Urban guerrillas are the only realistic alternative at this time to electoral politics or mass armed resistance.”[5]

Tom Hayden’s anti-government, revolutionary rhetoric bordered on the fringes of sedition and treason. His speech inflamed so many radical extremists that some blame him for agitating fragile race relations in Newark, New Jersey, causing nearly a week of rioting in the summer of 1967. While Hayden was not directly involved, he seemed to approve of using violence as a way of “shattering the status quo.” The August 24, 1967, issue of The New York Review of Books includes an article in which Hayden wrote:

The role of organized violence is now being carefully considered. During a riot, for instance, a conscious guerrilla can participate in pulling police away from the path of people engaged in attacking stores. He can create disorder in new areas the police think are secure. He can carry the torch, if not all the people, to white neighborhoods and downtown business districts. If necessary, he can successfully shoot to kill.

The guerrilla can employ violence effectively during times of apparent “peace,” too. He can attack, in the suburbs or slums, with paint or bullets, symbols of racial oppression.

These tactics of disorder will be defined by the authorities as criminal anarchy. But it may be that disruption will create possibilities of meaningful change. . . . Violence can contribute to shattering the status quo, but only politics and organization can transform it.[6]

Civil unrest and purposeful destruction of the nation’s infrastructure and authority institutions was the order of the day in the late 1960s. “On September 3, 1968, The New York Times reported that the city of Berkeley was declared to be in a state of civil disaster; the city authorities invoked emergency police powers, and the campus of the university was placed under curfew rules.[7]

Obama is hoping for social unrest. He and his Leftist cronies want more control of the economy. They want to bleed it for some larger purpose. I believe Obama is deliberately sabotaging the economy. He knows that tax cuts work and deficit spending is a fiscal drag on the economy. It’s hard for some to fathom, but I believe that Barack Obama has a long-held grudge against American ideals that he inherited from his anti-American parents and his radical friends who groomed him for the Senate and the presidency. The 1960s have been reborn in Barack Obama.

Notes:

1.     Stanley Rothman and S. Robert Lichter, Roots of Radicalism: Jews, Christians, and the New Left (New York: Oxford University Press, 1982), 18. [↩]

2.    New York Times (May 7, 1967). Quoted in Eugene H. Methvin, The Rise of Radicalism: The Social Psychology of Messianic Extremism (New Rochelle, NY: Arlington House, 1973), 497 and The  Riot Makers: The Technology of Social Demolition (New Rochelle, New York: Arlington House, 1970), 27. [↩]

3.    Methvin, Rise of Radicalism, 504. [↩]

4.    Thomas Kahn, “The Political Significance of the Freedom Riders,” in Mitchell Cohen and Dennis Hale, eds., The New Student Left (Boston, Massachusetts: Beacon Press, 1966), 59, 63. Quoted in Rothman and Lichter, Roots of Radicalism, 13. [↩]

5.     Quoted in Methvin, Rise of Radicalism, 505. [↩]

6.    Quoted in Riot Makers, 51. [↩]

7.     Feuer, The Conflict of Generations, 479. [↩]

Source:

http://godfatherpolitics.com/1882/these-are-obama’s-riots/

II. House Oversight Chairman Calls for Probe into ACORN Role in Occupy Wall Street!-Posted on FoxNews.com-By Jana Winter-On November 7, 2011:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/11/07/house-oversight-chair-calls-for-probe-into-acorn-occupy-wall-street/

III. ‘Vendetta’ Mask Becomes Symbol of Occupy Protests!-Posted on CNSNews.com-By TAMARA LUSH AND VERENA DOBNIK, Associated Press-On November 4, 2011:

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/vendetta-mask-becomes-symbol-occupy-protests

IV. Obama adviser urges 'militancy' in nationwide Occupy protests!-Posted on WND.com-By Aaron Klein-On November 4, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=363693

V. #OccupyOakland Teachers Gone Wild!-Posted on Big Government-By Kyle Olson-On November 4, 2011:

http://biggovernment.com/kolson/2011/11/04/occupyoakland-teachers-gone-wild/

VI. ACORN Officials Scramble, Firing Workers and Shredding Documents, After Exposed as Players Behind Occupy Wall Street Protests!-Posted on FoxNews.com-By Jana Winter-On November 03, 2011:

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/11/03/acorn-officials-scramble-firing-workers-and-shredding-documents-after-exposed/

VII. Is the Tide Turning for OWS? ‘Local residents abandon political sympathies in favor of law and order!’-Posted on National Review Online-By CHARLES C. W. COOKE-On November 3, 2011:

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/282179/tide-turning-ows-charles-c-w-cooke

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Is President Obama inciting riots across the US?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/23/is-president-obama-inciting-riots-across-the-us/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

NOTE: PLEASE SUPPORT THE CAUSE TO TAKE OUR COUNTRY BACK!

The following website and video provide you with the details on how you can participate in and/or help the cause-You Decide:

Veteran Defenders of America’s Declaration To Restore The Constitutional Republic!

http://www.veterandefenders.org/

Video: Declaration to Restore the Republic!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=MYycZOCJv4k#

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

     I hear a great many people complain that the nation's political system is too polarized. They say that as if Congress existed in a vacuum rather than as a reflection of the electorate. If the middle-of-the-road is hard to find, it's because the right and the left are on completely different highways.

     The Conservative Flyer leaves Union Station at 0800 traveling south at 45mph on track 9. The Liberal Express pulls out of the same station 15 minutes later going west at 65mph on track 7. At what time will both trains arrive at the Tropic of Capricorn? The answer is: the same time a consensus is reached on debts and spending.

     The truth is Americans have very different ideas about where the country is and where it ought to be going. Those differences are nearing the point of being irreconcilable. It has happened before. The question is, what happens this time? A peaceful, no-fault divorce is the contemporary thing to do. But, is liberal America open minded enough to "let the erring sisters depart in peace?" I doubt it. If they were they wouldn't think of representing themselves as the 99%. Conservatives are not simply the unconverted. We are the opposition. We are committed to our vision for the country.

     Jefferson was speaking of human nature not spouting political theory when he wrote:

     "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."

     Will history repeat itself? Time will tell.

Contact P Toniah Gray via freedombaby@tampabay.rr.com

Herman Cain has a bulls-eye on his back. In the center is a red circle that reads "I am for limited government." The innermost ring says, "I am a black Conservative Republican." And the outermost ring, the biggest, most visible, and most irritating to the Left says, "I am pro-life." Yes, Herman Cain is targeted for destruction because he opposes the wanton killing of unborn babies.

It has been within the last month that Herman Cain made a number of statements clarifying his stance on abortion. He didn't waffle or dance towards the middle. He was clear in his unapologetic pro-life positions. He is a champion for the unborn, a champion for life. The bulls-eye on Cain's back is made even larger by the fact that he is a devout and practicing Christian. It must have irked the Left to the core when he sang "Amazing Grace" at the National Press Club.  

The attack on Cain from his enemies, who are numerous, is to be expected. The GOP establishment dislikes limited-government Tea Party Conservatives. Liberals fear Black Conservatives. But today, when Gloria Allred reared her pro-abortion advocate head, the true mastermind behind the unsubstantiated accusations of sexual harassment against Cain was betrayed. Gloria Allred has made her career defending Liberal, pro-abortion women. She arrives on the scene predictably when "reproductive rights," aka killing babies, is at issue, or if there is a Conservative, pro-life politically or culturally significant individual that must be destroyed in the name of protecting the Left's Holy Scripture, Roe vs. Wade. Gloria Allred is the point man in the campaign to eliminate the threat of Herman Cain. The pro-abortion Left hates Herman Cain more deeply, more savagely, than any other group in American politics. And they hate him precisely because he opposes their darling cause; abortion on demand. 

Abortion on demand, and a Black, Christian, Pro-life POTUS, are simply incompatible in the pea brains of Liberals. Herman Cain defies all of the stereotypes contained in the Liberal fantasy that says they support the interests of the Black Community. They purport to value Black families and pretend to want the best for the children. The truth is that, while Blacks in America make up less than 13% of the overall population, 30% of all abortions are performed on Black mothers. Thanks to the Left, unborn Black babies are killed at a rate 3 times that of the rest of the population. Herman Cain is not just a threat to their agenda and stereotypes, he is a threat to their most beloved and defended issue; abortion for any reason, at any time a woman may deem appropriate. And as a Black man, he has a personal interest advocating for life.

Herman Cain must be defended against the relentless and brutal attacks on his record, his character, and his basic goodness. What is more effective and irrefutable than to destroy an individual through rumor and hearsay? Even when no evidence exists, an onslaught of defamation, if it goes on and on, will harm the image of an individual in the eyes of the public. This is their plan. It is vicious, it is based on a lie, and it has been devised by those who fear Herman Cain because of he is Black, Christian, Conservative, and opposed to killing babies for any reason at any time Gloria Allred may deem appropriate. 

We need to support Herman Cain. The future of this decent man, and the future of the Republic hangs on our ability to stand against the evil forces that want him out of the picture of American politics.

Quote of the Day: "A constitution is not the act of a government, but

of a people constituting a government; and government without a

constitution is power without a right. All power exercised over a

nation, must have some beginning. It must be either delegated, or

assumed. There are not other sources. All delegated power is trust,

and all assumed power is usurpation. Time does not alter the nature

and quality of either." -- Thomas Paine (1737-1809)

The government is making you poor, and making you more poor, still as time

passes by. That's because congress is negotiating

with the White House, on how to make YOU pay high taxes, forever. If not

through higher rates, than through an even more pernicious means...

INFLATION.  The deficit makes you poorer. Read that last sentence again,

it's that important. And then ponder this FACT...

Both Democrats and Republicans want to add trillions of dollars to the

national debt. They only disagree about how many trillions, and when

we should schedule the next "debt limit" crisis.

Have you had enough? Or do you think we need Democrat tax rate hikes

or tax by inflation instead?

Do you believe we need...

* a smaller government

* a balanced budget

* and a strong economy

...ASAP?

These can ALL be achieved if Congress simply refuses to raise the debt

limit. They don't even need to schedule a vote! That's why I sent this letter

to Congress using DownsizeDC.org's "Cap the Debt" campaign.

You may borrow from or copy this sample letter...

I believe government is too big and too costly. Capping the debt limit

where it already is will force government to become smaller.

But there's another big reason why you must stop running budget

deficits. The more Congress spends, the weaker my saved dollars

become. This means I have to pay higher prices. It wipes out my

savings. Deficits make me poorer!

Economist Christopher Lingle explains why this will happen.

http://www.thefreemanonline.org/headline/the-threat-is-in-the-spending/

In the second round of Quantitative Easing (QE2) beginning in

November, 2010 . . .

* the Federal Reserve created money out of thin air

* and used it to buy a whopping 85% of all government debt sold by the

Treasury

In other words, your record-setting deficits aren't being financed

through purchases of bonds by you and me, or even by China. Those

dollars are being created out of thin air.

That means the value of those dollars falls, and then prices go up.

The Consumer Price Index may not yet reveal it, but Americans see

prices going up in the grocery aisles.

Your deficit spending is being done through monetary inflation on the

backs of the poor, the elderly on fixed incomes, and even the middle

class you so claim to love.

Moreover, inflation . . .

* Creates uncertainty about future price increases...

* Leading investors to purchase assets and commodities as a hedge

against inflation...

* Instead of investing in new enterprises and business expansion...

* Which means stagnant growth, high unemployment, and depressed wages.

In other words, there is a direct relationship between inflation on

the one hand, and slow economic growth and persistently high

unemployment, on the other. Both are the fault of a Congress that

refuses to make real, dramatic spending cuts. But the leadership of

BOTH parties continues to sell Alice in Wonderland economics. They

would have us believe that all this deficit spending is good for us.

Yet as Lingle points out, another increase in the debt limit will most

likely mean a "QE3" where the Fed will create even more money to

purchase even more federal debt.

Here's what's needed, NOW: A balanced budget. It will bring stability

to the dollar's value. Stability will lead to a greater sense of

certainty for investors and businesses, which will spur new investment

and create jobs.

Stop inflation now. Stop deficits now. Do NOT increase the debt limit!

And demonstrate political courage -- make the cuts.

Because of 'We the People' having demonstrated our power of  RELENTLESS PRESSURE upon

Congress, more and more Democrats realize the U.S. is on an unsustainable path

and that reforms must be implemented NOW instead of putting them off any longer.

The vote was good news, but this is only the beginning of the fight.

WE ARE HOLDING THE LINE . . .

NO increase on the debt ceiling.

Unless you tell your Representative and Senators where you stand, they

may be tempted to cut a deal which will raise the debt limit while

making only symbolic and marginal spending cuts.

Both Democrats and Republicans need to learn from history,

particularly the Democratic Truman Administration. That's why I sent

this letter to Congress, from which you may borrow or copy . . .

I understand the concern you have about making the drastic spending

cuts necessary to balance the budget and maintain the current debt

ceiling.

However, the last time the national debt was this high relative to

Gross Domestic Product (GDP) was at the end of World War II.

Economists Jason E. Taylor and Richard K. Vedder tell us what a

Democratic-controlled White House and Congress did to the budget after

World War II. They . . .

* slashed spending by more than 50% in one year

* removed ten million servicemen and one million civilian employees

from the federal payroll

* lifted wartime economic controls, AS WELL AS many New Deal era

regulations/Instead of a new Depression, the opposite occurred . . .

* The economy grew by 10% in two years

* Unemployment was under 4.5% in the first three postwar years

* By 1947, budget surpluses reached 6% of GDP, and the U.S. started

paying down the debt

This isn't surprising. It makes economic sense . . .

* More money is available for capital investment and economic growth,

when government spends, taxes, and borrows less.

* It is less expensive to hire new workers, when regulations are reduced.

PLEASE DO NOW, WHAT CONGRESS DID THEN:

1. End the wars, cancel defense contracts, and bring the troops home.

2.Cut spending to balance the budget, AND lift regulations that strangle the economy.

3.Follow the 1946, Truman formula, and America will adapt quickly to a

more free and more prosperous reality. 

For 25 years, I’d been a successful go-between for independent lumber mills and retail lumber yards. I was a successful entrepreneur. Unfortunately, before Nixon left office he established price controls favoring a few corporate giants in the lumber industry. Thousands of independents were put out of business. 

Government was responsible for the double digit inflation—called stagflation—that put me out of business.  People couldn’t afford 15 percent interest rates on home mortgages. My business depended on homes being built.

Congress has the constitutional authority to regulate commerce, but no authority to control the economy. It is an assumed authority with an ulterior motive.   American’s politicians are playing a shell game, the motive of which is to divide and conquer.  The free enterprise system that gave me the opportunity to build a successful business, destroyed by price controls and stagflation, America’s political maneuver aimed at turning the nation into a collectivist autocracy, this colossal fraud and the American people’s passivity has wrecked America’s free enterprise system.

  West Va. State Board of Education v. Barnette:

The very purpose of the Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and  officials and establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts. One’s right to life, liberty, and property. . . and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections.

The above Court decision was written by Justice Jackson.  Jackson was one of the judges at the Nuremburg trials in Germany after World War II.  The Nazis on trial claimed they were following German law. Likewise America’s politicians, who have invented an income tax (now 3,000,000 words long), the aim being to redistribute the nation’s wealth, the motive to buy votes with our money, falsely claim to be following the law. “One’s right to life, liberty, and property and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections.”  The Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution to stop politicians from doing exactly what they are doing, I might add, with the leftist press’ overwhelming approval.

I heard Chief Justice Black say that the Constitution was what he said it was.  The Supreme Court, by decree, is America’s super legislature.  I say to hell with that.   

I’d not spent one day in law school. I knew the law, not how to get around it. I was not about to allow Nazi law to prevail in America without a fight.

If I have a personal stake in the outcome, I am permitted to take the Commissioner of Internal Revenue to court. What did Moses do to free his people? He went to the highest authority. I’d written Attorney General William B. Saxbe a letter letting him know that I believed federal income tax was unconstitutional—as it applied to me—and that I’d see him in court. Prior to my letter, I had read law professor Edward S. Corwin’s The “Higher Law” Background of American Constitutional Law, incidentally, published in 1925, the year of my birth.  In the year of my birth, also, Congress authorized the IRS to examine personal records for income tax purposes. Little did the American people know what that meant in 1925.  At the time, only the rich paid income tax. Live and learn.

America’s unscrupulous press set me up. I was on a nutcake rant, one of those “spurious constitutional objectors” judges talked about, and you read about in the newspaper. I was an illegal tax protester. What you didn’t read was that I was acting under the law.

Saxbe, the IRS’ lawyer, forwarded my letter to the IRS.  With the authority to examine this illegal tax protester’s personal records, the IRS, simply because I wrote the Attorney General a letter, in violation of my constitutional right to be secure in my possessions, which prohibited unreasonable searches and seizures—Amendment IV—a federal autocrat trespassed my Fourth Amendment right. Be informed that the word legal is merely the form of law. Hitler was legal. An IRS agent legally entered this illegal tax protester’s home, unconstitutionally, and spent a week going through my personal records. The motive was to intimidate. Without showing me any of the notes he took, and without comment, other than to notify me that I failed to report $5,000 of taxable income, the IRS departed.  The IRS called to set up an appointment. I told the IRS to go straight to hell.  If you think things were going to go very badly for me you are wrong.  Things went very badly for the IRS.  I had the law. The IRS hung itself with its own rope.

Ostensibly, in an effort to spur growth and hiring, but actually putting off on tomorrow’s taxpayers an enormous debt, President Obama, Congress, and the Federal Reserve have flooded the economy with monopoly money—no way to help the economy. Unemployment rates refuse to dip below their current levels of around 9.1, while inflation pressures and other harmful side effects of such corrupt policies are becoming more and more threatening. The above named are actually bent on controlling the economy, thus the American people. The egomaniacs the American people elect, the same as Hitler, Stalin, and Mao, feel that they know what is best for America,

The founding fathers named U.S. currency after a Spanish-milled dollar, which represented 371.25 grains of pure silver, and placed protecting its value a congressional responsibility. The above named frauds have no authority to deliberately devalue the dollar through inflation. Protectionism, tax increases, attacking the free enterprise system, in the courts and through regulations, creating a climate of uncertainty, these were the very ways birds-of-feather created the Great Depression. Get ready for a depression that will make the Great Depression look like prosperity.