THEY HAVE TRIED TO DEVIDE US, TODAY UNDER THE DEMOCRATS WE WOOD LOSE THAT WAR, BECAUSE OF THE DEMOCRATS. THE TRUTH HURTS WE ARE REALLY LOSEING THE WAR WERE IN NOW.
All Posts (28256)
Sort by
<This bears repost>
Banned by a stroke of Barack Obama’s pen.
In a move unprecedented in American history, the Obama Administration quietly banned the re-importation of nearly one million American made M1 Garand and Carbine rifles.
The M1 Garand, developed in the late 1930’s, carried the United States through World War II seeing action in every major battle.
General Patton at the time called the M1 Garand “the greatest battle implement ever devised.”
The rifle is largely credited with giving American soldiers the advantage and securing victory for the allies.
During the Korean War, nearly one million of these rifles were brought to South Korea and left with the South Korean government afterward.
Now, South Korea wants to give American gun collectors the chance to get their hands on this unique piece of history.
A piece of American history that Barack Obama would like to see go down the memory hole.
After War II, the United States government sent millions of these rifles overseas to our allies and friends.
Over the past 50 years, many of the countries we lent them to returned them to America to be bought and sold by firearms collectors. This is nothing new.
Make no mistake; these rifles were made in America, by Americans, for Americans, to defend freedom on foreign shores.
As a part of our history, they are greatly sought after by American shooters and collectors.
But according to Hillary Clinton’s State Department there is a danger they might “fall into the wrong hands.”
That they might, possibly, one day be used in a crime.
No mention of the hundreds of thousands of gun owners deprived of the opportunity to own an integral part of American history.
The State Department’s outrageous claims are nothing more than a thinly veiled ploy to distract from the real issue:
President Obama’s deep seated hatred for gun rights.
While his gun-grabbing base is giddy with praise at this back-door gun ban, law-abiding citizens across the United States are crying foul.
Let me be clear: at no time in U.S. history has the ownership of this firearm -- or any part of this firearm -- been illegal, restricted or banned.
Americans have collected World War II M1 Garand and Carbine rifles for decades.
Now they are sold through the Civilian Marksmanship Program.
You can even purchase a newly manufactured model from Springfield Armory that was made just a month or two ago.
And the M1 Garand’s caliber or capacity is no more dangerous than the millions of modern firearms owned by Americans across the country today.
As you can see, there is absolutely no justification for this unconstitutional gun ban. This is just the latest in a series of anti-gun schemes from the Obama Administration:
*** New BATFE regulations on semi-automatic rifles, requiring firearms dealers to act as an informant to anti-gun federal bureacrats if someone buys more than one rifle;
*** The Disarming American Citizens Act (H.R. 2159 in the last Congress) letting Attorney General Eric Holder revoke the Second Amendment rights of ANY American he chooses based on pure suspicion;
*** Notorious anti-gunners appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court and other senior administration positions;
That’s why it is essential that Americans like you and I take a stand against the M1 Garand gun ban!
It has been common practice since the end of World War II to re-import these American made rifles from the foreign allies they were lent to during the war.
But the Obama Administration departs radically from the American tradition.
In fact, on top of banning American citizens from owning these historic firearms, Obama’s State Department is arranging for the destruction of nearly one million of them -- ironically, at a time of ballooning federal deficits.It’s an outrage!
These firearms -- truly pieces of American history -- rightly belong in the hands of U.S. citizens.
That’s why I was glad to hear that the National Association for Gun Rights is helping fight this power grab in the U.S. Senate.
Do you believe the U.S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the Second Amendment are the supreme law of the land?
Do you believe that President Obama banning the re-importation of these historic firearms is an unprecedented and unconstitutional power grab?
Let Government Brainwash Tots (LGBT)
By Karl Priest 7 December 2011
In my book (see below) I disclose the sneaky tactics used by homosexuals to incorporate their agenda into the minds of public school students. They are relentless and our taxes are being used to help them.
At http://www.stopbullying.gov/ there are three main features:
Cyberbullying, Webisodes for Kids, and LGBT with a rainbow button over the caption:
“If you experience bullying or violence because you are lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender (LGBT) youth, or others think you are, there are resources available to help you.”
The “Resources and References” (http://www.stopbullying.gov/references/online_resources/index.html) for the entire site—not under the LGBT button feature the LGBT category. Of 24 sources, 7 (29%) are LGBT. The LGBT page has a sidebar with more resources including a message from Resident B. Obama.
Even though diversions such as “cyber bullying” are thrown in only someone educated in the public school system cannot see that this government site is devoted to perverted sexual lifestyles.
From Protester Voices—The 1974 Textbook Tea Party. pgs.329-330
Near the end of my career, I attended a Faculty Senate session for training in prevention of student bullying. The session was promoted by the office of the West Virginia Attorney General. An Attorney General’s office staff member was present to assist in conducting the meeting. The school principal had recruited the two faculty sponsors of the FCA as the teacher liaisons for the anti-bullying policy. The two teachers were unaware of what was under way. Early in the meeting it became obvious that the goal was to promote homosexuality. I created somewhat of a stir by pointing out the absurdity of deviant sexual behavior being considered normal. Soon thereafter, the two sponsors resigned from leading the program and the West Virginia Family Foundation fought the slick attempts to place this agenda in schools statewide. I cannot say for sure that there was a connection, but the West Virginia Attorney General cooperated with an evolutionist extremist in an attempt to have me arrested (http://www.insectman.us/testimony/henke.htm) a few years later.
Incidents like that stealth Faculty Senate meeting are not going to be noticed by parents. It is impossible for parents to monitor what is happening in the public schools. In fact, the word “public” is not appropriate for describing the schools. They are “government” schools and they are doing a great job of instituting the government’s ungodly educational goals.
OORAH!!!
Posted on FoxNews.com-By Eric Shawn-On December 7, 2011:
“Charity Rorie, a mother of four, sat in her Mishawaka, Ind., kitchen, stunned that her name appeared on a 2008 Democratic presidential primary petition for then-candidate Barack Obama.
“That’s not my signature,” she told Fox News, saying her signature is “absolutely” a fake. She also said she was troubled someone forged both her signature and that of her husband, Jeff, and listed personal details such as their address and birthdays.
“It’s scary,” Rorie said. “It’s shocking. It definitely is illegal. A lot of people have already lost faith in politics and the whole realm of politics, so that just solidifies all of our worries and concerns.”
Robert Hunter Jr. said his name was faked, too.
“I did not sign for Barack Obama,” he told Fox News, adding his signature supporting the then-Illinois senator’s effort to get on the primary ballot was also a forgery.
As he examined the Obama petition he held in his hands, Hunter pointed out that “I always put ‘Junior’ after my name, every time ... there’s no ‘Junior’ there.” He said the signature on the petition looks “very close” to his real one, but it clearly is not.
“My wife and I actually signed a petition for Hillary Clinton,” he said. “I am an Obama fan, but not in the primaries I wasn’t.”
The prospect that theirs are two of an estimated 150 signatures that may have been forged on the petitions has raised the question of whether President Obama actually reached the legitimate number of signatures needed to be placed on the ballot in Indiana. Under state law, presidential candidates need to file 500 signatures from each of the state’s nine congressional districts. Indiana election officials say that in St. Joseph County, the Obama campaign qualified with 534 signatures; Clinton’s camp had 704. The certified signatures were never challenged.
“I had always thought that, now-President Obama, had earned his victory in Indiana,” said the state’s Republican chairman, Eric Holcomb. “But then I quickly learned that he had cheated his way on to the ballot in the primary.”
The allegations that election fraud touched a race for the highest office in the land are at the center of an investigation by St. Joseph County Attorney Michael Dvorak. He would not comment, but sources say the probe is gaining steam as prosecutors delve into the petitions that sailed through the St. Joseph County Voter Registration Board, located in South Bend. There have been reports that as many as seven people may have been involved in an alleged conspiracy to fake the petitions.
“I was very surprised,” said the newly elected Democratic chairman of St. Joseph County, State Sen. John Broden. “This is a bipartisan issue that we need to take a look at ... so I hope that this is something, that we as both parties, try to look at what exactly happened, and most importantly, how do we prevent it from happening again.”
Broden recently replaced long-serving Democratic Chairman Butch Morgan, who resigned suddenly in October under party pressure because of the scandal.
“There is no evidence that Butch Morgan ever personally directed, authorized or condoned the forging or alteration of petition signatures,” said his attorney, Shaw Friedman, who argued against the resignation. He said Morgan did “absolutely not” forge any signatures, or know who might have.
“This is a man who has worked mightily over the 20 years that he served as district chairman, to do so fairly, ethically, appropriately, and my concern was that he not leave under these circumstances,” Friedman told Fox News.
He called the alleged forgeries “a sloppy, amateurish effort, ordinarily that kind of thing would have been caught by the voter registration offices. I’m not quite sure here why it slipped through.”
St. Joseph County Board of Voter Registration worker Dustin Blythe has reportedly been identified as having handwriting that matches the writing on some of the suspect Obama petitions. The South Bend Tribune and the political newsletter Howey Politics Indiana hired a handwriting analyst who examined the documents and says Blythe’s writing can be found on “nine suspicious pages from the Obama petition,” according to the newspaper.
Blythe, 37, works at one of the desks in the Board office. When Fox News asked if he forged any signatures or faked any petitions, he repeatedly replied, “I don’t have anything to say.”
Blythe’s LinkedIn profile describes him as a “government employee” who is also an “independent contractor/volunteer at Indiana Democratic Party” and a St. Joseph County Democratic Party “volunteer.” His Facebook page includes a photograph of him taken with former Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards.
Blythe’s lawyer, Andre Gammage, has said that his client did not do anything wrong. He told Fox News that handwriting comparisons don’t mean anything.
“Handwriting is not the same as DNA, handwriting is not the same thing as fingerprints,” Gammage said.
Authorities would not comment about any aspect of the ongoing investigation, including any possible targets of the probe.
Gammage said the accusations have “been difficult for Dustin. Dustin is a hardworking individual who has been trying to do the job the best he can in St. Joe county. It’s been tough for him and his family to be under this kind of negative scrutiny.”
That scrutiny has prompted Indiana election officials to review the procedures for authorizing presidential primary petitions.
“Unfortunately, it appears that we have an appearance of a widespread, systematic organized effort by Democrat operatives to cheat the system by forging names of, especially Democrat voters, to put Barack Obama on the presidential ballot for the Democratic presidential primary in 2008,” charged Indiana Secretary of State Charlie White, who is a Republican.
White is proposing that presidential petitions be posted online on the Indiana secretary of state’s website, www.sos.in.gov, for all to see.
“I think by shining a light on this problem and putting in on the Internet, I have a strong suspicion that this isn’t going to happen anymore in Indiana, especially on my watch.”
White has had his share of alleged voter fraud troubles himself: he faces felony charges for allegedly having registered to vote at his ex-wife’s residence. He denies any wrongdoing and is awaiting trial.
He says the integrity and honesty of the electoral process must be protected.
“The main thing here is to make sure that we maintain choices for all voters, Republicans and Democrats in the primary, and that we make sure that voters continue to trust the system and that their vote still counts,” White said. He calls the alleged signature forgeries “an awfully bold action to take. I sure hope it only happened in 2008.”
Broden, the local Democratic chairman, thinks that there should be new measures instituted to ensure that signatures being gathered now for the 2012 presidential election are legitimate. He proposes having petition gatherers initial the sheets, and having officials undertake random audits to confirm that the signatures are real.
“We are doing everything we can to fully cooperate with the state police investigation and we will do everything we can to make sure that the investigation gets to the bottom of all of the facts,” Broden insists.
Brian Howey, a veteran political reporter, runs the non-partisan political newsletter Howey Politics Indiana, which broke the story with the Tribune.
“Somebody tried to pull a fast one,” Howey said.
“In one case there were 18 consecutive pages where it looked like there was one or two handwriting. Were these low-level functionaries that decided to tamper with the process, or was this something that was ordered from a higher level?”
The state’s Republican chairman seems to have no doubt.
“This is the Chicago way and it will not be tolerated in the state of Indiana,” Holcomb said. “I would tell my friends across the country that they have to be on the lookout as well, because it’s just fact that some folks will do anything to try and win an election.”
The chairman of the Indiana State Democratic Party, Dan Parker, was not available for an interview. He issued a statement in October saying that the Democrats “continue to support the ongoing investigation to determine how this isolated incident occurred and hold anyone involved accountable.”
But voters like Charity Rorie say they feel victimized and are fearful of the message that the scandal sends across the country.
“We have a generation that’s behind us who is not very faithful in making sure that they vote,” she lamented. “I think this isn’t going to help the situation.
“I think that if we need to continue with our children the way that America is supposed to work, then I think it needs to be done correctly.”
- If you suspect voter fraud or election problems where you live, write us at: voterfraud@foxnews.com.
Source:
Note: The following articles and/or blog posts relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
I. Did Obama Submit Phony Ballot Petitions in 2008?-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Ben Johnson-On October 13, 2011:
http://floydreports.com/election-fraud-watch-did-obama-submit-phony-ballot-petitions-in-2008/
II. Suspicious petitions got a stamped signature: ‘Former Gov. Kernan, 12 others come forward to say they didn’t sign!’-Posted on South Bend Tribune-By ERIN BLASKO, South Bend Tribune Staff Writer-On October 12, 2011:
III. Liberty Legal Foundation serves DNC with Obama eligibility complaint!-Posted on Examiner-By Linda Bentley, Maricopa County Crime Examiner-On December 7, 2011:
IV. Obama's ties with voter fraud!-Posted on OneNewsNow.com-By Russ Jones, OneNewsNow-On December 1, 2011:
http://www.onenewsnow.com/Politics/Default.aspx?id=1487470
V. 3rd state facing challenge over Obama eligibility: ‘Alabama complaint alleges, 'We're now talking of fraud!'-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On December 1, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=373301
VI. Washington Post misleads on meaning of NATURAL Born Citizen!-Posted on ObamaStateBallotChallenge.com-By Mario Apuzzo, Esq.-On December 6, 2011:
http://obamaballotchallenge.com/washington-post-misleads-on-meaning-of-natural-born-citizen
Note: My following blog post contains numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
Massive Voter Fraud-Again!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/25/massive-voter-fraud-again/
The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetrated-in-american-history/
Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?
Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial. Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.
“Food For Thought”
God Bless the U.S.A.!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related
Semper Fi!
Jake
Dear Fellow Patriots:
What follows is a letter that I recently forwarded to our NM U.S. Senator Udall and Congressman Heinrich regarding Congressional Insider Trading & Land Grab Movement (Agenda 21):
December 7, 2011
The Honorable Tom Udall
United States Senate
110 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510-3101
Congressman Martin Heinrich
Capitol Office
336 Cannon HOB
Washington, D.C. 20515
Phone: (202) 225-6316
Fax: (202) 225-4975
Dear Senator Udal/Congressman Heinrich:
I am writing to inform you that I have become extremely concerned about the supposedly legal, but questionable insider stock market trading by some of our elected officials in Congress, which occurred in the days leading up to the 2008 economic crash and seem to continue to this date.
The reasons for my concerns are as follows:
On or about March 5, 2011, there was an article published by Nancy Morgan, a columnist and news editor, that revealed that after two full years following the 2008 economic crash a Pentagon contractor had finally issued a report on the series of events that led to the crash. The report suggested that financial subversion was carried out by unknown parties, such as terrorists or hostile nations, which contributed to the crash by covertly using vulnerabilities in the U.S. financial system and that “there was sufficient justification to question whether outside forces triggered, capitalized upon or magnified the economic difficulties of 2008.”
What follows are pertinent excerpts from this article:
“Notable for its absence is any suggestion that the economic events that arguably catapulted Obama into the White House may have originated in our own political system.
Consider: The economic house of cards started tumbling on June 26, 2008, when Senator Chuck Schumer leaked a memo questioning the solvency of IndyMac bank. This memo precipitated a run on IndyMac, which led to its failure. Federal regulators pointedly cited U.S. Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., in explaining the bank's failure.
"The immediate cause of the closing was a deposit run that began and continued after the public release of a June 26 letter to the OTS and the FDIC from Senator Charles Schumer of New York."
As I wrote in February of 2009, this event, coupled with the Lehman Brothers collapse in September, marked the beginning of the current economic meltdown and provided the environment that enabled Barack Obama to focus on the economy instead of his position on Iraq - and, not incidentally, resulted in his election as President.
For the last two years, the media has neglected to connect the dots regarding the strange gyrations in our financial markets that started in the summer of 2008. After Schumer caused the run on IndyMac in June, the government moved in:
July 12, 2008: The federal government takes control of the $32 billion IndyMac Bank. *
* Six months later, Jan 2, 2009, a seven-member group of investors agreed to buy the remnants of failed lender IndyMac for $13.9 billion. Other investors included a fund controlled by billionaire George Soros' Fund Management.
Sept. 6, 2008: Fannie Mae begins its downward spiral, which will end with a crash in November. This crash was avoidable, as the problems with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were identified in June of 2006, when 15 Republicans on the Senate Banking Committee introduced legislation to address the problem. Democrats, led by Barney Frank, killed the reform efforts.
Sept. 15, 2008: Obama and McCain are virtually tied in their race for the presidency. Out of no-where, in the space of less than 2 hours, the Federal Reserve noticed a tremendous drawdown of money market accounts in the U.S. to the tune of $550 billion. Rep. Paul Kanjorski of Pennsylvania said that if authorities had not closed the banks, $5.5 trillion would have been withdrawn from US banks, which would have caused the collapse of the US within 24 hours.
This seminal event marked the ascendancy of Obama's candidacy, and arguably resulted in his election as president.
Fast forward to February of 2009:
The markets reacted to Obama's proposal to bail-out mortgages and Senator Christopher Dodd's talk of nationalizing banks by reaching 11-year lows.
Obama continues to stoke the fears of imminent crisis, actually using the word 'crisis' a total of 26 times in one speech.
Enter George Soros. The infamous one-worlder, billionaire George Soros adds his voice to the media doomsayers by opining that the world financial system has effectively disintegrated, adding that there is yet no prospect of near-term resolution to the crisis.*
The series of 'inadvertent errors', deliberate obstruction, political shenanigans, behind the scenes manipulation of the money markets and non-stop calls for immediate infusions of taxpayer cash brought the U.S. to its knees by February 2009. And continues to this day.
The newly issued Pentagon report, along with the media and our elected officials, seem intent on not connecting the dots, considering only foreign enemies as the possible cause of the financial meltdown:
Suspects include financial enemies in Middle Eastern states, Islamic terrorists, hostile members of the Chinese military, or government and organized crime groups in Russia, Venezuela or Iran. Chinese military officials.
This author believes there is enough information to at least consider that this crisis was manufactured for political gain. Right here at home.”
Source:
Was the Economic Crisis Manufactured?-Posted on American Thinker-By Nancy Morgan-On March 5, 2011:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/03/was_the_economic_crisis_manufa.html
What crossed my mind when I initially read the above article was that it had to be another conspiracy theory because I couldn’t imagine that any individual and/or individuals within our own government would be that corrupt, unethical and heartless to either allow and/or do anything that would contribute to an economic crash that literally destroyed so many American’s lives, but much to my dismay, I discovered that it was no conspiracy theory when I read a CBS News Report that was published on November 13, 2011, along with viewing a CBS 60 Minutes broadcast that aired on November 14, 2011, that revealed that in the days leading up to the 2008 economic crash some of our elected officials in Congress had made a variety of insider stock trades, which ultimately enriched them and their families while millions of Americans lost their jobs, homes and life savings.
What follows are pertinent excerpts from this CBS News report:
“The next national election is now less than a year away and congressmen and senators are expending much of their time and their energy raising the millions of dollars in campaign funds they’ll need just to hold onto a job that pays $174,000 a year.
Few of them are doing it for the salary and all of them will say they are doing it to serve the public. But there are other benefits: Power, prestige, and the opportunity to become a Washington insider with access to information and connections that no one else has, in an environment of privilege where rules that govern the rest of the country, don’t always apply to them….
Most former congressmen and senators manage to leave Washington - if they ever leave Washington - with more money in their pockets than they had when they arrived, and as you are about to see, the biggest challenge is often avoiding temptation.
Peter Schweizer: This is a venture opportunity. This is an opportunity to leverage your position in public service and use that position to enrich yourself, your friends, and your family.
Peter Schweizer is a fellow at the Hoover Institution, a conservative think tank at Stanford University. A year ago he began working on a book about soft corruption in Washington with a team of eight student researchers, who reviewed financial disclosure records. It became a jumping off point for our own story, and we have independently verified the material we’ve used.
Schweizer says he wanted to know why some congressmen and senators managed to accumulate significant wealth beyond their salaries, and proved particularly adept at buying and selling stocks.
Schweizer: There are all sorts of forms of honest grafts that congressmen engage in that allow them to become very, very wealthy. So it’s not illegal, but I think it’s highly unethical, I think it’s highly offensive, and wrong.
Steve Kroft: What do you mean honest graft?
Schweizer: For example insider trading on the stock market. If you are a member of Congress, those laws are deemed not to apply.
Kroft: So congressman get a pass on insider trading?
Schweizer: They do. The fact is, if you sit on a healthcare committee and you know that Medicare, for example, is—is considering not reimbursing for a certain drug that’s market moving information. And if you can trade stock on—off of that information and do so legally, that’s a great profit making opportunity. And that sort of behavior goes on.
Kroft: Why does Congress get a pass on this?
Schweizer: It’s really the way the rules have been defined. And the people who make the rules are the political class in Washington. And they’ve conveniently written them in such a way that they don’t apply to themselves.
The buying and selling of stock by corporate insiders who have access to non-public information that could affect the stock price can be a criminal offense, just ask hedge fund manager Raj Rajaratnam who recently got 11 years in prison for doing it. But, congressional lawmakers have no corporate responsibilities and have long been considered exempt from insider trading laws, even though they have daily access to non-public information and plenty of opportunities to trade on it.
Schweizer: We know that during the health care debate people were trading health care stocks. We know that during the financial crisis of 2008 they were getting out of the market before the rest of America really knew what was going on.
In mid September 2008 with the Dow Jones Industrial average still above ten thousand, Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke were holding closed door briefings with congressional leaders, and privately warning them that a global financial meltdown could occur within a few days. One of those attending was Alabama Representative Spencer Bachus, then the ranking Republican member on the House Financial Services Committee and now its chairman.
Schweizer: These meetings were so sensitive—that they would actually confiscate cell phones and Blackberries going into those meetings. What we know is that those meetings were held one day and literally the next day Congressman Bachus would engage in buying stock options based on apocalyptic briefings he had the day before from the Fed chairman and treasury secretary. I mean, talk about a stock tip.
While Congressman Bachus was publicly trying to keep the economy from cratering, he was privately betting that it would, buying option funds that would go up in value if the market went down. He would make a variety of trades and profited at a time when most Americans were losing their shirts….”
Sources:
Congress: Trading stock on inside information?-Posted CBS.com-On November 13, 2011:
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18560_162-57323527/congress-trading-stock-on-inside-information/
Video: ‘60 Minutes’ Blows The Lid Off Congressional Insider Trading!-Posted on Business Insider-By Zeke Miller-On November 14, 2011:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x95uC_wzUX4&feature=related
I have to admit that I totally agree with Mr. Schweizer’s statement contained in the above CBS News report, which is that “it is unethical, highly offensive, and wrong for members of Congress to be able to legally use non-public insider information they obtain during their official duties to make well-timed stock market trades in the very industries that they regulate” and believe that those members that used the non-public insider information to make stock market trades in the days leading up to the 2008 economic crash while millions of Americans lost their shirts and are still trading should be impeached or voted out of office and not be allowed to serve in public again.
Additionally, the following recent article and video revealed an ongoing land grab movement by members of both the Democratic and Republican party, along with other hedge fund managers, which will require Americans to give up their individual freedoms, personal property and redistribute their wealth. Also included are recent articles that revealed that Sheriffs around the country, to include here in New Mexico, are now rising up against this despicable movement:
Agenda 21:
Agenda 21 and the Threat in Your Backyard!-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-By Mike Brownfield-On December 5, 2011:
Video: How your community is implementing AGENDA 21!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CEHWsdimVO4&feature=player_embedded
Sheriffs Rising-Up Against Agenda 21:
Sheriffs Rise Up Against Feds!-Posted on American Free Press-By Pat Shannan-On November 2011:
http://www.americanfreepress.net/Issue_fronts/Issue_47_AFP_2011_1.pdf
New Mexico Law and Local Sheriff Trump the Feds in Agenda 21 Land Grab!-Posted on The Truth is Treason-By KEVIN HAYDEN-On November 8, 2011:
http://www.truthistreason.net/new-mexico-law-and-local-sheriff-trump-the-feds-in-agenda-21-land-grab
I am outraged that American’s across the country are not out in the streets protesting these repulsive actions by our elected officials and hedge fund managers. I also wonder why the “Occupy Wall Street” protestors were not protesting some of their own Congressmen that are still taking part in the insider trading and land grab movement, along with Wall Street, big corporations and banks.
What I find just as deplorable, reprehensible and unforgiving is not only that these actions are contributing to the further destruction of so many American’s lives, but now, as a result of the failure of the Congressional defense-reduction super-committee to do their job, which I now see as another distracter, we will experience additional tax hikes for the middle class, along with cuts to the Defense budget, especially when we’re asking our military to do more, will not only send a “horrible message” to Americans here at home and abroad, but “our adversaries and our enemies all across the world.” And, if our President (Commander-In-Chief) is willing to put politics over the men and women that we have in uniform serving all over this country and world that were asked to stand on freedom’s ramparts and protect us so that we could enjoy a Merry Christmas, instead of looking at places within the executive branch where he can look at agencies, failed programs, and duplicative programs that could be put on the table for now, I believe the president is being misguided.
I hope and pray that you were not one of our elected officials that profited by making well-timed stock market insider trades during the economic events that led to the 2008 economic crash, along with the ongoing land grab movement and would urge you to consider sponsoring and/or supporting a bill that would prohibit members of Congress and staffers from using knowledge gained from their jobs to trade in securities and a bill that would put a stop to the land grab movement.
I look forward to hearing back from you regarding this extremely disturbing matter, along with the numerous other issues that I shared with you in my letter of November 23, 2011, which I believe are just as important and, if not immediately dealt with, they will continue to covertly erode our Constitutional Rights and/or Bill of Rights and ultimately destroy our state, country and our Republic, which seems to be the ultimate goal by some within our own government or country.
May you and your loved ones have a Merry Christmas and a Happy and Prosperous New Year.
Thank you again for your continued public service to this state and our country.
Respectfully,
Jake L. Martinez
Captain-USMC-Retired
Automatic Electronic Response Received From Senator Udall’s Office Regarding My Email Above:
Thank you for your message!
I look forward to reviewing your comments and questions.
Before you leave, I hope you'll explore my website. On this page, you can learn more about the work that I've been doing on important issues and legislation as your U.S. Senator.”
Personal Note From Me: Please be aware that I am not senile enough (YET) to believe that any of my NM Representatives will ever respond to my numerous letters regarding this or any other issues that I feel will eventually destroy this great country of ours as we know it, but that's not going to discourage or stop me from staying in their face, which I will do until the day I get called home by my beloved Creator who has graciously allowed me to survive two colon cancer surgeries to continue the fight so that my four sons, fourteen grandchildren and one recent great grandson can enjoy the great opportunities that I've enjoyed in my 65 years of life on this earth, which includes the opportunity of serving my country honorably as a Marine for twenty years. I honestly couldn't live with myself if I did what so many other Americans seem to be doing at this crucial time when our Republic needs us more than ever, which is taking the easy road by sticking their heads in the sand hoping that it would all go away like a bad nightmarish dream-not going to happen! REMEMBER WHAT A FORMER MARINE & EX-CIA OFFICER RECENTLY SHARED WITH US ON THE FOLLOWING VIDEO:
"YOU ARE THE RESISTANCE"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uI0cd_aIxVg&feature=related
Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and videos relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
I. ‘Legalized Bribery’: How Bad is Congressional Insider Trading?
Outrageous!!!
Posted on The Blaze-By Becket Adams-On December 6, 2011:
“How can we fix our country with this going on?” Glenn Beck asks Peter Schweizer.
“We can’t,” Schweizer responds, shaking his head. “And you know, Glenn, if we can’t fix this?”
“You can’t fix anything,” Beck says, finishing the sentence for him.
What are they discussing that’s so serious as to prohibit America from being fixed? Congressional insider trading.
In case you‘re unfamiliar with Washington’s most recent scandal, Peter Schweizer has written a bombshell book titled “Throw Them all Out” that carefully details multiple cases where members of Congress have made outrageous gains in the stock market by trading on information available only to them. Ordinarily, that’s called “insider trading” and it’s highly illegal. Yet, somehow, Congress is able to get away with it.
And it doesn’t end there. It seems that several people have been profiting from Washington’s insider information. As reported earlier on The Blaze:
Similar to some members of Congress, billionaire philanthropist and market speculator Warren Buffett has allegedly been using an “informational advantage” to make bets and investments on the market.
The man who once said, “Through the tax code, there has been class warfare waged, and my class has won,” might have been investing in the markets with information that only he and a select few had been given access [because of his government connections].
You think that’s bad? How about this:
. . . in July 2008, then-Treasury Secretary Paulson met with several hedge fund managers and told them that a government takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac was a very real possibility.
Why is this shocking? Consider the fact that just a week before informing hedge fund managers that the Fed would be moving in on Fannie and Freddie, Paulson testified before the U.S. Senate (as well as various media outlets) that government intervention in Fannie and Freddie was near “impossible.”
…the group of managers could have profited off the the information Paulson gave them…
What’s most disturbing–and frustrating–is that this been going on for some time and it’s all completely legal.
How?
“The rules for what can or cannot be disclosed by government officials are often either unclear or nonexistent,” writes Richard Teitelbaum of Bloomberg. Simply put, there’s no law against members of Congress engaging in the same behavior that put Martha Stewart behind bars.
Makes sense. Think about it: if you are a government official acting in a way that many would view as illegal, but is only legal because you “failed” to make a law against it, what are the voters going to do? Call a cop?
See Glenn Beck and Peter Schweizer reveal which members of Congress profited from insider information, how much they made, and how they did it via GBTV:
{…}
Source:
II. Behind the financial crisis: A fraud investigator talks!-Posted on CBS.com-By 60 Minutes Overtime Staff-On December 4, 2011:
III. Congressional insider trading ban gains momentum, but has far to go!-Posted on MSNBC.com-By Tom Curry, MSNBC.com’s National Affairs Writer-On December 2, 2011:
IV. Throw Them All Out on O’Reilly: Unusual Monday Features Author Schweizer with Steve Kroft of CBS!-Posted on Big Government-By Publius-On November 20, 2011:
V. Video: Peter Schweizer Author of "Throw Them All Out!"-Posted on YouTube.com-By ybgrsfd-On November 18, 2011:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGIl4X-ECwc&feature=related
VI. Video: Rick Perry On Hannity!-Posted on YouTube.com-By agitatorxmedia-On November 17, 2011:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U4iN04oI9_s&feature=related
VII. Video: Peter Schweizer: Throw Them All Out!-Posted on YouTube.com-By agitatorxmedia-On November 16, 2011:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fy20mLAx7Y4
VIII. Video: '60 Minutes' Blows The Lid Off Congressional Insider Trading!-Posted on YouTube.com-By NeedToAwaken-On November 14, 2011:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x95uC_wzUX4&feature=related
IX. Congress: Trading stock on inside information?-Posted CBS.com-On November 13, 2011:
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18560_162-57323527/congress-trading-stock-on-inside-information/
X. Rep. Paul Ryan on Transparency: ‘The Books are Cooked in Washington’!-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Christopher Goins-On December 7, 2011:
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/rep-paul-ryan-transparency-books-are-cooked-washington
XI. 80% of ‘Green Energy’ Loans Went to Top Obama Donors!-Posted on Big Government-By Wynton Hall-On November 16, 2011:
http://biggovernment.com/whall/2011/11/16/80-of-green-energy-loans-went-to-obamas-top-donors/
XII. George Soros Helped Craft Stimulus Then Invested in Companies Benefiting!-Posted on Big Government-By Wynton Hall-On November 21, 2011:
XIII. Solyndra to Cost You Another $14.3 Million!-Posted on Western Journalism-By BEN JOHNSON-On November 23, 2011:
XIV. The Judas Media!-Posted on Floyd Reports-Guest Writer-On April 27, 2011:
Note: My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
Was the Economic Crisis Manufactured?
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/03/06/was-the-economic-crisis-manufactured/
Who or what caused the economic crisis that propelled President Obama into office?
Is the Fed’s concept of buying $600 billion of Treasuries just a smokescreen?
ACORN-The Community Reinvestment Act (CRA)-Automaker Labor Unions
Treasury Secretary hired firm to help cover-up stimulus records!
The Obama Fiscal Responsibility Farce Continues!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/27/the-obama-fiscal-responsibility-farce-continues/
New World Order By Executive Order!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/13/new-world-order-by-executive-order/
Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?
Who owns our supposedly fair and balanced airwaves and news outlets?
Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial. Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.
“Food For Thought”
Here's Wishing You & Your Loved Ones A "Very Merry Christmas" & A "Prosperous New Year"-Keep The Faith.
God Bless the U.S.A.!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related
Semper Fi!
Jake
We'll have a special guest tonight on Tea Party Radio. JB Williams, conservative author and activist will be joining us to discuss his dissection of SB 1867, the Defense Authorization Bill which was voted FOR by 93 of our elected Senators in Washington over strenuous and vocal objections. This bill gives a green-light for the Usurper-in-Chief to detain indefinetly any American citizen or group HE deems dangerous as "domestic terrorists" and a host of other open-ended descriptors.
Tea Party Radio
Join Tea Party founder Dale Robertson and co-hosts David Toy and Jim Seigfreid on Tea Party Radio as we discuss issues of the day and offer solutions to the dilemmas we face together as a nation. The Tea PartyMovement is... more
SENATOR JIM DE MINT OF SOUTH CAROLINA HAS INTRODUCED THE NATIONBAL RIGHT TO WORK ACT AND IS SEEKING SIGNATURES ON A PETITION TO BER SENT TO YOUR REPRESENTATIVES IN CONGRESS. ANY ONE INTERESTED IN OBTAINING A PETITION TO SIGN CAN OBTAIN ONE FROM SENATOR JIM DE MINT-NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK COMMITTEE-8001 BRADDOCK ROAD- SPRINGFIELD VA 22151-9986
Perhaps the most important personal characteristics the President of this great country should have is the courage and confidence in their personal convictions and never fail to or refuse to take advantage of every opportunity to display those convictions. Any president of any company must use those core convictions to make his company sucessful. Sucess hinges on the ability to face all comers, both friendly and not so friendly while maintaining and strengthening those core convictions, so why are Romney, Huntsman and Paul ducking the opportunity to put those core of convictions on the table at the December 27 th Newsmax debate simply because of the announced moderator. Donald Trump is not the most obnoxious person or country that the president of the United States will encounter, in fact he might be a pussy cat by comparison to some of the personality's they are likely going to encounter as president. These other personalities they will have to deal with are not debate moderators who in actually are pre-schoolers by comparison. Pawlenty, excuse was financial, Cain put family before politics when he was confronted by nobodys who were seeking their 10 minutes of fame and probably book royalty's by selling their lying allegations.
A question for everyone. Do Romney, Huntsman and Paul realy have the courage of their convictions and if they do I urge them to bury their dislike of the conditions of the Nov 27th debate. If they allow their personal dislike of certain conditions of a specific situation to put themselves on the shelf, then how will they be able to be effective as the leader of this country.
We already have one noodle backbone as president, can we afford another?
What’s new with this picture?
Posted on WND.com-By Aaron Klein-On November 6, 2011:
“NBC-owned television stations in cities across the nation just teamed up with a nonprofit “journalism” group funded by a billionaire husband-and-wife team who not only spent millions campaigning for President Obama but also topped donor lists to groups such as ACORN and MoveOn.org.
The nonprofit, ProPublica, will contribute to the news operations of all NBC-owned-and-operated stations, including those in such cities as Los Angeles, Chicago and Philadelphia, the network announced Monday.
The NBC affiliates will get early access to investigative reports from ProPublica, which describes itself as an “independent, non-profit newsroom that produces investigative journalism in the public interest.”
Also included in the arrangement are local radio stations owned by Comcast, which purchased NBC Universal earlier this year.
The Los Angeles Times reported the arrangement comes as Comcast moves to fulfill its commitment to federal regulators to strengthen local public-interest programming.
Bill Davis, chief executive of Pasadena-based KPCC-FM, said his radio station and KNBC-TV in Los Angeles will be able to expand the size of their audiences and the reach of their reporting.
“We can get to the kind of investigative and enterprise stories we wouldn’t be able to singularly,” Davis told the Times.
NBC stations will be given access to ProPublica’s newsroom to focus their own reporting on similar stories.
“We put the reporting at their fingertips and they can do terrific local stories with it,” said Richard Tofel, general manager for ProPublica.
NBC-owned television stations in cities across the nation just teamed up with a nonprofit “journalism” group funded by a billionaire husband-and-wife team who not only spent millions campaigning for President Obama but also topped donor lists to groups such as ACORN and MoveOn.org.
The nonprofit, ProPublica, will contribute to the news operations of all NBC-owned-and-operated stations, including those in such cities as Los Angeles, Chicago and Philadelphia, the network announced Monday.
The NBC affiliates will get early access to investigative reports from ProPublica, which describes itself as an “independent, non-profit newsroom that produces investigative journalism in the public interest.”
Also included in the arrangement are local radio stations owned by Comcast, which purchased NBC Universal earlier this year.
The Los Angeles Times reported the arrangement comes as Comcast moves to fulfill its commitment to federal regulators to strengthen local public-interest programming.
Bill Davis, chief executive of Pasadena-based KPCC-FM, said his radio station and KNBC-TV in Los Angeles will be able to expand the size of their audiences and the reach of their reporting.
“We can get to the kind of investigative and enterprise stories we wouldn’t be able to singularly,” Davis told the Times.
NBC stations will be given access to ProPublica’s newsroom to focus their own reporting on similar stories.
“We put the reporting at their fingertips and they can do terrific local stories with it,” said Richard Tofel, general manager for ProPublica.”
Source:
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=375053#ixzz1frQXbQcD
Note: George Soros Controls The Main Stream Media and Hollywood!
The following articles and/or blog posts and reports reveal how George Soros, along with other liberal backers use their money to fund and/or manipulate media outlets, to include Hollywood because they see that as a powerful way to influence the American public.
It’s a strategy that Soros has been deploying extensively in media both in the United States and abroad. Since 2003, Soros has spent more than $48 million funding media properties, including the infrastructure of news - journalism schools, investigative journalism and even industry organizations.
Nearly 30 Soros-funded Media Operations Part of 'War on Fox'!-Posted on Business & Media Institute-By Dan Gainor-On June 1, 2011:
http://www.mrc.org/bmi/commentary/2011/Nearly__Sorosfunded_Media_Operations_Part_of_War_on_Fox_.html
Soros-Funded Lefty Media Reach More Than 300 Million Every Month!-Posted on Business & Media Institute-By Dan Gainor-On May 25, 2011:
http://www.mrc.org/bmi/commentary/2011/Soros_Lefty_Media_Reach_More_Than__Million_Every_Month.html
Soros Spends Over $48 Million Funding Media Organizations!-Posted on Business & Media Institute-By Dan Gainor-On May 18, 2011:
http://www.mrc.org/bmi/commentary/2011/Soros_Spends_Over__Million_Funding_Media_Organizations_.html
Over 30 Major News Organizations Linked to George Soros!-Posted on Business & Media Institute-By Dan Gainor-On May 11, 2011:
http://www.mrc.org/bmi/commentary/2011/Over__Major_News_Organizations_Linked_to_George_Soros.html
Citizen Soros Manipulating the Media!-Posted on Capital Research Center-By Matthew Vadum-On January 2011:
http://www.capitalresearch.org/pubs/pdf/v1293869054.pdf
George Soros, Movie Mogul: ‘Social Justice’ Cinema and the Sundance Institute!-Posted on Capital Research Center-By Rondi Adamson-On March 20o8:
http://www.capitalresearch.org/pubs/pdf/v1204311857.pdf
Note: What follows is a “Soros Files” website that reveals other deplorable actions by the anti-American hedge fund billionaire that I believe, if not stopped now, will ultimately destroy this great country of ours as we know it:
Continue Reading More On This Disturbing Issue:
Note: The following articles and/or blog posts relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
I. Indoctrination Outrage: California Teacher Uses Media Matters’ Anti-Fox News Article in ‘World History’ Class!-Posted on Big Government-By Kyle Olson-On December 5, 2011:
II. Anti-Obama Ads Spiked By Major Networks – Even Fox!-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On November 29, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=372421
II. The Secrets of Soros, Obama, Occupiers and the MSM!-Posted on The Patriot Update-By Chuck Norris-On November 20, 2011:
http://patriotupdate.com/articles/the-secrets-of-soros-obama-occupiers-and-the-msm
Note: My following blog post contains numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
Who owns our supposedly fair and balanced airwaves and news outlets?
Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?
Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial. Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.
“Food For Thought”
God Bless the U.S.A.!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related
Semper Fi!
Jake
DONALD SHOULD PICK A CANADATE AND HELP HIM IN EVERY WAY. READ DONALD TRUMPS NEW BOOK. IT REALLY TELLS THE TRUTH ABOUT WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN TO AMERICA.. ITS A REAL BUY. SAVE AMERICA.
SOME ONE NOT GOVERMENT CONNECTED COULD PROBIBLY TURN IT INTO A PROFITIBLE BUSINESS.
The Obama administration is using U.S. foreign aid to promote rights for gays and lesbians living abroad.
President Barack Obama issued a memorandum Tuesday directing government agencies, including the State Department and the U.S. Agency for International Development, to use foreign aid to assist homosexuals who are facing human rights violations.
"I am deeply concerned by the violence and discrimination targeting LGBT persons around the world," Obama said in the memo.
"Our deep commitment to advancing the human rights of all people is strengthened when we as the United States bring our tools to bear to vigorously advance this goal," he added.
The president also ordered U.S. agencies to "protect vulnerable gay and lesbian refugees and asylum seekers."
WE COULD DO A BETTER JOB THAN THE DEMOCRATS, THAT I KNOW. FOR SURE.
We must win the independant vote.
Newt will not attract the "must win" Independant vote
Working women will look at Obama and Gingrich and vote for Obama. Not even close.
People are all rushing to back Newt Gingrich, almost in panic mode, in mass.
Am just asking people to slow down. Is we screw this up early, we can't change it and do not want to make Obama's path easier.
Give Newt consideration, but don't cast your mental vote yet.
Please let Newt play out.
Yes, we all would love to see Newt "Debate" Obama. In recent past some Democratic candidates have limited debates in in Presidential Campaign to one debate. So can we afford to put Newt up there for maybe one debate? And what if he has one descent debate, what then? Or what if Obama does better than expected? have we put all our marbles in one bag with hopes that will catapult us to election win?
We are having financial problem a country. We need a financial wiz to help pull us out of thie depression.
EVERY AMERICAN HAS TO READ IT, THERE IS NOT MUCH TIME LEFT FOR AMERICA, THIS IS THE TRUTH, WE SCERWED UP IN EGYPT, WE REALLY SCREWED UP IN IRAQ, WHERE IS OUR PAYMENT IN THEIR OIL//////IRAN IS NOW GOING TO COME IN AND TAKE IT.. FOUR MORE YEARS OF DEMOCRATS AND THERE IS NO MORE AMERICA, AS WE KNOW IT TODAY< WE WILL BE A SOCIALIST NATION. I PRAY TO JESUS EVERY NIGHT FOR THIS COUNTY.
Posted on Townhall-By Robert Knigh-On December 1, 2011:
“Atheists must be the most fragile peaches in the basket.
They’re always getting bruised by the slightest exposure to public displays that remind them of Christmas, God, the Ten Commandments, or worst of all, Jesus.
Just as pathetic are the atheist enablers who are complicit in doing away with any reminders of America’s Christian heritage, even secular symbols. For example, the Hollings Cancer Center in Charleston, South Carolina recently decided that a visit by Santa Claus might upset nonbelievers. Perhaps they feared that it could lead to heart attacks, an Inquisition or perhaps even inspire local militant imams to issue a fatwa (death threat). You can never be sure what kind of chaos a visit by Santa could unleash.
After the public rebelled, the center said that Santa can squeeze down the center’s chimney, but we’ll have none of that overtly religious stuff such as creches, angels, Christmas greetings – anything that brings joy to the world.
On Nov. 18, the Christian legal group Liberty Counsel sent a letter reminding Center Director Andrew S. Kraft, M.D., about how freedom of religion works in America under the Constitution and how his actions constitute viewpoint discrimination. Let’s hope Dr. Kraft will grow a big heart like the Grinch did in Whoville.
The secular virus has been spreading for years in public and private zones. Shopping malls, which would go broke without Christmas, try their best to attract Christmas shoppers without mentioning Christmas. Hence, we get generic “happy holidays” and color schemes with blue and silver snowflakes cold enough to freeze the socks off Grandfather Frost. He’s the former Soviet Union’s made-up patron saint who took over giving gifts to children after the commisars bumped off St. Nicholas. It’s rumored (just starting it now) that the Christmas-phobic ACLU tacks up portraits of Grandfather Frost in back offices to inspire them during that darned holiday season that Dare Not Tell Its Name.
Driving the whole mess is the growing fear Not to Offend. The war on Christmas, part of the ongoing trend to eradicate anything Christian in the public square, is also driven by a profound misreading of the First Amendment, which says “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”
To the ACLU and other pro-atheist groups, that means the government must be hostile to any public expressions of belief that offend atheists. That makes atheism the de facto official religion, something the Founders went out of their way to prevent.
Genuine conflicts do arise, and the courts have found ways to keep religiously themed items legal on public property – as long as they fulfill a secular purpose. In 1984, the Supreme Court in Lynch v. Donnelly ruled that the presence of a crèche amid other seasonal displays – a Santa Claus house, a Christmas tree, and a “Seasons Greetings” banner – erected by the city of Pawtuckett, R.I., was not an unconstitutional establishment of religion.
The secular purpose? Government was acknowledging the cultural significance of a traditional holiday celebrated by the vast majority of Americans. In what became the “reindeer test,” the Court said that religious elements are okay if secular elements are present. So if you dust off a Bambi, put a red nose on it and place it next to the baby Jesus, all is right with the world. Previous generations didn’t need this kind of “cover,” but we’re in a different place now.
The court also noted that, “The Constitution does not require complete separation of church and state; it affirmatively mandates accommodation, not merely tolerance, of all religions, and forbids hostility toward any.”
In early November, the Supreme Court declined to hear a case involving roadside cross memorials to fallen Utah state troopers. The American Civil Rights Union filed an amicus brief arguing for a new constitutional standard. The “Coercion Test” would evaluate whether a policy, practice, or action involves coercion in regard to religion. The framers meant to prohibit coercion, but they did not intend to prohibit voluntary, public, religious speech, or religious expression or symbolism, which do not involve coercion. This test might have helped the state-supported cancer center folks see that barring Santa was a silly idea.
Source:
Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and video relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
I. DOJ Ignores Christians and Defends Muslims!-Posted on Godfather Politics-By GIACOMO-On November 25, 2011:
http://godfatherpolitics.com/2221/doj-ignores-christians-and-defends-muslims/
II. Obama Doesn‘t Mention ’God’ in Thanksgiving Message – Problem?-Posted on The Blaze-By Scott Baker-On November 24, 2011:
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/obama-doesnt-mention-god-in-thanksgiving-message-problem/
III. Video: Obama Doesn‘t Mention ’God’ in Thanksgiving Message – Problem?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=STsr9_VvzNA&feature=player_embedded
IV. Herman Cain: Obama’s scrubbing Christian heritage ‘intentional’ ‘The majority of people do not want God to be taken out of our culture!’-Posted on WND.com-By Drew Zahn-On March 18, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=276825
V. Why Does Religious Freedom Matter?-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-On December 20, 2010:
VI. The ACLU’s Communist, Atheist Roots!-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Guest Writer-On December 16, 2010:
VII. Faith is the Source of America’s Greatness-Posted on Patriot Update-By Floyd Brown-On December 11, 2010:
http://www.patriotupdate.com/exclusives/read/292/Faith-is-the-Source-of-Americas-Greatness
VIII. Pope in the UK: Atheists Like Nazis-Posted on NewsMax.com-On September 17, 2010:
IX. Pastors taken to task for political apathy: ‘What we have in America is a preacher problem!’-Posted on WND.com-On September 16, 2010:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=204473
Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and reports reveal that George Soros has a pastor close to President Obama on his payroll, along with exposing the President, Soros and the Religious Left-You Decide:
Soros Has a Pastor Close to Obama On His Payroll!-Posted on American Thinker-By Ed Lasky-On August 25, 2010:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/08/soros_has_a_pastor_close_to_ob.html
Barack Obama, George Soros and the Religious Left!-Posted on American Thinker-By Jason Lee-On June 12, 2011:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/06/barack_obama_george_soros_and_the_religious_left.html
Note: What follows are two articles and/or blog posts that reveal the connection between NBC and New York Atheists that were written by Chuck Norris-You Decide:
Our Founders vs. NBC and New York Atheists! (Part 1 of 2)-Posted on Town Hall-By Chuck Norris-On June 28, 2011:
Our Founders vs. NBC and New York Atheists! (Part 2 of 2)-Posted on WND.com-By Chuck Norris-On July 4, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=318489
Note: My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
Faith of Our Forefathers!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/09/faith-of-our-forefathers/
Have the “power elite” and pseudo-experts covertly sold us corruption disguised as freedom?
Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/09/does-europe-have-a-future/
Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial. Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.
“Food For Thought”
God Bless the U.S.A.!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related
Semper Fi!
Jake
I hope people slow down on this Newt Gingridge poll surge.
Newt is just telling people the
(Red Meat) they wish to hear.
I do not think he can even compete wth Obama.
How can he draw independants?
Do you think the youth of America will even consider him?
People who look at image will look at him and Obama and run to Obama?
Will he just be another old fogey, to youth?
Newt is smart, but those who are just average intelligence may not understand him?
He is serious gamble.
Is Newt playing us?
What’s disgusting about this?
Posted on The Heritage Foundation-By Mike Brownfield-On December 5, 2011:
“Ready to trade in your car for a bike, or maybe a subway instead? Interested in fewer choices for your home, paying more for housing, and being crammed into a denser neighborhood? You can have all this and more if radical environmentalists and “smart growth” advocates have their way and local, state, and the federal government impose the policies set forth in the United Nations’ Agenda 21.
You might have heard of this nefarious-sounding policy in a recent Republican presidential debate, but even if you haven’t, here’s some background information: Agenda 21 is a voluntary plan adopted at the 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. It calls on governments to intervene and regulate nearly every potential impact that human activity could have on the environment. The end goal? Getting governments to “rethink economic development and find ways to halt the destruction of irreplaceable natural resources and pollution of the planet.”
As adopted, Agenda 21 was described as “a comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the United Nations System, Governments, and Major Groups in every area in which human impacts on the environment.” That includes hundreds of specific goals and strategies that national and local governments are encouraged to adopt. And that translates into restrictive zoning policies that are aimed at deterring suburban growth. Ultimately, they suppress housing supply and drive up home prices, in turn imposing unnecessary costs, especially on middle- and lower-income households. These policies contributed to and aggravate the real estate bubble by putting inflationary pressures on housing prices.
But here’s the catch: Nothing about Agenda 21 is binding, and it’s not a threat in and of itself. Instead, the threat Americans need to be concerned about is the one that lies in their own backyard. In a new paper, “Focus on Agenda 21 Should Not Divert Attention from Homegrown Anti-Growth Policies,” Wendell Cox, Ronald Utt, Brett Schaefer explain:
“Opponents of Agenda 21 should not be distracted from the more tangible manifestation of the smart-growth principles outlined in that document. If they focus excessively on Agenda 21, it is much more likely that homegrown smart-growth policies that date to the early 1970s and undermine the quality of life, personal choice, and property rights in American communities will be implemented by local, state, and federal authorities at the behest of environmental groups and other vested interests.”
In the United States, smart-growth policies started in California and Oregon but then spread around the country to “deter suburban growth for all but the well-to-do,” as Cox, Utt, and Schaefer explain. They also write that those policies were not without detrimental impact:
“As they became more prevalent and restrictive, their impact on housing prices and construction likewise expanded. An explosion of exclusionary zoning throughout the U.S. encouraged many communities to adopt zoning policies to ensure that they maintained a certain demographic ‘profile.’ Such zoning limited real estate development to higher-cost homes in order to ‘price out’ moderate-income households, which included a disproportionate share of minorities.”
Where do these home-grown smart-growth policies stand today? The Obama Administration has embraced them while also increasing environmental regulations and restrictions on the use of natural resources. But the White House isn’t the only one behind the smart-growth movement. Local and state officials, along with interest groups, are promoting the policies at all levels of government.
And that’s where smart growth must also be thwarted. It’s not just a matter of standing against the implementation of Agenda 21 at the national level; it’s also about protecting our own backyards against the home-grown threat.”
Source:
Note: What follows are other articles and/or blog posts and videos that reveal a disturbing global land grab movement by George Soros, President Obama, elitists (both Democrat and Republican), and other hedge fund managers as part of the New World Order, which will require Americans to give up their individual freedoms, personal property and redistribute their wealth. Also included are articles and blog posts that reveal that Sheriffs around the country are rising up against the move-You Decide:
Agenda 21:
Video: Obama’s Executive Order 13575 Rural Council – Agenda 21!-Posted on Cowboy Byte-On November 29, 2011:
http://cowboybyte.com/2150/obamas-executive-order-13575-rural-council-–-agenda-21/
The U.N.’s “Agenda 21″ must be stopped now!-Posted on Vickie Goes to Washington-By Victoria Jackson-On September 15, 2011:
http://vickigoestowashington.com/2011/09/the-u-n-s-agenda-21-must-be-stopped-now/
Global Land Grab: Nervous Rulers and Hedge Fund Managers Alike Scramble for Land!-Posted on The Truth is Treason-By KEVIN HAYDEN-On August 22, 2011:
UN’s Agenda 21 Update: Family Farms Are Under Attack!-Posted on The Blaze-By Mike Opelka-On July 31, 2011:
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/agenda-21-update-family-farms-are-under-attack/
The CLEAR Act of a Federal Land Grab (HR 3534)-Posted on The Truth is Treason-By Cassandra Anderson, MorphCity-On July 22, 2011:
http://www.truthistreason.net/the-clear-act-of-a-federal-land-grab-hr-3534
Is The Soros-Sponsored ‘Agenda 21’ A Hidden Plan For World Government?-Posted on The Blaze-By Mike Opelka-On June 14, 2011:
Video: Texans for Accountable Government Exposes Agenda 21!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3h-lTRxKu3A&feature=player_embedded
Video: John Bush Speaks On The Austin Regional Intelligence Center!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMZBV5abpLk&feature=related
Video: How your community is implementing AGENDA 21!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CEHWsdimVO4&feature=player_embedded
Cedar Falls, Iowa City Council defies citizens; says YES to the United Nations and NO to the 4th Amendment!-Posted on The Gaspee Gazette-On June 11, 2011:
Video: Wildlands Project!-Posted on You Tube.com-By skiebus-On June 28, 2008:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVTGK1uYqJo&feature=player_embedded#
For more analyses on Agenda 21, visit Cassandra Anderson’s website at www.MorphCity.com.
1. http://lib.store.yahoo.net/lib/realityzone/UFNHR3534LandTrust.html
2. http://lib.store.yahoo.net/lib/realityzone/UFNEPAlanduse5percnt.html
3. http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=a2PHwqAs7BS0
4. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/02/white-house-land-grab/
5. http://www.takingliberty.us/TLHome.html
Sheriffs Up-Rising Against Agenda 21:
Sheriffs Rise Up Against Feds!-Posted on American Free Press-By Pat Shannan-On November 2011:
http://www.americanfreepress.net/Issue_fronts/Issue_47_AFP_2011_1.pdf
New Mexico Law and Local Sheriff Trump the Feds in Agenda 21 Land Grab!-Posted on The Truth is Treason-By KEVIN HAYDEN-On November 8, 2011:
http://www.truthistreason.net/new-mexico-law-and-local-sheriff-trump-the-feds-in-agenda-21-land-grab
Note: The following video reveals the impact of the Senate declaring war on Americans via the recent passage of S. 1867, the National Defense Authorization Act, and its utterly destructive attitude towards the Constitution and Bill of Rights, along with a video that contains a powerful message from a former C.I.A. Agent to all Americans-You Decide:
Video: NDAA's World Wide Declaration of War on The People!-Posted on YouTube.com-By TheAlexJonesChannel-On December 4, 2011:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vbu4SCaMEDA&feature=uploademail
Video: YOU ARE THE RESISTANCE!-Posted on YouTube.com-By in5d-On May 6, 2010:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uI0cd_aIxVg&feature=related
Note: My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
New World Order By Executive Order!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/13/new-world-order-by-executive-order/
It’s Getting Very Serious Now!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/15/it’s-getting-very-serious-now/
Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?
Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial. Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.
Note: What follows is an article and/or blog post and a video (film) that exposes the real Newt Gingrich, to include who he serves by examining his actions and voting record-You Decide:
Globalist Candidate Gingrich Gets Influential Establishment Endorsement!-Posted on InfoWars-By Kurt Nimmo, Infowars.com-On November 27, 2011:
http://www.infowars.com/globalist-candidate-gingrich-gets-influential-establishment-endorsement/
Video: The Real Newt Gingrich!-Posted on YouTube.com-By Lentenlands-On November 28, 2011:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EXVc1oxm_VQ&feature=related
“Food For Thought”
God Bless the U.S.A.!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related
Semper Fi!
Jake
Should voters in New York be allowed to contribute to local elections in New Hampshire?
Should voters in Concord, NH be allowed to contribute to elections in Manchester, NH?
If you can not vote in an election, why should you be allowed to contribute to that election?
Whom do you want politicians to raise money from, their constituents or people that can NOT vote for them?
Campaign Finance Reform should be about Insiders versus Outsiders not hard money versus soft money.
US Citizens
An Example for US Citizens Who Live, Vote and Pay Taxes in the Government District:
Three people contribute to a campaign. One contributes $10,000 worth of time, one contributes $10,000 worth of resources and one contributes $10,000 in cash.
Which has violated campaign finance laws?
The person that contributes $10,000 cash. The persons that contributed $10,000 worth of time and resources are making legal contributions. But all three people live under regulations, pay taxes, and earn income in the government district that the candidate represents.
Question:
If you are not going to limit the time and resources a voter may contribute to a candidate, why is it fair to limit the cash a voter can contribute?
Answer:
Time, resources and money are all acceptable and equivalent contributions. There should be no limits on contributions by people who can vote in an election. They pay taxes and live under that government's regulations so they should be allowed to help select their representative any way they can, with time, money or resources.
Conversely, if a person can NOT vote in an election then they should not be allowed to contribute anything to a candidate, not time, money or resources.
Voting in an election is the key determiner of Insider versus Outsider. If it were not so, we could vote in all 50 states, for 50 governors, 100 senators, etc. Because we are limited to whom we can vote for, we should also be limited to whom we can contribute to. This limit applies to time, money and resources.
An Example for Unlimited Campaign Contributions by Voters in an Election District:
Let’s use New York City as an example. Two billionaires live in New York city and one billionaire we’ll call Michael, wants to be mayor of New York city. Michael contributes $10 million to his own campaign, which is perfectly legal under the current campaign finance laws. The other billionaire, we’ll call Donald, does not want to be mayor, but he also does not want Michael to be mayor. He would like to contribute $10 million to another candidate. This is not legal. Why? They both live, work, pay taxes and vote in New York city.
If you are having problems with allowing voters to give unlimited campaign contributions please ask yourself these questions:
If you had a million dollars investment in the stock market, would you pay a stock broker to manage that investment.
If you paid one million dollars in taxes, would you not contribute to a politician to manage your "investment" in government?
If you received one million dollars in government contracts or tax deductions or subsidies, would you not contribute to a politician to manage your "revenue" from government?
If you paid one million dollars to comply with government regulations would you not contribute to a politician to manage your "investment" with the government?
Remember that billionaires can only make unlimited contributions in one election district, the one they can vote in.
Non-voting US Residents
The Supreme Court has ruled that people that can not vote in the US, but pay taxes to the US can participate in a limited way in elections. This ruling applied to permanent residents who are not yet citizens. The Supreme Court did allow restrictions on the amount of money non-citizens could contribute to an election. They limited their contributions to only the amount of money the person earned in the US.
Question:
Two people make the same amount of money in a government district and pay the same taxes to that government, but only one of them can vote in that district. Should the contributions by the nonresident be limited to the same amount of contributions as the voters in that district? Should nonresidents be banned from making contributions of time and resources because placing a value on it and accounting for it is difficult to impossible?
An Example for People that Can Not Vote in a Government District:
Two people work in a election district, but only one can vote in that district. Think of people who live in one district/state but work in another such as traveling sales people.
Person A represent the average constituent in the election district. He makes $100K, pays $10K in taxes in that election district. He contributes $100 to the election he can vote in.
If Person B who is not a constituent, represents Outsiders who are affected by the government in the election district. He makes $100K and pays $10K in taxes in that election district. He should be allowed to contribute $100 to that district. If person B makes the 10 times the money or pays 10 times the taxes, he should be allowed to contribute 10 times the campaign contribution as person A.
Notice that if voters (Insiders) do NOT makes cash campaign contributions and only contribute time and resources, then person B can NOT make any cash contributions. This means that people who vote in an election determine how much money will be spent on a campaign. It is not the Outsiders, because their contributions are limited. The limitation is calculated by dividing the total Insider donations by the number of constituents in the district.
Conclusion
People that can vote in an election have unlimited contributions to the candidates running in that district.
Voters determine how much money is spent in an election.
People that can NOT vote in an election but who are affected by that government's by taxes, laws and regulations have some limited contribution to the candidates running in that district based on what Insiders contribute.
People that can NOT vote in an election are NOT allowed to contribute time or resources to that election.
People that are NOT affected by that government may NOT contribute to the candidates running in that district. Not time, not money and not resources.
Final Question
So which campaign finance laws do you want to live under? The existing hard money and soft money laws with unlimited spending by Political Action Committees? Or would you rather have the campaign finance laws regulate contributions based on Insiders versus Outsiders?
This and other papers can be found at www.cashinthehand.org
There are two possible visions for America. Imagine two major league baseball stadiums.
In one stadium there are billionaire owners in sky boxes, millionaire players on the field and in the stands there are people at work selling soda, popcorn and peanuts and working for peanuts. The workers in the stands live in public housing, send their kids to public schools, have public health care, take public transportation, live on food stamps with government subsidized utilities and retire onto public pension plans. The billionaire owners and millionaire players pay taxes to support all those government programs.
In another stadium there are billionaire owners in sky boxes, millionaire players on the field and in the stands there are people at work selling soda, popcorn and peanuts, but they are not working for peanuts. The billionaire owners and millionaire players pay the workers in the stands enough money to live in private housing, send their kids to private schools, have private health care, use private transportation, buy their own food and pay for their own utilities and retire onto private pension plans.
Which one is your vision for America?
How You Get to the Second Baseball Stadium:
If you received a $1000 tax deduction for giving a person $1000 for food, would you do it?
If you received a $5000 tax deduction for giving a child $5000 for education, would you do it?
If you received a $10,000 tax deduction for hiring a person and paying them $10,000 for health care, would you do it?
This tax deduction is called “Cash in the Hand” and this is how the tax deduction works.
For Individuals:
- If you could deposit your income tax payment in a Health Savings Account, would you do it?
- If you could deposit your property tax payment in a Education Savings Account, would you do it?
Waiters and Waitresses:
- Would you like all the sales taxes collected each day by your employer to be divided equally between all the workers in the restaurant and deposited into a Housing Savings Account for you?
Workers in a big box store:
- Would you like your employers property tax bill divided equally between all the workers and deposited in your Education Savings Account for you?
- Would you like your employers corporate income tax bill divided equally between all the workers and deposited in your Retirement Savings Account?
The education, retirement, health, housing, and transportation savings accounts can be one account that each individual controls.
Benefits of the Tax Deduction “Cash in the Hand”:
Gives every American Worker a Profit Sharing Plan with their Employer
Improves Public Education
Destroys Socialism
Eliminates Unemployment Benefits
Provides Health Care to People with Pre-Existing Conditions
Eliminates Farm Subsidies
Reduces Corruption in Politics
Enables the Public Option of the Health Care Law
Eliminates Corporate Subsidies
Solves the Immigration Problem, Both Legal and Illegal
Reduces the Trade Deficit
Eliminates the Movement of Jobs Overseas
This is a partial list of some of the problems that are reduced or eliminated by the tax deduction “Cash in the Hand”. I will explain how this is done in a separate paper for each topic.
This and other papers can be found at www.cashinthehand.org
