IT REALLY WAS INTERESTING TO LISTEN TOO FOR ANY PERSON THAT WANTS TO SAVE AMERICA FROM A DUME LIKE THEY WILL NEVER SEE AGAIN, WE MUST SAVE AMERICIA . VOTE REPUBLICAN.
All Posts (28268)
Sort by
IT REALLY WAS INTERESTING TO LISTEN TOO FOR ANY PERSON THAT WANTS TO SAVE AMERICA FROM A DUME LIKE THEY WILL NEVER SEE AGAIN, WE MUST SAVE AMERICIA . VOTE REPUBLICAN.
DUHHH!!!
Posted on Investors.com-On December 2, 2011:
“Jobs: Americans woke up Friday to the good news that the unemployment rate had dropped sharply from 9% to 8.6%. On closer inspection, the decline is highly questionable — and doesn’t warrant a surge in optimism.
The White House hailed the news as “further evidence that the economy is continuing to health” and proving the $447 billion stimulus proposal “is the right medicine” for what ails us. Some in the media likewise saw good news, with headlines such as the Boston Globe’s “Unemployment Drops To Lowest Since 2009.”
We’re not trying to be Grinches, but the decline in the unemployment rate is highly suspect for many reasons.
The number is derived from a huge survey of 60,000 households the government takes each month. In November, the survey showed the labor force shrank by 315,000. That shrinkage makes the unemployment rate look a lot better than it is.
This is questionable because in the previous three months, the labor force increased by 323,000 workers on average. Statistically, a one-month reversal in the size of the workforce of more than 600,000 people just doesn’t make sense — unless an awful lot of people threw up their hands in disgust and quit looking.
And that’s what seems to be the case. The labor participation rate declined to 64% from 64.2% a month before. Usually, it rises when jobs are growing as people rejoin the labor force.
“Some of the decline relates to the aging of the U.S. population, but a substantial portion of the decline reflects the lack of well-paying jobs, and it (is) driving people from the labor force, discouraged,” wrote economist Anthony Crescenzi of bond giant Pimco.
That is not good news.
Looking at other data, both public and private, shows why that is true.
Take the number of net new jobs businesses create in a given month. For November, it was 120,000 — weak by any measure. Over time, we need to create 130,000 new jobs each month just to soak up new entrants into the workforce.
At the current rate, it will take until May 2016 just to regain the number of jobs we had in 2008 (see chart).
Weekly claims for unemployment benefits, another government measure, rose 6,000 to a seasonally adjusted 402,000 after remaining below 400,000 for three weeks in a row, the Labor Department said Thursday.
This is significant, since government and Wall Street economists say jobless claims must fall below 375,000 and stay there to make a real dent in unemployment.
And there are private measures of unemployment that still show deep distress across the country when it comes to jobs.
Take the Gallup “underemployment” survey, which the polling firm has been taking dutifully for decades. It shows underemployment — the share of workers without jobs plus the share working part time but wanting full-time work — hit 18.1% in November, up from 17.5% just two months ago and 17.2% a year earlier.
Our own IBD/TIPP Poll estimates that nearly 25% of all households have someone who’s unemployed and looking for work — roughly 32 million Americans.
We’re happy that 120,000 people found jobs in November. But this is no real jobs recovery.
We can do a lot better. Sadly, those in charge in the White House seem to think this is good enough.”
Source:
Note: The following articles and/or blog posts relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
I. Obama Manipulates Numbers to Get Unemployment Headline Under 9%!-Posted on Conservative Byte-On December 3, 2011:
http://conservativebyte.com/2011/12/obama-manipulates-numbers-to-get-unemployment-headline-under-9/
II. The Fed Will Make Sure Obama Wins in 2012!-Posted on CNBC.com-By Patrick Allen, CNBC EMEA Head of News-On April 28, 2011:
http://www.cnbc.com/id/42794512
Note: My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
Is the Fed’s concept of buying $600 billion of Treasuries just a smokescreen?
Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?
Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial. Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.
“Food For Thought”
God Bless the U.S.A.!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related
Semper Fi!
Jake
By John W. Lillpop
In a said day for those of us who found Herman Cain’s candidacy refreshing—at least for a while—the fellow who calls himself the “Black Walnut” has apparently cracked under the pressure of national politics.
As reported, in part, at the reference:
ATLANTA (AP) — The Cain train has come to a stop.One hopes that quitting the race will bring a measure of peace to Cain who has been battered and rammed non-stop for two months.
Herman Cain suspended his bid for the Republican presidential nomination on Saturday following a steady drumbeat of sexual misconduct allegations he said were harming his family and drowning out his ability to deliver his message.
With just one month to go until the lead-off Iowa caucuses, Cain's announcement is tantamount to a concession. Still, he told supporters, he planned to continue his efforts to influence Washington and announced "Plan B" — what he called a grassroots effort to return government to the people.
Cain denounced the accusations of impropriety against him as "false and unproven" but said that they had been hurtful to his family, particularly his wife, Gloria.
"So as of today, with a lot of prayer and soul-searching, I am suspending my presidential campaign. I am suspending my presidential campaign because of the continued distractions and the continued hurt caused on me and my family," a tired-looking Cain told about a 400 supporters.”
For his wonderful wife Gloria, one offers more than hope: A prayer that she is able to withstand the hurt and pain inflicted on her over the past 60 days.
God Bless Gloria Cain!
http://news.yahoo.com/cain-announces-hes-suspending-campaign-185930830.html
What’s wrong with this picture?
Posted on Western Journalism-By DOUG BOOK-On December 2, 2011:
“Mens rea is Latin for “guilty mind.” In legal theory acting to set up a crime before committing it indicates a guilty mind; or guilty intent.
In the spring of 2009, just a few months before the Obama Administration instructed the Phoenix ATF office to commence Operation Fast and Furious, Attorney General Eric Holder introduced and secured a curious change to United States gun legislation.
The tracing of firearm serial numbers provides information about the manufacture of a weapon, its original retail seller and buyer, the entire known history of the weapon. For years, anti-gun rights zealots had procured these trace statistics from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms for the purpose of initiating frivolous lawsuits against both gun dealers and manufacturers.
Then, in 2004, Kansas Republican Rep. Todd Tiahrt successfully added an amendment to the yearly ATF funding bill. Known since as the Tiahrt Amendment, the legislation prohibits the sharing of trace information for any but legitimate law enforcement purposes. That is, trace information on firearm serial numbers could only be provided to federal, state and local law enforcement agencies engaged in specific, criminal investigations. Those responsible for left-wing fishing expeditions would no longer have access to trace statistics for the purpose of manufacturing lawsuits.
Then, although Barack Obama and Eric Holder had promised liberal supporters they would fight to overturn the Tiahrt Amendment, in the spring of 2009 Holder lobbied Congress for a change to the Amendment, one which would allow ATF acquired trace data to be provided to “a foreign law enforcement agency solely in connection with or for use in a criminal investigation or prosecution.”
The Regime was just about to launch the corrupt and murderous Operation Fast and Furious. And it must be remembered that during the year long course of that despicable gun-walking venture, no agency or official of the United States government informed the Mexican government of the scheme’s existence, keeping all particulars concerning the deliberate smuggling across the Mexican border of thousands of firearms quite hidden from Mexican officials and law enforcement.
So former Congressman Tiahrt asks the obvious question: “Why sign into law the Tiahrt Trace Data Amendment with clarification language to share trace data with foreign law enforcement agencies at approximately the same time that “Fast and Furious” program illegally allows firearms to cross the border into a foreign country?”
Certainly this Holder-inspired change to Tiahrt was no coincidence. So, why did Barack Obama and Eric Holder, hardly known for their attention to details of legality, suddenly consider this detail so important? How was the Regime to benefit from the new language? What possibilities for deceit and abuse of power did it secure for an Administration bent upon terminating the God-given right of the American people to keep and bear arms?
It is often easy to forget that the entirety of the Fast and Furious agenda was not played out, the ultimate goal not realized, as ATF whistleblowers and citizen journalists forced a premature close to the Operation. What would the giving of trace information to a foreign nation—presumably Mexico–have accomplished and why was it so important to the final outcome of the scheme? It’s very revealing to note that, even at the zenith of its power, with clear majorities in both the House and Senate, the Administration apparently could not afford to lose a fight for the overthrow of Tiahrt. It had to settle for a change.
It’s quite possible that when we discover the reason for Holder’s change to the Tiahrt Amendment, we’ll finally have the rest of the pieces to the Fast and Furious puzzle.
Use this site to contact your Congressional Representative:
https://writerep.house.gov/writerep/welcome.shtml
To read more use this link:
Further reading:
http://www.whittierdailynews.com/news/ci_18605000
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/politics/2009111078_apusholderguns.html http://www.gunweek.com/2003/tiahrt0820.html
http://www.nraila.org/issues/factsheets/read.aspx?ID=208
http://www.coachisright.com/origins-of-fast-and-furious-accidentally-revealed-by-white-house/
Source:
Note: The following websites reveal that George Soros’ Open Society Institute (OSI) and groups that promote a variety of leftwing causes are strong advocates of gun control and fund the Arms Control Association (ACA), which outlines the UN Process on Small Arms, along with the International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA) that is a global movement against gun violence, which has lobbied the United Nations to pass a measure outlawing private gun ownership and effectively overturning the U.S. Constitution’s Second Amendment, along with the-You Decide:
Arms Control Association (ACA):
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6924
Arms Control Association (ACA): UN Process on Small Arms:
http://www.armscontrol.org/act/2007_03/Anders
International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA): Global Movement Against Gun Violence:
International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA): National Gun Laws:
http://www.iansa.org/workarea/national-gun-laws
International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA) Members:
http://www.iansa.org/region/americas
International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA): New US Government Plan to Tackle Arms Trafficking to Mexico!-Posted on July 15, 2011:
http://www.iansa.org/news/2011/07/us-new-government-plan-to-tackle-arms-trafficking-to-mexico
Note: The following House Bill was introduced in 2009:
H.R.45 - Blair Holt's Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009:
http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h45/text
Note: The following articles and/or blog posts relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
I. Breaking News on Fast and Furious: Obama Knew in May 2010?
What’s disturbing about this picture?
Posted on Big Government-By AWR Hawkins-On December 1, 2011:
“To date Barack Obama, the dispenser of hope and change and the presiding officer over the least transparent presidency in history, has claimed he only learned about Fast and Furious earlier this year. However, with each new document dump Obama’s timeframe seems to be as inaccurate (or as purposely misleading) as Attorney General Eric Holder’s.
For example, just months after he took office it was evident he was focused on a Fast and Furious-like operation, ostensibly aimed at cutting down on gun trafficking on the southern border. Thus, on March 24, 2009, Deputy Attorney General David Ogden made the following announcement:
“The President has directed us to take action to fight [Mexican] cartels…and Attorney General Holder and I are taking several new and aggressive steps as part of the administration’s comprehensive plan.”
And the following month, April 2009, he stood beside Mexican President Felipe Calderón and uttered words we now recognize as hypocritical and duplicitous at best:
“I continue to believe that we can respect and honor the Second Amendment right in our Constitution — the rights of sportsmen and hunters and homeowners that want to keep their families safe — to lawfully bear arms, while dealing with assault weapons that, as we know here in Mexico, are used to fuel violence.”
Fast forward one year, and White House logs show that then-Deputy Attorney General Gary Grindler met personally with Obama four times between May 7 and May 19, 2010.
Just in case Grindler’s name doesn’t set off sirens in your mind, he had received an in depth briefing on Fast and Furious on March 12, 2010. (This briefing came via an ATF slideshow , which I covered in a post for Big Government earlier this year.) During this same briefing, Grindler was provided with details concerning the number of times that a straw purchaser named Uriel Patino had purchased guns during Fast and Furious. (Patino’s total weapon acquisition numbered approx. 720 guns.)
By the way, Grindler is no longer a Deputy Attorney General. Rather, he is Holder’s Chief of Staff.
So what do you figure he and Obama talked about when they met four times in May 2010?
Perhaps a better question is—do you think there’s any way they didn’t talk about Fast and Furious?
Even the LA Times admits Fast and Furious was at its height then, so I really don’t think Obama and Grindler used their meetings to plan Obama’s next vacation. Rather, I think Obama may have known about Fast and Furious nearly a year before he admits.
Looks like it’s time for Congressman Darrell Issa (R-CA) to broaden his inquiry into this mess.”
Source:
II. U.S. Seals Court Records Of Border Patrol’s Murder!-Posted on Judicial Watch-On November 30, 2011:
http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2011/nov/u-s-seals-court-records-border-patrol-s-murder
III. Cover-Up: Fast and Furious Documents Suddenly Sealed on Judge’s Orders!-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Doug Book-On November 23, 2011:
http://floydreports.com/cover-up-fast-and-furious-documents-suddenly-sealed-on-judges-orders/
IV. Armed illegals stalked Border Patrol: ‘Mexicans were ‘patrolling’ when agent was slain, indictment says!’-Posted on The Washington Times-On November 22, 2011:
V. Perry: Eric Holder must go: ‘Attorney general should resign or be fired’-Posted on The Washington Times-By Gov. Rick Perry-On November 21, 2011:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/nov/21/eric-holder-must-go/
VI. Bachmann first presidential candidate, 52nd member of Congress to demand Eric Holder’s resignation!-Posted on The Daily Caller-By Matthew Boyle, The Daily Caller-On November 19, 2011:
VII. Are Rising Guns Sales Responsible for Declining Crime?-Posted on The Blaze-By Becket Adams-On December 1, 2011:
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/are-rising-gun-sales-responsible-for-declining-crime/
VIII. New Gun Company Advertisement Compares Obama to Hitler, Stalin!-Posted on CBS Washington-On December 1, 2011:
IX. Liberty University OKs Concealed Guns on Campus!-Posted on Godfather Politics-By THE GODFATHER-On November 18, 2011:
http://godfatherpolitics.com/2121/liberty-university-oks-concealed-guns-on-campus/
X. Shooters Heard: Interior Will Not Ban Target Practice!-Posted on U.S. News-By Paul Bedard-On November 17, 2011:
XI. Video: Stop Gun Control!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fUPDSpCcdg&feature=player_embedded
Note: My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
Did ATF provide weapons to Mexican drug cartels that were subsequently used to kill one of our own?
What is the true intent of the UN Small Arms Treaty?
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/12/what-is-the-true-intent-of-the-un-small-arms-treaty/
New World Order By Executive Order!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/13/new-world-order-by-executive-order/
Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?
Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial. Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.
Note: What follows is an article and/or blog post and a video (film) that exposes the real Newt Gingrich, to include who he serves by examining his actions and voting record-You Decide:
Globalist Candidate Gingrich Gets Influential Establishment Endorsement!-Posted on InfoWars-By Kurt Nimmo, Infowars.com-On November 27, 2011:
http://www.infowars.com/globalist-candidate-gingrich-gets-influential-establishment-endorsement/
Video: The Real Newt Gingrich!-Posted on YouTube.com-By LentenlandsOn November 28, 2011:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EXVc1oxm_VQ&feature=related
“Food For Thought”
God Bless the U.S.A.!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related
Semper Fi!
Jake
Dear Fellow Patriots:
What follows is a “must read” recently updated Obama Presidential Eligibility Introductory Primer, by Stephen Tonchen, which is different from and should not be confused with, the WorldNetDaily Obama Eligibility Primer. The Tonchen Primer initially appeared on the Internet in June 2009, more than a year prior to the WND Primer-You Decide:
Obama Presidential Eligibility - An Introductory Primer!-Posted on PeoplesMag.net-By Stephen Tonchen-Revised on December 1, 2011:
These are pertinent excerpts from this primer:
“UPDATE (4/27/2011): Now that President Obama has released his long-form birth certificate, questions 31 through 34 in this Primer have become moot [91]. They are retained here for posterity purposes only. The other 33 questions and corresponding answers remain entirely unaffected. Those questions have acquired even greater importance and relevance, now that Obama’s newly-released long-form birth certificate has further substantiated his dual nationality at birth.
Introduction
The Philadelphia Convention adopted the U.S. Constitution on September 17, 1787 [01]. Anyone born after that date must be a natural born citizen in order to be eligible to serve as President of the United States [02].
What is a natural born citizen? Even if President Barack Obama is a U.S. citizen by birth, is he a U.S. natural born citizen?
According to an article which appeared in the Michigan Law Review in 2008, we know two things for sure about the meaning of “natural born citizen”:
- Anyone who is born in the United States, of parents who are U.S. citizens, is definitely, without doubt, a natural born citizen.
- Anyone who acquires U.S. citizenship through naturalization, after his or her birth, is definitely not a natural born citizen [03].
But what about a child born overseas to U.S.-citizen parents? And what about a U.S.-born child of an alien parent? These children are U.S. citizens by modern-day law. But are they natural born citizens? So far, Federal law, the Constitution and the courts have not answered these questions.
In 2004, Senator Don Nickles predicted that, if these questions remain unanswered, they will someday become “a real issue”:
The definition of this term [”natural born citizen”] is an issue that has been debated in legal circles for years and has never been ruled on by the courts. Clarification is needed before this becomes a real issue. (Nickles)
Senator Nickles’ prediction has come true.
Barack Obama—regardless of where he was born—acquired British/Kenyan citizenship (in addition to U.S. citizenship) at birth. His citizenship status, at birth, was “governed” by the British Nationality Act of 1948 (see Barack Obama’s “fight the smears” website). In light of these facts, an increasing number of Americans are concerned that President Obama might not be a “natural born citizen” and therefore might not be eligible, under the Constitution, to serve as president [04].
Members of the mainstream news media generally believe that all persons born in the United States are “natural born citizens”, regardless of their parents’ citizenship. Although this belief is widely held, the Supreme Court has never accepted it. On the contrary, our nation’s highest court has consistently used the term “natural born citizen” only in reference to persons born on U.S. soil, to U.S.-citizen parents.
In Scott v. Sandford (1856), the Supreme Court characterized, as unexceptionable (incapable of being criticized), the viewpoint that:
- “natural-born citizens are those born in the country of parents who are citizens” (Vattel, as quoted in the majority opinion in Scott v. Sandford, 1856)
In Minor v. Happersett (1874), the Supreme Court defined two classes of persons. One class consisted of U.S.-born children of U.S.-citizen parents. The second class consisted of all other U.S.-born children. Members of the first class were “natural born citizens”. Regarding members of the second class, the Court doubted whether they were even citizens, let alone natural born citizens. The Court distinguished “natural born citizens” from “aliens or foreigners”, suggesting that a “natural born citizen” is one who is not a “foreigner” (foreign citizen) at birth [05].
The United States has had 44 presidents (including Barack Obama). Of these 44 presidents, 34 were born after 1787 (the year the Constitution was adopted) and were therefore subject to the “natural born citizen” requirement. With only two exceptions, every one of these 34 presidents was born in the United States, of parents who were both U.S. citizens (Natural Born Presidency). The two exceptions were Chester Arthur and Barack Obama. While running for office in 1880, Chester Arthur lied to newspaper reporters about his family history (and later burned most of his family records), thereby concealing the fact that, when he was born, his father (William Arthur) was British subject, not a U.S. citizen (Historical Breakthrough - Chester Arthur).
President Obama’s “fight the smears” website, his published long-form birth certificate, and his autobiography identify his father as Barack Hussein Obama Sr., a Kenyan native who never became a U.S. citizen. President Obama is no longer a Kenyan citizen today, but when he was born, he received British/Kenyan citizenship by descent from his father (FactCheck.org: Does Barack Obama have Kenyan citizenship?). The year 2008 was the first time in history that the United States knowingly elected a post-1787-born president whose parents were not both U.S. citizens. Moreover, 2008 was the first time that the U.S. knowingly elected a post-1787-born president who was a foreign citizen (as well as a U.S. citizen) at the time of his birth [06].
Since President Obama acquired foreign nationality (in addition to U.S. citizenship) at birth, his “natural born citizen” status is in doubt [07]. This doubt is not based on the imaginings of tin-foil-hat-wearing conspiracy theorists on the lunatic fringe of society. This doubt comes from what the Supreme Court has said, as well as a variety of other historical and legal sources, which are presented and discussed here.
In the following pages, we introduce the Obama eligibility controversy, in question-and-answer format, for a non-technical general audience. We’ve double-checked the facts presented here, cited their sources, and believe them to be correct. Please contact us if you find any material in this Primer that you believe to be inaccurate.
Continue Reading:
http://people.mags.net/tonchen/birthers.htm
Question: When will Americans wake up?
On or about March 2, 2010, the following article and/or blog post revealed that Sarah P. Herlihy, an associate attorney specializing in litigation at the Chicago law firm Kirkland & Ellis LLP, which is a law firm with ties to Obama, published an essay in the Chicago-Kent Law review on February 22, 2006 entitled “Amending the Natural Born Citizen Requirement: Globalization as the Impetus and the Obstacle” that floated the idea of a “takeover” of our government by a foreign power. Herlihy’s essay was widely disseminated on the internet during the 2008 presidential campaign as rumors surfaced that Obama and possibly McCain did not meet the “natural born Citizen” requirement laid out in Article II, Section 1, paragraph 5 of the U.S. Constitution:
Was there a conspiracy to put Obama in the White House?-Posted on The Post & EMail-By Sharon Rondeau-On March 2, 2010:
http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/03/02/was-there-a-conspiracy-to-put-obama-in-the-white-house/
On or about June 12, 2011, the following article and/or blog post revealed overwhelming evidence that we in fact have a fraud and a usurper that resides in the people’s White House, despite the overt lack of journalistic investigating on the part of the American press. The new evidence indicates that the conspiracy to carry out that fraud was much broader than originally thought, which includes a forty-year story that requires a book, not a column, to tell because the evidence suggests that our President was being groomed from a very young age for the moment in history that would end American supremacy in the world, and usher in a new era of Global Marxist Governance:
The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!-Posted on The Post & Email-By JB Williams-On June 12, 2011:
http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/06/07/evidence-broadens-obama-natural-born-conspiracy/
On or about June 13, 2011, retired Maj. Gen. Paul Valley revealed that the “Certificate of Live Birth” that was released by the White House, on or about April 27, 2011, as “proof positive” of President Obama’s Hawaiian birth was a forgery, but that the FBI was covering the fraud and no one in Congress was willing to tackle the situation because of fears of a “black backlash,” if the failings of the nation’s first black president were revealed.
Source:
Ex-CIA: ‘Forged document’ released as birth certificate!-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On June 15, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=311433
Continue Reading:
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetrated-in-american-history/
Note: 25 U.S. Supreme Court Opinions That Defined “Natural Born Citizen” Were Sabotaged In The Run Up To The ’08 Presidential Election!
On or about October 20, 2011, Leo Donofrio, a New Jersey attorney who brought the first legal challenge to Barack Obama's occupancy in the Oval Office to the U.S. Supreme Court published a report that revealed that 25 U.S. Supreme Court Opinions that defined “Natural Born Citizen” were sabotaged in the run up to the ’08 Presidential Election.
Source:
25 U.S. Supreme Court Opinions That Defined “Natural Born Citizen” Were Sabotaged In The Run Up To The ’08 Presidential Election!-Posted on Natural Born Citizen-By Leo Donofrio, Esq.-On October 20, 2011:
On or about October 20, 2011, the following article and/or blog post revealed that someone had been incredibly busy in June 2008 working on an illegal front invisible to the public by searching and altering Supreme Court Cases published at Justia.com, which cite the only case in American history - Minor v. Happersett (1875) - to directly construe Article 2 Section 1’s natural-born citizen clause in determining a citizenship issue as part of its holding and precedent. In this unanimous decision, the Supreme Court defined a “native or natural-born citizen” as a person born in the US to parents who were both citizens, a definition that excludes President Obama from eligibility:
JustiaGate!-Posted on Examiner-By Dianna Cotter, Portland Civil Rights Examiner-On October 20, 2011:
http://www.examiner.com/civil-rights-in-portland/justiagate
On or about October 23, 2011, the following WND article and/or blog post revealed that Leo Donofrio, a New Jersey attorney who brought the first legal challenge to Barack Obama's occupancy in the Oval Office to the U.S. Supreme Court had published a report revealing that references to a U.S. Supreme Court decision addressing the definition of "natural-born citizen" were scrubbed at one of the key online resources for legal documents:
Eligibility rulings vanish from Net!-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On October 23, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=358645
Continue Reading:
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetrated-in-american-history/
Note: Congressional Staff, to include a legislative attorney, within the Congressional Research Service (CRS) are attempting to redefine the eligibility clause in our Constitution as a means of convincing the American public that President Obama meets the eligibility requirements.
On or about November 14, 2011, it was also revealed that the Congressional Research Service (CRS), the research arm of Congress, has launched a defense of Barack Obama's presidential eligibility with a 50-page report that has been described as a "polemic aimed at convincing readers" Obama meets the requirements to be president:
Source:
Congressional staff gives Constitution new meaning: ‘Researchers target 'eligibility,' say 'native born' really is 'natural born!'-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On November 30, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=373085
Additionally, it was revealed that Jack Maskell, a legislative attorney with the Congressional Research Service (CRS), issued yet another in a series of reports on presidential eligibility that appears aimed at providing members of Congress with talking points to respond to constituents contending that Barack Hussein Obama is not a "natural born citizen" within the meaning of Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution, along with redefining the eligibility clause by equating "native born" with the constitutional "natural born" citizen:
Source:
Congressional ‘scholar’ shilling for Obama!-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On November 30, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=372977
Question: Did a Pennsylvania District Court rule that President Obama was ineligible for Presidency in 2008 and ordered the DNC to withdraw him or is it just another distraction?
The following article and/or blog post seems to make that case-You Decide:
Pennsylvania District Court Ruled Obama ineligible for Presidency in 2008 and ordered DNC to withdraw him!-Posted on Press-By PC-On October 2, 2011:
http://presscore.ca/2011/?p=4615
Note: My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
Was there a conspiracy to put Obama in the White House?
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/03/03/was-there-a-conspiracy-to-put-obama-in-the-white-house-2/
The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetrated-in-american-history/
Could the President’s newly released COLB be a forgery?
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/04/29/could-the-president’s-newly-released-colb-be-a-forgery/
Congress report concedes Obama eligibility unvetted!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/congress-report-concedes-obama-eligibility-unvetted/
DC knows that Obama is ineligible for office!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/27/dc-knows-that-obama-is-ineligible-for-office/
Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?
Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial. Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.
“Food For Thought”
God Bless the U.S.A.!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related
Semper Fi!
Jake
REACTING FROM FEAR AND HATRED, FROM POLITICATIONS INSIDER TRADEING, AND MOST DEMOCRATS. ARE NG.
LETS MAKE IT AMERICA AGAIN, WE CAN DO IT. LETS DO IT FOR OUR CHILDREN.
What’s wrong with this picture?
Posted on OneNewsNow.com-By Russ Jones, OneNewsNow-On December 1, 2011:
“A conservative online media outlet is calling into question President Barack Obama’s connection with an advocacy group known for voter registration fraud, as the president is leveraging his relationship with the group more than ever and has named a campaign effort in its namesake.
J. Christian Adams, an election attorney and contributor to PJ Media, says President Obama’s re-election campaign has significant ties to Project Vote, which is an affiliate of ACORN—one of the most corrupt advocacy organizations in recent memory.
”It was actually the first, and maybe one of the only clients that President Obama had when he was an attorney in private practice,” Adams explains. “And during the 2008 election, he liked to distance himself from them. He said that he really didn’t have a real serious role with them.”
Despite the corrupt and fraudulent activities of ACORN and Project Vote, the attorney contends that President Obama has already dubbed the voter registration part of his 2012 campaign “Project Vote,” which he does not find surprising, given the president’s history with the organization.
”It is clearly an intentional, in-your-face move,” Adams decides. “They don’t care about perceptions that most Americans have regarding these election crimes.”
Adams goes on to note that according to some former employees-turned-whistleblowers, flooding election officials with an overwhelming number of new, faulty registration forms was planned conduct that was meant to cause turmoil.
Related articles:
Combating voter fraud with ID laws
Democrats vow to fight voter ID laws
http://www.onenewsnow.com/Politics/Default.aspx?id=1487470
Note: The following articles and/or blog posts relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
I. 3rd state facing challenge over Obama eligibility: Alabama complaint alleges, 'We're now talking of fraud!'-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On December 1, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=373301
II. Did Obama Submit Phony Ballot Petitions in 2008?-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Ben Johnson-On October 13, 2011:
http://floydreports.com/election-fraud-watch-did-obama-submit-phony-ballot-petitions-in-2008/
III. Suspicious petitions got a stamped signature: ‘Former Gov. Kernan, 12 others come forward to say they didn’t sign!’-Posted on South Bend Tribune-By ERIN BLASKO, South Bend Tribune Staff Writer-On October 12, 2011:
IV. Sharpton’s Atlanta HQ admits handing out possibly bogus stimulus check forms!-Posted on 11alive.com-By Paul Crawley-On September 30, 2011:
V. Obama’s 2012 Strategy: Fear, Fraud, and a Cowardly Republican!-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Doug Book, CoachIsRight.com-On September 23, 2011:
http://floydreports.com/obamas-2012-strategy-fear-fraud-and-a-cowardly-republican/
VI. Obama’s HUD execs deliver $730,000 to ACORN spinoffs!-Posted on WND.com-On September 24, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=347313
VII. Obama’s ‘Jobs Bill’ Makes ACORN Eligible for $15 Billion in Taxpayer Money!-Posted on Pjamas Media-By Matthew Vadum-On September 15, 2011:
VIII. ACORN operative admits ‘voter fraud’: ‘Americans are sick and tired of having the votes of law-abiding citizens canceled out’!-Posted on WND.com-On September 13, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=344577
IX. GOP Push to Tighten State Voting Laws Prompts Dem Backlash!-Posted on FoxNews.com-By Judson Berger-On July 7, 2011:
X. Black Activists “Deeply Disappointed” in President Clinton’s “Disingenuous” Racial Attack on Ballot Security Measures!-Posted on The National Center for Public Policy Research-On July 7, 2011:
http://www.nationalcenter.org/P21PR-VoterID_070711.html
XI. Senators Seek to Stymie Polling Place Protections!-Posted on The National Center For Public Policy Research-On July 1, 2011:
http://www.nationalcenter.org/P21PR-VoterID_070111.html
XII. Black Activists Criticize Jesse Jackson on Voting Rights!-Posted on The Center For Public Policy Research-On June 22, 2011:
http://www.nationalcenter.org/P21PR-Jackson_062211.html
XIII. Time to Launch Operation Chaos!-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Michael Oberndorf-On June 16, 2011:
http://floydreports.com/time-to-launch-operation-chaos-2-0-12/
XIV. Election Fraud is Ruining America (And How to Fix It)-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Floyd Brown-On April 1, 2011:
Note: The following websites reveal that George Soros’ Open Society Institute (OSI) -- has dispensed more than $5 billion to a multitude of organizations whose objectives are consistent with those of Soros and one of those organizations is Project Vote, which is the voter-mobilization arm of the notoriously corrupt ACORN, whose voter-registration drives and get-out-the-vote initiatives have been marred by massive levels of fraud and corruption-You Decide:
Guide to the George Soros Network:
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=589
Project Vote:
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6966
Note: The following web sites and article and/or blog post reveal George Soros’s Secretary State Project (SOSP) and an education fund run by progressive labor leaders tasked with naturalizing new citizens and register new voters by using the 2010 Census as a redistributive mechanism, along with how he is using his money to help tip the elections to Democrats (Progressives) in all 50 states-You Decide:
George Soros’s Secretary Of State Project (SOSP)!-Posted on DiscoverTheNetworks.org:
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=7487
Mi Familia Vota Education Fund (MFVEF)!-Posted on DiscoverTheNetworks.org:
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=7538
George Soros’ Money Could Tip Elections in All 50 States!-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Michael Oberndorf-On July 1, 2011:
http://floydreports.com/george-soros-money-could-tip-elections-in-all-50-states/
Note: The following website and article and/or blog post reveal that George Soros funds Leftist foundations, litigators and organizations that dominate Election Laws and crusaders that enable massive voter fraud while the DOJ turns a blind eye-You Decide:
George Soros Funds Leftist Foundations, Litigators and Organizations That Dominate Field of Election Laws!-Posted on DiscoverTheNetworks.org:
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=1431
The Left Owns the Election Law Industry!-Posted on FrontPage Magazine-By J. Christian Adams-On August 12, 2011:
On or about December 12, 2009, the following article and/or blog post revealed the foreign influences of George Soros on the Obama campaign in detail, to include who ran cover Obama’s Islamic background and the connections and players in the campaign of misinformation waged by Obama supporters during the 2008 Election:
Who ran cover for Obama’s Islamic background? ‘Tracing The Politics And The Money Behind Obama’s Campaign!’-Posted on Post & Email-by John Charlton-On December 12, 2009:
http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/12/look-who-ran-cover-for-obamas-islamic-background/
Note: I, like many other Americans, have little or no faith in polls due to our bad experiences during the final days of the 2008 Presidential Election, as substantiated by the following NewsMax article that revealed that almost every major pollster, to include the main stream media, had egg on their face after the election because most of them predicted a double-digit win for then Senator Obama, but only two pollsters were accurate and critics say that the inflated numbers helped Senator Obama by reducing enthusiasm and support for Senator McCain. Also included are other articles and/or blog posts that revealed that the same thing occurred during the 2010 mid-term elections-You Decide:
2008 Presidential Election Polls:
Pollsters Inflated Senator Obama’s Lead?
2010 Mid-Term Election Polls:
Don’t Believe the State-Run Polls!-Posted by Rush Limbaugh-On October 22, 2010:
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_102210/content/01125108.guest.html
About That New Poll in Alaska . . .-Posted on National Review-By Jim Geraghty-On October 28, 2010:
http://www.nationalreview.com/campaign-spot/251296/about-new-poll-alaska
AP Says Dem Early Voters Big Turnout in MD, But MD Early Voting Hasn’t Started?-Posted on Publius Forum-By Warner Todd Huston-On October 22, 2010:
Note: The following article and/or blog post revealed that Media Matters, a disgusting news outlet that recently received $1 million from anti-American George Soros, was mocking anyone who claimed that there was voter fraud occurring during the 2010 mid-term elections-You Decide:
Baseless right-wing accusations of voter fraud? Must mean an election is near!-Posted on Media Matters-On October 27, 2010:
http://mediamatters.org/research/201010270031
Note: My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
Massive Voter Fraud-Again!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/25/massive-voter-fraud-again/
Is ACORN Really Disbanding or Is It Just Changing Its Name Because of Scandals?
President Obama and ACORN Connection!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/12/29/president-obama-and-acorn-connection/
Active complaint to the FEC over President Obama’s campaign finances!
The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetrated-in-american-history/
Who owns our supposedly fair and balanced airwaves and news outlets?
Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?
Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial. Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.
“Food For Thought”
God Bless the U.S.A.!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related
Semper Fi!
Jake
OORAH!!
Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On December 1, 2011:
”A formal challenge to Barack Obama’s candidacy in the 2012 presidential election has been filed now in a third state, where a submission by a citizen, Albert Hendershot, alleges that the Democratic Party “intends to act negligently or fraudulently in a manner that will cause irreparable harm to the citizens of Alabama.”
Earlier challenges to Obama’s candidacy were filed in New Hampshire and Georgia. State officials in New Hampshire, noting that the application had been filled out and the $1,000 fee had been paid, rejected the complaint, which now is being appealed.
The complaints note that state officials are constitutionally obligated to prevent fraudulent ballots in their jurisdictions, along with concerns that the Democrats, as in 2008, are proposing a candidate that is linked to fraud through his presentation of a contested birth certificate as well as his use of a suspect Social Security number.
“This complaint does not request or require [officials] find that President Obama is not qualified to hold the office of president of the United States. Instead, this complaint simply asserts that sufficient evidence exists to make any reasonable person doubt, in light of the evidence, that Barack Obama is a ‘natural-born citizen,’” said the document, which was posted online by the BirtherReport.com.
The website, which pursues information about Obama’s background, reports that among the various documents for Obama that remain concealed are his passport records, kindergarten records, Punahou School records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, University of Chicago scholarly articles, Illinois State Bar Association records, Illinois State Senate records/schedules, medical records, Obama/Dunham marriage license, Obama/Dunham divorce documents, Soetoro/Dunham marriage license and adoption records.
The Alabama complaint, directed to Secretary of State Beth Chapman, seeks a “hearing on the validity of evidence of electoral fraud in the 2008 presidential election and the potential for the same occurrence in the 2012 presidential election in and for the state of Alabama.”
The goals include an injunction from the state prohibiting the Democratic Party from making representations about Obama “absent a showing of evidence to your office sufficient to prove that said representation is not negligent and that Barack H. Obama is eligible to be placed on the ballot.”
The document explains the state office has “sole responsibility in placing Barack H. Obama for president” on the state ballot.
“This notice and my challenge ... request he be removed from our ballot as he does not meet the minimum qualifications as set forth in Article II Section I Clause V concerning the natural born citizen status,” the complaint explains.
Yesterday, WND reported that members of the Congressional Research Service have launched a campaign arguing that Obama is qualified, even though some critics contend he wasn’t born in Hawaii (and his birth document is forged) and, therefore, would not meet the constitutional requirement that a president be a “natural born citizen,” which is not the same as being a “citizen” or a “native-born” citizen.
The CRS argued that anyone “native-born,” such as the offspring of two illegal immigrants, is the same as “natural born citizen.”
Others say that even if Obama was born in Hawaii, by requiring “natural born citizen” the Founders excluded from eligibility anyone born a dual citizen. Obama’s father, Barack Obama Sr., was a citizen of Kenya and subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at Obama’s birth.
WND has reported that there were multiple attempts in Congress during the years that Obama was building a power base and staging his bid for the White House to remove that requirement from the Constitution. A member of a law firm at which a partner served on Obama’s finance committee also lobbied to have the change made.
The Alabama document explains the jurisdiction for vetting candidates “falls squarely on the shoulders of your office as head of the voter fraud unit and it is your sworn duty as a leader of honor and public servant to protect and defend the Constitution.”
The complaint says the fraud allegations come not only from allegations regarding Obama’s birth documentation but also from his use of a “bogus” Social Security number of Connecticut.
“The SSN discrepancy is worthy of investigation. His naturalization, if it ever occurred, is another issue since he was officially adopted by Indoensian Lolo Soetoro. These additional two issues alone would constitute the need for further investigation.”
The complaint notes the significance of the approval of the state secretary of state.
“Leading Americans, including some judges, have incorrectly concluded that the voters are the final arbiters of whether an individual is qualified to hold office. This is simply not correct. America is a constitutional Republic, not a democracy without a constitution. The Constitution is an anti-majoritarian document; meaning that it protects individuals from invasions and usurpations of the majority.”
WND previously has reported that historically, in both New Hampshire and California, candidates have been removed from ballots for ineligibility. And there even was a case in North Dakota in which a chief officer, the governor, was removed from office after he was elected and installed, because of ineligibility.
That case involved Thomas H. Moodie, who was elected. But later it was revealed that he had not lived in the state the necessary five years before running for office. “Because of that ineligibility, he was removed from office and replaced by the lieutenant governor,” state records say.”
Source:
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=373301
Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and video relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
I. Ballots with Obama's name facing more legal challenges!-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On November 29, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=372849
II. Video: Crowd Reacts to NH Obama Eligibility Hearing, “Traitors!”-Posted on ImpeachObamaCampaign.com-By admin-On November 23, 2011:
http://www.impeachobamacampaign.com/video-crowd-reacts-to-nh-obama-eligibility-hearing-traitors/
III. New Hampshire wakes up to Obama's alleged Social Security fraud ...!-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On November 16, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=368645
IV. A storm is brewing on the Obama eligibility horizon!-Posted on Sonoran News-By Linda Bentley-On November 16, 2011:
http://www.sonorannews.com/archives/2011/111116/frontpage-storm.html
V. Attack Watch still obsessing over Obama’s birth certificate!-Posted on The Examiner-By Joe Newby, Spokane Conservative Examiner-On September 16, 2011:
VI. Obama's ties with voter fraud!-Posted on OneNewsNow.com-By Russ Jones, OneNewsNow-On December 1, 2011:
http://www.onenewsnow.com/Politics/Default.aspx?id=1487470
Question: When will Americans wake up?
On or about March 2, 2010, the following article and/or blog post revealed that Sarah P. Herlihy, an associate attorney specializing in litigation at the Chicago law firm Kirkland & Ellis LLP, which is a law firm with ties to Obama, published an essay in the Chicago-Kent Law review on February 22, 2006 entitled “Amending the Natural Born Citizen Requirement: Globalization as the Impetus and the Obstacle” that floated the idea of a “takeover” of our government by a foreign power. Herlihy’s essay was widely disseminated on the internet during the 2008 presidential campaign as rumors surfaced that Obama and possibly McCain did not meet the “natural born Citizen” requirement laid out in Article II, Section 1, paragraph 5 of the U.S. Constitution:
Was there a conspiracy to put Obama in the White House?-Posted on The Post & EMail-By Sharon Rondeau-On March 2, 2010:
http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/03/02/was-there-a-conspiracy-to-put-obama-in-the-white-house/
On or about June 10, 2010, it was revealed that Mr. Tim Adams, a college instructor, who worked as a senior elections clerk for the city and county of Honolulu from May 2008 through September 2008, made a stunning claim that President Obama was definitely not born in Hawaii as the White House maintains, and that a long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate for him did not even exist in the Aloha State.
Source:
Hawaii Elections Clerk: Obama birth not here – Official who oversaw ballots in 2008 race says long-form birth certificate non-existent!-Posted on WND.com-By Joe Kovacs-On June 10, 2010:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=165041
On or about January 24, 2011, it was also revealed that Mr. Adams had signed an affidavit, on or about January 20, 2011, swearing that he was told by his supervisors in Hawaii that no long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate existed for Barack Obama Jr. in Hawaii and that neither Queens Medical Center nor Kapi’olani Medical Center in Honolulu had any record of Obama having been born in their medical facilities.
Source:
Hawaii official now swears: No Obama birth certificate!-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On January 24, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=254401#ixzz1PT0rwcGl
On or about May 31, 2011, the following articles and/or blog posts revealed that President Obama’s “Certificate of Live Birth” that was released by the White House, on or about April 27, 2011, was found to be fraudulent by an international expert on scanners and document-imaging software who filed a 22-page criminal complaint with the FBI to that effect:
Criminal complaint charges Obama birth record ‘forged’! (Part 1)-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On May 31, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=305705
Criminal complaint details birth-certificate ‘forgery’! (Part 2)-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On June 5, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=306953
Why did Obama release electronic birth certificate? (Part 3)-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On June 7, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=308277
On or about June 3, 2011, an eye-opening interview took place and aired on TruNews Radio with attorney Stephen Pidgeon, who claimed during the interview that he had found a record that revealed that President Obama had changed his name from “Barak Mounir Ubayd” to “Barack Hussein Obama” on October 14, 1982 in Skookumchuck, British Columbia.
Source:
Video: Attorney’s Explosive Claim, Obama Changed Name in 1982!-Posted on ExposeObama.com-On June 4, 2011:
http://www.exposeobama.com/2011/06/04/video-attorneys-explosive-claim-obama-changed-name-in-1982/
On or about June 12, 2011, the following article and/or blog post revealed overwhelming evidence that we in fact have a fraud and a usurper that resides in the people’s White House, despite the overt lack of journalistic investigating on the part of the American press. The new evidence indicates that the conspiracy to carry out that fraud was much broader than originally thought, which includes a forty-year story that requires a book, not a column, to tell because the evidence suggests that our President was being groomed from a very young age for the moment in history that would end American supremacy in the world, and usher in a new era of Global Marxist Governance:
The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!-Posted on The Post & Email-By JB Williams-On June 12, 2011:
http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/06/07/evidence-broadens-obama-natural-born-conspiracy/
On or about June 13, 2011, retired Maj. Gen. Paul Valley revealed that the “Certificate of Live Birth” that was released by the White House, on or about April 27, 2011, as “proof positive” of President Obama’s Hawaiian birth was a forgery, but that the FBI was covering the fraud and no one in Congress was willing to tackle the situation because of fears of a “black backlash,” if the failings of the nation’s first black president were revealed.
Source:
Ex-CIA: ‘Forged document’ released as birth certificate!-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On June 15, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=311433
Continue Reading:
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetrated-in-american-history/
Note: 25 U.S. Supreme Court Opinions That Defined “Natural Born Citizen” Were Sabotaged In The Run Up To The ’08 Presidential Election!
On or about October 20, 2011, Leo Donofrio, a New Jersey attorney who brought the first legal challenge to Barack Obama's occupancy in the Oval Office to the U.S. Supreme Court published a report that revealed that 25 U.S. Supreme Court Opinions that defined “Natural Born Citizen” were sabotaged in the run up to the ’08 Presidential Election.
Source:
25 U.S. Supreme Court Opinions That Defined “Natural Born Citizen” Were Sabotaged In The Run Up To The ’08 Presidential Election!-Posted on Natural Born Citizen-By Leo Donofrio, Esq.-On October 20, 2011:
On or about October 20, 2011, the following article and/or blog post revealed that someone had been incredibly busy in June 2008 working on an illegal front invisible to the public by searching and altering Supreme Court Cases published at Justia.com, which cite the only case in American history - Minor v. Happersett (1875) - to directly construe Article 2 Section 1’s natural-born citizen clause in determining a citizenship issue as part of its holding and precedent. In this unanimous decision, the Supreme Court defined a “native or natural-born citizen” as a person born in the US to parents who were both citizens, a definition that excludes President Obama from eligibility:
JustiaGate!-Posted on Examiner-By Dianna Cotter, Portland Civil Rights Examiner-On October 20, 2011:
http://www.examiner.com/civil-rights-in-portland/justiagate
On or about October 23, 2011, the following WND article and/or blog post revealed that Leo Donofrio, a New Jersey attorney who brought the first legal challenge to Barack Obama's occupancy in the Oval Office to the U.S. Supreme Court had published a report revealing that references to a U.S. Supreme Court decision addressing the definition of "natural-born citizen" were scrubbed at one of the key online resources for legal documents:
Eligibility rulings vanish from Net!-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On October 23, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=358645
Continue Reading:
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetrated-in-american-history/
Question: Who ran cover for Obama’s Islamic background during his campaign?
On or about December 12, 2009, the following article and/or blog post revealed the foreign influences of George Soros on the Obama campaign in detail, to include who ran cover Obama’s Islamic background and the connections and players in the campaign of misinformation waged by Obama supporters during the 2008 Election:
Who ran cover for Obama’s Islamic background? ‘Tracing The Politics And The Money Behind Obama’s Campaign!’-Posted on Post & Email-by John Charlton-On December 12, 2009:
http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/12/look-who-ran-cover-for-obamas-islamic-background/
Continue Reading:
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/11/godfather-of-the-islamic-revolution/
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/25/massive-voter-fraud-again/
Note: All three branches of the Federal government, along with National leaders are aware that Barack Hussein Obama is ineligible for the office of President!
On or about April 24, 2010, the following article and/or blog post revealed that members from all three branches of the Federal government, to include members of the US Supreme Court, already know that Barack Hussein Obama is ineligible for the office of President. Additionally, National leaders are also aware that he is not a “natural born citizen” of the United States of America, and therefore, is ineligible for the office he currently holds:
DC Knows that Obama is Ineligible for Office: ‘The certification of constitutional qualification for the office of president!’-Posted on CanadaFreePress.com-By JB Williams-On April 24, 2010:
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/22221
On or about November 8, 2010, the following WND article and/or blog post revealed a congressional document that was posted on the internet that confirms that no one, to include Congress, the states, or election officials bothered to check then Senator Obama’s eligibility to be our president:
Congress report concedes Obama eligibility unvetted: 'There is no specific federal agency' to review candidates for federal office!-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On November 8, 2010:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=225561
Continue Reading:
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/27/dc-knows-that-obama-is-ineligible-for-office/
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/congress-report-concedes-obama-eligibility-unvetted/
Note: It was recently revealed that Congressional Staff, to include a legislative attorney, within the Congressional Research Service (CRS) are attempting to redefine the eligibility clause in our Constitution as a means of convincing the American public that President Obama meets the eligibility requirements.
On or about November 14, 2011, it was also revealed that the Congressional Research Service (CRS), the research arm of Congress, has launched a defense of Barack Obama's presidential eligibility with a 50-page report that has been described as a "polemic aimed at convincing readers" Obama meets the requirements to be president:
Source:
Congressional staff gives Constitution new meaning: ‘Researchers target 'eligibility,' say 'native born' really is 'natural born!'-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On November 30, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=373085
Additionally, it was revealed that Jack Maskell, a legislative attorney with the Congressional Research Service (CRS), issued yet another in a series of reports on presidential eligibility that appears aimed at providing members of Congress with talking points to respond to constituents contending that Barack Hussein Obama is not a "natural born citizen" within the meaning of Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution, along with redefining the eligibility clause by equating "native born" with the constitutional "natural born" citizen:
Source:
Congressional ‘scholar’ shilling for Obama!-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On November 30, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=372977
Note: My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
Was there a conspiracy to put Obama in the White House?
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/03/03/was-there-a-conspiracy-to-put-obama-in-the-white-house-2/
The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetrated-in-american-history/
Could the President’s newly released COLB be a forgery?
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/04/29/could-the-president’s-newly-released-colb-be-a-forgery/
Godfather of The Islamic Revolution!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/11/godfather-of-the-islamic-revolution/
Massive Voter Fraud-Again!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/25/massive-voter-fraud-again/
Active complaint to the FEC over President Obama’s campaign finances!
Congress report concedes Obama eligibility unvetted!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/congress-report-concedes-obama-eligibility-unvetted/
DC knows that Obama is ineligible for office!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/27/dc-knows-that-obama-is-ineligible-for-office/
Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?
Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial. Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.
“Food For Thought”
God Bless the U.S.A.!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related
Semper Fi!
Jake
REMBER THE TEA PARTY AT CHRISTMAS TIME. MERRY CHRISTMAS.
OBAMA LAWYERS: Americans legitimate targets in war on terror
In numerology, the number 8 represents assuming power, for now we’ve achieved personal responsibility for our lives. In the 8 cycle of numerology, recognition and financial rewards are bestowed in business. We now have reached the point when we can reap what we’ve sown. We’ve learned to view life in broad terms. The quality of life expands to new plateaus, giving one more drive, more perseverance to go to the very top of whatever one chooses to do.
Exploiting the envy of the unsuccessful, called class warfare, is the favorite way the makers and keepers of the law in America accomplish their goals. Birds-of-a-feather flock together.
As defined in Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, the individual’s soul is his immaterial essence, animating principle or actuating cause. Once you are free to think for yourself, have awakened your soul, layer upon layer of awareness released, numerology defines as cycles of development, now that we’ve arrived at the personal power cycle, it goes back to fundamental law, which significantly involves personal discipline. This is the human’s unique ability to make sense.
I began with law professor Edward S. Corwin’s The “Higher Law” Background of American Constitutional Law. Ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle “advanced in Ethics the concept of ‘natural justice,’ ‘Of political justice,’ he wrote, ‘part is natural part legal—natural, that which everywhere has the same force and does not exist by people’s thinking this or that; legal, that which is originally indifferent. . .’ That is to say, the essential ingredient of the justice which is enforced by the state is not of the state’s own contrivance; it is a discovery from nature and a transcript of its constancy.”
The discovery that custom was neither immutable nor invariable even among the Greek city states impelled the Sophists to the conclusion that justice was either merely “the interests of the strong,” or at best a convention entered upon by men purely on considerations of expediency and terminable on like considerations. Ultimately, indeed, the two ideas boil down to the same thing, since it is impossible to regard as convenient that which cannot maintain, while that which can do so will in the long run be shaped to the interests of its sustainers.
What could be truer of America’s makers and keepers of the law? “We are our brother’s keeper” is distorted by those who use their reasoning ability to empower themselves at everyone else’s cost. It’s as easy as falling off a log because the American people don’t know the law. This being the case, by knowing the law—and using it for my personal benefit—the powers that be were not prepared. They hung themselves with their own rope.
Aristotle advanced this: “even the best of men in authority are liable to be corrupted by passion. We may conclude then that the law is reason without passion and it is therefore preferable to any individual.”
Never depend on the makers and keepers of the law to correct their wrongs. When you have a personal stake in the outcome, you remain with the right to be heard in a meaningful way in a meaningful place. If you want your rights to be honored, you must demand and be prepared to legally fight for them, lest you spill your blood over your rights. Count on the end result to be for the good of all—as determined by the makers and keepers of the law.
So know this: no matter what they say, they are not in their positions of power and control to protect your God-given rights.
My life is good. In my experience, God helps those who help themselves.
A lawyer told me it would cost big money to take my $1,500 tax issue to court, and even if I won, no judge would grant the lawyer more than a small fraction of his cost. You don’t hire a lawyer to fight your tax issue unless it is big money.
What would the makers and keepers of the law do if 10,000 working people, because they had a personal stake in the outcome, took their tax issues to court? If they knew the law, they could afford the cost. It takes time and study, but it doesn’t take a brain to know the law regarding tax. Surely, 10,000 taxpayers have a personal stake in the outcome.
Do you think Congress would remain doing nothing to solve the nation’s growing out of control spending problem if 10,000 taxpayers took their individual cases to court? Would Harry Reed and Nancy Pelosi be able to keep their fellow Democrats in line with President Obama, the Attorney General, the Secretary of Treasury, and all the other bureaucrats making life hard for the American taxpayer? Would the Federal Reserve Bank and Wall Street be able to continue ripping off taxpayers? Would the Republican leadership remain compromising on what they know is the wrong way to go? Do you think the government would continue to allow illegal entrance of our land? Do you think we would continue to keep a military presence in other nations? Do you think fraud, waste, and mismanagement would be tolerated? Do you think government workers and union workers would remain commanding far higher wages and benefits, all at the taxpayers’ expense? Or do you think all of the above named abuses of taxpayers’ rights would turn politicians into representatives of the people if taxpayers employed the law?
You don’t accept my thoughts? What other answer could there be? As a student of the law, I’ve never read in the law that God guarantees you the right to be free. I’ve never seen it in practice. I can only conclude that God-given rights are yours to protect. If you don’t accept my thoughts, then you accept being used in whatever way those in control want to use you. You are a target for Obama's lawyers. All I can say is good luck!
The criteria embraced by the liberal media, Democrats and some conservatives for selecting the 2012 Republican presidential nominee is quite clear. Imperfect conservatives need not apply. Conservative presidential candidates must have been born yesterday; not having lived long enough to break any of the Ten Commandments, make a mistake, say or do anything stupid.
However, in their short time on the planet, our conservative candidate along with possessing a “perfect past”, must display a masterful expertise of all topics foreign and domestic. Anything less means our conservative guy or gal is an incompetent idiot.
Then, there is the Reelect Obama Liberal Media/Democrat multi-headed dragon which is committed not only to simply defeating our conservative candidate, but beheading him or her and hanging their bloody dead carcass in the public square to discourage all future challengers of Liberalism. Our candidate is expected to flawlessly and masterfully battle this beast, winning every skirmish, lest we chorus that they are not quite presidential material.
Conservative presidential candidates unwilling to wear an “I heart Chaz” t-shirt are homophobic and vehement haters of homosexuals. Conservative candidates not having at least one Kanye West song in their iPod are white supremest redneck Tea Party racists. Black conservative Republican candidates are obviously self-loathing traitors to their race suffering from Stockholm Syndrome.
Meanwhile, the requirements for the Democratic presidential candidate are a bit less demanding. The liberal media's and the Democrats' candidate can hangout with self-proclaimed America haters. Their candidate can say America has 57 states and mispronounce corpsman as “corpse-man” and still be considered a genius. He can travel the world bowing to foreign leaders and apologizing for America. He can wreck America's economy, hostilely takeover a private auto company, cram government-controlled healthcare down our throats, bully banks and funnel money to his supporters via government bailouts. A New York Times article reported that the Time's candidate has abandoned pursuing the white working class vote to target entitlement-minded, loser Occupy voters without anyone raising an eyebrow.
Liberal media and Democrats do not give a rat's rear end about the character of their candidates as long as those candidates further Liberalism.
Conservative candidates are expected to have lived flawless lives without leeway to repent, learn and grow.
Peter in the Bible was a cruel tax collector who cowardly betrayed Jesus. And yet, speaking about Peter, Jesus said, “Upon this rock I will build my church.” St. Peter repented, developed and grew into a courageous Christian ultimately dying for his faith. If running for office today as a conservative, Peter's former cruelty and cowardly beginnings would end any hope of him being elected; too much stuff in his past.
Moses began as a murderer. And this religious guy Moses wants to lead his people to the Promised Land. The liberal media would say, “Forget about it; too much stuff in your past!”
Conservative presidential candidate Herman Cain is a gifted businessman of character; never been arrested, saved and created jobs and touched many lives in a positive way. However, some conservatives and the media say Cain is a little weak on foreign policy and has too much stuff in his past.
Conservative presidential candidate Newt Gingrich is really smart. Actually, Newt is brilliant with great ideas to reverse the devastatingly destructive results of liberalism. Newt would eat Obama's lunch in a debate. However, Newt does have his share of self admitted poor judgment calls. Thus, some conservatives and the media say Newt has too much stuff in his past.
Conservative presidential candidate Congresswoman Michele Bachmann has a great record in Minnesota. She and her husband adopted a ga-zillion kids which speaks to her great character. As with all conservative women, left-wing feminists despise Bachmann. If the feminists were true to their supposed mission, Bachmann would be their poster girl; a strong woman successful in and outside of the home. Instead, for reasons I do not understand, an NBC program introduced Bachmann by playing a song about a “lyin' a-- b----!” Bachmann has been attacked for comments she has made expressing her Christian faith. Some conservatives and the media say there is too much stuff in her past.
Conservative presidential candidate Gov. Rick Perry has been super in Texas. Some conservatives and the media say Perry is not the smoothest guy in the world during TV debates, is weak on immigration and has too much stuff in his past; something about a rock on a property rented by his family for hunting which still bears the “n” word, put there many years earlier. Surely, the Texas governor must be a member of the KKK. Bottom line, too much stuff in Perry's past.
The rest of the Republican field of contenders for the nomination have not yet been targeted by the liberal media. Rest assured, whoever rises to frontrunner status will be attacked and discovered to be racist, sexist, homophobic or stupid. The Republican candidate will be stripped naked and made to suffer the humiliation of “gang allegations” by the liberal media. For example. Upon becoming the frontrunner, Cain was declared an Uncle Tom, stupid and a serial sexist by the liberal media (as the knockout punch) by the liberal media.
We conservatives hold our candidates to a high standard. And for that, I make no apology and proudly name myself among you. Still, I believe any of our flawed conservative candidates are far superior to Obama in terms of their qualifications, core values and love for America. So I will not toss every frontrunner into the unelectable trash can whenever the liberal media dictates.
But obviously, some conservatives believe all of our conservative candidates are too flawed with too much stuff in their past to enthusiastically embrace as our Republican nominee. So, let's just settle for the “articulate and clean” RINO Romney, watch him go down in humiliating defeat and buckle our seat belts for four more years of Barack Hussein Obama.
Lloyd Marcus, Proud Unhyphenated American
Chairman of The Campaign to Defeat Barack Obama.
Lloyd is singer/songwriter of the American Tea Party Anthem and author of Confessions of a Black Conservative, foreword by Michele Malkin.
Spokesperson for Tea Party Express
Please help me spread my message by joining my Liberty Network.
LloydMarcus.com
What’s disturbing about this picture?
Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On November 30, 2011:
“On Nov. 14, Jack Maskell, a legislative attorney with the Congressional Research Service, issued yet another in a series of reports on presidential eligibility that appears aimed at providing members of Congress with talking points to respond to constituents contending that Barack Obama is not a “natural born citizen” within the meaning of Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution.
Entitled “Qualifications for President and the ‘Natural Born’ Citizen Eligibility Requirement,” the 50-page report peppered with 253 footnotes reads less like an objectively argued, even-handed discussion of competing legal arguments than a polemic aimed at convincing readers that Barack Obama is a “natural born citizen” qualified to be president.
Obama has several obvious liabilities when it comes to the natural-born-citizen question:
1. Obama’s father was a citizen of Kenya when Obama was born in 1961, hence both Barack Obama Sr. and his son at birth were citizens of the Commonwealth of Great Britain;
2. Barack Obama Jr., when in Indonesia with his mother and Indonesian step-father, was registered in school under the name “Barry Soetoro,” and his mother listed him as “Soebarkah” when requesting the State Department remove her son from her passport; and
3. Questions remain whether the long-form birth certificate made public by the White House on April 27 is a forgery; the Hawaii Department of Health still refuses to show original 1961 Obama birth records; and Kapiolani Hospital has failed to provide corroborating evidence that Ann Dunham Obama was ever a patient in the hospital or that Barack Obama Jr. was born there.
So, the case of Barack Obama’s presidency raises several yet unresolved questions:
- Whether a “natural born citizen” at birth requires having two U.S. citizen parents at birth, as well as being born on U.S. soil;
- Whether being a dual citizen at birth or subsequently compromises ”natural born citizen” status;
- Whether original birth records must be submitted for determination of “natural born citizen” status, or whether copies of relevant birth documents and affirmation by state authorities is sufficient to establish place of birth;
- What agency of government will be responsible for making the “natural born citizen” determination according to the Constitution’s dictates of Article 2, Section 1, to qualify presidential candidates as eligible to run?
To resolve these questions, Maskell and the CRS advance the arguments that “native born” is equivalent to “natural born,” that English Common Law is determinative of the question, and that being a “U.S. citizen at birth” is equivalent to “natural born citizen.”
The end result of Maskell’s analysis is that an anchor baby born to two illegal immigrants, or a baby born in “birth tourism” to two foreign national parents and raised outside the United States would both be eligible to be president, provided the person was 35 years old and had spent 14 years as a resident living within the United States before running for president.
Maskell typically states as established fact legal principles that truthfully remain in dispute – for instance, on page 1 of the report, where he asserts that a person born “in” the United States of one or more alien parents is “clearly a U.S. citizen ‘at birth’ by the 14th Amendment.”
In so concluding, Maskell intentionally ignores the “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” qualification within the language of the 14th Amendment that opponents to anchor babies and birth tourism feel invalidates the entire concept that being born in the U.S. is sufficient to being deemed a “U.S. citizen at birth.”
Moreover, even if the 14th Amendment were to establish being born a native to the U.S. is sufficient to being deemed a “U.S. citizen at birth,” that does not make a “natural born citizen” equivalent to being a “U.S. citizen at birth.”
The 14th Amendment makes no reference whatsoever to redefining “natural born citizen” under Article 2, Section 1.
The point is that Maskell wants “natural born citizen” to be equivalent to “U.S. citizen at birth,” because the argument eliminates the need to have even one U.S.-citizen parent at birth.
Similarly, Maskell wants to read English Common Law into the “natural born citizen” requirement of Article 2, Section 1, because under English Common Law a “natural born subject” is anyone born on English soil, a principle known as jus soli – a right conferred by place of birth – rather than jus sanguinis – a right conferred by blood, requiring an inquiry into the citizenship of the parents at the time a child is born.
That English Common Law is applicable to the interpretation of Article 2, Section 1, was advanced by the Supreme Court in dicta – i.e., arguments made by the justices that are not central to the decision in the case, hence arguments that are not considered determinative for the purposes of legal precedent – in United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898).
While Maskell accepts the dicta in Wong Kim Ark because he agrees with the argument, he dismisses as dicta the only Supreme Court definition of “natural born citizen” that is on point regarding the meaning of Article 2, Section 1, namely, Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 21 Wall. 162 (1874), where the Supreme Court implied “natural born citizens” were those born on U.S. soil to parents who were U.S. citizens at the time the child was born.
On page 25 of the CRS report, Maskell finally admits that the Supreme Court has never ruled specifically on the meaning of the “natural born citizen” clause of Article 2, Section 1, even though that does not stop Maskell from arguing that federal courts have not established a “two citizen-parent” requirement on “native born U.S. citizens.”
From there, Maskell wants us to conclude that requirements of “lineage or bloodline” are not required “for a native born U.S. citizen to be eligible for the Presidency.”
Even when it comes to the case of Sen. John McCain’s eligibility to be president, Maskell glosses over the excoriating attack launched on McCain by the Democrats and the mainstream media because McCain was born in the Panama Canal Zone, ignoring the arguments made by constitutional lawyers Larry Tribe and Ted Olsen to the U.S. Senate concluding McCain was eligible to be president in part because McCain had two U.S. citizen parents at birth.
Maskell in his pro-Obama advocacy goes so far as to assert the two-citizen requirement would “entail the unique notion that under American jurisprudence parental citizenship or lineage is the determining factor for eligibility to the Presidency for native born U.S. citizens.”
In so doing, Maskell failed to acknowledge the concern the founders had when inserting into the Constitution the “natural born citizen” requirement that being a citizen was not sufficient for a person to ascend to the presidency.
Instead, the founders determined eligibility to be president was reduced to a subset of citizens identified as “natural born citizens.”
This specification demanded consideration of parental citizenship and allegiance, every bit as much as the phrase “and under the jurisdiction of” demands the same considerations of parental citizenship and allegiance when it comes to the 14th Amendment.
Still, this is not the first time Maskell and the CRS have attempted to interpret the Constitution so as to advance to members of Congress arguments that could be used to explain why Obama is eligible to be president.
On Nov. 8, 2010, WND reported an interview with Maskell in which he acknowledged that CRS memoranda he authored were written for distribution to congressional offices, not for public distribution, and that copies were available only if released to the public by one or more congressional offices.
The CRS memo in discussion at that time containing responses written by Maskell to help congressional offices answer constituent questions regarding why no official body had ever asked to see or authenticate Obama’s long-form birth certificate.
Maskell’s answer then conceding that a loophole in the Constitution did not assign the responsibility to any institution in government for making a “natural born citizen” determination on presidential eligibility.
In that memorandum, Maskell ended up noting there is no requirement that a candidate for president produce his original birth certificate for examination by any governmental body, at the state or federal level.
Unfortunately, rather than advance the eligibility debate with a truly scholarly analysis, Maskell produced for Congress what amounts to a footnoted polemic aimed at appearing scholarly to prop up Obama’s eligibility defense.
In the final analysis, Maskell’s purpose appears thinly disguised – namely, to advance the ongoing cover-up regarding Obama nativity facts and evidence by quashing with arguments couched in legalese the continuing concerns held by millions of Americans that Obama has truly not proved to the American public or any duly-constituted governmental institution that he is eligible to be president.”
Source:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=372977
On or about November 8, 2010, the following article and/or blog post revealed a congressional document that was posted on the internet that confirms that no one, to include Congress, the states, or election officials bothered to check then Senator Obama’s eligibility to be our president-You Decide:
Congress report concedes Obama eligibility unvetted: 'There is no specific federal agency' to review candidates for federal office-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On November 8, 2010:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=225561
On or about April 24, 2010, the following article and/or blog post revealed that members from all three branches of the Federal government already know that Barack Hussein Obama is ineligible for the office of President. National leaders, to include members of the US Supreme Court, already know that Barack Hussein Obama is not a “natural born citizen” of the United States of America, and therefore, is ineligible for the office he currently holds-You Decide:
DC Knows that Obama is Ineligible for Office; “The certification of constitutional qualification for the office of president”-Posted on CanadaFreePress.com-By JB Williams-On April 24, 2010:
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/22221
On or about October 20, 2011, Leo Donofrio, a New Jersey attorney who brought the first legal challenge to Barack Obama's occupancy in the Oval Office to the U.S. Supreme Court published a report that revealed that 25 U.S. Supreme Court Opinions that defined “Natural Born Citizen” were sabotaged in the run up to the ’08 Presidential Election.
Source:
25 U.S. Supreme Court Opinions That Defined “Natural Born Citizen” Were Sabotaged In The Run Up To The ’08 Presidential Election!-Posted on Natural Born Citizen-By Leo Donofrio, Esq.-On October 20, 2011:
On or about October 20, 2011, the following article and/or blog post revealed that someone had been incredibly busy in June 2008 working on an illegal front invisible to the public by searching and altering Supreme Court Cases published at Justia.com, which cite the only case in American history - Minor v. Happersett (1875) - to directly construe Article 2 Section 1’s natural-born citizen clause in determining a citizenship issue as part of its holding and precedent. In this unanimous decision, the Supreme Court defined a “native or natural-born citizen” as a person born in the US to parents who were both citizens, a definition that excludes President Obama from eligibility:
JustiaGate!-Posted on Examiner-By Dianna Cotter, Portland Civil Rights Examiner-On October 20, 2011:
http://www.examiner.com/civil-rights-in-portland/justiagate
On or about October 23, 2011, the following article and/or blog post revealed that Leo Donofrio, a New Jersey attorney who brought the first legal challenge to Barack Obama's occupancy in the Oval Office to the U.S. Supreme Court had published a report revealing that references to a U.S. Supreme Court decision addressing the definition of "natural-born citizen" were scrubbed at one of the key online resources for legal documents:
Eligibility rulings vanish from Net!-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On October 23, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=358645
Note: The following articles and/or blog posts relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
I. Congressional staff gives Constitution new meaning: ‘Researchers target 'eligibility,' say 'native born' really is 'natural born!'-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On November 30, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=373085
II. Ballots with Obama's name facing more legal challenges!-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On November 29, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=372849
Note: My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
DC knows that Obama is ineligible for office!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/27/dc-knows-that-obama-is-ineligible-for-office/
Congress report concedes Obama eligibility unvetted!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/congress-report-concedes-obama-eligibility-unvetted/
The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetrated-in-american-history/
Could the President’s newly released COLB be a forgery?
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/04/29/could-the-president’s-newly-released-colb-be-a-forgery/
Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?
Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial. Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.
“Food For Thought”
God Bless the U.S.A.!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related
Semper Fi!
Jake
WE ARE WORSE OFF NOW. ADD A BLOG IF YOU ARE BETTER OFF.
What’s disturbing about this picture?
Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On November 30, 2011:
“The Congressional Research Service, the research arm of Congress, has launched a defense of Barack Obama’spresidential eligibility with a 50-page report that “Where’s the Birth Certificate?” author Jerome Corsi has described as a “polemic aimed at convincing readers” Obama meets the requirements to be president.
Shortly after Obama took office, it was CRS staffer Jerry W. Mansfield, an information research specialist in the Knowledge Services Group, who wrote a memo titled “Qualifications of Barack Obama to Be President of the United States” that seemed aimed at providing talking points for members of Congress whose constituents who were questioning the absence of documentation for Obama.
Now comes the new campaign from CRS Legislative Attorney Jack Maskell, which seems to redefine eligibility, equating “native born” with the constitutional “natural born” citizen.
He cites the questions that have plagued Obama from before his 2008 election – the location of his birth and the status of his parents. The Constitution requires a president to be a “natural born citizen,” and a common definition at the time the Constitution was written was an offspring of two citizen parents.
While Obama has released a purported “Certificate of Live Birth” from Hawaii, there are experts who have questioned whether it is genuine. Others say even if he was born in Hawaii, he would not be eligible because his father was a Kenyan subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of the birth. They argue the inclusion of “natural born” in the Constitution precluded dual citizens from occupying the Oval Office.
The definition of the status was addressed in 1875 in the U.S. Supreme Court decision Minor v. Happersett, which concluded it was a child born of two U.S. citizens – regardless of location of the birth.
That decision said: “The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.”
The current Supreme Court has avoided addressing the question directly, according to one of its members, by refusing to hear any of the dozens of cases that have been brought specifically on the question of the application of “natural born citizen” to a child whose father was a foreign national, whether he was born on U.S. soil or not.
But Maskell states that “the Supreme Court has never needed to address this particular issue within the specific context of a challenge to the eligibility of a candidate under Article II, Section 1, clause 5, the only place in the entire Constitution that the phrase appears.”
He said that because the Supreme Court “has never needed to address this particular issue,” there is “certain speculation on the scope of the language.”
Corsi notes that Maskell simply advances the argument that “native born” is equivalent to “natural born” and that “being a ‘U.S. citizen at birth’ is equivalent to ‘natural born citizen.’”
“The end result of Maskell’s analysis is that an anchor baby born to two illegal immigrants, or a baby born in ‘birth tourism’ to two foreign national parents and raised outside the United States would both be eligible to be president, provided the person was 35 years old and had spent 14 years as a resident living within the United States before running for president,” Corsi writes.
“Maskell typically states as established fact legal principles that truthfully remain in dispute, for instance, on page 1 of the report, where he asserts that a person born ‘in’ the United States of one or more alien parents is ‘clearly a U.S. citizen ‘at birth’ by the Fourteenth Amendment,’” Corsi continues.
“In so concluding, Maskell intentionally ignores the ‘and subject to the jurisdiction thereof’ qualification with the language of the Fourteenth Amendment that opponents to anchor babies and birth tourism feel invalidates the entire concept that being born in the U.S. is sufficient to being deemed a ‘U.S. citizen at birth,’” he says.
Corsi continues, “Similarly, Maskell wants to read English Common Law into the ‘natural born citizen’ requirement of Article 2, Section 1, because under English Common Law a ‘natural born subject’ is anyone born on English soil, a principle known as jus soli – a right conferred by place of birth – rather than jus sanguinis – a right conferred by blood, requiring an inquiry into the citizenship of the parents when a child is born.”
He notes that Maskell, “in his pro-Obama advocacy,” asserted the two-citizen parent requirement would “entail the unique notion that under American jurisprudence parental citizenship or lineage is the determining factor for eligibility to the presidency for native born U.S. citizens.”
“In so doing, Maskell failed to acknowledge the concern the Founders had when inserting into the Constitution the ‘natural born citizen’ requirement that being a citizen was not sufficient for a person to ascend to the presidency,” Corsi says.
Maskell argues that “natural born” citizens probably were considered by the early members of Congress “to include more than merely the ‘native born,’ that is, those born in the country.”
And he notes at the time of the Dredd Scott decision by the U.S. Supreme Court affirming slavery, the U.S. attorney general wrote, “I am quite clear in the opinion that children born in the United States of alien parents, who have never been naturalized, are native-born citizens of the United States, and, of course, do not require the formality of naturalization to entitle them to the rights and privileges of such citizenship.”
The Constitution, however, requires “natural born,” not only “native born.”
That’s no problem, Maskell said, as various commentators, such as James Kent in his “Commentaries on American Law,” equated the two terms.
And he said the U.S. Supreme Court did the same thing in an opinion, quoting, “We start with the premise that the rights of citizenship of the native born and of the naturalized person are of the same dignity and are coextensive. The only difference drawn by the Constitution is that only the ‘natural born’ citizen is eligible to be president.”
In Obama’s case, he says, “there is currently no requirement under federal law … for any federal candidate, that is, candidates to the U.S. Senate, the House of Representatives, of the office of president, to publish, produce, or release an official ‘birth certificate.’”
He writes, “The initial burden of proof is always upon those who challenge a candidate’s eligibility, and not on a candidate to ‘prove’ eligibility.”
He continues by noting that “no official record” … is around that places “President Obama’s mother in a foreign country at the time of the president’s birth.”
He also moves on to arguments that are thin, Corsi says, quoting the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in the Kerchner v. Obama eligibility case that “because we have decided that this appeal is frivolous, we will order counsel for appellants to show cause why just damages and costs should not be imposed.”
However, in that case, when the Kerchner side pointed out that under the rules of the court, a threat of sanctions comes with a right to discovery regarding the allegations, the court retreated from its position.
That also happened in a previous case involving Gregory S. Hollister, who brought a challenge to Obama’s eligibility. A threat of sanctions was met with approval by Hollister’s attorney, because then he would have the right of discovery. Again, the court retreated.
Concludes Maskell, “Every child born in and subject to the jurisdiction of the United States … is a native born U.S. citizen and thus a ‘natural born citizen’ eligible to be president … regardless of the nationality or citizenship of one’s parents.”
However, Maskell makes no reference to an effort by a Chicago firm led by an Obama fundraiser to remove the “natural born citizen” requirement from the U.S. Constitution – a move that seems to betray doubt about Obama’s eligibility.
The article in 2006 by Sarah Herlihy stated: “The natural born citizen requirement in Article II of the United States Constitution has been called the ‘stupidest provision’ in the Constitution, ‘decidedly un-American,’ ‘blatantly discriminatory,’ and the ‘Constitution’s worst provision.’”
She said “emotional” reasons were defeating attempts by “rational” arguments to remove it.
She was listed as an associate at the Chicago firm Kirkland & Ellis, where partner Bruce I. Ettelson cited his membership on the finance committee for Obama. Her writings were available online under law review articles from Kent University until after WND reported on the statements.
In the earlier memo by Mansfield, posted on Scribd.com for download, he suggested questions raised about Obama’s eligibility have been conclusively dismissed as Internet falsehoods that are taking on mythical proportions.
Mansfield told WND that he had written the memo to give to congressional constituents who were peppering congressional offices for a response to eligibility challenges.
WND also has reported that there have been at least eight attempts by members of Congress, during the past few years as Obama was developing his power base and running for president, to remove the Constitution’s requirement that a president be a “natural born citizen.”
Source:
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=373085
Note: On or about March 2, 2010, the following article and/or blog post revealed that Sarah P. Herlihy, an associate attorney specializing in litigation at the Chicago law firm Kirkland & Ellis LLP, which is a law firm with ties to Obama, published an essay in the Chicago-Kent Law review on February 22, 2006 entitled “Amending the Natural Born Citizen Requirement: Globalization as the Impetus and the Obstacle” that floated the idea of a “takeover” of our government by a foreign power. Herlihy’s essay was widely disseminated on the internet during the 2008 presidential campaign as rumors surfaced that Obama and possibly McCain did not meet the “natural born Citizen” requirement laid out in Article II, Section 1, paragraph 5 of the U.S. Constitution-You Decide:
Was there a conspiracy to put Obama in the White House?-Posted on The Post & EMail-By Sharon Rondeau-On March 2, 2010:
http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/03/02/was-there-a-conspiracy-to-put-obama-in-the-white-house/
Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and video relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
I. George Soros assault on U.S. Constitution: ‘White House officials involved in rewriting nation’s founding document’!-Posted on WND.com-By Aaron Klein-On March 27, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=280277
II. Obama Versus the Constitution!-Posted on American Thinker-By James Lewis-On April 25, 2011:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/04/obama_versus_the_constitution.html
III. Who ran cover for Obama’s Islamic background? ‘Tracing The Politics And The Money Behind Obama’s Campaign!’-Posted on Post & Email-by John Charlton-On December 12, 2009:
http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/12/look-who-ran-cover-for-obamas-islamic-background/
IV. Video: “A Republic, If You Can Keep It”!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=H8I9pLmuyyA#at=13
Note: My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetrated-in-american-history/
Could the President’s newly released COLB be a forgery?
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/04/29/could-the-president’s-newly-released-colb-be-a-forgery/
Was there a conspiracy to put Obama in the White House?
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/03/03/was-there-a-conspiracy-to-put-obama-in-the-white-house-2/
Godfather of The Islamic Revolution!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/11/godfather-of-the-islamic-revolution/
Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?
Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial. Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.
“Food For Thought”
God Bless the U.S.A.!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related
Semper Fi!
Jake
REMBER ALL YOU DECOCRATS THAT WE ARE STONE COLD BROKE. ALL OUR MONEY SHOULD STAY IN AMERICA
Last August, 2011, I indicated that the world communist party is running the U.S. Federal Government via two primary proxies; Mr. Obama and the progressive group in the Senate and to a somewhat lesser extent, the house of representatives. By the way, don't forget their numerous support groups, the labor unions and "public" education at all levels, as well as 95% of the traditional press outlets, more accurately pegged as communist propagandists.
I am writing this because it is becoming increasingly obvious that the communist party has infiltrated the Republican presidential nomination process. Last summer, I warned about Rick Perry. Now what do you say after the country has had a chance to take a look at him? Gingrich now enters the fray yet again. I don't relish having to say this because I still remember when Newt rebuked House Speaker Tip O'Neal by calling him a communist. This was to Newt's credit because it was an accurate statement that took courage to say. Very, very few of our representatives have had the courage to call a dog a dog. Unfortunately, Mr. Gingirch has now himself been co-opted by the communists via Pelosi to accept the environmentalist agenda, yet another communist front or proxie. So Newt is now an environmentalist and we should know that the environmentalists are the most potent communist front in organizing and implementing the communist regime in America.
So, let's see now. Only Bachman, Santorum, and Cane remain as viable candidates. Bachman has recently said she would raise taxes yet her record is clear Tea Party. Why hasn't Santorum been given more, even any press coverage? Cane is obviously a threat to the communist agenda since he has been so savagely attacked in repeated attempts to discredit him. Any of these three might "do." But just adequate may produce just adequate results.
So who is the diamond hidden among the rough? Cane, Santorum, Bachmann? Established psychological principle states that past behavior is the best predictor of future behavior. This being the case, Bachmann's record clearly indicates she is the true American Patriot. To raise taxes is rarely good, but even Patrick Henry favored raising taxes for the narrow purpose of funding an American Revolution against tyrannical Britain.
I, like all Americans have spent the last 4 1/2 years listening to the socialist ruling class elites and their propaganda machine espouse the mental superiority of one Barack Hussein Obama aka. Barry Soetoro. They have elevated his supposed intellect to equate it to Albert Einstein, Aristotle, Socrates, Galileo, Leonardo DaVinci, Stephen Hawking, Nikolai Tesla, and thousands more of Histories great minds. Yet there is one glaring problem that keeps them from solidifying this scenario. Barry's not much more than a sharp street hustler with more hyperbole than substance and a slightly above average IQ.(avg. is 85)
If Barry were as sharp as touted they would be more than happy to release his academic records from Occidental College, Columbia, Harvard, or any of his published papers or articles from his community organizing days. As a matter of fact the only 2 touted publications by Shifty are his 2 books 1 of which was a miserable failure so poorly written that it was a privately paid for publishing. The second written after several years affiliation with Bill Ayers has an amazing new syntax, verse and writing style that was "inspired" by Mr. Ayers coaching Obama. So much so that it is almost a carbon copy of several books written by Bill the Bomber right down to the "definable writing styles". And after personally researching with several members of Mensa, we could not find anywhere in their records of Barry ever being tested.
Now I am 10 years older than Barry and I was tested in the mid 60's and the International Organization just celebrated its 65th. birthday, and has tested in every major population center on earth, so if he were as intelligent as portrayed he would have been tested somewhere while attending school either in Hawaii, Indonesia, California, New York or Massachusetts, wherever there was a Mensa chapter. To be recognized for membership you must have an IQ in the top 2 percentile as recognized by national or international standardized testing methodology. There are no records of either of his names in the records of his testing warranting any recognition of any level of genius or even border line above average intellect that would resemble a genius IQ.
So where oh where is the "Brilliant Barry" records and why someone of such great mental prowess is not showering us with his intellectual greatness beyond his oratorical skills while demonstrating his reading abilities. If he is as truly gifted in the IQ department, why would they not be flooding us with the proof of said gifts?
As a youth growing up in NYC I can remember the street hustlers in Times Square dealing 3 card Monty and impressed by how smooth they had their play down. Their banter was well rehearsed and their desired effect was the diversionary tactic to distract you from paying attention to what his hands were doing, rigging the game against you by removing the object that would allow you to win. They called it follow the queen and by the time they got done with their play the queen was never on the table or box in front of you and your money was as good as in their pocket. The espoused intellectual greatness of Barry is nothing more than a game of follow the queen.
We are being hustled and it is not just our money being taken but the very freedoms that we as Americans were born with. And in Barry they have the perfect front man, someone who they can manipulate and control yet someone who is polished enough in the art of deception to avoid the scrutiny that socialists and communists and progressives have been vilified for in the past. They now have their carnival barker that can convey their class warfare divisive Marxist message while quietly enacting the necessary infrastructure to supplant our Constitution.
Barack Hussein Obama is now dealing this country 3 card Monty while he enacts more than 4000 federal regulations not voted on in Congress and just recently signed another executive order #13575.
He has with his minions and puppet masters and the main sewer media propagandizing their agenda took this 235 year old Constitutional Republic with democratically elected representation and turned it into a totalitarian socialist state where the rule of law is now been supplanted by the rule of men. As of Nov. 24 2011 he has signed 101 executive orders that also bypass the aforementioned stop gaps that once defined our representation. This has been a trend by many presidents since the turn of the 20th. century with FDR holding the record with 3,728 in his tenure and 573 in 1933 alone.
It is not so much the proclivity of Barry's orders as it is the orders themselves that tells the tale of the intended and instituted deception to hide the truth of his verifiable intellectual capabilities and starts the deception. His first order on 01/21/2009 the very first day of his administration he signed executive order 13489 and 13490 blocking any attempt for anyone to access any sitting or former POTUS' official records if they do not wish them to be and the release of any said document must be reviewed and approved by both the POTUS and the Attorney General and reversing 2 previous executive orders from former POTUS' that were demanded by the same main sewer media that now has amnesia about their boy Barry. His most recent explained in the video above received as much media attention as the first two did but the real difference is that we are even further down the road of a fascist totalitarian socialist democracy that is now under mob rule.
And he is not alone in this and has allies all around and from both sides of the aisle because the "ruling class elite" our own version of the dukes and barons of foregone monarchal rule that are willing to supplant our civil liberties to maintain their power.
They have moved their agenda of a one world order with the United Nations as the ruling body and not our elected representatives. They have moved past the laws of this Republic and are fast approaching the point of no return. And the latest attempt in the Senate to remove another barrier is with the " National Defense Authorization Act" (S.1867)
The U.S. Senate is moving to enact a law that would allow military troops to march on U.S. soil and arrest American citizens with no due process, no trial, no legal representation and no protection under the Bill of Rights. Americans could be thrown in secret military prisons, interrogated, tortured and held indefinitely without ever being charged with a crime!
We are one step further down the road to socialist fascism and the front man for their grand plan is well suited, he has no morals or honor and never let the truth get in the way of a good lie, just like any good con man. He has a 100 watt smile and can be smooth and charming which are common traits for a skilled deceiver. He is narcissistic and in private condescending and self righteous believing his own hype and that also is a necessary trait for a good con to work, the person doing the conning has to convince everyone including himself that it is not a con for it work. And you must have a supporting cast to complete the con and he has one in his Czars and the Democrat party and the unions and the media. If you doubt this watch an oldie but a goodie of a movie called "The Sting" I just re-watched it and realized that we are being played like Doyle Lonnigan the mark in the movie.
Now watchy here for the lady don't' look at the gents keep your eyes on the lovely lady of the hearts she'll steal your soul, don't blink she moves fast she'll break your heart or make you rich watch here the lady disappear!
The Lady is called LIBERTY!
Dr. Keith C. Westbrook Ph.D.
OK, everybody, when WE, the American people say: " They should do this or that", we have to ask ourselves who "they" is. "They" is US. We started this illegal alien invasion mess, now we have to fix it. WE, not they. Obama is benefiting from the illegals and, unfortunately, so are many American businesses.
I say that we started this mess because we patronize and support the illegals and then we complain about illegal immigration.
We all have an opinion of what others should do, and we even list it. Now, here is the to-do-list for ourselves, the real American citizens who care for our community, and our country. Remember, "Ask not what your country can do for. ask what you can do for your country". We do not need the help of the government to fix illegal immigration; we can do it ourselves. How? Here is how:
1. Stop hiring day labor for your house chores and maintenance. No more yard workes in our subdivisions. If you must use outside help, call a friend who knows legal workers who do the same type of work. Call your neighbor. Post it here. Offer the job (at the same rate or even higher) to high school kids, they really need to start early learning about personal responsibility.
2. Apply the same principle to cleaning people. Go to your church and start a group to help each other. Stop hiring illegal aliens to clean your house!!!
3. Baby-sitters...Do I need to tell you again?
4. Home remodeling, repair or painting people. Come on!! Didn't you know?
4.Post the business names who you know that use illegals to conduct business in your neighborhood. Here is a hint (in case you are one of those who "can't tell the differece" or say: " I am not an immigration agent")
In Houston most of the following business hire illegals:
a) Car washes
b) Dry cleaners
c) Almost all mexican restaurants (I give some the beneifit of the doubt)
d) Most McDonalds
Now, hopefully whoever manages this site could open a special tab to post the businesse who hire illegals by Zip Code for example. We, then, send them a friendly reminder of their betrayal to our country and that we wish that they clean their act swiftly, before the boicott and bad publicity starts.
So, stop NOW hiring illegals to do your house chores and post the businesses names with as much information as posible (address, phone, website, manager's name, etc), and stop patronizing that or those businesses. We have to stop this madness because Obama, nor Perry for that matter, are going to do it for us.
It is, also a good idea to post here reports of what's wrong with our country. How about flooding our representatives e-mails and websites with denounces of illegals abusing the Lone Star card, or the WIC benefits. If you see something, say something in the government official' websites!
Here the first post:
Bear Creek Car Wash
5614 Highway 6 North, Houston, TX 77084
Uses illegal aliens to do the work.
Governor Perry said that we don't have a heart...we do. But the illegals hate America and they have become a very serious threat. Enough is enough. I say.
