The criteria embraced by the liberal media, Democrats and some conservatives for selecting the 2012 Republican presidential nominee is quite clear. Imperfect conservatives need not apply. Conservative presidential candidates must have been born yesterday; not having lived long enough to break any of the Ten Commandments, make a mistake, say or do anything stupid.

However, in their short time on the planet, our conservative candidate along with possessing a “perfect past”, must display a masterful expertise of all topics foreign and domestic. Anything less means our conservative guy or gal is an incompetent idiot.

Then, there is the Reelect Obama Liberal Media/Democrat multi-headed dragon which is committed not only to simply defeating our conservative candidate, but beheading him or her and hanging their bloody dead carcass in the public square to discourage all future challengers of Liberalism. Our candidate is expected to flawlessly and masterfully battle this beast, winning every skirmish, lest we chorus that they are not quite presidential material.

Conservative presidential candidates unwilling to wear an “I heart Chaz” t-shirt are homophobic and vehement haters of homosexuals. Conservative candidates not having at least one Kanye West song in their iPod are white supremest redneck Tea Party racists. Black conservative Republican candidates are obviously self-loathing traitors to their race suffering from Stockholm Syndrome.

Meanwhile, the requirements for the Democratic presidential candidate are a bit less demanding. The liberal media's and the Democrats' candidate can hangout with self-proclaimed America haters. Their candidate can say America has 57 states and mispronounce corpsman as “corpse-man” and still be considered a genius. He can travel the world bowing to foreign leaders and apologizing for America. He can wreck America's economy, hostilely takeover a private auto company, cram government-controlled healthcare down our throats, bully banks and funnel money to his supporters via government bailouts. A New York Times article reported that the Time's candidate has abandoned pursuing the white working class vote to target entitlement-minded, loser Occupy voters without anyone raising an eyebrow.

Liberal media and Democrats do not give a rat's rear end about the character of their candidates as long as those candidates further Liberalism.

Conservative candidates are expected to have lived flawless lives without leeway to repent, learn and grow.

Peter in the Bible was a cruel tax collector who cowardly betrayed Jesus. And yet, speaking about Peter, Jesus said, “Upon this rock I will build my church.” St. Peter repented, developed and grew into a courageous Christian ultimately dying for his faith. If running for office today as a conservative, Peter's former cruelty and cowardly beginnings would end any hope of him being elected; too much stuff in his past.

Moses began as a murderer. And this religious guy Moses wants to lead his people to the Promised Land. The liberal media would say, “Forget about it; too much stuff in your past!”

Conservative presidential candidate Herman Cain is a gifted businessman of character; never been arrested, saved and created jobs and touched many lives in a positive way. However, some conservatives and the media say Cain is a little weak on foreign policy and has too much stuff in his past.

Conservative presidential candidate Newt Gingrich is really smart. Actually, Newt is brilliant with great ideas to reverse the devastatingly destructive results of liberalism. Newt would eat Obama's lunch in a debate. However, Newt does have his share of self admitted poor judgment calls. Thus, some conservatives and the media say Newt has too much stuff in his past.

Conservative presidential candidate Congresswoman Michele Bachmann has a great record in Minnesota. She and her husband adopted a ga-zillion kids which speaks to her great character. As with all conservative women, left-wing feminists despise Bachmann. If the feminists were true to their supposed mission, Bachmann would be their poster girl; a strong woman successful in and outside of the home. Instead, for reasons I do not understand, an NBC program introduced Bachmann by playing a song about a “lyin' a-- b----!” Bachmann has been attacked for comments she has made expressing her Christian faith. Some conservatives and the media say there is too much stuff in her past.

Conservative presidential candidate Gov. Rick Perry has been super in Texas. Some conservatives and the media say Perry is not the smoothest guy in the world during TV debates, is weak on immigration and has too much stuff in his past; something about a rock on a property rented by his family for hunting which still bears the “n” word, put there many years earlier. Surely, the Texas governor must be a member of the KKK. Bottom line, too much stuff in Perry's past.

The rest of the Republican field of contenders for the nomination have not yet been targeted by the liberal media. Rest assured, whoever rises to frontrunner status will be attacked and discovered to be racist, sexist, homophobic or stupid. The Republican candidate will be stripped naked and made to suffer the humiliation of “gang allegations” by the liberal media. For example. Upon becoming the frontrunner, Cain was declared an Uncle Tom, stupid and a serial sexist by the liberal media (as the knockout punch) by the liberal media.

We conservatives hold our candidates to a high standard. And for that, I make no apology and proudly name myself among you. Still, I believe any of our flawed conservative candidates are far superior to Obama in terms of their qualifications, core values and love for America. So I will not toss every frontrunner into the unelectable trash can whenever the liberal media dictates.

But obviously, some conservatives believe all of our conservative candidates are too flawed with too much stuff in their past to enthusiastically embrace as our Republican nominee. So, let's just settle for the “articulate and clean” RINO Romney, watch him go down in humiliating defeat and buckle our seat belts for four more years of Barack Hussein Obama.

Lloyd Marcus, Proud Unhyphenated American

Chairman of The Campaign to Defeat Barack Obama.
Lloyd is singer/songwriter of the American Tea Party Anthem and author of Confessions of a Black Conservative, foreword by Michele Malkin.
Spokesperson for Tea Party Express
Please help me spread my message by joining my Liberty Network.
LloydMarcus.com

What’s disturbing about this picture?

Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On November 30, 2011:

“On Nov. 14, Jack Maskell, a legislative attorney with the Congressional Research Service, issued yet another in a series of reports on presidential eligibility that appears aimed at providing members of Congress with talking points to respond to constituents contending that Barack Obama is not a “natural born citizen” within the meaning of Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution.

Entitled “Qualifications for President and the ‘Natural Born’ Citizen Eligibility Requirement,” the 50-page report peppered with 253 footnotes reads less like an objectively argued, even-handed discussion of competing legal arguments than a polemic aimed at convincing readers that Barack Obama is a “natural born citizen” qualified to be president.

Obama has several obvious liabilities when it comes to the natural-born-citizen question:

1.     Obama’s father was a citizen of Kenya when Obama was born in 1961, hence both Barack Obama Sr. and his son at birth were citizens of the Commonwealth of Great Britain; 


2.    Barack Obama Jr., when in Indonesia with his mother and Indonesian step-father, was registered in school under the name “Barry Soetoro,” and his mother listed him as “Soebarkah” when requesting the State Department remove her son from her passport; and 


3.    Questions remain whether the long-form birth certificate made public by the White House on April 27 is a forgery; the Hawaii Department of Health still refuses to show original 1961 Obama birth records; and Kapiolani Hospital has failed to provide corroborating evidence that Ann Dunham Obama was ever a patient in the hospital or that Barack Obama Jr. was born there.

So, the case of Barack Obama’s presidency raises several yet unresolved questions:

• Whether a “natural born citizen” at birth requires having two U.S. citizen parents at birth, as well as being born on U.S. soil; 

• Whether being a dual citizen at birth or subsequently compromises 
”natural born citizen” status; 

• Whether original birth records must be submitted for determination of “natural born citizen” status, or whether copies of relevant birth documents and affirmation by state authorities is sufficient to establish place of birth; 

• What agency of government will be responsible for making the “natural born citizen” determination according to the Constitution’s dictates of Article 2, Section 1, to qualify presidential candidates as eligible to run?

To resolve these questions, Maskell and the CRS advance the arguments that “native born” is equivalent to “natural born,” that English Common Law is determinative of the question, and that being a “U.S. citizen at birth” is equivalent to “natural born citizen.”

The end result of Maskell’s analysis is that an anchor baby born to two illegal immigrants, or a baby born in “birth tourism” to two foreign national parents and raised outside the United States would both be eligible to be president, provided the person was 35 years old and had spent 14 years as a resident living within the United States before running for president.

Maskell typically states as established fact legal principles that truthfully remain in dispute – for instance, on page 1 of the report, where he asserts that a person born “in” the United States of one or more alien parents is “clearly a U.S. citizen ‘at birth’ by the 14^th Amendment.”

In so concluding, Maskell intentionally ignores the “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” qualification within the language of the 14^th Amendment that opponents to anchor babies and birth tourism feel invalidates the entire concept that being born in the U.S. is sufficient to being deemed a “U.S. citizen at birth.”

Moreover, even if the 14^th Amendment were to establish being born a native to the U.S. is sufficient to being deemed a “U.S. citizen at birth,” that does not make a “natural born citizen” equivalent to being a “U.S. citizen at birth.”

The 14^th Amendment makes no reference whatsoever to redefining “natural born citizen” under Article 2, Section 1.

The point is that Maskell wants “natural born citizen” to be equivalent to “U.S. citizen at birth,” because the argument eliminates the need to have even one U.S.-citizen parent at birth.

Similarly, Maskell wants to read English Common Law into the “natural born citizen” requirement of Article 2, Section 1, because under English Common Law a “natural born subject” is anyone born on English soil, a principle known as jus soli – a right conferred by place of birth – rather than jus sanguinis – a right conferred by blood, requiring an inquiry into the citizenship of the parents at the time a child is born.

That English Common Law is applicable to the interpretation of Article 2, Section 1, was advanced by the Supreme Court in dicta – i.e., arguments made by the justices that are not central to the decision in the case, hence arguments that are not considered determinative for the purposes of legal precedent – in United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898).

While Maskell accepts the dicta in Wong Kim Ark because he agrees with the argument, he dismisses as dicta the only Supreme Court definition of “natural born citizen” that is on point regarding the meaning of Article 2, Section 1, namely, Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 21 Wall. 162 (1874), where the Supreme Court implied “natural born citizens” were those born on U.S. soil to parents who were U.S. citizens at the time the child was born.

On page 25 of the CRS report, Maskell finally admits that the Supreme Court has never ruled specifically on the meaning of the “natural born citizen” clause of Article 2, Section 1, even though that does not stop Maskell from arguing that federal courts have not established a “two citizen-parent” requirement on “native born U.S. citizens.”

From there, Maskell wants us to conclude that requirements of “lineage or bloodline” are not required “for a native born U.S. citizen to be eligible for the Presidency.”

Even when it comes to the case of Sen. John McCain’s eligibility to be president, Maskell glosses over the excoriating attack launched on McCain by the Democrats and the mainstream media because McCain was born in the Panama Canal Zone, ignoring the arguments made by constitutional lawyers Larry Tribe and Ted Olsen to the U.S. Senate concluding McCain was eligible to be president in part because McCain had two U.S. citizen parents at birth.

Maskell in his pro-Obama advocacy goes so far as to assert the two-citizen requirement would “entail the unique notion that under American jurisprudence parental citizenship or lineage is the determining factor for eligibility to the Presidency for native born U.S. citizens.”

In so doing, Maskell failed to acknowledge the concern the founders had when inserting into the Constitution the “natural born citizen” requirement that being a citizen was not sufficient for a person to ascend to the presidency.

Instead, the founders determined eligibility to be president was reduced to a subset of citizens identified as “natural born citizens.”

This specification demanded consideration of parental citizenship and allegiance, every bit as much as the phrase “and under the jurisdiction of” demands the same considerations of parental citizenship and allegiance when it comes to the 14^th Amendment.

Still, this is not the first time Maskell and the CRS have attempted to interpret the Constitution so as to advance to members of Congress arguments that could be used to explain why Obama is eligible to be president.

On Nov. 8, 2010, WND reported an interview with Maskell in which he acknowledged that CRS memoranda he authored were written for distribution to congressional offices, not for public distribution, and that copies were available only if released to the public by one or more congressional offices.

The CRS memo in discussion at that time containing responses written by Maskell to help congressional offices answer constituent questions regarding why no official body had ever asked to see or authenticate Obama’s long-form birth certificate.

Maskell’s answer then conceding that a loophole in the Constitution did not assign the responsibility to any institution in government for making a “natural born citizen” determination on presidential eligibility.

In that memorandum, Maskell ended up noting there is no requirement that a candidate for president produce his original birth certificate for examination by any governmental body, at the state or federal level.

Unfortunately, rather than advance the eligibility debate with a truly scholarly analysis, Maskell produced for Congress what amounts to a footnoted polemic aimed at appearing scholarly to prop up Obama’s eligibility defense.

In the final analysis, Maskell’s purpose appears thinly disguised – namely, to advance the ongoing cover-up regarding Obama nativity facts and evidence by quashing with arguments couched in legalese the continuing concerns held by millions of Americans that Obama has truly not proved to the American public or any duly-constituted governmental institution that he is eligible to be president.”

Source:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=372977

On or about November 8, 2010, the following article and/or blog post revealed a congressional document that was posted on the internet that confirms that no one, to include Congress, the states, or election officials bothered to check then Senator Obama’s eligibility to be our president-You Decide:

Congress report concedes Obama eligibility unvetted: 'There is no specific federal agency' to review candidates for federal office-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On November 8, 2010:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=225561

On or about  April 24, 2010, the following article and/or blog post revealed that members from all three branches of the Federal government already know that Barack Hussein Obama is ineligible for the office of President. National leaders, to include members of the US Supreme Court, already know that Barack Hussein Obama is not a “natural born citizen” of the United States of America, and therefore, is ineligible for the office he currently holds-You Decide:

DC Knows that Obama is Ineligible for Office; “The certification of constitutional qualification for the office of president”-Posted on CanadaFreePress.com-By JB Williams-On April 24, 2010:

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/22221

On or about October 20, 2011, Leo Donofrio, a New Jersey attorney who brought the first legal challenge to Barack Obama's occupancy in the Oval Office to the U.S. Supreme Court published a report that revealed that 25 U.S. Supreme Court Opinions that defined “Natural Born Citizen” were sabotaged in the run up to the ’08 Presidential Election.

Source:

25 U.S. Supreme Court Opinions That Defined “Natural Born Citizen” Were Sabotaged In The Run Up To The ’08 Presidential Election!-Posted on Natural Born Citizen-By Leo Donofrio, Esq.-On October 20, 2011:

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2011/10/20/justia-com-surgically-removed-minor-v-happersett-from-25-supreme-court-opinions-in-run-up-to-08-election/

On or about October 20, 2011, the following article and/or blog post revealed that someone had been incredibly busy in June 2008 working on an illegal front invisible to the public by searching and altering Supreme Court Cases published at Justia.com, which cite the only case in American history - Minor v. Happersett (1875) - to directly construe Article 2 Section 1’s natural-born citizen clause in determining a citizenship issue as part of its holding and precedent.  In this unanimous decision, the Supreme Court defined a “native or natural-born citizen” as a person born in the US to parents who were both citizens, a definition that excludes President Obama from eligibility:

JustiaGate!-Posted on Examiner-By Dianna Cotter, Portland Civil Rights Examiner-On October 20, 2011:

http://www.examiner.com/civil-rights-in-portland/justiagate

On or about October 23, 2011, the following article and/or blog post revealed that Leo Donofrio, a New Jersey attorney who brought the first legal challenge to Barack Obama's occupancy in the Oval Office to the U.S. Supreme Court had published a report revealing that references to a U.S. Supreme Court decision addressing the definition of "natural-born citizen" were scrubbed at one of the key online resources for legal documents:

Eligibility rulings vanish from Net!-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On October 23, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=358645

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. Congressional staff gives Constitution new meaning: ‘Researchers target 'eligibility,' say 'native born' really is 'natural born!'-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On November 30, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=373085

II. Ballots with Obama's name facing more legal challenges!-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On November 29, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=372849

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

DC knows that Obama is ineligible for office!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/27/dc-knows-that-obama-is-ineligible-for-office/

Congress report concedes Obama eligibility unvetted!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/congress-report-concedes-obama-eligibility-unvetted/

The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetrated-in-american-history/

Could the President’s newly released COLB be a forgery?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/04/29/could-the-president’s-newly-released-colb-be-a-forgery/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

WE ARE WORSE OFF NOW. ADD A BLOG IF YOU ARE BETTER OFF.

What’s disturbing about this picture?

Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On November 30, 2011:

“The Congressional Research Service, the research arm of Congress, has launched a defense of Barack Obama’spresidential eligibility with a 50-page report that “Where’s the Birth Certificate?” author Jerome Corsi has described as a “polemic aimed at convincing readers” Obama meets the requirements to be president.

Shortly after Obama took office, it was CRS staffer Jerry W. Mansfield, an information research specialist in the Knowledge Services Group, who wrote a memo titled “Qualifications of Barack Obama to Be President of the United States” that seemed aimed at providing talking points for members of Congress whose constituents who were questioning the absence of documentation for Obama.

Now comes the new campaign from CRS Legislative Attorney Jack Maskell, which seems to redefine eligibility, equating “native born” with the constitutional “natural born” citizen.

He cites the questions that have plagued Obama from before his 2008 election – the location of his birth and the status of his parents. The Constitution requires a president to be a “natural born citizen,” and a common definition at the time the Constitution was written was an offspring of two citizen parents.

While Obama has released a purported “Certificate of Live Birth” from Hawaii, there are experts who have questioned whether it is genuine. Others say even if he was born in Hawaii, he would not be eligible because his father was a Kenyan subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of the birth. They argue the inclusion of “natural born” in the Constitution precluded dual citizens from occupying the Oval Office.

The definition of the status was addressed in 1875 in the U.S. Supreme Court decision Minor v. Happersett, which concluded it was a child born of two U.S. citizens – regardless of location of the birth.

That decision said: “The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.”

The current Supreme Court has avoided addressing the question directly, according to one of its members, by refusing to hear any of the dozens of cases that have been brought specifically on the question of the application of “natural born citizen” to a child whose father was a foreign national, whether he was born on U.S. soil or not.

But Maskell states that “the Supreme Court has never needed to address this particular issue within the specific context of a challenge to the eligibility of a candidate under Article II, Section 1, clause 5, the only place in the entire Constitution that the phrase appears.”

He said that because the Supreme Court “has never needed to address this particular issue,” there is “certain speculation on the scope of the language.”

Corsi notes that Maskell simply advances the argument that “native born” is equivalent to “natural born” and that “being a ‘U.S. citizen at birth’ is equivalent to ‘natural born citizen.’”

“The end result of Maskell’s analysis is that an anchor baby born to two illegal immigrants, or a baby born in ‘birth tourism’ to two foreign national parents and raised outside the United States would both be eligible to be president, provided the person was 35 years old and had spent 14 years as a resident living within the United States before running for president,” Corsi writes.

“Maskell typically states as established fact legal principles that truthfully remain in dispute, for instance, on page 1 of the report, where he asserts that a person born ‘in’ the United States of one or more alien parents is ‘clearly a U.S. citizen ‘at birth’ by the Fourteenth Amendment,’” Corsi continues.

“In so concluding, Maskell intentionally ignores the ‘and subject to the jurisdiction thereof’ qualification with the language of the Fourteenth Amendment that opponents to anchor babies and birth tourism feel invalidates the entire concept that being born in the U.S. is sufficient to being deemed a ‘U.S. citizen at birth,’” he says.

Corsi continues, “Similarly, Maskell wants to read English Common Law into the ‘natural born citizen’ requirement of Article 2, Section 1, because under English Common Law a ‘natural born subject’ is anyone born on English soil, a principle known as jus soli – a right conferred by place of birth – rather than jus sanguinis – a right conferred by blood, requiring an inquiry into the citizenship of the parents when a child is born.”

He notes that Maskell, “in his pro-Obama advocacy,” asserted the two-citizen parent requirement would “entail the unique notion that under American jurisprudence parental citizenship or lineage is the determining factor for eligibility to the presidency for native born U.S. citizens.”

“In so doing, Maskell failed to acknowledge the concern the Founders had when inserting into the Constitution the ‘natural born citizen’ requirement that being a citizen was not sufficient for a person to ascend to the presidency,” Corsi says.

Maskell argues that “natural born” citizens probably were considered by the early members of Congress “to include more than merely the ‘native born,’ that is, those born in the country.”

And he notes at the time of the Dredd Scott decision by the U.S. Supreme Court affirming slavery, the U.S. attorney general wrote, “I am quite clear in the opinion that children born in the United States of alien parents, who have never been naturalized, are native-born citizens of the United States, and, of course, do not require the formality of naturalization to entitle them to the rights and privileges of such citizenship.”

The Constitution, however, requires “natural born,” not only “native born.”

That’s no problem, Maskell said, as various commentators, such as James Kent in his “Commentaries on American Law,” equated the two terms.

And he said the U.S. Supreme Court did the same thing in an opinion, quoting, “We start with the premise that the rights of citizenship of the native born and of the naturalized person are of the same dignity and are coextensive. The only difference drawn by the Constitution is that only the ‘natural born’ citizen is eligible to be president.”

In Obama’s case, he says, “there is currently no requirement under federal law … for any federal candidate, that is, candidates to the U.S. Senate, the House of Representatives, of the office of president, to publish, produce, or release an official ‘birth certificate.’”

He writes, “The initial burden of proof is always upon those who challenge a candidate’s eligibility, and not on a candidate to ‘prove’ eligibility.”

He continues by noting that “no official record” … is around that places “President Obama’s mother in a foreign country at the time of the president’s birth.”

He also moves on to arguments that are thin, Corsi says, quoting the U.S. 3^rd Circuit Court of Appeals in the Kerchner v. Obama eligibility case that “because we have decided that this appeal is frivolous, we will order counsel for appellants to show cause why just damages and costs should not be imposed.”

However, in that case, when the Kerchner side pointed out that under the rules of the court, a threat of sanctions comes with a right to discovery regarding the allegations, the court retreated from its position.

That also happened in a previous case involving Gregory S. Hollister, who brought a challenge to Obama’s eligibility. A threat of sanctions was met with approval by Hollister’s attorney, because then he would have the right of discovery. Again, the court retreated.

Concludes Maskell, “Every child born in and subject to the jurisdiction of the United States … is a native born U.S. citizen and thus a ‘natural born citizen’ eligible to be president … regardless of the nationality or citizenship of one’s parents.”

However, Maskell makes no reference to an effort by a Chicago firm led by an Obama fundraiser to remove the “natural born citizen” requirement from the U.S. Constitution – a move that seems to betray doubt about Obama’s eligibility.

The article in 2006 by Sarah Herlihy stated: “The natural born citizen requirement in Article II of the United States Constitution has been called the ‘stupidest provision’ in the Constitution, ‘decidedly un-American,’ ‘blatantly discriminatory,’ and the ‘Constitution’s worst provision.’”

She said “emotional” reasons were defeating attempts by “rational” arguments to remove it.

She was listed as an associate at the Chicago firm Kirkland & Ellis, where partner Bruce I. Ettelson cited his membership on the finance committee for Obama. Her writings were available online under law review articles from Kent University until after WND reported on the statements.

In the earlier memo by Mansfield, posted on Scribd.com for download, he suggested questions raised about Obama’s eligibility have been conclusively dismissed as Internet falsehoods that are taking on mythical proportions.

Mansfield told WND that he had written the memo to give to congressional constituents who were peppering congressional offices for a response to eligibility challenges.

WND also has reported that there have been at least eight attempts by members of Congress, during the past few years as Obama was developing his power base and running for president, to remove the Constitution’s requirement that a president be a “natural born citizen.”

Source:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=373085

Note: On or about March 2, 2010, the following article and/or blog post revealed that Sarah P. Herlihy, an associate attorney specializing in litigation at the Chicago law firm Kirkland & Ellis LLP, which is a law firm with ties to Obama, published an essay in the Chicago-Kent Law review on February 22, 2006 entitled “Amending the Natural Born Citizen Requirement:  Globalization as the Impetus and the Obstacle” that floated the idea of a “takeover” of our government by a foreign power. Herlihy’s essay was widely disseminated on the internet during the 2008 presidential campaign as rumors surfaced that Obama and possibly McCain did not meet the “natural born Citizen” requirement laid out in Article II, Section 1, paragraph 5 of the U.S. Constitution-You Decide:

Was there a conspiracy to put Obama in the White House?-Posted on The Post & EMail-By Sharon Rondeau-On March 2, 2010:

http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/03/02/was-there-a-conspiracy-to-put-obama-in-the-white-house/

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and video relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. George Soros assault on U.S. Constitution: ‘White House officials involved in rewriting nation’s founding document’!-Posted on WND.com-By Aaron Klein-On March 27, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=280277

II. Obama Versus the Constitution!-Posted on American Thinker-By James Lewis-On April 25, 2011:

http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/04/obama_versus_the_constitution.html

III. Who ran cover for Obama’s Islamic background? ‘Tracing The Politics And The Money Behind Obama’s Campaign!’-Posted on Post & Email-by John Charlton-On December 12, 2009:

http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/12/look-who-ran-cover-for-obamas-islamic-background/

IV. Video: “A Republic, If You Can Keep It”!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=H8I9pLmuyyA#at=13

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetrated-in-american-history/

Could the President’s newly released COLB be a forgery?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/04/29/could-the-president’s-newly-released-colb-be-a-forgery/

Was there a conspiracy to put Obama in the White House?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/03/03/was-there-a-conspiracy-to-put-obama-in-the-white-house-2/

Godfather of The Islamic Revolution!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/11/godfather-of-the-islamic-revolution/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

REMBER ALL YOU DECOCRATS THAT WE ARE STONE COLD BROKE.  ALL OUR MONEY SHOULD STAY IN AMERICA

Last August, 2011, I indicated that the world communist party is running the U.S. Federal Government via two primary proxies; Mr. Obama and the progressive group in the Senate and to a somewhat lesser extent, the house of representatives.  By the way, don't forget their numerous support groups, the labor unions and "public" education at all levels, as well as 95% of the traditional press outlets, more accurately pegged as communist propagandists. 

I am writing this because it is becoming increasingly obvious that the communist party has infiltrated the Republican presidential nomination process.  Last summer, I warned about Rick Perry.  Now what do you say after the country has had a chance to take a look at him?  Gingrich now enters the fray yet again.  I don't relish having to say this because I still remember when Newt rebuked House Speaker Tip O'Neal by calling him a communist.  This was to Newt's credit because it was an accurate statement that took courage to say.  Very, very few of our representatives have had the courage to call a dog a dog.  Unfortunately, Mr. Gingirch has now himself been co-opted by the communists via Pelosi to accept the environmentalist agenda, yet another communist front or proxie.  So Newt is now an environmentalist and we should know that the environmentalists are the most potent communist front in organizing and implementing the communist regime in America.

So, let's see now.  Only Bachman, Santorum, and Cane remain as viable candidates.   Bachman has recently said she would raise taxes yet her record is clear Tea Party.  Why hasn't Santorum been given more, even any press coverage?  Cane is obviously a threat to the communist agenda since he has been so savagely attacked in repeated attempts to discredit him.  Any of these three might "do."  But just adequate may produce just adequate results.

So who is the diamond hidden among the rough?  Cane, Santorum, Bachmann?  Established psychological principle states that past behavior is the best predictor of future behavior.  This being the case, Bachmann's record clearly indicates she is the true American Patriot.   To raise taxes is rarely good, but even Patrick Henry favored raising taxes for the narrow purpose of funding an American Revolution against tyrannical Britain.

I, like all Americans have spent the last 4 1/2 years listening to the socialist ruling class elites and their propaganda machine espouse the mental superiority of one Barack Hussein Obama aka. Barry Soetoro. They have elevated his supposed intellect to equate it to Albert Einstein, Aristotle, Socrates, Galileo, Leonardo DaVinci, Stephen Hawking, Nikolai Tesla, and thousands more of Histories great minds. Yet there is one glaring problem that keeps them from solidifying this scenario. Barry's not much more than a sharp street hustler with more hyperbole than substance and a slightly above average IQ.(avg. is 85)

If Barry were as sharp as touted they would be more than happy to release his academic records from Occidental College, Columbia, Harvard, or any of his published papers or articles from his community organizing days. As a matter of fact the only 2 touted publications by Shifty are his 2 books 1 of which was a miserable failure so poorly written that it was a privately paid for publishing. The second written after several years affiliation with Bill Ayers has an amazing new syntax, verse and writing style that was "inspired" by Mr. Ayers coaching Obama. So much so that it is almost a carbon copy of several books written by Bill the Bomber right down to the "definable writing styles". And after personally researching with several members of Mensa, we could not find anywhere in their records of Barry ever being tested.

Now I am 10 years older than Barry and I was tested in the mid 60's and the International Organization just celebrated its 65th. birthday, and has tested in every major population center on earth, so if he were as intelligent as portrayed he would have been tested somewhere while attending school either in Hawaii, Indonesia, California, New York or Massachusetts, wherever there was a Mensa chapter. To be recognized for membership you must have an IQ in the top 2 percentile as recognized by national or international standardized testing methodology. There are no records of either of his names in the records of his testing warranting any recognition of any level of genius or even border line above average intellect that would resemble a genius IQ.

So where oh where is the "Brilliant Barry" records and why someone of such great mental prowess is not showering us with his intellectual greatness beyond his oratorical skills while demonstrating his reading abilities. If he is as truly gifted in the IQ department, why would they not be flooding us with the proof of said gifts?

As a youth growing up in NYC I can remember the street hustlers in Times Square dealing 3 card Monty and impressed by how smooth they had their play down. Their banter was well rehearsed and their desired effect was the diversionary tactic to distract you from paying attention to what his hands were doing, rigging the game against you by removing the object that would allow you to win. They called it follow the queen and by the time they got done with their play the queen was never on the table or box in front of you and your money was as good as in their pocket. The espoused intellectual greatness of Barry is nothing more than a game of follow the queen.

We are being hustled and it is not just our money being taken but the very freedoms that we as Americans were born with. And in Barry they have the perfect front man, someone who they can manipulate and control yet someone who is polished enough in the art of deception to avoid the scrutiny that socialists and communists and progressives have been vilified for in the past. They now have their carnival barker that can convey their class warfare divisive Marxist message while quietly enacting the necessary infrastructure to supplant our Constitution.

Barack Hussein Obama is now dealing this country 3 card Monty while he enacts more than 4000 federal regulations not voted on in Congress and just recently signed another executive order #13575.

He has with his minions and puppet masters and the main sewer media propagandizing their agenda took this 235 year old Constitutional Republic with democratically elected representation and turned it into a totalitarian socialist state where the rule of law is now been supplanted by the rule of men. As of Nov. 24 2011 he has signed 101 executive orders that also bypass the aforementioned stop gaps that once defined our representation. This has been a trend by many presidents since the turn of the 20th. century with FDR holding the record with 3,728 in his tenure and 573 in 1933 alone.

It is not so much the proclivity of Barry's orders as it is the orders themselves that tells the tale of the intended and instituted deception to hide the truth of his verifiable intellectual capabilities and starts the deception. His first order on 01/21/2009 the very first day of his administration he signed executive order 13489 and 13490 blocking any attempt for anyone to access any sitting or former POTUS' official records if they do not wish them to be and the release of any said document must be reviewed and approved by both the POTUS and the Attorney General and reversing 2 previous executive orders from former POTUS' that were demanded by the same main sewer media that now has amnesia about their boy Barry. His most recent explained in the video above received as much media attention as the first two did but the real difference is that we are even further down the road of a fascist totalitarian socialist democracy that is now under mob rule.

And he is not alone in this and has allies all around and from both sides of the aisle because the "ruling class elite" our own version of the dukes and barons of foregone monarchal rule that are willing to supplant our civil liberties to maintain their power.

They have moved their agenda of a one world order with the United Nations as the ruling body and not our elected representatives. They have moved past the laws of this Republic and are fast approaching the point of no return. And the latest attempt in the Senate to remove another barrier is with the " National Defense Authorization Act" (S.1867)

The U.S. Senate is moving to enact a law that would allow military troops to march on U.S. soil and arrest American citizens with no due process, no trial, no legal representation and no protection under the Bill of Rights. Americans could be thrown in secret military prisons, interrogated, tortured and held indefinitely without ever being charged with a crime!

We are one step further down the road to socialist fascism and the front man for their grand plan is well suited, he has no morals or honor and never let the truth get in the way of a good lie, just like any good con man. He has a 100 watt smile and can be smooth and charming which are common traits for a skilled deceiver. He is narcissistic and in private condescending and self righteous believing his own hype and that also is a necessary trait for a good con to work, the person doing the conning has to convince everyone including himself that it is not a con for it work. And you must have a supporting cast to complete the con and he has one in his Czars and the Democrat party and the unions and the media. If you doubt this watch an oldie but a goodie of a movie called "The Sting" I just re-watched it and realized that we are being played like Doyle Lonnigan the mark in the movie.

Now watchy here for the lady don't' look at the gents keep your eyes on the lovely lady of the hearts she'll steal your soul, don't blink she moves fast she'll break your heart or make you rich watch here the lady disappear!

The Lady is called LIBERTY!

Dr. Keith C. Westbrook Ph.D.

OK, everybody, when WE, the American people say: " They should do this or that", we have to ask ourselves who "they" is. "They" is US. We started this illegal alien invasion mess, now we have to fix it. WE, not they. Obama is benefiting from the illegals and, unfortunately, so are many American businesses.

I say that we started this mess because we patronize and support the illegals and then we complain about illegal immigration. 

We all have an opinion of what others should do, and we even list it. Now, here is the to-do-list for ourselves, the real American citizens who care for our community, and our country. Remember, "Ask not what your country can do for. ask what you can do for your country". We do not need the help of the government to fix illegal immigration; we can do it ourselves. How? Here is how:

1. Stop hiring day labor for your house chores and maintenance. No more yard workes in our subdivisions. If you must use outside help, call a friend who knows legal workers who do the same type of work. Call your neighbor. Post it here. Offer the job (at the same rate or even higher) to high school kids, they really need to start early learning about personal responsibility.

2. Apply the same principle to cleaning people. Go to your church and start a group to help each other. Stop hiring illegal aliens to clean your house!!!

3. Baby-sitters...Do I need to tell you again?

4. Home remodeling, repair or painting people. Come on!! Didn't you know?

4.Post the business names who you know that use illegals to conduct business in your neighborhood. Here is a hint (in case you are one of those who "can't tell the differece" or say: " I am not an immigration agent")

In Houston most of the following business hire illegals:

 a) Car washes

 b) Dry cleaners

 c) Almost all mexican restaurants (I give some the beneifit of the doubt)

 d) Most McDonalds

 Now, hopefully whoever manages this site could open a special tab to post the businesse who hire illegals by Zip Code for example. We, then, send them a friendly reminder of their betrayal to our country and that we wish that they clean their act swiftly, before the boicott and bad publicity starts.

So, stop NOW hiring illegals to do your house chores and post the businesses names with as much information as posible (address, phone, website, manager's name, etc), and stop patronizing that or those businesses. We have to stop this madness because Obama, nor Perry for that matter, are going to do it for us.

It is, also a good idea to post here reports of what's wrong with our country. How about flooding our representatives e-mails and websites with denounces of illegals abusing the Lone Star card, or the WIC benefits.  If you see something, say something in the government official' websites!

Here the first post:

Bear Creek Car Wash

5614 Highway 6 North, Houston, TX 77084

Uses illegal aliens to do the work.

Governor Perry said that we don't have a heart...we do. But the illegals hate America and they have become a very serious threat. Enough is enough. I say.

AS LONG AS THEY ARE REPUBLICANS  AND LIKE WHAT THE TEA PARTY IS TRYING TO DO I AM FOR THEM.

What’s wrong with this picture?

Posted on The Daily Caller-By Matthew Boyle - The Daily Caller-On November 28, 2011:

“A newly released internal audit appears to indicate that the Government Accountability Office and President Barack Obama’s Department of Housing and Urban Development incorrectly argued that a specific organization wasn’t ACORN-affiliated.

HUD’s office of general counsel and the GAO have both claimed that Affordable Housing Centers of America, or AHCOA, is not affiliated with the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, or ACORN. AHCOA formerly called itself ACORN Housing, but changed its name after the 2009 ACORN meltdown.

The Obama administration has awarded more than $700,000 in taxpayer funds to AHCOA despite a 2010 law stipulating that no taxpayer funds could be awarded to ACORN “or any of its affiliates, subsidiaries, or allied organizations.”

The previously confidential internal audit report, from NeighborWorks America, shows that contrary to what the GAO and the Obama administration contend, AHCOA is far too close to ACORN to receive taxpayer funding. In fact, NeighborWorks America — a nonprofit group that doles out taxpayer funds — decided against sending cash to AHCOA because of the internal audit report it conducted.

“Although AHC and ACORN might be incorporated as separate entities in form and structure, the financial transactions noted below evidence extensive relationships between both organizations that may undermine claims of an ‘arm’s length relationship’ between them,” the NeighborWorks America auditors wrote.

Even so, the GAO issued a September 2010 letter giving the Obama administration cover to legally provide AHCOA with taxpayer cash.

That GAO opinion became official policy at the end of September 2011 because no members of Congress challenged it. The GAO then reaffirmed its opinion that AHCOA isn’t ACORN-affiliated in a June 2011 report, in which it cites the previously confidential internal audit report.

That means the GAO was well aware of this NeighborWorks America internal audit report while it was finalizing its ruling that will now allow what appears to be a former ACORN affiliate to continue receiving taxpayer funding through a loophole.

NeighborWorks America has subsequently decided it will not be providing funding to AHCOA.

According to June 2011 emails The Daily Caller has obtained, NeighborWorks America representatives informed Congress this past summer that even though the Obama administration and GAO said it’s okay to fund AHCOA, because of that internal audit report, the organization would not be giving money to AHCOA. That’s because NeighborWorks America didn’t want to break the law.

NeighborWorks America isn’t a government agency, but it acts like one in how it disburses taxpayer funds. NeighborWorks America’s board of directors includes several members of the Obama administration, too, and though it’s a 501©3 nonprofit organization, Congress created it.

One of the board members, Raphael Bostic, is Obama’s assistant secretary of policy development and research at HUD. Because he’s on NeighborWorks’ board while he serves in the administration, Bostic likely had access to the aforementioned internal audit report, and could’ve provided it to Obama’s senior officials at HUD. It’s unclear what level of influence Bostic has in HUD’s office of general counsel and it’s unclear whether he discussed the internal audit with his superiors at Obama’s HUD.

Investigative organization Cause of Action forced NeighborWorks America to finally release the internal audit report in late November 2011. But, since its release came after the one-year deadline that hit at the end of September 2011, the GAO ruling stands indefinitely.

Cause of Action executive director Daniel Epstein told TheDC that he’s worried about political motivations behind NeighborWorks America’s board members keeping the internal audit report confidential until after the GAO ruling was finalized.

Epstein said Obama administration officials sympathetic to ACORN’s cause, who sit on the NeighborWorks America board, might have intentionally withheld the report from the public until AHCOA was cleared and legally allowed to receive taxpayer funding despite its close ties to ACORN.

Epstein had requested the report be made public before the GAO deadline, something that NeighborWorks America officials failed to do. Epstein is suspicious that some kind of malfeasance took place within NeighborWorks America and has filed a Freedom of Information Act request with the organization to find any and all internal communications regarding its release of the report.”

Source:

http://dailycaller.com/2011/11/28/obama-administration-gao-appear-to-have-ignored-groups-acorn-affiliation-to-award-700k/

Note: The following article and/or blog post relates to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Obama’s ‘Jobs Bill’ Makes ACORN Eligible for $15 Billion in Taxpayer Money!-Posted on Pajamas Media-By Matthew Vadum-On September 15, 2011:

http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/obama’s-jobs-bill-makes-acorn-eligible-for-15-billion-in-taxpayer-money/

Note: The following websites reveal that George Soros’ Open Society Institute (OSI) -- has dispensed more than $5 billion to a multitude of organizations whose objectives are consistent with those of Soros and one of those organizations is Project Vote, which is the voter-mobilization arm of the notoriously corrupt ACORN, whose voter-registration drives and get-out-the-vote initiatives have been marred by massive levels of fraud and corruption-You Decide:

Guide to the George Soros Network:

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=589

 Project Vote:

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6966

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Is ACORN Really Disbanding or Is It Just Changing Its Name Because of Scandals?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/03/23/is-acorn-really-disbanding-or-is-it-just-changing-its-name-because-of-scandals/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

The Lynching of Herman Cain

by Kris Zane

For those of us old enough to remember the debacle of the Clarence Thomas “lynching,” many have likened Politico’s “scoop” of Herman Cain being accused of sexual harassment in the 1990s, the new thirteen-year "affair" allegation, and the subsequent “coverage” by the mainstream media, as an attempt to repeat history. Several years after the Clarence Thomas debacle, with the changing of the guard, another man, Bill Clinton, was accused of sexual impropriety; and when, like the Whac-a-Mole game, women were popping up across the United States accusing Clinton of everything from casual sexual encounters to rape and beating, the scant critical coverage was attributed to, according to Hillary Clinton, a “vast Right-wing conspiracy,” headed by one of the few news sources that were actually news sources back then, Rush Limbaugh.  Unlike the Clarence Thomas case, Bill Clinton being a liberal versus a conservative—this is the one crucible of the Left—the mainstream media circled their wagons, protecting their darling. 

And history is repeating itself, although this time we get to see the two ways the mainstream media treats a liberal versus a conservative, not years apart, but in “real time.” On the one hand we have Herman Cain being “exposed” by Politico’s “scoop” that Cain had been accused of sexual harassment, Politico the next day stating that Cain was flip-flopping in his responses to the accusations, and that he was in “damage control” mode, both baseless statements, and the networks endless looping of Cain's "mistress" disclosing thirteen years infidelity. On the other hand, we have the mainstream media circling the wagons in regard to Obama, specifically the “Green Jobs” scandal, of which Solyndra appears to be only the tip of the iceberg; in which millions—if not billions of dollars were fed to Obama 2008 campaign bundlers; but also more importantly the Fast and Furious scandal. Think about it: Obama and Holder oversaw a program that put thousands of taxpayer-funded assault weapons into the hands of Mexican drug cartel members, and then lied about having knowledge of it; that hundreds of Mexican citizens have been murdered with these weapons, and at least one American citizen—Border Patrol agent Brian Terry—and yet the mainstream media, like the Clinton debacle, is still circling the wagons. If the mainstream media hadn’t protected their darling, Clinton would have been viewed as what he was—a sexual predator; obstructing justice; suborning and committing perjury. If the mainstream media weren’t protecting their darling, Obama, Obama and Holder would, frankly, be impeached as accessories to murder for the hundreds of deaths in Mexico, and the murder of Brian Terry.

But as Bob Dylan sang back in the 1960s, the times they are a-changin’. It is interesting that the one thing (I believe) that gave Obama the push to the Presidency in 2008, and quashed all those nasty little doubts the American people were having about him—i.e., his hidden records, his dual citizenship, his unsavory connections with radicals and socialists, etc.—this one thing, the Internet, in the form of his campaign’s YouTube “town hall meetings,” (i.e., orchestrated, complete with casting companies and prepared questions and answers); this YouTube venue which carried him over the top, is the two-headed snake that now bites his heel. There are literally tens of thousands of YouTube videos covering everything from Obama’s Freudian slip about his “Muslim faith,” to the endless anomalies in his long-form birth certificate. These two subjects are not merely marginal; simply taking the highest view counts of two videos adds up to over two million views.  This is only one tenth of one percent of YouTube videos critical of Obama.

But there is much more than YouTube now. Instead of the lone voice of Rush Limbaugh in the ether, we have what is now rivaling (and I think crushing) the mainstream media: grassroots media, primarily where you have what amounts to conservative blogs turned news gatherers and news reporters. Would Solyndra and Fast and Furious be an issue today if it weren’t for The Daily Caller and Human Events? Would we have the hundreds of Obama documents detailing corruption, crony capitalism, and endless illegal activity if it weren’t for Judicial Watch? Would the anomalies in the Obama birth certificate, the irregularities in his Social Security number, the vast suppressing of Obama college, state senate (etc., etc., etc.) records be at the forefront of America’s doubts about Obama were it not for World Net Daily? 

But let us get back to the lynching of Herman Cain. One of the interesting aspects of the Internet that didn’t have as significant an impact as Obama 2008 campaign’s use of YouTube and mass emails was Twitter. Now Twitter is huge, and I would argue is actually the driving force of news (and, for that matter of attacks). I would call myself a student of Twitter, specifically in regard to the traffic that has occurred after the Fox/Google Republican debate, when Cain’s poll numbers began to skyrocket. Hillary Clinton said (falsely) regarding “Monicagate” that there was a vast Right-wing conspiracy to destroy her husband; but it doesn’t take a genius to decipher that Twitter has been used, in an orchestrated manner, to take down Cain. Observing the Cain traffic by the hour, nay, by the minute, you can see that a certain narrative occurs on cue; that, as quickly as a certain narrative pops up like our Wac-the-Mole game, the game is reset, and a new narrative occurs. These narratives are sometimes downright odd, other times substantive, but always orchestrated. Like the traditional mainstream media’s attack of all conservatives, the narrative began with Herman Cain being stupid and/or crazy, using, as they did with Sarah Palin, some supposed gaff or flip-flop statement. When this didn’t work, and the American public—specifically the Tea Party which has been from the beginning and until now his strongest supporter—didn’t buy this, the narrative was that the Tea Party was supporting Cain to try to cover up the fact that they were racists; that as soon as a viable candidate came upon the scene—a white candidate, that is—Herman Cain would be dropped like a hot potato. Again, the Left seeing that the Tea Party were not going to rein in their support for Cain, the narrative began that Herman Cain was an Uncle Tom; that he was coddling the white Tea Partiers; that he wove his message depending on what he thought the white Tea Partiers wanted to hear. Upon this narrative rearing its head, the Left showed their true racists colors, including the ridiculousness of the white Lawrence O’Donnell lecturing Herman Cain on how he wasn’t black enough; that during the Civil Rights years, he didn’t do enough; or Cornell West’s telling Cain to “get off the symbolic crack pipe.” For a time there was an attack on Cain’s 999 flat tax plan, of which Twitter was abuzz with citing an endless parade of economists and pundits, stating that the American public, especially the poor, would pay more in taxes under the plan. Then there was the narrative that Cain had changed his 999 plan, to a 9-0-9 plan, meaning that the poor would not have to pay taxes under his plan, charging Cain with flip-flopping. Of course, like all other narratives presented in this orchestrated assault, this was baseless. The Twitter “Uncle Tom” narrative (and the subsequent racism) falling on deaf ears, and upon more and more blacks beginning to support Cain, the Left pulled out their secret weapon, the Clarence Thomas-inspired smear campaign. Politico broke their amazingly lame “scoop,” in which they “decided” to not release details, “decided,” to make their story as vague as possible. The “victims,” unnamed, and without any details of the accusation, received “five-figure” settlements?  What are the details of the accusation? What is the background of the women? Did they bother to ask Herman Cain about their “scoop” before publishing the narrative? They then followed this up with their statements that Herman Cain had given “conflicting” responses to the accusations; that his campaign was in “damage control”—both baseless statements. Meanwhile the Left-wing media jumped on the wagon with all their fury, parroting the same. Twitter, on cue, almost to the minute, reflected the mainstream media’s attack of Cain, in this rabid, foaming at the mouth parroting.   

Twenty years ago with Americans getting their news from three major networks (all Left-wing), and one extreme Left-wing source (i.e., “Public” Radio), a Herman Cain, upon being pummeled by the media,  would have quietly slithered away, being pelted to death by the Left; but today with most Americans being sick and tired of the mainstream (lamestream as Sarah Palin calls it) media, contrary to the Left’s predictions, Cain has actually risen in the polls because of this baseless charge. America is sick of the Lawrence O’Donnell and Rachel Maddow type of “news” programs, even sickening of the “Right-wing” Fox, becoming disenchanted after their hatchet job on Hank Williams, Jr., and their ignoring of the Obama birth certificate and Social Security number issue.  Most Americans are now getting their news from websites outside of the mainstream. Further, a person working part-time out of their home is now part of the new mainstream media—case in point, the “I am the 53%” movement, in contradistinction to the Left’s Occupy Wall Street rabble. Or, even to the extent that a single individual like myself can write an article or produce a video that exposes Obama or supports Cain, that can potentially reach thousands, if not millions. Anyone with a computer can be a part of the new mainstream media, fighting off the lies and deceptions of the Left.

Most Americans are tired of the media telling them what to think; telling them what candidate they are to vote for: Both the Republican party and the Left have been telling the American public for months that Mitt Romney is the only viable candidate. Twenty years ago the American people would have complied. Today, with the mainstream media dying a quick death—I would say fighting in a sort of death throe—the sleeping giant, as Herman Cain says, the “we the people,” has awakened, and aren’t going to take it anymore, and have cut that noose that the Left put around Herman Cain’s neck.  

Posted on The Patriot Post-By Nate Jackson for The Patriot Post Editorial Team-On November 30, 2011:

“The Foundation

“The natural cure for an ill-administration, in a popular or representative constitution, is a change of men.”—Alexander Hamilton

Editorial Exegesis

“It is a newspaper truism that what is good for journalism is bad for the country, and vice versa. Let’s just say that regarding the pending retirement of Congressman Barney Frank, we’re delighted to make the professional sacrifice. Few House Members have made a bigger legislative mark, and arguably no one so expensively. Mr. Frank deserves to be forever remembered—and we’ll help everyone remember him—as the nation’s leading protector of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac before their fall. For years Barney helped block meaningful reform of the mortgage giants while pushing an ‘affordable housing’ agenda that helped to enlarge the subprime mortgage industry. ‘I do think I do not want the same kind of focus on safety and soundness that we have in OCC [Office of the Comptroller of the Currency] and OTS [Office of Thrift Supervision],’ Mr. Frank said on September 25, 2003, in one of his many legendary rhetorical hits. ‘I want to roll the dice a little bit more in this situation towards subsidized housing.’ The dice came up snake-eyes for the housing market and U.S. economy. Democracy can be unfair, and for his sins Mr. Frank was rewarded with the chairmanship of the Financial Services Committee in 2009 and an opening to remake the U.S. financial industry. It was like asking Charlie Sheen to teach an anger management class. The result was Dodd-Frank, which didn’t solve the ‘too big to fail’ problem but did make banks even more subject to the wishes of Washington. The crony capitalism exemplified by Fannie and Freddie became more broadly embedded in U.S. financial markets. ... Liberals who regret Mr. Frank’s departure needn’t worry too much. The next Democrat in line to run Financial Services is California’s Maxine Waters, whose main contribution to Dodd-Frank was requiring racial-preference officers at each of the regional Federal Reserve banks. Journalists may not miss Mr. Frank after all.”—The Wall Street Journal

Upright

“If you thought Rep. Barney Frank was bad, his likely replacement is worse. Rep. Maxine Waters is Congress’ most anti-bank member—unless she owns stock in one, that is. ... When in 2003, the publicly created mortgage giants [Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac] became dangerously overleveraged with weak mortgages, Waters pushed them to underwrite even ‘more products where you have no down payments.’ She accused critics of the quotas of discriminating against minorities and the poor. ... She lobbied to exclude them and their government-mandated affordable housing charter from the ‘sweeping financial reforms.’ And she got her wish. She also got another wish: a provision exempting minority-owned banks from the new oversight. Quite interesting. Because at the same time she got that little gem added to the bill, she was under investigation for steering federal bailout money to a troubled minority-owned bank in which she and her husband held a large financial stake.”—Investor’s Business Daily

“Under a new 893-page proposal unveiled last week, automakers must hit a fleet-wide fuel economy average of 54.5 miles per gallon by 2025 -- double today’s 27.3 standard. The government says it would cost automakers $8.5 billion per year to comply, which means a spike in sticker prices of at least $2,000 to $2,800, according to official projections. ... The Obama Administration is pointing to the supposed benefits of the new standards—including a fuel savings of $1.7 trillion—but as [Heritage Foundation’s Diane] Katz writes, that number is ‘pure speculation given that actual savings would depend on the price of gasoline,’ which can’t be predicted 14 years into the future, much less next summer. ... The EPA should not be in the business of picking and choosing what kind of cars and trucks Americans can drive, and neither should President Obama.”—Heritage Foundation’s Mike Brownfield

“Last week, 5,000 files of private email correspondence among several of the world’s top climate scientists were anonymously leaked onto the Internet. Like the first ‘climategate’ leak of 2009, the latest release shows top scientists in the field fudging data, conspiring to bully and silence opponents, and displaying far less certainty about the reliability of anthropogenic global warming theory in private than they ever admit in public. The scientists include men like Michael Mann of Penn State University and Phil Jones of the University of East Anglia, both of whose reports inform what President Obama has called ‘the gold standard’ of international climate science, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).”—columnist James Delingpole

The Demo-gogues

Sometimes they get it right: “This country has never had a congressman like Barney Frank, and the House of Representatives will not be the same without him.”—Barack Obama

Blather: “Barney is a fighter for fairness in financial services and civil rights for all, including minorities and LGBT Americans. Because of his leadership, the Financial Services Committee has been one of the most productive committees in Congress. ... I hope to use my experience to continue and expand his work in the committee. I will continue to champion practical regulations, while making sure they work for consumers and the financial sector, a sector which has the right to be profitable but the obligation to be fair, two concepts which are not mutually exclusive.”—Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA)

Excuses: “If I were to run again, I would be engaged full-fledged in a campaign, which is entirely appropriate. Nobody ought to expect to get elected without a contest. But the fact that [the district] is so new makes it harder in terms of learning about new areas, introducing myself to new people. And I have other obligations; one is to continue to serve the people I currently serve.”—Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA), who is avoiding mentioning the writing on the wall for Democrats in 2012

High-minded socialist: “Over the last decade, we became a country that relied too much on what we bought and consumed.”—Barack Obama

Irony: “[N]o matter how tough things are right now, we still give thanks for that most American of blessings, the chance to determine our own destiny. The problems we face didn’t develop overnight, and we won’t solve them overnight.”—Barack Obama, the man who wants to take away the chance for each American to determine his own destiny.”

Continue Reading:

http://patriotpost.us/edition/2011/11/30/chronicle/#post-comment

Note: These are other articles and/or blog posts and videos that revealed that President Bush and Senator McCain attempted to rein in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, along with Barney Frank’s conflict of interest-You Decide:

Bush Proposed Fannie Mae / Freddie Mac Supervision In 2003-Posted on Bucks Rights-On September 16, 2008:

http://www.bucksright.com/bush-proposed-fannie-mae-freddie-mac-supervision-in-2003-1141

McCain’s attempt to fix Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac in 2005-Posted on Hot Air-On September 17, 2008:

http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/17/mccains-attempt-to-fix-fannie-mae-freddie-mac-in-2005/

Media Mum on Barney Frank’s Fannie Mae Love Connection: ‘Democratic House Financial Services Committee Chair promoted GSEs while former ‘spouse’ was Fannie Mae executive.’-Posted on Business & Media Institute-By Jeff Poor-On September 24, 2008:

http://www.businessandmedia.org/printer/2008/20080924145932.aspx

Lawmaker Accused of Fannie Mae Conflict of Interest-Posted on FoxNews.com-By Bill Sammon-On October 3, 2008:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,432501,00.html

O ‘Reilly - Barney Frank Had Affair with Fannie Mae Exec-Posted on Live Leak-On October 7, 2008:

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=f5b_1223348928

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Who or what caused the economic crisis that propelled President Obama into office?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/06/who-or-what-caused-the-economic-crisis-that-propelled-president-obama-into-office/

Who or What Was Behind the Financial Crisis?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/03/06/who’s-behind-the-financial-crisis/

The Wall Street Bailout Bill Threatens Our Bottom Line!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/20/the-wall-street-bailout-bill-threatens-our-bottom-line/

ACORN-The Community Reinvestment Act (CRA)-Automaker Labor Unions!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/22/acorn-the-community-reinvestment-act-cra-automaker-labor-unions/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

President Lincoln, a Republican, went about correcting the wrong of slavery by the Civil War.  It didn’t stop the wrong. Going to war against terrorism is not the way to stop terrorism.

It took the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s, Martin Luther King’s non-violent marches to start the ball rolling. Civil rights lawyers brought cases of abuse of minorities to the Supreme Court’s attention.

Because taxpayers have not brought their cases before the Court, I was brushed off. The Court has gone overboard in protecting the rights of minorities. What is the Tea Party but a non-violent movement? And what good is it?  Once the politicians the Tea Party supports go to Washington, it’s the same old thing.  

Because civil rights activists brought their grievances to the Court’s attention, the Court has settled on a preferred freedoms concept—preferred over taxpayer rights.  Judges, after all, are lawyers—trained to make the law whatever their clients pay them to make the law. Lawyers and politicians made government robbery the law, ostensibly for a greater good.  Unchallenged, the law becomes everlastingly more immoral, finally bringing down society. Justice Jackson wrote, “Let it not be overlooked that due process of law is not for the sole benefit of the accused.

While the accused are not forced to testify against themselves, IRS lies are the law, unless the taxpayer can prove his innocence before a biased court.  There is no better reason than the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s to allow taxpayers to use the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment to bring abuses and blunders of the tax collector to the attention of the Court.

Roosevelt’s legacy, government entitlement, millions of government dependents in one political camp, free enterprise advocates in another, and a stonewall dividing the two, the message is loud and clear. But don’t expect lawyers and politicians make the decision. They are being paid to keep the current law in place.   

The corporation that is too big to fail, that government bails out with your tax money, ostensibly, to keep the economy from melting down, is immoral. Ultimately, this kind of government will end American freedom. 

When I was a child, my parents admonished me for asking too many questions. I was curious, imaginative, and adventurous. When I was five, disobeying my parents, I crossed busy Preston Road on my tricycle and went exploring. The cops found me two hours later chatting with a yard man. At midlife, I went on a two-year boating adventure on the South Atlantic Ocean.

The more the latent inhibition, the more focused one is, the more tuned into system and order, the more easily manipulated. The more imaginative one is, the less the focused attention; they are more creative and better suited for change.  I remain with low latent inhibition.

Henry Ford, with low latent inhibition, said, If you think you can, you are right. If you think you can’t, you are right. William P. Merrill of Merrill and Lynch, with low latent inhibition, said, “Respectable men and women content with good and easy living are missing some of the most important things in life.  Unless you give yourself to some great cause you have not begun to live.”

Nothing can bring a nation down faster than immoral laws. Unless the American people awaken to the seriousness of their situation, the lawless United States will continue until America goes bankrupt. When Germany went bankrupt, Hitler took control.  The Muslim Brotherhood, formerly in support of Hitler, has taken Hitler’s place.  

International terrorism is the counteraction of what has happened in the United States: putting the government before its source of energy, the American people—who, born under the sign of Aquarius, the sign of brotherhood and fraternity, who have as their sign the water-bearer, “who spills out to mankind the life-force and spiritual energy,” says Astrologer’s Handbook.

Currently in the death throes of the Age of Pisces, Earth is moving into the Age of Aquarius. From the Lord’s prayer, “in earth as it is in heaven. . .But seek ye first the kingdom of God,”  a word to the wise.  Obama revealed his intent in his autobiographies. He is a Marxist—naturally against free enterprise and in support of the Muslim Brotherhood. They are birds of a feather.

Obama spent 20 years in Reverend Jeremiah Wright’s word of God church.  In September 2001, after the 9-11 event, in the presence of your President, Wright: “The government lied about inventing HIV virus as a means of genocide against people of color. We bombed Hiroshima. We bombed Nagasaki. And we nuked far more than the thousands in New York and the Pentagon and never batted an eye.”

I was on the high seas heading for the invasion of Japan when the bombs were dropped. They ended World War II. If I were you, I wouldn’t count on Obama to help. He doesn’t value my life. He doesn’t value America. Like his pastor for 20 years, Obama is against America and the American people.   

ITS GOING TO BE A LONG TRUDGE BACK UP,  KICK ALLTHE DEMOCRATS OUT.

What’s wrong with this picture?

Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On November 29, 2011:

“Two television spots developed by a national investment firm specializing in U.S. gold and silver coins have been rejected by major television networks, including the Fox News Channel and the Fox Business Network, for apparently political reasons.

The ads by Phoenix-based Swiss America Trading Corp., a WND advertiser, feature President Obama and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke as animated characters engaging in the potentially inflationary policy of printing paper money with abandon to stimulate the struggling economy.

Singer Pat Boone, a spokesman for Swiss America for more than 15 years, appears in the commercials as an animated announcer who concludes that investing in gold is a prudent strategy to diversify a portfolio in inflationary times.

“The Creature from Jekyll Island: A Second Look at the Federal Reserve”

Swiss America CEO Craig Smith said the intent of the ads was not to make a political statement.

The goal, he said, “was to take what we thought was a humorous approach to a timely and important economic topic in order to advertise our company and promote a new book we’ve recently published.”

Along with Fox News and Fox Business, the two commercials have been rejected by NBC, MSNBC, CNBC, ABC, CBS, CNN/HLN and the Discovery Channel.

Comcast, in rejecting the spot, told Swiss America that it “does not meet our standards on public symbol.”

Comcast’s Public Symbol Policy specifies that the “use of the name or likeness of the President of the United States and/or the Presidential Seal for endorsing commercial purposes must be authorized by the White House.”

Fox News said the “representation of public figures is something we try to avoid.”

CNN/HLN told Swiss America the commercials were “not appropriate for the current landscape.”

“The networks’ reaction shocked me,” Smith said. “It’s a threat to First Amendment rights when a commercial message is rejected not because it is inaccurate or misleading, but because it makes what is perceived to be a political statement the networks want to avoid.”

Smith told WND he was concerned that the networks were protecting Obama and Bernanke.

“All we are saying in these two commercials is what dozens of responsible professional economists are saying every day,” Smith said. “Gold investment as a responsible diversification strategy when governments printing of fiat currencies with abandon risk unleashing inflationary principles.”

Only Google TV accepted the commercials, for broadcast on the DISH Network and Direct TV satellite networks.

Google TV has planned a test in which the two ads will be broadcast 1,132 times on the DISH Network and Direct TV from Dec. 5, 2011, through Jan. 12, 2012.

Ironically, the Swiss America ads will be seen nationally via Google TV on many of the major networks that have refused to air them. While cable subscribers to Fox News and CNN/HLN will not see the ads, for example, subscribers to the DISH Network or Direct TV will see them on those networks during the test period.

“The silver lining,” said Smith “is that many of the television and cable networks who told us ‘no’ have come back saying ‘yes’ to Google TV, which will begin broadcasting the two commercials next week. We are very thankful to Google TV for helping us keep free speech alive on the television airwaves.”

In June, Smith and co-author Lowell Ponte published “The Inflation Deception: Six Ways Government Tricks Us … and Seven Ways to Stop It!” in a paperback edition.

“Welcome to the ‘inflatocracy’ – our new form of government of, by, and for inflation – in which deliberately debasing our money has become a tool of mind manipulation, wealth distribution, and secret taxation,” the publicity for the book on Amazon.com reads.

The first Swiss America commercial, seen below, plays off the theme “Helicopter Ben,” a nickname Wall Street has conferred upon Bernanke for his reputation of “helicoptering” into financial crises to dump money on a problem.

{…}

The second Swiss America commercial, seen below, evokes imagery from the classic movie “The Wizard of Oz” to portray Bernanke and Obama as “financial wizards” hiding as “the men behind the door” in an inflationary scheme to solve economic problems by printing money.

{…}

Ray Griggs, the producer of the 2010 feature film documentary “I Want Your Money,” a critical examination of the Obama administration’s economic policies, produced the two Swiss America commercials.”

Source:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=372421

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and reports reveal how George Soros, along with other liberal backers use their money to fund and/or manipulate media outlets, to include Hollywood because they see that as a powerful way to influence the American public.

It’s a strategy that Soros has been deploying extensively in media both in the United States and abroad. Since 2003, Soros has spent more than $48 million funding media properties, including the infrastructure of news - journalism schools, investigative journalism and even industry organizations:

Nearly 30 Soros-funded Media Operations Part of 'War on Fox'!-Posted on Business & Media Institute-By Dan Gainor-On June 1, 2011:

http://www.mrc.org/bmi/commentary/2011/Nearly__Sorosfunded_Media_Operations_Part_of_War_on_Fox_.html

Soros-Funded Lefty Media Reach More Than 300 Million Every Month!-Posted on Business & Media Institute-By Dan Gainor-On May 25, 2011:

http://www.mrc.org/bmi/commentary/2011/Soros_Lefty_Media_Reach_More_Than__Million_Every_Month.html

Soros Spends Over $48 Million Funding Media Organizations!-Posted on Business & Media Institute-By Dan Gainor-On May 18, 2011:

http://www.mrc.org/bmi/commentary/2011/Soros_Spends_Over__Million_Funding_Media_Organizations_.html

Over 30 Major News Organizations Linked to George Soros!-Posted on Business & Media Institute-By Dan Gainor-On May 11, 2011:

http://www.mrc.org/bmi/commentary/2011/Over__Major_News_Organizations_Linked_to_George_Soros.html

Citizen Soros Manipulating the Media!-Posted on Capital Research Center-By Matthew Vadum-On January 2011:

http://www.capitalresearch.org/pubs/pdf/v1293869054.pdf

George Soros, Movie Mogul: ‘Social Justice’ Cinema and the Sundance Institute!-Posted on Capital Research Center-By Rondi Adamson-On March 2008:

http://www.capitalresearch.org/pubs/pdf/v1204311857.pdf

Note: What follows is a “Soros Files” website that reveals other deplorable actions by the anti-American hedge fund billionaire that I believe, if not stopped now, will ultimately destroy this great country of ours as we know it:

http://sorosfiles.com/gsoros/

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Who owns our supposedly fair and balanced airwaves and news outlets?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/21/who-owns-our-supposedly-fair-and-balanced-airwaves-and-news-outlets/

What Happened to Free Speech?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/23/what-happened-to-free-speech/

Is the Fed’s concept of buying $600 billion of Treasuries just a smokescreen?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/11/03/is-the-fed’s-concept-of-buying-600-billion-of-treasuries-just-a-smokescreen/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

ASK FOX T.V NEWS AND O,RIELLY.

WE MUST RIGHT THIS SHIP NOW BEFORE WE BECOME A SECOND CLASS NATION OR WORSE YET A SOCIALIST  NATION.

We all have those around us who just can't seem to remember history, or find it easier to distort it than believe it.  Well, here's a little nugget we all  need to carry with us every day and SCREAM FROM THE ROOFTOPS---REMEMBER JANUARY 3rd, 2007!!

The day the Democrats took over was not January 22nd 2009, it was actually January 3rd 2007, the day the Democrats took over the House of Representatives and the Senate, at the very start of the 110th Congress. 

The Democratic Party controlled a majority in both chambers for the first time since the end of the 103rd Congress in 1995.

For those who are listening to the liberals propagating the fallacy that everything is "Bush's Fault", think about this: 

January 3rd, 2007, the day the Democrats took over the Senate and the Congress:
The DOW Jones closed at 12,621.77
The GDP for the previous quarter was 3.5%
The Unemployment rate was 4.6%
George Bush's Economic policies SET A RECORD of 52 STRAIGHT MONTHS of JOB CREATION! 

Remember that day...
January 3rd, 2007 was the day that BarneyFrank took over the House Financial Services Committee and Chris Dodd took over the Senate Banking Committee.
The economic meltdown that happened 15 months later was in what part of the economy? 

BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES!
THANK YOU DEMOCRATS (especially Barney ) for taking us from 13,000 DOW, 3.5 GDP and 4.6% Unemployment...to this CRISIS by (among MANY other things) dumping 5-6 TRILLION Dollars of toxic loans on the economy from YOUR Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac FIASCOES! 

(BTW: Bush asked Congress 17 times to stop Fannie & Freddie - starting in 2001 because it was financially risky for the US economy). Barney blocked it and called it a "Chicken Little Philosophy" (and the sky did fall!) 

And who took the THIRD highest pay-off from Fannie Mae AND Freddie Mac? OBAMA 

And who fought against reform of Fannie and Freddie?
OBAMA and the Democrat Congress, especially BARNEY!!!! 

So when someone tries to blame Bush...
REMEMBER JANUARY 3rd, 2007....THE DAY THE DEMOCRATS TOOK OVER!" 

Bush may have been in the car but the Democrats were in charge of the gas pedal and steering wheel they were driving the economy into the ditch. 

Budgets do not come from the White House. They come from Congress and the party that controlled Congress since January 2007 is the Democratic Party.  

Furthermore, the Democrats controlled the budget process for 2008 & 2009 as well as 2010 & 2011. 

In that first year, they had to contend with George Bush, which caused them to compromise on spending, when Bush somewhat belatedly got tough on spending increases. 

For 2009 though, Nancy Pelosi & Harry Reid bypassed George Bush entirely, passing continuing resolutions to keep government running until Barack Obama could take office. At that time, they passed a massive omnibus spending bill to complete the 2009 budget. 

And where was Barack Obama during this time? He was a member of that very Congress that passed all of these massive spending bills, and he signed the omnibus bill as President to complete 2009. Let's remember what the deficits looked like during that period:

If the Democrats inherited any deficit, it was the 2007 deficit, the last of the Republican budgets. That deficit was the lowest in five years, and the fourth straight decline in deficit spending.After that, Democrats in Congress took control of spending, and that includes Barack Obama, who voted for the budgets.

If Obama inherited anything, he inherited it from himself.

In a nutshell, what Obama is saying is "I inherited a deficit that I voted for,
And then I voted to expand that deficit four-fold since January 20th."

There is no way this will be widely publicized, unless each of us sends it on!

"The problems we face today exist because the people who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living."

 

 

HIT THEM HARD THEY ARE NOT OUR FRIENDS,  STOP SENDING THEM ANY MONEY OR SUPPLYS.  THEY HATE US.  WE DO NOT REALLY NEED THEM ANY MORE.  AND THEN GET THE HELL OUT OF AFGHANISTAN,  THE WAR THAT YOU CAN NOT WIN EVER.

WE NEED TO DUMP THE FEDERAL RESERVE IN THE COURTS ! WHEN THEY EVALUATE THE DOLLAR, WE

WILL ALL BE DEAD DUCKS !! WE NEED TO GO BACK TO THE U.S. TREASURY NOTES AS PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY WANTED TO DO - BUT WAS KILLED ! THESE

PEOPLE DO NOT FOOL AROUND .