Do you realize what you have accomplished? I’d like to add to what Beck said. In all likelihood you are not conscious of this. Before the Big Bang, there was something, as from nothing you get nothing. The something was universal consciousness. From the study of aspects of matter—subatomic particles—science theorizes that there is a God-particle called the Higgs bosen, a first out the box from which sprang a state of infinite possibility. What does that have to do with us? I’ll tell you. This state of infinite possibility, with local forces, began the process of creating the physical universe.

The meaning of life comes from its creator, universal consciousness. Science now reasons that consciousness is an absolute in the mix of things; our minds interconnected with a dimension of infinite possibility.

Again, the meaning of life, referring to the Bible, Gen. 1:26, “And God said, Let us make man in our image,” you may say your religious faith is your salvation, but you are really saying faith in yourself is what made you take a stand. It was your faith in you that is responsible for the Tea Party. Give yourself credit where credit is due.

America’s most read Bible is The Scofield Reference Bible. I frequently refer to it because of its large Concordance. I read in the Introduction of the Scofield Bible, “The saying that ‘anything may be proved by the Bible’ is both true and false—true if isolated passages are used; utterly false if the whole divine revelation is in view.” The Intro goes on to state, “The Dispensations are distinguished, exhibiting the majestic, progressive order of the divine dealings of God with humanity, ‘the increasing purpose’ which runs through and links together the ages, from the beginning of the life of man to the end in eternity.” I totally agree.

The left has construed “progressive order” to mean strong central government. The “increasing purpose” of progressive government is to replace God with government and leave the individual stripped of all rights, replaced by government entitlements. This thought, coupled with the above Scofield thought, has stuck with me, the right and left, in general terms, the different meanings they give to our purpose, and neither the truth.

“In Cosmos and Psyche,” from the back cover we read, “distinguished philosopher and cultural historian Richard Tarnas demonstrates the existence of an astonishingly consistent correspondence between planetary alignments and the archetypal patterns of human history.” Interestingly, Tarnas writes that Saturn and Pluto went into unfavorable alignment in November 2008, the year Obama was elected President. It was no coincidence. We read that “these three-to-four year periods, as did a widespread sense of epochal closure: ‘the end of an era,’ ‘the end of innocence,’ the destruction of an earlier mode of life that in retrospect may seem to have been marked by widespread indulgence, decadence, naiveté, denial, and inflation . . . With the help of corrupt government, the American people have sold their souls to the devil. We’re going down the tube.

In The Physics of Consciousness: the Quantum Meaning of Life. Evan Harris Walker gets into specifics of our demise with this: “The consequences have been devastating to religion. Religion—all religion—has for some time been dying a slow death.” What about Obama’s collective salvation? Obama is selling out America to revolutionaries. “Many will greet such a statement with elation that the earth may be freed of the self-righteous, the fear mongers, those who raise the specter of eternal condemnation, those who instill guilt in children and the frail of mind, and those who have inflicted pain, inflamed hatred, and fostered wars in the name of this or that religion. Sadly, these have indeed been legion. Surely what I have to say here, what I see for tomorrow, will never tolerate the return of such perverted minds. . . But for this terror, there is one thing that is worse: the thought that all the suffering and all the pleasure of life have no meaning.” Walker says we are at the very edge “of a world stripped of all innate moral values, without giving us anything to take its place.”

It cannot be denied that astrology shows consistent correspondence between planetary alignments and the archetypal patterns of human history. Consciousness exists, write Walker. “And for the first time, we have used the instruments of scientific investigation to fit its existence into the overall tapestry of reality. For the first time, we understand what consciousness is. We can understand mind as including conscious experience and will. We can see how these fit into the physical processes . . .Walker reasons that we are more than matter. The observer emerges now as “a co-equal in the foundry of creation.”

Connecting with Walker’s thought, astrology gives me Aquarius rising. In the Rising Sign, under “Aquarius Rising” Jeanne Avery writes, “If he is in touch with his individuality and special qualities, he can express strong humanitarian concern, have a strong sense of freedom for himself and for others, and be ahead of his time.”

Avery informs us that “The planet Uranus is on the ascendant of the chart of the United States. Freedom of speech and opportunity was the cornerstone of the Constitution. Inventions flourished, humanitarian concerns made us friends to all. We became the water-bearer, broadcasting our message of human rights.” The left wants to rewrite the Constitution. They say it is flawed.

Uranus transited from the time of my birth to a position opposing itself when I was in my forties. Avery says this fact may bring “a major life crisis,” and as well bringing about “opportunity for growth and change.” This is precisely what took place. My business enterprise went on the rocks. My second wife divorced me. “Old patterns and static conditions are no longer viable, old formulas no longer work; new decisions are necessary for growth. Uranus opposing its own position indicates times of drastic change. This may be life’s way of blasting us out of a comfortable rut we’ve established.” Long before I read this, I departed my old life, I didn’t plan it, but on Good Friday. The first day of my new life was on Easter Sunday. From that day forward, my life took on new meaning. Tomorrow, I’ll be 85. If my life could be any better, I don’t know how. The planet Uranus is on my ascendant. The Constitution gave me my bigger than life calling. It put my life on course. I don’t call myself a Christian. I found Jesus my own way.

In Astrologer’s Handbook, we read that the Age of Pisces, with its symbol of two attached fish swimming in opposite directions, indication of “drastic duality of emotion,” they (Pisceans or progressive liberals) are “easily influenced by external factors,” and they are “extremely responsive to the thoughts and feeling of others. They unconsciously absorb the ideas and mental outlook of those around them.” They “desperately want to do the right thing, but as a rule they do not have strong willpower.” Progressive liberals are no match to the Tea Party.

Under “Aquarius,” we read, “Individuals born under the sign of brotherhood and fraternity have as their symbol the water-bearer, who spills out to mankind the life-force and spiritual energy. Since the planet Uranus rules Aquarius, friendship and companionship are extremely important to Aquarians. . . There is no affectation or snobbery in the Aquarian personality but a dislike of spurious imitation and hypocrisy in any form. Aquarians operate as equals among equals. However, they are not dependent on their environments for their security, because they derive this from being in the company of others.” I’m an Aquarian messenger. The Tea Party is the beginning of the Aquarian brotherhood. It is here to stay.

On earth as it is in heaven, we are leaving the Age of Pisces, entering the Age of Aquarius. Glenn Beck says “You have won the day,” you who decided you were not going to sit silently and take it anymore. Let the left stew in its own juice. Let the right join the Tea Party, the brotherhood of man under tomorrow’s God.

As he left the Constitutional Convention Dr. Franklin was asked what manner of government the founders had bestowed upon us. He answered, "A Republic, if you can keep it!"

"As we celebrate Constitution Week (Sept. 17-23), it would be wise to heed Franklin's challenge. A constitutional republic is not an easy form of government to maintain. It requires wise leaders more interested in the public good than in holding and using power. It requires an enlightened citizenry that understands and exercises its rights and duties and is willing to fight to preserve them. Moreover, both wise leaders and enlightened citizens must arise with each new generation, prepared and able to make the system work."

John Cooke, Marshall Croddy

Thursday, September 21, 2006

San Franciso Chronicle

These guys have it right. We need to understand that our much loved Republic is fragile. It requires constant attention to its care and feeding. Patriots cannot assume that it will survive on its own with no effort on their part. The coming elections are just a battle in the war for the hearts and minds of generations to come. We must not let setbacks or poor showings blunt our zeal or our will. We will step up and see to it that this great experiment in government that our founders bequeathed us lives on and prospers, in spite of those who would subvert it. As an afterthought, make sure the schools in your area are actually teaching the Constitution as it is during this time. Offer to lecture or form discussion groups with students and young people. They are the future. They must carry the fight when we are no longer able or here to do it for them. They must be made to understand that this really is the greatest nation on God's earth and its survival is worth the fortune, the blood and the honor of each and every one of us.

“Subject to and under the authority of Presidential Security Directive 9999 (or whatever), you are ordered to be detained for investigation relating to activities deemed dangerous to the national security.”

Are any of us likely to hear this utterance reminiscent of Nazi Germany or soviet Russia? Who knows? Posse Comitatus forbids the use of the military on US soil to enforce civilian law. Of course Posse Comitatus is a fragile thing at best. There are already God knows how many Executive Orders that provide for the suspension of Posse Comitatus in times of national emergency. How safe are we?

None of the previous Presidents seemed to want or desire to take that last fatal step into tyranny and oppression of the masses. It seemed a very remote possibility. Until now…

I am not a conspiracy nut nor do I spend much time dwelling on the hundreds of FEMA detention centers around the country. There may well be some nefarious purpose for them, but as yet, there doesn’t seem to be any way of actually implementing the process of rounding up “enemies of the state.” The military is something of an enigma. It is hard to say how many officers and soldiers would simply refuse to obey an order to detain or , heaven forbid, fire on American citizens.

When men and women join the military service they are required to take an oath. That oath is as follows:

“I, (NAME), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.”

On the surface this is pretty cut and dried, but let’s look at it more closely. The new soldier swears (or affirms) to support and defend the Constitution, not the President or the Governor, or anybody else… just the Constitution. He or she further swears (or affirms) to bear true faith and allegiance to that same Constitution. Then things get dicey. They further swear (or affirm) that they will obey the orders of the President and the officers appointed over them.. Yet, this phrase is not as simplistic as one would first surmise. There are qualifiers for that obedience. The orders will be followed according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Here things get more interesting. The UCMJ requires uncompromising obedience to all lawful orders whether from the President or some other official or ones officers. The penalties for disobeying a lawful order are swift, and in time of war, life threatening. A soldier can literally be executed for disobeying a direct order …. a direct lawful order. Additionally, a soldier is required by that same UCMJ to disobey an unlawful order. Wow! Pretty heady stuff! Now it comes down to what constitutes a lawful order. Disobeying any order can place a solders well-being at peril. The definition of what makes an order lawful or unlawful lies not with the soldier or good conscience or public opinion, but with the whims of the military court deciding the issue. Talk about subjective truths. The soldier is literally in the hands of a group of officers who may or may not be in a generous and forgiving mood.

This is scary for most military men and women. Some few could care less. They will do whatever they are told and let someone else deal with the consequences. How many times have soldiers in trouble used the old “ I was just following orders?” This is not, however, a defense. Just ask Lt Calley. None the less, this attitude does exist in the military and it is troublesome. Thankfully, most of the men and women in the military have some sense of what is right or wrong. Will that sense override their oath to obey their President and officers? Interesting question. I think in the clutch it will. Having been in the military, and coming from a military family, I believe that the men and women we trust our very lives and freedom to will rise to the occasion.

BUT…..

During the 2008 campaign in Colorado, our goofy President made the following statement: “We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."

WHAT? Does this bother anyone other than myself? What exactly is the One proposing here? It would seem that he is painfully aware of what we have been discussing here. The military would probably balk at anything like violating Posse Comitatus. So how is an ambitious President going to rein in those pesky activist citizens that oppose his benign “rule”? Well, let’s see. Hitler and Stalin had a similar problem. They solved it by creating the largest most oppressive “civilian security force” in history. Uh wait. Isn’t that what Obamaroo is suggesting? So, if you can’t rely on the military to do your dirty deeds, you create a civilian security force that is bigger than the military, better equipped, better funded, and wholly answerable to the President alone.

What are the chances of this happening? Slim and none? Maybe not. Under the present regime, it is possible. Reid and Pelosi would probably go along as would most of the Democratic tiddlywinks and the RINOs in the house and senate. It would take some doing but it could be done. After the elections of 2010 it becomes very unlikely. So what can we expect in the near future? Who knows, but I shall be watching very closely.

this is a made in usa product search engine and database . they have a listing of all web sites with products sold on the internet that are made in america. please go to and check out

www.madeinusa.org

The Tea Party is the best happening since the American Revolution !! God bless America and God bless

the Tea Party !

Speaking of weak willed people, namely, Harry Reid, with the world’s industrial nations hopelessly in debt, with the exception of the number two industrialized nation, China, a great change is inevitable. But you wouldn’t know that, Harry. As an out of touch progressive, there you stand, picking your nose.

America’s popular talk show host, Fox News’ Glenn Beck, a reformed alcoholic who found his Christian God, is leading millions to mistrust progressives and to trust in God.

Pointing out the problem of who God is and what He is about, presently, there is a flap over the building of a mosque near ground zero, This has nothing to do with freedom of religion, and Harry agrees. Give him credit for that. So let’s discuss what this is really about--so we can help out of touch Harry come to the Party.

Two thousand years ago astrologers advised kings. The Magi (the three wise men in the Bible), Persian astrologers who followed “the star in the east” to Bethlehem, in Matthew 2, “came wise men from the east . . . saying where is he that is born the King of Jews. . . When Herod the king had heard of these things, he was troubled.” Harry needs to know what is really involved here.

When Beck realized that his life was at rock bottom, he was saved by his Mormon faith. When I hit rock bottom, I turned away from my Presbyterian faith. I looked within for my answers. Glenn’s Mormon faith worked. My faith in self worked. We don’t have to be of a particular religious faith to get on our paths of destiny. But Harry, you’ve got to believe in a higher power than Harry Reid’s ego. A progressive control freak left at the switch, we are onto you!

Beck frequently refers to faith, hope, and charity, and to the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence. In the Declaration, we are given rights that come from divine providence, rights that cannot be taken without the owner’s permission, Harry. Get this into your limited progressive mind: on earth as it is in heaven.

After reading the Constitution and Declaration of Independence, in 1975, and after reading The “Higher Law” Background of American Constitutional Law by Edward S. Corwin, I wrote a letter to Nixon’s Attorney General William B. Saxbe, in it stating that I’d see him in court. Everyone I knew thought I’d lost my mind. You don’t mess with the IRS and get away with it. Everyone is dumbed down. They were wrong.

Saxbe forwarded my letter to the IRS and the fight started. I’d never had any formal training in the law. That was in my favor. Lawyers can’t fight common sense. I had nothing to lose. Nothing could stop me. I maintained that federal income tax was, in its implementation, unconstitutional. Similarly, Jesus told the temple priests they were not teaching God’s law. Those in authority crucified Jesus. We’ve never been governed by any semblance of God’s law, or the Constitution.

After my advanced understanding of the Constitution, I was soaring with eagles, the IRS a paper tiger. I had the feeling that voices of the past were speaking to me, encouraging me to proceed in my legal action. After I told the IRS, also, that I’d see them in court, I was called into the IRS offices to discuss my issues, or rather, as it turned out, to be threatened.

This is what Harry Reid gives us: a fat toad IRS official, his eyes bugging and his face red as a beet, yelling at me what he was going to do if I didn’t conform, referring to me as a “Fifth Amendment Freak.” The Department of Justice and IRS hung themselves with their own rope, and that’s what you are doing, Harry.

I’m giving you people the real news. At the time I wrote the Attorney General, tax protester was in the news and IRS warnings were frequent. Tax protesters were reported by the mainstream press to be going to jail. And they told us why. I was in every sense of the word a tax protester, and one who knew the law. I wasn’t one of their nut cases. 60 Minutes heard about me and called. They didn’t like what they heard. To 60 Minutes, say I, the absence of truth is as much a lie as a deliberate untruth. I had every right to challenge the income tax—after paying the tax. I had a personal stake in the outcome. The press pointed out that refusing to pay tax can put you in jail, but failed to point out that if you pay your tax you have the right to protest it. We are reminded that the Obama Administration claimed the border with Mexico was secure and that Arizona law allows profiling, without reading the law. The mainstream press, as usual, is leaving out anything that makes the Obama Administration look bad. You can’t believe the press.

The tax court allows you to protest your tax, but not on constitutional ground. I protested my tax in tax court. The IRS “mistake” was corrected. As soon as the case was closed, the IRS made the same “mistake” again. The IRS lawlessly confiscated my property. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals didn’t think the lawless confiscation of my property was unconstitutional. I was a tax protester. The Court found it necessary and proper to defend the income tax, and no matter what, the end justifies the means. The courts give us the right to challenge the tax and the IRS the authority tax us, mistakenly, for the good of all. Don’t forget that judges once held that simply because one’s skin was black, he or she was too stupid to be free. We know now that is not true. We don’t know the current truth about the IRS.

The whole truth is that the federal judiciary does not want you to know that you have the right to take the IRS to court. The progressive idea prevails. You are too stupid to know how to spend the money you earn. Federal judges, making no distinction, call tax protesters “spurious constitutional objectors.” Without questioning judges the mainstream press prints the lies Judges tell them. The President and Congress, who think they know better how we should spend our money, don’t want taxpayers to know that the IRS is permitted to make limitless “mistakes.”

Voices of the past, strongly behind me, told me that by a double standard the United States rules over weak-willed people. I’m reminded that the original Tea Party was protesting the king’s tax. The current Tea Party is not a Nazi organization, or rabble rousing, nonconforming trouble makers, Harry. The Tea Party wants to take the county back to the original Constitution.

The Tea Party should be pleased to know that this tax protester made good his pledge to the Attorney General. Solicitor General Wade McCree, Jr., the Attorney General’s lawyer, upon my petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, filed a memorandum for the respondent, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, in opposition. Speaking for Harry Reid and his colleagues, McCree’s memorandum was a pack of lies. The Supreme Court dismisses the truth and that’s what they did in my cause. We are left with a quandary. But when the moment of truth comes, Harry Reid and his colleagues have painted themselves into a corner,

I took my court record to The Palm Beach Post. The Post investigated. The Post got the admission from the IRS that it made numerous “mistakes” against me for a period of eleven years. A front page story in the Post told in detail the IRS “mistakes,” in violation of the Tax Court’s order, and in violation of a later U. S. District Court order.

Not a peep from anyone. This disgusting news told every taxpayer who read the article that the IRS is above being questioned, and above the law.

Nancy Pelosi, maker of the law, accuses the Tea Party of being Nazis. The pathetic press people are rats following the Pied Piper to the river. Is it any wonder that we now have the Tea Party?

Due to the weakness of wills, an authoritarian age, Jesus, born at the beginning of the Age of Pisces, his crucifixion, a sign of a coming age, Jesus left us with a prophecy that he would appear again. Blessed are the poor in spirit: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

I’m an Aquarian messenger bringing to you the wave of the future. Like Glenn Beck, I came to a jumping off place. I jumped and my life began to improve. On the first date with my present wife and soul mate, a hike to Multnomah Falls near Mt. Saint Helens, the mountain erupted. It was a sign. After the calamity my life had become, hope and renewal.

For 2,000 years, the wrong answers have caused the greatest suffering and death anyone can imagine. Ground zero, a hole in the ground, a monument of despair, let the prophet Jesus remain the hope of the world. When Muslims weep for the dead and pray for peace, let the mosque be built. But, alas! That will be the day! We have never heard a devout Muslim ever admit he or she is wrong. They bend the truth to suit their needs. To be truthful is a sign of weakness.

President Obama may be a Christian, but for shame, his arrogance shows him to be like Harry, weak, like all progressives, clinging to the fading past. Progressives leave us in harm’s way. It is up to the Tea Party to be strong. Enter the Age of Aquarius, an age of strong wills and of brotherhood. Goodbye Harry.

THE SPECTOR OF MUSLIM DISLOYALTY IN AMERICA IS NOW ALL OVER THE COUNTRY. WE ARE NOT INFIDELS ! GO BACK TO YOUR TRIBES !

THE FRENCH SENATE BANNED BURQA'S, VEILS, NEXT SPRING. WITH A $ 190.00 FINE. SO THEY BOMB !

This past weekend, America remembered 9-11. There was a miriad of emotion - intense sadness, pride for our first responders, joy for our country, undaunted in the face of terror, and nine years ago today, comforted by our strong leader, commander-in-chief President Bush at Ground Zero. Just as December 7th is remembered as "a day that will live in infamy", so will 9-11.

DON'T TELL ME IT'S NOT HALLOWED GROUND

Just like the ARIZONA in Pearl Harbor, this is hallowed ground... http://bit.ly/b6wkih

Just added. I setup another site for this, www.teapartycandidate.ning.com. Candidates should address issues and there platform there.

We have a section national offices and state offices. The best way for candidate to develop a campaign is to talk about issues and have solutions. As people learn about the candidates, each person will decide who will be the best leader for our nation. I can't decide for people and the truth about politics it is very dirty and we have a lot of work within the Tea Party to shine the light on corruption and clean up Washington.

Dale

As Speaker Nancy Pelosi lectured to her flock of minions, "We have to pass the bill, so that you can find out what is in it", truer words were never spoken. It is well known that this bill was not read by the majority of congress; members of congress had to be bribed [with our tax dollars] in order to vote for the bill; there were backroom deals we will never hear about [unless a "Deap Throat" eventually comes forward]; the public, at a joint session of congress, were, in fact, lied to by a president of the United States.

GET SET FOR BIG PREMIUM HIKES

Obama pledged to "bend the cost curve" on health insurance. But he's bending the truth instead http://bit.ly/dmlcpM

This is an interview that has apparently been banned by the liberal press. The interview was on Ireland's RTÉ One television, and the interviewer -- well, I'll let you decide.

BANNED IRISH TV INTERVIEW WITH PRESIDENT BUSH - GUESS WHY

>

MitolocyA And By Ege

PRETOSTO ÖYLE DEĞİL BÖYLE YAPILIR

ABD Halk Yoldan Saptıkça Dünyaya Zararvermektedir Kendi Sapmış Dinleriyle İnsanlığa Hakaretler Yağdırmaktadır. İslamiyet Tüm Dinlere Irklara Hoşgörü Demektir Sİz Hiç İncil Yakan Müslüman Gördünüzmü? Osmanlı Adaleti Bunun En Açık Göstermiştir.

Siz Kana Susamış Köpeklere Bir İslam Tokatıda Bizden Gelsin ve Allahın Laneti Üzerinizde olsun Daha Çok Tayfunlar Kasırgalar Göresiniz

------------------------------------------

English

It is NOT DO SO PRETOSTO


U.S. Public Roads as Deviation from the religious world has to handle yourself with Zararvermektedir insult to humanity is the rain. Race for all to Islam Religious Tolerance Means No Bible burning Muslim Gördünüzmü you? It was the Justice of the Ottomans Outdoor Show.

Kana you thirsty dogs are coming to us and below are a Muslim God Curse Tokat you get over by more typhoons are hurricanes

www.hacktebugun.com

“. . . two things work in O’Donnell’s favor: 1) Sarah Palin is backing her and 2) Sarah Palin is backing her because the Republican Senator Mike Castle is one of the most liberal Republicans in the nation. Castle actually supported Cap and Trade. The biggest thing against O’Donnell among practical considerations? Money, support and expertise are lacking, not to mention integrity.” Rajjpuut

Delaware Suggests TEA Party Express

is Harry Reid’s Creation

Loyal readers know that Rajjpuut is a Libertarian and has advised often and mightily against the TEA Party running their own candidates unless absolutely necessary. (As it was in upper state New York when the Republican Party last November gave a $1 Million campaign war chest to a woman running for the G.O.P. who was well to the left of the left-leaning Democratic candidate in a very conservative district. The TEA Party backed Conservative Party candidate chased her out of the race with only 5% support in the polls and came within an eyelash of victory.) If it’s necessary to run a TEA Party candidate, run an out and out third-party Conservative candidate of the highest level of integrity.

Several times now, the TEA Party Express has been behind very poor candidates and helped propel them to primary wins and Republican nominations. In effect these TEA Party Express candidates are giving aid and comfort to the progressive-Democrats on the ballot by creating an easily knocked off “straw-man” to campaign against. Such a candidate is Ken Buck in Rajjpuut’s Colorado. It is Rajjpuut’s firm conviction that the TEA Party Express is NOT a real TEA Party group it is a Harry Reid creation designed to get the poorest candidate to run against him in Nevada so Harry, the most hated man in America besides Barack Obama, would have an easy victory.

It’s happening again in Delaware in the fight for Joe Biden’s old senate seat. The TEA Party Express has supported the candidacy of one Christine O’Donnell. Like all TEA Party Express “candidates” she is virtually unelectable. Ms. O’Donnell has reportedly lied for 21 years about having a college degree which she was only just awarded this year. Ms. O’Donnell has a questionable tax and earnings situation. Ms. O’Donnell lied and said she took two of Delaware’s three counties in the most recent race against Biden . . . she actually won zero. Ms. O’Donnell has been violating campaign finance laws over the last six months.

The situation is not cut and dried, however; two things work in O’Donnell’s favor: 1) Sarah Palin is backing her and 2) Sarah Palin is backing her because the Republican Senator Mike Castle is one of the most liberal Republicans in the nation. Castle actually supports Cap and Trade. The biggest thing against O’Donnell among practical considerations? Money, support and expertise are lacking. Just as Sharon Angle (who was nominated by the TEA Party Express over two far better conservative candidates to unseat Harry Reid; then was left high and dry by the TEA Party Express once she’d won and only saved by DickMorris.com’s incredible work in her behalf nationally) found out, the question is obvious, if an outside party wins a Republican primary and the Republican nomination, why in hell should the Republican Party support her financially? Indeed, since she’s such a poor candidate should anyone in their right mind support her?

Let’s look the situation over logically: it looks like a three-way LOSE-LOSE-LOSE situation for Conservatives in Delaware and around the country unless things change dramatically (more on that later). A) the Democrat’s candidate benefits by running against a presumably unelectable O’Donnell and wins B) O’Donnell somehow gets elected but because she has no apparent integrity or ability to practically manage her own life, the state gets a loser for a senator C1) Castle wins the primary against O’Donnell but his war chest is depleted and the in-fighting weakens him as a candidate and helps the Democrat win or C2) Castle wins and wins again and Delaware gets a fiscal RINO** and a Constitutional RINO again in the senate.

How much better for all involved if a real TEA Party candidate and an electable one was running, no? Only one thing can save the situation for Castle and presumably Delaware. He needs to sign the TEA Party Contract from America. He needs to admit his past stupidity. He needs to understand with all his soul . . . .

http://www.econlib.org/library/Essays/rdPncl1.html and

http://fee.org/library/books/economics-in-one-lesson/#0.1_L2 and

http://fee.org/library/books/economics-in-one-lesson/#0.1_L3

And pledge to the people of Delaware and to the Republican Party that he will embody the spirit of these three websites and of the Contract from America. Short of this rebirth, nothing good is liable to come out of Delaware

Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,

Rajjpuut

** Unfortunately, the concept of RINO (Republican in name only) has deeply hurt the G.O.P. coming and going. On the one hand you have people like the two Maine senators or Mr. Castle in Delaware or the upstate New Yorker mentioned earlier who just use Republican money to get elected and then prove themselves absolutely progressive/liberal on taxes, spending and the Constitution. On the other hand and even more dangerous, too many undesirable candidates like Ken Buck and Sharon Angle survive the primary process because of their “fidelity” to the old litmus tests and then prove UNelectable and cede the field to the progressives directly. One great thing, however, virtually any candidate who keeps his/her big trap shut and only opens it to speak about the Contract from America should prevail, even perhaps Ken Buck, Sharon Angle, and Christine O’Donnell. The trouble is this kind of “non-RINO” tends to give Conservatives a bad name because they’re stupid enough to be against (just to name one thing) abortion even in case of incest or rape or if the mother’s life is in danger. American women won’t stand for this kind of authoritarian stand on what they can do and endure with their own bodies. That Republican stance makes abortion on demand all but inevitable.

“The progressive/Marxist big government mindset is that life is a zero-sum game, so they can’t really understand the creative-cooperative nature of capitalism even if they themselves are involved in some creative-cooperative activity. They treat the world as if everybody’s playing checkers** . . . if somebody wins, somebody else must lose and therefore the best result in their view is a draw; and they will always seek to drag the “wealthy” down to the level of the poor with wealth-redistribution schemes that just impoverish everyone. In America, thanks in part to largely unfettered capitalism, the rising tide of general prosperity has lifted all boats for over two hundred years and continues to lift all boats so that the typical American living under the “poverty line” in 2004 was better off than 88% of the world’s population.” Rajjpuut

Crocodile Tears of the Left

Flood America with Corruption

as the “BIG LIE” Dominates

Part IV: Victim #4, The Rich and the Poor

Loyal readers are advised to skip ahead as we give a brief review. In this blog series, we’ve been exposing the self-described “victimhood” of progressives at the hands of their evil, racist, etc. conservative oppressors and showing you where the real victimhood is:

http://rajjpuutsfolly.blogtownhall.com/2010/09/04/first_crocodile_tears,_then_dismemberment_part_i.thtml

In part I of the series (the link immediately above) the victim was “TRUTH” and among six key areas we hit Rajjpuut documented and exposed this truth:

Using the same Cloward-Piven** strategy that DELIBERATELY created the bankruptcy of New York City earlier between 1967 and 1975 by deliberately overloading the welfare rolls . . . beginning especially after 1992, ACORN, OBAMA, First ACORN PRESIDENT Bill Clinton, and oodles of progressives (98% of them Democrats) DELIBERATELY were pushing the car toward a 500-foot cliff. George W. Bush jumped in and grabbed the steering wheel and hit the brakes. Bush was able to create a controlled-skid and guide the car to rest in a friendly-looking ditch!

The chain of evidence producing that statement is something that every American ought to be aware of, just as every American ought to be aware of the identities of Saul Alinsky, Richard Cloward and Frances Piven and be able to articulate what Cloward-Piven strategy is . . . the fact that most Americans are totally ignorant of these things means someone hasn’t been doing their job.

http://rajjpuutsfolly.blogtownhall.com/2010/09/05/first_crocodile_tears,_then_dismemberment___part_ii.thtml

In Part II of the series we examines the “Fourth Estate” and how their willful actions and inactions and choreographed responses (the scandal known as the “JournOList” which many Americans have not heard of because it’s too embarrassing for the liberal media to reveal that over 400 of its people have been colluding on how stories ought to be presented – to the benefit of the progressive political movement in this country) have sabotaged the nation and freedom and the Constitution. In Rajjpuut’s J-school classes reporting was all about revealing TRUTH in an ‘inverted-pyramid’ of Who? What? Where? Why? and How? That immediately put the most important facts at the top of the story and gradually petered out as less important details were shown. Today the inverted-pyramid has disappeared and unsupported opinion has replaced TRUTH in much of what passes for “NEWS.” Then we looked at how the false victimhood of the progressives (we must “progress” beyond the outdated and flawed U.S. Constitution) has created another real victim: “Responsibility” in the guise of the rising numbers of single-mother-families (a problem obviously created by everybody else’s sexism, according to feminists). As the irresponsible notion of deliberately choosing a single-parent family drags down all of society (see this link).http://rajjpuutsfolly.blogtownhall.com/2010/09/06/first_crocodile_tears,_then_dismemberment___part_iii.thtml

Victim #4: The Rich and the Poor

This will be the shortest blog in our ten-part blog-series because despite all the lies progressives might tell you, economics is a very simple area. It’s only when you tell gross lies about economics aimed at furthering the likelihood of socialism or totalitarianism or both that economics gets difficult. If your “economic world system” is a lie (the “school” of Keynesian economics) then you must forever be adding sub-schools that purport to justify and “solve” the big lie in the system. Today there are at least a hundred sub-schools of John Maynard Keynes (all of them telling lies in favor of big government at every turn). In the “Wealth of Nations” Adam Smith revealed the marvelous truth we today call “Classical Economics” that “individual men through creativity, through industry, through communications can create and magnify wealth cooperatively.”

Here is the point where the fearful progressive departs from common sense. In his world there is always an oppressor (the conservative-captitalist) and always a victim (the whole world of progressives themselves) being exploited by the oppressor. Life, in short, is a zero sum game between two people. If the capitalist wins, the laborer must lose. If the capitalist wins the consumer must lose. If the capitalist wins society as a whole must lose. How does the capitalist win? By creating “PROFIT.” Profit is the ultimate “dirty word” to progressives which means they who claim to follow a historically necessary path based upon the lessons of history, don’t understand the simplest lessons of human history because . . . (drum roll, maestro) profit is good, indeed profit is the ultimate good that makes civilization, some degree of comfort, and large amounts of free will possible to mankind.

Another word for profit is “SURPLUS.” When people live hand to mouth existences . . . in that cold gray world . . . there is indeed a greater likelihood of exploitation, exploitation of the criminal over the victim. I barely have enough and you barely have enough, if I hurt you and steal what you’ve got then I have twice as much and you have nothing. However, when we both have a little profit, a bit of surplus, instead of a win-lose proposition, life becomes win-win. I’m a farmer and I trade a little bit of my extra corn (beyond what I need to survive and to feed my animals) to you in exchange for the chair you made, your profit; to your neighbor the smith for the hoe and shovel he made, his surplus or profit beyond survival needs; and to your other neighbor for the wool he’s got, his family’s profit. I have so much corn that I’d almost give it away for the chair, the garden tools and the wool.

Each of the others I trade with feels the same about the furniture, tools, and wool they produce. Each of us feels like we’ve gained by the trades we made and lost virtually nothing. This is the essence of win-win interaction, the essence of capitalism. When money is created, capitalism often becomes broadly expansive, the resulting interactions become sort of complicated, but the essence is the same, men willingly give of their labor and their surplus to interact with other men in cooperative win-win trade. There is no oppressor and no victim. The simplest and best example of unfettered capitalism is found in this brief essay:

http://www.econlib.org/library/Essays/rdPncl1.html

But there often is an oppressor after all; the heavy hand of government is played when power enters the marketplace by force. Whether for taxation or other confiscation, it is government which befuddles the simple win-win formula, simply stated the one lesson for understanding economics is:

http://fee.org/library/books/economics-in-one-lesson/#0.1_L2

But when government enters the marketplace, with taxes, subsidies, willful destruction, payment for zero production or lessened production, etc., etc., ad nauseum they have to justify the “displacement” of normal market forces and normal free-market good this way:

http://fee.org/library/books/economics-in-one-lesson/#0.1_L3

Here’s the total picture free online, Rajjpuut recommends you make this website a “favorite”:

http://fee.org/library/books/economics-in-one-lesson/

So what’s really going on when government enters the picture? In a word “theft,” stealing by the powerful (the government) of what the productive have earned. Sometimes it is literally out-and-out direct theft for and by those in power. More commonly at other times they steal from some, pay take “their cut” as well and redistribute the wealth to others so as to win the favor of those others receiving benefits and “earn” their votes and support. Today in America 47% pay no taxes but are rather in complete or partial measure supported by those who do produce and do pay the taxes . . . this is what government has done to us.

The progressive/Marxist big government mindset is that life is a zero-sum game, so they can’t really understand the creative-cooperative nature of capitalism even if they themselves are involved in some creative-cooperative activity. They treat the world as if everybody’s playing checkers . . . if somebody wins, somebody else must lose and therefore the best result in their view is a draw; and they will always seek to drag the “wealthy” down to the level of the poor with wealth-redistribution schemes that just impoverish everyone. In America, thanks in part to largely unfettered capitalism, the rising tide of general prosperity has lifted all boats for over two hundred years and continues to lift all boats so that the typical American living under the “poverty line” in 2004 was better off than 88% of the world’s population. A rising tide of prosperity is the hallmark of capitalism; stagnation and lack of economic growth is the hallmark of government interference.

While government does play a legitimate and necessary role in defending the people and their borders and maintaining order and protecting their god-given liberties . . . government run amuck under progressivism fulfills a totally corrupted role: screwing the rich, screwing the poor and making itself ever bigger, every day . . . .

Next Time: First Crocodile Tears, then Dismemberment Part V

Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,

For his cause, President Obama has “collective salvation,” a far cry from conventional American ideas on salvation, a far cry from the salvation Jesus talked. What do you expect from a man who attended Reverend Wright’s “Christian” church for 20 years. Rev. Wright “God damned” America.

Obama has stated that the U. S. Constitution is flawed and that American liberties are negative. What else but Marxism? Give Obama credit for doing as he promised, transforming America. His advisors are mostly hippie revolutionaries of the 60s and 70s. They hate American values. If they have their way, freedom of the press is not long for this world. They will dictate the news. Their model is Hugo Chevaz, communist dictator of Venezuela. This isn’t me talking. This is their talk. I’ve been listening to them talk on Glenn Beck’s Fox News show.

Obama is a deliberate divider. Of course he would want a mosque near ground zero. Obama and his ilk are for anything that can be done to intimidate and anger the American people. They want their opposition brought down to their knees, or angrily lashing out, in which case they can brutally wheel and deal with them. This is tantamount to their cause, which is to transform America, first by moral, spiritual, and fiscal bankruptcy, then into a banana republic. The bottom line is control.

Actually, capitalism has control for its bottom line, only under capitalism the control is spread out and the law conforms to the Constitution’s original intent. There’s a great difference. Hitler was legal. Anything can be considered legal. But never mind that, under hippie law, the end justifies the means—murder, bomb throwing, whatever it takes. Obama is here to save us from our rotten, greedy, imperialistic selves, we who have caused all the wrongs in the world. Why don’t we know that we don’t deserve inalienable rights? We are so far away from the truth there is no way to convince us other than to take us down. Obama is here for the good of all. We’re to be collectively saved by the intelligence people, hippies, revolutionaries, and such. Glory! Hallelujah! Again, this is not me talking. This is Obama’s own talk. He got his noble ideas in his early dysfunctional life, his education in Harvard by Marxist teachers, and later from his hate mongering preacher, Rev. Wright.

This is not to say that there is not greed under capitalism. The control is spread out. That’s a great difference the U. S. Supreme Court has ignored. The all white Taney Court, from its study of the Constitution, found that a black person had no more rights than a mule or a cow, or any other beast of burden. How could any human be more hateful? How could any intelligent human come to the Taney Court’s conclusion from studying the U. S. Constitution? None of this I mention is intelligence. It is lower animal power—might makes right, the law of the jungle. It’s the form of law being practiced in America, legal but lawless.

To be lawful the government must conform to ethical and moral principles that date back to antiquity. Obama’s pick, Judge Sotomayor, believes a Latino woman makes a better judge than a white male. Her opinion comes from the seat of her pants. Obama’s pick, Elena Kagan, when under questioning in the Senate, while admitting there are other long standing human values and principles, she was not obliged, in her misguided opinion, to consider them. She was only obliged, according to Kagan, to study what the U.S. Constitution says; that is, as interpreted by the Supreme Court. In other words, the law is what Kagan and Sotomayor say it is. Judges like Sotomayor and Kagan, not knowing the law, leave America a self-fulfilling prophecy. One never knows when and where the fickle finger of fate will fall. Why would anyone want to invest in America’s future? Hey sport fans, under Obama’s “collective salvation” agenda, government has a duty to the individual. That reads out to be control of the individual. It excludes individual needs. Most of today’s problems in America arise from FDR’s “New Deal” law, his idea of redistributive justice, and now Obama, the Roosevelt democrat is bankrupting America morally, spiritually, and fiscally. Shades of the past, America’s economy has had it.

I speak from personal experience. In 1973, I wrote the chief law enforcement officer of the United States, at the time Attorney General William B. Saxbe, a letter letting him know that I’d see him in court. Do you find that to be exceptional egotism? My ex-wife wanted me to see a psychiatrist. Saxbe was Nixon’s attorney general. Nixon put me out of business and then attempted to rob me of my property.

In case you didn’t know it, let me advise you that you are allowed to take your government to court if you have a personal stake in the outcome. You don’t need a lawyer. You can go to the county law library and read the procedure. Why don’t you? Let me warn you that you will be called all manner of names if you do decide to take matters in your own hands. The IRS called me a “Fifth Amendment Freak.” It didn’t do them any good. In the end the IRS ate crow. So, who’s nuts?

I made good my promise. I took the Commissioner of Internal Revenue to the Supreme Court. That must have been a shock to the all-powerful, law breaking IRS. The IRS is above the law, for the good of all, you know. The Supreme Court doesn’t listen to taxpayers. Like the high priests in the temple in Jerusalem defrauding the poor of their good money to be priest blessed, they look out for their own. Like the high priests in Rome selling indulgences, they look out for their own. The law is what the high priests on the U. S. Supreme Court say it is, not what the law clearly states, not what the Higher Law says, the law Jesus taught, but “for the good of all” might makes right. Hitler was legal. As mentioned earlier, neither Kagan nor her colleagues know that there are certain precepts of law that never change. Kagan was a law clerk in the Supreme Court. Naturally, she knew that none of those priests on the bench pay any attention to the long-standing principles of law, ethics, or morals. The Supreme Court is nothing more than a super-legislature run by life-appointed egomaniacs, doing their part in bringing America down.

With the above thought in mind, I took my Supreme Court case to The Palm Beach Post and proved that I’m right. Our American Supreme Court is a fraud. The Post printed my tax case in detail on the front page of the local section. Sotomayor and Kagan are both idiots. The Post story pointed out several instances of the IRS violating the IRS code, and ignoring lower court orders. On all of this, the Supreme Court looked the other way. They ignored the facts I gave them. The government admitted to the Supreme Court in its brief that it made mistakes, but that they had been corrected. Our Attorney General forgot mention that the IRS made the same mistakes over and over. Do you want these kinds of folks in control of your life? Our keepers of the law are as trustworthy as rattlesnakes.

The Post, from the court record I left with them, forced the IRS to admit to the world that it had lawlessly, on several occasions, confiscated my property and never corrected their “mistakes.” The IRS is a criminal organization. Same as the Nazi Gestapo, this government has given the IRS legal status.

There was no public reaction at all on the front page story the Post printed. I got my property back with interest. The IRS criminals the Supreme Court protects continued sending me warning letters and went on the attack again, this time against my wife. They threatened to take our home in payment of taxes they claimed my wife owed, which mistake could have been easily discovered. These are the folks who want to redistribute the wealth. We are powerless to stop them. I went to my Congressman. He moved the case to a different office. In short order, the mistake was corrected. But the question remains, what makes the present Supreme Court any less corrupt than the Supreme Court that read in the Constitution that black people, because of the color of their skin, could be owned by white people? The American people allow the criminal IRS to confiscate their property. They allowed slavery. I have legitimate questions no one in government has answered. It is time that we wise up. America is up for grabs.

If asked, what would Sotomayor and Kagan say? They don’t have to say anything. Why? They should be forced to answer this fundamental question of law or be removed from the bench. None of the hard questions we ask those in control of our lives are being answered. Obama speaks in riddles and platitudes.

The American people have been subjected to the greatest fraud of all times. Let the police make the slightest mistake, egged on by those hard working hippies of the 60s and 70s, those bomb throwing freaks bent on taking control of America, they are now behind the rioting by America’s lowlife, those gangs of cut-throats, many from south of the border, who exist by intimidation and brutality, the kind we “racially profile.” Isn’t that nice of Obama to protect them by the filing of a lawsuit to prevent Arizona from dealing with the problem? Anything to help bring America down.

You bet, Obama has pals. I’ve heard him say, with great emotion, that he has worked with people who hate America all his life. With friends like these, who needs enemies? These folks, today’s civil righters, a far, far cry from Martin Luther King’s, claim that Beck and Alveta King, Dr. King’s niece, are hijacking the civil rights movement.

While America slept, America’s hippies, now calling themselves civil righters, including President Obama, have left the American people with a hard row to hoe. I congratulate them for the spellbinders they are. Yes, they have every reason to be proud of their accomplishments. They have managed put themselves in positions of power. They apologize for America, wreck the economy, fail to enforce our border laws, support a Muslim cleric who is financed by the same money that finances Hamas. Obama surrounds himself with hate mongers. If Obama has his way, America will go down the tube. What a wonderful goal! America gone, her wealth scattered to the four winds, and in her place a banana republic.

Hello Tea Party and goodbye Obama. Enjoy your permanent vacation. It has been nice to know you.