What’s wrong with this picture?

Posted on The New York Post-By Michael A. Walsh-Updated on December 15, 2011:

“If you want to buy over-the-counter cold medicine at your local drugstore, chances are you have to show a photo ID to do it. Same if you want to get on a plane, rent a car or open a bank account. So why not to vote?

But to Attorney General Eric Holder, the idea is an outrage. In the name of “civil rights,” he’s declared war on a nationwide movement to ensure the integrity of the electoral process.

Just this year, eight states have passed new photo-ID laws; more than half now have some form of ID requirement for voting. But Holder has already sicced Justice’s Civil Rights Division on new voter-ID laws in South Carolina and Texas to see if there’s any “disproportionate impact” on minorities. He’s also objecting to reforms in “early voting” in places like Florida, which recently tightened its electoral window.

And he went to Austin, Texas, on Tuesday to give a speech denouncing what his ally Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.) calls “a deliberate and systematic attempt to prevent millions of elderly voters, young voters, students, minority and low-income voters from exercising their constitutional right to engage in the democratic process.”

Hogwash. Yes, using neutral-seeming barriers to deny blacks a real chance to vote was central to Jim Crow — but for a generation now, the nation’s assigned an entire division of the Justice Department precisely to jumping on top of any such chicanery.

This is not a civil-rights issue, it’s ensuring that everyone’s vote counts.

Liberals have long insisted that voter fraud is a “myth,” and voter-ID laws a plot to suppress turnout among “people who are more likely to vote Democratic, particularly the young, the poor, the elderly and minorities,” in the words of The New York Times.

Now that’s chutzpah coming from New York City, where the organized-crime ring known as Tammany Hall regularly and proudly stole municipal and statewide elections well into the 20^th century with its army of “repeaters” — men who altered their appearances by shaving or changing their clothes so they could “vote early and often” — and other tactics.

Nor is it history. Just this week, the chairman of the Indiana Democratic Party resigned in the wake of election-fraud allegations involving forged ballot-petition signatures that are now under investigation.

Nor is it “merely” registration fraud. The Commission on Federal Election Reform, created after the 2004 election and co-chaired by Jimmy Carter and James Baker, uncovered examples of vote-buying, repeat voting and absentee-ballot fraud. As Justice John Paul Stevens wrote in upholding Indiana’s voter-ID law in 2008, “flagrant examples of such fraud have been documented throughout this nation’s history by respected historians and journalists.”

So, while Holder intones that unfettered access to the ballot box “must be viewed not only as a legal issue but a moral imperative,” his real agenda is surely politics: Fraud generally benefits Democratic candidates.

Even posturing about the issue might sway a few souls. Hence the new Senate bill, introduced yesterday by New York’s own Chuck Schumer and Ben Cardin of Maryland, to criminalize “deceptive” campaign literature, such as giving the wrong date for elections. A similar bill went nowhere four years ago, and this one’s likely just as doomed — but it’s a fine pretext for muddying the debate over voter-ID.

In fact, Holder is right on one count: This is a moral issue, if not in the way he claims.

The history of voting in America has been one of expanding the franchise to include (by constitutional amendment) blacks, women and young adults. But it’s not infinitely expandable to felons, foreigners and fraudsters — no matter how much use the Dems might see in those constituencies.

Were photo-ID regulations as onerous as liberals claim, “the young, the poor, the elderly and minorities” would barely be able to function. Further, it is an insult to millions of Americans to assume that they are too ignorant to know when elections are (hint: they’re generally on Tuesdays).

The Supreme Court, in its 6-3 Indiana decision, called voter-ID laws “eminently reasonable.” That’s the true “moral” position. But with a crucial election coming up next year, expect the Obama administration to go all in to try and stop them.”

Source:

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/behind_holder_war_on_voter_id_laws_q2b1T6orOktnMipcdhg25L

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and video relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. Eric Holder Announces Opposition to Election Integrity Laws!

Posted on PJ Media-By J. Christian Adams-On December 13, 2011:

“On Tuesday night, I spoke in Austin, Texas, at a rally organized by True the Vote.  It took place on the grounds of the LBJ Library on the campus of the University of Texas.  The rally was in response to Eric Holder’s announcement at the same place two hours later of a concerted Justice Department effort to oppose virtually every electoral integrity measure promoted by Constitutional conservatives and Republicans.

Holder’s announcement will have profound partisan results in the 2012 election because of his professed unwillingness to enforce laws to prevent voter fraud.  Indeed, tonight he made clear his opposition to these laws, such as voter ID and even the requirement to register to vote in advance of an election.

Holder announced broad opposition to voter identification requirements and a ramped up effort to enforce voting registration laws in welfare agencies.  He didn’t make any announcements about enforcing Section 8 of Motor Voter to ensure dead people don’t populate the roles.  He also said that voter fraud “isn’t a huge problem,” perhaps marking the first time the nation’s chief law enforcement downplayed criminal behavior.  Of course that is in vogue in this administration, starting with the New Black Panther dismissal and now with Fast and Furious.

In opposition to Holder, I spoke, as did a group of inspiring patriots starting with Catherine Englebrecht of True the Vote.  Anita Moncrief, Reverend C. L. Bryan, George Rodriguez (head of the San Antonio Tea Party) and Adryana Boyne, national director of VOCES Action followed.  Boyne’s speech defending Texas voter ID may be the first time I heard the policy defended in Spanish.  Moncrief, though, had the line of the night — that “Al Sharpton has a platinum race card.”

Holder laid down markers, which will excite his base and disturb law abiding citizens.  He supported restrictions on political speech which will criminalize campaign falsehoods.  He vowed hyper-scrutiny of voter integrity laws such as voter ID and vowed to run states like Texas through a nasty gauntlet on redistricting.  If this doesn’t send a signal to Texas and South Carolina to pull their voter ID laws out of Justice and go to court, nothing else will.  Also in attendance was Assistant Attorney General Tom Perez, a starring character in my book Injustice.

Holder brought along his puppy, Charlie Savage of the New York Times, from whom we can expect glowing sycophantic coverage of Holder’s announcement at any minute at the New York Times website.  Savage is the same reporter who covered purported politicization at the Bush Justice Department.  For this he won a Pulitzer Prize.

PJ Media’s Every Single One series reported on the same story Savage did, except this time on the 113 attorney hires by the Obama Civil Rights Division.  Savage only covered a handful of Bush hires — he had to, otherwise his story wouldn’t work because the Bush DOJ hired scores of liberal activist lawyers.  But the Obama Justice Department gives no quarter to the enemy in hiring, and hired 113 leftists out of 113 openings.  I described in my book Injustice how PJ Media had to sue Eric Holder to extract this information:

• During the Bush era, DOJ leaders quickly fulfilled FOIA requests. For instance, in 2006 Charlie Savage, then at the Boston Globe, requested all the resumes of the recently hired attorneys in the Bush Civil Rights Division. The DOJ leadership produced the materials within days, well ahead of the legal deadline—they acted so fast, in fact, that some colleagues and I complained they were rushing. Suspecting we were being set up for a leftwing smear campaign, we urged DOJ officials to protect our privacy while fully complying with the requests. But our concerns were ignored and the information was rushed out anyway, resulting in a slew of slanderous media stories, some attacking us in extremely personal ways, followed by curious questions from our family members about why we were in the news. There was a particularly merciless leftist blogosphere attack on a pair of attorneys who happened to be two of the hardest working and most dedicated lawyers in the entire Voting Section.

After PJ Media obtained the Obama hiring information, Savage, ever the cuddly puppy, wrote a puff piece about the Obama hiring practices.  Gone was his outrage over politicized hiring that he exhibited at the Boston Globe for the Bush DOJ.  That’s what PJ Media is for – reporting on stories the dying dead trees media won’t. Given the scope of the Every Single One series, perhaps PJ Media deserves a Pulitzer too.  If Charlie got one, PJ Media certainly should.  Stay tuned.

Source:

http://pjmedia.com/jchristianadams/2011/12/13/eric-holder-announces-opposition-to-election-integrity-laws/

II. Black Conservatives Say Attorney General Holder's Tuesday Night Speech at LBJ Library Was Partisan and Racialist!-Posted on The National Center for Public Policy Research-On December 14, 2011:

http://www.nationalcenter.org/P21PR-Holder_121411.html

III. In Wake of Indiana Petition Forgery Probe, New Rules Offered to Prevent Fraud!-Posted on FoxNews.com-By Eric Shawn-On December 14, 2011:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/12/14/in-wake-obama-petition-signature-probe-indiana-democrats-propose-new-rules/

IV. Documents Reveal Coordination Between ACORN Affiliate and Justice Department Voting Section!-Posted on Big Government-By J. Christian Adams-On December 14, 2011:

http://biggovernment.com/jcadams/2011/12/14/documents-reveal-coordination-between-acorn-affiliate-and-justice-department-voting-section/

V. Obama’s Creepy New Plot to Get Republican E-mail Addresses!-Posted on ExposeObama.com-Ben Johnson, The White House Watch-On December 14, 2011:

http://www.exposeobama.com/2011/12/14/obamas-creepy-new-plot-to-get-republican-e-mail-addresses/

VI. Video: Rush, Democrats “Can’t Win Unless There is Vote Fraud!”-Posted on ExposeObama.com-On December 14, 2011:

http://www.exposeobama.com/2011/12/14/video-rush-democrats-cant-win-unless-there-is-vote-fraud/

VII. Indiana Democratic Party Head Resigns as Fraud Probe Heats Up!-Posted on FoxNews.com-By Eric Shawn-On December 12, 2011:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/12/12/indiana-democratic-party-head-resigns-as-fraud-probe-heats-up/

Personal Note From Me: I know that most of you have already seen the following information before, but bare with me for taking the liberty of sharing it with you again to make sure that we are all on the same page when it comes to knowing what we face in our next Presidential election:

Note:  The following websites reveal that George Soros’ Open Society Institute (OSI) — has dispensed more than $5 billion to a multitude of organizations whose objectives are consistent with those of Soros and one of those organizations is Project Vote, which is the voter-mobilization arm of the notoriously corrupt ACORN, whose voter-registration drives and get-out-the-vote initiatives have been marred by massive levels of fraud and corruption, along President Obama’s ties to this voter fraud machine-You Decide:

Guide to the George Soros Network:

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=589

Project Vote:

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6966

Obama’s ties with voter fraud!-Posted on OneNewsNow.com-By Russ Jones, OneNewsNow-On December 1, 2011:

http://www.onenewsnow.com/Politics/Default.aspx?id=1487470

Note:  The following websites and article and/or blog post reveal George Soros’s Secretary State Project (SOSP) and an education fund run by progressive labor leaders tasked with naturalizing new citizens and register new voters by using the 2010 Census as a redistributive mechanism, along with how he is using his money to help tip the elections to Democrats (Progressives) in all 50 states-You Decide:

George Soros’s Secretary Of State Project (SOSP)!-Posted on DiscoverTheNetworks.org:

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=7487

Mi Familia Vota Education Fund (MFVEF)!-Posted on DiscoverTheNetworks.org:

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=7538

George Soros’ Money Could Tip Elections in All 50 States!-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Michael Oberndorf-On July 1, 2011:

http://floydreports.com/george-soros-money-could-tip-elections-in-a...

Note:  The following website and article and/or blog post reveal that George Soros funds Leftist foundations, litigators and organizations that dominate Election Laws and crusaders that enable massive voter fraud while the DOJ turns a blind eye-You Decide:

George Soros Funds Leftist Foundations, Litigators and OrganizationsThatDominate Field of Election Laws!-Posted on DiscoverTheNetworks.org:

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=1431

The Left Owns the Election Law Industry!-Posted on FrontPage Magazine-By J. Christian Adams-On August 12, 2011:

http://frontpagemag.com/2011/08/12/the-left-owns-the-election-law-i...

I, like many of you, have little or no faith in polls due to our bad experiences during the final days of the 2008 Presidential Election, as substantiated by this NewsMax article that revealed that almost every major pollster, to include the main stream media, had egg on their faces after the election because most of them predicted a double-digit win for then Senator Obama, but only two pollsters were accurate and critics say that the inflated numbers helped Senator Obama by reducing enthusiasm and support for Senator McCain.  Also included are other articles and/or blog posts that revealed that the same thing occurred during the 2010 mid-term elections-You Decide:

2008 Presidential Election Polls:

Pollsters Inflated Senator Obama’s Lead?

http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/polls_inflated_obama_lead/2008/11/...

2010 Mid-Term Election Polls:

Don’t Believe the State-Run Polls!-Posted by Rush Limbaugh-On October 22, 2010:

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_102210/content/01125108.guest.html

About That New Poll in Alaska . . .-Posted on National Review-By Jim Geraghty-On October 28, 2010:

http://www.nationalreview.com/campaign-spot/251296/about-new-poll-alaska

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Massive Voter Fraud-Again!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/25/massive-voter-fraud-again/

Is ACORN Really Disbanding or Is It Just Changing Its Name Because of Scandals?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/03/23/is-acorn-really-disbanding-or-is-it-just-changing-its-name-because-of-scandals/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

President and DOJ have contributed to the racial mess in our country!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/09/26/president-and-doj-have-contributed-to-the-racial-mess-in-our-country/

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

A Must Read!

Posted on The Patriot Post-By Mark Alexander-On December 15, 2011:

“Honor, justice, and humanity, forbid us tamely to surrender that freedom which we received from our gallant ancestors, and which our innocent posterity have a right to receive from us. We cannot endure the infamy and guilt of resigning succeeding generations to that wretchedness which inevitably awaits them if we basely entail hereditary bondage on them.”—Thomas Jefferson

December 15^th marks the anniversary of the 1791 ratification of the Bill of Rights, the common name for the first 10 amendments to our Constitution. The purpose of the Bill was, and remains, to assert the enumeration of limitations on the national government in order to protect our natural rights to Liberty and property as “endowed by our Creator.”

There was much debate among our Founders about the need to enumerate rights that are inherently endowed, especially as amendments rather than in the corpus of our Constitution. Alexander Hamilton argued this point in Federalist No. 84: “I ... affirm that bills of rights ... are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. ... For why declare that things shall not be done which there is no power to do?”

But a majority of our Founders, led by James Madison and George Mason, prevailed, and the state legislatures concurred with the addition of enumerated limitations on the central government, as outlined by the Bill of Rights Preamble: “The Conventions of a number of the States having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added...”

Thus, it is a fitting day to pause and take account of the principles of Essential Liberty embodied in our Constitution, the sustenance for which generations of Patriots have expended much treasure, blood and life.

As a vigilant student of American history, I can’t state too emphatically that we are at a tipping point between Liberty and tyranny. I also argue that this juncture is like no other since the Tenth Amendment challenge that was waged and lost in the War Between the States.

For those who choose to read such words as hyperbole, Samuel Adams said it best: “If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands, which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.”

But it is the inherent nature of genuine Patriots to stand ever ready to defend Liberty, convicted that, in the words of George Washington, “Our cause is noble; it is the cause of mankind.”

It is in that spirit that I offer this observation about this precarious position we now inhabit between freedom and bondage.

To fully understand the state of our Republic, one must consider it in the context of history to avoid repetition. As 20^th-century philosopher George Santayana concluded in his treatise, “The Life of Reason”: “Progress, far from consisting in change, depends on retentiveness. When experience is not retained, as among savages, infancy is perpetual. Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”

In 1764, as historian Edward Gibbon “sat musing amidst the ruins” of Rome, he was inspired to write about the failure of republics. The original text of his seminal work, “The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire,” was published in 1776, as our Patriot ancestors were declaring our natural right to Liberty. Gibbon outlined in detail how opulence and entitlement led to the incremental loss of civic virtue.

The 18^th/19^th century Scotsman Alexander Fraser Tytler, a lawyer and professor of history, summarized this link as follows: “[Patriotism], like all other affections and passions, it operates with the greatest force where it meets with the greatest difficulties ... but in a state of ease and safety, as if wanting its appropriate nourishment, it languishes and decays. ... It is a law of nature to which no experience has ever furnished an exception, that the rising grandeur and opulence of a nation must be balanced by the decline of its heroic virtues.”

Tytler’s assertion about the relationship between opulence and decadence reflected his astute understanding of human nature.

This contiguous rise and decline has been characterized as a fatal “Cycle of Democracy” (often misattributed to Tytler as its source). The cycle follows this sequence: From bondage to spiritual faith; From spiritual faith to great courage; From courage to Liberty (Rule of Law); From Liberty to abundance; From abundance to complacency; From complacency to apathy; From apathy to dependence; From dependence back into bondage (rule of men).

So, at what stage of this rise and decline do we now find ourselves? In his recent book, “After America,” Mark Steyn gives us a clue.

With their average 8^th grade education, the Greatest Generation built the strongest and most innovative economy in history. However, “In the space of one generation,” writes Steyn, “a nation of savers became the world’s largest debtors, and a nation of makers and doers became a cheap service economy.” Indeed, our country now hosts the most over-educated and under-productive generation in history, and has institutionalized a social subculture demanding government subsidies to compensate for their lack of initiative.

“Big government makes small citizens,” Steyn concludes. “A great power can survive a lot of things, but not a mediocrity of spirit. A wealthy nation living on the accumulated cultural capital of a glorious past can dodge its rendezvous with fate, but only for so long.”

It is my observation that since WWII, we have transitioned from abundance to complacency, from complacency to apathy and from apathy to dependence.

The rise of populist Socialism spawned by Barack Hussein Obama and his Leftist cadres, has resulted in a surge of dependence upon the state.

The manifestation of this dependence spilled onto the streets this year in the form of the “Occupy Movement.”

In fact, Time Magazine, that erstwhile advocate of statism, just named its 2011 Person of the Year, “The Protester.” Its cover story category, “Prelude to the Revolutions,” lists in order of significance, first Tunisians protesting dictatorial tyranny, second Egyptians protesting dictatorial tyranny, and third, “Occupy Wall Street and its millions of supporters.” (To be fair, a few paragraphs later Time did richly understate, “The stakes are very different in different places. In North America and most of Europe, there are no dictators, and dissidents don’t get tortured.”)

As for the gap between dependence and bondage, philosopher and author of “Atlas Shrugged,” Ayn Rand, wrote, “The difference between a welfare state and a totalitarian state is a matter of time.”

The most pressing question now is this: Are we irrevocably locked into the Cycle of Democracy where totalitarian rule of men is inevitable, or is there still time to restore republican Rule of Law?

The answer, I believe, is no and yes, respectively. But time is short.

The prospect for restoring Liberty as enshrined in our Constitution continues to improve as the number of Americans joining the debate over the proper role of government authorized by our Constitution grows strong. There is a resurgence of Patriotism underway, and together we can sustain the sunrise on Liberty.

We can and must circumvent the Cycle of Democracy to avoid the terminus of Democratic Socialism which is bondage. Together, we can maintain the momentum of our mission and charge. Thank you Patriots for locking and loading on the frontlines of Liberty.”

Source:

http://patriotpost.us/alexander/2011/12/15/liberty-v-the-fatal-cycle-of-democracy/

Note:  My following blog post contains numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

President Obama says USA still working on its democracy!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/13/what-did-president-obama-mean-when-he-recently-said-that-the-usa-was-still-working-on-its-democracy/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

New World Order By Executive Order!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/13/new-world-order-by-executive-order/

Where Is America Today?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/26/where-is-america-today-2/

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

SO THEY COULD TRY TO TURN US INTO A SOCIALIST COUNTRY.  DO NOT LET THEM GET A WAY WITH THIS.  VOTE REPUBLICAN.

Again, I watch online and tv and see more articles giving publicity to the occupation that seems to be something people are just allowing to continue. The occupy 'movement' is a national disgrace, and while I am an American, and I do support everyone's right to free speech, I would like to know why, if we tea party supporters/members are serious about our points of view, our messages, our votes, why are we sitting silently by, allowing our viewpoints to become a distant memory.

If we do not continue to inform people of our true, and highlight TRUE, message, then how do we ensure our Country goes in the right direction? People have very short attention spans, are inundated with mixed messages, and are poisoned against the truth.

I am asking everyone to gather their thoughts, and lets bring our message back to the people, so we can teach people, our younger generations who have not been given the correct messages, are not taught to be proud of our Country, and fight for the freedoms that our citizens have died for, sacrificed for.

I would like to get tea party supporters in the area of Maryland, Delaware, Pennsylvania, to have a rally, an information outreach, to help put this Nation back where she belongs...

I live in Cecil County Maryland, and would like to have support if any one else would like to participate, and help organize this. We must keep our message out in the public's view.

I worry about the future of this nation, my children's and grandchildren's lives, and if you are a tea party member, then obviously you are too. It is time to rev up the public, get them excited about the true change this country, the change of residents in the peoples White House..

OVER 4,000 OF OUR BOYS KILLED FOR NOTHING, I KNOW IT WAS BUSHS FAULT. BUT IT WAS THE DEMOCRATS WE DID NOT GET ANY OIL FOR THE BILLIONS OF DOLLARES WE SPENT.  THEY KICKED US OUT MR McCAIN.  AND WE ARE STILL IN A WAR WE CANT WIN OR AFFORD.  BIG GOVERMENT IS NOT SMART ITS DUMB.

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/

This is the link to Dr. Orly Taitz web page.   You can find her pleadings of various cases here.

If I can remember right several T. Party groups were funded by Freedom Works which could mean they owe the 'Big Dogs" a few favors.  Will Newt and Dick call in their seed capital in the form of endorsements?

Will we see the 'end game' of the investment into certain Tea Party groups for their supply of donors, supporters and Republican minions?

If we are going to endorse Newt, it should be because either we agree with him or because we MUST defeat Obama, NOT because we MUST return the favor.

I know this. This group TeaParty.org is beholden to no one and is completely self-funded. Furthermore, there are a few other groups out there that are self funded.

But who has been funded by Newt Gingrich & Dick Army's Freedom Works?  Those are the ones we must carefully watch.

....and then again, maybe I'm just a paranoid, right-wing conspirator.

What the hell do you think? Are we a bunch of wackos or will there be favors paid back by Tea Party endorsements?

The T. Party doesn't realize who has funded certain parts of this movement.

WE WILL GET OUR DRONE BACK WHEN HELL FREZZES OVER.

DEA, Eric Holder’s DOJ

Laundered Drug Money

For Mexican Criminal Cartels

            If you thought Eric Holder deliberately letting Mexican drug cartels buy automatic weapons in this country and then allowing them to take the weapons across the border unimpeded was a terrible idea . . . “you ain’t heard nothin’ yet, Pilgrim!”  It’s been a terrible week for Eric Holder’s Department of Justice (DOJ); Janet Napolitano’s Homeland Security Department; and the Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) Department as well.  Their combined inanity is being exposed by Darrell Issa’s Congressional Investigation.  Just as Operation Fast and Furious’ “gun-walking” stupidity which killed an American Border Patrol agent and at least 300 (Mexico recently raised these numbers) Mexican citizens was exploding in Obama’s Attorney General’s face and dropping his reputation even lower . . .  with CBS News showing us memos indicating that Holder proposed 1) not to ever tell anyone about the Operation Fast and Furious (OF&F) gunwalking fake-sting project and 2) resulting border violence was to be used as an excuse to pass much tighter and onerous gun restrictions on law-abiding Americans. . . things have taken a hard left turn for the worse.  Yes, that’s Eric Holder leaving Carlsbad now heading toward Carlsworse as Mexican authorities have discovered that in a pathetic OF&F-like scheme, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has been laundering drug money for those same Mexican criminal cartels and allegedly “facilitated tran$fer of million$ of dollar$” directly to the coffer$ of those monster mobsters. 

         The biggest surprise of all may be that recently the mainstream media (MSM) has begun to do its job.  As mentioned in recent Rajjpuut’s Folly blogs: CBS News upped the ante on OF&F with three recent document revelations from Lois Lane, ace girl reporter (better known as Sharyl Attkinsson, CBS’ Washington Bureau investigative JOURNALIST.  That word is written in capital letters because it’s been a long time since Rajjpuut felt admiration for any MSM journalists).  Now the “Old Gray Lady,” a.k.a. the New York Times has decided to stop running interference for President Obama and his incompetent and crooked White House crew and also do some actual journalism.

         According to the N.Y. Times report,  “in operations supervised by the DOJ and orchestrated to get around sovereignty restrictions,” drug enforcement agents “laundered or smuggled millions of dollars in drug proceeds as part of Washington’s expanding role in Mexico’s fight against drug cartels.”   Immediately after the Times published their “money-laundering” article, House Oversight Committee Chairman Rep. Darrell Issa announced he is “expanding his investigation of Operation Fast and Furious and the DOJ to examine reports of DEA-facilitated money laundering.”  Holder’s DOJ released a public statement disclaiming the practice as “perfectly ordinary.”  The DOJ also said they were seeking to trace the drug money’s path and that they had been “working collaboratively with the Mexican government” on the efforts to fight more widespread money laundering.  Mexican officials including President Felipe Calderon denied the report and said that Mexico was not aware of the Times’ article and not aware of the DOJ scheme either.

         The similarities to OF&F are unmistakable:   it appears that, at best, AG Holder was furnishing narcotics traffickers with American DEA laundered drug proceeds reportedly in an attempt to discern how those funds moved and who did the moving.  Rajjpuut says, “at best” because there is also the possibility none of this was merely incompetence and idiocy, there’s also the possibility that we’ll find the DOJ was “100% in cahoots” with some mighty slimy and powerful and dangerous criminals.

         The DOJ’s and DEA’s joint statement contradicted the Mexican denials and put those two agencies at odds with the Mexican government, “As our partners in Mexico have stated, the joint investigations to detect and   dismantle money laundering networks have led to important advances and detentions in each country.  The cooperation between the United States and Mexico is based on principles of shared responsibility, mutual trust and respect for the jurisdiction of each country.” 

         Obviously, the Mexicans and Calderon are saying NO SUCH THING!   Who do we believe?   If OF&F is any indication, leaving Mexico in the dark about operations that cross international borders is not a new plan for Eric Holder’s DOJ.   On Dec. 8, AG Holder testified before the House Judiciary Committee that he still has not briefed Mexican officials, including Attorney General Marisela Morales, about OF&F.  Calderon’s press secretary Sota said, “The Mexican Government did not know.   It’s important to stress we have begun an investigation by our Attorney General Morales to establish responsibilities, and in any case to investigate if there was any involvement. But the government did not have any knowledge of an operation of this nature.”

          Jorge Ramos, host of the Al Punto TV show, emphasized that according to the N.Y. Times report “Mexican agents participated” alongside DEA agents.  Curiouser and curiouser, no?  IF the Mexican government was NOT involved, it’s beginning to look like criminal corruption rather than mere incompetence by AG Holder and his folks . . . IF Eric Holder doesn’t resign or get impeached, American justice no longer exists.

Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,

Rajjpuut

What would it take to form an arm of the Tea Party, perhaps called One for All whose objective is to get an addition to our constitution saying something like the following?

Proposed 28th Amendment to the United States Constitution: "Congress shall make no law that applies to the citizens of the United States that does not apply equally to the Senators and/or Representatives; and, Congress shall make no law that applies to the Senators and/or Representatives that does not apply equally to the citizens of the United States ."

Make sure to join us on Tea Party Radio Wednesday evening @ 9 pm EST!  Attorney Orly Taitz will be joining us for what should be a very interesting program.  Dr. Taitz has been all over the eligibility issue now for over 3 years, and has been at the forefront of the most valid-and-controversial issue this nation has ever seen...an ineligible foreigner in the White House, with the exception of Chester Arthur, and Chester Arthur was not a Communist/Marxist/Islamofascist/community organizer.  Tell your friends, get on your blogs, whatever...Dr. Taitz will be filling us in on her latest excursion to Hawaii with Doug Voght, who was on the program just over a month ago talking about his analysis of the forged BC and how it was done with Adobe Illustrator, among other things.  This is one hour you don't want to miss!

Link to the show from the Command page, or go to www.blogtalkradio.com/teapartyorg

Our call-in # is 1-646-200-4032.  

C ya then!

Jim Seigfreid

co-host Tea Party Radio

THE DEMOCRATS ARE BUTING IN TO EVERY THING,  THATS NOT REALLY NONE OF THEIR BUSINESS. THATS THE BIG REASON FOR OUR FAILURES.  I STILL WANT IRAQS PAYMENT  IN OIL,  WHERE IS  IT   ????????????????????????

Rick santorim bragged about winning hisn legislative views in aq democratic congress while Michele Bachman has not won her legislative basttles.  What Mr Santorim fails to note is that the congress he served in was in a differnt time with a different cast of characters.  For all of the time that Michele Bachman had to deal with a congress dominated by presidential puppet Harry Read in the Senate and mistress Nancy and her dungeon of slaves.  This was a legislative atmosphere that was impossable for a good christian legislator to win anything. If Senator Santorim had those two to deaL with, it is very doubtful that he would even be allowed to propose any meaningfull legislation.

All the prospective candidates hire experts who specialize in political imageing, they will mold the candidate into an image that will satisfy the political establishment.

So how much of the real person are we allowed to see.  Sarah Palin tried to rebel against the hiding her light under a bushel full of political gambits, for some reason the political excperts dont want us to know much about a candidates core values. what do we know about the real Newt Gingrich, He has been in the political arena for so long, does he know where and what the real Newt Gingrich is all about or has the real Newt Gingrich been buried in politics for so long it no longer exists. What do we know about the real Mitt Romney, he has been on a merry go round for so many years, does Mitt Romney even know what the real Mitt Romney is all about.  What do we know about Ron Paul, we know he is an extreme Libertarian, but what does an extreme anything know about the realities of life as we know them to be. An extremist always lives in a single dementioned dream world so how could he be real to the extent that we could ever know about the real Ron Paul. The same can be said about Santorim, Huntsman, Pawlenty, etc.  They have all been politically imaged to the point that we can't know them.

But when I see and listen to Michele Bachman, I get the sense that what I see  and hear  is the real deal she   speaks  and carries herself in a manner consistent to the core beliefs that she so eloquently express's.  I do not beleive that there can be any doubt about where she is coming from.  I hope and pray that she will not allow herself to be politically imaged by the so called experts because I like and admire what I see.

Oboma has been politically imaged to the point that even he does not know who or what he is and his hypocritic behavior shows it.

Heads-Up:  

ObamaBallotChallenge.com is a website that was recently founded by Capt. Pamela Barnett (Ret.), which includes an initiative to assist ordinary registered voting citizens wishing to challenge Obama’s constitutional eligibility and name placement on the presidential ballot for 2012.  She and her team are currently compiling election laws from all 50 states and will be providing forms and sample letters, which registered voters can use to file a complaint.

What follows are pertinent excerpts from a recently published blog by Sharon Rondeau titled “WE’RE GOING TO CHALLENGE THEM IN EVERY STATE”:

“…Captain Barnett has recently appeared on The Roth Radio Show and the Andrea Shea King Radio Show to detail her plan to challenge Obama’s eligibility based on the claim that he is not a “natural born Citizen” as required by Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution.  Barnett also operates the website “Unlawful President” and will be releasing a book entitled Never Vetted, the first chapter of which was published on the internet at no charge for informational and educational purposes.

We cannot wait for Congress, the federal judiciary, or the Department of Justice to enforce the law regarding Obama’s eligibility. They have failed us.  The Obama State Ballot Challenge puts the power back into the hands of the people.  It gives any voter a course of action to take to ensure that the Constitutionally ineligible Obama is not re-elected.

Filing a ballot complaint to keep Obama off the ballot in their state is free, easy, and doesn’t require an attorney.  This process gives instant “standing” to the complainant to have their ballot complaint heard on the merits. The complaint absolutely needs to be filed within the legal time frame for their state. 

The Obama State Ballot Challenge staff will offer assistance with complaints to those who request it.

If in the future the administrative complaint is rejected, we hope that our strategic partner, the ART2 SuperPAC, will have a legal fund to assist those who need it.

It is the goal of Obama State Ballot Challenge to inspire citizens to file complaints in every state so that the American citizens might finally receive justice against the Un-Constitutional, usurper Barack Obama…  and to ensure that he will not be re-elected by finally having the mandate of the Supreme Court in Minor v. Happersett enforced within the several states….

Barnett also said that hearings concerning ballot challenges normally take place within 30 days after the complaint is filed.

Continue Reading:

http://obamaballotchallenge.com/obama-ballot-challenge-founder-interviewed-by-post-email

Note: For your information, you can read my recent letter to our NM Secretary of State that was published on the above website here:

http://obamaballotchallenge.com/retired-marine-captain-files-obama-ballot-challenge-in-new-mexico

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Dear Fellow Patriots:

What follows is a letter that I recently forwarded to our NM Secretary of State requesting her guidance and/or assistance in the removal of President Obama from the NM 2012 Primary Presidential Election Ballot:

“December 13, 2011

Mrs. Dianna J. Duran

New Mexico Secretary of State

325 Don Gaspar, Suite 300

Santa Fe, NM 87503

Phone: (505) 827-3600

Fax: (505) 827-8081

Dear Mrs. Duran:

I wanted to start off by thanking you for your office’s speedy response to my recent request for a copy of the ‘New Mexico 2010 Candidate Guide’ that deals with instructions for removing a candidate from the 2012 primary election ballot.

Upon receipt, I immediately took the opportunity to review specific sections within the guide that provided me with the ‘General Eligibility Requirements That Apply to All Offices’ and the‘Duties of Each Elected Office,’ to include the office of the President of the United States and have taken the liberty of including pertinent excerpts from specific pages of subject guide below: 

Page 14:

“GENERAL ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS THAT APPLY TO ALL OFFICES

“(Section 1-8-18(A) and 1-4-16(B) NMSA 1978)

No person shall become a candidate for nomination by a political party or have his/her name printed on the election ballot unless the record of voter registration shows:

• Affiliation with that political party on the date of the governor’s proclamation for the primary election (the 2012 primary election proclamation will be issuedby January 30, 2010)…
• Every person appearing as a candidate on the primary or general election ballot shall be a candidate only under the name and party affiliation indicated on the certificate of voter registration on the date of the governor’s proclamation...”

Page 15:

“SPECIFIC ELEGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS AND DUTIES

President of the United States

In addition to the general requirements, to serve as President of the United States, a person:

• Must be a natural born citizen;
• Must be a resident with within the United States for fourteen years; and
• Must be at least thirty-five years of age. (U.S. Const. Art. II Sec. 1)”

As an American citizen of the United States and a native New Mexican, I am now hereby requesting that your office provide me with some direction and/or guidance that would assist me in getting President Obama removed from the 2012 presidential primary election ballot over allegations of fraud in that I now believe that “he does not meet the minimum Constitutional qualification requirements set forth in Article II, Section I, Clause V concerning the natural born citizen status. 

Please be advised that, although I am not an attorney or have little or no legal background, I have arrived at this determination only after conducting my own extensive research into this extremely disturbing matter, which revealed that it is now undisputed that President Obama’s father was not a U.S. citizen and therefore he can never be a ‘natural-born citizen,’ as that term was defined by a  ‘1875 U.S. Supreme Court decision, Minor v. Happersett’ in which the court defined “natural-born citizens” as ‘all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens.’

The following information, which includes numerous sources, will hopefully provide you with what I believe to be a preponderance of undisputable evidence that seems to collectively prove that President Obama in fact may be ineligible to hold the office of President of the United State and Commander-In-Chief of our armed forces:

On or about April 27, 2011, the White House released a pdf copy of President Obama’s long-form ‘Certificate of Live Birth’, which I believe substantiated his dual nationality in that when he was born in Hawaii in 1961 he acquired British nationality by descent because his father was a British subject by birth and when Kenya gained its independence from Great Britain in 1963, President Obama became a citizen of the newly-formed nation. 

Below is a pdf copy of President Obama’s ‘Certificate of Live Birth’ that was released by the White House:

http://whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf

On or about November 29, 2011, is was revealed that there are numerous state ballots with President Obama’s name that are facing legal challenges across the country. They are claiming that, while he is listed as the only Democratic candidate, he must be removed from the 2012 presidential primary election ballot over allegations of fraud in that “he does not meet the minimum qualifications as set forth in Article II, Section I, Clause V concerning the natural born citizen status.”

Source:

Ballots with Obama’s name facing more legal challenges!-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On November 29, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=372849#ixzz1gKfJA2bY

On or about December 7, 2011, it was revealed that there was a class action complaint that was recently filed against the National Democratic Party by the Liberty Legal Foundation (LLF) challenging President Obama’s eligibility. The allegations are that “he does not meet the minimum qualifications as set forth in Article II, Section I, Clause V concerning the natural born citizen status.”

The LLF’s lawsuit cites the 1875 U.S. Supreme Court decision, Minor v. Happersett, in which the court defined “natural-born citizens” as “all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens.”

The LLF’s motion for preliminary injunction further states, “Because it is undisputed that Mr. Obama’s father was not a U.S. citizen, Mr. Obama can never be a natural-born citizen, as that term was defined by the U.S. Supreme Court and therefore Mr. Obama cannot meet the constitutional requirements to hold the office of President and alleges that any representation by the Democratic Party that President Obama is constitutionally qualified to hold the office of President would constitute “negligent misrepresentation or fraud.”

Source:

Liberty Legal Foundation serves DNC with Obama eligibility complaint!-Posted on Examiner-By Linda Bentley, Maricopa County Crime Examiner-On December 7, 2011:

http://www.examiner.com/crime-in-phoenix/liberty-legal-foundation-serves-dnc-with-obama-eligibility-complaint?CID=examiner_alerts_article#ixzz1ftSzDuaz

On or about December 1, 2011, it was revealed that an Obama Presidential Eligibility Introductory Primer, which was initially published on or about June of 2009, has been recently revised and published. This primer reveals that President Obama has further substantiated his dual nationality, which he acquired at birth, when the White House released his supposedly new long-form birth certificate on or about April 27, 2011. The author does a meticulous job of introducing President Obama’s eligibility controversy, in a question-and-answer format, for a non-technical general audience and has supposedly double-checked the facts presented, along with citing their sources, and believes them to be correct.

Source:

Obama Presidential Eligibility - An Introductory Primer!-Posted on PeoplesMag.net-By Stephen Tonchen-Revised on December 1, 2011:

http://people.mags.net/tonchen/birthers.htm

Finally, and only after much thought, I have also taken the liberty of including the attached letter that I recently forwarded to our NM U.S. Congressman Tom Udall, which I believe will provide you with additional supporting information regarding this extremely disturbing matter.

I look forward to hearing from your office regarding this disturbing matter, which I believe is extremely time sensitive due to the fact the 2012 Primary Election Proclamation will be issued by our Governor on or about January 30, 2012, as noted on the ‘2012 Candidate Guide.’

Thank you again for the excellent and professional job that you are doing as our Secretary of State.

May you and your loved ones have a “Merry Christmas” and a “Happy and Prosperous New Year.”

Respectfully yours,

Jake L. Martinez

Letter To NM U.S. Senator Tom Udall:

“December 12, 2011

The Honorable Tom Udall

United States Senate

110 Hart Senate Office Building

Washington, DC 20510-3101

Dear Senator Udall:

Thank you again for your speedy response regarding the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act. I again appreciate hearing from you regarding this disturbing issue.

Since my letter to you of December 7, 2011, it was revealed that our former New Mexico Governor, Bill Richardson, recently faced new reports of a federal grand jury into his alleged violations of campaign finance laws. Investigators are supposedly now probing how his close allies steered more than $2 billion of public money into investment funds run by money managers who in turn agreed to pay millions of dollars in consulting fees to high-profile Democratic fundraisers and his other supporters.

Source:

http://townhall.com/columnists/michellemalkin/2011/12/09/holder_blago_richardson_triangle_of_sleaze

If proven to be true, I guess that our New Mexico tax payers not only took a hit when some of our elected officials in Congress took part in the insider stock market trading practices, but now we discover that our own Governor’s close allies may have been steering more than $2 billion of our public money into investment funds that were allegedly run by money managers who in turn agreed to pay millions of dollars in consulting fees to high-profile Democratic fundraisers and his other supporters. If this is not a great example of crony-capitalism, which is literally destroying our Capitalist system in America, I don’t know what is.

Although, I truly appreciate your speedy response to my letter of December 7, 2011 regarding the insider stock market trading issue, I again find myself wondering why there was no mention in your letter regarding Agenda 21, which is supposedly a voluntary plan that was adopted at the 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. It calls on governments to intervene and regulate nearly every potential impact that human activity could have on the environment, which translates into restrictive zoning policies that are aimed at deterring suburban growth. An action that is ultimately suppressing our housing supply, driving up home prices and, in turn imposing unnecessary costs, especially on middle- and lower-income households.

Sources:

Agenda 21 and the Threat in Your Backyard!-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-By Mike Brownfield-On December 5, 2011:

http://blog.heritage.org/2011/12/05/morning-bell-agenda-21-and-the-threat-in-your-backyard/?utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Morning%2BBell

Video: How your community is implementing Agenda 21!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CEHWsdimVO4&feature=player_embedded

Additionally, what was suspiciously missing in your letter was your response to my numerous other issues that I’ve shared with you in the recent past that I believe are just as important because they are systemically eroding our “Constitution,” and “Bill of Rights”, which, if left un-attended, will ultimately destroy this great country of ours.  

Be that as it may, after having some time to step back and look at the big picture, I’ve realized that, as we prepare for our upcoming 2012 Presidential Election, there is an issue that I’ve previously presented to you in the recent past that is currently heating up around our country, which I believe is even more important in size and scope because it deals with the question of whether or not our President is even eligible to hold the office of President and Commander-In-Chief of our Armed Forces. 

I, like many Americans across our country, believe that there is a preponderance of undisputable evidence being revealed on a daily basis by extremely reliable sources that may collectively prove that he in fact is ineligible to hold office, which would surely be the greatest fraud that has been perpetrated in American history. 

This issue literally keeps me up at night because, if true, I believe that it would literally spark civil unrest across our country, which would ultimately destroy what I consider to be the greatest country on earth.  And, it is for this reason that I would like to take the liberty of providing you with the following information and sources, which seem to provide us with the undisputable evidence that I mentioned above and again graciously ask that you give me your take regarding this extremely disturbing and time sensitive issue:

On or about March 2, 2010, it was revealed that Sarah P. Herlihy, an associate attorney specializing in litigation at the Chicago law firm Kirkland & Ellis LLP, which is a law firm with ties to Obama, published an essay in the Chicago-Kent Law review on February 22, 2006 entitled “Amending the Natural Born Citizen Requirement: Globalization as the Impetus and the Obstacle” that floated the idea of a “takeover” of our government by a foreign power. Herlihy’s essay was widely disseminated on the internet during the 2008 presidential campaign as rumors surfaced that Obama and possibly McCain did not meet the “natural born Citizen” requirement laid out in Article II, Section 1, paragraph 5 of the U.S. Constitution.

Source:

Was there a conspiracy to put Obama in the White House?-Posted on The Post & EMail-By Sharon Rondeau-On March 2, 2010:

http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/03/02/was-there-a-conspiracy-to-put-obama-in-the-white-house/

On or about December 12, 2009, it was revealed in detail that there were foreign influences of George Soros during then Senator Obama’s 2008 Presidential Election Campaign, to include who covered up his Islamic background and the connections and players in the campaign of misinformation waged by numerous Obama supporters.

Source:

Who ran cover for Obama’s Islamic background? ‘Tracing The Politics And The Money Behind Obama’s Campaign!’-Posted on Post & Email-by John Charlton-On December 12, 2009:

http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/12/look-who-ran-cover-for-obamas-islamic-background/

On or about April 24, 2010, it was revealed that members from all three branches of the Federal government, to include members of the US Supreme Court, already know that Barack Hussein Obama is ineligible for the office of President. Additionally, National leaders are also aware that he is not a “natural born citizen” of the United States of America, and therefore, is ineligible for the office he currently holds:

Source:

DC Knows that Obama is Ineligible for Office: ‘The certification of constitutional qualification for the office of president!’-Posted on CanadaFreePress.com-By JB Williams-On April 24, 2010:

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/22221

On or about June 10, 2010, it was revealed that Mr. Tim Adams, a college instructor, who worked as a senior elections clerk for the city and county of Honolulu from May 2008 through September 2008, made a stunning claim that President Obama was definitely not born in Hawaii as the White House maintains, and that a long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate for him did not even exist in the Aloha State.

Source:

Hawaii Elections Clerk: Obama birth not here – Official who oversaw ballots in 2008 race says long-form birth certificate non-existent!-Posted on WND.com-By Joe Kovacs-On June 10, 2010:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=165041

On or about November 8, 2010, it was exposed that the White House had posted a congressional document on the internet that confirmed that no one, to include Congress, the states, or election officials bothered to check then Senator Obama’s eligibility to be our president.

Source:

Congress report concedes Obama eligibility unvetted: ‘There is no specific federal agency’ to review candidates for federal office!-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On November 8, 2010:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=225561

On or about January 24, 2011, it was revealed that Mr. Adams had signed an affidavit, on or about January 20, 2011, swearing that he was told by his supervisors in Hawaii that no long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate existed for Barack Obama Jr. in Hawaii and that neither Queens Medical Center nor Kapi’olani Medical Center in Honolulu had any record of Obama having been born in their medical facilities.

Source:

Hawaii official now swears: No Obama birth certificate!-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On January 24, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=254401#ixzz1PT0rwcGl

On or about May 31, 2011, it was revealed that President Obama’s “Certificate of Live Birth” that was released by the White House, on or about April 27, 2011, was found to be fraudulent by an international expert on scanners and document-imaging software who filed a 22-page criminal complaint with the FBI to that effect.

Sources:

Criminal complaint charges Obama birth record ‘forged’! (Part 1)-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On May 31, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=305705

Criminal complaint details birth-certificate ‘forgery’! (Part 2)-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On June 5, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=306953

Why did Obama release electronic birth certificate? (Part 3)-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On June 7, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=308277

On or about June 12, 2011, it was revealed that there was overwhelming evidence that we in fact have a fraud and a usurper that resides in the people’s White House, despite the overt lack of journalistic investigating on the part of the American press. The new evidence indicates that the conspiracy to carry out that fraud was much broader than originally thought, which includes a forty-year story that requires a book, not a column, to tell because the evidence suggests that our President was being groomed from a very young age for the moment in history that would end American supremacy in the world, and usher in a new era of Global Marxist Governance.

Source: 

The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!-Posted on The Post & Email-By JB Williams-On June 12, 2011:

http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/06/07/evidence-broadens-obama-natural-born-conspiracy/

On or about June 13, 2011, retired Maj. Gen. Paul Valley revealed that the “Certificate of Live Birth” that was released by the White House, on or about April 27, 2011, as “proof positive” of President Obama’s Hawaiian birth was a forgery, but that the FBI was covering the fraud and no one in Congress was willing to tackle the situation because of fears of a “black backlash,” if the failings of the nation’s first black president were revealed.

Source:

Ex-CIA: ‘Forged document’ released as birth certificate!-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On June 15, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=311433

On or about October 20, 2011, Leo Donofrio, a New Jersey attorney who brought the first legal challenge to Barack Obama’s occupancy in the Oval Office to the U.S. Supreme Court, published a report that revealed that 25 U.S. Supreme Court Opinions that defined “Natural Born Citizen” were sabotaged in the run up to the ’08 Presidential Election.

Source:

25 U.S. Supreme Court Opinions That Defined “Natural Born Citizen” Were Sabotaged In The Run Up To The ’08 Presidential Election!-Posted on Natural Born Citizen-By Leo Donofrio, Esq.-On October 20, 2011:

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2011/10/20/justia-com-surgically-removed-minor-v-happersett-from-25-supreme-court-opinions-in-run-up-to-08-election/ 

On or about October 20, 2011, it was revealed that someone had been incredibly busy in June 2008 working on an illegal front invisible to the public by searching and altering Supreme Court Cases published at Justia.com, which cite the only case in American history – Minor v. Happersett (1875) – to directly construe Article 2 Section 1’s natural-born citizen clause in determining a citizenship issue as part of its holding and precedent. In this unanimous decision, the Supreme Court defined a “native or natural-born citizen” as a person born in the US to parents who were both citizens, a definition that excludes President Obama from eligibility. 

Source:

JustiaGate!-Posted on Examiner-By Dianna Cotter, Portland Civil Rights Examiner-On October 20, 2011:

http://www.examiner.com/civil-rights-in-portland/justiagate

On or about November 29, 2011, is was revealed that there are numerous state ballots with President Obama’s name that were facing legal challenges across the country. They are claiming that, while he is listed as the only Democratic candidate, he must be removed from the 2012 presidential primary election ballot over allegations of fraud in that “he does not meet the minimum qualifications as set forth in Article II, Section I, Clause V concerning the natural born citizen status.”

Source:

Ballots with Obama’s name facing more legal challenges!-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On November 29, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=372849#ixzz1gKfJA2bY

On or about November 30, 2011, it was revealed that the Congressional Research Service (CRS), the research arm of Congress, had launched a defense of President Obama’s presidential eligibility with a 50-page report that has been described as a “polemic aimed at convincing readers” Obama meets the requirements to be president.

Source:

Congressional staff gives Constitution new meaning: ‘Researchers target ‘eligibility,’ say ‘native born’ really is ‘natural born!’-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On November 30, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=373085

On or about November 30, 2011, it was also revealed that Jack Maskell, a legislative attorney with the Congressional Research Service (CRS), issued yet another in a series of reports on presidential eligibility that appears aimed at providing members of Congress with talking points to respond to constituents contending that Barack Hussein Obama is not a “natural born citizen” within the meaning of Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution, along with redefining the eligibility clause by equating “native born” with the constitutional “natural born” citizen.

Source:

Congressional ‘scholar’ shilling for Obama!-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On November 30, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=372977

On or about December 1, 2011, it was revealed that an Obama Presidential Eligibility Introductory Primer, which was initially published on or about June of 2009, has been recently revised and published. This primer reveals that President Obama has further substantiated his dual nationality, which he acquired at birth, when the White House released his supposedly new long-form birth certificate on or about April 27, 2011. The author does a meticulous job of introducing President Obama’s eligibility controversy, in a question-and-answer format, for a non-technical general audience and has supposedly double-checked the facts presented, along with citing their sources, and believes them to be correct.

Source:

Obama Presidential Eligibility - An Introductory Primer!-Posted on PeoplesMag.net-By Stephen Tonchen-Revised on December 1, 2011:

http://people.mags.net/tonchen/birthers.htm

On or about December 7, 2011, it was revealed that there was a class action complaint that was recently filed against the National Democratic Party by the Liberty Legal Foundation (LLF) challenging President Obama’s eligibility. The allegations are that “he does not meet the minimum qualifications as set forth in Article II Section I Clause V concerning the natural born citizen status.”

The LLF’s lawsuit cites the 1875 U.S. Supreme Court decision, Minor v. Happersett, in which the court defined “natural-born citizens” as “all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens.”

The LLF’s motion for preliminary injunction further states, “Because it is undisputed that Mr. Obama’s father was not a U.S. citizen, Mr. Obama can never be a natural-born citizen, as that term was defined by the U.S. Supreme Court and therefore Mr. Obama cannot meet the constitutional requirements to hold the office of President and alleges that any representation by the Democratic Party that President Obama is constitutionally qualified to hold the office of President would constitute “negligent misrepresentation or fraud.”

Source:

Liberty Legal Foundation serves DNC with Obama eligibility complaint!-Posted on Examiner-By Linda Bentley, Maricopa County Crime Examiner-On December 7, 2011:

http://www.examiner.com/crime-in-phoenix/liberty-legal-foundation-serves-dnc-with-obama-eligibility-complaint?CID=examiner_alerts_article#ixzz1ftSzDuaz

As I’ve mentioned to you in the past, I am not a politician and thus am not known for always being politically correct because I call it as I see it.  I also come from a long line of family members that are Veterans. Four out of my six male siblings honorably served their country and my father was a WWII Veteran, who survived the Battle of the Bulge, but lost the battle with his PTSD symptoms at the young age of fifty-nine.  My two eldest sons honorably served their country as Marines.  My eldest son participated in the first Gulf War as a Marine and Iraqi Freedom as a weekend warrior with the Air National Guard. Additionally, I lost many a friend during the Viet Nam War that fought and died to uphold our “Constitutional Rights” and the freedom that sadly too many Americans take for granted.  As a result, I have to admit that I tend to get extremely concerned when I see politicians, regardless of political affiliation, sex, race, color (in the Marine Corps we were all green), creed, ethnic origin or religion, doing things and/or taking actions that I see as a threat to the freedom and/or rights given us under our “Constitution” and “Bill of Rights”, which millions of Americans have died and continue to die to this date to uphold them.

Please feel free to contact me at my home address listed below, if you should have any questions regarding any of this information.

I look forward to hearing from you regarding this disturbing and time sensitive issue.

Thank you again for all you continue to do for our Veterans, our state and our country.

May you and your loved ones have a “Merry Christmas” and a “Happy and Prosperous New Year.”

God Bless You and God Bless America.

Respectfully,

Jake L. Martinez

Captain-USMC-Retired

Automatic Electronic Response Received From Senator Udall’s Office Regarding My Email Above:

Thank you for your message!

I look forward to reviewing your comments and questions.

Before you leave, I hope you'll explore my website. On this page, you can learn more about the work that I've been doing on important issues and legislation as your U.S. Senator.”

Note:  My following blog post contains numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetrated-in-american-history/

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

{IT IS TIME FOR GOD's PEOPLE, TO REPENT AND PRAY ACCORDING TO [2 Chron. 7:14] !   'WE the People' need

to see GOD Intervene on our behalf; and heal our nation}

Here are some disturbing excerpts from a Presidential Memorandum signed by Barak Obama last week:
>"I declared before heads of state gathered at the United Nations, ‘no country should deny people their rights because of who they love, which is why we must stand up for the rights of gays and lesbians everywhere.”
“Under my Administration, agencies engaged abroad have already begun taking action to promote the fundamental human rights of LGBT [Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans-gender] persons everywhere. Our deep commitment to the advancing the human rights of all people is strengthened when we (as the United States) bring our tools to bear to vigorously advance this goal."<
Under the guise of promoting “human rights,” President Obama has issued a memorandum outlining seven specific actions that the Department of State and other federal agencies will be required to implement on a global scale “to ensure that U.S. diplomacy and foreign assistance promote and protect the human rights of LGBT persons.”
Under Obama’s mandate, federal agencies are directed to offer moral, legal, and financial support to national and international organizations which support LGBT advancement – while preferential expedition and asylum will be offered to LGBT people allegedly forced to flee persecution in their home countries.
There is already mounting international backlash and disapproval from leaders of countries where sodomy or homosexuality is banned by law, which includes most of the Middle East, Africa, Latin America, and Oceania.
++Obama’s directive will use YOUR tax dollars to advance the LGBT agenda globally!
Among Obama’s presidential mandates:
* “To combat discrimination, homophobia, and intolerance on the basis of LGBT status or conduct.”  (Force acceptance of homosexuality whether a country wants to or not)
* “The Federal Government has the ability to identify and expedite resettlement of highly vulnerable [LGBT] persons with urgent protection needs.” (Grant preferential asylum to those who claim LGBT status)
* “Ensure the Federal Government's swift and meaningful response to serious incidents that threaten the human rights of LGBT persons abroad.”  (Presumably, such a “response” could include U.S. military and/or police action)
* “Broaden the number of countries willing to support and defend LGBT issues in the multilateral arena.”  (Using United States pressure to advance the LGBT agenda by recruiting core “allies” in the community of nations)
All federal agencies involved in Obama’s initiative are to file a report within 180 days of the December 6th announcement and submit subsequent annual reports to the Department of State, which will also be reviewed by the President.
In short, our President is dictating that government agencies with foreign operations direct their workers to advance the LGBT agenda and then submit regular reports to him on how the effort is progressing.

Under President Obama and his pro-homosexual administration, the forced reception of the radical LGBT agenda into our culture (including our military) – and now international society – is happening at unprecedented levels.  And we, the American taxpayers, are shouldering the expense of all this pro-homosexual activism!
Our tax dollars have been hijacked to promote homosexuality around the globe whether the American people agree with such an outrageous program or not!
The double standard in this international activism is mindboggling.
This “human rights” zeal on the part of President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton is focused on a small, radical minority of the global population while vast numbers of people in this world are suffering persecution on an unimaginably large scale.
According to a December, 2010 report published by Charisma Magazine…
“Nearly all human-rights groups and Western government agencies that monitor the plight of Christians worldwide agree: Between 200 million and 230 million believers face daily threats of murder, beating, imprisonment and torture, and a further 350 million to 400 million encounter discrimination in areas such as jobs and housing. A conservative estimate of the number of Christians killed for their faith each year is around 150,000.”
Yet the federal government has defunded the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom this year, presumably due to budgetary limitations.  And could you imagine President Barack Obama launching an initiative to end world-wide persecution of Christians with the same enthusiasm he has invested in this Presidential Memorandum on LGBT “human rights”?

It is difficult to find a ballpark number of homosexuals who were actually persecuted or killed world-wide last year, although most reports indicate it would be a very small fraction of the number of Christians suffering the same fate. And as of May 2011, it is reported that seventy-five countries criminalize consensual sexual acts between adults of the same sex!
Internationally, churches are being bombed, Christians are denied the right to assemble, and believers are persecuted and put to death…while the Obama administration turns a blind eye to these catastrophic international events and initiates programs to promote the homosexual lifestyle!
The Obama Administration has launched a full-scale global campaign to promote the LGBT agenda while continuing to push it in America.
Given the flood of new attacks empowered by the Obama administration’s  pro-homosexual actions and manipulation of the legal system, we must continue fighting this cultural battle in both the courtroom and the court of public opinion. .
We MUST band together to counter the advance of radical homosexual activists whose goals, among others, is to redefine marriage and family. This is perhaps the greatest “culture war” of our generation – and it’s escalating at a breathtaking pace!
We must also confront and expose the horrific deception and disinformation these radicals are spreading!  The pro-homosexual advance is being paved with outright lies about the practice of homosexuality, misleading “facts” about their movement, and fraudulent use of taxpayer funds obtained by cynically presenting their cause as a “civil rights” or “human rights” movement!