ACTION

We had a small but significant battle victory yesterday when we stopped the "vote" on the disgusting bill that Mr. Boehner was going to send over to the senate.  That liberal bill would have been twisted further into the communist mold and sent back to the house, eventually being "passed".  That would have been a victory for the communist-led senate. 

But as often occurs during an argument, one can find out what side a person really stands on when the pressure increases.  In this case, Allen West of Florida, showed his true colors.  From what I understand from FOX News this morning, Mr. West was voted in by us, yet he now favors the business-as-usual, liberal and spineless "bill" that John Boehner put forth to be voted upon yesterday.  That bill would have been an aid and comfort to the enemy. 

Take notice Florida Tea Party!  You have a turncoat among you!  You better make plans to VOTE OUT Mr. Allen West the first chance you get.  He apparently likes his new job better than his duty to the citizens of conservative Florida!  Keep throwing the tea overboard!

I just received the message below from someone I know very well.  I had to shake my head at their outrage over everything in this message and ask myself "Who is responsible for this?"

We are, each of us.  We elected the folks in Washington that voted for these bills and enacted these programs because we listen to their song & dance and warnings-promises-scary messages    that if we would only vote for them, they will fix these problems.  So, we vote for them then we ignore them for another 2 or 4 or 6 more years until they come back with their dog and pony show again, "vote for me and I'll fix these problems".  We do and they go back to business as usual and we go back to our ignorant bliss.

Right now in Washington, YOUR Congressman and Senator are arguing over nickel and dime programs while this country spends $10,000,000,000 PER DAY more than we have.  For you numerically challenged that is TEN BILLION DOLLARS!

One side wants to take more money, by saying the RICH should pay more. They call it "Enhanced Revenue".   Well, just who are those people they cal rich? It's everyone who makes money from any source. 

Yep, that's right anyone and everyone who makes money is rich.

You have a job and pay taxes? YOU'RE RICH!

You have a job with a retirement plan?  Then your retirement money is invested in the stock market, so.  YOU'RE RICH!

Are you drawing a pension in addition to Social Security? (see above, it’s in the stock market too). YOU'RE RICH!  You're not only rich, you're so rich we are going to take part of your retirement check AND reduce your Social Security because you had the audacity to earn more than we think you should.

You feel rich?  By their definition you are and they want some more of it. But they only want to help the senior's and poor.  They helped us so much, last year they removed $500,000,000,000 from Medicare by abolishing the Advantage program that we could opt for and pay for, among other things that "we had to pass the bill to know what was in the bill". 

The other side says that everyone pays enough and they want to cut spending.  They're half right, we do pay too much and the government spends too much.  But what do they want to cut?  Social Security and Medicare.  Programs we paid for our entire working lives.  I haven't heard any talk of cutting "Earned Income Credit" that little known safety net to help the working poor.  Bull Shit, but more about this one later!  We haven't heard about cutting money to foreign countries.  We haven't heard about stopping corporate welfare.  They don't talk about fixing tax codes or programs that might hurt the big money people who paid to get them elected.

And speaking about corporate welfare . . .

How many mortgage brokers went to jail?

How many bankers went to jail?

How many General Motors executives went to jail?

How many Chrysler executives went to jail?

They said these companies were too big to let fail.  Who the hell let them get that big if the first place?  So what did they do?  They gave them Billions of our money and made them merge with others too big to fail.  Doesn't that just make them bigger? I don't know of any of these regional or local banks that were too big to fail.

A few years ago, didn't they say AT&T and Microsoft were too big and force them to split up?  Did they pay them to diversify? I don't think so.  Why don't they break up these "too big to fail" businesses and reintroduce some marketplace competition? 

By the way, of all those Billions we gave those companies, where is it?

>The banks shipped it to foreign subsidiaries. But they won't make loans in the USA.

>Chrysler was sold to an Italian company.

>GM issued stock to the US Treasury and used the money to pay back the US Treasury.  (An IOU in lieu of a loan payment).  Then spent a zillion bucks advertising that "We paid our TARP loan back" until someone with more brains than the US Treasury blew the whistle on them.

I WANT MY MONEY BACK!

I have sat back and watched for the last three years as this working poor game the tax system, lie and cheat to hit their maximum "refund".  Many actually quit their jobs when they have reached that peak earning limit for the maximum refund, because once you earn more, you get less.  In other words, Congress tells them this is what they want you to earn and no more.  Because if you earn any more, you move into that category of Rich and they will take it away from you.  They pay you to stay poor and more important dependant.  Dependant on Whom, you ask?  Them, the government, the social hand holders who need you to keep voting for them while they keep promising to fix things.  The only thing they want to fix is their own entitlements to their jobs in Washington and then their lifelong pension. 

When Pat owned her restaurant, we had trouble finding people to work for minimum wage.  Why?  Because in order to match the Federal and State assistance programs for rent, medical, food stamps, earned income credit, and utilities, we would have had to pay $40,000 a year.  At that time that was close to what I made and worked my ass off.  But if you earn minimum wage you loose almost all of the assistance.

Every Federal program and budget gets an automatic increase every year.  For the sake of argument, let's say that increase is 10% (I, know it may be 8.7745% or 9.45643%, but let's use a nice round number so you can follow this).  Congressman R or Senator S proposes that spending be limited to only a 7% increase.  Congressman L and Senator C runs to the TV cameras and cries that they want to CUT spending for Grandma and Grandpa by 3% and bimbo blond talking head goes on the nightly news and says Grandma will be eating ALPO because of these cuts and school kids will starve because they will be dumping two tofu veggies they didn't eat instead of three they didn't eat.  (Nothing to do with they taste like shit because the food police have already been there).

So, what do we do? We wake up for a few days and call that Guy that promised to fix things and tell him to fix this.

So, I'm through ranting.  How do we really fix this?  We pray that those people in Washington finally get it.  Any chance of that?  Nope!  They have already shown they don't get it.  Some of them got our message last November, but some have already forgotten our message.

According to Congressman Jo Ann Emerson,  "The Bible, the guide of our lives, is 1,291 pages and contains 774,746 words. But the Tax Code and its regulations which are referred to by some as, 'a person's worst nightmare come true' is 9,471 pages and over 7 million words."  How stupid it that.

1.  Repeal all 9,471 pages and adopt either the Flat Tax, no deductions or the Fair Tax.  I prefer the Fair Tax, but don't really care which.  One page is all it should take.

2. Pass a balanced budget amendment.

3. Comply with the Constitution of the United States. ALL OF IT!

4.  Try every elected and appointed official for TREASON if they violate their oath.

5. Repeal the 17th Amendment to the Constitution.

California and the rest of the states can take care of themselves if we follow the above 5 recommendations.

......        ORIGINAL MESSAGE THAT SET ME OFF...........

Subject: What the HELL's wrong???

There are millions of Americans thinking the same thing.  If we don't start taking care of our OWN, what's going to happen?  If they are cutting the budget all over the United States' federal and state government programs, how can we afford to send so much money over seas to other countries. 

The deserving people we help around the world deserve better but we truly    have no way of knowing who actually benefits -- too many times the food,    medicine, etc., is intercepted by the government and it never reaches the    people it was intended for.  I don't know who wrote this but it certainly gives US something to think about.

AMEN TO THIS

What the HELL's wrong???    

WAKE UP AMERICA!!!!

Tuesday's Daily Bulletin paper, ran two articles on the front page side by side :

1- Calif's 20 Billion Dollar Budget Deficit 

2- The Calif Supreme Court ruling that ILLEGALS can attend college and get     benefits. 

Why don't they just deport them when they arrive to register?

3- Last year they ran an article on the yearly costs to Calif Taxpayers from Illegals using Hospital Emergency Rooms for their general health care  -  At just one hospital the cost to tax payers totaled over 25  million a year  

Someone please tell me what the HELL's wrong with all the people that run this country!!!!!!

We're "broke" & can't help our own Seniors, Veterans, Orphans, homeless       etc???????????

In the last months we have provided aid to Haiti, Chile, and Turkey . And now Pakistan ......home of bin Laden.  Literally, BILLIONS of DOLLARS!!!

Our retired seniors living on a 'fixed income' receive no aid nor do they get any breaks while our government and religious organizations pour Hundreds of Billions of $$$$$$'s and Tons of food to Foreign Countries!

They call Social Security and Medicare an entitlement even though most of us have been paying for it all our working lives and now when its time for us to collect, the government is running out of money. Why did the government borrow from it in the first place?  

We have hundreds of adoptable children who are shoved aside to make room for the adoption of foreign orphans. 

AMERICA: a country where we have homeless without shelter,  children going to bed hungry, elderly going without 'needed' meds, and mentally ill without treatment -etc,etc. 

YET......................

They have a 'Benefit'  for the people of Haiti on 12 TV stations, ships and planes lining up with food, water, tents clothes, bedding, doctors and           medical supplies.  

Imagine if the *GOVERNMENT* gave 'US' the same support they give to other      countries.. 

Sad isn't it?

Free Our Free Markets: Non-Passage of Debt Ceiling | Logic 101http://t.co/yxry7c6 || 

What’s wrong with this picture?

Posted on WND.com-By Aaron Klein-On July 23, 2011:

“President Obama’s China adviser, Evan Medeiros, has a long history of downplaying the threat to U.S. interests posed by Beijing’s rapid military and economic growth, once even penning a paper that argued China should embrace a “great power mentality.”

Medeiros was appointed as China director of the White House National Security Council in 2009.

He was a foreign policy adviser to Obama during the 2008 presidential campaign and even donated $3,800 to the candidate, his only campaign contribution on record since 2000.

Read about the growing conflict, in “AMERICA FOR SALE: Fighting the New World Order, Surviving a Global Depression, and Preserving USA Sovereignty.”

Medeiros has been an external researcher at the Strategic Studies Institute of the U.S. Army War College, where he has given several recent lectures.

He was formerly a senior research analyst at the Arms Control Association in Washington, D.C. He was also a project associate with the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Project at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and joined the RAND Corporation as a political scientist in 2002.

Prior to that, Medeiros was a senior research associate at the Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Monterey Institute.

In his most recent “Inside the Ring” column in the Washington Times, Bill Gertz cited congressional Republicans as identifying Medeiros as a key player involved in the Obama administration’s policy of refusing to sell needed arms toTaiwan.

The same report blamed Medeiros for delaying the release of a second Pentagon report to Congress on the shifting air power balance in the Taiwan Strait.

The Times also cited Republican staff aides and a defense official as stating they believe Medeiros is behind efforts to block the release to Congress of the Pentagon’s annual report on Chinese military power, completed months ago and due to Capitol Hill on March 1.

The report on China’s military was also delayed last year. When it was eventually released, the report was watered down with a minimized title. Previously called the “Annual Report to Congress: Military Power of the People’s Republic of China,” the report was renamed “Annual Report on Security Developments Involving China.”

Medeiros, meanwhile, was fingered by Gertz’s sources as a key official in preventing the U.S. sale of 66 advanced F-16 jets to Taiwan and for delaying the sale of equipment to upgrade Taiwan’s existing F-16s. Both military moves were expected to anger China.

A review of Medeiros’s articles and statements to the news media finds a regular trend of minimizing China’s threat to the U.S.

In 2009, just before his appointment to the NSC, Medeiros stated China was not seeking to “confront the United States or expel it from the region.”

He argued China was not aiming to replace America as a superpower.

In 2007, Medeiros, speaking as an expert at the RAND Corporation, argued Beijing’s military buildup is limited to Asia and it has not sought to project power globally.

“Cumulatively, this is a substantial amount of money devoted toward military modernization. And it’s clearly a reflection of the Chinese government’s priorities and the fact that they seek to build a modern military with regional power projection capabilities,” Medeiros said.

In 2005, Medeiros said of China’s People’s Liberation Army: “Do the old shibboleths still apply – that the Chinese defense industry is backward, poor and low-quality?”

“No,” he continued. “It seems China has turned the corner. … For the first time in 20 years, the PLA has adopted reforms that make sense. They adopted, and implemented, and are really learning quickly.”

Medeiros that year was lead author of a 300-page RAND study, “New Directions for China’s Defense Industry.”

In 2002, he minimized China’s missile project, telling The Economist that the Chinese “don’t really see missiles as weapons of mass destruction while most American policymakers equate the two.”

In an article in the November-December 2003 issue of Foreign Affairs magazine, Medeiros, with analyst M. Taylor Fravel, presented the views of experts on Chinese foreign policy as stating China should overcome its long-held “victim mentality” and adopt a “great power mentality” instead.

Speaking to Knight Ridder in 2001, Medeiros stated, “The Chinese defense industrial base is very outdated and dilapidated, especially in these areas where warfare is headed.

“They don’t have the high technology to compete at all,” he said.

He stated China’s ships and planes, at least those not acquired from Russia, are outfitted with technology equal to what American forces had in the late 1960s or early 1970s.

“So if they ever got in a battle with the United States, we could destroy their forces before they ever saw us,” Medeiros added.

Still, Medeiros has incorporated criticism of China into his work. His 2005 RAND study, for example, said China “needs to do more to enforce its own controls.”

Stated the study: “China has erected a structure that has a strong legal basis to control exports of goods that can be used for making weapons of mass destruction, but it hasn’t devoted the necessary financial or political resources to make these controls effective.

“This is a persistent and glaring weakness,” the study said.

• With research by Brenda J. Elliott.”

Source:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=324577

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. S. Korea: North Can Deliver Nuke Warhead Via Rocket!-Posted on NewsMax.com-By Reuters-On June 13, 2011:

http://www.newsmaxworld.com/global_talk/Korea_likely_can_miniat/2011/06/13/393373.html?s=al&promo_code=C6DC-1

II. The Administration Must Not Bend to Russian Missile Defense Demands-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-On May 21, 2011:

http://blog.heritage.org/2011/05/21/the-administration-must-not-bend-to-russian-missile-defense-demands/

III. Top 10 Obama Foreign Policy Flubs-Posted on Human Events-By Human Events-On May 21, 2011:

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=43631

IV. CNN’s Fareed Zakaria Praises Obama’s Mideast Foreign Policy ‘Restraint’!-Posted on The Media Research Center-By Matt Hadro-On July 6, 2011:

http://www.mrc.org/biasalert/2011/20110706063708.aspx

Note:  The following websites and report reveal that George Soros’ Open Society Institute (OSI) funds: (a) organizations that advocate America’s unilateral disarmament and/or a steep reduction in its military spending; (b) organizations that favor global government, which would bring American foreign policy under the control of the United Nations or other international bodies; and, (c) the Peace and Security Funders Group (PSFG), which is a liberal internationalist coalition of U.S. donors who believe the best way to prevent wars, constrain rogue nations, and prevent the spread of nuclear weapons is to let international laws and organizations set the terms of world peace. The umbrella group, whose listed supporters claim to have assets exceeding $25 billion, aims to entangle the U.S. government in a process of international negotiation to create a new global legal regime. It would likely limit U.S. sovereignty and replace a strong national defense with endless rounds of international rulemaking and consensus-building-You Decide:

(a) Organizations that advocate America’s unilateral disarmament and/or a steep reduction in its military spending:

• The American Friends Service Committee, which views America as the world's chief source of international strife, has long had a friendly relationship with the Communist Party USA. Lamenting that “the United States spends 59% of the discretionary federal budget on military-related expenses,” the Committee seeks to “realign national spending priorities and to increase the portion of the budget that is spent on housing, quality education for all, medical care, and fair wages.” In 2000, George Soros himself was a signatory to a letter titled “Appeal for Responsible Security” that appeared in The New York Times. The letter called upon the U.S. government “to commit itself unequivocally to negotiate the worldwide reduction and elimination of nuclear weapons,” and to participate in “the global de-alerting of nuclear weapons and deep reduction of nuclear stockpiles.”

(b) Organizations that favor global government, which would bring American foreign policy under the control of the United Nations or other international bodies:

• According to George Soros, “We need some global system of political decision-making. In short, we need a global society to support our global economy.” Consistent with this perspective, the Open Society Institute in 2008 gave $150,000 to the United Nations Foundation, which “works to broaden support for the UN through advocacy and public outreach.” Moreover, OSI is considered a “major” funder of the Coalition for an International Criminal Court, which aims to subordinate American criminal-justice procedures in certain cases to an international prosecutor who could initiate capricious or politically motivated prosecutions of U.S. officials and military officers.

Source:

Guide to The George Soros Network-Posted on DiscoverTheNetworks.org:

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=589

(c) Peace and Security Funders Group (PSFG)!-Posted on DiscoverTheNetworks.org:

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6519

The New Internationalism: Peace and Security Funders Group (PSFG)!-Posted on Capital Research Center-By John J. Tierney-On August 2009:

http://www.capitalresearch.org/pubs/pdf/v1249061645.pdf

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Nuclear Summit Part of Obama Administration’s ‘Fantasy Foreign Policy’

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/14/nuclear-summit-part-of-obama-administration’s-‘fantasy-foreign-policy’/

Will The New START Undermine Our Nuclear Security?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/03/25/will-the-new-start-undermine-our-nuclear-security/

National Security Shouldn’t Be For Sale!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/11/16/national-security-shouldn’t-be-for-sale/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

If you cross the N. Korean border illegally, you are either shot or get 12 yrs. hard labor. If you cross the Afghanistan border illegally, you get shot. If you cross the U.S. border illegally you get a job, a driver's license (without I.D), food stamps, a place to live,free health care, housing & child benefits, education, & tax free business for 7 yrs. No wonder we are a country in debt....

What’s wrong with this picture?

Posted on FoxNews.com-By William Lajeunesse-On July 26, 2011:

“The failed federal anti-gunrunning program known as Operation Fast and Furious got so out of control in November 2009, it appeared the U.S. government was single-handedly “arming for war” the Sinaloa Cartel, documents show, even as U.S. officials kept lying to fellow agents in Mexico about the volume of guns it helped send south of the border.

Those shocking allegations are revealed in the latest congressional report investigating the operation.

At one point, agents with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives say guns sold under the program took just 24 hours to travel from a gun store in Phoenix to a crime scene in Mexico. ATF agents there pleaded for help but were told nothing about Fast and Furious, which was intended to let guns “walk” in order to track them to higher-profile traffickers.

Meanwhile, the report claims the agents’ superiors in Washington met every Tuesday, to review the latest sales figures and the number of guns recovered in Mexico.

“How long are you going to let this go on?” Steve Martin, an assistant director of intelligence operations asked the ATF top brass at meeting Jan. 5, 2010, according to a transcript of the meeting contained in the congressional report. None of the men responded and several quickly left the room, the transcript reveals.

By Feb. 27, 2010, Lanny Breuer, the head of the Criminal Division of the Justice Department in Washington, D.C., was allegedly told that the ATF had successfully helped sell 1,026 weapons worth more than $650,000 to members of the Sinaloa cartel. The briefing included all top ATF officials, including the agents in charge in Los Angeles and Houston, as well as a half dozen top Justice Department attorneys.

“So there’s no doubt after this briefing that guns in this case were being linked to the Sinaloa cartel?” a congressional investigator asked Martin during a July 2011 interview.

“I’d say yes.” Martin replied.

“Very apparent to everyone in the room?” the investigator asked.

“That’s correct,” Martin said.

Meanwhile, ATF agents in Mexico were seeing a flood of weapons coming south. When asked, ATF brass told the resident ATF attaché in Mexico things were “under control.”

“They were afraid I was going to brief the ambassador on it or brief the government of Mexico,” said Darren Gil, former ATF attaché in Mexico.

For months, officials assured Gil that Fast and Furious was going to be “shut down,” but it wasn’t.

“We’re getting hurt down here,” Gil told ATF International Affairs Chief Daniel Kumor.

Kumor reportedly raised Gil’s concerns and was told the case “was going great,” and nothing happened until the death of Agent Brian Terry in December 2010.

Ironically, a year before, in December 2009, Southwest Border Czar Ray Rowley threatened to expose Operation Fast and Furious because of “the large number of guns that had already been trafficked” but ATF officials talked him out of it.

When the case was finally revealed in the press, Gil said, “never in my wildest dreams ever would I have thought of (gun walking) as an (investigative) technique. Never. Ever. It was just inconceivable to me.”

“You don’t lose guns. You don’t walk guns. You don’t let guns out of your sight.”

Gil also testified at a House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing Tuesday where one ATF supervisor left members of Congress exasperated.

William Newell, who was formerly in charge of the Phoenix office, insisted that guns don’t walk despite the facts clearly showing they did, he knew it and approved it time and time again.

Newell said the purpose of the operation was to dismantle the entire Mexican cartel but agents testified they were not allowed to do that when they saw transfers of money and weren’t permitted to follow the money.

Lawmakers repeatedly tried unsuccessfully to nail Newell down.

“I acknowledge we made some mistakes,” Newell said when asked by committee’s chairman, Rep. Darrell Issa,R-Calif., whether he thought it was a good program.

“You were right on that,” Issa said.

Under fierce questioning from other lawmakers, Newell said that taking out “just one straw purchaser” has “no effect on the larger investigation.” 

The precise number of casualties in Mexico isn’t known, but ATF officials confirm the murder of Mario Gonzales Rodriguez, brother of the Chihuahua attorney general, with a Fast and Furious gun.

According to the report, the U.S. knew for eight months of the link between the ATF operation and his death, but refused to tell any Mexican officials. Finally the acting ATF attaché told the Mexican Attorney General Maricela Morales. Her reply, “Hijole,” which translates into “Oh my.”

Source:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/07/26/atf-accused-in-congressional-report-arming-cartel-for-war-through-operation/

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. Guns from ‘Fast and Furious’ Found at Mex. Crime Scenes!-Posted on NewsMax.com-By Newsmax Wires-On July 26, 2011:

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/operationfastandfurious-mexico-crimescenes-congressionalreport/2011/07/26/id/404832?s=al&promo_code=CAFF-1

II. Melson’s Testimony Proves Fast and Furious was an Obama Plot!-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Guest Write-On July 18, 2011:

http://floydreports.com/melsons-testimony-proves-fast-and-furious-was-an-obama-plot/

III. Grassley Suspects Botched Gun-Tracking Program Was Motivated by Desire to ‘Restrict Guns’!-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Fred Lucas-On July 22, 2011:

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/grassley-suspects-botched-gun-tracking-p

IV. Congressman Says Fast & Furious Was Administration Conspiracy To Regulate Gun Owners!-Posted on United States Justice Foundation-By NEWSEDITOR-On July 15, 2011:

http://usjf.net/2011/07/congressman-says-fast-furious-was-administration-conspiracy-to-regulate-gun-owners/

Note:  The following websites reveal that George Soros’ Open Society Institute (OSI) and groups that promote a variety of leftwing causes are strong advocates of gun control and fund the Arms Control Association (ACA), which outlines the UN Process on Small Arms, along with the International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA) that is global movement against gun violence, which has lobbied the United Nations to pass a measure outlawing private gun ownership and effectively overturning the U.S. Constitution’s Second Amendment-You Decide: 


Arms Control Association (ACA):

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6924

Arms Control Association (ACA): UN Process on Small Arms: 

http://www.armscontrol.org/act/2007_03/Anders

International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA): Global Movement Against Gun Violence:

http://www.iansa.org/aboutus

International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA): National Gun Laws:

http://www.iansa.org/workarea/national-gun-laws

International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA): Members:

http://www.iansa.org/region/americas

International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA): New US Government Plan to Tackle Arms Trafficking to Mexico!-Posted on July 15, 2011:

http://www.iansa.org/news/2011/07/us-new-government-plan-to-tackle-arms-trafficking-to-mexico

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Did ATF provide weapons to Mexican drug cartels that were subsequently used to kill one of our own?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/03/04/did-atf-provide-weapons-to-mexican-drug-cartels-that-were-subsequently-used-to-kill-one-of-our-own/

Threat of the Mexican drug cartel, illegal border-crossers and “sanctuary cities”!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/23/threat-of-the-mexican-drug-cartel-illegal-border-crossers-and-“sanctuary-cities”/

What is the true intent of the UN Small Arms Treaty?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/12/what-is-the-true-intent-of-the-un-small-arms-treaty/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Here's the link to a poll initiated by Debbie "Take Your Meds" Washingmachine Schultz regarding Allen Wests' comments recently;

http://patriotsunion.ning.com/forum/topic/show?id=6376701%3ATopic%3A38602&xgs=1&xg_source=msg_share_topic

Read it, and then vote on it!  It's driving her nuts because she's losing in her own poll!!!

Couldn't happen to a nicer person!

Posted on The Daily Caller-By Alex Pappas, The Daily Caller-On July 25, 2011:

“Iowa Rep. Steve King said Monday that President Obama could face impeachment if the country goes into default.

“Obama would be impeached if he blocked debt payments,” King, a Republican, wrote on Twitter.

King prefaced the comment by writing: “STOP talking about default. The 1st dime of each $1 of revenue services debt.”

His comments come as Obama is negotiating with Congress over a debt reduction package that includes raising the country’s debt limit by the August 2 deadline.

King ended the tweet with a reference to the Republican “Cut, Cap and Balance” plan he supports that passed in the House last week, but was killed in the Senate.

It would require spending cuts and caps along with a constitutional amendment for a balanced budget.”

Source:

http://dailycaller.com/2011/07/25/rep-steve-king-obama-could-be-impeached-over-debt-crisis/

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and videos relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. Debt ceiling: Obama’s demagoguery vs economic reality!

Posted on The Patriot Update-By Nathaniel Davidson-On July 25, 2011:

“The current hot topic is yet another raise of the debt ceiling. The Demagogues, led by King Barack and Treasury Secretary Tim “tax cheat” Geithner, are trying to scare the country with threats of losing our AAA credit rating, and scaring seniors by threatening to withhold Social Security, and holding military pay hostage.  Never mind that according to Chris Whalen, a banking industry analyst and co-founder of Institutional Risk Analytics, the government can continue to pay off its debt for months before defaulting.

They are trying to use this to trick Republicans into agreeing to what Obama calls “balance”, but really means “more taxes”, in line with Obama’s ‘Redistribution of Wealth’ Radio Interview, 2001.  They hope the GOP will forget what happened when the first President Bush was tricked into violating his “Read my lips: no new taxes” pledge—by similar promises of spending cuts that never materialized.

Soaking the rich?

In a previous Patriot column, I pointed out that the “rich” are already being Taxed Enough Already.  A more recent Heritage blog, Soaking the Rich to Raise the Debt Ceiling Won’t Solve Spending Problem, pointed out:

The reality is often lost that the top 10 percent of income earners—those making more than $113,799 in 2008 (the latest year available from the IRS)—already pay 69.9 percent of the income taxes. The same top 10 percent, however, earn only 45.8 percent of the income.

The IRS also reports that in 2008, the top 25 percent of income earners—those earning $67,280 or more—pay 86.34 percent of the income taxes, yet earn only 67.38 percent of all income in the U.S.

Furthermore, the two greatest presidents of last century, Calvin Coolidge and Ronald Reagan raised government revenues by cutting tax rates, because people work harder and are more entrepreneurial when they can keep more of what they earn.  There is more money for hiring workers as well, which is why unemployment plummeted under these presidents.

Also, it should be obvious that low rates that are paid will probably gain more than high taxes that are avoided—mostly legally.  For example, Bloomberg.com estimates that American corporations have $1.5 trillion in cash sitting overseas.  If they brought it back home, they would be gouged at 35%, the highest corporate tax rate in the developed world.  But if it were reduced to 15%, say, then they are more likely to bring it back home and help our economy grow, and also enrich the Treasury by $200 billion!

But Obama is an ideologue, and an especially dishonest one.  His latest trick is to demagogue about jet planes:

If we do not have revenues, that means there are a bunch of kids out there who do not have college scholarships. … I’ve said to Republican leaders, you go talk to your constituents and ask them, ‘Are you willing to compromise your kids’ safety so some corporate-jet owner can get a tax break?’

However, he neglected to mention that the tax break for corporate jets came not from Republicans but from his own 2009 “stimulus” package, rammed through against Republican opposition.  It is really taking from the despot’s playbook to blame the opposition for one’s own failures!

And of course, it would ruin the rhetoric to talk actual figures.  The savings would be at most about $300 million a year, “less than one-tenth of 1 percent of Obama’s stated deficit-reduction target.”  And they “wouldn’t pay for even a month of those college scholarships he wants to fund (Annual cost: $42 billion.)”  And of course, most of the “rich” who Obama wants to tax-gouge are light years away from owning their own jets.  (I should say that I have no problem with getting rid of socialism for the rich, such as the ethanol scam.)

Because of the above analysis, it was most encouraging to see the recent Patriot column Boehner derails tax increase, Obama’s 2012 plan.  I’ve criticised him before for being too willing to appease the Debtocrats, so when he does something right, he deserves kudos from me, and support from the Tea Party.

It's the spending, stupid!

Despite Obama’s demagoguery, we don’t suffer from low tax revenue but from a government with out-of-control spending.  Economist Dr. Thomas Sowell puts all the left’s envy-mongering into perspective in his column Slaves to Words:

Even if the income tax rate were raised to 100 percent on millionaires and billionaires, it would still not cover the trillions of dollars the government is spending.

But Obama and the Dems have no desire to rein in this spending, even though this Keynesian spendulus hasn’t improved the economy.  Furthermore, it never has done so in history, and never could because the money is sucked out of productive sections of the economy.

For example, they refused to cut funds for the abortion and sex-trafficking business Planned Parenthood, founded by the racist eugenicist Margaret Sanger to eliminate what she called “human weeds”, including black people.  The House voted to defund this rotten organization, but the Dems said “nope” and the appeasing RINOs caved.

Obama also refuses to reconsider the trillions of dollars in new spending from Obamacare, or his other big-spending sprees on high-speed rail or “green energy”.

The Dem Senators voted on party line to reject the sensible Cut, Cap and Balance bill.  This just shows that  there is no longer such a thing as a “blue dog Democrat” (just as ramming through Obamacare and protecting Planned Parenthood showed that “pro-life Democrat” is now an oxymoron).  Rather, voting for a Democrat now always means a vote for fiscal irresponsibility and war against the unborn (see also previous Patriot column Why conservatives should hold their nose and vote Republican).

Credit rating:

The whole debate is a joke.  As Mark Steyn put it:

"There is something surreal and unnerving about the so-called ‘debt ceiling’ negotiations staggering on in Washington. In the real world, negotiations on an increase in one’s debt limit are conducted between the borrower and the lender. Only in Washington is a debt increase negotiated between two groups of borrowers."

Really, it’s like your teenager maxing out his credit card, and you increase his limit even more, rather than help him pay off his debt and control his spending so it’s less than his income.   As the fine new Conservative senator Mario Rubio explained (below), it’s the debt and spending that is endangering our credit rating, according to the credit agencies themselves:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHUqUbjuaW0&feature=player_embedded

Conclusion:

Boehner and the other Republicans are far too fond of “collegiality” or playing nice, as the Democrats and their Media allies smear them viciously.  They should instead stop treating Obama as if he were an honest man who loves this country.   Instead they should follow the conservative British statesman and philosopher Edmund Burke:

“There is no safety for honest men but by believing all possible evil of evil men” (from his Reflections on the Revolution in France, p. 249, 1790; NB he supported the cause of the American revolutionaries while he was scathing of the French ones, much like Ann Coulter does in Demonic).”

Source:

http://patriotupdate.com/articles/debt-ceiling-obama’s-demagoguery-vs-economic-reality

II. IMF Cites ‘Urgency’ in Raising $14.3 Trillion U.S. Debt Cap!-Posted on NewsMax.com-By Bloomberg News-On July 25, 2011:

http://www.moneynews.com/FinanceNews/IMF-Urgency-Raising-Debt/2011/07/25/id/404736?s=al&promo_code=CAFF-1

III. Rep. Issa: US deserves to have credit downgraded if spending isn't addressed!-Posted on The Hill-By Alicia M. Cohn-On July 25, 2011:

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/173261-rep-issas-not-concerned-about-credit-rating

IV. 40% expect Obama to punish public over debt-ceiling battle!-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On July 25, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=324445

V. Who’s Holding America Hostage?-Posted on Godfather Politics-By GIACOMO-On July 26, 2011:

http://godfatherpolitics.com/258/whos-holding-america-hostage/

VI. Is EPA’s true purpose protecting the environment or shutting down industry?-Posted on The Washington Examiner-By Bryan W. Shaw, OpEd Contributor-On July 23, 2011:

http://washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columnists/2011/07/sunday-reflection-epas-true-purpose-protecting-environment-or-shutting-do

 VII.  Video: Democrat Congressman Admits Debt Limit Debate Is a ‘Charade’!-Posted on Big Government-By Lee Stranahan-On July 25, 2011:

http://biggovernment.com/lstranahan/2011/07/25/stark-admission-democrat-congressman-admits-debt-limit-debate-is-a-charade/

VIII. Big Surprises Uncovered in Fed Audit!-Posted on The Patriot Update-By Ann-Marie Murrell-On July 25, 2011:

http://patriotupdate.com/articles/big-surprises-uncovered-in-fed-audit

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Is George Soros deliberately handicapping American energy?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/03/02/is-george-soros-deliberately-handicapping-american-energy/

Is there a Christian basis for combating the threat of global warming?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/21/is-there-a-christian-basis-for-combating-the-threat-of-global-warming/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

What’s wrong with this picture?

Posted on Fox News O-Reilly Factor-On July 25, 2011:

“BILL O’REILLY, FOX NEWS HOST: “Impact” segment tonight: mass murder in Norway. A vicious killer, Anders Breivik, has murdered at least 76 people in the Scandinavian nation of Norway. Breivik is a brutal fanatic who apparently objects to the presence of Muslims in Europe.

Last Friday he bombed buildings in Oslo and then took an automatic weapon to an island a few miles away gunning down 68 people. Norwegian authorities couldn’t get to the island because they didn’t have a helicopter, if you can believe it.

Now, on Sunday, the “New York Times” headlined “As Horrors Emerged, Norway Charges Christian extremist”. A number of other news organizations like the “LA Times” and Reuters also played up the Christian angle. But Breivik is not a Christian. That’s impossible. No one believing in Jesus commits mass murder. The man might have called himself a Christian on the net, but he is certainly not of that faith.

Also Breivik is not attached to any church, and in fact has criticized the Protestant belief system in general. The Christian angle came from a Norwegian policeman not from any fact finding. Once again, we can find no evidence, none, that this killer practiced Christianity in any way.

So why is the angle being played up?

Two reasons:

First, the liberal media wants to make an equivalency between the actions of Breivik and the Oklahoma City bomber Tim McVeigh and al Qaeda. The left wants you to believe that fundamentalists Christians are a threat just like crazy jihadists are.

In fact, in the “New York Times” today an analysis piece says that some believe we have overreacted to the Muslim threat in the world. Of course, that’s absurd. Jihadists have killed tens of thousands of people all over the world. The Taliban, Iran and elements in Pakistan use governmental power to support terrorism by Muslims. But the left-wing press wants to compare nuts like Breivik and McVeigh to state-sponsored terrorism and worldwide jihad.

Again, dishonest and insane.

The second reason the liberal media is pushing the Christian angle is they don’t like Christians very much because we are too judgmental. Many Christians oppose abortion. Gay marriage and legalized narcotics, secular left causes. The media understands the opposition is often based on religion. So they want to diminish Christianity and highlighting so-called Christian-based terror is a way to do that.

The primary threat to this world comes from Islamic terrorism. Iran is a major problem. If the country gets nuclear weapons and it’s desperately trying to, does anyone doubt those weapons could be used? A Muslim in Pakistan exported nuclear technology to North Korea. And Muslim suicide bombers blow innocent people up almost every day.

Yet, once again the liberal media wants you to fear Christian terrorists. And going forward when jihad is mentioned, you know Breivik and McVeigh will enter the conversation.

Sometimes I think the world is going mad. This Breivik guy is a loon, a mass murderer who apparently acted out of rank hatred. No government supported him. No self-proclaimed terror group like al Qaeda paid his bills. Breivik is just another loser who caused tremendous horror by murdering innocent people. There is no equivalency to jihad. No worldwide Breivik movement. Just another violent pathetic legacy stemming back to Cain.

Source:

http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/oreilly/2011/07/26/oreilly-blasts-media-branding-norwegian-terror-suspect-christian-extremist

Note:  The following articles and/or blog posts support the above article and/or blog post and video-You Decide:

I. The Norway Terrorist!

Posted on FrontPage Magazine-By Mark Tapson-On July 25, 2011:

“A year or two ago I was at a dinner party where a gentleman and his wife confronted me about my writing on Islamic terrorism. “Why is it,” he asked irritably, “that terrorism is always called ‘Islamic’? What about ‘Christian’ terrorists?”

“Well, name a Christian terrorist,” I replied. I wasn’t being combative; I was genuinely curious to know whom they considered to be someone committing politically-driven murder and mayhem in the name of Jesus. The sentence was barely out of my mouth before the wife shot back, “

Timothy McVeigh.”

McVeigh’s bombing of a federal building in Oklahoma City took place sixteen years ago. Unlike Muslim fundamentalists who theologically justify their acts of terrorism, McVeigh can not rightly be characterized as a “Christian terrorist,” because he was, by his own admission, not a committed Christian, and he carried out the attack not because God or the Bible commanded him to, but because he hated the U.S. government.

And yet after all these years his name remains virtually the sole flimsy example that people have at the ready to challenge what they consider to be the stereotype of Islamic terrorism.

No more. Now a new McVeigh has arisen, a symbol that the Left and Islamic supremacists themselves will use to bludgeon Christian conservatives and critics of jihad for the next sixteen years – Anders Behring Breivik. Breivik is in police custody for carrying out what some are calling Norway’s “Oklahoma City,” a reference to McVeigh’s 1995 bombing, of course. Breivik, who claims to have acted alone, set off a massive bomb that devastated an Oslo government building and killed seven, then traveled to a nearby youth camp for hundreds of teen children of Labour Party politicians, where he proceeded to massacre as many as 90 of them with ruthless, methodical gunfire.

As the news began leaking out about Europe’s deadliest terror attack since the 2003 Madrid train bombing, there was a predictable – and perfectly reasonable – assumption on the part of terrorism experts, the media, and possibly anyone who follows the

Clash of Civilizations, that the perpetrators were Islamists. After all, there were plenty of reasons to suspect initially that these were acts of Islamic terrorism: at least one Islamist group initially claimed responsibility (but later retracted it); Muslim extremists cheered the attacks in online chatrooms; Norway is still a target of Islamists burning to avenge the Muhammad cartoons; legal action was finally taken against the radical Mullah Krekar whom Norway has been sheltering for years, and he threatened retaliation; al Qaeda tried to attack Oslo last year; and, frankly, most terrorism carried out worldwide today is at the hands of jihadists.

But the truth was a stunning reversal. Not only is the perpetrator a well-educated, boyishly blond, ethnic Norwegian, he is a self-described Christian conservative bent on sparking a Pan-European resistance movement to oppose – by violence if necessary – the corrosive forces of multiculturalism, Islamic immigration, and “cultural Marxism” that are destroying the fabric of European society and culture. It’s too soon to have all the facts –speculation, as usual, began flying at light-speed over the rumor-mongering internet, including the mystery of a fake Facebook page and the musing that Breivik is himself a jihadist posing as a Christian conservative. But as of this writing, the coldly rational Breivik has apparently confessed to what he described in a 1500-page manifesto as the “systematical and organized executions of multiculturalist traitors.”

But the tragedy won’t end at the lives lost in Norway. Bruce Bawer, the author of Surrender: Appeasing Islam, Sacrificing Freedom who lives in Norway, notes the broader concern that “legitimate criticism of Islam, which remains a very real threat to freedom in Norway and the West, has been profoundly discredited by association with this murderous lunatic.”

As the European anti-jihad blogger Fjordman puts it, Breivik has scored a major victory for his opponents. An agent provocateur seeking to discredit the right-wing conservative sliver of the European political spectrum would have a hard time doing a better job… It is the perfect excuse to persecute and silence opposing voices… We’re heading for dark days.

The Left – including the mainstream media, and stealth jihadists themselves, like the ubiquitous Muslim Brotherhood legacy group CAIR, the Council on American-Islamic Relations – won’t even bother to contain its collective glee over the fact that Breivik is a “right-wing Christian.”

The narrative is already being constructed that will use him to tar everyone on the Right, particularly vocal critics of Islamic fundamentalism. This is the same Left that hijacks any and all discussions of Islamic terrorism by jumping up to insist that all Muslims must not be smeared because of the actions of a “tiny minority of extremists,” that not all terrorism is committed by Muslims and not all Muslims are terrorists. Of course, no responsible anti-jihadist has ever made such claims, but the Left never bothers to concede this.

By contrast, instead of living by the standards they demand of the Right, Leftists will now be perfectly happy to politicize Breivik’s terrorism and use him to tar everyone on the Right – Christians, conservatives, anti-jihadists, the Tea Party – everyone. And in fact, they have already begun attempting to link the Norway terrorist to Sarah Palin, of all people.

Breivik is a terrorist. His targeting of helpless schoolchildren makes him no better than the slaughterers at Beslan. But that doesn’t make everyone concerned about unfettered Islamic immigration, jihad, or the rapid disintegration of Europe’s cultural heritage a terrorist or even a sympathizer. There is no connection between the legitimate, courageous, lawful work of notable anti-jihadists and such evil.

No true Christian, conservative, or responsible critic of jihad would condone Breivik’s despicable, cowardly acts or deem them to be in accordance with our beliefs and values. Much less would we celebrate those acts, unlike our Islamist counterparts. But denouncements of Breivik will be purposefully ignored by the Left.

Nor does it make Islamic terrorism any less of a threat. But the Left will use Breivik to divert attention from worldwide jihad, to advance their cultural Marxism, and to demonize the defenders of freedom. To echo Fjordman, we are facing dark days. We must face them with the truth.”

Source:

http://frontpagemag.com/2011/07/25/the-norway-terrorist/

II. Debunking the Left-Wing Myths About 'Right-Wing, Extremist Christians'!-Posted on The Weekly Standard-By MARK HEMINGWAY-On July 25, 2011:

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/debunking-left-wing-myths-about-right-wing-extremist-christians_577384.html

III. Terrorist proclaimed himself ‘Darwinian,’ not ‘Christian’!-Posted on WND.com-On July 24, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=325765

Note:  The following disgusting Main Stream Media articles and/or blog posts wasted no time in claiming that the Norway shooter was a Christian fundamentalist/ right-wing extremist and compared him to the Oklahoma City bomber-You Decide:

I. Norway Shooter and His Enablers!-Posted on The New York Times-By ROGER COHEN-On July 25, 2011:

II. Suspect In Friday’s Deadly Terror Attacks In Norway Has Right-Wing Extremist Views!-Posted on CNN.com-By the CNN Wire Staff-On July 24, 2011:

http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/europe/07/24/norway.terror.manifesto/index.html

III. ABC Describes Norway Shooter As A Christian Fundamentalist and a "Right-wing Extremist”!-Posted on ABCNews.com-By OLIVIA KATRANDJIAN, DEAN SCHABNER and MIGUEL MARQUEZ-On July 23, 2011:

http://abcnews.go.com/International/norway-shooting-explosion-91-killed-suspect-charged/story?id=14141571

IV. NY Times Compares Norway Shooting/Bombing to Oklahoma City Bombing!-Posted on The New York Times-By ELISA MALA and J. DAVID GOODMAN-On July 22, 2011:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/23/world/europe/23oslo.html

Note:  I find it disgusting and/or deplorable that Progressives/Liberals/Socialists, with the help of the Main Stream Media, continue to label conservatives as right-wing extremists and/or terrorists, while they ignore and/or spin the truth regarding the leaders and/or members of the Weather Underground, which I consider our county’s true home grown terrorists.

The following eye-opening reports, articles and/or blog posts and video expose: (a) the Weather Underground, our country’s home grown communist terrorist organization; (b) how one of the leaders of “Progressives for Obama” was also the founder of the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS)”, the group that spawned the Weather Underground; and, (c) the ties between Bill Ayers, founder of the Weather Underground and President Obama-You Decide:

I. What Was The Weather Underground?-Posted on America’s Survival-By Herbert Romerstein:

http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/romerstein_rtp.pdf

II. From Henry Wallace to William Ayers-The Communist and “Progressive” Movements- Posted on America’s Survival-By Herbert Romerstein:

http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/Wallace_to_Ayers_Communist_Progressive.pdf

III. The Obama-Ayers meeting: What you haven't been told: ‘Most exhaustive investigation ever into prez's background, radical ties’!-Posted on WND.com-On May 2, 2010:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=148037

IV. Obama seeks to silence ad tying him to 60s radical!-Posted on Breibart.com- By JIM KUHNHENN, US/Eastern, Associated Press Writer -On August 25, 2008:

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D92PL7400

V. Bill & Barack's Excellent Adventure!-Posted on American Thinker-By Thomas Lifson-On August 22, 2008:

http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/08/bill_baracks_excellent_adven...

VI. Video: Obama's Relationship with William Ayres!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8cdolg2y_BU&feature=related

Note:  The following articles and/or blog posts relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

DHS Video Characterizes White Americans as Most Likely Terrorists!-Posted on InfoWars.com-By Paul Joseph Watson,
Infowars.com-On July 21, 2011:

http://www.infowars.com/dhs-video-characterizes-white-americans-as-most-likely-terrorists/

Hill Poll: Media Unethical, Biased Toward Democrats!-Posted on NewsMax.com-On July 25, 2011:

http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/media-biased-unethical-Hill/2011/07/25/id/404700

The Judas Media-Posted on Floyd Reports-Guest Writer-On April 27, 2011:

Note:  The following articles and/or blog posts and reports reveal how George Soros, along with other liberal backers use their money to fund and/or manipulate media outlets, to include Hollywood because they see that as a powerful way to influence the American public.

It’s a strategy that Soros has been deploying extensively in media both in the United States and abroad. Since 2003, Soros has spent more than $48 million funding media properties, including the infrastructure of news - journalism schools, investigative journalism and even industry organizations-You Decide:

Nearly 30 Soros-funded Media Operations Part of 'War on Fox'!- Posted on Business & Media Institute-By Dan Gainor-On June 1, 2011:

http://www.mrc.org/bmi/commentary/2011/Nearly__Sorosfunded_Media_Operations_Part_of_War_on_Fox_.html

Soros-Funded Lefty Media Reach More Than 300 Million Every Month!-Posted on Business & Media Institute-By Dan Gainor-On May 25, 2011:

http://www.mrc.org/bmi/commentary/2011/Soros_Lefty_Media_Reach_More_Than__Million_Every_Month.html

Soros Spends Over $48 Million Funding Media Organizations!-Posted on Business & Media Institute-By Dan Gainor-On May 18, 2011:

http://www.mrc.org/bmi/commentary/2011/Soros_Spends_Over__Million_Funding_Media_Organizations_.html

Over 30 Major News Organizations Linked to George Soros!-Posted on Business & Media Institute-By Dan Gainor-On May 11, 2011:

http://www.mrc.org/bmi/commentary/2011/Over__Major_News_Organizations_Linked_to_George_Soros.html

Citizen Soros Manipulating the Media!-Posted on Capital Research Center-By Matthew Vadum-On January 2011:

http://www.capitalresearch.org/pubs/pdf/v1293869054.pdf

George Soros, Movie Mogul: ‘Social Justice’ Cinema and the Sundance Institute!-Posted on Capital Research Center-By Rondi Adamson-On March 20o8:

http://www.capitalresearch.org/pubs/pdf/v1204311857.pdf

The Hidden Soros Agenda: Drugs, Money, the Media, and Political Power!-Posted on AIM-By Cliff Kincaid-On October 27, 2004:

http://www.aim.org/special-report/the-hidden-soros-agenda-drugs-money-the-media-and-political-power/

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Shocking New Report! Obama’s Real Terrorists: Targeting Patriots and The Right!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/05/shocking-new-report-obamas-real-terrorists-targeting-patriots-and-the-right/

It’s Getting Very Serious Now!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/15/it’s-getting-very-serious-now/

Daily Kos ‘Bull’s-Eyed’ Gabrielle Giffords for Defeat in 2008!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/25/daily-kos-‘bull’s-eyed’-gabrielle-giffords-for-defeat-in-2008/

Liberal web site publishing harsh racial rhetoric!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/liberal-web-site-publishing-harsh-racial-rhetoric/

Who owns our supposedly fair and balanced airwaves and news outlets?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/21/who-owns-our-supposedly-fair-and-balanced-airwaves-and-news-outlets/

Should Americans Fear Islam?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/05/should-americans-fear-islam/

Muslim Brotherhood Declares War on America-Will America Notice!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/12/muslim-brotherhood-declares-war-on-america-will-america-notice/

What are CAIRs obstructionist goals?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/03/06/6951/

What we haven’t been told about the President’s background!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/03/what-we-haven’t-been-told-about-the-president’s-background/

Obamanites Get Violent in Support of the Agenda!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/05/obamanites-get-violent-in-support-of-the-agenda/

Have Americans Stopped Having Confidence In Their Government?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/08/24/have-americans-stopped-having-confidence-in-their-government/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

THE POSTAL SERVICE MAY CLOSE 3,653 FACILITIES THIS FALL !!