ACTION

WE WILL SEE WHEN ROMNEY AND  2012 ROLLS AROUND.

Every time a candidate overtakes Romney the Democrats and press smear him.  Democrats keep telling us that Romney is the only  candidate that Republicans can hope to beat Obama. Romney and McCain are cut from the same cloth. Obama beat McCain. 

I'd take the Democrat's advice seriously if I were you. I think Romney is the only Republican candidate Obama can possibly beat.

Posted on The Patriot Update-By Chuck Norris-On November 20, 2011:

“While Occupy protesters continue to rant in select cities around the country, I’m wondering who is shadier: corporate Wall Street or corporate media?

Of course, there’s no surprise or secret in saying that the mainstream media (MSM) are biased. Even when the CBS producer inadvertently sent an anti-Michele Bachmann email to one of her own staff members during last Saturday night’s GOP debates, her campaign manager confessed it was another evidence of “what every conservative already knows — the liberal mainstream media elites are manipulating the Republican debates by purposely suppressing our conservative message.”

But have you noticed the particularly rapid acceleration of progressive MSM news reports in the last decade? Even for veteran news viewers, it is sometimes difficult to separate the wheat from the chaff. But how fair is that augmented bias for most trusting and unsuspecting Americans who turn to news for objectivity and comprehensive reporting?

Like many of you, my wife Gena and I are avid watchers of local, national and global news. Though we have our own preferences, we try to acquire a broad understanding of the big issues. But for quite some time, if we want to obtain the “complete news,” we often have to go to multiple sources. And we feel for other hardworking people (including homemakers) who don’t have the time to read and research like we do.

Gone are the days when broadcasters like Walter Cronkite attempted to convey objective and unbiased news. Propaganda seems to be at the heart of most national news. Passions, preferences and political persuasions permeate nearly all the news. Opine is ubiquitous and made obvious alone by many broadcasters’ tone of voice or facial expressions.

As reported by NewsBusters (www.newsbusters.org), consider in a single day last week how the MSM angled their reporting in ways to manipulate public opinion and align it with their corporate media (supporters) bias, which ironically (or maybe not so) parallels White House prejudice.

• “Networks Hit Cain With 117 Stories; ABC: Accusers Seek ‘Safety in Numbers’ From Cain.”
• “NBC Uses Penn State Scandal to Slam Catholic Church.”
• “NPR Asks Bill Clinton: Obama’s Seen As Liberal, ‘How’d That Happen’?”
• “New York Times Spikes Fast & Furious Hearing in Print, Omits Eric Holder’s Admission Completely.”
• “CNN to Perry: Convince Us Your Campaign Isn’t Finished.”
• “New York Times Twice Omits Obama From Headline to Embarrassing Insults of Netanyahu.”
• “Newt Mocks (CNBC journalist’s) ‘Funny’ Defense of the Liberal Media.”
• “CNN Spins Elections as Republican Setback.”
• “ABC and CBS Spike Ohioans Rejection of ObamaCare Mandate, NBC Sees Voter Call for ‘Restraint.”

The Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs even confessed that big business monies funneled via the MSM molds and directs the public’s social and political viewpoints: “The summits of American business now control or powerfully influence the major media that create American public opinion.”

The fact is that the primary networks — ABC, CBS and NBC — and their smaller cable channels are owned and financed by an interlocking network of corporate conglomerates and controlled by progressive and politically biased proprietors. Billionaire moguls like George Soros are using millions and millions of dollars not to ensure the second coming or election of President Obama but also to carry out a greater goal of chipping away the very foundations of our republic.

Just a few months ago, Media Research Center’s Dan Gainor exposed globalist George Soros’ financial connections to MSM and his funding of $52 million to influence and direct journalism in the national networks. Or do you think it’s merely a coincidence that Soros has ties to over 30 major news organizations, including The New York Times, The Associated Press, The Washington Post, NBC and ABC, and yet no one hears anything from those networks about his behind-the-scenes finagling and financing?

It fascinates me that Occupiers hate the rich cats unless they help finance their cause or rally at their sides, like George Soros and Michael Moore.

It prompts one to wonder: Why haven’t such power relations been reported by the MSM? And would they be so silent if the correlations were between such agents of control and the tea party?

For example, even with its liberal bent, Snopes.com just verified last Thursday that Vice President Joe Biden’s attorney son, Robert Hunter Biden, was retained for years to “undertake some lobbying efforts on behalf of Brookfield Office Properties,” which just happens to own Zuccotti Park in New York, where the Occupiers rally their national movement.

Snopes.com also verified that New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s live-in girlfriend, Diana L. Taylor, is on the board of directors of Brookfield Office Properties.

And just two months ago in September, the federal government’s Department of Energy guaranteed a stimulus “loan” of $168.9 million to Brookfield Asset Management, which is a parent company of Brookfield Office Properties.

But I’m sure those local and Washington governmental associations with Occupy Wall Street are all just coincidental and inconsequential, right?

(In Part 2, during Thanksgiving week, I’ll detail George Soros’ most recent covert “investment” in the 2012 Obama presidential campaign and detail much further his collective goal and master plan with the MSM and the White House itself.)”

• Follow Chuck Norris through his official social media sites, on Twitter @chucknorris and Facebook’s “Official Chuck Norris Page.” He blogs at http://chucknorrisnews.blogspot.com. To find out more about Chuck Norris and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

Source:

http://patriotupdate.com/articles/the-secrets-of-soros-obama-occupiers-and-the-msm

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and video relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. Video: Comedian Claims That “Fascist University Professors” Indoctrinating Youth With “Marxist Idea[s]” Are Ruining America!-Posted on The Political Carnival-By Paddy-On November 21, 2011:

http://thepoliticalcarnival.net/2011/11/21/video-on-fox-friends-comedian-claims-that-fascist-university-professors-indoctrinating-youth-with-marxist-ideas-are-ruining-america/

II. The President's Allies Continue to Flee!-Posted on National Review Online-By Jim Geraghty-On November 21, 2011:

http://www.nationalreview.com/campaign-spot/283681/obama-iyesi-really-good-it-gets

III. Democratic Pollsters: Obama Should Abandon Run for Second Term!-Posted on National Journal-By Michael Catalini-On November 20, 2011:

http://nationaljournal.com/2012-presidential-campaign/democratic-pollsters-obama-should-abandon-run-for-second-term-20111120

IV. Video: Chris Matthews Turns On Obama: ‘I Hear Stories You Would Not Believe!’-Posted on Vision to America-On November 20, 2011:

http://visiontoamerica.org/5700/chris-matthews-turns-of-obama-i-hear-stories-you-would-not-believe/

V. NASCAR Crowd Boos Michelle Obama!-Posted On The Patriot Update-On November 20, 2011:

http://patriotupdate.com/14825/nascar-crowd-boos-michelle-obama

VI. Islamist: We sparked violent protests in America!-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On November 19, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=369205

VII. Media Won’t Link White House Shooter to Occupy Wall Street!-Posted on Canada Free Press-By By Warner Todd Huston, Canada Free Press-On November 15, 2011:

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/42411#When:00:00:45Z

VII. Main Stream Media’s Deplorable ‘Notable Quotables’-Posted on The Media Research Center-On November 14, 2011:

http://www.mrc.org/notablequotables/nq/2011/20111113093528.aspx

VIII. Media Diverts Attention from Obama Economic Collapse!-Posted on Western Journalism-By FLOYD BROWN-On November 12, 2011:

http://www.westernjournalism.com/media-diverts-attention-from-oba/?utm_source=Western+Journalism&utm_campaign=4a40cbda5c-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email

IX. Video: Pamela Geller:  “We are at war and the enemy is the media”!

http://www.westernjournalism.com/video-we-are-at-war-and-the-enemy-is-the-media-pamela-geller/?utm_source=Western+Journalism&utm_campaign=08b6e3f066-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email

X. Video: Allen West to Media, “Stop Being Afraid of this President” who is “Destroying this Country”!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=RAl_13DtQ1w

Note:  The following articles and/or blog posts and reports reveal how George Soros, along with other liberal backers use their money to fund and/or manipulate media outlets, to include Hollywood because they see that as a powerful way to influence the American public.

It’s a strategy that Soros has been deploying extensively in media both in the United States and abroad. Since 2003, Soros has spent more than $48 million funding media properties, including the infrastructure of news - journalism schools, investigative journalism and even industry organizations.

Also included is an article and/or blog post that reveals George Soros’ hidden agenda-You Decide:

Nearly 30 Soros-funded Media Operations Part of 'War on Fox'!- Posted on Business & Media Institute-By Dan Gainor-On June 1, 2011:

http://www.mrc.org/bmi/commentary/2011/Nearly__Sorosfunded_Media_Operations_Part_of_War_on_Fox_.html

Soros-Funded Lefty Media Reach More Than 300 Million Every Month!-Posted on Business & Media Institute-By Dan Gainor-On May 25, 2011:

http://www.mrc.org/bmi/commentary/2011/Soros_Lefty_Media_Reach_More_Than__Million_Every_Month.html

Soros Spends Over $48 Million Funding Media Organizations!-Posted on Business & Media Institute-By Dan Gainor-On May 18, 2011:

http://www.mrc.org/bmi/commentary/2011/Soros_Spends_Over__Million_Funding_Media_Organizations_.html

Over 30 Major News Organizations Linked to George Soros!-Posted on Business & Media Institute-By Dan Gainor-On May 11, 2011:

http://www.mrc.org/bmi/commentary/2011/Over__Major_News_Organizations_Linked_to_George_Soros.html

Citizen Soros Manipulating the Media!-Posted on Capital Research Center-By Matthew Vadum-On January 2011:

http://www.capitalresearch.org/pubs/pdf/v1293869054.pdf

George Soros, Movie Mogul: ‘Social Justice’ Cinema and the Sundance Institute!-Posted on Capital Research Center-By Rondi Adamson-On March 20o8:

http://www.capitalresearch.org/pubs/pdf/v1204311857.pdf

The Hidden Soros Agenda: Drugs, Money, the Media, and Political Power!-Posted on AIM-By Cliff Kincaid-On October 27, 2004:

http://www.aim.org/special-report/the-hidden-soros-agenda-drugs-money-the-media-and-political-power/

Note:  The following article and/or blog post reveals how the Main Stream Media is assisting President Obama and his minions to bring down capitalist America, as the propaganda machine of the neo-fascist Left-You Decide:

The Judas Media-Posted on Floyd Reports-Guest Writer-On April 27, 2011:

http://floydreports.com/the-judas-media/?utm_source=Expose+Obama&utm_campaign=43b350b9f6-EO_04_27_20114_27_2011&utm_medium=email

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Is President Obama inciting riots across the US?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/23/is-president-obama-inciting-riots-across-the-us/

Who owns our supposedly fair and balanced airwaves and news outlets?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/21/who-owns-our-supposedly-fair-and-balanced-airwaves-and-news-outlets/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Right On!

Posted on NewsMax.com-By Amy Woods-On November 20, 2011:

“Republican Sen. Marco Rubio says he wants the supercommittee to come to an agreement by Wednesday “because so much is at stake,” but he says President Barack Obama is playing politics with the negotiations.

“We knew this day was coming, and we know what lies ahead,” the Florida freshman said today on ABC’s “This Week.” “We need to look no further than Europe to understand what lies ahead unless we take these issues seriously.”

Political strategy is at play, Rubio said, adding that he believes Obama “would like to run against a do-nothing Congress” in 2012.

“But I hope that doesn’t stand in the way of meaningful legislation, particularly out of the supercommittee,” he said.

The Obama administration is hindering Democrats on the supercommittee because they don’t know “how far they can go on making concessions, for example, on entitlement reform.”

“I blame the White House for a little lack of leadership on this,” he said. “It’s very difficult for the Democrats on that committee to enter into a negotiation not knowing where the White House is. They don’t want to get their legs cut out underneath them.”

Regarding the bipartisan jobs bill negotiated with Democratic Sen. Chris Coons of Delaware, Rubio said there’s no reason it shouldn’t pass.

“If something like this can’t get traction, if something like this can’t pass, what does it say about our process?” Rubio said. “We believe that one of the things that’s holding back economic activity is all the bad news and impending bad news that’s coming out of Washington. We can’t sit around for 12 months and do nothing.”

Source:

http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/Rubio-Obama-supercommittee-politics/2011/11/20/id/418616?s=al&promo_code=D8EF-1

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and video relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. Why We Want the Super Committee to Fail!

Posted on Western Journalism-By BY FLOYD AND MARY BETH BROWN-On November 19, 2011:

“Washington is once again in a deal making mode, and you are about to lose again. When Congress passed the massive debt increase bill earlier this year, it abdicated legislative responsibility to craft a solution to the spiraling debt. They gave the legislative responsibility to what Congress calls the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction.

The committee was then loaded with legislative “veterans” to limit the influence of the recently elected Tea Party Republicans. Since its inception, the committee has been pushing a mountain of tax increases using the popularity of the concept of balancing the Federal budget. The only question at this point is how much the two sets of Washington elites will raise taxes.

Obama and the Democrats have laid down the gauntlet. They will accept not one penny less than one trillion in new taxes, Republicans have already agreed to raise taxes by at least 250 to 300 billion. We favor another path, no agreement.

Now if you talk to the governing elite in Washington DC the resulting chaos of no agreement is the end of the world. According to the earlier passed law if the taxes are not increased, then we may actually see a decrease in the rate of spending growth.

According to this agreement, spending will be cut across the board in non-entitlement programs by a mere 75 billion a year in military expenditures and 75 billion a year in non-defense discretionary programs. Remember in Washington-speak the budget that is cut can still increase in real terms.

According to the Wall Street Journal, “Total domestic discretionary spending doubled to $614 billion in 2010 from $298 billion in 2000. Even if there were a 10-year $1.2 trillion “cut,” total discretionary spending would still rise by $83 billion by 2021 because those cuts are calculated from inflated “current services” projections.”

This sleight of hand is accomplished by the way Washington budgets. The cut is actually an increase.

So expect to hear lots of scary talk over the course of the next few days about the end of the world as you know it. Children will starve, schools will close, police and fire protection will end, planes will fall from the sky and scariest of all our enemies in Iran and North Korea will rejoice.

The truth of the situation is schools should be funded by states and local communities, we shouldn’t miss one dollar because much of the money spent by DC actually raises the cost of schooling children through unnecessary regulation. The same should be true of foodstuffs. Washington actually raises the cost of food through agricultural price supports and regulations. Turn the regulation of food back to the states and let communities where regulators actually eat the food be the judge.

As for the military budget, America can absorb these cuts in defense spending if we bring our troops home from around the globe just a little faster. Maybe Obama could do something revolutionary such as defend our borders as opposed to the borders of Iraq and South Korea. And let’s strip out all the dollars stuffed in the defense budget, which is really foreign aid masquerading as defense spending.

Congress and Obama can always go back and make adjustments to the actual cuts because none of this is set to affect the budget until 2013 anyway.

We say, let’s cut the budget across the board. If not now, when?”

Source:

http://www.westernjournalism.com/why-we-want-the-super-committee-to-fail/?utm_source=Western+Journalism&utm_campaign=b72281c611-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email

II. Video: Democrat: Obama Owns Deficit Reduction Failure!-Posted on ExposeObama.com-On November 21, 2011:

http://www.exposeobama.com/2011/11/21/democrat-obama-owns-deficit-reduction-failure/

III. Congress May Try Blocking Cuts if Debt Panel Fails!-Posted on FoxNews.com-By The Associated Press-On November 21, 2011:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/11/21/congress-may-try-blocking-cuts-if-debt-panel-fails/#ixzz1eLw4gyAC

IV. Deficit Supercommittee Nears Failure as Obama Steers Clear!-Posted on NewsMax.com-On November 20, 2011:

http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/supercommittee-hensarling-obama-deficit/2011/11/20/id/418638?s=al&promo_code=D8EF-1

V. Super Committee Fails?-Posted on The New Republic-By Timothy Noah-On November 20, 2011:

http://www.tnr.com/blog/97638/super-committee-fails

VI. Breaking: Senate Rules Committee Blocks Tea Party Debt Commission Hearing on Budget Reform!-Posted on Freedom Works-By Tabitha Hale-On November 17, 2011:

http://www.freedomworks.org/press-releases/breaking-senate-rules-committee-blocks-tea-party-d

VII. The Obama Fiscal Responsibility Farce Continues-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-On April 27, 2010:

http://blog.heritage.org/2010/04/27/morning-bell-the-obama-fiscal-responsibility-farce-continues-2/?utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Morning%2BBell

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

The Obama Fiscal Responsibility Farce Continues!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/27/the-obama-fiscal-responsibility-farce-continues/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Posted on Sonoran News-By Linda Bentley-On November 16, 2011:

“CAVE CREEK – Birther Summit Executive Director Dean Haskins indicated recently that he has been conducting some investigative work, but due to the sensitive nature of the work, could not reveal his location.



On Monday, however, Haskins issued a press release titled “The Calm Before the Storm” to update the public on the investigation, which he said “encompassed the greater Honolulu area, where, for two weeks, we were able to uncover key pieces of evidence regarding what are believed by many to be fraudulent documents that have been released to the public.”


Although not yet at liberty to discuss the details of the evidence, “due to specific restraints placed upon us by counsel,” Haskins said, “[P]lease be aware that we are merely experiencing the calm before the storm. Once there is a lawsuit filed in Honolulu, we are confident that counsel will allow us to share the vital evidence that will be presented to the court for scrutiny, so that the citizens of this country will be able to weigh it for themselves.”



In anticipation of the release of that information, Haskins said they have visited key individuals in various cities to establish information pipelines and noted the expansive media blackout concerning Obama’s ineligibility and the numerous crimes committed by and for him to accomplish his illegal tenure in the White House.

From Honolulu, Haskins said they headed to Phoenix where they had a lengthy meeting with the lead investigator in Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse.

Haskins said they next headed for meetings in San Antonio, Austin and Houston, Texas before concluding their near four-week venture.

At these meetings, Haskins said they shared their newly acquired information and enlisted vital assistance in disseminating it to the country once given the green light from counsel.
 “We are hoping that it will be no more than a couple weeks before we are able to release this new information, and that this information will garner the national attention it deserves.”



Haskins assured all those who have donated generously to the Birther Summit efforts that these current initiatives are fully funded by benefactors specifically for the purposes of these initiatives and are not using any of the general funds of the Birther Summit.

Meanwhile, Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. ® has filed an election law complaint in New Hampshire, seeking to remove President Barack Hussein Obama from the ballot as a democrat Party presidential candidate due to his lack of eligibility; lack of any legal and verifiable identification documents; the fraudulent use of a Connecticut-issued Social Security number, which was never assigned to him, according to both E-Verify and the Social Security Number Verification System; and due to the use of computer generated forgery instead of a valid long-form U.S. birth certificate.



Section 5 of the Federal Voting Rights Act states, “Anyone may report alleged violations of state or federal election laws subject to enforcement by the Attorney General by submitting a completed complaint form.”



According to Taitz, one does not need to be a resident of New Hampshire, an early primary state, to file a complaint.

The law goes on to state, “The Attorney General will evaluate each complaint.”



However, under the same section it states, “The Attorney General’s Office will publicly neither confirm nor deny the receipt of a complaint nor the existence of an investigation, unless doing so is deemed necessary to gather information or alert the public to a preventable hazard.”



Taitz said she received calls on Tuesday from two Republican state representatives from New Hampshire, Harry Accornero and Larry Rappoport, to say they are joining her in her elections challenge of Obama in New Hampshire. According to Taitz, they have forwarded her complaint to other legislators, asking them to join.

Sonoran News learned late Wednesday afternoon that the Ballot Law Commission will review Taitz’s complaint seeking removal of Obama from the New Hampshire primary ballot at 2 p.m. this Friday, Nov. 18.



Taitz is also running for the U.S. Senate in 2012, challenging the seat currently held by Democrat Sen. Barbara Boxer.”

• Visit BirtherSummit.org and OrlyTaitzEsq.com to stay informed, make a donation to help offset costs or make a campaign contribution.

Source:

http://www.sonorannews.com/archives/2011/111116/frontpage-storm.html

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. Is Putative President Barack Obama’s Mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, Really Jo Ann Newman?-Posted on Obama Release Your Records-By Mario Apuzzo, Esq.-On November 15, 2011:

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/11/is-putative-president-barack-obamas.html

II. Stan The Sham, And True Love!-Posted on Terrible Truth-By Martha Trowbridge-On November 15, 2011:

http://terribletruth.wordpress.com/2011/11/15/stan-the-sham-and-true-love/

III. Another Cold Case File, Closed: “Malcolm X’s Missing Eyeglasses”!-Posted on Terrible Truth-By Martha Trowbridge-On October 25, 2011:

http://terribletruth.wordpress.com/2011/10/25/another-cold-case-file-closed-malcolm-xs-missing-eyeglasses/

IV. Saps, Stool Pigeons And Stanley Ann’s Hair!-Posted on Terrible Truth-By Martha Trowbridge-On September 29, 2011:

http://terribletruth.wordpress.com/2011/09/29/saps-stool-pigeons-and-stanley-anns-hair/

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetrated-in-american-history/

Could the President’s newly released COLB be a forgery?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/04/29/could-the-president’s-newly-released-colb-be-a-forgery/

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

We the People need to start our campaigning now to stop the destruction of our beautiful country and restore honor to the offices of the USA. . .If you love GOD, say so,  and defend his words. . .Make your own bumper stickers and share them with everyone. . .Call your local Congressman today and give them a ear full!!!!. . .Join a Tea Party group and voice your opinion; we listen. . .Donate each month until Voting Day!!!!   If you are a Democrat. . .change you affiliation and send them a message!!!  America needs you to Stand Up and Speak Out!!!!  Biggest Election for your Freedom is Coming in 2012!!!!  Pick the next President based on Morals, Values and Experience!!!  The Do-Nothing but Spend Democrats are wasting OUR money like its water. . .  We need to vote these Spenders out and reduce the size of the government asap!!!!   If you care as I do. . .please share these comments!!!!

1.2  TRILLION DOLLARS OVER THE COMEING DECADE.  SO WHAT ELSE IS NEW?

I petitioned the White House to address job losses, underemployment and the trade deficit by creating a more even playing field between domestic and international producers of goods and services.  For this petition to be searchable on the White House web site, 150 people must sign it.  If you agree with the concept, please click on the link below and forward this e-mail to as many people as you can.  

I realize that as a Tea Party member, we are opposed to the Obama administration and are therefore not supportive of the We the People initiative.  Indeed, many of the petitions on the website run counter to our goals.  However, I believe our voices should also be heard, even if in a liberal oriented forum.  I will also note that one sensible petition already has over 25,000 signatures (for the reinstatement of Glass Steigel).  Therefore, please use the White House site to express support for changes that we feel will help our country.  Thanks, Tim

https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions/!/petition/enact-international-fair-trade-standards/Yb5jLGLX

Obama used the the G-20 "stage" to play to us, taking only 4 questions, all from American reporters. He said,  “My hope is that the folks back home, including those in the United States Senate and House of Representatives,   think twice before they vote no again on a proposal that economists say would actually make a dent in unemployment”  A Dent? Read on and you'll see why he didn't take any questions from foreign reporters.

 First the members implemented the "Canada Action Plan for Jobs Growth", co-sponsored by India. It is "a wide range blueprint for building foundation of renewed world wide growth". Wow! As leaders of the free world, weren't we suppose to do that?

Second, To add insult to injury, they selected Mark Carney as the Chairman of the Swiss "Financial Stability Board".  His actions as the Bank of Canada's governor are said to account for Canada having
avoided the worst of the recent global financial crisis^. The Canadian economy outperformed those of its G7,  (The top 7 nations of the G-20.),   peers during the crisis, and Canada was the first G7 nation to have both its GDP and employment recover to pre-crisis levels.   Canada has recovered that means our unemployment should be at 7.8 or lower.  Blaming Bush just isn't working anymore.

Before he left  Pinocchio said, "We can't wait for Congress to do its job,” he said. “The middle-class families who’ve been struggling for years are tired of waiting.  So where Congress won’t act, I will." BO  thinks he's king and is forgetting the Constitution....again! Maybe he learned something at the G-20.

I love this: The House of Representatives passed a bi-partisan resolution Nov.1 reaffirming “In God We Trust” as the official motto of the United States. The 396-9 vote came at the request of Rep. Randy Forbes (R-VA) , "Obama’s refusal to correct remarks he made that misstated the motto as “E pluribus unum” instead of “In God We Trust.”
"I trust God, but God wants to see us help ourselves and put people back to work." BO-11/03/11(What an ass!)

Thank you for being CarolynsVoice, because I don't have one. 

Join us Monday evening @ 9 pm EST, when we'll have as our guest conservative columnist, pundit and author Burt Prelutsky.  If that's not enough for ya, here's the promo I sent out elsewhere as well;

Especially during the Obama administration Mathews has exhibited a particularly rabid bias against the Republicans and all that associate themselves with the Conservative viewpoint. I have noticed of late that Mathews seems to finally be more amenable to acknowledging the fact that Obama has failed in his efforts to improve the lot of the US population. Its not an overt change, but he does seem to be somewhat less of a blind adherent to the Obama vision. If so. there may be some hope that more of the population will fall away from the "Pied Piper" of the Democrat party that seems bent on leading us all over the cliff into oblivion. 

Ron Paul has always been a peculiar political creature. He is like a two-headed dragon with one side sporting the features of a constitutional purist, and social conservative. The other side is the face of a leftist, embracing the leftist foreign policy of appeasement, and the devil-may-care attitude of many important social issues such as the legalization of pot, and the "War on Drugs." But a two-headed anything is also two-faced and it is dangerous to trust a two-faced political creature of any party.

Ron claims to be a Republican but his approaches are more Libertarian. He rides on the coattails of the GOP because he otherwise would never have even a ghost of a chance of winning the presidential nomination. There is what I call a "ornery cabal" of disgruntled activists who adore Ron Paul, and who through no measure of reasoning, will closely scrutinize their two-headed dragon. Their strategy is instead to pick apart every little imperfection they see in every other conservative candidate from Herman to Mitt to Michelle. They challenge the good conservatives now in Congress who are up against a bulwark of decades-old big government policies and practices that cannot be hammered away overnight. And yet they cite Constitutional precepts when their goals are not met within a few months after an election. They think that in 2011 we can govern like it was 1787.

This ornery cabal would not be a problem if they were not so dangerous. The danger lies in their knee-jerk tendency to run Independent candidates against any Republican who does not live up to their expectations of Constitutional purity and the superhuman ability to remake a dysfunctional Congress into a well-oiled machine working within an ideally balanced triumvirate government, overnight. Despite the fact that it will take a majority of conservatives in both houses of congress, and a strong conservative president many months, if not years, to redirect the course of America's economy, national defense, and social issues, some Ron Paul supporters rail against the very steps that are being taken by our majority in one house of the congress, which is but one branch of three, as if the current Republicans in government we the scourge of the planet. Their vitriol is so unreasonable that they will embrace Independents who are much more liberal and big-government oriented than the Republicans with whom they are so dissatisfied.

Now to the question of Ron Paul's Antisemitism: He has been accused by at least two iconic Jewish Conservatives of cold indifference for the well-being and fate of Israel, if not outright contempt for the Jewish people.  In one of the following video clips David Horowitz describes Israel as "a tiny Democracy surrounded by Islamic dictatorships in the Middle East." He asks Ron Paul rhetorically, "isn't that in itself worth defending?" Yet Ron Paul adheres stubbornly to his isolationist policies. Policies which, by the way, are disastrous not just for Israel, but for all of our foreign allies and, ultimately, for the security of the United States.

David Horowitz: Ron Paul's Antisemitism

Ben Stein on Ron Paul's Antisemitism

Ron Paul supporters, I ask but two thing of you. First, examine your adored leader with the same eye of scrutiny with which you study every other GOP candidate. Second, remember that if Ron Paul runs a third party campaign it will guarantee another 4 years of Barak Obama, Obamacare, overstretched and undefined military actions, social decline, economic catastrophe, and the death knell to our precious Constitution. If you run Ron Paul you will get exactly the opposite of what you think he stands for.

LETS BE AMERICA AGAIN,  A COUNTRY WE CAN BE PROUD OF, NOT A SECOND RATE COUNTRY OR A THIRD WORLD COUNTRY.

Monday, December 1, 1986

Taxpayer wages 11-year feud with IRS

By Joe Brogan, Palm Beach Post Staff Writer

Joseph W. Smith Jr. is convinced he’ll never have any peace as long as he’s a taxpayer and the Internal Revenue Service exists.

He’s driven by an 11-year feud with the IRS over what turned out to be erroneous assessments on his 1973 and 1974 federal income tax returns. The problems started in 1975 when his return was audited.

The IRS twice collected the money, twice returned it with interest after Smith filed suit, and then again tried to collect the money this month—despite a federal court order that said Smith didn’t owe the IRS anything.

Holger Euringer, IRS public relations officer in Jacksonville, said last week that the agency had been wrong all along and that Smith soon would receive a letter of apology from the IRS district director.

“We did make numerous mistakes in the collection procedures,” Euringer said. “We’re very sorry and we apologize. We did not intend in any way to harass or intimidate him, but I can see why he might have that impression.”

The 61-year-old Smith said his long ordeal has made him bitter.

“I don’t believe it was unintentional,” he said. “If ever there has been a case of deprivation of rights, a violation of the due process clause, this is true in my case. The federal government is a lawless renegade.”

Smith, who operates a videotaping business from his home at 2009 S. Olive Ave., has asked for court orders since 1975 against what he termed, “an out-and-out government fraud.”

While generating a snowstorm of legal documents, the outspoken Texas native has battled one of the government’s most powerful agencies largely without help from attorneys.

Court documents, IRS letters and Smith’s files tell a chilling story of IRS bumbling that began in 1975 when the agency disagreed with Smith on how much he owed on 1973 and 1974 taxes.

After the audit, the IRS said Smith owed $1,468 in back taxes in addition to what he had paid. Smith disagreed, so the IRS took out the money he was owed in rebates as a result of business losses in other years.

Smith filed suit, but the government kept the money until just before his 1978 hearing in U.S. Tax Court, when IRS officials admitted the assessment was inaccurate, according to court records.

The IRS said the error was caused by confusion over what Smith and his ex-wife individually owed in 1974, the year they were divorced.  The court ruled that he owed only $640 for 1974, and the rest of the assessment was refunded to him. The court also said Smith had been overcharged $300 in 1973, and ordered a refund.

During the three years it took to get his suit settled, Smith said the IRS held $5,000 it owed him because of business-related operating loss rebates. He said the IRS first applied part of that money to the erroneous assessment. He said he later was paid the full amount of the rebates.

Euringer said the IRS is not allowed to withhold refunds pending the outcome of court cases unless the total amount is applied to taxes owed.“If what he’s saying is correct, we were wrong,” he said.

Then in 1980, the IRS took a second look at Smith’s 1973 and 1974 tax returns and said he owed $2,556 plus interest.  The IRS took that money out of proceeds from the sale of a condominium in Portland, Ore.

Smith said he told the IRS about the previous tax court decision and said he didn’t owe the money. The IRS stuck by its decision, and he filed a refund claim for the $2,556, which he said the IRS failed to answer.

Euringer, however, said the IRS rejected the claim, which allowed Smith to take the matter to court.

In 1983, Smith filed suit in U. S. District Court in West Palm Beach to get the money back.

But before the case could go to trial, according to documents from the tax division of the U.S. Justice Department, the division declared the $2,556 assessment a wrongful levy.

Kayla Lettow, a tax auditor with the examination section of the agency’s Problems Resolution Office, said last week that the assessment was dropped because Oregon IRS revenue officer W. J. Manderfeld incorrectly analyzed Smith’s tax liability.

So on Nov. 28, 1984, Smith signed an agreement with Justice in which he dropped the suit in exchange for a refund of the $2,556, plus $1,675 in interest.

Smith said he waited for months, however, and no check came. So he reopened his suit. On March 11, 1985, U.S. District Court Judge James C. Paine ordered the IRS to pay up in 30 days.

Smith received a check for $4,231 on April 12, 1985, five months after the deal was made and just one day before the government would have been in contempt of Paine’s order.

After that, he said, he put the matter out of his mind and figured the final chapter had been written.

But on Oct. 23, 1986, he said, an IRS revenue agent came to his door demanding that he pay $3,130 in assessments, interest and penalties owed on his 1974 taxes. He said the agent told him the IRS mistakenly had refunded the money.

“I couldn’t believe it,” Smith said. “I told her I didn’t owe it and that I had a court order to prove it. She said she didn’t know anything about that but I should give her a check, and now. I told her to tell the IRS to try to get the money and slammed the door in her face. The agent turned on her heel and muttered that would no problem of the IRS.”

Action wasn’t long in coming. On Nov. 5, the IRS issued a notice to Barnett Bank of Palm Beach saying it  wanted the $960 in Smith’s bank account because he owed $96l.70 on his 1974 return.

Euringer said the Nov. 5 bank account levy was a mistake.

Nixon Was A Fascist

I owned and operated a successful lumber business. Nixon put in place price controls that favored America’s largest lumber producers and penalized independents—my suppliers. He put hundreds of independent lumber mills out of business.  Stagflation, government’s means of taxing us through inflation, put me out of business.

My wife divorced me and legally grabbed all of our property, leaving me with nothing. The IRS cooperated with her to illegally tax me. A conspiracy left me struggling to exist. I was locked out for non-payment of rent.  I was called an illegal tax protester.

COMMUNISM… FASCISM…. HAS ARRIVED…
 

Great Youtube by Larry Elder,

A fool appears to always be right until they are questioned.  There is definite contrary opinions by historians and when bias is clearly used objectivity is lost.  This is why Larry Elder raises the question regarding journalism.  Journalist are suppose to have code of ethics similar to doctors however, Chris Mathews personal agenda has clearly eroded his professional ethics.  The following is the NY Times article cited

IN his inaugural address, President John F. Kennedy expressed in two eloquent sentences, often invoked by Barack Obama, a policy that turned out to be one of his presidency’s — indeed one of the cold war’s — most consequential: “Let us never negotiate out of fear. But let us never fear to negotiate.” Arthur Schlesinger Jr., Kennedy’s special assistant, called those sentences “the distinctive note” of the inaugural.

They have also been a distinctive note in Senator Obama’s campaign, and were made even more prominent last week when President Bush, in a speech to Israel’s Parliament, disparaged a willingness to negotiate with America’s adversaries as appeasement. Senator Obama defended his position by again enlisting Kennedy’s legacy: “If George Bush and John McCain have a problem with direct diplomacy led by the president of the United States, then they can explain why they have a problem with John F. Kennedy, because that’s what he did with Khrushchev.”

But Kennedy’s one presidential meeting with Nikita Khrushchev, the Soviet premier, suggests that there are legitimate reasons to fear negotiating with one’s adversaries. Although Kennedy was keenly aware of some of the risks of such meetings — his Harvard thesis was titled “Appeasement at Munich” — he embarked on a summit meeting with Khrushchev in Vienna in June 1961, a move that would be recorded as one of the more self-destructive American actions of the cold war, and one that contributed to the most dangerous crisis of the nuclear age.

Senior American statesmen like George Kennan advised Kennedy not to rush into a high-level meeting, arguing that Khrushchev had engaged in anti-American propaganda and that the issues at hand could as well be addressed by lower-level diplomats. Kennedy’s own secretary of state, Dean Rusk, had argued much the same in a Foreign Affairs article the previous year: “Is it wise to gamble so heavily? Are not these two men who should be kept apart until others have found a sure meeting ground of accommodation between them?”

But Kennedy went ahead, and for two days he was pummeled by the Soviet leader. Despite his eloquence, Kennedy was no match as a sparring partner, and offered only token resistance as Khrushchev lectured him on the hypocrisy of American foreign policy, cautioned America against supporting “old, moribund, reactionary regimes” and asserted that the United States, which had valiantly risen against the British, now stood “against other peoples following its suit.” Khrushchev used the opportunity of a face-to-face meeting to warn Kennedy that his country could not be intimidated and that it was “very unwise” for the United States to surround the Soviet Union with military bases.

Kennedy’s aides convinced the press at the time that behind closed doors the president was performing well, but American diplomats in attendance, including the ambassador to the Soviet Union, later said they were shocked that Kennedy had taken so much abuse. Paul Nitze, the assistant secretary of defense, said the meeting was “just a disaster.” Khrushchev’s aide, after the first day, said the American president seemed “very inexperienced, even immature.” Khrushchev agreed, noting that the youthful Kennedy was “too intelligent and too weak.” The Soviet leader left Vienna elated — and with a very low opinion of the leader of the free world.

Kennedy’s assessment of his own performance was no less severe. Only a few minutes after parting with Khrushchev, Kennedy, a World War II veteran, told James Reston of The New York Times that the summit meeting had been the “roughest thing in my life.” Kennedy went on: “He just beat the hell out of me. I’ve got a terrible problem if he thinks I’m inexperienced and have no guts. Until we remove those ideas we won’t get anywhere with him.”

A little more than two months later, Khrushchev gave the go-ahead to begin erecting what would become the Berlin Wall. Kennedy had resigned himself to it, telling his aides in private that “a wall is a hell of a lot better than a war.” The following spring, Khrushchev made plans to “throw a hedgehog at Uncle Sam’s pants”: nuclear missiles in Cuba. And while there were many factors that led to the missile crisis, it is no exaggeration to say that the impression Khrushchev formed at Vienna — of Kennedy as ineffective — was among them.

If Barack Obama wants to follow in Kennedy’s footsteps, he should heed the lesson that Kennedy learned in his first year in office: sometimes there is good reason to fear to negotiate.

I remember that Soros was declared a criminal in France and in one SE Asian country, can't remember if it was Cambodia or Laos. He is prohibited entry in these countries because of his destructive efforts to devestate those countries both financially, civilly and politically. He almost brought the British pound down in one of his massive trading schemes to short that currency.

To that end, the article link I am posting below should me a MUST READ for everyone on this site and it should go viral and be sent to both Darrell Issa and all the investigative members on the House investigative committee. They Will and Must pay attention if enough of us contact his and other committee members' through emails and calls.

Until we cut off the ability of Soros, through his secret hedge fund, to manipulate the markets, pay off corrupted elected officials, and the media itself, nothing we do to tinker with the tax code or puny budget "fixes." will delay the destruction of this country. I truly believe we only have several months, at the MOST, to get cracking and get this committee and our elected officials to call for action. Please read the article below to see why all the things we are concentrating on now are nothing but diversions unless we cut off these globalists' ability to control the financials of the market worldwide and bring down our free market to enrich the corrupt of the world and enslave the working men and women of this once great country. Not one word of exaggeration here.

Read and TAKE ACTION! ---  http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/