All Posts (28256)

Sort by

Where Did All the QE2 Money Go?

What's wrong with this picture? 

Posted on The Blaze-By Scott Baker-On June 12, 2011:

Zero Hedge:

Courtesy of the recently declassified Fed discount window documents, we now know that the biggest beneficiaries of the Fed’s generosity during the peak of the credit crisis were foreign banks, among which Belgium’s Dexia was the most troubled, and thus most lent to, bank.

Having been thus exposed, many speculated that going forward the US central bank would primarily focus its “rescue”efforts on US banksnot US-based (or local branches) of foreign (read European) banks: after all that’s what the ECB is for, while the Fed’s role is to stimulate US employment and to keep US inflation modest.

And furthermore, should the ECB need to bail out its banks, it could simply do what the Fed does, and monetize debt, thus boosting its assets, while concurrently expanding its excess reserves thus generating fungible capital which would go to European banks. Wrong.

Below we present that not only has the Fed’s bailout of foreign banks not terminated with the drop in discount window borrowings or the unwind of the Primary Dealer Credit Facility, but that the only beneficiary of the reserves generated were US-based branches of foreign banks (which in turn turned around and funnelled the cash back to their domestic branches), a shocking finding which explains not only why US banks have been unwilling and, far more importantly, unable to lend out these reserves, but that anyone retaining hopes that with the end of QE2 the reserves that hypothetically had been accumulated at US banks would be flipped to purchase Treasurys, has been dead wrong, therefore making the case for QE3 a done deal.

In summary, instead of doing everything in its power to stimulate reserve, and thus cash, accumulation at domestic (US) banks which would in turn encourage lending to US borrowers, the Fed has been conducting yet another stealthy foreign bank rescue operation, which rerouted $600 billion in capital from potential borrowers to insolvent foreign financial institutions in the past 7 months. QE2 was nothing more (or less) than another European bank rescue operation!

For those who can’t wait for the punchline, here it is. Below we chart the total cash holdings of Foreign-related banks in the US using weekly H.8 data.

{…}

Read the rest here.

Source:

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/zero-hedge-the-feds-600-billion-stealth-bailout-of-foreign-banks-continues-at-the-expense-of-the-domestic-economy-or-explaining-where-all-the-qe2-money-went/

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and video relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. Obamanomics Destroyed the Economy and the Environment!-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Michael Oberndorf-On June 13, 2011:

http://floydreports.com/obamanomics-destroyed-the-economy-and-the-environment/

II. Obama Jokes at Jobs Council: ‘Shovel-Ready Was Not as Shovel-Ready as We Expected’!-Posted on FoxNews.com-On June 13, 2011:

http://nation.foxnews.com/president-obama/2011/06/13/obama-jokes-jobs-council-shovel-ready-was-not-shovel-ready-we-expected

III. Federal data shows troubling unemployment, underemployment trends!-Posted on The Daily Caller-By Neil Munro-On June 10, 2011:

http://dailycaller.com/2011/06/10/federal-data-shows-troubling-unemployment-underemployment-trends/

IV. Nearly Half of Americans Expect Another ‘Great Depression’ in Next 12 Months!-Posted on Conservative Byte-On June 9, 2011:

http://conservativebyte.com/2011/06/cnn-nearly-half-of-americans-expect-another-great-depression-in-next-12-months/

V. Legendary Investor: Approaching Crisis ‘Worse’ Than ’08, Yuan Will be Safer Than Dollar!-Posted on Conservative Byte-On June 9, 2011:

http://conservativebyte.com/2011/06/legendary-investor-approaching-crisis-worse-than-08-yuan-will-be-safer-than-dollar/

VI. The Next Financial Crisis Will Be Hellish And It’s On Its Way!-Posted on Forbes-By ADDISON WIGGIN- On June 1, 2011:

http://blogs.forbes.com/greatspeculations/2011/06/01/the-next-financial-crisis-will-be-hellish-and-its-on-its-way/

VII. Video: Anger Over Obama’s Handling of Economy!-Posted on The Patriot Update-On June 8, 2011:

http://patriotupdate.com/videos/anger-over-obamas-handling-of-economy

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Is the Fed’s concept of buying $600 billion of Treasuries just a smokescreen?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/11/03/is-the-fed’s-concept-of-buying-600-billion-of-treasuries-just-a-smokescreen/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts, please copy web site and paste it on your browser.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered controversial is being censored-what happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…

Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On June 12, 2011:

A backlash has begun against an Indiana Supreme Court ruling that homeowners have no right to resist a police officer’s illegal entry but can argue it later in court.

State lawmakers are seeking a change in the state statutes and asking the court to make the judges fix the problem themselves.

A constitutional expert contends the moves are needed, because the court’s arguments essentially are the same as the idea that “someone can’t use a firearm to protect himself from someone who is threatening to kill him.”

A later argument over such use of a firearm might very well be of no help to the person who wanted to protect himself, the expert, Herb Titus of William J. Olson, P.C., Attorneys at Law, told WND today.

“He might be dead.”

According to local reports when the ruling was released last month, the state Supreme Court concluded that “allowing resistance [to an illegal police entry] unnecessarily escalates the level of violence and therefore the risk of injuries to all parties involved without preventing the arrest.”

The panel, in a 3-2 vote, said that people who are victimized by police entering their homes illegally must not resist but instead could pursue a complaint later in the court system.

The case originated with police officers who responded to a report of a domestic dispute outside of a home. When the officers wanted to follow the man into his home, he resisted, and they shot him with a Taser and arrested him.

“Although some state legislatures have abrogated the common law right to resist arrest, Indiana has not,” explains a friend-of-the-court brief filed by dozens of state lawmakers. “The right to resist arrested in the streets is quite different from the right to resist unlawful entry into one’s home – for arrest, investigation, or any other purpose.”

The brief, asking the state Supreme Court to rehear the case, said, “The public policy of this state, as embodied in the 2006 legislation, has been to grant our citizens greater autonomy to protect themselves from unlawful incursions into their homes.”

According to the brief, the state in 2006 specifically adopted a law that explains a person is justified in using “reasonable force, including deadly force, against another person: and does not have a duty to retreat; if the person reasonably believes that the force is necessary to prevent or terminate the other person’s unlawful entry of or attack on the person’s dwelling, curtilage, or occupied motor vehicle.”

“Any rule that encourages ‘immediate surrender’ whenever a person hears the word ‘police!’ or sees a badge could expose citizens to a great risk of harm. …

For example, a serial killer in Pennsylvania used a police disguise to gain entry into a home where he raped and strangled a woman, and men claiming to be narcotics agents in Alabama kicked in a door and stole money ... after hitting the occupant on the head.

“These headlines need not be replicated in Indiana. Rather, granting rehearing is appropriate to narrow this court’s holding and apprise our citizens that they retain the venerable right to reasonably resist unlawful entry into their homes by police.”

State Sen. Mike Young, who played a key role in getting the 71 lawmakers together on the brief, also confirmed that he will craft legislation to respond to the court’s ruling.

At the time, Young noted the judges “overturned a basic common law that dates back to the English Magna Carta nearly 800 years ago. This flies in the face of our 4th Amendment right in the U.S. Constitution, protecting us against unreasonable search and seizure.”

“When someone enters your home illegally at 3 a.m., your first thought is not what court will have jurisdiction, but, rather, what do I need to do to protect my family,” Young said.

“Few issues before this court have galvanized the public’s attention and concern as much as the declaration in this case that the right to reasonably resist an unlawful police entry into a home is no longer recognized under Indiana law,” Young said. “Rehearing is appropriate to reconsider that holding in light of Indiana’s robust self-defense statute.”

But Justice Steven David wrote for the court that if a police officer decides to enter a home – for any reason or no reason at all – a homeowner cannot do anything the stop him.

Even state Attorney General Greg Zoeller, who argued the winning side in the state Supreme Court case, endorsed the idea of a rehearing.

“In supporting a rehearing, the state will continue to argue that [the] convictions should be upheld, but on more narrow grounds. We contend that under the circumstances, the police entry of [the] residence was legal: The officers responding to the 911 call sought to avoid leaving the alleged victim with the defendant after a confrontation outside. So while there is no right to commit battery with police, I believe the individual has the right to shut the door, stand his ground and communicate with police without engaging in an altercation. In balancing the perils of domestic violence with respect to law enforcement, I will continue to advise our police clients to respect people’s Fourth Amendment rights.”

Titus told WND that the court’s move is symptomatic of the moves in U.S. courts to weaken the principle of private property.

“We [recently] filed a brief in the U.S. Supreme Court in another case involving GPS searches,” he said. “And in our brief we urged the court to return to the original meaning of the 4th Amendment, which is based on property as contrasted to privacy.”

“The Indiana court openly stated that they were reversing something that has been in the common law for centuries. … A lot of people have forgotten why the amendment is in the Constitution. It was designed if you own your house, the property is a barrier to keep the government out.”

When courts substitute “privacy” for “property,” however, it can mean anything, he noted.

He explained that over history the government had to show a “superior property interest” before searches could happen. In the Indiana case, he said, the entry “completely disregards the sanctity of the home. It disregards the property interest that serves as a barrier to government intrusion.”

He said while that is “divorced” from constitutional foundations, it is the argument judges use in current cases.

They act, he said, by the dictates of what they believe should happen.

“This comes as part of the evolution of law,” he said. “They believe the law is changing to meet changes in society. The law becomes an instrument in the hands of the courts or the hands of some other government official to achieve whatever it is they want.

“They live in a world in which they presume that the rules governing them are mere constructs, instruments that a ruling class has decided to be what they want to happen, what they think. There aren’t any fixed rules.”

WND columnist Nat Henthoff, an authority on the First Amendment and Bill of Rights, said there are other recent cases in which the 4th Amendment has come under fire.

“On May 16, 2011, in these United States, eight justices, apparently unaware of the deep roots the Fourth Amendment has in our history, ruled in Kentucky v. King – as warned in the interpretation of the lone dissenter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg – to suspend the Fourth Amendment,” he wrote. “How ‘secure’ do our homes remain if police, armed with no warrant, can pound on doors at will and, on hearing sounds indicative of things moving, forcibly enter and search for evidence of unlawful activity?”

He explained that Lexington, Ky., case involved police who suspected there was a drug operation in an apartment.

“They went to the wrong apartment. But outside that apartment, they smelled marijuana, knocked hard, announced who they were and at that point heard noises coming from inside the apartment. What could these sounds be caused by? Evidence being destroyed, the police believed, but without actual proof,” he wrote.

“In view of the marijuana smell and what they suspected, they could have easily obtained a warrant. Judges are very accommodating in this context. But the police roared they were going in and knocked down the door,” he explained.

The federal government also has been accused of violating the 4th Amendment’s protections in its new procedures to take virtually nude body images of airline travelers, or subject them to physical pat-downs critics have likened to public sexual assaults.

There are a number of legal challenges continuing to the procedures.”

Source:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=309233

Note:  The following articles and/or blog posts relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. No right to resist unlawful police entry, rules Indiana Supreme Court: ‘Decision says resisting officers would increase risk of violence’!-Posted on News Sentinal-Fort Wayne IN-By The Associated Press-Updated on May 14, 2011:

http://www.news-sentinel.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/SE/20110514/NEWS/105140339

II. Cedar Falls, Iowa City Council defies citizens; says YES to the United Nations and NO to the 4th Amendment!-Posted on The Gaspee Gazette-On June 11, 2011:

http://gaspeegazette.wordpress.com/2011/06/11/cedar-falls-iowa-city-council-defies-citizens-says-yes-to-the-united-nations-and-no-to-the-4th-amendment/

III. Former Marine killed by SWAT was acting in defense, family says!-Posted on KGun9.com-By Joel Waldman-Updated on May 27, 2011:

http://www.kgun9.com/story/14621212/marine-killed-by-swat-was-actin…

IV. Ex-Marine’s lawyer opens up about SWAT, questions Sheriff!-Posted on KGun9.com-By Joel Waldman-Updated on May 19, 2011:

http://www.kgun9.com/story/14674077/marines-lawyer-opens-up-about-s…

V.  States to federal gov't: Stop feeling up fliers!-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On March 7, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=271773

Note:  My following blog post contains numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

It’s Getting Very Serious Now!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/15/it’s-getting-very-serious-now/

What is the ultimate goal of the TSA fiasco?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/11/26/what-is-the-ultimate-goal-of-the-tsa-fiasco/

New World Order By Executive Order!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/13/new-world-order-by-executive-order/

Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts, please copy web site and paste it on your browser.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered controversial is being censored-what happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…

Freedom's Phoenix

Freedom’s Phoenix

 

From the ashes of decline, shall rise, a great phoenix

On the wings of American exceptionalism

A symbol of  “We the people”, republicanism

 

The founding fathers in their wisdom did greatly fear

Two very dangerous things, that more than any other,

A standing army or central bank, liberty would smother

 

The Constitution, Article 1 and the laws of the land

Were intended to protect the people from being ripped off

In refusing to be audited, the Fed and Pentagon do scoff

 

The earmarks flourish, while our Liberty shrivels

For the power and the glory of a Capitol hill few

Who blindly throw our money in the pot, as if, fixing a stew

 

We have a standing Army, in spite of our founders fear

It has its own air force, as does the Navy and its army, the Marines

All in addition to the US Air Force, flying must be in the genes

 

The Pentagon has bases galore and on nearly every shore

Duplicative programs abound, as the branches trust not each other

If this, be the case, why should we people trust one branch or another?

 

We spend nearly as much on defense as the rest of the world combined

Yet our weapons systems are aging and our troops often do suffer

As the sheer size of the DOD bureaucracy, our success does buffer

 

Put the Pentagon under scrutiny, to trim the waste, and unnecessary spending

Before financial calamity doth spark a round of indiscriminate cuts

Our security put at risk, by the unwitting in Congress or those without guts

 

We have a great Central Bank that we all know as “the Fed”

We know not what they do, for they report not to Congress

Operating audit free, cronyism run amok, part of the mess

 

They are printing new money at an alarming rate

We know not to whom they give it, only who they come to,

“We the people”, whenever, the piper’s bill doth come due.

 

 

As the founders feared, unchecked, our government has grown too big

Big enough to give to some, everything that they want and need

Big enough to take from others, all they have, down to the seed

 

There is a movement afoot, across this great land

To spread the light of truth and fiscal awareness

By bringing to bear, transparency, audits and fairness

 

It is a movement born of the spirit, the heart and soul of our great Nation

Men and women uniting with purpose, Liberty’s flame burning, in their heart

Restoring pride, honor and moral bearing that our nation, be not, torn apart

 

Won’t you please read, and join us in signing, the Pentagon Petition

Demanding of the Congress, fair and orderly cuts in the spending

Bringing all departments to the table and leaving no sacred cows pending

 

If you have had enough and are tired of watching your Country decline

Join the ranks of the patriots who are uniting and working together

To see our Republic flourish once more and our exceptionalism un-tether.

 

Tom Whitmore

Copyright 2011, Thomas J Whitmore

 

Please Sign the Petition here: http://committeefortherepublic.org/?page_id=9

 

 

 

 

Read more…

 

 

Charles Rangel Brilliant Defense of Weiner: “At least He Wasn’t Going out With Little Boys!”



By John W. Lillpop

Leave it to Charles Rangel, self-anointed moral ombudsman for the Democrat Party, to come up with an argument in favor of Anthony Weiner that may save the other  disgraced New York Democrat from House banishment and perhaps worse.

Rangel’s brilliant argument, terse but tough, consisted of the following quotable quote, “At Least He(Weiner) didn’t go out with little boys!”


Hmmm.

Just how can you be sure, Charlie? Remember, the Weiner scandal started out as a third-rate hack job by a pervert, according to Weiner. It then escalated to an admitted bit of “foolishness” on Weiner's part, but not worthy of headline news or resignation.

The next shoe to drop was the news that Weiner was somehow involved, digitally, with a 17-year-old girl in Cyberspace chit chat, none of which was inappropriate or salacious.

According to Weiner, that is.

To say that Weiner’s recent record with respect to the truth is somewhat tainted would be akin to saying that Congress spends too much! The obvious is, well—too damn obvious.

Still, there is a bit of good news that Charlie could have used to defend the wayward Weiner: At least he did not cheat on his taxes!

What say ye, Charles?


Read more…

Posted on The Blaze-By Naked Emperor News-On June 12, 2011:

“Report: US gives Netanyahu ultimatum on resuming talks.

Israel Radio Reported Sunday that The United States gave Netanyahu an ultimatum on renewing negotiations with the Palestinians.

According to the ultimatum, Netanyahu has to decide within a month whether he agrees to accept US President Obama’s proposal and resume talks based on 1967 lines.

Washington is pressuring Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to accede to its proposal to resume Israeli-Palestinian peace talks on the basis of U.S. President Barack Obama’s May 19 speech.

An Israeli source who spoke recently with senior officials in Washington said the Americans were very frustrated with Netanyahu’s behavior, feeling that he was impeding America’s efforts to keep the Palestinians from unilaterally seeking UN recognition of a state in September.

Netanyahu’s personal envoy, Isaac Molho, spent last week in Washington, where the Americans presented their proposal for resuming talks on the basis of Obama’s speech. Specifically, Obama’s plan calls for negotiating over borders and security first, while deferring issues such as Jerusalem and the refugees until later. It also calls for the borders to be based on the 1967 lines, with mutually agreed land swaps.

The Americans told Molho that to block European initiatives such as France’s proposal for an international peace conference in Paris, they must have something concrete to offer, like Netanyahu‘s agreement to negotiate on the basis of Obama’s speech.

The U.S. proposal was also given to chief Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat, who said the Palestinians would resume talks on this basis.

Meanwhile, a European diplomat who was briefed on Molho’s talks in Washington said they were fruitless. “The Americans didn’t get anything new from Molho,” the diplomat said.

This week, American diplomat David Hale will arrive in Israel to hold further meetings with both Molho and Erekat. Hale is temporarily replacing George Mitchell, the U.S. special envoy who resigned earlier this year.

An Israeli source who maintains close ties with both senior U.S. officials and people close to Netanyahu said that Washington‘s frustration began with Netanyahu’s trip to Washington last month, when he publicly fought with Obama and then refused in an address to Congress to endorse the president’s outline for talks. The Americans were now speaking very harshly of Netanyahu, said the source.

“He’s asking us to protect him in September, but he isn’t giving us any tools with which to help him,” the source quoted one American official as saying. “Instead of helping us, he’s making it harder for us.”

As a result, American officials complained, Obama was unable to get Britain and France to commit to opposing a unilateral Palestinian move when he visited Europe last month.

“The Americans need Israel inside, but Netanyahu isn’t there yet,” the source said. “To date, from the American and European perspective, Israel hasn’t given anything.”

European diplomats said Netanyahu’s speech to Congress was viewed in Europe as one long “no” and had thus increased European distrust of him. “We want to hear Netanyahu say he‘s willing to negotiate on the basis of Obama’s speech and that he’ll discuss borders based on the 1967 lines with land swaps,” said one diplomat.

Since the barren talks with Molho last week, the White House has been upping the pressure on Netanyahu.

On Friday, Steve Simon, who heads the U.S. National Security Council’s Middle East desk, told American Jewish leaders that Netanyahu needs to reply within a month to the U.S. proposal for restarting talks.

The White House knew this remark would both be conveyed to Netanyahu and leaked to the American and Israeli press, thus making its displeasure public.”

Source:

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/obama-gives-netanyahu-ultimatum-on-resuming-talks/

Note:  The following article and/or blog post and video relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. Video: Minutes After Muslims Are Allowed to Participate in the Friday Prayers They Throw Rocks at Jewish Worshipers!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=EGcOEZ7TO_g

II. Obama Inspired Ship to Join IHH Gaza Flotilla!-Posted on Israel National News-By Gavriel Queenann-On June 3, 2011:

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/144733#replies

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Is Israel the next Arab Facebook Campaign?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/03/30/is-israel-the-next-arab-facebook-campaign/

Godfather of The Islamic Revolution!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/11/godfather-of-the-islamic-revolution/

Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts, please copy web site and paste it on your browser.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered controversial is being censored-what happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…

Posted on CNSNews.com-By Matt Cover-On June 13, 2011:

(CNSNews.com) - CIA Director Leon Panetta, who President Barack Obama has nominated to be secretary of Defense, told the Senate Armed Services Committee on Thursday that he believes the president can unilaterally use military force, without congressional authorization to “protect our national interests.”

Panetta’s claim of broad unilateral presidential power to initiate U.S. military action absent an attack or imminent threat to the United States came in response to a question from Sen. John McCain—who said he agreed with Panetta.

The U.S. is now involved militarily in Libya even though Congress has never authorized that involvement.

“Does it worry you if the Congress begins to tell the commander in chief as to exactly … what the president can or cannot do in any conflict?” asked McCain.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EOr8VraYnEU&feature=player_embedded

“Senator, I believe very strongly that the president has the constitutional power as commander in chief to take steps that he believes are necessary to protect this country and protect our national interests,” said Panetta. “And obviously, I think it’s important for presidents to consult, to have the advice of Congress. But in the end, I believe he has the constitutional power to do what he has to do to protect this country.”

Article 1, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution says Congress “shall have Power … to declare War, grant letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make rules concerning Captures on Land and Water.”  At the constitutional convention in 1787, James Madison of Virginia and Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts proposed that the word “declare” war be inserted in place of “make” war in this passage so that it would leave the president the limited power to “repel sudden attacks.”  Madison’s proposal was adopted.

Madison notes from the Constitutional Convention clearly indicate that the drafters of the Constitution meant to deny the president the power to initiate military action by the United States except when necessary for self-defense.

“The Executive should be able to repel and not to commence war.”

President Barack Obama expressed this same interpretation when he was a presidential candidate. On Dec. 20, 2008, he told the Boston Globe: “The president does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation.”

However, with the ongoing Libyan operation, President Obama has maintained that he does not need explicit congressional authorization because he has sufficient authority as commander-in-chief to attack Libya, even though he admits that Libya did not attack the United States nor did it pose any direct military threat.

Instead, Obama contends that the civil war currently underway there threatens regional stability and thus endanger U.S. national interests in the region. Obama also contends that his administration has sufficiently consulted with Congress by briefing key members on the details of the operation, arguing that in doing so he has secured congressional consent for the attacks.

Sen. Jim Webb (D-Va.) told Panetta that while there was no question about the president’s authority to defend the country in case of an attack or to fulfill treaty obligations, a “unilateral” military decision such as Obama’s attacks on Libya “needs to be subject to the review and direction of the Congress.”

Panetta said it was “very important” for the president to consult with Congress after he takes military action, saying that“hopefully” Congress will agree that military action is necessary.

“[O]nce those [military] decisions are made, in order for those decisions to be sustained,  that it’s very important to work with the  Congress and seek the best advice and counsel of the Congress and hopefully get the Congress’ support for those actions,”said Panetta.

Critics of American involvement in the NATO-led attacks on Libya have argued that Obama lacks the constitutional authority to commit U.S. forces there, claiming that while the president is commander and chief, he must first seek congressional authorization before deploying any military forces, except in the case of an attack on the United States.”

Source:

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/panetta-obama-can-use-military-...

Note:  The following articles and/or blog posts relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. Ten Questions for Defense Secretary Nominee Leon Panetta!-Posted on The Weekly Standard-By DANIEL HALPER-On June 9, 2011:

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/ten-questions-defense-secretary...

II. Obama Kills the War Powers Act!-Posted on National Review Online-By RICH LOWRY-On June 7, 2011:

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/268973/obama-kills-war-power...

III. Obama’s Contempt for War Powers Act Earns Him Bipartisan Rebuke from U.S. House!-Posted Canada Free Press-By John Lillpop-On June 4, 2011:

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/37227

IV. Obama is Impeachable over Libya!-Posted on AIM-BY CLIFF KINCAID-On June 2, 2011:

http://www.aim.org/aim-column/forget-weinergate-obama-is-impeachabl...

V. Podesta: Obama Can Use ‘Armed Forces’ To Push Progressive Agenda-Posted on The Blaze-By Jonathon M. Seidl-On November 18, 2010:

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/podesta-obama-can-use-armed-forces-...

VI. Can the U.S. Cut Defense Spending Wisely?-Posted on The Brookings Institution-By Michael E. O'Hanlon, Director of Research and Senior Fellow, Foreign Policy, 21st Century Defense Initiative-On June 10, 2011:

http://www.brookings.edu/multimedia/video/2011/0610_at_brookings_po...

VII. Media Blackout: CIA director accused of links to Communist spy contact—scandal ignored!-Posted on RenewAmerica-By Wes Vernon-On June 13, 2011:

http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/vernon/110613?utm_source=getresponse&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=asinews&utm_content=%5BASI%5D+Is+the+Panetta+Scandal+the+Next+Alger+Hiss+Case%3F

VIII. Obama’s CIA Director Linked to Spies Through Communist Party Figure!-Posted on TrevorLoudon.com-By Trevor-On June 8, 2011:

http://trevorloudon.com/2011/06/panetta-hearing-for-secdef-on-thursday-obama’s-cia-director-linked-to-spies-through-communist-party-figure/

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

The Military Pays the Price for Obama’s Agenda!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/08/11/the-military-pays-the-pric...

Godfather of The Islamic Revolution!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/11/godfather-of-the-islamic-r...

Progressives and Communists Are Out of the Closet Together!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/05/progressives-and-communists-are-out-of-the-closet-together/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-underst...

Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts, please copy web site and paste it on your browser.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered controversial is being censored-what happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…

 

 
 
“That’s right, in Texas they have part-time citizen lawmakers rather than a lot of professional politicians clogging up the scene all year round every single year.”
  
 
“. . . Texas dodged almost the full-brunt of the sub-prime lending crisis.” 
 
 
 
 
Texas Grows 38% of Nation’s New BLS Jobs;
45% in REAL STATISTICAL Terms
 
 
            Like the silly unemployment numbers used by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) measuring new job growth across the nation by BLS nonsense is a lesson in frustration. Nevertheless, according to BLS statistics since the financial meltdown ended (officially we’ve been recovering since June 2009) one state (Texas) has dominated the new job generation picture. 38% of all new jobs in the nation were created in Texas. So it took entire rest of the country 49 states and Washington, D.C. taken altogether to create the 62% of our new jobs that Texas didn’t create. 
If instead of BLS statistics we use the far more accurate and straightforward non-farm payroll employment, Texas accounts for 45% of all new job creation.    Texas, North Dakota, Alaska and Washinton, D.C. are the only areas to show a net job growth since the beginning of the meltdown. The District of Columbia, of course, benefitted from the huge growth in government size created by the Obama administration’s stimulus and regulation and new agencies (one law alone, Obamacare, created 384 brand new federal government agencies) programs. 
Texas created roughly 72,000 more jobs, 266,000 in total) than the next two successful states (New York and Pennsylvania) put together and roughly 1,000 fewer jobs than the sum total of the other forty-seven states combined. This should come as no surprise since Texas is easily the most business friendly  free market state in the union. These kind of figures are one reason that Texas Governor Rick Perry (though so far he’s UNannounced, is considered an important and necessary candidate in the Republican presidential polling). 
Overall, eighteen states have lost jobs since the Obama-recovery began in June, 2009; California alone has lost 11,400 jobs. Thanks to Obama’s growth of government D.C. payrolls have increased 18,000 jobs since the meltdown began in mid 2007 compared to Texas’ 30,800 new jobs over the same period all the while the Lone Star State was eliminating government jobs and trial lawyer jobs (it’s harder for them to find work in Texas now due to new tort regulations that protect business and doctors from nuisance suits).
Besides the new tort laws, Texas has no state income tax. Its regulatory conditions are contained and flexible. It is fiscally responsible and government is small. Its right-to-work law doesn't impose unions on businesses or employees. It is always wide-open to global trade and competition. The words “government interference” are seldom heard in Texas where the state legislatute meets for roughly one-half year and then takes off the next eighteen months . . . that’s right, in Texas they have part-time citizen lawmakers rather than a lot of professional politicians clogging up the scene all year round, every single year.
Perhaps the single healthiest pro-jobs condition in Texas is the state rule in place since 1998, that limits mortgage borrowing to 80% of the appraised value of the home. Like a large minimum down payment, this reduces problems associated with over-leveraging and means Texas wasn't hurt nearly as badly by the housing crash as other states.   So Texas dodged almost the full-brunt of the sub-prime lending crisis. Think about these five facts (the next five paragraphs) . . .
In 1975 before the Carter administration created the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 (CRA ’77) the questionable loan rate in the country was 0.24% of all home mortgages offered at 3% down payment or less (Texas, now, you’ll remember is requiring 20% minimum). The nation was largely operating as a free market in the home mortgage industry.
By 1985 with ACORN operating mainly only in one medium-sized state, Arkansas, (ACORN in those days stood for Arkansas Community Organizations For Reform Now) forcing mortgage lenders there to make knowingly bad loans in accord with CRA ’77 . . . the suspect loan rate more than doubled to 0.51%. ACORN was, of course, the driving force also for putting Bill Clinton into the governor’s mansion in Little Rock for 12 of the next 14 years and into the Oval Office after that. Except for Arkansas, the nation was still operating as a free market with regard to home mortgages.
After three legislative expansions in Washington (one by G.H.W. Bush; two by Clinton), a huge regulatory expansion of CRA ’77 by Clinton in 1993, and ACORN being expanded across the whole nation: the suspect loan rate jumped to 14.1% in 1995. ACORN was very busy, including a Chicago-area ACORN attorney named Barack Obama who was shaking down banks to make ever more bad loans and even to get ACORN donations from them. ACORN now had it’s present meaning of Associations of Community Organizations for Reform Now and operated in all fifty states. The free market in home mortgages is wiped out.
About the same time as Bill Clinton was paying off his friends at ACORN for their support in 1998, by passing the steroid version of CRA ’77 expansion . . . Texas, with George W. Bush as governor, is wisely passing a 1998 law requiring a minimum of 20% down payment on all home mortgage loans. With ACORN’s push, Clinton’s law allows 0% down payments from people without jobs whose only “income” is food stamps. Even illegal aliens are now being put into $440,000 homes by ACORN with less effort than they needed a decade earlier to put better-qualified (but still UNqualified) loan seekers into $110,000 homes. By 2005, the suspect home rate is 34% across the nation. A large percentage of these new loan recipients are getting NO-Down payment loans.
The G.W. Bush administration first tries in January, 2005 to pass a law repealing CRA ’77 but Democrats block it. Finally thirty months later after nineteen speeches on the subject and other direct appeals to Congress, Bush and a bi-partisan group pass a weakened version of Bush’s 2005 bill into law in July, 2007. It helps immensely to save the housing market from utter collapse, but is way too little, way too late to stem the tide of nasty side effects and the financial meltdown begins within three months. The fifteen year long government-created housing bubble is ended.
Let’s sum this up: why has Texas prospered during this great downturn and mediocre “recovery?” Texas has, in a phrase, stuck to real core American values when the rest of the nation was throwing the U.S. Constitution out with the “wash water” and engaging in the wildest unjustified financial hokus-pokus imaginable. Let us learn our lesson from Texas’ wisdom. As the former “Lone Star State,” Texas is the only state with the legal-power to secede from the Union at will . . . we need about forty-nine other states to follow her lead and to uphold the 10th Amendment of the Bill of Rights . . . if the UNITED States is to prove worth saving.
 
 
 
Ya’ll live long, strong and ornery,
Rajjpuut
 
 
  
Read more…

What’s wrong with this picture?

Posted on The Daily Mail-By DANIEL BATES-On June 9, 2011:

Barack Obama has come under fire for extending a formal invitation to a shamed African dictator who has ruthlessly plundered billions of dollars from his own country.

The U.S. President is today having a coveted private meeting with President Ali Bongo of Gabon in the Oval Office despite his appalling track record.

Bongo’s family has ruled the impoverished African nation with an iron fist for five decades and have used its oil riches to fund a life of outrageous luxury.

Meanwhile one third of people in Gabon live on less than $2 a day and thousands starve to death each year or are forced to pick through garbage to find food.

Critics have pointed out that Gabon, with a population of 1.5 million, is the third-largest oil producer in sub-Saharan Africa.

They claim that the only reason Mr Obama has agreed to the meeting is that he wants to curry favour with an ally to secure America’s fuel supplies - regardless of who it is.

The Bongo family’s abuse of Gabon is well-documented and dates back to 1967 when Omar Bongo, Ali’s father, took over.

Two years ago he died paving the way for Ali Bongo to continue the reign of corruption.

Investigations have revealed the Bongos have dozens of luxury homes in places like the French Riviera and a $120million 14-bedroom townhouse in Paris.

During one shopping spree in 2006 Ali Bongo’s then wife balked at the idea of moving into a property that cost a mere $25million.

‘I need something really big, really, really, really big,’ Inge said. ‘I would think for that amount of money, I would expect a bit more grandeur.

‘I’ve tried to downsize, but it’s just not in my character’.

Jack Blum, a United Nations consultant and expert on offshore banking, told ABC News that the meeting with Mr Obama sends out the wrong message.

He said that over the years the Bongos had siphoned off a quarter of Gabon’s GDP which has made them ‘incredibly rich’.

‘There’s absolutely no shame,’ Blum said of Bongo and his cronies.

‘I would say that the people who are running the country are guilty of grand theft nation’.

Senator Carl Levin, D-Michigan, added that: ‘Omar Bongo and now his son Ali Bongo have for more than 40 years run a regime in Gabon which diverts their country’s wealth for their family’s personal use’.

A Congressional report he wrote last year showed that ‘the Bongos misused U.S. financial institutions to carry out suspicious transactions involving millions of dollars.’

Speaking to ABC News White House press secretary Jay Carney admitted that Bongo has a ‘less than sterling’ record.

‘First of all, the president of Gabon is making reform efforts, which we support,’ he said.

‘Secondly ... Gabon has been an important partner in some of the issues that are very important to American national security.’

A spokesman for Bongo claimed that the president is a reformer, but could not explain how he built up such fantastic wealth.

Source:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2001593/Barack-Obama-invites-Gabon-dictator-Ali-Bongo-White-House.html

Note:  The following articles and/or blog posts and videos relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. Lupe Fiasco Calls Obama a “Terrorist”!-Posted on NBC Chicago-By Marcus Riley-On June 8, 2011:

http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/politics/123467904.html

II. Video: Is Our President A Terrorist?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=-fmtJ5kh-50#at=2334

III.  Obama Administration pushing Sharia Law in Kenya!-Posted on ExposeObama.com-On July 12, 2010:

http://www.exposeobama.com/2010/07/12/obama-administration-pushing-sharia-law-in-kenya/?utm_source=Expose+Obama&utm_campaign=2b37e4613a-EO_7_12_107_12_2010&utm_medium=email

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

What we haven’t been told about the President’s background!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/03/what-we-haven’t-been-told-about-the-president’s-background/

Is Shariah Law A Danger To Our U.S. National Security?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/09/16/is-shariah-law-a-danger-to-u-s-national-security/

Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts, please copy web site and paste it on your browser.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered controversial is being censored-what happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…

WAKE UP AMERICA BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE!

 

Abortion - This is a Dilation and Extraction Abortion (4 minutes & 23 seconds)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RyKc6nPw6C4&playnext=1&list=PL1D719AEF8790CA52

 

Baby Body Parts (1 minute & 49 seconds)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiyxFCASdIg&feature=autoplay&list=PL1D719AEF8790CA52&index=4&playnext=2

 

Abortion is murder.  To murder babies is to defy the very Will of God.  Abortion is a disgrace upon which future generations will look back and wonder what we thinking.  Do your part in stopping future abortions but refrain from illegal activities since breaking the law to stop abortions makes us no better than the abortionists.

WAKE UP AMERICA BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE!

Read more…

Time For Action!

Hope all of you had a chance to read my earlier blog post that contained the following article and/or blog post:

The Greatest Fraud Ever Perpetrated In U.S. History!-Posted on The Post & Email-By JB Williams-On June 12, 2011:

http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/06/07/evidence-broadens-obama-natural-born-conspiracy/

Note: What follows are pertinent excerpts from the above article and/or blog post:

 “Only 25% of the nation strongly supports this White House resident, which means 75% have great doubts, with more than 35% strongly opposed.

Only the people can put this nation back on track to freedom and liberty, the rule of law and our beloved constitutional republic and they cannot do it in the election booth.

The people must rise up, stand together and hold these criminal actors accountable for the theft of our government which has become the greatest threat to the American way of life in history.

The people must wake up, stand up, come together and put this evil down and they must do it while they still have the power to do so. TAKE ACTION TODAY!

The name Barrack Hussein Obama II cannot appear on the 2012 President ballot and neither can the name of any co-conspirator.

Every citizen who wants to live in freedom tomorrow must contact the appropriate officials today!

1) CLICK HERE to demand that your State Officials take immediate action to investigate the crimes of the 2008 Election, and make certain that this can never happen again by holding those responsible fully accountable. Barrack Obama should not have been on the ballot in 2008 and he cannot be allowed to appear on the ballot again in 2012.

2) CLICK HERE to send a letter to editor notifying the press of the most serious constitutional crisis in American history!

3) A list of co-conspirators will be served for their direct involvement in the effort to subvert and remove Article II of the U.S. Constitution. (More information on this effort will be forthcoming)”

Note I’ve stepped up to the plate today and did my part by using the easy process listed above as a means of taking the first steps in taking our country back-now it’s your turn to take some action, if you want to live in freedom tomorrow-Please pass on to your family and friends for their action-You Decide?

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…

What's wrong with this picture?

Posted on The Post & Email-By JB Williams-On June 12, 2011:

“(Jun. 7, 2011) — Evidence that we have a fraud and a usurper currently residing in the people’s White House is overwhelming, despite the overt lack of journalistic investigating on the part of the American press. But now new evidence indicates that the conspiracy to carry out that fraud was much broader than originally thought.

The story of whom and what Barack Hussein Obama II really is – is a forty-year story that requires a book, not a column, to tell.

Strong evidence suggests that he was being groomed from a very young age for the moment in history that would end American supremacy in the world, and usher in a new era of Global Marxist Governance.

But there was a major hurdle that had to be overcome – the U.S. Constitution, in this case, Article II – Section I – Clause V specifically, which requires that “no person except a natural-born citizen of the United States” can hold the office of President. – Obama is not a natural-born citizen of the United States…and may not even be a legal citizen of the United States. So, how can he be President?

This column focuses upon the period 2003-2008 and the political maneuvers that took place in order to make way for America’s first unconstitutional resident of the White House.

Efforts to Eliminate the Natural Born Requirement (2003-2005):

Proving that the players involved knew the correct definition of natural born citizen borrowed from the Law of Nations by our founders – 1) those born in the country, of parents who are citizens; 2) those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights; 3) The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; 4) in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen. – that they knew Barack Hussein Obama II did not meet that definition as a foreign or dual citizen via his father’s British citizenship and that they worked feverishly to find a way around this constitutional requirement for office, as Obama was about to become president…

The effort to remove the natural-born citizen requirement from the U.S. Constitution actually began in 1975 – when Democrat House Rep. Jonathon B. Bingham, [NY-22] introduced a constitutional amendment under H.J.R. 33 which called for the outright removal of the natural-born requirement for president found in Article II of the U.S. Constitution – “Provides that a citizen of the United States otherwise eligible to hold the Office of President shall not be ineligible because such citizen is not a natural born citizen.”

Bingham’s first attempt failed and he resurrected H.J.R. 33 in 1977 under H.J.R. 38, again failing to gain support from members of congress. Bingham was a Yale Law grad and member of the secret society Skull and Bones, later a lecturer at Columbia Law and thick as thieves with the United Nations via his membership in the Council on Foreign Relations.

Bingham’s work lay dormant for twenty-six years when it was resurrected again in 2003 as Democrat members of Congress made no less than eight (8) attempts in twenty-two (22) months, to either eliminate the natural-born requirement, or redefine natural-born to accommodate Barack Hussein Obama II in advance of his rise to power. The evidence is right in the congressional record…

1. On June 11, 2003 Democrat House member Vic Snyder [AR-2] introduced H.J.R 59 in the 108th Congress – “Constitutional Amendment – Makes a person who has been a citizen of the United States for at least 35 years and who has been a resident within the United States for at least 14 years eligible to hold the office of President or Vice President.” – Co-Sponsors: Rep Conyers, John, Jr. [MI-14]; Rep Delahunt, William D. [MA-10]; Rep Frank, Barney [MA-4]; Rep Issa, Darrell E. [CA-49]; Rep LaHood, Ray [IL-18]; Rep Shays, Christopher [CT-4].

2. On September 3, 2003, Rep. John Conyers [MI] introduced H.J.R. 67“Constitutional Amendment – Makes a person who has been a citizen of the United States for at least 20 years eligible to hold the office of President.” – Co-Sponsor Rep Sherman, Brad [CA-27]

3. On February 25, 2004, Republican Senator Don Nickles [OK] attempted to counter the growing Democrat onslaught aimed at removing the natural-born citizen requirement for president in S.2128 -  “Natural Born Citizen Act – Defines the constitutional term “natural born citizen,” to establish eligibility for the Office of President” – also getting the definition of natural born citizen wrong. – Co-sponsors Sen Inhofe, James M. [OK]; Sen Landrieu, Mary L. [LA]

4. On September 15, 2004 – as Barack Obama was about to be introduced as the new messiah of the Democrat Party at the DNC convention, Rep Dana Rohrabacher [CA-46] introduced H.J.R. 104“Constitutional Amendment – Makes eligible for the Office of the President non-native born persons who have held U.S. citizenship for at least 20 years and who are otherwise eligible to hold such Office.” – No co-sponsors.

5. Again on January 4, 2005, Rep John Conyers [MI] introduced H.J.R. 2 to the 109th Congress – “Constitutional Amendment – Makes a person who has been a citizen of the United States for at least 20 years eligible to hold the Office of President.” – Co-Sponsor Rep Sherman, Brad [CA-27]

6. Rep Dana Rohrabacher [CA-46] tries again on February 1, 2005 in H.J.R. 15 “Constitutional Amendment – Makes eligible for the Office of the President non-native born persons who have held U.S. citizenship for at least 20 years and who are otherwise eligible to hold such Office.” – No Co-Sponsor

7. On April 14, 2005, Rep Vic Snyder [AR-2] tries yet again with H.J.R. 42“Constitutional Amendment – Makes a person who has been a citizen of the United States for at least 35 years and who has been a resident within the United States for at least 14 years eligible to hold the office of President or Vice President.” – Co-Sponsor Rep Shays, Christopher [CT-4]

8. All of these efforts failing in committee and the 2008 presidential election looming with an unconstitutional candidate leading the DNC ticket, Democrat Senator Claire McCaskill, [MO] tries to attach the alteration to a military bill in S.2678 on February 28, 2008“Children of Military Families Natural Born Citizen Act – Declares that the term “natural born Citizen” in article II, section 1, clause 5 of the Constitution, dealing with the criteria for election to President of the United States, includes any person born to any U.S. citizen while serving in the active or reserve components of the U.S. armed forces.” – Co-Sponsors DNC Presidential candidate Sen Clinton, Hillary Rodham [NY]; DNC Presidential candidate Sen Obama, Barack [IL]; Sen Menendez, Robert [NJ]; Sen Coburn, Tom [OK] – (This was the first effort to also assure that GOP Presidential candidate Sen. John McCain [AZ] would be cleared to run against the DNC primary victor.)

From June 11, 2003 to February 28, 2008, there had been eight (8) different congressional attempts to alter Article II – Section I – Clause V – natural born citizen requirements for president in the U.S. Constitution, all of them failing in committee — All of it taking placing during Barack Obama’s rise to political power and preceding the November 2008 presidential election.

In politics, there are no coincidences… not of this magnitude.

Finally on April 10, 2008, unable to alter or remove the natural born citizen requirement to clear the way for Barack Obama, the U.S. Senate acts to shift focus before the election, introducing and passing S.R.511 – declaring Sen. John McCain a “natural born citizen” eligible to run for and hold the office of president. There was never any honest doubt about McCain, the son of a U.S. Navy Commander. The Sponsor of the resolution is Democrat Senator Claire McCaskill, [MO]

S.R.511 States that John Sidney McCain, III, is a “natural born Citizen” under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States. S.R511 passed by a 99-0 unanimous consent of the Senate, with only John McCain not voting. The basis was – “Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens;” – a condition not met by Barack Hussein Obama II. – Co-Sponsors DNC Presidential candidate Sen Clinton, Hillary Rodham [NY]; DNC Presidential candidate Sen Obama, Barack [IL]; Sen Leahy, Patrick J. [VT]; Sen Webb, Jim [VA]; Sen Coburn, Tom [OK] (They had made certain that John McCain would run against Barack Obama)

However, in the McCain resolution is also this language – “Whereas the Constitution of the United States requires that, to be eligible for the Office of the President, a person must be a ‘natural born Citizen’ of the United States; – Whereas the term ‘natural born Citizen’, as that term appears in Article II, Section 1, is not defined in the Constitution of the United States;”

The U.S. Constitution is not a dictionary. The definition of “is” is not in the constitution either. Yet this is the text that would later be issued in Congressional Research Service talking points memos distributed to members of congress, to protect an individual that all members of congress know and understand to be an “unconstitutional” resident of the people’s White House – Barack Hussein Obama II.

Once again, as the political left was unable to alter the U.S. Constitution by way of legitimate constitutional process, they resorted to altering the constitution via precedent setting, in short, knowingly electing and getting away with seating an unconstitutional president in order to alter Article II requirements for the office via breaking those constitutional requirements.

The press would not ask any questions and the American people were already too ill-informed of their constitution to know or too distracted by daily life to care. The press would provide the cover, swearing to the lies of an unconstitutional administration put in power by criminal actors focused only on their lofty political agenda of forever altering the American form of government.

The people would be caught up in a steady diet of daily assaults on their individual freedom and liberty and overlook the most obvious constitutional crisis in American history, the seating of an unconstitutional and anti-American president.

Evidence of What?

  • Barack Obama is an unconstitutional resident of the people’s White House
  • He did not become America’s first unconstitutional president alone, he had help
  • While most of the criminal cabal are Democrats, some are Republicans
  • Every member of congress knew Obama was ineligible for the office of president
  • Every member of the U.S. Supreme Court knows that Obama is unconstitutional
  • Every intelligent member of the press knows the truth, but won’t dare tell this story
  • Numerous people tried to remove natural born citizen from the constitution
  • They all know the correct definition of natural born citizen and applied it to John McCain
  • None of these people wants to apply the same definition to Barack Obama
  • Nobody in the Federal Government is going to do anything about the greatest constitutional crisis in American history, because all of them are complicit on one level or another

As a result, the DNC was forced to remove the “constitutionally eligible” language from the 2008 DNC certification of the Obama-Biden ticket, omitting from the certification the following language –

“and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution.”

Instead, the DNC only certified that the Obama-Biden ticket was duly nominated for the offices of President and Vice President, using the following language –

“THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democrat Party of the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 though 28, 2008, the following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively:” (Note that the word “through” is misspelled in both DNC versions, indicating that it is an alteration from the same document.)

Later, adding insult to injury, responding to endless public demands for documentation that would prove Obama eligible for the office he currently holds, the Obama White House issued not one but at least two (2) blatant forgeries, the first in the form of a Hawaiian COLB (Certification of Live Birth – not to be confused with a common birth certificate), and then a forged (so-called long form) Birth Certificate, otherwise known as an actual birth certificate.

Meanwhile, the entire U.S. Press has been blatantly complicit or terminally derelict in their total lack of interest in investigating or reporting these facts. The fourth estate had become a fifth column.

The Greatest Fraud Ever Perpetrated:

The Obama conspiracy to seat an unconstitutional president is the greatest fraud ever perpetrated on the American people and it has drastically altered the American system of self-governance from a constitutional republic to a corrupt democracy of frauds elected by fools.

Obama did not do this alone – he had a lot of help, including from an ignorant electorate.

But these wheels were set in motion in the late ‘90s and placed in overdrive in 2003. Numerous government officials were involved in the conspiracy to defraud the American people out of their government, including key Republicans like Darrell Issa and Tom Coburn. Every member of congress, the courts and the press, have been given the cover-up talking points by the Congressional Research Service and so far, not one individual has the honor or decency to break from those talking points and tell the American people the truth. Their government had been stolen…

Where was Obama while the Path was being cleared?

1992:

  • Barack Obama begins working at the firm of Davis, Miner, Barnhill & Gallard as a junior lawyer, hoping to work on civil rights cases.
  • Barack Obama is teaching constitutional law at the University of Chicago Law School.
  • 1992 is an election year. Barack Obama becomes the director of Illinois Project Vote, an organization focused on registering minority voters. Obama registers approximately 100,000 new voters, primarily in the African-American community.

1995:

  • Before achieving a single significant accomplishment in life, Barack Obama releases his first memoire, Dreams from My Father. The creation of the Barack Hussein Obama II story begins.
  • November 7, 1995 – Barack Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham, dies of ovarian cancer.

1996:

  • Barack Obama wins the Democratic nomination for the seat, and is elected to the Illinois State Senate.

1998:

  • After failing to accomplish anything in the Illinois Senate for two years, Barack is re-elected to the Illinois Senate.

1999:

  • Barack Obama runs for U.S. Congress and loses due to his record of not showing up for key votes in Illinois.

2002:

  • Barack Obama is re-elected to the Illinois Senate. Politically, his stock is rising, not due to a record of accomplishments, but rather due to his increasing circle of influential friends including Rev. Wright and William Ayers.

2003:

  • Despite the title of Illinois most absent Senator, Barack Obama becomes chairman of the Illinois Senate’s Health and Human Services Committee.
  • In January 2003, Barack Obama formally enters the race for the United States Senate. Team Obama destroys Democratic rival, Blair Hull, by exposing his domestic abuse allegations.

2004:

  • Barack Obama wins the Illinois primaries with 53 percent of the vote. In the general election, Barack Obama faces Republican candidate Jack Ryan.
  • Team Obama pushes Jack Ryan out of the race with reports of a sex scandal.
  • July 7, 2004 – Boston, Massachusetts: The Democratic National Convention introduced the new messiah of the Democrat Party to the world when 42 year old Barack Obama, who had yet to accomplish anything, becomes the hit of the John Kerry convention by the handy work of Sen. Ted Kennedy. [MA]
  • November 2, 2004 – Barack Obama, 43, is elected for the U.S. Senate.

2005:

  • January 4, 2005 – Barack Obama is sworn in as a U.S. senator.
  • Barack’s first law is passed with Republican Tom Coburn.

2007:

  • February 10, 2007 – Barack Obama announces his candidacy for President of the United States in the 2008 U.S. presidential election.

2008:

  • June 3, 2008 – After defeating Senator Hillary Clinton in the primaries, Barack Obama becomes the presumptive nominee of the Democratic Party for the 2008 presidential election.
  • November 3, 2008 – Barack Obama’s grandmother, Madelyn Dunham, age 86, dies of cancer, just one day before the Presidential Election.
  • November 5, 2008 – Barack Obama wins the US Presidential Election and becomes the first UNCONSTITUTIONAL President of the United States

In short, as Obama was rising through the ranks of Democrat Party power and being systematically groomed as the new messiah of the party, friends of the movement were busy making way by trying repeatedly to remove Article II – Section I – Clause V from the U.S. Constitution. When they failed to do it legitimately, they did it via setting precedent.

Despite a total lack of significant accomplishment, Obama was clearly fast-tracked by Democrat Party powers and even the massive Clinton War Machine was no match for the people behind Obama’s unparalleled rise to power.

Now you know how this nobody from nowhere came to power in almost no time at all with a completely blank résumé, and if you follow the names attached to the flood of initiatives to eliminate natural born citizenship as a requirement for the office, you can see some of the folks behind that effort.

Since many of the key figures in the three branches of the Federal government were involved in this conspiracy, we know that we cannot rely on anyone at the Federal level to address this crisis, and since we have watched the U.S. press run cover for it, we know not to expect any help from them in returning America to her people.

Only the People Can End this Crisis:

From 2003 through 2008, members of Congress worked to eliminate Article II – Section I – Clause V of the U.S. Constitution, requiring that all presidential candidates be natural born citizens of the United States.

In 2008, fifty state Secretaries allowed the name Barrack Hussein Obama to appear on their state ballot for the president, despite the known fact that Barrack Hussein Obama did not meet the constitutional conditions for the office sought, and that the Democrat Party had intentionally failed to certify Barrack Obama as constitutionally eligible for office.

On January 20, 2009, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Roberts administered the presidential oath of office to an individual and every member of the Supreme Court had knowledge that Barrack Hussein Obama failed to meet constitutional requirements for the office he was about to take.

The Chief Law enforcement officer in our country is head of the Department of Justice, Eric Holder. A long-time leftist comrade of Barrack Obama who uses the power of the office to silence the voice of American dissenters, while protecting all who intend America harm.

The voting fraud is so prevalent in America today that it is almost impossible to rely upon the election system as a means of correcting anything and even if you could rely on the system, decent honest qualified leaders do not run for political office in this cesspool we call a country today.

Only 25% of the nation strongly supports this White House resident, which means 75% have great doubts, with more than 35% strongly opposed.

Only the people can put this nation back on track to freedom and liberty, the rule of law and our beloved constitutional republic and they cannot do it in the election booth.

The people must rise up, stand together and hold these criminal actors accountable for the theft of our government which has become the greatest threat to the American way of life in history.

The people must wake up, stand up, come together and put this evil down and they must do it while they still have the power to do so. TAKE ACTION TODAY!

The name Barrack Hussein Obama II cannot appear on the 2012 President ballot and neither can the name of any co-conspirator. Every citizen who wants to live in freedom tomorrow must contact the appropriate officials today!

1) CLICK HERE to demand that your State Officials take immediate action to investigate the crimes of the 2008 Election, and make certain that this can never happen again by holding those responsible fully accountable. Barrack Obama should not have been on the ballot in 2008 and he cannot be allowed to appear on the ballot again in 2012.

2) CLICK HERE to send a letter to editor notifying the press of the most serious constitutional crisis in American history!

3) A list of co-conspirators will be served for their direct involvement in the effort to subvert and remove Article II of the U.S. Constitution. (More information on this effort will be forthcoming)

  • Government Communication software is made available to the general public at no charge, by The United States Patriots Union of Sheridan Wyoming. It’s up to the American people to demand proper solutions, take this action and follow-up until elected servants begin to act in the best interest of the people.”

Source:

http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/06/07/evidence-broadens-obama-natural-born-conspiracy/

Note:  The following articles and/or blog posts and videos relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. Video: Is Dreams From My Father a Fraud?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B6_DPqV0uHk&feature=related

II. Four Curious Errors In Obama's 'Dreams'!-Posted on WND.com-By Jack Cashill-On June 9, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=308781

III. Video: Obama's Fraudulent Use of Connecticut Social Security Number!-Posted on YouTube.com-By DJEN33-On Jun 8, 2011:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hl-5t3ffU-s&feature=related

IV. Is Our President A Terrorist?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=-fmtJ5kh-50#at=2334

V. The Judas Media-Posted on Floyd Reports-Guest Writer-On April 27, 2011:

http://floydreports.com/the-judas-media/?utm_source=Expose+Obama&utm_campaign=43b350b9f6-EO_04_27_20114_27_2011&utm_medium=email

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Was there a conspiracy to put Obama in the White House?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/03/03/was-there-a-conspiracy-to-put-obama-in-the-white-house-2/

Congress report concedes Obama eligibility unvetted!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/congress-report-concedes-obama-eligibility-unvetted/

DC knows that Obama is ineligible for office!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/27/dc-knows-that-obama-is-ineligible-for-office/

Massive Voter Fraud-Again!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/25/massive-voter-fraud-again/

New World Order By Executive Order!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/13/new-world-order-by-executive-order/

The Midterm Elections and the Communist Manifesto!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/08/the-midterm-elections-and-the-communist-manifesto/

What we haven’t been told about the President’s background!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/03/what-we-haven’t-been-told-about-the-president’s-background/

Could the President’s newly released COLB be a forgery?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/04/29/could-the-president’s-newly-released-colb-be-a-forgery/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts, please copy web site and paste it on your browser.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered controversial is being censored-what happened to free speech?-You Decide.

Question:  What action are you going to take today to demand that your State Officials take immediate action to investigate the crimes of the 2008 Election, along with notifying the press of the most serious constitutional crisis in American history because I’ve done my part by using the easy process listed at the end of the original article and/or blog post above-now it’s your turn to take some action, if you want to live in freedom tomorrow-You Decide?

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…

Federal Reserve Money Ends

The headlines today tell us we need to know what the politicians have done, with the help of the privately owned and operated Federal Reserve Bank.  This bank was snuck in while Congress was in recess.  It was touted as the means of preventing bank runs.  Now we’re finding out another purpose of this bank—to steal from us big time. Who are these people we vote for and what is their true purpose? With the help of the Federal Reserve Bank, to try to prevent the collapse of the federally manipulated housing boom, coupled with fraudulent lending practices, which was to help the financially unqualified to own a home, the Federal Reserve Bank came up with “Quantitative Easing 1,” the printing of $1.7 trillion in Federal Reserve Bank notes, which politicians would use to help out the faltering economy. They always have good intentions—help for the little guy, help for the economy. 

 

Unfortunately, the help didn’t work. The housing market was collapsing.  So, continuing with the policy of helping people who could not afford home ownership, the politicians, with the help of the Federal Reserve Bank, came up with “Quantitative Easing 2,” the printing of an additional $600 billion of monopoly money to pass out to certain people.  The last of that money has been printed.  The monopoly money will not completely end.  The Federal Reserve Bank will continue to reinvest maturing securities, mainly mortgage related debt, which is estimated to be around $12 to $16 billion per month.

 

All of this monopoly money is watering down the world market value of the dollar. Foreign investors in America are paying a big price, which the American people don’t pay, since the dollar is the world standard.  Nice work if you can get it. This political shell game, be aware, focused on people owning a home and stimulating the economy, while frauds in the lending business made a killing, while crooked politicians helped the little guy.  QE1 and QE2 kept the public from focusing attention on the truth of the matter.

 

After the fact, when the American people wake up to the fact that they have been royally taken, the private fat cats and dirt bag politicians that caused it all will be there with the answer:. “Take from the rich and give to the poor.” The inflation QE1 and QE2 caused will be here, the dollar maybe buying 20 cents worth of food and fuel.  The American people will be between a rock and a hard place.  How many not so rich Americans are going to demand their independence?  

 

Were you following my thinking, you too would be coming up with answers you don’t hear.  While the gasping American establishment tries harder and harder to hang in there, but slowly slipping into oblivion, watch for the pace to quicken.  Communist China allows capitalism to  move in. The entrepreneurial spirit is high in China. The joke is on America. Water seeks its level. Communist dominated labor in America sits helplessly on outrageously high wages as we buy more and more of our goods from China.  Billionaire Donald Trump digs me, but he is not running for President.   How many candidates for President understand what is taking place?  Herman Cain thoroughly understands free enterprise. Why is it that most blacks depend on government? Cain is a black man you have to admire.  I wonder where Obama would be if Herman Cain won the Republican nomination? Black against black, Obama for collective salavtion, Cain for the individual. I kind of think that Cain would go for the black vote big time.  

 

Are you going to pray to that almighty God somewhere out there in the sweet bye and bye?  Well, good luck!  In my case, God helped me after I read the Constitution, heard voices of the past speaking to me, and I had a bigger than life calling—when I ceased looking to the establishment for help, when I discovered the power that lies within us.  Welcome to the Age of Aquarius.

Read more…

Posted on TrevorLoudon.com-By Trevor-On June 8, 2011:

New research from writers and researchers Trevor Loudon and Cliff Kincaid shows that Leon Panetta, the CIA director being considered on Thursday for the position of Secretary of Defense, had a previously undisclosed personal and friendly relationship with Hugh DeLacy, a prominent member of the Communist Party USA. DeLacy visited such countries as China and Nicaragua and was himself a personal contact of identified Soviet spies Solomon Adler and Frank Coe and accused spy John Stewart Service. Panetta spoke at DeLacy’s memorial service, directed a series of letters to him personally as “Dear Hugh,” and placed a tribute to him in the Congressional Record.

Former Washington State Rep. DeLacy, named by Communist Party lawyer John Abt as a fellow member of the party, remained a communist operative until his death in 1986.

One “Dear Hugh” letter from then-Rep. Panetta to DeLacy offered a summary of a report on U.S. military operations that Panetta said was “unavailable for distribution.” Panetta concludes the March 24, 1977, letter, “If there is anything I can do for you in the future, Hugh, please feel free to call on me.”

The Panetta SecDef hearing is being held June 9 by the Senate Armed Services Committee at 9:30 a.m. in open session in Room SD-G50 of the Dirksen Senate Office Building, with a closed session later in the day in Room SVC-217, the Office of Senate Security in the Capitol Visitor Center.

Like DeLacy, Panetta shared a preference for communist regimes in Latin America, including the Sandinistas in Nicaragua. DeLacy had visited Nicaragua and had honored the Sandinistas, who were pawns of the Soviets and Cubans in Central America, while Panetta, as a member of Congress in 1983, strongly opposed President Reagan’s effort to undermine the Sandinista regime through CIA covert action.

In addition, Panetta actively collaborated with the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS), a Washington, D.C. think tank that provided a cover for Chilean Marxist and Cuban agent Orlando Letelier to conduct communist political influence operations in the nation’s capital. Panetta, a member of Congress from 1977 to 1993, was a vocal opponent of Chile’s anti-communist government. In 1986, Panetta publicly endorsed protests against Reagan’s “illegal and extraordinarily vicious wars against the poor of Nicaragua, El Salvador, and Guatemala.”

“Panetta’s bias in favor of revolutionary Marxist movements in Latin America helps explain why the CIA has been spectacularly unsuccessful in stopping the advance of Hugo Chavez and his minions south of the U.S. border,” Trevor Loudon and Cliff Kincaid said in a joint statement. “His only apparent success as CIA director has been the killing of Osama bin Laden, an impressive operation that has nevertheless backfired in the sense of sending a nuclear-armed Pakistan into the arms of Communist China.”

“It is astounding that Panetta was confirmed as Obama’s CIA director without any of this being considered by the U.S. Senate,” Loudon and Kincaid went on. “But now that Panetta is set to move on to another critical national security post — Secretary of Defense — with new Senate hearings being held on Thursday, it is time to get all of this information out in the open. One of the most important matters that deserves scrutiny is Panetta’s apparent failure to be forthcoming about his personal relationship with DeLacy. It is time for the Senate to investigate this previously undisclosed relationship.”

Loudon and Kincaid, writers and researchers on national security issues, have assembled critical information about Panetta from important sources that have apparently been overlooked by Senate investigators and even FBI agents who investigated Panetta’s background.

Among these sources, Loudon reviewed the Hugh DeLacy papers at the University of Washington, while Kincaid examined hearings conducted on “Communist Political Subversion” by the House Committee on UnAmerican Activities and “Un-American Activities in California” by the California Senate Fact-Finding Committee on Un-American Activities.

“When this information is examined in context,” Loudon and Kincaid stated, “it is clear that Panetta, whose nomination to be CIA director was considered mystifying even to those in the intelligence business, has been a key component of a network of left-wing activists and socialist organizations for over two decades.

These individuals and groups include not only Hugh DeLacy and his communist associates but the communist-dominated Progressive Party, Democratic Socialists of America and the neo-Marxist New American Movement. Panetta, in short, was a player in the network that sponsored the political career of a young Barack Obama in Chicago. This helps explain why Panetta was picked, seemingly out of nowhere, for the CIA job.”

(Loudon, who runs the New Zeal blog http://trevorloudon.com/, and Kincaid, president of America’s Survival, Inc. www.usasurvival.org , specialize in researching and reporting on anti-American extremist political movements with foreign connections, funding, and sponsorship.)

For further information contact Trevor Loudon on 202 506 8733 and/or trevor.newzeal@gmail.com

For back up documentation go to:

http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/pannetta.pdf

http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/panetta3.pdf

Source:

http://trevorloudon.com/2011/06/panetta-hearing-for-secdef-on-thursday-obama’s-cia-director-linked-to-spies-through-communist-party-figure/

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and video relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. Media Blackout: CIA director accused of links to Communist spy contact—scandal ignored!-Posted on RenewAmerica-By Wes Vernon-On June 13, 2011:

http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/vernon/110613?utm_source=getresponse&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=asinews&utm_content=%5BASI%5D+Is+the+Panetta+Scandal+the+Next+Alger+Hiss+Case%3F

II. Ten Questions for Defense Secretary Nominee Leon Panetta!-Posted on The Weekly Standard-By DANIEL HALPER-On June 9, 2011:

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/ten-questions-defense-secretary-nominee-leon-panetta_574010.html

III. Forecast for U.S. cities: Confrontation, chaos? Unions, radicals plot to counter 'right-wing threats' to 'Middle Class'-Posted on WND.com-By Aaron Klein-On June 9, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=309345

IV. Video: ‘Green Book’ Socialism: Former Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney In Libya Admits She Wants Gaddafi-Style Government In USA To Solve All The Problems Of America!-Posted on The Blaze-By Naked Emperor News-On June 3, 3011:

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/green-book-socialism-former-congresswoman-cynthia-mckinney-in-libya-admits-she-wants-gaddafi-style-government-in-usa-to-solve-all-the-problems-of-america/

V. Organization With Socialist Ties Driving “Net Neutrality” Agenda Inside FCC!-Posted on Judicial Watch-June 2011:

http://www.judicialwatch.org/news/2011/jun/fcc-colluded-leftist-organization-free-press-push-government-regulation-internet-docum

VI. The Russian Agents, Obama, and the Cover-up-Posted USASurvival.org-By Cliff Kincaid-On July 16, 2010:

http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/russian_agents.pdf

VII. Evidence Broadens Obama Natural Born Conspiracy!-Posted on The Post & Email-By JB Williams-On June 12, 2011:

http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/06/07/evidence-broadens-obama-natural-born-conspiracy/

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Progressives and Communists Are Our of the Closet Together!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/05/progressives-and-communists-are-out-of-the-closet-together/

The Military Pays the Price for Obama’s Agenda!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/08/11/the-military-pays-the-price-for-obama’s-agenda/

The FCC Should Not Interfere With The Internet!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/13/the-fcc-should-not-interfere-with-the-internet/

What do CAIR, Anna Chapman, and Rep. Mark Siljander have in common?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/07/23/what-do-cair-anna-chapman-and-rep-mark-siljander-have-in-common/

The Russian View of What Has Been Happening In America!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/22/the-russian-view-of-what-has-been-happening-in-america-2/

Nearly 80 percent don’t trust the government!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/19/nearly-80-percent-don’t-trust-the-government/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts, please copy web site and paste it on your browser.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered controversial is being censored-what happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…

nappynippy.jpg










By John W. Lillpop


The most serious challenge to America’s home land security is surely the “progressive” policies of the Obama Administration, particularly as articulated by Janet Napolitano, the leftist in whom President Obama has imprudently entrusted the well-being of over 300 million of we the people.

Secretary Napolitano once again defied common sense by declaring that the profiling of Muslim men under 35 was “illogical” as a tool for preventing terrorist attacks. She made her remarks at a forum on U.S. security and preventing terrorist attacks, as reported, in part, at reference 1.

While Big Sis was regaling forum attendees with her homeland security expertise, TSA agents in Detroit were headed in another direction as described, in part, at reference 2:



A Detroit father said agents with the Transportation Security Administration singled out his special-needs son for a pat-down while the family was headed to Disney World, MyFoxDetroit.com reported, an incident that the TSA admitted was a “case of bad judgment.”

David Mandy said agents at Detroit Metro Airport took his son Drew, 29, and asked him about the padding underneath his pants, which turned out to be adult diapers. Drew, who is severely mentally disabled, had trouble understanding the agents’ orders because his family said he has the mental capacity of a 2-year-old.

When the father tried to intervene and explain Drew’s disability, he said the two agents said, “Please, sir, we know what we’re doing.”

The agents confiscated a six-inch plastic hammer, something Drew had carried with him for 20 years for comfort. Agents called it a security threat, his father said, adding that they tapped the wall with it and said, “See, it’s hard. It could be used as a weapon.”

The family was told they’d have to ship the hammer if they wanted to keep it, David Mandy said.

“I understand they’re trying to keep people safe,” Mandy said told MyFoxDetroit.com. “But come on, does he look like a terrorist?”

In a statement to FoxNews.com, the TSA said it’s reviewing the incident but early findings indicate this was an “isolated case of bad judgment.” The TSA reached out to the Mandy family to apologize and said the man’s toy hammer should have never been confiscated.”

 

ISOLATED case of bad judgment?


In fact, with folks like Janet Napolitano running TSA, bad judgment is the rule, rather than the exception.

Another outrage that the American people need to “get used to,” Mr. President?




Ref 1
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/06/09/napolitano_no_logic_in_profiling_muslim_men_under_the_age_of_35.html



Ref 2
http://www.myfoxhouston.com/dpp/news/national/TSA-Admits-Bad-Judgment-After-Disabled-Man-Subjected-to-Airport-PatDown_54930533


Napolitano Calls Profiling of Muslims “Illogical,” TSA Focuses on Mentally Disabled!



 
John W. Lillpop
San Jose, California
  
  
 
Read more…

E-Blast Request to stop Sustainable Development

An open letter to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors

(where Jefferson's Monticello, and University of Virginia are located)

 

Ladies and Gentlemen,
 
The climate may be getting hotter, but man has not reached the technological prowess to affect it in any way.  The attached should show why.  It is a picture of the earth, and the sun, to scale!  Actually, the whole sun would not fit in the 800x600 frame with enough pixels to display the earth as anything recognizable.  Not even close! 
 
That picture, and the fact that the observed results are far different from the "predictions" made by the "models" of scientist that conspired to control the global media message destroy the anthropogenic climate change argument.  Their measurements were not properly taken.  The East Anglia E-Mail incident showed their political motivations.  Quick research on the events of the 21st century should stand as incontrovertable proof that anthropogenic climate change is a fad, farce or fraud.
 
In any case, it does not justify a tax to pay for information collection on individual citizens.  The result will not be far
from the kilowatt hours billed to those citizens in the first place.  Ultimately, the greenhouse gasses generated by buildings connected to the power grid come from the fire used to generate that electricity.  Around here, a big portion of that is the Lake Anna Nuclear Plant...  ZERO Emissions!   The information is available in the annual reports of Dominion Power!
 
Every cent paid to an entity operating a "market" proscribed and protected by the government IS A TAX.   Every regulation, especially those demanding lower power light bulbs, IS A TAX.  Cap and Trade IS A TAX.  They call it sustainable government.  Given our latest economic results, we know that their reasons, and their budget are NOT SUSTAINABLE!

Read more…

The Premise of the objections posted on 13 April, to a fiscally sound plan is that government has a place in providing HealthCare and/or College.  Before WWI it most certainly DID NOT!  And Unemployment benefits, as a whole, tend to make job creation harder.  True job security can only be obtained by production.  If an employee produces, the company will pay anything to keep him.  That is reality!
 
   The hypothetical government program needs means testing to verify its targeted purpose.  Those that have received these benefits for generations (and there are many, nationwide, including in your town), have learned how to get around those limits.  This result of human nature robs those "poor" of their potential, traps them in a low quality world, impedes the economic growth in those areas that are means tested for the rest of us, and teaches the progeny of the dole supported a twisted path to "success".  Such is the nature of the destructive power of government "cheese".
 
   Governments in general are force.  The sole motivator of government is law, which is made true by the treat of jail.  Thus, as a free people, we must never forget that everything that government does happens at the point of a gun.  If you buck the government long enough, it will kill you.  James Madison said "The essence of Government is power; and power, lodged as it must be in human hands, will ever be liable to abuse."
 
   It is thus incredulous that "educated" people look to government for tasks that require charity.  Taking charity at the point of a gun robs the givers of the benefits of the process of identifying needs, a job they would do much better than the government.  Depending on private folks to identify those needs would also bring the community closer together.  We see above how it robs charity's beneficiaries.  Private charity provides better benefits, tailored to the specific need, and is much easier to escape.
 
   The Ryan budget moves our nation toward a truly beneficial society by reducing the destructive force of government cheese.  It is amazing that one who calls herself "Attorney" cannot see that.  Thomas Jefferson told us: "To take from one, because it is thought his own industry and that of his fathers has acquired too much, in order to spare to others, who, or whose fathers, have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association, the guarantee to everyone the free exercise of his industry and the fruits acquired by it."  It should be our goal to return to that state!

 

 

Read more…

Vehicular Jihad: Kansas Muslim Drives for Three Miles with Dead Man on Roof of Van


Driving with a dead man on your roof for miles?

We have seen an unusually high number of  suspicious incidents involving Muslim drivers over the last few years.

Hassan Daly, a 52-year-old described as a "devout Muslim," plowed his cab into a crowd on a sidewalk in San Diego, injuring over 24 people. Mohammed Reza Taheri-Azar explicitly grounded his hit-and-run in the teachings of the Koran. Munir Muthana told the police who arrested him that "the Muslims will fix this co... Omeed Aziz Popal, we were told, was suffering from stress from an arranged marriage. Ismail Yassin Mohamed, we were informed, was mentally ill, suffered from depression, and hadn't being taking his.... And Muhammad Teshale, according to "law enforcement officials," "did it to be famous."

Spencer queried here, "Coincidence or jihad? Certainly there are a lot of hit-and-run and incidents involving people hit by cars that have nothing to do with Muslims, but in the cases listed here there is a degree of intentionality in these that we do not usually see."

U.S. Kansas Motorist Drives for Three Miles with Dead Man on Roof o... FOX (hat tip Carl)
WICHITA – After fatally striking a lawn mowing contractor, the driver of a van continued on for another three miles (4.8km) with the body on the roof of his vehicle in Wichita, Kansas on Friday -- sparking 911 calls from people who saw the disturbing sight.

The victim, an unnamed 32-year-old man, was working with a weed-eater near a street outside a Hawker Beechcraft plant when he was struck about 7:15am, The Wichita Eagle reported citing local police capital Hassan Ramzah.

The force of the impact threw the victim onto the windshield and then the roof of the van -- a Toyota Sienna XLE with a luggage rack on top -- but the motorist, a 67-year-old man, did not stop.

Witnesses who saw the van called 911, and one followed it to a house in an upscale development.

KAKE-TV reported the driver -- named as Mohamed Sarrafizadeh -- was booked into jail Friday evening on a charge of leaving the scene of a fatal accident, but was later released after paying a bond.

Mar 9, 2011 ... In yet another attack of vehicular jihad, an NY cabbie ran down goes jihad. Kuffirophobia in New York City: Muslim cabbie runs over two of ...
Dec 14, 2010 ... Holder, call your damn office. Jihad gone wild. Muslim shuttle driver charged in series of hit-and-run attacks near Dulles airport ...
Jan 10, 2010 ... More ties to Zazi the nazi, who was arrested back in September for a massive plot to blow up the NYC subway system, ...
Dec 14, 2010 ... Vehicular Jihad: Devout Muslim Cabbie Runs Down Two of His Riders ... In yet another attack of vehicular jihad, an NY cabbie ran down goes ...


http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2011/06/vehicular-j...
 
Read more…

WAKE UP AMERICA BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE!

They are scared to death of Sarah Palin.  If they were not they would ignore her!  So far there is no dirt to be found and that causes regret on their part because they won't be able to control her.  Those politicans who have skeletons in their closets can be bought and sold by the super powerful and the super rich.  Apparently she has no skeletons and it is driving them nuts because they have no sword to hang over her head to force her to do their bidding.  Sounds far out but think about it.  They desperately want her out of the race.  If they cannot find any dirt they will entice her with huge opportunities to make a fortune.  It won't be the first time they greased the skids and make a good solid candidate an economic offer they could not refuse.  The media controls the election process by constantly feeding out their hidden agenda propaganda and they do it in a very convincing manner.  They are experts at providing all of the rationale for their hidden agendae.  Between  the money provided by the super rich and the super powerful and the almost total control of the media they can get their candidate in the Republican party elected or their candidate in the Democratic party elected.  All others need not apply, for example, Mike Huckabee, Ron Paul, Rick Santorum, Michele Bachmann, and Donald Trump.  I don't know how clean or unclean their backgrounds are but I do know that the media will do everything possible to shove them out into the cold.  They do not care if you vote for tweedle dee or tweedle dum, i.e., their Republican man or their Democratic man.  They will win either way.  Have you ever noticed how people always say after an election that nothing has really changed.  The only way anything can really change is if someone who is not owned by them is elected and that that someone is clean as a whistle.  That someone may be Sarah Palin or one of the others mentioned above. If the American public would simply get wise to the super powerful/rich and media control and ignore their propaganda this country just might be able to get off dead center and do the things which would help us to resolve our problems of which I believe most of them were manipulated by these powerful and rich manipulators.  The problem is that we cannot identify these people because they are extremely secretive and spend a fortune guarding their privacy.  They do not want you to know the extent of their power and how they use it to manipulate the elections to their benefit and not only the elections but the economy of the U.S. and most of the world.  They will not stop until they have total control over the U.S.  That is one reason why they want a one world currency and a one world government.  They have already succeeded in Europe even though it still might blow up in their faces yet.  They have been trying hard to do the same in North and Central America.  Several years ago they were almost on the verge of annexing Canada into the U.S. as three more states, but could not quite get there because some 30,000 plus Canadians hit the streets and physically demonstrated.  I'll bet you don't remember reading about that in the newspapers or seeing it on TV.  The question comes to mind why would they want to unify all of these countries under one government.  The answer is that they want to have total control over the population, to insure that that you have no Liberty, Freedom or Property rights or even to eliminate all Religious Denominations and I do mean ALL.  It is extremely hard to control religious people because their loyalty and obedience is first and foremost to God and not to them.  Following the 10 Commandments and achieving a high level of moralty is absolutely intolerable to those who want to control the population, that is why the Communist government in Russia tried to shut down the Churches altogether but did not quite succeed because of the millions of prayers offered up to God for the demise of Godless Communism.  The Chinese Communists have done the same thing.  There have been a multitude of Chinese Catholics martyred.  The Chinese government has tight control on the few Catholic Bishops in China.  A population without a belief in their Creator is like a rudderless ship on the high seas, i.e., it can be shoved in any direction.  In effect, it has lost control of itself, and can be controlled externally. Religious people are not rudderless.  They know right from wrong.  They understand what is morally correct and what is immoral in accordance with the 10 Commandments.  That is why there was a big ruckus over the public posting of  the 10 Commandments in one of the southern states.  That is the last thing they want to see happen.  They cannot have total control over you if God is your boss.  Americans need to wake up and smell the roses and understand that these elections can and are being manipulated not only by money and media propaganda but also that the elections can easily be tampered with through the manipulation of the computer software being used to count your vote.  Unless the software is audited and guarded like they guard banks and trucks which pick up and deliver large chunks of money anything is possible, i.e., the computer code can be tampered with to move a vote from a Republican to a Democrat or vice versa.  You may have thought you voted for a Republican but many have voted for a Democrat.  The manipulation of the code does not contradict the tweedle dee or tweedle dum situation as they may have a greater desire for their Democratic man than their Republican man or they may not be able to control a candidate like Sarah Palin.  My attitude is that the more they bash a candidate the more interested I become in that candidate since it may be that they do not have control over that candidate.

Read more…

Obama wants to control and tax the internet, but what most people don't know is over 50% of the traffic on the internet now comes from cell phones!    Most of them are called 'Smart Phones'.  This means by controlling and taxing the internet Obama will control and tax your cell phone calls!

Obama's plan is to  tax internet servers, which now means he must tax your cell phone provider because of the new internet from your cell phone applicants!

Not only that, but he want to control content of the interent. At this point content includes your conversation, not just a visual content like a website but an audio, blog and forum content as well if they in any way touch the internet.

Do you want your cell phone tapped by Obama and screened by the government for content? 

How about a T.S.A. style digital "Pat-Down" on your cell phone call?

How about a governement tax on top of your monthly bill from your cell phone provider?

Oh, it's just not about Weiner and his pictures, its about your conversation on your cell phone!

So, Tea Partiers are we going to let Obama get away with it?

Read more…