All Posts (28849)

Sort by

Hispanics Won’t Save Obama In 2012!

Posted on Forbes-By Merrill Matthews. RIGHT DIRECTIONS-On June 18, 2011:

“President Barack Obama is hoping his visit to Puerto Rico will shore up the Hispanic vote for Democrats, but more importantly for his 2012 re-election bid.

The media choir has been singing a similar tune, especially since the U.S. Census Bureau recently released a new report, “The Hispanic Population: 2010,” which documents the disproportionately large growth in the Hispanic population.

According to the 2010 Census, there were 308.7 million people residing in the U.S. on April 1, 2010, of which 50.5 million (16 percent) were of Hispanic or Latino origin.

In addition, the Bureau asserted, “More than half of the growth in the total population of the United States between 2000 and 2010 was due to the increase in the Hispanic population.”  Since Hispanics tend to vote Democratic—67 percent for Obama in 2008, according to a post-election poll cited in the New York Times—the Obama campaign thinks that growth could swing important states to the president.

That thinking is as wishful, and deluded, as the happy talk that surrounded the president’s economic policies and “shovel-ready” stimulus efforts that were going to get the country working again.  Here’s why.

People ≠ Voters That New York Times story pointed out that only 10 million Latinos voted in the 2008 election, 9 percent of all voters, and that was a record high.  Why so low?  For one thing, the Hispanic population is younger than the general population: 27.4 years was the median age for Hispanics in 2009, vs. 36.8 years for the U.S.  Younger ages are less likely to vote, and a disproportionately large percentage of Hispanics aren’t even of voting age.

Another important point: No one knows how many of those 50 million Hispanics are citizens eligible to vote.  The Census counts people in the U.S., not citizens.  Someone from the Bureau told me that interviewers do not ask about citizenship nor do they record citizenship status.  There has been a groundswell of Hispanics entering the U.S. over the last decade, some legally but many not, which has led to a huge national debate over immigration.  How many of the 15.2 million more Hispanics (between 2000 and 2010) are eligible to vote?  We simply don’t know from Census surveys, but it’s reasonable to think that many, and perhaps most, can’t—at least not legally.

The Electoral College Decides The Electoral College, not the popular vote, decides who will be president.  If none of those 50 million new Hispanics lived in California, President Obama would likely get all of the state’s 55 electoral votes; if all of them lived in California—and the largest number do—and they all vote for Obama he would still get … 55 electoral votes.

So the question for presidential election purposes is as much about where those votes are as how many there are.  The Census Bureau says 75 percent of the Hispanic population is located in eight states: California, Texas, Florida, New York, Illinois, Arizona, New Jersey and Colorado.  Of those states, California, New York, Illinois and New Jersey will very likely remain blue in the next presidential election, while Texas and Arizona will almost certainly remain red.  Colorado, which has been trending blue, and Florida, which leans red but not by much, could be swayed.

Of the nine states where the Hispanic population more than doubled—Alabama, Arkansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and South Dakota—eight are in the south and all but one, Maryland, either lean or are strongly red.

The point is that a burgeoning Hispanic population may lead to a major shift in voting patterns at some point in the future, but not 2012.  That said, there are some important swing states—e.g., Florida, Pennsylvania, North Carolina and Colorado—that could be affected by Hispanic votes next year.

Hispanics Are Diverse The Census Bureau struggles with identifying a “Hispanic” since it is not a race, but more a place of origin, such as Central or South America or countries located in the Caribbean.  Needless to say, there are lots of differences among these populations.  Puerto Ricans living on the mainland, for example, tend to vote Democratic; those of Cuban descent tend to vote Republican.  But the largest Puerto Rican population is in New York, which will vote for Obama anyway.  In swing-state Florida, however, Cubans outnumber Puerto Ricans by 400,000.

Hispanics Are More Affected by a Bad Economy — A lot has been made of the notion that the Hispanic population, many of whom are Catholic, tend to embrace conservative social values but liberal economic policies.  And those conservative social values give Republicans an opportunity to attract them to the GOP.

But the real opportunity for the GOP to get their presidential vote in 2012 comes from the devastating impact President Obama’s economic policies have had on lower-income families.  Texas, where I live, has the second largest Hispanic population; they come mostly from Mexico and Central America, according to the Census.  Most are hard workers who take service sector jobs in agriculture, construction, yard and landscape work, and restaurants.  When the economy goes south, they are some of the first and hardest hit.

Those who are citizens and can vote may decide that Obama has had his chance.  The recession officially ended in June of 2009, yet two years later the unemployment rate at 9.1 percent is still disastrously high—and much higher for Hispanics.  Even more troubling, the president seems befuddled about what to do next.

Of course, Obama may still get more Hispanic votes than his Republican challenger, but that doesn’t mean he wins; Sen. John Kerry won the Hispanic vote over President Bush in 2004 by 9 percentage points, and Bush still won.  But there is little reason to think, both for demographic reasons and the sour economy, that Hispanics will provide Obama with a victory in 2012.

However, the Census Bureau publication does point to a trend that neither party can ignore.  Hispanics are becoming a larger and more politically potent force in U.S. politics.  The party that moves to provide them with the greatest opportunities, not the most handouts, is the one that will capture their allegiance for the long term.

Source:

http://blogs.forbes.com/merrillmatthews/2011/06/15/hispanics-wont-save-obama-in-2012/

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts relate to this issue-You Decide:

I. Obama’s Hispanic Vote Slipping Away!

Posted on Front Page Magazine-By Tait Trussell-On Jun 17, 2011:

“Buenas Tardes” (good afternoon). Barack Obama greeted a crowd of Puerto Ricans in Spanish in San Juan on a presidential visit intended to shore up support of roughly 4.6 million Puerto Ricans who live on the mainland. The Puerto Ricans on the island can’t vote for president even though they’re U.S. citizens.

The Obama campaign machine is striving desperately to recapture the Hispanic vote. In 2008, Obama won 67 percent of the Hispanic voters nationally. The president’s failure to enact an immigration law and vigorously crack down on undocumented workers, however, has caused his glamour to tarnish a bit. A Wall Street Journal/NBC poll in late March found that his Latino support had slid to 60 percent.

As of July 2009, 48.4 million people of Hispanic origin lived in the U.S. Today, it’s 50.5 million, the country’s largest ethnic or race minority.

During his welcoming ceremony in San Juan, Obama tried to scrape together Hispanic favor by saying that he would support whatever decision the Island makes about statehood—a long standing dispute over statehood or independence.

The recession has hit Puerto Rico like a small hurricane. The jobless rate is 17 percent, compared to the latest unemployment figure for the U.S. of 9.1 percent. Referring to unemployment, Obama, in a lame statement, said, “These problems didn’t develop overnight here in Puerto Rico or anywhere else, but that means we’re not going to solve them overnight. But day by day, step by step, we will solve them.”

Obama flew to Puerto Rico from campaign stops in North Carolina and Florida to play up to more Latinos. North Carolina has about 380,000 Hispanics. In Florida there are about 840,000 Puerto Ricans.

While the Democrats have the Hispanic vote for 2012 in their headlights, some disconcerting facts that are not well known should dampen their enthusiasm. Despite the overly rapid growth of Latinos, many are far too young to vote. More than a third of Latinos (34.9 percent) are now below the voting age of 18, according to the Pew Hispanic Center.

Hispanics comprise 22 percent of all U.S. children younger than 18. Some 43 percent of married couples who are Hispanic have children under age 18. Twenty percent of all elementary and high school students combined are Hispanic. They won’t be voting any time soon.

While 67 percent of eligible Hispanics voted for Obama in 2008, voter turnout of Latinos lags behind whites (48.6 percent), and 44 percent of eligible blacks. That compares to less than a third (31.2 percent ) of eligible Latino voters who said they voted. Only 42 percent of the Latino population — for one reason or another — is eligible to vote. Among Latinos who go to the polls, those age 18 to 28 had the lowest turnout—17.5 percent. Obama’s glory seems to be disappearing among youthful worshipers.

In 2010, the Hispanic electoral tidal wave dissipated. Latino voters, along with Asian voters, mainly avoided the 2010 election. A record 14.7 million Hispanic voters, in effect, sat on their hands for the 2010 race, according to the Pew Hispanic Center. The absence from the ballot boxes of so many Hispanic voters hurt many Democrats.

Fewer than 31 percent of eligible Hispanic and Asian voters went to the polls in the 2010 congressional elections, compared with 49 percent of eligible white voters and 44 percent of eligible black voters, the Pew report said.

The picture of minority voting comes in the wake of a poll showing the support for Obama among Latinos down by more than 25 percent from what it was at the start of his administration, should send shivers up Democratic spines—even of those who are spineless on many issues.

More signs that the Obama “spell” is fading: After winning 67% of the Latino vote in 2008, only 43 percent of Hispanics polled by Univision—the Spanish language TV network in the U.S.– at the end of last July said Obama has addressed their needs. Another 32 percent indicated they were uncertain, while 21 percent said they believe Obama has done a poor job.

A meeting of Republicans in South Florida aimed at extending the GOP’s outreach to Latino voters was co-chaired by former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush. The conference was organized by the new Hispanic Action Network. It is one of a number of Republican efforts to influence Latino voters before the 2012 election.

CNN reported in 2010 that 38 percent of Hispanic voters cast ballots for Republican candidates, compared to only 29 percent in 2008.

Significantly, Republican Susana Martinez was elected governor of New Mexico (46 percent Hispanic population), Brian Sandoval  became governor of Nevada (27 percent Hispanic population) and Marco Rubio won the U.S. Senate race in Florida (23 percent Hispanic).

Exit polls indicated that 38 percent of Latino voters voted for House Republican candidates in 2010. This “despite pre-election claims by advocates for illegal immigration that a pro-rule-of-law stand would alienate Hispanic voters,” wrote Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX) June 2 in Politico. 

Five Hispanic Republicans were elected to the House.

“They focused on patriotism, rule of law, freedom, family, support for small business, jobs, and education,” Smith wrote.

Most of these are fundamental values from which President Obama has distanced himself.

Source:

http://frontpagemag.com/2011/06/17/obama’s-hispanic-vote-slipping-away/

II. 64,000 Cases of Possible Voter Fraud Being Investigated in New Mexico!-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Susan Jones-On June 15, 2011:

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/64000-cases-possible-voter-fraud-being-i

III. Despite Congressional Leader's Claim, Requiring an ID to Vote is Nothing Like Forced Segregation!-Posted on The Center for Public Policy Research-On June 7, 2011:

http://www.nationalcenter.org/P21PR-VoterID_060711.html

IV. Time to Launch Operation Chaos!-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Michael Oberndorf-On June 16, 2011:

http://floydreports.com/time-to-launch-operation-chaos-2-0-12/

V. ‘White House officials involved in rewriting nation’s founding document’!-Posted on WND.com-By Aaron Klein-On March 27, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=280277

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this issue-You Decide:

Massive Voter Fraud-Again!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/25/massive-voter-fraud-again/

Court overturns Arizona’s proof of citizenship requirement for voter registration!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/27/court-overturns-arizona’s-proof-of-citizenship-requirement-for-voter-registration/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…

My Sharpest Weapon: A Smile

I've learned to smile.  It is an acquired skill.  It is a gift.  Heavenly Father gave to me and I like to share, so you get some of it too.

I have spent a couple of days at the Right Online conference in beautiful downtown Minneapolis.  I have had a thoroughly happy time.  Why not?  I am an American.  I am still (mostly free).  I am surrounded by other Americans in a great American city.  I have a God who cares about me and my freedom.  I have 4 beautiful and amazing children in Colorado.  What's not to smile about.

Netroots, the liberal version of Right Online, a little older, more extreme Left than we are Right, cranky and negative, has been taking place across the street from our hotel.  Meetings in the streets, on elevators, in lobbies are inevitable between the "Nutroots" crowd and the "Vast Right Wing Conspirators."  I got on the elevator going down this morning and a very hip young lady got on at the same time.  She noticed my Right Online lanyard, I noticed her Netroots lanyard.  She was uncomfortable. I was exhilarated.  I had her trapped for 6 floors.  She began, "It looks like we're...opposites."  I was thoughtful, "Ummm," I said, "yeah, but we're both Americans.  That is the most important thing we share."  "And," she added, relaxing slightly, "we both use the internet!"  A pleasant conversation ensued.  She asked me what I blogged about and I told her my story.  When we got to the lobby I wished her a wonderful day.  She smiled a big smile my direction.  I walked up to the intersection and she promptly jay-walked across the street.

I have seen perhaps a hundred activists from Netroots on the streets around the convention centers here.  I smile and purposely make eye contact.  Some give me a glower, some an "hurrumph," and some, like the young lady in the elevator, have shared my smile.  I have 4 children who have passed through or are now residing in their young adulthood.  I have an instinctive love for young people.  And it occurred to me that I am not fighting against the individuals at Netroots, or on the Left.  I am fighting, as a Conservative, against bad ideas, bad policies, and bad institutions.  This is not a war of Americans against Americans.  It is a war of truth against lies, freedom against tyranny,  and civility against hatred.  I wielded the weapon of a smile, and I won a little piece of a young woman's heart.  And she won a little of mine.  This is where the most crucial battles will be fought.  It is more than a platitude to say "winning the hearts and minds of America."  It is a crucial strategy which should be the foundation of all rhetorical and political battles.

What better way to disarm the ideological foe, who is at their heart a friend waiting to  learn that they too love their liberty, than to give them a smile, a pleasant conversation, and a wish for a wonderful day.  We have nothing to fear in our own kindness.  And that young lady whom I met on the elevator will never honestly be able to say that all conservatives are crazy, or mean, or cranky, or old white men.

 

read more at http://reagangirl.com/?p=9528

 

Read more…
flag









By John W. Lillpop

As a point of reference, racist is formally defined as follows:

Racist - a person with a prejudiced belief that one race is superior to others.

In the on-line dictionary from which that definition was derived, the word "white" was omitted before the word "person," no doubt the product of biased editing by a red-necked scalawag from the Old South still immersed in denial.

Keeping the formal definition above in mind, compare it to the applications used by politically correct progressives, ever watchful for wedge issues with which to divide the American people.

According to progressives, you are a racist if you:

*Are on record as believing that American culture, including contributions made by angry white Christian men, has produced the greatest and most successful society in human history;

*Get goose bumps and shivers up and down your spine when Old Glory is feted or when the Star Spangled Banner is performed;

*Believe that America is a sovereign nation and, as such, perfectly justified in securing our borders against invasion by illegal aliens and other criminals;

*Believe that the rule of law is a basic tenet of American democracy, and, as such, inviolable;

*Believe that federal spending and the $14 trillion dollar national debt are destroyng the nation and agree with Paul Ryan's Blueprint for Propserity;

*Support enforcement of the Immigration Reform Control Act of 1986;

*Are proud of the English language, and support making English the official language of commerce, law, education, and culture in America;

*Oppose affirmative action, bilingualism and other reverse discrimination outrages;

*Watch FOX News for more than three hours in any given calendar quarter;

*Believe that the federal government should prevent illegal aliens from taking over American streets to demand rights and benefits reserved for U.S. citizens;

*Believe that Uncle Sam has an obligation to round up and deport illegal aliens, particularly during time of war;

*Believe that legislation is urgently needed to prevent illegal aliens from using "anchor babies" to circumvent U.S. law;

*Adamantly oppose amnesty, defined as anything short of deportation;

*Regard "Sanctuary Cities" as serious violations of federal law that should cause city officials to be arrested and prosecutedl

*Believe that in-state tuition breaks, driver's licenses, and other progressive hand outs serve only to attract even more illegal aliens and should be unlawful;

*Oppose the use of taxpayer funds to print ballots, government information, and educational materials in languages other than English;

*Own two or more American flags and participate in tawdry displays of excessive Americanism on Flag Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, and other patriotic holidays;

* Have knowingly registered or, perish the thought, voted Republican within the past 50 years;

*Failed to vote for Barack Obama and/or are among those who disapprove of his incompetent, biased, dangerous presidency;

*Are Caucasian, or look suspiciously like a Caucasian.

Please note that this checklist does not apply to African-Americans, Hispanics, Asians, or Native Americans because people from those racial and ethnic backgrounds are genetically incapable of being racists!


Read more…

"ONE QUESTION" HAMMER and NAIL

June 19, 2011: Happy Fathers Day! 

 

When You’re Holding a Hammer (Everything Looks Like a Nail)

http://www.holdingahammer.com/

 

Questions about Obama’s citizenship status from before the election in 2008 have come full circle, you might say the most Holy Reverend Jeremiah Wright, was right, chickens do come home to roost. Obama is not a “Natural Born Citizen”, and his alliance by birth is to two countries. Obama’s release of his Long Form Birth Certificate April 27, 2011, is a prima facie admission that the two alleged disqualifiers for the Presidency, is now confirmed as fact.

 

NOTE: This call to action is not a question of Obama’s qualification (at this step), rather it is a question of Congresses Constitutional understanding of the requirements to run for the President of the United States of America, and their (Congressmen’s) oath to uphold that Constitution, as being questioned by their employer, We the People aka the HAMMER.

 

As Obama has now confirmed he was not qualified to run for president pursuant to The Constitution of the United States of America. All current members of Congress, Republicans, Democrats and other’s, aka NAIL(S) totaling 100 in the Senate and 435 in the House, have by their silence, confirmed they are either an ACCESSORY BEFORE and/or AFTER THE FACT.

 

Prior such violations of our Constitution if any, does not set precedence as one crime or intent (action taken or not) cannot be used to validate another like crime or intent.  The old adage applies: two wrongs don’t make a right. Better check Mitt Romney’s “Natural Born Citizen” status while we are at it.  

 

To determine who has and/or is continuing to PERVERT the Constitution, it is VERY IMPORTANT that we provide the 112th Congress 1st Session, the opportunity this coming July 2011 when they are back in Session, to consider the “ONE QUESTION” being asked by WE THE PEOPLE.

 

That “ONE QUESTION” being asked of EACH AND EVERY CONGRESSMAN, by EACH AND EVERY RESPECTIVE CONSTITUENT is: Congressman ....(name).... DEFINE by August 1, 2011 what “Natural Born Citizen” means in respect to one being qualified to seek and hold the office of the President of the United States of America according to our Constitution? Please give MY (our) “ONE QUESTION” the attention it deserves in the time frame requested. Sign your name and address.

 

You are asking THE question, only one question, stick to the question, no redirect and no deflection, tell them to just answer the damn question!

 

Start asking your representative when you read this, FAX, EMAIL and PHONE any and all of their District and DC offices. Send POST CARDS by USPS to their district office (they arrive sooner) as piles are impressive. Heck for the price, two or three post cards can be sent. Print post cards up and hand them out for a signatures so all they have to do is sign it and drop it in the mail, and by all means plaster the “ONE QUESTION” everywhere possible.

 

Here is the hard part: put Congresses appearance of complicity aside until after August 1, 2011, until after we have a chance to review their (House, Senate or both) response(s) to our ONE QUESTION, until after they commite one way or the other. Let it go until after August 1, 2011, DON’T ENGAGE IN DEBATE wait until August 1, 2011 – it will drive them nuts. Let it boil within you but only ask “THE” ONE QUESTION a hundred times until August 1, 2011. Give our elected Representatives aka NAILS, our employees a opportunity to respond to their boss WE THE PEOPLE, aka HAMMER.4063329968?profile=original

 

After August 1, 2001 depending on their response(s) – use your judgment on what to do.

 

In the mean time as we prepare to celebrate Independence Day, lets also prepare for the day after, Tuesday July 5, 2011, which marks the sixth month anniversary of the swearing in of the 112th Congress. Abraham Lincoln said it best, “We the People are the rightful master of both congress and the courts – not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”

 

In most states, there is a waiting period of six months after swearing in of the U.S. Congress before recall petitions can be initiated. On July 5 we can send an indirect direct message, start recalls on them all, each and everyone as we don’t know how they are going to answer our “ONE QUESTION.” Why walk around with one petition, when you can walk around with a fist full of them? Check your local laws and get started July 5, 2011. As for States that do not allow recall of their Senators, start a recall on them anyway, as well as initiate petitions to change any said laws prohibiting the recall of those not representing or responding to our best interest.

 

HOPE and CHANGE, how about MAKE CHANGE HAPPEN because, WHEN YOU’RE HOLDING A HAMMER, EVERYTHING LOOKS LIKE A NAIL! Ain’t that right Howard Dean YYYYEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!

 

Just who is allowing this to continue, the U.S. Senate, the House - both, or the courts slow response before the election, after the election, or both? Or WE THE PEOPLE the boss; are we allowing this tyranny to be played against us?

 

IF I HAD A HAMMER (The Hammer Song)

words and music by Lee Hays and Pete Seeger

(last chorus)

Well I've got a hammer

And I've got a bell

And I've got a song to sing

All over this land

It's the hammer of justice

It's the bell of freedom

It's the song about love between my brothers and my sisters

All over this land

 

WOW, If I had a hammer, never thought a song written to support the progressive movement would symbolize the struggle to save America from the clutches of those same progressives.

 

Than again I kind of like

 

When You’re Holding a Hammer (Everything Looks Like a Nail!)

Words and Music by Kyle Hill and Bryan Glover

(last chorus)

There’ll be a party come this November

Where we’re gonna set things straight

All good people gonna gather ‘round

Gonna show what made this country great

We’ll run off the schemers and back-room dealers

So the Red, White and Blue will prevail

When we’re holding the hammer

When we’re holding the hammer

When we’re holding the hammer

Every one of them looks like a nail

 

"ONE QUESTION" HAMMER and NAIL on PatriotHQ

"ONE QUESTION" HAMMER and NAIL on GPTPP

 

Read more…

Posted on CNSNews.com-By Matt Cover-On June 16, 2011:

(CNSNews.com) – In a 30-page report justifying continued military involvement in the NATO-led strikes in Libya, the Obama administration claims that U.S. military involvement is “legitimated” by the UN Security Council – saying that therefore no congressional authorization is needed.

“U.S. forces are playing a constrained and supporting role in a multinational coalition, whose operations are both legitimated by and limited to the terms of a United Nations Security Council Resolution that authorizes the use of force solely to protect civilians and civilian populated areas under attack or threat of attack and to enforce a no-fly zone and an arms embargo,” the report said.

Obama also claimed that the U.S. military’s involvement falls under his constitutional authority as commander in chief and his power to conduct foreign relations.

“Given the important U.S. interests served by U.S. military operations in Libya and the limited nature, scope and duration of the anticipated actions, the President had constitutional authority, as Commander in Chief and Chief Executive and pursuant to his foreign affairs powers, to direct such limited military operations abroad,” the report said.

Thirdly, the administration claims that its actions are not governed by the War Powers Act because the U.S. involvement does not constitute “hostilities” – the term used by the act to limit the time the president may commit U.S. forces into combat.

The War Powers Act limits the president to a unilateral military commitment of no more than 60 days before he must request congressional authorization.

However, Obama claims that he needs no such authorization.

“The President is of the view that the current U.S. military operations in Libya are consistent with the War Powers Resolution and do not under that law require further congressional authorization, because U.S. military operations are distinct from the kind of “hostilities” contemplated by the Resolution’s 60 day termination provision.”

While the report misleadingly uses the term “further authorization,” the fact is that Congress never granted it authorization in the first place. Instead, Obama has issued a series of letters to congressional leadership explaining his actions and has dispatched various aides and surrogates to brief Congress on the mission in Libya.”

Source:

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/obama-us-actions-libya-legitimated-un

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and videos relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. Video: Liberal Congressman, Obama is “An Absolute Monarch”!-Posted on ExposeObama.com-On June 24, 2011:

http://www.exposeobama.com/2011/06/24/video-liberal-congressman-obama-is-an-absolute-monarch/?utm_source=Expose+Obama&utm_campaign=d9ed8c26f9-EO_06_24_2011_Aft6_24_2011&utm_medium=email

II. U.S. Paying to Keep Libyan Anti-Aircraft Missiles Away From Terror Groups!-Posted on CNSNews.com-By STEPHEN BRAUN, Associated Press-On June 17, 2011:

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/us-funds-hunt-libyan-missiles

III. Obama's unauthorized war on Libya costs $9,421,000 a day: Are you getting your money's worth?-Posted on The LA Times-By Andrew Malcolm-On June 16, 2011:

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2011/06/obama-libya-war-congress-authority-war-powers.html

IV. Pelosi: Obama Doesn't Need Congressional Authorization for Libya Action!-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Nicholas Ballasy-On June 16, 2011:

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/pelosi-obama-did-not-and-does-not-need-c

V. The Way Forward in Libya!-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-By by James Phillips, James Jay Carafano, Ph.D. and Morgan Roach-On June 15, 2011:

http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2011/06/US-Role-in-Libya-and-the-Way-Forward

VI. NATO sliding towards Libyan ground war: Russian envoy!-Posted on Yahoo News-By Adrian Croft, Reuters –On Jun 15, 2011:

http://beta.news.yahoo.com/nato-sliding-towards-libyan-ground-war-russian-envoy-193632749.html

VII. A Showdown over the War in Libya!-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-On June 15, 2011:

http://blog.heritage.org/2011/06/15/morning-bell-a-showdown-over-the-war-in-libya/?utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Morning%2BBell

VIII. Will John Boehner and Congress Finally Take a Stand for the Constitution?-Posted on The Patriot Update-On June 15, 2011:

http://patriotupdate.com/8191/will-john-boehner-and-congress-finally-take-a-stand-for-the-constitution

IX. Video: “Nothing Could Be More Impeachable” Than Obama’s Libyan War!-Posted on ExposeObama.com-On June 16, 2011:

http://www.exposeobama.com/2011/06/16/video-nothing-could-be-more-impeachable-than-obamas-libyan-war/?utm_source=Expose+Obama&utm_campaign=c179baf9e2-EO_06_16_20116_16_2011&utm_medium=email

X.  George Soros assault on U.S. Constitution: ‘White House officials involved in rewriting nation’s founding document’!-Posted on WND.com-By Aaron Klein-On March 27, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=280277

Note:  My following blog post contains numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Godfather of The Islamic Revolution!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/11/godfather-of-the-islamic-revolution/

Note If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…

Harlequin Novel, 2011 Version

Dear Friends,

I was sure my computer was going to crash any second, but surely it would smoke no later than reaching the end of this brilliantly titillating piece. Thoughts of somehow having intercepted the latest of the “Weiner” tapes went through my mind, or possibly the LasVegas pressure cooker. Well, I’ll refrain from saying more – but you must promise me you’ll go all the way, to the end that is! And I promise that you will not regret it, when you get there, and we will still be Friends! I wish I could take credit, instead it merely goes to show you that I have good Friends who are also nuts. I like it that way.

Semper Fi

(Note: don't skip the lines as you progress)

 

_____________________________________________________________________

 

 

He grasped me firmly, but gently, just above my elbow and

guided me into a room, his room.  Then he quietly shut the

door and we were alone.  He approached me soundlessly, from

behind, and spoke in a low, reassuring voice close to my

ear.

  

 

  

"Just relax."

  

 

 

  

Without warning, he reached down and I felt his strong,

calloused hands start at my ankles, gently probing, and

moving upward along my calves, slowly but steadily. My

breath caught in my throat.

  

  

  

I knew I should be afraid, but somehow I didn't care.  His

touch was so experienced, so sure.  When his hands moved up

onto my thighs, I gave a slight shudder, and partly closed

my eyes.  My pulse was pounding.

  

 

  

I felt his knowing fingers caress my abdomen, my  ribcage.

And then, as he cupped my firm, full breasts in his hands, I

inhaled sharply.

  

 

  

Probing, searching,

knowing what he wanted, he brought his hands to my shoulders,

slid them down my tingling spine and into my panties.

  

 

  

Although I knew nothing about this man, I felt oddly

trusting and expectant. This is a man, I thought.  A man

used to taking charge.  A man not used to taking 'No' for an

answer.  A man who would tell me what he wanted. 

A man who would look into my soul and say . . .

 

(keep going)  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

"Okay ma'am, you can board your flight now."

Maybe we shouldn’t complain – this might after all be the last thrill grandma can ever hope to get.

___________________________________________________________________

 

Now that you have taken your cold showers and returned from never land, here is my take on this ingenious little piece of ecstasy - the fact is that these groping sessions are exacted upon us, the American citizen, a free people, from infant to senior Viagra, and all because we have been misled into believing that dealing with a terrorist by looking for the Fox in the chicken coop is somehow compromising our freedom - what freedom? The freedom we are protecting!?
 

I am publishing this piece without fear of retribution, for it is as powerful a statement as one can make in exposing the hypocrisy that rules the day - dictated behavior in a free society, void of all common sense, and ordered by the State!

There is nothing wrong with either the language nor the substance of this satire. It is a clean and straight forward statement of factual behavior when ruled by legalisms and the State, and a perfect example of Common Sense, or the lack thereof (you are fortunate to have it and smart to know when you don’t - and the State has neither), but it wants to teach our fourth graders about sex (I am sure you remember how that worked out when the State started teaching your kids about their rights - my two beautiful boys turned into little jerks, before we managed to return them back to normal) - I’d say this passes the test.

Read more…

Posted on National Review Online- By Stanley Kurtz-On June 17, 2011:

Jonah rightly calls today’s David Brooks column a must-read. Brooks discusses Reckless Endangerment, the new book by Gretchen Morgenson and Joshua Rosner exposing Fannie Mae’s role in the runup to the financial crisis. Brooks also rightly credits Michele Bachmann for her important role in publicizing a topic many other national politicians have been silent on.

I’ve only had a chance to give Reckless Endangerment a quick look, but my impression is that it tells the right story, if a bit too much from Fannie Mae’s point of view. In Morgenson and Rosner’s telling, Fannie Mae effectively buys off ACORN and other low-income housing groups. There’s some truth to that, but it underestimates the extent to which ACORN and allied groups forced Fannie Mae into the subprime business in the first place, and sometimes pushed themselves onto Fannie Mae against resistance.

I tell that story in the ACORN chapter of Radical-in-Chief, based on heretofore unseen documents from the ACORN archive at the Wisconsin Historical Society.

I also show that Barack Obama was knee-deep in ACORN activities just as their banking campaign reached its height. In fact, much of ACORN’s national housing campaign in the mid-nineties was coordinated from the Chicago office Obama was funneling money to at the time.

So if the combination of the publication of Reckless Endangerment and Michele Bachmann’s campaign brings a new awareness of Fannie Mae’s role in precipitating the financial crisis, by rights it also ought to raise awareness of ACORN’s role, and Obama’s abetment of ACORN activism as well. Of course, for that very reason, the entire story is likely to be ignored. Maybe only someone like Bachmann has the power to break it through.”

Source:

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/269895/fannie-acorn-obama-and-financial-crisis-stanley-kurtz

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. Fannie Mae scandal is the most important political scandal since Watergate!-Posted on The New York Times-By DAVID BROOKS-On June 16, 2011:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/17/opinion/17brooks.html?_r=1

II. Video: Obama’s Failed Secular, Socialist Ideas are Destroying the USA!-Posted on ExposeObama.com-On June 19, 2011:

http://www.exposeobama.com/2011/06/19/video-obamas-failed-secular-socialist-ideas-are-destroying-the-usa/?utm_source=Expose+Obama&utm_campaign=4a78c9e4a1-EO_06_19_20116_19_2011&utm_medium=email

III. Alan Simpson, Erskine Bowles Predict Coming Economic Crisis!-Posted on NewsMax.com-By Forrest Jones-On June 18, 2011:

http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/Economy-AlanSimpson-ErskineBowles/2011/06/18/id/400503?s=al&promo_code=C76C-1

IV. IMF: Washington is ‘Playing With Fire’ on Deficit!-Posted on Money News-By Thomson, Reuters-On June 17, 2011:

http://www.moneynews.com/StreetTalk/imf-debt-globaleconomy/2011/06/17/id/400410?s=al&promo_code=C76E-1

V. Swindling America’s Youth!-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Guest Writer-On June 15, 2011:

http://floydreports.com/swindling-americas-youth/

VI. The Ignorance of Barack Obama!-Posted on RushLimbaugh.com-By Rush Limbaugh-On June 15, 2011:

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_061511/content/01125110.guest.html

VII. ‘Too Big to Fail’ May Still Exist Despite Democrats’ Regulations!-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Matt Cover-On June 15, 2011:

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/too-big-fail-may-still-exist-despite-dem

VIII. Stimulus destroys more jobs than it creates!-Posted on The Locker Room-On June 14, 2011:

http://lockerroom.johnlocke.org/2011/06/14/stimulus-destroys-more-jobs-than-it-creates-there-was-no-other-possiblity/

IX. Obama's Co-Chair Concurs: We Face Most Predictble Economic Crisis in History In About 2 Years!-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Patrick Ryan-On June 14, 2011:

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/former-sen-simpson-tipping-point-will-co

X. Obama Blames ATMs for High Unemployment!-Posted on Conservative Byte-On June 14, 2011:

http://conservativebyte.com/2011/06/obama-blames-atms-for-high-unemployment/

XI. 18 Signs The Collapse Of Society Is Accelerating!-Posted on The Economic Collapse-On June 2011:

http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/18-signs-the-collapse-of-society-is-accelerating

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

ACORN-The Community Reinvestment Act (CRA)-Automaker Labor Unions!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/22/acorn-the-community-reinvestment-act-cra-automaker-labor-unions/

What Was The Chicago Annenberg Challenge?

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/03/22/what_was_the_chicago_annenberg_challenge.thtml

Was the Economic Crisis Manufactured?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/03/06/was-the-economic-crisis-manufactured/

Who or What Was Behind the Financial Crisis?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/03/06/who’s-behind-the-financial-crisis/

Treasury Secretary hired firm to help cover-up stimulus records!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/11/06/treasury-secretary-hired-firm-to-help-cover-up-stimulus-records/

Is the Fed’s concept of buying $600 billion of Treasuries just a smokescreen?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/11/03/is-the-fed’s-concept-of-buying-600-billion-of-treasuries-just-a-smokescreen/

The Obama Fiscal Responsibility Farce Continues!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/27/the-obama-fiscal-responsibility-farce-continues/

The Wall Street Bailout Bill Threatens Our Bottom Line!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/20/the-wall-street-bailout-bill-threatens-our-bottom-line/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by the Obama administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…

Left & Right With Andrew Breitbart!

What follows is a must see five video series that contain an eye-opening interview conducted by Peter Robinson with Andrew Breitbart, a publisher, columnist, and blogger, who is the founder ofBreitbart.comBreitbart.tvBig GovernmentBig HollywoodBig Journalism, and Big Peace. He is also the author of his latest book titled “Righteous Indignation”-You Decide:

Left & Right with Andrew Breitbart: ‘Andrew Breitbart describes his liberal origins’. (Chapter 1 of 5)-Posted on National Review Online-On June 13, 2011:

http://tv.nationalreview.com/uncommonknowledge/post/?q=MDBjZjcxOWI2ZDQ1MzVhMjc0Y2FhYWFlODNmNDhlYWI=

Left & Right with Andrew Breitbart: ‘Andrew Breitbart illustrates the Democrat-Media Complex.’ (Chapter 2 of 5)-Posted on National Review Online-On June 14, 2011:

http://tv.nationalreview.com/uncommonknowledge/post/?q=YWQ5NGY1MzY4NzA4MjJmNTkwNmZmNDk3N2Y4N2I3YjE=

Left & Right with Andrew Breitbart: ‘Andrew Breitbart accepts some blame for the Huffington Post.’ (Chapter 3 of 5)-Posted on National Review Online-On June 15, 2011:

http://tv.nationalreview.com/uncommonknowledge/post/?q=MjZmN2U0ZGIzMjc2NGU1MmQwYjQ0YTJlZTdkNDA4YzM=

Left & Right with Andrew Breitbart: ‘Andrew Breitbart reveals his one “Ah ha!” moment.’ (Chapter 4 of 5)-Posted on National Review Online-On June 16, 2011:

http://tv.nationalreview.com/uncommonknowledge/post/?q=NjlhZGJiYzVhM2U1OWRmYjM5NjJkMTUyNTE1ZDBlY2Y=

Left & Right with Andrew Breitbart: ‘Andrew Breitbart lists his rules.’ (Chapter 5 of 5)-Posted on National Review Online-On June 17, 2011:

http://tv.nationalreview.com/uncommonknowledge/post/?q=ODE4OGZmNWMzYzk3NWJjZmMyNjU0M2U3OTk2YzYyYzc=

Also included is a book review of Andrew Breitbart’s new book that reveals the history of Socialism in America, beginning with early worship of Jean-Jacques Rousseau (who actually came before Karl Marx) to the scary Frankfurt School at Columbia University and that Marxism started in universities, government and the media, which he claims is America’s worst enemy, along with 13 Rules for Conservative Activists and much more:

Book Review: Andrew Breitbart’s Righteous Indignation!-Posted on The Patriot Update-By Ann-Marie Murrell-On May 23, 2011:

http://patriotupdate.com/articles/book-review-andrew-breitbart’s-righteous-indignation

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Who owns our supposedly fair and balanced airwaves and news outlets?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/21/who-owns-our-supposedly-fair-and-balanced-airwaves-and-news-outlets/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed since 2009 by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…

Posted on The Daily Caller-By Jonathan Strong-Updated on June 16, 2011:

Faced with bracing evidence and the testimony of four ATF agents contradicting the Justice Department’s initial blanket denials that assault weapons were knowingly allowed to escape into the clutches of Mexican drug cartels, Democrats tried a new approach at a hearing Wednesday.

Rather than focus on questioning the GOP’s investigative tactics, Democrats on the House Oversight Committee sought to subtly channel the burgeoning scandal into a push for new gun control laws.

For instance, Rep. Gerry Connolly, Virginia Democrat, connected the apparently reckless investigative strategy to the National Rifle Association’s (NRA) lobbying pushes.

“The NRA has opposed regulations which would require tracking of multiple gun sales,” Connolly noted in a statement passed out to reporters. “The gun lobby and its advocates in Congress are even trying to pass legislation to eviscerate the ATF’s authority to stop criminals.”

Rep. Carolyn Maloney, New York Democrat, also drew a link between the Operation Fast and Furious scandal and whether ATF agents are plagued by “toothless” laws.

“US Attorneys have complained” that prosecutions for illegally purchasing weapons to resell to criminal networks are viewed by judges as “mere paper violations. Have you heard this criticism before?” Maloney asked the four ATF agents testifying.

(CONTRADICTION: Four ATF agents contradict Justice Department account on ‘Fast and Furious’)

“I have and I agree with it,” said Peter Forceilli, who thought a minimum sentence of one year in jail would ensure cooperation from “straw buyers” caught by federal authorities.

Darrell Issa, chairman of the Oversight Committee, sought to intervene.

“I want to caution the witnesses,” Issa said. “The scope of your testimony here is limited, and is not about proposed legislation and the like.”

Elijah Cummings, Maryland Democrat and Issa’s combative foil on the oversight panel, protested vociferously. “It’s only fair” for the ATF agents to speak their mind about whether gun laws should be strengthened, he said.

The shift in tactics by the Democrats came as they also appeared to concede the weight of the evidence Issa was presenting clearly undercut blanket denials initially issued by the Justice Department.

Cummings, for instance, called the four ATF agents “great Americans” for “standing up for what you believe in,” and warned the ATF not to retaliate against the agents.

(RECONSIDER: ‘Wire’ co-creator to Holder: Reconsider drug war)

However, when a top deputy to Attorney General Eric Holder was testifying, Cummings ostentatiously apologized for Issa’s conduct in demanding answers from assistant attorney general Ronald Weich. “Let me apologize,” he said. Issa objected that “you may apologize on behalf of something you say.”

Cummings, in defending Weich, shows Democrats are still invested in defending the Obama administration even as documents and testimony are increasingly undermining the administration’s claims.

But the gun control comments Wednesday indicate they may be preparing to chart a new course: embracing the controversy and using it for their own political purposes.

That would, at the very least, leave less time to save Holder from Issa’s zealous investigation.”

Source:

http://dailycaller.com/2011/06/15/democrats-try-to-channel-scandal-into-gun-control-push/#ixzz1PTojDdvU

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and videos relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. Plan to Let Drug Cartels Buy Guns in U.S. Approved at ‘Highest Levels' of DOJ!

Posted on CNSNews.com-By Fred Lucas-On June 17, 2011:

(CNSNews.com) - Instead of trying to stop the flow of weapons from the U.S. to Mexican drug cartels, the Obama administration’s “Operation Fast and Furious” deliberately allowed it to happen. Moreover, “This shift in strategy was known and authorized at the highest levels of the Justice Department,” says a report by congressional staffers.

“Through both the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Arizona and ‘Main Justice’ headquarters in Washington, D.C., the Department closely monitored and supervised the activities of the ATF,” the report says.

On Wednesday, Rep. Darrell Issa, chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, convened a hearing to determine who ultimately authorized the Operation Fast and Furious, who knew about it – “and why it took the murder of a 40-year old border patrol agent and a congressional inquiry before administration officials cancelled it.”

Operation Fast and Furious, conducted by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, was launched in 2009 in an effort to track the flow of guns from U.S. straw purchasers to Mexican cartels.

ATF agents who complained about the recklessness of allowing cartel associates to buy guns in Arizona were reprimanded, the congressional report said.

David Voth, a supervisor at the ATF field division in Phoenix, told complaining agents to back off: “Whether you care or not people of rank and authority at HQ are paying close attention to this case and they also believe we (Phoenix field division) are doing what they envisioned the Southwest Border Groups doing,” Voth wrote in an e-mail dated March 12, 2010. “It may sound cheesy, but we are ‘The Tip of the ATF spear’ when it comes to Southwest Border Firearms Trafficking.

“If you don’t think this is fun you’re in the wrong line of work – period,” the Voth e-mail continued: “This is the pinnacle of U.S. law enforcement techniques. After this, the tool box is empty. Maybe the Maricopa County Jail is hiring detention officers and you can get paid $30,000 (instead of $100,000) to serve lunch to inmates all day.”

Voth’s e-mail was included in a 51-page report by Republican staffers on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee and the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Two of the guns purchased by cartel associates were found at the scene of a U.S. Border Patrol agent’s murder in December.

Attorney General Eric Holder said in March he ordered the Justice Department inspector general to investigate the ATF’s gun-tracking operation – “to see exactly what happened, and whether or not what happened was appropriate.”

Source:

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/atf-gun-tracking-probe-approved-highest

II. Assistant AG: ‘I Do Not Know’ Who Authorized Plan to Let Drug Cartels Get Guns!-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Edwin Mora-On June 17, 2011:

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/assistant-attorney-general-i-do-not-know

III. ATF Director Could Watch Live Video of Cartel Gun Buys--While Permitting Them to Proceed!-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Edwin Mora-On June 17, 2011:

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/top-atf-official-very-much-weeds-gun-run

IV. Gov't's Gun Scheme: ‘Loads of Weapons … for Criminals Was The Plan’!-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Susan Jones and Terence P. Jeffrey-On June 16, 2011:

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/dodson-video

V. ATF Agent to Bosses on Gun-Running Scheme: ‘Prepared to Attend Funeral of a Slain Agent’?-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Edwin Mora-On June 16, 2011:

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/atf-agent-bosses-govt-gun-running-scheme

VI. Issa: ATF Mexican Gun Scandal a Lot Like Iran-Contra!-Posted on CNSNews.com-By David A. Patten-On June 15, 2011:

http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/DarrellIssa-CharlesGrassley-ProjectGunrunner-OperationFastandFurious/2011/06/15/id/400174?s=al&promo_code=C719-1

VII. Four ATF Agents Contradict Justice Department Account on “Fast and Furious”?-Posted on ExposeObama.com-By Jonathan Strong, The Daily Caller-On June 15, 2011:

http://dailycaller.com/2011/06/15/four-atf-agents-contradict-justice-department-account-on-fast-and-furious/

VIII.  Video: Issa, Project Gunrunner was a Deadly Mistake!-Posted on ExposeObama.com-On June 15, 2011:

http://www.exposeobama.com/2011/06/15/video-darrell-issa-project-gunrunner-was-a-deadly-mistake/?utm_source=Expose+Obama&utm_campaign=48ec7d4e1b-EO_06_15_20116_15_2011&utm_medium=email

IX. Video: ATF Agent to Bosses on Gun-Running Scheme: ‘Prepared to Attend Funeral of a Slain Agent’?-Posted on CNSNews.com:

http://www.cnsnews.com/cnsnewstv/v/95922

X. DOJ Potentially Charged with Obstruction of Justice!-Posted on Patriot Update-By Ann-Marie Murrell-On June 8, 2011:

http://patriotupdate.com/articles/while-weiner-wept-doj-charged-with-obstruction-of-justice

XI. Back Door Gun Control and Fighting Back!-Posted on Human Events-By  Mike Piccione-On June 14, 2011:

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=44108

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Did ATF provide weapons to Mexican drug cartels that were subsequently used to kill one of our own?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/03/04/did-atf-provide-weapons-to...

What is the true intent of the UN Small Arms Treaty?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/12/what-is-the-true-intent-of...

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed since 2009 by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…


 

 
                        When in Doubt, Dems Attack Messenger,
Whistle-blowing McKinsey Consulting Firm
 
 
                “WHEN is this nonsense going to stop?”   AT&T calculated that dropping coverage and paying the fine rather than face the escalating future premiums associated with Obamacare and rising health care costs will save the huge firm $1.8 Billion annually. 
 
 
 
            We’re all familiar with journalists who protect their sources being sent to jail for “contempt of court.” High-profile global business consulting company McKinsey & Co. may soon be facing a similar situation. McKinsey’s great transgression? Not revealing the sources of a stunning new poll finding that “30% of employers intend to, or probably will stop offering employer-sponsored insurance after 2014 to avoid the expensive burden of Obamacare. The 78 million employees involved rank as just one more “unintended consequence” of the 2,773 page Obamacare law which creates 384 brand new federal agencies. 2014 is the year the full-impact of Obamacare is scheduled to kick-in.
            It gets worse than that, however . . . . Among businesses citing “a high awareness” of what Obamacare is all about,” over half of them are planning to drop health care insurance benefits for their workers. In a phrase, the death knell for private health insurance has been sounded. Among those uncomfortable with the tolling bell: the Democratic Party, specifically Dems in the Senate, and the Obama administration who are attacking McKinsey and the results of the study. Already the threats of senate hearings have been issued. Already “requests” for McKinsey data related to the study have been mentioned. Already talk of “subpoena” power (to get McKinsey to reveal the sources of its poll results) is rampant.
Besides the now infamous 1,920 “waivers” granting freedom from Obamacare to numerous unions and progressive employers favored by the Obama administration (In April 20% of all such waivers in the country were granted to one San Francisco district whose representative is House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi) other cracks are showing already in Obamacareland: unrelated studies have also shown that many small businesses employing slightly more than the “cut-off” number intend to lay off workers rather than face the prospect of mandatory expensive new Obamacare regulations “gutting their businesses.” (Obamacare requires employers of more than fifty workers to provide insurance for them or pay a fine).   In yet another unrelated study roughly 76% of such businesses this year intend to pay the $2,000 fine per employee rather than offer insurance and dealing with Obamacare. AT&T, for example, calculated that dropping coverage and paying the fine rather than face the escalating future premiums associated with Obamacare and rising health care costs will save the huge firm $1.8 Billion annually. 
Of course the kickback among Senate Dems was instantaneous. Hoping, it seems, to be able to pressure businesses with the temerity to respond honestly to the poll they want to know WHO? is responsible for such answers about their beloved takeover of the nation’s health care industry. A better question might be WHEN is this nonsense going to stop? You’ll recall that among the numerous phony projections used to sell Obamacare to the Dems themselves (no Republicans in the House or Senate voted for it) was the notion that only 2.5% of employers would find a way to opt out of the program. Chances are the Republican projections that huge portions of the business world would seek to escape Obamacare’s burdensome provisions sent the Obama administration to giggling among themselves . . . now it seems that 30% or perhaps 50%**(once they learn more of what Obamacare is all about) of all businesses might “vote with their feet” and endeavor to escape Obamacare. We repeat, “WHEN is this nonsense going to stop?”
It can now be expected that millions of the workers cut loose will be forced to shop within the government blessed "exchanges" – and will be eligible based on income levels for generous taxpayer funded premium subsidies thus predictably driving the cost to the taxpayers sky-high. Thus the Dems will once again be buying votes with taxpayer's money” – or worse, with debt borrowed from China.  ObamaCare makes subsidies available up to 400% of poverty level income.” This is wealth-redistribution that holds the potential to destroy capitalism in three years.   Thus it’s now official, the Republicans were right, rather than being a program that “pays for itself” as promised, the impact on the taxpayer and the treasury and the national debt will be in the tens of TRillions of dollars.   Bankruptcy of the nation looms.
 
 
Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,
Rajjpuut
 
 
**Once again the progressives in Washington, D.C. show their ignorance of reality and of the broken-window fallacy so that the taxpayer and the business owner and the owner’s employees are negatively impacted by a fanciful creation^^ of their deluded minds: Obamacare.
 
^^Of course that fanciful creation of the deluded mind of Jimmy Carter CRA ’77 (the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 which forced banks and mortgage lenders to knowingly make horrifically bad home loans to highly UNDERqualified loan seekers) sent the percentage of “suspect” loans in this country from 0.24% in 1975 to 34.1% in 2005 (after four legislative expansion – three by Bill Clinton – and a Clinton regulatory expansion) and created our sub-prime lending crisis and financial meltdown. Thanks to the Clinton steroid-version legislative expansion of CRA ’77 in 1998; ACORN in 2000 found it easier to put bad loan candidates into $440,000 homes than they’d been able to put better (but still Unqualified candidates) into $110,000 homes in 1990. Instead of 3% down payment loans of 1990, many illegal aliens; and welfare recipients whose only “income” was food stamps after 2000 were put into very expensive homes with ARMS (adjustable rate mortgages); a situation just waiting to meltdown into the abyss.
 
 
 
 
Read more…

TX State Sen. Interrupts Immigrant’s Testimony: ‘Why Aren’t You Speaking in English?’

(The Blaze - Posted on June 17, 2011 at 8:33am by Jonathon M. Seidl Jonathon M. Seidl)

If you are giving testimony in front of Texas State Senator Chris Harris, he’d prefer you speak English.

 

During a Senate hearing on Monday, Antolin Aguirre of the Austin Immigrant Rights Coalition was testifying against Senate Bill 9, a law that would crack down on illegal immigrants in Texas. But instead of giving testimony in English, he decided to give it in Spanish and speak through an interpreter.

 

Harris wasn’t having any of that. KTRH-RADIO explains:

Two minutes into Antolin Aguirre’s testimony, Sen. Chris Harris, a Republican
from Arlington, interrupted asking Aguirre’s interrupter, “Did I understand him
correctly that he has been here since 1988?” Harris asked. “Why aren’t you
speaking in English then?”

 

Through his interpreter, Aguirre said Spanish is his “first language and
since it is his first time giving testimony he would rather do it in
Spanish.”

 

“It is insulting to us,” Sen. Harris fired back. “It is very insulting. And
if he knows English, he needs to be speaking in English.”

You can watch the fireworks below:

 

 

The bill, which would allow police officers to check a suspect’s immigration
status, eventually passed the Senate and will now go before the House.

 

What do you think?

Read more…
By John W. Lillpop

Alabama’s new immigration law combines common sense and rule of law in a manner that protects the rights and property of American citizens against assault by foreign illegal aliens. The measure is based on legitimate concerns involving home land security, unemployment among U.S. citizens, financial crisis in America, and preservation of American culture and language.

Those are not reason enough for some religious leaders who play the J word—Jesus—in opposing the law.

As reported, in part, at the reference:

“Some church groups are speaking out against Alabama's new law against illegal immigration, which they say violates Christian principles.


Leaders of the United Methodist Church, the Episcopal Church, the Lutheran Church and the Roman Catholic Church have all criticized the law as running counter to the Bible's teaching about loving others. Episcopal Bishop Henry N. Parsley of Birmingham calls its passage "a sad moment for our state."

The state's largest denomination, the Alabama Baptist Convention, hasn't taken a position publicly. But the latest edition of its widely read state newspaper, The Alabama Baptist, includes a front-page story that features Hispanic worries about the new law.
The Nevada-based Mormons issued a statement saying they are worried about tough state immigration statutes the day after Alabama Gov. Robert Bentley signed the law.”

 
Where, in the name of Jesus Christ, is concern for American citizens? Illegal aliens violate our borders, steal public services such as education, medical care, food, and shelter intended to provide a safety net for citizens.

Would Jesus support the invasion and occupation of a sovereign nation by millions of foreign aliens, invasions which cost taxpayers dearly, and which lead to deterioration of the established culture and language?

Did Jesus not counsel, “Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s, and unto God the things that are God’s”?

Is there not a Commandment among the Big 10 which forbids stealing?

Further, why are the churches not directly funding health care, education, etc. for illegal aliens rather than having those costs dumped on the back of taxpayers, where said cost exceeds $100 billion a year?

Question to those self-righteous hypocrites who oppose rule of law and basic fairness: What if legislation was passed to revoke the tax-exempt status of your institutions to fund the care and nurturing of illegal aliens?

Would your crying bleeding hearts be so compassionate if your pocket books were involved?


MSNBC host Chris Matthews recently used the term “culturally-backward Christians” to describe those whom were most bothered by the Anthony Weiner scandal.

His was dead wrong on that score, but his question may have application to how certain faiths come down on the side of invading criminals.

The question, “Are religious leaders who oppose common sense and rule of law when it comes to illegal aliens ‘Culturally backward’?”

Just asking.

Are Religious Leaders Who Oppose Alabama’s New Immigration Law 'Culturally Backward'?

http://www.necn.com/06/16/11/Churches-speaking-out-against-Ala-immigr/landing_politics.html?&blockID=3&apID=eb73ee282055466fae188d4fbb6df47b
Read more…

Who Shot The Dollar?????

This is from our friends at Personal Liberty;

 

Who Shot The Dollar?

June 15, 2011 by John Myers

Who Shot The Dollar?
PHOTOS.COM
President Barack Obama delivered the deathblow to the dollar.

Who killed the U.S. dollar? This question will be debated by future historians. Already, more people are asking that question than tuned in to find out who shot J.R. on Dallas. The lineup of suspects is long, but it ends with Barack Obama, the triggerman who killed the buck.

The first wound came from Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who expanded the Federal government’s influence far beyond what the writers of the Constitution ever imagined. He devalued the price of gold and made it impossible for ordinary Americans to convert currency to bullion. But FDR was also crucial during America’s World War II victory, a pivotal event that set the stage for America to become the world’s largest creditor and greatest superpower.

LBJ Chooses Guns And Butter

Another suspect is Democrat Lyndon B. Johnson. When I was in college studying economics, our professor made us read history. This seemed counterintuitive until we read about the guns-and-butter policies of the Johnson Administration.

And while Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama make Johnson look like a penny-pincher, Johnson was the first to take a shot at the dollar.

Johnson pressed forward his vision with major spending programs for education, medical care, crime and transportation. He wanted to transform America the way FDR had. And he had a war to fight in Vietnam.

Gold demand rose, creating a drawdown on America’s gold reserves. The root of it all was a growing trade deficit that the United States owed to the rest of the world.

The Administration of John F. Kennedy knew America’s gold standard was in trouble. In January 1961, Kennedy’s Undersecretary of the Treasury, Robert Roosa, suggested the U.S. and Europe pool their gold to prevent a private marketplace for gold in which the price would exceed the mandated price of $35 per ounce. French President Charles de Gaulle reneged on the deal and began to redeem dollars for gold instead of U.S. Treasuries. The drain on U.S. gold became severe.

The 1960s marked a gigantic increase in Federal spending. Johnson’s two-front war was being fought at a prohibitive cost. In 1968, for the first time since 1893, the United States ran a deficit in its balance of trade. Federal debt began to soar. By the end of the 1960s, the U.S. faced the stark choice of eliminating trade deficits or devaluing the dollar.

Gold On Nixon’s Enemies List

On Aug. 15, 1971, President Richard Nixon cut the final link between gold and the dollar. Other nations could no longer redeem rapidly depreciating greenbacks for bullion.

In February 1973, the world’s currencies “floated.” By the end of 1974, the price of gold had soared from $35 to $195 an ounce. The U.S. could suddenly pump dollars without constraint. It was a period during which red flags were being raised for paper investors, few of whom paid any notice.

The majority of investors would pay a steep price for their ignorance. Over the next decade, they suffered through the worst bear market in stocks since the Great Depression and the worst bond market of the 20th century.

A Democrat Gives The Dollar A Reprieve

It is ironic that another Democrat would breathe life into the buck, but that is what President Bill Clinton did.

During the Clinton Administration — with the help of innovative accounting — the dollar stormed back. The disgrace Clinton brought to the Oval Office over the Monica Lewinsky affair seems almost forgivable since his Administration presided over a growing economy and what underpinned it, a strong dollar. More than a decade ago, the world had confidence in the U.S. dollar.

If you do not believe me, check the chart below.

 

Trade Weighted Exchange Index

As you can see, the greenback has been experiencing an unprecedented decline since 2001. No doubt much of the weakness in the dollar was caused by another guns-and-butter President: George W. Bush.

Just 2½ years into office, Obama is pushing the value of the dollar even lower. It’s so low that the value of the U.S. dollar now threatens to undermine our future and our children’s future.

 

To read the rest of the article go here:

http://www.personalliberty.com/conservative-politics/government/who-shot-the-dollar/?eiid=&rmid=2011_06_15_PLA_[P11408439]&rrid=394822321

Read more…

Chickens Come Home to Roost

The notion of bad deeds, specifically curses, coming back to haunt their originator is long established in the English language and was expressed in print as early as 1390, when Geoffrey Chaucer used it in The Parson's Tale: And ofte tyme swich cursynge wrongfully retorneth agayn to hym that curseth, as a bryd that retorneth agayn to his owene nest. 

The Center for Media and Democracy's Real Economy Project is now assessing the total cost to taxpayers of the Wall Street bailout. Multiple federal agencies have disbursed $4.6 trillion dollars in support of the financial sector since the meltdown in 2007-2008. Of that, $2 trillion is still outstanding. Our assessment demonstrates that the Federal Reserve has provided by far the bulk of the funding for the bailout in the form of loans amounting to $3.8 trillion. Little information has been disclosed about what collateral taxpayers have received in return for these loans. CMD also concludes that the bailout is far from over, as the government has active programs authorized to cost up to $2.9 trillion, and still has $2 trillion in outstanding investments and loans.

You are looking at the tip of the iceberg—two ideas in play, one, independence—life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, calling for self-governance; the other, dependence—for the good of all.  The above stated assessment tells you that for the good of all the world’s leadership, through the systematic theft of the individual’s property, is striping the individual of his life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. What to do about it is the problem.  Hundreds of millions of people are caught between a rock and a hard place.

The answer to the problem is clear enough, but it doesn’t fit the world’s current reality. Sociologist Robert K. Merton’s self-fulfilling prophecy:  “in the beginning, a false definition of the situation evoking a new behavior which makes the original false conception come 'true'. This specious validity of the self-fulfilling prophecy perpetuates a reign of error. For the prophet will cite the actual course of events as proof that he was right from the very beginning.”  

The universe is both quantitative and qualitative.  Everyone understands the difference.  Quantity applies to space and time. Quantitatively, the planet Earth compares to one grain of sand on all the beaches in the world. Qualitatively, one can be completely dependent on others. Why are millions of Indians living on the street?  Why was the World Trade Center destroyed and thousands of innocents killed? Why do millions of Middle-East Muslims see Jews as a threat and want to kill them all?

The quality of life is terrible for the majority of the world’s population.  Millions of the miserable in Americans are on the Yellow Brick Road with Dorothy, the Tin Man, without a heart, the Cowardly Lion, and the Man of Straw, without a brain, all on their way to see the Wonderful Wizard of Oz.  The dream ends back where we were, at square one.

This fairy tale would be true were it not for the Mayan calendar. The world turns; it transits around the sun; the sun around the galaxy.  We are about to reach the tipping point of a galactic change.  Thousands of responses to my blogs at www.mymiraclemessage.com  say a groundswell of new thought is building that is going to break and sweep the world.  

I’m thinking about Woodrow Wilson’s progressive inspired depression. It didn’t last but a year. President Harding took care of Wilson’s progressive attempt to make socialist slaves of us. And then there was Jimmy Carter’s progressive inspired stagflation, which didn’t last either, not after Ronald Reagan took office and changed directions. The change coming with the end of Barack Obama’s economic disaster, according to the Mayan calendar, on December 21, 2012—be ready for astounding news—is going be an evolvement that happens once in many thousands of years.  But, ah, this change I’m speaking of, “the progressive order of the divine dealings of God with humanity, ‘the increasing purpose’ which runs through and links together the ages, from the beginning of the life of man to the end in eternity,” says Rev. C.I. Scofield, Editor of the Scofield Reference Bible, makes it clear to me this one is going to be the big change the world is waiting for.  Welcome to the Age of Aquarius.

Rev. Scofield: “The appointed mission of Israel was (1) to be a witness to the unity of God in the midst of universal idolatry; (2) to illustrate to the nations the greater blessedness of serving the one true God; (3) to receive and preserve the Divine revelation; (4) to produce the Messiah, earth’s Savior and Lord,” Jesus told us, “in earth as it is in heaven . . .But seek ye first the kingdom of God.” There is a distinction. Are you of the earth, an insignificant part of a mere grain of sand—for the good of all—or, are you an inextricable part of the consciousness of the universe?  It is your choice, but if you accept Jesus, who said that you and God are one, you got nothing to worry about.  You are about to become the person you were meant to be.

 

Ricardo Thach’s comment today to my post, “Everything is in Divine Order”  http://www.mymiraclemessage.com/?p=104  “It’s like you read my mind! You seem to know a lot about this, like you wrote the book on it or something.”

I didn’t write a book. Voices of the past are speaking through me.   

 

 

Read more…

After taking some time to view Leah’s recent powerful video regarding “Conversational Hypnosis”, I wanted to share my following blog post with you that I drafted on or about March 12, 2009, which I believe relates to this issue-You Decide:

Are We Witnessing Conversational Hypnosis At Work?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/17/are-we-witnessing-conversational-hypnosis-at-work/

Question:  Does President Obama covertly use a little known and highly deceptive and manipulative form of conversational hypnosis techniques in his speeches and how does that affect the way he governs our country?

The following document contains over 60 pages of evidence and analysis, which seem to make a good case that President Obama uses a little known and highly deceptive and manipulative form of “hack” hypnosis on millions of unaware Americans and reveals what only a few psychologists and hypnosis/NLP experts know-You Decide: 

An Examination Of Obama’s Use Of Hidden Hypnosis Techniques In His Speeches: “Exposing Obama’s Deception May Be The Only Way To Protect Democracy”:

http://www.pennypresslv.com/Obama's_Use_of_Hidden_Hypnosis_techniques_in_His_Speeches.pdf

These are pertinent excerpts from this document:

“Barack Obama’s speeches contain the hypnosis techniques of Dr. Milton Erickson, M.D. who developed a form of “conversational” hypnosis that could be hidden in seemingly normal speech and used on patients without their knowledge for therapy purposes.

Obama’s speeches intentionally contain:

  • Trance Inductions 
  • Hypnotic Anchoring
  • Pacing and Leading 
  • Pacing, Distraction and Utilization
  • Critical Factor Bypass
  • Stacking Language Patterns
  • Preprogrammed Response Adaptation
  • Linking Statements/ Causality Bridges
  • Secondary Hidden Meanings/Imbedded Suggestions
  • Emotion Transfer
  • Non-Dominant Hemisphere Programming

Obama’s techniques are the height of deception and psychological manipulation, remaining hidden because one must understand the science behind the language patterns in order to spot them.  This document examines Obama’s speeches word by word, hand gesture by hand gesture, tone, pauses, body language, and proves his use of covert hypnosis intended only for licensed therapists on consenting patients. 

Obama’s mesmerized, cult-like, grade-school-crush-like worship by millions is not because “Obama is the greatest leader of a generation” who simply hasn’t accomplished anything, who magically “inspires” by giving speeches. 

Obama is committing perhaps the biggest fraud and deception in American history.

Obama is not just using subliminal messages, but textbook covert hypnosis and neuro-linguistic programming techniques on audiences that are intentionally designed to sideline rational judgment and implant subconscious commands to think he is wonderful and elect him President.

Obama is eloquent. However, Obama’s subconscious techniques are shown to elicit powerful emotion from his audience and then transfer those emotions onto him, to sideline rational judgment, and implant hypnotic commands that we are unaware of and can’t even consciously question. 

The polls are misleading because some of Obama’s commands are designed to be triggered only in the voting booth on November 4th

Obama is immune to logical arguments like Wright, Ayers, shifting every position, character, and inexperience, because hypnosis affects us on an unconscious and emotional level. 

To many people who see this unaccomplished man’s unnatural and irrational rise to the highest office in the world as suspicious and frightening and to those who welcome it, this document uncovers, explains, and proves the deceptive tactics behind true “Obama Phenomenon” including why younger people are more easily affected.” 

Note:  For more information relating to Dr. Milton Erickson, M.D., please refer to the following web sites:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milton_H._Erickson

http://www.erickson-foundation.org/drerickson.html

Note:  The following articles and/or blog posts are examples of how President Obama used video games as a deceptive tactic to get to our young people in this country during his 2008 Presidential election campaign-You Decide:

Obama Mind Control Operation Targets The Young:

http://transformatum.com/2008/10/03/were-gonna-change-the-world/

Obama buys first video game campaign ads:

http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSTRE49EAGL20081016?sp=true

Obama Ads Invade Video Games:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,437763,00.html

Note:  The following web site, along with articles and videos give us some undisputable examples of how President Obama’s use of hypnosis affects us on an unconscious and emotional level as a means of covertly accomplishing his hidden agenda to destroy our country-You Decide:

http://bornatthecrestoftheempire.blogspot.com/2007_12_30_archive.html

The Truth About Obama:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vkrWo-BdKrc&feature=related

Warning: Controversial Video! Did Obama Use Covert Conversational Hypnosis To Seduce America?

http://conversational-hypnosis1.com/conversational-hynosis-techniques/warning-controversial-video-did-obama-using-covert-conversational-hypnosis-to-seduce-america/

Obama’s Use of Hidden Hypnosis Techniques in His Speeches:

http://www.infowars.com/obama’s-use-of-hidden-hypnosis-techniques-in-his-speeches/

Obama’s Hypnotic Effect:

http://www.brutallyhonest.org/brutally_honest/2008/10/obamas-hypnotic.html

Beware Of Charismatic Men Who Preach ‘Change’:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L0GeVdrPxSw&feature=PlayList&p=08775E81DA24CA66&index=38

Barack Obama inauguration: this Emperor has no clothes, it will all end in tears:

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/gerald_warner/blog/2009/01/20/barack_obama_inauguration_this_emperor_has_no_clothes_it_will_all_end_in_tears

Note:  This web site gives you a series of videos that show you how hidden hypnosis works with great examples-You Decide:

https://www.youtube.com/results?search=related&search_query=Derren%20Brown%20NLP&v=befugtgikMg&page=2

Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed on the above blog post may have been removed since 2009 by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered to be too controversial by this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

Have A Great Day & God Bless-Keep The Faith.

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…
On June 9, 2011, an Executive Order established the White House Rural Council with 25 executive branch departments including Defense, Justice, Homeland Security, National Drug Control, Environmental Quality, Labor, Commerce, Interior, EPA, Housing, Health, Education to name just a few.


The order covers 16% of the American population who lives in rural counties because they “supply our food, fiber, and energy, safeguard our natural resources, and are essential in the development of science and innovation.”

“Strong, sustainable rural communities are essential in winning the future and ensuring American competitiveness in the years ahead.” What kind of future are we supposed to win? Are we losers right now? This is very vague, what years ahead?

“To enhance the Federal Government’s efforts to address the needs of rural America, this order establishes a council to better coordinate Federal programs and maximize the impact of Federal investment to promote economic prosperity and quality of life in our rural communities.” As a world traveler, I can attest that Americans already have the highest standard of living in rural areas, prosperity, and excellent quality of life when compared to anybody else.

A recent article in Washington Post appeared with the innocuous title, “What we need: Smarter growth plans.” The author is Roger K. Lewis, a practicing architect and professor emeritus at the University of Maryland. Who can possibly object to “smarter growth plans?” Except that “smart growth plans” is the euphemism used by the United Nations for its Agenda 21, a direct assault on private property rights and American sovereignty.

Roger K. Lewis suggests that “smart growth” was designed by market forces driven by “green building.” He makes no mention of Agenda 21 and ICLEI objectives and intrusion into our society since the early 1970s or the agreement signed in 1992 that went under the radar of the American people’s understanding of the complex negative ramifications for our economy and our liberties.

I have not met Americans who think, “sprawl-producing planning, zoning and mortgage templates are obsolete” as the author claims. Would Americans willingly give up their land and homes with or without compensation in exchange for a move to a densely populated high-rise, with no parking garages, no access to cars, like rats fenced in a grey concrete maze?

Communist “social engineering” confiscated land and homes for agriculture. People were forced to move into many-storied, tiny cinder block apartments without any compensation for the land or homes bulldozed. They were forced to commute by bicycles or public transit.

Lewis deems subdivision developments with low-density, detached, single-family homes as outdated. He calls the areas educationally dysfunctional and unsafe. American suburbia was built, he says, on four assumptions that have lost validity today:

Unlimited supply of land
Inexpensive and inexhaustible supply of oil
Homogenous land use
The American dream to own and inhabit a mortgaged house.
I am not sure on what research Lewis based his conclusions, but we have huge domestic oil reserves if permits were issued to drill. We also have a vast land mass. Some areas have 70 or less inhabitants per square mile. Americans still want to own their own home and want to live in a homogeneous community of other homeowners. Just because power hungry bureaucrats at the United Nations have decided to “preserve” land and the environment for the future of the planet and its animals, neglecting the future of humans, does not mean Americans agree to this vision.

“Much of America’s land cannot and should not be developed.” Who are you to decide for us, Mr. Lewis and why? Last time I checked we were free people who determined their own life choices.

“Dependency on oil and limitless use of cars pose daunting environmental, economic, and geopolitical problems.” Who is going to decide the limit to our car use? Is it going to be done by law, more regulations, or executive order?

A handful of environmentalists, the EPA, and the United Nation’s dictators, using faulty debunked data from the University of East Anglia or phony research are trying to separate Americans from their land use, cars, trucks, and the open-wide roads.

Lewis continues his Agenda 21 fallacy. “The traditional nuclear family—mom, dad, two to three kids and one or two pets—is now a minority of America’s households.” I am positive that this man is not describing America that I know and see every day. His statements continue, “Today a majority of households are people, young or old, living alone; couples or sets of unrelated individuals of various ethnicities, ages and tastes.”

Agenda 21 and Mr. Lewis suggest building high-rises in “designated areas within municipalities where new development and re-development is feasible and desirable.” Affordable housing is a priority and so are environmental standards.

It is obvious that “smart growth plans” or Agenda 21 designed by United Nations will affect our future choices in how we live and where. EPA will be involved and will twist the arms of those who do not adopt “smart growth plans,” denying grants to states and cities and levying other penalties. By the time Americans realize the implications of Agenda 21“smart growth,” they will lose their homes and lands with no compensation. At least people who lost property under Eminent Domain have been compensated.

The International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) is a conglomerate of 600 national, regional, and local government associations who promote “sustainable development” and protection of the environment because of man-made global warming that does not exist.

“Sustainable development” is the United Nations effort to contain and limit economic development in developed countries and thus control population growth. It is “sustainable de-growth,” plain and simple. The focus is “low-income agriculture” and to set limits on the developed world.

United Nations and its affiliates believe that first world countries polluted significantly during their development while urging third world countries to reduce pollution thus impeding their growth. Implementation of “sustainable development” would revert our society to a pre-modern lifestyle.

ICLEI wants to keep the environment as pristine as possible through “ideal-seeking behavior.” These euphemisms are not clearly defined in terms of what or who will evaluate or set the standards for this “ideal-seeking behavior.”

Agenda 21 sets up the global infrastructure to manage, count, and control assets. It is not concerned with protecting the environment or the world’s resources. Agenda 21 wants change from old sector-centered ways of doing business to new approaches. The “desired future state” should be to pursue “economic prosperity, environmental quality, and social equity.”

“Social equity” is the new euphemism for “social justice” the Marxists in our government have been using a lot lately. Who gave them the authority and the mandate to initiate such change? I do not remember the American people being asked through a referendum whether we wanted our way of life to be fundamentally changed according to mandates set up by the United Nations. How will population growth control be achieved in order to protect the precious environment?

There are four tiers to UN’s “sustainable development” plan:

Environmental sustainability
Economic sustainability
Socio-political sustainability
Cultural diversity.
In 2001 UNESCO, in The Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity, stated that cultural diversity is as important as biodiversity in the sense of a more satisfactory, intellectual, emotional, moral, and spiritual existence. Who is to decide the level and quality of the population’s satisfaction, intellectual, emotional, moral, and spiritual existence? Human needs must be met while preserving the environment for the future. Again, who will decide what our needs are in order to preserve the future?

In February 2011 in Nairobi, Kenya, ICLEI attended a United Nations conference as representative of the interests of local governments. “In collaboration with partners such as UN-Habitat, Cities Alliance and ICLEI, UNEP (United Nations Environmental Protection) is working to make cities more livable, better prepared for the multiple environmental challenges they are facing, as well as giving them a stronger voice in the international climate negotiations.” Last time I checked, global warming has been debunked as a hoax and UN rapidly changed its name to climate change, continuing the attempt to fleece developed countries. In addition, who decides these international climate negotiations and why? What are we negotiating? Carbon credits?

In October 2009 in Bangkok, ICLEI stated, “local governments are offering national governments our partnership in the fight against climate change.” ICLEI wants local governments to collaborate with national governments to fight against climate change, the very change that has been scientifically debunked.

Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution states clearly, “No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation, ...No State shall,... enter into an Agreement or Compact with another State or with a foreign power…” The counties and cities that are members of ICLEI in the U.S. through its national organization are attempting to implement foreign policy, which our Constitution forbids. What mayors and municipal governments are doing is plain unconstitutional.

“Mayors and local governments set forth the following commitments to implement sub-national, national, and international frameworks by providing resources, authority, and mandate to carry forward climate protection roles and responsibilities.”

There is no law or act of Congress to authorize the aiding and abetting of foreign policy globalism by state and local governments. We have to protect our sovereignty by banning cities and counties to be members of ICLEI, an organization that promotes United Nation’s Agenda 21/“smart growth” which is detrimental to American economic interests, liberty, and sovereignty.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Read more…

Weiner Thanks Parents for “Values”!




By John Lillpop

Anthony Weiner IS a sick, sick man.

To prove it, while giving his resignation speech, which brought to an end a scandalous career involving debauchery, exhibitionism, distribution of pornographic materials over the Internet, possible violations of law with respect to underage girls, and lord knows how many other federal, state, and local laws he may have violated, the deranged little man said:

“And I want to thank my mother and father for instilling in me the values that brought me this far .” (Paraphrase)

Thank them?

Good heavens, this wacko has just been forced to give up a position in the U.S. House, is headed for rehabilitation and may face felony charges and prison time!

A more appropriate response would have been for Weiner to Tweet Erick Holder and demand that his parents be arrested for child abuse! Attach those crotch shots as hard evidence, Mr. Weiner!
Read more…
LINK;  http://voiceoflillpop.blogspot.com/2011/06/texas-state-senator-to-bloke-giving.html

 



By John W. Lillpop

Why is it that so many Hispanics refuse to assimilate into American culture, even refusing to speak English?

Hispanics often deny that that is the case, but as stated at the link, in part, one Texas Congressman grew very angry at one Hispanic's Spanish testimony:


State Sen. Chris Harris (R-Arlington) spoke for many Americans when he interrupted the Spanish-language testimony of a citizen of 23 years against the Sanctuary Cities ban (SB9), to say it was "insulting" for the man not to speak English. This goes right to the heart of everything that is wrong with those who advocate for illegals and La Raza. The seperatism. The sense of entitlement. The contempt for our common language that prior immigrants always hurried to adopt. God bless you Sen. Harris for speaking for all of us!"
 

Indeed he does. Thank you Senator Harris.

America needs to make English the official language of the nation. Period!
Read more…

Dear Fellow Patriots:

For informational purposes, I wanted to take the liberty of sharing the email that I forwarded to our New Mexico U.S. Congressman Martin Heinrich on June 12, 2011, his response of June 15, 2011, and my response to him on June 16, 2011:

4063329506?profile=original

I.  Email Forwarded to Congressman Heinrich on June 12, 2011- Ref: “The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!

June 12, 2011

The Honorable Martin T. Heinrich

U.S. House of Representatives

336 Cannon House Office Building

Washington, DC 20515-3101

Dear Congressman Heinrich:

The story of whom and what Barack Hussein Obama II really is - is a forty-year story that requires a book, not a column, to tell. Strong evidence suggests that he was being groomed from a very young age for the moment in history that would end American supremacy in the world, and usher in a new era of Global Marxist Governance.

But there was a major hurdle that had to be overcome - the U.S. Constitution, in this case, Article II - Section I - Clause V specifically, which requires that "no person except a natural-born citizen of the United States" can hold the office of President. - Obama is not a natural-born citizen of the United States...and may not even be a legal citizen of the United States. So, how can he be President?

http://thepatriotsnews.com/indx.php/content/163

This column focuses upon the period 2003-2008 and the political maneuvers that took place in order to make way for America's first unconstitutional resident of the White House.

Sincerely,

 

Jake Martinez

Albuquerque, NM 87123-3798”

 

II. Email Received From Congressman Martin Heinrich on June 15, 2011, in response to my letter of June 12, 2011. Ref: “The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!”

“Responding to your message

Wednesday, June 15, 2011 3:40 PM

From:  "Congressman Martin Heinrich" nm01mhima@mail.house.gov

June 15, 2011

Dear Mr. Martinez,

This short note is to let you know that I received your email about the citizenship status of United States President Barack Obama, and the legitimacy of his presidency. 

President Barack Obama was born in Honolulu, Hawaii, on August 4, 1961.  For your reference, a pdf copy of his long-form birth certificate can be found here: http://whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf

Again, thank you for contacting me.  For more information and additional details about legislation, please visit my website, http://heinrich.house.gov.  While you are there, you can also sign up to receive periodic updates on my work in Congress. 

As always, I value your input and hope you will continue to keep me informed of the issues important to you.

 

Sincerely,

 

Martin Heinrich

Member of Congress

Web Site: http://Heinrich.house.gov

Subscribe to my e-newsletter.

Look for me on Facebook and YouTube”

 

III.  Email Forwarded to Congressman Martin Heinrich on June 16, 2011, in response to his letter of June 15, 2011. Ref: “The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!”

"June 16, 2011

Congressman Martin Heinrich

Capitol Office

336 Cannon HOB

Washington, D.C. 20515

Phone: (202) 225-6316

Fax: (202) 225-4975

Dear Congressman Heinrich:

Thank you for your speedy response to my recent correspondence regarding the “The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!” and for providing me with the White House’s pdf copy of President Obama’s long-form birth certificate, which is include below:

http://whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf

By now you are probably aware that President Obama’s recently released “Certificate of Live Birth”, which you provided to me above has been found to be fraudulent by an international expert on scanners and document-imaging software and he has recently filed a 22-page criminal complaint with the FBI to that effect.

For your information, I have included some information regarding subject criminal complaint below:

On or about May 31, 2011, Mr. Doug Vogt, an international expert on scanners and document-imaging software filed a 22-page criminal complaint with the FBI charging that the long-form birth certificate released by the White House, on or about April 27, 2011, is criminally fraudulent.

Background on Mr. Doug Vogt:

Since 1993, Vogt has owned Archive Index Systems Inc., in Bellevue, Wash., a company that sells a wide variety of document scanners worldwide and develops document-imaging software.

Before that, Vogt owned Nova Typesetting for 11 years.

Mr. Vogt stated the following in the Criminal Complaint:

“What the Obama administration released is a PDF image that they are trying to pass off as a Certificate of Live Birth Long Form printed on green security paper by the Hawaiian Health Department,” Doug Vogt writes, “but this form is a created forgery.” 

Mr. Vogt’s criminal complaint asserted: 

“I have irrefutably proven that the Certificate of Live Birth that President Obama presented to the world on April 27, 2011, is a fraudulently created document put together using the Adobe Photoshop or Illustrator programs, and the creation of this forgery of a public document constitutes a class B felony in Hawaii and multiple violations under U.S. Code section Title 18, Part 1, Chapter 47, Sec.1028, and therefore an impeachable offense.”

“It is a logical conclusion,” he says, “that since President Barack Obama felt it necessary to have a Certificate of Live Birth forged for himself then we must conclude that there is in fact no birth certificate in Hawaii and therefore he was not born inside the United States, as the Constitution requires, and he knew it and others also knew it but wanted him in office for whatever reason.”

When the Obama birth certificate “forgery” comes to the public’s attention, Vogt continues, “It will surpass all previous scandals including the Watergate scandal of the Nixon administration.”

Sources:

Criminal complaint charges Obama birth record ‘forged’! (Part 1)-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On May 31, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=305705

Criminal complaint details birth-certificate ‘forgery’! (Part 2)-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On June 5, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=306953

Why did Obama release electronic birth certificate? (Part 3)-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On June 7, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=308277

On or about June 2010, Mr. Tim Adams, a college instructor, who worked as a senior elections clerk for the city and county of Honolulu from May 2008 through September 2008, made a stunning claim that President Obama was definitely not born in Hawaii as the White House maintains, and that a long-form, hospital-generated birth certificatefor him did not even exist in the Aloha State.

Source:

Hawaii Elections Clerk: Obama birth not here – Official who oversaw ballots in 2008 race says long-form birth certificate non-existent!-Posted on WND.com-By Joe Kovacs-On June 10, 2010:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=165041

On or about January 20, 2011, Mr. Adams, a former Hawaii elections clerk signed an affidavit swearing he was told by his supervisors in Hawaii that no long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate existed for Barack Obama Jr. in Hawaii and that neither Queens Medical Center nor Kapi’olani Medical Center in Honolulu had any record of Obama having been born in their medical facilities.

Source:

Hawaii official now swears: No Obama birth certificate!-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On January 24, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=254401#ixzz1PT0rwcGl

On or about June 13, 2011, Retired Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely, stated that the “Certificate of Live Birth” released, on or about April 27, 2011, by the White House as “proof positive” of President Obama’s Hawaiian birth is a forgery, but the FBI is covering the fraud and no one in Congress is willing to tackle the situation because of fears of a “black backlash”if the failings of the nation’s first black president are revealed. He revealed this during an interview that was aired on the Terry Lakin Action Fund Radio Show on June 13, 2011.

Source:

Ex-CIA: ‘Forged document’ released as birth certificate!-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On June 15, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=311433

On June 12, 2011:  The following eye-opening article and/or blog post revealed overwhelming evidence that we in fact have a fraud and a usurper that resides in the people’s White House, despite the overt lack of journalistic investigating on the part of the American press. The new evidence indicates that the conspiracy to carry out that fraud was much broader than originally thought, which includes a forty-year story that requires a book, not a column, to tell because the evidence suggests that our President was being groomed from a very young age for the moment in history that would end American supremacy in the world, and usher in a new era of Global Marxist Governance.

The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!-Posted on The Post & Email-By JB Williams-On June 12, 2011:

http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/06/07/evidence-broadens-obama-natural-born-conspiracy/

I will be looking forward to hearing from you on this disturbing and time sensitive issue.

Thank you again for all you continue to do for our Veterans, our state and our country.

God Bless You and God Bless America.

Respectfully,

 

Jake L. Martinez

Captain-USMC-Retired"

Automatic Electronic Response Received From Congressman Heinrich's Office Regarding My Email Above:

"Thank You

Thank you for starting the conversation. I am honored to represent you in Congress and am here to help in any way possible.

I will send a reply via email and want to make sure you receive it. Therefore, please add the following email address to your address book or your spam filter’s list of approved email addresses: NM01MHIMA@mail.house.gov.

I hope that you have also visited the Briefing Room, and Agenda sections of my website where you will find an abundance of information to answer any question you may have regarding my work in the United States House of Representatives.

In light of the critical legislative debates we'll be facing this year over health care, climate change, clean energy, and the economy, please consider signing up for my e-newsletter, The Heinrich Headliner, delivered right to your inbox.

Thank you for visiting my Congressional Web site.

Regards,

MARTIN HEINRICH”

P.S.: I will be providing you with periodic updates as I receive other responses to my emails that I forwarded to the President and other NM State Officials regarding this issue, as a means of providing all of you with an example of what peaceful and legal action you could take regarding this disturbing and time sensitive issue-You Decide. 

Have A Great Day & God Bless.

God Bless the U.S.A.! 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…