All Posts (30365)

Sort by

OUR COUNTRY MORAL RESPONSIBILITY IS DEAD

By: Juan Reynoso, WTP Activist -  clearglobal2016@gmail.com

Americas must realize that self-scrutiny is not treason. Self-examination is not disloyalty.

Truth and knowledge diffused among the people are necessary for the reclamation and preservation of our Democracy, rights, freedom and liberties.

The U.S. must take responsibility for the exodus and the refugee crises. http://northerntruthseeker.blogspot.com/2015/09/the-truth-about-syrian-refugee-crisis.html

Fellow Americans, our country’s moral responsibly is dead.  The roots of these refugee crises are the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya and other countries. We know that the “roots” of the crises in these countries which have given rise to this “Human catastrophe” is the United States of American; George W. Bush created this exodus of innocent people that was force to leave their country and seek refuge in the EU. But the response to meet America’s moral responsibility of this crisis created by their greed for power and control of the Middle East oil is only a guilty silence.

Any serious consideration of what lies behind the surge of refugees into Europe leads to the inescapable conclusion that it constitutes not only a tragedy but a crime. More precisely, it is the tragic byproduct of the US criminal policy of aggressive wars and regime change interventions pursued uninterruptedly by the US imperialism, with the aid and complicity of its Western European allies, over the course of nearly a quarter century.

The US, the UK and NATO are responsible for the EU refugee’s crisis.  The destruction and the killings by the wars in the Middle East is the root of this problem. We've lost sight of the simple fact that our fellow humans are in dire need of help, having fled death and destruction in their homelands only to face an even more perilous journey into Europe.  This refugee crisis was created by us; a huge number of people are continuing to cross the Mediterranean in voyages that have killed more than 2,000 so far this year. We must take responsibility and now is the time to help the people who need it the most.

Enough is enough; our attitudes have to change we must see the human and not the imagined danger that anything is under threat apart from these people's lives, somehow our government has stopped seeing refugees, but they are refugees created by their military actions and tried to deny them the assistance they are legally, and morally, entitled to, is the worst crime against humanity.  But it has to end, and end now; it has to end because people are dying in their thousands, because Europe's reputation as a champion of human rights is disintegrating, because if we don't act now we will regret it for the rest of our history.

To share this please clicks here       Share

Sources for this article include:

US Military and Clandestine Operations in Foreign Countries

https://www.globalpolicy.org/us-military-expansion-and-intervention/26024.html

Chronology of U.S. Military Interventions, from Vietnam to the Balkans

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/military/etc/cron.html

A Brief History of U.S. Interventions: 1945 to the Present

http://thirdworldtraveler.com/Blum/US_Interventions_WBlumZ.html

U.S. Military Intervention in the Middle East

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article6308.htm

Iran, the United States and a Political Seesaw

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/04/07/world/middleeast/iran-timeline.html?_r=0#/#time5_210

U.S. Military intervention in the Middle East

http://usmeforeignpolicy.umwblogs.org/intervention-timeline/

U.S. Military intervention in Iraq.

http://usiraq.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=000670

The U.S. used military power in support of its national interests. “The US Corporations”

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/globalconnections/mideast/questions/uspolicy/

Read more…

FREE TRADE KILLS THE AMERICAN DREAM

By: Juan Reynoso, WTP Activist -  clearglobal2016@gmail.com

Americas must realize that self-scrutiny is not treason. Self-examination is not disloyalty.

Truth and knowledge diffused among the people are necessary for the reclamation and preservation of our Democracy, rights, freedom and liberties.

Free trade kills the American dream.

http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/the-shockingly-high-cost-of-free-trade-10-reasons-why-globalism-is-bad-for-middle-class-americans

I am 78 years old and I have experienced the takeover of our country by the oligarchs. It is the super-rich that control the US corporations and the elite of the Republican Party Neocons warmongers, that in a strategic partnership with the Democrats; systematically pushed back the progress of the American working class and all the effort of growing and improving our national economy.   Since Ronald Reagan, Via the mainstream news media the propaganda machinery of the oligarch and the Republican party neocons, they feed the American people their unchecked misinformation and disinformation, the Republican Party Neocon Elite has even shanghaied the emotional support of everyday ordinary Republican party members and the Americans people into taking this non-sensible political positions against their own best economic and self-interests and supported all of the free trade ill policies that destroyed the American dream.

Today the people is waking up and seeing the results of the free trade policies that were implemented by the puppets of the oligarchs “Bill Clinton and the majority of the neocons Republicans and the Democrats whores” that sell out to the oligarchs. Americans today find themselves to an increasingly unaffordable healthcare, a true unemployment of 12% with no private sector job growth opportunities, poor quality education and few good teachers that really care to educate their children, a police force that is overpay and abuse their power and become the number one killers of the minority working class in this country. The fact is that the American worker is the one that suffer the consequences of free trade; no one can deny that most American today works long hours and no benefits and get pay slave wages.  The American worker today,  many do not earned enough to cover their living expenses and few only have very little money after they paid for gas, food, housing and insurance to paid for other things they need; we are on the path toward a third-world country, but it is not too late to change this path of self-destruction, millions of people recognize what is happening and they are join the BERNIE SANDERS political revolution to help all of us the ordinary American, in a sustained effort to get off our country from the path toward a third world country status and restore the American dream. Thanks God we have some Republicans and Democrats that believe in our country’s mission, that our country was founded by the people and for the people; under the ideology that our government was formed to protect and defend our God given freedom and liberty to self-determination in support of our economic and welfare. Our US constitution and our Bill of rights it is based on the Bible principles “The laws of nature are the laws of God, whose authority can be superseded by no power on earth.” 

 It is not too late to recognize, that what is happening in our country is the result of greed for power and money, the love for money destroy our nation moral responsibility toward the American people. God is giving us hope to take our country back and reclaim our moral principles, take responsibility for the making of our future and embrace God’s laws as our guiding light to build a country with moral responsibility toward all humanity.

Greed destroyed the moral leadership of our country-and passed many free trade legislations that destroyed the American dream. http://biblescripture.net/Bill.html

Join the revolution and re-store the American dream.

https://berniesanders.com/remarks-at-afl-cio-conference/

Washington lost their moral responsibility.

http://www.businessweek.com/debateroom/archives/2007/02/outsourcing_wheres_uncle_sam.html

American corporations are the world’s exploiters of humanity.

http://www.businessweek.com/debateroom/archives/2007/06/overseas_sweatshops_are_a_us_responsibility_1.html

Read more…

By: Juan Reynoso, WTP Activist -  clearglobal2016@gmail.com

Americas must realize that self-scrutiny is not treason. Self-examination is not disloyalty.

Truth and knowledge diffused among the people are necessary for the reclamation and preservation of our Democracy, rights, freedom and liberties.

Hillary Clinton should be ban from the political arena. She is sycophant self-serving person. Nothing matter but her and what she want. http://www.nationalreview.com/article/423015/hillary-clinton-emails-inner-circle-yes-men

The political history of the Clinton's is full of criminals acts committed by the Clinton's and their associates. Bill and Hillary Clinton are sycophants, sociopaths; their ideology is: the ends justified the means.  Hillary insecurity as women transformed her into a pathological liar. Hillary Clinton was fire by her supervisor Jerry Zeifman, while working for the house judiciary committee during the Watergate investigation, because she was a liar. The Clintons are criminals and must be ban from the political arena

The Clintons, cleanup their history of crimes and corruption by killing the ones that know too much.

http://whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/BODIES.html

http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/another-clinton-associate-found-dead-bill-hillarys-body-count-increases/

The Clintons Legacy of crimes and corruption.

http://prorev.com/legacy.htm

Clinton's Labor Legacy

http://www.ranknfile-ue.org/cap_st15.html

Hillary Clinton the criminal operating with impunity protected by the Obama administration

http://observer.com/2015/08/the-countless-crimes-of-hillary-clinton-special-prosecutor-needed-now/

Former Arkansas Trooper Speaks Out about the Clintons.

http://www.aim.org/media-monitor/former-arkansas-trooper-speaks-out/

Why Hillary Clinton let husband Bill seduce any woman in sight, She will do anything for power.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-507762/Why-Hillary-Clinton-let-husband-Bill-seduce-woman-sight.html

Hillary's insecurity as woman, make her to support humiliation and she swept Bill Clinton's affairs under the carpet.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-508015/Hillarys-humiliation-How-swept-Bill-Clintons-affairs-carpet.html

EXCLUSIVE: Hillary Clinton’s Lesbian Affairs Named in Secret Emails

http://pamelageller.com/2015/04/hillary-lesbian-2.html/

Jennifer Palmieri. Is a whore, she sold her principles to protect Hillary Clinton

http://www.businessinsider.com/hillary-clinton-email-server-defense-2015-8

Read more…

By Craig Andresen – The National Patriot and Right Side Patriots on cprworldwidemedia.net

kd-1.jpg?width=262When my Right Side Patriots radio partner and friend, Diane Sori and I wrote and published yesterday’s article, “First Amendment Held Hostage in Kentucky,” I had no intention of writing a follow-up article but, considering the comments received after yesterday’s article…I felt compelled to address a few things which some folks out there just refuse to grasp.

Far too many of the holier-than-thou religious Conservatives out there, and one can only guess from some talking points memo, are feigning ignorance which makes them appear foolish…their top question has been…”What law did this woman, Davis, break to be sent to jail?”

That of course was followed by an often repeated, in nearly the exact same wording…”What law did congress pass making gay marriage legal?” And the direct talking points memo statement of…”She’s in jail for her beliefs…not for breaking any law,” was another oft repeated comment being made so…let me make this clear for the terminally religious fabricaters of spin out there…

READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE!!!

Read more…

“Never apologize and never explain--it's a sign of weakness."--- John Wayne in “She Wore a Yellow Ribbon”"

“Apologizing as a coward to appease murderous communists, Moslems and Black Supremacists is weakness.”----Confede on Scribd

 Obama Hidden Agenda Apologies

Apologizing when carried out by the tyrant Obama is a way of insulting and besmirching the USA. He symbolically informs, evil, twisted and hateful foreign crowds: “I am a felon who seized control of the USA illegally. I seized that power so that I could destroy the US. One part of my destructive strategy is to join America’s enemies in condemning America as bad and problematic. In this way I undermine the hope, pride and honor of white Americans. When they see me, an evil ignoramus, apologize for the heroes of the American past and for mistakes that other nations have made in far greater frequency. I am saying that white Americans who voted me into office to prove how much they love Africans, are  such low down scum that I, President for Life, Tutu Obama will symbolically make them grovel, just as the crook they elected grovels before the thugocracies of the world.”

 Obama's apologies made the US more vulnerable to attack because enemies realize that they can commit mass murder in America and then build mosques on the ashes of the murdered. The Bwana Obama claimed that he wanted to engage enemies through the application of "smart power" (apologies are stupid surrenders of self and power) so you carried out a series of stupid power apologies to mass murderers and tyrants everywhere. Appeasement consists of letting certain special religions and races commit crimes which only white Americans are forced to pay for. Recent missile tests by Iran and North Korea show there's nothing smart in "appeasing rogue states." Thanks to Obama, the US is increasingly "jeered rather than feared" by enemies. No leader in American history has gone to greater lengths than Barack Obama to make amends for his own country. From condemnation of American “arrogance” in a speech in Strasbourg to acknowledging U.S.“mistakes” before millions of Muslims on Arab television, Obama has rarely missed an opportunity to apologize for the actions of the American people.

President Obama has elevated the art of national self-loathing to new heights, and seems to delight in prostrating the most powerful nation on the face of the earth before its critics and rivals, especially on foreign soil. The Obama world view revolves around the central premise that the United States must be humble and “engage” and work with its enemies through the application of “smart power”. There is nothing smart, however, in appeasing rogue states such as North Korea or Iran. The Obama doctrine is now lying in tatters after North Korean tyrant Kim Jong-Il and Iranian demagogue Mahmoud Ahmadinejad met Obama’s recent overtures with missile tests and even a nuclear blast from Pyongyang. The president’s video message in March offering “a new beginning” to “the people and leaders of the Islamic Republic of Iran” was followed by the launch of a surface-to-surface missile with a range of 1,200 miles capable of reaching southern Europe. Incredibly,the U.S. response has been to slash defense spending, with a dramatic scaling down of plans for a global missile defense shield.

The world today is considerably more dangerous, than it was in the days of the Bush Administration, and the Obama White House has nothing to show for its weak-kneed, anti-American efforts, but premeditated failure. The brutal truth is that the United States is increasingly viewed as a soft touch by its enemies, increasingly jeered rather than feared.

 It will be hugely tempting for the rock star president “obama” to play to his Arab and European audiences by scoring points against his hugely unpopular predecessor. He could easily rail against the Bush Administration’s enhanced interrogation techniques, boast of the impending closure of the Guantanamo detention facility, or revive the ghosts of Abu Ghraib. The president’s advisers are no doubt furiously trying to outdo one another with the most original mea culpas.

 Obama’s supine approach has become a humiliating spectacle for a country that, together with Great Britain, has done more to advance the cause of liberty and freedom across the world than any nation in the world. Every groveling apology by the president undermines America’s confidence, standing and power, and strengthens the hand of those who seek her destruction.

 Obama is exercising another form of the put-down power of apologies which the racist, minority parasites that he really represents, use to heap scorn on white Americans. It is white Americans who have awarded black treachery, violence and racism by transforming them into the most evil, pampered, privileged synthetic parasitic communist elite in the world. Pampered false elites who have extorted their wealth from the majority simply because their skin color and souls are varying degrees of black, will always stab their benefactors in the back.

 Everyday in North America and Europe gangster minority parasites are wrenching apologies from national political figures. Those apologizing national political figures are always communists who fanatically promote African and Islamic supremacy paid for by the hard work of white working and middles classes. Although the evil wretches and political whores who are pulling the strings behind the scenes of the “Apologies Movement,” are among the most craven political gangsters in the world and are infamous for using their political power to get rich and enrich their cronies, they remain immune from criticism.

The Apologies Movement

The fact that the “Apologies Movement,” is just another communist program to gain more financial handouts for the real constituents of the American democrat-republican party is only sensed by the enraged American public.

It is time to spell out exactly what the “Apologies Movement,” is after. In fact the “Apologies Movement,” has two goals:

 -Extort money and privileges from the white enemy

   A major weapon constantly exercised by professional racist negroes in America is the “Apology Card.” Racist communists claim that apologies are meant to accomplish positive things. However the apologies are always one sided, discriminatory and dishonest. If the minorities seeking apology were honest and sincere, they would also apologize for many of their own shortcoming, violence, murders and racist/religious hate crimes.

  The subversive aspect of the “Apologies Movement,” is important to recognize. Among its several real purposes are the demands that white working and middle class people be apologized “for” by a communist political whore and hypocrite. Such apologies by an arrogant commie political “Ho”, is in fact, nothing more than :

  Humiliation rituals, the apologizing white race must grovel and heap public scorn on itself as evil, although the true facts about each “crime” committed are not honestly brought to light.

   Domination rituals, by apologizing one submits to the minority parasite group and accepts their control.

   Dishonest, there are two or more sides to every issue and the people who are forced to apologize are convicted of guilt without a fair hearing.

   Mercenary, the real purpose of the apology by a lying political whore who presumes to apologize for white America, is to justify more reparations in the form of financial payments to the phony “aggrieved parties.”

   Unfair, political whores who are elected to represent the best interests of all of their constituents decide that one race is guilty and must be apologized for while another race is pimped as heroic victims. In other words the political/cultural apology process is an exercise in deceit and duplicity.

   Institutionalizes communist values: Communism has always preached that groups and/or races are guilty of the “crimes” that their ancestors supposedly committed, and must pay for them currently. The so-called “guilty party” is robbed to enrich the “aggrieved party.” Such reparations never end and in the long run produce a false nobility of racist parasites who are paid to live a life of leisure.

   Illegal: White people are judged as guilty and all rights to legal due process are abrogated in order to satisfy the demands of minority parasites.

   Institutionalizes racism and religious bigotry: White Christians are evil, black muslims are good

    Promotes Anti-Democratic Police State Communism: When one group of people is proclaimed to be guilty, without recourse to the constitutional right to trial by jury, it is illegal. When the same group is forced to pay reparations as well as grovel by participating in humiliating and obnoxious apologies, the group judged guilty is discriminated against. It is thereafter treated as a criminal. Were the architects of the “Apologist Movement,” among the hundreds of thousands (over 500,000 foreign moslems attend US universities at US taxpayer expense) of college professors and student who, a few years ago, signed a petition demanding the genocide of all white Americans?

 Who is Behind the Apology Scam?

    No one should be surprised to learn that the usual combination of back stabbing communists are behind the “Apologies Movement,” scam. That gang of political gangsters includes communist black/Islamic supremacists from: US universities, the federal government and the media. In other words the usual political criminals who re always involved in scheme to embarrass and rob the white working and middle classes are at it again.

    A leading communist academician behind the “Apologies Movement,” is Melissa Nobles, Associate Professor of Political Science at MIT. She holds a BA in history from Brown University and an MA and PhD in political science from Yale University. She is a black racist and has written: The Politics of Official Apologies (Cambridge University Press, 2008). Nobles argues that political apologies help to alter the terms and meanings of national membership. It raises the prestige of one race at the expense of another. Minorities demand apologies in order to focus attention on self-serving and moot historical injustices, the rectification of which, they argue, should guide changes in present-day government policies that favor special rights above the civil rights paid for by taxpayers. When employed by political whores apologizing for white people without their agreement or approval, apologies play an important, if under appreciated, role in bringing certain views about history and moral obligation to bear in public life.

   The apology-reparations process institutionalizes minority parasitism, forever. The so-called “moral obligation” of white working taxpayers, consists of accepting minority parasite charges without questions, apologizing and then awarding the parasitic minority power and financial handouts known as reparations. Nobles preaches that white people owe blacks and moslems reparations and contrite apologies. Examples of such apologies and reparations are the German government’s continuous apology and ongoing reparations for the pay 70 years to Jews after WWII and the state of Israel, and U.S. President Ronald Reagan providing $20,000 to every surviving Japanese-Americans who claimed to be affected by the necessary internment of Japanese fifth columnists during World War II. Nobles insist that, “what is the least desirable is an apology that is just said and is not followed by any kind of compensation...” Guess who has to pay.

 What About Communist-Congress Political Whores of the One Party System?

Two congressional communists, Republican Sam Brownback and Democrat Rep. Stephen I. Cohen are pimping two of the most sweeping, unfair and insulting apology stunts in American history.

Cohen, a Tennessee communist-Democrat, has introduced a resolution apologizing for all of the supposed wrongs suffered by blacks at the hands of the U.S. government, especially slavery and segregation (over a hundred and fifty years ago). And red-leg Brownback, a Kansas communist-Republican, is pushing a measure offering "an apology to all native peoples" for hundreds of years of government hostility and oppression.

 Brownback, who is seeking the GOP presidential nomination (and will never get it now), has offered his American Indian resolution in the last two Congresses, and it was approved by the Senate Indian Affairs Committee in 2005. But it has never been adopted by the full Senate. His co-sponsors consists of a rogues gallery of congressional communist whores who have been robbing the American people for decades, including: Sens. MariaCantwell (D-Wash.), Mike Crapo (R-Idaho), Chris Dodd (D-Conn.), Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii) and Mary L. Landrieu (D-La.).

Brownback's resolution opens with declarations that the government "violated many of the treaties ratified by Congress and other diplomatic agreements with Indian tribes" and took numerous official actions that caused immense harm to American Indians, including "extermination, termination, forced removal and relocation, the outlawing of traditional religions and the destruction of sacred places," the resolution says. And these policies contribute to the social and economic problems facing American Indians today. Brownback wants a formal apology to American Indians from the president and Congress.

In a speech on the House floor a few years ago, Cohen, a freshman communist party hack representing a predominantly black district in Memphis, spoke out passionately for his resolution apologizing for the wrongs inflicted on blacks. (Cohen is well hated in TN for his racism.) Gives typically communist reasons why modern, post-slavery white Americans must grovel and pay reparations to rampageous black minority parasites." For 246 years, our Constitution and our laws allowed a system that made people slaves, that divided people from their families and treated them as property," Cohen said. "And for 100 years thereafter, a system of laws in many states throughout the country had Jim Crow laws that deprived people of the opportunity for equal access to education, health care, public facilities and other types of programs. These ended by law in the [1960s], somewhat through the efforts of Thurgood Marshall and other attorneys in Brown v. Board of Education, but the effects are lingering. "This country needs to apologize for a brutal, inhumane system of slavery and Jim Crow laws," Cohen (who is a grotesque black racist bigot and has never mentioned black racism or black supremacy in his white put-down harangues), went on. "President Bush has made remarks similar to this in Senegal; President Clinton also in the [commonwealth] of Virginia most recently."Cohen's resolution is graphic. "Slavery in America resembled no other form of involuntary servitude known in history, as Africans were captured and sold at auction like inanimate objects or animals," it says.

Cohen also states that "the system of de jure racial segregation known as 'Jim Crow,' which arose in certain parts of the nation following the Civil War to create separate and unequal societies for whites and African-Americans" still has some "vestiges" today. Cohen wants the House to acknowledge "the fundamental injustice, cruelty, brutality and inhumanity of slavery and Jim Crow" and officially apologize to "African-Americans on behalf of the people of the United States" and offer a "commitment to rectify the lingering consequences of the misdeeds committed against African-Americans under slavery and Jim Crow and to stop the occurrence of human rights violations in the future."

Cohen has 36 co-sponsors for his resolution, all of which are the usual communist suspects that have been involved in dozens of criminal rip offs, immoral acts and legislation designed to suppress white civil rights for years, including Reps. Patrick J. Kennedy (D-R.I.) and Dennis J. Kucinich (D-Ohio), as well as House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.), Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.) and several other members of the extremely racist and segregated Congressional Black Caucus.

Cohen tried to join the Black Caucus after the November election but was turned down because he's white. He talks the commie talk, but his skin is the wrong color to be accepted by his black racist cronies who insist upon segregation, for themselves only.

Read more…

How Obama Communists Operate, A Short Introduction

Groups and institutions are the primary targets for the power seeking efforts of the communists. However, communist media serves as an instrument of terror as it carries out political pogroms against freedom loving whites before the actual political war reaches its highest intensity.

There are four principles or demands by which the commies (democrat-republicans) party is guided in this power-seeking quest: (1) to develop means of access to the groups which are its targets; (2) to neutralize competing elites which may be striving to control such target groups; (3) to legitimate, by the controlled media, whatever positions of power that are gained so that such power positions are recognized and accepted by people as sanctioned authority; and (4) to mobilize the captured groups so that they can be set in motion along the lines desired by the party.

We must analyze effectively (a) the bodies of strategy developed by communists with regard to these four demands and (b) many of the operating tactics employed to implement these strategies. Only a few of the strategies need be mentioned here: the formation of small concealed cadres in the target groups (republican party); their mutual efforts to gain official positions; the discrediting of officials and inner groups who stand in their way; the readiness to espouse vigorously the objectives of the target organizations as a means of moving into power; entering into united fronts in such manner as to make impossible demands (political correctness) and then throw on other groups the onus for the breakdown of the united front; the carrying on of conspiratorial activity behind and beyond the facade of the legitimate tasks of official positions.

In general, the quest for power by communists is marked by high adaptability and expediency in tactics. In an ultimate sense the communists seek to develop progressively a net work of power and control inside of established groups and institutions and, thus, to be in a position at the propitious time to displace constitutional authority in a given society. That communist network is in place and flourishing in the USA at this time. However, obama is behind the scene demanding that he be given the position of dictator for life, because enemies that the democrat-republicans have heretofore discounted are rising for a political war to the death. Thus obama’s ruthless reign is the only way, according to obama, that the commies can ultimately win. Obama advocates the initiation of mass violence against white people and incarceration in concentration camps for them also, by 2017.

However, we must recognize the inherent bestiality of the commie, the black racist and the Moslem. They are used to winning and they have won every fight during the past 40 years, during their slow march to power. Now they get very angry if they perceive the promise of a possible derailment of their train to totalitarianism. That anger is expressed in virulent hatred that calls for murder, (black lives matter) and people on this site. See them squirm. They are dangerous felons that only total annihilation can stop. They do not play by honest or fair rules, and they love terror, torture, slavery and murder. Do not be fooled by their false fascades.

Read more…

If You Want To Regain Freedom, Learn Strategem

The history of wars (political and shooting wars) shows that in all times successful military and political  leaders have given great importance to stratagem. They endeavored to force on the enemy false notions concerning their troops and intentions and thereby establish better conditions for victory.

Our enemies here in America have used the stratagems of Marxist-Leninism to beat us down to the level of serfs or wage slaves. The founders of Marxism-Leninism repeatedly pointed to the importance of strategem. F. Engels, in investigating wars, explained the setbacks of the Prussian Army during the Franco-Prussian War (1870-1871) to neglect of procedures for misleading the enemy. He criticized the military leaders of the feudal period for the fact that they fought "without any strategems."

V.I. Lenin had high regard for the strategem question. He wrote that "there are no wars without stratagem," and that "it is essential to endeavor to catch the enemy by surprise— and "be able to use the inflexibility..of the enemy and attack it when it least expects an attack."

The experience of the employment of stratagem has accumulated over many centuries. This is clearly shown by world history and the history of our European fatherland.

For example, the methods of armed combat of our ancient European forbears are instructive. Against the routine tactics of the enemy which fought in such formations as the phalanx and cohort, their soldiers successfully employed the strategem: they enticed the enemy troops into positions advantageous for themselves and then attacked. "Often they abandoned their loot as if out of fear," wrote the "Strategicon," "and retreated into the forest and then, rushing by surprise from there, caused great losses to those who approached the loot."

Strategem must be used in political warfare, or else victory is impossible in that sphere. The consequences of the struggle between communist evil and Christian Constitutionalism is too important to do anything but our intellectual best.

The given historical material makes it possible to define strategem as an aggregate of measures aimed at achieving surprise in military and political operations and thereby creating additional opportunities for victory with the least expenditures of men, weapons and time. The main components of strategem are secrecy and misleading the enemy.

Secrecy, in turn, can be defined as a range of measures relating to vigilance, the keeping of military secrecy and camouflage with the aim being to ensure the survival of one's troops and the achieving of surprise.

          Misleading the enemy or deception is a range of measures relating to disinformation, feints and simulation carried out in the aim of creating a false idea in the enemy about one's troops, future methods and forthcoming areas of operations. The aim of deception is to force on the enemy a plan which is advantageous for oneself, to cause the enemy to weaken his group, to divert attention, men and weapons from the areas of real combat to a false sector and thereby achieve surprise.

Of course, the definition given here of strategem and its components is not complete. In fact, I am holding out many secrets of stratagem, because oour enemies will read this. Thus, this concept has not been theoretically elaborated in a proper manner. At the same time, the experience of the past irrefutably shows the importance which strategem has played in various historical periods and under various historical conditions. For this reason, there is an urgent need to study the acquired experience and improve it on a new basis. The 2nd American Revolution will employ stratagem in its political warfare.

The development of scientific and technical progress has led to the development of more modern equipment and weapons and to the appearance of new forms and methods of armed combat. There are also many new political tactics that patriots must become masters of. Such Skills also exist among our probable enemies who in every possible way endeavor to conceal this.

Read more…

If you believe that homosexuality is sick the communist micromanagers tell you that you can't say that anymore. You aren't likely to go to jail for saying it, but you might well be penalized in a variety of ways by the thought and culture police from the politically correct far left. Look at how Phil Robertson of Duck Dynasty was treated by the media and culture in general for expressing his views on homosexuality. He was fired, made to apologize for his own views, etc. That’s why a man or woman  who refuses to apologize to one of the commie’s iconic untouchable totems, is such a courageous person. Look how courageous the female Kerntucky clerk was. (What did you do to support her?) If you express views, especially about anything related to the homosexual agenda, that are not politically correct, the far left will everything they can to destroy you. Today's news reports a coach for Colorado State University's football team, who alleged called the opposing team's quarterback a “faggott” during the game, and is suspended without pay for that incident. Again, you can't offend the homosexual movement without grave consequences. For using that word, the assistant coach was basically made to apologize to the “GLBTQ community” and required to participate in mandatory anger management and “sensitivity training.”

While this issue is one of censorship, culturally, by the far left, it goes beyond that. It's part of the far left's attempt to enforce conformity and destroy anything and anyone that doesn't comply. It's not enough that you don't express your hideous and politically incorrect views in public, you can't even think them and if you do, you need to be re-educated. The far left won't stop until it has stamped out every bit of even thought that homosexuality is wrong, or sick, or unnatural, or sinful. The far left doesn't want you to believe it, or even think it.

If you dare to make politically incorrect statements about these issues, the far left wants you destroyed. They will try to get you fired from your job even completely blackballed from whatever profession you're in. But stopping you from earning your living isn't enough of a consequence for the far left, for your act of speaking out against the left's politically correct imposed morality. They will get you blackballed from social groups and circles, and make sure you don't get the holiday cards from certain people (can't call the Christmas cards) or invited to the parties, or what it is they can run you out of. Leftists are quick to point out you aren't going to prison for expressing your views, but the ways the far left seeks to destroy can be almost as bad in real life consequences.

But they just stop at punishing you for what you said. In many instances, like the assistant coach at Colorado State, they make you apologize to the very elements you spoke out about in your comments, which is really rubbing your nose in it. So if you spoke out against homosexuals, you're made to apologize to the “homosexual community,” whoever that is. You can't even think the things you said either. They will send you to so-called “diversity training,” which is actually politically correct re-education to badger you into not thinking those politically correct views, and not even believing them. The purpose of such “sensitivity training” is to get you to believe in perversity, accept as normal that which you don't believe in normal, and not only to stop you from holding your politically correct views, but reverse your thinking and turn you politically correct as well. And if they succeed, they want you to come out of sensitivity training preaching against your former views with the zeal of an ex-smoker lecturing smokers to give up their cigarettes. The far left won't stop until you've been completely converted to the politically correct left, or otherwise destroyed and culturally oppressed for speaking out.

Every time they make someone apologize, and cause them to get fired or suspended, for speaking their minds and uttering politically incorrect views, they further enforce the conformity and extend the cultural fascism. Cultural oppression can be very effective in many ways, and it's a lot less expensive to stamp out what the far left finds offensive this way, than to go the old fashioned way and pass laws to ban such speech and put people in jail for doing it. Sure, the left loves to say, we don't put you in jail for saying such things, you still have freedom of speech. But they are the ones quick to put you in the cultural gulag for speaking your mind.

Our course of action, is as plain as the past cowardice of the white majority. We must organize a white political party that is like a labor union in its protection of its members. Every time a member speaks the truth and is punished, we strike back and ferociously pull every tactic of battle that we can think of, legal suits, demonstrations, propaganda and also recruit. If no member speaks we set up situations wherein we call out our enemies.   After awhile white people will be capable of many forms of self defense. Then we become aggressive and force our enemies on the defensive. The cultural war thus becomes real.

Read more…

Atlanta Ga, A Future Moslem Base Camp Area

America is Burning While You Read Racist Lies by Commie Lovers of MLK

If you drive up Buford Highway, Route 13 out of Atlanta, you head towards the northern suburbs of Chamblee and Doraville. Both used to be upper class dwelling areas, I know, I used to live there. Of course black racism rules urban Atlanta but foreigners already outnumber blacks and whites. The area is filled with every type of Hispanic and Asiatic, including ChiComs.

Along the Buford Highway travelers cannot fail to notice a mélange of foreign strip malls. This part of balkanized America shows little signs of such Americana as Comfort Inn and Waffle House. Instead businesses run by foreign merchants who communicate in every Hispanic, Asian and Islam dialect,  tell the story of what this place is.

Of course all the relics of the former south are gone along Buford Highway, replaced by the new “obama America” (7 years old) where white men are hated and Islamic thugs rule. Along Buford Highway you will find Tu Banco Local (1st International Bank) and the Buford Farmer’s Market is controlled by central American  immigrants. Despite its bucolic name, the Buford Farmers Market sells oxtails and bull testicles wrapped in plastic for $3.99 a pound.

The locals call Chamblee, “Chambodia”, but the term hardly describes its occupation by a variety of foreign maggots of every stripe and language. Anybody can come here and disappear, and you can purchase iron clad IDs if you darken your skin and pretend not to be white. The landlords don’t require any kind of identification and as long as you keep your mouth shut and pay rent on time, you can live along the network of roads on both sides of Buford Highway. Of course, armed foreign gangs, whom obama has permitted to ignore his anti-gun edicts,  rule. In fact you can buy crew served weapons there, and much more in the future. White slavery is a growth business along Buford Highway and in Atlanta, and many beauteous young southern belles disappear from rural Georgia, annually, to serve evil masters before they die young. Robbery by foreign criminals along with rape and murder of females, is rampant in the Atlanta , Georgia area. The local police have been out-gunned and overrun.

I have gone disguised there, and I can tell you a sorry fact. One day in a couple of years, Buford Highway will bristle with fortified Moslem strongholds and roadblocks, demanding toll “payments” and abusing any white stopped by their road blocks, on the way to Florida. The US government, unless Trump is elected, will favor such activities, as the democrats and republicans smirk that, “its about time that whites got a taste of the third and fourth worlds.” You see, Atlanta has been selected as the epicenter of the new “Islamic Caliphate of America”. You try to fight them and you have to take on the commie army and bureaucracy first.

Read more…

Dr. Susan K. Smith is offended by comparisons between Martin Luther King, Jr. and Kim Davis, the Kentucky clerk who has refused to sign any marriage licenses since the Supreme Court imposed same-sex marriage on her state.

Smith, a pastor and “social justice advocate” (whatever that is) protested the invocation of St. Martin of Atlanta’s name to justify the deeds of a bigot like Kim Davis. “But I am angered by the claim that Ms. Dixon (sic) is acting as did Dr. King when he was thrown into jail for working to end racial injustice,” wrote Smith in a recent column at the Huffington Post. Dr. Smith is apparently so sloppy that she didn’t even get the clerk’s name right. Her name is Davis, not Dixon. “Ms. Dixon (sic) has been jailed because her God-sense tells her it is right and fitting to discriminate against people; Dr. King was in jail because his God-sense told him it was wrong to mete out injustice against anyone – especially blacks.”

My own feelings about Kim Davis would probably require a separate column to spell out in detail. I understand why she has to make her stand and it pains me that she was forced into that situation. I don’t like the Obergefell decision—in fact, I loathe it. But her case is weak because she is a government official.

Furthermore, I don’t generally like lawlessness. Liberals, on the other hand, celebrate lawlessness, which explains why they gave the lawless Martin Luther King a holiday and generally revere him as something of a demigod. I don’t believe he deserves a tenth of the deference we afford him which is why I must stress that Kim Davis’s obvious similarity to King is not necessarily flattering.

It is, however, accurate. Dr. Smith would know this if she’d ever read anything that King wrote. Has she? I don’t see how she could have read, for example, King’s “Letter from a Birmingham Jail” or his “Paul’s Letter to the American Christians” and concluded that King would oppose Kim Davis.

I think Dr. Smith falls into a common trap when evaluating King; that is, she creates in her own mind an image of the man as she wished him to be—a fighter for “justice,” as defined by Smith herself. It probably never occurs to her that King’s idea of justice might diverge from her own. In Smith’s mind it’s axiomatic that the mainstreaming of homosexuality and the crushing of dissenting voices are civil rights issues. As a champion for civil rights, MLK would certainly be on her side. Any attempt to counter her vision of King with the actual historical MLK is enough to raise her blood pressure.

Martin Luther King did not support same-sex marriage. Period. No one in pre-1968 America did, not even “gay” “rights” activists. (Their aim was to destroy the institution, not join it.) Nor did King find homosexuality morally acceptable. He was a mid-20th century Baptist minister with the accompanying moral code regarding sex. He claimed the Bible as his authority and the Bible is absolutely unequivocal on the subject of homosexuality. The fact that King had a plethora of mistresses and enjoyed an orgy every once in a while proves only that he was a hypocrite, not a “gay” “rights” activist.

King’s clearest public proclamations on homosexuality are found in an advice column he wrote for Ebony Magazine in 1958. When a boy asked his advice on how to handle feelings of attraction toward other males, King actually advised psychiatric treatment! He also referred to the feelings as a “problem.” Most importantly, King said that the boy’s attractions were “probably not an innate tendency.” In other words, he did not subscribe to the shoddy, unfalsifiable “born that way” theory. It doesn’t take much of a leap to infer that King would have rejected any comparison between race and homosexual conduct and would probably have been offended by it, as many blacks are even today. As they should be.

King did not march for homosexuals’ supposed “rights” because he did not see them as equivalent to his struggle against Jim Crow. He understood homosexuality as a behavior—and a deviant one at that. So if Kim Davis is a “bigot,” then Martin Luther King is a “bigot” too. What then is so outrageous about comparing the two?

Smith continues with her misguided rant: “There is a stark difference between the two ‘reasons’ for incarceration…” I see what’s she’s getting at. She believes that MLK went to jail for doing something good, while Davis went to jail for doing something bad. She is therefore endorsing the cafeteria approach to civil law. The King who lives in her imagination would oppose Davis, so comparing the two lawbreakers is, in her estimation, not fair. Never mind that the real King—as evidenced by his words—was on Davis’s side when it came to homosexuality.

But even that’s beside the point. Kim Davis and Martin Luther King both defied the law for the exact same reason—because they considered themselves responsible to a higher power. (I’m not sure King really meant it, of course, on account of his incredible hypocrisy.) They both claimed that God’s law was superior to man’s law.

From King’s “Letter from a Birmingham Jail”:

“The answer lies in the fact that there are two types of laws: just and unjust. I would be the first to advocate obeying just laws. One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws… Now, what is the difference between the two? How does one determine whether a law is just or unjust? A just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law.”

Now some might argue that Kim Davis’s religion should have no bearing whatsoever on a civil marriage. That’s one argument, though certainly not one that MLK would make. He would agree with Davis that our civil law should always align with scripture and when it doesn’t Christians are called to defiance.

Consider “Paul’s Letter to American Christians,” an epistle that King imagined St. Paul would have written to his church in 20th century America. After reading it, one can only conclude that Kim Davis is innocent of most of the failings that King found among Christians of his time.

“I am impelled to write you concerning the responsibilities laid upon you to live as Christians in the midst of an un-Christian world,” wrote King as Paul. “That is what I had to do. That is what every Christian has to do.” Yes, and that’s all Kim Davis is trying to do.

“But I understand that there are many Christians in America who give their ultimate allegiance to man-made systems and customs. They are afraid to be different. Their great concern is to be accepted socially.” Kim Davis doesn’t have that problem. She won’t compromise her faith for civil authority, or to be liked, just as “Paul” (King) advised.

King continued: “For so many of you Morality is merely group consensus…You have unconsciously come to believe that right is discovered by taking a sort of Gallup poll of the majority opinion.” Yes indeed, that is a very accurate diagnosis of what ails our society. But Kim Davis is not that kind of Christian. She believes that right is right and wrong is wrong. Neither public opinion nor a court can change that.

“Therefore, your ultimate allegiance is not to the government, not to the state, not to nation, not to any man-made institution,” wrote King. “The Christian owes his ultimate allegiance to God, and if any earthly institution conflicts with God’s will it is your Christian duty to take a stand against it. You must never allow the transitory evanescent demands of man-made institutions to take precedence over the eternal demands of the Almighty God.” King and Davis are in agreement on this point as well.

On all of the key issues, King and Davis are of the same mind. Both oppose segregation. Both oppose homosexuality, same-sex marriage, and its accompanying imposition on people of faith. Both agree that they have an obligation to disobey any law that is unjust. Both measure the justice of a particular law by the standards of God.

Susan Smith really wants to believe that Kim Davis’s rogue actions were the polar opposite of her idol Martin Luther King’s actions. Unfortunately, her arguments reveal her stunning ignorance. Her fantasies of what King would have become if he had lived long enough to “evolve” to precisely her own policy positions have clouded her judgement. She really ought to curl up with the collected writings of the man she claims to admire and read what he actually wrote.


Read more at http://patriotupdate.com/if-you-dont-think-mlk-is-like-kim-davis-you-probably-dont-know-mlk/
Read more…

 

By Oscar Y. Harward

While many Americans may pronounce the 2015 SCOTUS Decision OBERGEFELL ET AL. v. HODGES, (No. 14–556)’ as the law, and must be obeyed immediately, our US history will show many instances of SCOTUS’s ‘wrong’ rulings. 

The OBERGEFELL ET AL. v. HODGES decision is certainly one example as another one of these ‘wrong’ SCOTUS verdicts. 

Over the years, many Americans have chosen to oppose other earlier and unacceptable SCOTUS ‘Decisions’; based on ‘wrong’ SCOTUS findings: 

1.  Scott v. Sandford (1857) (60 U.S. 393) SCOTUS ruled that African Americans, whether enslaved or free, were not citizens of the United States.  African Americans did not have the right to sue in federal court.  SCOTUS ruled that the federal government could not prohibit slavery in the territories.  Later, the 14th Amendment to the Constitution provided that anyone born or naturalized in the United States is a citizen of the nation and of his or her state. https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/60/393 

At this point, may I suggest that this must have included ‘legally’ born, and not for those born ‘illegally.  As an analogy, when a criminal robs a bank, it is crime.  It is an ‘illegal’ act.  Just getting away does not allow the robber to keep the money. 

2.  ROE v. WADE, (1973) No. 70-18  SCOTUS declared a pregnant woman is entitled to have an Abortion until the end of the first trimester of pregnancy without any interference by the state. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/roe_v._wade_1973  

Since this 1973 SCOTUS decision, there have been approximately 57,762,169 abortions that have destroyed the lives of unborn children. http://www.lifenews.com/2015/01/21/57762169-abortions-in-america-since-roe-vs-wade-in-1973/  

3.  Texas v. Johnson (1989) (No. 88-155)  As far as I am concerned in this case, SCOTUS is and was ‘wrong’.  In this ‘Decision’ SCOTUS ruled that Johnson’s burning of the American flag was a 1st Amendment ‘Freedom of Speech’ ‘Right.  Near 600,000 have died while serving in the US Military for defending (y)our American flag.  https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/491/397 

One of my first classes in Army’s Basic Training at Ft. Bragg, NC, we were taught and/or reaffirmed was to always uphold our USA, our Constitution, and our American flag.  

The incident of Kim Davis being jailed as she refused to honor our Judiciary’s conclusions with the SCOTUS ruling was and is ‘wrong’ as a majority members of SCOTUS have overruled our Constitutional 1st Amendment’s ‘Freedom of Religion’. 

It appears a majority of SCOTUS Justices have disregarded our Constitutional ‘freedoms’ as determined by our founding Fathers based on Judeo-Christian values.  Our historical ‘Federalist Papers’ will substantiate these findings as facts. http://thomas.loc.gov/home/histdox/fedpapers.html  

In SCOTUS’s majority decision rejecting ‘God’s Law’, our Holy Bible, as addressed by many of our Founding Fathers,  it could well be compared to Rev. Martin Luther King’s decision on ‘Civil Rights’. 

Many other instances in US History will disclose that many Americans have been rejected on other Constitutional ‘Rights’; members within (y)our majority and minority communities across the USA. 

Today is a sad day for a SCOTUS majority of Justices to disallow our US Constitutional freedoms, including our 1st Amendment’s ‘Freedom of Religion’, and based on Judeo-Christian values to be disallowed as the ‘law’ of (y)our precious nation.

Read more…

Conservatism

Conservatism is an "attitude".  A constant force performing a timeless function in the development of a free society.

It has its roots in the American revolution and its commitment to sovereignty of the people and the rights and liberties of all Americans.  Some constants are the respect for traditional values, the rule of law, the support of religion and a strong defense of Western civilization from the challenges of totalitarian governments.

Those Republicans who claim to be conservative should revisit its meaning.

Read more…

Not to late

"Don't rock the boat" seems to be the position of many of the senators and reps in congress. As we slowly sink to the bottom.    Our present form of term limits is to vote for someone else.  If we did not re-elect anyone in congress who has 20 or more years in office, a great change could occur, hopefully, for the better.    Those 20 plusers do not want the boat rocked...from both parties.    So what should we all do ?  Throw them out !   We can only improve the situation if we do.

Read more…

This is part 2 of a five part series taken from my blog at whileweslept.org

Former Indiana Senator Evan Bayh once described the vetting process for high political office as ‘totally invasive… like having a colonoscopy, except they use the Hubble telescope on you.’ And he would certainly know, after being on the shortlist of VP candidates for Al Gore, John Kerry, and Barack Obama. By comparison the vetting process employed by the media and the American public is much less invasive but has the potential to be considerably more deadly. Consider the swift rise and abrupt collapse of Howard Dean’s candidacy back in 2004.

On December 9, 2003 Al Gore endorsed Howard Dean by saying, “I’m very proud and honored to endorse Howard Dean to be the next president of the United States of America..”

Al Gore’s endorsement was highly coveted, and CNN reported that it “could cement Dean’s status as the leading Democratic candidate….

On January 19 after placing third in the Iowa primary, Dean gave a passionate speech, saying:

“If you had told us one year ago that we were going to come in third in Iowa – well, we’d have given anything for that. And you know something, not only are we going to New Hampshire; we’re going to South Carolina, and Oklahoma and Arizona and North Dakota… and then we’re going to Washington D.C. and we’re going to take back the White House…”

And then it happened: he let out a cackly, off-pitched battle cry. Watching this clip now, more than a decade later, is nothing less than heartbreaking. He is standing there surrounded by flags and supporters in what for him was a pinnacle moment. It’s impossible not to feel sorry for this man who at the time had no idea that he was destroying his bid for the White House. There is no teleprompter. There are no speech notes. There is just Howard Dean – bright-eyed and fully charged with raw emotion. That battle cry, that joyful “hee-ya!” was all anyone needed to convict him, in their own minds, of a rabid lust for power.

That was just over ten years ago. Things have certainly changed. We are less than a year away from both Democrats and Republicans announcing their presidential candidates. Earlier this morning I came across an article about Hillary Clinton’s inevitable nomination that stated, “Unless she is indicted, she will surely win the Democratic nomination.”

Let’s reflect on that for a moment.

Amidst all of the allegations swirling around the Clinton campaign, I wonder if there is anything that could prove to be as damaging as Howard Dean’s Rebel Yell… Certainly Benghazi and the subsequent private server/email findings as well as the gross mishandling of classified material all should have been – not to mention the very real links to Hillary Clinton using the Clinton Foundation as a channel for terrorist nations and regimes to purchase backing from the State Department. Somehow it has all managed to withstand public scrutiny.  

For those of us who are old enough to vividly recall the scandalous years of the Clinton White House, this is beyond belief, yet not at all surprising. However, for the 93 million Millennials who will be able to cast a vote in 2016, who were born after ‘Billary’, the seriousness of understanding the Clinton standard of fraudulence cannot be understated. While she herself may regard her own history of ruthless and illicit conduct as “old news”, it is vital that we endeavor to apply the same ‘intrusive and rigorous’ vetting procedures to her just as we would to anyone else seeking the highest office in our land.

Even the most casual meandering through our recent history reveals a very real and disagreeable pattern – travelgate, whitewater, filegate, pardongate and the dozen or so others. These colorless terms certainly benefit the culprits by sounding trivial and easily discarded. I’m sure that most folks, given the opportunity, would prefer to hear about a sex scandal over one involving the White House travel office. However, when held to proper scrutiny, these scandals reveal a consistently contemptuous, underhanded, self-serving, and dangerous political duo that are eerily comparable to Frank and Claire Underwood in House of Cards.

While campaigning for the Presidency in 1992, Bill Clinton remarked that by voting him into the White House, America would be getting ‘two for the price of one’ in reference to the role Hillary would play in his administration. At the time, such an admission was certainly provocative, even exciting to our nation. It had been less than a generation since the integration of the Feminist Movement into our collective principles.

Four months into their Presidency, the first of more than a dozen public scandals, Travelgate, surfaced. Four months after the Clintons took office, they announced that they would be firing all seven of the employees in the White House office that arranges travel for the media and first family. Though it may seem inconsequential to most, this announcement was particularly striking to the media and Washington insiders. These seven employees had faithfully served the administrations of seven Presidents – Republican and Democrat alike – and were well-known, respected civil servants.

After reportedly denying longtime Clinton business acquaintance Harry Thomason access to the White House charter business (worth 31 billion dollars annually), Travel Office Director Billy Dale was promptly locked out of his office while officers removed several boxes of paperwork.

Shortly after being allowed back into his office Mr. Dale was told that he, along with the six others who comprised the travel office team, had been fired for criminal misconduct. Additionally, he was slapped with a lawsuit for allegedly embezzling fourteen thousand dollars because the logs were ‘missing’. Also during this time, out of pure coincidence I’m sure, Mr. Dale received a letter from the IRS informing him that was to be audited, and for the next thirty months he was investigated. His son and daughter were subpoenaed. As the case went to trial in the fall of 1995, a long line of Washington journalists volunteered to serve as character witnesses to Mr. Dale. The jury needed less than two hours to reach a verdict of not-guilty.

Though the final report found that Mrs. Clinton’s sworn statement was ‘factually inaccurate’ and that she had indeed spoken with Harry Thomason on numerous occasions regarding his takeover of the travel office, Billy Dale did not get his job back despite being only a few months away from retirement. Further investigations by the FBI, Department of Justice, and The House Oversight Committee scrutinized Hillary Clinton for playing a central role in this debacle and for making false statements under oath.

The methods administered by Hillary Clinton – the whimsical misuse of law enforcement authority while dragging someone’s reputation and family through the mud in retribution for having been inconvenienced – are contemptible and terrifying.

In that same year, Mrs. Clinton had hired Craig Livingstone for the position of Director of White House Security and given him the highest security clearance despite lacking any sort of high-level security experience – unless you would count working as a bouncer in a D.C. nightclub as sufficient.

While investigating the Travelgate catastrophe, the House Committee on Government Reform and Oversight had found that some 900 unauthorized FBI background reports had been pulled by Livingstone at the request of Mrs. Clinton. The FBI files covered White House employees from Republican administrations and then current political adversaries. The Director of the FBI acknowledged this as an “egregious violation of privacy”, as the files contained detailed information about such things as extramarital affairs and personal medical problems. The politics of personal destruction made easy by improperly obtained, private files of political rivals to be used for professional gain.

The House Oversight Committee ordered an investigation on September 24, 1996 to determine if the events surrounding the files were “a blunder, the result of colossal incompetence, or whether they are established to be more serious or even criminal.” During the investigation the FBI learned that Craig Livingstone – the man who had obtained the files at her request – was the son of a friend of Hillary Clinton’s. They had managed to find photographs with Mrs. Clinton and Mrs. Livingstone. Hillary maintains that she doesn’t know her and that she had nothing to do with hiring Mr. Livingstone. Following this debacle, the FBI closed its White House Liaison Office after more than thirty years of service to seven presidents.  

Also in July of 1993, Bill Clinton fired FBI Director William Sessions. This was the first time that an FBI Director had been fired by a President. Clinton-appointed Attorney General Janet Reno said that Sessions had exhibited some “serious deficiencies in judgement” by using an FBI plane to visit his daughter on several occasions. Sessions denied that he had acted improperly and refused to give a letter of resignation. On the 19th, Clinton used his powers to dismiss him immediately.

The very next day, Vincent Foster – long-time friend, coworker and confidant of Hillary Clinton and then current Deputy White House Council – was found dead in a federal park in Virginia. He’d been shot in the head. Due to the recent vacancy of FBI Director, the park police were assigned to handle the case. The park police had certainly never dealt with a case of this magnitude and were vastly unqualified. The official position was that Foster, who had recently been prescribed a suspect dosage of trazodone for insomnia and depression, had killed himself.

After searching his briefcase a full three days later, a suicide note did turn up. It had been torn into twenty-eight pieces, of which twenty-seven were recovered. There were no fingerprints to be found. After examining the remaining pieces forensic experts agreed that the ‘note’ was a fake.

A few months later, a White House volunteer intern named Kathleen Willey nervously made claims to other White House staffers that President Bill Clinton had kissed and groped her during a private meeting regarding the possibility of Willey joining the permanent White House staff in the Oval Office. The alleged encounter occurred on November 29. Hours after her meeting with Clinton concluded, her husband Edward Willey committed suicide over a large debt. Another puzzling coincidence, I’m sure. The Clintons again escaped any sort of charges. The final report of the U.S. Office of Independent Council reads – “Willey and President Clinton are the only direct witnesses to their meeting, and their accounts differ substantially on the crucial facts of what occurred”.

These situations all end in a similar fashion: due to a lack of evidence the final verdict comes down to a ‘your word versus mine’ scenario. While digging through this ‘old news’, I often wonder what Mrs. Clinton and our media would have to say about these wrongdoings if they involved, say, a Republican Senator from Texas or a conservative Governor from Florida. Would they even be allowed the opportunity to run any sort of campaign, let alone one for the highest office in the land?

Over the years, time and time again when publically addressing her innocence in any one of these scandals the narrative changes from her involvement in them to how she responds to being asked about them. Instead of realizing and reflecting on the kind of character that emerges from the connecting of these innumerable dots, we instead hear about how she is “unflappable”, that “the real message is her attitude and poise” and that her “confiding tone and relaxed body language immediately draws approving reviews”.

And now, when people in her own party and large segments of the electorate describe her as “a terrible candidate”, “not easy to trust”, and Secret Service members consider it a punishment to be assigned to her detail because she is so foul and mean-spirited, it is crucial to remember that Hillary Clinton is the first First Lady to come under criminal investigation – not once – but several times.

There is a deeply troubling standard that arises even when considering these accounts individually, but when they are assembled into a timeline we are confronted with the fact that when a Clinton is granted a position of influence we really do get “two for the price of one”.  

Read more…

This is part one of a five part piece taken from my blog at whileweslept.org

As the tide of political correctness rolls over our nation there are millions of Americans who will wear their vote as a civic crown of acceptance; of broad-mindedness. Just as a vote for Barack Obama seven years ago was seen as an exclusive gesture of modernity by pronouncing our transcendence of race, this election may well be the same for gender. The landscape seems to have been assembled with that in mind.

Let us realize that for over thirty years Hillary Clinton has been the beneficiary of the American public’s short-sighted memory. And now, as she hopscotches her way into position as the front-runner for the Democratic Party it is important the we look objectively at the trail of wreckage that both she and her husband have left behind.

Has there ever been a Presidential candidate so mired in controversy? For example, as I write this, despite the preponderance of evidence that during her time serving as Secretary of State she broke a number of federal laws – regarding the handling of classified material as well as operating on a personal server instead of the required government appointed one – there are still millions of people who seem to regard the Oval Office as Mrs. Clinton’s just reward for her long pursuit of it.

Many people who may vote in the democratic primary election and the general election in 2016 have no genuine knowledge of Mrs. Clinton. Millions of first-time voters will not remember the dozens of prior scandals that date back to the late-seventies. As the public’s critical vetting of a candidate has been reduced to an embarrassing confluence of smack-down banter and feckless mudslinging many have lost sight of Hillary Clinton’s sustained tradition of using felonious methods to further her own self-interest.

For those of us who remember headlines like ‘Travelgate’, ‘Filegate’ and ‘Whitewater’ this will serve as a reminder; for those whose image of her is a convoluted knot of sound-bytes about the ‘middle class’ and ‘college loans’, this will exhibit a forty year quest by an arrogant, sanctimonious, and reckless collectivist who has created inexhaustible resources through deceit and treacherous means.  

Surely, most potential voters are likely to associate Hillary with Benghazi but what does it mean? During a recent conversation with a lifelong Democrat and Clinton supporter I asked what she thought about what happened in Benghazi: “C’mon, it’s just like everything that happens over there.”

Actually, it isn’t.

It is in fact, a grotesque and criminally negligent mishandling of a terrorist attack that occurred on the eleventh anniversary of the World Trade Center attacks. On September 11, 2012 a group of Islamist militants launched an organized attack the American Consulate. Chris Stevens had been appointed to Ambassador just two months prior to the attack. Upon his arrival in Benghazi he’d asked for an additional 13 security guards citing the increasingly dangerous situation on the ground. His request went unanswered. 5 weeks prior to attack, Ambassador Stevens sent an urgent cable to Hillary Clinton personally requesting a protective detail bodyguard. Three days later, Hillary Clinton ordered the removal of his entire security team. In fact, there were hundreds of messages sent to the State Department and to Mrs. Clinton personally describing how Al-Qaeda militias had been patrolling the area around the Benghazi Consulate. There had been as assassination attempt on the British Ambassador nearby. In April of 2012, terrorists threw an IED (improvised explosive device) over the Consulate wall. In June of that same year terrorists blew a large hole in the Consulate gate.

At the onset of the attack on September 11, 2012 newly appointed Ambassador Chris Stevens and State Department Information Manager Sean Smith become separated from their meager security. They take refuge in the main building of the compound behind a fortified door with metal bars but the militants set fire to the building. Shortly thereafter, Ambassador Stevens is captured. He is raped and tortured before being killed. His body is dragged through the streets. Sean Smith dies of asphyxia caused by smoke inhalation.

A militant group advocating the strict implementation of Sharia law across all of Libya – Ansar al-Sharia – claims credit for the attack.

Around this time a U.S. surveillance drone arrives over the compound. It sends real-time footage back to the White House, the State Department and the CIA.

About a mile from the Consulate Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty (both former Navy Seals) were at the CIA Annex when the attack began. They radioed to their higher headquarters asking for permission to help and they were denied per the State Department. Also nearby, a Foreign Emergency Support team trained specifically for when a Consulate comes under terrorist attack had been deployed – but was held back by the State Department under the direction of Hillary Clinton. CIA officers on the ground nearby during the attack sent three separate requests for help but those, too, were denied. Woods and Doherty waited another hour and sent another request that was immediately denied. In a devastating exhibit of heroism, while knowingly disobeying their orders, they made their way to the Consulate to help. They requested air support. They called for ground support. The fighting went on for more than six hours with an unarmed drone hanging in the sky directly above them. Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods were killed by a mortar shell nearly seven hours after the fight began. One of them was on the roof with a laser pointer on the mortar team – that laser could have helped guide in an armed drone easily. Tyrone’s body was found slumped over his machine gun.

Eight minutes after Doherty and Woods were killed Hillary Clinton issued an official statement in which she claims that the attack was a spontaneous response to ‘inflammatory material posted on the internet” and not a planned terrorist attack. The alleged ‘inflammatory material’ turned out to be a low budget satirical depiction of the early life of Muhammad.  

Two days later, as Doherty and Woods were returned to the U.S. in boxes, Obama again blamed the attack on this internet video. Hillary Clinton told Charles Woods, the father of Tyrone, “We will make sure the person who made that film is arrested and prosecuted” and indeed the filmmaker was jailed. On September 20 the White House began airing apology ads for the internet video – apology ads.

This is the story the precedes the current email scandal.

Perhaps that according to Mrs. Clinton is another attempt by the ‘vast right wing conspiracy’ to knock her off from her pedestal.  

Perhaps you have scrolled through various headlines reporting on recent developments in this ongoing email scandal that alleges that while Clinton was Secretary of State she operated her communications through a private email server instead of the government-issued server. An email scandal may not have a dire ring to it – unless of course, the emails and files that were deliberately scrubbed from Mrs. Clinton’s private server contained detailed information regarding the illegal shipment of millions of dollars of arms to terrorist cells operating in Syria, Qatar, Libya, and Turkey.

In 2011 then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton with the aid of President Obama authorized the sale of literally hundreds of millions of dollars in arms to the government of Qatar which then, at their request, were sold and given to Libyan and Syrian rebel groups in the hopes that these rebels would overthrow their governments. It is a chilling fact that the Libyan rebels who attacked the American Consulate in Benghazi did so with weapons procured from Mrs. Clinton’s State Department.

This is what all the headlines spring from. The irritating banter from the ‘vast right wing conspiracy’ that Mrs. Clinton has been advancing for so many years has been brought on by her own criminal arrogance.  

The State Department has the power to authorize the sale of weapons to other countries and organizations. They can also declare a country or state a terrorist nation, in which case the selling of arms to these nations would be a felony. However, Libya and Syria were on the U.S. terror list hence the sale of weapons to them is a felony. This is where Hillary’s private server comes into play. If Hillary Clinton had been conducting business as the U.S. Secretary of State on her government-issued email address (you know, ending in .gov instead of clintonemail.com) then her emails would have been subject to the Freedom of Information Act. That means that anyone can access them at any time through the proper legal channels. Government servers are encrypted and backed up regularly. Her personal email address had no encryption, meaning that it is safe to assume that the rumors alleging that both Russia and China had hacked her email account years ago are true.

By mandate, all electronic government communication is copied, stored and backed up. Since Mrs. Clinton was running her email through a personal server her communications were completely off the grid.

In fact, her tenure as Secretary of State enriched more than Syrian rebels and terrorist cells from Qatar. Though it is against the law to pay an government employee like a Secretary of State directly for any services, Hillary Clinton found a convenient loophole by using The Clinton Foundation as well as payments made to her husband Bill for ‘speaking engagements’. Isn’t it curious that in 2011 the Kuwait American Foundation wanted to buy arms from Boeing and shortly thereafter Bill Clinton gets paid 175,000 dollars by that very same foundation for giving a forty-five minute speech at a gala event. Quite suddenly, Kuwait is no longer considered a terrorist nation – so it is absolutely safe to sell weapons to them. In that same year, Bill Clinton is paid 625,000 dollars to speak at an event put on by Goldman Sachs (one of the largest donors to Hillary’s 2016 campaign). Two days later Goldman Sachs is awarded a contract to sell arms to Algeria; arms that would aid in the human trafficking industry. At the time Senator Richard Luger noticed these parallels and reported it to the media, who promptly tossed the story in the dustbin of history. Let us not forget that it is our job to discover who our ‘public servants’ really are. Hillary Clinton is banking on the notion that you won’t. 

 

Read more…

Take a Close Look At America's Future. Obama Has Already Put out Feelers About a Third Term

Those insisting that “black lives matter” — and shouting down politicians such as former Baltimore Mayor Martin O’Malley for saying “all lives matter” — are unfazed by this shocking increase in black murders of whites. BLM activists call for murder of police and all whites. Some wear shirts with the words “Assata taught me” — a reference to the woman, now a fugitive in Cuba, convicted in 1977 of murdering a New Jersey state trooper. BLM activists marching outside the Minnesota State Fair chanted, “Pigs in a blanket. Fry ’em like bacon.” That was a day after the Democratic National Committee, meeting in Minneapolis, approved a resolution “condemning extrajudicial killings and affirming black lives matter” and hailing “a generation of young African-Americans who feel totally dismissed and unheard as they are crushed between unlawful street violence and unjust police violence.” “We need to start killing these officers,” shouted a crowd as police arrested a violent woman in Madison, Wisconsin — an ultraliberal university town where, incidentally, blacks are arrested at ten times the rate of whites because they carry out 100 times the crimes.. Across the country some people seem to be acting on that advice. Last December, after the protests of the death in custody of a man on Staten Island, two New York Police Department officers were shot and killed in Brooklyn. On August 2, a policeman was killed during a routine traffic stop in Memphis. On August 29, a sheriff’s deputy was gunned down in Houston. On August 31, a police officer was killed in Fox Lake, Illinois. No wonder a Rasmussen poll conducted on August 31 and September 1 found that 58 percent of Americans think there is a “war on police” today. This violence has evoked little response from Barack Obama, who weighed in unnecessarily on the arrest of scholar Henry Louis Gates in July 2009 and the death of Trayvon Martin in March 2012. In August 2014 he said that the death of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri — after he robbed a convenience store and charged a policeman — “awakened our nation” to a reality blacks already understood, all of which sounds like the BLM narrative. It is folly to wait out these black murderers, they will only get worse!

Read more…

First Amendment Held Hostage in Kentucky

By: Craig Andresen and Diane Sori / Right Side Patriots on CPR Worldwide Media / www.cprworldwidemedia,net

“I’ve weighed the cost and I’m prepared to go to jail, I sure am…this has never been davis-10.jpg?width=220a gay or lesbian issue for me. This is about upholding the word of God.” – Kim Davis, the woman who has made herself the flag bearer for the anti-gay marriage issue

Diversions…deflections…and all modes of roadblocks for a woman who’s been turned into a martyr by the religious far right as she, a civil servant, used her personal religious beliefs as a weapon of sorts to stop others…in this case a same-sex couple…from accessing their now SCOTUS awarded Constitutionally given legal right to civilly marry.

Now please understand before we go forward that this co-written article in no way is an attack on Christianity nor on anyone’s personal beliefs, know that we both are straight, and that we both are believers in the one true living God of the Christians and the Jews.

READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE!!!

Read more…

4064167597?profile=original

When the phone rings and your child’s school is calling, can you be certain that your child is safe, not from physical harm but from the school’s administration? Are you willing to bet that today your child will not have their pro-life views criminalized and shut down in their school classroom?  What will you do?

According to the Daily Caller, Angelique Clark a high school student who attends the magnet high school West Career And Technical Academy in Las Vegas saw her efforts to start a pro-life-club blocked by the school.

The Nevada legislature has introduced legislation, Assembly Bill 120, approved by the Governor in May 2015, that “clarifies rights that public at public schools are entitled to express themselves in a manner consistent with the rights guaranteed by the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, provided that such expression doe not disrupt instruction at a public school, is not used to bully or intimidate any person and is not organized, broadcast or endorsed by the public school.”

Clark is a Christian who faced an anti-Christian barrier that many school administrators across America create for Christian students who refuse to bend or abandon their faith. This student’s school had already impeded her efforts to establish a pro-life club in the last school year, while the school already had a gay-straight alliance club which reflected a hypocritical contradiction.

In addition, she had already identified 25 students who wanted to join the pro-life school club.

Unlike last year, when the school administration had simply run the clock out, Clark started her efforts to establish a pro-life student club at the beginning of the school year. This time when she made efforts to launch the pro-life club and was met by opposition she contacted the Thomas More Society; a conservative legal issue support group.


Read more at  http://www.commdiginews.com/politics-2/commentary/when-christian-views-are-suppressed-by-the-public-schools-48129/#PlMXZKZ0uHR51m1w.99

Read more…

There you go again you lying bigoted media saying: "Only trump could get away with that..." Have you forgotten how you communist media types have covered up for dictator obama, in a thousand different ways, for 8 years? Your refusal to criticize any of obama's thousands of crimes, should convince the most moronic idiot that the media is a gang of biased commie propagandists and the media must be dismembered. Media swine should be hauled outside their studios and hung like the traitorous rats they are. There is no honest, fair or objective media. You are a communist propaganda machine sending out lies, brainwashing and intimidating white people 24-7. You have turned most white people into stupid, ignorant, voyeuristic cowards. But not all of us, there is a growing core of hatred against the media that one day will blossom out and annihilate you enemy propagandists. When it comes to the supporting other traitors who wipe their asses on american flags, while you gleefully snap the pics, you media traitors are right their hurrahing black racist traitors. When it comes to black racist murders, rapes, threats , intimidation and special privileges, you media traitors are always on their side, twisting the truth, belittling innocent white people and scaring white sheeple with your biased terrorism. You are pro-muslim, although moslems are a phony murder cult that wants to turn the world into a charnel house. There is always the US media backing them up. Obama is a crooked marxist racist moslem dictator but to you media swine, he is a demi-god. You coined the term "birther" in a childish attempt to intimidate those who know that obama is illegal, a foreign born hater of america. But the media always lies for him  because , like the media says, "obama can say or do anything, we will make sure of that." You media are marked as totalitarian criminals and you will be treated like all the others of your ilk when justice comes for you. In the meantime you have perverted the idea of a free press. It does not exist. It  is either a commie media that hates everything America once stood for and is a clear and president danger to white people (that's what we have) or a patriotic media that represents the majority. That's what we don't have. Media scum are crazy commies, they have got away with every crime in the book too long by exploiting the lie that freedom of the press leads to a fair and honest press. We will never forget how you media protect obama, filled the world with lies and are a pressure group for authoritarian, totalitarianism Your power and evil must be destroyed along with your twin propaganda advertising.. Damn you to hell forever!

Read more…