Today, the United States Congress struck a significant blow against the basic human right to read, write, learn, and associate free of government’s prying eyes.
Goaded by those who let fear override democratic principles, some members of Congress shuttered public debate in order to pass a bill that extends the National Security Agency’s unconstitutional Internet surveillance for six years.
This is part 2 of a five part series taken from my blog at whileweslept.org
Former Indiana Senator Evan Bayh once described the vetting process for high political office as ‘totally invasive… like having a colonoscopy, except they use the Hubble telescope on you.’ And he would certainly know, after being on the shortlist of VP candidates for Al Gore, John Kerry, and Barack Obama. By comparison the vetting process employed by the media and the American public is much less invasive but has the potential to be considerably more deadly. Consider the swift rise and abrupt collapse of Howard Dean’s candidacy back in 2004.
On December 9, 2003 Al Gore endorsed Howard Dean by saying, “I’m very proud and honored to endorse Howard Dean to be the next president of the United States of America..”
Al Gore’s endorsement was highly coveted, and CNN reported that it “could cement Dean’s status as the leading Democratic candidate….“
On January 19 after placing third in the Iowa primary, Dean gave a passionate speech, saying:
“If you had told us one year ago that we were going to come in third in Iowa – well, we’d have given anything for that. And you know something, not only are we going to New Hampshire; we’re going to South Carolina, and Oklahoma and Arizona and North Dakota… and then we’re going to Washington D.C. and we’re going to take back the White House…”
And then it happened: he let out a cackly, off-pitched battle cry. Watching this clip now, more than a decade later, is nothing less than heartbreaking. He is standing there surrounded by flags and supporters in what for him was a pinnacle moment. It’s impossible not to feel sorry for this man who at the time had no idea that he was destroying his bid for the White House. There is no teleprompter. There are no speech notes. There is just Howard Dean – bright-eyed and fully charged with raw emotion. That battle cry, that joyful “hee-ya!” was all anyone needed to convict him, in their own minds, of a rabid lust for power.
That was just over ten years ago. Things have certainly changed. We are less than a year away from both Democrats and Republicans announcing their presidential candidates. Earlier this morning I came across an article about Hillary Clinton’s inevitable nomination that stated, “Unless she is indicted, she will surely win the Democratic nomination.”
Let’s reflect on that for a moment.
Amidst all of the allegations swirling around the Clinton campaign, I wonder if there is anything that could prove to be as damaging as Howard Dean’s Rebel Yell… Certainly Benghazi and the subsequent private server/email findings as well as the gross mishandling of classified material all should have been – not to mention the very real links to Hillary Clinton using the Clinton Foundation as a channel for terrorist nations and regimes to purchase backing from the State Department. Somehow it has all managed to withstand public scrutiny.
For those of us who are old enough to vividly recall the scandalous years of the Clinton White House, this is beyond belief, yet not at all surprising. However, for the 93 million Millennials who will be able to cast a vote in 2016, who were born after ‘Billary’, the seriousness of understanding the Clinton standard of fraudulence cannot be understated. While she herself may regard her own history of ruthless and illicit conduct as “old news”, it is vital that we endeavor to apply the same ‘intrusive and rigorous’ vetting procedures to her just as we would to anyone else seeking the highest office in our land.
Even the most casual meandering through our recent history reveals a very real and disagreeable pattern – travelgate, whitewater, filegate, pardongate and the dozen or so others. These colorless terms certainly benefit the culprits by sounding trivial and easily discarded. I’m sure that most folks, given the opportunity, would prefer to hear about a sex scandal over one involving the White House travel office. However, when held to proper scrutiny, these scandals reveal a consistently contemptuous, underhanded, self-serving, and dangerous political duo that are eerily comparable to Frank and Claire Underwood in House of Cards.
While campaigning for the Presidency in 1992, Bill Clinton remarked that by voting him into the White House, America would be getting ‘two for the price of one’ in reference to the role Hillary would play in his administration. At the time, such an admission was certainly provocative, even exciting to our nation. It had been less than a generation since the integration of the Feminist Movement into our collective principles.
Four months into their Presidency, the first of more than a dozen public scandals, Travelgate, surfaced. Four months after the Clintons took office, they announced that they would be firing all seven of the employees in the White House office that arranges travel for the media and first family. Though it may seem inconsequential to most, this announcement was particularly striking to the media and Washington insiders. These seven employees had faithfully served the administrations of seven Presidents – Republican and Democrat alike – and were well-known, respected civil servants.
After reportedly denying longtime Clinton business acquaintance Harry Thomason access to the White House charter business (worth 31 billion dollars annually), Travel Office Director Billy Dale was promptly locked out of his office while officers removed several boxes of paperwork.
Shortly after being allowed back into his office Mr. Dale was told that he, along with the six others who comprised the travel office team, had been fired for criminal misconduct. Additionally, he was slapped with a lawsuit for allegedly embezzling fourteen thousand dollars because the logs were ‘missing’. Also during this time, out of pure coincidence I’m sure, Mr. Dale received a letter from the IRS informing him that was to be audited, and for the next thirty months he was investigated. His son and daughter were subpoenaed. As the case went to trial in the fall of 1995, a long line of Washington journalists volunteered to serve as character witnesses to Mr. Dale. The jury needed less than two hours to reach a verdict of not-guilty.
Though the final report found that Mrs. Clinton’s sworn statement was ‘factually inaccurate’ and that she had indeed spoken with Harry Thomason on numerous occasions regarding his takeover of the travel office, Billy Dale did not get his job back despite being only a few months away from retirement. Further investigations by the FBI, Department of Justice, and The House Oversight Committee scrutinized Hillary Clinton for playing a central role in this debacle and for making false statements under oath.
The methods administered by Hillary Clinton – the whimsical misuse of law enforcement authority while dragging someone’s reputation and family through the mud in retribution for having been inconvenienced – are contemptible and terrifying.
In that same year, Mrs. Clinton had hired Craig Livingstone for the position of Director of White House Security and given him the highest security clearance despite lacking any sort of high-level security experience – unless you would count working as a bouncer in a D.C. nightclub as sufficient.
While investigating the Travelgate catastrophe, the House Committee on Government Reform and Oversight had found that some 900 unauthorized FBI background reports had been pulled by Livingstone at the request of Mrs. Clinton. The FBI files covered White House employees from Republican administrations and then current political adversaries. The Director of the FBI acknowledged this as an “egregious violation of privacy”, as the files contained detailed information about such things as extramarital affairs and personal medical problems. The politics of personal destruction made easy by improperly obtained, private files of political rivals to be used for professional gain.
The House Oversight Committee ordered an investigation on September 24, 1996 to determine if the events surrounding the files were “a blunder, the result of colossal incompetence, or whether they are established to be more serious or even criminal.” During the investigation the FBI learned that Craig Livingstone – the man who had obtained the files at her request – was the son of a friend of Hillary Clinton’s. They had managed to find photographs with Mrs. Clinton and Mrs. Livingstone. Hillary maintains that she doesn’t know her and that she had nothing to do with hiring Mr. Livingstone. Following this debacle, the FBI closed its White House Liaison Office after more than thirty years of service to seven presidents.
Also in July of 1993, Bill Clinton fired FBI Director William Sessions. This was the first time that an FBI Director had been fired by a President. Clinton-appointed Attorney General Janet Reno said that Sessions had exhibited some “serious deficiencies in judgement” by using an FBI plane to visit his daughter on several occasions. Sessions denied that he had acted improperly and refused to give a letter of resignation. On the 19th, Clinton used his powers to dismiss him immediately.
The very next day, Vincent Foster – long-time friend, coworker and confidant of Hillary Clinton and then current Deputy White House Council – was found dead in a federal park in Virginia. He’d been shot in the head. Due to the recent vacancy of FBI Director, the park police were assigned to handle the case. The park police had certainly never dealt with a case of this magnitude and were vastly unqualified. The official position was that Foster, who had recently been prescribed a suspect dosage of trazodone for insomnia and depression, had killed himself.
After searching his briefcase a full three days later, a suicide note did turn up. It had been torn into twenty-eight pieces, of which twenty-seven were recovered. There were no fingerprints to be found. After examining the remaining pieces forensic experts agreed that the ‘note’ was a fake.
A few months later, a White House volunteer intern named Kathleen Willey nervously made claims to other White House staffers that President Bill Clinton had kissed and groped her during a private meeting regarding the possibility of Willey joining the permanent White House staff in the Oval Office. The alleged encounter occurred on November 29. Hours after her meeting with Clinton concluded, her husband Edward Willey committed suicide over a large debt. Another puzzling coincidence, I’m sure. The Clintons again escaped any sort of charges. The final report of the U.S. Office of Independent Council reads – “Willey and President Clinton are the only direct witnesses to their meeting, and their accounts differ substantially on the crucial facts of what occurred”.
These situations all end in a similar fashion: due to a lack of evidence the final verdict comes down to a ‘your word versus mine’ scenario. While digging through this ‘old news’, I often wonder what Mrs. Clinton and our media would have to say about these wrongdoings if they involved, say, a Republican Senator from Texas or a conservative Governor from Florida. Would they even be allowed the opportunity to run any sort of campaign, let alone one for the highest office in the land?
Over the years, time and time again when publically addressing her innocence in any one of these scandals the narrative changes from her involvement in them to how she responds to being asked about them. Instead of realizing and reflecting on the kind of character that emerges from the connecting of these innumerable dots, we instead hear about how she is “unflappable”, that “the real message is her attitude and poise” and that her “confiding tone and relaxed body language immediately draws approving reviews”.
And now, when people in her own party and large segments of the electorate describe her as “a terrible candidate”, “not easy to trust”, and Secret Service members consider it a punishment to be assigned to her detail because she is so foul and mean-spirited, it is crucial to remember that Hillary Clinton is the first First Lady to come under criminal investigation – not once – but several times.
There is a deeply troubling standard that arises even when considering these accounts individually, but when they are assembled into a timeline we are confronted with the fact that when a Clinton is granted a position of influence we really do get “two for the price of one”.
By Oscar Y. Harward
While I fully support our US Constitution including the First Amendment, God-loving Americans who fully support our US Constitution that is based on Christian values and freedoms needs a very ‘solid case’ in the Federal Judiciary that will open the facts that many in our ‘main-stream’ Medias are hiding behind the First Amendment; rather than reporting these TRUTHS.
Most ‘main-stream’ Medias are not providing Americans and the world the ‘TRUTH, the WHOLE TRUTH, and NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH’ on the issues of the day. Therefore, these left-wing reporters and their organizations are not or should not be protected under (y)our First Amendment ‘rights’.
‘Main-stream’ Medias’ Reporters and their anti-Constitutional organizations should not be protected under their untruthful reporting of the issues.
Most of these ‘main-stream’ Medias are fabricating their own ‘radical’ views when in fact these individuals and organizations know the differences.
Should Lindsey Stone's employer be blamed for Facebook photo of her
disrespecting Arlington Cemetery Tomb of Unknown Soldiers
Lindsey Stone’s photograph on her Facebook page disrespecting the solemn military burial ground of Arlington National Cemetery sent shockwaves across the nation. Unfortunately her former employer, Living Independently Forever, Inc. (LIFE), was caught in the Facebook photograph crossfire. It appears that a lot of the anger that was generated by outraged Americans was also laid at the doorstep of the organization.
This does raise several crucial questions that many employers and employees have to come to terms with. How responsible or even liable are employers for bad conduct that their employees engage in outside of the office? Is it fair to hold any organization, morally liable if an employee like Lindsey Stone decides to engage in outlandish disrespectful and dishonorable actions?
Should an organization like LIFE, or any other employer initiate an employment policy that includes forbidding employees from engaging in conduct that embarrasses their employer? Would that employment policy also include, posting of photographs on Facebook that may harm the organization’s ability to conduct its business or delivery of services.
Certainly, many Americans feel it is unreasonable to assign any liability for the immature 30-year-old Lindsey Stone’s conduct at Arlington Cemetery to LIFE. This notable non-profit organization has a solid reputation for proving quality services for adults with disabilities in Cape Cod, Mass. In fact, the organization responded to the disturbing behavior by stating in part:
Living Independently Forever, Inc. (LIFE) Statement
“This photograph in no way reflects the opinions or values of the LIFE organization, which holds our nation’s veterans in the highest regard. We are proud to have veterans serving on our staff and board of trustees, and we value their service. The men and women who have selflessly fought and sacrificed their lives to protect the rights and lives of Americans deserve our utmost respect and gratitude. We are acutely aware that this photo has done a disservice to veterans and we are deeply saddened that it was taken and shared in a public medium.”
The organization’s deep sincere regret expressed by the former employer of Lindsey Stone and her co-worker Jamie Schuh, demonstrates clearly that every employer in America needs to have a chat with their employees and examine their employee policies. Unruly conduct on and off the premises of an organization, business or employment location, does have consequences.
Employees may claim that they have 1st Amendment “Freedom of Speech" rights under the U.S. Constitution. However those constitutional rights do not extend entirely to certain types of postings on an employee’s private Facebook page. ( Click to read more )
Lindsey Stone Facebook photo of her Disrespecting Arlington Cemetery
Tomb of Unknown Soldiers
When your son or daughter or other loved one goes off to war, there is pride in your heart as well as tears in your spirit. If they are called on to pay the ultimate price and are laid to rest in a place of honor like Arlington National Cemetery or local military cemeteries you understand in your soul that a grateful nation and its families appreciate their sacrifice as well as their noble service.
But what about those disrespectful Americans that engage in actions to attack the honored silence and solitude of the military resting place. What if instead , they decide to give the dead soldiers the finger or brazenly shout absurdities at those gathered to grieve at their loved one’s gravesite?
Lindsey Stone is such an American, who by birth can claim citizenship, but who by conduct certainly walks the line of needing to be stripped of it.
She decided in October to go to Arlington National Cemetery, to according to published accounts, engage in behavior that was prankish. But what exactly is prank behavior when a person not only engages in this behavior to disrespect the soldiers and their families? She then to add insult to injury, had an accomplice take a photo of her conduct and posted the photo to her Facebook page a as badge of honor.
The photo which went viral across the nation shows Ms. Stone using an obscene gesture. In addition, Next to her was a sign at Arlington Cemetery which clearly displays, "Silence and respect." Yet in the photo, Stone is depicted yelling. What was her purpose and what was she thinking?
Does this trouble you? Was Stone’s behavior juvenile for a 30-year-old woman, who seemed to seek social media approval by posting this shameful act on her Facebook page? Was it her First Amendment right to break the solemn rules of a hallowed place of dignity, because respect, discipline and decency are diminished institutional beliefs?
Lindsey Stone’s, now former employer Living Independently Forever (LIFE) initially placed her on suspension along with Jamie Schuh who joined her in the incident, according to Fox News. On Wednesday, Fox News reported that both Stone and Schuh were fired.
So where is the line in America? How far can a person be allowed to go to disrespect or infringe upon another citizen’s rights to grieve in peace? What about the right of the nation to insure that their honored war dead in any military cemetery in any state will not be dishonored?
Despite recognition by virtually everyone but the Oval Office that the White House trumpeted anti-Islamist video trailer has next to nothing to do with violence in the Middle East, and that it is simply a re-election distraction ploy that deflects blame from Obama’s failed foreign policy; in his speech to the United Nations General Assembly Barack Obama continued to blame the video for Mid-East riots and violent demonstrations.
Obama used that narrative as the backdrop for saying there is "No speech that justifies mindless violence. There are no words that excuse the killing of innocents" and "No video that justifies an attack on an embassy". Obama also said that the video "is an insult not only to Muslims, but to America as well."
http://news.yahoo.com/obama-condemns-violence-tied-anti-muslim-film-145204587--election.html
How is the exercise of free speech by an American an insult to America? Is Obama ever going to make a similar statement about artists who dip Crucifixes in urine?
Obama also said “I know that not all countries in this body share this particular understanding of the protection of free speech. We recognize that.”
So Obama recognizes that UN member states do not share American views on the protection of free speech by the U.S. Constitution.
What is Obama doing about it? Recognizing that Islamists will continue to launch military assaults upon American embassies and consulates around the world while he continues to lay the blame at the feet of Americans exercising their right to free speech?
GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney, giving an address before the Clinton Global Initiative's annual conference, made the case for the inherent strength and endurance of the private sector and the dignity derived by individuals reaping the rewards of their own labor.
"That must be at the heart of our effort to help people build economies that can create jobs for people, young and old alike. Work builds self-esteem. It transforms minds from fantasy and fanaticism to reality and grounding. Work will not long tolerate corruption nor quietly endure the brazen theft by government of the product of hardworking men and women."
Romney said if he wins the White House, he will "remind the world of the goodness and bigness of the American heart. I will never apologize for America. I believe that America has been one of the greatest forces for good the world has ever known. We can hold that knowledge in our hearts with humility and unwavering conviction."
Two candidates for one high office offer distinctly differing world views.
Obama’s view is to preach moral equivalence while shrinking from defense of the U.S. Constitution and the God given rights it protects for all Americans.
Romney’s is to stand up for America and its economic system while celebrating the prosperity and good America has both created and symbolized for over two centuries.
Does the distinction need to be drawn more clearly?
http://mjfellright.wordpress.com/2012/09/25/romney-obama-two-speeches-two-views/
Explaining his endorsement of the current White House occupant on the administration’s infrastructure spending, healthcare reform, and position on abortion, Florida’s former Republican Governor Charlie Crist endorsed him on the eve of the 2012 Republican National Convention in Tampa.
Crist has betrayed American taxpayers before. He supported the $787 billion “stimulus” boondoggle, which did little to fund shovel ready infrastructure projects but went a long way towards rewarding big “progressive” 2008 presidential campaign bundlers who “just happened” to run “green energy” companies with lucrative loan guarantees and grants. It also bailed out state and local governments guilty of practicing irresponsible fiscal policies for decades, especially where spending on government sector union contracts was concerned. It was no accident that the lion’s share of “stimulus” spending “just happened” to have gone to “blue states”. Crist’s decision to support the highly partisan, pork stuffed “stimulus” bill helped get the monstrous waste of money through Congress.
“Moderate Republican” go-along to get-along me-first career politicians who, like Crist are so willing to compromise with the institutionalized “progressive” left cannot be trusted.
Tea Party principles are America’s principles. To an intolerable degree, “Moderate Republicans” do not believe in or follow Tea Party principles. Quite often they appear to be completely devoid of principles. They game the political system to gain power and prestige for themselves and themselves alone. They will turn on Americans faster than you can say Specter.
Conservative Tea Party Americans like Allen West, Marco Rubio, Jim DeMint, Pat Toomy, Rand Paul, Ron Johnson Michele Bachmann, Ted Cruz and Mike Lee have the guts to stand against the institutionalized “progressive” left. They have the willingness, backbone and fortitude to preserve individual liberties, restore the U.S. Constitution, and a return to constitutionally limited government, a balanced budget, equal opportunity and equal protection under the law for all Americans.
Today’s Democratic Party is not your father's Democratic Party. They keep insisting that Tea Party Republicans and their affiliates are "extreme". Since when are protecting individual liberties, following the U.S. Constitution, having constitutionally limited government and a balanced budget extreme?
The Tea Party’s positions are extreme only when seen as standing in the way of establishing an all-powerful, centrally planned big government controlled by a self-appointed oligarchy of self-imagined “intellectual elites” i.e. a Communist state.
The institutionalized "progressive" left in 2012 America is acting exactly like every other Communist power grab in history. They lie, cheat and steal to win elections. Then they will lie, cheat, steal and kill to consolidate and strengthen their grip on unrestrained power.
The institutionalized "progressive" left complains about how "extreme" Tea Party Republicans refuse to compromise. The Tea Party knows that Communists have no interest in compromising with anyone. The institutionalized "progressive" left's negotiating position has been, is, and will continue to be: What's Yours is Negotiable, What's Mine is Not. Those who hold this negotiating position, when they do finally obtain an iron grip on unrestrained power, do not compromise with their political opposition. They eliminate them…permanently.
America is at an historic crossroads. The 2012 election will determine what life in America will be like for the next and following generations.
In the words of Ronald W. Reagan, 40th President of the United States of America:
“Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it was once like in the United States where men were free.”
FAITH IN ACTION
Blessings beloved children of The Living God. Paul writes: Lord, who shall believe our report?! Yes, a question, Yet an Exclamation. And why? Because, God is expecting of us what He alone has endowed us with, Our Faith. Jesus says: Your own Faith has made you whole. We OWN our Faith, Hallelujah! He tells us: Seek Ye FIRST: The Kingdom of Heaven and His Righteousness! And ALL these things shall be added unto you.
They are the Fruits, Virtues, and Gifts of His Holy Spirit. We are saved by GRACE. We live by FAITH. We do not ask Him for anything we already own. Faith is among these things which He filled us with when we became Born Again. Many there are in the Clergy who do not give this information out, let alone teach it unto understanding to the mass. And why not? They have a Paycheck to protect.
Did you ask God, Jesus, or His Holy Spirit of Truth to use your own bathroom? Or, did you ask them to Blink? Breathe? Sneeze? This list goes on infinitesimally. We do not ask Him to use things we already own. Oh, Yes and assuredly we thank Him so reverently for them and that we have them to use and utilize, but they are ours and we do own them only by His Grace. And what is His Grace?
It is reported by many in the Clergy that Gods Grace is unmerited Favor. Hmm?! Where so ever in the scripture or the Gospels does it refer or even speak of such a thing? I have been given to know, acknowledge, work in, and exercise through this word of Glory as I share it now with you as well the viewers’.
It is a long story, but one well worth the time to read, consume, and put into a reality base within each and every heart the world over.
In Matthew 18:11 and John 19:10 is written: The Son of Man is come to SEEK and to SAVE "That!" which WAS lost.
What was the "THAT" which was lost? Our INNOCENCE!
Well, beloved, it was that "WHICH WAS" that was lost. OUR INNOCENCE!
Many equate this to the meaning and the subversive conniving of the brainstorming crowd as: We, Us. "NOPE" When we read His Word, and as Paul also writes: Comparing Spiritual things with Spiritual things! We find a new order of thinking. He also writes: by the renewing of the mind! So, at and by this we find that our conventional ways of thinking must take on a whole new way of processing our information about His Word. Not to dispel any or all that He is about, NO WAY!
It is by the Order (or COMMAND) unto our very Souls that we understand ALL that He has given us from the very beginning unto forever, amen.
So, what was "That which was LOST?!
Our Innocence. As individuals, nations, tribes, peoples, Souls.
In Psalms 88, (and please read it again, this time understanding it is the very spoken words of Jesus as He died on that Cross at Calvary) we read: 6) You have laid me in the Lowest Pit, in Darkness, in the depths.
While Jesus was alive on the face of Planet Earth, He Prophesied upon His very own life and the life of His eternal Soul, even upon the face of His very own Faith: I lay down my life, for I have power to take it up again.
:12) Shall Your wonders be known in the dark? And Your righteousness in the Land of Forgetfulness?
As we continue to read and discover all that Jesus did just walking in this life on Earth, we are more profoundly Amazed by His completed work at Calvary and that His real work came at that point of death. For His Journey at that point had just begun.
:18) Loved one and friend, You have put far from me, and my acquaintances into darkness. He became Literally "NOTHING!" as in Never was. As if God had never even thought of creating Him to begin with. I know this sounds odd, but Truth never fails. And please do not ask me to explain how this word has come to
In Psalms 88, (and please read it again, this time understanding it is the very spoken words of Jesus as He died on that Cross at Calvary) we read: 6) You have laid me in the Lowest Pit, in Darkness, in the depths.
While Jesus was alive on the face of Planet Earth, He Prophesied upon His very own life and the life of His eternal Soul, even upon the face of His very own Faith: I lay down my life, for I have power to take it up again.
:12) Shall Your wonders be known in the dark? And Your righteousness in the Land of Forgetfulness?
As we continue to read and discover all that Jesus did just walking in this life on Earth, we are more profoundly Amazed by His completed work at Calvary and that His real work came at that point of death. For His Journey at that point had just begun.
:18) Loved one and friend, You have put far from me, and my acquaintances into darkness. He became Literally "NOTHING!" as in Never was. As if God had never even thought of creating Him to begin with. I know this sounds odd, but Truth never fails. And please do not ask me to explain how this word has come to me other than by faith and obedience unto Him who knows and does all things, amen.
For, In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth, and the earth was without form (order, total chaos) and void (no presence of His Majesty, Love, and Kindness). And Darkness was upon the face of the Deep.
When Lucifer fell and 1/3 of the Angels with him, God needed a place apart from Heaven to send them to. Bamm! Creation.
The whole idea is revealed in the message: And God would that NONE should perish! And this meant even Lucifer and the angels. Hoping upon the Soul of those whom made their choice at that time, that they would miss Heaven and Repent and return back unto God for forgiveness and be rightfully restored into Heaven for the eternal home they'd once knew. But that did not happen. They were having too much fun creating the Dinosaur and Cro-Magnon man after their idealist ways. And we clearly see what happened to them.
For, yes there were planets and moons, earthquakes, volcanoes and all sorts of things going BUMP in the night. But, there were neither Stars nor Suns to give light.
Gen 1:2b-3: And the Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters. Then God said, "Let there be light!" and there was Light. 4) And God saw the light that it was good and God divided the Light from the Darkness.
So, when LIGHT finally hit the scene, all that (then known) Satan had created, all turned to Stone in an instant, so that God could do His Creativity upon the face of Planet Earth. Hence, why it took Him 6 days to create all that we know of today. Amen.
So, why are we here, existing upon this earth?
Because, Satan (total personality) did not repent, nor did his angels. Remember, God would that NONE should perish.
Gen 2:5c: And there was no man to till the ground
God created man in His image, so that every time Satan and the fallen ones would see them, that when they were wrong and seeking Favor from God, repenting and God forgiving, that someway they (Satan and all those) would see, realize, and repent and be redeemed. Yet, all for naught
The first fall of man, in the Garden of Eden, Eve was Beguiled, tempted, lied to, and manipulated into thinking and believing the lie.
Adam, also believing in the lie, for who was Eve, but his better half, amen, why would she lie? They both ate of the same fruit.
The fruit was the Knowledge. Hmm. Apples, Oranges, Peanut Butter? Oh grow up, you get my drift.
The fruit of the Tree of the KNOWLEGE of Good and Evil, was the Knowledge. Think about how when you burned yourself from the stove or stumped your toe in the night, you hold yourself accountable to this knowledge, a certain level of conscious thought that this will never happen again, right?
OK then. This tree was on a Need to Know basis, and Adam and Eve had no NEED to know of these things. Yet, they believed the lie that they did, and BAMM! Here we are.
It was at this very moment in time that Innocence for all mankind was lost. For God asked them: Who told you - you were naked? (3:11) Until this time, they had been 100% innocent, perfect, holy, and righteous in Gods eyes.
Satan, not remembering what all took place in Heaven before his fall, saw something Golden fall from them at that time. And he (Satan) still seeking to One-Up on God, swooped her (Innocence) up and thrust her into the Land of Forgetfulness. A very real place which does exist. Thinking that if he forgot about her, so would God.
At the time of the fall of Lucifer and the Angels, being slam-dunked into this time/space continuum, God kept their total recall of remembrance unto Himself, so they would not know any of the hidden secrets which only God knew. Hence, this is why Satan, when tempting Jesus in the desert for 40 days, did not recognize Him.
So, for all this time and space which had come and gone, Before man, quite possibly eons of millennia of time, then since man unto the time of Calvary another 4-6,000 years, wow! A long time to remember a password to a FB acct, huh?
Back to Calvary: Jesus, just like Innocence, had been thrust into the Lowest Pit of hell, into the Land of Forgetfulness. Being crushed by the stressors and such in that place is like the Black Hole that Scientists speak of now that produces this event known as total annihilation of particle matter, bodies, etc.
Key point: Revelation 8:1) When he opened the 7th Seal, there was SILENCE in Heaven "About The Space" of half an hour.
Nothing in all creation, time, and space had ever happened. Jesus, The Be-Gotten Son of The Living God, because of the exactness of the Mysteries of God, had become Absolute Nothing, as in Never was. All of Heaven stood in silence about the Space which had been created because of Jesus' Divine work to be accomplished, to REDEEM Innocence from the Lowest Pit of hell.
For, if this would not have happened, Innocence would not have been found, redeemed, and the struggle over the Souls of men would have been put to naught, and the end of all existence as we know it would have happened right then.
This is why all of Heaven was Silent about the space; they all waited to hear the sound of that still small voice from the Abyss, of Innocence herself crying out to Jesus: MY LORD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
At this point, Jesus (taking up His most Holy Faith) comes back unto Himself, and seeing Innocence with His own eyes, thrusts her into His bosom and makes His trek with her back to the surface of the Earth.
Yet, on His way out of there, Stops and gives the greatest grave-side call of redemption ever known, to all who had lived before Him, to understand the fulfillment of the promise: Though you be dead, Yet shall you live!
Then, as His Imperical Right of Authority over all of Heaven and Earth, Death, Hell, and The Grave, Stands upon the Face of the earth. This is when in that Garden, Mary Magdalene sees Him. And He tells her: WOMAN! Touch ME not, for I have not yet ascended unto the Father. Go! Tell the Disciples of seeing Me and meet Me in the Upper Room. And off to Heaven He goes with Innocence, Placing Her upon the Mercy Seat of God, Adorning Her and hearing the words of the Father, Well done my good and Faithful Son.
Aw, Yes, one little point needs to be placed between the 2 previous posts, And there was a War in Heaven. Revelation 12:7-8) And WAR broke out in Heaven: Michael and his Angels fought with the Dragon, and the dragon and his angels fought. But they did not prevail, nor was a place found for them in heaven any longer.
All of Heaven had to be completely cleared from the Accuser of the brethren, Satan, the dragon, that old serpent and anything like him. For as described in Job 1:6-7) Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan also came among them. And the Lord said to Satan:"From where do you come?" So Satan answered the Lord and said "From going to and fro on the earth and from walking back and forth on it"
For as Jesus speaks with Peter: Simon Bar-Jonah, this day I call you Peter, See this day, I give you the Keys to the Kingdom, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it (like in Eden). Upon this Rock of INNOCENCE Build MY Church!
Yet, the scripture says: we are born into sin.
Hold it right there!
The words here, as Paul writes: Study to show yourself APPROVED unto God! A workman, not ashamed, Rightly dividing the word of Truth. Here is where we discern the comparison of Spiritual things.
We are born! Stop right there, shut the book and call it good.
We are born, in this life as new born innocent babies. Pure as the driven snow. For, until the individual point of Age of Accountability (and it is different with everyone) we are innocent. Until we are able to form our own individual thought by ourselves and realizing the difference between right and wrong, even about the thought itself, we are innocent. The rule of Ignorance (Leviticus, you'll find it) applies. For, once enlightened (understanding the exactness of right and wrong) you have no excuse Romans 2:1.
We are born. (Stop) Into Sin! Hmm. OK, we are innocent unto a certain point in our lives. But, after that (between that time {rebellion or whatever} we are catapulted into believing lies from all angles of this life. Known as Learned Behaviors/ Character Defects.
But, at the point of Born Again, we are to be given this information about receiving back our Innocence, where in lies the formidable Wisdom and discernment of the Living God within us, come alive and dwell within us for His Right Righteousness and purpose.
If anyone has never heard of such a thing until now (and I'm sure there are many) then please follow these few instructions to achieve and enter into the place He Father God and Jesus the Son has created for you to do:
Hold out both hands. For the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand.
With your left index finger Point to the thumb on your Right hand and proclaim with a Loud Voice: My Father
Next finger, My Jesus. Next, My Holy Spirit Next, My Kingdom of Heaven Next (Pinky) ME
NOW, Reach towards Heaven and proclaim: I Receive back my Innocence, in Jesus' name.
Place your hand upon your heart. This is the Kingdom of God within you.
Guard your Heart and your Innocence with all you know how to do. Hold it closely and dearly.
For our Innocence is Gods Grace, The Holy Grail, our most Holy Faith, and our First Love.
We are Born Again children of Peace. We have no right to accept anyone else's blame, shame, nor guilt.
We command our gifts, fruits, and virtues of His Holy Spirit of Truth to Come Forth, GO! Before us, and make Straight the Path of The Lord of Glory, Hallelujah!
Blessings to one and all.
The Freedom of speech that we are entitled to in the First Amendment has been DELETED by this president in secret and signed into LAW. HR347 gives secret service agents (hand picked by the president) sweeping powers to decide where we can and can't protest his policies. They are able to determine NO FREE SPEECH ZONES!!
For 230 years we have had the right to debate policies by any political figure. This freedom of speech has been abridged. Very little public debate in Congress. Speech violations, the right to petition the government for a redress of your grievances, association violations will all fall into this category. It gives unbridled power to the Secret Service members hired by Obama to decide where we can speak up against him - and since Obama is able to assign Secret Service protection to whomever he chooses - then they can decide that we are not entitled to protest those designated by the president as part of his team (David Axelrod, for example). We need to be outraged and protest Congress on this one! Destruction of our basic liberties happening live!
Posted by African Press International on March 9, 2012
By api
Now it is here and places the president in the African continent. The debate surrounding it will now end after the revelation, and those who have not been telling the truth will have to be made answerable one way or another.
The revelation, however, coming during this election year 2012 is doing no good to the democratic party.
API on Tuesday the 6th March evening received President Obama’s genuine birth certificate. API decided not to hurry in publishing it immediately because we wanted to be sure of the content value.
Now that the scrutiny has been done, the publishing of the Birth certificate that will clear the air once and for all is being done without prejudice. This may force the US president to apologise to the American people for having been kept in the dark on the issue for a long time now on demanding the publishing of the birth certificate by President Obama.
www.africanpress.me Coast province? Check it out
API will scan in here a letter from Coast Provincial Birth Registration Office in the next few hours or days, depending on how quick API is cleared to do so.
The purpose of scanning the official letter is to ensure that what we have received as you see here is fully collaborated officially.
www.africanpress.me : Obama registration sir edward of lavender was the colonial registrar in Mombasa in 1961? Check it out and satisfy yourself by weighing the facts individually.
Everyone knows that the documents are very sensitive and are not for misuse by any person to gain upper hand in political games.
It is, however, fair that the whole truth is brought to light and have the whole saga put to rest once and for all.
Many people seem to be of the opinion that there is a plan to hide from them the real thing. The US President says he is born in Hawaii. Many documents being circulated worldwide says otherwise. Therefore, it is very important to be outright and get the real thing on the table without witch hunt or without trying to malign the president’s name, unless the truth is not what he personally has said.
A duly signed official letter and a very special document will be scanned here for all to see – this comes in a few hours or days, depending on how quick API gets the clearance to do so. The two documents will put the issue to rest and clear the air once and for all who wish to know the true facts of this case file that has bothered a section of the American people!
It is only reasonable to continue working on this case in order to reveal the truth of the matter.
Another issue important to consider is why many are so interested in this. If Obama has ruled now for three good years and is now in his fourth year – and already asking for another term that will give him new 4 years in the White House, is there any wrongdoing when he actually has delivered leadership and continues to do so? He has not run down the country, so what is all the farce about where he is born? After all, he has lived in the US all his life.
Posted by African Press International on April 13, 2011
By API.
Now, President Obama has announced his intention to run for a second term despite questions on his citizenship and the eagerness by the Americans to see his real birth certificate to ascertain where he was born.
The Mombasa-born US President has managed to run the White House very well since January 2009, despite pressure on him to reveal his real citizenship to the American people, and he now wants a second term in office. Elections in the US in 2012 will most probably be like in 2008 when pressure mounted seeking to have him produce his genuine birth certificate. Obama has decided not to reveal his citizenship because if he does, he will be taken to court for having ruled a country against the constitution which states that a president must be a citizen by birth.
Sources disclose to API that President Obama will write a very interesting biography revealing his birthplace, but only when he is no longer the President. One thing he should not forget, however, is the fact that he can still be prosecuted after leaving office.
The former Mombasa Imam who gave Obama’s mother the birth certificate after the birth of Barack Hussein Obama is now living in the UK after seeking for asylum in 2008 when the subject of Obama’s citizenship was in top gear. The Imam fled Mombasa to Britain where – saying he did so for his own safety. The former Imam tells API that he will soon hold a press conference on the issue when it feels safe to do so..
End
Just a moment before I highlight Obama accomplishments.....Am I getting paranoid or what?...It seems every time I send a blog with some 'substance' my Internet Provider experiences troubles...like less than a month ago they were down/off for @ 3 days and it happened again from Friday 16 to today!....
Who said he hasn't done anything? That’s just not so...and he was the first president to do many things
An impressive list of accomplishments!
• First President to apply for college aid as a foreign student, then deny he was a foreigner.
• First President to have a social security number from a state he has never lived in.
• First President to preside over a cut in the credit-rating of the United States .
• First President to violate the War Powers Act.
• First President to be held in contempt of court for illegally obstructing oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico .
• First President to defy a Federal Judge's court order to cease implementing the Health Care Reform Law.
• First President to require all Americans to purchase a product from a third party.
• First President to spend a trillion dollars on 'shovel-ready' jobs when there was no such thing as 'shovel-ready' jobs.
• First President to abrogate bankruptcy law to turn over control of companies to his union supporters.
• First President to by-pass Congress and implement the Dream Act through executive fiat.
• First President to order a secret amnesty program that stopped the deportation of illegal immigrants across the U.S. , including those with criminal convictions.
• First President to demand a company hand-over $20 billion to one of his political appointees.
• First President to terminate America 's ability to put a man in space.
• First President to have a law signed by an auto-pen without being present.
• First President to arbitrarily declare an existing law unconstitutional and refuse to enforce it.
• First President to threaten insurance companies if they publicly spoke-out on the reasons for their rate increases.
• First President to tell a major manufacturing company in which State they are allowed to locate a factory.
• First President to file lawsuits against the states he swore an oath to protect (AZ, WI, OH, IN).
• First President to withdraw an existing coal permit that had been properly issued years ago.
• First President to fire an inspector general of Ameri-corps for catching one of his friends in a corruption case.
• First President to appoint 45 czars to replace elected officials in his office.
• First President to golf 73 separate times in his first two and a half years in office, 90 to date.
• First President to hide his medical, educational and travel records.
• First President to win a Nobel Peace Prize for doing NOTHING to earn it.
• First President to go on multiple global 'apology tours'.
• First President to go on 17 lavish vacations, including date nights and Wednesday evening White House parties for his friends; paid for by the taxpayer.
• First President to have 22 personal servants (taxpayer funded) for his wife.
• First President to keep a dog trainer on retainer for $102,000 a year at taxpayer expense.
• First President to repeat the Holy Quran, and tell us the early morning call of the Azan (Islamic call to worship) is the most beautiful sound on earth.
Who knows what this man will accomplish with another four years?
Seems everyone has their mind on the Primaries. I want to know where are our Candidates on this issue?
http://www.infowars.com/h-r-347-another-step-in-the-elimination-of-the-first-amendment/
Please go to the National Tea Party Fund LLC web-site. They have the FIRST TEA PARTY FLAG!
Go to: National Tea Party Fund. Com
Little known, however, is Reid’s aim to create a national police force for Barack Obama killing two birds with one horrible stone . . . Reid is pushing the “Public Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act (HR 413) as a way to solidify the strength of unions in the country and hand Obama a national police and fire force loyal to him more than the states and cities they protect.
The temerity of the Democrats in aiming to make individual union “yea” or “no” choices into a matter of national law is scandalous. Of course, Reid is talking up the proposed laws as “crucial to national security.” One wonders if radical Islamic Jihadists are part of that particular vision of national safety? The law “benignly” seeks to nationalize rules governing every police, fire and other first responder union in the country and to have every single policeman and fireman and emergency responder to be represented by collective bargaining rules emanating from Washington, D.C. In the process, state rules and municipal rules would be nullified.
You’d think the Greek example of overly powerful national unions would have been an abject lesson for Harry Reid, who’s never met a socialist law which didn’t send an orgasmic thrill up his leg. By taking away the local and state control over police and fire forces, this is a tremendous challenge to the 10th Amendment’s separation of federal powers from state and local ones. Of course, national unions would also determine pay and benefits as well as promotions. An evil law that deserves to be flushed down the toilet.
Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,
Rajjpuut
