+2+obama+visa.jpg)
----------------------------OK I am comiing out of the closet. I have become a birther over the last few months. Anyone with so much to hide he will spend an estimated seven million dollars ($7,000,000) to be sure it stays hidden from the American public makes me think he may have something to hide about who he is. No verifiable birth certificate (the one on his web site has been proven in several venues to be a phony) no school records, traveling to Pakistan in 1981 when no AMERICAN citizen was allowed to travel there all just makes me suspicious. Yeah. Suspicious.
By the way, just where did a community organizer and first term senator get even one million????
February 15, 2013 by Bob Livingston
Who is Harrison J. Bounel? According to the 2009 tax return submitted by President Barack Obama he’s the President of the United States. All nine U.S. Supreme Court Justices arescheduled to discuss this anomaly today.
The case in question is Edward Noonan, et al v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State, and the Justices are finally looking at it thanks to the dogged determination of Orly Taitz. The case calls into question many of the documents Obama (Bounel, Soetoro, Soebarkah, etc.) has used and/or released as authentic since he came on the national scene. The case contends that the documents — birth certificate, Social Security number, Selective Service registration, etc. — are fakes or forgeries. If that’s the case, Obama should not have been on the California ballot in 2008 and, therefore, should not have received the State’s electoral votes.
Four of the nine Justices must vote to move the case forward. We’ll see.
Meantime, on Feb. 4, Kathleen O’Leary, presiding judge of the 4th District Court of Appeal, reinstated the appeal of Taitz v. Obama et al filed by Taitz when she ran for Senate. That case involves evidence of 1.5 million invalid voter registrations in the State of California. The appeal also involves Obama’s lack of legitimacy to hold the office of President based on his forged IDs, stolen Connecticut Social Security number, the fact the last name he’s using is not legally his and his fraudulent claim to be the U.S. citizen.
Evidence in the case includes:
On another legal front, Obama defaulted in the case of Grinols et al v. Obama et al on Jan. 30 when he failed to file a response within 21 days of being served notice of the suit. This case also involves Obama’s phony SSN.
http://www.petition2congress.com/8222/petition-recount-on-2012-presidential-election/
http://nesaranews.blogspot.jp/2013/02/employees-of-supreme-court-of-united.html
http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474981851622
I have a simple queastion I'm just a simple unarticulate 69 yr.old male American and at the risk of being labled a simpleton my question is : What happens if the Feds find a way if they havn't already to cut off our ability to communicate with one another? There seems to me to be variety of consiquences. What do we do ? or more importantly how do we stop it ?
Edward Gibbon, the great British historian who chronicled the rise and fall of the first great Western civilization stated the following:
| In the end, more than freedom, they wanted security. They wanted a comfortable life and they lost it all – security, comfort, and freedom. When the Athenians finally wanted not to give to society but for society to give to them, when the freedom they wished for most was freedom from responsibility, then Athens ceased to be free and was never free again. |
Company produces cardboard cut-outs of “non-traditional threats”: Pregnant women, elderly & children
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
February 19, 2013
A provider of “realistic” shooting targets to the Department of Homeland Security and other federal agencies has created a line of “non-traditional threat” targets that include pregnant women, mothers in playgrounds and elderly American gun owners.
Law Enforcement Targets, Inc. is a 21-year designer and full service provider of training targets for the DHS, the Justice Department and thousands of law enforcement agencies throughout the country.
The company’s website offers a line of “No More Hesitation” targets ”designed to give officers the experience of dealing with deadly force shooting scenarios with subjects that are not the norm during training.” The targets are, “meant to help the transition for officers who are faced with these highly unusual targets for the first time.”
The targets include “pregnant woman threat,” “older man with shotgun,” “older man in home with shotgun,” “older woman with gun,” “young school aged girl,” “young mother on playground,” and “little boy with real gun.”
Why are top training target suppliers for the government supplying the likes of the DHS with “non-traditional threat” targets of children, pregnant women, mothers in playgrounds, and elderly American gun owners unless there is a demand for such items?
This is particularly alarming given the fact that the Department of Homeland Security has purchased roughly 2 billion rounds of ammunition over the course of the last year, enough to wage a near 30 year war.
In comparison, during the height of active battle operations in Iraq, US soldiers used 5.5 million rounds of ammunition a month.
The DHS also purchased no less than 7,000 fully automatic assault rifles last September, labeling them “Personal Defense Weapons.”
The fact that targets of armed pregnant women, children, mothers in playgrounds, and American gun owners in general are being represented as “non traditional threats” “for the first time” is deeply concerning given the admitted preparations for civil unrest undertaken by Homeland Security as well as other federal agencies.
A leaked US Army Military Police training manual for “Civil Disturbance Operations” also outlines how military assets are to be used domestically to quell riots, confiscate firearms and even kill Americans on U.S. soil during mass civil unrest.
This also dovetails with the continuing characterization of Americans who are “suspicious of centralized federal authority,” and “reverent of individual liberty” as “extreme right-wing” terrorists by DHS-funded studies.
The US military trained last year to take on another “unusual target” – zombies – which some fear is just a ruse to get troops used to engaging crowds of people with deadly force. As Alex Jones documented in his film Police State 2000, numerous “urban warfare” training drills stretching back well over a decade have revolved around incarcerating and battling the American people on domestic soil.
See the other “non-traditional threats” that are being provided in the form of shooting targets to the DHS and thousands of law enforcement agencies below.
Note: The website containing these targets has crashed since this article was published, but this graphic shows a screenshot of the page with the URL visible.
*********************
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News.
http://www.infowars.com/dhs-supplier-provides-shooting-targets-of-american-gun-owners/
It is amazing how quickly the focus in DC can change from fiscal matters to something entirely different. Politicians remind me of three-year old children – easily distracted. Never mind the huge deficits and fiscal crisis we have on our hands which has not been addressed in over twelve years! I know – let’s talk about federal immigration reform or better yet, federal gun control laws… whatever is viewed as the next crisis is the one to which attention is given. Reminds me of the old political saying – “Never let a good crisis go to waste”.
I wrote an e-mail to my House Representative a few weeks ago asking him to vote NO on the $50.4 billion dollar bill to approve aid to Hurricane Sandy victims because a large portion of the bill included spending for items that had absolutely nothing to do with aiding the storm victims. In addition, there were no offsetting spending cuts. The House could not even approve to cut spending to cover 1/3 of the cost of this bill.
As one of my favorite Washington DC correspondents, Jamie Dupree, posted on his blog: “While many Republicans wanted a smaller disaster relief bill, some of them refused to embrace a plan to pay for 1/3 of the plan, by using an across the board budget cut of 1.63% to trim $17 billion. “Are we willing and able to do without anything?” asked a frustrated Rep. Mick Mulvaney (R-SC), who saw 71 of his fellow Republicans vote against the offsetting budget cuts. The move reinforced arguments by Democrats that the GOP loves to talk about cutting the budget and saving money, but doesn’t follow through.”
Think about this as it relates to your household budget. Let’s say a disaster strikes – strong winds damage your home’s shingles and you need to have new shingles put on your roof. Your insurance policy will cover the cost of replacing the shingles, BUT will require you to pay a $2,000 deductible. The first item most of us would do is look at our budget and see what we need to cut in order to account for that unexpected $2,000 outlay. Perhaps we have savings and can tap into that, have a line-of-credit and can borrow the funds, or can do the work ourselves. Of course, we may decide to look for a second job and try to increase our revenue stream to pay for the $2,000, but putting these options aside, normal folks look to what they can cut to make up for this new “required” expense. We may look at cutting entertainment or budgeted funds for clothes or simply decide not to get the roof fixed at this time.
Let’s face facts, neither Republicans nor Democrats are serious about budget cuts or reining in government spending. Their actions over the previous twelve years (Bush and Obama administrations) make this evidently clear. Our politicians are in the business of keeping our government growing – why do you think the seat of government continues to attract those looking for work? A large % of the government’s spending manages to stay in DC – how convenient!
The choices we face in each election are pretty much as follows:
Vote Democrat for unbridled spending – after all for many Democrats there is no fiscal crisis – just keep raising the debt ceiling and borrowing funds – eventually the economy will come around and with the tax increases just introduced and the savings from Obamacare, enough revenue will be generated to deal with it (FAT CHANCE)!
But a vote for Republicans is just as bad – big talk about budget cuts when they can be used to criticize Democrats, but then go forward with huge increases in spending on military and other Republican favored programs.
The U.S. government has an enormous spending problem and I believe very few if any, of those who represent us on the Hill give a damn!
With all of the support given to Chris Dorner after his murder spree I find myself looking for a person I can call a hero for “standing up for himself”. I found him in Tulsa, Oklahoma of all places. The Tulsa story didn’t get the same publicity Dorner garnered but the story is essentially the same. Dorner is in the process of being canonized by leftists across this nation for murdering people who had nothing to do with his firing from the Los Angeles Police Department over questions of conduct. I don’t know for sure why he was fired, and no one probably ever will know as the truth won’t be allowed to see the light of day. The Los Angeles Police Department will cover their tracks and whitewash the affair, as will supporters of the actions taken by Dorner. No one cares what the truth is, only that their side wins. It doesn’t help that the LAPD took to tossing a hail of bullets at anyone driving a pickup truck in California without bothering to find out who was in the vehicle, but that is another issue.
Read More:
"Why is it the progressive liberal who steals guns then goes and kills movie goers and children in school has never been a NRA member?"
Ft Hood - Registered Democrat- Muslim
Columbine - Too young to vote - both families were registered democrats and progressive liberals
VA Tech - Wrote hate mail to Pres Bush and to his staff. Registered Democrat
Colorado Theater - Registered Democrat, staff worker on the Obama campaign, occupy wall street participant, progressive liberal
Connecticut School Shooter - Registered Democrat, hated Christians
Common thread is that all of these shooters were progressive liberal democrats."
Interesting...isn't it? Maybe we should ban Democrats instead of guns!
No more privacy and no where you can go to enjoy your personal privacy. Now you know who's watching you and just how much they can see from a drone. The real question is who is watching the watchers to ensure they do not violate our rights.
We must take a stand against this invasion of privacy under the guise of Homeland Security. Contact your congressman and senator immediately to demand they take action against spying on US citizens now. The time to take a stand is now because our constitutional rights depend on our vigilance every day.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=od6kWBjh4Kc&feature=player_embedded
Department of Homeland Security
When lines of authority are blurred, power naturally defaults to the highest level. The states are not ‘partners’ with the federal government in matters that require state authority over their jurisdiction.
From the Legal Information Institute;
Jurisdiction-The term jurisdiction is really synonymous with the word “power”
Jurisdiction is the territory within which a court or government agency may properly exercise its power
State and local policing is a jurisdictional matter and the states and local governments have conceded their authority in this. Informational jurisdiction is no exception and in fact leads physical control.
What is revealed in this IACP Nov. 2012 article is that the Department of Homeland Security has funded an international non-governmental organization, the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP), to manage the operational issues of the endeavor; Targeted Interstate Photo Sharing (TIPS).
“The DHS S&T has funded the IACP Technology Center to provide a practitioner group to advise Nlets on operational issues. These experienced practitioners will provide input on how this technology can be used in the field.”
What that means is that we are in trouble.
The IACP is an international, non-governmental organization accredited by the United Nations and has been instrumental in bringing about profound changes to our nation politically, technologically and culturally. There has been a great paradigm shift in our nation since 9-11 that spans all agencies of government. This shift affects every aspect of our lives and has practically decimated the US Constitution and Bill of Rights. US citizens, regardless of their political persuasion, are united in astonishment as they witness the slash and burn abrogation of one cherished right after another.
There is no sector of our society left untouched by the new paradigm and each has its own specialists attending to the transformation in their particular realm. In the realm of policing, it is the IACP who is in charge of nurturing and tending this transformation.
Here is just one example;
Intelligence Led Policing and Fusion Centers: How the IACP Helped the USA to Cross the Rubicon
Unfortunately there’s no solution in legislation, no real willingness by enough of our elected representatives to do what they took an oath to do; to protect our liberty I do still recommend that you contact your state representative and tell them if you have concerns about open access to your data contained in the state Dept. of Public Safety database. Tell them that you expect them to protect your personal information from being freely shared and used on a whim to track and spy on you. They need to hear concerns from their constituents.
It is clear that we cannot stop the government from sharing this information in ways that will hurt our ability to control our own lives. If we want to protect ourselves we must remove our biometrics from the system by either not giving it to them in the first place or taking legal action to remove it.
*CALL ME POST-STATIST*
by Jim Babka
for The Zero Aggression Project
I'm not liberal, conservative, green, libertarian, or socialist. I prefer
being called [LINK: http://www.downsizedcfoundation.org/blog/our-lexicon-poststatist]
"Post-Statist."Â That means, I envision a day when political domination is held in low regard, like communism and monarchy presently are. For many years, I believed that the size and scope of the government was the problem. I worked to [LINK: http://www.DownsizeDC.org/] "Downsize DC."Â Directionally, that was correct, but it avoids the BACkbone problems, which is that [LINK:
http://www.downsizedcfoundation.org/blog/our-lexicon-the-state] The State is a...
· Bullying
· Abusive
· Cartel
*BULLYING*
The State has one power -- coercion. It either bribes or threatens human beings, compelling them to do things that they would not otherwise choose to do on their own. Statists imagine all the wonderful things that could happen if the coercion was intensified. They never calculate the costs.
*What if what passes for dialogue in this country was focused not on
self-serving, partisan bickering points, but was, instead, an evaluation of all the real costs of statist schemes, both hidden and evident?*
*ABUSIVE*
People turn to The State because they think it's an effective short-cut to social progress and security. Indeed, The State has two powers that attract reformers.
First, politicians have tons of money with which to bribe the behaviors
that are politically preferred, and that's because they're very good at
stealing it. They are further supported by cronies who want their share of the loot.
Second, bureaucrats back those threats with real violence. Ignore their
edicts at your peril. Armed men and women will show up to take your
property or your liberty. Resist and they'll take your life! Â
*CARTEL*
The State is a [LINK:
http://www.downsizedcfoundation.org/blog/our-lexicon-the-violent-monopoly]
"Violent Monopoly." Who else can require you to "patronize" their business?
Imagine, you don't like the hamburger you just received. Maybe you ordered it without onions, but it came with them. You can complain. In business, the customer is right. Maybe they apologize and replace the order. Perhaps they discount your bill. Even then, you have the choice to never darken the door of the establishment ever again.Â
On the other hand, how many IRS agents or FDA regulators say, "The citizen is always right?"
As Perry Willis has observed...
/You have more power as a customer than you do as a citizen./
Therefore, the size of The State is the smaller problem by comparison with the BACkbone problems. And if "governments" are supposed to protect and enhance rights, then...
*The bullying, abusive, cartel-like behavior disqualifies The State from
being an actual government.*
None of us would voluntarily sign all of our rights and reservations away, especially to someone who might be working against our interests. Even the masochist would want the control of a "safe word." Such control eludes the citizen. What's your safe word -- your escape -- when politicians or bureaucrats bully you?
All the democratic version of The State can offer you is, "Elect better
people." Suggesting that you have to convince 50%, plus one of your
neighbors to "give" you relief is hardly an outlet. The problem is
compounded when we see how rigged the system is in favor of the very power that oppresses your rights of conscience and happiness. So instead...
SIMPLY imagine an END to the Bullying, the Abuse, and the Cartel. Imagine instead that government is a service, accountable to the consumer. That's what the Post-Statist does.
If you found this article valuable please share it. /You can follow Jim
Babka on Twitter @JimBabka/
[LINK: https://secure.downsizedcfoundation.org/contribute/] If you like what you've read here, please support the Zero Aggression Project with a donation via the Downsize DC Foundation.
Â
--------------------
Copyright (c) 2013 by Jim Babka. Permission to distribute this blog post for educational purposes is granted, if done with attribution to the author and the Downsize DC Foundation. Permission to use for commercial purposes is denied.
This message is an educational service of the Downsize DC Foundation.Please share it with others. Please tell your friends that they can receive similar material in the future by subscribing to our free email newsletter, [LINK: https://secure.downsizedcfoundation.org/newsletter/]
This offering by Rev. Jerry L. Robertson
The American Gestapo is already here!
The American Gestapo is already here and it was built with your permission and your tax dollars! Yep, The Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
Created after the 9-11 attacks in 2001 the DHS was created and charged with the primary responsibilities of protecting the United States of America and U.S. territories (including Protectorates) from and responding to terrorist attacks, man-made accidents, and natural disasters.
Back during Obummer’s first run for the White House while making a speech in Denver, Then Senator Obama stated that he wanted to see a governmental police force as well equipped and armed as all of our armed forces combined. For some reason he has never spoken of that again. It is rumored that his advisors jumped all over him for making it in the first place.
Now consider the following facts: There are DHS offices in every state in the Union; There are DHS offices in over 125 counties in those states; Obummer has begun firing any top ranking general that won’t pledge to fire on American citizens if ordered to do so. He has already “retired” three of them: The budget announced for DHS is in the $100,000,000,000 range or one hundred billion dollars of your money each year. The 2010 fiscal year budget was $98,800,000,000 I have never heard of any budget decreasing for any department of the government with the exception of the Military budget of course.
One more example of why we should never trust our government and grant them a blank check without VERY specific instructions.
They took that check and, among other things did a few things that are unconstitutional. Let’s take a look at one of them before I move on to today’s topic.
The Fourth Amendment to our Constitution, reads – “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” Would you believe that your DHS has decided that amendment does not pertain within 100 miles of any border in the good old USA? That means if you live in almost anywhere in the state of Florida you can be searched and your private property seized on the whim of an agent of your DHS. (You might want to check on the history of the Gestapo at this point) How about NYNY or all of Rhode Island; all of the upper peninsula and more of Michigan; there is even a special proviso that takes in almost the entire states of Pennsylvania. Texas and New Mexico. Just go around the US map and wherever the US stops mark off 100 miles and you are no longer protected by the fourth amendment by DHS fiat.
Now let’s add in a few more facts just to clear things up a little more. Non-military departments of your government have already purchased enough ammunition to wage a war similar to the one in Iraq for SEVEN YEARS. Do as I did and look up the number of rounds of ammunition used per month in Iraq by our soldiers and do the math. Oh , I forgot to mention the reason they espouse for the purchase:” To maintain the qualification with various weapons their agents are required to qualify on each year. In other words, target practice. Literally billions of rounds of ammunition already purchased for target practice. This doesn’t even begin to talk about all of the new military style weapons purchased. You know the ones I mean. Those listed in Feinstein’s bill plus many of the fully automatic ones manufactred.
DHS IS your new secret police. Aren’t you proud?
America’s Abortion may end with North Dakota Personhood Law
History may mark February 7th as the day that Personhood for the unborn was established. This is the day that provided the unborn at conception the God given right to life bestowed upon all since the beginning of creation. This is a significant step in the continuing evolution of sanctioning the protection of life which has been riddled by abortion rights activists since the infamous 1973 Roe v. Wade U.S. Supreme Court decision.
Forty years and 55 million plus deaths of the unborn who committed no crime except to be conceived in God’s image were murdered. This was accomplished because of a court and society that would protect a tree frog’s existence above a human life. These murders may soon be put to a stop with the North Dakota Personhood Measure that passed in the State Senate. When it is established that a fetus has U.S. 14th Amendment constitutional protection, abortion ends in America!
Often times in the history of monumental movements, they often have their genesis in the hearts and souls of the faithful who are unwilling to witness or permit the undoing of basic rights. The aptly named Personhood Constitutional Amendment initiative would codify the constitutional protections and absolute rights afforded all citizens of North Dakota and equally apply them to human embryos.
This is not just a momentary battle that supporters of life will wait to see what will happen in North Dakota’s House. The fact is that, in North Dakota as well as other states that are considering Personhood laws; the war for life should and can be won on the local battleground of state turf. These legislators, unlike their federal congressional counterparts, are not afraid to stand up to protect their religious values and principles, under the heat of unceasing liberal mass media contempt.
At the very core of the right to life is the imbalance that exists in continuing to treat the right to exist and to be born as incidental and given no more value than extinguishing the life of a common earth worm. The rights of the mother is given weight not as the carrier of life, but the right to her privacy to do as she pleases, which includes state sanctioned murder.
Yet for forty years the growing tearful cries of fathers who will never be, and mothers who are now filled with regret because of abortion. Their mournful regret is coupled with birthrights of the unborn, sheered away by abortion clinics.
http://www.petition2congress.com/8222/petition-recount-on-2012-presidential-election/
I put together this song for the 2012 elections, however I believe any day could be America's New Year's Eve when Obama is impeached for treason and he and his cronies go to jail.
