ACTION

           IF EVER THERE WAS A TIME TO SAY HONEY I NEED YOUR VOTE IT IS NOW. SWEETHEARTS, WIFES, GRIL FRIENDS PLEASE VOTE WITH ME FOR MITT ROMNEY.

           IF EVER THERE WAS A TIME TO SAY HONEY I NEED YOUR VOTE IT IS NOW. SWEETHEARTS, WIFES, GRIL FRIENDS PLEASE VOTE WITH ME FOR MITT ROMNEY.

           IF EVER THERE WAS A TIME TO SAY HONEY I NEED YOUR VOTE IT IS NOW. SWEETHEARTS, WIFES, GRIL FRIENDS PLEASE VOTE WITH ME FOR MITT ROMNEY.

           IF EVER THERE WAS A TIME TO SAY HONEY I NEED YOUR VOTE IT IS NOW. SWEETHEARTS, WIFES, GRIL FRIENDS PLEASE VOTE WITH ME FOR MITT ROMNEY.

           IF EVER THERE WAS A TIME TO SAY HONEY I NEED YOUR VOTE IT IS NOW. SWEETHEARTS, WIFES, GRIL FRIENDS PLEASE VOTE WITH ME FOR MITT ROMNEY.

           IF EVER THERE WAS A TIME TO SAY HONEY I NEED YOUR VOTE IT IS NOW. SWEETHEARTS, WIFES, GRIL FRIENDS PLEASE VOTE WITH ME FOR MITT ROMNEY.

           IF EVER THERE WAS A TIME TO SAY HONEY I NEED YOUR VOTE IT IS NOW. SWEETHEARTS, WIFES, GRIL FRIENDS PLEASE VOTE WITH ME FOR MITT ROMNEY.

           IF EVER THERE WAS A TIME TO SAY HONEY I NEED YOUR VOTE IT IS NOW. SWEETHEARTS, WIFES, GRIL FRIENDS PLEASE VOTE WITH ME FOR MITT ROMNEY.

Fox News was the only channel that reported this.

They may be "politically incorrect", but at least they had the balls to report it.

In my opinion, the Muslims are all getting very brave now.                    

Tedd Petruna's story below. Can you imagine, our own news media now are so politically correct that they are afraid to report that these were all Muslims?

Unbelievable. Thank God for people like Tedd Petruna.

Tedd Petruna is a diver at the NBL (Neutral Buoyancy Lab) facility at NASA Houston. Tedd happened to be on the AirTran Flight 297, fromAtlanta to Houston. Here's his report :

"One week ago, I went to Ohio on business and to see my father. OnTuesday, the 17th, I returned home. If you read the papers the 18th you may have seen a blurb about where an Air Tran flight was canceled from Atlanta to Houston due to a man who refused to get off of his cell phone before take- off.. The story was only on Fox News. That was NOT what really happened. I was seated in 1st class coming home. Eleven Muslim men got on the plane in full Muslim attire. Two of them sat in 1st class and the rest seated themselves throughout the plane, in coach class, all the way to the back. As the plane taxied out to the runway, the stewardesses gave the safety spiel that we are all so familiar with. At that time, one of the men, in 1st class, got on his cell and called one of his companions back in coach. He proceeded to talk on the phone in Arabic very loudly and very, very aggressively. This activity took the 1st stewardess out of action for she repeatedly told the man that cell phones were not permitted at that time. He ignored her as if she were not there. The man, who answered the Phone back in the coach section, did the same and this took out the 2nd stewardess. Further back in the plane, at the same time, two younger Muslims, one in the back on the aisle, and one sitting in front of him by the window, began to show footage of a porno video they had taped the night before. They were very loud about it. The 3rd stewardess informed the two men that they were not to have any electronic devices on at this time. One of the men said "shut up you infidel dog!" The stewardess attempted to take the camcorder and the Muslim began to scream in her face in Arabic. At that exact moment, all eleven of the men got up and started to walk throughout the cabin. I guess that because of the noise, the flight crew must have decided that there was something amiss and changed the plane's directions to head back to the terminal. The commotion and noise was reaching a feverish pitch, and at this point I had had enough! I got up and started towards the back of 1st class, when I heard a voice behind me, from another Texan twice my size, say "I got your back." Then I grabbed the man, who had been on the cell phone, by the arm and said "You WILL sit down in your seat or you WILL be thrown from this plane!" As I "led" him around me to take his seat, the fellow Texan grabbed him by the back of his neck and his waist and headed him back to his seat. I then grabbed the 2nd man and said,"You WILL do the same!" He protested loudly, but my adrenaline was flowing now and he was going to go also. Just as I escorted him forward, the plane stopped, the doors opened and three TSA agents and four police officers entered  the cabin. Myself and my new Texas friend were told to cease and desist for they had the situation under control. I was quite happy to oblige actually. There was still some sort of commotion in the back, but within moments, all eleven Muslim men were escorted off the plane. The TSA agents then had their luggage unloaded. We talked about the occurrence and were in disbelief that it had happened. Then suddenly, the door opened again and in walked all eleven Muslim men! Stone faced, eyes front and robotic, (the only way I can describe it) they were reseated. The stewardess from the back had been in tears and when she saw the men, she was having NONE of it! Since I was up front, I heard and saw the whole ordeal. She told the TSA agents there was NO WAY she was staying on the plane with the Muslim men. The agent told her that they had searched the men and were going through their luggage with a fine tooth comb. However, nothing had been found and that the men were allowed to proceed on to Houston. The captain and co-captain came out of the cockpit and told the agent, "We and our crew will not fly this plane!" After a word or two, the entire crew, luggage in tow, left the plane. Five minutes later, the cabin door opened again and a whole new crew walked on. Again, this was where I had had enough! I got up and asked the TSA agent, "What the hell is going on? I was told to take my seat. The airlines and TSA were sorry for the delay and we would be home shortly. I said "I'm getting off this plane". The stewardess sternly told me that she could not allow me to get off. Now I'm really mad! I said "I am a grown man who bought this ticket, who's time is mine with a family at home and I am going through that door, or I'm going through that door with you under my arm, but I AM going through that door!" And then I heard a voice behind me say "So am I!" Then everyone behind us started to get up and say the same thing. Within two minutes, I was walking off that plane where I was met by more TSA agents who asked me to write a statement about the incident. I had five hours to kill at this point waiting for the next flight to Houston, so why the hell not give them my statement. Due to the amount of people who got off that flight, it was canceled. I was supposed to be in Houston at 6 PM, but I finally got there at12:30 AM. If you don't believe this, look up the date and then Flight 297 from Atlanta to Houston. If this wasn't a terrorism dry run, I don't know what one is.The terrorists wanted to see how TSA would handle it, how the crew would handle it, and how the passengers would handle it. I'm telling this to you because I want you to know. The threat IS real. I saw it with my own eyes."                 

American Blacks plus socialism equals a self-imposed period of second slavery!  Many have chosen re-enslavement to a dead philosophy which nearly destroyed Eastern Europe and Africa.

 Nevada Solar Company


    The Solar thing just got a little more interesting.......REALLY!

    The Tonopah Solar Company in Harry Reid's Nevada is getting a

    $737 million loan from Obama's DOE.

    The project will produce a 110 megawatt power system and employ

    45 permanent workers.

    That's costing us just $16 million per job.

    One of the investment partners in this endeavor is Pacific

    Corporate Group (PCG).

    The PCG executive director is Ron Pelosi who is the brother to

    Nancy 's husband.

 

    EVERY AMERICAN SHOULD KNOW HOW THEIR MONEY IS BEING STOLEN!

    SO, FORWARD THIS TO EVERYBODY
 



"WHO CARES WHERE OBAMA WAS BORN ...

...THE PROBLEM IS WHERE HE LIVES!"

Are our troops being set up for failure or worse?-You Decide:

Posted on The Post & Email-By Sharon Rondeau-On October 24, 2012:

“JIHADISTS WANTED WESTERN INTERESTS OUT OF LIBYA”

Emails revealed this evening by Fox News agree with many of Denise Simon’s statements and contention that the Obama regime’s explanation of an anti-Islamic video as the reason for violence in Benghazi on September 11, 2012 was a “cover-up” from the beginning.  The group Ansar Al Sharia had taken responsibility early on for the attack, which killed four Americans.

(Oct. 24, 2012) — On October 20, 2012, The Post & Email published the first part of an interview with Denise Simon, a Senior Research Analyst on Domestic and Foreign Policy for Maj. Gen. Paul E. Vallely (Ret.), a well-known Middle East military and Middle East analyst and commentator.

Ms. Simon had written a two-part article on her observations regarding the events of September 11, 2012 which killed Amb. Christopher Stevens and four specialists working for the State Department in tracking Libyan weapons released after the fall ofMuommar Gaddafi.  Simon contends that “Egypt was a massive protest on 9-11-2012; this was a militia attack of Benghazi operators” on the U.S. consulate.

Ms. Simon’s research can be found at Stand Up America, Patriots Duty and Gulag Bound.

In part 1 of our interview, Simon stated that Libya has fallen “into the hands of the jihadists” and that Iran could be influencing Libya.  Iran has been named by the United States as “the most active state sponsor of terrorism.”  Simon has also linked the violence in Libya to the civil war in Syria and found that Syria is now in possession of missiles.  She stated in part 1 that it was likely that thousands of weapons hoarded by Gaddafi had found their way to Syria by way of militant groups throughout Libya.  It is estimated that 30,000 people have been killed or are missing as a result of the upheaval there.

Prior to the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi on September 11, 2012, rising violence and attempts to attack the compound had not been reported in the U.S. press.

A recent New York Times article claims that the Obama regime has been negotiating with Iran in “secret exchanges” since Obama took office, but in last night’s final presidential debate, when asked by the moderator if the story were accurate, Obama responded that it was “not true.”

The second half of our interview follows.

THE POST & EMAIL:  Obama involved the U.S. in Libya without congressional approval.  Why do you think he wanted Gaddafi removed?

MS. SIMON:  There’s a lot of speculation, and I can’t tell you for sure, except that Gaddafi was stirring the pot when it came to currency manipulation and oil.  He was selling his oil; obviously he had a lot of oil.  He didn’t want currency; he didn’t want Euros; he didn’t want the U.S. dollar; he wanted gold.  People need the oil.  So we needed to assume control of his oil revenues and exports so we could keep the value of the gold in check. The gold is worth $800 today; people are buying oil for the sake of gold, and tomorrow that gold is now worth $1,500.  So that added to Gaddafi’s wealth.

That looks like the single-plan speculation on why we wanted him removed, but I also have a deep sense that one of the other bigger reasons to have him removed was to allow the movement of The Muslim Brotherhood into Libya.  Gaddafi had kept them at bay, as Mubarak had tried to do.  We cannot dismiss that we effectively got Hosni Mubarak out of there as well.

THE POST & EMAIL:  Mubarak had been a U.S. ally, kept terrorism under control and tolerated Israel, had he not?

MS. SIMON:  He was far beyond tolerant.  He was a true protector in a lot of cases of Israel, which had to worry less about Mubarak than Ahmadinejad or any of the mullahs.

THE POST & EMAIL:  Do you think that the U.S. had a part in the Arab Spring, and if so, what role do you think this country played in it?

MS. SIMON:  By ignoring all the threats and the regime changes and not intervening in that regard and supporting a regime change in Libya and Egypt is our hand in the Arab Spring: to hand it over to The Muslim Brotherhood, and to a large extent, to Iran.  Iran is running completely unchecked now in Iraq.  So the poor decisions or lack of a decision on what was going on when it all started in Tunisia and ended up in Tahrir Square is a failure of the United States and the United Nations.  We just found out within the last two weeks that Syria, and this includes the Assad opposition forces have come into a large ownership of missiles.  If we had addressed Syria early on, as in last year, we could have saved that country, but now, we can’t do it.  Now it is completely infiltrated, and the rebels in Syria are angry at the United States because we did nothing to help them. They wanted, and in some cases still do, to be a true friend of the U.S. and the Western world; they don’t want radical Islamists or true Sharia law.  There is a Muslim Brotherhood, but it’s different there than in some of the other countries.  They wanted to be in charge of their own destiny and would have accepted Israel.  But we’ve done nothing, so they have to fold in with somebody for the sake of “We’re going to get our country back and use whoever we can.”

I can’t eliminate the Gulf States, who were very late to this party as well.  They didn’t care about the Syrians, either.  Russia wants Syria; Iran wants Syria.  North Korea wants Syria.  We have all of the countries that don’t like us and they’re all posturing their power and force in Syria on both sides.

THE POST & EMAIL:  Who do you think will end up taking over Syria?  Are we supplying them with anything that you know of?

MS. SIMON:  We’re allegedly told that we are supplying them with “non-lethal” supplies.  After reading through a lot of open-source material, I have a deep sense that we are giving them weapons, but we’re doing it through the Gulf States, meaningQatar; France, Jordan and Turkey.  But the bigger fallout is this:  tens of thousands of people have left Syria.  Where have they gone?  They’ve gone to Lebanon; they’ve gone to Jordan and Turkey.  We found out recently that there are an estimated 30,000 people missing.  Also, Turkey has called for our formal intervention in Syria, which is due to Qaddafi weapons being in fact shipped to Turkey that make their way to Syrian factions, mostly AQ types.

[Editor’s Note:  Fox News and The Washington Post have reported within the last week that “the Obama administration has participated in the creation of an arms pipeline to Al Qaeda in Syria...a “Fast & Furious” program that is running Saudi and Qatari weapons to our terrorist enemies in the Middle East, and Joe Biden lied about it in the [vice-presidential] debate.”]

Jordan is likely to fall under this pressure.  What does this look like in the next 2-3 years?  Do we have to go through nation-building in Syria if Assad is removed?  Do we have to do nation-building in Jordan should it fall?  We are not gaining anything.  The forecast of this is grimmer today for the United States than it was before.

THE POST & EMAIL:  So you do not call the Arab Spring a success?

MS. SIMON:  There is zero success in the Arab Spring:  zero.  Look at the guy who’s taken over Libya:  Magarief.  Gaddafi hated him and tried to have him killed.  He came to the United States and was here for 30 years.  “OK, we’ve made good friends with him; we’ve recognized him.  Gaddafi’s gone, so you can go back into Libya now and handle things.”  But he can’t handle them.  There are numerous militia groups, and he’s bought them.  With the whole thing happening in Benghazi, he’s saying, “We’ll work to get rid of them.  We’ll throw all of these militias out.”  But they haven’t been thrown out.

[Editor’s Note:  A September 13, 2011 article in the UK Daily Mail reported that the interim Libyan government at the time had declared that “Sharia law” would become the basis to “guide the country” after Gaddafi was deposed.]

THE POST & EMAIL:  The Libyan president said that Benghazi was a terrorist attack almost right away while Obama and his regime were blaming an internet video.  He said it was “planned.”

MS. SIMON:  The video was used for damage control and nothing more.  That was a plot.  There are thousands of anti-Muslim videos on the internet.  It’s the cover-up afterward…and the death of four Americans.  I think there’s a deeper, deeper cover-up here, and that’s really the thing that bothers me.  I can’t get to it:  was the cover-up actually that we were going to turn Libya over to The Muslim Brotherhood? Was it the cover-up of who’s working for whom?  Was it the cover-up that nobody is wanting any kind of diplomatic objective on Libya?  That’s where I am.  Why would Hillary take responsibility for the failure of the State Department?  It’s not her style to do that.

[Editor’s Note:  After more than two weeks, the Obama regime admitted that the Benghazi attack was the work of terrorists, which the CIA station chief in Libya had reportedly asserted  within 24 hours of the event.  However, on October 21, the day before the last presidential debate, a new story quoting an unnamed “U.S. intelligence official” was reported by several mainstream media outlets which combined the video and militants but “no planning” as the cause of the attack.  Severaldifferent explanations have been offered since September 11, the day of the attack on the U.S. consulate.

Following the October 10 hearing, the House Oversight Committee released cables sent by U.S. embassy staff in Tripoli, including those signed by the late Amb. Stevens, which indicated rising extremism and danger in Libya over the prior year with requests for increased security.]  Additional documentation was released by the committee late last week.

An individual who escaped from Libya and was traveling to Syria following the September 11 attack in Benghazi has admitted to being a member of “violent extremist networks” and is being held in Turkey.]

THE POST & EMAIL:  I recall that Lt. Col. Andrew Wood testified on October 10 to the House Oversight Committee that between 10,000 and 20,000 manpads had been released once Gaddafi fell and that he was compelled to speak even if it were at his own peril.

MS. SIMON:  That’s because (Rep.) Dennis Kucinich asked the question, and then Col. Wood responded.  Then Eric Nordstrom said that “the Taliban is inside the building.”

THE POST & EMAIL:  What do you think Nordstrom meant by that?

MS. SIMON:  Inside the State Department.

THE POST & EMAIL:  Do you think that Nordstrom was saying that there are people inside the State Department working with The Muslim Brotherhood against the United States?

MS. SIMON:  They are.  They clearly are.  We have three Muslim Brotherhood members working in the White House; there are Muslim Brotherhood inside the State Department; there are Muslim Brotherhood working in the Department of Defense.  There is no denial of that; it is absolutely a fact.  The problem is that it all comes down to Muslim sensibilities.  The other thing that was revealed in that congressional testimony is that we were the last flag standing.  That tells you that everybody else felt that “This isn’t worth our treasure and time; we’re getting out of Libya.”  But the United States said, “No, we’re good; we’re going to stay here,” and we are, in fact, the last flag standing.

The sad part about that is that we didn’t have any true security.  Blue Mountain, the contracting company that was supposed to supply security, did what they were told to do in the letter of the contract.  But it tells us that the people who were assigned by Blue Mountain in Benghazi were nothing more than Wal-Mart greeters.  They had no weapons.  They provided only building maintenance, if you will, and transportation; they were drivers.  They were paid less than $5.00/hour.

THE POST & EMAIL:  Why do you think the State Department agreed to such an arrangement?

MS. SIMON:  Because we don’t want to offend any of the Muslims.  We don’t want to put a flag out there; we don’t want to have armed security people saying to the Libyans or anyone else in the Middle East that “We are offended” and “We feel we are a threat by any outside force.”  So we don’t have the Marines here; we’re not walking around with M-16s and other weapons.

THE POST & EMAIL:  Even though they may have been needed?

MS. SIMON:  There’s no question they were needed.  The entire year’s-worth of events in Libya tells us that they were needed.  Not only did we need Marines’ we probably needed a lot more humans on the ground.

THE POST & EMAIL:  Do you think Amb. Stevens was aware that security was kept “artificially low” purposely?  Might he have thought that there was something strange about his being denied additional security?

MS. SIMON:   Amb. Stevens had a long career working in the Middle East.  He had made some good contacts and good friends.  I think he was particularly chosen to be the ambassador there because of those contacts.  They were good contacts in his world and the Obama world, but they weren’t good contacts for the safety and the trust of the United States having a footprint in the Middle East, certainly in Libya.

I listened to an interview that he had given to some people in the press about a year ago, and he was very up-front, very articulate, very well-versed, very insightful, and very current.  But personally, I think he was on a fool’s mission thinking that they could deal diplomatically with coffee and crumpets at the table and make nice with these people.  Clearly, that is what the Obama administration thinks they can do, and it hasn’t worked.  We’ve extended the olive branch by the tonnage, and it hasn’t gotten us anywhere because this administration is not being honest about what an Islamic Caliphate wants.  They all hate us, and we cannot get by that.  So the rules of engagement, whether it be at the ambassador level or the lower levels, have all been altered up.  Let’s all play “nice-nice.”  He tried that with Ahmadinejad several times, and Ahmadinejad is laughing at us.

THE POST & EMAIL:  In the vice-residential debate, Joe Biden said that Iran is not close to being able to deliver a nuclear weapon…but why does he want to wait?

MS. SIMON:  It’s not only “Why wait?”  It goes much deeper than that.  Joe Biden clearly has not paid any attention to any of the IAEA reports.  They have enough fissure material; they already have enough weaponized systems.  The thing now is having more quantity for more weaponized systems.  Israel would not take all the proactive measures they have taken to stop and slow down Iran if it weren’t an imminent threat, “imminent” meaning days, months or weeks.  Israel wasn’t going to tolerate that same kind of agenda in Syria and Israel bombed their nuclear facility.  They’re just not going to do that.

There are other countries over there that we’re not paying enough attention to, but Israel is.  One is Kuwait, and one is Azerbaijan.  The UAE.  If we do the right thing with theses countries and show force, they will bend and come over to our side.  But right now, that’s not the case.  What Israel is doing certainly is for Israel, but not only for Israel.

THE POST & EMAIL:  Do you think there is anything else underlying the Obama regime’s approach to the Middle East?

MS. SIMON:  If you look at The Muslim Brotherhood history here in the United States, they actually came in to the U.S. in the 1960s and established an office and a presence in Chicago.  If you look at who in Chicago – and you can look at some of the players in the Chicago Commerce Clause – if you look at some of the people and some of the deals that have been cut by Mayor Daley and all of the other people – let’s face it:  Gaddafi had business deals with Louis Farrakhan.  So this tells you that they have some deep loyalty or they are marching to certain orders demanded of them by The Muslim Brotherhood.  I think now at this point, for their own safety, they have to appease every demand of The Muslim Brotherhood, whether they like it or not.  The Arab footprint in Chicago and Illinois is massive; it’s actually much worse than it is in Michigan.  I think there is a very long history of that.

THE POST & EMAIL:  How about Obama’s apparent sympathy with the Muslim world?

MS. SIMON:  Not only is he sympathetic; he is pro-agenda.  There are too many indicators.  When you take out any reference to Islam or the Muslim faith from training materials that the FBI uses; the fact that we have changed the Rules of Engagement in Afghanistan; the fact that Lt. Col. Matthew Dooley was removed from the Joint Forces Staff College for teaching an Islamic course that he didn’t design…that was not his syllabus; that syllabus was there before he got there.  So what has happened is that this entire administration, including Dempsey, including Panetta, including and Hillary and the National Security Council – they have all become overly sensitive, to the point most recently that we bought a $70,000 ad that both Hillary and Obama were in and played it in Pakistan saying that we embrace all faiths and that’s what America was founded on…

THE POST & EMAIL:  Who paid for that?

MS. SIMON:  The taxpayers.  Another thing that is a topic for another day is that this administration continues to support the Palestinians, which is another problem.  I would also submit the name “Samantha Power.”  Samantha Power is completely anti-Israel and works as a senior staff person for the National Security Council.  She was part of the Obama transition team and the Obama 2008 campaign and is still there.  She’s married to Cass Sunstein.

THE POST & EMAIL:  Do you think that Ambassador Stevens and the other three were specifically targeted for murder?

MS. SIMON:  I don’t think that they were targeted, but I think their objective, their mission was what was targeted as well as to get the United States out of Libya.  If you look at how many attacks we have had in Libya just in the last year, it was sending a clear message:  “All you Westerners, including Britain, get out, including the Red Cross.”  I did mention in my piece that Sean Smith – and Hillary was the one who actually pointed this out to me when she gave that talk in front of the four flag-draped caskets – was a gamer.  In the gaming world, after 9/11 and when we decided that we weren’t going to get caught any more in this, he found out at the end of the Clinton administration that there was a massive wall between the FBI and the CIA.  So he had to work not only to take down that wall, but we also had very antiquated systems.  That’s the reason that we ended up with the Patriot Act; that’s the reason that we ended up with a lot of the technology that they had to employ to start scratching this nonsense.  Once the NSA was going to the telecommunications companies and working with them to track all cell phone traffic, email traffic, and text traffic back to the U.S. so we could analyze it, don’t think that our enemies didn’t know that.  So what did they do?  They all altered their communications methods.  They all went back to couriers, carrier pigeons, and thumb drives.  They also would pass out a password and craft an email, but they would never click on the email to send it; it would always sit there in a draft.  So it never flew across the email corridor.  Then, these people could and sign in and go look at that draft.

The other piece is this:  they started using video games because they can say and operate and type and play true jihad going completely unfettered and unchecked in the gaming world.  You can hide documents in those.  So when Hillary said that Sean Smith was a gamer, I knew immediately what he was doing.  Now we have a problem.  In the last two or three years we’ve had a massive problem that we want to address:  cyber security, because we’re in a cyber war.  We have people working in those gaming rooms to find out whatever we can.  We’re in an information vortex; we don’t have enough analysts.  We don’t have enough people connecting all of the dots to come up with a true conclusion and hand it off to the CIA top guy so they can put it in an PED.

THE POST & EMAIL:  But Sean Smith was one of them?

MS. SIMON:  Absolutely.  Going back to your question, I truly believe that the jihadists – the Ansar al-Sharia, the February 17 Martyrs Brigade, the Rahman Brigade – knew that they were being tracked.  So was Amb. Stevens the target?  I don’t think that he was specifically the target; it could have been anyone.  The target was “We don’t want you watching us anymore.  We don’t want you to know where these weapons are going.  We don’t want you to know who of us has these weapons.

THE POST & EMAIL:  “We want you to leave.”

MS. SIMON:  Exactly right.  We were the last people there, and we broadcasted our presence, but we didn’t put any security there.  We did not have enough human intelligence on the ground.  We may have had it in Tripoli, but we didn’t have it in Benghazi.

THE POST & EMAIL:  We may not have it in other parts of the world where Americans are.

Editor’s Note:  Ms. Simon told us that she often works ten hours a day for Stand Up America.  “In doing so, I come across a lot of things where I start seeing a pattern and where dots need to be connected.  The real watch-point for me to write the two pieces on Benghazi was when Hillary spoke about Sean Smith being a gamer.  That’s what set me off.  I said, ‘There’s way, way too much to this not to dig in to it,’” she said.  “It’s a bigger thing than just blaming it on a video and having this administration lie to us.  They can lie to us, but what are the lies truly covering up?  I’m just trying to get some clues about what they’re covering up, but I don’t think I’ve hit it all.”

Source:

http://www.thepostemail.com/2012/10/24/middle-east-analyst-u-s-appe...

Note: The following article and/or blog post relates to and/or supports the above article and/or blog post-You Decide: 

Why They Love Usama, Hate Obama, and How Obama Uses the Same Tactic at Home!-Posted on The Lid-By Barry Rubin-On October 7, 2012:

"Why are tens of thousands of Middle Eastern Muslims chanting about how much they love Usama bin Ladin and how much they hate Barack (Hussein) Obama?

Simple. Because bin Ladin was a Muslim and an Arab (for the Arab demonstrators) and thus he was one of their people, someone from their side, whatever tactical disagreements they might have had with him. And Obama isn’t. No amount of groveling, apology, or money will change that fact. Isn’t that clear?

I should quickly add that many Muslims don’t support the Islamists. In elections in Libya and Tunisia, a majority voted for non-Islamist parties. Even in Egypt when the showdown came in the presidential election the Muslim Brotherhood candidate won by only a narrow margin. Most Lebanese don’t support the Islamists (the main force of which is Hizballah, a Shia group). There are, of course, plenty of Islamists and they have lots of sympathizers. They can cite chapter and verse from Islamic holy texts.

Yet that doesn’t make all Muslims supporters of revolutionary Islamism or advocates of Shia totalitarian states, no matter how many times people who are ignorant about Islam and the Middle East run their little rants. Those rants are just as false as the “Islam is a religion of peace” nonsense.

But that’s not my point here. The key element for this article is this:

When solidarity along group lines takes priority and the line is that all of “us” must unite against the “other” no matter what truth, logic, or justice dictates then that means serious trouble.

Well, guess what? That is the line of the Obama Administration and its Newest Left supporters. All African-Americans should support the regime because Obama is black and anyone opposing him is a racist. All “Hispanics” should support the president because he really wants open borders and the turning of all illegal immigrants into citizens, while everyone else is a racist.

All women should support the ruling group and leftist ideology because it wants to give them free birth control and anyone on the other side hates women. And everyone who receives a government check has to support the regime or someone might take away their check. Actually what’s most likely to take away their check is the bankruptcy of the programs due to over-spending.

In other words, the dominant forces in the mass media and academia and the current government and their supporters are tearing America apart by inciting interest groups to hate each other, make war on each other, and give loyalty primarily to their group no questions asked.

And this is precisely the kind of thing that makes Middle Eastern Muslims who even if they were Islamists—like the Muslim Brotherhood and the Salafist groups—hated bin Ladin when he was alive opportunistically turn him into a martyr. The creation of a hysterical mob mentality for political gain is not restricted to the Middle East.”

Barry Rubin is director of the Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center and editor of the Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA) Journal. His latest book, Israel: An Introduction, has just been published b... Other recent books include The Israel-Arab Reader (seventh edition), The Long War for Freedom: The Arab Struggle for Democracy in the Middle East (Wiley), and The Truth About Syria (Palgrave-Macmillan). The website of the GLORIA Center  and of his blog, Rubin Reports. His original articles are published at PJMedia.

Source:

http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2012/10/why-they-love-usama-hate-oba...

Note: My following updated blog posts relate to this disturbing & time sensitive issue-You Decide:  

‘TREASON’ AND POSSIBLE ‘PRISON’: BECK BREAKS DOWN OBAMA’S ‘LYING’ ON LIBYA IN FIERY SEGMENT!

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/treason-and-possible-...

Hold Obama Accountable For Libya!

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/hold-obama-accountabl...

Arming Our Enemies!

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/arming-our-enemies?xg...

“Innocence” Film a Premeditated Provocation for Islamic Terror?

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/innocence-film-a-prem...

The Film ‘Innocence of Muslims’ — Made By Terrorists?

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blog/show?id=4301673%3ABlogPos...

2000 Dead Soldiers and Obama Can Still Do No Wrong!

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blog/show?id=4301673%3ABlogPos...

Red Flags All Around–But the Media Won’t Tell!

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blog/show?id=4301673%3ABlogPos...

Just Happened!

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/just-happened?xg_sour...

Dishonest Media Avoids Truth about Obama Through Diversions!

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/dishonest-media-avoid...

Note: My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that reveal: 1) the live presentation by Joel Gilbert, his DVD Film titled "Dreams From My Real Father," along with the newly released film titled "The Unvetted”; 2) the Islamic infiltration inside our government armed with our secrets, to include the President's secret link to Hamas; 3) the Islamic infiltration inside our military; 4) the Communist infiltration inside our government, to Include President Obama's secret link to Communists; 5) the George Soros connection, to include the shared agendas of George Soros and the President; and 6) the disastrous results of these infiltrations, links and connections-You Decide: 

The Vetting: ‘Obama, Radical Islam and the Soros Connection’! (Part 1):

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/the-vetting-obama-rad... 

The Vetting: ‘Obama, Radical Islam and the Soros Connection’! (Part 2):

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/the-vetting-obama-rad...

The Vetting: ‘Obama, Radical Islam and the Soros Connection’! (Part 3):

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/the-vetting-obama-rad…

The Vetting: ‘Obama, Radical Islam and the Soros Connection’! (Part 4):

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/the-vetting-obama-rad...

Continue Reading My Following Blog Posts That Relate To This Disturbing & Time Sensitive Issue:

Communists and Muslims: The Hidden Hand of the KGB!

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blog/show?id=4301673%3ABlogPos...

White Reds Exploiting Blacks: The Weather Underground, Barack Obama, and the Fundamental Transformation of the United States!

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/white-reds-exploiting...

The coming chaos from the Obama-Soetoro playbook!

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/the-coming-chaos-from..

‘CIVILIZATION JIHAD’ AND OBAMA’S CONNECTIONS!

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/civilization-jihad-and-o...

Is President Obama inciting riots across the US and abroad?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/23/is-president-obama-incitin...

Godfather of The Islamic Revolution!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/11/godfather-of-the-islamic-r...

Is Israel the next Arab Facebook Campaign?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/03/30/is-israel-the-next-arab-fa...

The President Must Stop Voting “Present” on Iran!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/02/12/the-president-must-stop-vo...

What are CAIRs obstructionist goals?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/03/06/6951/

Federal judge confirms CAIR is Hamas!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/11/24/federal-judge-confirms-cai...

The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetr...

Are We Witnessing Narcissism At Work?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/10/27/are-we-witnessing-narcissi...

Obamanites Get Violent in Support of the Agenda!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/05/obamanites-get-violent-in-...

Nearly 80 percent don’t trust the government!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/19/nearly-80-percent-don’t-tr...

Where Is America Today?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/26/where-is-america-today-2/

Is History Repeating Itself?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/09/20/is-history-repeating-itself/

Note: The following videos seem extremely appropriate today:

A Republic, If You Can Keep It!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGL8CiUtXF0

Breaking Point: 25 Minutes That Will Change America:

http://www.goptrust.com/25_minutes_Breaking_Point.html

We The People:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVAhr4hZDJE&feature=player_embedded

I Stand For America!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KTlDyY5i9i4&feature=player_embedded#at=208

Madison Rising - The Star Spangled Banner!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8C7i9kdEf8

Hank Williams Jr New Song Dedicated to Obama: "Takin' Back the Country"!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uY-Z1hjquqo&feature=player_embedded

The Fightin Side of Me!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32-OyyLJzHw&feature=player_embedded

Freedom Isn’t Free:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kfIO3VMLdRE

Declaration to Restore the Republic!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYycZOCJv4k&feature=player_embedded

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts, please copy website and paste it on your browser.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered controversial by this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

What wrong with this picture?-You Decide:

Posted on FrontPage Magazine-By Daniel Greenfield-On October 24, 2012:

“It’s no secret that civil rights groups are running short of civil rights issues. The NAACP is outdated as its name and there’s only so much time that it can spend fundraising off its ancient history. The NAACP has drifted so far off its mission that its advocacy programs include promoting gay marriage, fighting obesity and pushing global warming. In ten years the NAACP will be indistinguishable from every other liberal group pushing the same exact causes with the same exact talking points.

The NAACP is so terminally unhip that Obama skipped it this election cycle, passing it up for the Urban League, while sending noted civil rights hero, Joe Biden in his place. The average age of an NAACP member is 58. The average age of an AARP member is 64 making it only slightly older than the NAACP.

The NAACP runs constant deficits and has been shutting down branches. Its membership numbers were a closely guarded secret for a long time. Confidential documents estimated that the group was down to 178,000 in the 1980s. Despite claims otherwise, it’s probably even lower now. With numbers like that the NAACP will stop existing in twenty years and everyone, including its leaders and its allies, know that it’s only a matter of time before its national headquarters at Mt. Hope Drive gives up hope and shuts its doors.

The only reason that anyone in the Democratic Party still pays attention to the NAACP is voter turnout. In the last few years, the NAACP has shamelessly mortgaged its history to vocally defend voter fraud and attack any voter ID measure as the return of the firehoses and colored water fountains. While the NAACP required a photo ID to access its convention, asking as much of the voter was held to be just as bad as segregation, slavery and Spike Lee movies.

The Voter ID argument has cemented the NAACP’s status as a dusty trophy on the back shelf of liberalism. The Urban League is better for fundraising and Sharpton’s National Action Network has the better organization. All that the NAACP is good for is being taken out once a year to denounce any attempt at preventing the “Vote Early, Vote Often” election strategy of Chicago politics.

The NAACP’s most successful president, Walter Francis White, had blue eyes and blond hair. That gave him something in common with the NAACP which exists only because white people recognize the brand and accept its moral authority on completely absurd issues.  And so unsatisfied with just getting the dead to vote, the most recognized and most irrelevant civil rights organization in America turned its attention to helping their murderers vote too.

Taking their case to the United Nations, the NAACP protested that disenfranchising 2 million African-Americans out of 5.3 million felons constituted a crime against humanity. NAACP Senior Vice President for Advocacy Hilary Shelton insisted that disenfranchising felons “prevent those most in need of an advocate from the ability to elect someone who will represent their concerns.” And without the franchise, how will felons register their concerns about the dangers of gun ownership and their noise complaints about excessively loud burglar alarms?

NAACP President Ben Jealous, a man who never misses an opportunity to say something completely incomprehensible in public, kicked off the campaign by proclaiming, “It’s easy to do dirt in the dark.  It’s harder to do dirt in the light.” By that Jealous probably wasn’t referring to the dirt that the murderers, rapists and muggers he’s fighting for did. He meant the dirty deed of taking away their right to vote for Congressmen who would deprive their potential victims of their right to bear arms.

But is any politician out there really as low and dirty as to get down in the mud and compete for the serial rapist vote? There’s no competition because one candidate already has the robber, rapist and mugger vote all wrapped up.

After Governor Charlie Crist enabled felon voting in Florida, Obama ran a “You Can Vote Too” registration drive for the child molester who still hadn’t been told that he could cast his ballot for Hope and Change. With between 250,000 and 500,000 new murderer, robber and rapist votes in play, the bludgeoner ballots probably accounted for Obama’s 200,000 vote win in Florida.

The NAACP has targeted Florida governor Rick Scott for reversing Crist’s Votes-for-Arsonists, and their felon voting campaign is backed by the usual ideal public faces of felons who are now wonderful people and have singlehandedly made the world a better place. Or at least that’s what their bios claim. But felon voting isn’t about letting ideally rehabilitated criminals vote. It’s about letting all criminals vote.

In Ohio, Eletrice Harris, an Obama staff member reminds volunteers to target the criminal vote. “We want to remind you that felons can vote – past felons, current, waiting-to-be-sentenced. We need to get them registered because if they are not incarcerated on November the 6^th, they can vote.” It doesn’t matter if they killed in the past, if they’re waiting around to be convicted of a murder of if they’re killing with one hand while voting with the other—Obama wants their votes.

The NAACP is just the front for a voter recruitment drive among the dregs of society, and for once we aren’t talking about lawyers. In Virginia, the Advancement Project is trying to put as many crooks and criminals back in good graces with the voting booth as possible. Like all good things in life, the Advancement Project is backed by George Soros. While professional groups like the Advancement Project do the heavy lifting, the NAACP lends its name to yet another corrupt perversion of its history.

The states that the NAACP is focusing its Get-Out-the-Murderer Vote campaign on just happen to be swing states. There’s Iowa, Florida, Virginia and North Carolina; swing states whose felon voting rights the NAACP happened to take an interest in before the election. This isn’t about voting rights, it’s about voting results. And signing up murderers is the NAACP’s last resort after exhausting the population of local cemeteries where their buried murder victims always vote Democrat.”

Source:

http://frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/a-vote-for-every-murderer-...

Guilford Co. NC Voters Say Ballot Cast for Romney Came up Obama on ...!-Posted on InfoWars-By Adan Salazar, Infowars.com-On October 24, 2012:

http://www.infowars.com/guilford-co-nc-voters-say-ballot-cast-for-r...

Voting Machines Calibrate Vote for Obama instead of Romney!-Posted on The Post & Email-By Sharon Rondeau-On October 24, 2012:

http://www.thepostemail.com/2012/10/24/voting-machines-calibrate-vo...

Obama campaign staffer caught helping activist vote twice!-Posted on The Daily Caller-By Matthew Boyle-On October 10, 2012:

http://dailycaller.com/2012/10/10/new-okeefe-video-obama-campaign-s...

Voter Fraud Allegations Surface Again in Florida!-Posted on Townhall-By Kevin Glass, Managing Editor, Townhall.com-On October 5, 2012:

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/kevinglass/2012/10/05/voter_fraud_alle...

Obama’s Military Voter Suppression Campaign!-Posted on FrontPage Magazine-By Matthew Vadum-On September 12, 2012:

http://frontpagemag.com/2012/matthew-vadum/obama’s-military-voter-s...

Half of US Military Bases Around the World Lack Voting Facilities!-Posted on The New Media Journal-By Washington Times-On September 6, 2012:

http://newmediajournal.us/indx.php/item/6710

IS THIS HOW OBAMA WILL STEAL ELECTION? ‘This quiet push would make citizens in dozens of states irrelevant!’-Posted on WND.com-On August 8, 2012:

http://www.wnd.com/2012/08/is-this-how-obama-will-steal-election/

Obama’s Drive to Disenfranchise Soldiers!-Posted on FrontPage Magazine-By Matthew Vadum-On August 6, 2012:

http://frontpagemag.com/2012/matthew-vadum/obama’s-ugly-drive-to-di...

Video: Obama Tries To Disenfranchise Our Troops!-Posted on Big Government-By MIKE FLYNN-On August 2, 2012:

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/08/02/obama-campaign-s...

Illegal Aliens CAN Vote, Military CAN’T?-Posted on The Post & Email-By Sharon Rondeau-On August 7, 2012:

“ELECTION INTEGRITY MUST BE ASSURED"

by JB Williams, ©2012

(Aug. 7, 2012) — Why is the Obama Campaign trying to disenfranchise military votes and at the same time, trying to make sure that illegal aliens remain on state voter rolls? Why are both political parties pandering for the Latino vote? Can illegal aliens vote now? The answer is yes, but I’ll get to that in a minute.

As Obama’s so-called Department of Justice sues numerous states to block military votes from being counted in the upcoming November election, they are also suing states to keep them from purging known illegal voters from voter registration files.

Just in case you needed iron-clad proof that Obama’s Democrat Party is as anti-American as Stalin’s Russia, this should do it for you. Directing the DOJ to use all of its power to block the vote of men and women who pay with their blood for every right to vote, while at the same time demanding that people not even in the U.S.A. legally, have their votes counted. That should cover any questions you might still have about Obama’s anti-American agenda for change.

And as usual, the good ole ACLU is engaged in protecting the illegal alien vote, but they are nowhere to be found in the fight to protect the military vote. There’s no link for the ACLU defense of the military vote, sorry.

How much more do the American people really need to see?

If you think this is a new strategy from Democrats, think again. Most people remember when Al Gore tried to keep recounting Florida hanging chads until he could defeat George W. Bush in 2000. What they might not remember, is the Gore campaign also tried to disenfranchise the overseas Military vote while counting those hanging chads. They may not remember it because the American press failed to report it and unless you read foreign news publications like the London Telegraph, you wouldn’t know.

In 2004, confirmed traitor John Kerry (D) was under attack from fellow “Swift Boat Vets” and he too, tried to make sure the military vote was squashed in his bid to unseat George W. Bush.

For decades, the Military vote has trended heavily in favor of Republicans with up to 80% of active duty soldiers supporting the Party with a history of supporting them, the Republican Party. Even after Democrat efforts to dismantle or at least weaken the Military, almost 70% have voted Republican in recent elections, Bush 64% – Kerry 15% —- McCain 66% – Obama 25%.

That’s all you need to know when asking why Democrats want to disenfranchise the Military vote. Soldiers don’t vote for anti-American Marxists…

We also know why Democrats pander for the Latino vote, even mandating temporary Amnesty for Illegals from the Oval Office ahead of the election, when members of congress know better than to support Amnesty for Illegals ahead of the election.

But why are Republicans also pandering for the illegal alien vote? Yes, not just the Latino vote, but the illegal alien vote…

YES, Illegal aliens CAN vote in our elections, illegally, of course. But who cares about the law these days?

First, the government refuses to enforce our existing immigration laws, or even allow Border States like Arizona to enforce those laws in their own states.

Second, because our federal government has allowed millions of illegal aliens to take up residence in the United States and the 14^th Amendment is interpreted as a fast-track to citizenship via so-called “anchor baby” statutes, many states are issuingdriver’s licenses to illegal aliens so that they can obtain auto insurance.

With a 14^th Amendment birth certificate and a photo I.D., such as a driver’s license, they can register to vote.

In addition, Democrat Motor-Voter laws make it possible for illegal voters of all types, illegal aliens, felon voters, dead voters, duplicate voters, etc., to register and vote on the same day, before anyone can even begin to verify the credentials of the newly registered.

According to Democrats, “Republicans want to disenfranchise Democrat voters.” In reality, American taxpayers want to disenfranchise people who are not legally eligible to vote in our elections to begin with.

The only voters Democrats want to disenfranchise are members of our Military, who pay for every American right to vote with their blood. You can’t make up insane stuff like this and you can’t get any more Un-American than this.

Before American taxpayers can even hope to win the November election or save their Constitutional Republic, they will have to secure the integrity of the election itself. To do that, they must address at least four high priority items in every local community and they have very little time to do it.

1.     Make sure that EVERY Military vote is counted in every district

2.    Make sure that NO illegal aliens are voting anywhere in the nation

3.    Make sure that NO unconstitutional candidate ends up on the ballot with Romney

4.    Unify and galvanize voters to remove Obama-Clinton from office at any cost

Unless patriotic Americans engage at their local level to make sure the November election is as legitimate as possible, there is no chance they can defeat the unethical and illegal acts of Democrats in 2012 or any time after.

You can work with and on behalf of the Military at Veteran Defenders of America, and with other American Patriots at The Patriots Union.

Unite with others to fight these evils, or there is no way to win…”

jb.uspu@gmail.com

Source:

http://www.thepostemail.com/2012/08/07/illegal-aliens-can-vote-mili...

Note:  The following websites reveal that George Soros’ Open Society Institute (OSI) — has dispensed more than $5 billion to a multitude of organizations whose objectives are consistent with those of Soros and one of those organizations is Project Vote, which is the voter-mobilization arm of the notoriously corrupt ACORN, whose voter-registration drives and get-out-the-vote initiatives have been marred by massive levels of fraud and corruption, along with President Obama’s ties-You Decide:

I. Guide to the George Soros Network:

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=589

II. Project Vote:

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6966

III. Obama’s ties with voter fraud!-Posted on OneNewsNow.com-By Russ Jones, OneNewsNow-On December 1, 2011:

http://www.onenewsnow.com/Politics/Default.aspx?id=1487470

Note:  The following websites and article and/or blog post reveal George Soros’s Secretary State Project (SOSP) and an education fund run by progressive labor leaders tasked with naturalizing new citizens and register new voters by using the 2010 Census as a redistributive mechanism, along with how he is using his money to help tip the elections to Democrats (Progressives) in all 50 states-You Decide:

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=7487

II. Mi Familia Vota Education Fund (MFVEF)!-Posted on DiscoverTheNetworks.org:

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=7538

III. George Soros’ Money Could Tip Elections in All 50 States!-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Michael Oberndorf-On July 1, 2011:

http://floydreports.com/george-soros-money-could-tip-elections-in-a...

Note:  The following website and article and/or blog post reveal that George Soros funds Leftist foundations, litigators and organizations that dominate Election Laws and crusaders that enable massive voter fraud while the DOJ turns a blind eye-You Decide:

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=1431

II. The Left Owns the Election Law Industry!-Posted on FrontPage Magazine-By J. Christian Adams-On August 12, 2011:

http://frontpagemag.com/2011/08/12/the-left-owns-the-election-law-i...

Note: My following recent blog posts relate to and/or further support the above articles and/or blog posts, websites and videos-You Decide: 

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/was-obama-rattled-by-...

Still Don’t Know Who to Vote For? Then Read This!

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/still-don-t-know-who-...

Red Flags All Around–But the Media Won’t Tell!

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blog/show?id=4301673%3ABlogPos...

2000 Dead Soldiers and Obama Can Still Do No Wrong!

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blog/show?id=4301673%3ABlogPos...

Dishonest Media Avoids Truth about Obama Through Diversions!

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/dishonest-media-avoid...

WILL WE THE PEOPLE ALLOW A CRIMINAL SYNDICATE TO STAY IN POWER?-Posted on We The People USA-ByJake Martinez-On October 8, 2012:

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/will-we-the-people-al...

Continue Reading My Following Blog Posts That Relate To This Disturbing & Time Sensitive Issue:

Massive Voter Fraud-Again!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/25/massive-voter-fraud-again/

Active complaint to the FEC over President Obama’s 2008 campaign finances!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/20/active-complaint-to-the-fe...

Recipient of Foreign Donations Accuses Others of Taking Foreign Donations!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/13/recipient-of-foreign-donat...

Did Saudis Buy Obama 2008 Election?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/13/did-saudis-buy-obama-2008-...

Clearing the Smoke on Obama’s Eligibility!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/19/clearing-the-smoke-on-obam...

The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetr...

Nearly 80 percent don’t trust the government!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/19/nearly-80-percent-don’t-tr...

Where Is America Today?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/26/where-is-america-today-2/

The Russian View of What Has Been Happening In America!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/22/the-russian-view-of-what-h...

Is History Repeating Itself?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/09/20/is-history-repeating-itself/

Letter to Congressman Allen West Regarding Alleged Illegal Credit Card Solicitations and Donations To President and Capitol Hill From Un-Secure Overseas Accounts!-Posted on We The People USA-By Jake Martinez-On October 8, 2012:

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/letter-to-congressman...

Letter To NM U.S. Senator Udall Regarding Alleged Illegal Credit Card Solicitations and Donations To President and Capitol Hill From Un-Secure Overseas Accounts!-Posted on We The People USA-By Jake Martinez-On October 8, 2012:

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/letter-to-nm-u-s-sena...

Note: The following video is extremely appropriate today:

The Fightin Side of Me!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32-OyyLJzHw&feature=player_embedded

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts, please copy website and paste it on your browser.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered controversial by this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Someone Needs To Be Locked Up!-You Decide:

Posted on The Blaze-By Erica Ritz-On October 24, 2012:

“Glenn Beck took to his radio show Wednesday morning for a fiery denouncement of the administration’s handling of the crisis in Libya.

“This president is lying to you about Benghazi in such [a] spectacular fashion that I believe people will go to prison.  This is impeachable.  The president might go to prison for this one,” he said.  “What’s happening in Benghazi is so far beyond lying, it is staggering.”

While politicians are known for twisting words into half truths, Beck added that has never seen an administration persist in such a boldfaced lie when American lives are at stake, or seen a media so content to let it slide.

He continued, going over the newly-released documents that prove the administration was alerted to what was really happening in Libya before spinning a story about a YouTube video:

Now we have [the] beginning of the truth on Benghazi.  Five days into the Benghazi scandal, when no one was saying anything, I presented a theory…I told you that [Ambassador Stevens] was involved in running guns, and he was running guns to al-Qaeda in Libya, and he was running guns through Turkey into Syria.  And whether it was a deal that went bad, I don’t know, but that’s what happened.  And the White House knew…And while everyone else was arguing about whether it was a videotape or not, we were furthering the story.

Today we have evidence that is staggering.  We now have a memo posted [at] TheBlaze…to the White House two hoursafter the attacks began.  Last night on the TV show I laid it out again…exactly what happened, when.  At 1:00, or 12:54 in the afternoon on September 11, the White House was warned that somebody was watching the Benghazi safe house– and so you know, do not let any member of the press get away with calling this an embassy safe house.  It is not.  It was a CIA safe house.  Now why, in the most dangerous place in one of the most dangerous parts of the world, on Sept. 11…why would he be at a CIA safe house? …We now know he was having dinner with the general counsel of Turkey. [Emphasis added]

Beck reminded that it has been widely reported that President Obama has a close relationship with the Turkish prime minister, before continuing:

An hour after that, the Turkish ambassador leaves through the front door and the front gate, unmolested.  Now you tell me– why was the Turkish general counsel there?  …Why was it so important on Sept. 11 to go to the most dangerous city, into a CIA safe house?

An hour after he leaves, the fight begins.  We now know that the White House– somebody, the military, somebody, sent a drone.  So there was a live video feed of what was going on.  They’re watching it in the State Department, they’re watching it at the Pentagon, they’re watching it at Langley, and they’re watching it in the Situation Room.  At 5:00 in the afternoon, Leon Panetta has a meeting with the president of the United States.  The first email comes at 4:05.  So the Secretary of Defense arrives at the White House to have a meeting with the president 55 minutes after the Situation Room and everybody else gets an email saying, ‘Libya, the safe house is under attack.”  [Emphasis added]

{…}

Beck proceeded to read several more emails explaining how our personnel in Benghazi were missing and under attack, before he got to one timestamped at 6:07.  According to the memo, Ansar al-Sharia had claimed responsibility for the attack and– though he isn’t sure– Beck said it’s possible that Ansar al-Sharia was one of the groups that we gave arms and funding to during the war to overthrow Gaddhafi.

“This is why the White House covered, because our ambassador was killed by [guys] we were running guns to, and we are stillrunning guns today.”

He then read an international report from Russia Today saying U.S. Stinger Missiles are in the hands of Syrian rebels, adding that the New York Times has also reported that we are using the Muslim Brotherhood to arm the rebels in Syria.

Beck concluded the segment:

“This president is on the wrong side.  It is so crystal clear.  You can at this point begin to make a case for treason, but let’s just take it one step at a time.  The President of the United States of America, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of State have all lied to you.  They lied to you and said, ‘this might be a video, we don’t have all the information, the information is still sketchy, it’s confusing,’…We now have the documents that came into the Situation Room saying, ‘There’s an attack, they’re watching.’  Then, we have the documents that we had a live video feed in the Situation Room, so they could see that there was no protest.  Then there are the documents– and there’s now 13, with this new one– there’s now 13 different documents saying it’s a terrorist attack, and here’s the group that’s doing it.  And they lied to you.”

White House Press Secretary Jay Carney responded to questions about the newly-released emails by saying there was “all sorts of information” coming in at the time.

Watch the entire clip, via TheBlaze TV, below:

{…}”

Source:

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/treason-and-possible-prison-beck-br...

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and videos relate to and or support this disturbing & time sensitive issue-You Decide:

State Department emails from day of Libya attack show Al Qaeda-tied group on radar!-Posted on FoxNews.com-By Chad Pergram-On October 24, 2012:

“A series of internal State Department emails obtained by Fox News shows that officials reported within hours of last month’s deadly consulate attack in Libya that Al Qaeda-tied group Ansar al-Sharia had claimed responsibility.

The emails provide some of the most detailed information yet about what officials knew in the initial hours after the attack. And it again raises questions about why U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice, apparently based on intelligence assessments, would claim five days after the attack that it was a “spontaneous” reaction to protests over an anti-Islam film.

Ansar al-Sharia has been declared by the State Department to be an Al Qaeda-affiliated group. A member of the group suspected of participating in the Sept. 11 attack in Benghazi has been arrested and is being held in Tunisia.

The emails obtained by Fox News were sent by the State Department to a variety of national security platforms, whose addresses have been redacted, including the White House Situation Room, the Pentagon, the FBI and the Director of National Intelligence.

Fox News was told that an estimated 300 to 400 national security figures received these emails in real time almost as the raid was playing out and concluding. People who received these emails work directly under the nation’s top national security, military and diplomatic officials, Fox News was told.

The timestamps on the emails are all Eastern Time and often include the subheading SBU, which is shorthand for “Sensitive But Unclassified.”

The third email came at 6:07 p.m. ET and was sent to a different email list but still includes the White House Situation Room address and a subject line of “Update 2: Ansar al-Sharia Claims Responsibility for Benghazi Attack (SBU).”

“Embassy Tripoli reports the group claimed responsibility on Facebook and Twitter and has called for an attack on Embassy Tripoli,” the email reads.

Earlier emails did not go into who might have been responsible for the attack.

The first email indicates that U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and other personnel were “in the compound safe haven.” Officials later discovered that Stevens and three other Americans had died in the attack.

The first email was sent at 4:05 p.m. ET with the subject line: “U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi Under Attack (SBU).”

“The Regional Security Officer reports the diplomatic mission is under attack,” the email reads. “Embassy Tripoli reports approximately 20 armed people fired shots; explosions have been heard as well. Ambassador Stevens, who is currently in Benghazi, and four COM personnel are in the compound safe haven. The 17^th of February militia is providing security support.

“The operations Center will provide updates as available.”

The second email came at 4:54 p.m. ET, with a subject line: “Update 1: U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi (SBU)”

“Embassy Tripoli reports the firing at the U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi has stopped and the compound has been cleared. A response team is on site attempting to locate COM personnel.”

The emails on the day of the attack further challenge not only the initial statements made by administration officials like Rice about the strike, but also recent claims that they were only basing those statements on the intelligence they had at the time. 

State Department official Patrick Kennedy recently testified to Congress that anyone in Rice’s position would have made the same statements about the attack being spontaneous. 

But the newly uncovered emails clearly state the involvement of a militant group whose agenda is to establish an Islamic state in eastern Libya. 

Despite this, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney backed up Rice on Sept. 18. He said: “Based on information that we—our initial information ... we saw no evidence to back up claims by others that this was a preplanned or premeditated attack; that we saw evidence that it was sparked by the reaction to this video.” Carney went on to say “that is what we know” based on “concrete evidence, not supposition.”

Source:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/10/23/state-dept-emails-from-d...

New info about suspect connected to Libya attack!-Posted on FoxNews.com-On October 24, 2012:

“A series of internal State Department emails obtained by Fox News shows that officials reported within hours of last month’s deadly consulate attack in Libya that Al Qaeda-tied group Ansar al-Sharia had claimed responsibility.

The emails provide some of the most detailed information yet about what officials knew in the initial hours after the attack. And it again raises questions about why U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice, apparently based on intelligence assessments, would claim five days after the attack that it was a “spontaneous” reaction to protests over an anti-Islam film.

Ansar al-Sharia has been declared by the State Department to be an Al Qaeda-affiliated group. A member of the group suspected of participating in the Sept. 11 attack in Benghazi has been arrested and is being held in Tunisia.

The emails obtained by Fox News were sent by the State Department to a variety of national security platforms, whose addresses have been redacted, including the White House Situation Room, the Pentagon, the FBI and the Director of National Intelligence.

Fox News was told that an estimated 300 to 400 national security figures received these emails in real time almost as the raid was playing out and concluding. People who received these emails work directly under the nation’s top national security, military and diplomatic officials, Fox News was told.

The timestamps on the emails are all Eastern Time and often include the subheading SBU, which is shorthand for “Sensitive But Unclassified.”

The third email came at 6:07 p.m. ET and was sent to a different email list but still includes the White House Situation Room address and a subject line of “Update 2: Ansar al-Sharia Claims Responsibility for Benghazi Attack (SBU).”

“Embassy Tripoli reports the group claimed responsibility on Facebook and Twitter and has called for an attack on Embassy Tripoli,” the email reads.

Earlier emails did not go into who might have been responsible for the attack.

The first email indicates that U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and other personnel were “in the compound safe haven.” Officials later discovered that Stevens and three other Americans had died in the attack.

The first email was sent at 4:05 p.m. ET with the subject line: “U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi Under Attack (SBU).”

“The Regional Security Officer reports the diplomatic mission is under attack,” the email reads. “Embassy Tripoli reports approximately 20 armed people fired shots; explosions have been heard as well. Ambassador Stevens, who is currently in Benghazi, and four COM personnel are in the compound safe haven. The 17^th of February militia is providing security support.

“The operations Center will provide updates as available.”

The second email came at 4:54 p.m. ET, with a subject line: “Update 1: U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi (SBU)”

“Embassy Tripoli reports the firing at the U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi has stopped and the compound has been cleared. A response team is on site attempting to locate COM personnel.”

The emails on the day of the attack further challenge not only the initial statements made by administration officials like Rice about the strike, but also recent claims that they were only basing those statements on the intelligence they had at the time. 

State Department official Patrick Kennedy recently testified to Congress that anyone in Rice’s position would have made the same statements about the attack being spontaneous. 

But the newly uncovered emails clearly state the involvement of a militant group whose agenda is to establish an Islamic state in eastern Libya. 

Despite this, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney backed up Rice on Sept. 18. He said: “Based on information that we—our initial information ... we saw no evidence to back up claims by others that this was a preplanned or premeditated attack; that we saw evidence that it was sparked by the reaction to this video.” Carney went on to say “that is what we know” based on “concrete evidence, not supposition.”

Source:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/10/23/state-dept-emails-from-d...

White House told of militant claim two hours after Libya attack: emails!-Posted on Yahoo! News-By Mark Hosenball | Reuters-On October 23, 2012: 

“WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Officials at the White House and State Department were advised two hours after attackers assaulted the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, on September 11 that an Islamic militant group had claimed credit for the attack, official emails show.

The emails, obtained by Reuters from government sources not connected with U.S. spy agencies or the State Department and who requested anonymity, specifically mention that the Libyan group called Ansar al-Sharia had asserted responsibility for the attacks.

The brief emails also show how U.S. diplomats described the attack, even as it was still under way, to Washington.

U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans were killed in the Benghazi assault, which President Barack Obama and other U.S. officials ultimately acknowledged was a “terrorist” attack carried out by militants with suspected links to al Qaeda affiliates or sympathizers.

Administration spokesmen, including White House spokesman Jay Carney, citing an unclassified assessment prepared by the CIA, maintained for days that the attacks likely were a spontaneous protest against an anti-Muslim film.

[Related: Benghazi suspect held in Tunisia]

While officials did mention the possible involvement of “extremists,” they did not lay blame on any specific militant groups or possible links to al Qaeda or its affiliates until intelligence officials publicly alleged that on September 28.

There were indications that extremists with possible al Qaeda connections were involved, but also evidence that the attacks could have erupted spontaneously, they said, adding that government experts wanted to be cautious about pointing fingers prematurely.

U.S. intelligence officials have emphasized since shortly after the attack that early intelligence reporting about the attack was mixed.

Spokesmen for the White House and State Department had no immediate response to requests for comments on the emails.

MISSIVES FROM LIBYA

The records obtained by Reuters consist of three emails dispatched by the State Department’s Operations Center to multiple government offices, including addresses at the White House, Pentagon, intelligence community and FBI, on the afternoon of September 11.

The first email, timed at 4:05 p.m. Washington time - or 10:05 p.m. Benghazi time, 20-30 minutes after the attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission allegedly began - carried the subject line “U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi Under Attack” and the notation “SBU”, meaning “Sensitive But Unclassified.”

The text said the State Department’s regional security office had reported that the diplomatic mission in Benghazi was “under attack. Embassy in Tripoli reports approximately 20 armed people fired shots; explosions have been heard as well.”

[Related: Holiday truce in Syria]

The message continued: “Ambassador Stevens, who is currently in Benghazi, and four ... personnel are in the compound safe haven. The 17^th of February militia is providing security support.”

A second email, headed “Update 1: U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi” and timed 4:54 p.m. Washington time, said that the Embassy in Tripoli had reported that “the firing at the U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi had stopped and the compound had been cleared.” It said a “response team” was at the site attempting to locate missing personnel.

A third email, also marked SBU and sent at 6:07 p.m. Washington time, carried the subject line: “Update 2: Ansar al-Sharia Claims Responsibility for Benghazi Attack.”

The message reported: “Embassy Tripoli reports the group claimed responsibility on Facebook and Twitter and has called for an attack on Embassy Tripoli.”

While some information identifying recipients of this message was redacted from copies of the messages obtained by Reuters, a government source said that one of the addresses to which the message was sent was the White House Situation Room, the president’s secure command post.

Other addressees included intelligence and military units as well as one used by the FBI command center, the source said.

It was not known what other messages were received by agencies in Washington from Libya that day about who might have been behind the attacks.

Intelligence experts caution that initial reports from the scene of any attack or disaster are often inaccurate.

By the morning of September 12, the day after the Benghazi attack, Reuters reported that there were indications that members of both Ansar al-Sharia, a militia based in the Benghazi area, and al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, the North African affiliate of al Qaeda’s faltering central command, may have been involved in organizing the attacks.

One U.S. intelligence official said that during the first classified briefing about Benghazi given to members of Congress, officials “carefully laid out the full range of sparsely available information, relying on the best analysis available at the time.”

The official added, however, that the initial analysis of the attack that was presented to legislators was mixed.

“Briefers said extremists were involved in attacks that appeared spontaneous, there may have been a variety of motivating factors, and possible links to groups such as (al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb and Ansar al-Sharia) were being looked at closely,” the official said.”

Source:

http://news.yahoo.com/white-house-told-militant-claim-two-hours-lib...

IS NEWLY APPOINTED LIBYA INVESTIGATOR AN ISLAMIST-SYMPATHIZER WITH TIES TO CAIR?-Posted on The Blaze-By Tiffany Gabbay-On October 24, 2012:

“Is the man the Obama administration appointed on October 4 as key investigator for the terror attacks in Benghazi an Islamist-sympathizer? According to recently published reports, the new chairman of a State Department’s “Accountability Review Board,” which is heading the federal investigation into the Benghazi terror attacks, has been accused of being an “apologist for Islamic terrorism who has a cozy relationship with Iran.”

What’s more, the man in question — former Ambassador Thomas R. Pickering — has documented ties with the controversial group, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). CAIR, of course, is a documented Muslim Brotherhood affiliate and was named unindicted co-conspirators in the Holy Land Foundation trial — the largest terror-funding trial in U.S. history.

To make matters worse, Pickering is also co-chairman of the board of George Soros’ International Crisis Group who has ties to other Islamic organizations as well, including the National Iranian American Council (NIAC), which has been described as pro-Iran “front group.”

NIAC lost what Matthew Vadum at FrontPageMag describes as ”an important defamation case in federal court last month in which it unsuccessfully argued the group was not a tool of the Islamic Republic of Iran.”

Pickering, who is a member of NIAC’s advisory board, formerly served as Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs (1997 to 2000). He was featured in a report “Rise of the Iran Lobby,” by former CIA officer Clare M. Lopez, who was recently featured on the Glenn Beck Program to discuss the motivations behind the terror-attacks on the U.S. diplomatic outpost in Benghazi.

Pickering’s Islamic-connections came to light after a report by the Investigative Project on Terrorism was published, exposing what it called the “scores” of established, radical Islamists who met with senior administration officials over the course of hundreds of White House visits.

“Ambassador Pickering’s positions on Iran include calls for bilateral talks without preconditions and a plan for a multinational uranium enrichment consortium in Iran,” Lopez wrote.

As noted by Vadum, Pickering was, as of Tuesday evening, poised to participate in a panel discussion at the National Cathedral in Washington, D.C., on “what role the faith community can play in fighting Islamophobia.”  Along with Pickering, the discussion featured Arab American Institute president James J. Zogby, American Association for Muslim Advancement executive director Daisy Khan, and her husband, Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, who serves as chairman of the Cordoba Initiative. Vadum characterized Khan and Rauf as “prime movers behind the proposal to build a mosque near Ground Zero in lower Manhattan.” Further, he notes:

Khan is known for her over-the-top attacks on those who question the wisdom of building a Muslim holy site so close to the place where nearly 3,000 Americans were killed in an Islamist attack on the World Trade Center on Sept. 11, 2001.

Asked in 2010 if America was “Islamophobic,” Khan replied that “It’s not even Islamophobia, it’s beyond Islamophobia — it’s hate of Muslims,” she said.

Meanwhile Soros-funded organizations including the International Crisis Group are tirelessly working to champion the defeat of America’s alleged xenophobic bent and rampant Islamophobia. Perhaps there are no coincidences.”

Source:

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/is-newly-appointed-libya-investigat...

Obama’s Benghazi Investigator: An Iran Sympathizer!-Posted on FrontPage Magazine-By Matthew Vadum-On October 24, 2012:

“The freshly appointed chairman of a federal investigation into the Benghazi massacre is an apologist for Islamic terrorism who has a cozy relationship with Iran, the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism.

And to add insult to injury, at press time Tuesday evening the chairman of this new State Department panel, former Ambassador Thomas R. Pickering, was poised to participate in a panel discussion at the National Cathedral in Washington, D.C., on “what role the faith community can play in fighting Islamophobia.”

The news comes on the heels of a new report by the Investigative Project on Terrorism that found that “scores” of known radical Islamists met with senior Obama administration officials during hundreds of visits to the White House.

Pickering’s appointment as probe chairman was announced in the Federal Register on October 4. The State Department “Accountability Review Board” headed by Pickering is tasked with examining the circumstances surrounding the Sept. 11, 2012 deaths of Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens, information management officer Sean Smith, and security personnel Glen Doherty, and Tyrone Woods at the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya.

The problem is that Pickering has ties to the pro-Iran Islamist front group known as the National Iranian American Council (NIAC). NIAC lost an important defamation case in federal court last month in which it unsuccessfully argued the group was not a tool of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Pickering is a member of the advisory board of NIAC. He was Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs from May 1997 through the end of 2000, according to a 2009 report titled “Rise of the Iran Lobby,” by Clare M. Lopez of the Center for Security Policy. He’s also vice chairman of international consultancy, Hills & Co., and co-chairman of the board of directors of the International Crisis Group (whose executive committee includes George Soros).

“Ambassador Pickering’s positions on Iran include calls for bilateral talks without preconditions and a plan for a multinational uranium enrichment consortium in Iran,” Lopez writes. “Iran has proposed a similar plan to the UN Security Council. Ambassador Pickering advocates a process leading to mutual diplomatic relations between Iran and the United States.”

“U.S. national security policy is being successfully targeted by Jihadist entities hostile to American interests,” she writes. One of these groups, NIAC, is involved in “a de facto partnership” with its better known but more notorious jihadist ally “the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) and other organizations serving as mouthpieces for the mullahs’ party line.”

This network “includes well-known American diplomats, congressional representatives, figures from academia and the think tank world.” NIAC and its predecessor group, the American-Iranian Council, have long “functioned openly as apologists for the Iranian regime.”

CAIR is an affiliate of the Muslim Brotherhood and was named by the Department of Justice as an unindicted co-conspirator in the 2007 and 2008 Holy Land Foundation trials.

The panel discussion featured Pickering, Arab American Institute president James J. Zogby, American Association for Muslim Advancement executive director Daisy Khan, and her husband, Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, chairman of the Cordoba Initiative.

Khan and Rauf are prime movers behind the proposal to build a mosque near Ground Zero in lower Manhattan.

Khan is known for her over-the-top attacks on those who question the wisdom of building a Muslim holy site so close to the place where nearly 3,000 Americans were killed in an Islamist attack on the World Trade Center on Sept. 11, 2001.

Asked in 2010 if America was “Islamophobic,” Khan replied that “It’s not even Islamophobia, it’s beyond Islamophobia — it’s hate of Muslims,” she said.

Of course use of the word “Islamophobia” is a tool of intimidation, calculated to silence the so-called Islamophobe.

If one fears Islamist ideology as an irredentist, imperialist, totalitarian force, one is rational. “Phobia” implies that one who fears or is skeptical of the intentions of Muslims is mentally unbalanced. The term is used the same way American leftists use the word “racist” to shut down debate.

While two George Soros-funded nonprofits, the Center for American Progress and Media Matters for America, are working overtime to try to convince Americans that this make-believe mental illness of Islamophobia is a threat to American democracy and pluralism, the embattled Obama administration has been in damage control mode for weeks as the president’s foreign policy aimed at appeasing totalitarian Islamic theocrats collapses. The administration has been sucking up to the Organization of the Islamic Conference, a 57-state (56 sovereign states and the Palestinian Authority) group that considers itself the Caliphate reborn.

Americans’ civil rights and political correctness are weapons of infiltration used by our Islamofascist enemies. Just like our Soviet Communist enemies during the Cold War, Islamists are using Americans’ goodness and their sense of fair play, including an aversion to being accused of racial stereotyping, against America.

Hard data do not support claims that Islamophobia exists in the United States.

As Jonathan S. Tobin wrote in Commentary last year: “the notion of a rising wave of hatred against Muslims is unsupported by any statistical research.”

“When you consider that Muslims claim to have about the same number of adherents in this country as Jews and that anti-Jewish crimes have always far outnumbered those committed against Muslims, the media hysteria about Islamophobia is exposed as a big lie. But even if there are fewer Muslims here than their groups claim, the conclusion is unchanged.”

And there is credible evidence that Obama, who told the UN last month that “the future does not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam,” is sympathetic to Islamists’ increasingly vocal demands for Saudi-style anti-blasphemy laws.

So, apparently, is Ambassador Pickering, which makes him unfit to head any probe of what happened last month in Benghazi, Libya.”

Source:

http://frontpagemag.com/2012/matthew-vadum/obamas-benghazi-investig...

Clinton downplays emails implicating Al Qaeda-tied group within hours of Libya strike!-Posted on FoxNews.com-On October 24, 2012:

“Secretary of State Hillary Clinton pushed back Wednesday on the suggestion that Sept. 11 emails implicating an Al Qaeda-tied group in the Libya consulate attack were proof of terrorist involvement, saying their claims of responsibility on Facebook and Twitter were not “evidence.” 

Though social media was vital in driving—and monitoring—the so-called Arab Spring that overthrew longtime dictators in Libya and other countries, Clinton dismissed it as an unreliable source after a series of internal emails sent by Clinton’s State Department staff surfaced in which officials reported within hours of the attack that militant group Ansar al-Sharia claimed responsibility in Internet postings. 

“Posting something on Facebook is not in and of itself evidence,” Clinton said. “And I think it just underscores how fluid the reporting was at the time and continued for some time to be.” 

She suggested those producing the emails were “cherrypicking” documentation, as the White House noted the organization reportedly had denied responsibility in other settings. 

“I think within a few hours that organization itself claimed that it had not been responsible. Neither should be taken as fact,” White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said. 

But the group is a prime suspect. Indeed, one suspect in custody in Tunisia is a member of Ansar al-Sharia, one lawmaker told Fox News. 

Three Republican senators, in a letter Wednesday to the White House, said they were “disturbed” by the latest email revelations, claiming it “adds to the confusion” about what the administration knew of the attacks.

“In television interviews nearly a week after the events in Benghazi, you yourself even refused to describe it as a terrorist attack, instead emphasizing the role played by a hateful video. This concerted misrepresentation of the facts of the case—facts that, it appears, you and your administration possessed almost as soon as the attack began—is why so many of our constituents are demanding a fuller explanation of why your administration responded as it did,” wrote Sens. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C.; John McCain, R-Ariz.; and Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H. They called on the president to “address the American people directly” on what happened. 

Though the emails, obtained by Fox News on Tuesday, are just one piece of the puzzle, they reveal some of the most detailed information yet about what officials knew in the initial hours after the attack. And they again raise questions about why U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice, apparently based on intelligence assessments, would claim five days after the attack that it was a “spontaneous” reaction to protests over an anti-Islam film. 

Ansar al-Sharia has been declared by the State Department to be an Al Qaeda-affiliated group. A member of the group suspected of participating in the Sept. 11 attack in Benghazi has been arrested and is being held in Tunisia. 

The emails obtained by Fox News were sent by the State Department to a variety of national security platforms, whose addresses have been redacted, including the White House Situation Room, the Pentagon, the FBI and the Director of National Intelligence. 

Fox News was told that an estimated 300 to 400 national security figures received these emails in real time almost as the raid was playing out and concluding. People who received these emails work directly under the nation’s top national security, military and diplomatic officials, Fox News was told. 

The timestamps on the emails are all Eastern Time and often include the subheading SBU, which is shorthand for “Sensitive But Unclassified.” 

The third email came at 6:07 p.m. ET and was sent to a different email list but still includes the White House Situation Room address and a subject line of “Update 2: Ansar al-Sharia Claims Responsibility for Benghazi Attack (SBU).” 

“Embassy Tripoli reports the group claimed responsibility on Facebook and Twitter and has called for an attack on Embassy Tripoli,” the email reads. 

Earlier emails did not go into who might have been responsible for the attack. 

The first email indicates that U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and other personnel were “in the compound safe haven.” Officials later discovered that Stevens and three other Americans had died in the attack. 

The first email was sent at 4:05 p.m. ET with the subject line: “U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi Under Attack (SBU).” 

“The Regional Security Officer reports the diplomatic mission is under attack,” the email reads. “Embassy Tripoli reports approximately 20 armed people fired shots; explosions have been heard as well. Ambassador Stevens, who is currently in Benghazi, and four COM personnel are in the compound safe haven. The 17^th of February militia is providing security support. 

“The operations Center will provide updates as available.” 

The second email came at 4:54 p.m. ET, with a subject line: “Update 1: U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi (SBU)” 

“Embassy Tripoli reports the firing at the U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi has stopped and the compound has been cleared. A response team is on site attempting to locate COM personnel.” 

The emails on the day of the attack further challenge not only the initial statements made by administration officials like Rice about the strike, but also recent claims that they were only basing those statements on the intelligence they had at the time. 

State Department official Patrick Kennedy recently testified to Congress that anyone in Rice’s position would have made the same statements about the attack being spontaneous. 

But the newly uncovered emails clearly state the involvement of a militant group whose agenda is to establish an Islamic state in eastern Libya. 

Despite this, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney backed up Rice on Sept. 18. He said: “Based on information that we—our initial information ... we saw no evidence to back up claims by others that this was a preplanned or premeditated attack; that we saw evidence that it was sparked by the reaction to this video.” Carney went on to say “that is what we know” based on “concrete evidence, not supposition.”

Source:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/10/24/clinton-downplays-emails...

WHITE HOUSE RESPONDS TO NEW LIBYA EMAILS: ‘THERE WAS A VARIETY OF INFORMATION COMING IN’!-Posted on The Blaze-By Madeleine Morgenstern-On October 24, 2012:

“White House press secretary Jay Carney told reporters Wednesday morning that there was “a variety of information coming in” after the deadly attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, responding to emails that show that White House and State Department officials we... that an Al-Qaeda-linked group had taken responsibility.

One of emails, sent two hours after the attack occurred on Sept. 11, said the Ansar al-Sharia group had claimed responsibility for the Libya assault in postings on Facebook and Twitter, Reuters reported.

“There were emails about all sorts of information that was coming available in the aftermath of the attack,” Carney told reporters. “The email you are referring to was an open source email referring to an assertion made on a social media site that everyone in this room has access to and knew about instantaneously.”

Four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens, were killed in the attack.

“There was a variety of information coming in,” Carney continued. “The whole point of an intelligence community and what they do is to assess strands of information and make judgements about what happened and who was responsible….This is an open source, unclassified email about a posting on a Facebook site. I would also note that within a few hours the organization itself claimed that it had not been responsible. Neither should be taken as fact. That is why there is an investigation.”

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on Wednesday also sought to downplay the significance of the emails, particularly with regard to the Facebook claim.

“Posting something on Facebook is not in and of itself evidence and it just underscores how fluid the reporting was at the time and continued for some time to be,” Clinton said. “We will find out what happened we will take whatever measures necessary to fix whatever needs to be fixed and we will bring to justice those who committed these murders.”

Source:

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/white-house-responds-to-libya-email...

Palestinians Fire Dozens of Rockets at Civilian Areas, May Have Used Advanced Libyan Antiaircraft Missile, Too!-Posted on Restoring Liberty-By News Editor-On October 24, 2012:

http://joemiller.us/2012/10/palestinians-fire-dozens-of-rockets-at-...

Note: My following updated blog posts relate to this disturbing & time sensitive issue-You Decide: 

Hold Obama Accountable For Libya!

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/hold-obama-accountabl...

Arming Our Enemies!

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/arming-our-enemies?xg...

“Innocence” Film a Premeditated Provocation for Islamic Terror?

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/innocence-film-a-prem...

The Film ‘Innocence of Muslims’ — Made By Terrorists?

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blog/show?id=4301673%3ABlogPos...

2000 Dead Soldiers and Obama Can Still Do No Wrong!

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blog/show?id=4301673%3ABlogPos...

Red Flags All Around–But the Media Won’t Tell!

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blog/show?id=4301673%3ABlogPos...

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/was-obama-rattled-by-...

Just Happened!

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/just-happened?xg_sour...

OBAMA JUST CAUGHT IN BIG LIE? ‘Documents confirm he was member of socialist party!’

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blog/show?id=4301673%3ABlogPos...

Dishonest Media Avoids Truth about Obama Through Diversions!

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/dishonest-media-avoid...

My Opinion of How and Who Controls the People! (Part 1)

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/my-opinion-of-how-and...

Still Don’t Know Who to Vote For? Then Read This!

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/still-don-t-know-who-...

WILL WE THE PEOPLE ALLOW A CRIMINAL SYNDICATE TO STAY IN POWER?

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/will-we-the-people-al...

Note: My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that reveal: 1) the live presentation by Joel Gilbert, his DVD Film titled "Dreams From My Real Father," along with the newly released film titled "The Unvetted”; 2) the Islamic infiltration inside our government armed with our secrets, to include the President's secret link to Hamas; 3) the Islamic infiltration inside our military; 4) the Communist infiltration inside our government, to Include President Obama's secret link to Communists; 5) the George Soros connection, to include the shared agendas of George Soros and the President; and 6) the disastrous results of these infiltrations, links and connections-You Decide: 

The Vetting: ‘Obama, Radical Islam and the Soros Connection’! (Part 1):

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/the-vetting-obama-rad... 

The Vetting: ‘Obama, Radical Islam and the Soros Connection’! (Part 2):

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/the-vetting-obama-rad...

The Vetting: ‘Obama, Radical Islam and the Soros Connection’! (Part 3):

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/the-vetting-obama-rad…

The Vetting: ‘Obama, Radical Islam and the Soros Connection’! (Part 4):

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/the-vetting-obama-rad...

Continue Reading My Following Blog Posts That Relate To This Disturbing & Time Sensitive Issue:

Communists and Muslims: The Hidden Hand of the KGB!

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blog/show?id=4301673%3ABlogPos...

White Reds Exploiting Blacks: The Weather Underground, Barack Obama, and the Fundamental Transformation of the United States!

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/white-reds-exploiting...

The coming chaos from the Obama-Soetoro playbook!

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/the-coming-chaos-from..

‘CIVILIZATION JIHAD’ AND OBAMA’S CONNECTIONS!

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/civilization-jihad-and-o...

The planned re-election of Obama, revolutionary style!

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/the-planned-re-electi...

President and DOJ have contributed to the racial mess in our country!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/09/26/president-and-doj-have-con...

Is President Obama inciting riots across the US and abroad?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/23/is-president-obama-incitin...

Godfather of The Islamic Revolution!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/11/godfather-of-the-islamic-r...

Is Israel the next Arab Facebook Campaign?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/03/30/is-israel-the-next-arab-fa...

The President Must Stop Voting “Present” on Iran!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/02/12/the-president-must-stop-vo...

What are CAIRs obstructionist goals?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/03/06/6951/

Federal judge confirms CAIR is Hamas!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/11/24/federal-judge-confirms-cai...

The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetr...

Has President Obama Gone Off The Deep End?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/09/has-president-obama-gone-o...

Are We Witnessing Narcissism At Work?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/10/27/are-we-witnessing-narcissi...

Obamanites Get Violent in Support of the Agenda!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/05/obamanites-get-violent-in-...

Nearly 80 percent don’t trust the government!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/19/nearly-80-percent-don’t-tr...

Where Is America Today?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/26/where-is-america-today-2/

Is History Repeating Itself?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/09/20/is-history-repeating-itself/

Note: The following videos seem extremely appropriate today:

A Republic, If You Can Keep It!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGL8CiUtXF0

Breaking Point: 25 Minutes That Will Change America:

http://www.goptrust.com/25_minutes_Breaking_Point.html

We The People:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVAhr4hZDJE&feature=player_embedded

I Stand For America!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KTlDyY5i9i4&feature=player_embedded#at=208

Madison Rising - The Star Spangled Banner!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8C7i9kdEf8

Hank Williams Jr New Song Dedicated to Obama: "Takin' Back the Country"!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uY-Z1hjquqo&feature=player_embedded

The Fightin Side of Me!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32-OyyLJzHw&feature=player_embedded

Freedom Isn’t Free:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kfIO3VMLdRE

Declaration to Restore the Republic!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYycZOCJv4k&feature=player_embedded

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts, please copy website and paste it on your browser.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered controversial by this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Why can we not impeach this president on the grounds that he let the ambassador of Libya and three other americans die?  He knew that on sept 11 that the consolate was under attack  by extreamist and did nothing to help them.  We now have factual evidence (emails  sent to the goverment). He has blatantly lied to the American public and continues to distort the truth as to what really happen in Libya.  If you compare Watergate to what this president has done to cover up the true facts regarding the murder of ambassador Stevens and the three other americans,congress should start impreachment proceedings to have him removed as president. 

Mitt Romney and Barack Obama argued foreign policy in the final 2012 presidential debate in Boca Raton Fl.  Romney looked like a solid, strong American Commander in Chief, while Obama resembled an ageing hippie college professor wannabe enraged at having his beliefs successfully debunked in public.

Obama insulted Romney, speaking to him in patronizing fashion while mocking his stance on defense cuts: “I think Governor Romney maybe hasn't spent enough time looking at how our military works. You mentioned the navy, for example, and that we have fewer ships than we did in 1916. Well, governor, we also have fewer horses and bayonets because the nature of our military's changed.”

Then Obama became truly condescending when he said “There are these things called aircraft carriers where planes land on them. We have these ships that go underwater, nuclear submarines.  The question is not a game of Battleship, where we’re counting ships, it’s what are our capabilities”.

So Obama apparently believes that Mitt Romney, someone who also graduated from Harvard, who also just happens to have earned both a business and a law degree, doesn’t know what aircraft carriers and submarines are.

In short, Obama’s performance was crude and un-presidential.

Not unusual for the narcissist in chief, the words “I”, “me” and “mine” seemed to come out of his mouth every four or five seconds.

Despite numerous assertions by the likes of MSNBC’s Chris Matthews and other card carrying members of the “progressive” Party Pravda, the night was won by Romney when Obama, instead of offering viable answers to serious questions posed by Moderator Bob Schieffer, angrily attacked Romney with red herring arguments.  To which Romney replied: “Attacking me is not an agenda”.

That moment laid waste to the entire Obama re-election strategy, which was to attack Romney with viscous smears and repeated false accusations in hopes the damage inflicted would set Romney so far back in the polls he could never recover.

Unfortunately for “the smartest man in the world” and his hatchet wielding political henchmen, the strategy has completely backfired.  Going into the last two weeks of the race their campaign is borrowing money, while Romney is financially poised to blanket swing states with political ads favorable to him.  Ads that reflect the calm, cool, thoughtful, caring individual American voters witnessed in the debates.  The man who stands in stark contrast to the phony Romney portrait the Obama campaign intentionally painted.

Naturally, because “progressives” are so tolerant and open minded, Obama supporters are still threatening to riot and assassinate Romney.

Not the least bit surprising, after the debate was over Chris Matthews claimed that support for Romney is fueled by race hatred.

Once one team starts taking cheap shots and committing flagrant fouls, it is a sure sign they have lost and the game is over.

http://mjfellright.wordpress.com/2012/10/24/game-over/

        CHRISTIANS, CATCHLICS, MORMANS,   SALVATION ARMY, BAPTISISTS TOO HOP ABORD THE ROMNEY BAND WAGON.  GOD BLESS YOU ALL WE WILL WIN IT ,GOD SAYS SO.

        CHRISTIANS, CATCHLICS, MORMANS,   SALVATION ARMY, BAPTISISTS TOO HOP ABORD THE ROMNEY BAND WAGON.  GOD BLESS YOU ALL WE WILL WIN IT ,GOD SAYS SO.

Barack Obama-

Integrated Misery!

Mitt Romney

Integrates Opportunity!

Romney/Ryan 2012

Cap Black, The Hood Conservative

..of O."the chair" plus his heartbeat away replacement Joe Hee Haw Hee Haw Biden...
Speaking of Biden, did you hear that he couldn't dial
911 because he couldn't find the 11?