ACTION

I like to watch tv just like the next guy, but what I don't like paying for is the leftwing programming.  What if everyone united and made a commitment to just say no.  Call our cable, dish/direct TV subscribers and cancel our subscription at the same time coordinated buy all active teaparty members through the United States.

When asked why tell them to contact the primary teaparty spokesman.  I know me and my friends will do this what about you.  The teaparty spokesman could demand a teaparty channels just like the spanish speaking channel, but not pay for it or any of the leftwing channels.  That would hit them where it hurts and maybe they would start to recognize that the teaparty is just everyday American people with a hugh voice!!!!!

What do you think?????

John Mc Cain and the Wall Street Journal didn't investigate the " Hobbits " role in the trilogy, The Lord of the Rings.

As a fellow Hobbit ( Tea Party member ) it was Hobbits that were made aware of the One Ring ( The National Debt ) that controlled all the other Rings ( the U. S. Economy ).

The Hobbits didn't ask for the One Ring but it was lost by the Creator of the One Ring in the Land of Mordor ( the U. S. Congress ).

Seeing the damage that the One Ring was creating to Middle Earth ( The United States of America ) it was obvious that the One Ring must be destroyed.

In the Land of Mordor another wanted to control the One Ring, Sauron ( President Obama ) with help from the wizard Saruman ( Harry Reed ).

They, Sauron and Saruman, sent out the Ringwraiths and Orcs ( the Democratic Congress ) to retrieve the One Ring but the Hobbits were caring not to let them take it.

With the help from the Elfs,Dwarfs and Men  ( the Republican Congress ) they were able to fight their way to the Land of Mordor where the Hobbits destroyed the Evil One Ring and restored Middle Earth to the rule of Men ( The American people ).

Thus Ends the Beginning

We had a small but significant battle victory yesterday when we stopped the "vote" on the disgusting bill that Mr. Boehner was going to send over to the senate.  That liberal bill would have been twisted further into the communist mold and sent back to the house, eventually being "passed".  That would have been a victory for the communist-led senate. 

But as often occurs during an argument, one can find out what side a person really stands on when the pressure increases.  In this case, Allen West of Florida, showed his true colors.  From what I understand from FOX News this morning, Mr. West was voted in by us, yet he now favors the business-as-usual, liberal and spineless "bill" that John Boehner put forth to be voted upon yesterday.  That bill would have been an aid and comfort to the enemy. 

Take notice Florida Tea Party!  You have a turncoat among you!  You better make plans to VOTE OUT Mr. Allen West the first chance you get.  He apparently likes his new job better than his duty to the citizens of conservative Florida!  Keep throwing the tea overboard!

I just received the message below from someone I know very well.  I had to shake my head at their outrage over everything in this message and ask myself "Who is responsible for this?"

We are, each of us.  We elected the folks in Washington that voted for these bills and enacted these programs because we listen to their song & dance and warnings-promises-scary messages    that if we would only vote for them, they will fix these problems.  So, we vote for them then we ignore them for another 2 or 4 or 6 more years until they come back with their dog and pony show again, "vote for me and I'll fix these problems".  We do and they go back to business as usual and we go back to our ignorant bliss.

Right now in Washington, YOUR Congressman and Senator are arguing over nickel and dime programs while this country spends $10,000,000,000 PER DAY more than we have.  For you numerically challenged that is TEN BILLION DOLLARS!

One side wants to take more money, by saying the RICH should pay more. They call it "Enhanced Revenue".   Well, just who are those people they cal rich? It's everyone who makes money from any source. 

Yep, that's right anyone and everyone who makes money is rich.

You have a job and pay taxes? YOU'RE RICH!

You have a job with a retirement plan?  Then your retirement money is invested in the stock market, so.  YOU'RE RICH!

Are you drawing a pension in addition to Social Security? (see above, it’s in the stock market too). YOU'RE RICH!  You're not only rich, you're so rich we are going to take part of your retirement check AND reduce your Social Security because you had the audacity to earn more than we think you should.

You feel rich?  By their definition you are and they want some more of it. But they only want to help the senior's and poor.  They helped us so much, last year they removed $500,000,000,000 from Medicare by abolishing the Advantage program that we could opt for and pay for, among other things that "we had to pass the bill to know what was in the bill". 

The other side says that everyone pays enough and they want to cut spending.  They're half right, we do pay too much and the government spends too much.  But what do they want to cut?  Social Security and Medicare.  Programs we paid for our entire working lives.  I haven't heard any talk of cutting "Earned Income Credit" that little known safety net to help the working poor.  Bull Shit, but more about this one later!  We haven't heard about cutting money to foreign countries.  We haven't heard about stopping corporate welfare.  They don't talk about fixing tax codes or programs that might hurt the big money people who paid to get them elected.

And speaking about corporate welfare . . .

How many mortgage brokers went to jail?

How many bankers went to jail?

How many General Motors executives went to jail?

How many Chrysler executives went to jail?

They said these companies were too big to let fail.  Who the hell let them get that big if the first place?  So what did they do?  They gave them Billions of our money and made them merge with others too big to fail.  Doesn't that just make them bigger? I don't know of any of these regional or local banks that were too big to fail.

A few years ago, didn't they say AT&T and Microsoft were too big and force them to split up?  Did they pay them to diversify? I don't think so.  Why don't they break up these "too big to fail" businesses and reintroduce some marketplace competition? 

By the way, of all those Billions we gave those companies, where is it?

>The banks shipped it to foreign subsidiaries. But they won't make loans in the USA.

>Chrysler was sold to an Italian company.

>GM issued stock to the US Treasury and used the money to pay back the US Treasury.  (An IOU in lieu of a loan payment).  Then spent a zillion bucks advertising that "We paid our TARP loan back" until someone with more brains than the US Treasury blew the whistle on them.

I WANT MY MONEY BACK!

I have sat back and watched for the last three years as this working poor game the tax system, lie and cheat to hit their maximum "refund".  Many actually quit their jobs when they have reached that peak earning limit for the maximum refund, because once you earn more, you get less.  In other words, Congress tells them this is what they want you to earn and no more.  Because if you earn any more, you move into that category of Rich and they will take it away from you.  They pay you to stay poor and more important dependant.  Dependant on Whom, you ask?  Them, the government, the social hand holders who need you to keep voting for them while they keep promising to fix things.  The only thing they want to fix is their own entitlements to their jobs in Washington and then their lifelong pension. 

When Pat owned her restaurant, we had trouble finding people to work for minimum wage.  Why?  Because in order to match the Federal and State assistance programs for rent, medical, food stamps, earned income credit, and utilities, we would have had to pay $40,000 a year.  At that time that was close to what I made and worked my ass off.  But if you earn minimum wage you loose almost all of the assistance.

Every Federal program and budget gets an automatic increase every year.  For the sake of argument, let's say that increase is 10% (I, know it may be 8.7745% or 9.45643%, but let's use a nice round number so you can follow this).  Congressman R or Senator S proposes that spending be limited to only a 7% increase.  Congressman L and Senator C runs to the TV cameras and cries that they want to CUT spending for Grandma and Grandpa by 3% and bimbo blond talking head goes on the nightly news and says Grandma will be eating ALPO because of these cuts and school kids will starve because they will be dumping two tofu veggies they didn't eat instead of three they didn't eat.  (Nothing to do with they taste like shit because the food police have already been there).

So, what do we do? We wake up for a few days and call that Guy that promised to fix things and tell him to fix this.

So, I'm through ranting.  How do we really fix this?  We pray that those people in Washington finally get it.  Any chance of that?  Nope!  They have already shown they don't get it.  Some of them got our message last November, but some have already forgotten our message.

According to Congressman Jo Ann Emerson,  "The Bible, the guide of our lives, is 1,291 pages and contains 774,746 words. But the Tax Code and its regulations which are referred to by some as, 'a person's worst nightmare come true' is 9,471 pages and over 7 million words."  How stupid it that.

1.  Repeal all 9,471 pages and adopt either the Flat Tax, no deductions or the Fair Tax.  I prefer the Fair Tax, but don't really care which.  One page is all it should take.

2. Pass a balanced budget amendment.

3. Comply with the Constitution of the United States. ALL OF IT!

4.  Try every elected and appointed official for TREASON if they violate their oath.

5. Repeal the 17th Amendment to the Constitution.

California and the rest of the states can take care of themselves if we follow the above 5 recommendations.

......        ORIGINAL MESSAGE THAT SET ME OFF...........

Subject: What the HELL's wrong???

There are millions of Americans thinking the same thing.  If we don't start taking care of our OWN, what's going to happen?  If they are cutting the budget all over the United States' federal and state government programs, how can we afford to send so much money over seas to other countries. 

The deserving people we help around the world deserve better but we truly    have no way of knowing who actually benefits -- too many times the food,    medicine, etc., is intercepted by the government and it never reaches the    people it was intended for.  I don't know who wrote this but it certainly gives US something to think about.

AMEN TO THIS

What the HELL's wrong???    

WAKE UP AMERICA!!!!

Tuesday's Daily Bulletin paper, ran two articles on the front page side by side :

1- Calif's 20 Billion Dollar Budget Deficit 

2- The Calif Supreme Court ruling that ILLEGALS can attend college and get     benefits. 

Why don't they just deport them when they arrive to register?

3- Last year they ran an article on the yearly costs to Calif Taxpayers from Illegals using Hospital Emergency Rooms for their general health care  -  At just one hospital the cost to tax payers totaled over 25  million a year  

Someone please tell me what the HELL's wrong with all the people that run this country!!!!!!

We're "broke" & can't help our own Seniors, Veterans, Orphans, homeless       etc???????????

In the last months we have provided aid to Haiti, Chile, and Turkey . And now Pakistan ......home of bin Laden.  Literally, BILLIONS of DOLLARS!!!

Our retired seniors living on a 'fixed income' receive no aid nor do they get any breaks while our government and religious organizations pour Hundreds of Billions of $$$$$$'s and Tons of food to Foreign Countries!

They call Social Security and Medicare an entitlement even though most of us have been paying for it all our working lives and now when its time for us to collect, the government is running out of money. Why did the government borrow from it in the first place?  

We have hundreds of adoptable children who are shoved aside to make room for the adoption of foreign orphans. 

AMERICA: a country where we have homeless without shelter,  children going to bed hungry, elderly going without 'needed' meds, and mentally ill without treatment -etc,etc. 

YET......................

They have a 'Benefit'  for the people of Haiti on 12 TV stations, ships and planes lining up with food, water, tents clothes, bedding, doctors and           medical supplies.  

Imagine if the *GOVERNMENT* gave 'US' the same support they give to other      countries.. 

Sad isn't it?

Free Our Free Markets: Non-Passage of Debt Ceiling | Logic 101http://t.co/yxry7c6 || 

What’s wrong with this picture?

Posted on WND.com-By Aaron Klein-On July 23, 2011:

“President Obama’s China adviser, Evan Medeiros, has a long history of downplaying the threat to U.S. interests posed by Beijing’s rapid military and economic growth, once even penning a paper that argued China should embrace a “great power mentality.”

Medeiros was appointed as China director of the White House National Security Council in 2009.

He was a foreign policy adviser to Obama during the 2008 presidential campaign and even donated $3,800 to the candidate, his only campaign contribution on record since 2000.

Read about the growing conflict, in “AMERICA FOR SALE: Fighting the New World Order, Surviving a Global Depression, and Preserving USA Sovereignty.”

Medeiros has been an external researcher at the Strategic Studies Institute of the U.S. Army War College, where he has given several recent lectures.

He was formerly a senior research analyst at the Arms Control Association in Washington, D.C. He was also a project associate with the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Project at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and joined the RAND Corporation as a political scientist in 2002.

Prior to that, Medeiros was a senior research associate at the Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Monterey Institute.

In his most recent “Inside the Ring” column in the Washington Times, Bill Gertz cited congressional Republicans as identifying Medeiros as a key player involved in the Obama administration’s policy of refusing to sell needed arms toTaiwan.

The same report blamed Medeiros for delaying the release of a second Pentagon report to Congress on the shifting air power balance in the Taiwan Strait.

The Times also cited Republican staff aides and a defense official as stating they believe Medeiros is behind efforts to block the release to Congress of the Pentagon’s annual report on Chinese military power, completed months ago and due to Capitol Hill on March 1.

The report on China’s military was also delayed last year. When it was eventually released, the report was watered down with a minimized title. Previously called the “Annual Report to Congress: Military Power of the People’s Republic of China,” the report was renamed “Annual Report on Security Developments Involving China.”

Medeiros, meanwhile, was fingered by Gertz’s sources as a key official in preventing the U.S. sale of 66 advanced F-16 jets to Taiwan and for delaying the sale of equipment to upgrade Taiwan’s existing F-16s. Both military moves were expected to anger China.

A review of Medeiros’s articles and statements to the news media finds a regular trend of minimizing China’s threat to the U.S.

In 2009, just before his appointment to the NSC, Medeiros stated China was not seeking to “confront the United States or expel it from the region.”

He argued China was not aiming to replace America as a superpower.

In 2007, Medeiros, speaking as an expert at the RAND Corporation, argued Beijing’s military buildup is limited to Asia and it has not sought to project power globally.

“Cumulatively, this is a substantial amount of money devoted toward military modernization. And it’s clearly a reflection of the Chinese government’s priorities and the fact that they seek to build a modern military with regional power projection capabilities,” Medeiros said.

In 2005, Medeiros said of China’s People’s Liberation Army: “Do the old shibboleths still apply – that the Chinese defense industry is backward, poor and low-quality?”

“No,” he continued. “It seems China has turned the corner. … For the first time in 20 years, the PLA has adopted reforms that make sense. They adopted, and implemented, and are really learning quickly.”

Medeiros that year was lead author of a 300-page RAND study, “New Directions for China’s Defense Industry.”

In 2002, he minimized China’s missile project, telling The Economist that the Chinese “don’t really see missiles as weapons of mass destruction while most American policymakers equate the two.”

In an article in the November-December 2003 issue of Foreign Affairs magazine, Medeiros, with analyst M. Taylor Fravel, presented the views of experts on Chinese foreign policy as stating China should overcome its long-held “victim mentality” and adopt a “great power mentality” instead.

Speaking to Knight Ridder in 2001, Medeiros stated, “The Chinese defense industrial base is very outdated and dilapidated, especially in these areas where warfare is headed.

“They don’t have the high technology to compete at all,” he said.

He stated China’s ships and planes, at least those not acquired from Russia, are outfitted with technology equal to what American forces had in the late 1960s or early 1970s.

“So if they ever got in a battle with the United States, we could destroy their forces before they ever saw us,” Medeiros added.

Still, Medeiros has incorporated criticism of China into his work. His 2005 RAND study, for example, said China “needs to do more to enforce its own controls.”

Stated the study: “China has erected a structure that has a strong legal basis to control exports of goods that can be used for making weapons of mass destruction, but it hasn’t devoted the necessary financial or political resources to make these controls effective.

“This is a persistent and glaring weakness,” the study said.

• With research by Brenda J. Elliott.”

Source:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=324577

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. S. Korea: North Can Deliver Nuke Warhead Via Rocket!-Posted on NewsMax.com-By Reuters-On June 13, 2011:

http://www.newsmaxworld.com/global_talk/Korea_likely_can_miniat/2011/06/13/393373.html?s=al&promo_code=C6DC-1

II. The Administration Must Not Bend to Russian Missile Defense Demands-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-On May 21, 2011:

http://blog.heritage.org/2011/05/21/the-administration-must-not-bend-to-russian-missile-defense-demands/

III. Top 10 Obama Foreign Policy Flubs-Posted on Human Events-By Human Events-On May 21, 2011:

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=43631

IV. CNN’s Fareed Zakaria Praises Obama’s Mideast Foreign Policy ‘Restraint’!-Posted on The Media Research Center-By Matt Hadro-On July 6, 2011:

http://www.mrc.org/biasalert/2011/20110706063708.aspx

Note:  The following websites and report reveal that George Soros’ Open Society Institute (OSI) funds: (a) organizations that advocate America’s unilateral disarmament and/or a steep reduction in its military spending; (b) organizations that favor global government, which would bring American foreign policy under the control of the United Nations or other international bodies; and, (c) the Peace and Security Funders Group (PSFG), which is a liberal internationalist coalition of U.S. donors who believe the best way to prevent wars, constrain rogue nations, and prevent the spread of nuclear weapons is to let international laws and organizations set the terms of world peace. The umbrella group, whose listed supporters claim to have assets exceeding $25 billion, aims to entangle the U.S. government in a process of international negotiation to create a new global legal regime. It would likely limit U.S. sovereignty and replace a strong national defense with endless rounds of international rulemaking and consensus-building-You Decide:

(a) Organizations that advocate America’s unilateral disarmament and/or a steep reduction in its military spending:

• The American Friends Service Committee, which views America as the world's chief source of international strife, has long had a friendly relationship with the Communist Party USA. Lamenting that “the United States spends 59% of the discretionary federal budget on military-related expenses,” the Committee seeks to “realign national spending priorities and to increase the portion of the budget that is spent on housing, quality education for all, medical care, and fair wages.” In 2000, George Soros himself was a signatory to a letter titled “Appeal for Responsible Security” that appeared in The New York Times. The letter called upon the U.S. government “to commit itself unequivocally to negotiate the worldwide reduction and elimination of nuclear weapons,” and to participate in “the global de-alerting of nuclear weapons and deep reduction of nuclear stockpiles.”

(b) Organizations that favor global government, which would bring American foreign policy under the control of the United Nations or other international bodies:

• According to George Soros, “We need some global system of political decision-making. In short, we need a global society to support our global economy.” Consistent with this perspective, the Open Society Institute in 2008 gave $150,000 to the United Nations Foundation, which “works to broaden support for the UN through advocacy and public outreach.” Moreover, OSI is considered a “major” funder of the Coalition for an International Criminal Court, which aims to subordinate American criminal-justice procedures in certain cases to an international prosecutor who could initiate capricious or politically motivated prosecutions of U.S. officials and military officers.

Source:

Guide to The George Soros Network-Posted on DiscoverTheNetworks.org:

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=589

(c) Peace and Security Funders Group (PSFG)!-Posted on DiscoverTheNetworks.org:

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6519

The New Internationalism: Peace and Security Funders Group (PSFG)!-Posted on Capital Research Center-By John J. Tierney-On August 2009:

http://www.capitalresearch.org/pubs/pdf/v1249061645.pdf

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Nuclear Summit Part of Obama Administration’s ‘Fantasy Foreign Policy’

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/14/nuclear-summit-part-of-obama-administration’s-‘fantasy-foreign-policy’/

Will The New START Undermine Our Nuclear Security?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/03/25/will-the-new-start-undermine-our-nuclear-security/

National Security Shouldn’t Be For Sale!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/11/16/national-security-shouldn’t-be-for-sale/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

If you cross the N. Korean border illegally, you are either shot or get 12 yrs. hard labor. If you cross the Afghanistan border illegally, you get shot. If you cross the U.S. border illegally you get a job, a driver's license (without I.D), food stamps, a place to live,free health care, housing & child benefits, education, & tax free business for 7 yrs. No wonder we are a country in debt....

What’s wrong with this picture?

Posted on FoxNews.com-By William Lajeunesse-On July 26, 2011:

“The failed federal anti-gunrunning program known as Operation Fast and Furious got so out of control in November 2009, it appeared the U.S. government was single-handedly “arming for war” the Sinaloa Cartel, documents show, even as U.S. officials kept lying to fellow agents in Mexico about the volume of guns it helped send south of the border.

Those shocking allegations are revealed in the latest congressional report investigating the operation.

At one point, agents with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives say guns sold under the program took just 24 hours to travel from a gun store in Phoenix to a crime scene in Mexico. ATF agents there pleaded for help but were told nothing about Fast and Furious, which was intended to let guns “walk” in order to track them to higher-profile traffickers.

Meanwhile, the report claims the agents’ superiors in Washington met every Tuesday, to review the latest sales figures and the number of guns recovered in Mexico.

“How long are you going to let this go on?” Steve Martin, an assistant director of intelligence operations asked the ATF top brass at meeting Jan. 5, 2010, according to a transcript of the meeting contained in the congressional report. None of the men responded and several quickly left the room, the transcript reveals.

By Feb. 27, 2010, Lanny Breuer, the head of the Criminal Division of the Justice Department in Washington, D.C., was allegedly told that the ATF had successfully helped sell 1,026 weapons worth more than $650,000 to members of the Sinaloa cartel. The briefing included all top ATF officials, including the agents in charge in Los Angeles and Houston, as well as a half dozen top Justice Department attorneys.

“So there’s no doubt after this briefing that guns in this case were being linked to the Sinaloa cartel?” a congressional investigator asked Martin during a July 2011 interview.

“I’d say yes.” Martin replied.

“Very apparent to everyone in the room?” the investigator asked.

“That’s correct,” Martin said.

Meanwhile, ATF agents in Mexico were seeing a flood of weapons coming south. When asked, ATF brass told the resident ATF attaché in Mexico things were “under control.”

“They were afraid I was going to brief the ambassador on it or brief the government of Mexico,” said Darren Gil, former ATF attaché in Mexico.

For months, officials assured Gil that Fast and Furious was going to be “shut down,” but it wasn’t.

“We’re getting hurt down here,” Gil told ATF International Affairs Chief Daniel Kumor.

Kumor reportedly raised Gil’s concerns and was told the case “was going great,” and nothing happened until the death of Agent Brian Terry in December 2010.

Ironically, a year before, in December 2009, Southwest Border Czar Ray Rowley threatened to expose Operation Fast and Furious because of “the large number of guns that had already been trafficked” but ATF officials talked him out of it.

When the case was finally revealed in the press, Gil said, “never in my wildest dreams ever would I have thought of (gun walking) as an (investigative) technique. Never. Ever. It was just inconceivable to me.”

“You don’t lose guns. You don’t walk guns. You don’t let guns out of your sight.”

Gil also testified at a House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing Tuesday where one ATF supervisor left members of Congress exasperated.

William Newell, who was formerly in charge of the Phoenix office, insisted that guns don’t walk despite the facts clearly showing they did, he knew it and approved it time and time again.

Newell said the purpose of the operation was to dismantle the entire Mexican cartel but agents testified they were not allowed to do that when they saw transfers of money and weren’t permitted to follow the money.

Lawmakers repeatedly tried unsuccessfully to nail Newell down.

“I acknowledge we made some mistakes,” Newell said when asked by committee’s chairman, Rep. Darrell Issa,R-Calif., whether he thought it was a good program.

“You were right on that,” Issa said.

Under fierce questioning from other lawmakers, Newell said that taking out “just one straw purchaser” has “no effect on the larger investigation.” 

The precise number of casualties in Mexico isn’t known, but ATF officials confirm the murder of Mario Gonzales Rodriguez, brother of the Chihuahua attorney general, with a Fast and Furious gun.

According to the report, the U.S. knew for eight months of the link between the ATF operation and his death, but refused to tell any Mexican officials. Finally the acting ATF attaché told the Mexican Attorney General Maricela Morales. Her reply, “Hijole,” which translates into “Oh my.”

Source:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/07/26/atf-accused-in-congressional-report-arming-cartel-for-war-through-operation/

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. Guns from ‘Fast and Furious’ Found at Mex. Crime Scenes!-Posted on NewsMax.com-By Newsmax Wires-On July 26, 2011:

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/operationfastandfurious-mexico-crimescenes-congressionalreport/2011/07/26/id/404832?s=al&promo_code=CAFF-1

II. Melson’s Testimony Proves Fast and Furious was an Obama Plot!-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Guest Write-On July 18, 2011:

http://floydreports.com/melsons-testimony-proves-fast-and-furious-was-an-obama-plot/

III. Grassley Suspects Botched Gun-Tracking Program Was Motivated by Desire to ‘Restrict Guns’!-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Fred Lucas-On July 22, 2011:

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/grassley-suspects-botched-gun-tracking-p

IV. Congressman Says Fast & Furious Was Administration Conspiracy To Regulate Gun Owners!-Posted on United States Justice Foundation-By NEWSEDITOR-On July 15, 2011:

http://usjf.net/2011/07/congressman-says-fast-furious-was-administration-conspiracy-to-regulate-gun-owners/

Note:  The following websites reveal that George Soros’ Open Society Institute (OSI) and groups that promote a variety of leftwing causes are strong advocates of gun control and fund the Arms Control Association (ACA), which outlines the UN Process on Small Arms, along with the International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA) that is global movement against gun violence, which has lobbied the United Nations to pass a measure outlawing private gun ownership and effectively overturning the U.S. Constitution’s Second Amendment-You Decide: 


Arms Control Association (ACA):

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6924

Arms Control Association (ACA): UN Process on Small Arms: 

http://www.armscontrol.org/act/2007_03/Anders

International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA): Global Movement Against Gun Violence:

http://www.iansa.org/aboutus

International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA): National Gun Laws:

http://www.iansa.org/workarea/national-gun-laws

International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA): Members:

http://www.iansa.org/region/americas

International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA): New US Government Plan to Tackle Arms Trafficking to Mexico!-Posted on July 15, 2011:

http://www.iansa.org/news/2011/07/us-new-government-plan-to-tackle-arms-trafficking-to-mexico

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Did ATF provide weapons to Mexican drug cartels that were subsequently used to kill one of our own?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/03/04/did-atf-provide-weapons-to-mexican-drug-cartels-that-were-subsequently-used-to-kill-one-of-our-own/

Threat of the Mexican drug cartel, illegal border-crossers and “sanctuary cities”!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/23/threat-of-the-mexican-drug-cartel-illegal-border-crossers-and-“sanctuary-cities”/

What is the true intent of the UN Small Arms Treaty?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/12/what-is-the-true-intent-of-the-un-small-arms-treaty/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Here's the link to a poll initiated by Debbie "Take Your Meds" Washingmachine Schultz regarding Allen Wests' comments recently;

http://patriotsunion.ning.com/forum/topic/show?id=6376701%3ATopic%3A38602&xgs=1&xg_source=msg_share_topic

Read it, and then vote on it!  It's driving her nuts because she's losing in her own poll!!!

Couldn't happen to a nicer person!