All Posts (28268)

Sort by
By John W. Lillpop

Earlier this spring, President Obama ordered the firing of more than 160 cruise missiles into Libya. He justified his action on humanitarian grounds and declared that the conflict would be over in “days, not weeks.”

It was Obama doing his part to make the “Arab Spring” a resounding success. The fact that there was no vital American national interest involved seems to have been lost on our in-over-his-head college professor and community organizer.

More than 90 days later, Libya is still on fire and the Pentagon is reporting that the original cost estimates were vastly understated: Actual costs will approach $1 billion dollars.

Congress has insisted that Obama comply with the War Powers Resolution, which requires Congressional approval within 90 days of the initial military action.

Obama has refused to comply and has insulted the intelligence of the U.S. Congress and the American people by claiming that the U.S. was not involved in “hostilities.”

Let's be clear: One can fire 165 Tomahawk missiles and spend one billion dollars of taxpayer money on the war in Libya without violating the War Powers Act because there were/are no “hostilities” involved?

Mr. President, that has to be one of the most outrageous arguments that your administration has advanced to date.

Even if the “war” is refined as Kinetic Military Action, hostilities have taken place, many based on your orders as Commander-in-Chief.

War without hostilities: Yet another outrageous fairy tale promulgated by progressives in denial!

Read more…

By John W. Lillpop


The Republican Party is the last and only real hope that America has to reign in suicidal spending and insane debt accumulation by reckless liberals.

Raising the debt ceiling is an issue that provides the GOP with vital leverage in forcing Democrats to see sense.

However, GOP resolve on this issue appears to have developed somewhat of a crack as indicated at the story from the reference which states in part:


“WASHINGTON- Congress and the White House could raise the debt limit for a few months while they seek a comprehensive, long-term budget deal, Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell said on Sunday.

The Obama administration has warned it will run out of money to pay the nation's bills if Congress does not raise the $14.3 trillion debt limit by August 2 -- a prospect that could push the country back into recession and upend global financial markets.

"The president and the vice president, everybody knows you have to tackle entitlement reform," McConnell said on CBS's "Face the Nation."

"If we can't do that, then we'll probably end up with a very short-term proposal over, you know, a few months. And we'll be back having the same discussion again in the fall," McConnell said.”

With all due respect to Senator McConnell, given the history of this president and the Democrats, what in the world would cause anyone to believe that Democrats will any more open to reason a few months hence?

By agreeing to a “short-term” fix, Republicans will kick the can down the road, only to be bitten in the tush when autumn leaves start to fall and liberals remain blinded to truth.

 
Listen up, GOP! You have the leverage now—backing away (even slightly) will only embolden those who created the mess in the first place.

Bottom line: Deal with the debt ceiling now by demanding a dollar-for-dollar tradeoff with spending cuts.

Remember, your probation period expires in November 2012, which is only 17 months away. You can, and will, be booted out unless you cut government!

Beware!



http://ca.news.yahoo.com/short-debt-limit-hike-possible-mcconnell-195539802.html

Read more…

4063332297?profile=originalPatriots, I am heart broken and extremely angry. TEA for Education, a non-profit, invited me to a viewing of the documentary, “Waiting For Superman”. Wow, talk about powerful. I realize many of you are familiar with this movie, but many are not.

 

The movie exposes how America's public education system is about keeping the teachers unions fat and happy at the expense of our kids. The devastating affect on the lives of “real people”, students and their parents is infuriating.

 

Despite what libs would have you believe, we spend a ton of money, per child, on education. And yet, public school test scores continue to plummet. Your money is not going to teachers, it is going to bureaucrats and union dues. The democrat party receives 90% of teachers unions political contributions.

 

In the movie, committed good teachers and administrators attempted to implement common sense changes to better educate students. They were politically beaten down and kicked to the curb by the teachers unions. How dare these teachers and administrators buck the system!

 

The movie exposes, “The Lemon Dance” a term used by education insiders. Every public school has bad (lemon) teachers. The teachers unions make it almost impossible to fire them. A frustrated principal, once a year, can send his lemon to another school. Hopefully, the new lemon another frustrated principal dumps on him will be a little better than what he had. Thus, The Lemon Dance.

 

Folks, as I said, the movie made me angry, but not with an anger which causes me to behave badly. I have a healthy righteous anger which inspires me to do something to encourage positive change. I could not wait to tell you about this extremely important and moving film.

 

For decades, liberals have been selling the myth that urban minority kids surrounded by drugs, poverty, gangs and crime simply can not learn. The typical liberal so-called compassionate solution was to lobby to lower standards and not expect much out of them.

 

Any conservative who suggests giving minorities the respect and dignity of holding them to the same academic standards as whites is branded an insensitive racist.

 

“Waiting For Superman” knocks the liberal myth into the stratosphere that urban low income minority students are doomed to failure. The film documents that given the proper expectation, attention, discipline and good TEACHERS, low income inner city minority students test higher than ALL students; including white kids in wealthy neighborhoods.

 

Another thing I find truly annoying is we black conservatives are called Uncle Tom “traitors to our race”. But, black conservatives are the ones working with the tea party to end the liberal teachers unions tyrannical grip which has wreaked havoc on the lives and education of all American students, particularly minorities.

 

The national black student high school dropout rate is around 70%. In many New York City minority communities only 17% of blacks graduate public high school. This is horrifically scandalous. http://bit.ly/k8uwfX

 

 

Meanwhile, the liberal media, NAACP, Jessie Jackson and company are united in their mission to protect teachers unions. Why? The teachers unions are great financial contributors to the democrats and are in complete solidarity with the left's socialist/progressive agenda.

 

Sometimes God gives us great gifts in ugly packages. I was devastated when Obama won the presidency. I knew he was wrong for America.

 

Today, I thank God for our most far left radical president in American history. Patriots have been passively submitting to political correctness and tolerating failed liberal policies for years.

 

Upon entering the Oval Office, Obama immediately began fulfilling his vow to “fundamentally transform America”.This was the liberal straw that broke the camel's back. Rather than throwing their televisions out of the window yelling, “I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore”, Americans began having tea parties. Thus, Obama birthed the Tea Party.

 

TEA For Education is a perfect example of which I speak. Unopposed for far too many years, the left has been indoctrinating our kids focusing on “Heather Has Two Mommies” and “going green” while almost ignoring the teaching of reading, math and science.

 

Also seen in the movie, I was shocked to learn how far down the list U.S. students are testing in reading, math and science compared to the rest of the world. Truly disheartening.

And yet, our kids are well educated about how America and white males in particular, are the greatest source of evil in the world. This is unacceptable and infuriating.

 

So, I thank God and Obama for TEA For Education. They have chapters in 11 states and are spreading. TEA For Education is doing the Lords work, fighting on behalf of our children.

 

I would like to give a special “shout out” to TEA For Education Florida rep, Rhonda Lochiatto and national rep, Beverly Elliott for inviting me to the viewing. Patriots across America truly appreciate your efforts. God bless you both for your compassion and commitment to our kids.

 

Patriots, please see this movie. It will make you cry. It will make you angry. Good!

 

Anger is not always a bad thing. As a matter of fact, certain things should make you angry; such as the injustice of extremely bright black and Hispanic students being trapped in failing schools because of selfish teachers unions.

 

The Bible says, “Be angry, but sin not.”

 

Patriots, I pray that “Waiting For Superman” will inspire a righteous anger, not to behave badly, but passionately seek to correct the left's horrific assault on our children.

 

Lloyd Marcus, Proud Unhyphenated American

 

Vice Chair, www.CampaignToDefeatObama.com

 

 

 

 

Read more…

A Coil of Rage

 
  The character of any man is defined by how he treats his mother as the years pass ....
need I say more about this person below other than there is no character, no integrity
but there is a ton of attitude and arrogance that defines his shallow past and hollow future ..... I rest my case.
 
I bought and read Audacity of Hope. It was difficult to read considering his attitude toward
us and everything American. Let me add a phrase he uses to describe his attitude toward whites.
He harbors a "COIL OF RAGE". His words not mine.
 
THIS IS OUR PRESIDENT Is anyone out there awake?
 
Everyone of voting age should read these two books: Don't buy them, just get them from the library.
 
 
From Dreams From My Father:
 
"I ceased to advertise my mother's race at the age of 12 or 13, when I began to suspect that by
doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites."
 
From Dreams From My Father : "I found a solace in nursing a pervasive sense of grievance and
animosity against my mother's race."
 
From Dreams From My Father:
 
"There was something about her that made me wary, a little too sure of herself, maybe and white."
 
From Dreams From My Father:
 
"It remained necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty to the black masses,
to strike out and name names."
 
From Dreams From My Father:
 
"I never emulate white men and brown men whose fates didn't speak to my own. It was into my
father's image, the black man, son of Africa, that I'd packed all the attributes I sought in myself:
the attributes of Martin and Malcolm, DuBois and Mandela."
 
And FINALLY ............ and most scary:
 
From Audacity of Hope:
 
"I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction."
 
If you have never forwarded an e-mail, now is the time to do so!!! We have someone
with this mentality running our GREAT nation! Keep your eye on him and don't blink.
 
I don't care whether you are a Democrat, a Republican, a Conservative or a liberal,
be aware of the attitude and character of this sitting President.
Read more…

Did you notice newts folks bailed on him to run over to Perrys camp, and now Bilderberg is backing perry. Why you ask, simple Perry is a globalist stooge, and violated the Logan act. I e-mailed the Texas atty. Gen. to ask for the AG to arrest Perry. Well what a surprise, they didn't know he went to the 2007 bilderberg meeting. Folks are getting dumb as a char-broiled frogleg.  Anywat they said , " this is a case for the feds" talk about passing the buck. So far the tea party folks in Wash. D.C. who voted for the Patriot act aren't as Tea Party as they claim eh, check this out...

    120 Tea Party members of Congress voted FOR the Patriot Act. Only 18 Tea Party members voted against it. Pretty lousy record don't ya think...see full article here  

http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2011/05/28/tea-party-roll-call-may-2011-patriot-act/  why you ask, cuz ya'll got co-opted again brought back into the fold by mainstrem neo-cons, Fox no news, Hannity, Huckabee,the rest of the game show hosts, karl rove and the like say it ain't so. The elites are playing everybody like a drum. Back to perry, he is there to knock off Ron Paul, we can't have a real conservative, when the elites can install a puppet, wake up folks. All you texans should write the AG and ask for perry to be arrested for violating the logan act...Remember back when Ron Paul first started the Tea Party ya'll booooood Perry off-stage now he's Gov?  What happened? 

Bilderberg-Approved Perry Set to Become Presidential Frontrunner

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars
Monday, June 20, 2011

Every indication suggests that Bilderberg-approved  Texas Governor Rick Perry is set to become the frontrunner in the Republican  race to challenge Barack Obama for the presidency, illustrating once again how a  shady, secretive and undemocratic global elite holds the reigns of true power  while Americans are distracted by the delusional notion that they have a genuine  choice in 2012.

“Perry has said he will announce his decision  soon. One member of his campaign team said he was closer than ever to joining  the race and he was testing the prospects in the early caucus and primary states  of Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina. If he does stand, Republicans  at the New Orleans conference predicted he would become the frontrunner of a  so-far uninspiring field,” reports  the London Guardian.

Texas Governor Perry, a protégé of Karl Rove, is  very good at acting like a down-home populist, but that’s all it is – an act.  Perry is George W. Bush 2.0.

While spewing Tea Party-style rhetoric about  secession, shooting coyotes and courting the favor of Christian evangelicals,  behind closed doors Perry has been quietly selling out Texas to globalist  interests, auctioning off  highways to foreign companies to turn them into profit-driven toll  roads.

“Speculation that Perry is the Bilderberg group’s  ace card was prompted by the current political climate, which can largely be  gleaned from the fact that Perry is a longtime, unwavering supporter of the  NAFTA Superhighway and related infrastructure projects,” wrote  AFP’s Jim Tucker earlier this month. “These pave the way for the  Bilderberg-supported North American Union (NAU) proposal that would merge the  U.S., Canada and Mexico.”

Perry has also given enthusiastic support to  former Mexican  President Vicente Fox’s efforts to turn Texas into a sanctuary state for  illegal immigrants. He also aggressively promoted the Rockefeller  Foundation-backed HPV vaccination campaign in Texas that has led  to deaths worldwide. David Rockefeller is a prominent Bilderberger,  attending each annual meeting without fail.

Perry  attended the June 2007 Bilderberg conference in Istanbul, Turkey, and in  doing so violated the Logan  Act, a United States federal law that forbids unauthorized citizens from  negotiating with foreign governments.

Look beyond the rhetoric and study what Perry has  actually done in his role as Governor – he’s the ultimate globalist – his every  action illustrates how he’s the diametric opposite to the image of the Tea Party  populist that he attempts to portray. That’s why he’s the perfect pick for the  globalists, someone who can suck in the trust of the American people only to  stab them in the back upon becoming president, just as Obama did before him.

Bilderberg has proven its kingmaker role time and  time again not just in US politics but worldwide. Bill Clinton was a  little-known Governor of Arkansas before he attended a Bilderberg meeting in  1991 and went on to become President a year later. Similarly, British Prime  Minister Tony Blair attended Bilderberg before his election in 1997. According  to Euro Weekly News, Maria Dolores De Cospedal’s attendance at Bilderberg  2011 in St. Moritz Switzerland also “augurs a victory in Spain’s next general  election” for her Partido Popular party.

Obama himself was reportedly vetted by Bilderberg  when he infamously  disappeared to a secret location with Hillary Clinton in June 2008 in Northern  Virginia, at precisely the same time and location the Bilderberg Group were  convening in Chantilly. Bilderberg luminary James  A. Johnson was also responsible for selecting Obama’s running mate Joe  Biden, having also previously selected John Edwards as John Kerry’s right  hand man in 2004 after Edwards  had impressed Bilderberg elitists Henry Kissinger and David Rockefeller with  a speech he gave at the globalist confab in Italy that year.

In a comparatively weak GOP field, the  establishment cannot take any chances in allowing Ron Paul to gain momentum as  the only candidate who has a real chance of defeating Barack Obama.

As polls have shown, out of the Republican  candidates, only Ron Paul has a realistic hope of success in a hypothetical run  off against Obama – the other candidates are equally unpopular as the  President.

Despite the fact that Mitt Romney has been  anointed by the establishment as the Republican favorite, a  May CNN poll found that he would lose by 11 points if he got the nomination  and went head to head with Obama, whereas Paul only trails the President by 7  points.

Bilderberg’s continual influence in picking US  presidents and potential vice-presidents again serves up a reminder that the  real power structure steering the planet goes beyond teleprompter-reading puppet  presidents and rests in the hands of multi-generational globalists, central  banking moguls and the CEO’s of the world’s biggest corporations, all of whom routinely  attend the Bilderberg Group confab every year.

 

 

 

 

 

Read more…

This is from Personal Liberty;

 

Moe, Larry And Curly Bernanke

June 20, 2011 by Bob Livingston

Moe, Larry And Curly Bernanke
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said he wanted inflation. He got his wish. Now the question is: Is it getting out of hand?

In the 1940 short film “A Plumbing We Will Go,” The Three Stooges pose as plumbers trying to stop a leaky pipe in a large home while a party is going on.

Since they know nothing about plumbing, it isn’t long before the boys have connected the water pipes to a conduit and water is pouring out everywhere. Of course, the party is ruined and the house is wrecked.

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke is Moe, Larry and Curly all rolled into one, and his efforts to stop the leaky economy have been as successful as the boys’ efforts were in fixing the dripping pipe. Bernanke’s latest effort of quantitative easing — known as QE2 — is running out, and the bubble he created is deflating faster than one of the Stooges’ helium-filled cakes.

Last week, a Chinese ratings house accused the United States of defaulting on its massive debt by allowing the dollar to weaken against other currencies — eroding the wealth of its creditors, the biggest of which is China.

China holds $1.145 trillion of U.S. Treasury securities. That is down from its peak of $1.175 trillion in October, according to a story by the AFP news service.

China, the No. 1 holder of U.S. debt, is now a seller of U.S. Treasuries. Japan, the second largest holder of U.S. Treasuries, may soon be a seller as well. It needs money to repair infrastructure following this year’s earthquake and tsunami.

The stock market was down six weeks in a row before last week, when it finally finished a week on an up note. According to The Economic Collapse blog, that hasn’t happened since the dotcom bubble burst in May 2001.

The false euphoria created by QE2, which propped up Bernanke’s Wall Street buddies by driving money into the market, has worn off. Investors realize this, and they are looking for new places to put their money.

Meanwhile, once again, John and Jane American are watching their meager retirement funds dry up. Unemployment is up (the true unemployment rate, which includes discouraged workers, is 22.3 percent, according to the National Inflation Association), manufacturing and consumer confidence are down and one in seven Americans is on food stamps. Millions of Americans receive some sort of government assistance.

The price of everything is increasing. According to NIA: “90% of sporting goods manufacturers have seen their input costs rise substantially this year and 41% of them have already announced major price increases for athletic apparel, footwear, and sports equipment. As the 8,000 toy manufacturers in China are forced to raise the wages they pay their employees, Toys R’ Us is now beginning to see major wholesale price increases for their products, which they will have to pass on to U.S. consumers. Hasbro recently raised prices on all of their products by 6% to 7%. Mattel recently imposed an across the board high single digit price increase after reporting a 33% decline in quarterly profits (despite sales surging by 8%) due to skyrocketing raw material costs.”

May sales reflected what consumers thought of the rising prices. Retail sales fell for the first time in 11 months. The drop in sales hit autos, electronics, appliances, furniture, groceries, sports retailers and department stores.

Bernanke said he wanted inflation. He got his wish. Now the question is: Is it getting out of hand?

 

Go here to read the rest of the article;

http://www.personalliberty.com/conservative-politics/government/moe...

Read more…


 

  
              "Facing the most crucial election in modern times, this is no time for disunity . . . but disunity seems to be in the cards."
 
 
Would Romney Nomination
Split Conservative Vote,
Hand Re-election to Obama?
 
 
 
 
            Former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, the current front-runner in the race for the 2012 Republican Party presidential nomination, is doing three things very right:  he’s leading the pack while avoiding big gaffes and controversies. Governor Romney, however, came into June with four critical strikes against him and in some conservative eyes he got a 5th strike by refusing to sign a key pro-life pledge recently. It’s beginning to be more and more apparent that Governor Romney is perceived as being very much like John McCain. McCain could at best be called a “Republican Moderate,” although because many of his votes aligned with big-expansionistic government some in his party’s most right-most camps considered McCain a RINO (Republican In Name Only) or even a progressive member of the G.O.P.  Among the candidates and potential candidates out there, Governor Romney clearly appears to be the least conservative of all with the possible exception of ex-Ambassador John Huntsman (whose candidacy at present seems absolutely phantasmagoric).
            Let’s look more closely at Governor Mitt Romney’s presumptive five-strike situation:
1.      Obamacare, President Obama would have us believe, was based upon Romneycare in Massachusetts. Tim Pawlenty, before copping his plea in the most recent debate, even spoke of “Obamneycare.” In truth, while Romneycare went way too far, it resembles much more the sort of healthcare law mainstream Republicans like Newt Gingrich were advocating in the mid-90’s. Certainly at 74 pages rather than 2,773 any valid comparison-contrast is liable to support Governor Romney’s contentions. 
It was a state rather than a federal law but required the individual mandate provision to pay for it. Most importantly, the Massachusetts law stuck to the subject at hand while Obamacare is a total takeover of the healthcare system in a piecemeal fashion. Among other sins of Obamacare, that one monstrous law created 384 brand new federal government agencies (FDR’s twelve-plus years in office saw 40 new government agencies so Obamacare created 9.6 times as much new bureaucracy. Governor Romney’s law was adulterated by the overwhelmingly Democratic House and Senate in Massachusetts and seemingly came out quite different than he planned. Verdict: Romneycare is no real hindrance to Mitt Romney although the Big Lies told about it by Obama and the extreme right of the G.O.P. are somewhat embarrassing. 
Governor Romney needs to say, “The Massachusetts healthcare insurance law that I signed was adulterated by the Democrats in the legislators there, so what finally passed was NOT at all what I set out to pass and I should have been circumspect and vetoed it, regardless of the veto over-ride votes against me. If it happened today, I would veto it. However, comparing it to Obamacare is ridiculous and I will defend it as a mediocre and weak law, but not a horrific and evil law like Obamacare. We actually learned an awful lot from that law. You will recall that 2-3 years before we passed that law in Massachusetts, good strong conservative Republicans like Newt Gingrich and others were considering such a law for the federal government. The law I envisioned would have been 55 to 60 pages long compared to the almost 2,800 pages of Obamacare. I will effectively veto Obamacare my first day in office as president by giving every state and company in the country a waiver from Obamacare; then I’ll seek the votes in congress to veto it once and for all.”
2.     Governor Romney’s alignment with Global Warming alarmists recently applauded by Al (divide-and-conquer) Gore, however, is a serious, serious knock on the candidate’s judgment and an indication that he definitely leans well left of center at times. When tied in with his perceived violation of principle in supporting Romneycare, Governor Romney begins to look a bit like those great “conservative” Maine senators Olympia Snow and Susan Collins and like them appears now to deserve the hideous label “progressive Republican.”    Governor Romney apparently has not delved into the matter at all; never has mentioned the Climate Gate Scandal or the deliberate omission of 400 years of the Medieval Warm Period (also known as the Medieval Optimum which occurred before the Little Ice Age and was why Leif Erikson was able to settle in Greenland because Greenland was Green and almost glacier free then) which would have greatly challenged the whole Global Warming idea. Since in Europe, Global Warming theories now hold as much water as the Cardiff Giant (a famous anthropological hoax that was believed for about 45 years); they call environmentalists “mean greenies” and “watermelons” (green on the outside – pink or red commie-colored on the inside) because it now seems that the whole purpose of the Global Warming theatrics was to provide an excuse for virtually totalitarian government takeover of virtually everything. 
Governor Romney needs to read and understand the information at the following three websites. He then needs to absolutely and unequivocally state that Climate Gate showed that Global Warming was fraudulent science misused by fraudulent politicians to advance anti-business and anti-freedom agendas; and until the science is excellent science he will risk no American jobs or American money on any Global Warming schemes.
 
3)   Past Flip-Flop Behavior by Governor Romney shows him off potentially as a man of no backbone. He needs to take off 3-6 weeks; examine the positions of Ronald Reagan (and if possible adopt them 100%); of the TEA Party Contract from America; and the Republican Party’s Pledge to America . . . and then create a coherent policy and tell the American people what it is . . . then to follow it to the letter as promised. If this activity is not done soon Governor Romney will lose ALL credibility.
4) Associated with #1, #2, and #3 is the RINO charge held in many corners against Governor Romney. Republicans In Name Only like Scott Brown, Olympia Snow and Susan Collins are an embarrassment to the G.O.P. and since they vote with the Democratic Party 85-90% of the time . . . should NOT be allowed Republican funds for re-election campaigns or to use the G.O.P name. Only by handling this matter and #3 in the circumspect manner mentioned above, can Governor Romney hope to redeem himself. At question in the most significant election in our lifetime is nothing less than the survival of the American experiment in freedom.
5) Governor Romney is a devout Mormon or Latter Day Saint. On the one hand if a Muslim like Obama (under false Christian pretense who openly listened without apparent objection to Jeremiah Wright’s “God Damn America!”) can get voted into the Oval Office, then a Mormon ought to be more than all right. Whoever heard of a Mormon terrorist? Nevertheless, Governor Romney needs to address the matter proactively and swear greater allegiance to this country’s well-being than to any religious dictates a la John F. Kennedy. Governor Romney will definitely become a lightning rod for the left-sympathizing press and he’s sure to hear questions about Kolob; pre-existence; the mother goddess; becoming divine; multiplicity of gods; etc., etc. in a nasty attempt to discredit the man and the faith. 
At present probably the most devout and God-fearing and generous Christian people of faith on earth are the Latter-Day-Saints . . . but the leftwing American press has shown it has no honor in carrying on its biased campaigns on behalf of progressivism** and the Democratic Party, so expect their usual nonsense heightened by Obama-desperation and dirty tricks. Even a Romney vice-presidential candidacy could become a serious distraction under these conditions.  Has the liberal press given Governor Romney such a pass so far because they believe he’ll be the easiest to destroy later on?
             Rightly or wrongly as far as the crucial question of unifying his party and attracting Independents, unless he begins to act very circumspectly (as suggested above) and very, very quickly, Governor Romney would probably be the least unifying G.O.P. candidate since Gerald Ford in 1976.   He and Governor Sarah Palin may indeed be the dream ticket in the eyes of the Liberal Press. The extreme right of the G.O.P. will oppose him for all five reasons mentioned above . . . Independents will not respect a nominee who cannot control his own party. The Republican Party may well be standing at a “moment of utmost transition” as the Whig Party did in 1852 before total dissolution that year; the abyss in 1854; and non-existence in 1856, the cracks were clearly all there but all good Whigs were in full denial anyway.  Facing the most crucial election in modern times, this is no time for disunity . . . but disunity seems to be in the cards.
 
Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,
Rajjpuut
 
 
** http://fabiansocialism.info/
Progressivism is the doctrine that we must “progress” beyond the ‘outdated and ill-conceived American Constitution’ if we are to make ‘progress’ toward an earthly Utopia. Tied in with the Fabian Socialists in England, they were called progressives in America for about a quarter of a century. Once the evils of the movement became plain under Woodrow Wilson, the term “liberal” was favored for the next 85 years or so. Now the term liberal is associated with liberally taxing and spending America’s resources and “progressive” is the name de jour.
 
 

Read more…

This is a recent article from The Energy Tribune. The numbers are based on a new report from the Congressional Research Service (CRS). There are graphs and charts available at the link that did not transfer over which show the numbers more dramatically. By the way, the shale oil deposits that are not included in the numbers in this article are estimated to be over 800 Billion barrels, that is per the U.S. Department of Natural Resources.

 

U.S. Has Earth’s Largest Energy Resources


Posted on Mar. 24, 2011

In case anyone missed it, let me repeat something that is of a magnitude of 10 on the scale of news-quakes for Joe Public USA: America’s combined energy resources are, according to a new report from the Congressional Research Service (CSR), the largest on earth. They eclipse Saudi Arabia (3rd), China (4th) and Canada (6th) combined – and that’s without including America’s shale oil deposits and, in the future, the potentially astronomic impact of methane hydrates.

The energy facts in the CRS report should be making front page news all over America. Mostly it isn’t. Given the devastating news from Japan and New Zealand, it may be right to postpone dancing in the streets. But something else is going on. Even though they are going to dominate global energy supply for decades to come the insidious war on vital fossil fuels continues apace.

Thus it perhaps falls to a friend of the US (i.e. me) to state that if the White House is in any way serious about impacting the economic Black H*** that is the burgeoning national debt, reinvigorating business big-time, creating real jobs and restoring ebbing national wealth, the best shot by a distance if you’re American ... well, you’re standing on it, or rather above it.

While love, spiritually speaking and in fiction, may make the world go around, it is energy – and mostly hydrocarbon energy – that actually drives it. As blockbuster thrillers sometimes put it, “Who will tell the President?”

Political pantomime

From over here, the lack of a comprehensive US energy policy and the incoherence of President Obama’s political take on energy, reminds me of a pantomime I saw last Christmas, Aladdin. The cave is full of energy riches, but ‘Emperor’ Obama – or is it Wishy-Washy? –refuses to allow the words “open sesame” to be spoken.

Senator Lisa Murkowski, Ranking Member of the Senate Energy and National Resources Committee, takes up the theme: “As we debate ways to reduce gas prices and provide relief to American families and businesses, this report should be required reading for every member of Congress.” How about for every American citizen too, Senator? Murkowski adds, “For the sake of our national security, our economy, and the world’s environment, we need to explore and develop more of our own resources.”

“The Obama administration has made a conscious policy choice to raise energy prices, accomplished in good measure by restricting access to domestic energy supplies.” So says Senator James Inhofe, a Ranking Member of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee. He adds forthrightly, “We could help bring affordable energy to consumers, create new jobs, and grow the economy if the Obama administration would simply get out of the way so America can realize its true energy potential.”

Wow, heavy stuff. But then there’s much to be ‘heavy’ about.

While the US is often depicted as having only a tiny minority of the world’s oil reserves at around 28 billion barrels (based on the somewhat misleading figure of ‘proven reserves’) according to the CRS in reality it has around 163 billion barrels. As Inhofe’s EPW press release comments, “That’s enough oil to maintain America’s current rates of production and replace imports from the Persian Gulf for more than 50 years”. Next up, there’s coal. The CRS report reveals America’s reserves of coal are unsurpassed, accounting for over 28 percent of the world’s coal. Much of it is high quality too. The CRS estimates US recoverable coal reserves at around 262 billion tons (not including further massive, difficult to access, Alaskan reserves). Given the US consumes around 1.2 billion tons a year, that’s a couple of centuries of coal use, at least.

In 2009 the CRS upped its 2006 estimate of America’s enormous natural gas deposits by 25 percent to around 2,047 trillion cubic feet, a conservative figure given the expanding shale gas revolution. At current rates of use that’s enough for around 100 years. Then there is still the, as yet largely publicly untold, story of methane hydrates to consider, a resource which the CRS reports alludes to as “immense...possibly exceeding the combined energy content of all other known fossil fuels.” According to the Inhofe’s EPW, “For perspective, if just 3 percent of this resource can be commercialized ... at current rates of consumption, that level of supply would be enough to provide America’s natural gas for more than 400 years.”

See what I mean about an Aladdin’s Cave of untapped energy? Could America.........

 

To read the rest of the article and view the graphs and charts, go here;

http://www.energytribune.com/articles.cfm/6933/US-Has-Earths-Larges...

Read more…

Sarah Palin is Pro-God and Pro-Life. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9IR3HdyeXRo

The morally challenged continuously say that she does not get it but this film shows that she not only does get it but that those who accuse her of not getting it are themselves bewildered about the purpose of life and their reason for living.  They don't get the meaning of life at all.  Is it no wonder that the decisions coming out of Congress and the White House do not resolve the problems of our country.  Any one who is willing to deny God and/or is willing to abort an innocent baby simply cannot be trusted to make decisions that will have good results for this Republic and its citizens.  How in the world can one vote for those who do not understand that abortion is murder...if someone believes that harming an innocent, helpless, unborn baby is ok then extend that reasoning to the decision making process of these people after they get into office and commence making decisions that affect our lives.  Is it no wonder this country is in a mess.  Decisions that are made without the concern for their moral implications can only and ultimately cause tremendous collateral damage.  Take for example a Board of Directors whose members are morally challenged when they decide to move a factory to China when they understand full well the implications of that decision will result in devastation of a multitude of families that had ties to that factory.  This destruction of families does not seem to be of any concern to these morally challenged people.  Those who make decision based on Judaeo-Christian morality will not move those factories to China.  They will find ways of resolving their competitive issues and remain here in the U.S.  Sure it may mean that the Executives will not make more millions or that management and labor may have to make a little less money until they resolve their competitive issues but the decision was a morally based one which did not profoundly hurt a multitude of families.  The same reasoning may be applied to those we elect to Congress and the WHAT House.  Those who are morally challenged will not make decisions that ultimately and finally benefit the American public.  By electing morally challenged people we are committing social and financial suicide.  When will the people begin  to understand that someone who does not care about morality will not care what mal-effect their decisions will have upon you the constituent.  We Americans need to wake up and smell the roses of moral reality and face up to the un-reality of the morally challenged!

Read more…

California! California! California!

Wake up you Idiots!Recently a Texas delegation came to California with a mission to lure private businesses away from California and to make there new home in the business friendly state of Texas. O! And they where successful. So successful that they are planning to up their efforts in an ongoing campaign to capitalize on California's failed economy, corrupt unions, corrupt local and state legislature and very unfriendly business environment. The poor relationship between the state and private enterprise has been going on for years and it took this "depression" to put it in full awareness.O! Wake up. Nobody in California reported on it. I would have thought the great and almighty Governor you elected would be on top of this. O! You must of forgot he did not do anything the last time he was in office. Quite trying to make it in Hollywood and wake up!!!!!!
Read more…


                                   

                                                             All You'll Ever Need to Know 

                                       About Big Government Interference:







     Pythagorean theorem:......................24 words.

 

     Lord's prayer:..................................66 words.

 

     Archimedes' Principle:.....................67 words.
 

     Ten Commandments:........................179 words.

 

     Gettysburg Address:.......................286 words.
 

     Declaration of Independence:..........1,300 words.

 

     US Constitution with all 27 Amendments:........7,818 words.

 

     US Government regulations on sale of cabbage:….......26,911 words.
 
     Obamacare . . . . . . . . . 2,773 PAGES
 
 
Read more…


  

 
           Obamacare . . . created 384 brand new government agencies – roughly 9.6 times as many as big spending Franklin Delano Roosevelt created during twelve years-plus in the Oval Office.”
 
 
Warns of Impending European Crisis
 
The George Soros-inspired International Monetary Fund (IMF) cut its forecast for U.S. economic growth Friday while warning Washington and debt-ridden European countries they are “playing with fire” unless they immediately begin to reduce their budget deficits. World economic recovery, the IMF says, is severely threatened if Europe’s regional debt woes would spill over into global financial markets.
It trimmed its forecast for 2011 worldwide growth, from 4.4 per cent to a still optimistic 4.3 per cent, due to weakness in the US and fallout from Japan’s “tsunami disaster” at present the U.S. is growing at a rate close to 2.1%. Since Japan is America’s chief auto and electronics competitor, Rajjpuut would guess that except for the ongoing Obama “near-depression,” Japan’s troubles should objectively be an opportunity for undisputed and powerful American growth which should have been sufficient to counter Japan’s huge problems following the three-headed earthquake-tsunami-nuclear disaster . . . but led by the input of multi-billionaire currency-manipulator George Soros, the IMF updated its World Economic Outlook , noting deepening market fears of a slowdown in the United States, the world’s largest economy where a persistent struggle with high unemployment seems to rival a twenty-year collapse in Japan’s economy even before the three-pronged spear was driven into the country’s gut. Soros could be right, led by Barack Obama, America seems intent on killing business and all hope of economic recovery on its shores.
Meanwhile the “Fund” remained very upbeat about the Australian and Southeast Asian area’s potential for growth but emphasized that setbacks in Europe could have serious consequences for the entire world. In Asia, the IMF was very upbeat and held its 2011 growth forecasts for China and India (the worlds #1 and #2 major “developing economies”) at 9.6% and 8.2% respectively.
After Greece warned it might default unless bailed out again, IMF chief economist Olivier Blanchard was pessimistic about the long-term outlook for “peripheral” European countries. Greece’s credit rating was recently downgraded by Standard and Poors to make its debt the worst in the world even below Ecuador.   “They have very high debt, very large deficits and very low growth, and so there’s absolutely no question it’s going to take a very long time for them to return to health,” according to Mr. Blanchard.   Blanchard also dismissed all thought of a “double-dip” U.S. recession. Back on our own shores, however, it appears that despite the golf game with House Speaker John Boehner, Barack Obama is NOT opposed to a significant American meltdown that would fulfill “his handler and chief campaign financier” Soros’s desired collapse of the American dollar presumably doubling his net worth.
            Mr. Obama has shown no indication he wants to reduce America’s national debt; trim its ongoing budget and budget deficits; deal intelligently with our own three-pronged entitlement fiasco (Medicare, Social Security and the federal side of Medicaid); nor has any inclination to repeal his great spending and government-interference boondoggle: Obamacare. Obamacare, while just one 2,770 page law, created 384 brand new government agencies – roughly 9.6 times as many as big spending Franklin Delano Roosevelt created in his twelve years-plus in the Oval Office.
 
Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,
Rajjpuut
 
 
 
Read more…

Beyond bluster to action

Part of the frustration of both sides of the issues of importance to the continuation of this Nation is the lack of any action.  We hear. all the time, that the other side is foolish and they have no clue, that their ideas will bring the end to this Nation, as we know it.  Words, we hear them all the time.  America needs no more words.  Every person, who even remotely cares about anything and the majority who could care less have heard all about it.  The sheer volume of words and finger pointing and accusations lead to complete inaction as this Nation falls apart.  There are consequences to every action, or inaction.  We must put aside all the differences, (in the grander scheme of things, they sure seem petty).  Enough talk, time for action.  Everyone must start from a common ground.  Regardless of HOW we get there, I am sure all will agree that America borrows much more than it takes in and this cannot continue.  One more point of common ground would be caring about this nation and its continued existence.  Politicians, on both sides, will talk and point fingers and accuse the other of any number of inhuman acts and will continue to do this while America falls completely.  When this nation has become part of say, China, who will they point fingers at?  The Chinese will simply execute them to shut them up.  Enough talk.......actually do something.
Read more…

Barack Obama’s 10 Commandments of War

 

By John W. Lillpop


President Obama’s actions in dealing with the crisis in Libya have revealed much about his progressive approach to war, near-war, and humanitarian intervention.

The Barack Obama 10 Commandments of War:


1. One must never call an intervention “war,” particularly when that is exactly what it is.

2. The contemplated use of American military force is always subject to approval by the United Nations Security Council.

3. Rulings made by the United Nations trump the will of the U.S. Congress.

4. The only thing worse than starting a war is actually winning one.

5. Surrender is the only “exit strategy” a progressive president will ever need.

6. Braggadocio about the U.S. military being the best and “number one” is no longer appropriate in this, the era of post-American Exceptionalism.

7. Because the U.S. military is no longer exceptional, Americans forces must never take the lead when only the best will do.

8. Gloating over military victory is in very poor taste and can lead to hurt feelings among the defeated. Better to apologize and promise to make diplomacy work next time.

9. Congressional pre-approval is always a Constitutional requirement—when the president is Republican.

10. Killing and maiming civilians is justifiable only when a president is engaged in humanitarian intervention to prevent the killing and maiming of citizens,but only after approval by the UN.
Read more…

Beware the Hazards of Clinical Liberalism

 

liberal-idiot.jpg









 
 
Satire by John W. Lillpop

Recognizing when one’s mind has been infested with clinical liberalism is vital information that one must be aware of order to survive in an ever-increasingly dangerous world where liberals are tolerated, even encouraged, in some quarters.

This simple, yet scientific, test has been programmed to evaluate “liberal quotient,” which is the exact opposite of intelligence quotient, and normally portends serious mental and moral defects.

The test:

1. Abortion

A. The privacy provision in the U.S. Constitution was authored by:

( ) Roe V. Wade, one of the original founding fathers
( ) Sandra Day O’Connor
( ) Paid lobbyists for Planned Parenthood and Code Pink

B. Abortions should be:

( ) Mandatory for all unmarried women.
( ) Included in universal health care coverage paid for by the government.
( ) Funded by eliminating the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy.

2. Global War on Terror

The war on terror is:

( ) A term that deeply offends Muslims and should, therefore, be expunged from all government communications.
( ) Lost: The terrorists have won and America should surrender immediately.
( ) Yet another failed policy of George W. Bush, which has been inherited.

3. Taxes

Higher taxes:

( ) Stimulate economic growth and create millions of secure, high paying jobs.
( ) Are needed to keep overachievers modestly modest
( ) Should be paid by any family with an annual income in excess of $7,450

4. Energy and Dependence on Foreign Oil

A. Drilling for new oil reserves in America is:

( ) Prohibited by the U.S. Constitution.
( ) Sure to irritate Muslim leaders whom Obama should be working with, rather than against.
( ) Unnecessary if automobiles are outlawed.

B. Additional refining capacity would:

( ) Increase demand, thereby causing more global warming.
( ) Be the moral equivalent of the Holocaust.
( ) Be OK in blue states if built by brown illegal aliens.

C. The best option for dealing with the high cost of gasoline is to:

( ) Ignore it. Americans drive too much as it is.
( ) Raise gasoline taxes $5.50 per gallon to reduce demand.
( ) Cut off supplies to Red states.


5. Illegal Immigration

A. Illegal immigration is:

( ) Needed by liberals in order to win elections.
( ) A misnomer. They are actually undocumented Democrats!
( ) Mexico’s chief export.

B. Border security should be:

( ) Ignored, because we need cheap lettuce.
( ) Ignored, because we need cheap lettuce and more Democrats.
( ) Put on hold until the Obama Administration fixes Afghanistan.

C. The fence between the United States and Mexico is:

( ) Unconstitutional. It discriminates against Mexicans too fat to scale a fence.
( ) A good idea if it will stop the Minutemen from invading Mexico.

D. Obama’s proposed immigration reform scheme:

( ) Will work if guest workers are required to join a labor union.
( ) Sounds like amnesty, but Mexicans here illegally deserve amnesty!

E. Janet Napolitano, Home Land Security Boss and a Democrat

( ) Thinks ‘’Minutemen’’ is a reference to the sexual staying power of Border Patrol agents.
( ) Believes that the 12-40 million people who have ignored our borders and invaded America are “Newly Arrived Refugees” who deserve respect and a path to citizenship

6. Liberal Understanding of Islam

A. Ramadan:

( ) Is a scared Muslim ritual that has been commercialized into a national hotel chain—Ramada Inn—by greedy American capitalists.
( ) Is not covered by constitutional separation of church and
state, because the founding fathers were all Christian Caucasians.

B. The Koran:

( ) Should be required reading in U.S. schools starting in Kindergarten
( ) Was used in the second swearing-in procedure for Barack Obama to the presidency
( ) Is needed to counter Judeo-Christian propaganda found in the Bible.

C. Mosques:

( ) Are holy sanctuaries, except when used to plot nuclear attacks against Israel.
( ) Are never used to hide weapons, except during time of war. Because of infidels, Islam has always been, and will always be, at war.

D. The practice of rewarding martyrs with 72 virgins:

( ) Makes far more sense that the Christian myth about a virgin giving birth to a Jew come to save the world.
( ) Assures that Allah will always have a large contingent of dedicated, virile young men eager to give their very lives for the righteous cause of Islam.


Congratulations! You have successfully completed this objective assessment of your vulnerability as a practicing liberal.

Because we understand that self-esteem and confidence are very fragile commodities to liberals, we provide neither answers nor grades to this test. This is essential to protect those who may have performed poorly.

But rest assured that you did GREAT-- like everyone else, regardless of sex, nationality, race, language, sexual preference, age, blah, blah, blah!
Read more…

What’s wrong with this picture?

Posted on The Gateway Pundit-By Jim Hoft-On June 15, 2011:

“It’s not just Bill Ayers…

In October 2010 FBI agents raided the homes of far left activists in Chicago and Minneapolis who were linked to the Marxist FARC terrorists and Islamic radicals as part of a terrorism investigation.

The home of radical Hatem Abudayyeh, a friend of Barack Obama, was raided in the terror sweep.

Radical Hatem Abudayyeh protested against Israel in Chicago in January 2009. (Daylife)

Hatem Abudayyeh is the executive director of the Arab American Action Network (AAAN). Hatem Abudayyeh has been with the Arab American Action Network (AAAN) since 1999, and was appointed Executive Director in 2003.

The Arab American Action Network was founded by former PLO operative and close Obama family friend Rashid Khalidi. Obama was a director of the Woods Fund from 1994 through 2001, when the board approved a $40,000 grant to the Arab American Action Network.

In 2003 Barack Obama was an honored guest at a dinner sponsored by the AAAN for former PLO-operative Rashid Khalidi.

During the dinner a video was taken that shows Barack Obama celebrating with members of this Palestinian group who are openly hostile towards Israel. Barack Obama even gave a toast to a Rashid Khalidi at this going away party. The LA Times will not release the video from this Jew-bashing dinner.

Not only was Hatem Abudayyeh’s radical organization given $40,000 by Barack Obama and the Woods Fund but his organization also collected nearly half a million in taxpayer money.

The Obama Administration invited Abudayyeh to the White House last year.

Stanley Kurtz at The Corner reported this week that the FBI is still investigating this radical Obama associate:

“Today’s Washington Post features a story by Peter Wallsten (the reporter who obtained the Obama-Khalidi video tape) noting that, under the direction of U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald, the FBI is investigating prominent peace activists and labor organizers for possible ties to terrorism. According to Wallsten, some of the investigation’s targets include “Chicagoans who crossed paths with Obama when he was a young state senator.” This includes, for example, according to Wallsten, Hatem Abudayyeh, executive director of the Arab American Action Network, founded by Rashid Khalidi. (I tell the story of Obama’s ties to AAAN here.) According to the search warrants, investigators are tracking possible “material support” for “Columbian and Palestinian groups designated by the U.S. government as terrorists.” Wallsten suggests that the probe might be awkward for Obama, given his need for support from some of the leftist and labor groups involved.

This is just an investigation, of course, and all so-called targets should be presumed innocent. Also, the activists themselves are crying foul, with the help of close Obama ally, Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky (D-IL). It’s important to protect the right of political dissent. At the same time, support for terrorism is a legitimate target of investigation.”

Source:

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2011/06/good-grief-radical-obama-pal-who-was-awarded-457000-in-taxpayer-funds-has-visited-white-house-is-being-investigated-for-ties-to-terrorism/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+gatewaypundit2+%28Gateway+Pundit%29

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. The L.A. Times Suppresses Obama’s Khalidi Bash Tape!-Posted on National Review Online-By ANDREW C. McCARTHY-On October 27, 2008:

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/226104/i-l-times-i-suppresses-obamas-khalidi-bash-tape/andrew-c-mccarthy

II. Obama and a White House invite for dictator who has stolen billions from his impoverished African nation!-Posted on The Daily Mail-By DANIEL BATES-On June 9, 2011:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2001593/Barack-Obama-invites-Gabon-dictator-Ali-Bongo-White-House.html

III.  Is Our President A Terrorist?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=-fmtJ5kh-50#at=2334

IV. Canada Turns Away Obama’s Terrorist Pal, Bill Ayers!-Posted on The Blaze-By Mike Opelka, The Blaze-On June 16, 2011:

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/canada-turns-away-obamas-old-pal-1960s-domestic-terrorist-bill-ayers/

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

What we haven’t been told about the President’s background!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/03/what-we-haven’t-been-told-about-the-president’s-background/

Sen. Obama’s Radical Islamic Past and Ties To Terrorist Groups:

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/04/17/sen_obamas_radical_islamic_past_and_ties_to_terrorist_groups.thtml

What Was The Chicago Annenberg Challenge?

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/03/22/what_was_the_chicago_annenberg_challenge.thtml

Why is Obama Handing Out Millions of Dollars to Terrorist?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/06/17/why-is-obama-handing-out-millions-of-dollars-to-terrorists/

Godfather of The Islamic Revolution!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/11/godfather-of-the-islamic-revolution/

Is President Obama in on the Uprising in Egypt?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/01/is-president-obama-in-on-the-uprising-in-egypt/

Is Israel the next Arab Facebook Campaign?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/03/30/is-israel-the-next-arab-facebook-campaign/

Note If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…

Pawlenty Red Flags: Right Online Minnesota

Former Governor of Minnesota, Tim Pawlenty gave a great Tea Party conservative speech at Right Online this afternoon.  I am from Colorado so all I know about Pawlenty I have learned within the last 6 months or so.  I applauded loudly and whooped as he SPOKE all the right words.  He is fiery, he is smart, yada yada.  The problem is that his constituents in Minnesota, the real Conservative constituents, don't trust him.  An unnamed source who had worked on campaigns at different levels in Minnesota described him as a compromiser, a RINO, a politician by nature, one who talks the Tea Party talk but does not walk the Tea Party walk. 

 

I asked the unnamed source about Michelle Bachmann, the US Rep from Minnesota.  This seemingly well versed and credible Minnasotan described Bachmann's rise through the political ranks, first as a business owner, tax litigation attorney, pro-life activist (Phyllis Schafley)and education reform advocate.  Bachmann was asked by many supporters to run for public office, which, initially she did not want to do.  But she ran and beat a RINO in her primary race, and beat an establishment dem to win a seat in the Minnesota State Senatenational race.  She then went on to run for the United States House of Representatives and beat an extreme-left dem. Michelle Bachmann, it is said, is hated by the RINOs and the Dems in Minnesota, which in the mind of most Tea Party members, makes her imminently qualified for high office.  I love a woman who makes enemies of corrupt, dishonest, musty, dusty establishment politicians.  Thank you (name withheld)

Read more about Right Online at

http://reagangirl.com

Read more…

Posted on CNSNews.com-By Penny Starr-On June 16, 2011:

(CNSNews.com)Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D.-Texas) likened “Christian militants” to Islamic radicals in a hearing of the House Homeland Security Committee on Wednesday, suggesting they posed a comparable threat to the rule of law in the United States.

At the same hearing, a witness told the committee that the conversion of U.S. prison inmates to radical Islam is an “evolving threat” to national security.

Michael Downing, the head of counter-terrorism and special operations at the Los Angeles Police Department, was one of three witnesses who testified at the hearing on Muslim radicalization called by Rep. Peter King, a New York Republican.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBAmPxSI8bo&feature=player_embedded

But Democrats on the committee condemned the proceedings as “racist” because of its focus on Muslims. They said the hearing should focus on broader issues, including gangs, unfair sentencing practices that target young black men, and other extremists, including white supremacists.

King rebuffed those criticisms, telling Democrats that they controlled the Homeland Security Committee for four years, yet they did not call one hearing on any of the issues they claimed should be part of Wednesday’s hearing.

“Suddenly this issue emerges when we start talking about Muslim radicalization,” King said. “The purpose of this committee is to combat Islamic terrorism because that is the terrorist threat to this country,” King said.

In his prepared testimony, the LAPD’s Downing said nearly 300 people are spending time in federal prisons on terrorism-related charges, including nearly two dozen al-Qaeda-linked terrorists who were involved in the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center, the 1998 East African embassy bombings, the 1999 millennial plot to bomb the Los Angeles International Airport and the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole.

Another witness testified that many prison inmates who are jailed for lower-level crimes emerge from prison “committed to Jihad” because of their contact with Muslim inmates.

“Every one of them, while incarcerated, was exposed to extremist ideology through literature, visitors, volunteers, and clergy with ties to terrorist organizations or extremists and/or known terrorists who were also doing time in prison,” said Patrick Dunleavy, retired deputy inspector general with the criminal intelligence unit at New York Department of Correctional Services.

Rep. Laura Richardson (D-Calif.) grilled Dunleavy on the definition of the world “radicalize” and said that “various groups,” including white supremacists, also have been radicalized in U.S. prisons.

Richardson criticized the hearing for focusing only on Muslim radicalization: “I actually believe that the focus of one particular group on the basis of race or religion can be deemed as racist and as discriminatory.” 

She said a hearing singling out one group on the basis of race or religion “is flawed and should not be done in the House of Representatives.”

But Rep. King, the committee chair, said he “disagreed 100 percent” with Richardson. He noted that the Homeland Security Committee was formed to investigate terrorist threats following the attack by radical Islamists on Sept. 11, 2001.

Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee expressed “angst” about the hearing and compared radicalized Muslims to what she called “radical Christian militants.”

Jackson Lee cited the case of Verne Jay Merrell, one of three men described by prosecutors as “extremist” and “paramilitary,” who was sentenced to life in prison for setting off bombs near a Spokane, Washington, newspaper office and an abortion clinic.

Jackson Lee described Merrell as a “Christian militant.”

“Mr. Dunleavy, are you familiar with the Christian militant?”

“Yes I am,” Dunleavy answered.

“Can one say that they might possibly want to undermine this country?” Jackson Lee asked. “Because right now, constitutionally, the right for women to choose (abortion) is a constitutional right.

“People disagree with it, but here’s an individual attempting to undermine the protections that are given to women,” Jackson Lee continued. “Would you suggest that that might be compared to trying to undermine this country? That’s a possibility, is it not?”

Dunleavy responded that anyone who kills in the name of God is an ideologue, but that he did not believe Christian militants were connected to foreign groups that pose a threat to U.S. security.

“I don’t think that’s the issue,” Jackson Lee said. “The issue is whether or not their intent is to undermine the laws of this country. And I think it is clear that that is the case,” she said.”

Source:

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/democrats-compare-islamic-radicals-white

Note: What follows is a C-SPAN video of the House Homeland Security Committee that was held on June 15, 2011, which was the second in a series of hearings on Islamic radicalization in the United States. 

The Committee focused on prison radicalization, including discussions on various cases from the States of New York and California involving the radicalization of prisoners. 

Witnesses for the hearing included Patrick Dunleavy, Former Deputy Inspector, Criminal Intelligence Unit, New York Department of Correctional Services; Kevin Smith, former assistant U.S. Attorney, Central District of California; and Michael Downing, Deputy Chief and Commanding Officer, Counterterrorism and Special Operations Bureau, Los Angeles Police Department:

Lawmakers Review Islamic Radicalization in Prisons!-Posted on C-SPAN.org-On June 15, 2011: 

http://www.c-span.org/Events/Lawmakers-Review-Islamic-Radicalization-in-Prisons/10737422285-1/

Note What follows is the CSPAN video of Congressman King’s First Panel Hearing on the “Radicalization in The U.S. Muslim Community, Islamic  Organizations”, which was held on March 10, 2011.

The Los Angeles County sheriff and Islamic community representatives testified at a House Homeland Security hearing on the threat of radicalization among U.S. Muslims. Chairman Peter King defended the controversial hearing and pushed back against critics saying that there was nothing un-American about the hearings despite their focus only on a religious minority:

Radicalization in The U.S. Muslim Community, Islamic Organizations!-Posted on C-SPANVideo.org-On March 10, 2011:

http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/USMusli

Note: What follows is the CSPAN Video of the hearing held on April 13, 2011 by the House Subcommittee on Terrorism, Human Intelligence, Analysis and Counterintelligence that heard thought provoking testimony from several analysts from policy organizations that offered their opinions as to what kind of governments would be formed in the aftermath of the uprisings across the Middle East and North Africa in an attempt of examining the future political landscape as groups, such as the Muslim Brotherhood, compete for power there. The House Subcommittee also heard eye opening and disturbing testimony from these analysts regarding what should be of the utmost concern with the Muslim Brotherhood within the U.S.-You Decide:

Hearing Examines Role of Muslim Brotherhood in Middle East Politics-Posted on CSPAN Video-On April 13, 2011:

http://ww.c-span.org/Events/Hearing-Examined-the-Role-of-Muslim-Brotherhood-in-Middle-East-Politics/10737420863-1/

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts relate to this issue-You Decide:

I. Weiner’s In-Laws and the Secret Muslim Brotherhood Connections Revealed!-Posted on FloydReports.com-By Walid Shoebat and Ben Barrack-On June 15, 2011:

http://floydreports.com/weiners-in-laws-and-the-secret-muslim-brotherhood-connections-revealed/

II. Islamic education on the rise in US!-Posted on MSNBC-By Kari Huus, Reporter-On June 15, 2011:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43331744/ns/us_news-life/t/islamic-education-rise-us-struggle-acceptance/

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

What are CAIRs obstructionist goals?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/03/06/6951/

The Islamic Infiltration: Inside Our Government, Armed With Our Secrets!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/15/the-islamic-infiltration-inside-our-government-armed-with-our-secrets/

Shocking New Report! Obama’s Real Terrorists: Targeting Patriots and The Right!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/05/shocking-new-report-obamas-real-terrorists-targeting-patriots-and-the-right/

Should Americans Fear Islam?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/05/should-americans-fear-islam/

Note If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

 “Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…

Posted on CNSNews.com-By Patrick Goodenough-On June 17, 2011:

(CNSNews.com) – The U.N. General Assembly is set to pass a resolution on Friday afternoon that will retain Israel as the only country out of 192 member-states to be the target of a dedicated permanent item on the agenda of the U.N. Human Rights Council.

The move comes two days after an Obama administration official gave a speech saying that its deeper engagement with the United Nations has helped to counter the body’s anti-Israel bias.

The General Assembly vote will ensure that, as the Geneva-based Human Rights Council (HRC) approaches its sixth year, its disproportionate focus on Israel will remain. The resolution adopts the outcome of a five-year review which the U.S. and other mostly Western democracies had hoped would improve the council by removing some of the identified faults.

However, two of the most glaring flaws – the skewed attention paid to Israel and the absence of enforceable criteria for HRC membership – will remain unchanged.

The HRC has ten permanent items on its agenda, ranging from “organizational and procedural matters” (item one) to “technical assistance and capacity-building” (item ten).

Only two of the 10 items deal with specific human rights situations. One, item four, is entitled “Human rights situations that require the council’s attention,” potentially covering situation across the entire globe.

The other, item seven, deals with the “human rights situation in Palestine and other occupied Arab territories.”

The resolution to be voted on in New York on Friday maintains that anomaly.

Agenda item seven was back on the table on Tuesday in Geneva, where the council is wrapping its 17th regular three-week session.

During the debate, Israel repeatedly was condemned by Arab and Islamic states and their allies – which continue to dominate the council – including some countries which themselves face charges of responding violently to dissent.

Syrian ambassador Faysal Khabbaz Hamoui accused Israel of “war crimes and crimes against humanity” and “state terrorism. Iran drew attention to the “Zionist regime’s” policies regarding detention and imprisonment of “political prisoners.” Bahrain alleged “deliberate killings” of unarmed Palestinians.

Pakistan, speaking on behalf of the Islamic bloc, cited “continuous flagrant violations” of Palestinians’ right to life and self-determination, while Cuba complained that Israel demonstrated a lack of respect for the U.N. by ignoring its recommendations.

Others criticizing Israel included Saudi Arabia, Venezuela, Jordan, Turkey, Egypt, Sudan, Morocco and Kuwait. Common themes included last year’s flotilla incident and the recent deadly clashes along the disputed Israeli-Syria border.

In response, Israeli envoy Aharon Leshno-Yaar said that amid the turmoil and change in the Arab world, the HRC still appeared to be “mired” in the issue of Israel. His country was clearly not before the council because of any current burning human rights need, he added.

During contributions by non-governmental organizations, Hillel Neuer of the Geneva-based NGO U.N. Watch rebuked the council for focusing on Israel at a time “when citizens were being “persecuted or massacred by their own governments, in Syria, Iran, Yemen, Libya, Bahrain and elsewhere.”

“History will record that at a time when citizens across the Middle East were being attacked by their own government – by rifles, tanks, and helicopters – the U.N. focused its scarce time and attention on a country in that region where this is not happening; the only country in the region which, despite its flaws, respects the right to peaceful assembly, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and freedom of religion …” he said.

(A number of members of the HRC on Wednesday signed up to a statement condemning human rights violations in Syria. The statement was delivered by the Canadian envoy on behalf of 54 countries.)

'Egregious'

The Obama administration, which reversed its predecessor’s policy and joined the HRC in 2009, has been fending off calls to reduce U.S. contributions to the United Nations.

As part of this campaign, Assistant Secretary of State for International Organization Affairs Esther Brimmer delivered a speech Wednesday highlighting the administration’s efforts to counter bias against Israel at the U.N. and the HRC.

Before the U.S. joined the council, she told the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, far too much of its attention focused on Israel, while far too little attention was “directed to the world’s most troubling and urgent human rights situations.”

The U.S. took its seat on the council for the first time in June 2009, at the start of its 11th regular session.

Before then, the HRC had held nine emergency “special sessions” relating to rights abuses in specific countries, five of them dedicated to Israel. Since the U.S. joined, the council has held a further four special sessions dealing with specific countries, one of them on Israel.

The HRC has passed a total of 79 resolutions relating to specific countries, according to statistics kept by the Hudson Institute’s Eye on the U.N. project. Of the 79, almost half (38) deal with Israel, while the rest relate to situations in 15 other countries. Of the 38 dealing with Israel, 14 were passed after the U.S. joined.

Brimmer conceded that the council remains flawed.

“We continue to protest the egregious permanent agenda item on Israel,” she said. “But we have managed to use every opportunity to shift the focus of the debate at the council addressing the most serious human rights abusers, rather than unfairly singling out Israel.”

Source:

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/un-human-rights-council-retaining-its-bi

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. Senators Challenge Obama on Foreign Policy on Israel!-Posted on Israel National News-By Elad Benari-On June 15, 2011:

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/144942#replies

II. Obama Inspired Ship to Join IHH Gaza Flotilla!-Posted on Israel National News-By Gavriel Queenann-On June 3, 2011:

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/144733#replies

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Is Israel the next Arab Facebook Campaign?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/03/30/is-israel-the-next-arab-facebook-campaign/

Godfather of The Islamic Revolution!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/11/godfather-of-the-islamic-revolution/

Note If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…

Hispanics Won’t Save Obama In 2012!

Posted on Forbes-By Merrill Matthews. RIGHT DIRECTIONS-On June 18, 2011:

“President Barack Obama is hoping his visit to Puerto Rico will shore up the Hispanic vote for Democrats, but more importantly for his 2012 re-election bid.

The media choir has been singing a similar tune, especially since the U.S. Census Bureau recently released a new report, “The Hispanic Population: 2010,” which documents the disproportionately large growth in the Hispanic population.

According to the 2010 Census, there were 308.7 million people residing in the U.S. on April 1, 2010, of which 50.5 million (16 percent) were of Hispanic or Latino origin.

In addition, the Bureau asserted, “More than half of the growth in the total population of the United States between 2000 and 2010 was due to the increase in the Hispanic population.”  Since Hispanics tend to vote Democratic—67 percent for Obama in 2008, according to a post-election poll cited in the New York Times—the Obama campaign thinks that growth could swing important states to the president.

That thinking is as wishful, and deluded, as the happy talk that surrounded the president’s economic policies and “shovel-ready” stimulus efforts that were going to get the country working again.  Here’s why.

People ≠ Voters That New York Times story pointed out that only 10 million Latinos voted in the 2008 election, 9 percent of all voters, and that was a record high.  Why so low?  For one thing, the Hispanic population is younger than the general population: 27.4 years was the median age for Hispanics in 2009, vs. 36.8 years for the U.S.  Younger ages are less likely to vote, and a disproportionately large percentage of Hispanics aren’t even of voting age.

Another important point: No one knows how many of those 50 million Hispanics are citizens eligible to vote.  The Census counts people in the U.S., not citizens.  Someone from the Bureau told me that interviewers do not ask about citizenship nor do they record citizenship status.  There has been a groundswell of Hispanics entering the U.S. over the last decade, some legally but many not, which has led to a huge national debate over immigration.  How many of the 15.2 million more Hispanics (between 2000 and 2010) are eligible to vote?  We simply don’t know from Census surveys, but it’s reasonable to think that many, and perhaps most, can’t—at least not legally.

The Electoral College Decides The Electoral College, not the popular vote, decides who will be president.  If none of those 50 million new Hispanics lived in California, President Obama would likely get all of the state’s 55 electoral votes; if all of them lived in California—and the largest number do—and they all vote for Obama he would still get … 55 electoral votes.

So the question for presidential election purposes is as much about where those votes are as how many there are.  The Census Bureau says 75 percent of the Hispanic population is located in eight states: California, Texas, Florida, New York, Illinois, Arizona, New Jersey and Colorado.  Of those states, California, New York, Illinois and New Jersey will very likely remain blue in the next presidential election, while Texas and Arizona will almost certainly remain red.  Colorado, which has been trending blue, and Florida, which leans red but not by much, could be swayed.

Of the nine states where the Hispanic population more than doubled—Alabama, Arkansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and South Dakota—eight are in the south and all but one, Maryland, either lean or are strongly red.

The point is that a burgeoning Hispanic population may lead to a major shift in voting patterns at some point in the future, but not 2012.  That said, there are some important swing states—e.g., Florida, Pennsylvania, North Carolina and Colorado—that could be affected by Hispanic votes next year.

Hispanics Are Diverse The Census Bureau struggles with identifying a “Hispanic” since it is not a race, but more a place of origin, such as Central or South America or countries located in the Caribbean.  Needless to say, there are lots of differences among these populations.  Puerto Ricans living on the mainland, for example, tend to vote Democratic; those of Cuban descent tend to vote Republican.  But the largest Puerto Rican population is in New York, which will vote for Obama anyway.  In swing-state Florida, however, Cubans outnumber Puerto Ricans by 400,000.

Hispanics Are More Affected by a Bad Economy — A lot has been made of the notion that the Hispanic population, many of whom are Catholic, tend to embrace conservative social values but liberal economic policies.  And those conservative social values give Republicans an opportunity to attract them to the GOP.

But the real opportunity for the GOP to get their presidential vote in 2012 comes from the devastating impact President Obama’s economic policies have had on lower-income families.  Texas, where I live, has the second largest Hispanic population; they come mostly from Mexico and Central America, according to the Census.  Most are hard workers who take service sector jobs in agriculture, construction, yard and landscape work, and restaurants.  When the economy goes south, they are some of the first and hardest hit.

Those who are citizens and can vote may decide that Obama has had his chance.  The recession officially ended in June of 2009, yet two years later the unemployment rate at 9.1 percent is still disastrously high—and much higher for Hispanics.  Even more troubling, the president seems befuddled about what to do next.

Of course, Obama may still get more Hispanic votes than his Republican challenger, but that doesn’t mean he wins; Sen. John Kerry won the Hispanic vote over President Bush in 2004 by 9 percentage points, and Bush still won.  But there is little reason to think, both for demographic reasons and the sour economy, that Hispanics will provide Obama with a victory in 2012.

However, the Census Bureau publication does point to a trend that neither party can ignore.  Hispanics are becoming a larger and more politically potent force in U.S. politics.  The party that moves to provide them with the greatest opportunities, not the most handouts, is the one that will capture their allegiance for the long term.

Source:

http://blogs.forbes.com/merrillmatthews/2011/06/15/hispanics-wont-save-obama-in-2012/

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts relate to this issue-You Decide:

I. Obama’s Hispanic Vote Slipping Away!

Posted on Front Page Magazine-By Tait Trussell-On Jun 17, 2011:

“Buenas Tardes” (good afternoon). Barack Obama greeted a crowd of Puerto Ricans in Spanish in San Juan on a presidential visit intended to shore up support of roughly 4.6 million Puerto Ricans who live on the mainland. The Puerto Ricans on the island can’t vote for president even though they’re U.S. citizens.

The Obama campaign machine is striving desperately to recapture the Hispanic vote. In 2008, Obama won 67 percent of the Hispanic voters nationally. The president’s failure to enact an immigration law and vigorously crack down on undocumented workers, however, has caused his glamour to tarnish a bit. A Wall Street Journal/NBC poll in late March found that his Latino support had slid to 60 percent.

As of July 2009, 48.4 million people of Hispanic origin lived in the U.S. Today, it’s 50.5 million, the country’s largest ethnic or race minority.

During his welcoming ceremony in San Juan, Obama tried to scrape together Hispanic favor by saying that he would support whatever decision the Island makes about statehood—a long standing dispute over statehood or independence.

The recession has hit Puerto Rico like a small hurricane. The jobless rate is 17 percent, compared to the latest unemployment figure for the U.S. of 9.1 percent. Referring to unemployment, Obama, in a lame statement, said, “These problems didn’t develop overnight here in Puerto Rico or anywhere else, but that means we’re not going to solve them overnight. But day by day, step by step, we will solve them.”

Obama flew to Puerto Rico from campaign stops in North Carolina and Florida to play up to more Latinos. North Carolina has about 380,000 Hispanics. In Florida there are about 840,000 Puerto Ricans.

While the Democrats have the Hispanic vote for 2012 in their headlights, some disconcerting facts that are not well known should dampen their enthusiasm. Despite the overly rapid growth of Latinos, many are far too young to vote. More than a third of Latinos (34.9 percent) are now below the voting age of 18, according to the Pew Hispanic Center.

Hispanics comprise 22 percent of all U.S. children younger than 18. Some 43 percent of married couples who are Hispanic have children under age 18. Twenty percent of all elementary and high school students combined are Hispanic. They won’t be voting any time soon.

While 67 percent of eligible Hispanics voted for Obama in 2008, voter turnout of Latinos lags behind whites (48.6 percent), and 44 percent of eligible blacks. That compares to less than a third (31.2 percent ) of eligible Latino voters who said they voted. Only 42 percent of the Latino population — for one reason or another — is eligible to vote. Among Latinos who go to the polls, those age 18 to 28 had the lowest turnout—17.5 percent. Obama’s glory seems to be disappearing among youthful worshipers.

In 2010, the Hispanic electoral tidal wave dissipated. Latino voters, along with Asian voters, mainly avoided the 2010 election. A record 14.7 million Hispanic voters, in effect, sat on their hands for the 2010 race, according to the Pew Hispanic Center. The absence from the ballot boxes of so many Hispanic voters hurt many Democrats.

Fewer than 31 percent of eligible Hispanic and Asian voters went to the polls in the 2010 congressional elections, compared with 49 percent of eligible white voters and 44 percent of eligible black voters, the Pew report said.

The picture of minority voting comes in the wake of a poll showing the support for Obama among Latinos down by more than 25 percent from what it was at the start of his administration, should send shivers up Democratic spines—even of those who are spineless on many issues.

More signs that the Obama “spell” is fading: After winning 67% of the Latino vote in 2008, only 43 percent of Hispanics polled by Univision—the Spanish language TV network in the U.S.– at the end of last July said Obama has addressed their needs. Another 32 percent indicated they were uncertain, while 21 percent said they believe Obama has done a poor job.

A meeting of Republicans in South Florida aimed at extending the GOP’s outreach to Latino voters was co-chaired by former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush. The conference was organized by the new Hispanic Action Network. It is one of a number of Republican efforts to influence Latino voters before the 2012 election.

CNN reported in 2010 that 38 percent of Hispanic voters cast ballots for Republican candidates, compared to only 29 percent in 2008.

Significantly, Republican Susana Martinez was elected governor of New Mexico (46 percent Hispanic population), Brian Sandoval  became governor of Nevada (27 percent Hispanic population) and Marco Rubio won the U.S. Senate race in Florida (23 percent Hispanic).

Exit polls indicated that 38 percent of Latino voters voted for House Republican candidates in 2010. This “despite pre-election claims by advocates for illegal immigration that a pro-rule-of-law stand would alienate Hispanic voters,” wrote Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX) June 2 in Politico. 

Five Hispanic Republicans were elected to the House.

“They focused on patriotism, rule of law, freedom, family, support for small business, jobs, and education,” Smith wrote.

Most of these are fundamental values from which President Obama has distanced himself.

Source:

http://frontpagemag.com/2011/06/17/obama’s-hispanic-vote-slipping-away/

II. 64,000 Cases of Possible Voter Fraud Being Investigated in New Mexico!-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Susan Jones-On June 15, 2011:

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/64000-cases-possible-voter-fraud-being-i

III. Despite Congressional Leader's Claim, Requiring an ID to Vote is Nothing Like Forced Segregation!-Posted on The Center for Public Policy Research-On June 7, 2011:

http://www.nationalcenter.org/P21PR-VoterID_060711.html

IV. Time to Launch Operation Chaos!-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Michael Oberndorf-On June 16, 2011:

http://floydreports.com/time-to-launch-operation-chaos-2-0-12/

V. ‘White House officials involved in rewriting nation’s founding document’!-Posted on WND.com-By Aaron Klein-On March 27, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=280277

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this issue-You Decide:

Massive Voter Fraud-Again!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/25/massive-voter-fraud-again/

Court overturns Arizona’s proof of citizenship requirement for voter registration!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/27/court-overturns-arizona’s-proof-of-citizenship-requirement-for-voter-registration/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…