Herman Cain needs a "Money Bomb".
Please go to www.hermancain.com
And give $1.00, $5.00, or what ever you can afford. He needs help.
Please go to friends, family, neighbors and ask them to help him as well.
Help Herman Cain now!

This article and/or blog post reveals how some of our youth have caught on to this President and his minion’s deplorable transformation agenda-You Decide:

Posted on The Daily Caller-By Neil Munro-On May 20, 2011:

“A very large proportion of recent university graduates have soured on President Barack Obama, and many will vote GOP or stay at home in the 2012 election, according to two new surveys of younger voters.

“These rock-solid Obama constituents are free-agents,” said Kellyanne Conway, president of The Polling Company, based in Washington, D.C. She recently completed a large survey of college grads, and “they’re shopping around, considering their options, [and] a fair number will stay at home and sit it out,” she said.

The scope of this disengagement from Obama is suggested by an informal survey of 500 post-grads by Joe Maddalone, founder of Maddalone Global Strategies. Of his sample, 93 percent are aged between 22 and 28, 67 percent are male and 83 percent voted for Obama in 2008. But only 27 percent are committed to voting for Obama again, and 80 percent said they would consider voting for a Republican, said New York-based Maddalone.

That’s a drop of almost 60 points in support for Obama among this influential class of younger post-grad voters, who Maddalone recruited at conferences held at New York University and Thomson-Reuters’ New York headquarters.

The bad news for Obama was underlined May 19 with a report by a job-firm Adecco that roughly 60 percent of recent college-grads have not been able to find a full-time job in their preferred area. One-in-five graduates have taken jobs far from their training, one-in-six are dependent on their parents, and one-in-four say they’re in debt, according to the firm’s data.

(Read: AARP Latest to Receive Obamacare Break…)

Overall, roughly one-third of young voters have some college education, and one-half have college degrees, said Conway. Many are underemployed or unemployed, they’re worried about their debts and economic trends, and they’re worried about the value of their educations, she said. In 2012, she said, “I suspect a fair number will return to Obama, but maybe not enough, and not in the [swing] states where he needs them,” she said.

Those states include Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, New Hampshire, Indiana, Virginia and Iowa, she said. All were won by Obama in 2008, and all were lost in state-wide elections to GOP candidates in 2010, she said.

The GOP is making some progress towards earning their votes, Maddalone said.

For example, 38 percent of his respondents said the GOP is “doing a good job addressing and engaging with young professionals,” and 58 percent said they would consider voting for the GOP “if you felt that Republicans were doing a good job addressing and engaging with young professionals.”

Only one-in-six of his respondents voted for the GOP presidential candidate in 2008, and 80 percent of those said they would vote GOP again, said Maddalone.

(Read: Palin on 2012: ‘I Do Have the Fire in my Belly’…)

“People have had time to reflect on how they voted in 2008, and now they’re thinking about whether they have a job or like their job,” said Maddalone.

As their trust in the federal government shrinks, they’re becoming more self-reliant, as their attitude shifts from “‘yes, we can,’ to ‘yes, I can,’” he said.

This shift, he said, “is not really being discussed.”

Source:

http://dailycaller.com/2011/05/20/recent-college-grads-sour-on-obama-surveys-say/#ixzz1N7OoOmtB

Note:  The following articles and/or blog posts relate to this issue-You Decide:

High Tech High Students Expose Flaws in Obama’s Long Form Birth Certificate- Posted on San Diego Reader-By Walter Mencken-On May 11, 2011:

http://www.sandiegoreader.com/news/2011/may/11/sdqt-schooled/

LSU Student Decides Against Burning Flag as Thousands Stage Counter Demonstration-Posted on FoxNews.com-By Marla Friedman-On May 11, 2011:

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/05/11/lsu-student-surrounded-thousands-protesters-attempting-burn-american-flag/#ixzz1MAHCyQHH

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Does Our President Hate America?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/03/04/does-our-president-hate-america/

American Flag Clothing Sparks New Protest!

Nearly 80 percent don’t trust the government!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/19/nearly-80-percent-don’t-trust-the-government/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts, please copy web site and paste it on your browser.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered controversial is being censored-what happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”

Semper Fi!

Jake

WAKE UP AMERICA BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE!

There are powerful but misguided people who want to see the end of the U.S. as an independent nation for the greater good of the world.  One way is to orchestrate the disintegration of the U.S. economy.  Could that be the possible reason why 4000+ factories have been moved out of the U.S.?  Are they trying to dismantle the industrial might of the U.S.?  Over the last 30 years, the productive capacity of the U.S. economy has been cut in half, measured in terms of market baskets of goods on a per-capita, and per-household basis. At the same time, the monetary claims on that declining production have risen substantially.  The gradual collapsing of the U.S. economy began in the 1980's.  As a result, the rich have grown richer, and the poor, poorer, while the middle class has continued to shrink.  Those who advocate Socialism and those rich and powerful who fund and support it are leading us down the path to national disintegration.  The politicans are always talking about cutting back the spending which is as it should be, or talking about increasing taxes which will hurt the economy now and moreso in the future but no one, no, not even one, talks about rebuilding our productive capabilities and reimplementing Hamilton's "American System" of economic nationalism.  Hamilton's "American System" of developmental economic nationalism was intended to allow the U.S. to become economically independent and nationally self-sufficient by imposing industry protection through (1) selective high tariffs to keep out manufactured goods, (2) government investments in infrastructure to create targeted internal improvements, and (3) a national bank with policies to promote the growth of productive enterprises. 

Our political, military and financial leaders are still accountable to we the citizens of the U.S.  We need to demand that good, honest, descent people run for office and we need to make our votes count.  In the final analysis this is "a government of the people, by the people, and for the people" as stated by President Abe Lincoln.  We need a quiet revolution at the poles.  In the nineteenth century, Edwin H. Chapin stated the following, which still remains true today:

"Not armies, not nations, have advanced the race; but here and there, in the course of ages, an individual has stood up and cast his shadow over the world."  [Edwin Hubbell Chapin (December 29, 1814-December 26, 1880), minister, author, lecturer, and social reformer, was one of the most popular speakers in America from the 1840s until his death. He was revered for his eloquent tongue and passionate pleas for tolerance and justice.]

The point is that we must endeavor to cast our shadow over the U.S. to rebuild our nation to enable a complete riddence of our own and our governments debts and to create a better standard of living for ourselves and future generations.

WAKE UP AMERICA BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE!

This article and/or blog post does a great job of exposing how this President and his minions use our youth as pawns to push their outrages transformation agenda-You Decide: 

Posted on The Blaze-By Jonathon M. Seidl-On May 20, 2011:

“Oliver Darcy is doing his part to expose liberal ideas and hypocrisy on college campuses. Last month he produced two videos showing students willing to redistribute wealth but not grades and also refusing to pay their share of the national debt. Now he (along with his colleagues Michael Fincher and Maurice Lewis) is back, and this time he’s showing how college students who say they support free speech are willing to sign a petition to “ban” Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, and other conservatives from the airwaves.

In the video, the students are not only willing to sign the petition, but some even offer their thoughts on Beck and those like him.

“That guy’s a douchebag,” one guy says of Beck. “He’s an a**.”

“I hate them bastards,” another man says, even after telling the petition author that in America Beck and others should have a right to say what they want. He signs the petition anyway.

Watch Darcy’s latest video below:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=IaqB_EGDLVg

The group’s website, Exposingleftists.com, explains:

“Today, many want to limit the speech of those they disagree with, primarily conservative republicans. In 1949, the Fairness Doctrine was introduced under the FCC. Under Reagan, in 1987, the FCC ended the doctrine. While Democrat-controlled congresses have tried to make it law again, Republicans and those who support free speech oppose their efforts to reinstate the Fairness Doctrine. To begin the limitation of political speech and dissent would lead us to a downward spiral of freedoms. As the last bastion of freedom in the world, we must fight to retain our most important right, and failure is not an option.”

Source:

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/college-students-sign-petition-to-ban-rush-beck-from-radio-but-love-free-speech/

Note:  We, as God, family and country loving Americans, must remain vigilant and keep our eyes on the ball and not be distracted by the relentless propaganda being fed to us on a daily basis as part of this President and his minion’s transformation strategy.

My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Who owns our supposedly fair and balanced airwaves and news outlets?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/21/who-owns-our-supposedly-fair-and-balanced-airwaves-and-news-outlets/

What Happened to Free Speech?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/23/what-happened-to-free-speech/

Obamanites Get Violent in Support of the Agenda!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/05/obamanites-get-violent-in-support-of-the-agenda/

Liberal web site publishing harsh racial rhetoric!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/liberal-web-site-publishing-harsh racial-rhetoric/

The FCC Should Not Interfere With The Internet!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/13/the-fcc-should-not-interfere-with-the-internet/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts, please copy web site and paste it on your browser.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered controversial is being censored-what happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”

Semper Fi!

Jake

Posted on The Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (Report #: 976)-On April 2, 2011:

“Editor’s Note: When U.S.-Israel relations hit a rough patch, there are those who quickly blame Israel for America’s difficulties abroad.

Israel has outrageously been blamed for endangering American soldiers in Afghanistan and Iraq, and erroneously been blamed for preventing the formation of an Arab coalition to work with the US to contain Iran.

While we recognize, as Gen. Petraeus did, that American support for Israel is used by our adversaries to foment anti-Americanism, we also recognize that the important countries of the region won’t like us any better if we shed Israel as an ally. They will wonder how quickly we will shed THEM when they are inconvenient.

The correct response to those who denigrate the U.S.-Israel relationship, is to note that Israel is a friend by virtue of shared civic and political values and a security asset upon which the United States can rely.

For nearly 30 years, JINSA has been taking recently retired American Admirals and Generals to Israel to better understand the threats Israel faces, the resources it brings to its own defense and ways in which the U.S. and Israel can cooperate on common security issues. Their understanding of the role of Israel is in the ad below. JINSA is working to place the ad in newspapers (Jewish and other) around the country to ensure that Americans (Jewish and other) hear these voices. You can help spread the word by making a contribution to JINSA - clicking below.

We, the undersigned, have traveled to Israel over the years with The Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA). We brought with us our decades of military experience and, following unrestricted access to Israel’s civilian and military leaders, came away with the unswerving belief that the security of the State of Israel is a matter of great importance to the United States and its policy in the Middle East and Eastern Mediterranean. A strong, secure Israel is an asset upon which American military planners and political leaders can rely. Israel is a democracy - a rare and precious commodity in the region - and Israel shares our commitment to freedom, personal liberty and rule of law.

Throughout our travels and our talks, the determination of Israelis to protect their country and to pursue a fair and workable peace with their neighbors was clearly articulated. Thus we view the current tension between the United States and Israel with dismay and grave concern that political differences may be allowed to outweigh our larger mutual interests.

As American defense professionals, we view events in the Middle East through the prism of American security interests.

The United States and Israel established security cooperation during the Cold War, and today the two countries face the common threat of terrorism by those who fear freedom and liberty.

Historically close cooperation between the United States and Israel at all levels including the IDF, military research and development, shared intelligence and bilateral military training exercises enhances the security of both countries.

American police and law enforcement officials have reaped the benefit of close cooperation with Israeli professionals in the areas of domestic counter-terrorism practices and first response to terrorist attacks.

Israel and the United States are drawn together by shared values and shared threats to our well-being.

The proliferation of weapons and nuclear technology across the Middle East and Asia, and the ballistic missile technology to deliver systems across wide areas require cooperation in intelligence, technology and security policy. Terrorism, as well as the origins of financing, training and executing terrorist acts, need to be addressed multilaterally when possible.

The dissemination of hatred and support of terrorism by violent extremists in the name of Islam, whether state or non-state actors, must be addressed as a threat to global peace.

In the Middle East, a volatile region so vital to U.S. interests, it would be foolish to disengage - or denigrate - an ally such as Israel.

Rear Admiral Charles Beers, USN (ret.);
General William Begert, USAF (ret.);
Rear Admiral Stanley W. Bryant, USN (ret.);
Lieutenant General Anthony Burshnick, USAF (ret.);
Lieutenant General Paul Cerjan, USA (ret.);
Admiral Leon Edney, USN (ret.);
Brigadier General William F. Engel, USA (ret.);
Major General Bobby Floyd, USAF (ret.);
Major General Paul Fratarangelo, USMC (ret.);
Major General David Grange, USA (ret.);
Lieutenant General Tom Griffin, USA (ret.);
Lieutenant General Earl Hailston, USMC (ret.);
Lieutenant General John Hall, USAF (ret.);
General Alfred Hansen, USAF (ret.);
Rear Admiral James Hinkle, USN (ret.);
General Hal Hornburg, USAF (ret.);
Major General James T. Jackson, USA (ret.);
Admiral Jerome Johnson, USN (ret.);
Rear Admiral Herb Kaler, USN (ret.); Vice Admiral Bernard Kauderer, USN (ret.);
General William F. Kernan, USA (ret.);
Major General Homer Long, USA (ret.);
Major General Jarvis Lynch, USMC (ret.);
General Robert Magnus, USMC (ret.);
Lieutenant General Charles May, Jr., USAF (ret.);
Vice Admiral Martin Mayer, USN (ret.);
Major General Fred McCorkle, USMC (ret.);
Rear Admiral Mark Milliken, USN (ret.);
Major General William Moore, USA (ret.);
Lieutenant General Carol Mutter, USMC (ret.);
Major General Larry T. Northington, USAF (ret.);
Lieutenant General Tad Oelstrom, USAF (ret.);
Major General James D. Parker, USA (ret.);
Vice Admiral J. T. Parker, USN (ret.);
Major General Robert Patterson, USAF (ret.);
Vice Admiral James Perkins, USN (ret.);
Rear Admiral Brian Peterman, USCG (ret.);
Lieutenant General Alan V. Rogers, USAF (ret.);
Rear Admiral Richard Rybacki, USCG (ret.);
General Crosbie Saint, USA (ret.);
Rear Admiral Norm Saunders, USCG (ret.);
Major General Sid Shachnow, USA (ret.);
Rear Admiral Jeremy Taylor, USN (ret.);
Major General Larry Taylor, USMCR (ret.);
Lieutenant General Lanny Trapp, USAF (ret.);
Vice Admiral Jerry O. Tuttle, USN (ret.);
General Louis Wagner, USA (ret.);
Rear Admiral Thomas Wilson, USN (ret.);
Lieutenant General Robert Winglass, USMC (ret.);
Rear Admiral Guy Zeller, USN (ret.).

• Signatures as of April 1, 2010”

Source:

http://www.jinsa.org/node/1342

Note:  The following video relates to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Video: Why Israel mustn't retreats to it pre '67 borders line!-Posted on YouTube.com-By shaharclips-On May 21, 2011:

Note:  My following blog posts contains numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Godfather of The Islamic Revolution!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/11/godfather-of-the-islamic-revolution/

Is Obama The Greatest Strategic Disaster For Israel?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/03/28/is-obama-the-greatest-strategic-disaster-for-israel/

Is Israel the next Arab Facebook Campaign?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/03/30/is-israel-the-next-arab-facebook-campaign/

Muslim Brotherhood Declares War on America-Will America Notice!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/12/muslim-brotherhood-declares-war-on-america-will-america-notice/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts, please copy web site and paste it on your browser.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered controversial is being censored-what happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”

Semper Fi!

Jake

Posted on WND.com-On May 19, 2011:

“WASHINGTON – The founder and chief executive officer of WND has decided to pursue an aggressive legal challenge of what he calls Esquire’s “libelous smear” in which the magazine’s executive editor published a completely fictional article claiming Jerome Corsi’s best-selling book – “Where’s the Birth Certificate?” – was being pulled from the shelves and destroyed and that book purchasers were being offered refunds.

“I have concluded with attorneys who say we have an excellent chance of winning a lawsuit or lawsuits for the reckless disregard for the truth demonstrated by Mark Warren, Esquire and the Hearst Corporation in this matter,” said Farah. “Personally, I think we should set our sights on taking ownership of Esquire. I think that would be a fair settlement. Obviously the magazine is in dire need of professional management.”

The controversy began just after 10 a.m. Wednesday, when Mark Warren, Esquire’s executive editor who supervises political coverage for the magazine, published what appeared to be a news story quoting Farah as saying he was destroying hundreds of thousands of copies of Corsi’s high-flying book challenging Barack Obama’s eligibility for office and issuing refunds for them.

Support WND’s “Esquire Justice Fund” to support lawsuits against Mark Warren, Esquire and the Hearst Corporation for its malicious attack on Jerome Corsi’s book.

Immediately, news organizations throughout the U.S. began contacting Farah for confirmation of the story and comment. In addition, consumers began requesting refunds and book supporters began attacking Farah.

“Only when I issued a statement saying I was exploring our legal options did Warren append a disclaimer to the article explaining that it was ‘satire,’” said Farah. “That was too little, too late. The damage was done. And Warren himself confirmed his own malicious intent by characterizing Corsi as ‘an execrable piece of sh--.’”

A WND message left on Mark Warren’s answering machine requesting comment did not generate a response. Nor did an email to a publicist to whom WND was referred when requesting a comment from the magazine.

Farah has established the “Justice From Esquire Fund” for contributions to what he says will be a very expensive legal battle that is likely to take years.

“I don’t like to sue people or organizations,” said Farah. “It’s not what I do. But I was strongly encouraged by hundreds of supporters within the past 48 hours to take on this fight. People were shocked by the brazenness of this attack. This was not satire. It was not funny. It was designed to materially hurt my business and disrupt the marketing efforts behind a best-selling book. And it was carried out by a lifelong Democratic political activist masquerading as a journalist.”

Farah points out Warren is best known as Sen. Harry Reid’s collaborator on his autobiographical “The Good Fight.” While he has served in several capacities at Esquire for the last 23 years, his resume shows he was a Democratic political activist and political aide prior to that experience.

“Warren has never stopped being a partisan political hack throughout his 23 years in the insular corporate media world of Hearst – the same institution that offered safe harbor to anti-Semitic Helen Thomas in her declining years in the White House press corps,” said Farah. “Having worked for Hearst for nearly 10 years ending just about the time Warren was hired, it grieves me to see what has become of the company.

Examine Warren’s recent work for yourself and you will clearly see one simplistic common thread running through it – Democrats good, Republicans bad.”

Source:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=300761

Note:  The following articles and/or blog posts and video relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

White House panic: Corsi book targeted: 'Fight the Smears' 2.0 launched, mocks No. 1 best-seller as delusional 'joke'-Posted on WND.com-On May 18, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=300389#ixzz1N3yR3Rm5

Video:  Farah Responds To False Report That He Pulled "Where's The Birth Certificate?" Book!-Posted on YouTube.com-By BirtherReportDotCom-On May 18, 2011:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fVztCuSxHpE&feature=related

Note:  My following blog post contains numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Could the President’s newly released COLB be a forgery?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/04/29/could-the-president’s-newly-released-colb-be-a-forgery/

Who owns our supposedly fair and balanced airwaves and news outlets?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/21/who-owns-our-supposedly-fair-and-balanced-airwaves-and-news-outlets/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts, please copy web site and paste it on your browser.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered controversial is being censored-what happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”

Semper Fi!

Jake

Victory in the French and Indian War was costly for the British. At the war's conclusion in 1763, King George III and his government looked to taxing the American colonies as a way of recouping their war costs. They were also looking for ways to reestablish control over the colonial governments that had become increasingly independent while the Crown was distracted by the war. Royal ineptitude compounded the problem. A series of actions including the Stamp Act (1765), the Townsend Acts (1767) and the Boston Massacre (1770) agitated the colonists, straining relations with the mother country. But it was the Crown's attempt to tax tea that spurred the colonists to action and laid the groundwork for the American Revolution.

Did King George throw colonial America under the bus? Did the British Nabobs throw colonial India under the bus? Did America’s white racists throw black America under the bus? Did Obama throw Israel under the bus?  Obama takes the cake as an amateur politician.  In response to Obama’s offer to help—by taking the Palestinian position—Netanyahu bluntly told Obama: “It isn’t going to happen.”  Israel threw Obama under the bus.  Whatever he claims, Obama has finally said it all. Obama is no American.

I understand how Netanyahu felt. I’d had it. I was not going to take it anymore. Everyone I knew in 1975 thought I was a non-conforming nutcake, certainly not a good citizen.  In the news, I was called a tax protester. Judges called me a spurious constitutional objector.   The IRS called me a Fifth Amendment freak.  Society gave me the heave ho. When I departed my old life, to America it was good riddance.  Said I: “It isn’t going to happen.”  America didn’t thow this peon under the bus. Uncle Sam hung himself with his own rope. It is all recorded.  I made the front page in The Palm Beach Post. Uncle Sam ate crow.

Your government, for little cost, in a Ponzi scheme, gave the American people “insurance.” Such a deal!  Insurance actuaries told the American people, at the time Social Security became law, that this so-called federal insurance was not actuarially sound.  Years later, newspapers called Roosevelt’s “New Deal” the fraud of your future.

Good old conservative Republican Bob Dole whacked the hell out of the taxpayers to save a Roosevelt Ponzi scheme. Congress spent the extra revenue as fast as it came in, giving the American taxpayer worthless paper IOUs.

The American people have been dutifully paying into a federal Ponzi scheme since 1935 and now the truth comes out.  A cut in “federal insurance” benefits would cause millions of voters to look upon their representatives as exactly what they are, lying frauds.   

Republican Speaker Boehner weeps.  The U. S. Supreme Court looks upon federal welfare as “preferred freedom.”  In order to stop federal welfare, the government would have to show federal legislation that forked over taxpayer money to welfare recipients would present a clear and immediate danger and that the immediate danger was not some scattergun approach.   Would you say that having my meager entry-level wages withheld for federal welfare was just? The courts, the same was when black slavery was practiced in America, now go along with tax slavery.  I was locked out of my pad for non-payment of rent. Down the street from my room was a mile-long line of food stamp recipients.  According to American courts of law, the taxpayers don’t have the right to a crust of bread. Would you say that federal taxes help the working poor get a foothold?   The U. S. Supreme Court refuses to hear the case.

With impunity, good old Republican Bob Dole threw American taxpayers under the bus.  It’s typical for today’s politicians to benefit themselves at the future’s expense, by giving the present generation something later generations will have to pay for. It is typical for the courts to go along with such frauds.    

What makes you think anyone with authority knows better than you know what is good for you? 

Be prepared. America’s good times are as good as gone.

I’m trying to sell my wares—peace and prosperity at www.mymiraclemessage.com .  Others trying to sell their wares on the Internet are buying what I’m selling. I’ve received more than 6,000 favorable comments on my blog since last February. 

The light at the end of the tunnel:  In Wired magazine’s September 1997 issue, I saved Kevin Kelly’s “New Rules for the New Economy.”   Briefly, Kelly’s New Rules:

1.   The Law of Connections: The collapsing microcosm of chips and the exploding telecosm of connections will tear the old laws of wealth apart and prepare territory for the emerging economy.
2. The Law of Plentitude: Curious things happen when you connect all to all.  Adding a few more members can dramatically increase the value for all members
3. The Law of Exponential Value: The chart of Microsoft’s cornucopia of profits is a revealing graph because it mirrors several other plots of rising stars in a Network Economy. However, the same forces that feed on each other to amplify network presences into powerful overnight standards can also work in reverse to unravel them in a blink. Success will become nonlinear and self-regulating.
4.  The Law of Tipping Points:  Significance precedes momentum. Success became infectious and spread pervasively.  It became difficult not to be infected. For instance, how long could one hold out not having a telephone?
5. The Law of Increasing Returns:  Them that’s got shall get. It depends on this: while centralized government gets more punishing, the Network Economy rewards schemes that allow decentralized creation, and punishes those that don’t.
6. The law of Inverse Pricing: While the worst—government—gets more costly each year, the very best gets cheaper each year. It is a major engine for the new economy.
7. The Law of Generosity:   Microsoft makes huge profits by giving away its Web browser, thereby creating a need. 
8. The Law of Allegiance: The prosperity of the company is directly linked to the prosperity of the network. 
9. The Law of Devolution: The tightly linked nature of any economy, but especially the Network Economy’s ultraconnected constitution, make it behave ecologically. The fate of individual organizations is not dependent entirely on their own merits, but also on the fate of their neighbors, their allies, their competitors, and, of course, on that of the immediate environment. 

Innovators are going to reign supreme.  We are at the end of a dying age. Tag-alongs have had it.  The freaks in control today are going to be reduced to functionaries.  Time to get on the future’s bandwagon.  The best of all times are ahead.  

Obama may have been born in Hawaii.

He only lived in Hawaii a few short years as young man then he was moved to Jacarta and was enrolled in Muslim School.

He did not return to USA till he was in late teenage years/College age.
He did not fit in as he had not lived in US since was a child.
Stayed with his grandparents who were white.
His grandparents found him a "mentor" who was black Communist Poet.

No one knows people who sent to school with Obama when in college years.
No one has any history what so ever on Obama college grades or courses Obama took.
Obama has no or little history on himself with regard to anything.
Few if any friends. Unknown college courses or grades.

Manchurian Candidate!

Obama helped in pushing out Egypt leader and now Radical Muslim Brotherhood is taking over.

Obama wants to replace Syria's Assad with Radical Muslim Brotherhood.
Obama wanted Libya's Quadaffi pushed out, when most had no clue who Rebels were. They Radical Muslims.

Obama is methodically surrounding Israel with Radical Muslim Countries. Obama is "Pure Evil"
Who's side is Obama on? Not the USA's side.
Has Obama done anything that is am impeachable event?
Why won't Congress call Obama for impeachment?
Has Congress no guts or is Obama staying with law so can't get impeached?

       General Motors a.k.a. “Government Motors” (henceforth referred to as GM) in late 2010 agreed to sponsor a propaganda film celebrating the 90^th anniversary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP):   your bailout cash hard at work!  The now completed film, whose title literally translated into English is “The Great Achievement of Founding the Party,” will open all over China on June 15^th.  The film produced by the Cadillac division of GM glorifies the CCP, which under their patron saint, Mao Tse Dong, sent some 60 million Chinese souls to heaven a bit earlier than planned.  Young Mao and his lover are featured in the film paying homage to the author of The Little Red Book, he of the face so often seen on T-shirts these days.

       According to an announcement posted on Shanghai GM’s official web site yesterday, the film will discuss events that led up to the formation of the CCP following the 1917 Russian Revolution. When the movie first went into production GM signed up Cadillac as the “chief business partner” with the Communist Party, stating: “Cadillac whole-heartedly supports the making of The Birth of a Party.”

       In the same way that the CCP has married totalitarianism with capitalism; and fools the Chinese people and her guests with entertainment extravaganzas like the recent Olympic Games . . . so too the Obama administration has married the American Communist Party with progressive Democratic political correctness so that today only those songbirds among us echoing the Obama dogma 24-7; or the most abject imbeciles can prosper in the Brave New World of Barack’s Crony- Capitalism.  That the once proud General Motors eagerly takes part in creation of such a shameless propaganda output shows you how easily one loses integrity in the shadow of the Obama White House.  Of course, based on the high quality of GM products like its electric car the Volt, there’s a good chance that the great film will start with a series of snippets from the Usama Bin Laden porn cache with a voice-over of Barack’s most inspiring speeches all served with popcorn and chop suey – phooey!

Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,

Rajjpuut

Posted on NewsMax.com-By Lowell Ponte-On May 20, 2011:

“American politics underwent a tectonic shift this week, a change that apparently reflects a huge shift in political money and global power.

Breaking with more than half a century of bipartisan U.S. policy on the Middle East, President Barack Obama appeared to turn against our longtime ally Israel.

He called for a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict to be based on Israel retreating to its pre-1967 borders, a boundary to be altered only by “a few swaps” of land between the parties.

To those of us who have stood near the old Syrian cannon emplacements on the Golan Heights looking down on the Galilee and Tiberius, or who have landed at Israel’s international airport within 3 miles of the pre-1967 border, or who understand that this would produce an indefensible Israel only 8 miles wide at its narrowest point, Obama’s proposal seems bizarre.

As recently as 2005, President George W. Bush promised Israel, in exchange for new concessions, that the United States would not press Israel to return to the 1967 borders.

This week President Obama broke that pledge by our government.

Obama’s new pressure on Israel, he knows, will alienate many American Jews. Jews comprise only about 2 percent of America’s population, but this mostly-Democratic bloc turns out to vote, and 80 percent in 2008 voted for him.

President Obama, I believe, would have risked losing a large share of Jewish support only if he believed it could be offset elsewhere.

In 2008 he had an active outreach to America’s Muslim community. One of his campaign workers stirred brief controversy by attending a gathering of radical Islamist Muslims. The number of American Muslims is growing.

A greater concern, however, is the mountain of cash an American president who turned against Israel might harvest from donors in oil-rich Muslim nations.

Obama is not the first Democratic presidential candidate to pander for Muslim petrodollars.

Sen. John Kerry during his 2004 presidential campaign received more than $180,000, from Hassan Nemazee. This Iranian-American investor raised a cool $250,000 for Al Gore in November 1995, and he and his family provided another $150,000 to Democrats during the mid-1990s.

Six Nemazee family members and friends (including the caretaker of his 12-acre Katonah, N.Y., estate) donated a total of $60,000 — the maximum legally allowed — to President Bill Clinton’s legal defense fund.

In the closing days of 1998, Clinton named Nemazee his ambassador-designate to Argentina. Hillary Clinton embraced the Muslim moneyman at a January 1999 White House celebration of the Islamic holiday Eid.

The Senate refused to confirm the controversial nominee after a Forbes magazine investigation exposed Nemazee’s questionable business dealings.

The Forbes investigation documented how, in order to get his hands on public-employee pension fund monies allocated for minority managers, the U.S.-born Nemazee had falsely claimed to be a Hispanic of Venezuelan background and, on another occasion, an Asian-Indian.

Nemazee’s cynical lust for money could be frightening as well as laughable. He is a founding board member of the Iranian American Political Action Committee (IAPAC), which seeks to create friendly and lucrative business relationships with the medieval theocratic dictatorship now ruling Iran.

Iran is, of course, an “axis of evil” nation that seeks to acquire nuclear weapons and is on our State Department’s official list of nations that support terrorism. Nemazee sought to enrich himself by further enriching the power-mad Mullahs ruling Iran.

“The founding member of this group is Mr. Hassan Nemazee, an American of Iranian origin and one discredited, and well-known agent of the Islamic Republic, within the Iranian community in the United States,” wrote opponent of the Iran regime Aryo B. Pirouznia of the Student Movement Coordination Committee for Democracy in Iran. “Their [IAPAC’s] agenda in their own words is, ‘how relations between the Islamic Republic and the United States can be restored in support of the Islamic Republic and the revolution.’”

From now until 2012 President Obama aims to raise $1 billion for his re-election. In 2008 the Obama campaign raised more than $450 million, with nearly half coming in contributions of less than $200 that were not required to be reported by the donor’s name.

In some instances Obama staffers reportedly held handfuls of identical envelopes full of such campaign contributions.

In 2012, do not weep over how much Jewish money the president might have lost. Instead, watch to see how much Islamist and Muslim money Obama might gain by turning against Israel.

• Lowell Ponte is co-author, with Craig R. Smith, of “The Inflation Deception: Six Ways Government Tricks Us, and Seven Ways to Stop It,” in bookstores this June.”

Source:

http://www.newsmax.com/LowellPonte/israel-hillaryclinton-IranianAmericanPoliticalActionCommittee/2011/05/20/id/397097?s=al&promo_code=C512-1

Note:  The following article and/or blog post relates to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Lieberman Calls Parts of Obama’s Speech ‘Profoundly Ill-Advised’-Posted on The Wall Street Journal-By Naftali Bendavid-On May 20, 2011:

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Active complaint to the FEC over President Obama’s campaign finances!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/20/active-complaint-to-the-fec-over-president-obama’s-campaign-finances/

Sen. Obama’s Radical Islamic Past and Ties To Terrorist Groups:

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/04/17/sen_obamas_radical_islamic_past_and_ties_to_terrorist_groups.thtml

Godfather of The Islamic Revolution!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/11/godfather-of-the-islamic-revolution/

Jewish Donors Outraged by 'Sociopath' Obama!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/13/jewish-donors-outraged-by-sociopath-obama/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts, please copy web site and paste it on your browser.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered controversial is being censored-what happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”

Semper Fi!

Jake

Posted on Floyd Reports-By Guest Writer-On May 20, 2011:

“In December of last year, Border Agent Brian Terry was killed by Mexican gang members in an Arizona border shootout. Two of the weapons recovered from the scene had been part of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF)’s “Project Gunrunner,” a plot whereby thousands of firearms were deliberately sold to known straw purchasers for Mexican drug cartels, then assisted across the border by the ATF itself.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_RmqbuNyHQ&feature=player_embedded

On May 4^th, Obama regime Attorney General Eric Holder sat before the House Judiciary Committee, evading California Representative Darrell Issa’s questions about the Justice Department’s involvement in ATF’s ultimately deadly Gunrunner scheme:

Issa: How about the head of the Criminal Division, Lanny Breuer, Did he authorize it?

Holder: I’m not sure whether Mr. Breuer authorized it. You have to understand the way in which the Department operates. Although there are operations, this one has become–has gotten a great deal of publicity.

Issa: Yeah, there are dead Americans as a result of this failed and reckless program. So I would say that it hasn’t gotten enough attention, has it Mr. Attorney General?

Later, after enduring all he could stomach of Holder’s reverence for his own department’s phony investigation of the ATF, Issa finally rebuked the self-important bureaucrat, saying:

We’re not looking at straw buyers, Mr. Attorney General. We’re looking at you. We’re looking at your key people…who should have known about this…and whether or not the Justice Department is basically guilty of allowing weapons to kill Americans and Mexicans.

Of course, no one who learned his arrogance at the knee of the Crown Prince of Conceit will allow himself to be beaten down with subpoenas or contempt of Congress hearings. So, Holder has chosen a new tack.

After more than five months of inaction, a 14 count indictment for murder has been filed against Manuel Osorio-Arellanes, a Mexican illegal wounded during the shootout which took the life of Agent Terry.

Is this a sudden act of contrition or piety on the part of the Attorney General? A bone thrown to Congress, the American people, or Brian Terry’s family? Hardly.

With the filing of murder charges – two days after the Issa hearing – Holder can now claim that any and all Project Gunrunner information subpoenaed by the Issa committee may be withheld as material to the prosecution of Osorio-Arellanes. Although Holder had ignored requests and demands for information all along, now there would be an excuse.

By the way, two other names are included in the indictment against Osorio-Arellanes, but they will not be made public. These two were arrested along with the Mexican illegal on the night of Terry’s murder, then deported in February after pleading guilty to minor illegal entry infractions.

Is it possible they were the straw purchasers of the AK-47 used to kill Terry? Does the regime prefer they be out of the country, rather than spilling their guts on the witness stand about how they were illegally sold weapons by the ATF?

After all, in February, Project Gunrunner had yet to attract the volume of heat and attention focused on it today, so who would notice the sudden “elimination” of two murder suspects, or rather, potential witnesses against the Regime?

The outrage over Project Gunrunner is not going away soon. It’s anyone’s guess who will be thrown under the White House bus for this one.”

Continue Reading:

http://floydreports.com/holder-files-murder-charges-to-provide-cover-for-the-obama-regime/

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Did ATF provide weapons to Mexican drug cartels that were subsequently used to kill one of our own?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/03/04/did-atf-provide-weapons-to-mexican-drug-cartels-that-were-subsequently-used-to-kill-one-of-our-own/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts, please copy web site and paste it on your browser.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered controversial is being censored-what happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”

Semper Fi!

Jake

Posted on Floyd Reports-By Guest Writer-On May 20, 2011:

“ACT! for America recently sent out a “Special Action Alert” requesting support for a Rep. John Shimkus [R, IL-19] sponsored bill,  H.R. 1687 - Open Fuel Standardization Act.  The bill promises “to ensure that new vehicles enable fuel competition so as to reduce the strategic importance of oil to the United States.” 

According to ACT! for America, the bill is “one common sense approach to energy independence!”  Reading the actual bill, however, may lead you to a different conclusion.

Washington, it seems, has determined that our energy problems are because the auto manufacturers simply aren’t giving us the right choices to make when we peruse their dealership lots. 

Rep. Shimkus, along with co-sponsors Rep. Roscoe Bartlett [R, MD-6], Rep. Howard Berman [D, CA-28], Rep. Eliot Engel [D, NY-17], Rep. Steve Israel [D, NY-2], Rep. David Loebsack [D, IA-2], and Rep. Collin Peterson [D, MN-7] sprang into action and crafted a bill that only Cass Sunstein could appreciate.  H.R. 1687 would mandate that 50% of all new cars and light duty trucks produced by 2014 be engineered to run on some type of alternative fuel.

By 2016, the percentage of new alternative fuel vehicles increases to 80%; finally topping out at 95% in 2017.  Step aside, Free Market, Big Government coming through! 

If only “We The People” weren’t so obtuse.  Unwilling to do the right thing; passing over Chevy Volts in favor of Ford F-Series Pickups and Honda Accords.  Shame, shame.

Unburdened by frivolous things such as actual consumer demand, the Government will save us from our folly.  We’ll plug millions of new electric cars into our aging and already underpowered electrical grid. It doesn’t get more green than electricity after all (never mind all of those pesky coal plants).  Want to drive more than 40 miles, you say? 

Common sense in Washington dictates that we should burn food in our cars (Ethanol, Biodiesel).  Don’t you worry one little bit… food prices couldn’t possibly be affected by the added demand on our corn fields.  The world will love us for being so green.

Think you’ll outsmart them by maintaining your current gas guzzling beast?  Plan on camping out at the dealership for a chance to buy a rare, new gasoline burning car?  Imagine the gas stations of the future… now supplying us with natural gas, hydrogen, biodiesel, E85 (Ethanol), M85 (Methanol), and charging stations.

How many pumps do you think will be left for you?

Continue Reading:

http://floydreports.com/environmentalists-new-plan-abolish-normal-cars-by-2017/

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Is there a Christian basis for combating the threat of global warming?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/21/is-there-a-christian-basis-for-combating-the-threat-of-global-warming/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts, please copy web site and paste it on your browser.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered controversial is being censored-what happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”

Semper Fi!

Jake

Posted on The Patriot Update-By Ann-Marie Murrell-On May 21, 2011:

“Attorney General Eric Holder is definitely a fascinating man.  In Part 1, I gave a little background into his life.  Throughout his career under the Obama administration, Eric Holder and his Department of Justice have made some hugely controversial decisions.  Maybe his early training at the home of the Frankfurt School, Columbia University contributed; I’m not sure.

Following are some highlights of the past two years with Holder as Attorney General.

Islam/Terrorism:

• Holder led voting to ban enhanced interrogations (specifically waterboarding).  He did this against the advice of top-ranking military personnel and despite the fact that enhanced interrogations have helped locate and stop terrorists, including Osama bin Laden.
• Holder transferred 9/11 conspirators to the U.S. District Court to be tried in public instead of military tribunals.  Holder did this against the advice of law enforcement, city and state officials as well as families of those killed in the 9/11 attacks.  Holder believed the international terrorists deserved a “fair trial in New York”.
• Holder later changed his mind about trying the terrorists in public and transferred them back to the military tribunal system as originally planned…
• Holder refuses to declare Islam a threat.  Appearing before the House Judiciary committee, the following dialogue took place:

Texas Republican Rep. Lamar Smith:  “Are you uncomfortable attributing any of their (terrorists) actions to radical Islam?”

Holder:   “No, no I don’t want to say anything negative about a religion…that’s not consistent with the teachings of it.”

Rep. Smith:  “Ok, could it have been the case in one of these three (terrorism) instances…could one of these three individuals have been incited by radical Islam…”

Holder:  “Well, I think potentially incited by an Islam that is inconsistent with the teachings (of Islam)…”

Rep. Smith:  “It’s hard Mr. Attorney General, it’s hard to get an answer yes or no (from you)…”

Immigration:

Holder filed suit against the state of Arizona for their immigration law SB-1070 claiming it would “lead to racial profiling”.  Under investigation, Holder admitted that he had not read the Arizona law and that he formed his opinions based on news reports…

Race Relations:

In a 1996 interview with The Washington Post, Holder said “’Regardless of how affluent, educated and mobile a black person becomes, his race defines him more particularly than anything else.’ In other words, according to Mr. Holder, no matter how successful and integrated blacks are in U.S. society, they will always be victims; racial solidarity must supersede their American identity.”

Holder’s Department of Justice dropped the voter intimidation civil suit brought by the Bush administration against the New Black Panther Party.  The charges were dropped “due to lack of evidence”, despite the fact that several current and former members have stated that Holder’s Department of Justice “is unwilling to prosecute minorities for civil rights violations”.

In 2010, J. Christian Adams resigned his post at Holder’s Department of Justice out of protest of the Black Panther dismissal.

Regarding the dismissal of the Black Panther case, Holder said during a House subcommittee meeting, “When you compare what people endured in the South in the ’60s to try to get the right to vote for African Americans, to compare what people subjected to that with what happened in Philadelphia… I think does a great disservice to people who put their lives on the line for my people.” Critics have interpreted this comment as evidence of racial bias on Holder’s part.

Strange Times in the Department of Justice:

Attorneys claim the civil rights division of Holder’s Department of Justice is wrought with “inactivity and wastefulness” and that there simply wasn’t enough work for the dozens of new attorneys they hired.  Since Holder took office, “many of its employees spend their time playing computer Solitaire, watching videos, and complaining about the the lack of activity.”  Spakovsky wrote, “Attorneys beg for work and are told there is none.  If Holder denies this, you should require that the DOJ Inspector General provide the evidence that I am told they have already collected on this point.”

The same attorneys claimed that “during a Voting Section staff meeting called to address chronic tardiness, numerous attorneys demanded permission to arrive at work up to 30 minutes late without penalty. Others wanted to work from home.”

ACORN:

Holder’s Justice Department released a legal opinion that allowed the Obama administration to ignore the will of Congress which voted overwhelmingly to suspend federal funding of ACORN. He also ignored the 88-page report on ACORN’s systemic corruption and flagrant racketeering activities that was issued by Republican investigators on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

2^nd Amendment:

Holder is notorious for his anti-gun stance and his interpretation of the 2^nd Amendment.  In a 2008 Supreme Court briefing, he said, “The Second Amendment did not protect an individual right to keep and bear arms…it only protected government militias’ rights to guns.”  He claimed that the Second Amendment posed no obstacle to implementing gun bans.

During his tenure with the Clinton Justice Department, Holder oversaw the “instant background check system”.  It was a disaster; the system was constantly breaking down, halting gun sales, costing stores and gun shows untold sales and additional costs.  (The problem “magically fixed itself” within weeks of President Bush assuming office in 2001, and the problems have not recurred.)

Fairness Doctrine:

Holder is a big supporter of the Fairness Doctrine, which the Left is hoping will silence talk radio and internet on the Right.  In 2004, he told the (very left wing) American Constitution Society:  “With the mainstream media somewhat cowered by conservative critics, and the conservative media disseminating the news in anything but a fair and balanced manner, and you know what I mean there, the means to reach the greatest number of people is not easily accessible.”

Gunwalker Case:

Holder has been involved in the “Gunwalker Case” in which the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms is accused of allowing guns to get into the hands of criminals in Mexico.  Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) asked Holder when he first knew about the ATF operation known as “Fast and Furious”.  Despite the fact that the documents originated in 2009, Holder told Congress he only learned of it a “few weeks” ago.  Issa asked who at the DOJ, if not Holder, approved ‘Fast and Furious’. Holder said he didn’t know, ‘but that investigations are underway to find that out.’  (In April ’11, the NRA called for Holder’s resignation over this matter.)

Holder Quotes Highlighting his Dislike for All-Things-Conservative:

Eric has been a long-standing member of the board of directors of the ultra-left swinging American Constitution Society.   The ACS believes–as one can assume Holder and the entire Obama administration believes– that the Constitution is a “living, breathing thing”.  It is funded by all the major Left Wing stereotypes, including George Soros’s Open Society Institute, the Ford Foundation, Tides
Foundation and the Barbra Streisand Foundation. At one of their functions, Holder had the following things to say about Conservatives.  (Spoiler alert:  He doesn’t like us very much…)

• “Conservatives have been defenders of the status quo, afraid of the future, and content to allow to continue to exist all but the most blatant inequalities.”
• “They (Conservatives) have made a mockery of the rule of law.”
• “Conservatives try to put the environment at risk for the sake of unproven economic theories, to play to the fears of our citizens, and not to their hopes, and to return the nation to a time that in fact never existed.”
• “Conservatives are breathtaking in their arrogance, from redistricting schemes, to attacks on abortion rights, to energy policies that are as shortsighted as they are ineffective, to tax cuts that disproportionately favor those who are well off and perpetuate many of the inequities in our nation, the conservative movement has been unafraid to push the limits in advancing this agenda.”
• Holder denounced “the conservative agenda of social division, mindless tax cutting, and a defense posture that does not really make us safer.”
• “The nation must be reminded that the word liberal is more than a conservative slur. The nation must be reminded that it was the progressive, liberal tradition that brought about the social and economic changes that were necessary many years ago. The nation must be convinced that it is a progressive future that holds the greatest promise for equality and the continuation of those policies that serve to support the greatest number of our people. In the short term this will not be an easy task.”

When you see everything altogether, Eric Holder’s agenda seems perfectly clear—and he continues to be completely in sync with his boss regarding the direction they want to take America.”

Source:

http://patriotupdate.com/articles/obama’s-attorney-gen-eric-holder-who-is-this-man-part-2-of-2

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to the above article and/or blog post-You Decide:

President and DOJ have contributed to the racial mess in our country!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/09/26/president-and-doj-have-con...

Obama and Holder’s Hidden Agenda!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/11/14/obama-and-holders-hidden-a...

When Did the American People Elect Eric Holder Commander in Chief?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/02/05/when-did-the-american-peop...

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-underst...

Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts, please copy web site and paste it on your browser.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered controversial is being censored-what happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”

Semper Fi!

Jake

Posted on Floyd Reports-By Ben Johnson-On May 20, 2011:

“In his official notice to Congress that he had unilaterally sent American soldiers into the Libyan war kinetic action, Barack Obama wrote, “I am providing this report as part of my efforts to keep the Congress fully informed, consistent with the War Powers Resolution.”

Today, he decided the War Powers Resolution is also disposable. In a letter to Congress today Obama declared America’s role in the Libyan civil war is so “limited” that he does not need Congressional authorization, as that law requires. He then asked their support for a measure John Boehner had not even seen. The move is the most recent of a string of Obama actions that bypass Congress to implement his agenda.

The War Powers Resolution allows the president to introduce troops into war for 60 days before either seeking Congressional approval or beginning a 30-day withdrawal.

Those 60 days ended today. However, Congress adjourned this afternoon without providing authorization.

Obama has made clear our troops are staying in the middle of a losing civil war no matter what the members of Congress – or the people who elected them – think.

Only as Congress was ready to adjourn did Obama send a letter to the leaders of both houses supporting a resolution in favor of the war. The measure drafted by Sens. John Kerry, John McCain, Carl Levin, Dianne Feinstein, Lindsey Graham, and Joe Lieberman.

Obama wrote passing the resolution would “underline the U.S. commitment” to this “remarkable” action. As an afterthought, he added it would be “important in the context of our constitutional framework” – not because it is a legal requisite imposed by constitution and statute – but because “it would demonstrate a unity of purpose among the political branches.” If there is a division, the implication is that Obama would continue without such “unity.”

At least one Congressional leader said he had not yet seen the resolution, much less had it been approved. A spokesman for Speaker of the House John Boehner, Michael Steel, told the L.A. Times, “We received the president’s letter but have yet to see the draft resolution it mentions.”

The president concluded the letter with his traditional audacious lie: “It has always been my view that it is better to take military action, even in limited actions such as this, with Congressional engagement, consultation, and support.”

Obama has similarly lied to Congress by proxy. Deputy Secretary of State James Steinberg recently told legislators Obama had always “been mindful of the provisions of the War Powers Resolution. He has acted in a manner consistent with it. He will continue to do so.”

On Friday, Obama proved this statement is a lie. (If Congress cannot summon the courage to hold Obama accountable, can they at least force out Steinberg?)

The administration’s allies have been remarkably open about why they did not wish to bring a resolution to the floor: It will not pass. Sen. Carl Levin, D-MI, admitted, “I’m not inclined to try to put forth a resolution because I think it just won’t accomplish what I want to, which is to provide, basically, support.” He added allowing Congress to vote on this war “kind of opens up issues that frankly I don’t think end up being helpful to what I think is the right position, which is to basically continue on the course that we’re on.”

For once, Levin’s calculations are right on. Indiana Sen. Richard Lugar, who opposes the intervention, has stated, “it is uncertain whether majorities could be assembled for any particular resolution.”

Sen. John Kerry, the chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, has provided predictably mushy leadership, hoping the president would do his legal duty so he is not “stretching anything inappropriate.” And that’s as far as he went. The man who lied that the memory of spending Christmas Eve 1968 fighting in Cambodia had been “seared” into his mind, and who criticized Richard Nixon’s widening of a war Congress authorized via the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, now says stretching a war on behalf of al-Qaeda in Libya can go forward.

If given the chance Congress would (or should) vote to end our involvement in our third and least-justified war in the Muslim world.

“In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found,” James Madison wrote, “than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace to the legislature, and not to the executive department.”

From the days of the Founders until recent decades, no significant U.S. military action took place apart from Congressional authorization.

A look at the history of U.S. interventions abroad taken without Congressional approval shows most actions were taken in self-defense or as an immediate response to a foreign attack upon U.S. interests. The War Powers Resolution may be unconstitutional because it allows the president to initiate war for 60 days.

Even assuming the act is constitutional, it is dubious that Obama had the authority to commit troops to battle. Its provisions specifically limit when the president may send our soldiers into “hostilities”:

The constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to

1.    a declaration of war,

2.    specific statutory authorization, or

3.    a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces. (Emphasis added.)

Intervening in Libya’s civil war meets none of these criteria.

Congressmen Dennis Kucinich and Ron Paul raised the specter of impeachment over this unauthorized war, only to step their statements back. Former Reagan administration Justice Department official Bruce Fein has drafted articles of impeachment over the matter.

Starting a war-by-decree is bad enough. Continuing it without approval is virtually unprecedented. Bill Clinton conducted his 78-day bombing of Serbia – another war that benefited an al-Qaeda affiliate, the Kosovo Liberation Army – without statutory approval. However, Clinton argued that by voting to fund the war, Congress had voted for authorization.

Until today, Obama had not asked for any authorization of any kind. This is a war by executive order.

This defiance has some detractors. Sen. Rand Paul led five additional senators, including Jim DeMint and Tom Coburn, in writing a letter to President Obama asking if he planned to comply with the law (read the full text here). Rand told CNN this week Obama “appears to be in violation of the War Powers Act.”

California Democratic Congressman Brad Sherman accused Obama of bringing “democracy to Libya while shredding the Constitution of the United States.” Sherman stood tough against the leader of his own party, saying Obama “cannot continue what he is doing in Libya without congressional authorization. When a president defiantly violates the law, that really undercuts our efforts to urge other countries to have the rule of law.”

Conversely, at least one significant Republican has given the president cover. John McCain said, “I’ve never recognized the constitutionality of the War Powers Act, nor has any president, either Republican or Democrat.” That’s good; it is likely unconstitutional. Unfortunately, McCain’s objection is not how easy it makes for the president to launch a war. CNN reports, “McCain said he doesn’t believe the War Powers Act is constitutional and therefore he doesn’t believe the president needs congressional authorization to continue the mission.” (Emphasis added.)

When it comes to unconstitutional wars, McCain seems to be saying he is siding with “my friends” on the other side of the aisle.

In this case, it means supporting a president who has shown a willingness to rule by executive orders, regulations, and decrees – bypassing Congress to implement his supporters’ far-Left agenda.

Obama’s war-by-decree goes forward shamelessly, illegally, and unconstitutionally. The nation must rise up and end this war before ending the lawless administration that launched it.”

Source:

http://floydreports.com/king-obama-tramples-the-law-continues-libyan-war-by-decree/

Note:  The following articles and/or blog posts and video relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

White House on War Powers Deadline: ‘Limited’ US Role in Libya Means No Need to Get Congressional Authorization-Posted on ABCNews.com-By Jake Tapper-On May 20, 2011:

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2011/05/white-house-on-war-powers-deadline-limited-us-role-in-libya-means-no-need-to-get-congressional-autho.html

Video: Democrat Congressman, Obama “Shredding the Constitution” with Libyan War-Posted on ExposeObama.com-On May 20, 2011:

http://www.exposeobama.com/2011/05/20/video-democrat-congressman-obama-shredding-the-constitution-with-libyan-war/?utm_source=Expose+Obama&utm_campaign=ec5f51dce6-EO_05_20_20115_20_2011&utm_medium=email

Six GOP Senators to Obama: Follow the Law on Libya-Posted on ExposeObama.com-On May 20, 2011:

http://www.exposeobama.com/2011/05/20/six-gop-senators-to-obama-follow-the-law-on-libya/?utm_source=Expose+Obama&utm_campaign=ec5f51dce6-EO_05_20_20115_20_2011&utm_medium=email

Note:  My following blog post contains numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Godfather of The Islamic Revolution!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/11/godfather-of-the-islamic-revolution/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts, please copy web site and paste it on your browser.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered controversial is being censored-what happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”

Semper Fi!

Jake

So the title ain't much to look at, but this tidbit of info may be.

Tuesday, May 17, 2011.

Phoenix,  AZ

Noon

3 Israeli Fighters trek across the Phoenix Metro skies flying in a Northerly direction at a usual speed and altitude, I'd assumed for training purposes. Usual altitude because they were high enough for the radar from Luke AFB to pick them up I'm sure.

Now, my question is, were they from Israel? Pakistan? Mexico City? or all three? Hmm?!

I know that we are all aware that the US military and State Department are well versed within the scope of International Laws prohibiting such Flights over Sovereign Airspace without prior and approved notice from Host Nation.

So, did anyone know or care to know if Mexico has an AirForce?

With the Drug Cartel reaping Havoc down there, would it be at all possible for the thing which escapes everyones mind come to a reality one day?

China owns the Panama Canal. FACT!

And, North Korea has the Nuke. FACT!

Mexico has a major problem with its own people. FACT!

Central and South America toying and entertaining possible ties with Taliban, Iran, China, North Korea, etc. etc. FACT!

And we're all being Hyped Out by some Contraversy about our President. D I S T R A C T I O N S !!!!!!!!!!!!!

LOOK ALIVE AMERICA.

This is the usual suspect of Case Scenario's which always takes place before the Big One happens.

Distractions up the wazoo to keep everyone (us People-Folk) at a "I / we didn't have a clue that was going on!" mindset, while our enemy (s) sneakup from behind, from the sides, and direct full frontal assault (remember 911) so our government leaders can cry "Foul!" and call us a bunch of illiterate bystanders.

I don't think so.

NOT THIS TIME!!!!!!!!

AMERICA MUST SAVE AMERICA!

BECAUSE OUR LEADERS ARE SLEEPING WITH THE ENEMY!

NO BRAG. NO HYPE.

JUST F A C T !!!!!!!

 DID THE PAKISTAN MILITARY RECEIVE 50 MILITARY

JETS, FROM THE CHINESE MILITARY LAST WEEK ? SO

THEY COULD LOOK AT OR TAKE THE HIGH TECH U.S.

MILITARY HELICOPTER TAIL WING ?

IS SO THE PAKISTANEES  ARE TWO FACED, AND CAN NOT BE TRUSTED  ~ FOR A LONG TIME NOW. THE PART IS VERY HIGH TECH, AND COSTED THE TAX PAYERS MILLONS TO MAKE.

     “The president of the United States, Barack Obama, doesn’t seem to have chosen the right model to copy for his “green economy,” Spain. After the government of José Luís Rodríguez Zapatero demonized a study of different experts about the fatal economic consequences of renewable energies, an internal document from the Spanish cabinet that it is even more negative has just been leaked. 

     PajamasMedia.com

Green-Tech Model Advocated by Obama

Destroyed the Prosperous Spanish Economy

Undisclosed Debt Revelations Startle Voters

     First Greece, then Ireland and Portugal, now Spain, next America?  Two reports by the every vigilant Pajamas Media (PJM); and numerous other revelations from Spain are painting an ugly picture of political corruption, stupidity and rampant cronyism in eastern Iberia.  The Spanish Socialist government has issued a secret report showing that their green-tech jobs program destroyed the country’s once prosperous economy. 2011’s 21.3% UNEMPLOYMENT  figure confirms their confession as did the PJM’s uncovering of the original story.

     In 1997, Spain was the most prosperous European economy and one of the strongest in the world:  unemployment stood at less than 4%.  The country’s most popular political power, the Socialist Party began movement toward a green economy at that time.  Today, unemployment is five and a half times as high.  The elections in Spain in 2010 sent the ruling Socialists out of power; but people are today none too happy with the traditionally weaker Conservative Party either.  Most people believe that all the politicians in Spain pass laws to benefit themselves and do little for the people.  The country’s tiny Moderate Party made big gains in the 2010 elections and is expected to do even better in the 2012 ones.  The Socialists, however, are truly under-the-gun since recent revelations of heretofore huge unacknowledged debt has dealt an angry surprise to the voters and may force the nation to follow in the footsteps of bankrupt Greece, Ireland and Portugal and require a bailout from the international monetary fund (which American voters largely finance).

     Piles of undisclosed debt in local government associated with the operation of the country’s green-tech jobs programs are shaking up a political scene that was pretty much in chaos to begin with.  Spain, which had been doing everything it could to avoid becoming the next European bailout recipient, is far worse off than its people had been led to believe.  The huge debt revelations in 2010 seemed to indicate that the Socialists were waiting for the Conservatives to discover it after the election so the voters might “shoot the messenger” in the next election.  Unfortunately for the Socialists, the truth emerged and anger has remained rampant along the Costa del Sol and throughout the Spanish countryside over the last year.   Even today Spain has had trouble eradicating the debt and regaining a firm economic footing because of contract disputes with green energy companies created by the Socialist’s green energy programs.

     It all began with the first “offseason” government change earlier in 2010 in Catalonia which revealed a budget deficit there more than twice what had been reported earlier.  Piles of “hidden debt” are still being revealed to the new government related to the green program and to health clinics and other suppliers . . . in short, economists and analysts and numerous anecdotal reports from companies that supply local governments in Spain indicate widespread, unrecorded debt.  Companies complained that the Socialists when in power pressured them to do business off-the-books rather than immediately bill for goods and services according to  Fernando Eguidazu, vice president of the Circulo de Empresarios business lobby group in Madrid.  This chicanery continues to add tens of billions of euros to the official debt figures reported by local and regional governments.

     Undermined by a 21.3% unemployment rate and a perceived slowness in reacting to the country’s economic crisis, the Socialists lost control of the municipal governments of Barcelona and Seville, the country’s second- and third-largest cities.  Young people are protesting everywhere including the main plazas of Madrid, Barcelona and Valencia.  Unemployment among those in their 20’s and 30’s reached 50% in many areas at the height of the Spanish crisis. 

      Pajamas Media’s exclusive original story about the leaked Spanish government report in 2010 was confirmed later by several Spanish newspapers.   Yes, the very same Spanish “green economy” policies  that Barack Obama has modeled his administration’s green-jobs programs upon . . . have been cited by the Socialist government that created them as an “expensive, ineffective and unworkable disaster.”  The first Spanish newspaper on the scent was La Gaceta, a Madrid daily.  At about the time the story “went viral” the Socialist government came out with an admission that it was true. 

For Americans the shocker has to be that the headline in La Gaceta (the Gazette) seemed to be aimed squarely at a USA target audience as it screams out (English Translation Provided by Rajjpuut):

“Spain admits that the green economy

Sold to Obama is a disaster.”

http://pajamasmedia.com/files/2010/05/economia_verde_ruina.pdf

     The Spanish public is still up in arms.  An academic team in Spain revealed all this in 2007 and was treated monstrously by the country’s media and by the ruling Socialists trying to discredit the survey’s purpose as purely political and without merit (Americans will recall that when the results of the Spanis study were brought up in a press conference, Obama Press Secretary Robert Gibbs made fun of the questioner).  Dr. Gabriel Calzada, the Spaniard who first exposed the disaster in 2007 was finally vindicated despite taking mountains of flack from the progressive academic establishment at his own and other universities across the country. 

     Professor Calzada is today often still  featured on all the nation’s most important news and business talk shows.  Despite all the nasty attacks he received, the good professor had enough integrity to stick by his guns these last four years and a year ago even wrote praise for “The dissection of ‘free-ice cream green jobs economics’” on the book jacket of Power Grab:  How Obama’s Green Policies Will Steal Your Freedom and Bankrupt America by American author Christopher C. Horner, a Pajamas Media watchdog whose book bears this enscription on the inside flap:  “Barack Obama’s ‘Green’ Policies Start With Controlling Your Energy…and End With Your Life.”

http://www.amazon.com/Power-Grab-Policies-Freedom-Bankrupt/dp/1596985992

     This scandal associated with deliberately villifying Calzada and covering up the truth for three years, however, pales in contrast with the undisclosed debt still popping up everywhere in the country.  But Spaniards and Americans would do well to remember that the problems associated with our own financial meltdown** and with Spain’s collapse began years ago with misguided and deliberate progressive policies (more later).  For now remember this, in Calzada’s study:

       A)   2.2 real jobs in the real economy were lost for each green-tech job subsidized by the Spanish government. 

       B)   The average subsidized green tech job there (although counted equally with all the lost permanent jobs in the real economy) lasted less than a year. 

       C)   Only 10% of all the Spanish green-tech jobs proved permanent.

       D)  So, in reality, 22 real jobs in the real economy were lost for every permanent green job created in Spain

       E)   The average green tech job there paid roughly $12.20.

       F)   The owners of Spanish solar plants make 12 times more than what they pay for the energy coming from fossil fuel combustion. The majority of this profit comes from subsidies charged to the consumer via taxes.

     The long-run numbers are even scarier for Spain.  The government itself in recent revelation says that the alternative energies sector are stil scheduled to receive 126 billion euros in the next 25 years.  And things bode very badly for America:   Pajamas Media put it like this: 

      “The president of the United States, Barack Obama, doesn’t seem to have chosen the right model to copy for his “green economy,” Spain. After the government of José Luís Rodríguez Zapatero demonized a study of different experts about the fatal economic consequences of renewable energies, an internal document from the Spanish cabinet that it is even more negative has just been leaked.

     To one of the authors of the first report, Gabriel Calzada, “the government has leaked it intentionally in order to turn the media against renewable energies and to be stronger in negotiations with businesses.”  On eight occasions, the occupant of the White House referred to the Spanish model as an example to follow.  Barack Obama wants us to enjoy the same success the Spanish have known from green energy.

Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,

Rajjpuut 

** In America, the second wave of progressive sabotage began with the progressives in the Carter administration in 1977 passing the CRA ’77 legistlation that first forced private sector home lenders to make knowingly ill-advised loans to unqualified home loan applicants.  This travesty was multiplied four times by Bill Clinton (Bush, Sr. has a bit of the guilt on his resume as well); attacked this ridiculous law and exposed its weaknesses using Cloward-Piven Strategy by ACORN which controlled Bill Clintons electoral destiny for eighteen years.  Even ACORN lawyer Barack Obama did his part.  Overall the suspect loan rate in 1975 0.24%; became 0.51% in 1985; 14.2% in 1995 (after a Clinton regulatory expansion and two legislative expansions); and 34% in 2005. 

Thanks to ACORN many of these suspect loans after Clinton’s 1998 steroid version final expansion of CRA’77 put people without jobs; with abysmal credit ratings; with only food stamps to declare as “income” into $250,000 to $450,000 homes at zero downpament.  Bush, Jr. who is getting all the blame now . . . in January, 2005 (one of 19 such speeches and vote efforts) tried to repeal CRA laws and only succeeded thirty months later in getting a very weak version of his law passed in July, 2007.  It all proved too little too late, but did help some.  Today, much of the CRA legislation is still on the books waiting another ACORN push.  Of course, the mainstream media runs with the progressive line that “the conservatives and the free market put our economy into the ditch.”

By the way, the First Wave of sabotage ended when the federal government bailed out bankrupt New York City in 1975.  New York State and many states and other large cities were also driven near the point of bankruptcy and the stock market suffered its biggest losses (46%) since the Great Depression (sound familiar?) . . . thanks to the progressive-left’s implementation of Cloward-Piven Strategy and Alinsky tactics to deliberately double the welfare rolls from eight to sixteen million people in seven years and overload the system as promised. This also was a deliberate sabotage by the progressive left.  Rajjpuut has explained the matter in deep detail in numerous blogs.   Find another take on the Cloward-Piven Strategy history leading to the bankruptcy of NYC, here:

http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/09/barack_obama_and_the_strategy.html