ACTION

Hi Friends!

I just wanted to post this so my Teaparty friends could watch it. My company recently did this viral video for a client in Dallas and I thought some of you might enjoy it.  Everything cant be politics all the time!

Hi all,

Just wanted to say I am sorry if I have missed your emails - I have been unplugged for awhile so I could focus on family and friends and the holidays.

I hope you all had a great Christmas and a New Year filled with hope for our movement, our families and our sacred Republic.

If I owe you a response I will get it to you, I am in catch up mode right now!

Robert

You’ve done it folks! Republicans, thanks to the Tea Party, now have control of the “People’s House.” The new Speaker, after taking his oath that he would protect and defend our Constitution, was congratulated.  This humble man deserves all that we can give him in guidance.  Now our work begins of taking back our God-given rights, and our people in Congress will be with us. They say they are taking orders from us.  We of the Tea Party individually chose the Tea Party. Individually, we are chosen to accomplish this feat, not our representatives in Washington. Listen to what I tell you and those we put in office will do our bidding because what I tell you is your inner will.

Currently, the lesser of evils is to raise the debt ceiling. Currently, there are a lot of ideas going back and forth. Indecision is apparent. At the forming of the union, the lesser of the evils was seen as slavery.  At the time, the South’s economy was at stake. Slavery was for the good of all. The Supreme Court, in light of the needs of the time, sided with slavery.  The Civil War made the decision that slavery was the greater evil. America paid a hell of a price for the mistake of doing what was for the good of all. We are still paying. It is a lesson to remember.

In 2008, the lesser of the evils was seen as bailing out corrupt Wall Street.  It’s still the same. In 2011, the lesser of the evils is seen as raising the debt ceiling. It’s like being caught in a bear trap and the only solution is to cut off a foot; otherwise we perish. I’ll guarantee you that most people, rather than cut off a foot, would hope and pray for a miracle. Well, I’m going to tell you the miracle that will get us out of the bear trap we’re in.

The purpose of the law is to prevent being caught in a bear trap.  Having said this, it is customary in our time to ascribe legality as well as supremacy to the Constitution, legality being the form of law, supremacy being the moral and ethical values of the law, the one in truth but the obverse of the other.  That which is legal is a general expression of the law—whatever pleases our judges having the force of law; we the people yield our God-given rights, ostensibly, for the good of all.

At the cost of his life, Jesus declared: “seek ye first the Kingdom of God.”  That has no place in America’s current law, declared Elena Kagan, Obama’s last pick of Supreme Court judges, and approved by the Senate.  We do not have God-given rights under America’s current law.  Do not depend on Congress to protect your rights.  Your representatives consider only what is for the good of all.  You would think of all people Obama would know it is wrong.  He needs to be reminded that if it were not for Abraham Lincoln he would be an American slave.  Lincoln was not thinking in terms of what was for the good of all. Like Jesus, Lincoln paid with his life for thinking what Higher Law says.

Well, here we are, folks, caught in a bear trap. What to do? I’ve told you what I did. I’m going to tell you again. I studied the Constitution and my protections under it in the country library. Make this distinction: I did not go to law school to learn the customary way.  I learned the law and my protections. I used my common sense; that is, what was best for me, not what was for the good of all.  I felt that voices of the past were speaking to me, encouraging me. I had a bigger than life calling.

I challenged federal income tax as being unconstitutional.  Make a mental note of this: income tax is the only way to be heard in a court of law on your God-given rights. You have a personal stake in the outcome. 

When I went out on a limb for my God-given rights, I was aware that long ago the federal judiciary had ruled that the income tax was constitutional, and had many times since ruled that the income tax had not changed so much that it was unconstitutional.  Income tax has often been ruled illegal, but not unconstitutional.  When I petitioned the Tax Court, I could only be heard on the question of legality.  The Tax Court ruled that the IRS had illegally taxed me.  The IRS gave me back my sweat, that which it had illegally taken from me, which put me on the street, by the way.  Was that not a violation of the supremacy of the Constitution? Not according to America’s courts of law, who see it as an “error.” Mistakes will be made. It can’t be helped. Let’s take a  closer look at this “error” and judge whether the  courts are not lawless frauds but honestly interpreting our Constitution.  

The IRS made another “error.” The IRS confiscated my property again after the Tax Court ruled that it was in error.   I appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on the ground that the continuing errors were unconstitutional. The Court ruled for the IRS.  The IRS was allowed to keep my sweat it confiscated (in error).  I petitioned the Supreme Court. The Solicitor General told the Supreme Court that the IRS made an “error.” He didn’t tell the Court that the IRS was making error after error.  My case was not heard. The IRS kept what it had confiscated in “error.”  I filed a complaint in the District Court, for a third time. This time the judge didn’t dismiss my claim. Before I was heard, the Department of Justice told the Court that the IRS made an “error.”  The money confiscated was refunded.  Then the IRS went to my bank and confiscated every cent in my checking account.

I took the record to The Palm Beach Post.  The Post investigated. The IRS admitted on the front page of the Post that it had been in “error” many times and that the bank seizure was another “error.”  Was this an “error” or a violation of my God-given rights?  Whatever, the IRS ate its humble pie.  That was the end of it.  Does the end justify the means even when the means is lawless? Your judges say the end justifies the means. What say you?

As a general rule, the commands of law givers, sanctioned by the courts, is the law, whatever the case may be.  Is it lawful to tax incomes to the extent that some workers can’t exist, merely on the ground that it is for the good of all?   If this is the case, why couldn’t robbery be for the good all?  In fact, it is. The question isn’t whether or not to increase the debt. Common sense says the IRS is a lawless bandit.  We’ve got a long way to go and a short time to get there.

By standing up for my God-given rights—“seek ye first the kingdom of God,” said Jesus—my personal power became miraculous. I opened the bear trap and kept my foot. Not only did the IRS eat crow, but many miracles followed. When everything should have gone wrong, everything went right. I’m not a member of any religious faith. On my own, in a very real way, Jesus became my savior and redeemer. I can tell you from personal experience that Jesus is there for all of us.  If I could convince every member of Tea Party that there is a Higher Law that protects the individual’s right to life, liberty, and property, and it is there for each of us to use, we would not look to Washington ever again for leadership. We would look within for the God that exists in each of us, who has blessed us, my dear friends, and lead our representatives in paths of righteousness. I’m merely repeating what our Constitution says.  Don’t allow self-serving authorities to rob you of your rights. Our reason and logic is fundamental to the law. With it, we can climb the highest mountain, be anyone we want to be.  All of our dreams will come true if only we will look within.  

The other day there was a member of this site who posted regularly and often, "RAISING UP A STANDARD."

This member has inexplicably disappeared from the site.

All Blog Posts and All comments.

What Happened?

Anyone got a clue?

The Tea Party is made up of Americans who got a wake-up call and proceeded to act on a grand scale. This has never before happened in America. You people, in spite of the insults, have continued to grow in numbers by leaps and bounds—and individually directed. 

I’m 35 years ahead of you. I got my wake-up call in 1973 and acted.  I wrote a letter to Attorney General William Saxbe letting him know the income tax was unconstitutional and I’d see him in court. Be advised that you have a personal stake in the law under the income tax. Saxbe passed my letter on to the IRS and it acted, unconstitutionally. Under the Constitution, let it be known, we are innocent until proven guilty. Under the IRS rules, same as in slavery, an expedience for the good of all, you are guilty until proven innocent.  Why do we allow this?

I petitioned the Tax Court with a list of grievances.  The IRS offered, in part, to back off if I’d agree to drop the petition. Why would the IRS back off if they were right?  With their offer, they let me know that they would lose. They assumed that a peasant like me would not take them to court.  I turned the offer down.  I made good my promise that I’d see the Attorney General in court.  His lawyer, Solicitor General Wade H. McCree, Jr. appeared against me in the U. S. Supreme Court claiming the IRS made an “error.”  If I had made the error the IRS made, I’d be in jail.

The IRS, courts, Congress, and the President, because they had been getting away with it, thought they could sweep me under the carpet. They were wrong.

I took the court record to The Palm Beach Post. An investigation was made. The IRS admitted that it made many errors, and was still making errors against me 11 years after the first, this admitted in a front page story. The IRS apologized. Uncle Sam was very sorry that it is an unconstitutional fraud; it meant no harm. End of the story for all but me.

Would the original Americans have stood for this unconstitutional fraud?  Where did the Tea Party get its name?  The American people did not put up with King George’s tax. They revolted.  

I believed that federal income tax was abusing my God-given rights. One does not settle for part of his God-given rights. The IRS put me on the street, and in violation of the U. S. Code. When the key to my apartment would not open my door, I called the police. Although I didn’t have the money to pay my rent, thanks to the lawless IRS, the landlord had no right to lock me out without a legal procedure.  I’m law abiding. The IRS and my landlord were not. By acting against an unconstitutional tax, I found that the only way to keep the income tax in place is by intimidation and lies.  By the way, that’s what kept slavery in place.  One of the greatest of Presidents, Abraham Lincoln, freed the slaves.  Who will free we income tax slaves?

Do the American people know that God-given rights mean nobody can take them from you without your permission? America’s tyrannical authorities think you will not call their bluffs. Most of the time they are right. Now that the Tea Party has made itself known, your work has just begun. You must continue, uncompromisingly, toward your goal, your God-given rights. Give Washington an inch; it will take a mile.

Already we hear from Washington that we don’t have a choice. We simply must increase the debt limit in March, even though it is absolutely insane. This has all been carefully planned.  We will not be able to pay our debts; we will ruin our credit.  We will not be able to pay the troops; an unspeakable disaster will occur if we don’t raise the debt ceiling, and on and on until the inevitable: we become the hopeless slaves of the perpetrators. It’s nothing new.  

Maybe it would be a good thing to ruin our credit.  Maybe it would be a good thing to bring the troops home. Maybe it would be a good thing to shrink government to half of its size, even though the suffering would be great.  Even that could be a good thing. I was petrified in fear. A great change in my life was taking place over which I had no control. In my case, it forced me to look within and discover the real me.  There was no one else there for me.  I pulled myself up by my bootstraps and got on my path of destiny.  Everything started going right.

Jesus, after saying “in earth as it is in heaven,” in the Lord’s Prayer, said, “But seek ye first the kingdom of God.” Where do you think the kingdom of God is? Where is your soul? Where is your conscious awareness?  You exist in a place and a state. God is not in the IRS, or the government, or the courts. God is in your soul. Why would authorities not want to make you feel that you have no rights, that you must depend on them?  They think they know what is best for you. They are taught that.

Why do you think you were put in this place? Do you think you come programmed to go through the motions already set for you in advance, like a herd animal? That’s what your government wants. Are you here to make a life for yourself or here for the good of all? Government believes you are here to serve government, for the good of all. If you don’t believe me, try telling government you have God-given rights. 

Are you not doing your children an enormous disservice to obey unconstitutional laws that strip you of all of your God-given rights? The Nazis didn’t get away with saying they were obeying the law. Germany’s judges backed the Nazis. Why would America’s judges not back Uncle Sam? The law is not what tyrants say it is.

It will go hard on you to inform Washington that you have God-given rights nobody can take from you. Washington will try every way it can, by giving to you, by taking from you, by threatening you, by imprisoning you, to make you a believer in its corrupt power.

Henry Ford said if you think you can, you can. If you think you can’t, you can’t. I thought I could and I did. Welcome to the Tea Party.

In 2003, 2005, 2006, and again in 2008, then Kansas Governor Kathleen Sebelius killed legislation that would have tightened the rules for minors receiving abortions, tightened the rules for coerced late term abortions and tightened the rules in general for late term abortions.  In other words, from conception to  one minute before birth, Kathleen Sebelius insisted the womb be just another killing field for the unborn.  Now as head of HHS (Health and Human Services), Sebelius has reinstated the dreaded death panels removed from the health care bills by both the Republicans and Democrats, neither of who could face their constituents with the prospect of authorizing panels that could well sentence them or their loved ones to death via non-treatment of medical issues.

In a completely characteristic, brazen, cold-blooded move on Christmas eve, while the country celebrated the birth of a Savior, Kathleen Sebelius did with the stroke of a pen what Barrack Obama, Harry Reid, and Nancy Pelosi were unable to do and that is to create morbid, end of life death panels.  Congress and the president so feared the wrath of the people that they specifically stripped the so called "death panels" out of ObamaCare.  Just the thought of government deciding who lives and who dies was too much for the American Public, but apparently not too much for this amazing guilful Obama Administration.

So, what does all of this mean?  Simple, government is back in the death business.  Now Ms. Sebelius will have  the opportunity to create death panels from sea to shining sea all across the country.  Such panels will necessarily be staffed by Progressives who, unfortunately, see the elderly sick, the unborn poor, the chronically infirmed as useless eaters, who as times get tougher, will be denied medical care in defference to more "viable" treatment candidates for the highest and best use of resources as concerns overall positive outcomes.  In other words, good Progressives will take the less expensive and treat them and let the infirmed elder, poor, and chronically ill die.  As Alan Grayson said of the Republicans, their idea of health care is "die quickly."  He was correct … he just had the wrong party.

One might ask why I would infer that such panels would be staffed by Progressives?  Simple.  No Christian or constitutionalist would sit on such a ghoulish panel.  That leaves the job to heartless, empathetically challenged progressives.  That, of course, begs the question:  Will politics eventually find its way into the death panels?  That is, will conservatives die at a much higher rate than liberals?  One  may say, “No,” but history says, “Yes.”

Politics, like fine dust, finds its way into everything.  For instance, had Sarah Palin needed government health care to deliver her down syndrome baby, would that baby have been born — or — would have that baby have received a death sentence from the death panel?  If two people are in need of the same liver, one a Progressive political leader, the other a member of the Tea Party, which is the more likely candidate for the transplant if progressives are making the decision?   

Now Ms. Sebelius will be deciding the fate of your grandparents, or parents, or perhaps even our chronically ill sibling with MS, or perhaps even you and your chronic illness.  The death panels will be sold to us as just counselling sessions, letting the patient know of their treatment options.  But you and I know the truth.  Before they are done, these will be nothing more than eugenics chambers deciding on what "class" of people live and what "class" of people are not worth trying to save.  In other words, your treatment will be determined by where society or the Progressive elite feel they can get the most bang for the buck.  And, if a deteremination has to be made between a Christian constitutionalist and a good agnostic Progressive, is there any doubt about who lives and who dies with none but Progressives on the committee?

For Ms. Sebelius, this is the big time.  No longer confined to killing only the unborn, now she has created for herself the power of life and death from the sparkle of the wine, to the glint in the eye, to the last tremmoring breath of old age.

Death comes calling and death's name is government.  To paraphrase Revelation 6: "And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was government, and Hell followed with him."

When government, and this president, becomes as brazen as to bestow upon themselves the power of life and death, I fear the worst has already overtaken us and that both death and hell will follow with it.  Can one even grasp the breathtaking arrogance of this?  Government has now assumed the power of life and death!  No longer content with just making us appear naked in the surrender position in airports, no longer satisfied with the killing of the unborn, now Ms. Sibelius and Mr. Obama have assumed the power to grant or refuse life itself.  This is the ultimate “Star Chamber,” which now decides how and when your life might end. 

Have you had enough YET?  Is it finally time to say, “NO MORE!”

Is it not time for the Republicans, on our behalf, to gather up what little manhood they seem to have left (after getting their collective butts kicked during the Lame Duck session) and demand both the repeal of these ghoulish death panels and the immediate firing of Kathleen Sibelius?  After her firing, will they have the courage to charge her with Contempt of Congress for this egregious offense?

This is beyond wanton.  This is an act of war against both the constitution and the people of this country!  If Mr. Obama refuses to fire her, it is time to call for his impeachment.  This is such a grotesque breach of the public trust that it warrants the severest action possible under the Constitution of the United States.  This, added to the continued insults, contemptuous behavior, and unconstitutional dictums of this administration are unprecedented since the treason of Woodrow Wilson.

Now for the worst news yet ... this hasn't even been deemed a major story in the media.  

.   

Is this not disgusting?

In March 2011, we are told, America has no choice but to raise the debt ceiling. This idea of no choice began at the end of the Bush Administration. We were told that we had no choice but to bail out the frauds responsible for the economic crises. How stupid!  Next it will be the states that can’t control spending that we bail out, and for the same stupid reason. Would you buy a million dollar home when you didn’t have the money to buy a shack because you could borrow the money?  That’s exactly what a lot of people did. Should they be bailed out?  It’s a disaster, they tell us.

We are told that we must balance the budget by cutting who knows what?  I’ve offered the idea that we should phase out government entitlements. I received one favorable comment. Not one Member of Congress has had the courage to offer this as a solution. What does that tell you?

In several of my blogs, I’ve offered that we should do away with the income tax and the IRS, and valid reasons for it. I’ve received not one favorable comment. Congress is against it. What does that tell you?

Your government has in every way put itself higher than God, as well as the law of all times. I’ve written many blogs about my idea of God and the workings of the universe. I’ve yet to receive one favorable comment.  What does that tell you?

As our representatives in Washington have yet to offer any real solution to government overspending, everything I’ve written is worthy of serious consideration. As usual, all Washington talks about are the symptoms of the problem Washington caused. I’ve not heard this from anyone: under no circumstances, should the debt ceiling be raised.    All I’ve heard is that ceasing to overspend is totally out of the question.  It tells me that the American people are out of control,  and unless the people demand that their government cease now to raise the national debt ceiling we don’t have a chance of saving our precious freedoms.

How do you know what will happen if we cease now to overspend?  I tell you that in the end your  world will be better beyond your wildest imaginations. And if you don’t get real, you will be asking for another Dark Age.

I hear that the Tea Party wants a balanced budget amendment.  We cannot afford to wait for a balanced budget amendment. That takes a lot of time. America is a disaster waiting to happen for the simple reason that no one has the courage to do the only thing that can prevent disaster: stop overspending now, no matter what happens.  Get hold of your representative today and demand it.

I was here when the world watched Germany go bankrupt. Nothing was done to stop it. I was here when Hitler took control of Germany. Nothing was done to stop that madman.  I was here when Hitler’s armies crushed nations east and west of Germany. Nobody did one thing to stop him.  England was under German siege when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor. No matter what happened, the American people united.

America has not won a foreign war since World War II, and we’ve lost the war on poverty, too. One would think we would get real, but we have not. We are flat-out losers and yet we are not ready yet to say no matter what we’ve got to get spending under control.  Unless we face the facts now, folks, it is all over for America.  We won World War II and then we let what could have been the greatest advance in human history slip through our fingers. Here we sit on the brink of disaster with no answer, while the Obamas, making a mockery of our plight, make merry on our money. How can you do this to our children?  What are they to do after you lived your good life on borrowed money and are dead and gone. When they are struggling under the debt you left them, what are they going to think of you when they look at your President and First Lady?

I find it very interesting that conservative talk show hosts who say that Obama wants to surrender some of our governance to the United Nations are the same people who claim we have done nothing to cause the Palestinians, and much of the Muslim world, to be so upset with us. They forget that the state of Israel was taken from Palestinian land without their approval.
The Balfour Declaration of 1917 formalized British policy preferring the establishment of a national home for the Jewish people. Following World War I, the League of Nations granted Great Britain the Mandate for Palestine, which included responsibility for securing "the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people". In 1947, Tte newly created United Nations approved the Partition Plan for Palestine, which sought to divide the country into two states—one Arab and one Jewish. Jerusalem was to be designated an international city administered by the UN.

So far, Anuzis is the only RNC Chair candidate to hold a grassroots forum. Be sure to let your RNC folks know, and let your state GOP delegates know as well.

Tuesday, Jan 4, 2011
8 to 9 PM Eastern
7 to 8 PM Central
5 to 6 PM Pacific

For the phone to call and more details, visit party.PROCINCT.net

PROCINCT is proud to be part of the effort to bring you a balanced, informed view of the race for RNC Chair.

My Webster’s College Dictionary defines secular humanism as any set of beliefs that promotes human values without specific allusion to religious doctrine, and secularism as secular spirit or tendency, especially as a system of political or social philosophy that rejects religious faith and worship. I ask that you make this distinction before we proceed.

As a secular humanist, I’m open all human values. This is not counter in any way to the Word of God?  As a secular humanist, I don’t think to be a child of God one must adhere to the doctrines and dogmas of any religion, as long as he or she possesses human values. Humans believe in doing to others as you would have them do unto you.  In any event, in my opinion, humans would not condemn their own kind to hell.  Christian dogma condemned my Jewish mother to hell, and me, a secular humanist, the work of the devil!  We are smart enough to know better.  What is the reason for this?

I accept Jesus as my personal savior but I do not condemn those who do not accept Jesus.  Why should I? As a matter of fact, Jesus was not a Christian; he as an unorthodox Jew. Jesus was, by definition, a secular humanist, one who believed we are all our brother’s keeper. My thinking works for me. If your thinking works for you, more power to you. Why judge me? Why should I think like you?

Five hundred years ago, the Church, supposedly founded by St. Peter, the first Pope, the “foundation rock” of Christianity, Christians believe, also believing in a supernatural god under whom, most conveniently, anything goes they say goes, the Holy Roman Catholic Empire, which controlled Europe, having decreed that our planet was at the center of the universe, and that anyone who did not accept this ungodly nonsense was a heretic, and would go to trial for heresy, Galileo, who proved by scientific means that the earth was not at the center of the universe, was convicted of heresy and threatened with torture if he did not confess his sin.  

Any more than the Holy Roman Catholic Empire, is Islam attempting to promote human values.  In no way by today’s interpretation of human values, a husband has the God-given right to beat his wife. Islam wants to take us back to Arabia in the year 600 A.D, and there is no way you can reason with Muslims. Like the Holy Catholic faith 500 years ago, it is blind to today’s reality.

In Time Life’s European Emergence:  “On foot and horseback, a steady stream of peasants and villagers crowded the rutted roads into the small German town of Juterbog. . . The celebrated Dominican preacher Johann Tetzel had set up in the marketplace a rostrum surmounted by a great cross decorated with the arms of Pope Leo X; Tetzel’s credentials, a document of authorization from the pontiff himself, lay on a gold-embroidered cushion. And beside the rostrum, a representative of the Augsburg banking house of Fugger superintended the chest into which the credulous would be invited to deposit their florins. ‘As soon as the coin in the coffer rings, the soul from purgatory springs,’ ran the catch phrase attributed to Tetzel.”  

Martin Luther, a 33 year-old lecturer in biblical studies from the nearby University of Wittenberg was there, and madder than a hornet.  Little did he know that the banking house of Fugger was there to collect on a loan it made to Luther’s bishop.  His bishop agreed to pay the pope for his high office, and borrowed the money from the Augsburg banking house.  The whole thing was a Ponzi scheme for ungodly purposes.

Luther was dead set against the money making indulgences fraud. It just so happened that the printing press had been invented and Pope Leo was a bit slow in taking action against Luther. Too bad. Luther spread the word around that he did not approve of indulgences. A protest grew and the Holy Catholic Empire lost much of its power. I doubt that you know that the Protestant Reformation got its start because of a Holy Catholic Ponzi scheme?  

Don’t fight it. Islam fights back with a vengeance. Let Islam stew in its own juice. Promote human values. In Evan Harris Walker’s The Physics of Consciousness, in Chapter 18, “A God for Tomorrow,”  this new age prophet, a quantum physicist and brain doctor, writes:

Now we see that the independent existence of matter and absoluteness of space were false dogma. But it has only been with the advent of quantum theory that we have discovered proof that we exist as something more than pieces of matter.  In the development of quantum theory, the observer emerges as a co-equal in the foundry of creation.  .  . The tests of Bell’s theorem have shown us that objective reality as it has been conceived is not the true fabric of reality.  The observer interacts with matter.  Consciousness, the substance of this newfound reality that defines the observer, has fundamental existence.” Did you know that the quantum mind is the basic reality? I doubt it.

As a matter of scientifically proven fact, beyond the forces of electromagnetism and gravity, there is a force of nature that controls the universe. It is beyond space and time.  It is the superconsciousness of the universe. Not many know this. With the present knowledge emerging of the underlying structure of the universe, a unity of man and nature, all things being aspects of the mind, this is going to replace religion.  A god-self exists in each of us.

Logic tells us that without consciousness, nothing could exist; that we are conscious beings created with logic. Consciousness is natural, not supernatural. Thus, it is unnatural for man to give up his most essential asset: logic. Having said this, I submit to you the First Amendment to the Constitution:

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

At the present, only 13 percent of the American people have faith in Congress.  Obama was elected with the support of big money, the labor unions, and government workers. Rather than a supernatural illusion placed on the gullible by less than human men, we’ve got the Tea Party to take on Congress, the President, and the judiciary. What are we going to do with it? Has Congress, or the President, or the federal judiciary adhered to the First Amendment?  Have they all not unconstitutionally imposed their power on the American people? Have not men in authority read into the First Amendment all manner of illogic to deprive you of your God-given rights, to enslave you to their wills?  Are they your master or you servants? What can we do about it?   Keep in mind that Hitler was legal but that logic said there were higher laws that adhered to the principles and values established over the life of man.  The First Amendment gives you the right to petition the Government for a redress of grievances,  and we’ve got plenty.

Your Constitution is a historical document in a glass case unless you use it as a living document, giving you inalienable rights, to quote Black’s Law Dictionary: “Rights which are not capable of being surrendered or transferred without the consent of the one possessing such rights.” It doesn’t take a Philadelphia lawyer to understand this.  We read scores of blogs telling us how our God-given rights are being abused. We don’t read what we, personally, can do about it, accept from me.

I’ve been told that here that Jesus will do wonders for me if I accept him as my Lord and Master. Obviously, the informer had not been reading my blogs.  I have accepted Jesus and I’ve been greatly rewarded. I’ve written my personal experiences. I’ve told you that you can, yourself, shoot your government down—make it eat crow before the whole world. You can argue with me till the cows come home, but given the facts and evidence, you deserve everything you get or don’t get from your government if you don’t personally demand, in some meaningful way, your God-given rights. It is the nature of government to take every right you have if you allow it.  That’s why you have the Bill of Rights.  The Founding Fathers knew what happens when people have no rights.