All Posts (27634)

Sort by


So the next step for me was to put together a platform on what I stood for and willing to fight for. I came up with the following:


text-autospace:none"">God13.0pt;font-family:Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana""> is Love. “In God We Trust.” “Do to others as you would have others do to you,” Promoting God in theSacramento Equation.


text-autospace:none"">Family, “One Man, One Woman,” is the “Core of American Society.”


text-autospace:none"">Freedom is Personal Power “Under God” to Determine Direction and Destiny.


text-autospace:none"">Republic is “Of the People, by the People, and for the People”.


text-autospace:none"">Constitution is the Operating Law of the Republic.


text-autospace:none"">Limited Government is Opposite of Socialism, Marxism, & Fascism where Government has total control of everything: land, business, life, water, & servitude.


text-autospace:none"">Justice13.0pt;font-family:Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana""> = Punish Criminals,
not Law Abiding; Impeach Special Interest Judges. People's Grand Jury indictment only. All three elements of crime present - Act, Intent & Damage.


text-autospace:none"">Free Market =
Right to Succeed or Fail in Business; No Bail-outs; No Favoritism; No Socialism.


text-autospace:none"">Business Friendly = Jobs coming into the State, Not Jobs leaving the State


text-autospace:none"">Small Business = Responsible for 99.4% of all of the jobs in California, therefore create a business friendly environment for small business through tax restructuring.


text-autospace:none"">Large Business =
Crucial to the Economy, the creation of jobs and the building of GNP.


text-autospace:none"">Lower Taxes Now = Lower Personal & Property Taxes Now! No Estate Tax!


text-autospace:none"">Balanced Budget Now = Balance the Budget Now!


text-autospace:none"">Private Property =
The American Dream. The opposite of Socialism, Marxism, and Fascism where the State and the Elite own all the land.


text-autospace:none"">Right to Bear Arms = Second Amendment right; for the protection of Self, Family, Property, State,and Hunting for Conservation.


text-autospace:none"">Rule of Law = Order in Government, Society, and Culture.





Read more…

Warren Willis Platform

text-autospace:none"">font-family:Verdana;mso-fareast-font-family:Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">1. Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">God13.0pt;font-family:Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana""> normal"">is Love. “In God We Trust.”“Do to others as you would have others do to you,” Promoting God in theSacramento Equation.

text-autospace:none"">font-family:Verdana;mso-fareast-font-family:Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">2. Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">Family, “OneMan, One Woman,” is the “Core of American Society.”

text-autospace:none"">font-family:Verdana;mso-fareast-font-family:Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">3. Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">Freedom mso-bidi-font-weight:bold"">is font-family:Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">Personal Power “Under God” toDetermine Direction and Destiny.

text-autospace:none"">font-family:Verdana;mso-fareast-font-family:Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">4. Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">Republic is“Of the People, by the People, and for the People”.

text-autospace:none"">font-family:Verdana;mso-fareast-font-family:Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">5. Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">Constitution isthe Operating Law of the Republic.

text-autospace:none"">font-family:Verdana;mso-fareast-font-family:Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">6. Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">Limited Government isOpposite of Socialism, Marxism, & Fascism where Government has totalcontrol of everything: land, business, life, water, & servitude.

text-autospace:none"">font-family:Verdana;mso-fareast-font-family:Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">7. Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">Justice13.0pt;font-family:Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana""> = Punish Criminals,not Law Abiding; Impeach Special Interest Judges. People's Grand Juryindictment only. All three elements of crime present - Act, Intent &Damage.

text-autospace:none"">font-family:Verdana;mso-fareast-font-family:Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">8. Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">Free Market =Right to Succeed or Fail in Business; No Bail-outs; No Favoritism; NoSocialism.

text-autospace:none"">font-family:Verdana;mso-fareast-font-family:Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">9. Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">Business Friendly =Jobs coming into the State, Not Jobs leaving the State

text-autospace:none"">font-family:Verdana;mso-fareast-font-family:Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">10. Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">Small Business =Responsible for 99.4% of all of the jobs in California, therefore create abusiness friendly environment for small business through tax restructuring.

text-autospace:none"">font-family:Verdana;mso-fareast-font-family:Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">11. Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">Large Business =Crucial to the Economy, the creation of jobs and the building of GNP.

text-autospace:none"">font-family:Verdana;mso-fareast-font-family:Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">12. Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">Lower Taxes Now =Lower Personal and Property Taxes Now! No Estate Tax!

text-autospace:none"">font-family:Verdana;mso-fareast-font-family:Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">13. Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">Balanced Budget Now =Balanced Budget Now!

text-autospace:none"">font-family:Verdana;mso-fareast-font-family:Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">14. Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">Private Property =The American Dream. The opposite of Socialism, Marxism, and Fascism where theState and the Elite own all the land.

text-autospace:none"">font-family:Verdana;mso-fareast-font-family:Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">15. Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">Right to Bear Arms =Second Amendment right; for the protection of Self, Family, Property, State,and Hunting for Conservation.

text-autospace:none"">font-family:Verdana;mso-fareast-font-family:Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">16. Verdana;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana"">Rule of Law =Order in Government, Society, and Culture.

Read more…
I soon found out out that recruiting candidates to run for office is not such an easy task, for after 3 weeks we had only recruited 2 candidates with our presuppositions. So, with one week to go before the filing deadline, I decided that I ought to run and find out first hand what everyone was so apprehensive about. Again, with the permission of the California School Project Board, I filed to run for the California State Senate in the 30th District where I live (La Mirada, Whittier, Norwalk, Santa Fe Springs, Montebello, East LA, etc) to run against Ron Calderon, the Head of the State Banking and Finance Committee. By March 12 my name was qualified to be placed on the June 8 California Primary ballot.

Amazing! Retired missionary, now running for the CA State Senate. Am I qualified? I certainly know how to vote "No" on an unbalanced budget, so maybe in the view of the Liberals, I am not qualified, but then that one thing makes me more than qualified then all of them in my mind.

This is a very interesting education and a much bigger undertaking than I had imagined. No wonder most express reluctance to run for an office. And then there are are the two formerly unknown big questions that suddenly loom....(smile) "What if I don't win?" and the other (even bigger smile) "What if I do win?"


Read more…

color:black"">George Washingtonyes""> from theChairmanmso-bidi-font-family:Arial;color:black"">

Political Action Committeeyes""> font-family:Arial;mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;color:black;mso-bidi-font-weight:bold">16177 Whittier Blvd,12.0pt;font-family:Arial;mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;color:black""> color:black;mso-bidi-font-weight:bold"">Whittier, CA 90603

yes""> Email.georgewashingtonpac@gmail.com

web: www.georgewashingtonpac.com

Tel. 562-902-1945; Fax 562-902-1940

CA ID #1323680; Last Edit: Feb 2, 2010

An Open Letter to Concerned Christian and Conservative Citizens

of California of any Party or Ethnic Background:

My name is Warren Willis. My wife of 46 years passed away and I have recently remarried. We have 20 grandchildrenbetween us and I have two that are fifth generation native Californians. Igrew up in LA and taught school here for several years and then joinedCampus Crusade for Christ. After 44 years, 25 as a missionary in othercountries, ten in Outer Mongolia, I recently retired.

I am presently president and founder of the California School Project. Our purpose is to promote God, theBible and Prayer in the California public school system. You can see ourwebsite at "californiaschoolproject.com." I have put togetherthe following with the permission of our CSP Governing Board.

It seems to me that the crisis in the State of California has reached mammoth proportions. There is an enormousfiscal crisis, a dire directional crisis, an alarming moral crisis, and acritical cultural crisis. The State has come under the control of a majority ofmen and women who have pushed the government to the brink of bankruptcy, havetaken God and the Bible out of the schools and polluted generations of studentswith decadent dictums, and have turned the hearts of the people and our culturefar from the Living God of the Bible, from America’s Founding Fathers andfrom the U.S. Constitution.

Responding to the web letter of the lady in Arizona, “Will someone please stand up!," We dedicate this3-week old PAC to her. I believe that it is time for us to take action and toget into this arena. Obviously we have neglected our civic duties long enough.

I believe that the present situation calls for Biblically dedicated, politically conservative, characterproven, special interest unconnected, Christian men and women to stand up andto run for the available seats in the California State Assembly and Senate inthe 2010 election. In order to simply balance the budget, we believe thatnearly all of the present incumbents would need to be replaced.

If God has been speaking to you about running and you agree with our standards, we would love to have you tojoin our team. If you can't run now, who do you know that would be a goodcandidate. Please call them and forward them this material. February 25this the final day to register. That is 20 days from today! We will help youregister and run. Remember……. Daniel 4:17b.

Very Sincerely,

Warren Willis, Chairman

Read more…

The Tea Party Needs You NOW!

If not us, then who? If not now, then when? These are reasonable questions for everyone who has eyes to see the state of our country. We have a chance to do something here that has not been done for nearly two hundred years and no one has to fight and die, or even shed one drop of blood. Even though our "Tree of Liberty" does indeed thirst, we are the logical choice for change in Washington and if we don't make that change, we have no reason to shout fowl play, or ever again say we are fed up with the same old, same old in Washington. Oh sure, we can sit on our laurels and allow a do nothing congress continue to reek havoc with our Rights and our Liberty, but if we continue to do so we have no one to blame but ourselves. And in the end ask yourself this one question: After all is said and done in this and future Novembers, if I had picked up the phone and made just one or two phone calls, could this have made the difference? Could I have spoken to my friends about helping to make a change? And when we look way off into the future and see where America is, believing you are safe in your bed at night, and you will be for a time, until you hear the thugs coming to drag you away because you dared to speak against the government. Then look between this time and that, with your Rights gone and your Liberty no more and repeat the words "If not us, who? If not now, when?" and ask yourself if it is possible to change the course of history in these United States? Then look to your children and grand-children and ask yourself if the "American Dream" is theirs to know and love as it was when you could have helped to make a difference and didn't.

As I sit and watch the different news broadcast and hear them call the members of the Tea Party all sorts of names like racist, bigots and extremists, knowing full well that these hurtful words are spoken at the behest of the congressmen and women who are afraid of losing their jobs, I have to say that we must be doing something right. When we, a grassroots movement, can put fear in the most powerful body politic in the world, can influence the outcome of elections, then we do indeed have a chance to make change that really does count for real change in Washington. And so what if we don't get it right the first go-around? Just keep in mind that we have national elections every two years and eventually we will send people to congress that has the will of the people in their minds and that we will be watching them. So lets rally the troops, talk to people, make phone calls, get people registered to vote and make sure they have a ride to the polls if need be. If not us, who? If not now, when? Remember, ONE VOTE AT A TIME MAKES CHANGE HAPPEN!!!

Read more…

Standing

For those of us who take a stand,
and I know theres only a few,
We do what all of our brothers did,
for the glory of the red, white and blue.
You may be asked to take a stand,
to see if your honor is true,
and wave old glory high and proud,
for the Republic could be calling you.
The road looks bleak and old glory looks worn,
and patriots are looked at with scorn,
but have no fear for our stand is dear,
and our Republic will ever endure!
Read more…
Obama Sells Out U.S. Borders with Secret Amnesty Deal

The Department of Homeland Security has drafted a 14-page plan through its “U.S. Citizen and Immigration Services” Division for processing thirteen million illegal alien applicants for amnesty over a 30-week period at a cost of more than a billion dollars according to information leaked to World Net Daily (wnd.com) online. The plan anticipates Democrats will succeed in passing their so-called “Comprehensive Immigration “Reform” Bill. As always the Obama administration uses the euphemism “reform” to denote some sort of slick and tawdry actions that no sane and honest person would ever contemplate. In this case, opening the floodgates from south of our borders to overwhelm our present entitlement systems and bankrupt the country. The United States has had a fair and effective system for legal immigrants becoming citizens via the naturalization process for over 220 years and now Obama wants to “fix” it. What he wants is to immediately create 13 million new Democratic voters to keep him in office in 2012, nothing more.

The leaked plan assumes a nine-month period of legalization processing. The plan anticipates that public benefits will be required by most amnesty applicants. “If the statute requires interim benefits while application pending, issue discrete variant of status document (shorter term duration than if issued after prospective immigrant status granted)," the 14-page memo states. Under the plan applicants 14 through 79 years of age would be required to submit themselves for photographing, supply a full set of fingerprints and signatures while illegal aliens outside that age range would only need a photo and single print. It remains to be seen how real American Citizens will react to this outrageous citizenship giveaway . . . . of course, there's always the possibility that this is just an Obama ploy to arouse the Hispanic voters as he did with his lying appraisal of the Arizona immigration law. The question of illegal immigrants becoming overnight citizens can't be that much of a slam-dunk can it?
Ya'll live long, strong and ornery,
Rajjpuut

Read more…
I just watched a newspost about the Tea Party and the (pardon the redunancy) Sharon Angle angle in NV. I couldn't help but notice the "cup of tea from the spout" they used as a backdrop on the story. Would it not be more indicative of our feelings if the AP and local media maybe showed a picture of say, an early settler of America with the US flag for a hat dumping a barrel reading "Lipton", or because of copyright issues just TEA, over the side of the USS Constitution or Old Ironside's? Just thought it would be more to the point...
Read more…

Just got an e-mail from a friend who taunted me with remembrances of the presumably unfounded “birther” notion; and Van Jones’ slip from power because he was discovered to be a “9/11 Truther.” He asked me “How can you be so careless as to use that Maurice Strong quotation in your otherwise wonderful and thought-provoking blogs, Bob? It makes you seem like just another conspiracy fanatic.”
OK, let’s set matters straight, a political blog is an agreement, a contract between the writer and the reader for honest and full evaluation and judgment about the state of the world as he sees it. Rajjpuut when asked for his opinion does NOT give warmed over milk:
1.
BIRTHERS: My friend and I and all loyal readers know Rajjpuut is not a birther. I have on several occasions said something akin to this (but probably NOT these exact words) to dismiss the birther line of thinking. “It’s possible that Barack Obama is NOT a U.S. citizen according to the strictest interpretation of the rules. However, no matter what else is discovered, he was born to an American citizen, no matter how much I despise her and no matter how likely it may be that she screwed up his paper-work possibilities with her shenanigans. IF he is NOT a U.S. Citizen on a technicality, I’m NOT impressed. The SPIRIT of the law is that he IS a citizen, certainly much more than any baby born to an illegal alien is a citizen. It’s not his fault his mother was a ditzy communist bi__h! My problems with Barack Obama are not cleared up by technicalities. Remove him and another progressive idiot replaces him. My problems are that Barack never used his free will and his intellect to disprove the communist crap he was spoon-fed as a boy and that he now embraces that refuted ideology with all his being and is leading our country down the road to ruin." Any questions on that?
2. 9/11 TRUTHERS: To a certain small degree, Rajjpuut himself is a 9/11 Truther. You heard me right. TO A CERTAIN small DEGREE . . . let’s explore and explain that. If you were to visit and watch:
You’d see a lot of truth and nonsense woven together . . . (one proviso here – the link is apparently NOT the original link I viewed 2-3 years back and it’s a movie, pretty long . . . but unless it’s been changed dramatically, I’m aware of what’s in it. The original movie was in three parts, before I go further I’ll describe them . . .
A. one part was an attempt to link conservativism with Christianity and then to repudiate both on some semi-damning evidence about Christianity’s origins – from my knowledge of Christianity’s origins in studying the matter from history classes and several books, I’d say that this 1/3 of the movie is about 90% accurate but about 70% corrupted as far as interpretation. Yes, Christianity has screwed us up at times, but taken to its core . . . its intentions are purely good. Certainly the same could be said of many other religions. One strong point Zeitgeist makes is tying in “fundamentalism” to much of the problems that religions cause, regardless of which religion is being talked about.
B. Another part was an attack on federal reserve banking in the United States and Britain before 1776 across history and on the Fed as it exists right now. Rajjpuut refers you to the book, “The Creature from Jekyll Island” to now say that he’s absolutely convinced that this 1/3 of the Zeitgeist link is not only 100% accurate but, far more importantly, 100% true to the spirit of the Fed’s history. Rajjpuut would say that 97% of today’s worst problems in this country arose with Jekyll Island’s secret meetings that created today's federal reserve system.
C. The third part of the movie is the one Rajjpuut has viewed the most, about seven times. It is certainly the most compelling 1/3 of the movie. At first, though quite skeptical, Rajjpuut was willing to cede the possibility that the movie could have it right . . . that 9/11 could have been an inside job. The evidence presented sounded very strong. Every time viewing, however, the doubts have grown. An incompetent FBI and CIA can explain 99% of the situation quite nicely in Rajjpuut’s view. So 9/11 Truthing is not part of Rajjpuut’s make-up. However, the possibility exists, Rajjpuut does not have the resources to say with 100% certainty the whole thing is a humbug. Besides some difficulty believing certain technicalities and the science behind them, it’s just very hard to believe that the 300 or so persons necessary to pull that monumental crime off could all keep quiet so long. Even the possibility of “just standing aside and letting the Jihadists succeed “with their plan (a huge sin of “omission” rather than an even more monstrous sin of commission) would take too much effort to be believed by too many people . . . and one good American woud have stood up before, during and/or after the event at least.

For a comparison of thinking patterns when faced with the same possible universes (conspiracy? or no conspiracy?) . . . whereas my extensive reading on the Kennedy assasination led me in 1995-6 to the conclusion that the truth was covered-up and a larger conspiracy than Oswald (who well may have been a patsy) existed and involved about a half-dozen people and that VP LBJ (who was to be dropped off the presidential-ticket in 1964 by Kennedy and benefitted most when all the corruption charges aimed at him and Baker and Sol Estes disappeared the day after the assassination; not to mention becoming President of the United States) was at its heart. I’m much more convinced that 9/11 was NOT an inside job than I am that a wider conspiracy exists in Kennedy’s death, say about 90% convinced there. But, I’m a fallible human being . . . and that fact, underlines the tiny 1% 9/11 truther in me and the meager 10% conviction that the Warren Commission got it right about Oswald. Rajjpuut does not have trouble holding these contrary notions of conspiracy-yes and conspiracy-no at the same time.
So, now, in answer to my friend’s claims that by using the Maurice Strong quote from 1990, Rajjpuut left his otherwise excellent blogs open to “conspiracy-theory” charges, let’s revisit the Maurice Strong quote in question:
“. . . What if a small group of . . . world leaders were to conclude that the principal risk to the Earth comes from the actions of the rich countries? In order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn't the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn't it our responsibility to bring this about? . . .”
The quote is valid, you can find it in a 10,000 places on the internet and in the original form which is much, much longer. The context in brief is that Strong was purportedly driving a car while giving an interview to a left-leaning journalist and the quote was later written up in the man’s magazine as part of a fairly long story, the journalist involved recently covered Strong’s tracks by saying “he was discussing a possible novel plot.”
The fuller context is that Maurice Strong (who had written no novels before 1990 and none since) is a Canadian multi-millionaire who’s been politically very active within the United Nations and among environmental groups. Today he is a man who sees himself standing to gain mightily if Cap and Trade legislation passes in the United States, because of his connection to CCX (Chicago Climate eXchange). If you’ve read Michael Crichton’s “State of Fear” than you might recognize the Strong persona clearly delineated as a character among the novel’s many environmental uh, “enthusiasts.” Crichton is the master of the Techno-thriller like “The Andromeda Strain” and “Jurassic Park” and his plot-description has been largely unvarying: technology runs amok and threatens man’s survival. Crichton did an enormous amount of research, starting out believing that global warming was the greatest threat to mankind and the planet and then . . . turning around completely by 2004 when the novel was published. Did Crichton interview Maurice Strong? Read the blog, read the novel and judge for yourself. As for Strong in the complete interview as published, he was referring originally to a yearly convocation of world leaders in business and government and environment attended by perhaps 1,000 persons. He was saying that the tone of the conference would lead virtually anyone to the conclusion that the principal risk to the earth during an upcoming catastrophic environmental collapse comes from the rich countries. Strong was then saying (in this proposed “novel” of his) that the rich countries are approached and asked to change, but of course (due to political consequences) they can NOT or will NOT. And now you have the “small group of world leaders” left to decide to bring about the collapse of the wealthy nations that will save the planet or not . . . gosh, one wonders what they’d choose. In a word, the Strong “novel” is about eco-tage or environmental- sabotage.
Strong has never written a novel, but everything about his life over at least the last twenty-five years suggests the man (who is very much into the occult as well as the environment) believes he is the protagonist in such a novel. He is greatly involved with CCX. And right now only the fact that cap and trade legislation (today given the prettier name “America’s Power Act”) is stalled in the U.S. Senate interrupts Strong’s novel reaching its denoument. If APA passes dozens of persons such as Andrew Stern, Al Gore, Barack Obama, Richard Sandor and Joel Rogers look to become hundred-billionaires; about eight progressive foundations and the AFL-CIO and SEIU unions can expect to prosper; and seven individual Goldman Sachs personalities and the 10% owning Goldman Sachs firm itself will reap the wild wind.
Michael Crichton didn’t start out researching and writing his novel believing their was a conspiracy to destroy much of today’s most civilized economies to the benefit of a power elite. He did not start out believing that global warming was a hoax. Those things arose the deeper and more deeply he looked into the matter. Up till 1998, Rajjpuut had never NOT believed in global warming. Greenhouse gasses and their ceaseless increase and danger were an ordinary unquestioned FACT taught in science classes at U.N.C. Even when slight doubts arose as to the severity of the problem and the absolute certainty of the connection to man’s activities, it wasn’t until he read Crichton’s novel and then saw a History Channel program “Little Ice Age, Big Chill” in early 2006 that his objections were firmed up. Global warming was nonsense. Rajjpuut’s been preaching strongly against the global warming lie ever since. Then last year three things happened first:
. . . first Climate-Gate occurred, as I always knew it must. Time magazine broadcast the story on the internet and I was amazed. Time online saw the story reach it’s “most popular story of the day” within fifteen hours . . .
. . . and then the next thing happened, Joel Klein of Time Magazine** took the article down and made all traces of it disappear from its online website, the story could NOT be found. Rajjpuut was aghast.
And the third thing is that after five months, the story (link above) run even by the ultra-liberal London Times (so now global warming is an Unquestioned hoax in rational European eyes) still has not been printed or broadcast in the United States by the oldest and till recently, most-trusted, sources of news (ABC, CBS, NBC, NPR, PBS, CNN). As a result we are within an eyelash of seeing APA pass and ruin our nation . . . that, my friend is why I showed the Maurice strong quote: I believe it underlies an actual conspiracy for wealth, power, and misplaced environmental concern. That quote underscores the greatest act of eco-terrorism ever contemplated and no one has to burn an SUV or drive a spike into a tree to pull it off . . . it’s all “legal.” The fact that the connections to CCX **by Gore, Obama, Strong, Joel Rogers, Richard Sandor, Valerie Jarrett, et al ad nauseum have been known for over five weeks and the mainstream media refuses to acknowledge or investigate them is that last straw on Rajjpuut’s back . . . somebody needs to speak up and it might as well be me. And no, Rajjpuut does not have trouble holding the two contrary ideas of Maurice Strong-conspiracy-yes and Maurice-Strong-conspiracy-no in a 97-3 ratio respectively in his mind . . . somebody's got to deal with uncertainty. This world is not black and white. Why make up your mind? Be strong and honor the possibilities. Who knows unlike the Kennedy assassination and 9/11 we might find out on this one . . . .
Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,
Rajjpuut
**the full story of consequences and means can be found at:
Read more…

Our lives begin again today

Martin Luther King Jr said--"Our lives begin to end the day we stop speaking out."

John Adams said--"Fear is the foundation of most governments."

What keeps people from speaking out? Fear, intimidation, uncertainty, lack of character, inability to discern right from wrong, true from false?

I've gotta tell ya, I'm so proud and enthused by the TEA Party movement nation-wide some days I could just bust. As vice-chairman of the TEA Party of Gilmer County, Ga, I see a lot of folks doing what they never thought they would do, or imagined they would ever HAVE to do. Many, if not most of them have already spent their lives working, building families, futures, and look forward to a dreamed-of retirement. Many are veterans.

And what still brings tears to my eyes is to look every one of these great Americans straight in the eye at our meetings, in our correspondences, and KNOW, without a shadow of a doubt, that WE HAVE EACH OTHERS BACK. We have a common course we've embarked upon, a cause with roots as deep as any man's soul, and the same cause that animated our Founding Fathers those many years ago.

To paraphrase Thomas Jefferson slightly--"Indeed I tremble for my nation, when I know that God is just, and his justice will not sleep forever."

America is awakening from a lethargy that was brought on by the very things we were warned about in the writings of our Founding Fathers...that good men will not always be in government, beware the follies of faction and party, and due diligence is required of all men at all times, because liberty is the gift of God, not government, and we are but one generation away from tyranny at any given moment in time.

Renewing the vigor of education to all regarding our liberties, as the Founders knew them, is key to our success as we go forward. The student of the Federalist Papers, the anti-Federalist Papers, and the letters of Jefferson, Madison, Washington, Jay, etc. will discover the lengths and depths of history our Founders went to as they sought to craft a system of government that was by the people and for the people, not government. They examined the Republics of ages gone by, the differing circumstances of various ancient nations, and how they might apply to a Republic of much larger extent, and how best to modify a system of government that was small enough that it would not encroach upon individual liberty, but would be strong enough to provide the basic essence of all good government---that of national defence and basic structural essentials. Period.

Glad to be here. Can't wait to get to know y'all better. Let's get busy and get this usurper and his henchmen the HELL OUT OF OUR HOUSE!!!------Jim Seigfreid

Read more…

No Excuses Now, Mr. Obama,

Socialism’s Sad History Repeating in Greece
Europe Semi-Cheerfully Opts for Combined Ruin

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolutions_of_1989

Should we, the United States of America, opt-out of greatness and turn the mantle of “the world’s lone super power” over to Red China? It’s NOT a rhetorical question, unfortunately . . . . Harry S. Truman used to say, “The buck stops here.” Unfortunately, Mr. Obama has not once in his sixteen months in office shown any proclivity for facing responsibility for his failings. So, if China quickly becomes the world’s single super-power . . . expect nothing but excuses from Mr. Obama as we slide into history’s trashbin.

With the specter of Greece hanging over the world’s markets and the halls of government everywhere, there can no longer be any pretense for the Obama administration. The potential debacle awaiting us is dramatically etched in our brains from the violent images repeatedly seen on the nightly news. Mr. Obama who reportedly went into a “three-year fugue” when the Berlin Wall came down and the USSR collapsed can NOT deny the obvious truth about his preferred political ends. You canNOT help the poor by willfully becoming one of them. The United States must resume its economic leadership. If this country wishes to remain the beacon of hope in the world, only three choices remain for Obama (only one for a STATESMAN):

  • 1) a return to sanity by butting out of the free markets (the choice Bill Clinton made in 1994) and ending the “let’s completely take over everything” games of socialism and “Obama and Progressives Know Best” . . . as stated a “return to sanity.” Rajjpuut states without reservation . . . this will NOT happen so long as Barack Obama has power in the oval office and so long as progressives Democrats call the tune in both chambers of congress
  • 2) ignore Greece’s example, continue the charade of “I am NOT a socialist, I’m not” and assume that the recent historical example from Greece as well as the older examples given by Cuba’s super-booming civilization and the defunct USSR and the defunct Warswa Pact and China prospering by stacking capitalism atop its Marxism and the failed attempts at communism in Italy long ago, and Chile long ago are all just anomalies . . . and this time we’ll get it right because . . . well, because we’ve got Barack Obama working things this time . . . this would be the choice one would expect if Obama were merely a socialist, dyed in the wool, and convinced of the rightness of his ideology (“I’m not an ideologue!”).
  • 3) Embrace Greece’s example and deliberately push even harder for financial markets takeover under the guise of a “financial ‘reform’ act” and the new “America’s Power Act” (actually NOT new at all, just “Cap and Trade” under a sweet sounding name) and literally see how quickly we can emulate Greece. “What,” you say, “he’d deliberately take the country into financial ruin?” Yes, Pilgrim he definitely could choose either door #2 or door #3 and they both might lead to abject financial ruin. And it’s NOT a moot question which choice he makes. More on that below.

As recently as last month, Rajjpuut’s Folly’s ran a hard-hitting little blog under a title something like “PIGIES R Us” which told of the sad state of economic collapse found in Portugal, Italy, Greece, Ireland, England (U.K.), and Spain whose initial gave us the “PIGIES” countries. The kicker to the story was that the United States’ ratio of debt/Gross Domestic Product (D/GDP) was worse than all but two of the six European countries mentioned. Things are changing rapidly in Europe. If written today the blog title would have to be ammended to: “BIG PIES R Us.” Belgium has now entered the “room of doom” and become an entrant in the “Who’s Next” Sweepstakes. And, you guessed it, the U.S. D/GDP ratio is worse than Belgium’s. Thankfully, the United States has a far more resilient economic system in place than most of the BIG PIES countries do. Socialism is not our underlying economic system YET. In terms of absolute risk we are very much caught between England (the U.K.) and Spain.

Yes, the U.K. just made a half-hearted effort to change directions by booting out the fanatically socialist government of Gordon Brown but they didn’t give a mandate to the conservatives either. Rajjpuut predicts the tenuous coalition between the Conservatives and the Social Democrats will break apart within a year. Remember that the so-called “Tories” are only fiscally-lukewarm conservatives anyway . . . in these days true Libertarianism is required and England’s condition will worsen, if only slightly. In short, England can most-likely only serve as a bad example: going fiscally-conservative with all your heart is the only viable path out of the swamp for them and they show no willingness to make that choice.

Spain, also, is a very good example the United States can learn from. Again the lesson learned is a negative one, however. Spain about eight years back bragged of Europe’s most robust economy. Among other things, surpluses were being run and unemployment was sticking around 3%. Today,” Tinta roja se encuentra por todas partes,” that is, “Red ink is everywhere!” Unemployment is also at 21% and rising (19% a year ago). “What the hell happened? “ you ask.

Spain’s economy went “GREEN!”

The cost of “political-correctness” in Spain was devastating. For every subsidized job in the green-pipedream world of Spain, 2.2 real, permanent jobs were lost. The hit didn’t come overnight but insidiously over about three years. Cost on average for creating one green job? $677,000 U.S. dollars. Most green jobs lasted only between six weeks and eighteen months. Only 10% proved permanent. The median green job paid $13.18 per hour, virtually all paid between $10 - $15 per hour. So for every permanent green job created, twenty-two real jobs were jeopardized and ultimately LOST!

Now let us translate that Spanish horror onto Barack Obama’s stated goal of “. . . creating five million green jobs . . .” That means eleven million real jobs lost. That means only 500,000 permanent green jobs created. That means a net loss of 10.5 million jobs. That means ruin . . . but wait, there’s more , much much more . . . .

http://rajjpuutsfolly.blogtownhall.com/2010/05/07/the_man_who_owns_obama%e2%80%99s_strings_says_%e2%80%9ccapitalism_is_monstrous%e2%80%9d.thtml

Barack Obama and roughly twenty cohorts (their leaders are ex-U.N. bigwig Canada’s Maurice Strong and communist Wisconsin professor Joel Rogers) and seven or eight upstanding progressive foundations and Al Gore and his private London-based company have been pushing like madmen to pass “Cap and Trade” legislation, now euphemistically known as “America’s Power Act.” (doesn't it look beautiful all green like that without the ugly words "cap and trade"?) Compared to the results of cap and trade, Obama’s green jobs promise (five million of ‘em, remember, resulting in only half a million permanent ones at the cost of eleven million real jobs) would seem like laissez faire capitalism.

Twenty-years ago Maurice Strong set this whole cap and trade boondoggle in motion. He was quoted by a reporter for a left-wing group in 1990 as saying,

“. . . What if a small group of these world leaders were to conclude that the principal risk to the Earth comes from the actions of the rich countries? In order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn't the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn't it our responsibility to bring this about?”

The reporter when queried about this later said that Strong was just discussing “a novel plot idea” he had. Mr. Strong had no novels written or published at that time and today twenty years later has still not written or published a novel.

Remember, Maurice has not yet acted on his bang up novel idea (he’s now approaching 80 years old) but fortunately, Michael Crichton has taken the bull by the horns and done the job for him and it’s a very good novel “State of Fear” which environmentalists and progressives detest with every atom of their beings. You remember Michael Crichton? If anyone could have been expected to be an environmental alarmist Crichton would have been everybody’s anti-technology #1 candidate. Everyone of his books starting with “The Andromeda Strain” and running through to mention just a few “Terminal Man,” “Jurassic Park”( and “Lost World “which was Jurassic Park II, really), and “Prey” are all 100% stories of technology run amok and threatening humanity’s very survival.

Crichton, unfortunately for Maurice Strong and his buddies, has a very bad habit of actually doing monumental research about the subjects of his forthcoming novels. He started to write a story about global warming, Al Gore's and the Climate Research Unit's (CRU's) preferred "global warming story" he believed it was true . . . so then Crichton went where his research took him . . . to a belief that global warming was a monstrous hoax aimed at creating a new power elite . . . feeling actually at risk for his life, he put that knowledge and conviction into writing “State of Fear.” His research took him to a strong conviction that Maurice Strong’s “novel idea” was being put deliberately into motion . . . but back to Maurice . . . Here in a piece from the ultra-liberal London Times is a story that our mainstream media has refused to disclose to American for over five months now:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article6936289.ece

Besides refusing to let Americans know that European liberals are fed up with the Climate-Gate scandal (link immediately above) and NO LONGER believe in global warming‘s inevitability and connection to man’s activites . . . here’s what the American mainstream media will NOT tell you, much less investigate about Maurice Strong’s activities and their connection to our favorite socialist president and ex-vice president:

http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article.aspx?id=531731

http://www.fusionfx.net/index.php/2010/05/01/crime-inc-obama-climate-collusion/

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,591845,00.html

Too bad Maurice was not just talking about conspiracy novel plots. No he’s never written that novel, but Maurice Strong is active in the Chicago Climate eXchange with Barack; Al Gore; John Ayers; Valerie Jarrett; Joel Rogers; Richard Sandor; Franklin Raines; David Blood; Paula DiPerna; several U.N. environmental honchos; the AFL-CIO union; the SEIU union; Andy Stern; Van Jones; several Goldman Sachs bigwigs (and independently 10% owned by Goldman Sachs itself); the Joyce Foundation; the Tides Foundation; ACORN (name now changed to fifty-one separate names); the Apollo Alliance; the Emerald Cities Collaborative; and so many others.

http://justincofield.typepad.com/my-blog/2010/05/digging-into-the-cap-trade-story.html

And the bottom line for Maurice and his fellow bandits is this: if cap and trade becomes the law of the land they each profit by BILLIONS from their connection to CCX (now supposedly talks are under way to sell CCX to a European group, bet we’ll find a lot of the same names hooked up with that) and most importantly the “ten TRillion dollar industry that Richard Sandor bragged about would be created. And the bottom line, what would be the result for America if cap and trade is created? Well you take a $15 TRillion economy and you create a $10 TRillion price tag for selling it “blue sky” (literally) and you have a nominal $25 TRillion economy with only $15 TRillion worth of goods and services. That is, 40% of the economy has become bogus –completely BS. The bottom line: everything in America would eventually cost 67% more than it now does (not counting any inflation caused by the Federal Reserves unending money-press activities). For you mathematically challenged, look at it this way 40% false economy supported by 60% real economy = 67% increase in prices or 40%/60% = .666667.

So, the only question left is this one, what is the goal for Strong, Obama, Gore, et. al. door #2 or door #3 mentioned above? Rajjpuut leaves you with a famous quote you may be familiar with . . . .

“. . . What if a small group of these world leaders were to conclude that the principal risk to the Earth comes from the actions of the rich countries? In order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn't the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn't it our responsibility to bring this about?”

Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,

Rajjpuut

http://rajjpuutsfolly.blogtownhall.com/2010/05/02/thanks_to_media_obama,__gore_and_cronies_might_make_trillions.thtml

Read more…

Let Us Make Man in Our Image

Dale Robertson: “We, The People, demand the best candidate, not the usual Democrat or Republican, but who lines up with Constitutional conservative platform.” Hey Dale! How are we to know? Can anyone tell us what the Tea Party is really about? I have not found agreement. Everyone has his or her own idea.

Gen. 1:26: “And God said, Let us make man in our image.” Did that mean with the help of the clergy? Did that mean with the help of government? If you take an isolated Bible passage, you can make a case for your idea of what Gen. 1:26 means. If you take a statutory law, one that attends to today’s needs, you can make a case for the law. If you take the Bible in its overall context, or if you take the whole of the U.S. Constitution, the meaning of Gen. 1:26 is clear. “Us” is you and I, individually, first, last, and always. “In light of today’s needs,” you do not make laws that rob Peter to pay Paul.

The image you have of yourself is more than likely to be an image the environment put in you. For instance, white people were taught that black people were somehow less than white people. I was born in the South. That’s what I was taught. During World War II, I was behind a black man in uniform at the train depot in Atlanta, Georgia. He was denied entrance in the depot restaurant. We were on a troop train heading for the war in the Pacific. This black man, who was willing to give his life for his country, was not good enough to dine with white folks.

Black people, by law, were like mules. The South depended on slavery. Black people were thought to be physically better equipped to do hard manual labor in the blistering heat of the South than whites. Southerners were taught, and in their churches, that black people were inferior to white people. If they had equal rights with whites it was feared they could not handle it. This way of thinking was general. It included the Founding Fathers. Was it “in light of yesterday’s needs?” Was it the law, or was it rationalization? There are certain intrinsic principles that never change. How can we be so dumb!

In America, many people believe they have the ability to cope without government help. Many believe they could not exist without government help, mostly black people, but a growing number of white people also believe they could not exist without government help. It is unbelievable. Many people believe that black people, because of the way they were treated, should be preferred in the law. Is it the luck of the Irish that those who believe they have the ability to cope without government help are the prosperous? How could we be so dumb!

Many people think they have the ability to cope without a religion. Many believe without their religion they could not cope. The Muslims who destroyed the World Trade Center, and killed thousands of innocent people, believed they were ordered by Allah, as the World Trade Center was a symbol of the “Great Satin.” Millions of Muslims danced in the streets. This is a fact of history that cannot be denied, no matter how it is rationalized. Is it racial profiling to think the way I think? Give me a break!

We, the people, are created with reason and logic. It is neither reasonable nor logical to believe all men, whether they are black or white, are not all equal; it’s a rationalization. It is neither reasonable nor logical to believe that God favors one religion over another; it’s a rationalization. Reasonably and logically, God does not destroy his own creation.

Our Creator gave human beings the ability to cope, not by the law of the jungle, but by the higher law of nature, the background of my Constitution. My Constitution was written for you and I, not for the powers that be—and used, not put in a glass case in Washington, D.C. Not many know how to use it. Indeed, the powers that be discourage the individual, in every conceivable way, not to use it. They encourage the individual, in every conceivable way, to depend on government.

The Founding Fathers knew this would be the case. They divided the powers of government and give the individual the Bill of Rights. If you don’t use this protection, what do you expect? I studied my Constitution and came to the conclusion that I should use it. I had a bigger than life calling. It turned my life around. All of my dreams came true.

All sentient beings, including man, are created with the power drive. The higher law of nature gives man the power to control any situation. The God I know gave me the “regenerative agency by which may make himself what he wills.” James Allen, As A Man Thinketh. I studied my Constitution, looked within, and came up with the right answers for me. Who knows me better than I know myself? I’ve been reborn the person I was meant to be.

Having said this, I read in Time-Life’s Mysic Places that at Stonehenge, 80 miles west of London, from the roof of his car in the parking lot, a young investigator with a wire antenna bent in the shape of a “awkh” (an Egyptian cross with a loop at the top) pointed it at the great stones. A bolt surged up his arm, hurling him to the ground unconscious. When he came to, his arm was paralyzed. It took six months to get the full use of his arm back. He tempted fate.

The ever-curious Werner von Siemens, founder of the giant German electrical company that bears that name, climbed to the top of the Great Pyramid at Giza. Having reached the top, he struck a pose, jabbing his finger upward. He experienced a prickling feeling in his finger and heard a sharp sound. Knowing a lot about electricity, Siemens wrapped a wet paper towel around a metal-necked wine bottle, his way of storing static electricity. When he held the bottle up, it became electrically charged and emitted sparks.

A French ironmonger, Antoine Bovis, toured the King’s Chamber of the Great Pyramid. He came upon several dead cats and other small animals. The bodies had no odor. Bovis found that they had dehydrated and mummified despite the chamber’s humidity.

Back home in Nice, Bovis constructed a wooden model of the Great Pyramid, oriented it due north, same as the Great Pyramid, and placed a dead cat inside. In a few days the body mummified. The forces of the Great Pyramid continued to multiply. It came to be thought that this was the essence of life forces itself. But, alas, scientific research found none of the claims to be true.

What was true for the above mentioned was not proven, and the same for my experience in the Bermuda Triangle. It is thought, but not proven, that there are time warps in the Triangle. In Mystic Places, I read that Bruce Germon, Jr., with his father the co-pilot of his Beechcraft Bonanza, had taken off from Andros Island in the Bahamas, bound for Palm Beach, Florida.

Germon accelerating to avoid a thick cloud, remembers that it seemed to rise to meet him and then enveloped him. He spotted a tunnel through the cloud. He dived down, hoping to exit into clear sky. The walls of the tunnel were growing white with small white clouds rotating clockwise around the tunnel. The plane seemed to pick up speed. For several seconds Germon and his father experienced weightlessness. Then the plane exited the tunnel and entered a greenish white haze. Trying to fix his position, Germon was startled to see his compass rotating counterclockwise. His navigation equipment was non-functional and he could not make contact with radar control.

Through the haze, he spotted an island which he thought to be Bimini. Minutes later, Germon recognized it as Miami Beach. Little more than half the expected flight time had elapsed.

I set sail from Nassau with three friends on my sloop Bold Venture, heading for Palm Beach. After we left the Bahamas Banks, I set my course southwest to allow for the north moving Gulf Stream, with the wind from southeast. At 2:00 A.M. we encountered tropical storm Dottie (1976) moving north up the Florida coast. I changed my course to North, as the wind was coming at me from the Northwest. My estimated time of arrival had been 10:00 A.M. Shortly after daybreak, as we rolled over a huge wave, I spotted the smokestacks of Florida Power and Light, a mile south of our inlet. It was impossible. I had been sailing north on the north moving Gulf Stream. We arrived at my estimated time of arrival, horrified that seas were breaking completely across Lake Worth Inlet. I was exhausted and my friends were in no shape to take the wheel. I went for it. My stern went up. Seas were breaking on both sides. The one behind never broke. We slid down it into the Inlet. My friends called it a miracle. My time warp experience was not published. It doesn’t matter. There is no way to prove it happened. There is no way to prove that after my bigger than life calling my life changed for the better.

America is currently in deep trouble, naturally, because We, The People, let the authorities have their way. God said, Let us make man in our image, and so says my Constitution. We’ve a long way to go and a short time to get there.

Read more…

Liberals are liberal about SEX!!!

Beyond that they are 100% about SLAVERY and HATE. As you examine the policies they introduce on a regular basis, the resulting effect support this.

  1. Governmental care (welfare) produces a dependency and nurtures NON productivity and by natural law subordinates to the provider.
  2. Slaves! Consistent dismantling of biblical truth creates a society of morally bankrupt people that have no foundation so they follow the religion of government.
  3. The Federal takeover of our schools, teaches children WHAT to think NOT HOW to disseminate information, and if you (the student) disagree… you are reviled as a mental midget and berated. (an usurping of power of the parents and over the youth)
  4. Free to murder the unborn innocent but not put to death the guiltiest (Death row murderers). Creating a dependence on a support group NOW and Planned Death or parenthood, to appease the continual guilt of abortion justification therefore rather than reconciliation, forgiveness and peace.
  5. Dismantling the second amendment turns citizens into subjects and increases crime. (Statistically proven). They use civilizations as a tool for personal power and financial gain. Just look at what they have done to the minorities.
  6. They tell minorities on a regular basis that they are so STUPID and WEEK that they cannot get along without the white liberals to feed and cloth them (welfare). Then they sell the story that they will never be rich so let’s go rob the rich man so you can be a SLAVE TO THE STATE. Brothers, I thought you hated slave ownership… Do you not realize that you only traded the Democrat plantation owner for the Democrats party? To the Hispanics they say NO BORDERS because we need the Hispanic SLAVE LABOR and more importantly VOTES. While Men are enslaved, women and children get raped left to die in the Sonora desert; While both Democrats and Republicans utilize the drug trade for the purpose of Federal expansion and creation of a police state with a so called war on drugs. States have become nothing more than a dairy cow of the federal government. Milked for all it can produce and then suckled on the tits of pork barrel projects to pacify the anger of the electorate.

  7. The LEFT contribute to the death of the most honored among us, Our solders and Veterans!!! They vote to send them into battle then tie them to prolong the battle so as to milk from them financial and political gain. They empower and encourage our enemy by publicizing our failings and hiding our victory’s. All in the name of political campaign victories.

  8. They use political correctness to destroy the first amendment as they cannot seem to win a debate on the facts. This from those who say I am inferior for not attending college. The left “for being so enlightened” are about the most inbred ignorant people in the United States. They scream “Freedom of speech” until they get offended. What offends them? Predominantly anything that encompasses common sense or simply the TRUTH!!! These people defile the constitution and the majority of what our founders intended.

  9. Let us make sure to vote them out every chance we get; Left or right. This war in America and is going to be won or lost with BALLETS NOT Bullets. As predictable as ever, these liberal simpletons believe that we will grab our guns and run on Washington…. They are pushing and insulting our populace to create an Oklahoma Bombing scenario just to further there cause. They want someone to pop…

Look gang don’t buy the lie any longer… 2010 election is the battle field and the vote is the bullet. EVERY NON CONSTITUTIONAL elected OR appointed official needs to be replaced. I do not care IF THEY ARE DEMECRAT OR REPUBLICAN!!! Do not let politics destroy our great nation. Get the government back to the STATE level where we can confront and control it.

Read more…

FREEDOM

When we are born we are blissfully unaware of the circumstances that will dictate the course of our lives. As we grow into adulthood and become more aware of our surroundings, to some an appalling realization becomes evident. In the social structure that exists today in these United States, there are those who claim for themselves the right to control the people who by right of their birth are born free. These so-called rulers who today govern the free have equated the words "to govern" as "to rule." These "rulers" of the free believe it is Divine Providence, handed down from father/mother to son/daughter, that they rule by divine right. Even in "our" governing body there are those who have ruled for 20, 30 and 40 years and their reason has become so blinded to the will of the people, that their acts are less the voice of the people and more the dictates of the totalitarian.

When the Founding Fathers began the "great experiment" and called it America, the very meaning of the word government took on an entirely new meaning. In the founding documents, the preamble begins with the words "We The People," and continues to now and forever declare the duty of the government is for the protection and defense of the natural, God given rights of the people. In this one document it declares that the People have the Right to live their Life; to live in the state of Liberty; and the Right to own Property and pursue that which makes them happy.

Over these past two hundred and thirty some years things have changed substantially. We are no longer the America called the Land of the Free, with Liberty and Justice for all. Today the government controls/rules the education of our children; the law abiding Citizen must carry State issued identification papers or be subject to arrest, fine or jail. To be engaged in a private business one must obtain permission from the State and pay the State fee and tax in order to enjoy the fruits of their labor. The normal Citezen must pay up to one half of their earnings to the Internal Revenue and the Social Security Administration.

The "Land of the Free" and "The Home of the Brave" no longer exists as it did when our Founders first had the "Dream of Liberty" called America. But there is a spark beginning to ignite once again, and soon, with the chance for the "Flame of Liberty" to once again burn bright, the patriots who are "We The People" can and must stand up for the one word that sets us apart from the oppression and control of the rulers of a tyrannical government and that word is...FREEDOM!

"In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man and brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot." Mark Twain

Read more…

HOW TO END THE TEA PARTY MOVEMENT

HOW TO END THE TEA PARTY MOVEMENT

A Primer for the Current Major Parties

By Bob Bennett

It is good that the major political parties are wondering how to end the Tea Party movement. If the Tea Party wins or ends, rational government should return. However, as both major parties have been in bed with their major campaign contributors for so long, real reform seems unlikely. Neither party seems to remember that the purpose of any just government is to protect the people from the abuses of the powerful. That is simply natural law. The left never bothered to learn political theory, while the far right abandoned it, in favor of misreading Darwin. It is Survival of the Fittest, not survival of the most powerful, and not survival of the best backstabbers.

Instead of focusing on paying off debts to major campaign donors, government and the parties need to address the problems the common people face due to the privileges given to the elites. How many laws have been passed solely to benefit your elites? Has there been a single law in the past 30 years that actually benefitted the common people? The FDA exists to curry favor with the Drug and pesticide Companies. The “FDA Food Safety Modernization Act” would give a bureaucracy the right to tell you how to grow your home garden; fining you if you don’t use enough pesticides. The Drug companies have run rampant for decades, with phony studies, and marketing campaigns designed solely to force drugs on people who don’t really need them. Big oil has avoided any meaningful oversight, as have most major corporations. The bureaucrats know they will have a fat paycheck waiting for them at the corporations they are suppose to be regulating, if they stab the public in the back enough.

Katha Pollitt writes (The Nation May 3rd- Letter From Berlin) “As for the political value of the Second Amendment in defending the Republic, the idea that homeowners could hold off a tyrannical government with their individual weapons is bound to look ridiculous to people who have actually experienced fascism.” The idea of the 2nd Amendment is to prevent a tyrannical government from getting in power in the first place; and then give the people a chance should they slip. Basically the position of the Left has been that any bureaucrat on the face of the earth should be allowed to tell you how to live your life, down to the tiniest detail. It is a large part of the reason many feel the USA is becoming tyrannical.

George Washington warned the nation about getting involved with foreign nations largely because, at the time, foreign nations, primarily European, used lies and deceit as the common way of doing business, and only those who were skilled in lies and deception were capable of avoiding the landmines inherent in such a system. We have become a land where lies and deceit are the common way of doing business, especially in government.

Eisenhower warned, in his farewell address, of the dangers of the military industrial complex. We have become a nation where by the military industrial complex rules every decision. A Free People must, first of all, be free from hate and fear. Both parties feed on hate and fear. The left is in favor a bureaucratic dictatorship, the right a dictatorship for corporate elites. Neither is acceptable.

The latest ploy of the Right is using the problem of terrorist to eliminate the individual’s rights under Miranda; but except for television programs and the rich, Miranda was eliminated in the 80’s; especially in urban areas. (I do have a personal bias in this; in 1988 I was given the choice of dying in the Los Angeles County Jail or pleading no contest to misdemeanor charge I didn’t believe myself guilty of. After 74 days in solitary, denied pen, pencil, access to a telephone and prescription medication, and a court appointed attorney who refused to speak to me, except to demand I plea no contest, I caved. The California Bar Association – Decision 93-29417 failed to see any ethical violations.)

Aside from reading a person his rights, the Miranda decision also required counties provide a public defender to all defendants facing 6 months or more incarceration (Possibly the first of many unfunded mandates). In most states, it now applies to all defendants, including those facing less than 6 months imprisonment.

Naturally enough, counties looked for ways to avoid the increased costs involved with providing a public defender. The result is the plea bargain system. At first, this system of injustice was used primarily to put pressure on individuals suspected of major crimes, but for which inadequate evidence existed to have a reasonable chance of conviction. Also, at about the same time police officers lobbied successfully to get paid for appearing in court, which previously they often had to do on their own time.

However, by the early 80’s, the plea bargain system was being used for just about everything, including to cover up abuses by police officers. (According to the Criminal Justice Profile, published by the State of California; the conviction rate in Los Angeles County rose from 81% in 1981 to 98.6% in 1988. I haven’t tracked this since 1996, when it was at 96%.) While prosecutors touted their high conviction rates as evidence of their tough on crime positions, the plea bargain system actually encourages crime (“Plead no contest and I can get you out of jail by tomorrow.”), increases the amount of jail time spent by those who believe themselves innocent, or at least had mitigating circumstances, and spews hatred for those who administer the criminal justice system.

But that is not the sole reason for the crime in cities, which began irritating the people outside the cities long ago.

Starting in the late 60’s individuals who really didn’t belong there began to be released from mental institutions. In the 70’s drugs were found which mitigated the symptoms of mental patients, and many more were released from institutions. In the 80’s, with the election of Ronal Reagan, who believed these individuals should compete with everyone else, both homelessness and the criminalization of the mentally ill began. Mental Health Courts began to reduce this aspect of the problem; although mentally ill individuals still make up abnormally high percentage of prison populations. (Full disclosure: I received Honorable Mention from the Pacific Research Institute (1992) for a paper on how Mental Health Courts could save communities money while providing better treatments.)

Drug laws – Are today’s drug laws the result of J. Edgar Hoover being blackmailed (for being a transvestite) by one or more mafia families? We will probably never know for sure, but we spend way too much money to keep people incarcerated for activities which primarily just injure themselves.

Both major political parties promote greater privileges for their elites. County prosecutors are on the list of the privileged elites for both Republicans and Democrats. This is part of the reason this country is sinking toward dictatorship, which appears to be the favored position of both far left and far right, although each appears to want a different flavor of dictatorship. This helps fuel the increase in gun advocates.

When government, State and Federal begin to address the problems created by the greed, both of power and money, of the elites instead of covering up their abuses, we will once again become a fit nation, deserving of survival.

Read more…

Slavery Among Us!!!

For the first question on this post: (Q:) Can anyone tell me/us what the first Tea Party was about..The Boston Tea Party? (A:) Taxation without representation. Okay then: What if I were to tell you that if we pay the first cent in taxation without the proper repersentation the United States Supreme Court has held that it is the very definition of peonage, or involuntary servitude? Okay now lets go one step further: The same Court has also held that if a person is served a tax for their labor the same peonage and/or involuntary servitude is in effect. Too, the Court has held that a persons labor is their private property and a tax cannot be imposed upon it. But of course we all know this, right? So when we go to work and sell our labor for an agreed upon price there cannot be any form of taxation on this because if it were it would be taxation without representation and a form of involuntary servitude, or in other words, slave labor. But what about the income tax? Well, its fairly simple, the money a person receives for the sell, or trade, of their labor (their private property) is NOT income. AND, if the united states government, or any part of it, levies a tax of any kind on the money you receive from your labor it is taxation without representation because the United States Constitution plainly states that a persons labor is their own private property and a tax cannot be levied on private property unless its done properly and within the bounds of the Constitution. AND, dear patriots, no matter what some bureaucrat or I.R.S. agent might tell you, the 16th Amendment does not give the government the authority to tax the money you receive from an everyday job, unless of course you work for the government. But a plumber, carpenter, bookkeeper, farmer, doctor, or shoe salesman (or any of the like kind) cannot be taxed for thier labor and if they are this is TAXATION WITHOUT REPERSENTATION. So heads up Tea Party, where is Washington getting the money to pay $165,000 each year to our so-called congressmen? These do nothing men and women are stealing your hard earned money right out of your pockets and laughing all the way to the bank, and they are doing this without you even raising the proverbial eyebrow! TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION was the first Tea Party's cry, let it be the same NOW!!! Wake up Patriots, you have the will and the power to stop Washington. Its your money, use it NOW.
Read more…

Barack Obama Sets Another Record for Incompetence

with Elena Kagan Nomination to Supreme Court

With the Sotomayor nomination and now the Elena Kagan nomination to be a United States Supreme Court Justice, Barack Obama is setting a record. Yes, yes he is attempting for the first time to place three women on the nation’s highest court. Yes, yes, for the first time it will be possible that the U.S. Supreme Court will not have a Protestant justice (Kagan is Jewish) . . . but more importantly, for the first time it will be possible that the U.S. Supreme Court would feature two justices who have seen their interpretations of American law overturned by a 9-0 or 8-0 contrary vote (against a Sotomayor judicial decision; and a Kagan advocacy position). The obvious assumption? Kagan, like Sotomayor, is a “living constitutionalist” that is she believes in creating law or attempting to create it from the bench or the advocate's chair or even the Dean's chair rather than making sincere efforts to respect the United States Constitution.

The shocking matter is that both cases featured the two ladies advocating great expansion of government powers against individual liberties. Sotomayor was clearly unqualified for the Supreme Court seat because in her two cause celebre`s one favored affirmative action that took away earned (by test scores) promotion from twenty-some firefighters of mixed races but NO Blacks in favor of affirmative action promotion of Black candidates who failed the test; and in another she sided with the state’s power to force an individual to sell his land over his objection so that a corporation could build a potentially lucrative shopping center. Like Sotomayor, Kagan, also, stands right in the crosshairs of legal philosophy. You’ll recall that Barack Obama insulted the Supreme Court attendees at his state of the union speech by cutting them down for their alignment 8-0 on corporate free speech and campaign donations. Kagan was the lawyer, technically the “solicitor general,” arguing the case for Obama when he tried to shutdown corporate free speech.

Kagan’s most clearly controvrsial actions as Dean of Harvard’s Law School were banning the presence of military recruiters on the campus and her defense of the action by referring to her distaste for “don’t ask don’t tell” standards for soldiers and other military citizens. Conservatives across the board favor denying federal funds to schools that oppose military presence (ROTC programs, recruiters’ visits and guest speakers for the most part) and this alone makes her highly suspect. Voicing her opposition to the policy is totally, OK. Rajjpuut disagrees mightily with her opinion, but free speech is guaranteed. Banning the recruiters is totally out of line . . . she was taken to court on the matter and when it reached the Supreme Court, surprise, surprise, her lower court wins were overturned and the school was denied government funding.

Kagan has been very guarded and even ingenuous about her views. Feigning a belief in constitutional limits regarding one matter in her only semi-open interview, she was pushed later in the interview for clarification and she would only say, she was referring to present status of the law, not necessarily her own views. The Obama administration has not allowed her since then to talk to the press. They engineered a phony-interview with an Obama administration sending her softball question and released that videotaping to the various press outlets apparently fearing another gaffe. So the opponent of free-speech is protected by denying the country a free-speech interchange with the news media??

She’s lived a circumscribed life in Academe and government, never had a real job and has always been aligned with the progressive-left leadership. Every action and word indicates that she’s like all those who in their ivory-towered stupidity believe we must “progress” well beyond the U.S. Constitution . . . ready, perhaps eager, to progress us over every available cliff in search of political correctness and expansion of government. Elena Kagan will definitely NOT exhibit a “principled view of the U.S. Constitution. Nor of common sense . . . she kicks the United States military off her campus and want federal funding for her unilateral UN-American show of political correctness??? Horse Pucky! Peter Beinart, no conservative he, puts it this way:

“On the day he or she is unveiled, conservatives will announce that they are approaching the selection with an open mind. Ten minutes later they will declare, more in sadness than anger, that the nominee has the judicial philosophy of Chairman Mao and the temperament of Dennis Rodman. Ten minutes after that, liberals will rise en masse to defend the nominee as wise, brilliant and humane, a person who restores our faith in humankind. And the kabuki theater will continue like that all summer long.

“I can’t blame my fellow liberals for playing along; if the other side fires, we have to fire back. But there’s one exception. If Solicitor General Elana Kagan gets the nod, conservatives will beat the hell out of her for opposing military recruitment on campus when she was dean of Harvard Law School. And liberals should concede the point; the conservatives will be right.”

Beinart has just committed the ultimate sin of political incorrectness in supporting a conservative argument and been proved right beyond the shadow of a doubt by the U.S. Supreme Court's rejection of Kagan's ugly argument 8-0, If only the United States Senate had Beinart's guts and integrity . . . .

Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,

Rajjpuut

Read more…