"Does Donald Trump's Family Bible Make Him A Christian?"

READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE AT THIS LINK... http://blackroberegimentpastor.blogspot.com/2015/09/does-donald-trumps-family-bible-make.html

"Does Donald Trump's Family Bible Make Him A Christian?" http://blackroberegimentpastor.blogspot.com/2015/09/does-donald-trumps-family-bible-make.html

By Craig Andresen – The National Patriot and Right Side Patriots on cprworldwidemedia.net

“So part of our job, together, is to work to reject such extremism that infects too many of our young people. Part of that effort must be a continued rejection by Muslims of those who distort Islam to preach intolerance and promote violence, and it must also involve a rejection by non-Muslims of the ignorance that equates Islam with terror.”

Those were Obama’s words at the United Nations (of thugs, thieves and despots) just a couple of days ago. He stood up there, just like he did a couple of years ago when he said that “the future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam” and said that non-Muslims must reject the IGNORANCE that equates Islam with terror.

It’s IGNORANT to equate ISLAM…with TERROR?

Oh really?

READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE!!!

President Obama Addresses the United Nations General Assembly

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uMgRqkF2tbo

Without a doubt our country is govern by a shameless President that is driven by his sycophantic and sociopath ideology.   It is deplorable that a mindset exists which allows us to think, that simply because we are Americans and born within our borders, we are somehow entitled to enjoy a greater degree of respect and dignity, but we are not prepared to acknowledge the birthright of the world community to live as they wish and elect their own president and have the right to self-determination.

The issue is not terrorism. It is injustice! America has been unjust and dishonest in its dealings with other nations. Our history of military interventions for the only purpose of controlling the natural resources of foreign nations is huge and it was done to protect the interest of the US multinational corporations; For many years our leaders lie and deceived the American people to seek our support and send our soldiers to fight wars for the interest of the US corporations; all these wars were provoked by our government and we paid the price with the lives of thousands of our soldiers and the trillions of Dollars expended that resulted of this huge national debt of over 18 trillions Dollars.  

Now, there's one thing  we might ask, who is worst the politicians that deceive us and commit all these crimes and send our soldiers to die for the corporations or we the people that have done nothing to stop these criminals.   Everybody complains about the politicians and what they done to our country, the poverty, the homeless and the lack of good paying jobs. Everybody says politicians suck. Well, where do people think these politicians come from? They don’t come from a foreign country; they come from American parents and American families, American homes, American schools, American churches, American businesses and American universities, and they are elected by American citizens. This is the best we can do folks. This is what we have to offer. It's what our system produces: Garbage in, garbage out. If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're going to get selfish, ignorant sycophants leaders.

The time has come to change this path of self-destruction and establish a new moral leadership in our country responsible to the people of this country and stop all foreign interventions, wars will be declare by congress not the President, the time has come to respect the rights of all nations and stop being the world’s bully; our place in the world community is to seek cooperation to help other countries to be self-sufficient and care for their own people the best they can, but not to dictate or control the political affairs of other countries, nor seek motives to invade and control other nations natural resources.

Help us to restore moral responsibly in America. http://billmoyers.com/episode/bernie-sanders-breaking-big-moneys-grip-elections/. Become an activist for Bernie Sanders.

http://billmoyers.com/episode/steve-fraser-new-robber-barons/    

America is the bully of the Free World.

https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/1999-03-01/bully-free-world

Obama is a pathological liar

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cse5cCGuHmE

 Obama a President without a shame. Master of deception

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UK7JEYqIfw4

Obama has amnesia or he is stupid or a complete ignorant.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uMgRqkF2tbo

By Craig Andresen – The National Patriot and Right Side Patriots on cprworldwidemedia.net

Another day and yet another of Hillary’s email sandal lies has been exposed. Her campaign staff is surely removing all sharp objects from her reach and no doubt, they have also relieved her of her shoe strings.

Hillary’s favorable ratings are sinking fast…down to but 38% a 7 point drop since May, her favorable rating, among democrats, is now down 11 points since May and since May, Hillary’s support from women has now dropped below 50%.

I expect any day now the call to abandon ship will be issued because, as though Trey Gowdy needs any more ammunition, Hillary’s emails are the gift that keeps on giving.

On Saturday, it was revealed or leaked that once again, Hillary lied. Previously, she had stated that she had turned over all…ALL of her work-related emails to the Department of State. Not only did she state it…she signed a sworn statement under penalty of perjury to it.

I, Hillary Rodham Clinton, declare under penalty of perjury that the following is true and correct:
1. While I do not know what information may be “responsive” for purposes of this law suit, I have directed that all my e-mails on clintonemail.com in my custody that were or potentially were federal records to be provided to the Department of State, and on information and belief, this has been done.
2. As a result of my directive, approximately 55,000 pages of these emails were produced to the Department on December 5, 2014.
3. Cheryl Mills did not have an account on clintonemail.com. Huma Abedin did have such an account which was used at times for government business.

Hillary, adding to the growing list of offenses, has now committed perjury because, it has been discovered that an email chain, between her and General Petraeus, had NOT been handed over as ordered by a federal judge but that’s not the biggest news coming from this particular breech of the law.

The BIG news is…who handed over this latest string of emails…

READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE!!!

Modern Immigration Wave Brings 59 Million to U.S., Driving Population Growth and Change Through 2065

Views of Immigration’s Impact on U.S. Society Mixed

Fifty years after passage of the landmark law that rewrote U.S. immigration policy, nearly 59 million immigrants have arrived in the United States, pushing the country’s foreign-born share to a near record 14%. For the past half-century, these modern-era immigrants and their descendants have accounted for just over half the nation’s population growth and have reshaped its racial and ethnic composition.

Looking ahead, new Pew Research Center U.S. population projections show that if current demographic trends continue, future immigrants and their descendants will be an even bigger source of population growth. Between 2015 and 2065, they are projected to account for 88% of the U.S. population increase, or 103 million people, as the nation grows to 441 million.

These are some key findings of a new Pew Research analysis of U.S. Census Bureau data and new Pew Research U.S. population projections through 2065, which provide a 100-year look at immigration’s impact on population growth and on racial and ethnic change. In addition, this report uses newly released Pew Research survey data to examine U.S. public attitudes toward immigration, and it employs census data to analyze changes in the characteristics of recently arrived immigrants and paint a statistical portraitof the historical and 2013 foreign-born populations.

Post-1965 Immigration Drives U.S. Population Growth Through 2065

Immigration since 1965 has swelled the nation’s foreign-born population from 9.6 million then to a record 45 million in 2015.1 (The current immigrant population is lower than the 59 million total who arrived since 1965 because of deaths and departures from the U.S.)2By 2065, the U.S. will have 78 million immigrants, according to the new Pew Research population projections.

The nation’s immigrant population increased sharply from 1970 to 2000, though the rate of growth has slowed since then. Still, the U.S. has—by far—the world’s largest immigrant population, holding about one-in-five of the world’s immigrants (Connor, Cohn and Gonzalez-Barrera, 2013).

Between 1965 and 2015, new immigrants, their children and their grandchildren accounted for 55% of U.S. population growth. They added 72 million people to the nation’s population as it grew from 193 million in 1965 to 324 million in 2015.

This fast-growing immigrant population also has driven the share of the U.S. population that is foreign born from 5% in 1965 to 14% today and will push it to a projected record 18% in 2065. Already, today’s 14% foreign-born share is a near historic record for the U.S., just slightly below the 15% levels seen shortly after the turn of the 20th century. The combined population share of immigrants and their U.S.-born children, 26% today, is projected to rise to 36% in 2065, at least equaling previous peak levels at the turn of the 20th century.

The 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act made significant changes to U.S. immigration policy by sweeping away a long-standing national origins quota system that favored immigrants from Europe and replacing it with one that emphasized family reunification and skilled immigrants. At the time, relatively few anticipated the size or demographic impact of the post-1965 immigration flow (Gjelten, 2015). In absolute numbers, the roughly 59 million immigrants who arrived in the U.S. between 1965 and 2015 exceed those who arrived in the great waves of European-dominated immigration during the 19th and early 20th centuries. Between 1840 and 1889, 14.3 million immigrants came to the U.S., and between 1890 and 1919, an additional 18.2 million arrived (see Table 1 for details).

After the replacement of the nation’s European-focused origin quota system, greater numbers of immigrants from other parts of the world began to come to the U.S. Among immigrants who have arrived since 1965, half (51%) are from Latin America and one-quarter are from Asia. By comparison, both of the U.S. immigration waves in the mid-19th century and early 20th century consisted almost entirely of European immigrants.

Latin American and Asian Immigration Since 1965 Changes U.S. Racial and Ethnic Makeup

As a result of its changed makeup and rapid growth, new immigration since 1965 has altered the nation’s racial and ethnic composition. In 1965, 84% of Americans were non-Hispanic whites. By 2015, that share had declined to 62%. Meanwhile, the Hispanic share of the U.S. population rose from 4% in 1965 to 18% in 2015. Asians also saw their share rise, from less than 1% in 1965 to 6% in 2015.

The Pew Research analysis shows that without any post-1965 immigration, the nation’s racial and ethnic composition would be very different today: 75% white, 14% black, 8% Hispanic and less than 1% Asian.

The arrival of so many immigrants slightly reduced the nation’s median age, the age at which half the population is older and half is younger. The U.S. population’s median age in 1965 was 28 years, rising to 38 years in 2015 and a projected 42 years in 2065. Without immigration since 1965, the nation’s median age would have been slightly older—41 years in 2015; without immigration from 2015 to 2065, it would be a projected 45 years.

By 2065, the composition of the nation’s immigrant population will change again, according to Pew Research projections. In 2015, 47% of immigrants residing in the U.S. are Hispanic, but as immigration from Latin America, especially Mexico (Passel, Cohn and Gonzalez-Barrera, 2012), has slowed in recent years, the share of the foreign born who are Hispanic is expected to fall to 31% by 2065. Meanwhile, Asian immigrants are projected to make up a larger share of all immigrants, becoming the largest immigrant group by 2055 and making up 38% of the foreign-born population by 2065. (Hispanics will remain a larger share of the nation’s overall population.) Pew Research projections also show that black immigrants and white immigrants together will become a slightly larger share of the nation’s immigrants by 2065 than in 2015 (29% vs. 26%).

The country’s overall population will feel the impact of these shifts. Non-Hispanic whites are projected to become less than half of the U.S. population by 2055 and 46% by 2065. No racial or ethnic group will constitute a majority of the U.S. population. Meanwhile, Hispanics will see their population share rise to 24% by 2065 from 18% today, while Asians will see their share rise to 14% by 2065 from 6% today.

For the U.S. Public, Views of Immigrants and Their Impact on U.S. Society Are Mixed

For its part, the American public has mixed views on the impact immigrants have had on American society, according to a newly released Pew Research Center public opinion survey. Overall, 45% of Americans say immigrants in the U.S. are making American society better in the long run, while 37% say they are making it worse (16% say immigrants are not having much effect). The same survey finds that half of Americans want to see immigration to the U.S. reduced (49%), and eight-in-ten (82%) say the U.S. immigration system either needs major changes or it needs to be completely rebuilt.

The public’s views of immigrants’ impact on the U.S. vary across different aspects of American life. Views are most negative about the economy and crime: Half of U.S. adults say immigrants are making things worse in those areas. On the economy, 28% say immigrants are making things better, while 20% say they are not having much of an effect. On crime, by contrast, just 7% say immigrants are making things better, while 41% generally see no positive or negative impact of immigrants in the U.S. on crime.

On other aspects of U.S. life, Americans are more likely to hold neutral views of the impact of immigrants. Some 45% say immigrants are not having much effect on social and moral values, and 56% say they are not having much effect on science and technology. But when it comes to food, music and the arts, about half (49%) of adults say immigrants are making things better.

U.S. adults’ views on the impact of immigrants on American society also differ depending on where immigrants are from. Some 47% of U.S. adults say immigrants from Asia have had a mostly positive impact on American society, and 44% say the same about immigrants from Europe. Meanwhile, half of Americans say the impact of immigrants from Africa has been neither positive nor negative.

However, Americans are more likely to hold negative views about the impact of immigrants from Latin America and the Middle East. In the case of Latin American immigrants, 37% of American adults say their impact on American society has been mostly negative, 35% say their impact is neither positive nor negative, and just 26% say their impact on American society has been positive. For immigrants from the Middle East, views are similar—39% of U.S. adults say their impact on American society has been mostly negative, 39% say their impact has been neither positive nor negative, and just 20% say their impact has been mostly positive on U.S. society.

Many Americans say that immigrants to the U.S. are not assimilating. Two-thirds of adults say immigrants in the U.S. today generally want to hold on to their home country customs and way of life, while only about a third (32%) say immigrants want to adopt Americans customs. The survey also finds that 59% of Americans say most recent immigrants do not learn English within a reasonable amount of time, while 39% say they do.

The nationally representative bilingual survey of 3,147 adults was conducted online using the Pew Research Center’s American Trends Panel from March 10 to April 6, 2015, before the current national discussion began about national immigration policy, unauthorized immigration and birthright citizenship. The survey has a margin of error of plus or minus 2.4 percentage points at the 95% confidence level.

The Profile of Today’s Newly Arrived Is Markedly Different than that of New Arrivals in Previous Decades

The rewrite of the nation’s immigration policy in 1965 opened the door to new waves of immigrants whose origins and characteristics changed substantially over the ensuing decades. As a result, newly arrived immigrants in 2013 (those who had been in the U.S. for five years or less) differ in key ways from those who were new arrivals in the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s.

Overall, the number of newly arrived immigrants peaked in the early 2000s: Some 8 million residents of other countries came to the U.S. between 2000 and 2005. The number of recent arrivals declined after that, to about 6 million for the years 2008 to 2013, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of federal government data.

Perhaps the most striking change in the profile of newly arrived immigrants is their source region. Asia currently is the largest source region among recently arrived immigrants and has been since 2011.3 Before then, the largest source region since 1990 had been Central and South America, fueled by record levels of Mexican migration that have since slowed. Back in 1970, Europe was the largest region of origin among newly arrived immigrants. One result of slower Mexican immigration is that the share of new arrivals who are Hispanic is at its lowest level in 50 years.

Compared with their counterparts in 1970, newly arrived immigrants in 2013 were better educated but also more likely to be poor. Some 41% of newly arrived immigrants in 2013 had at least a bachelor’s degree. In 1970, that share was just 20%. On poverty, 28% of recent arrivals in 2013 lived in poverty, up from 18% in 1970. In addition, fewer of the newly arrived in 2013 were children than among the newly arrived immigrants in 1970—19% vs. 27%.

Yet on several other measures, the characteristics of the newly arrived today are returning to those of the newly arrived in 1970. On gender, 51% of the newly arrived in 2013 were women, compared with 47% in 2000 and 54% in 1970. In terms of geographic dispersion, half of new arrivals in 2013 lived in one of four states: California, Florida, New York or Texas. Nearly two-thirds of new arrivals lived in those four states in 1990, up from a third in 1970. California alone had 38% of recently arrived immigrants in 1990, but the share has since declined, to 18% in 2013.

Roadmap to the Report

The report is organized as follows: Chapter 1 provides an overview of the nation’s immigration legislation, with a focus on key changes since 1965. It is accompanied by aninteractive timeline highlighting U.S. immigration legislation since 1790. Chapter 2explores the impact of post-1965 immigration on the nation’s demographics up to 2015 and provides a look forward at the future impact of immigration with new Pew Research population projections through 2065. Chapter 3 looks at the post-1965 flow of immigrants through the lens of the recently arrived, exploring changes in the group’s origins and other characteristics. Chapter 4 explores the U.S. public’s views of immigration and immigration policy. Chapter 5 provides a statistical portrait of the nation’s immigrants from 1960 to 2013 and is accompanied by an online interactive statistical portrait of the foreign born and an online interactive exploring the top country of origin among immigrants in each state from 1850 to 2013. Appendix A explains the report’s methodology, including for the population projections. Appendix B contains a U.S. immigration law timeline.Appendix C includes 1965 to 2065 population tables, and Appendix D contains the survey topline.

If you want to see the cumulative voting record for our congressmen, go to the Congressional conservative voting chart site.   It lists the % of conservative (and liberal) votes for each member of congress.

For instance, John Boehner's record was 11% !!!    Kevin McCarthy's was 67%.

If you want to see the cumulative voting record for our congressmen, go to the Congressional conservative voting chart site.   It lists the % of conservative (and liberal) votes for each member of congress.

For instance, John Boehner's record was 11% !!!    Kevin McCarthy's was 67%.

"Everyone's going to be taken care of and the government's going to pay for it."

http://www.forbes.com/sites/theapothecary/2015/09/28/donald-trump-on-obamacare-on-60-minutes-everybodys-got-to-be-covered-and-the-governments-gonna-pay-for-it/?utm_source=followingweekly&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=20150928

Pelley: How do you fix it?

Trump: There’s many different ways, by the way. Everybody’s got to be covered. This is an un-Republican thing for me to say because a lot of times they say, “No, no, the lower 25 percent that can’t afford private. But–”

Pelley: Universal health care.

Trump: I am going to take care of everybody. I don’t care if it costs me votes or not. Everybody’s going to be taken care of much better than they’re taken care of now.

Pelley: The uninsured person is going to be taken care of. How? How?

Trump: They’re going to be taken care of. I would make a deal with existing hospitals to take care of people. And, you know what, if this is probably—

Pelley: Make a deal? Who pays for it?

Trump: —the government’s gonna pay for it. But we’re going to save so much money on the other side. But for the most it’s going to be a private plan and people are going to be able to go out and negotiate great plans with lots of different competition with lots of competitors with great companies and they can have their doctors, they can have plans, they can have everything.

So TEA Party, how does the Donald's plan differ from Obamacare or any other socialized medicine scheme? How will those of us who reject "mainstream" medicine with its dangerous drugs and toxic vaccines be able to obtain health care? How can he claim "most it's going to be a private plan..." if the govt (taxpayers) pay for it?

IMHO, it is time for the TEA Party to call out the Donald for being a crony socialist!

And while we are at it, let's make sure our TEA Party friends who have been mesmerized by the Donald get their heads back on...

What do you think?

By: Juan Reynoso, WTP Activist -  texusa2016@gmail.com

Truth and knowledge diffused among the people are necessary for the reclamation and preservation of our Democracy, rights, freedom and liberties.  www.represent.us

Wake up Americans. For the record, I Am, not a Democrat or Republican;   I am here to tell the truth and serve the American people and humanity. The 2016 elections should not be about political ideologies or the parties; it is about our economic freedom and the preservation of our Republican and Democracy.

 http://robertreich.org/post/3317811319

Something is wrong with the American people, from politicians to the average American, it seems that they have amnesia; they are complete ignorant or plain stupid; because they are in complete denial about President Ronald Reagan legacy. Reaganomics was the beginning of what we got today “The GOP NEOCON WARMONGERS” that under the pretense of promoting a conservative system of government they created a Plutocracy run by the oligarchs and the slavery of the American working class.

The big accomplishment of the GOP NEOCONS is the brainwashing of the Republican party,  using Ronald Reagan’s legacy, Via the mainstream news media the propaganda machinery of the oligarch and the Republican party neocons, they feed the American people their unchecked misinformation and disinformation about Ronald Reagan accomplishments, the Republican Party Neocon Elite has even shanghaied the emotional support of everyday ordinary Republican party members and the American people into taking this non-sensible “Reaganomics”, political indoctrination against their own best economic and self-interests and supported the cut taxes for the super-rich, all of the free trade ill policies that destroyed the American dream and the military interventions that cost the lives of thousands of American soldier, trillions of Dollars of national debt and the demise of our economic to support and defend the interest of the US multinational corporations in foreign countries

Fellow American wake up,  this is the Ronald Reagan score card - On taxes; during the 1950s and early 1960s, the top bracket income tax rate was over 90% for the super-rich and the economy, middle-class, and stock market boomed so please do not let the GOP NEOCONS lie and deceive you with their propaganda that the rich will create jobs for Americans if we cut their taxes.

Spread the word. To share this please clicks here       Share

Reaganomics killed America's middle class

http://www.salon.com/2014/04/19/reaganomics_killed_americas_middle_class_partner/

A Simple Economic Truth America's Super Rich don’t want you to know

http://www.alternet.org/simple-economic-truth-americas-super-rich-dont-want-us-know-about

How the GOP Became the Party of the Rich

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/how-the-gop-became-the-party-of-the-rich-20111109

The truth about taxes.

http://www.businessinsider.com/history-of-tax-rates-2012-5

Ronald Reagan score card on military intervention.

30 years on: The legacy of Reagan's invasion of Grenada

http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2013/10/25/invasion-grenadaronaldreagan.html

Iran contra- Reagan and Bush criminal liability.

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB365/

Lost History: Reagan-Bush Crime Syndicate

https://consortiumnews.com/archive/lost7.html

The Iran-contra affair – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

https://www.google.com/#q=Iran%E2%80%93Contra+affair+-+Wikipedia%2C+the+free+encyclopedia

Iraq confession and cover-up

http://www.democracynow.org/2004/6/9/the_reagan_saddam_connection_we_create

The Mena Arkansas-Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Drug Connection

http://www.dldewey.com/columns/menaf.htm

Ronald Reagan was a Drug Dealer

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/06/16/347209/-Ronald-Reagan-was-a-Drug-Dealer

New evidence links George Bush to Los Angeles drug operation

http://www.bwbadge.com/bush.htm

Before Pope Francis' visit to United States of America I did not know nothing about Dorothy Day and other "Catholic" Communists. Pope Francis in his speech to US Congress mentioned an American "Catholic" Communist Propagandist and Agitator Dorothy Day saying that we should look up to her. So I checked the Internet and found many shocking things about her and her heavy activity in Communist Subversion of America. 

I wanted also to know reason why Pope Francis would not use much better Catholic example for all American People and why he did not mention continuous holocaust of abortion, children body parts sold by Planned Parenthood, gay marriages and other things, then I stumbled on this shocking info regarding one Liberation Theology Icon and Pope Francis:

Pope Francis lifted 29-year suspension on liberation theology icon a Central American priest the Rev. Miguel D’Escoto Brockman who was suspended by the Vatican in the 1980s for his involvement in the political activities of Nicaragua’s Communist Sandinista movement.

Looks like that Rev. Brockman was one of those Communists who massively disrespected Pope John Paul II during his visit to Nicaragua, by encouraging the crowd to catcall and shout down the voice of Pope John Paul in his outdoor address. Looks like that Rev. Miguel D’Escoto Brockman was in that time the Foreign Minister in the Sandinist Communist Government according to this report from NY Times:

http://www.nytimes.com/1983/03/05/world/pope-says-taking-sides-in-nicaragua-is-peril-to-church.html

ENOUGH…I’M TIRED AND YOU SHOULD DAMN WELL BE TOO
by Guest Post • May 24, 2015
FacebookTwitter117Share

US Flag

By John Velisek USN (Ret)

I think back on the days of my childhood, days when all the kids in the neighborhood I lived in would get together for a game of stickball. All colors, all nationalities, everyone would play. Some better than others, but everyone would play until our mothers called us home at dark for dinner. The only break would come when the ice cream truck came by, and if someone didn’t have the dime for ice cream, someone else would buy it for them.

Times have changed, but the basic principles of how I was brought up have stuck with me. It doesn’t make for a tranquil way of life these days. There is a choice which must be made by every one of our citizens. Do we keep those old values, or do we toss them to the side for a more modern way of living our lives?

For me, I’ve had enough. There are certain things I am tired of:

I’m tired of partisan politics, of politicians working only to line their pockets and those of family and friends.

I’m tired of election promises never kept and the lying that has somehow become an accepted part of their everyday lives.

I am tired of state and federal masters who believe they have the authority to decide what I may say or do, whether I am allowed to carry a gun or favor Christianity over Islam.

I am tired of the “It Takes a Village” mindset which claims special insight in what our children should learn and how they must be taught.

I am tired of a federal government that shatters the Constitution and Bill of Rights to protect us from ourselves. I am tired of regulations that cost money, jobs and cause damage to the country in order that some crony or lobbyist can make a bundle.

I am tired of people wanting something for nothing and blaming others for the life that they made for themselves.

I’m tired of voters being called uninformed when they are really just stupid, lazy or greedy.

I am tired of being called racist because I am against illegal immigration. We are a country of laws, or used to be. Illegal is illegal. What part of that gets lost on the administration and media? Our Republican lawmakers have lost the integrity and backbone their constituents expect them to have.

I am tired of being told that in our modern culture, family does not matter. The foundation of this country was based on Christian principles. If you want that to change, count me out. I don’t care about your new ideas, or new way of life. It doesn’t matter to me. If that offends you, I am NOT sorry and I will NOT change.

I am tired of people being perpetually offended; offended by anything you say or do. The new buzzword is “microagression”. What exactly is that, other than a way to silence the people who disagree with today’s victim class. It won’t work. I and many others will not be cowed into silence.

I am tired of people believing I have to apologize for being a Christian Atheists out there who get so upset about someone being a Christian, I ask why? If God doesn’t exist, why does being a Christian make you so angry? Here’s a fair test: tell a Muslim that his religion is wrong, and let’s see what happens.

I am tired of a school system which indoctrinates rather than educates. Don’t indoctrinate our children into acceptance of socialism or homosexuality. Alumni who give to these systems are just as guilty as those who teach in them or run them. And parents, take the time to see what they are teaching your kids; from global warming nonsense to sex they are teaching your kids things that will make you angry. Stand up and opt out. You should decide what your child needs to know and what he is to be taught.

I am tired of slavery. My family never owned any, I never lived through it and no one alive has either. If there are reparations to be paid, they won’t get a dime from me. The first slaveholder in America was a black man and the slaves were rounded up by blacks in Africa and sold to him by Muslims. Ask those people to pay.

I am tired of Bowe Bergdahl being treated as a victim or hero, while Amir Hakmati languishes in a prison in Iran. Mr. President, do what is right by having a Rose Garden ceremony for Amir, with his parents and Amir standing next to you.
I am tired of class warfare. The middle class has been devastated over the past six years. Redistribution, like all other aspects of socialism does not work, never has and never will.

There is so much more. It is time for this administration, and all politicians to wake up to the fact that people in this country are fearful of where it is going; that all people, black and white want the opportunity of a better life for their children. It is up to us, the people of this country to stand up and tell those who believe they are above the law that there will be a reckoning.

Responsibility, accountability and respect must be integral to the education of our children and citizens. Today, our priorities are in free-fall. The nation is falling into third world chaos as a result of the deliberate actions of the New World Order crowd. No victims, no excuses. The time is now, and only time will tell what the citizenry of this country really wants.

Those quiet days of summer and ice cream still await. What will you do to bring them back?

John C. Velisek USN (Ret.)
Follow on twitter : sjspecialist
Related Posts: