All Posts (28965)

Sort by

The Most Danger to U.S. Sovereignty ever !

Everyone should write, call and e-mail your senators !

I believe that issues such as fast and furious etc.are purposely confusing clutter to divert us from the biggest threat to our FREEDOM, I believe this is the most serious issue that we are facing ! This is a serious issue that many do not know about. 

Obama is planning to ratify five treaties that give away our sovereignty to UN groups. They will give the UN authority over the US, our property rights, and our money.

ONE The Law of the Sea Treaty 

This has already been signed, and Obama was going to have Richard Lugar (who was just defeated) help him get it ratified. That's right, a RINO repuplican was going to help Obama give away our sovereignty. This treaty forces us to give the UN half of our royalties from offshore drilling. Then the UN would give that money to whomever they see fit. We would get one vote out of 160 as to where the money goes. And we'd have to give our (offshore) drilling technology to any nation that wants it - free.

TWO Outer Space Code of Conduct

Using the excuse that we can't let space junk build up in space...the EU has persuaded (bet that wasn't hard) Hilary Clinton to negotiate a code of conduct. That code would ban anything that might generate any debris in outer space (littering).
Here's the real deal....to prevent the US from placing anti-missile missiles on platforms in space. That leaves us defenseless from missile attacks by N Korea, Iran, China or whomever. Lefties of all types had a hissy when Bush opted out of the ABM treaty banning weapons of defense. Now they're trying to get it back in under a phony-baloney "code of conduct" to prevent littering.

THREE International Criminal Court 

Hilary Clinton has reversed Bush's policy and has been negotiating over U.S. Participation in an international court. Euro-leftists who are sponsoring the court are trying to craft a new "crime of aggression"; basically going to war without the approval of the UN. If we go along with that, our president and Cabinet officials can be arrested and prosecuted criminally for going to war without U.N. Approval. The court could even prosecute our Generals, soldiers or whomever they say was involved at their SOLE DISCRETION. Why does Hilary want to trust the UN to have real power over our president and our military??? Does she trust them? I don't. Do you?

FOUR Rights of the Child

A fourteen member court will be set up for this one. The draft for the treaty dictates that wealthy nations will be obligated to provide monies for housing, clothing, shoes, food, and schooling for kids in poor countries. This would dictate how much foreign aid we'd be obligated for - whether we could afford it or not - regardless of our struggling economy, our debt or whatever. And WE would have NO say in it. Euro-lefties are already using this in England to stop welfare cuts that England cannot afford to maintain...imagine that...Europe is dictating welfare obligations in England.

FIVE Small-arms control 

Hilary is about to start negotiating on a global ban on the export of small arms. It would only apply to private citizens - so far - but most small-arms deals come from governments, specifically the US, Israel, China, and Russia. The treaty would enforce the requirement that each nation implement measures to STOP the exportation of small arms. It can easily be used to force a national registration of all guns AND ammo.

Liberals and lefties of all types may applaud this, but it's giving up PERMANENTLY large portions of our sovereignty, money, and property rights. It will function as an amendment to our Constitution.

What can we do to stop this? Tell everyone !!! Call your legislators. This is NOT a small matter.

And shame on you , DICK Lugar for assisting Obama ins getting these ratified... You had to go, you traitor; don't let the door hit ya in the ass.
Read more…

Patriot Concert to "Honor Our Heroes"

Patriot Concert to "Honor Our Heroes"

Help our Veterans by spreading the word to "Honor Our Heroes".  Concert is tomorrow 21 June 2012 at Colorado National Speedway 6-10pm.  If you can't attend, then donate a ticket so a veteran can attend.  Proceeds support needs of our veterans: and families including issues of homelessness, Post Tramatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), unemployment and service connected disabilities.  Check out more details at www.patriotfriend.com .

Read more…

ChineseTake-Out

 

Obama creating Chinese Jobs by letting Chinese Contractors and workers build Bridges and Roads Here in America!
Where's the "America First" Job' Hire Promise/Law?!!
Freaking Obama is a one man plague on America and anyone who can't see it is as blind as one of those creatures that have been found in those DEEP DARK caves !
GBAAIGWT
Cal

ps-Holder hands out business cards that say "Blacks First"..Rascist?

Read more…

WHY THERE ARE NO JOBS IN AMERICA

Fellow Steven of the Tax Technicaldiscussioin group which I am in on  linked in posted this interesting and accurate dissertation.  Does it sound familiar.

I'd like to make you business offer

 

Seriously, thjis is a real odder that you realy can't turn down, as you'll understand in a moment.

 

Here's ther deal, You're going start a business or expand the one you've got nowq, It doesn't realy matter what you do, I'll partner with you no matter business you're in-as long as it's legal.

 

But I can't give you any capital-you have to come up with that on your own. I wont give you any labor. Thats definitly up to you. What I will do, however, is demand you follow all sorts of rulesabout what products and services you can offer, how much and how often you pay your employees, and where and when you're allosed to operate your business.  Thats my role in the affaie-to tell you what to do.

 

Now in return for my rules, I'm going to take roughly half of whatever you make in the business each year. 

Half seems fair, doesn't it? I think so, of course thats half of your profits.

 

You're also going to pay me about 12% of whatever you decide to pay your employees because you've got to cover my expenses for promulgating all of the rules about who can employ, when, where and how.

come on, you're my partner, its only fair.

 

Now, after you've put your hard savings at risk to start the business, and after you've worked  hard at it for a few decades, paying me my 50% or a bit more along the way each year, you might decide you'd like to cash out-to finally have the good life.

 

Whether or not, this is "fair"-0some people never can afford to retire-is a different argument.  As your partner, I'm happy for you to sell whatever you like-because our agreement says, if yoiu sell, you have to pay me an additional 20% of whatever the capitalized value of the business at that time.

 

I kn ow, I know,you put up all the original capital, you took all yhe risks, you put in all the labor, thats all true.  But I've done my part too,  Ive 50% of the profits each year.  And I've always come up with more rules for you to follow each year, therefore, IU deserve another, final 20% slice of the business.

 

Oh, and just one more thing

 

Even after you've sold the business and paid all of my fees, I'd recommend buying lots of insurance.  You see, even after you'v e been retired for. years, when you die, you'll have to pay me 50% ofr whatever your estate is worth.

 

After all, I've got lots of partners and not all of them are as sucessful as you and your family.  We don't think it's "fair" for your kids to have such a big advantage, but if you buy enough unsurance , you can finance this expense for your children.

 

All in all, if you';/re a very sucessful entrirepreneur - If your one of the rare, lucky and hard working people who can create a new company, enjoy lots of people and satisfy the public--you'll end paying me more than 75% of your income over your life

 

Thanks so much

 

'm sure you'll think my offer is a reasonable and happily partner with me-- but if it doesn't realy matter how you feel about it because if you ever try to stiff me-or cheat me on any of my fees or rules--I'll break down your door in the midle of the night, threaten you and your family with heavy, automatic weapons and throw you in jail.

 

This ius how civiul society  is supposed to work, right?  This is A,erika, isn't it

 

thats the offer Amerika give its entreprenuwers. And the idiots in Washington wonder why there no new jobs.

Originall posted by Porter Shansberry on June 17, 2012

 

 

 

Read more…

WE N EED A NEW US SENATOR FROM NEW YORK

I taped the debate on YNN of the debate of 3 contenders for the republican senatorial candidatacy for N Y and after reviewing it severasl times, I would like to share my perceptive on the casndidates.  Congressman Bob Turner apparantly has a good awareness fo the various problems facing our great nation and has apparantly done a good job furthering many of the principles embraced by many teapartiers< he has a good voting record- votinmg in favor of many of the house bills that now languish in the dark recess' of senator Reids secret archives and I question the wisdom of having him give up his seat in the house for an unknown.  He does not strike me as the type who coiuld be an effective force in the senate.  The small business man of the group does not appear to me to have any kind of a grasp on the ways our congress works and I applaud him in the manner in the ways he beliueves the congress would operate, he doesn't appear to me that he has sufficient grasp of the magnitude of governmental finances as opposed to the financial operation  of a small business.  Wendy, seems to have the intellectual capacity to grasp the magnitude of national operations in the overall picture and she appears to possess the dynamicsm that could help the process of reforming the government and she was unamisously selected as the canditate of the consertative party of N Y and was very impressive throughout the debate.    

 

Read more…

Be Encouraged! 6/19/12

Howdy all!  You know, kids, especially the toddlers are so much fun to play with.  They smile just because you look at them.  They laugh at your jokes, even though you know they don’t understand.  And you can teach them so many things, sometimes in short order!  Like my granddaughter.  Many times she will blankly stare at us when we try to get her to say ‘papa’ or ‘grandma’.  But give her a simple sounding word, like ‘Coco’…  Hey, coco. Hi coco.  Mama coco.  I coco.

Any coco (I mean hoo),..

Let the wise listen to these proverbs and become even wiser. Let those with understanding receive guidance. ~ Proverbs 1:5

[I]f the public are bound to yield obedience to laws to which they cannot give their approbation, they are slaves to those who make such laws and enforce them. ~ Candidus (Samuel Adams), in the Boston Gazette, 1772

Ok Mr. Adams, you’ve been paying attention from your lofty place above.  You’ve noticed what is going on here.  We beg of you to pass on to your fellow founders about this.  Yes, if We the People are bound to obey the laws we don’t approve of, (Obamacare, et al) we become slaves to those who make them.  And I think it is safe to add executive orders in this message as well.  In fact, it’s downright mandatory, since most of the laws we feel enslaved by have come from a usurpation of our legislative capabilities as a nation by a majority slave owner, or the dictator in the White House.  And those dang federally elected employees won’t lift a finger to stop it.  Too busy trying to save their jobs.  Jobs?  Do they really think being elected to office is a job?  Hmm, something we may need to clarify soon.   Also, many Americans are still asleep; all cozy and warm in the fuzzy cozy blanket they receive every night, fresh and smelling so good, courtesy of the mainstream media.  “Life is good, right?  You still have a car, and a home, and a job, right?”  Well, how many Americans cannot answer all three?  How many in this audience would have trouble saying yes?  Up until a couple of months ago I couldn’t.  But the, what are they?  Can’t call them progressives; that seems too meek anymore.  But the leftists would love for us all to wear our best Lemming outfits and eat the soft chewy candies all day long and leave the tedious minutia to them.  So, the tea party folks, the 9/12 groups, and all the conservative entities must stand up and take position, NOW.  I don’t mean man the walls with guns and ammo.  I mean stand and speak up.  Forget speaking to the elected employees; they’re a lost cause.  Talk to your families.  Talk to your friends.  Talk to an Occupier.  Show them what you know.  Don’t waste your breath thinking they will believe you because of what you say.  Show them the facts of which you speak.  The more you say, the more they will question.  That’s ok. In fact that is what you want.  You want them to research and find out what you found out.  It’s the only way they’ll believe.  So, if this is true, what do we do next?  Well, look to Proverbs. Let the wise listen and become even wiser.  Let those with understanding receive guidance.  Why?  Why should we receive the guidance?  Aren’t the lemmings the ones who need the epiphany?  Yes, but they will need leadership, and guidance.  You must receive that guidance from Him, so you can share it with others.  Speaking to, or at our elected employees will no longer be as effective as it was.   The people now need to hear the message first hand.  Take the guidance from Him, and speak of the message Candidus relates.  We are edging closer and closer to a dictatorship.  Once there, our country will not be ours anymore.  You must stand and be a presence.

Take care, God bless,

AND STAND WITH ISRAEL!!!

Tom Kiley

Read more…

Congressional fear of Obama

I have submitted the following queston  to my congressonal representative, John Shimkus:

 

           Why are you in congress so TERRIFIED of Obama??   He is clearly legislating from the oval office.

a practice that is outside his relm of responsibility and you are not raising all kinds of hell about it.

 

Clearly you must be TERRIFIED of Obama

 

       I would like to see similiar questions sent to all members of both houses

Read more…

Obamacare Home Tax?

Everybody should know this...and please sign any petition to get rid of Obamacare.

It is going to be a nightmare for us seniors.  Thanks.

Woodey

Obamacare Home Tax?

Q (from 23669): Did you know that if you sell your house after 2012 you will pay a 3.8% sales tax on it? That's $3,800 on a $100,000 home, etc. When did this happen? It's in the health care bill and goes into effect in 2013. Why 2013? Could it be to come to light AFTER the 2012 elections? So, this is "change you can believe in"? Under the new health care bill all real estate transactions will be subject to a 3.8% Sales Tax.If you sell a $400,000 home, there will be a $15,200 tax. This bill is set to screw the retiring generation who often downsize their homes. Does this make your November and 2012 vote more important? Oh, you weren't aware this was in the Obamacare bill? Guess what, you aren't alone. There are more than a few members of Congress that aren't aware of it either.

A: That's right. We're finding out what's in Obamacare. And don't forget you pay that 3.8% even if you have no gain on the sale. And if you do have a gain your cap gains tax is going up from 15% to 20% PLUS the 3.8.  Have a nice day AND VOTE

?

Q (from 23669): Did you know that if you sell your house after 2012 you will pay a 3.8% sales tax on it? That's $3,800 on a $100,000 home, etc. When did this happen? It's in the health care bill and goes into effect in 2013. Why 2013? Could it be to come to light AFTER the 2012 elections? So, this is "change you can believe in"? Under the new health care bill all real estate transactions will be subject to a 3.8% Sales Tax.If you sell a $400,000 home, there will be a $15,200 tax. This bill is set to screw the retiring generation who often downsize their homes. Does this make your November and 2012 vote more important? Oh, you weren't aware this was in the Obamacare bill? Guess what, you aren't alone. There are more than a few members of Congress that aren't aware of it either.

A: That's right. We're finding out what's in Obamacare. And don't forget you pay that 3.8% even if you have no gain on the sale. And if you do have a gain your cap gains tax is going up from 15% to 20% PLUS the 3.8.  Have a nice day AND VOTE

Read more…

IS ANYONE THERE? DO YOU EVEN CARE?

This is a matter for Congress; but they seem to want to ignore it.
I am posting this in many forums AND on several Senator's & Rep's pages:

AP declared Obama “Kenyan-Born”
        

John Charlton
The Post & Email
October 16, 2009

What most people know is that the Associated Press (AP) is one of the largest, internationally recognized, syndicated news services.  What most people don’t know that is in 2004, the AP was a “birther” news organization.

How so?  Because in a syndicated report, published Sunday, June 27, 2004, by the Kenyan Standard Times, and which was, as of this report, available at

http://web.archive.org/web/20040627142700/eastandard.net/headlines/news26060403.htm

The AP reporter stated the following:

Kenyan-born US Senate hopeful, Barrack Obama, appeared set to take over the Illinois Senate seat after his main rival, Jack Ryan, dropped out of the race on Friday night amid a furor over lurid sex club allegations.

This report explains the context of the oft cited debate, between Obama and Keyes in the following Fall, in which Keyes faulted Obama for not being a “natural born citizen”, and in which Obama, by his quick retort, “So what? I am running for Illinois Senator, not the presidency”, self-admitted that he was not eligible for the office.  Seeing that an AP reporter is too professional to submit a story which was not based on confirmed sources (ostensibly the Obama campaign in this case), the inference seems inescapable: Obama himself was putting out in 2004, that he was born in Kenya.

The difficulty in finding this gem of a story is hampered by Google, which is running flak for Obama:  because if you search for “Kenyan-born US Senate” you wont find it, but if you search for the phrase without quotes you will find links which talk about it.
A d v e r t i s e m e n t
 For those who believe what they see, here is the screen capture of the page from the Kenyan Sunday Standard, electronic edition, of June 27, 2004 — Just in case that page is scrubbed from the Web Archive:

 

Readers should take note that this AP story, was syndicated world-wide, so you should be able to find it in major newspapers, archived in libraries world-wide.  If any reader does this, please let The Post & Email know, so that we can publish a follow up-story.  You can scrub the net, but scrubbing libraries world-wide is not so easy.

[efoods]Hanen of Sentinel Blog Radio broke the public news of the existence of this AP story at on October 14, 2009 at 12:31 pm.  However, The Post & Email can confirm that a professional investigator had uncovered this story months ago, and that certified and authenticated copies of this report, meeting Federal Rules of evidence, have already been prepared and archived at many locations nationwide.

It should be noted that on January 8, 2006, the Honolulu Advertiser also reported that Barack Hussein Obama was born outside the United States.

http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/2006/Jan/08/ln/FP601080334.html

A Chronology of Deceit

One can now ask an important question which has not yet been emphasized enough:  “Just when did Obama begin to publically claim he was born in Hawaii?” This question is distinct from the question, “Just where in fact was Obama born?”, and from the other question, “What do official documents say about where he was born?”

Regarding his claims, we can summarize what is known:

1. As of Monday, Aug. 28, 2006, Obama’s Campaign was putting out that he was born in Hawaii.  This is known from the introductory speech given by Prof. George A. O. Magoha, Vice-Chancellor of the University of Nairobi, on the occasion of a speech given there by Senator Obama that day. (One presumes that the Vice-Chancellor was given notes from the Obama campaign, as is customary on such occasions)

2. From the newspaper reports above, it is clear that the Obama campaign was putting out that he was born in Kenya, or overseas, during the period of June 27, 2004, until January 8, 2006.

3. In October of 2004, during the ABC Chicago Affiliate’s broadcast of the Obama-Keyes debates, Obama openly admitted — he conceded — that he was not a natural born citizen. (C-Span aired the uncut version of the debates, which contained this exchange, in the second half of April, 2005)

4. It is known from a classmate of Obama at Harvard University, that while at Harvard, Obama at least on one occasion admitted that he was born in Kenya. (This friend went on record on a call in radio program in Idaho in early July, 2009)

If any reader can find a link which documents a claim to a birth location before Aug. 28th, 2006, which differs from this timeline or which supports it; please let The Post & Email know of it, by posting it in the comment section below.

In a follow up report, The Post & Email has published a brief analysis of the Google Newspaper archive, which shows that Obama’s story changed after June 27, 2004.

Finally, that the AP did cover this story, reprinted by the East African Standard, can be seen from the citation made to AP stories about it (Jack Ryan dropping out of the race), in the following contemporary news articles, which however are incomplete:

June 25, 2004 — http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,123716,00.html

June 26, 2004 — Bellview News Democrat

June 26, 2004 — AP Online Story by Michael Tarm

June 25, 2004 — AP Syndicated Story by Maura Kelly Lannan

(Second Source on June 26, 2009, which cites Associated Press Special Correspondent David Espo and reporter Dennis Conrad as contributors to this report)

(Third Source, The Ledger, print edition of June 26, 2009: partial republication)

What will you do about this?

Read more…

Here is another email that I got from MoveOn...  Again, they are using Social Media to spread their lies and messaging vis-a-vis Youtube.  I hope that people with some power on our side are also using these methods - they are much cheaper and the young people do check them out (I know, my kids are up all night long during the summer perusing the net).  See what they have to say...

 

________________________________________________________________________

 

Dear MoveOn member,

Think Obama's a shoo-in? 

Think again. Romney is ahead in a whole series of recent polls.1 And super PACs are poised to spend huge amounts of money to sway the race—just like they did yesterday in Wisconsin.

The good news is that in this election the Internet is giving us whole new ways to fight back at a fraction of the cost of a traditional ad campaign—and we're miles ahead of the right-wing Super PACs figuring out how to take advantage.

You see, today a single YouTube video can get more attention than a big-budget TV campaign. And people are far more likely to be persuaded by something shared by a friend than what they see on TV.

That's where we come in. With a tiny social media team of just four staff and a few interns, MoveOn.org has figured out how to disseminate powerful messages to millions of people through social media. For instance, just one video we publicized on gay marriage alone reached more than 21 million people. To reach this many eyeballs with TV ads, it could cost almost a million dollars.3

Here's the kicker: We only need to raise $200,000 to fund this entire project for the next few critical months.

Can you chip in $5 to help counter the Super PACs using social media?

In 8 out of 16 national polls released over the last month, Romney is ahead.4 Anyone who says Obama's a shoo-in just isn't paying attention. But social media is giving us new ways to fight back—and MoveOn.org is on the cutting edge. 

Research shows that more and more voters are getting news through social media like Facebook and Twitter.5 That's especially true of those under-30 voters.

We've spent a year working on the computer software and online tools that let us reach these viewers. Our high-tech platform supports a talented team of volunteer and staff editors who scour the Web for the highest impact progressive videos and graphics. When news breaks, they're ready to toss a wrench into the conservative spin machine.

But we need to scale up even more. Fox News reaches more than 2 million people per day. We can match that—we need to match that. We need to reach further into Facebook and other social media realms like Twitter, Digg, Reddit, and Pinterest, where hundreds of millions of Americans are spending huge chunks of time. The war of ideas is happening in short, 8 to 24 hour news cycles on the web, and we're ramping up to be right on the front lines.

Chip in $5 to help counter the Super PACs using social media.

Sometimes, all we need to counter the right's agenda is the right picture at the right moment. When Republicans in Congress convened a panel on birth control, but didn't bother to invite any women, that image of five middle-aged men said it all. Thousands instantly shared it on Facebook.

Other times, it's a gripping personal story that changes minds. When there was controversy about the Susan G. Komen Foundation, we featured a video by a gutsy breast cancer survivor named Linda, who had some no-nonsense words for the people who had let her down. More than 383,000 watched, as we and our allies mobilized phone calls and grassroots pressure—and Komen changed course.

It's an entirely new way of communicating, and MoveOn is proud to be a pioneer. We can't stop those right-wing SuperPACs from buying their old-fashioned TV ads. Yet. But we can beat them by investing in people-power and staying ahead of the curve in online campaigning.

Click here now to chip in $5.

Thanks for all you do.

–Angie, Brandon, Carrie, Linda, and the rest of the team

Sources:

1. "General Election: Romney vs. Obama," Real Clear Politics, accessed June 6, 2012
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=276096&id=43097-21569168-p4454ox&t=5

2. "Super PACs' Let Strategists Off the Leash," The New York Times, May 20, 2012
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=275923&id=43097-21569168-p4454ox&t=6

3. "TV Cost & CPM Trends," Television Bureau of Advertising, accessed May 27, 2012
http://www.tvb.org/trends/4718

4. "General Election: Romney vs. Obama," Real Clear Politics, accessed June 6, 2012
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=276096&id=43097-21569168-p4454ox&t=7

5. How Social Media Is Taking Over the News Industry," Mashable, April 28, 2012
http://mashable.com/2012/04/18/social-media-and-the-news/

Read more…

Cody's Taken A Stand for the Constitution and needs your help for his Georgia Supreme Court Case. He's asking that you send him the 'hope and change' Obama gave you represented by the "Change" in your pocket America. Cody says, 'Help Me Help You" in this funny but true plea for 'change'.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqeiH2dX8pY" target="_blank">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqeiH2dX8pY"> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqeiH2dX8pY

http://www.codyjudy.blogspot.com/2012/06/cody-robert-judy-fundraiser-your-change.html

Also, take a look at Cody Robert Judy's 3 Point Platform in 3 minutes!

The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign

www.codyjudy.us

www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

YouTube: CODE4PRES

www.facebook.com/CODE4PRES

Read more…

4063528467?profile=original

What's disturbing about this picture?

Posted on WND.com-By Aaron Klein-On June 17, 2012:

“Frances Fox Piven, co-architect of a strategy to overload the U.S. welfare system to precipitate a transformative economic crisis, was an early builder of the socialist-leaning New Party.

Scores of other New Party activists, meanwhile, have been tied to President Obama.

The now-defunct controversial third party is coming under increased scrutiny after new information further indicates Obama was a New Party member.

The New Party sought to elect members to public office with the aim of moving the Democratic Party far leftward to ultimately form a new political party with a socialist agenda.

In 2008, Obama’s campaign denied the president was ever a member amid reports, including from WND, citing the New Party’s own literature listing Obama as a member.

Last week, researcher and author Stanley Kurtz, writing at National Review Online, reported on documentation from the updated records of Illinois ACORN at the Wisconsin Historical Society that “definitively establishes” that Obama was a member of the New Party.

Kurtz reported Obama also signed a “contract” promising to publicly support and associate himself with the New Party while in office.

A July 20, 1992, article in The Nation magazine by New Party founder Joel Rogers, meanwhile, lays out the case for the establishment of the party and lists several of the group’s early founders and activists.

In that article, titled “Out with the Old Politics, in with the New Party,” Rogers cites Piven as an early activist in the formation of the New Party, which he describes as a “social democratic” party.

Piven, together with her late husband, activist and fellow Columbia professor Richard Cloward, developed the Cloward-Piven strategy, which called for overloading the U.S. public welfare system.

The duo’s stated goal was to agitate a financial crisis that would collapse the U.S economy and replace it with a national system with “a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty.”

Other early New Party activists listed by Rogers have ties to Obama. Those activists and others were also listed as New Party “builders” in the party’ newsletter, the New Party News.

Some of the key New Party activists with Obama ties include:

  • Madeline Talbott, listed as national field director of ACORN. Talbott is a former colleague of Obama’s from his 1990s Project Vote! Chicago Coalition, which worked directly with ACORN when Talbott was ACORN’s lead Illinois organizer. She has also written about working with Obama as a fellow Chicago community organizer in the 1990s. Obama himself has linked his work on Project Vote to Talbott’s Illinois ACORN. When he sought the endorsement of ACORN for his 2008 presidential bid, Obama said, “When I ran Project Vote, the voter registration drive in Illinois, ACORN was smack dab in the middle of it.”
  • Manning Marable, a socialist Columbia University professor. Marable in 1998 helped found the Black Radical Congress, where he worked with controversial race scholar Cornel West, an Obama friend and 2008 campaign adviser who introduced the politician at his first campaign stop in Harlem.WND disclosedthat during that 2007 introduction, West first railed on stage against the “racist” U.S. criminal justice system of the “American empire.”In 2007, Marable was elected chairman of Movement for a Democratic Society, or MDS, an arm of the radical Students for a Democratic Society from which the Weather Underground terrorist organization later splintered. Some Weathermen terrorists, including Bill Ayers, participated in Marable’s MDS.
  • Marxist activist Carl Davidson. Davidson later co-founded Chicagoans Against the War in Iraq, the group that invited Obama to speak at its Oct. 2, 2002, anti-war rally in Chicago – an address that was said to propel Obama to national attention.
  • Quentin Young, key organizer of the Physicians for a National Health Program. Young reportedly was present at a 1995 meeting at the home of Bill Ayers that was said to have launched Obama’s political career. He was an adviser to Obama in the late 1990s. Young himself took credit in March 2009 in an interview with the Democracy Now network for “turning Barack Obama into a ‘single payer’ advocate when the president was an Illinois state senator.”

Socialist goals

The New Party, established in 1992, took advantage of what was known as electoral “fusion,” which enabled candidates to run on two tickets simultaneously, attracting voters from both parties. But the New Party disbanded in 1998, one year after fusion was halted by the Supreme Court.

The socialist-oriented goals of the New Party were enumerated on its old website.

Among the New Party’s stated objectives were “full employment, a shorter work week and a guaranteed minimum income for all adults; a universal ‘social wage’ to include such basic benefits as health care, child care, vacation time and lifelong access to education and training; a systematic phase-in of comparable worth; and like programs to ensure gender equity.”

The New Party stated it also sought “the democratization of our banking and financial system – including popular election of those charged with public stewardship of our banking system, worker-owner control over their pension assets [and] community-controlled alternative financial institutions.”

Many of the New Party’s founding members were Democratic Socialists of America leaders and members of Committees of Correspondence, a breakaway of the Communist Party USA.

Last month, WND reported on a 1996 print advertisement in a local Chicago newspaper that shows Obama was the speaker at an event sponsored and presented by the Democratic Socialists of America, the DSA.

WND first reported on the event in 2010.

Obama listed as New Party member

In 2009, WND reported on newspaper evidence from the New Party’s own literature listing several new members of the New Party, including Obama.

Last week, Kurtz, writing at National Review Online, reported Obama signed a “contract” promising to publicly support and associate himself with the New Party while in office.

In 2008, Obama’s Fight the Smears campaign website quoted Carol Harwell, who managed Obama’s 1996 campaign for the Illinois Senate, as stating: “Barack did not solicit or seek the New Party endorsement for state senator in 1995.”

Fight the Smears conceded the New Party did support Obama in 1996 but denied that Obama had ever joined.”

  • With research by Brenda J. Elliott

Source:

http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/obama-tied-to-architect-of-u-s-collapse/

Note: My following blog posts and article and/or blog post relate to and/or support the above article and/or blog post-You Decide:

4063503170?profile=original

I. OBAMA JUST CAUGHT IN BIG LIE? ‘Documents confirm he was member of socialist party!’-Posted on TeaParty.org-By Jake Martinez-On June 7, 2012:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blog/show?id=4301673%3ABlogPost%3A763299&xgs=1&xg_source=msg_share_post

4063493143?profile=original

II. STUDENTS FOR A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY (SDS)-FOUNDED 1959!-Posted TeaParty.org-By Jake Martinez-On April 14, 2012:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/students-for-a-democratic-society-sds-founded-1959

4063528480?profile=original

III. Barack Obama and the Strategy of Manufactured Crisis!-Posted On American Thinker-By James Simpson-On September 28, 2008:

http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/09/barack_obama_and_the_strategy.html

4063527910?profile=original

IV. WHO IS THE WHITE HOUSE MOLE?-Posted on TeaParty.org-By Jake Martinez-On June 16, 2012:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/who-is-the-white-house-mole

Continue Reading:

Is Obama Employing the Cloward-Piven Strategy?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/07/is-obama-employing-the-cloward-piven-strategy/

Is President Obama inciting riots across the US?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/23/is-president-obama-inciting-riots-across-the-us/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

“Food For Thought”

God Bless The U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…

A twofer post.  They are intertwined and I could not separate them so I took excerpts from both but have provided the links for the full articles. 

First was By Steve Baldwin for the Western Center for Journalism

Second by Jerome R. Corsi WND EXCLUSIVE

**********************************************************

This should concern all Americans.  A nation-wide network of researchers has sprung up to attempt to fill in the blanks, but at every opportunity Obama’s high-priced lawyers have built walls around various records or simply made them disappear. It is estimated that Obama’s legal team has now spent well over $1.4 million dollars blocking access to documents every American should have access to. The question is why would he spend so much money to do this?

The president who campaigned for a more “open government” and “full disclosure” will not unseal his medical records, his school records, his birth records or his passport records. He will not release his Harvard records, his Columbia College records, or his Occidental College records—he will not even release his Columbia College thesis. All his legislative records from the Illinois State Senate are missing and he claims his scheduling records during those State Senate years are lost as well. In addition, no one can find his school records for the elite K-12 college prep school, Punahou School, he attended in Hawaii.

http://www.westernjournalism.com/exclusive-investigative-reports/the-mystery-of-barack-obama-continues/

What is he hiding? Well, for starters, some of these records will shed light on his citizenship and birth. So, people - you just keep thinkin' it ain't possible that our gvt (or should I say the Marxists left in our gvt) have been planning for this INELIGIBLE FRAUD to be president for a looooong time.

http://mobile.wnd.com/2012/06/was-communist-mentor-intimate-with-obamas-mother/

 

4063528366?profile=original

So compare these men – if you HAD to guess which he looks most like… yeah. I thought so. I posted this to my facebook for all my "in the dark" friends to keep your head in the sand… nothing to see here… ignorance is bliss, isn’t it? I wouldn’t know, because I am not ignoring the facts like many of you are in this country.

Honestly, I don't give a ratzass who is father is - I just know he is NOT ELIGIBLE to be our president. The constitutional crisis our esteemed leaders are in fear of isn't that this happened, but that they are too cowardly to CORRECT IT!

Read more…