hate (11)

There has been an increasing amount of people posting videos, on YouTube and Facebook with weapons threatening Donald Trump.  They are often in small groups or sometimes alone, flashing guns, money and drugs.  100 round clips to do harm, bragging about the amount their firepower, also revealing  ISIL contacts?  The inherent danger of course is a certain class of people find this socially acceptable and may do harm.  When I looked at the thumbs-up and thumbs-down on these YouTube Videos, which is the typical way we rate if we like the video there were lots of thumbs "Up" to do harm.  BLM is at the heart of it.

I have forwarded several videos to Donald Trump and I don't know how that's going to work I'm sure someone is already well aware of all of this.

Read more…

Why People Hate Feminism

A little bit of background before we get started: In the late 1800’s into the early 1900’s there was a movement of people, mainly in the UK and the US who wanted women’s voting rights.  This group are now referred to as “1st Wave Feminists”.  The goals of this group were accomplished as the UK allowed women to vote in 1910 and the US followed with the same decree in 1920.  In the 1950’s through the 1980’s there became a new group; “2nd wave feminists”.  This group was slightly more radical than their predecessors, their goals being to legalize abortion and to have government subsidized birth control.  This group came and went as a new group formed in the late 1990’s; 3rd wave feminism.  Unlike the first two waves who were found all around western countries, third wave feminists can be found either crying about the “misogyny” and “patriarchy” on social media or sleeping in their parents house.  On a serious note, this group has a very literal cult-like following which has gained them a very negative reputation among society as fat, bitchy, supremacists who have no chance at getting a male spouse and way too eager to claim victim status.  The funny thing is that they do not even know why them have gained this reputation.  In the following presentation I will attempt to explain to these people why they have gained this horrible reputation and why everyone's turning their backs on them.

  1. Cult-Like Attributes

Society hates cults, and feminism is no exception.  A am I republican, which is an unpopular opinion where I live.  I normally make jokes about who I will get a scholarship to West Point (a jab at Ben Carson) and how I will build a wall so h-uge it will be envied by Chi-na (a jab at Donald Trump).  However, feminists fail to make jokes about themselves or even laugh at themselves.  Political movements and parties can laugh at themselves, cults cannot.

Another way feminism is similar to a cult is how the separate you from society and then make you more radical and then adopt them as your new family.  They pull you in by claiming that they are a group from women’s rights.  Then  they have you adopt radical stances for LGBT-related issues and environmental issues.  They push you to be more and more radical until you think that it is ridiculous to shower because then you would be “giving in to the patriarchy”.  By doing this, they are isolating you from all men (49% of the American population) and most women.  You end up adopting them as your family as you become more and more of a radical.

2.) Weakening Women Under the Guise of Empowering Them

This is one that really rubs me the wrong way.  You may see the title of this and start scratching your head, but let me explain.  A more specific way of saying “empowering” would be threatening women with claims they are giving into the patriarchy.  You want to lose weight?  Stop!  You’re giving into the patriarchy and female beauty standards.  You want marry a man?  Stop!  You’re giving into the patriarchy.  You want to take a shower daily and take care of your basic hygiene?  Stop!  You’re giving into the patriarchy.  The feminists are using this line of “Don’t give in to male standards. Don’t give in to the patriarchy,“ as a way of weakening women under the subtle guise of making them feel strong.

You might say, “This is ridiculous, who would be that stupid to fall for this?  Once they realize they are a fat, smelly shell of their potential, they will blame the movement.”  But this is the worst part; the feminist movement has figured out a way to evade all blame for women’s problems caused by their movement.  How, you ask?  By blaming it on society.  “Society decides you are fat!  Society decides you are smelly!  Society decides that you are not beautiful!” they will tell you.  Let this be a message to all feminists who has such great potential but were dragged into this movement and because a short-haired, fat, smelly, society-blaming feminist.  SOCIETY DOES NOT DECIDE WHO YOU BECOME.  YOU DO!  You have the power to decide your destiny, to choose your path.  DON’T LET FEMINISM DICTATE YOUR FUTURE.  Society does not choose who is fat, who smells like a dog, and who is beautiful.  All of that are thing that you decide.  Go on a diet.  Use soap in the shower.  Put on makeup.  Society is not telling you who you are and what you can become.  Feminism is.

3.) Disdain, Contempt, and Even Hate for Men

In 2014, the shampoo company Pantene ran a commercial that involved a series of situations there was a woman and a man and the woman said “sorry” to be polite.  These include; a woman interrupting a man’s presentation, woman interrupting someone in their office, woman not allowing a man enough space for him to comfortably sit down, mother interrupts to give him the baby so she can find something to eat, women not giving man enough space to sit at a board room table, woman waking man up by taking man’s covers, and two people start talking at the same time, followed by the title card, “Don’t be Sorry”.  The commercial goes through the same scenarios except with the women acting like passive-aggressive bitches instead of politely saying sorry like a normal person.  Obviously, this not that bad, at least compared to some other examples.

The in 2015 superbowl, phone service T-Mobile ran an ad starring prominent feminist Sarah Silverman.  In this ad, Sarah Silverman hands a couple a newborn child saying, “Sorry, it’s a boy;”  a line that sums up 3rd wave feminism.  If you think that feminists would conduct an apology for this ad and make sure this kind of thing does not happen again, you have not yet figured out 3rd wave feminism.  Almost immediately, feminists denied claims that this was a sign of supremacy. They countered the claims of supremacy by claiming that women are victims of sexism every day through, “treating threats to release women’s private information as a hoax… actually releasing women’s private photos… banning bodies on social media… paying them less for the same work… (this is) institutionalized oppression and misogyny,” (Salon.com, Jenny Kunter).

Let’s start with the “ paying them less for the same work”.  The irony is, in this commercial, which is basically feminist propaganda, that Chelsea Handler, the other woman in the commercial says, “I can talk from anywhere in my mansion.”  That along with the wage gap myth, which we will talk about and debunk later.

Let’s move on to the next ones.  “Banning bodies on social media” refers to instagram’s ban on pubic hair that was retracted soon after it was enacted.  

Threatening and even releasing nudes is truly as terrible thing to do, but it doesn’t equate to the “institutionalized oppression” that Jenny Kunter is claiming to be a victim of.

We can talk about these kinds of commercials all day, but you could still claim that the hatred of men is not written down.  Point your attention to the SCUM manifesto, the Society of Cutting Up Men, a book by feminist Valerie Solanas in 1967.  The SCUM manifesto argues that men have ruined the world so women have to fix it by eliminating the male gender.  This is surprising popular amongst feminists have been the basis of a number of murders.

Then trend has seeped into twitter, in the form of #killallmen.  It’s not like someone with any real power or influence would fall to this depth.  Oh wait, Hillary “I will say whatever I must to become president” Clinton.  Hillary Clinton apparently wants to be known as a feminist.  In 1998, then First-Lady Clinton gave a speech to a conference on domestic violence in San Salvador, El Salvador, where she claimed that, “Women have always been the primary victims of war… (because) women lose their husbands, fathers, and sons in combat.”  This is an example of a feminist completely dismissing the importance of a man’s life as if he were a computer or a machine.  This is the equivalent of saying men are the primary victims of childbirth when there are complications and the mother dies.  She claims that having the sole responsibility of raising children is more catastrophic than dying.

When a blog post called, “I Aborted my Baby- Because it was a Boy”, hit the web and went viral, everyone assumed it was written by a feminist.  After all, from what we have seen and heard from feminists, why wouldn’t we think that?  Feminists continued to go on their regular path of denying the level of sexism and credibility of this blog instead of asking themselves questions like, why are people automatically assuming it was us?  Is sexism our status quo?  How can we fix our reputation or change our ways?

3.)  The Feminist(s) that cried “Patriarchy!”

There’s nothing more annoying than a ginger, overweight, smelly, feminist crying patriarchy in a shrill voice, especially when the facts don’t add up.  Feminists enjoying yelling patriarchy, misogyny, and that the world in Men Vs. Women.  You add that opinion to the fact that women make up over 50% of the population if female (quickfacts.census.gov) and you get a feminist logic moment!  If this country was Male vs. Female, like the feminists claim, then Hillary Clinton would have shot through the Democratic primary in 2008 and walked right into the White House, or a woman would have become president years before that.  This of course did not happen.

Before we move forward on this topic, we should define our term.  Patriarchy means “a form of social organization where the father is the supreme authority in the family, clan, or tribe and descendant in the male line, with the children belonging to the father’s clan or tribe.”

This patriarchy just does not exist in our country or in any western country.  If you look at the statistics way more single moms than single dads.  This means that when there is a divorce, the children generally go to the mother, contrary to “the children belonging to the father’s clan or tribe” part of the definition.

In terms of “girl power” or “woman power” there is no way we live in a patriarchy.  Women control a substantial 20% of congress and 20% of the senate.  The number of female CEO’s of fortune 500 companies has hit an all-time high.

On a monetary perspective, it is also a no-contest.  Women control 60% of all personal wealth and 51% of stocks in the US (according to Virginia Tech).  Women also manage the household finances, being the primary shopper in 75% of American families as of a 2009 study, contrary to the father being supreme.

Feminists, this is a huge reason why people cannot stand you.  You throw around phrases like patriarchy without even knowing what they mean.  Please, next time one of you want to scream, “Patriarchy!  Patriarchy!” learn the meaning of the damn word and bring some actual facts to back up your blank claim.

4.) Wage Gap Myth

How many times have you heard a feminist claim that women in this country get paid 65%, 67%, 73%, 75%, or 80% (honestly, the percentage changes every time I hear it) of a man for the same work?  This is, of course, a blatant lie.  The exact claim is that all women make 77% of a all men in the US overall, regardless of education, credentials, employer, risk, hours, or even specific job.

Well, let’s say that this was true and women were being paid an average 77% of men’s wages for the same work.  One, if I were a business owner I would never hire a men again if I knew that I could get away with paying a woman 77% for the same work.  Two, this would be illegal.  In every country in the western world there is a law banning unbalanced paid for the same work for the same hours.  In the US, it is mandated by the equal pay act, which was signed into law by John F. Kennedy in 1963.

However, it is an undeniable fact that as a whole women are getting paid an average 77% of men.  But, why?  According to the US Bureau of Labor, women are twice as likely to work part-time as men.  25% of women work part time.  Women are also 50% more likely to work in the public sector, which is typically offers lower pay to employees.  According to a recent survey, 19% of men worked 50 or more hours a week while only 7% of women did the same.  43% of women leave the workforce after having children, leaving them with no income therefore bringing down the average.

Men are also proved to more likely move into high-paying jobs.  For example, there are more males that pursue degrees in engineering and computer science than there are females.  There are more females who pursue degrees in education and social sciences than males.  The highest paying job in America today is a physician, with is dominated by men 2/1.  Only 17% of technology related jobs are females.

Now, you can’t blame it on capitalism, so I guess you are going to blame it on patriarchy.  “Oh, society is not letting women pursue their dreams.”  This brings me back to an earlier point; society does not dictate your life.  Society does not choose your major in college.  Society does not choose what colleges you choose to apply to.  Society does not decide where you look for work.  You do.  The patriarchy is not denying women the right to education so that they can keep women down.  In fact, women are 33% more likely to graduate college than men and have noticeably lower high school and college drop-out rates.

5.) Turning Human Issues into “Women’s Issues”

Here I will be specifically talking about the issues of abortion, rape, and sexual harassment.  Feminists have made a habit of blaming things on men, labeling them “women’s issues”, and disqualify you from having an opinion if you happen to have a penis.  The most prominent examples of this are abortion, rape, and sexual harassment.

Feminists like to pretend that there is an “institutionalized patriarchy” and that sexual harassment is perpetrated by men to keep women down.  This would be ignoring the facts which shows that 1 in 6 men have been or are being sexually harassed.  By claiming that this is a “women’s issue” and disqualified male opinions they are silencing 17% of men who actually have been victims of sexual harassment.

Rape is an issue that feminists have really pushed as a “woman’s issue”.  Feminists have repeatedly attempted changing the definition of rape to basically mean regretful decisions (which is a huge middle finger towards victims of violent rape, if you ask me) and have discredited their opposers by saying, “This is a women’s issue.  You are not qualified to have an opinion of women’s issues.”  Like sexual harassment, this hurts the significant number of male rape victims.

Feminists have started another lie called “rape culture”.  This claims that culture amongst the patriarchal men that encourages and rewards rape.  Obviously, this is ridiculous, especially combined with the fact that if you put the number of male rapists in the country over the number of men in the country you will get a decimal that is closer to zero than one.

Abortion is the biggest issue that feminists have shoved down people’s throats as a women’s issue.  Personally, I am pro-life, but I understand that it is a very complex issue and many of you probably have strong opinions.  However, if you think that men should not be allowed to have opinions on this issue, you are kidding yourself.  Abortion is as much as an issue for women as it is for the black community.  Abortion has been sold cheaply to blacks and has terminated over half of african american fetus's.  Many minorities have fallen victim similarly to abortion as the example of the black community.  If you think that these people should not be allowed to hold opinions on this issue, slap yourself.  Hard.  You deserve it.

6.) Male Feminists

I seriously can’t stand these people.  I really, really can’t.  As you have probably noticed already, feminists have a strong prejudice against men.  So, why do these men become feminists?  There are a multitude of rationales and reasons, but they basically boil down to three; they are more feminine than masculine so the movement appeals to them, men with guilt that they are sexist and use feminism to convince themselves that they are not sexist, and people who think they have “white guilt/male privilege” for really no good reason.

According to feminists, can men be real feminists?  On everydayfeminism.com there is an article titled, Men Should be Feminists, but Should They Call Themselves Feminists?  In this article, author Drew Bowling says, “In short, I’m skeptical of the legitimacy of men calling themselves feminists… In general, I think me could be useful to feminism… (because the are) vested in privilege… but men calling themselves feminists also makes me slightly nervous because I think a lot more accountability could be made of feminist men.”  Prominent feminist Emma Watson was bombarded by the feminist community for claiming that the “best feminists are men”.

So as you can see, feminists are not very comfortable with male feminists.  This is just one of the many backstabbing divisions of feminism, which brings me to my next point...

7.) Online Hate

It should come to no surprise to any of you that there is a multitude of stupid people on social media.  One of the many sects of these many stupid peoples are self revered revolutionaries/activists, which, based off of my experiences on social media, is made up mainly by feminists.  Feminists have used social media as a main weapon to spread their ideas.

Unfortunately, feminists have shifted over the years from using social media to spread their ideas but have gone on to do other things like; crying patriarchy.  The comes into form under the #everydaysexism project, which tries to catalog all women’s experiences with sexism with the hashtag #everydaysexism.  I’m an not saying that all of these should be treated like jokes, but every tweet about a woman getting molested when she was a kid there are ten or twenty more like this:

“#Googles algorithm shows prestigious job ads to men, but not to women #everdaysexism” - @1helenmc

“Hey buddy, I’m not an ornament.  If you don’t like how I look that’s your problem.  Grrrrrrr.  #everydaysexism” - @writeontime_

“Today’s street harasser said ‘c’mon you can at least smile’ in a growl that conveyed ‘how dare you not acknowledge me.’ #everydaysexism” @skinny

You can see where I am coming from.  These are the greatest examples I have ever seen of first world problems.  There are other movements too that try and bully men as a whole.  #whowillyouhelp is a hashtag campaign that was hijacked by feminism to paint men of all professions, races, and creeds as sex offenders.  It is important to note that all of the scenarios in #whowillyouhelp have the man as the offender and women as a victim.  As I have said before, this is not always the case.

When people point out to feminists that boys and men are victims of sex crimes as well, feminists fights back by attempting to bully them into submission.  This come to form in #maletears, #misandry, and of course, #killallmen.  Feel free to look any of these up on facebook, twitter, instagram, or tumblr.

The hashtag #killallmen was started back in 2013 and has no end in sight.  It was started as a joke to get a reaction of surprise from the strength of FEMINIST POWER!  This, of course, did not happen.  To feminists surprise, various men wrote back:

“Congrats feminists, you have officially become hate filled irrationalists,”

“(this is) childish posturing, whining, and identity politics,”

“Dear feminists… Guess how I know you are gay,”

Feminists have made the realization that on their own they are small minorities in their communities, but though the space of social media they can band together to become a powerful hate group.

8.) Objectifying Women and Fat Pride vs. Slut Pride and #Freethenipple

These are four big beliefs of the feminist movement, so let me explain them.  The idea of objectifying women claims that putting sexy women in commercials or thinking women are hot because of their bodies is the equivalent of treating them like objects.  Fat pride, as I explained before, is a way of the feminist movement absolving themselves from the blame of making women fat, by blaming it on society.  Slut pride is blaming the label “slut” on society.  #Freethenipple is a movement that pushes the social acceptance of women walking around shirtless.

There is no such thing as “objectifying women”.  A man can watch a car commercial that sports a model holding the beer and think  that the model is hot while still recognizing the woman’s rights as a human being.  Just because a man thinks a woman is hot because of her body does not mean that he is dismissing her her rights as a human being.

You should not be proud to be fat.  Being fat is extremely unhealthy.  Fat is not beautiful for a number of reasons.  Men do not want to date fat women because it will be a source of endless humor among his friends at his expense.  Men do not want to date fat women because it comes with other issues like lack of discipline that could potentially be passed on to their children.

You should not be proud to be labeled a slut.  Being with multiple partners is not healthy, both physically and mentally.  Mentally, it is better to be committed to one partner.  Physically, the more men you sleep with the larger your chance is to contract STD’s.

I don’t really care about the #Freethenipple movement.  Since I am a man, it does not really affect me.  Honestly, if you want to walk around shirtless, go for it.  I seriously couldn’t care less.

The thing is, the ideas of fat pride and objectifying women contradict slut pride and #Freethenipple.  Objectifying women and fat pride are about how there is no beauty standard and how women should not be treated like sex-objects.  Slut pride is glorifying something that is only a couple steps below selling yourself, like an object, for sex.  #Freethenipple is literally parades of women showing off their boobs to promote the idea of women regularly showing off their boobs.

This rift in ideology has created a huge amount of confusion.  I should be proud that I am a slut, right?  On shouldn’t I because I am objectifying myself and involuntarily oppressing fat women.

9.) The Idea of “White Feminists”

“Calling all white, straight, cis, feminists,” read the title of a feminist writing piece in a feminist information pamphlet, “It’s time to wake the fuck up.”  The idea of differentiating white, straight, and cisgender feminists (let’s call them white feminists for short) from the rest of the pack is an ideal that has not only been around since the dawn of third-wave feminists, but also an ideal that is intertwined with the core values of feminism.

Besides Planned Parenthood, fat models, and tumblr, feminists value victim status.  Many minority groups claim victim status to make themselves more important; whether that be Blacklivesmatter, who claim they are targeted by an unfriendly police force; or hispanic group Deportracism who claim that they are oppressed by presidential candidates with no political power.  These groups claim victim status to guilt people to listen to their demands and create a level of importance for themselves above all of the “non-victims”.  In fact, the whole movement of feminism is built around claiming victim status, using it to force people to hear their views, and then attempting to make themselves more important that the “non-victims.”  In the hierarchy of this system, if you are a white, male, straight, cisgender, christian then you are the equivalent of dirt.  If you are a female, black, lesbian, transgender, muslim, feminist then you are a god.

The whole idea of victim status has been one of the many, many cancers that have slowly degraded that noble first-wave feminism into the modern third-wave feminism.  Victim status has taught feminists this: the more minority groups you belong to, the more of a victim you are; the more of a victim you are the more power/voice you have.  This has caused transgender, gay, black, hispanic, muslim, etc. feminists have power over white, straight, cis, and especially male feminists.

This hierarchical system has heavily crippled the internal culture of feminism but has also posed a huge double standard.  Feminists preach nonstop that they wish to tear down the (fictional) hierarchical patriarchy while they practice their own, very real, hierarchical system of internal oppression.  This hierarchical system has created a dog eat dog world in the world of feminism.  If a lowly white, straight, cis, feminists tries to stand down a gay, transgender feminist’s ideas, the rest of the pack pounces on them with claims of homophobia and transphobia.

10.) Slacktivism

As I said before, feminists scream their loudest on instagram, twitter, and tumblr.  Many feminists sit on their overweight, unmarried asses and type away on their smartphones and computers making a “difference in the world”.

When I think of the phrase making a difference in the world I think of four people.  The first three were men; Mahatma Gandhi, Nelson Mandela, and Martin Luther King Jr.  These three men made a huge difference in the world.  They didn’t do it by making anonymous instagram accounts or screaming with their friends of tumblr, they gathered a mass of people and made their voices heard.

The fourth person was Susan B. Anthony.  Susan B. Anthony was a brilliant speech giver and embodies and rallied the first-wave feminist movement.  Susan B. Anthony traveled across the United States of America rallying women and men with her heartfelt speeches under the simple cause for women’s rights to vote.  Susan B. Anthony did not impose a hierarchy of status among her followers, she did not hate groups of people, and she did not spread lies to further her agenda and popularize her propaganda.  She gathered an army of American citizens, both male and female, that won women the right to vote soon after she died.

Feminists know that cannot compare to the glory days of Susan B. Anthony, or become the next Martin Luther King Jr.  They know that they cannot reach these ceilings for the following two main reasons.  One, there are not that many strong feminists.  It seems like it is 50-50 between feminists and the sane few but it is because in this day in age with the media, the shrillest scream gets the MSNBC microphone.  They know that if they step out of their homes and gather in a MLK-esque march on Washington, there will be only so many CNN camera angles before even the casual viewer at home will realize that this group is a slim minority.  

Two, today’s feminism is an extremist group.  Most people who don’t consider themselves either strong feminists or strong haters of the group think of themselves as feminists because they associate feminists with Susan B. Anthony and first-wave feminism rather than the fat, ugly beast it is.  If feminists publicly voice their views then thousands more will turn their backs on them.

For these reasons feminism has been confined to the social media.  Since it has, it has made fat, ugly, lazy women (and probably some men) even lazier by incentivise them to cling to computer screen under the guise of leading the feminist charge.

Wrap up

Hopefully this has shed some light on the dark, ugly, fat, lazy, grotesque, smelly, stenchy, large, bloated, overweight, whale-like, obese-- oh God; it has begun!  I’ve spent so long writing about feminists that I’m just continuing to write about feminists!  Anyway, I hope I have showed the uneducated (on the issue) why this group is who they are and I hope I have showed feminists why they are so hated.

Read more…

Why does nearly everyone of you never criticize the hate crimes of black supremacists? The "black lives matter" movement has advocated hate crimes including white genocide,  innocent whites have been murdered because of the hate crime propaganda of your brothers. That's double hate crimes! Why do you not renounce that? Why are black supremacists allowed to spread propaganda on this site, while white people  are not allowed to address your racist black sites? Why should blacks be allowed to get away with murder, advocacy of murder and circulation of pictures of blacks wiping their asses on the US flag?  That flag represents a government of traitors whose power is "black-racistly" brought to bear ONLY on enemies of black racism! The Confederate Flag represents civil rights for white people. If you are as objective as you pretend, why don't you denounce black hate crime? Does that mean that you agree with murder of whites as justified black supremacy privilege? Race criminality law was supposed to apply to all, not just whites. No more special privileges for blacks! We are the majority and we should demand that every BLACK HATE CRIME be punished!

Read more…


Two hundred and fifty years ago, American colonists who criticized King George III would find themselves arrested and thrown into prison.  Sometimes they lost their businesses, homes and families because of their sedition to the crown.  The colonists had no freedom of speech to criticize the king, parliament or even a British citizen.

When James Madison and George Mason penned the Bill of Rights, there was a reason why they made the freedom of speech part of the First Amendment.  It was the right to speak freely and openly criticize the government that was a right they fought for.  They knew that in order to have a republic, not a democracy, the freedom of speech was a vital importance to its success.  (In a democracy, people don’t need the right for free speech as the people elect their own dictators.)

POLL: Does Congress need to revive the House Committee on Un-American activities?

Over recent years, we have seen our freedom of speech being challenged and diminished by the whining’s of a liberal minority.  Now, we are on the verge of losing our First Amendment right to freedom of speech.

Massachusetts Senator Edward Markey (D) and New York Representative Hakeem Jeffries (D) have introduced the Hate Crime Reporting Act of 2014.  The opening of the bill reads:

“To require the National Telecommunications and Information Administration to update a report on the role of telecommunications, including the Internet, in the commission of hate crimes.”

“The report required under subsection (a) shall— “

‘‘(1) analyze information on the use of telecommunications, including the Internet, broadcast  television and radio, cable television, public access television, commercial mobile services, and other electronic media, to advocate and encourage violent acts and the commission of crimes of hate, as de-scribed in the Hate Crime Statistics Act (28 U.S.C. 534 note);”

Read more at http://godfatherpolitics.com/15283/senator-introduces-bill-silence-christians-conservatives/#QwPGJCchbc0iuRLe.99


Read more…

Prosecute grayson for Hate Speech

Alan grayson was clearly looking for a response when he spewed his putrid vitriolic hate speech.


Here’s mine.

  •  grayson is not worthy of either title, Representative or Mr.
  • His hate speech falls below the bottom of the moral sewer into criminal
  • He did a disservice to both his fellow democrats and to the House of Representatives
    • To his fellow democrats by shining light on the fact that the KKK is uniquely democrat
    • To the House by providing a public example of the trash that is in there.
  • With failure by obama to rebuke such racist behavior and instruct grayson in civility, the House needs to Censure grayson in the strongest terms.
    • He should be relegated to latrine duty on the 1st shift.
  • IF The House does not severely censure him, it will signal Americans that both democrats and republicans have turned against them.
  • ALL democrats who fail to join in censure should be exposed as grayson followers/supporters.
  • After his prosecution for hate speech, he should be drummed out of any and all jobs of public trust.
  • He is truly despicable.







Read more…

obama hate priorities

Read 'em and DON'T weep...bury Washington in faxes and phone calls

More Notes on the Shutdown

Imagine how bad it must be for a distinguished commentator to accuse Obama of a “bald-faced lie” !

In addition to my own observations, I have also included a list of 21 egregious hate actions ordered by obama…….

First, read Thomas Sowell’s  commentary

Who Shutdown the Government

  • House of Representatives voted all the money required to keep all government activities going -- except for ObamaCare.
  • All spending bills must originate in the House of Representatives, which means that Congressmen there have a right to decide whether or not they want to spend money on a particular government activity.
  • The hundreds of thousands of government workers who have been laid off are not idle because the House of Representatives did not vote enough money to pay their salaries or the other expenses of their agencies
  • we do know who had the option to keep the government running and chose not to   
    • The Senate chose not to vote to authorize that money to be spent, because it did not include money for ObamaCare…. Mgi.. their “leader” being dirty harry reid
    • When Barack Obama keeps claiming that it is some new outrage for those who control the money to try to change government policy by granting or withholding money, that is simply a bald-faced lie.
    • Perhaps the biggest of the big lies is that the government will not be able to pay what it owes on the national debt, creating a danger of default.
      • Even if the debt ceiling is not lifted, that only means that government is not allowed to run up new debt
      • unless the Republicans get their side of the story out…… -- the lies will win. More important, the whole country will lose.

 Now check some Priorities

  • Evicting citizens from their homes and businesses is more important ( critical) than the Amber Alert System for missing children
  • Locking down National Memorials and spiting Veterans is more important (critical) than helping a child with cancer
  • Beefing up Obamacare websites are more important (critical) than keeping our FBI open and working on National Defense
  • Foreign Aid ( to hamas, Libya, egypt, mexico, russia) is more important (critical) than taking care of our Seniors
  • Closing the Oceans is more important than………….Prayer
  • Paying Government Union Officials is more important than…………The Statue of Liberty

If that is not enough………….read on…………….

The lawlessness of this spoiled brat has to be stopped. The only reason for all this is to inflict pain on the American people.

1. Treatments for Children Suffering From Cancer - The GOP have agreed to a compromise by funding part of the government, including the National Institutes of Health, which offers children with cancer last-chance experimental treatment. Obama has threatened to veto this funding.

2. The World War II Memorial - The WWII memorial on the DC Mall is a 24/7 open-air memorial that is not regularly staffed. Although the White House must have known that WWII veterans in their eighties and nineties had already booked flights to visit this memorial, the White House still found the ( critical ???) resources to spitefully barricade the attraction. 

The Republican National Committee has offered to cover any costs required to keep the memorial open. The White House refused. Moreover, like the NIH, the GOP will pass a compromise bill that would fund America's national parks. Obama has threatened to veto that bill.

3. Furloughed Military Chaplains Not Allowed to Work for Free - Furloughed military chaplains willing to celebrate Mass and baptisms for free have been told they will be punished for doing so.

(They should set up a Field Church off base and proceed)

4. Business Stops In Florida Keys - Although the GOP have agreed to compromise in the ongoing budget stalemate and fund the parks, Obama has threatened to veto that funding. As a result, small businesses, hunters, and commercial fisherman can't practice their trade. While the feds have deemed the personnel necessary to keep this area open "non-essential," the "enforcement officers" to ensure no business is done are "essential."

5. Obama Blacks Out Sports, Entertainment Programming to Overseas Troops - The American Forces Network (AFN) that provides American sports and entertainment programming to our troops stationed abroad, has been shut down. For some reason, though, AFN News will still broadcast news, just not any of the popular and fun stuff.

Camp David is essential, but popular programming for heroes overseas is non-essential.

( ANOTHER slap-in-the-face disrespect by obama)

6. Obama Closes D-Day Memorial - The GOP have offered to compromise and fund the National Parks. Obama has said he will veto this compromise legislation. As a result, along with 24 other military cemeteries, the D-Day memorial in Normandy has been barricaded.

7. Obama Tries to Close Privately-Funded Mt. Vernon - Although George Washington's Mt. Vernon estate is privately funded, the feds blocked visitors from entering the parking area because the Park Service maintains the lot. Apparently, the New Media publicity resulted in the feds backing down.

(Having citizens drive thru an empty parking lot is a GRAVE threat to our National Security ????)

8. Obama Closes Over 100 Privately-Managed Parks That Cost No Money to Run -  The U.S. Treasury actually makes money from the rent paid by a private company that "employs about 400-500 camp workers and managers across about a dozen states." No federal money is used to operate these parks. No federal employees are used to staff these parks. Taxpayers make a profit from these parks. Still, Obama had them closed and as a result 400-500 employees and a private business are taking it in the neck.

(SO, it is NOT about money. It is about SPITE/HATE)

9. Obama Closes Self-Sustaining Colonial Farm It Hasnt Supported Since 1980 - "For the first time in 40 years, the National Park Service (NPS) has finally succeeded in closing the Farm down to the public. In previous budget dramas, the Farm has always been exempted since the NPS provides no staff or resources to operate the Farm.

10. Obama Tries to Close State-Run Parks in Wisconsin - "The park service ordered state officials to close the northern unit of the Kettle Moraine, Devil's Lake, and Interstate state parks and the state-owned portion of the Horicon Marsh, but state authorities rebuffed the request because the lion's share of the funding came from state, not federal coffers."

( Finally….somebody stands firm…. Will Obama send in the Russian troops?)

11. Obama Closes Vietnam Memorial - The GOP have passed compromise legislation that would fund national memorials and parks, and open them to the public. Obama threatened a veto. Apparently, the "essential" government employees are those erecting barricades, not those who could keep the memorial open.

12. Obama Closes Privately-Owned Hotel, Police Block Parking Lot - "The operator of a 51-room inn located on U.S. government-owned land in North Carolina abandoned his defiant stance on Thursday to keep the property open despite being ordered to close as part of the federal government shutdown."

October is this inn's prime season. The GOP have offered compromise funding opening the parks. Obama said he will veto that compromise.

State troopers blocked customers from entering the inn's parking lot.

(Oh, wow! They could be in a Federal Park, just can’t go into the INN !)

13. Park Service Ranger: 'We've Been Told to Make Life As Difficult For People As We Can' - Its a cheap way to deal with the situation, an angry Park Service ranger in Washington says of the harassment. Weve been told to make life as difficult for people as we can. Its disgusting.

( nuff said)

14. Obama Forces Residents Out of Private Homes - "The government shutdown is being felt close to home for some locals. They say they're being forced out of private homes on Lake Mead because they sit on federal land."

The GOP have agreed to fund the parks. Obama has threatened a veto.

15. Acadia Park In Maine Shut Down - '"We’ve been training for two years at CrossFit for this hike — no kidding,” Hart said. She added that the shutdown should be as inconvenient for the Washington politicians who caused it as it is for average citizens.'

The GOP have agreed to fund the parks. Obama said he will veto.

16. Historic Restaurant Open During Last Shutdown Forced to Close - "An iconic Philadelphia restaurant has been forced to close its doors and turn away booked parties because of the government shutdown. …

"Restaurant public relations director Molly Yun said they were notified there was a possibility a closure might happen, but they were allowed to remain open during the last government shutdown 17 years ago."

The restaurant is part of the federal park system, which the GOP have agreed to fund. Obama said he will veto the funding.

17. Obama Shuts Down a Road Tha Goes Through CO Park: "The Forest Service announcement, in turn, led the Pitkin County commissioners to order that Maroon Creek Road be shut down at the height of the colorful leaf-changing season. Ahead of what is to be one of the busiest weekends of the fall, the road is to be closed to vehicles at T-Lazy-7 Ranch, pending a resolution to the government shutdown."

The GOP have agreed to fund the parks. Obama said he will veto that compromise funding.

18. Residents Plan Protest of Cape Hatteras Closing - "Businesses and residents on the Outer Banks have planned a peaceful protest of the closure of Hatteras Island's beaches due to the government shut down.

"The U.S. House Wednesday passed a measure to reopen national parks and monuments. It will now go to the U.S. Senate."

In the unlikely event the Democrat Senate passes the bill, Obama has threatened a veto of any compromise legislation opening the parks.

19. Obama Blocks People From LOOKING at Mt. Rushmore - "Blocking access to trails and programs at South Dakota’s most popular attraction was one thing, but state officials didn’t expect Congress’ budget stalemate to shut down a view of Mount Rushmore.

"The National Park Service placed cones along highway viewing areas outside Mount Rushmore this week, barring visitors from pulling over and taking pictures of the famed monument.

The cones first went up Oct. 1, said Dusty Johnson, Gov. Dennis Daugaard’s chief of staff. The state asked that they be taken down, and federal officials did so with some of them. The state was told the cones were a safety precaution to help channel cars into viewing areas rather than to bar their entrance."

20. Crucial USDA Websites Taken Down - "The U.S. Department of Agriculture has turned off its entire website in response to the government shutdown, leaving farmers, reporters and others with no way to access any of the agency's information online. …

"USDA's total website shutdown goes far beyond the response of other federal agencies, and seems to be part of an effort to make people feel the effects of the shutdown. Thursday morning calls to USDA's press office seeking an explanation were not answered."

This website is down and yet the ObamaCare and White House websites are up.

21. St. Louis Gateway Arch Closed - The GOP have agreed to compromise legislation funding the parks. Obama has threatened a veto




Read more…

Liberals and Decadence

Liberalism and decadence have taken root in the U.S. - Conservative and religious values are bashed by spineless elected liberal DemocRat officials and repeated by their Pinko Media. Muslims look in disgust at the cancer growing within the U.S. - Osama Bin Laden and other radicals point to the sickness when recruiting for their violence. Gay liberals refuse to discuss that their homosexuality is punished by death under Islamic Law. Adultery may also get you a death penalty. Abortions are considered murder. As more Muslims move into the U.S. they refuse to mix with the liberal aspects of the society. Relieve the sick pressure. VOTE DEMOCRATS OUT
More at http://www.WarriorsForTruth.com

Read more…

Wright’s Racism and Hate Speech History

Not Just Some Recent Aberration

For the naïve among you who somehow believe that Barack Obama is an honorable man and a statesman . . . and who still believe that Barack Obama is NOT a racist . . .

Obama, in his speech in mid 2008, disavowing Wright in Philadelphia, said you'll remember, “Not once in my conversations with him have I heard him talk about any ethnic group in derogatory terms, or treat whites with whom he interacted with anything but courtesy and respect.” Yes, and Adolf Hitler wasn't a national socialist and never said anything against Jews, Gypsies and so-called "November Criminals, either . . . But Wright did give Louis Farrakhan an award which seemed bothersome, since Farrakhan is a much-discussed antisemite. Obama, defending Wright, claimed Farrakhan’s work with ex-prisoners had been the inspiration for the award. But neither the award citation nor Wright’s own description made any mention of ex-prisoners. Instead the award citation explicitly was given for Farrakhan’s “lifetime achievements” whatever they might have been . . . .

Wright and Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, you see, have a long history of being "great minds running in similar racist ruts." Farrakhan can't seem to avoid making anti-Semitic and anti-white comments, regularly documented by the (Jewish) Anti-Defamation League’s website; and Wright himself is one of the Anti-Defamation League's favorite love-to-hate-him personalities. Wright has often dissed black leaders for avoiding mention of Farrakhan’s name.

During the 20+ years Obama listened to Wright's sermons, hate speech was Wright’s main stock in trade. America, he said, created the AIDS virus to kill off blacks. His church’s website and newsletters throughout the period of Obama's membership have featured numerous anti-semitic rants. After the "God damn America!" sermon, Wright eventually was disavowed by Obama. But speakin of Wright in Philadelphia, Obama lied about his self-described longtime friend and adviser, to deflect attacks on his own judgment and patriotism, “Not once in my conversations with him have I heard him talk about any ethnic group in derogatory terms . . . " etc., etc. ad nauseum and the mainstream media declined to chase down the story and the truth. Obama also claimed that Wright had grown up "in the ghettoes in the 60's with memories of doubt, fear and humiliation," but actually Wright had lived a privileged youth, another Obama lie which again the media didn't choose to track down.

Obama often uses Adolf Hitler's famous propaganda technique "the big lie" and surely everything Obama's said about Jeremiah Wright qualifies as a monster lie so outrageous that no one would think anyone would have the temerity to speak it, were it not true. From his first autobiography, "Dreams From My Father" (the title of his second autobiography "The Audacity of Hope" came from the title of a Jeremiah Wright sermon; the fatherlike role of Wright is amazing in Obama's life even though the reality of Rev. Wright is clearly 100% the opposite of every myth Barak, Jr. has built up and the mythical persona he's made himself appear to be) to virtually every statement about his past to all his public statements, Obama has carried on a string of fantastic lies unchallenged by the mainstream media . . . only one thing is obvious the "Devil we know," Jeremiah Wright, is not one-hundredth as dangerous as the man who lies about him and for him . . . Barack Obama . . . indeed, Rajjpuut has found only one "important" statement that Obama's ever made that was not a lie: "I am NOT a socialist, I'm not." No he isn't a socialist, Barack Obama is a dyed-in-the-wool communist** and listening to Jeremiah Wright's "Black-Liberation Theology" (which is based entirely upon the teachings of Karl Marx) must have been a great comfort to him.

Ya'll live long, strong and ornery,

** in "Dreams From My Father" Obama never mentioned that his grandfather Stanley Armour Dunham and his mother Stanley Ann Dunham were communists and his birth father Barak (no 'c') Hussein Obama, Sr. was also a communist as shown here:

You'll remember from reading "Dreams From My Father" that Obama Senior's dream or lifetime love for Kenya was socialism and "fairness" but here we find out that it wasactually "scientific socialism inter alia communism." And we learn more about what's really going on when we see him in this essay discussing the advisability of 100% taxes upon the rich; takeover via nationalization of foreign businesses; and out and out transfer of wealth from Kenya's European and Asian citizens to its black ones.

Read more…

Rajjpuut just listened to yet another Democrat talking about the relationship between the TEA (taxed enough already) Party and the Ku Klux Klan and then he also mentioned the “hate-mongers like Glen Beck” with his very next breath. This is a typical example of the lame-stream media in action. Regular viewers of Beck’s show have often heard him close with “let truth be your anvil and non-violence your hammer and reject anything which doesn’t answer the test of truth and non-violence.” These words of Gandhi are very close to the spirit guiding the TEA Party and, of course, are the furthest thing from what CBS, NBC, ABC and CNN would like you to know about those “crazies that are attacking the programs of our Dems and our President.” The amount of lying about the TEA Party by the Obama administration and the congressional Democrats and the lamestream media has gone well beyond epic proportions . . . .

Supposedly when Nancy Pelosi and the Dems were walking in unison on the day that Obamacare passed, at least one TEA Party member shouted the word “nig__r” fifteen times at Representative John Lewis and another Black Democrat was spit upon by a white TEA Partier. Now fifteen times is an awful lot of racial abuse but somehow with all the mainstream and other media (including FOX News) in the area, not even one racial slur was aired on the public air waves. Andrew Breitbart has challenged Representative Lewis and his honor, in effect calling the good congressman “a liar.” Rajjpuut will herein repeat Breitbart’s offer of a reward of 10,000 paid out of his own pocket for conclusive videotape proof that one of these incidents occurred . . . .

“It’s time for the allegedly pristine character of Rep. John Lewis to put up or shut up. Therefore, I am offering $10,000 of my own money to provide hard evidence that the N- word was hurled at him not 15 times, as his colleague reported, but just once. Surely one of those two cameras wielded by members of his entourage will prove his point.

“And surely if those cameras did not capture such abhorrence, then someone from the mainstream media — those who printed and broadcast his assertions without any reasonable questioning or investigation — must themselves surely have it on camera. Of course we already know they don’t. If they did, you’d have seen it by now THOUSANDS OF TIMES.

“Rep. Lewis, if you can’t do that, I’ll give you a backup plan: a lie detector test. If you provide verifiable video evidence showing that a single racist epithet was hurled as you walked among the tea partiers, OR you pass a simple lie detector test, I will provide a $10K check to the United Negro College Fund.”

Looking over dozens of online videos, Rajjpuut has seen only one scene in which the “spitting incident” might reasonably have been THOUGHT to have occurred. In one scene a dark skinned man, presumably a Democratic representative, walks up the stairs through the assembled TEA Party protestors and one white fellow has his hands cupped around his nose and mouth to amplify his voice. It appears that this man is yelling, but the videotapes showing this incident are all “silent movies” for some reason. If this actually was a fellow yelling the “N-word 15 times it surely would have been picked up by somebody with live audio since it is very obvious that he is yelling something. As far as the spitting?? Well, again the onlyreasonable candidate located by Rajjpuut is that same possibly obnoxious fellow yelling and quite clearly he DID NOT spit, however, the possibility of hims spraying his message accidentally as he was saying it does exist . . . but there was no reaction by the dark-skinned man to indicate anything but being weary with the yealling as he calmly turned and continued up the stairs.

Supposedly the story of John Lewis’ horrific experience was witnessed by one of his associates . . . who like Lewis will NOT take a lie detector test, even to enrich the coffers of the United Negro College Fund. Just yesterday, a union man who said he was there has come forward and said he heard the racial slur and saw the spitting but was totally uninterested in providing evidence didn’t even wish to talk about who was filming when this all supposedly happened. Let Rajjpuut be very clear here: in the 2008 elections, there are racist claims and then there are racist facts: Barak Obama got more White votes than Kerry or Gore in 2004 and 2000 respectively . . . almost 48% of the White votes. John Mc Cain, who was a pretty good man, got just a bit over 4% of the Black votes. The highest percentage of real racists in this country are probably not going to be found among the White voters. Let us just say that if 8-10% of the Whites in America could be called serious racists then perhaps 40-50% of the Blacks might vie for that dubious honor.

Talking more personally about racism, President Obama listened for 20 years to Jeremiah Wright spewing hate from the pulpit before the cameras caught that magic “God Damn America!” moment as he proselytized about White’s treatment of Blacks in the United States . . . perhaps Obama and his administration and his fellow Dems are just accusing others of what they themselves are guiltiest about? Last time Rajjpuut looked, none of his ancestors ever owned a Black slave or even an indentured White servant; indeed Rajjpuut personally kicked the crap out of two much bigger (thankfully drunk) White fellows verbally assaulting a trio of Black girls so quite frankly accusing the Ol’ boy of being a racist or of being responsible for racism in this country is pretty darn stupid and yet that’s precisely what the Dems are doing . . . accusing every TEA Party advocate of hate and racism. And why? Just to detract the attention of the sillier branches of the media from the justifiable attacks on the Dems in congress for their anti-constitutional tax and spend and magnification of already too-big government agendas. Obama and his ilk have been playing the racism card for almost 40 months now on the national stage. It never was true, it isn’t true now and he ought to apologize right now. Fat chance of that man ever admitting a mistake, eh?

By the way, the Dems’ accusation that the TEA Party is made up of extremists and radicals was put down recently by not one but four different polls showing the TEA Party make up to include roughly 58% Republicans, 28% Independents and 14% Democrats; and another poll that showed that on most issues people in this country trust the TEA Party more than they do President Obama 48% to 42% and far more than the Democrats in Congress 21% or the Republicans in Congress 27%. And yet another poll by the mainstream media showed that 62% of TEA Partiers call themselves conservative; while 28% call themselves moderate; and 9% call themselves liberal; and while 34% of ALL Americans prefer Democratic candiates and 32% prefer Republican candidates; 28% prefer candidates supported by the TEA party.

On a related front, several TEA Party groups have created the National TEA Party Federation (NTPF)** and this central group has also announced alliances with the National Taxpayers’ Union and the following other organizations with fiscally-conservative agendas:

  • 60 Plus
  • Americans for Prosperity
  • Americans for Tax Reform
  • Bannon Strategic Advisors
  • Citizens Against Government Waste
  • Citizens United
  • Constitutional Sovereignty Alliance
  • Contract From America
  • Doctor Patient Medical Association
  • Family Research Council
  • FreedomWorks
  • Heartland Institute
  • Institute for Liberty
  • Let Freedom Ring
  • Moms for America
  • Ronald Reagan Institute for Conservative Leadership
  • Richard Viguerie
  • Tea Party Patriots Live!
  • Victory Media Group

Ya’ll live long, strong and ornery,


** http://video.foxnews.com/v/4142953/introducing-the-national-tea-party-federation/?playlist_id=87249
Said Arkansas Ex-governorMike Huckabee talking about the NTPF, “Pedophiles are more popular than members of congress right now." as he presented a very perceptive look at the growing TEA Party movement despite the contempt and unfounded accusations thrown their way by some Democrat members of congress.

Read more…