All Posts (29758)

Sort by

Join me this Wednesday Feb. 27th as we welcome two great guest, Todd Woods the author of the economic thriller Currency and Chuck Morse of USA Radio Network. The air time is 8pm to 10pm Wed. Feb. 27th and the call in number is 347-327-9601!
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/the-truth-is-out-there1/2013/02/28/the-truth-is-out-there--voice-of-the-people

Read more…

The Sequester Scam

The Sequester SCAM

Meatcleaver fearmongering.

YOUR government is SCAMMING YOU!

Your Government is scaring the crap out of you… with LIES!

Here are some facts:

  • FY2012 ACTUAL Spending = $3.279 Trillion
  • FY2013 Budgeted Spending = $3.796 Trillion
  • The INCREASE  in SPENDING = $67 BILLION
  • The Sequester Funds = $85 Billion …. Or $18 Billion more than spending
    • So…. We should see $18 Billion of actual spending versus 2012… RIGHT?
    • Scroll down…. There’s more

 

 

 

SO… with ACTUAL SPENDING at $15 BILLION MORE, President Obama has described doomsday scenarios with hundreds of thousands of jobs lost


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/02/22/on-sequester-worse-better-for-obama/#ixzz2LxkVbRGN

 

  • WHAAAAAT???? With $15Billion MORE spending, the sequestration will cost hundreds of thousands of jobs….. HE SAID IT!

Will you ever give up drinking the swill from this fraud?

Call or email your Politician and raise hell!... including those that jumping on obama’s bandwagon as well as the sluggos who are laying back doing nothing on behalf of truth!

Click Here to Email Politicians

I just did!

Read more…

An idea to unite the right and stop the enemy.

OK, everyone who hates obama, and I'm convinced that's around 75% of the population, wants him out but the so-called republicans are divided, right? Some like me think a third party is the way to go, others want to stick with what I call the Titanic of politics, the GOP.

Someone tell me why this wouldn't work to bring the conservative thinking people together:

The establishment republicans run their candidate as usual. The New Tea Party, or something like it runs a truly conservative candidate, ala Col. Allen West, or Sarah Palin, Michelle Bachman, or Dr. Ben Carson the neurosurgeon. 

Here's the catch. *The stated policy of the conservative party is that they will run as hard as they can to win over America. All true conservatives like me will be able to vote for someone who hasn't been selected by the likes of Boehner and Rove. The GOP can run their typical unelectable candidate, Dole, McCain, Romney. Two weeks before the election if the conservative party isn't in contention based on a mutually agreed upon polling service, they pledge to swing their votes over to the Republicans and withdraw their candidate! That way, no votes end up going to supporting the likes of this hunk of garbage we have in there now and all of us can unite behind one candidate while still voting our conscience.

Now, if that sounds too unreasonable, or if you can't get on board with that, we are truly doomed because right now the left is rolling over us and the Constitution like a bull dozer.

We need something bold. Why not this? If you agree that it's worth a try, please spread it around. I'm so sick of liberalism and it's tentacles, not to mention islam while I'm at it. Liberalism is at the heart of the vast majority of our decline! 

Michael Quinn

Read more…

Reject Hagel

Gentlemen:

I am sending you this message today in strong opposition of Chuck Hagel's nomination as Secretary of Defense.

 

Despite Hagel's exemplary service in the U.S. military, it is

  • his anti-semitic remarks about Israel,
  •  his willingness to talk to our enemies,
  • his naive and dangerous "nuclear zero" policies and
  • his lack of leadership experience

that make him a very poor candidate for the role of Secretary of Defense.

 

America needs a strong, unflinching leader who not only understands the different world arenas and their unique challenges, but possesses the necessary skill set to walk the delicate balance and make the difficult decisions that could impact us all.

 

In my opinion, Chuck Hagel is not the right man for this key role,

and I urge you to strongly oppose Chuck Hagel's confirmation as Secretary of Defense.

 

Read more…

Erosion and the Constution

Erosion of the Constitution

 

I will begin by allegorically defining erosion.  The Grand Canyon was formed out of solid rock by water over eons of time.  Water ‘eroded’ a small obstructing hill into a chasm over a mile deep. Erosion may be insidious, but it is also ruthless.  A term that might be applied to the power mad in Washington of today.

 

Many people refer to FDR’s New Deal as the start of the erosion of the Constitution by our government.  I submit that it began much earlier than that.  Take a look at Grant’s administration and his use of carpet baggers during the Restoration following the Civil Was.  I could take you on a long and boring walk through many presidencies, but being the kind and gentle soul I am I will spare you that tedium.

 

So how about some things closer to our time?  OK that should be easy.  Let’s start with the Supreme court hearings during the Carter term.  The media began to make an epithet of the phrase “Strict Constructionist” when referring to candidates that believed the constitution means just what it says.  Skipping over many other worthy examples we come to what, in my opinion, is the single greatest practicing threat to the constitution the so called “Patriot Act” that ended with the formation of the Department of Homeland Security.  This “act” was envisioned by Bush as way to imprison foreign terrorist whether on our soil or some one else's.  You see the constitution strictly prohibits the incarceration of American citizens without that little thing called Habeas Corpus.  Basically that is the right to appear before a judge.  It does not so protect our non-indigenous enemies, nor should it.  The case could be made that it doesn’t even protect a foreign national committing a lesser crime on our soil, but we habitually and rightfully extend that courtesy to them.

 

Now the Department of Homeland Security (Insecurity?) has decided that our mental property is not a Constitutionally protected asset to the point of saying that they have the right to search and seize your Emails, thoughts committed to hard disc, Text messages, listed phone numbers and anything else they deem ‘potentially subversive’ without either probable cause or a warrent.  Particularly if it is within one hundred miles of ANY border.  I wonder who decided to stop at the one hundred mile point?  Why limit themselves?

 

In addition we are now subject to spying from the skies by our own government and threatened with murder for being in the company of a non convicted suspected person.  The CIA and FBI has taken the right to open our mail, listen in on our conversations, invade our homes without warrants and on and on and on.

 

A Constitutional Republic?  Not lately.  I submit to you that most of this is caused by you and me.  We have allowed the country to be taken over by the power hungry politician that is much more concerned with keeping his/her POWER than governing in a constitutional manner.

Read more…

 by Admin online

 

State Sen. Dan Patrick, chairman of the senate education committee, told Fox News he is very disturbed by the photograph as well as reports that students were exposed to a story that blamed Egypt’s turmoil on democracy – rather than the Muslim Brotherhood.

“Parents are very sensitive to any issue that seems to be anti-American – that blames democracy for some sort of trouble in the world,” he said.

A Texas mom became outraged after she discovered a Facebook photo of her child wearing Islamic garb.

The lesson on Islam was taught in a world geography class at Lumberton High School. 

READ MORE AT http://cufaba.blogspot.com/2013/02/state-investigation-launched-after.html

Read more…

Sequester: And now, the rest of the story

Subject: Some interesting info on how the sequester came about. Note the author!--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Obama’s sequester deal-changerBy Bob Woodward, Published: February 22Bob Woodward (woodwardb@washpost.com) is an associate editor of The Post. His latest book is “The Price of Politics.” Evelyn M. Duffy contributed to this column.Misunderstanding, misstatements and all the classic contortions of partisan message management surround the sequester, the term for the $85 billion in ugly and largely irrational federal spending cuts set by law to begin Friday.What is the non-budget wonk to make of this? Who is responsible? What really happened?The finger-pointing began during the third presidential debate last fall, on Oct. 22, when President Obama blamed Congress. “The sequester is not something that I’ve proposed,” Obama said. “It is something that Congress has proposed.”The White House chief of staff at the time, Jack Lew, who had been budget director during the negotiations that set up the sequester in 2011, backed up the president two days later.“There was an insistence on the part of Republicans in Congress for there to be some automatic trigger,” Lew said while campaigning in Florida. It “was very much rooted in the Republican congressional insistence that there be an automatic measure.”The president and Lew had this wrong. My extensive reporting for my book “The Price of Politics” shows that the automatic spending cuts were initiated by the White House and were the brainchild of Lew and White House congressional relations chief Rob Nabors — probably the foremost experts on budget issues in the senior ranks of the federal government.Obama personally approved of the plan for Lew and Nabors to propose the sequester to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.). They did so at 2:30 p.m. July 27, 2011, according to interviews with two senior White House aides who were directly involved.Nabors has told others that they checked with the president before going to see Reid. A mandatory sequester was the only action-forcing mechanism they could devise. Nabors has said, “We didn’t actually think it would be that hard to convince them” — Reid and the Republicans — to adopt the sequester. “It really was the only thing we had. There was not a lot of other options left on the table.”A majority of Republicans did vote for the Budget Control Act that summer, which included the sequester. Key Republican staffers said they didn’t even initially know what a sequester was — because the concept stemmed from the budget wars of the 1980s, when they were not in government.At the Feb. 13 Senate Finance Committee hearing on Lew’s nomination to become Treasury secretary, Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.) asked Lew about the account in my book: “Woodward credits you with originating the plan for sequestration. Was he right or wrong?”“It’s a little more complicated than that,” Lew responded, “and even in his account, it was a little more complicated than that. We were in a negotiation where the failure would have meant the default of the government of the United States.”“Did you make the suggestion?” Burr asked.“Well, what I did was said that with all other options closed, we needed to look for an option where we could agree on how to resolve our differences. And we went back to the 1984 plan that Senator [Phil] Gramm and Senator [Warren] Rudman worked on and said that that would be a basis for having a consequence that would be so unacceptable to everyone that we would be able to get action.”In other words, yes.But then Burr asked about the president’s statement during the presidential debate, that the Republicans originated it.Lew, being a good lawyer and a loyal presidential adviser, then shifted to denial mode: “Senator, the demand for an enforcement mechanism was not something that the administration was pushing at that moment.”That statement was not accurate.On Tuesday, Obama appeared at the White House with a group of police officers and firefighters to denounce the sequester as a “meat-cleaver approach” that would jeopardize military readiness and investments in education, energy and readiness. He also said it would cost jobs. But, the president said, the substitute would have to include new revenue through tax reform.At noon that same day, White House press secretary Jay Carney shifted position and accepted sequester paternity.“The sequester was something that was discussed,” Carney said. Walking back the earlier statements, he added carefully, “and as has been reported, it was an idea that the White House put forward.”This was an acknowledgment that the president and Lew had been wrong.Why does this matter?First, months of White House dissembling further eroded any semblance of trust between Obama and congressional Republicans. (The Republicans are by no means blameless and have had their own episodes of denial and bald-faced message management.)Second, Lew testified during his confirmation hearing that the Republicans would not go along with new revenue in the portion of the deficit-reduction plan that became the sequester. Reinforcing Lew’s point, a senior White House official said Friday, “The sequester was an option we were forced to take because the Republicans would not do tax increases.”In fact, the final deal reached between Vice President Biden and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) in 2011 included an agreement that there would be no tax increases in the sequester in exchange for what the president was insisting on: an agreement that the nation’s debt ceiling would be increased for 18 months, so Obama would not have to go through another such negotiation in 2012, when he was running for reelection.So when the president asks that a substitute for the sequester include not just spending cuts but also new revenue, he is moving the goal posts. His call for a balanced approach is reasonable, and he makes a strong case that those in the top income brackets could and should pay more. But that was not the deal he made.Read more from PostOpinions: Bob Woodward: Time for our leaders to delegate on the budget Robert J. Samuelson: The lowdown on Lew Jennifer Rubin: Jack Lew’s truth problem Eugene Robinson: The sequester madness© The Washington Post Company
Read more…

My grand daughter posted this video on face book, she thought it was "AWSOM" needless to say grandpa thought it was crap! her teacher ha drecomanded to the kids if your feeling depressed or bullied watch this video. GEEES! what a bunch of Bul shit! I felt like killing myself after a few minutes of watching it.

 

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltun92DfnPY

Read more…

The Sequester Lie

 

                         The big deal they are making over this sequester nonsense is giving me a headache.  I have made this point on several social network site discussions so I thought I would put it all together on one place.  Obama, his cabinet minions, and all of the members of Congress come out and say; Social Security checks will stop, meat plants will shut down, the FBI won’t be able to track terrorists, the Border Patrol won’t be able to secure the borders, airports will shut down, pony rides in national parks will end, the sun won’t come up on March 2, and on and on and on adnauseum.  And the RINO’s in Congress aren’t doing any better.

Read More:

http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2013/02/the-sequester-lie/

Read more…

Federal Gov't Moves to Disam Vets

Federal Government Moves to Disarm Veterans

soldiergirl
  • 467
    Share

It’s no secret that the Department of Homeland Security considers returning veterans a threat to the established order. They said as much back in 2009 when they wrote in a report exposed by Alex Jones and the alternative media: “Returning veterans possess combat skills and experience that are attractive to right-wing extremists… DHS/I&A is concerned that right-wing extremists will attempt to recruit and radicalize veterans in order to boost their violent capacities.”

SPECIAL: Join TeaParty.org to Fund “Youth Firearms Training Initiative”

Following the case of veteran Brandon Raub, who was abducted and held in a psychiatric ward for Facebook posts the government considered subversive, police in Ohio seized a veteran’s guns after he was adjudged to be mentally incompetent despite the fact a Veterans Administration psychiatric evaluation determined he was not mentally ill...(MORE)

 

=================            ======================          ===================

Please, someone tell me what I am missing in this article.

The Feds run to disarm the veterans who are returning from Iraq and Afghanistan because they believe these vets will be a threat to them because they have combat skills, so they want to take their guns away.  OK, do I understand this so far?

However, when the Feds disarm these vets, the right-wing nuts as they call us will arm them again.  I don't personally know anyone who has a lot of fire arms, but I know they exist.  These people are out there in somewhere in the United States.

I do know that Conservatives who love these comrads as much as I do will give them all the guns, ammo, knives, etc. to dress them up, head to feet, so what is the point of disarming these vets in the first place, I wonder??

 

Read more…

http://www.augustforecast.com/2009/01/27/obama_trilateral_commission_endgame/

The above web site contains the following:

As pre­vi­ously noted in Pawns of the Global Elite, Barack Obama was groomed for the pres­i­dency by key mem­bers of the Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sion. Most notably, it was Zbig­niew Brzezinski, co-founder of the Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sion with David Rock­e­feller in 1973, who was Obama’s prin­cipal for­eign policy advisor.

The pre-election atten­tion is rem­i­nis­cent of Brzezinski’s tutoring of Jimmy Carter prior to Carter‘s land­slide elec­tion in 1976.

For anyone who doubts the Commission’s con­tin­uing influ­ence on Obama, con­sider that he has already appointed no less than eleven mem­bers of the Com­mis­sion to top-level and key posi­tions in his Administration.

According to offi­cial Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sion mem­ber­ship lists, there are only 87 mem­bers from the United States (the other 337 mem­bers are from other regions). Thus, in less than two weeks since his inau­gu­ra­tion, Obama’s appoint­ments encom­pass more than 12% of Commission’s entire U.S. membership.

Is this a mere coin­ci­dence or is it a con­tin­u­a­tion of dom­i­nance over the Exec­u­tive Branch since 1976? (For impor­tant back­ground, read The Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sion: Usurping Sov­er­eignty.)

  • Sec­re­tary of Trea­sury, Tim Gei­thner
  • Ambas­sador to the United Nations, Susan Rice
  • National Secu­rity Advisor, Gen. James L. Jones
  • Deputy National Secu­rity Advisor, Thomas Donilon
  • Chairman, Eco­nomic Recovery Com­mittee, Paul Volker
  • Director of National Intel­li­gence, Admiral Dennis C. Blair
  • Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of State, Asia & Pacific,  Kurt M. Campbell
  • Deputy Sec­re­tary of State, James Stein­berg
  • State Depart­ment, Spe­cial Envoy, Richard Haass
  • State Depart­ment, Spe­cial Envoy, Dennis Ross
  • State Depart­ment, Spe­cial Envoy, Richard Hol­brooke

There are many other inci­dental links to the Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sion, for instance,

Sec­re­tary of State Hillary Clinton is mar­ried to Com­mis­sion member William Jef­ferson Clinton.

Gei­thner‘s informal group of advi­sors include E. Gerald Cor­rigan, Paul Volker, Alan Greenspan and Peter G. Peterson, among others. His first job after col­lege was with Henry Kissinger at Kissinger Associates.

Brent Scow­croft has been an unof­fi­cial advisor to Obama and was mentor to Defense Sec­re­tary Robert Gates.

Robert Zoelick is cur­rently pres­i­dent of the World Bank

Lau­rence Sum­mers, White House Eco­nomic Advisor, was men­tored by former Trea­sury Sec­re­tary Robert Rubin during the Clinton administration.

There are many other such links, but these are enough for you to get the idea of what’s going on here.

Ana­lyze the positions

Notice that five of the Tri­lat­eral appointees involve the State Depart­ment, where for­eign policy is cre­ated and imple­mented. Hillary Clinton is cer­tainly in line with these poli­cies because her hus­band, Bill Clinton, is also a member.

What is more impor­tant than eco­nomic recovery? Paul Volker is the answer.

What is more impor­tant than national intel­li­gence? Gen. James Jones, Thomas Donilon and Adm. Dennis Blair hold the top three positions.

What is more impor­tant than the Trea­sury and the saving of our finan­cial system? Tim­othy Gei­thner says he has the answers.

The State Depart­ment is vir­tu­ally dom­i­nated by Tri­lat­erals: Kurt Camp­bell, James Stein­berg, Richard Haass, Dennis Ross and Richard Hol­brooke.

This leaves Susan Rice, Ambas­sador to the United Nations. The U.N. is the chosen instru­ment for ulti­mate global gov­er­nance. Rice will help to sub­vert the U.S. into the U.N. umbrella of vassal states.

Con­flict of interest

Since 1973, the Com­mis­sion has met reg­u­larly in ple­nary ses­sions to dis­cuss policy posi­tion papers devel­oped by its mem­bers. Poli­cies are debated in order to achieve con­sen­suses. Respec­tive mem­bers return to their own coun­tries to imple­ment poli­cies con­sis­tent with those consensuses.

The orig­inal stated pur­pose of the Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sion was to create a “New Inter­na­tional Eco­nomic Order.” Its cur­rent state­ment has mor­phed into fos­tering a closer coop­er­a­tion among these core demo­c­ratic indus­tri­al­ized areas of the world with shared lead­er­ship respon­si­bil­i­ties in the wider inter­na­tional system.” (See The Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sion web site)

U.S. Tri­lat­eral mem­bers imple­ment poli­cies deter­mined by a majority of non-Americans that most often work against the best inter­ests of the country.

“How,” you say?

Since the admin­is­tra­tion of Jimmy Carter, Tri­lat­erals held these mas­sively influ­en­tial positions:

  • Six out of eight World Bank pres­i­dents, including the cur­rent appointee, Robert Zoelick
  • Eight out of ten U.S. Trade Representatives
  • Pres­i­dent and/or Vice-President of every elected admin­is­tra­tion (except for Obama/Biden)
  • Seven out of twelve Sec­re­taries of State
  • Nine out of twelve Sec­re­taries of Defense

Is this sinking in? Are you grasping the enor­mity of it?

Endgame is at hand

For the Tri­lat­eral crowd, the game is about over. The recent reemer­gence of orig­inal mem­bers Henry Kissinger, Zbig­niew Brzezinski, Brent Scow­croft and Paul Volker serves to rein­force the con­clu­sion that the New Inter­na­tional Eco­nomic Order is near.

The Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sion and its mem­bers have engi­neered the global eco­nomic, trade and finan­cial system that is cur­rently in a state of total chaos.

Does that mean that they have lost? Hardly.

As I recently wrote in Chorus call for New World Order, they are using the crisis to destroy what remains of national sov­er­eignty, so that a New World Order can finally and per­ma­nently be put into place.

Con­clu­sion

The Obama pres­i­dency is a disin­gen­uous fraud. He was elected by promising to bring change, yet from the start change was never envi­sioned. He was care­fully groomed and financed by the Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sion and their friends.

In short, Obama is merely the con­tin­u­a­tion of dis­as­trous, non-American poli­cies that have brought eco­nomic ruin upon us and the rest of the world. The Obama expe­ri­ence rivals that of Jimmy Carter, whose cam­paign slogan was “I will never lie to you.”

When the Demo­crat base finally real­izes that it has been conned again (Bill Clinton and Al Gore were mem­bers), per­haps it will unleash a real polit­ical rev­o­lu­tion that will oust Tri­lat­eral politi­cians, oper­a­tives and poli­cies from the shores of our country.

If the reader is a Demo­crat, be aware that many Repub­li­cans and con­ser­v­a­tives are still licking their wounds after finally real­izing that George Bush and Dick Cheney worked the same con on them for a dis­as­trous eight years of the same policies!

Read more…

ABORTION IS MURDER!

Americans have lost track of the sacredness of the U.S. Constitution and their religious teachings.  Too many do not believe in sin and do not understand the nature of sin.  Too many do not fear God.  Too many are pushing the envelope regarding God's willingness to forgive their sins.  One day He will say:  "Enough is enough" and drop the veil of His Divine protection.  WAKE UP AMERICA...DO NOT OFFEND GOD!

Read more…

 WHAT OF THOSE THAT DIED BEFORE THEY EVER COLLECTED SOCIAL SECURITY .

The following is an email floating around on the Internet regarding Social
Security Fraud as seen from the eyes of a woman who lost two husbands before
they were able to retire.

Read this slowly so it sinks in!!!
 
KEEP PASSING THIS AROUND UNTIL EVERY ONE HAS HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO READ
IT... THIS IS SURE SOMETHING TO THINK ABOUT!!!!
 
THE ONLY THING WRONG WITH THE GOVERNMENT'S CALCULATION OF AVAILABLE SOCIAL
SECURITY IS THEY FORGOT TO FIGURE IN THE PEOPLE WHO DIED BEFORE THEY EVER
COLLECTED A SOCIAL SECURITY CHECK!!!
 
WHERE DID THAT MONEY GO?
 
Remember, not only did you and I contribute to Social Security but your
employer did, too. It totaled 15% of your income before taxes. If you
averaged only $30K over your working life, that's close to $220,500. Read
that again. Did you see where the Government paid in one single penny? We
are talking about the money you and your employer put in a Government bank
to insure you and I that we would have a retirement check from the money we
put in, not the Government. Now they are calling the money we put in an
entitlement when we reach the age to take it back. If you calculate the
future invested value of $4,500 per year (yours & your employer's
contribution) at a simple 5% interest (less than what the govt. pays on the
money that it borrows), after 49 years of working you'd have $892,919.98.
 
If you took out only 3% per year, you'd receive $26,787.60 per year and it
would last better than 30 years (until you're 95 if you retire at age 65)
and that's with no interest paid on that final amount on deposit! If you
bought an annuity and it paid 4% per year, you'd have a lifetime income of
$2,976.40 per month.
 
Another thing with me.... I have two deceased husbands who died in their
50's, (one was 51 and the other one was 59 before one percent of their
social security could be drawn. I worked all my life and am drawing 100% on
my own social security). Their S.S. money will never have one cent drawn
from what they paid into S.S. all their lives.
 
THE FOLKS IN WASHINGTON HAVE PULLED OFF A BIGGER PONZI SCHEME THAN BERNIE
MADOFF EVER DID.
 
Entitlement my foot, I paid cash for my social security insurance! Just
because they borrowed the money for other government spending, doesn't make
my benefits some kind of charity or handout!!
 
Remember Congressional benefits? --- free healthcare, outrageous retirement
packages, 67 paid holidays, three weeks paid vacation, unlimited paid sick
days. Now that's welfare, and they have the nerve to call my social security
retirement payments entitlements?
 
We're "broke" and we can't help our own Seniors, Veterans, Orphans, or
 
Homeless. Yet in the last few months we have provided aid to Haiti, Chile
and Turkey. And now Pakistan......home of bin Laden. Literally, BILLIONS of
DOLLARS!!!
 
Our retired seniors living on a 'fixed S.S. income' receive no additional
federal aid nor do they get any financial breaks, while our government 
pour hundreds of billions of $$$ and tons of food to foreign countries!
 
They call Social Security and Medicare an entitlement even though most of us
have been paying for it all our working lives, and now, when it's time for
us to collect, the government is running out of money. Why did the
government borrow from it in the first place? It was supposed to be in a
locked box, not part of the general fund.
 
Sad isn't it?  99% of people won't have the guts to forward this. I'm in the 1% -- I just
did.
Read more…

A flagrant horn blowing

Among other things, I am the webmaster and proud member of the Nicholas County West Virginia Tea Party.

Recently  I added the Constitution and all of the amendments thereto to the web site and spent many hours constructing and annotating a table of contents for each.  Want to look something up in one of the amendments or perhaps the Constitution itself?  Just click the link in the table of contents and it will take you right to the described portion in which you are interested.  

I sure hope this doesn't violate some rule here.  If it does just let me know and I will remove it.

If you do drop by please let me know what you think in one of our comment boxes.

Our web site

Read more…

I believe this needs to be said.  I recognize the danger involved and I accept it.

Let me begin by asking a few simple questions”

  1. What group of people have as a tenet of faith that Christians and Jews are inherently evil and must be eliminated.

     2.   What group of people have as a tenet of faith that they must never befriend anyone not of their belief system.

     3.   What group of people actually have a word to describe the means of eliminating people of any other faith.  The word?  Jihad or Holy War.

There happens to be only one answer to al of those questions – Islam.  All true followers of their prophet Muhammad believe all of those to be basic facts of life.  Why then are we Americans being so sensitive to their feelings?

The prime Minister of Australia issued a statement over two years ago letting Islamist know they would either follow the rules and be true to the Australian ideal of civility or they were summarily invited to leave the country.  The Muslim Brotherhood can’t seem to get a firm foot hold in that country, yet our Secretary of state has a member as one of her assistants.  Hmmmm I wonder why?  .It is even reported that six or more of Obama’s “advisers” are card carrying members also.  Gad.

Have we become so blase to our freedom that absolutely anything is to be allowed?  I recognize and respect the need to TOLERATE other religions.  I do not recognize the need to encourage infiltration by people or religions that have a sworn duty to kill any and all ‘infidels’. By the way, just in case you didn’t know, any person not of the Islamic faith is, by definition, and infidel.

Wake up America!  Islam has officially declared Jihad against us.  So why are we, or rather our government, so interested in appeasing them.  When someone declares war isn’t it usual to fight back?  At least to the point of attempting to prevent infiltration by the enemy.  Perhaps as in, oh maybe, Hilary and 'our' president having Muslim Brotherhood members on their immediate staff?

Of course one could always aid and abet them by making a grab for our guns.  The would work wouldn’t it? Certainly would make it easier to knock off this bunch of infidels called the United States of America.

Enough said.

But then perhaps I am just another bigot

Read more…

OH SH@#T I'M ON THE GRID!

When I first decided I had had enough, and it was time to speak my mind and stand up for my rights as an American Citizen, I felt some reservation in joining sites and making myself known as one who disagrees with Obama's agenda. I couldn't help but think oh s&*t, I'm on the grid, they have my number now, I'm probably on a watch list somewhere and my emails are being reviewed by the feds. Did I say echelon out loud?  I wonder how many Patriots are out there who are afraid to let others know how they feel. The truth is, “all that is needed for evil to prevail is to do nothing” It's time to get a back-bone stand with your neighbors and say I’ve had all I can take, and I'm not going to take anymore.

Assemble, Declare, March and make a Stand! Every one who wants to remain free, before it's too late.

Read more…

The American Prison of Perception

It has been said that life often gives us our greatest gifts brilliantly disguised as our worst nightmares. I cannot think of any worst nightmare for America than Obama, can you? We are beginning to see the same old politics under a different name. Smoke screens of false information that seem to be the norm of the day. I have not ran into one person so far that does not know Obama is an outright liar and a communist. I’m sure someone believes that Obama is the real deal but they number far and few in between. So, what should the real American people make of Obama’s approval rating being as high as it is when he is actually destroying America? It’s false, plain and simple. His false high rating is intended to keep the American people within the prison of perception.

Fortunately, in the fast approaching coming age of authentic spiritual enlightenment, the American people will soon begin to remember what they have been programmed to forget by the many false teachers prior to Obama. Obama is just the flesh covered embodiment of Evil for the final attempt for world dominance. His mission is doomed to fail because the American people will soon begin to see their own true nature and the revealing nature of God’s world. But mostly, they will experience the true nature of Jesus Christ as their brother and God as their loving father the same as Jesus did. In their hearts they will know God is not punishing mankind for their sins. Mankind punishes itself because of the lack of knowledge of the spiritual experience. Everyone who has not been drugged to stupidity will realize; we are not our name. We are not our race. We are not our working title because of our chosen field of study. We are not our religion. We are not our body. We are the collective consciousness of God having an individual physical experience and all of mankind is our brethren.

People will never see what’s really going on if they stay within the extreme limitations of the prison of perception of which they have been systematically programmed to accept as their only reality. The world is not just a little bit different to what people think it is, it is nothing like what they falsely know it to be. The secrete masters of control and exploitation, of which Obama embodies and embraces, seek to retain their power in the face of a mass awakening that they knew was coming and have been well prepared for. We are seeing the extreme levels of control and all overt burdens placed upon us by Obama’s communist regime at the very time we the spiritual Americans are slowly emerging from a deep sleep. What’s up with that? The house of glass, created by the likes of Obama and his handlers, will certainly shatter once We the People fully realize we are the ones in control and not Obama’s Government. Good people do not need any form of control. Only evil needs controlled and obviously the liberal socialist communist Democrat party believes the American people are evil or they would not be trying to control us.

The lack of discussion of truth in the State controlled mainstream media tells us something very profound about how badly they want to keep the American people in ignorance and in servitude to Obama’s world machine. What a despicable human being he has been programmed to be. He affirmed before God and the American people to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America yet privately huddles with his hand selected criminal element to destroy it. The masses that succumb to Obama’s psychology of fascism are not speaking or living their own unique truth or expressing their own unique self, they are merely existing within prison walls built by what they believe is acceptable by those around them. They are utterly impossible for the common good person to reach out to with the truth, but with God all things are possible. Even Obama can be reached as ludicrous as that sounds. I certainly hope it’s a prison Chaplain that finally reaches Obama. One can only hope, right?

My time in the TEA party showed me that politics are worthless when trying to change anything for the better and that different names different colors and the different spin do not mean different political methods of operation. It also showed me that politicians that are opposing each other in public are doing the exact opposite in private. Peaceful protesters the likes of the TEA party are being labeled as a terrorist threat by an out of control Government that says they must bomb other countries to protect the right to protest peacefully. We are being deluged by the Democrats constantly passing legislation to detail the very details of our lives, what we can do, what we can say, what we can eat or not eat. The moronic governor of New York Andrew Cuomo, a Democrat of course, is a prime example of evil trying to control good. To top it off, much of the out of control legislation is coming from non-elected officials being paid for by the tax payers. The Obama communist regime is efficiently using the age old technique of demonize and invade in order to take ultimate control of the American people. But first the good people must be disarmed so that only the communist and criminals have guns. Well I’ve heard it said, having a gun is like a parachute, if you ever need it and don’t have it, you will never need one again.

When social patterns reveal continually repeating cycles of stupid behavior, like voting for Obama a second time, they are telling you something very important; you are in a prison of perception. Once you know that and acknowledge that you can do something about the cause, it will begin to unravel. Obama will be impeached and tried for treason and anyone who voted for Obama will be considered a traitor of America’s Constitution. I added the last part, because it’s actually true, voters for Obama are traitors or they are just so stupid they need to be jailed to protect the American way of life within a peaceful society. But for now I’ll just accept Obama being Impeached and jailed for treason.

Finally, today, February 23, 2013, I have been released from the fear of what other people think about me. I have decided to go with what God has shown me and not try to tailor it for conventional belief. Buckle up and hold on to your hat, for we the American people, are in for our worst nightmare but it will be our greatest blessing when we fully awaken for the third and final time.

Read more…

Politically Correct

     What is our country coming too.  We have to have our attorney with us in order to have a conversation with anyone.  Our country is not our country anymore.  I remember 50 years ago we didn't have car alarms, no one questioned whether you had a gun or not, you went to school to learn and better yourself, no one told you what to eat or you carried a brown bag, you said prays in the classroom to start the morning off, and maybe even the pledge of alliegance, you didn't drop out of school, because you knew you needed a education in order to get anywhere, and you showed your parents respect and all other adults even if they might not be right, until you could show them in a diplomatic way the truth. NO ONE SUED BACK THEN.  We need to get back to our old ways again.  This President and almost all of Congress needs to be replaced with people that put their country first before each other.

                                                                   Thank you and God Bless,

                                                                                    Bob V.

Read more…