ACTION

http://youtu.be/SP9Cben3cuY

Downloads of the song are available HERE. You can donate as much as you want because...

ALL proceeds (less Bandcamp's 15%) will go to the SEAL NSW Family Foundation.

Lest we forget: Gov. Palin posted the following;

“Death Panel” Three Years Later

Obama has demonstrated zero flexibility on his insistence that higher tax rates for the wealthy kick in on January 1, 2013.

To those familiar with “progressive” modus operandi, it is not surprising that the White House and their “progressive” political allies envision Medicare and other “entitlement” savings happening ten to twenty years from now.

This is what “progressives” call a “balanced approach.”

The same “balanced approach” “progressives” used when they promised Ronald Reagan three dollars in future spending cuts for every dollar of tax increases.  The same “balanced approach” “progressives” used when they hood-winked George H. W. Bush into violating his “Read my lips, no new taxes” pledge with a similar two to one offer.

Reagan, Bush 41 and the American taxpayer have yet to see those promised spending cuts.

In the current “fiscal cliff” negotiations, Republicans who are willing to accept “revenue” increases as a part of a deal with “progressive” Democrats in exchange for promised spending cuts that will happen sometime in the future are stupid, in denial or both.  How many times do Republicans need to make this same mistake before they learn?

“Duh…as a kid I burned my finger every time I stuck it into the fire, but this time that won’t happen…duh…yup…uh huh…duh…ooooh…aaaah...look…something shiny…duh.”

By whatever means, no matter how much “new revenue” Republicans agree to provide, it will never be enough for “progressives”.  No matter how completely Republican squishes cave to “progressive” demands for more “revenue”, it will work against them in both the short and long term.

The economy will tank and Republican will be blamed by “progressives”, while being seen as unprincipled jellyfish willing to break promises made to their constituents in order to “deal” with those who have no interest in compromise.

The “progressive” motive is not to make a deal.  It is not to enact legislation that will stimulate private sector economic growth.  History instructs that lowering tax rates stimulates the private sector and increases economic growth while resulting in additional revenue to the IRS.  To “progressives” this is irrelevant.

They are far more concerned with what they call “fairness.”  To “progressives”, fairness means confiscating money through taxes from productive people who create wealth and redistributing it to the unproductive.

History shows that tax increases stifle economic growth, which leads to reduced revenue collection.  Budgetary imbalances grow worse and deficits continue to explode at an increasingly alarming rate.  By following this path, it is all but guaranteed that the American government will raise the debt ceiling again and experience another credit downgrade.   U.S. national debt will not go down and GDP growth will become virtually non-existent.

Eventually the federal government will need to find “other revenue” to fund its big spending operation.

With over twenty three million people unable to find work and almost fifty million living on the dole, government will try to invent ways to fund the “progressive” Party’s dependent class.

The retirement savings, IRAs and 401Ks of every American are in “progressive’s” sights.  Americans believe their 401ks and IRAs are private property, safe from government seizure.   

These retirement savings are already heavily controlled by government regulation.  Given the track record of “progressives” it is no stretch to realize that trillions of dollars in private savings are threatened by “progressives” who see them as a way to finance the national debt their big government socialist programs have created.

When Social Security began it was a compulsory savings program administered by the federal government.  When someone retired, they would get back what they had paid in plus interest.  It only took until 1939 for a “progressive” Democratic Congress to begin using a pay-as-you-go financing method, meaning money currently being paid into the Social Security System is financing current beneficiaries.  At first it was worked.  In 1950 sixteen people were paying into the system for each person receiving benefits.  In the not so distant future there will be two people making payments for each check.

What happened to all the money millions of Americans have had stolen over the course of their lives from their paycheck by government mandate?  What will happen if the government seizes private savings?

If Republicans ever wish to be taken seriously, they must stand on principle.  For the future of the American Republic, backing down is not an option.

http://mjfellright.wordpress.com/2012/11/29/obamas-plan-tax-now-cut-later/ 

Would you believe me if I toldRepublican fundraisers have joined forces to help President Obama keep his promise to pass "comprehensive immigration reform"? They have teamed up to form a new super-PAC to try to buy lawmakers' support for amnesty. The good news is that most of our allies in both parties in Congress won re-election and you can influence them to reject the bait.

Washington lawyer Charlie Spies raised over $100 million for Mitt Romney in the last election. He's working with former Bush Treasury Secretary Carlos Gutierrez to target our allies in Congress! Together, they intend to convince Republicans that the way to start winning elections is by selling out the American public and granting amnesty to millions of illegal aliens.

or click  https://www.numbersusa.com/donate

"This is not small ball," Gutierrez said. "We're serious, and we are going to push the debates on immigration reform to a place where I believe the Republican Party should be in the 21st century."

NumbersUSA is not a PAC. We can't buy political candidates the way they can. But we can fight back. The PACs are promising to help politicians get re-elected by giving candidates cash to run reelection campaigns. Our job is to remind them of the demands of the American people who voted for them and who control their political destiny. And right now we're reminding some panicky Congressmen that adding millions of illegal aliens to the voter rolls is hardly a winning strategy.

They aren't going to hear that from the news media, most of whom are part of the full-court press for an amnesty.

We're never going to raise the hundred million dollars that the PACs will. We don't need to. But we do need to raise money to attract hundreds of thousands of new activists, to influence new bills, and to respond to new legislative pushes by sending millions of your messages to Congress.

or click  https://www.numbersusa.com/donate

The good news is that some help is on the way. Several exceptionally generous individuals and foundations have lined up to give us grants. But, for various tax and foundation rules, these donors can't give us a dime unless we first raise money from individual citizens like you. For every dollar you give, they can give us two. That means for every $25 raised from people like you, we can spend $75 to fight against amnesty for illegal aliens. For every $100, we can spend $300.

Together, we can influence lawmakers in Washington to have the confidence they need to turn down the super-PACs and ignore the President's hardball politics. We'll have lots of opportunities to fax, call, or meet your congressmen in the coming months, as the legislation winds its way through Congress. But right now we have an opportunity to triple your donations to make sure we have the financial resources we need to stop this push for amnesty in its tracks.

"Read my lips, no-new-taxes" famously said George H W Bush, one of my favorite presidents. He raised them and it's argued cost himself conservative votes during his unsuccessful reelection bid.

  With Sarah Palin America should be

  ready for a true conservative voice

           in the White House

The presidential campaign of 2016 was launched as soon as the last light dimmed on the stage after Mitt Romney gave his concession speech, in losing his presidential bid to Barack Obama. With the new battle now warming up amongst the GOP hierarchy there are many Republican leaders who want to point the party leftward, away from Ronald Reagan and his heir apparent Sarah Palin.

That is correct. There is no stuttering here. Sarah Palin may appear to liberals, leftwing pundits as well as GOP Washington leaders as yesterday’s news. Yet Mitt Romney’s loss was not due to conservative steel in his campaign. What is clear is that nearly two million conservatives did not embrace Romney’s attempt to skedaddle to the middle road by running away from conservative positions and values. They simply stayed home.

Consider the results of Palin’s steadfast 2012 primary season effort as she crisscrossed the nation campaigning on behalf of conservative congressional, senatorial officials. The results of Palin’s efforts are notable, beginning with backing Texas U.S. Senator-elect Ted Cruz. Combine that with eight congressional candidates being elected to congress out of 14, due to Palin’s endorsement.

Now examine Romney’s results. In a general election where Republicans were expected to be more competitive in U.S. Senate races. Republicans actually lost two U.S. Senate seats. There are many who have engaged in a lot of finger pointing in order to place blame for the loss. But the buck does stop at the top with Mitt Romney.

To refresh everyone’s memory, it was Romney and his Boston campaign brain-trust, who said to Palin back in July, “Thanks but no thanks.” They denied her a prime time speaking role before the GOP National Convention and the nation. Mitt was bound and determined to place both Palin and the Tea Party organization supporters on the sidelines and go it alone to seek more moderate political pastures.

Romney may have listened to comedians like Bill Maher and political pundits like Chris Matthew who found no end in skewering the non-candidate Palin during the campaign year. There is a lesson in Romney’s loss that reminds conservatives that Ronald Reagan was the 1976 version of Sarah Palin. He too had his many detractors as well as liberal and Republican pundits who scoffed at Reagan’s notion of a new conservative under current building in America.

Ronald Reagan was held at arm’s length by Washington GOP insiders and derided in liberal circles as a joke. Many in the mainstream media poked fun of his film character that played opposite a Chimpanzee in the 1951 “Bedtime for Bonzo” movie. While the democrats and the Washington insider pundits laughed, Reagan beat President Jimmy Carter with nearly 51 percent of the vote to Carter’s 41 percent in the 1980 presidential election.

( Click to read more )

The lessons of the past seem lost upon us. Being morally superior to White racism gave way to dipping bias in chocolate and declaring it chic.

The lessons of the past seem lost upon us. Being morally superior to White racism gave way to dipping bias in chocolate and declaring it chic.

With events scheduled for in the White House and on the road, Barack Obama is back on the campaign trail spreading his message, with the clear and obvious intent of pressuring Congress into agreeing to his "fiscal cliff" terms.

While he will make claims to a willingness to listen to all ideas and negotiate with all parties, in fact he will endlessly argue for ending the current tax rates on Americans making $200,000 and above while accusing Congress of holding middle income families hostage.

To present the illusion he has been working hard to arrive at a successful resolution, Obama held closed doors meetings with big unions, big business and as an afterthought, small business owners.

Can you say all theatrics, no work?

Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell R-KY, categorized the White House efforts as nothing but a public relations ploy: "Rather than sitting down with lawmakers of both parties and working out an agreement, he's back out on the campaign trail, presumably with the same old talking points we're all familiar with.  Look: We already know the president is a very good campaigner.  What we don't know is whether he has the leadership qualities necessary to lead his party to a bipartisan agreement on a big issue like this."

Obama is planning to use American citizens as human props in the ongoing campaign to rally his base.  He will call upon his followers to pressure Congress into submitting to “progressive” demands to raise taxes on small businesses and entrepreneurs.  Obama will preach that if a stalemate persists, taxes on middle class American will go up because Republicans held them hostage to protect tax cuts for the rich.

Can you say economic justice?

Economic justice is a Marxist concept where economic policies must result in the distribution of economic benefits equally.

Obama’s push to let tax rates expire on incomes over $200,000 for individuals and $250,000 for families will hurt small businesses, the sector responsible for most new jobs growth in America.

Obama loves to characterize the tax increase as asking financially successful Americans to pay more in order to save government programs that face spending cuts.  The fact is, ending current tax rates for “the rich” would fund the United States federal government for less than nine days.

For Obama to propagate the false notion that taxing the rich will solve America’s fiscal problems is a red herring.  By consciously using middle class Americans as human props in attempts to sway public opinion in his favor, he is displaying true contempt for middle class Americans.

The United States federal government is borrowing forty cents of every dollar spent to prop up a slumping economy and support the deprived underclass it created using big government socialist programs to render American citizens dependent upon government.

Foreign debt buyers are slowly ending their investment in America’s bankruptcy and the Federal Reserve is now purchasing over sixty percent of America’s Treasury Bonds.

Can you say The Weimar Republic?  Can you say Zimbabwe?  Can you say today’s Eurozone on more steroids than the Soviet body builders at the 1952 Olympics, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Lance Armstrong, Sammy Sosa, Jose Canseco, Lyle Alzado, Barry Bonds and Mark McGuire combined?  Can you say the worst economic downturn ever?

America does not have a revenue shortage.  America has a spending addiction.

Giving the United States government more money to spend is like trying to sober up an alcoholic by having them drink a gallon of gin.

In the ongoing “progressive” campaign to “fundamentally transform” America, the fiscal cliff created by “progressive” big spending will happen because “progressives” want it to happen.

And “progressives” will blame successful Americans.

http://mjfellright.wordpress.com/2012/11/28/fiscal-cliff-will-happen/ 

Obama Jesus Painting

                   INTERPOSITION IN AMERICA! 

PRESENTED IN IT's ENTIRETY by Rev. Jerry L. Robertson- DIRECTOR of MINSTRY of JESUS CHRIST

With all the talk of Succession, being bantered about, by approximately twenty-three
States of the Republic of the United Sates of America! There is reason to consider the
pitfalls that can occur and possibly some serious repercussions.

Asking the White House to comment on the secession of one or more states, won't move the President, Congress, the Courts,or the military. 
But it is symbolic of disgust and exhaustion many people feel as they watch all the ridiculous parleying by the
the so-called professionals, and all those 'Politicians' as they banter about conducting themselves in the crony political class
as they squander their boundless coffers of the last of the contributions, which were so easily stripped from their constituents;
and even those, whom did not have a clue of the continued loss of our liberty's, that have been entrusted in their hands, as
the Administration refuses to observe the rule of law, and our 'Nation's Constitution' !
Succession can be seen a last resort form of "interposition of the lower magistrate". The interposition concept comes from
the 'early Calvinists', including John Calvin. It had a huge influence on our American Revolution. Interposition means that
the chosen leader of a group, IE: (a magistrate, has moved to block the bad actions of a higher authority). Such a leader can
Appeal against bad policies
Organize his constituents
Work to defeat current office-holders
Sue for redress
Launch recalls
Stall or incompletely implement bad laws
Refuse to enforce bad policies

And when all else fails, the lower magistrate can even lead a succession movement. “When all else fails” is a crucial phrase. Thomas Jefferson put it deftly, "Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience has shown that mankind is more disposed to suffer while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed."
These were not idle words. America's Founders acted as Jefferson preached. They followed a policy of incremental interposition. Our Founders began with the existing legal framework.
They asked the King to redress grievances. The King's ministers responded with further taxes and regulations. They even charged John Hancock with smuggling.
Hancock interposed with a retaliatory boycott. The King escalated again, He taxed colonial tea to favor an English cartel__an early example of the cronyism that afflicts us even now.
The King then spurned more appeals, so Boston's Sons of Liberty turned aggressive with their "tea party". But even this step was incremental. They only broke one lock and of course, ruined some tea. They harmed no other person or property. Ben Franklin even suggested that the protestors should pay for the tea, and some colonial merchants offered to do so! The British refused to accept it. Instead, the King imposed "Intolerable Acts". This removed Massachusetts' right to self-government. Then ordered that troops be quartered in colonial homes and gave these soldiers immunity, from any crimes that they might commit!
This 'train of abuses' was evidence, that grievances would not be redressed. Tensions heightened. The King then ordered his men to seize all the colonist's guns in the spring of 1775 - something no free people can tolerate. Even then, the colonial response was moderate and incremental. They defended themselves, but did not initiate violence.

The Continental Congress sent an "Olive Branch Petition" to King George. He refused it, and declared the colonists to be in an 'open state of rebellion.' In other words, the King declared the rebellion, not the colonist.
The Continental Congress responded by listing the King's abuses to justify their acts of self-defense. This was the "Declaration of the Causes and Necessity of taking up Arms." This came a full year before the Declaration of Independence. It was another incremental step before the final break. Please notice... The magistrates in this story were patient to the point of plodding; they continued to appeal to the established authority openly and often. This narrative doesn't justify everything the Colonials did during that time. But it does show that the King declared the rebellion, not the colonial magistrates.
This brief history is offered only as a guide for us now.

"CARTS and HORSES" by Jim Babka (Downsizer Dispatch)

I know that I'm frustrated, you're frustrated, we're all frustrated. And at this juncture, Succession seems appealing. Keep in mind, the last secession attempt was established on dubious grounds and led our nation to unbearable destruction. It left a long-lasting legacy of political division and cultural mistrust. Let's not rush into anything, just yet! And put cart before the horse. Skip no steps. First we must Deny Consent, just as the Founding Father's did. Our Founders provided a good model; so to, Thoreau, Gandhi, and Martin Luther King. They showed the power of non-violent tactics. They were incremental. They began small and slowly escalated, as needed. This requires patience. We likely will lose at each step. But this does not mean that we can afford to skip even one step. Suffering will expand in the short term. The political class may use brute force, if it feels threatened. Some may be injured! But all will be lost, if we allow any violence. Please understand__violence is the State's strength and our weakness. Therefore, it is imperative to appear as weak. This is where everyone can experience the 'Power of Jesus Christ', telling His Follower's, to turn the other cheek. It must be clear who the victims are, and who has done wrong. This will cause the wrong-doers to lose support, even from within our own ranks. This will take time. It may even exhaust our options. But exhaustion must come first. We must reach the point the Founders reached, before a resort to succession can work, or even be justified. But when that point comes, public support will follow; since no steps have been skipped, the case will be evident. Denying Consent is the first of those steps. This is no minor matter. Remember: Thomas Jefferson wrote, that the government rest on the consent of the governed. Deny that consent and what does the government rest upon then? The answer is "mere violence".
Our highest priority now is the awakening of all of our neighbors, our families, our co-workers and our friends to the issue of consent.
Awful things are being done in their name and with their money. Do they really consent to this? We must unmask all pretense. The State is nothing more than a corrupt cartel whose policies benefit only a handful of well-connected cronies.
When enough people understand that, things will change. Maybe it will come to secession, maybe not. But other steps come first, and they cannot be skipped.

Above all else, we all must truly understand, that we all stand before Our GOD, equally responsible for allowing our nation to become lawless and totally in rebellion. Therefore, it is necessary for all of us, to examine ourselves, and humbly come before GOD, to repent for the sins of our nation, according to 2 Chronicles 7:14! That GOD, WHO hears our prayer, will heal our nation! I say this to illustrate that the NUMBER ONE__REASON FOR THIS ELECTION RESULT, is more Spiritual, than any of the possible reasons that have been concluded by all the analyst and the columnist who have been able to determine, "What went Wrong?"
As I have found, with GOD'S HELP, with 'HIS REVEALED KNOWLEDGE', we found that in truth, the Real Story should not be that of the demographics nor any other factor behind this election and vote result! The answer is disobedience: GOD's People, which represent a critical-block of voters__STAYED HOME! Although there are many, that attributed the effect of the 'Superstorm-Sandy' as being GOD's-hand of intervention. But in truth this fact is even more staggering__The CHRISTIAN's stayed home, and DID NOT VOTE! There were several who had “PREDICTED THAT THE CHRISTIANS WOULD EMPOWER ROMNEY TO A LANDSLIDE WIN”! In reality, their absence, represented an even more startling and appalling out-come of the final vote! That is representative, of more than the entire State of Ohio, received for all its votes: including Democrats , Republican, Liberals, Libertarians, and Independents combined. Conservative estimates are at 11 Million (Eleven-Million) registered voters that did not vote, of which predominately, would have voted for the Republican Candidate's, with a reliability of 99.97%, that is disgusting. ~ ALL IN WITH JESUS CHRIST ~ Rev. Jerry L. Robertson

As a final contribution__CBN reported from- Franklin Graham: “US Has Turned Its Back on GOD”! as quoted, "Our country is in trouble," he warned.  "It's in trouble spiritually.  We've turned our back on GOD." "We need

to do a better job of getting our people-the church-to vote," he admonished. "GOD is in control, and the if the Christians are upset with the election, they need to be upset with themselves!"

Ever since John Boehner told Diane Sawyer there was "no tea party caucus" in the House, I've been sending him as many little reminders as I can that NO, the Tea Party has NOT been defeated by the Liberal Media nor by the Chicago-Bully-Boys currently occupying our White House!

Call John and remind him it was due to Tea Party efforts that the USA finally got rid of Pelosi and put him in the Speaker position of "power" . . .

Remind the Speaker of the House to stand UP to Obama and to hold the line AGAINST taxes and to CUT the spending, the waste, the fraud and the corruption!  John Boehner:  202-225-0600

I wouls]d encourage to write every Sen. and Congessman and let them know that we must stand behind Isreal. All you have to do ig "Bing: their name and click on their offical web site. There will be a space that says "contact" and you get let these no backbone idiots that it is time to grow one and remind them that Ireal has been a long time alley of ours.

After a Tuesday morning meeting with U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice, Senators John McCain, Lindsay Graham and Kelly Ayotte said concerns they had about Rice’s misleading statements regarding the attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya which resulted in the deaths of the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans have grown, not diminished.

McCain, R-AZ, had said he might oppose Rice’s nomination to replace Hillary Clinton as secretary of State because Rice should have known the statements she made in interviews just a few days after the Sept. 11 attack were false.

In those interviews, Rice repeated the Party line about the attack having emerged from a protest over an anti-Islamist video.  Rice apparently parroted that narrative in order to satisfy the needs of Obama’s re-election campaign.  The narrative, much of which had already been repeatedly trumpeted during the Democratic National Convention was, al Qaeda had been decimated and was losing ground, public sentiments in the Middle East toward the United States had improved, and the attack was in no way connected to Obama’s foreign policy.  It was later learned the attack was a well-organized terror assault by an al Qaeda related group timed for the anniversary of 9/11.

David Petraeus, former director of the CIA, testified under oath before a congressional investigative committee that from the beginning the CIA had advised the White House that the Benghazi attack was an organized assault by al Qaeda linked terrorists.  Petraeus also testified that the approved CIA report was later changed to diminish terrorist involvement.

After meeting with Rice, Graham, R-SC, said: "The bottom line is that I'm more disturbed than I was before ... about how four Americans died in Benghazi, Libya by Ambassador Rice does not to do justice to the reality at the time."

http://mjfellright.wordpress.com/2012/11/27/exposing-benghazi-baloney/

I want to share a story of a good man, a heroic man. He’s British and a SAS Sgt but operated with our SF in the Tora Bora actions and saved many US lives. He’s now sitting in Military Prison after the greatest travesty of justice I have ever seen. I was a Marine and had the chance to work with Danny’s unit in Afghanistan and I can’t let this slide without at least spreading the word. The British should be shamed and ridiculed and he should be returned to his family before Christmas. Here’s a excerpt from the British Newspapers. Read his story if you are a veteran or support those who keep our freedoms?

Even if they wear a different uniform!

“Sgt Nightingale, 37, is serving an 18-month sentence for possession of a firearm after a pistol given to him by Iraqi forces he trained was found in a locked box in his Army accommodation while he was on tour.

The SAS sniper had forgotten about its existence because of brain damage caused when he collapsed during an endurance sport event in which he was taking part to raise funds for the families of dead and injured SAS soldiers.

The sergeant, who had served 17 years in the Army, 11 of them in the SAS, pleaded guilty to possession of a handgun earlier this month, after his quarters were searched in an unrelated incident involving another SAS member.

 Civilian police found a 9mm Glock in a locked box.

 It had been given to Sgt Nightingale in 2007 by Iraqi special forces. He had intended to have it deactivated and kept as a souvenir in the SAS sergeants’ mess.

 But after he was ordered to accompany the bodies of two fallen comrades back to Britain, the pistol was packed with his other equipment and left in storage at SAS headquarters in Hereford.

 The SAS soldier then took part in an endurance running event in Brazil to raise money for the families of dead and wounded comrades, collapsed due to over-hydration and suffered brain damage which left him with lapses in his memory, which included forgetting about the existence of the pistol.

 The weapon was eventually transferred to his quarters, where it was found in the raid while he was on active service in Afghanistan.

Note - There is also growing concern over the quality of the case brought against Sgt Nightingale, and the actions of his Army superiors.

The Telegraph has learnt that the civilian West Mercia Police, which conducted the original investigation, decided not to press charges against Sgt Nightingale because “no criminal intent was suspected or could be established”.

 In a separate development, a leaked email from the SAS also showed that many of Sgt Nightingale’s colleagues believed that he had been “hung out to dry”.

 However, the email, which was sent to members of his squadron by a warrant officer, wrongly claimed that Sgt Nightingale stole operational equipment including weapons, body armour, radios, night vision goggles and ammunition."

Full Story - http://ow.ly/fCA35

His wife and Lawyer asked me to get the message out to other veterans here and get as many to sign this petition asking for his release on bail to await a new hearing. Please sign here -  http://ow.ly/fCzIn Lets get him home for Christmas.

Thanks

Gregg

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/may/14/obama-digital-campaigning-dashboard

I signed up for an account at this site to check it out. (used different name).  It is very well organized, yet easy to follow for even those not computer savvy.   It allows people to easily contact others and make it viral.

Sign up and find out how it works. We should use it as a model for our own system.  If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

https://dashboard.barackobama.com/join

Word on the political street from GOP consultants and the Left is that Rush Limbaugh and the Tea Party cost Romney the election. We Conservatives are advised to “moderate our tone” and back away from our “extremist ideas”.

So let me make sure I understand. Obama and company were allowed to go for the jugular, using false narratives (lies), to win votes. They said Romney hates dogs, blacks, women and the poor. Heck, they even threw in the absurd accusation that Romney was responsible for the death of a working man's wife. Check and mate. Game over. Obama won. Did anyone suggest Team Obama “moderate their tone”?

But, when Rush Limbaugh exposed and the Tea Party rejected Obama's socialistic agenda, Team Obama, which includes the mainstream media, called us “racists”. When we express our Biblical belief that marriage should remain defined as between one man and one woman, we were called “extremist”. And when did it become extreme to believe it immoral to deny medical assistance to babies that survive abortions?

And for the record, once and for all, Conservatives do not care what consenting adults do in their bedrooms. All we ask is that we not be forced to fund it or be mandated to say that it is, “OK and normal”.

Unfortunately, since Romney lost, GOP consultants have joined the chorus of folks on the Left calling for Conservatives to back away from our core beliefs and go-along to get-along with Obama. They claim that this is what younger non-whites and women voters want.

I say, “Hogwash!” Younger, non-white and women voters are clueless about Obama's destruction of America, the virtues of Conservatism and why Liberalism sucks!

We did not lose because America has become a nation of idiots expecting a free Obama-phone. We lost because Republicans did a horrible job getting the truth to the masses. Soylent Green is people! Conservatism is best for everyone – period!!!

Folks, the bottom line is that the Tea Party chose to oppose Obama's socialistic transformation of America from a character driven place of decency, truth, respect for the law, and patriotism. Behaving as the Chicago thug politician that he is, Obama came to D.C. committed to implementing his agenda by any characterless despicable means necessary. In essence, Obama came to the gunfight armed-to-the-teeth with guns. The Tea Party brought political knives.

In partnership with their bullies in the MSM, Team Obama successfully spread one lie after another.

Here's a prime example: A white caller on a national radio program said his black friend was petrified to attend a Tea Party rally. Team Obama had him convinced that the Tea Party is the modern version of the KKK. Remember when the Congressional Black Caucus said the Tea Party wants blacks hung from trees? A shameful outrageous hate-inspiring lie – but no rebuke from the MSM suggesting that the Dems “moderate their tone”.

Apparently, to the MSM, I am an invisible black man. Since Obama took office, I have been a high profile figure at several hundred Tea Party rallies and events. For crying out loud, I even wrote the “American Tea Party Anthem”. Still, for the most part, the MSM have done everything in their power to keep minorities in the movement non-existent.

That scared black guy did eventually attend a Tea Party with his white friend. He was surprised to be treated with respect as an equal rather than a victim in need of assistance, which was the “tone” of the Democrat rallies he attended.

And another thing: since the election, everyone is saying that more Americans than ever love Obama and agree with his agenda. Well then, how do you explain 9 million folks who voted for him in 2008 staying home this time? http://spectator.org/archives/2012/11/09/mccain-beats-romney One could conclude that the bloom is somewhat off the rare black rose.

Did you know that 3 million Republicans who voted for McCain decided to pass on this election? Could it be because Romney was not conservative enough?

Still, all the big-brain consultants say the Tea Party was too aggressive and that Limbaugh needs to shut up if we are to win over youths, non-whites and women.

Well, I am just crazy enough to believe that common sense will cause a majority, regardless of race or gender, to embrace Conservatism...when they're given the truth.

Still, Conservatives are called the aggressors. We are not. The left, Obama and company, are the true aggressors forcing their culture, agenda and lifestyles down our throats.

Despite our consultants advising conservatives adopt a new liberal Democrat-lite mind-set, I believe it is time to educate America to the virtues of true Conservatism.

In the simplest terms, Liberalism, offered by Obama equals government dependency, mediocrity, bitterness and low self esteem. Conservatism equals true compassion, striving for excellence, dignity and pride which is the true “American Way”!

For the past four years, we Conservatives brought political knives to the gunfight with Obama. While we know Team Obama will upgrade to machine guns, our consultants further advise that we drop our political knives and brings sporks.

Lloyd Marcus, Proud Unhyphenated American

LloydMarcus.com

Egyptian President Mohamed Morsy declared he is exempt from overview by Egyptian courts, saying they cannot overturn any decision or law he has issued since taking office or until a new Egyptian constitution is finalized.  Morsy also decreed that Egypt’s courts will have no authority or oversight over a constitution-writing panel dominated by Islamists.  The Islamists on the panel are striving to impose Sharia Islamic law on the country’s inhabitants.

The general assembly of the Egypt Judges Club is calling for a nationwide judicial strike.  Egypt’s Supreme Judicial Council expressed "dismay" over Morsy's decision.

Morsy's edict was "deemed necessary in order to hold accountable those responsible for the corruption as well as other crimes during the previous regime and the transitional period" by his office.

Yet such claims and assurances that Morsy’s new powers are only "temporary," have not quieted the uproar coming from those who are now describing Morsy as a dictator; Egypt’s new Pharaoh.

Mohammed ElBaradei, the head of Egypt's Constitution Party who had opposed Morsy for president said: "There is no room for compromise.  If he wants a dialogue, he has to rescind these measures."

Thousands in Egypt have taken to the streets to demonstrate against what they call an undemocratic power grab by Morsy.

http://www.cnn.com/2012/11/25/world/meast/egypt-protests/index.html?hpt=hp_t1

Islamist expert Andrew Bostom, who wrote the book “Sharia versus Freedom: The Legacy of Islamic Totalitarianism” warns: “Morsy appears to be fulfilling the [Islamists’] and his own long shared desire to re-create a Sharia supremacist Egyptian state.”

Islamist theocracies dominated by Sharia law create a system where Western-style rights are suppressed; where Muslim men rule over Muslim women, Christians and Jews.  Under Sharia law non-believers are permitted to live provided they pay Dhimmi taxes and submit to third or fourth class status, constantly remaining subject to false accusations and acrimonious treatment.

Despite Morsy’s actions being an abrogation of the “Arab Spring” democracy movement Obama supported the White House has remained silent.

Morsy’s moves came while he was still basking in praise from both Obama and Hillary Clinton for mediating between Israel and Hamas in Gaza, helping bring about a cease-fire.

Why no outcry denouncing Morsy’s power grab from the Oval Office?

For two years, has not Obama painted himself a lover of the democratic movement?  Was it not Obama who called for former Egyptian President Mubarak to step down because he was a dictator?

Or was Mubarak only objectionable because he was pro-American?

http://mjfellright.wordpress.com/2012/11/26/morsy-white-house-similar-designs/

http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/mccain-graham-norquist-chambliss/2012/11/25/id/465282?s=al&promo_code=10DDE-1