All Posts (28478)

Sort by

WHO DISPLAYS THE AMERICAN FLAG POLL

WITH ALL THE HYPERBOLE THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY ABOUT WHO IS PATRIOTIC AND WHO ARE THE TRAITERS, I DECIDED TO CONDUCT A PRIVATE CITIZENS POLL ON WHO PROUDLY DISPLAYS THE AMERICAN FLAG.

I CHOSE THE MONTHS OF MAY, JUNE AND JULY AS THESE MONTHS CONTAIN 3 DAYS WHEN DISPLAYING THE FLAG IS MOST COMMON-MEMORIAL DAY, FLAG DAY AND JULY 4 TH.

SEVERAL TIMES DURING THIS 3 MONTH PERIOD, I DROVE AROUND THE TOWNS, VILLAGES, CITIES AND RURAL AREAS STOPPING WHENEVER I SIGHTED A FLAG WAVING,  I THEN ASKED THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS- ARE YOU REGISTERED TO VOTE, HOW ARE YOU REGISTERED AND HOW OFTEN DO YOU VOTE.  I TOOK NOTICE OF EACH HOME I STOPPED AT TO MAKE SURE I DID NOT MAKE A REPEAT STOP AT ANY ONE HOME.   

 

I MADE 284 STOPS AND TALLIED UP THE RESULTS AS FOLLOWS

 

REPUBLICANS      95

INDEPENTENTS 119

DEMOCRATS      24

UNREGISTERED  46

WHEN I DISCUSSED VOTING WITH THE UNREGISTERED PEOPLE, THEY ALL TOLD ME THAT THEY GOT SO FED UP WITH POLITICS THAT THEY REFUSED TO VOTE.  I DISCUSSED VOTING WITH THEM BECAUSE I SYMPATHIZED WITH THEM INASMUCH AS I ONCE WENT FOR 3 YEARS REFUSING TO VOTE FOR THE SAME REASONS.

I TOLD THEM THAT MANY TIMES I LIKED CERTAIN ONES WHO WERE SEEKING OFFICE AND WISHED I COULD HAVE VOTED FOR THEM SO AFTER 3 YEARS I REGISTERED TO VOTE AS AN INDEPENDENT AND THEN I COULD VOTE FOR ANY PERSON I LIKED, EVEN IF IT WAS ONLY ONE CANDIDATE ON THE BALLOT THAT I VOTED FOR.  32 OF THOSE UNREGISTERED CITIZENS TOLD ME THAT THEY WERE GOING TO FOLLOW MY EXAMPLE. SO THEY COULD SUPPORT, WITH THEIR VOTE ANY CANDIDATE THAT THEY BELIEVED IN.

 

THIS WAS NOT A SCIENTIFIC POLL, JUST A CONCERNED CITIZEN TALAKING WITH OTHER CONCERNED CITIZENS AND FINDING OUT THAT THE UNREGISTERED CITIZENS WERE VERY MUCH CONCERNED WITH THE DIRECTION THE COUNTRY WAS HEADED.  THE MORE I THINK ABOUT WHAT I DID HAD POSITIVE RESULTS AND I WOULD RECOMMEND THAT OTHERS GET OUT AND TAKE A POLL OF THERE NEIGHBORS.  I DID NOT DISCUSS OR RECOMMEND ANY CANIDITATE BUT ENCOURAGED EVERY PERSON I TALKED WITH TO BE A FREE THINKER IN MAKING UP THEIR MIND IF THEY WOULD VOTE AND FOR WHOM. 

Read more…

Shocking: Gays agenda on Queering Kids

Next Up on the Gay Agenda: Legalizing Sex with Children

poorKids-e1314171303762.jpg

Yes you read correctly.  Sex with children.  Pedophilia.  Hebephilia.  Now that the gay lobby has had such resounding success getting gay marriage passed in some states, and queering the U.S. military, the new “frontier” is legally having access to your children.   If you are not worried about this, you are not paying attention.

 

Gays will never be able to change the law to allow sex with children?  Wake up!  They are doing it already…. confusing  your kids sexual identities and desensitizing them to homosexual  sex techniques  in the public schools. 

pedophilia-sign.jpg

The next phase is the American Psychiatric Association followed by ….the law/Constitution.

There is now a cadre of gay/child predator/perverts  [my terms for them, obviously not theirs]  “mental health” professionals who are working “through channels” to get the American Psychiatric Association to say that having sex with children is “normal.”  If they are successful in getting the APA manual changed, that sets the stage to begin changing the law.

Hamas_Muslim_Child_Brides-300x225.jpg

Hamas/Gaza: Child brides lined up with their husbands for a group wedding

Don’t forget:  under Islamic ‘shariah ‘ law, men are allowed to marry babies.   But before the American gay community decides to “bond” with Islamics on pedophilia, realize that homosexuality  under shariah is punishable by death.

Iran-gay-teens-hung-300x222.jpg

Iran gay teens hung

One of the biggest child stars of the 1980s, Corey Feldman, is throwing some sunshine on a very shadowy problem that is unpopular and very non-politically-correct to discuss:

“I can tell you that the No. 1 problem in Hollywood was and is and always will be pedophilia. That’s the biggest problem for children in this industry. … It’s the big secret,” Feldman said.

“I was surrounded by [pedophiles] when I was 14 years old. … Didn’t even know it. It wasn’t until I was old enough to realize what they were and what they wanted … till I went, Oh, my God. They were everywhere,” Feldman, now 40, said.”

corey-haim-corey-feldman-pedo.jpg

Child stars Corey Feldman and Corey Haim each claimed they were abused by pedophiles as teenagers in the movie business

Joel_Schumacher.jpg

Openly-gay director Joel Schumacher hired Haim and Feldman when they were teenagers to star in "Lost Boys."

Here are reports and commentary from a recent conference in Baltimore to legalize pedophilia.

b4uacttop-e1314172934871.gif

Daily Caller:

“If a small group of psychiatrists and other mental health professionals have their way at a conference this week, pedophiles themselves could play a role in removing pedophilia from the American Psychiatric Association’s bible of mental illnesses — the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), set to undergo a significant revision by 2013. Critics warn that their success could lead to the decriminalization of pedophilia.

The August 17 Baltimore conference is sponsored by B4U-ACT, a group of pro-pedophile mental health professionals and sympathetic activists. According to the conference brochure, the event will examine “ways in which minor-attracted persons [pedophiles] can be involved in the DSM 5 revision process” and how the popular perceptions of pedophiles can be reframed to encourage tolerance.

Researchers from Harvard University, the Johns Hopkins University, the University of Louisville, and the University of Illinois will be among the panelists at the conference.

B4U-ACT has been active attacking the APA’s definition of pedophilia in the run up to the conference, denouncing its description of “minor-attracted persons” as “inaccurate” and “misleading” because the current DSM links pedophilia with criminality.

“It is based on data from prison studies, which completely ignore the existence of those who are law-abiding,” said Howard Kline, science director of B4U-ACT, in a July 25, 2011 press release. “The proposed new diagnostic criteria specify ages and frequencies with no scientific basis whatsoever.”

The press release announced a letter the group sent to the APA criticizing its approach, and inviting its leaders to participate in the August 17 conference. “The DSM should meet a higher standard than that,” Kline continued. “We can help them, because we are the people they are writing about.”

B4U-Act.org website:

Principles are that people who are attracted to children are not mentally ill, and their preference to have sex with children……. is “not their fault.

One News Now:

Liberty Counsel Action‘s Matt Barber attended the conference and says he felt he was on a different planet, as the presenting professionals aimed to remove pedophilia from the American Psychiatric Association’s (APA) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). That would mean that pedophilia would no longer be considered a mental disorder.

“The entire focus of the event was on the victimhood of the pedophile,” Barber accounts. There was “very little concern for the children who are the victims of these individuals when they are raped, who these individuals lust after,” he adds.

And he says the experts’ discussions were focused on “destigmatizing pedophilia … removing the stigma, and [getting] the public to stop demonizing pedophiles.”

But the attorney reports that the APA is already moving toward declassifying pedophilia as a mental disorder “by saying that a pedophile is only a pedophile in their latest DSM … if they are distressed by their attractions or behaviors.”
 

Hebephilia”  experts are trying to justify sex with teenagers [as opposed to pedophiles having sex with pre-pubescent kids] …..as if somehow that is more acceptable.

Hebephiles argue how Michael Jackson really wasn’t a “pedophile,” technically speaking, or even wrong to have relations with teenagers.

Conservatives who attended filed this report from the B4U-Act conference:

Time to Normalize Pedophilia’: Firsthand Report on B4U-ACT Conference  

Lynchburg, VA –“ On Wednesday, August 17, child advocates Matt Barber, Vice President of Liberty Counsel Action, and Dr. Judith Reisman, a visiting law professor at Liberty University School of Law, attended a Baltimore, MD conference hosted by the pedophile group B4U-ACT. Around 50 individuals were in attendance including a number of admitted pedophiles – or “Minor-Attracted Persons” as they prefer to be identified (MAP “sexual orientation”) – as well as several supportive mental health professionals. World renowned “sexologist,” Dr. Fred Berlin of Johns Hopkins University gave the keynote address, saying: “I want to completely support the goal of B4U-ACT.”

Highlights of the conference:

  • Pedophiles are “unfairly stigmatized and demonized” by society.
  • There was concern about “vice-laden diagnostic criteria” and “cultural baggage of wrongfulness.”
  • “We are not required to interfere with or inhibit our child’s sexuality.”
  • “Children are not inherently unable to consent” to sex with an adult.
  • “In Western culture sex is taken too seriously.”
  • “Anglo-American standard on age of consent is new [and ‘Puritanical’]. In Europe it was always set at 10 or 12. Ages of consent beyond that are relatively new and very strange, especially for boys. They’ve always been able to have sex at any age.”
  • An adult’s desire to have sex with children is “normative.”
  • Our society should “maximize individual liberty. … We have a highly moralistic society that is not consistent with liberty.”
  • “Assuming children are unable to consent lends itself to criminalization and stigmatization.”
  • “These things are not black and white; there are various shades of gray.”
  • A consensus belief by both speakers and pedophiles in attendance was that, because it vilifies MAPs, pedophilia should be removed as a mental disorder from the American Psychiatric Association’s (APA) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), in the same manner homosexuality was removed in 1973.
  • Dr. Fred Berlin acknowledged that it was political activism, similar to that witnessed at the conference, rather than scientific considerations that successfully led to the declassification of homosexuality as a mental disorder: The reason “homosexuality was taken out of DSM is that people didn’t want the government in the bedroom,” he said.
  • Dr. Berlin appeared to endorse the politically maligned clinical practice of “reparative therapy” for homosexuals and pedophiles alike, saying, “If someone, for their own reasons, doesn’t want to live a homosexual lifestyle, I tell them that it’s hard but I’ll try to help them.”
  • The DSM ignores that pedophiles “have feelings of love and romance for children” in the same way adult heterosexuals and homosexuals have romantic feelings for one another.
  • “The majority of pedophiles are gentle and rational.”
  • The DSM should “focus on the needs” of the pedophile, and should have “a minimal focus on social control,” rather than obsessing about the “need to protect children.”
  • Self-descried “gay activist” and speaker Jacob Breslow said that children can properly be “the object of our attraction.” He further objectified children, suggesting that pedophiles needn’t gain consent from a child to have sex with “it” any more than we need consent from a shoe to wear it. He then used graphic, slang language to favorably describe the act of climaxing (ejaculating) “on or with” a child. No one in attendance objected to this explicit depiction of child sexual assault.
jacob-breslow.jpg

Jacob Breslow: Originally from Walnut Creek, CA. Attended UC-Santa Cruz. Since he is describing in detail having sex with children at the conference, get a good look and don't let him near your kids

Another group to watch is Reform Sex Offender Laws [RSOL]

Daniel Villareal at the gay website, “Queerty,” shows how the gay movement is no longer pretending that it doesn’t want to recruit kids:  “Can We Please Just Start Admitting That We Do Actually Want To Indoctrinate Kids?

“Why would we push anti-bullying programs or social studies classes that teach kids about the historical contributions of famous queers unless we wanted to deliberately educate children to accept queer sexuality as normal?

[…]

I for one certainly want tons of school children to learn that it’s OK to be gay, that people of the same sex should be allowed to legally marry each other, and that anyone can kiss a person of the same sex without feeling like a freak. And I would very much like for many of these young boys to grow up and start fucking men. I want lots of young ladies to develop into young women who voraciously munch box. I want this just as badly as many parents want their own kids to grow up and rub urinary tracts together to trade proteins and forcefully excrete a baby.

I and a lot of other people want to indoctrinate, recruit, teach, and expose children to queer sexuality AND THERE’S NOTHING WRONG WITH THAT.”

 

In California, a petition drive is underway to repeal a new state law which mandates “positive” gay role models in the curriculum.  It is not clear what exactly will be required of textbooks and content.

Meanwhile, California Teachers’ Association appoints another openly gay member, San Francisco teacher Eric Heins, to the union board, ostensibly to ensure the delivery of the “gay agenda” to public classrooms:

“Heins, a longtime homosexual teacher, announced that he always kept pro-LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender) books in his classroom library and spoke to his students about alternate lifestyles. Now, he reportedly plans to use his position in the union to fight for the LGBT community.

Steve Macias is the West Coast regional coordinator of Students for Life of America and a member of the California Republican Assembly.

“They want to use schoolteachers’ paychecks to pay for politicians who will do nothing but continue to push these seemingly alternative lifestyles that are really damaging to not only the mental health, but the physical health and the spiritual health of our children.”

He goes on to warn that the CTA will continue to push for pro-homosexual indoctrination in California’s schools. “What we can really expect from them is these tolerance laws, these ideas that make Christian speech against homosexuality, against abortion, intolerable,” Macias adds.
He points out that the CTA donated $1.25 million to stop Proposition 8, the 2008 measure passed by a majority of the state’s voters to define marriage as between one man and one woman. The union also supports S.B. 48, a bill that was recently signed into law that requires the state’s schools to teach on the contributions of LGBT individuals.”

Read more…

Why did Bernie Madoff go to prison?

Why did Bernie Madoff go to prison?

 

To make it simple, he talked people into investing with him. Trouble was, he didn't invest their money. As time rolled on he simply took the money from the new investors to pay off the old investors. Finally there were too many old investors and not enough money from new investors coming in to keep the payments going.

Next thing you know Madoff is one of the most hated men in America and he is off to jail.

Some of you know this. But not enough of you. Madoff did to his investors what the government has been doing to us for over 70 years with Social Security. There is no meaningful difference between the two schemes, except that one was operated by a private individual who is now in jail, and the other is operated by politicians who enjoy perks, privileges and status in spite of their actions.

Do you need a side-by-side comparison? Well here's a nifty little chart.

 

 

 

BERNIE MADOFF

SOCIAL SECURITY

Takes money from investors with the promise that the money will be invested and made available to them later. Takes money from wage earners with the promise that the money will be invested in a "Trust Fund" (Lock Box) and made available later.

Instead of investing the money Madoff spends it on nice homes in the Hamptons and yachts. Instead of depositing money in a Trust Fund the politicians transfer it to the General Revenue Fund and use it for general spending and vote buying.

When the time comes to pay the investors back Madoff simply uses some of the new funds from newer investors to pay back the older investors. When benefits for older investors become due the politicians pay them with money taken from younger and newer wage earners to pay the older geezers.

When Madoff's scheme is discovered all hell breaks loose. New investors won't give him any more cash. When Social Security runs out of money the politicians try to force the taxpayers to send them some more; or they cancel S/S to all those who paid into it.

Bernie Madoff is in jail. Politicians remain in Washington .. with fat medical and retirement benefits.

 

"If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert , in five years there'd be a shortage of sand.

~ Milton Friedman

PASS THIS ON TO YOUR FRIENDS!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Read more…

A friend posted this, too funny!

BREAKING NEWS: President Obama has just confirmed that the DC earthquake occurred on a rare & obscure fault-line, apparently known as "Bush's Fault". Obama also announced that the Secret Service & Maxine Waters continue an investigation of the quake's suspicious ties to the Tea Party. Conservatives however, have proven that it was caused by the founding fathers rolling over in their graves.
Residents of D.C. Don't be alarmed with the Earthquakes. That is just the Country shifting to the RIGHT!
Read more…
 

Speaking Truth-to-Power

The Only Hope for America Now

 

 

 

 

Two recent events emphasized for Ol’ Rajjpuut the importance of never-failing to tell truth to power. In America the TEA Party is the last hope for the voting, tax-paying public to get through the thick heads of our elected officials that fiscal- and Constitutional-responsibility are vitally necessary NOW.   The second instance concerns, Bill O’Reilly of FOXNEWS and will be dealt with in great detail later in this blog. In the first one, Rajjpuut who used to be a health educator and who has hammered away for a long time on the dangers of bureaucratic incursions into health care was gratified to see truth winning out over the Washington health care proselytizers . . . .

The dangers of the federal and state governments’  “one-size fits all medicine” will soon be revealed to all of us unless Obamacare is repealed. However, in a far less obvious story: for 25 years now, the federal government has been insisting that childhood shots required by law were absolutely blameless in causing mental and neurological damage to our children even as the numbers and rate of autism were skyrocketing. While they were doing this openly on the one hand they’ve been running a slush-fund to pay-off on the quiet many of the families involved. The only requirements for these slush-fund pay-offs were two: A) well-documented cause and effect that tie brain or nerve damage to the shots and B) the lawsuit could NOT mention the word “autism” in anyway, fashion or mode.    That dirty-little-secret is now blown to hell and back thanks to those of us who for over a generation have been insisting upon speaking truth to power . . . .

Today your child is more likely to develop autism than he is to have a twin. One in every 84 children develops autism. These numbers have risen steadily since the federal and state governments began requiring shots of all children first as they gained school age and secondly in more recent days infant shots after the first six weeks of life. A second factor no one has mentioned but key to understanding the problem is that instead of single shots, today it is very likely that a “combo-shot” of three, four or even more vaccines will be pumped into the arms of the children at one fell swoop . . . it is only as these combo-shots came into vogue that the autism ratio dropped dramatically from one in every 760 children to today’s one in every 84. The third factor is that mass vaccination drives are often held. No child who is not 100% healthy, displaying absolutely no cold-no fever-no other problems, should ever be given a vaccination and never more than one vaccine at a time should be administered. Finally, however, autism is just now being spoken of frankly and the government being accosted and big pharmaceutical companies and their combination vaccines are feeling the heat and paying up . . . finally.  It’s only a trickle so far, but this truth is finally coming out. Truth to power is vital. Perhaps someday soon we can see some greater responsibility on this issue and the autism ratio rise back to 400 or 500 to 1.

For our major blog coverage, Rajjpuut was aghast to see FOXNEWS’ Bill O’Reilly of The O’Reilly Factor opinion program get absolutely pummeled by liberal-progressive idiots on his program for roughly a week straight. Rajjpuut sent the following short e-mail to O’Reilly with the extensive follow-up information also included. If this information was part of our nation’s shared knowledge bank the financial meltdown would never have happened; Barack Obama would not be in the Oval Office using the Constitution as toilet paper; and our National Debt and UNfunded entitlement liabilities would be already on the road to manageable resolution . . . .

 

 

Bill, progressive mouthpieces on the Factor make you look bad when arguing about the Financial Meltdown of 2008 and Obama’s economic policies.  Unlike Truth-Meister Glen Beck, you seem afraid to deal with the underlying causes:  A) CRA ’77 and its five expansions took us from 0.24% suspect loans in 1977 to 34.2% in 2007 and B) the Broken Window Fallacy which virtually every liberal-progressive initiative displays.

NAME

Longmont, Colorado

                           More detail for you to research:

Broken Window Fallacy: 

http://fee.org/library/books/economics-in-one-lesson/#0.1_L3

The ACORN-Progressive-Clinton-Obama Conspiracy:

http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/09/barack_obama_and_the_strategy.html

1.      CRA ’77 the Community Reinvestment Act of  1977 from Carter and progressives in both chambers of Congress.  64% of Americans owned their own homes then . . . so the F-M system was very healthy and the envy of the world.  Free Market mortgages were no longer allowed.  Bad home loans MUST now be made to unqualified applicants by LAW.  Suspect loans allow 3% down payment or less.

2.      ACORN was created in 1977 virtually simultaneously (as the Arkansas Community Organizations for Reform Now by Cloward-Piven and Wiley Lieutenant Wade Rathke) with the creation of CRA ’77.

3.      After doubling the nation’s welfare rolls in seven years, (1968-75) with their National Welfare Rights Organization (NWRO), C-P and Wiley bragged publicly and in print about bankrupting NYC and nearly bankrupting NY State and many other states and large cities.  They charged their NWRO followers with using Saul Alinsky tactics in voter registration and housing.  Rathke from the NWRO was sent to Arkansas to get L-G Bill Clinton (he and his wife were Alinsky enthusiasts) elected and to test out the ACORN concept.  Clinton was elected governor for 12 of the next 14 years in Arkansas and by 1985 national suspect loans had doubled to 0.51% just from ACORN in one small test-state.  ACORN went national and become the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now.

4.      First of the five major expansions of CRA ’77 was under G. H. W. Bush who sustained 45 out of 46 vetoes.  Bush loved the bill given him by Congress in 1992 but hated one “tiny” rider segment of it that expanded CRA ’77 into Freddy Mac and Fannie Mae.  Instead of vetoing it and asking for a  cleaner bill, he signed it.

5.      One of Bill Clinton’s first acts resulted in a signing ceremony for the infamous Motor Voter Act (called a 12-lane highway for voter fraud) with Cloward and Piven standing directly behind him in the official portrait:  an ACORN payoff.

http://therealrevo.com/blog/?p=31698

6.       Clinton’s next ACORN payoff was four separate expansions of CRA ’77.

7.      Between 1993 when he first took office and 1995, Clinton presided over a huge expansion of CRA law by executive regulatory fiat.

8.      In 1995 he and his progressive Dems outdueled the Republican majority and got two legislative expansions of CRA ’77 passed.

9.      In 1998, despite his Monica scandal, Clinton passed a steroid-version of CRA expansion.

10. In high contrast, “W” as the governor of Texas passed a 1998 law requiring a minimal down payment of 20% on all mortgage loans.  Texas would become the state least impacted by the financial collapse.  Rick Perry would follow up “W’s” work by passing tort reform making Texas the most business-friendly state in the nation and the friendliest for the health care industry as well.

11. Barack Obama was an ACORN lawyer for two years browbeating and shaking down mortgage lenders around Chicago to comply (to their detriment) with CRA ’77 law and to give donations to ACORN.

12. After the ’98 steroid-version expansion of CRA law by Clinton, it was easier for ACORN to put a very poor (risk) loan applicant into a $440,000 home than it had been to put a better applicant into a $110,000 home a decade earlier.  Many of these ACORN-prodded loans were granted at 0% down payment.

13. By 2005, folks without jobs; without credit; with only food stamps to declare as “income;” and even illegal aliens were being put into expensive homes.

14. The problem of sub-prime lending and a housing bubble was first noticed by Jim Stack of investech.com  in late November, 2003.  He ran a chart of the Housing Industry Bubble on the website’s homepagefor the next 4.5 years as the 1,400% rise in these stocks was part of a bubble brought on by CRA laws that he said threatened the entire American economy.

15. Roughly thirteen months later in January, 2005, “W” made a speech about the sub-prime lending dangers and his administration sought to repeal much of CRA legislation.  They were defeated by progressive Republicans and Democrats.

16. Bush would make eighteen more speeches and attempted often to get the CRA laws repealed.  He was foiled for thirty months.

17. In July, 2007 a heavily watered down version of Bush’s January, 2005 bill was passed by a bi-partisan Congress.  It would prove way too little; way too late to do much about the coming fiscal collapse . . . but it helped a lot.  In August, 2010, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner praised Bush’s law and said that it prevented a complete collapse of the nation’s economy by heading off a severe crash in home prices.  This is practically the only positive comment on Bush’s handling of the economy ever breathed by the Obama administration.

18. On no less than 58 occasions (probably more) President Obama has referred to the “mess” caused by his predecessor and the economic hole he inherited -- while using an economic metaphor about a “car driven into the ditch” while referring to Wall Street, conservatives, the Bush administration, and most blatantly false:  the free market system.  The facts are that Wall Street is perhaps 10% guilty; Obama is perhaps 300% guilty; ACORN and Bill Clinton about 10,000% each; and Cloward-Piven, Wiley, Rathke and Progressive politicians are equally 500,000% guilty and Bush, conservatives, and the free market are blameless.

Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,

Rajjpuut

Read more…

Fast and furious

Obama's operation on our southern border to move large quantities of assault weapons to the Mexican drug cartel should be his Watergate. You see, he thought that quietly slipping hundreds of guns into Mexico would result in an escalation of violence and he could say, " because of our lax gun laws, murders and associated violence is now happening out of control along our borders and this is proof that we should ban guns." A stupid plan but there is no doubt that at the very least that his Attorney General knew of the operation and no doubt, if Holder knew, Obama did too. What they didn't plan on was one of the people involved to blow the whistle and once the cat was out of the bag, there was no covering it up. The shame of the whole thing is that one of our border agents was murdered with one of these guns. Now this changes everything. Now the operation resulted in a murder. Now those who were behind the program are accomplices to murder and should be tried and sent to jail. When a bartender puts a drink in the hand of a customer who should have been shut off and that customer drives drunk and kills someone, the bartender now faces charges. Same thing! Congressman Issa is having hearings on this and he is digging to find out the truth. If Bush did this, the Democrats would be screaming for impeachment. Lets push Issa to keep the pressure on so we can get some justice for, at least our dead border guard. Oh by the way, the justice department is blocking the family of the border guard from having the incident declared a crime which would entitle them to seek damages.
Read more…
Read this first before you see who got the money, if you can!!!!  Especially about the "Foreign Borrowers"!!!

21,000 Transactions

Any new rescues by the U.S. central bank would be governed by transparency laws adopted in 2010 that require the Fed to disclose borrowers after two years.

Fed officials argued for more than two years that releasing the identities of borrowers and the terms of their loans would stigmatize banks, damaging stock prices or leading to depositor runs. A group of the biggest commercial banks last year asked the U.S. Supreme Court to keep at least some Fed borrowings secret. In March, the high court declined to hear that appeal, and the central bank made an unprecedented release of records.

Data gleaned from 29,346 pages of documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act and from other Fed databases of more than 21,000 transactions make clear for the first time how deeply the world’s largest banks depended on the U.S. central bank to stave off cash shortfalls. Even as the firms asserted in news releases or earnings calls that they had ample cash, they drew Fed funding in secret, avoiding the stigma of weakness.

Read more…

VICIOUS POLITICS

ALL THIS UNDOCUMENTED CRITISCM OF POLITICAL CANDIDATES AND SARAH PALIN SHOW THE CRITICS TO BE IGNORANT OF ANY ACCURATE OR RELATIVE INFORMATION ON THE ISSUES OUR NATION FACES.  HELL! NO HUMAN IS PERFECT, ALL OF US HAVE MADE SOME MISTAKES AND BAD CHOICES IN OUR LIFETIMES.  THE CRITERIA SHOULD BE DID WE LEARN ANYTHING FROM IT TO USE TO MAKE US A BETTER PERSON OR DID WE BLAME SOMEBODY ELSE.  LESSONS LEARNED ARE A VALUABLE TOOL FOR OUR PERSONAL EVALUTION.  I KNOW I MADE SOME BAD CHOICES AND DECISIONS IN MY LIFE BUT I BELIEVE THAT BY ACKNOWLEDGING THEM AND USING THE LESSONS LEARNED IN A POSITIVE WAY HAS MADE ME A BETTER PERSON.

 

PAGE 1 IN MY BOOK OF POEMS IS ENTITLED "GODS CREATION"

 

I AM THAT WHICH I WAS CREATED TO BE

MY SOUL IS TRANSPARENT FOR GOD TO SEE

JESUE HAS TAUGHT ME TO REJECT HATRED

A LESSON THAT HAS MADE ME ELATED

JESUS HAS TAUGHT ME TO REJECT JEALOUSY

I AM THAT WHICH I WAS CREATED TO BE

I HAVE LEARNED TO CONTROL ANGER

AND HOW TO BEFRIEND A STRANGER

I NO LONGER EXPERIENCE ENVY

I AM WHAT I AM MEANT TO BE

GOD FILLS MY HEART WITH LOVE EVERY DAY

TO BE SHARED WITH ALL I MEET AT WORK OR PLAY

I HAVE LERNED TO OFFER COMPASSION WHEN NEEDED

MY FELLOW MANS HAPPINESS IS NOT TO BE IMPEDED

I HAVE LEARNED HOW TO BE A FRIEND

THESE EFFORTS WILL NEVER OFFEND

MYH LIFES EXPERIENCES HAVE MOLDED ME

I AM THAT WHICH I WAS CREATED TO BE

 

                                   COPYRIGHT 2006

                                    AUTHORHOUSE

JESUS SAID "LET HE WHO IS WITHOUT SIN CAST THE FIRST STONE"

 

WE SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO MAKE OUR OWN DECISION DEPENDING ON THE COMPLETENESS OF FACTS THAT WE GATHER. MANY TIMES THERE ARE NOT ENOUGH DOCUMENTED OR RELIABLE FACTS PRESENTED TO US, EITHER PRO OR CON TO MAKE AN INFORMED OPINION AND WHEN THAT IS THE CASE, WE MUST BE HONEST ENOUGH TO

ADMIT IT.

 

Read more…
Bankruptcy   101...why Arizona did the  right thing!!

It's  easy to dismiss individual programs  that
 benefit  non-citizens until they're put  together and  this picture emerges. Someone did a  lot of  research to put together all of this  data. Often  these programs are buried within  other programs  making them difficult to find. 


A Real Eye  Opener
 
WHY is the USA    BANKRUPT?

Informative,
 and  mindboggling! 


You think the war in Iraq was  costing
 us  too much?  Read this:

We have been hammered with  the
 propaganda  that it was the Iraq war  and the  war on terror that is bankrupting  us.


I now find that to be  RIDICULOUS.


I hope the  following 
14  reasons are forwarded  over and over again  until they  are read so many times that  the reader  gets sick of reading them. I  also have  included the URL's for  verification of  all the following   facts...


1.
 
$11 Billion to $22 billion is spent on  welfare
 to  illegal aliens each year by state  governments.

Verify 
at:  
http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer?pagename=iic_immigrationissuecenters7fd8 <http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer?pagename=iic_immigrationissuecenters7fd8>   <http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer?pagename=iic_immigrationissuecenters7fd8 <http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer?pagename=iic_immigrationissuecenters7fd8> >  


2.
 
$22 Billion dollars a year is spent on  food
 assistance  programs such as food  stamps, WIC,  and free school lunches for illegal  aliens.

Verify 
at:  
http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.HTML<http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.HTML>   <http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.HTML<http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.HTML> >  


3.
$2.5 Billion dollars a year is spent  on Medicaid  for illegal aliens. 

Verify at:  
http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.HTML<http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.HTML>   <http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.HTML> <http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.HTML>   


4..
 
$12 Billion dollars a year is spent  on
 primary  and secondary school  education for  children here illegally and  they cannot  speak a word of  English!

Verify 
at:  
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt..0.HTML<http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt...0.HTML>   <http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt....0..HTML<http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt..0.HTML> >  


5.
$17 Billion dollars a year is spent  for education  for the  American-born children  of illegal aliens, known  as anchor  babies.

Verify
at  
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML<http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML>   <http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt...01.HTML<http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML> >  


6.
 
$3 Million Dollars a DAY is spent  to
 incarcerate  illegal aliens. 

Verify at:   
http://transcripts.cnn.com/%20TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML<http://transcripts.cnn.com/%20TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML>   <http://transcripts.cnn.com/%20TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML<http://transcripts.cnn.com/%20TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML> >  
http://transcripts.cnn.com/%20TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML<http://transcripts.cnn.com/%20TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01HTML>   <http://transcripts.cnn.com/%20TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML> <http://transcripts.cnn.com/%20TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML><http://transcripts.cnn.com/%20TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML<http://transcripts.cnn.com/%20TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML>   <http://transcripts.cnn.com/%20TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML<http://transcripts.cnn.com/%20TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML> > 




7. 
30% percent of all Federal  Prisoninmates  are illegal aliens.


Verify at:
http://transcripts.CNN..com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML<http://transcriptscnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML>   <http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML> <http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML>    <http://transcripts/<http://transcripts/>   <http://transcripts/ <http://transcripts/> >  .."  href="" > 
 
American  wages are caused by the illegal
aliens.


Verify
at:  
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRI < <http://transcripts.cnn..com/TRANSC> http://www.nationalpolicyinstitute/<http://www..nationalpolicyinstitute/> ...org/PDF/deportationPDF>  



13.
 
In 2006, illegal aliens sent  home
$45  BILLION in remittances to their

 

14.
 
The  Dark Side  of Illegal Immigration:
Nearly  One million sex crimes committed
by  Illegal Immigrants In The United States    .

Verify 
at:
http:  // www.drdsk.com/articleshtml <http://www.drdsk.com/articleshtml> <http://www.drdsk.com/articleshtml <http://www.drdsk.com/articleshtml> >; 
" href=" "; ; "  href=20w.drdsk.com/articleshtml <http://20w.drdsk.com/articleshtml> <http://20w.drdsk.com/articleshtml<http://20w.drdsk.com/articleshtml> >;
"  href=""; 

The total  cost is a whopping
 " href=;  
$ 338.3 BILLION DOLLARS
A  YEAR AND IF YOU'RE LIKE ME,
HAVING  TROUBLE UNDERSTANDING
THIS  AMOUNT OF MONEY; IT IS
$338,300,000,000.00  WHICH
WOULD  BE ENOUGH TO STIMULATE
THE  ECONOMY FOR THE CITIZENS OF
THIS  COUNTRY.

Are   we THAT Stupid? 
YES, FOR LETTING THOSE
IN  THE U.S.    CONGRESS
GET  AWAY WITH LETTING
THIS  HAPPEN YEAR AFTER
YEAR!!!!! 


If this doesn't bother you, then  just
delete  the message.  If, on the other
hand,  it does raise the hair on the back
of  your neck, I hope you forward it to  every
legal  resident in the United  States    ..
Read more…

If we Fail to Remember History, we will Repeat it!!!

 

David Kaiser is a  respected historian whose published works have covered a broad range of  topics, from European Warfare to American League Baseball. Born in 1947,  the son of a diplomat, Kaiser spent his childhood in three capital cities:  Washington D.C. , Albany , New York , and Dakar, Senegal . He attended Harvard University ,  graduating there in 1969 with a B.A. In history. He then spent several  years more at Harvard, gaining a PhD in history, which he obtained in  1976.. He served in the Army Reserve from 1970 to  1976.

He is a prof
 essor  in the Strategy and Policy Department of the United States Naval War  College . He has previously taught at Carnegie Mviewmail.exe?id=011809c71c4fa9275987ce27cbbfdb472733&threadid=H193752229222960&download=2&width=180ellon, Williams College  and Harvard University . Kaiser's latest book, The Road to  Dallas, about the Kennedy assassination, was just published by Harvard  University Press.


 
Dr. David  Kaiser


History  Unfolding

I am a student of  history. Professionally, I have written 15 books on history that have been  published in six languages, and I have studied history all my life. I have  come to think there is something monumentally large afoot, and I do not  believe it is simply a banking crisis, or a mortgage crisis, or a credit  crisis. Yes these exist, but they are merely single facets on a very large  gemstone that is only now coming into a sharper  focus..


Something of  historic proportions is happening. I can sense it because I know how it  feels, smells, what it looks like, and how people react to it. Yes, a  perfect storm may be brewing, but there is something happening within our  country that has been evolving for about ten to fifteen years. The pace  has dramatically quickened in the past two.


We demand and  then codify into law the requirement that our banks make massive loans to  people we know they can never pay back? Why?


We learned just  days ago that the Federal Reserve, which has little or no real oversight  by anyone, has "loaned" two trillion dollars (that is $2,000,000,000,000)  over the past few months, but will not tell us to whom or why or disclose  the terms. That is our money. Yours and mine. And that is  three times the $700 billion we all argued about so strenuously just this  past September. Who has this money? Why do they have it? Why are the terms  unavailable to us? Who asked for it? Who authorized it? I thought this was  a government of "we the people," who loaned our powers to our elected  leaders. Apparently not.


We have spent two  or more decades intentionally de-industrializing our economy...  Why?


We have  intentionally dumbed down our schools, ignored our history, and no longer  teach our founding documents, why we are exceptional, and why we are worth  preserving. Students by and large cannot write, think critically, read, or  articulate. Parents are not revolting, teachers are not picketing,  school boards continue to back mediocrity.  Why?


We have now  established the precedent of protesting every close election (violently in  California over a proposition that is so controversial that it simply  wants marriage to remain defined as between one man and one woman. Did you  ever think such a thing possible just a decade ago?) We have corrupted our  sacred political process by allowing unelected judges to write laws that  radically change our way of life, and then mainstream Marxist groups like  ACORN and others to turn our voting system into a banana republic.  To what purpose?


Now our mortgage  industry is collapsing, housing prices are in free fall, major industries  are failing, our banking system is on the verge of collapse,  social security is nearly bankrupt, as is Medicare and our  entire government. Our education system is worse than a joke (I teach  college and I know precisely what I am talking about) - the list is  staggering in its length, breadth, and depth.. It is  potentially 1929 x ten...And we are at war with an enemy we cannot even  name for fear of offending people of the same religion, who, in turn,  cannot wait to slit the throats of your children if they have the  opportunity to do so.


And finally, we  have elected a man that no one really knows anything about, who has never  run so much as a Dairy Queen, let alone a town as big as  Wasilla , Alaska .. All of his associations and  alliances are with real radicals in their chosen fields of employment, and  everything we learn about him, drip by drip, is unsettling if not  downright scary (Surely you have heard him speak about his idea to create  and fund a mandatory civilian defense force stronger than our military for  use inside our borders? No? Oh, of course. The media would never play that  for you over and over and then demand he answer it. Sarah Palin's pregnant  daughter and $150,000 wardrobe are more important.)


Mr. Obama's  winning platform can be boiled down to one word: Change.  Why?


I have never been  so afraid for my country and for my children as I am  now.


This man  campaigned on bringing people together, something he has never, ever done  in his professional life. In my assessment, Obama will divide us along  philosophical lines, push us apart, and then try to realign the pieces  into a new and different power structure. Change is indeed coming. And  when it comes, you will never see the same nation  again.


And that is only  the beginning..


As a serious  student of history, I thought I would never come to experience what the  ordinary, moral German must have felt in the mid-1930s In  those times, the "savior" was a former smooth-talking rabble-rouser from  the streets, about whom the average German knew next to nothing. What they  should have known was that he was associated with groups that shouted,  shoved, and pushed around people with whom they disagreed; he edged his  way onto the political stage through great oratory. Conservative "losers"  read it right now.


And there were  the promises. Economic times were tough, people were losing jobs, and he  was a great speaker. And he smiled and frowned and waved a lot. And  people, even newspapers, were afraid to speak out for fear that his "brown  shirts" would bully and beat them into submission. Which they did -  regularly. And then, he was duly elected to office, while a  full-throttled economic crisis bloomed at hand - the Great Depression.  Slowly, but surely he seized the controls of government power, person by  person, department by department, bureaucracy by bureaucracy. The children  of German citizens were at first, encouraged to join a Youth Movement in  his name where they were taught exactly what to think. Later, they were  required to do so. No Jews of course,


How did he get  people on his side? He did it by promising jobs to the jobless, money to  the money-less, and rewards for the military-industrial complex. He did it  by indoctrinating the children, advocating gun control, health care for  all, better wages, better jobs, and promising to re-instill pride once  again in the country, across Europe , and across  the world. He did it with a compliant media - did you know that? And he  did this all in the name of justice and .... . ...  change. And the people surely got what they voted  for.


If you think I am  exaggerating, look it up. It's all there in the history  books.


So read your  history books. Many people of conscience objected in 1933 and were shouted  down, called names, laughed at, and ridiculed. When Winston Churchill  pointed out the obvious in the late 1930s while seated in the House of  Lords in England (he was not yet Prime Minister), he was booed into his  seat and called a crazy troublemaker. He was right, though. And the world  came to regret that he was not listened to.


Do not forget  that Germany was the most educated, the most cultured country in  Europe . It was full of music, art, museums,  hospitals, laboratories, and universities. And yet, in less than six years  (a shorter time span than just two terms of the U. S. presidency) it was  rounding up its own citizens, killing others, abrogating its laws, turning  children against parents, and neighbors against neighbors..  All with the best of intentions, of course.. The road to Hell  is paved with them.


As a practical  thinker, one not overly prone to emotional decisions, I have a choice: I  can either believe what the objective pieces of evidence tell me (even if  they make me cringe with disgust); I can believe what history is shouting  to me from across the chasm of seven decades; or I can hope I am wrong by  closing my eyes, having another latte, and ignoring what is transpiring  around me..


I choose to  believe the evidence. No doubt some people will scoff at me,  others laugh, or think I am foolish, naive, or both. To some degree,  perhaps I am. But I have never been afraid to look people in the eye and  tell them exactly what I believe-and why I believe  it.


I pray I am  wrong. I do not think I am. Perhaps the only hope is our vote in the next  elections.


David Kaiser  
Jamestown  , Rhode  Island
United States  

By passing this  along, perhaps it will help to begin the awakening of America as to where  we are headed.

Read more…

Dear Colleague:

We urge you to join us in adding your name to the statement in support of theAmerican Laws for American Courts Act, which has been enacted in three states and has been introduced in over twenty other state legislatures.   TheAmerican Laws for American Courts Act protects all American citizens and residents in state legal cases when the application of a foreign law would violate constitutional liberties.

The American Laws for American Courts Act is constitutional and “facially neutral.”  It does not mention any specific religion, creed or legal doctrine, and in the two years since its introduction into state legislatures, it has never been challenged in court.

The Act‘s sole objective is to protect all U.S. citizens and residents from the application of foreign laws when the application of a foreign law will result in the violation, in the specific matter at issue, of a liberty guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States or the public policies of the state in question.  Such violations would include but not be limited to infringements on due process, freedom of religion, speech, or press, equal protection, and any right of privacy or marriage as specifically defined by the constitution of the state.

Reviews of state laws provide extensive evidence that foreign laws and legal doctrines are introduced into US state court cases, including, notably, Islamic law known as Shariah, which is used in family courts and other courts in dozens of foreign Muslim-majority nations .

These foreign laws, frequently at odds with U.S. constitutional principles of equal protection and due process, typically enter the American court system through:

  • Comity (mutual respect of each country’s legal system)
  • Choice of law issues and
  • Choice of forum or venue

Granting comity to a foreign judgment is a matter of state law, and most state and federal courts will grant comity unless the recognition of the foreign judgment wouldviolate some important public policy of the state. This doctrine, the “Void as against Public Policy Rule,” has a long and pedigreed history.

Unfortunately, because state legislatures have generally not been explicit about what their public policy is relative to foreign laws, including as an example, Shariah, the courts and the parties litigating in those courts are left to their own devices – first to know what Shariah is, and second, to understand that granting comity to a Shariah judgment may be at odds with  our state and federal constitutional principles in the specific matters at issue.

The American Laws for American Courts Act is carefully limited in scope, recognizing the need to balance the protection of individual liberties with other legal principles:

  • The American Laws For American Courts Act does not apply to a business that contracts to subject itself to foreign law in a jurisdiction other than the state or the United States.
  • The American Laws for American Courts Act is carefully defined so as not to interfere with the right of any individual or entity to the free exercise of religion as guaranteed by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and by the constitution of this state.  For example, it would not affect the decisions of Jewish, Christian, Muslim or other ecclesiastical courts, or their enforcement, as long as those decisions did not result in the violation of a right guaranteed by the state constitution or the Constitution of the United States.
  • The American Laws for American Courts Act would not conflict with any federal treaty or other international agreement to which the United States is a party.

The goal of the American Laws for American Courts Act is a clear and unequivocal application of what should be the goal of all state courts: No U.S. citizen or resident should be denied the liberties, rights, and privileges guaranteed in our constitutional republic.  American Laws for American Courts is needed especially to protect women and children, identified by international human rights organizations as the primary victims of discriminatory foreign laws.

Please join our fellow Americans from across the country in signing this statement of support for American Laws for American Courts, the 21st Century civil rights initiative to ensure constitutional liberties for all Americans.

Please share this letter with leaders in your  community
and your colleagues across America.

 

Read more…

Some of us were in the boyscouts and helped a little old lady across the street.

 

Most everyone I know did at least 1 good deed.

 

Obama never did a good deed for anyone in his entire life unless there was a buck in it for him.

 

He never had a real job.  Just went to college on the back of affirmative action and complained about the injustice of the theoretical white man who controls the world.

 

This got him into the white house.  Now that this lifetime complainer got into the white house nobody is supposed to complain about the ultimate complainer.

 

The epitome of thanklessness.   At least Carter and other failures paid their dues somewhere along the way.  B.O. never paid any dues.   He just walked right into the white house with never helping a little old lady across the street.   He probably charged his grandma to bring home a christmas tree.

Read more…

Barry Obama is one ungreatful bastard

His Grandmother raised him in an expensive area.  Sent him to private Schools  She also got him into the best colleges.

 

What does he do for them in return?   Not a dam thing.  Throws her under the bus.

 

He writes a book on what a great his Father was who dumped him on the curb and said he would put him up for adoption.

 

Wrote nothing of thanks to his white grandparents who made him the man he is today.

 

ultimate lowlife.

Read more…
> 1. In my many years I have come to a conclusion
that one useless man is a shame,
two is a law firm and three or more is a congress

> ---john adams

> 2. If you don't read the newspaper you are uninformed; if you do read the
> newspaper you are misinformed
>
> --mark twain
>
> 3. Suppose you were an idiot.
> And suppose you were a member of Congress.
> But then I repeat myself.
>
> --mark twain
>
> 4. I contend that for a nation to try to tax itself into prosperity is 
> like
> a man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle.
>
> --winston churchill
>
> 5. A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the
> support of Paul.
>
> --george bernard shaw
>
> 7. Democracy must be something more than two wolves and a sheep voting on
> what to have for dinner.
>
> --james bovard, civil libertarian (1994)
>
8. Foreign aid might be defined as a transfer of money from poor people in
> rich countries to rich people in poor countries.
>
> --douglas casey, classmate of bill clinton at georgetown university
>
> 11. Goverment's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short
> phrases: If it moves, tax it.  If it keeps moving, regulate it.  And if 
> it
> stops moving, subsidize it.
>
> --ronald reagan (1986)
>
> 13. If you think health care is expensive now, wait until you see what it
> costs when it's free!!!
>
> --p.j. o'rourke
>
> 16. No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is 
> in
> session.
>
> --mark twain (1866)
Read more…

Author of the book "Where's the Birth Certificate?" Jerome Corsi gave a presentation to Surprise, Arizona Tea Party members regarding Obama's ineligibility, suppressing of birth records, passport records, school records, law practice records, senatorial records, Social Security fraud, Dreams from My Father lies, and, most importantly, proof that the Obama long-form birth certificate is a forgery. There was then a call to sign a petition to have Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio open an investigation into whether Obama's long-form birth certificate was forged. The basis for the call of an investigation is that when Obama's name is placed on the presidential  ballot in 2012, if the basis for the placing of his name on the ballot is a forged document, then this constitutes election fraud within the jurisdiction of Maricopa County, giving Arpaio authority to investigate it. See the link below to watch Corsi's presentation:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=goZJDw5vCNM

Read more…