All Posts (28358)

Sort by

Had Enough?

Why the decline in the quality of life? Why the dependence on government? Why the increase in violent crime? Why the high divorce rate? Why the decline in educational standards? Why the poor economy? Why jihad?

 

In 1974—on my own—I went to the county law library to study the Constitution and Bill of Rights, not for the sake of knowing, but with a plan to use the law to protect my inalienable right to exist on the fruits of my labor.

 

The “authorities” had informed me that the 16th Amendment to the Constitution (the income tax amendment) gave Congress the authority to tax my income up to 100 percent.  I bet you didn’t know that.  The reason you don’t, I venture to say, is because you have not demanded your right to exist on the fruits of your labor.

 

The question came up because in 1973 my business enterprise lost money. I was forced to sell some of my homestead for living costs.  Double digit inflation had caused the dollar  to be worth half as much. I sold the land for double what I paid for it and broke even.  The law said I made a capital gain that was taxable.  I said no to that, pointing out that the government entitled got cost of living increases.  I was entitled to the same consideration. The United States said no, I was not entitled to the same consideration.   What does that make government entitlement?

 

A Tax Court judge called me into his chambers and asked me why I felt that I didn’t owe any tax when everybody else had to pay their tax. I explained. The judge said he was going to rule against me.  In fact, the law said he had to rule against me.  But he ruled against the IRS on its erroneous tax assessment, it's deliberate mistake, the purpose of which was to tell me you don't mess with the IRS.  

 

After the case was closed, the IRS reinstated its erroneous assessment and confiscated my property to pay an assessment that the tax court had ruled against. It was an obstruction of justice.  The Court of Appeals ruled for the IRS. The Supreme Court refused to hear the case.  

 

I filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the money the IRS lawlessly took from me.  The Department of Justice said the assessment was wrongful. My property was refunded. Then the IRS then went to my bank and took every cent in my checking account.  For the good of all, Congress allows the IRS to make limitless mistakes.  I bet you didn't know that.  Thanks to a complicit press, I was out of sight, out of mind.

 

A miracle: The Palm Beach Post investigated. The IRS admitted that for 11 years it had been mistaken.  A front page story detailed what had happened.  It didn’t change a thing.  if the story did anything, it scared taxpayers. They knew what would happen if they dared to challenge their tax. For the good of all, we have the problems I named in my first paragraph. 

 

My case makes the statement that no American has an inalienable right to exist on the fruits of his own labor.  Does this not answer the questions I raised in my first paragraph?   

The uprising in Egypt is going to be repeated in America.  The question is what comes next?  Those same politicians who robbed you of your sacred rights envision themselves in total control of your lives.  How do you stop them?  

If my present life could be any better, I don’t know how.  What brought about my good fortune?  Was it the luck of the draw?  Which is bigger, my inalienable rights or politicians doing what is best for all?  I’ve been telling you for several months how I won.  You don’t believe me.  

 

 

 

Read more…
4063279151?profile=original

 The outcome of this revolution is unpredictable because the authorities now licking their chops don’t look beneath the surface, nary a one of em!  Those self-servers now grabbing center stage begin with their desirable end, the Islamic Brotherhood, with its Sharia law taking the world back to sixth century Arabia, the progressives and their collective good—that which Obama calls collective salvation, taking the world to La La Land.  Both the Brotherhood and the progressives have a common goal: control.   They will argue the details later. The important thing now is control. Obama can be read like an open book.  Now that the Egyptians, at great sacrifice, have opened the door, there is an evil glint in Obama’s eye. If Obama has his way, the Egyptian people could wind up worse off than they were, not to mention the Jewish people.

 

The above mentioned self-serving predators’ ideas of control have never worked because the powerful don’t understand the fundamental nature of man; that we don’t have the mentality of herd animals.  All they do is muddy the water. It really gets to me that the world’s control freaks begin with their desirable end, and force all the pieces to fit.  It’s called the end justifies the means. For the good of all, the individual is trained to jump through their hoops, this idea hatched in higher schools of learning like Harvard.  What do Harvard people know? Bill O’Reilly, a Harvard man, who says he is looking out for you, after listening to this bombastic buffoon, I conclude that O’Reilly is looking out for O’Reilly. After interviewing Harvard’s Obama on Super Bowl Sunday, O’Reilly pinned roses on himself for days.  I don’t know why. The interview was two babbling egomaniacs, the ill-conceived products of Harvard.  

 

My vastly superior education came in the school of hard knocks. After ten years of mind-search and making written notes, now putting it all together, I see beneath the surface.  I’ve observed signs along the way. The first sign resulted from my study of the U. S. Constitution in 1973—on my own—my bigger than life calling—and taking legal action against the IRS.  Mine is the Constitution Obama has repeatedly said he wants to change.  I felt that voices from the past were guiding me—inner power I’d never before experienced.  I won.  The Wizard of Oz ate crow on the front page of The Palm Beach Post.  What does that tell you about Obama?  He’s now transparent, an out and out hypocrite.  Obama told O’Reilly that people who hate him don’t know him. I know the four flusher. He is bad news for Americans and Egyptians.  I don’t hate him, but as one created equal to Obama—endowed by my Creator with certain unalienable rights, Obama’s power from the seat of his pants, whatever he is he, I don’t give a damn, he doesn’t belong here.  Send him back to Kenya.

 

The second sign was my cutting from the herd. I departed my old life on Good Friday, said to be the day Christ was crucified. Jesus was nailed to a cross for telling his people that their authority had profaned the Sabbath.  But just like authority to tell you that you are born in sin and must confess your sins in order to be forgiven, and leave some money with authority for this fine service.  Are we daft?

 

This maverick arrived in Miami, Florida on Easter Sunday for the first day of my new life, with the idea of telling the world that authority had profaned my God-given rights.  We don’t realize, dumbed down as we are,  that “we have only fear itself to fear,”  that under God’s law, we, individually, are in control of our lives.  Why have we ignored what the Founding Fathers left for us, law that says we are to be self-governed. Why have we opted for a hothouse environment, with Washington twisting valves and pulling levers?  Look what the self-serving stumblebums  have done to our freedoms.

 

The third sign was in the seven lives I miraculously saved from a watery grave, my own included, during my two years at sea.  The message: I am my brother’s keeper.

 

The fourth sign was in meeting my fourth wife. With three failures in marriage, why on earth would I want a fourth? Frankly, it was the last thing I wanted.  But from the moment I met Karen, I felt I was meeting an old friend I’d not seen for a long time.  After thirty years of married bliss, she remains the best friend a man ever had.  I have a fiend in Jesus. Karen was heaven sent.   

 

The fifth sign is in having all my dreams come true.   The message: We are meant to be self-governed.  The Constitution says it. Higher Law says it.  My new life did not begin by following the dictates of authority.  Did authority achieve its end. No. I achieved my end.  I threw down the gauntlet.  The Egyptians did the same. They have now won the first round. Will the Egyptians get the message or will authority win the battle?  Hopefully, they will be aware of the facts I’ve given you. If you know an Egyptian send him this blog.

 

My new life began by studying and knowing the one and only Higher Law. More lately, by studying the first book in The New Testament, The Gospel According to St. Matthew, I’ve found that one does not have to be a Christian to know what Jesus taught.  I’m not. If my good life has anything to say, Muslims, rather than adhere to Sharia law, would do well to know the message Jesus left them.

 

Jesus said, “in earth as it is in heaven,” followed by “But first seek ye the kingdom of God,” implying that God’s kingdom, rather than in earth or in heaven is in one’s own heart and mind.  Therefore, forgo ye, my Egyptian friends, the Islamic Brotherhood and Sharia law. Accept Jesus as spirit, the son of man within us, our individual power, and never ever Sharia law, but “whatsoever ye would that men should do to you do even so to them, for this is the law and the prophets.” It is Golden Rule of mankind, the only way to peace.  I’m non-religious, but not anti-religious.   My father was Christian, my mother Jewish, but she used to listen to Christian evangelist Orville Roberts on the radio every day.  Be Muslims—believing in Jesus.  Like me, your dreams will come true.

 

Ancient Egyptian priests were very much aware of “in earth as it is in heaven.” The Egyptian god Osiris is known as the “Lord of Love.”  Osiris brought rebirth. I’ve come from a past life.  “In earth as it is in heaven,” when I was born Saturn, the learning planet, was in its most favorable alignment with Pluto, the generational planet.  This means that I would have the ability to understand the laws by which subtle forces are organized.   In my chart, other planets lend themselves to this configuration, making this alignment, Saturn trine Pluto, one of the most profound anyone could have.  An astrologer told me that with Saturn trine Pluto I could have considerable willpower and inner strength, having endured many hardships in past lives. Quoting Astrologer’s Handbook, “They are able to work slowly and make fundamental and irrevocable changes in their own and others lives. Often there is a sense of destiny or a peculiar karmic mission which they must fulfill.” 

 

This brings me to quantum physicist Evan Harris Walker’s The Physics of Consciousness: The Quantum Mind and the Meaning of Life, my science bible.  Under “A God for Tomorrow,” writes Walker: “In the development of quantum theory, the observer emerges as a co-equal in the foundry of creation. . .The observer interacts with matter. Consciousness, the substance of this newfound reality that defines the observer, has fundamental existence. It is the quantum mind that is the basic reality,” as Jesus put it, connected with the kingdom of God.  In mind we exist in a state of consciousness,  as limited only by us.

 

In progressive government, the individual is stripped of his power for the good of all. In my Bible’s introduction, Reverand Scofield writes about the progressive order of the divine dealings of God with humanity, “the increasing purpose” which runs through and links together the ages. In As a Man Thinketh, James Allen: “As a being of Power, Intelligence and Love, and the lord of his own thoughts, man holds the key to every situation, and contains within himself that transforming and regenerative agency by which may make himself what he wills.”

 

In earth as it is in heaven, we are now moving away from the Age of Pisces, the symbol of which is two attached fish swimming in opposite directions. We are entering the Age of Aquarius, the symbol of which is the water-bearer.  The Age of Aquarius, as prophesized by Jesus, is an age of brotherhood and fraternity. 

In The Rising Sign, under “Aquarius Rising,” I’m Aquarius rising, Jeanne Avery writes: “He may be the person to bring back information that has been lost to civilization for centuries.”  “In Cosmos and Psyche,” from the back cover we read, “distinguished philosopher and cultural historian Richard Tarnas demonstrates the existence of an astonishingly  consistent correspondence between planetary alignments and the archetypal patterns of human history.”

 

I could go on for pages listing coincidences, but this ought to be enough to convince those of us with open minds that so-called authorities, especially those with Harvard educations,  are leading the world on a wild goose chase.  Hopefully, those brave Egyptians  wanting freedom will get the message and spare themselves the misery the world’s control freaks are attempting to push off on them.  

 

 

 

 

Read more…

WILL THE REAL NEWT GINGRICH PLEASE STAND UP?

Here we go again. Newt Gingrich? Too many choices for the Republican ticket, and too many old and worn out ones at that, with not enough declared new faces. RINO Romney, who endorsed Mary Bono Mack, who voted FOR Cap & Trade, or Huckabee, who is more concerned with "governing" than standing on principle, and pardons criminals who go back to a life of crime -- one killing four police officers. That being said, I'm old enough to remember the waffling of Newt Gingrich on core issues. Not as bad as The Chosen One, but bad enough.

WILL THE REAL NEWT GINGRICH PLEASE STAND UP?

Mr. Gingrich struts around like he's Thomas Jefferson....  http://bit.ly/fLNU1G

Read more…


 

 
 
 
 
Strange Bedfellows, Not So Strange After All 
 
 
 
                        On August 23, 1939, Nazi Germani and the Communist-controlled Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) concluded a Treaty of Non-Aggression between them just nine days before the Nazis launched World War II with its attack on Poland (a country situated immediately between the two great totalitarian states). Many in the United States were surprised, some even shocked by this turn of events. They, believing the lies they’d grown up with about the “Fascist Right” and the “Communist Left,” couldn’t understand how two such DISsimilar regimes could ever come to any agreement on anything.   Cases of “strange bedfellows” always catch someone unaware and what happened in 1939 and what’s going on in Egypt and the United States today definitely fit the bill . . . but they needn’t have.
            Compare the oldest instance first: the progressive or left wing “historians” in the United States have long put forth the distinction that Fascism is a “right-wing” ideology; and communism is a “left-wing” ideology.    Since everybody today is ignoring the fact that Communist leaders killed more than 122 million of their own citizens (its technically called “democide”) during the 20th Century, it’s convenient for American Progressives to have a bad example to point to on the right and they love to use the terms “Fascists” and “Nazis” for name-calling of conservatives. Only one problem:  Fascism began in Italy when labor unions got so powerful they took over the large corporations and then the large corporations took over the government under Benito Mussolini. Labor unions? Sounds like the left to me.  
The Nazi Party was the “National Socialist German Workers Party.” Socialists? Workers’ Party? That’s obviously from the left also, though perhaps not quite so far left as communism. Indeed, the Nazi literature proudly stated, “We are NOT communists and not capitalists. We are something different; something better.    So the non-aggression treaty between the Nazis and the Reds was very understandable: two great totalitarian leftist states, both looking to expand their borders agreed not to fight among themselves and to divvy up ultra-week Poland which still fought war on horseback. 
The progressives also like to lump despots like Egypt’s Mubarak, Panama’s Manuel Noriega, Uganda’s Idi Amin, and  Indonesia’s Sukarno into the so-called “right-wing dictator” category. The key item here is that these men all led totalitaraian states with their citizens allowed virtually no rights at all.   Those “right wing” American patriots such as the TEA Party who champion taking back our rights from a big-spending government are clearly not the same as any totalitarian dictators; and indeed all of this information has debunked the gross progressive lie that Fascists, Nazis, despots and dictators are different varieties of creatures all belonging to the right wing . . . in truth they’re all worthy of being lumped together in a different and leftist grouping known as “totalitarian leaders.” So much for leftist lies from the past . . . what about today? In Egypt? 
Prolific author Andrew C. McCarthy, famous for his 2010 masterpiece How Obama Embraces Islam’s Sharia Agenda, has outdone himself with his latest and perfectly-timed The Grand Jihad which is subtitled: How Islam and the Left Sabotage America.
 
 
                Much like the Non-Aggression pact between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Communists, any alliance between the left and Islam seems a strange marriage indeed. But once again proponents of atheistic totalitarian states where big government is looked upon as the prime agent of group salvation actually have an awful lot in common with Islamic fundamentalists. Both groups do advocate immense state-control over the individual; both carry a Utopian picture in their mind (from Marxism on the one hand; and from Allah on the other) and advocate the group salvation created by an over-arching state: both are anti-capitalist; both see the American way of life as a severe threat to the planet; and both of them are founded upon the belief that in public statement before the infidel, you can say whatever you like because the infidel is no good and doesn’t deserve the truth from you.  The fundamentalist Islamic theocracy founded by the Iranian Revolution in 1979 is the model to be feared, for example in Egypt where the infamous Muslim Brotherhood** is hoping to hold sway now that Mubarak is gone . . . and the differences between Iran's and the Soviet Union's totalitarianism are few indeed.
            One recent example of McCarthy’s premise is radical American leftist group Code Pink recently joining with Islamic terrorist group Hamas in proselytizing for Revolution; against Capitalism and Jews; and joint-financing a blockade running venture to Gaza last summer after which they condemned the Israelis for violence. Code Pink (Women for Peace) launched that so-called Gaza Flotilla with Hamas; and has been heavily involved with the Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamist jihadist organization during the rioting in Cairo. But this is just one small example of what McCarthy has uncovered in this eye-opening book . . . . highly recommended.
 
Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,
Rajjpuut
 
** The Looming Towers:  Al-Qaeda and the Road to 9/11 tells the story of the Muslim Brotherhood and its expansion into ever more and more violent activities culminating in the fall of the Twin Towers
 
 
Read more…

 

 

Americans Now Learning Real History,

Might NOT Have to Repeat Ill-Effects
 

A recent Rasmussen Reports Survey seems to show that Americans are starting to understand that the country was NOT rescued from the Great Depression by government spending and government policies (a.k.a. interference in the free markets), but rather that the government actually cost the nation millions of  jobs, intensified a normal recession with its increased spending, creating and lengthening the depression and eventually turning it into the “Great Depression.” The lesson, however, is not necessarily transferring into a greater understanding of today’s economics . . . .

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/business/general_business/february_2011/43_say_government_policy_mistakes_created_great_depression_of_1930s_26_disagree

 

According to the Rasmussen survey, 43% now say that government policy mistakes created the Great Depression of the ‘30s; while only 26% disagree and 31% say they are unsure. Americans, today however, are still greatly confused about the cause of the financial meltdown which, they think, began about October, 2007. More on that later . . . .

Despite the Rasmussen poll results, thanks to two and a half generations of revisionist history ,today far too many Americans still believe that Herbert Hoover was  a) a conservative rather than a progressive  b) that greedy Wall Street created the Great Depression c) that Hoover’s administration spent almost nothing fighting the economic problems d) that government spending can create jobs in the private sector e) that in 1932 Franklin Delano Roosevelt campaigned for president against Hoover’s “conservativism” f) that FDR did virtually everything entirely different than Hoover and g) that FDR saved the country from the Great Depression. Let’s quickly put those lies to rest before dealing with today’s situation, eh?

Since progressivism (we must ‘progress’ beyond the out-dated and seriously flawed U.S. Constitution if we are ever to make ‘progress’ toward an earthly socialist or even Marxist Utopia) first became a serious undercurrent in American Politics in the 1890’s only once in the following 120 years has a serious economic downturn been handled by pure conservative restraint . . . and no, Ronald Reagan was NOT president when that happened (Reagan actually increased government spending while cutting taxes extra-severely and created some whopping deficits in the process of also creating twenty million jobs). 

Teddy Roosevelt was our first progressive president. You’ll remember that his “Bull Moose Party” was actually a third party officially known as, wait for it:  the “Progressive Party.” Teddy certainly had done a lot of questionable and presumably out-and-out unconstitutional things earlier when he was a Republican president, luckily most of them worked out pretty well for the nation.  Perhaps a Progressive president once every century or so wouldn’t be a bad thing, but certainly no more often?

Our first ultra-progressive president, Woodrow Wilson, however, was another story. Besides giving us the Federal Reserve Banking system and the income tax (still called today: “progressive” income tax), Wilson was a great propagandist who ran for a second term under the slogan “He kept us out of War” but within a month after his March, 1916 inauguration he deliberately and unnecessarily thrust us into World War I. He was the first truly big-spending president the country had ever known . . . way, way beyond the costs of the war. When his term was winding down, we were in a serious recession much worse than the recession sparked by the 1929 collapse. When he left office in March, 1921 the country was in a full-fledged depression.Curiously, those events are generally overlooked by history. People in the know, however, speak of “The Invisible Depression” or of the “Not-so-Great Depression.” Why was the Invisible Depression so invisible we don’t even know about it today?

            Two things: 1) revisionist progressive historians have done everything possible to hide this quite remarkable set of events and keep us from comparing it to Franklin D. Roosevelt’s approach while creating an enormous myth of FDR as a savior and 2) these policies worked out as the launching pad for the World’s most expansive decade in free market history and gets lost in the shuffle while everyone writes books and novels and treatises about the “Roaring ‘20’s” instead. What actually happened was this:

            Warren G. Harding and his vice president, Calvin Coolidge took office in March, 1921 with a full-fledged economic contraction underway. The full story is available from the Cato Institute here:

http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=9880

but let’s sum it up briefly.  Unemployment stood 150% higher than it was a year earlier; and GDP was only 76% of 1920 levels. Harding immediately cut government spending 49%; taxes 48%; and reduced government debt 30%.   Unlike the business-bashing that Wilson, FDR, LBJ (Lyndon Johnson) and Obama are infamous for, the Harding administration did everything it could to get government out of business’ way.   In fifteen months the country was humming again and the Invisible Depression was over. When Harding died, VP, Calvin Coolidge continued the same policies saying “the business of America is business.” 

Where did Herbert Hoover come from? Hoover was a highly respected humanitarian with an engineering background that Harding installed as his Secretary of Commerce to appease certain Eastern Republican interests.  Under both Harding and Coolidge was very ineffective. Hoover promoted government intervention under the rubric "economic modernization" and tried to get Harding to dole out unemployment benefits to ease the pain of the high 1921 joblessness. Through the next eight years both presidents Harding and Coolidge largely ignored Hoover. 

Hoover was, in short a progressive . . .   Some people are aware of that but here’s what most don’t know. At the end of World War II, Hoover’s humanitarianism including involvement in a program akin to the Marshall Program after World War II which benefitted defeated Germany and the Bolsheviks in Russia. Hoover was so influential and well respected that the New York Times named him “One of the ten most important living Americans. Woodrow Wilson considered Hoover “my ideal successor,” Democratic leaders looked upon Hoover as a strong presidential candidate and FDR said, “There could be none finer.”    Hoover, who up to then was a-political, said that because of his childhood memories, he had no interest in being a Democrat (supposedly the only Democrat in his home city was “the town drunk) and ignored Democratic overtures.   Hoover decided he’d become a Republican and announced his candidacy for president but couldn’t get much Republican support although he did finish 2nd in the 1920 California Primary.   Despite the gridlock at the RNC Convention that year, Hoover’s name was never seriously discussed and Harding became a popular compromise candidate and he won the nomination on the 10th ballot.

After the 1920 Republican -- to appease influential Republicans on both coasts -- Harding installed Hoover as his Secretary of Commerce. Hoover’s only real contributions during his stint as Commerce Secretary were some important traffic safety (embracing motor vehicle standards, rules of the road, and urban traffic control) innovations. Nevertheless, he sought to expand the Commerce Secretary domain in every possible way. He became known for trying to take over parts of other cabinets so much so that the joke was that Hoover was "the Secretary of Commerce... and Under-Secretary of Everything Else” and Coolidge called him “Wonder-boy.” 

            After the combined Harding-Coolidge administration ended in 1928, Hoover again ran for president. As soon as he was elected in 1928, he set about making the government much bigger. His biggest moves began right after his inauguration and including implementing a wide series of farm programs and a much-criticized huge tariff increase.   A self-described “Progressive” and “Reformer,” Hoover saw the presidency as a vehicle for improving the conditions of all Americans by regulation and by getting government involved encouraging of volunteerism. Long before entering politics, he had denounced laissez-faire thinking.  As Commerce Secretary, he had taken an active pro-regulation stance. As President, he helped push expensive and interventionist tariff and farm subsidy bills through Congress. Hoover also increased taxes and increased the federal budget 50% (for comparison Barack Obama so far has only increased the budget 41%). It’s obvious that the real Hoover was nothing like the do-nothing Hoover that Progressive historians have insisted he was.  

Just as they did back then, the left (the progressives of today’s  Democratic Party) is now seeking to blame the current economic crisis on a conspiracy that is an inversion of the actual facts. By the way, back in 1932 FDR and his first VP-to-be called Hoover a “socialist” and promised to use Harding’s methods to regain prosperity . . . that is FDR promised to pay down debt; slash taxes; and slash government spending. Instead he actually raised the budget 100% above Hoover’s last budget; confiscated the nation’s gold and in other ways undermined the recovery so badly that only the nation’s entry into World War II nine years later got us out of the depression.

Most Americans have no idea about the facts you’ve just read and their opinions about government’s ability to create jobs in the private sector by increased spending are largely based upon the “Savior myth” of FDR as the man who heroically saved us from the Great Depression. 

When it comes to today’s problems and today’s myths the infamous Obama-car-in-the-ditch myth (blaming all our woes on conservatives and the free markets) tops them all.   The truth, however, is:

George W. Bush saw that ACORN, the progressives, big spenders, and Bill Clinton and Barack Obama were deliberately pushing the car (our economy) toward a 500-foot cliff. He jumped into the front seat, grabbed the steering wheel and slammed on the brakes . . . guiding it into the nearest friendly ditch.        
   
To prove this surprising assertion for yourself: you’ll need a little education:
 
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/
groupProfile.asp?grpid=7522
http://www.teapartypatriots.org/BlogPostView.aspx?id=0b1f6f49-f530-4d42-965b-7c0252850aa4
 
           That our current president was an ACORN lawyer and community organizer deliberately bankrupting our country as part of Cloward-Piven Strategy using Jimmy Carter’s 1977 Community Reinvestment Act (CRA ’77) who has the gall to repeatedly tell the car-in-the-ditch story is one of the most shocking hypocrisies imaginable.

The fact that Frances Fox Piven is today still openly calling for bloody revolution and urging the poor and unemployed to “use their anger” and begin the Marxist “revolution” while the lame-stream, mainstream media is accusing the TEA Party of hate-mongering and ignoring Piven is the greatest possible journalistic malfeasance.

The fact that George W. Bush’s administration recognized the problem as early as January, 2005 and sought to repeal the horrific CRA ’77 laws but the vote was defeated. And that Bush made at least 19 separate speeches on the matter and continued to strive for elimination of CRA ’77 right up until finally in July, 2007 (30 months later) when a much weaker law was passed has not been allowed as part of the history of the meltdown even though Obama’s Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner in August, 2010 credited Bush with preventing an absolute collapse of our financial system and with preventing total disintegration of the housing market again reflects poorly on the so-called journalistic “profession.” The “watchdogs of the Republic” have turned on us . . . this is the biggest story of the last half of the 20th and of the first decade of the 21st Century and naturally, it’ll never be reported by the present generation of mainstream journalists . . . .

 

Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,

Rajjpuut

           

 
Read more…

Nature's Law

4063234986?profile=original

So, who is your best friend? I’d like to say that although I’m grateful for my government entitlements, they are not affordable.  It is my duty to tell you this.  Those who give so generously to me are not going to receive the same when they are seniors.  Government entitlement goes against nature’s law.  

 

Islam’s Sharia law is one answer. It makes the statement that “man,” and especially woman, is born evil. Therefore, it is necessary for “man” to make harsh laws.  And, in Christianity we are born in sin. We’re on a guilt trip. In Judaism, one must place one’s self at the total mercy of God—whatever “man” says God is.  Some men say Jews don’t have the right to live. Some will not be happy until the last Jew is dead.  As to the promised land thing, when you look around,  especially Jews, you see that the concepts of God are not working to our advantage.   We note that in all life there are territorial disputes.  We humans are above other life forms, but acting like animals.

 

Nietzsche, the God is dead guy, wondered whether God made a mistake in creating “man” or whether “man” made a mistake in creating God. Nietzsche was an existentialist.  An existentialist is self-determining—responsible for his own choices, while the God Abraham created wrestles with various concepts of God, all of them external and lethal.

 

The astounding fact is that I found God in the County Law Library, in the Constitution; that is, in nature’s Higher Law. The Constitution says to be lawful we must be self-governing.  Authority, with zero backing, says the opposite. Authority says that we must be governed according to today’s needs; that is, as authority sees fit, because the law is whatever authority says the law is.  The proof is in the pudding that authority is wrong. The American people are fast becoming spineless jellyfish—bankrupt morally, spiritually, and more lately fiscally.  We know full well this can’t last and the longer we wait to correct the wrongs the worse the consequence.  We know that we don’t have leaders; we have followers of the status quo fraud.

 

America is precisely where I was, personally, 35 years ago.  The current choice: fly with eagles or fall into the abyss.  You can fly with eagles.  I didn’t look to authority for my answers. I went to the source, exactly as it is written in the Constitution, and took a stand.  My life is good.  All of my dreams have come true. Miraculously the Constitution worked for me.  Only if you allow yourself to be brainwashed by Washington, D.C. is the Constitution a historical document in a glass case in Washington.  By depending on Big Daddy Obama, and all that money he’s giving away, where are you?  Need I say more? It isn’t a pretty sight.

 

I did the whole nine yards of being the law abiding citizen—followed the rule of law and got absolutely nowhere.  As we’ve proceeded, Uncle Sam made the law favor himself. It’s the way of authority.  The courts complied.  Might makes right. The rule of law in America, complicit with Sharia law—the end justifies the means—we know what that means.  What is a hundred million human lives when the sacrifice is for the good of all. In Obama land,  both Mother Theresa and Mao were for the good of all.   

 

No way, Jose. I took the court record to the press and got a front page story. In the revelation of my legal case before the world, Uncle Sam ate crow.  Did I do America a service? No.  My noble cause didn’t change a thing. 

 

With the American people knowing that Uncle Sam is above the law, all I did was to frighten people into more compliance.   By court order, the government entitled have first call on our sweat. Taxpayers are expendable.  The IRS told me Congress has the authority, under the Sixteenth Amendment, to take one-hundred percent of my earnings and hand every penny to the voting constituency  deemed by Congress to be more needy of the fruits of my labor. What do you call it?  Paradoxically,  you are being robbed; I’m benefitting.  They say Jesus remains the most influential man that ever lived.  Maybe, but that isn’t good enough. Ten years of mind search, based on experience, tells me America is on the Yellow Brick Road.

 

In the Lord’s Prayer, I wonder if Christians know that when Jesus said “in earth as it is in heaven” he qualified it with “But first seek ye the kingdom of God?”  The kingdom of God isn’t limited to heaven. God is internal as well.  The religious are looking for an external God, an almighty authority to give us pie in the sky. That’s a hell of a note.   We imagine God looking down on us with a frown; to receive his grace we must fall to our knees, head to the ground, begging forgiveness.  It results in necessarily harsh laws to control evil people, or the guilt trip requiring confessing one’s sins, and of course a money contribution to the cause.  No thank you.  Rather than a God-self, the self-fufilling prophecy, the way “man” controls: Never allow the individual to know the power that lies within.

 

In Genesis 1:26,  “And God said, Let us make ‘man’ in our image,”  it comes down to making you and I in authority’s image—giving authority dominion.  Hey! You are intelligent . You know that’s wrong, but who are you to fight it, ye of such little faith?

 

At long last, I’ve found that Christ’s spirit has been working in me ever since I studied the Constitution and had my bigger than life calling.  There were signs all along the way .

 

The IRS says you don’t have any rights. Jesus said, “Come to me all ye that are laboring and are heavily laden, and I will give you rest” (Mt. 11:28).  Jesus said that priests profane the Sabbath (Mt. 12:5), “but I say unto you that in this place (the temple) one is greater than the Sabbath.”  Yes, and one is greater than any authority.  I proved it. 

 

The IRS hung itself with its own rope. Why do you think that the Founding Fathers wrote a constitution with three branches of government and a Bill of Rights for you and me?  If you want your liberties to be honored, you have to demand.

 

The truth will set you free.   Jesus said, “Therefore all things whatever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets.” (Mt. 7:12).  And he further said, “Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are raving wolves. Ye shall know them by their fruits . . .”(Mt. 7:15,16).

 

What has religion found by looking for an external God?  a set of rules that goes against the harmony and symmetry of nature. Look for Jesus sitting on the right hand of God the father almighty on a golden throne and the facts speak for themselves.  You become a tax slave or to live by the sword and die by the sword.  Have it your way, but by looking within, I’ve found peace. All of my dreams have come true.  I found a friend in Jesus.

Read more…
Please read if you are planning to contact me via tea party.org.   I am FEMALE, and not GAY.  So, all of you women from where ever the hell your from, stop sending me bio's and pictures!  Even if I was not straight, I would not bring another person in to this country, so back off!
Read more…
 

 

Verdict is in: Obama’s Political Correctness Kills

Does Administration Understand Yet?

 

 

     Today in a speech before the U.S. Senate, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano spoke passionately about the terrorist- threat our nation faces.   So passionate was Madam Secretary that during the speech she used the words “terrorism” and “terrorist” more than sixty times. This marks an incredible reversal of form and adoption of reality for Ms. Napolitano because in her initial speech to the Senate after her appointment was confirmed in 2009; Napolitano used the words “terrorism” and “terrorist” exactly . . . ZERO times. 

     You do remember that the Obama administration’s tortured political correctness originally banned the term “War on Terror” and rather than using "terrorism" spoke instead of “Man-Caused Disasters.” You do remember that immediately after the Fort Hood massacre, President Obama called for “patience” and insisted that Americans NOT “jump to any conclusions”^^ about Major Hassan, the man who yelled “Allah Akbar!” before killing thirteen fellow soldiers and wounding 29 others. You do remember that Major Hassan had been sharing his hate-filled inner life with fellow soldiers for seven full years prior to the Ft. Hood shooting . . . and that for his open anti-Americanism Hassan rather than being given a dishonorable discharge had instead been rewarded with three promotions. 

     You also do remember that in the Army’s 84-page report on the Ft. Hood disaster they never once named Hassan and never once used the words “terrorist,” “terrorism,” “Jihad,” Jihadist,” “Islamic radical” or “Islamic terrorist.” Political correctness, in other words is nothing but what in psychology they label “DENIAL.” And since whether in psychology or self-defense, denial leads to disaster: we are pleased to mark Ms. Napolitano’s belated return to reality, but wonder what’s keeping Mr. Obama** himself from similarly embracing reality . . . .

 

Ya’ll live long, strong and ornery,

Rajjpuut

 

** The Army report also insists that Major Hassan “acted alone” which is 100% false: Major Hassan was in contact with Al Qaeda and specifically prior to the shootings exchanged numerous messages with Anwar al-Awlaki, Hassan's former imam.   We are not safer thanks to all this self-delusion, but rather much, much more imperiled . . . .
  ^^Mr. Obama made no such request after the Tucson shootings and allowed his supporters in the House and Senate, and the media and internet three days to villify the TEA Party, Republicans, and Conservative talk shows as guilty of driving Jared Loughner to the acts . . . finally the President made a mild request for "civility"  without criticizing his own party. Loughner, of course, was a disturbed Leftist/Liberal nut-case who listed the Communist Manifesto among his favorite books.  Don't be shocked, but no apologies were ever made to conservatives.
Read more…

AT WHAT POINT?

Article II, Section 3 of the United States Constitution states:

 

“Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.”

 

Much discussion and speculation has been put forth as to whether or not President Obamugabe is guilty of treason. In light of the above excerpt from the Constitution, my opinion is NO. As much as it irritates me to not be able to hang the traitor tag on the ONE, I can find no grounds, yet, for treason. Such may indeed exist, but I have seen no evidence. He is obviously guilty of conduct unbecoming of a President, but that indicates his arrogance and ego, not an impeachable crime.

 

Having said that, I do strongly believe that the  ”Great Leader” is guilty of an almost equally heinous crime, namely perjury. Even this charge may be a case of overreaching. Perjury involves the foreswearing of an oath that affects the outcome of a judicial process. Strictly speaking, I would be hard-pressed to apply the textbook definition to Obamugabe. However, there is absolutely no doubt in my mind that he has violated his presidential oath of office and as such, he is definitely guilty of an impeachable crime.

 

Obamugabe took an oath to “ …  faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”  By refusing to accept Judge Vinson’s ruling on ObamaCare, he has violated that oath. He has placed himself and his administration above the law and outside the scope of judicial review. In doing so, he has declared himself to have imperial or dictatorial powers above those granted to the Executive by the Constitution. This, in my humble opinion, is a criminal act. At present, there is absolutely no chance of a conviction for these “crimes”. While it is entirely likely that he could be impeached by the House, there is no chance of a Reid controlled senate convicting their boy of a crime that could remove him from office. He is bullet-proof for now. But his increasing boldness will eventually put him at odds so onerous and indefensible as to cost him his job. Hopefully this will be the case before he can do irreparable damage to the foundations of the United States’ rule of law.


Read more…

My Miracle Message

We all know we have a problem. Here is my alert for an Obama underware bombing event, how to secure your liberties.

My life had been like trying to climb a greased pole.  The truth is stranger than fiction. This message is to all who share my early life experience.  Ask and it shall be given you; seek and ye shall find (Mt. 7:7).

 

My bigger than life calling came in the county law library shortly before my departure.  I was there to study the Constitution, my rights under it, and the legal procedure for taking the IRS to court. I blamed Uncle Sam for all of my woes. When I read the Constitution and U. S. Code sections concerning it, I felt that voices of the past were speaking to me. I felt a bigger than life calling. This was a first sign.

 

On Good Friday, 1975, said to be the day Christ died on the cross, I cut from the heard, the pioneer seeking to find my true identity.  The first two years of my  reborn life were spent on a sailboat I named Bold Venture, sailing in the Bermuda Triangle, where many people have vanished and never a trace of what happened.  When I left my life at sea, I’d saved seven lives, including my own, from a watery grave.  Christ is said to be his brother’s keeper. This was a second sign.

 

It is said that God works in mysterious ways. I’ve come to believe that Jesus is my savor and redeemer, although I’m not a Christian. The religion turns me off.  I’m not against believers, but I’m too independent for the dogmas and doctrines.  I look within for my answers.

 

After I left my life at sea, I took a job in Portland, Oregon, where I met Karen.  The moment we met I felt as though I were meeting an old friend I’d not seen in a long time.  Our first date was a hike to nearby Multnomah Falls, unbelievably, on May 18, 1980, the day Mount St. Helens erupted, not 50 miles from Multnomah Falls.  A third sign, after the calamity my life had been, hope and renewal. It’s legendary.

 

Just before the sky in the northwest turned black and we hurried back to the car, Karen had blurted out, “I want ours to be a platonic relationship.” She says it just “popped out.”  Fifteen years later I read in an astrological compatibility report, under Your Relationship with Karen, “The platonic thing was there from the start, and there is a sense of the brotherly and sisterly between you.”  Was Karen’s appearance the luck of the draw? How could this be? Karen is heaven sent. It happened after I looked within and discovered who I really was. I got on my path of destiny, symbolized  by the ancient Chinese yin and yang. This is a fourth sign.   

 

I was born with Aquarius on the rise.  In The Rising Sign by Jeanne Avery, under Aquarius Rising, “When this sign is on the ascendant, the individual has a unique approach to life . . .He becomes the water-bearer by walking to the beat of a different drummer. He may be the person to bring back information that has been lost to civilization for centuries.”

 

“The person with Aquarius on the rise can be very avant-garde. He is a forerunner in setting style, discovering new methods, and showing the rest of humanity the way. . .He is willing to let go of the trunk of the tree to walk out on the edge of a limb. He knows where the fruit grows and where the spotlight can hit.  He is not one to hide is light under a bushel” (Mt. 5:15).  

 

In Astrologer’s Handbook, under Aquarius, “Individuals born under the sign of brotherhood and fraternity have as their symbol the water-bearer, who spills out to mankind the life-force and spiritual energy.  Born with Aquarius  on the rise, this is a fifth sign.

 

Welcome to the Age of Aquarius. Let us not hide our light under a bushel.

 

My video https://www.youtube.com/user/inlink1#p/f

Read more…

Legislating Inspiration

I have recently come to believe that one thing that drives the momentum of larger government is that people think you can legislate inspiration. This is the same thought that says the reason for poor education performance is because we don't spend enough money on schools and school support. This country originated as an inspiration and that is something that can not be bought. It can be sold in the form of a goods or service the inspiration brought to fruition. However if you attempt to buy inspiration one of the things you might get is a beauracracy trying to protect the influx of money.
Read more…

Speak in Anger and...

Speak in anger and you will deliver the greatest speech you will ever live to REGRET! Winston Churchill

The airwaves today are filled with pundits and experts who constantly badger, butcher or blow up anyone who might disagree with their point of view. While this might be entertaining talk radio or night time television, it has produced a horrible precedent for dealing with people in general.

Many have come to believe that silence is weakness, that calmness is cowardly and that you must engage in a tit-for-tat exchange of point and counterpoint, claim and counterclaim to compete and survive in any relationship. If an unwanted fire has broken out the last thing you want to do is throw gasoline on it. Yet many seemingly cannot resist the urge to throw their last bit of fuel on the fire then spar, thrust and parry back and forth long after the source of problem has been left behind.

Often it is the preservation of ego which keeps us engaged in verbal combat, somehow believing that having the last word will win the day. Learning to check your ego at the door and determine what truly matters most is key, not only to success, but to happiness and peace of mind. Whether speaking to someone live or going back and forth in email, you must ask yourself if the messages you are about to speak or send are going to move the conversation, and more importantly, the relationship, forward or whether they will simply fuel more anger and angst. Winning a verbal battle at the expense of a relationship war is never wise.


General Robert E. Lee was once asked his view of a man he had had many disagreements with. Lee responded that the man was a good, just man, who he happened to disagree with greatly. The questioner then stated that the man in question did not hold such a respectful view of the General and often expressed that negative opinion to others. To which General Lee replied, “You asked me my opinion of him, not my view of his view of me. My view is the only one over which I have control.” The way you communicate with those you disagree with speaks volumes about who you are as a person. Petty, personal attacks never produce positive results and often keep us a safe distance from real solutions.

Be ware of your emotions and your ego, especially in the highly volatile arena of interpersonal communication. Silence can be strength, a kind word can carry a conversation, stepping away can be the best step forward. Words have weight and their impact is immense – so choose them wisely, use them with caution and whenever in doubt – don’t!

 

The Most Effective Way to Communicate is Video Communication http://mybrandedsite.com/donjburgess

Read more…

Moving On From O'Reilly

After watching O'Reilly "interview" The One, Obamalinsky, many should be questioning the continued viability of Fox News.  With a majority stakeholder of that network being a Muslim, and with AOL having purchased the Huffington Post for $315 million bucks and cedeing editorial content oversight to that nut-job, the pattern is pretty clear, if you have an eye to see, and an ear to hear.  While Fox News still remains the premier cable news outlet with the most objective, non-biased (ahemmm) content, the plan should be clear.  Take-over.  Control of the flow of information.  Internet "kill-switch".  A man that has been put into place to engineer the complete destruction of the Republic we've known for 235+  years, must have a clear path without the petty voices of the great unwashed to impede the process.  It's all very simple.

     The international handlers have figured this out  years ago.  Soros has engineered the near-destruction of at least FOUR national economies.  This, the United States, is THE PRIZE HE SEEKS.  He failed to destroy Bush43 in 2004, as he vowed to do.  He's getting even now.  But, as with all Cinderella stories, there's always a wicked witch, or an evil mother-figure, or another wrench that gets thrown in the gears.

     That would be Obamalinsky.  The man is not an idiot.  He is not an American, by any stretch of the imagination.  He was not, nor ever will be, eligible to hold the office he has been given by the internationalists, and the global unionist cabal.  He has been put into place because he resembles, in great measure, his mentor, George Soros, who funded Obamalinsky's "coming-out" political debut in the house of Bill Ayers, terrorist, and spent millions trying to influence the election of 2008.

     To get to the point, as stated, that Obamalinsky is not an idiot, he is also not a man that a majority of Americans will gravitate towards.  He is artificial, superficial, thin-skinned, and has absolutely no concept of the ideals and principles that made this nation great.  It would've been more effective if "Evil Dude" Soros could have found a true American Traitor that actually had an American narrative behind him, a tapestry of an American family to give him credence, authenticity.  Actually gone to school in this country, had a history of child-hood friends, just very basic things that most of us take for granted as a part of growing up in America.  Obamalinsky has NONE of that. 

     So "Evil Dude" Soros may have screwed up, in his egalitarian rage and pathological egotism.  This is where our hope really exists.  More and more people are seeing behind the curtain.  A tin-eared narcissist standing before the Chamber of Commerce and lecturing them on creating jobs he is solely responsible for destroying?  As if he's just discovered the elixer of prosperity and needs to tell us how it's to be done? 

     So I wasn't truthful at the beginning of this, I'll admit, after re-reading it.  I DIDN'T watch the interview.  I tried.  I turned it over, and had to turn the channel.  Again, and again and again.  I just couldn't stomach it.  That doesn't mean I can't stomach the fight to come.  It's just more ammunition.  I've seen enough excerpts of it to know all I need to know about that obfuscation of reality.  We knew what he was going to say before he even opened his mouth.

     That, my friends, is EXACTLY where we've got them.  WE KNOW where they are going to go.

     AND THAT'S WHY WE'RE HERE.

    

 

Read more…
Kennedy Millionaires In Line for Taxpayer HandoutIf a line of people looking for a government handout had formed outside the Capitol last week – two prominent people named "Kennedy" would have been among those with their hands outstretched.Victoria Reggie Kennedy, wife of the late Massachusetts Senator Ted Kennedy, wants $30 million more in federal dollars to help with the cost of a huge memorial to her husband, on top of the $38 million she managed to siphon off of budget lines such as the Defense appropriations bill.Further back in the line for a taxpayer-funded handout is former Congressman Joe Kennedy, who complains that this country doesn't spend enough on heating oil assistance for the poor -- when we're not funding shrines for his late uncle, of course.If you own a television in the Washington D.C. media market, you have seen Joe Kennedy thanking the people of Hugo Chavez's Venezuela and CITGO oil company for bankrolling a program to give discounted home heating oil to poor and elderly people in nine states here in America.You see, Kennedy actually pulling the hose from a big oil tanker from Venezuela to provide heating oil to a deserving family.The non-profit is called the Citizens Energy Oil Heat Program which, of course, has a website and a toll-free number just to remind you who's give you all that subsidized heating oil – 1-877-JOE-4-OIL.Any reasonable person looking at all this would have to ask – do these people ever talk to each other? Isn't there some break in the action at a Hyannisport touch football game or a big family gathering where they could compare notes about which Kennedy is getting how much from the U.S. Treasury?Maybe Victoria could scrimp a few million dollars on the Kennedy shrine – a towering pillar or two less – and ship the savings over to Joe. Or is Joe too busy making his deliveries of Hugo Chavez's oil for the TV cameras?One would think Joe would be trying to do anything to get a few million for fuel for the poor… before he goes begging to socialist dictators in Venezuela.TAKE ACTION: There's a very short window to stop this "shrine" to Ted Kennedy and prevent the $30 million of additional taxpayer-funding from going to fund this liberal pork-barrel project. Contact your elected officials in Washington right now and tell the Congress "no taxpayer funding for the Kennedy Shrine!"--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Read more…

Knowing Better Now


The Past in Light of the Present


When we look back at the past, knowing what we know now, we often find it difficult to understand how we made the mistakes we made. This is because once we learn new information, it is nearly impossible to reenter the headspace we were in before we learned that information. And so we look back at parents who spanked their kids, for example, and wonder how they could have thought that was a good idea. Similarly, our personal pasts are full of mistakes we can’t believe we made. We did things then that we would never do now, and this is precisely because we have information now that we didn’t have, or weren’t able to access, then.

From ideas about how to raise children to how to treat the environment, our collective human past sometimes reads like a document on what not to do. In many ways, this is exactly as it should be. We learn from living and having experiences. It is from these past actions that we garnered the information that guides us to live differently now. Just so, in our personal lives, we probably had to have a few unsuccessful relationships or jobs, learning about our negative tendencies through them, in order to gain the wisdom we have now.

In order to live more peacefully with the past, it helps to remember that once we know better, we tend to do better. Prior to knowing, we generally do our best, and while it’s true that from the perspective of the present, our best doesn’t always seem good enough, we can at least give our past selves the benefit of the doubt. We did our best with what knowledge we had. Beyond this, we serve the greater good most effectively by not dwelling on the past, instead reigning our energy and knowledge into our present actions. It is here, in this moment, that we create our reality and ourselves anew, with our current knowledge and information.DOM

 

Communicate more Effectively with Video Communication http://mybrandedsite.com/donjburgess

Read more…
4063261168?profile=original

Standing in replication of the current oppositon, the Great Pyramid of Giza, its base a square opposing its pinnacle, and all that lies beyond, what is taking place today in Egypt is something bigger than life. We’re at the end of an old age, the beginning of a new age.

 

Ancient Egyptian priests were star gazers. They were mathematicians.  Sir Isaac Newton was into astrology. He studied Egyptian mathematics and came up with calculus, from which he gave us the laws of motion.  

 

The square in astrology represents opposition, and so it was in my life when my ruling planet, Uranus, had transited from my time of birth to a position opposing itself. It happened in my forties.  An opposition is indicative of change.  It began with my opposition to federal income tax. 

 

I went to the county law library to study my constitutional rights and the legal procedure for taking the IRS to court, as American as anyone can get. In the country law library reading the Constitution, I had the feeling that voices of the past were speaking to me. I had a bigger than life calling.  It was more than taking the IRS to court. And so it is with the Egyptian street protest.  There is more than the eye can see.  The change in my life is now being repeated on a worldwide scale.

 

The many obstacles in the way of the Egyptian protest, the same as in my own experience, I had those to overcome. From then on my life improved, to the end that if it could get any better I don’t know how. Along the way, I learned the power that lies within us.

 

 Astrologer’s Handbook tells us the people of the old age are desperate to do the right thing, “but as a rule they do not have strong willpower.  Therefore, they are easily influenced by external factors.” They have as their symbol two attached fish swimming in opposite directions, indicative of dual emotions; they can’t make up their minds about what is taking place.  We are told that people of the new age are “born under the sign of brotherhood and fraternity. They have as their symbol the water-bearer. . .” They are stubborn in their beliefs and operate as equals among equals. Wouldn’t you know, I’m the latter type?   Yes, I’m Aquarius rising.  This means that Aquarius is the part I show the world, and as I age become more Aquarian.

 

In numerology, since Uranus completes its orbit around the sun in 84 years, an average lifespan, and the numbers are from 1  to 9, numerology divides life into 9 cycles, the first of which is discovery of who we are.   In my reinvented life, in 1975 I cut from the herd and discovered the real me. The second cycle is the pairing.  After I learned who I was, I found the right mate, on my fourth try. Knowing who I was made the difference. In 30 years of wedded bliss, she is still the right mate for me. The third cycle is diversity. Together we’ve lived a really diversified life.  The fourth cycle is stability and justice, and I got into that big time.  My legal battle with the IRS lasted 11 years, with the IRS hanging itself with its own rope.  How’s that for stabilization and justice?  Being Aquarian, it was due to my bigger than life calling.   

 

Rather than chaos, disorder and confusion, under the definition of anarchy in my Webster’s College Dictionary,  thinking about such as the situations in the Mid-East we wring our hands over,  we read: “the absence of direct or coercive government as a political ideal and that proposes  cooperative and voluntary associations  of individuals and groups as the principal mode of organized society.”  Who needs the kind of leadership we see in the Mid-East?  Out of chaos comes order. In my Aquarian mindset, God helps those who help themselves.  The least government is the best government.  

 

We don’t need a Washington daddy. Please, President Obama, won’t you get out of our lives?  Rather than the world’s police force, merely making the bad situation worse, let us be the world’s inspiration.  Besides placing our security in jeopardy, you are bankrupting us. We can’t afford this. Please stop stigmatizing us.  You give the world a very bad image of us.  Let us individually take care of our own needs. Our problems will vanish like mist in the morning sun.  It takes two to Tango. The best way to pit the Jewish state against the Arab states is to remain in the status quo. With us, it is individual to individual. You can be sure we, individually, are not going to get us involved in the Mid-East holy war. 

 

And, as to the great disparity in wealth,  officialdom leaving us with no logical remedy, in fact, with the world’s economy teetering, an economic meltdown on the brink of happening, we love you President Obama. You are a great orator, and so charming, too. Your toothy smile is catching. But pathetically, your Marxist education does not know the first thing about the economy.  

 

Kevin Kelly of Wired magazine, sees a bright future. Kelly’s economic prediction:

 

The Law of Connections: The collapsing microcosm of chips and the exploding telecosm of connections will tear the old laws of wealth apart and prepare territory for the emerging economy.

The Law of Plentitude: Curious things happen when you connect all to all.  Adding a few more members can dramatically increase the value for all members

The Law of Exponential Value: The chart of Microsoft’s cornucopia of profits is a revealing graph because it mirrors several other plots of rising stars in a Network Economy. However, the same forces that feed on each other to amplify network presences into powerful overnight standards can also work in reverse to unravel them in a blink. Success will become nonlinear and self-regulating.

The Law of Tipping Points:  Significance precedes momentum. Success became infectious and spread pervasively.  It became difficult not to be infected. For instance, how long could one hold out not having a telephone?

The Law of Increasing Returns:  Them that’s got shall get. It depends on this: while centralized government gets more punishing, the Network Economy rewards schemes that allow decentralized creation, and punishes those that don’t.

The law of Inverse Pricing: While the worst—government—gets more costly each year, the very best gets cheaper each year. It is a major engine for the new economy.

The Law of Generosity:   Microsoft makes huge profits by giving away its Web browser, thereby creating a need. 

The Law of Allegiance: The prosperity of the company is directly linked to the prosperity of the network.  

The Law of Devolution: The tightly linked nature of any economy, but especially the Network Economy’s ultraconnected constitution, make it behave ecologically. The fate of individual organizations is not dependent entirely on their own merits, but also on the fate of their neighbors, their allies, their competitors, and, of course, on that of the immediate environment.

Which is it going to be folks, wishing for Obama’s success, and dying in despair, or the law of all times?   

 

 

Read more…

NATO sees migrant risk to Europe from Egypt unrest

Mon Feb 7, 2011 1:16pm GMT
[-] Text [+]
 

BRUSSELS Feb 7 (Reuters) - NATO said unrest in Egypt and elsewhere in North Africa and the Middle East, could lead to an increase in illegal migrants seeking to enter Europe.  

 

NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen, a former Danish prime minister, said the unrest was not a direct threat to the 28 members of the military alliance, but could have an impact on the Middle East peace process and regional stability in general.

 

"That may also in the longer-term perspective have a negative impact on economies, which might lead to illegal immigration in Europe," he told a news briefing in Brussels.

 

"So of course, indirectly, there might be a negative impact on Europe caused by the evolving situation in North Africa and the Middle East." (Reporting by David Brunnstrom, editing by Rex Merrifield)

 

FAIR USE NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those interested thereto for non-commercial, personal research and educational purposes. If further information should be required, or you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes beyond 'fair use', permission must be obtained from original copyright owners. For more information goto: www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

 
Read more…