All Posts (30264)

Sort by

Maybe I just haven't read or heard anything yet, but where is the support by the Tea Party for Maines Conservative Candidates? I was told by Tea party patriots, that the Tea Party doesn't support or endorse political candidates! But if that is the case why is the Media reporting Victories for Tea Party Candidates?

These are a few Conservative Candidates that are running, and a couple are running against Multi Term Liberals.

Paul Lepage for Gov., Jason Levesque for Congress, Larry Dunphy for State Rep, Rod Whittemore for state senate.

Why is the Tea party so silent in Maine? I don't get it, can someone help me see the light here?

Thank you

Read more…

Increaseing our power

You and I are members of a very select group and we joined together as a group to make to make a difference.
There are literally hundreds of groups across all across America wanting to make a statement. Some of the groups are small with just a few members and some with a few hundred members and all like us dissatisfied with the current politicians and the wretchedly bad job they are doing.
Almost all groups are trying to figure out who is the best of the bad and, if they are not lying, will they support their cause. And they will encourage members of their group to vote for that career politician because there is no better choice.
The two parties have a lock on the candidate selection process and they always select the person that supports the issues that most concern them. Issues that when come to be law will benefit their pocket book or the pocket book of the supporter, donator to their past and future election.

In 1780 Samuel Adams wrote “If ever a time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin.
I can say with out a doubt that the vainest and aspiring men in this United States are the politicians that hold office and we the citizen the members of the many groups are the experienced patriots and that is why we have banded together as groups. We have the power collectively united to prevent the ruin of America.

We all disapprove of the job Congress is doing, yet 95% of incumbents are re-elected.
Why do they get reelected over and over again? Incumbents take advantage of the perquisites of office to enhance their electoral position over their challengers. Thus, the franking (free mailing) privilege incumbents get helps them maintain increased name recognition. Travel to the district helps incumbents as well. In addition, by performing casework for their constituents (such as by finding lost Social Security checks), incumbents can develop good will, which then translates into votes. Finally, incumbents can skillfully take positions that are in agreement with constituency opinion. They also advertise based on these positions and build a legislative record that the opinion leaders in the district can support. In short, incumbents are doing just enough to help them get reelected. Getting reelected is their number one priority from the day they take the oath of office. Representing the constituents of their district takes a back seat to getting reelected.
Do campaign contributions to congressman buy votes? Of course they do. If they didn't, there wouldn't be any campaign contributions in the first place, especially from the heavy interests in business, defense industry and others who regularly buy Congressional votes. Not all politicians in office are on the take, but too frequently the news exposes a glaring example. I would be hard pressed to name just one that is not on the take.
The most recent features suspected bribery taker Congressman William Jefferson (D., La.) trying to explain the $90,000 found in his freezer. This may be shameful, but certainly not surprising. Throughout history, there have been an old-boys' network operating among Washington lobbyists and legislators. Members of the House of Representatives must run for re-election every two years; Senators every six years.
Today a Presidential candidate must raise many millions for a campaign, and it takes at least from $250,000 to several million to finance a Congressional campaign. Does anyone really believe that all campaign gift money comes from selfless patriots whose only altruistic motive is to bring competent, honest government to Washington?
Today’s politician could not fix the problems we have even if they wanted to. They are trapped by what we call "political Catch-22s": They must serve their party or they will be gerrymandered out of office (ask Lieberman). They must serve the special interest groups that finance their campaign or they will not have enough money to seek re-election. They must be politically correct at all times - ensuring they do not offend any person and thus lose their votes and dollars. They can only create "pork", they can never remove wasteful spending. They are so determined to get re-elected that they spend ridiculous amounts of time fund-raising instead of representing their constituents.
The voters are becoming more and more dissatisfied with the political parties and are showing this by the ever increasing number of new organizations dedicated to changing policy in Washington, groups such as As A Mom, TEA Party, GOOOH, Sons of Liberty, 9-12, and Operation Pitch Fork, to name a few.
Most of the organizations have similar goals. Some focus on a single issue and others cover many. What is meaningful is they are all working to bring our nation into a new era of true and rightful government by the people, an idea that once made this nation great.
This nation can again become a nation for the people if we will work together, but our problem is we have so many organizations, each with a few thousand members. What we need to do is bring the thousands of members from all organizations into one central group.
It stands to reason, as long as we remain separate we stand no chance of opposing the parties. Is there a solution to all of this? A solution to special interest money used to buy votes, a solution to a candidate saying one thing to get elected and then doing just the opposite.

Yes there is. And the solution is to change the way candidates are chosen.

You and I want a candidate that will have no ties to special interest money and is not beholden to any political party telling them how to vote and is not worried about being reelected because the most they will ever serve is two terms.

I have researched over fifty groups all with special agendas, Tea Party,
Operation PitchFork, 9-12 Project, Break the Bonds of Tyranny just to name a few and none of them have a definite solution with one exception and that unique exception is an
organization named Go – GOOOH is an acronym for Get Out Of Our House. GOOOH is not a party, nor is it a platform. It is a process for electing citizen representatives to serve the people in the U.S. House of Representatives.

Why the House (something we all learned in school and most have forgotten)?
The President can suggest laws, but only Congress can make them. A member of either the House or Senate may introduce a bill but it must be approved by both. If similar but different bills are passed by the House and Senate, a conference committee attempts to reconcile the differences and then both will vote on the same bill. Before it can be a law it must also be approved by the President or, if he does not sign, the House and Senate can vote on it again and if they both pass it by a 2/3 majority it becomes law. If the law is challenged, the courts can rule that it is unconstitutional.

GOOOH has the solution: get rid of the politicians and elect true citizens. Go will
(a) Sever the ties with special interest groups
(b) Replace career politicians with true representatives
(c) Hold our elected officials accountable
(d) Allow you and your peers to actively participate in the selection of your representative.
(e) Allow you and your peers to determine, among yourselves, who can best represent your District

GOOOH does not define (or have) a platform. It allows selected candidates to represent their district's interests unencumbered by partisan politics. Candidates will define their own platform by filling out the Candidate Questionnaire.
Candidates are required to sign a legal contract agreeing to run for no more than two, 2-year terms. They will therefore spend their time representing their district and developing legislation - not fund-raising (or pandering) for the next election.

As a member of your select group you should also consider becoming a member of Go. It will cost you nothing to join and your benefit will be in helping pick the next candidate to run for Congress.

Visit www.goooh.com and learn more.


P.S. Having read this, please email me with your thoughts on the subject.

Sincerely
Don Alexander
Houston, TX
832-443-5108
donmalex@aol.com .
Read more…

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantitative_easing

Bernanke Makes Quantum Leap
Backward with “Quantitative Easing”
Most of us have heard “never use an elephant gun when a fly-swatter will do” or similar sayings reminding us to balance problem-solving responses with problem severity. Our dear friend Ben Bernanke, however, is currently brandishing nuclear weapons where most might consider a teaspoonful of radioactive-dye sufficient. Perhaps one day soon Federal Reserve Chief Ben will be explaining to us how the “operation was a success, too bad the patient died.”
The patient, as you know, is the United States economy. Dear Ben is so concerned about depressions lurking underneath his bedsprings that he multiplied the amount of circulating money in the country fifteen-fold between late 2008 and mid-2009. Thanks to Ben, technically speaking the present U.S. dollar bill is worth 6.7 cents of the 2008 dollar’s value. Nice job, Benny Boy!
Of course, tradition is what Ben has been counting on. The dollar has been the international storehouse of value for over three-score years now and people, even astute foreign investors and governments, don’t adapt as quickly as they might to the shifting reality known as hyper-inflation. The only problem is that someone in China someday soon might notice that fiscal-emperor Ben is running around buck naked and charge him with indecently dipping of super-skinny value. We’re talking about QE which is short for “Quantitative Easing” which under present conditions might be considered using a nine-pound sledge hammer against the mosquito in your friend’s ear. Ah, me.
The Fed Chief has a few problems in the economy to deal with: 1) jobs creation is worse than lackluster 2) homes are being foreclosed upon at a record rate well in excess of last year’s record rate 3) home prices are artificially high and threatening to plummet at the first wave of panic selling 4) the incredible size ($114 TRillion) of the UNfunded liabilites the government’s responsible for 5) severe recent increases in deficit and National Debt 6) the inflationary weight of all the money he printed just a few months back 7) a record setting run of bank failures and 8) most crucially, his normal tool for controlling the economy (interest rate variation) is largely denied him because he doesn’t want to discourage credit by raising rates and the present rates are so low that further lowering would be all but useless . . . so now he pulls quantative easing (QE) out of his quiver, Gentle Ben does . . . .
Just in case the term “quantitative easing” is unfamiliar to you . . . It’s sometimes known as “monetizing the debt.” You owe $95,000 to banks + a $325,000 mortgage debt, so Ben astutely gives you $420,000 monetizing your debt . . . sound fishy? It is. If you think of printing presses initiating a process of taking a perfectly useful product (paper) and making it valueless except for papering walls and use in outhouses . . . was that harsh . . . in any case, QE is the process of allowing banks to (effectively) print air-money just because, well because, they feel like it. This is pretty much the bank stupidity, now encouraged-earlier discouraged by the Federal Reserve, which exacerbated the meltdown we’ve suffered from over the last three plus years.
Think about it, since we’ve had a record series of bank failures due to forced mortgage-lending at less than 3% down** payments (usually 0%) mandated by federal law (CRA ’77 and three Bill Clinton legislative expansions + two Clinton regulatory expansions of CRA ’77 and the deliberate abetting of such stupid loans from ACORN seeking home loans for . . . .
1. The unemployed
2. Those with bad credit
3. Those with no rental history
4. Those whose only “income” is food stamps
5. Others on welfare
6. Illegal aliens
7. Those fitting all of the above categories
8. All given loans under duress by shakedowns from ACORN lawyer Barack Obama and others of his community organizing ilk . . . .
And since ACORN discovered shortly after Clinton’s ’98 steroid-version of CRA ’77 that it was almost as easy getting a dirt-poor person a loan for a $450,000 home as it previously had been for a home of $120-$150,000 . . . while banks were lumping all these loans together for profitable actions to intensify the meltdown that the sub-prime loan crisis itself was bringing our way . . . . and here Benny-Boy is setting us up again . . . . you get the picture, once again the fox in the henhouse is being given a cleaver and night-vision goggles. So, who exactly might be negatively impacted by QE? Anyone who holds or relies on the dollar. No, no, NOT just the Chinese, Americans too, especially Americans!
Once he’d already gone loco with the money printing presses, the process of “Quantative Easing” should be the last and least used of the armaments available to a Fed Chief. Big Ben, up to now has been imitating Japan during their lost (dozen) -economy years in the late 80’s and 90’s. Now thanks to employing QE to enlarge the bankers’ power, Ben may well have the ability to get America role-playing the Weimar Republic that brought Germany 100,000,000,000% inflation and made Adolf Hitler look like an inspiring political choice. God bless you, Ben, you’re a madman.
Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,
Rajjpuut

** such loans were reserved for the highest quality veterans’ credit in 1975 when they amounted to 1/404 of all home loans; by 2005 they amounted to 34/100 of all home loans


Read more…



Live by the political sword, get your foolish throat cut, it seems.
SPUD (with apologies to Idaho) = Super- Pathetic Useless Decision.” Rajjpuut
Dem Landrieu, Obama Moratorium Worse
Economically than BP Spill for Gulf Economy
It happened so easily and quickly that the pundits on the left were calling it a “no-brainer. Apparently that’s exactly how President Barack Obama saw the matter also . . . “we placate the extremist environmental factions within our own party and we show PRESIDENTIAL PRUDENCE by not allowing any Gulf Oil activity for six months while inspecting all the other rigs, an easy call.” Like so many progressive-wing “easy-calls,” however, this decision has hard-to-live with real world consequences. Senator Mary Landrieu of Louisiana is now holding a Barack Obama appointee hostage while she grabs the spotlight to protest the short-sighted Obama 6-month Oil drilling moratorium in the Gulf of Mexico which she describes as “much worse than the BP spill itself.” It happened this way: Landrieu, a Democrat, has taken the unusual tactic of blocking confirmation of Jack Lew, President Obama’s nominee for Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and says she will NOT allow a vote on Lew’s confirmation, until the offshore drilling moratorium is lifted. In a message to Harry Reid, the Senate Majority Leader, Landrieu wrote, “I do not take this step lightly. But the fact is that the Administration's moratorium on new energy exploration is profoundly impacting the economy of the Gulf coast, while doing nothing to improve safety or environmental performance."
Landrieu additionally accuses the administration of insensitivity or lack of understanding of the effect of the moratorium on Gulf Coast families because since the moratorium, both deepwater and shallow-water drilling have "been brought to a standstill," hurting rig workers as well as nearly 3,000 businesses in Louisiana that support the drilling industry. Mentioning a letter-writing campaign the administration has ignored and doing everything within her power "to get the Administration's attention," she told Reid, Louisiana continues to suffer despite her efforts.
Obama and his administration have continually downplayed the prospect of economic pain caused by the moratorium to justify the drilling freeze. In a recent report, it cited an analysis showing no more than 8,000-12,000 jobs are being affected by the drilling ban and none will be permanently lost. According to LSU Professor Joseph Mason, after examining the administration's report, the analysis is flawed and he says 20,000 jobs are being threatened. The moratorium is set to expire on November 30, but Gulf residents and their leaders are frustrated that no serious talk about lifting it earlier has been heard from the administration whose recent offshore policies have drastically affected offshore drilling in recent weeks. According to The Wall Street Journal:
  • Only five new-well drilling permits have been issued in the past 20 weeks. In normal times before the Deepwater Horizon accident, 60-65 new permits would have been issued.
  • 15 of the Gulf's 46 shallow-water rigs are idle because they don't have permits to drill;
  • By the end of October, 70 percent of the shallow-water drillers will be idle;
  • Five deepwater rigs have left the Gulf; and
  • 30 million barrels of domestic oil production will be lost in 2011.
Live by the political sword, get your foolish throat cut, it seems. The BP Spill may turn out to be utterly small potatoes while Obama’s moratorium is remembered as the Big SPUD. ‘SPUD’ (with apologies to Idaho) = a Super- Pathetic Useless Decision. While the impact upon 20,000 Gulf jobs is definitely not trivial, the energy security of the entire nation is at stake as well as the Gulf economy. This is one of the worst decisions made yet by a president who seems clueless on governing the entire nation and serving 100% of the people as a whole rather than his targeting benefit for his political allies only.
Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,
Rajjpuut
Read more…

curroption

As my poor soul jurneys through this town ware evil begins and seems to have no end. My soul feels with tears.A place ware curroption stretches its wings like an eagle from here to D.C.A gov. worker he or she traveled to mexico with family . Then came back with percription medication then distributed them out to big well known families in ascension parish.Seems sad then how they brag cause they know trouble is no ware near.It fills my bright eyes witth tears how the law and curroption works here.FOr I have seen good people down in a moment do many yrs for such a crime.It seems so unfair Seems sad how we must raise kids in a place ware evil and curroption is well hid any yet is still seen.Is this the united states future ware as long as you work for the goverment that this behavor is ok. Is this the future for our children in this place we all call home.
Read more…

To the Tea Party Membership

Tea Party Founder: “Joe - If we could replace Hilter with a different name Progressive or Obamanism people who understand that we are dealing with a something bigger then political parties. It is a global party using instead of Christianity, but Mohammidism/radicalism to acquire power. The political parties are out of their league. This is an issue of Americanism and Hedonism (Progressive). The religious players are Christianity and Islam.”

Let us be clear about our task, my dear friends. Religious players have brought us holy wars, but religious players notwithstanding, social organization in which the means of production and distribution are owned and controlled by government, socialism—for a fact, socialism has never produced a prosperous nation. The Soviet Union went bankrupt. Communist China, the second biggest economy in the world today, is now 75 percent capitalistic. The bottom line is the economy. With prosperity, everything else falls into place. Why then do authorities try so hard to see that we are not prosperous? Including religion, we don’t want to play any part in man’s mindless endeavors to maintain control.

To socialize society, to make fit for companionship with others, does not imply government ownership of production or control of distribution. For a fact, socialism is totalitarian dictatorship; the people slaves. Does President Obama want to socialize America, or does he want to make the nation a totalitarian dictatorship? The answer is simple. Hardly has Obama made America fit for companionship. Obama has done more to divide the nation than any president ever.

And not only is he the greatest of dividers, Obama claims my Constitution is flawed and my personal liberties are negative. Let us discuss that claim. We each have a path of destiny; each here for a special purpose. Trying to serve government’s purpose, the IRS hung itself with its own rope. Through my Constitution, I saw to it that government served my purpose. The IRS admitted on the front page of The Palm Beach Post that it had “mistakenly” (lawlessly) confiscated my property.

I’ve had the personal experience of knowing my Constitution and acting upon it. I proved Obama wrong. It is all in the court record. My friends, ask not what your country can do for you; ask yourself what you can do for your country.

But more than proving Obama wrong about my Constitution, I want you to know, during the period when I fought Uncle Sam I discovered the light of the world. I spent two years on a 37 foot sailboat in the Bermuda Triangle. Strictly on my own, I was miraculously saved from a watery grave to tell my story. From a life of failure, I was reborn at sea, when everything could easily have gone wrong. My life ever after has been good.

By knowing my Constitution, I came to know the power that lies within me. No man can take my inalienable rights from me without my permission. Obama would deny that, but can Obama overcome nature’s God? No sir, I’m not a religious player. Jesus rebukes externalism. The wave of the future, the Age of Aquarius, I’m an Aquarian messenger, this is the message my spiritual guides give me to pass on: brotherhood and fraternity. Jesus told us that you and I are our brother’s keeper. My Lord: “No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon” (Mt. 6:24). “Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are raving wolves”(Mt. 7:15). “Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?” Patrick Henry. No, I’m not a religious player to be manipulated by wolves in sheep’s clothing. Moreover, with millions of people like me blocking his way, Obama, with his father’s dream of communism, will never accomplish his objective. You can pass this on with assurance. Obama can’t change the universe.

Believe in your sacred self. You have the power to accomplish anything you want. I’m old enough to remember how it was in America. Government, our servant, let the Tea Party take its place in helping America return to our path of destiny. Let us socialize society; that is, make our society again fit for companionship, that America might once again be the light of the world.

Peace be with you,

Joe

Read more…

Creating a national force

We all see the problem: 90% of us disapprove of the job Congress is doing, yet 95% of incumbents are re-elected.The voters are becoming more and more dissatisfied with the political parties and are showing this by the ever increasing number of new organizations dedicated to changing policy in Washington, groups such as As A Mom, TEA Party, GOOOH, Sons of Liberty, 9-12, and Operation Pitch Fork, to name a few.Most of the organizations have similar goals. Some focus on a single issue and others cover many. What is meaningful is they are all working to bring our nation into a new era of true and rightful government by the people, an idea that once made this nation great.This nation can again become a nation for the people if we will work together, but our problem is we have so many organizations, each with a few thousand members.It stands to reason, as long as we remain separate we stand no chance of opposing the parties. The solution is to join forces and work for the common good of all.But how do we join? It’s simple: by encouraging our members to join other organizations.I belong to eleven organizations and have spent time reading about at least fifty others. I have decided that the one that covers all issues either directly or indirectly is an organization named Go – GOOOH is an acronym for Get Out Of Our House. GOOOH is not a party, nor is it a platform. It is a process for electing citizen representatives to serve the people in the U.S. House of Representatives.Why the House (something we all learned in school and most have forgotten)?The President can suggest laws, but only Congress can make them. A member of either the House or Senate may introduce a bill but it must be approved by both. If similar but different bills are passed by the House and Senate, a conference committee attempts to reconcile the differences and then both will vote on the same bill. Before it can be a law it must also be approved by the President or, if he does not sign, the House and Senate can vote on it again and if they both pass it by a 2/3 majority it becomes law. If the law is challenged, the courts can rule that it is unconstitutional.GOOOH has the solution: get rid of the politicians and elect true citizens. Go will(a) Sever the ties with special interest groups(b) Replace career politicians with true representatives(c) Hold our elected officials accountable(d) Allow you and your peers to actively participate in the selection of your representative.(e) Allow you and your peers to determine, among yourselves, who can best represent your DistrictGOOOH does not define (or have) a platform. It allows selected candidates to represent their district's interests unencumbered by partisan politics. Candidates will define their own platform by filling out the Candidate Questionnaire.Candidates are required to sign a legal contract agreeing to run for no more than two, 2-year terms. They will therefore spend their time representing their district and developing legislation - not fund-raising (or pandering) for the next election.If you, the leaders and organizers, and you know who you are, want to push or support your cause I suggest you do it by sending your people to Congress.Only Congress has the power to change an old law or make a new law.If you will put people in office that truly represent the citizens of your district, who have no ties to special interest money, and are not beholden to any party, they can attend to the needs of the their constituents instead of the demands of their party and the special interests who fund them.And the best way to put your people in Congress is by having all in your group join GOOOH.Do not just ask your members to join, ask them to be a part of the process. When we get enough groups working tougher we will have created a national force to be reckoned with.With the help of God and all members of every organization we will take back America!Visit www.goooh.com and learn more.SincerelyDon AlexanderHouston, TX832-443-5108donmalex@aol.com .
Read more…

Complicated?

The problems facing this country are all said to be very complcated when they are asked to be explained. I believe that when anyone says their problems, such as healthcare, are complicated it is because they are trying to take advantage and pad their own pockets. Case in point the new charge when you sell your home, it falls under the healthcare bill and cost thousands when you sell your home. I say term limits and line item vetos.
Read more…

Natural Law

Get ready for the big fight—government entitlement v. natural law. Get ready for the decision the prophets of ancient times have told us we will be forced to make.

The closest man can get to natural law is what we call the Golden Rule: do unto others as you would have them do unto you. There is no rational or reasonable argument against this concept.

Redistribution of the wealth of the nation, by no manner or means, can conform to the Golden Rule. Politicians take from the resourceful and give to those who do not fully use their resources. It’s a great way to win elections but unhealthy for the economy. It is finally bankrupting the nation.

The question now arises of how to help those who cannot help themselves, as though we’ve always depended on government. Would we let our own children perish? We humans are all of one blood.

By no manner or means can we follow the Golden Rule when the collective good is the bases of law. Do we have a right to good health care but not a right to food, clothing, and shelter? With the good of all in mind, what’s to stop us from depriving some of basic necessities in order that others might have their basic needs? If a few fall through the cracks, no matter. All that counts is the overall good. What if we, as a nation, can’t afford good health care for everyone? Going into debt to the extent that future generations will be forced to pay for this generation’s good health care, all that government is doing is totally against the Golden Rule. Politicians expediently pass laws against common sense in order to be reelected. It is foolish to think they will ever change. It’s a matter of us controlling them, or them controlling us.

The moment government decrees a duty to the individual, natural law is buried and bestial law takes over. Beasts live by the law of the jungle. When we speak of natural law, we are speaking of “Higher Law,” law based on reason and logic, a gift of our Creator.

What makes President Obama’s reasoning better than yours or my reasoning? Does his education better qualify him? Obama’s education makes him believe he is better qualified. There is no possible way Obama’s reasoning is better than mine in running my life, but we’re going by the good of all. The individual doesn’t count. By his acts, as well as his words, Obama tells the world that he does not follow natural law.

The Constitution has for its basis natural law, but from Obama’s higher education, he says, the Constitution is flawed and our liberties are negative. From my study of the Constitution, I got the opposite idea. I don’t live in an ivory tower. I live in the school of hard knocks. But again, the individual doesn’t count. With Obama in command, we’ve got “collective salvation.”

The individual’s inalienable rights are based on natural law; government entitlements are not. Limited government is based on natural law; for the good of all is not. The right of contract is based on natural law. Obama took over General Motors, favored the union, and broke the contract with the stockholders. Obama’s approach is the worst thing anyone could think of to help grow the economy. He’s not trying to grow the economy.

The idea put forth in the Declaration of Independence that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights—natural law—which does not connect with Obama’s idea of “collective salvation,” more and more, we see that rights come from the Oval Office, which brings me to the point of this writing.

What about the promises our self-serving representatives have made to the American people? Adding the accruing liabilities to the astronomical debt already obligating future taxpayers, knowing their creation is utterly unsustainable, what to do, live in hope and die in despair? I hate to burst your bubble. That which cannot possibly sustain itself will in the long run be shaped in the interest of the sustainers, while Obama, for the next two years, will freely take actions to strip us of every right we have left. By election day 2012, with our monopoly money being used for toilet paper, shades of the past, we will have a man educated to believe he knows what is best for the world in full control, the individual American citizen merely a pawn to be used, and no other choice.

“In this trinity of man, mind, and God,” says quantum physicist Evan Harris Walker, “all things being aspects of mind,” science now sees the underlying structure of our struggling souls. “We see the separation that lies between any of us and the rest of reality.” We are all of one blood, all under the same God, and all put to the test. Can we the people face the reality that the United States let us down, that this is the people’s government, and now it is up to us, individually, to solve the problem we allowed? The other choice is enslavement.

Read more…

Feds Pays Radical Mosque $582K/yr

VP Biden wanted control over Census Bureau, but did you know.....

Feds Pays Radical Mosque $582K/yr

And the government knows that the mosque is a front for Hamas terrorists which "has been under numerous investigations for financing and [providing] aid and comfort to bad orgs and members" - and was even home to radical cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, today considered the inspiration to Fort Hood shooter Nidal Malik Hassan and the underpants bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab.

303_large.jpg

However, it's now landlord of the Census Bureau office on Edsall Road in Alexandria, Va.:

In gearing up for the 2010 Census, the General Services Administration (GSA) leased office space throughout the country. One location is a 6,654 square foot section of a two-story building on Edsall Road in Alexandria, Va. owned by the Dar Al-Hijrah mosque. The United States government is spending $582,000, or about $23,000 per month, to lease the space from November 2008 through the end of this year.

The GSA helped the Commerce Department find office space for the Census. A GSA spokeswoman did not respond to requests for comment or for clarification of the lease's true cost. Fairfax County property records indicate that Dar Al-Hijrah bought the 40,000-square-foot building in May 2008 for $5.8 million.

The Investigative Project on Terrorism obtained the reports referencing Dar al-Hijrah through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request seeking records related to a brief detention of Awlaki. Those records were copies of TECS reports - a computer database operated by U.S. Customs and Border Protection. Some of the reports released to the IPT are redacted.

TECS data generally provides a summary narrative and referral to more detailed case references and case agent contacts.

The TECS reports dated in 2002 obtained under this FOIA stated that Dar Al-Hijrah was "associated with Islamic extremists" and was "operating as a front for Hamas operatives in U.S." A report dated in December, 2007, said the mosque "has been linked to numerous individuals linked to terrorism financing" and "has also been associated with encouraging fraudulent marriages." Another December 2007 report advised Dar Al-Hijrah, "has been under numerous investigations for financing and proving (sic) aid and comfort to bad orgs and members."

The TECS reports indicate that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) generated the information.

Continue reading ...

As the report goes on to point out, some of this information is publicly available. and the GSA could have learned about the DHS TECS reports by requesting a Federal Protective Service background check on its vendor. What we have here is nothing less than pure bureaucratic incompetence and the government paying our tax dollars to known radical Islamists. I'd love to know the name of the clown that made the decision to do this, wouldn't you?

Read more…

A Congressional Reduction Proposal a concept for Congress and the Whitehouse to consider. Here is a copy of an email a teaparty supporter sent to their House Rep. Henry Brown. A similar email was also sent out to Senator Lindsey Graham.

Email rumors are afloat about a 1% deficit reduction tax that was proposed earlier this year by house Dems possibly getting passed after the elections. I am interested in knowing where this stands both now and in the future.

I (as with many others in my circle) have reached a point of total frustration with Washington spending which in turn breeds further taxation. I am certain you have heard this over and over but as a retiree who is now looking at going back to work to survive, I feel something desperately needs to change in Washington.

Proposals such as this (and others) have lead me to strongly support a "Congressional Reduction" proposal. Inarguably, fewer representatives in Washington would generate a significant deficit reduction for years to come considering salaries and staff alone. With "main street" making all kinds of reductions as a result of the economy, it only seems fitting that Washington consider similar reductions. A Congressional Reduction Act likely would require a Constitutional Amendment, but if deficit reduction is the ultimate goal, then it seems this proposal has considerable merit. Just imagine the amount of public support such a proposal would garner at a time when the vast majority of people feel that Washington seems "recession proof."

Read more…

10 Highlighted problems with mainstream Islam (clarity and concerns are not "bigotry")


1) DEHUMANIZATION
Apes and pigs, the dehumanization of non-Muslims, Christians as pigs and Jews as apes. (Or as some Islamic cleric of the 'Bali bombing' called non-Muslims: "worms, snakes and maggots."

2) TERRORISM
Had the mainstream Islam really eject its radicals, the Jihadists wouldn't have the motivation to go on, Why else is there Islamic terrorism still active in so many parts of the world? The half-way condemnation, and almost always accompanied by a "but", but the west does this or that argument is still on - after 9 Years from the 9/11 Islamic massacre n 2001.

3) SHARIA: OPPRESSION AND ANNIHILATING THE INFIDEL
The campaign, hidden or open for implementation for Sharia law. In Sharia, besides the legal basis for the war against the infidel, women are subjucated, which explaines how top Islamic cleric of Australia called non-Muslim women plain "meat."

4) HONOR KILLING
One of the great imports from the Islamic culture.

5) JIHAD & INTIMIDATIONS BY "MODERATES"
The so called moderate Muslim leaders that the best they can do is intimidate the west to give in to their Islamic expansion, or else... the radicals will be unleashed. The hidden Jihad.

6) SELF-MADE VICTIMHOOD
The wide sympathy and support in mainstream Islam to the Palestinian, Hezbollah, Taliban, Al Qaeda in Iraq tactics of using civilians (indirect murder of their own people) so that the west looks bad. (All of the above causalties are seen by mainstream Islam as nothing else but the 'victims of the west').

7) ISLAMIC APARTHEID / BIGOTRY
With all the 'criticism" of the west, the Islamic world is still practicing Apartheid (in the real sense), religious and gender wise.
In the intolerant Muslim world all non-Muslims are either at an inferior status or worse. The Christian minority has dwindeled in Lebanon and among the Palestinian Arabs while Muslim population have increased with persecution.
Islamic bigotry's also at the roots of conflicts, including in the Sudan and in Israel/Palestine (in the intolerant Islamic Middle East against the "other").

8) WORLD DOMINATION - GOAL
The open or silent goal by Jihadists, yet backed by so many in mainstream Islam, towards a Caliphate - a theocratic Islamic dictatorship based on the Sharia (religious Islamic law).

9) A TOTALITARIAN WORLD
The Arab-Islamic world is totalitarian - oppressive, even Lebanon that is supposedly the real democracy in that world, the terror Islamic group Hezbollah has immense power. (Iraq is yet to bee seen). Minorities are in even worse shape.

10) MOST CONFLICTS ALL OVER THE GLOBE ARE BY MUSLIMS
Draw a map and point to the conflicts, then try to detach most of it from Muslims. Here's a partial list: Russia. Somalia. Sudan. Nigeria. Lebanon. Israel. Iraq. Afghanistan. Pakistan. India. Kashmir. Thailand. Philippines. China.
Read more…


“What you THINK you know but you don’t really know about the realities of history makes you a sucker for whatever B.S. the Progressives want to throw your way in order to control you, your vote and your emotions. You are literally ‘Homer Simpson’ in their eyes and they control you just about as easy as Homer would be controlled . . . .” Rajjpuut
Current Political Correctness is
Today’s Progressive Determinant

of Historical Truth
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_revisionism_(political)
In one of the more prophetic novels of all time, a fellow named Winston Smith works for his government’s Ministry of Truth performing historical alterations to quickly and cleverly brainwash his fellow citizens into aligning their ever-shifting knowledge of the nation’s history with current reality and government desiderata. Winston Smith is the protagonist charged with adjusting history so that seamless historical revisionism seems both natural and obvious to the citizenry as one Big Lie after another becomes reality.
Unfortunately, George Orwell named his novel 1984 instead of 2010 or even 2084 so today its lessons are considered passe rather than avant garde. Nevertheless today Progressivism (the notion that “we must ‘progress’ beyond the outdated and severely-flawed U.S. Constitution”) owns as its chief tools propaganda (particularly the Big lie) and historical revisionism. The fact that 98% of Americans don’t see it for what it really is, is because ‘NOT knowing history, they are doomed to repeat it.” Let’s give a few examples of historical revisionism** to start the ball of understanding rolling . . . you don't mind playing Sherlock Holmes for a bit, do you?
Have you heard any of the following terms used to demonize anyone recently? “Redneck?” “Nazi?” “Fascist?” “Eugenics” or ever heard disparagement about Warren G. Harding? Herbert Hoover was a conservative, right? Or been told that Franklin Delano Roosevelt was one of our greatest presidents? Recently a lady in high places lumped Chairman Mao and Mother Teresa together. Certainly we’ve seen Mao and Che T-shirts worn all across the nation . . . what’s going on, how are all these issues related? We’re talking about historical revisionism, friends . . . .
What is a redneck in some minds today is quite different from what a redneck originally was. The original “rednecks” were gun-toting union men trying to seize control of mining operations from the owners and bosses. They wore red bandannas around their necks as a tactical edge so that they wouldn’t have to hesitate before pulling the trigger knowing instantly that they were NOT aiming for one of their own if they gunned down someone without a red bandanna. The Battle of Blair Mountain was, next to the Civil War, the largest insurrection in the history of the country. It’s not taught in our schools today or if it is taught the history somehow comes down real hard on the owners and management and overlooks the miners’ transgressions . . . kind of how our Civil War was often called “The War of Northern Aggression” in many southern schools right up to 1964. Revisionism, regardless of who's doing it (ultra-conservative or ultra-leftist) is just plain EVIL. Because the Progessives have controlled the telling of American history since Woodrow Wilson wrote his version of it a hundred years ago, what you THINK you know but you don’t really know about the realities of history makes you a sucker for whatever B.S. the Progressives want to throw your way in order to control you and your vote and your emotions. You are literally ‘Homer Simpson’ in their eyes and they control you just about as easy as Homer would be controlled . . . .
The Nazis, of course were the National Socialists Workers’ Party and in case the words “Socialists” and “Workers” didn’t clue you they were definitely NOT right wing or conservative in any way. Nazi literature declared quite proudly “We are neither capitalists nor communists, but something better.” So the evils of Nazism were left-wing results sprung from a left-wing beginning. Only after Hitler was Chancellor (nine years after he wrote Mein Kampf) did the corporations start to come his way. But from the start their goals as listed in campaign literature was virtually identical with both that of today's CPUSA (Communist Party USA) and of Barack Obama. The antipathy of the Nazis for the Communists in Germany was infighting among leftists, but testimony was that once the Reds found out about the power of the Nazis they were life-time committed converts.
Fascism? The left would have you believe that the corporations took over the government and that certainly sounds like right-wing fanatics on steroids, doesn’t it? The truth? Fascism was, however, begun in Italy when the labor unions got so strong that the workers took over the corporations often killing or injuring management and owners in the process. Then they elected their favorite Fascist, Benito Mussolini, to lead the country. In Spain, the losers were the Church, royalty and the businessmen . . . that is, the Conservatives were the defeated army^^ in the Spanish Civil War. Franco and his victorious Spanish Fascists were supported by both Nazi Germany and by Italy with arms, technology and money. Italy, Germany and Spain were three countries with strictly left-wing radical socialist agendas that all became dictatorships. All of these governments were disasters for their national history; two of them were disasters for the world.
Eugenics? This was the original progressive brainstorm. If we just kept the deficient from breeding, the world would be a better place and the Utopia that the workers of the world deserve would come all the sooner. Margaret Sanger is today considered a hero for her “birth-control” movement but one of her main emphasis was on preventing Blacks and Puerto Ricans from reproducing themselves. Famous British socialists like George Bernard Shaw, Bertrand Russell, George Edward Moore and John Maynard Keynes were all eugenicism aficionados. Our first two progressive Presidents Woodrow Wilson and Theodore Roosevelt were also big fans of eugenics and Wilson was also so openly anti-Black that its incredible today that the man is considered one of our greatest presidents courtesy of being the creator of the science of propaganda and of some remarkable historical revisionism done in his behalf by progressives over the last 90 years.
Warren G. Harding was a victim of a line of lies that would make even Central Florida Democratic Rep. Alan Grayson blush. Harding died in office. His vice-president Calvin Coolidge replaced him and they were probably the most solid chief executives economy-wise the nation has ever known. The disastrous policies of progressive President Woodrow Wilson left the country in a depression which Harding inherited in March, 1921, when he was inaugurated. Harding ignored the advice of his commerce secretary Herbert Hoover to interfere on a grand scale and did three major things: 1) he cut both taxes and 2) government spending by nearly 50% and 3) he paid down the national debt by 30%. Before his death, in 1923, the country was already turned around. However, rather than being a hero for stopping the “Invisible Depression,” Harding is considered one of our worst presidents. So pervasive is the progressive lie about Harding that even the author of the best-selling book Blink proves himself a hypocrite, refusing to follow his own good advice and instead mentions Harding in a highly disparaging way.
Besides not getting credit, the lies about Harding’s involvement in the Tea Pot Dome scandal were spread by progressive historians who lumped the one guilty member of Harding’s cabinet with all of Harding’s administration. Calvin Coolidge took over and continued the policies of Harding and gave the United States the most productive decade in our history (the Roaring Twenties). When Silent Cal said, “I do not choose to run,” Herbert Hoover a progressive Republican interfered with everything good that was going on in particular raising tariffs sky high as well as increasing taxes, increasing spending and deficits. The stock market crash led into a recession and everything Hoover did made it worse. Where Harding would have cut taxes, cut spending and paid down the debt, Hoover did the opposite.
Franklin Delano Roosevelt and his vice-president Nance ran promising to cut taxes, pay down the debt and rollback the spending which really resonated with the voters since they’d already seen that it worked wonders. He and Nance called Hoover “a socialist” and criticized all his government interference. However, when FDR was elected he continued virtually all of Hoover’s initiatives and then created 40 separate new government agencies (the “New Deal” named after his progressive uncle Teddy’s “Square Deal”) the most massive U.S. government build-up to that point in history. Of course between Hoover and FDR they made an ordinary market panic into not just Hoover’s depression but a twelve and a half year Great Depression. By the way, just one new law this year, Obamacare, created 388 brand new government agencies or offices: roughly ten times the perverted output of FDR’s entire 12+ years in office.
How can Che and Mao be worthy of T-shirt status? The 122 million victims of communism in the 20th Century have apparently all been swept under the rug? How can socialism be seen as good? That’s historical revisionism for you! And what’s the Big Lie that the Progressives have sold America most recently? See if any of this sounds familiar . . . “It’s Bush’s fault. The huge hole the economy slipped into was created by Wall Street, the conservatives, the greedy corporations and their insistence on no-regulation of the free market.” Do you believe those lies? Do you believe that ‘They’ drove the car into the ditch and now when we’ve almost got it back on the road again, ‘they’ want us to give them the keys back again . . . ? Or do you believe the truth, which is . . . .
Using the same Cloward-Piven** strategy (that DELIBERATELY created the bankruptcy of New York City earlier between 1967 and 1975 by a planned overloading of the welfare rolls) . . . beginning especially after 1992, ACORN, OBAMA, First ACORN PRESIDENT Bill Clinton, and oodles of progressives (94% of them Democrats) DELIBERATELY were pushing the car toward a 500-foot cliff. George W. Bush jumped in and grabbed the steering wheel and hit the brakes. Bush was able to create a controlled-skid and guide the car to rest in a friendly-looking ditch!
If you don’t KNOW that truth, you have been brainwashed by the progressives. Here’s the antidote for you to reclaim your brain.
http://rajjpuutsfolly.blogtownhall.com/2010/09/10/will_real_dems_admit_truth,_throw_out_progressive_traitors.thtml
That’s the easy way (the link above) or you might want to do some research . . . .
1. Find out who Saul Alinsky was.
2. Find out who his most successful students Richard Cloward and Frances Piven are.
3. Find out who George Wiley was.
4. Find out what “Cloward-Piven Strategy” is.
5. Find out who created the National Welfare Rights Organization, when it was created, how it used Alinsky tactics and how it bankrupted New York City in 1975 and NYC had to be bailed out by the federal government.
6. What was the goal of Wiley, Piven and Cloward (stated in the famous article that’s come to be known as the Cloward-Piven Strategy)?
7. After 1975, Cloward and Piven said that the next areas for Alinsky tactics and C-P strategy were voter registration and housing. What Wiley lieutenant running NWRO in Arkansas since 1970 created ACORN? What did the “A” in ACORN originally stand for? Who did ACORN help win and keep a governorship for 12 of the next 14 years?
8. What is CRA’ 77? Was it needed?
9. Who expanded CRA ’77 three times and provided regulatory teeth to CRA ’77 when he was president?
10.Who got the Motor Voter Act passed?
Well that’s the first of about 40 questions that the Progressives have hidden from you that result in the TRUE statement that:
Using the same Cloward-Piven** strategy (that DELIBERATELY created the bankruptcy of New York City earlier between 1967 and 1975 by a planned overloading of the welfare rolls) . . . beginning especially after 1992, ACORN, OBAMA, First ACORN PRESIDENT Bill Clinton, and oodles of progressives (94% of them Democrats) DELIBERATELY were pushing the car toward a 500-foot cliff. George W. Bush jumped in and grabbed the steering wheel and hit the brakes. Bush was able to create a controlled-skid and guide the car to rest in a friendly-looking ditch!
Of course, if you went to: http://rajjpuutsfolly.blogtownhall.com/2010/09/10/will_real_dems_admit_truth,_throw_out_progressive_traitors.thtml
you’d actually know and appreciate why it’s true and you’d really understand what historical revisionism is all about! And now you know why it’s so important for Progressives to control our children’s textbooks and for, from their perspective, teachers to be members of unions . . . .
Ya’ll live long, strong and ornery,
Rajjpuut
** historical revisionism is also called “negationism” and is outlawed in some countries, but not here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_revisionism_(political)

^^ In the movie The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie, this fact was one of two zingers that Miss Jean Brodie received from her protege (who stole her teacher's lover and later informed her that the ultra-controlling Brodie had sent an ignorant young man to his death in Spain fighting for the WRONG side!)

Read more…

The Guilt Trip

President Obama, a charming man—you can’t help but like him—he says America’s Constitution is flawed and our liberties negative. Notwithstanding the day by day blows to Obama’s presidency, Obama’s minister for twenty years, Reverend Wright, “God damned” America. Obama doesn’t hold American values. Obama, who goes about the world apologizing for America, the world’s single-most exploiting imperialist nation (Obama’s term for capitalist nation), this jolly green giant, who humbles himself before tyrants, wants world-wide redistribution of the wealth. Ah yes, this one-worlder is pushing the guilt trip for all he’s worth.

The immature, to get their way, try to make others feel guilty. Obama’s following, people desperate to do right, and easily impressed, who depend on external factors, such as government help, Piscean in nature, we read, on their way out, Aquarians, whose sign is the water-bearer (“in earth as it is in heaven” [Mt. 6:10]), on their way in, “the new message of Jesus: not the kingdom, but personal discipleship,” we read in The Scofield Study Bible, welcome to the Age of Aquarius. “Come unto me all ye that labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest” (Mt 12:28).

On the other hand, let it be known that Obama is here to help those who are down and out because they have been given a raw deal in life. As far back as history goes, people have been given raw deals. Everyone feels that at one time or another, he has been given a raw deal. More than once, I’ve been given a raw deal. For one, the IRS put me on the street by mistake.

When I was a child, sermons always made me feel that God was looking down on me with a frown on his face. I was on a guilt trip until I looked within. When I listen to Obama’s support, I hear what a bad American I am. Obama’s support, people like Minister Farrakhan, and the Black Panthers, let it be known that Iran’s President Ahmabenijad, in his recent visit to the U.S., visited with Farrakan and the Black Panthers. Ahmabenijad says the United States orchestrated the 9-11 attack. He claims the Holocaust never happened. God created me with reason. I’m not bad; Obama and his following are bad.

But Obama’s support is right, they say, and for this reason, I heard the Black Panthers say: Black Panthers have clubs at the voting place to see that my kind of people don’t abuse their rights. Obama’s attorney general dismissed the charges. In this vein of thought, I hear that a million young people are going to be hired by the Obama folks—at the same time, to help the economy—paid $15,000 per year, by the taxpayers of course, they will be among us to see that bad people like me treat Obama’s following right.

With Black Panther mentality, friends of Obama, they advocate “kill cracker babies,” one of the club carrying screamed on a megaphone, and believing people are simple Simons who need to be manipulated, Obama and following are out to transform the American people into their notion of what we ought to be, which happens, coincidentally, to be the exactly the same as the hippies of the 1960s wanted. Being as I’m a bad person, best for all concerned to simply eliminate me and a lot more like me with set minds and too old to be productive. The burden of people like me to the taxpayers is unfair. No, it was not a holocaust in Germany, it was simply a matter of practicality. Ahmabenijad is right. What is a few million human lives? Get up to speed, folks, we get from the friends of Obama. The world is overpopulated.

For my 85th birthday on September 17, I received from my wife The Scofield Study Bible and The 5000 Year Leap. I’ve read “The Gospel According to St. Matthew.” In my reading nothing made me feel guilty. After the reading, I felt uplifted. I felt like a good person. I think we could all do well to read the Gospel According to St. Matthew.

I’ve started reading The 5000 Year Leap. The title speaks to America’s leap, beginning in 1607 in Jamestown, to the present. America began with no more than the people at the beginning of civilization, except for thousands of years of experience. Should we Americans feel guilty about our great success as a nation? Too bad if you are not individually a success, but why, pray tell me, should we all be failures? That’s what Obama’s redistribution says. Taking from the rich and giving to the poor is the same as killing the goose that laid golden eggs. How many of the poor do you know who provide jobs? This is no time to be raising taxes on the rich.

I’ve underlined some thoughts in A Miracle That Changed the World, The 5000 Year Leap.

“Problems are always solved by issuing more edicts or laws, setting up more bureaus, harassing the people with more regulators, and charging the people for these ‘services’ by continually adding to their burden of taxes.”

“The laws by which they were governed were considered natural laws given by divine dispensation, and were so well known by the people they did not have to be written down.” Ha! I’m reminded that in the Introduction of my Scofield Study Bible, “The Dispensations are distinguished, exhibiting the majestic, progressive order of the divine dealings of God with humanity, ‘the increasing purpose’ which runs through and links together the ages, from the beginning of the life of man to the end in eternity. Augustine said: ‘Distinguish the ages, and the Scriptures harmonize.”

The progressive order, the diametric opposite of progressive government, gives the individual increasing purpose. What does Obama know, who speaks of “collective salvation.” What does the all-knowing Obama know about divine dispensations or natural law? His law comes from Harvard Law School, and their law from the seat of their pants.

“When several of the larger states threatened to reject the Constitution, they were invited to ratify the main body of the Constitution but attach suggested amendments. They submitted 189! At the first session of Congress, these suggested amendments were reduced to 12 by James Madison, and 10 of them were finally approved and ratified by the states. Thus was born America’s famous Bill of Rights.”

America’s Bill of Rights, which were the subject of much debate, came from natural law, as Jefferson wrote in the Declaration of Independence, “from nature and nature’s God.”

“Wing #2 (of the American Eagle) has the responsibility of conserving the nation’s resources and the people’s freedom. Its function is to analyze the programs of wing #1 with two questions. First, can we afford it? Secondly, what will it do to the rights and individual freedom of the people?” What could be more apropos!

Thomas Jefferson: “If a monarchist be in office, anywhere, and it be known to the President, the oath he has taken to support the Constitution imperiously requires the instantaneous dismissal of such officer; and I hold the President criminal if he permitted such to remain.” What could be more apropos!

“They (the Founding Fathers) warned against confiscatory taxation and deficit spending. Jefferson said it was immoral for one generation to pass on the results of its extravagance in the form of debts to the next generation. He wrote: ‘. . .we shall all consider ourselves unauthorized to saddle posterity with our debts, and morally bound to pay them ourselves; and consequently within what may be deemed the period of a generation, or the life [expectancy] of the majority.’” What could be more Apropos!

“The Founders also warned that the only way for the nation to prosper was to have equal protection of ‘rights,’ and not allow the government to get involved in trying to provide equal distribution of ‘things.’” I’ve fought for equal rights all my adult life. What I’ve gotten is political expedience. I have no reason to feel guilty. I’m with Samuel Adams: “The Utopian schemes of leveling [redistribution of the wealth] and a community of goods [central ownership of the means of production and distribution], are as visionary and impractical as those which vest all property in the Crown. . .”

What does Obama know? To start with, “too big to fail” was Bush’s fault. He’s still getting blamed. Obama took up where Bush left off and made bad matters infinitely worse, but claims the hole Bush dug was deep and it will take time to fill. In the meanwhile, so we won’t have to suffer deprivation, the Federal Reserve Bank’s printing presses are turning out trillions of dollars in monopoly money to keep the Obama fairy tale going strong.

The election in a month will be a referendum on Obama and his spending policy. The jolly green giant, now turning brown this fall, is almost certain to lose. But the question: Does Obama need the support of the American people to carry out his agenda? I’ve yet to see Congress restrain Obama on any of his highly questionable acts, such as surrounding himself with revolutionary one-worlders who are out to throw America’s wealth to the four winds.

During campaigning, politicians always tell the people what they want to hear. Just wait until they mention cutting costs. Here’s what you will hear. “Why should my government entitlement be cut when George is getting far more help than I’m getting.” They are not going to cut spending. You people who just want to feel good better come to the party, you who have sat back and let politicians determine America’s fate.

Jefferson: “If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.” Hey folks, I’ve lived through the best of times. Now that my time here is close to being over, I, personally, have no complaints, but the sooner you get this Obamination over with, the sooner you will find yourselves in a world so good you cannot imagine. So please waste no time in getting this problem behind you. I expect to come back.

Read more…