Obama, the brain, against advice, places jobs ahead of investors. In the picture you see the most powerful lawyer in America, put in his high office by Barack Obama, another lawyer. Tea Party members, if you are going to do any good , you should be aware of the root cause of the division in America.  Patrick Henry was speaking to the Tea Party when he declared, “Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death." 

Freedom is not automatic.  A few questions:  Why is America forced to borrow money from China?  Why is government spending out of control?  How can government know who is entitled to receive and who is obliged to pay?  Does government lose control or do we, the people, lose control if America goes bankrupt? You know the answer. Why do you allow it?

Neither the vote nor my Constitution gives Obama authority to hand out taxpayer money for his political advantage, nor does Congress have the authority.  However, my reading of the Constitution doesn’t agree with government’s stand.  Does might make right?  In my view, the bigger they are the harder they fall. I’ve written a book about that. In Earth as It Is in Heaven 2012 will be available at Amazon this June—just in time to see your country go down the tube.

Do you know that if you have a legitimate personal stake in the outcome, you have the authority, as a taxpayer, in your Constitution to demand to be heard in a meaningful place in a meaningful way?   Your government and courts, by hook and crook, in order to rob you and hand out your money for its own power and control, have taken that right from you without an amendment to the Constitution.  Everyone who pays income tax has the constitutional right to take Uncle Sam to court. You’ve given up that right by allowing your government to take the stand that the voters and representatives of the people have the unquestionable authority to determine taxing and spending policy.  In Flast v.Cohen the Supreme Court did not agree with government. It agreed with me.

The sole reason your government is bankrupting the nation, turning America into a slave state, is your ignorance of the law. They say that ignorance of the law is no excuse. A professor of law set me straight in The “Higher Law” Background of American Constitutional Law. Edward S. Corwin’s famous essay was published in 1925, in the year of my birth. In 1925, unconstitutionally, America’s elected representatives authorized the IRS to examine your personal records if it suspected that you might be cheating on your taxes. The Fourth Amendment doesn’t allow the IRS to make fishing expeditions.  Not only did your elected representatives violate your Constitution in this case but went on to write into law that the only way you could question an IRS fraud was to take the matter to court.  Everything your government has done, and is doing, is for a political reason—for its benefit and your expense.

Having said this, in my tax case before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, the Court asserted: “Despite the fact that the amount of taxes owed by the taxpayer may be less than the amount the United States must spend to collect that amount, this is a case in which the excess should be expended to validate once again the legitimacy of the income tax.” The expense was the cost of government lawyers to fight me.  The facts don’t bear out the decision. And keep this in mind, taxpayers pay—and by law—not only to defend their rights, but pay their oppressor’s legal costs as well.   

Obama decided, on mere whim, that we taxpayers should pay for contraceptives. Good luck to the Catholic Church  on going to court.  The Church is going to pay its legal cost and the government’s legal cost. Your government will drag the case out for years.  It’s bound to be a loser.

Obama took an oath to protect and defend the Constitution. The law is based on reason.  What possible reason would Obama have for forcing taxpayers to pay for people’s contraceptives?  I learned from Professor Corwin, “It is customary nowadays to ascribe the legality as well as the supremacy of the Constitution—the one in truth, but the obverse of the other—exclusively to the fact that, in its own phraseology, it was ‘ordained’ by ‘the people of the United States.’ (that is,  my Constitution was held to be sacred.) The two ideas are thus brought into play. One is the so-called ‘positive’ conception of law as a general expression merely for the particular commands of a human lawgiver, as a series of acts of human will (nothing  sacred about it); the other is that the highest possible source of such commands, because the highest possible embodiment of human will is “the people” (not the makers and keepers of the law).  With this in mind,  “The Ninth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, in stipulating that ‘the enumeration of certain rights in this Constitution shall not prejudice other rights not so enumerated,’ illustrates this theory perfectly except that the principles of transcendental justice have been here translated into terms of personal and private rights (that is, the individual’s life, liberty and pursuit of happiness).” 

“Thus the legality of the Constitution, its supremacy, and its claim to be worshipped, alike find common standing ground (legal standing in a court of law) on the belief in a law superior to the will of human governors.” It doesn't take a Philadelphia lawyer to figure this out.  You have the God-given and constitutional right to challenge your government on its frauds against you.   

The American people have never been in Obama’s plans.  Typical of Chicago politics, in every instance you can name, Obama has favored those who favor him, and imposed illegal and lawless acts against those who oppose him.  

Now, as for the income tax and government lawyers, Black’s Law Dictionary, under lawful: “A further distinction is that the word legal is used as the synonym of ‘constructive,’ which ‘lawful’ is not. Thus ‘legal fraud’ is fraud implied or inferred by law, or made out by construction.”  Hitler was legal. Legal is merely the form of law.  In order to be lawful, the law must also include the spirit of the law—in other words, long standing ethics and morals. This is totally missing in America’s representation, and in America’s lawyer’s interpretations regarding income tax.  

America’s government would not be so rich and powerful if it adhered to the Constitution.  It would not be so hated by many other governments. The American people would not be subjected to hard times, and wars to end hard times.

I acted as my own lawyer, while the taxpayers paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to government lawyers fighting me in court. It’s the same as the taxpayers paying Al Capone to fight the law.  

Although the law supports me, all judges and lawyers, in what they call “bootstrap cases,” frown on my representing myself.  They give themselves credit for knowing the law far better than I could possibly know it. Why?  God created me with reason.  They go to law school; I go to God. Fundamental to the law is reason.  Think about this. It was lawyers that decided black people could be slaves under the law. What could be more unreasonable? When you have lawyers for friends, who needs enemies?  They are currently turning the American people into tax slaves.

I was before the tax court, three district courts, the court of appeals and the supreme court, all for naught, except that I acquired the court record—an absolute fraud—which I presented to the news media.  The court record showed that the tax court ruled in my favor. The IRS “mistakenly” violated the tax court’s order, and all the other courts looked the other way.  It’s all in the record.  The IRS couldn’t hide the truth. Those bandits were forced to admit to the press that they made numerous “mistakes.” If you or I made the same mistake, it would be called obstruction of justice.  

America’s lawyers have legalized the greatest fraud of all times, thus giving Obama all of his power.  The answer is as simple as falling off a log. You are getting from Obama the law of Chicago gangster Al Capone. He got his power by taking from some and giving to others. Ironically, hypocritical lawyers sent Capone to prison for failing to report income.  

 By studying my Constitution (in the county law library), and acting, I received magical power.   I went to the law books and learned the law I needed. The Department of Justice lost its case against me. The DOJ does a better job of covering its sleazy acts than enforcing the law.  If a layman can beat them at their own game, the DOJ must not have much to offer the American people.  

Obama, Capone style, appointed DOJ’s Holder. He appointed the boss of the IRS, Timothy Geithner, who failed to report income for taxation, and who was detained for questioning by New York police on February 24^th, and released after giving evidence about many high level financial criminals, friends of Obama and his mafia gang.    

Think about this: America’s taxpayers got zip from my effort, but miraculously, all of my dreams have come true. What it is going to take to turn the ship of state around? You have no idea of the power you possess.  It is all explained in great detail in my book.

I GUESS THE TEA PARTY IS  WRONG  ONCE IN A  WHYLE.  LIKE  MY SPELLING.

  I  WANT  THE   UNITED  NATIONS  BUILDING  CLOSED   OR MAKE  IT INTO  A OFFICE  BUILDING   AND  LEAESE  THE  BUILDING  OUT.   ITS   ALL  AS  USLESS  AS  THE  DEMOCRATIC  PARTY.   LETS  ALL  VOTE   REPUBLICAN  THIS   NOVEMBER.

      SOS Liberty         

@LibertySOS

A group of High School Students fighting for fiscal responsibility so the 'American Dream' is attainable for our generation and generations to come. #SOS

        The United States of America      ·          http://www.sosliberty.com/   

This is very encouraging to me, seeing how many good, responsibile young students aren't brainwashed by Obama's policies.  Check out their web-site!

Your thoughts?

Barack Obama signed four Executive Orders on Monday.  These add to the President’s growing list of Executive Orders.  They provide for an Order of Succession with the Department of Agriculture, the Office of Management and Budget, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Department of Commerce.

These lines of succession also include changes for the Office of Personnel Management, the National Archives and the Records Administration, and the Millennium Challenge Corporation for foreign aid.

A White House official said these amounted to nothing more than basic bureaucratic housekeeping.  Lines of succession can be very detailed as you can see by clicking the links below.

The Orders and their links are as follows:

Executive Order — Providing an Order of Succession within the Department of Agriculture

Executive Order — Providing an Order of Succession within the Office of Management and Budget

Executive Order — Providing an Order of Succession within the Environmental Protection Agency

Executive Order — Providing an Order of Succession within the Department of Commerce

Thirty days after being published in the Federal Register, executive orders become law. While they do bypass the U.S. Congress and the standard legislative law making process, no part of an executive order may direct the agencies to conduct illegal or unconstitutional activities.

One thing we do know, bi-partisanship only exists in the Obama administration at the bottom of the list of succession at the National Archives, where Alan C. Lowe, the director of the George W. Bush library was added as the fourth and last in line, bumping out Jimmy Carter library Driector Jay Hakes, who, coincidentally was put in that spot by George Bush in 2006.

It appears these particular Executive Orders will not lead to Armageddon, but might be poignant in the event of a nuclear disaster.

Before posting please read the Discussion Guidelines

   OBAMA   WILL  NOT  TELL YOU  THE  AMERICAN   PEOPLE  THE TRUTH,     WOULD  YOU  VOTE  FOR A  LIER????

This youtube video shows a 13 year old girl named Aryn singing her favorite pop song: 'Someone Like  you' by Adele. Aryn aspires to be a youth group pastor when she graduates from college and really enjoys singing pure songs like this. She is very proud of her Christian conservative values, and will never be seen performing half naked rapping about drugs, sex and slapping 'ho's'. Please enjoy and share with your friends and family. 

thanks

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1Bf1lnDAKw

The Dow Jones market lost $30 billion in the crash of 1929. Thirty billion dollars in 1929 would be the equivalent of $377 trillion today. The Dow Jones peaked on September 3, 1929 at 381 and bottomed out at 42. 

During the Great Depression a gallon of East Texas gas in Dallas cost 11 cents.  We bought a bushel of tomatoes at the Dallas City Market for 50 cents and canned them.  For many, the soup kitchen was their only source of food.

The cause of the Great Depression is widely debated but typically the cause included a weak banking system, overproduction and bursting of the credit bubble. We didn’t learn a thing from the Great Depression.

The letter of the law has to do with the form of the law, the spirit with morals and ethics.  Without the spirit of the law, you get the law of the jungle. I can tell you from personal experience how important it is to know the letter and spirit of the law.

Under the law of the jungle, the bigger you are, the more you consume: such as a herd of animals and a whale, in the human case, the majority vote or the king, president, dictator, capitalist, movie star, star athlete. None of the above connects with the spirit of the law.  The spirit of the law connects with intrinsic principles, such as equal in rights.

For the sake of forming a union of states, America’s forefathers compromised. They allowed for slavery, compromised their principle in the right to property.  Black slaves were the property of white people, the same as mules and cows.  More lately, the courts have compromised principle in the right to property though the taxing and spending authority, allowing for tax slavery.  Compromising intrinsic principles is always seen a being for the good of all—by kings, presidents, dictators, and the rich. Case in point: Although President Obama criticizes Governor Romney for catering to investors at the expense of jobs, he goes to the rich doing the same thing for campaign money.  Obviously, Obama feels that his expedience is for the good of all and Romney’s is for the rich.  Obama is trained in constitutional law, yet he does not seem to know the difference in the law of the jungle and the spirit of the law.  

I’d like to point out the great difference in legal training in constitutional law and actually studying the Constitution and using reason and logic to determine which is lawful; that is, backed by intrinsic principles.  To say that it is for the good of all to take from the rich and give to the poor violates intrinsic principles.  How is one to know why one is rich and another poor?  It doesn’t matter, say the makers and keepers of the law, because they have a certificate that says they know more than the people they control—or that they won an election.  In either case, it’s the law of the jungle.  You need to know this because it is you who loses your freedom.  

You are either self-governed or governed by external authority.  The original makers and keepers of American law gave you a Bill of Rights that cannot be taken from you except by due process of law, including your property.

If you knew the law, you would know chapter 29 of Magna Charta.  Nothing compares in importance with America’s Constitution.  “No free man shall be taken or imprisoned or deprived of his freehold or of his liberties or free customs, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any manner destroyed, nor shall we go upon him, nor shall we send upon him, except by a legal judgment of his peers or by the law of the land.”  

The law of the land in America is the U. S. Constitution.  Under the Fifth Amendment  (in the Bill of Rights) every individual is guaranteed  due process of law, as stated in chapter 29 of Magna Charta. Logically, a tax on income, under America’s law of the land, could not be constitutional if it taxed the individual out of a basic existence. In 1975, I was a single taxpayer employed in an entry level job. Government was taking withholding tax from my wages.  I was unable to pay my rent. I was locked out.  How can that be that under America’s Constitution?  This individual deprived of his basic rights is conveniently kept out of sight, out of mind.  In my case, it didn’t work.  I was in control because I took the time to learn the law and my constitutional rights.  It did something mysterious that people don’t grasp.  Whereas, if anything could go wrong it did, after I took the bull by the horns, when everything should have gone wrong everything started going right.

Since when has it worked to turn your control over to government?  After all, government is people in control of your life.  Too much control is corrupting. In spite of this fact, more than half of the American people depend on government in one way or another.

Nature provides man with reason and logic to survive. This is fundamental to man’s law.  But like other life, in that we possess the power drive, it causes us to form groups, and to look externally for our survival.  Might makes right only so long.  One ultimately becomes powerless. Compromising intrinsic principles is ultimately the reason nations come and go. 

Starting with a life in ruins, by learning the law, directly, and using it, all of my dreams came true. The United States lost its tax case against me, not in court, but from the court record. I took it to the press. An investigation was made.  The IRS admitted that for eleven years it had been wrong. I had been before the U.S. Tax Court, three U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Court of Appeals, and the U.S. Supreme Court. How could that be?  The powers that be allow the IRS to make limitless mistakes.  Is it for the good of all, or for the good of those with the power?

For some reason, it seems that I’ve been picked to tell the world the story of my life.  In Earth as It Is in Heaven 2012 will be available at Amazon this June.

AS  ALL   THE AMERICAN  PEOPLE DO.   OBAMA  THINKS  THAT  HE KNOWS  WHATS   BEST  FOR  THE  AMERICAN  PEOPLE.   WE KNOW  OBAMA  IS  JUST  A    PUPPET  LIKE THE ONE WITH  A  LONG NOSE. 

Have you noticed that the media is blind to racism when it is a black individual being a racist. They give them a free ride on that.

Anyone what to bet that the Teacher in Arkansas that made the news this week is "BLACK" , but did you see her picture ?  nope.

But when Zimmerman shot Martin his picture was all over national news.

Media bias is so strong it stinks to high heaven! 

The Black democrats who keep race baiting sure must want a race war!

Lewis Countian Thomas Massie Wins GOP Nomination in Ky. 4th District
ADVERTISEMENT
FRANKFORT, Ky. (AP) -- With the political and financial clout of the tea party behind him, Republican Thomas Massie easily won the GOP nomination Tuesday to run for an open congressional seat in Kentucky's 4th District.

The relative newcomer of politics, a protege of U.S. Sen. Rand Paul, beat two well-established Republicans, state Rep. Alecia Webb-Edgington and Boone County Judge-Executive Gary Moore.

With 99 percent of precincts reporting, Massie had 19,638 votes or 45 percent, to 12,501 votes for Webb-Edgington or 29 percent. Moore had 6,503 votes or 15 percent.

The race showed that the tea party movement remains strong in Kentucky. Paul endorsed Massie and was actively involved in the race, even appearing in a TV ad. And a Texas-based tea party group put more than $500,000 into the race.

"Some people want to make this race about the tea party," Massie said after securing the victory. "Good campaigns and good government are about building coalitions. This is a coalition of the tea party, the liberty movement and grassroots Ronald Reagan Republicans. And we have one thing in common: We want less government, not more."

Republican strategist Mike Karem of Louisville said Massie's decisive victory sends a strong signal to Kentucky's GOP establishment.

“The tea party is, in fact, a force to be reckoned with," Karem said.

The Republican nominee in the 4th District will be the overwhelming favorite to win the November general election. The congressional seat, which is centered in the suburbs just south of Cincinnati, has been held by the GOP since 1967, except for a six-year stint between 1999 and 2005 when Democrat Ken Lucas served.

M  PEOPLE  THAT ARE NOT  YOUR FRIENDS.  WISE UP AND  VOTE  REPUBLICAN  THIS  NOVEMBER.

DONT THE  AMERICAN  PEOPLE  HAVE  ANY  SAY  ANY MORE?   THE  DEMOCRATIC  RUN  GOVERMENT  IS  OUR  PROBLEM,  TO  MUCH  GOVERMENT.  THE  AMERICAN  PEOPLE  SAY FOR  US TO GET THE HELL OUT NOW.  YOU HAD  BETTER  START  LISTINING  TO  THE REAL  AMERICIAN  PEOPLE,  WE WANT   LESS  GOVERMENT  CONTROL,  WE WANT OUR  FREEDOM .

DONT THE  AMERICAN  PEOPLE  HAVE  ANY  SAY  ANY MORE?   THE  DEMOCRATIC  RUN  GOVERMENT  IS  OUR  PROBLEM,  TO  MUCH  GOVERMENT.  THE  AMERICAN  PEOPLE  SAY FOR  US TO GET THE HELL OUT NOW.  YOU HAD  BETTER  START  LISTINING  TO  THE REAL  AMERICIAN  PEOPLE,  WE WANT   LESS  GOVERMENT  CONTROL,  WE WANT OUR  FREEDOM .

Interesting... Just got a message from TP Command Center about a post regarding "While the South Slept", but when I clicked on the link, the article wasn't there, and doesn't come up on a search... Why not? Anyone care to tell me the reason?

The Dems are saying the Reps will take Social Security away from elderly...
When Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social Security (FICA)
Program. He promised:

1.) That participation in the Program would be completely voluntary,

No longer Voluntary

2.) That the participants would only have to pay 1% of the first $1,400 of
their annual Incomes into the Program,

Now 7.65% on the first $90,000

3.) That the money the participants elected to put into the Program would be
deductible from their income for tax purposes each year,

No longer tax deductible

4.) That the money the participants put into the independent 'Trust Fund'
rather than into the general operating fund, and therefore, would only be
used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program, and no other Government
program.
Under Johnson, another Democrat, the money was moved to The General Fund and
Spent

5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as
income.

Under Clinton & Gore, Democrats, Up to 85% of your Social Security can be
Taxed

Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are now receiving a
Social Security check every month -- and then finding that we are getting
taxed on 85% of the money we paid to the Federal government to 'put away'
for us -- you may be interested in the following:

Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the independent 'Trust
Fund' and put it into the general fund so that Congress could spend it?

A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the Democratically controlled House and Senate.

Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax deduction for Social
Security (FICA) withholding?

A: The Democratic Party.

Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social Security annuities?

A: The Democratic Party, with Al Gore casting the 'tie-breaking' deciding
vote as President of the Senate, while he was Vice President of the US

Q: Which Political Party decided to startgiving annuity payments to
immigrants?

AND MY FAVORITE:

A: That's right!

Jimmy Carter and the Democratic Party.

Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65, began to receive Social
Security payments! The Democratic Party gave these payments to them, even
though they never paid a dime into it!

Then, after violating the original contract (FICA), the Democrats turn
around and tell you that the Republicans want to take your Social Security
away!

And the worst part about it is uninformed citizens believe it!
If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of awareness will be planted and
maybe changes will evolve. Maybe not, some Democrats are awfully sure of
what isn't so.

It is sad that the word “gay” has been hijacked by an agenda driven group.  There is nothing “gay” about homosexuality! 

Read the rest at http://www.insectman.us/misc/gay-is-sad.htm.