The Lynching of Herman Cain

by Kris Zane

November 2, 2011

Read on Kris Zane's website: http://web.me.com/kzvideo/OBC/Lynching_of_Cain.html

For those of us old enough to remember the debacle of the Clarence Thomas “lynching,” many have likened Politico’s “scoop” of Herman Cain being accused of sexual harassment in the 1990s, and the subsequent “coverage” by the mainstream media, as an attempt to repeat history. Several years after the Clarence Thomas debacle, with the changing of the guard, another man, Bill Clinton, was accused of sexual impropriety; and when, like the Whac-a-Mole game, women were popping up across the United States accusing Clinton of everything from casual sexual encounters to rape and beating, the scant critical coverage was attributed to, according to Hillary Clinton, a “vast Right-wing conspiracy,” headed by one of the few news sources that were actually news sources back then, Rush Limbaugh.  Unlike the Clarence Thomas case, Bill Clinton being a liberal versus a conservative—this is the one crucible of the Left—the mainstream media circled their wagons, protecting their darling. 

And history is repeating itself, although this time we get to see the two ways the mainstream media treats a liberal versus a conservative, not years apart, but in “real time.” On the one hand we have Herman Cain being “exposed” by Politico’s “scoop” that Cain had been accused of sexual harassment, Politico the next day stating that Cain was flip-flopping in his responses to the accusations, and that he was in “damage control” mode, both baseless statements. On the other hand, we have the mainstream media circling the wagons in regard to Obama, specifically the “Green Jobs” scandal, of which Solyndra appears to be only the tip of the iceberg; in which millions—if not billions of dollars were fed to Obama 2008 campaign bundlers; but also more importantly the Fast and Furious scandal. Think about it: Obama and Holder oversaw a program that put thousands of taxpayer-funded assault weapons into the hands of Mexican drug cartel members, and then lied about having knowledge of it; that hundreds of Mexican citizens have been murdered with these weapons, and at least one American citizen—Border Patrol agent Brian Terry—and yet the mainstream media, like the Clinton debacle, is still circling the wagons. If the mainstream media hadn’t protected their darling, Clinton would have been viewed as what he was—a sexual predator; obstructing justice; suborning and committing perjury. If the mainstream media weren’t protecting their darling, Obama, Obama and Holder would, frankly, be impeached as accessories to murder for the hundreds of deaths in Mexico, and the murder of Brian Terry.

But as Bob Dylan sang back in the 1960s, the times they are a-changin’. It is interesting that the one thing (I believe) that gave Obama the push to the Presidency in 2008, and quashed all those nasty little doubts the American people were having about him—i.e., his hidden records, his dual citizenship, his unsavory connections with radicals and socialists, etc.—this one thing, the Internet, in the form of his campaign’s YouTube “town hall meetings,” (i.e., orchestrated, complete with casting companies and prepared questions and answers); this YouTube venue which carried him over the top, is the two-headed snake that now bites his heel. There are literally tens of thousands of YouTube videos covering everything from Obama’s Freudian slip about his “Muslim faith,” to the endless anomalies in his long-form birth certificate. These two subjects are not merely marginal; simply taking the highest view counts of two videos adds up to over two million views.  This is only one tenth of one percent of YouTube videos critical of Obama.

But there is much more than YouTube now. Instead of the lone voice of Rush Limbaugh in the ether, we have what is now rivaling (and I think crushing) the mainstream media: grassroots media, primarily where you have what amounts to conservative blogs turned news gatherers and news reporters. Would Solyndra and Fast and Furious be an issue today if it weren’t for The Daily Caller and Human Events? Would we have the hundreds of Obama documents detailing corruption, crony capitalism, and endless illegal activity if it weren’t for Judicial Watch? Would the anomalies in the Obama birth certificate, the irregularities in his Social Security number, the vast suppressing of Obama college, state senate (etc., etc., etc.) records be at the forefront of America’s doubts about Obama were it not for World Net Daily? 

But let us get back to the lynching of Herman Cain. One of the interesting aspects of the Internet that didn’t have as significant an impact as Obama 2008 campaign’s use of YouTube and mass emails was Twitter. Now Twitter is huge, and I would argue is actually the driving force of news (and, for that matter of attacks). I would call myself a student of Twitter, specifically in regard to the traffic that has occurred after the Fox/Google Republican debate, when Cain’s poll numbers began to skyrocket. Hillary Clinton said (falsely) regarding “Monicagate” that there was a vast Right-wing conspiracy to destroy her husband; but it doesn’t take a genius to decipher that Twitter has been used, in an orchestrated manner, to take down Cain. Observing the Cain traffic by the hour, nay, by the minute, you can see that a certain narrative occurs on cue; that, as quickly as a certain narrative pops up like our Wac-the-Mole game, the game is reset, and a new narrative occurs. These narratives are sometimes downright odd, other times substantive, but always orchestrated. Like the traditional mainstream media’s attack of all conservatives, the narrative began with Herman Cain being stupid and/or crazy, using, as they did with Sarah Palin, some supposed gaff or flip-flop statement. When this didn’t work, and the American public—specifically the Tea Party which has been from the beginning and until now his strongest supporter—didn’t buy this, the narrative was that the Tea Party was supporting Cain to try to cover up the fact that they were racists; that as soon as a viable candidate came upon the scene—a white candidate, that is—Herman Cain would be dropped like a hot potato. Again, the Left seeing that the Tea Party were not going to rein in their support for Cain, the narrative began that Herman Cain was an Uncle Tom; that he was coddling the white Tea Partiers; that he wove his message depending on what he thought the white Tea Partiers wanted to hear. Upon this narrative rearing its head, the Left showed their true racists colors, including the ridiculousness of the white Lawrence O’Donnell lecturing Herman Cain on how he wasn’t black enough; that during the Civil Rights years, he didn’t do enough; or Cornell West’s telling Cain to “get off the symbolic crack pipe.” For a time there was an attack on Cain’s 999 flat tax plan, of which Twitter was abuzz with citing an endless parade of economists and pundits, stating that the American public, especially the poor, would pay more in taxes under the plan. Then there was the narrative that Cain had changed his 999 plan, to a 9-0-9 plan, meaning that the poor would not have to pay taxes under his plan, charging Cain with flip-flopping. Of course, like all other narratives presented in this orchestrated assault, this was baseless. The Twitter “Uncle Tom” narrative (and the subsequent racism) falling on deaf ears, and upon more and more blacks beginning to support Cain, the Left pulled out their secret weapon, the Clarence Thomas-inspired smear campaign. Politico broke their amazingly lame “scoop,” in which they “decided” to not release details, “decided,” to make their story as vague as possible. The “victims,” unnamed, and without any details of the accusation, received “five-figure” settlements?  What are the details of the accusation? What is the background of the women? Did they bother to ask Herman Cain about their “scoop” before publishing the narrative? They then followed this up with their statements that Herman Cain had given “conflicting” responses to the accusations; that his campaign was in “damage control”—both baseless statements. Meanwhile the Left-wing media jumped on the wagon with all their fury, parroting the same. Twitter, on cue, almost to the minute, reflected the mainstream media’s attack of Cain, in this rabid, foaming at the mouth parroting.   

Twenty years ago with Americans getting their news from three major networks (all Left-wing), and one extreme Left-wing source (i.e., “Public” Radio), a Herman Cain, upon being pummeled by the media,  would have quietly slithered away, being pelted to death by the Left; but today with most Americans being sick and tired of the mainstream (lamestream as Sarah Palin calls it) media, contrary to the Left’s predictions, Cain has actually risen in the polls because of this baseless charge. America is sick of the Lawrence O’Donnell and Rachel Maddow type of “news” programs, even sickening of the “Right-wing” Fox, becoming disenchanted after their hatchet job on Hank Williams, Jr., and their ignoring of the Obama birth certificate and Social Security number issue.  Most Americans are now getting their news from websites outside of the mainstream. Further, a person working part-time out of their home is now part of the new mainstream media—case in point, the “I am the 53%” movement, in contradistinction to the Left’s Occupy Wall Street rabble. Or, even to the extent that a single individual like myself can write an article or produce a video that exposes Obama or supports Cain, that can potentially reach thousands, if not millions. Anyone with a computer can be a part of the new mainstream media, fighting off the lies and deceptions of the Left.

Most Americans are tired of the media telling them what to think; telling them what candidate they are to vote for: Both the Republican party and the Left have been telling the American public for months that Mitt Romney is the only viable candidate. Twenty years ago the American people would have complied. Today, with the mainstream media dying a quick death—I would say fighting in a sort of death throe—the sleeping giant, as Herman Cain says, the “we the people,” has awakened, and aren’t going to take it anymore, and have cut that noose that the Left put around Herman Cain’s neck.  

WATCHING THIS DEBATE ON C-SPAN 2 TURNED MY STOMACH AS THE DEMOCRATIC SENATORS KEPT PLAYING THE SAME OLD SONG ABOUT THE REPUBLICANS SANDBAGGING THE PRESIDENTS PLANS.  THE REPUBLIC HOUSE HAS PASSED 15 JOBS BILLS WITH NO TAX INCREASES OR TAX SURCHARGES BUT THE DEMOCRATS REFUSE TO  LET THEM ON THE SENATE FLOOR EVEN THOUGH THEY ALL PASSED THE HOUSE WITH SUBSTANTIAL DEMOCRATIC SUPPORT. THE PUSH FOR BRIDGES, ROADS, ETC ARE FOR PROGRAMS THAT WOULD TAKE MONTHS AND YEARS TO IMPLEMENT DUE TO THE CUMBERSOM REFGULATORY PROCESS. I WATCHED THE HOUSE DEBATE IN THE HOUSE ON THE REGULATOR REFORM SUBJECT AND I RECALL HEASRING THAT THE COST OF COMPLIANCE OF THE REGULATIONS WOULD RUN OVER A MILLION DOLLARS PER PROJECT AND TAKE 2 OR MORE YEARS TO COMPLETE AND THIS WAS PROVEN BY THE LACK OF SHOVEL READY JOBS PROMISED BY OBOMA'S FIRST INFRASTRUCTURE STIMULUS.  THE DEMOCRAT PACKAGE CONTAINS A SURTAX ON THE PEOPLE WHO WOULD BE DEPENDED UPON TO PROVIDE MATERIAL AND LABOR TO COMPLETE THE JOB.  THERE IS NO GUARANTEE THAT THE INCOME FROM THE SURTAX WOULD STILL BE THERE AFTER THE COSTLY AND LENGTHY REGULATORY PROCESS, I GUESS YOU COULD SAY THAT YOU HAVE TO PAY A FEE IF YOU WANT TO GET THE JOB.

IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT THE HOUSE REGULATORY REFORM BE PASSED BEFORE ANY OTHER PLANS ARE IMPLEMENTED  IN ORDER TO MAKE THE PROJECTS MORE PALATABLE OR THERE COULD B E A  SHORTAGE OF BIDS FOR THE PROJECTS. WHO IS SANBAGGING WHO HERE AND HOW STUPID DO THE DEMOCRATS BELIEVE THE GENERAL PUBLIC IS.  I GUESS THE DEMS ARE SO USED TO HAVE THEIR FOLLOWERS  FOLLOW BLINDLY THAT THEY ARE VILIFYING ANY ONE WHO OPENS THEIR MINDS AN EYES TO WHAT IS GOING ON  

IF A FEDERAL FLAT TAX IS INSTITUTED, IT WILL DEFINITLY IMPACT YOUR STATE TAX.  A FEDERAL FLAT TAX IS GREAT IN STATES LIKE TEXAS WHICH HAS NO STATE INCOME TAX BUT IT WOULD AFFECT THE FILING AND PROCESSING COSTS FOR YOUR STATE INCOME TAX.  THE STATES THAT DEPEND ON AN INCOME TAX FOR OPERATING REVENUE OF THE STATE HAVE A DEVELOPED INCOME TAX SYSTEM WHICH MIRRORS THE FEDERAL TAX SYSTEM. STATE INCOME TAX SYSTEMS USE THE FEDERAL TAX FORM AS A BASIS TO DETERMINE THE INCOME TAX THAT ITS CITIZENS SHOULD PAY ACCORDING TO THE TAX LAWS UNIQUE TO EACH INDIVIDUAL STATE.  THEREFOR STATE RETURNS INTERACT WITH THE FEDERAL RETURN ELECTRONICALLY. 

ELECTRONIC FILING OF FEDERAL AND STATE TAX RETURNS IS ALSO INTERCONNECTED, THE STATE RETURN IS PIGGYBACKED ON THE FEDERAL ON THE ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION OF THE TAX FORMS. THERE IS ALSO AN AUTIOMATIC ELECTRONIC COMPARISONS OF FEDERAL AND STATE RETURNS IN REGARDS TO THE INCOME ITEMS AP;PLICABLE TO EACH.  THIS SYSTEM REPLACES THE OLD SYSTEM OF INCOME COMPARISONS BETWEEN FEDERAL AND STATE WHERE AS THE FEDERAL AND STATE TAX SYSTEMS HAD A SEPERATE INCOME SHARING PROCESS  WITH EACH STATE FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL USING THE INDIVIDUALS SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER AS A BASE REFERENCE, WHICH WOULD REQUIRE BOTH THE FEDERAL AND STATE TO INVESTIGATE ANY DISCREPENCIES OF INFORMATION OF ANY INDIVIDUAL AND WHICH USED TO PICK UP ANY INDIVIDUAL WHO WOULD USE DIFFERENT IN FORMATION TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF DIFFERENCES BETWEEN FEDERAL AND STATE TAX LAWS .  THE REMOVAL OF THE CURRENT SYSTEM WOULD INCREASE THE COSTS OF BOTH THE FEDERAL AND STATE TO DETERMINE THE PROPER TAX LIABILITY FOR EACH ENTITY.  WHEN COSTS OF PROCESSING AND INFORMATION SHARING INCREASE, THOSE ADDED COSTS WILL FIND THEIR WAY INTO THE TAX LIABILITY OF EVERY INDIVIDUAL TAXPAYER.  

What’s wrong with this picture?

Posted on Human Events-By Aaron Klein and Brenda Elliott-On October 28, 2011:

“When Sen. Barack Obama, a few days before his inauguration as our 44^th President, promised an adoring crowd “the fundamental transformation of the United States of America,” few realized that he was not speaking merely of himself or of his own role as the country’s incoming chief executive.  Behind the avatar of “hope and change” lay a left-wing “progressive” movement waiting to come to power.

At first, we knew very little about this clandestine “Red Army,” whose goal is the transformation of America into a socialist system.  As a matter of strategy, the “progressives” had quietly and patiently perfected the art of creating innocuous-sounding front groups, and the promotion of its policies in the guise of moderation and in the rhetoric of modest-sounding social ideals.  Before the candidacy of Obama—whose entire political career has been spent under the tutelage of the progressives, including some of its leading figures—this radical network had already succeeded over the decades in infiltrating major institutions of American power.  But with his election to the presidency, it reached the highest levels of our government.

Along the way, the progressives hijacked an entire spectrum of important social causes, from feminism and race relations to environmental and antiwar activism, each of which became subordinated to an agenda having very little to do with the actual cause at hand and everything to do with the underlying agenda of the radical reconstruction of our society.

This Red Army has taken over not merely the largest worker unions, but also the mainstream of the Democratic Party.  It has deeply penetrated the United States Congress, forming one of the most powerful caucuses on Capitol Hill.  Key legislation, including President Obama’s health care and stimulus bills, was crafted by the network’s various branches—operating both inside and outside the government.  The same network is now pushing other major measures, including defense, economic and immigration policies.

Like a conventional army, the progressive Red Army is an organized network consisting of numerous branches and divisions, deploying an appropriate battalion for a specific goal or battle at hand.  Many of these activists are openly hateful of America, or at least of the American capitalist system, including its basic document and compact, the United States Constitution.  Many others, to be fair, genuinely love this country, while believing that socialism would pave the road to a better society.  Still others are merely along for the ride, and pursue personal power and profit in the service of a new order.

While this radical network played a major part in the nomination and election of Barack Obama, it runs far deeper than the slew of “czars” in the Obama administration or the extremist personalities demonstrably tied to our President.  It is much larger than Obama himself, and will far outlast however many months of the Obama presidency yet remain.  Indeed, it is already planning how to advance its agenda following the 2012 elections, regardless of which candidate is victorious.

This Red Army shows no signs of relenting.  With the dramatic erosion of his poll numbers and the ascension of Republicans in the 112^th Congress, Obama’s mandate for change may have for the time being run thin.  But these radical groups demonstrate an uncanny ability to wait patiently, like sleeper cells, for years or even decades, for the next opportunity to push their nefarious agenda while updating and perfecting the details of their well-planned, multilayered assault.

My co-author, Brenda J. Elliott, and I, in our previous book, The Manchurian President, documented President Obama’s extremist ties.  Our first book-length effort focused on unmasking Barack Obama and his radical associations.  But even before its publication, as we continued to delve into Obama’s administration, it became clear that we were uncovering a larger world of radical organizations, which are not only the force behind Obama’s “fundamental transformation of America” but are also now so well-entrenched in the institutions of American power that their influence can hardly be overstated.  In other words, in peeling off the layers of the onion that is the radical network, Brenda and I have unearthed something much larger and far more disturbing than even we, as seasoned political observers, could have anticipated.

We must take up the extremely loaded question of conspiracy.  Conspiracy is a very serious offense in the U.S. legal system, and of course this applies to conspiracy to commit a crime.  Yet the Red Army of which we write employs mostly legal means to pursue its radical agenda.  In fact, the largest part of its nefarious genius lies precisely in its employment of legal and quasi-legal stratagems to “fundamentally transform,” and even overthrow, the American system.

There is a conspiracy—albeit a mostly legal one—behind Obama’s promised “fundamental transformation of America.”  It is the radical socialist network behind the President that relentlessly pushes this agenda.  What we call the Red Army has devised the means to seize enormous instruments of political, economic and cultural power in our country, from the very presidency itself on down.

To be sure, the American people have begun awakening from their slumber, rousing from their acquiescence, and seem eager to reclaim their great, free and prosperous nation from this clutch of radical operatives.  But in order to prevail, in order to save our nation from the designs of these operatives, we must first comprehend—and then defeat—the radical network that has seized the reins of American power.”

• Aaron Klein is a NY Times bestselling author, senior reporter for WorldNetDaily.com and host on New York’s WABC Radio.
• Brenda J. Elliott is a NY Times bestselling author, journalist and researcher.

Source:

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=47166

Note: The following article and/or blog post and video relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. The Revolutionary Communist Party (RCP) Is Targeting Black Americans, Hispanics & Native Americans!-Posted on American Thinker-By Peter Wilson-On October 18, 2011:

http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/10/the_revolutionary_communist_partys_little_yellow_book.html

II. Obama czar's shocking communist connections: “Edited publication whose founders allegedly fed secrets to Soviet Union”-Posted on WND-By Aaron Klein-On March 3, 2010:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=126872

III. Video: ‘Marxism In America’-By Lt. General (Ret.) W.G. ‘Jerry Boykin!

http://www.morningstartv.com/oak-initiative/marxism-america

IV. Video: Former KGB Official Explains Plan Unfolding in America Right Now!-Posted on Vision to Amreica-On October 17, 2011:

http://visiontoamerica.org/4861/video-former-kgb-official-explains-plan-unfolding-in-america-right-now/

Note:  My following blog post contains numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Revolutionary Communist Party (RCP)!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/07/revolutionary-communist-party/

Obama Czar's Shocking Communist Connections!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/03/04/obama-czars-shocking-communist-connections/

The Midterm Elections and the Communist Manifesto!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/08/the-midterm-elections-and-the-communist-manifesto/

Progressives and Communists Are Out of the Closet Together!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/05/progressives-and-communists-are-out-of-the-closet-together/

Who is sponsoring the NAACP’s ‘One Nation Working Together’ rally?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/09/28/who-is-sponsoring-the-naacp’s-‘one-nation-working-together’-rally/

The Reason for the Treason!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/03/22/the-reason-for-the-treason/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

The Russian View of What Has Been Happening In America!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/22/the-russian-view-of-what-has-been-happening-in-america-2/

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Obama feels he doesn't need congress to pass laws and all he has to do is issue executive orders.

Obama care was passed and no one knew what was in it! He offers a 27,000 page bill and expects it to be passed in two weeks and he bribes 6 senators to pass it!

He starts his own 2 week war and extends it to 7  months and now all we have to do is wait for the Muslin Brotherhood to take over as in Egypt!

He offers a jobs plan which favors only his voting constituents such as the violent union leaders lke Trumka. So he gets about 1.5 million public temporary  jobs but nothing for the 12.5 unemployed in the private sector.

Government can not run anything well and the reason is that no one stands to loose a dime if the government is run poorly.

What’s wrong with this picture?

Posted on The Daily Caller-By Matthew Boyle, The Daily Caller-On November 1, 2011:

“Democratic California Sen. Dianne Feinstein told a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing that lax gun control laws, not Obama administration malfeasance within the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (BATF), was the real problem uncovered by Operation Fast and Furious.

“My concern, Mr. Chairman, is there’s been a lot said about Fast and Furious, and perhaps mistakes were made, but I think this hunt for blame doesn’t really speak about the problem,” Feinstein said during the Tuesday hearing. “And the problem is, anybody can walk in and buy anything, .50-caliber weapons, sniper weapons, buy them in large amounts, and send them down to Mexico. So, the question really becomes, what do we do about this?”

“I’ve been here 18 years,” Feinstein continued. “I’ve watched the BATF get beaten up at every turn on the road. And, candidly, it’s just not right.”

After the hearing, Feinstein’s staff refused to answer when The Daily Caller asked how gun control laws would have prevented the abuses in Operation Fast and Furious when the law enforcement agents responsible for upholding gun laws were the individuals giving the weapons to drug cartels.

They also refused to say whether the Sen. Feinstein wanted to hold Obama administration officials accountable for shipping guns into Mexico, for Border Patrol agent Brian Terry’s murder, or for the murders of countless Mexican citizens directly resulting from the failed gun-walking program.

When TheDC asked if Sen. Feinstein cared about the program’s connections to the murder of Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent Jaime Zapata, Feinstein’s spokesman pointed to a comment she made during a March 9, 2011 hearing. Then, Feinstein did not mention any relationship between the murder and Operation Fast and Furious.

House oversight committee chairman Rep. Darrell Issa recently indicated that Attorney General Eric Holder may be withholding more information about Zapata’s murder.

During Tuesday’s hearing, Sen. Feinstein advocated for Operation Fast and Furious as a springboard from which to advocate for gun control laws, including national databases and government-controlled firearms registration. She argued that such laws would prevent future programs like Fast and Furious from reaching maturity.

“So, the question comes, what can we do?,” Feinstein asked Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer, a hearing witness. “And, I’d really rather concentrate on the constructive, rather than other things, so the questions comes: Do you believe that, if there were some form of registration when you purchase these firearms, that that would make a difference?”

Breuer, a high-ranking Obama administration official who is notable for his willingness to accept some responsibilityfor the scandal, said it would.

“Senator, we’re talking today about transnational organized crime,” Breuer said, ”and your leadership, and the chairman’s, and other senators’ shows that information — information — is the tool we need to challenge and defeat organized crime.”

“I know others disagree,” Feinstein added, “but we have very lax laws when it comes to guns and I think, to some extent, this influences BATF as to whether they have political support or not,” Feinstein said. “But, I think these numbers are shocking — and when you know the number of deaths these guns have caused, used by cartels against victims, it’s literally up in the tens of thousands.”

According to the Obama administration’s BATF, 70 percent of weapons recovered in Mexico come from the United States. Feinstein insisted those numbers are a “very deep concern for me.”

Sen. Chuck Grassley, Iowa Republican, contested the weapons-trafficking statistics Feinstein and Breuer cited, arguing that they appear to make the U.S. appear to be a more rampant source of illicit firearms than is actually the case. Grassley has been challenging those statistics since June, when he wrote a letter to then-acting BATF director Ken Melson.

“I am concerned that the selective release of certain statistical data without further clarification and categorization may inaccurately reflect the scope and source of the problem of firearms in Mexico and the DTO [drug trafficking organization] violence,” Grassley wrote to Melson in June.

At least 29 members of Congress have now called on Attorney General Eric Holder to resign over Operation Fast and Furious. With a Tuesday tweet, North Carolina Rep. Walter Jones became the latest, writing: “It’s time for Eric Holder to go!”

Source:

http://dailycaller.com/2011/11/01/sen-feinstein-lax-gun-control-is-real-problem-with-fast-and-furious/

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and videos relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. Top Justice Dept. Official Admits ‘Mistake’ in Ignoring ATF’s ‘Unacceptable Tactics!’-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Susan Jones-On November 1, 2011:

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/top-justice-dept-official-admits-mistake-ignoring-atfs-unacceptable-tactics

II. Sheriff: Time For Citizens To Arm Themselves!-Posted on Vision to America-By V2A-On October 31, 2011:

http://visiontoamerica.org/5220/sheriff-time-for-citizens-to-arm-themselves/

III. Democrats cling to their guns: ‘Obama scares women and liberals into the gun store’!-Posted by The Washington Times-On October 27, 2011:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/oct/27/democrats-cling-to-their-guns/?utm_source=RSS_Feed&utm_medium=RSS

IV. Darrell Issa’s Fast and Furious rebuke of Eric Holder is one for the ages!-Posted on The Coach Is Right-By Coach Collins-On October 30, 2011:

http://www.coachisright.com/attorney-general-holder-eviscerated-by-darrell-issa-for-fast-and-furious-crimes-3/

V. Obama’s Freedom of Unformation Act!-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Guest Writer-On October 28, 2011:

http://floydreports.com/obamas-freedom-of-unformation-act/

VI. Attorney General Holder eviscerated by Darrell Issa for Fast and Furious crimes!-Posted on The Coach Is Right-By Coach Collins-On October 27, 2011:

http://www.coachisright.com/attorney-general-holder-eviscerated-by-darrell-issa-for-fast-and-furious-crimes/

VII. Hillary Clinton: ‘No Evidence’ DOJ Sought Required License to Send Guns to Mexico in ‘Fast and Furious’!-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Fred Lucas-On October 28, 2011:

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/hillary-clinton-no-evidence-doj-sought-required-license-send-guns-mexico-fast-and

VIII. Napolitano queried on lack of ‘Fast and Furious’ probe!-Posted on Cowboy Byte-On October 27, 2011:

http://cowboybyte.com/1544/napolitano-queried-on-lack-of-‘fast-and-furious’-probe/

IX. Did Obama Accidentally Reveal Origins of Operation Fast and Furious?-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Guest Writer-On October 20, 2011:

http://floydreports.com/did-obama-accidentally-reveal-origins-of-operation-fast-and-furious/

X. Sen. Grassley to ask for resignation of highest-level person who signed off on Fast and Furious!-Posted on The Daily Caller-By Matthew Boyle, The Daily Caller-On October 13, 2011:

http://dailycaller.com/2011/10/13/sen-grassley-to-ask-for-resignation-of-highest-level-person-who-signed-off-on-fast-and-furious/

XI. Obama Spoke About "Fast & Furious" Before Holder Claimed He Knew!-Posted on RealClear Politics-On October 13, 2011:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/10/13/obama_spoke_about_fast__furious_before_holder_claimed_he_knew.html

XII. CBS Highlights ‘Fast & Furious’; ABC, NBC Place Heads in the Sand!-Posted on News Busters-By Matthew Balan-On October 4, 2011:

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/matthew-balan/2011/10/04/cbs-highlights-fast-furious-abc-nbc-place-heads-sand#ixzz1bjPhUDQc 

XIII. NRA's LaPierre: 'Fast and Furious' Was Plot Against Second Amendment!-Posted on NewsMax.com-By Martin Gould and Ashley Martella-On October 14, 2011:

http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/LaPierre-NRA-gunrunning-fastandfurious/2011/10/14/id/414545?s=al&promo_code=D441-1

XIV. Michelle Obama’s warning to gun owners!-Posted on The Daily Caller-By Chris Cox-On October 11, 2011:

http://dailycaller.com/2011/10/11/michelle-obamas-warning-to-gun-owners/

XV. Breaking: new evidence shows Hillary a mastermind behind Gunwalker!-Posted on Examiner-By Anthony Martin, Conservative Examiner-On October 10, 2011:

http://www.examiner.com/conservative-in-national/breaking-new-evidence-show-hillary-a-mastermind-behind-gunwalker

XVI. Hillary's enemies list now includes Gunwalker reporters!-Posted on Examiner-By Anthony Martin, Conservative Examiner-On October 8, 2011:

http://www.examiner.com/conservative-in-national/hillary-s-enemies-list-now-includes-gunwalker-reporters

XVII. Video: The UN Considers Gun Regulation Treaty!-Posted on ExposeObama.com-On October 2, 2011:

http://www.exposeobama.com/2011/10/02/video-the-un-considers-gun-regulation-treaty/

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Did ATF provide weapons to Mexican drug cartels that were subsequently used to kill one of our own?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/03/04/did-atf-provide-weapons-to-mexican-drug-cartels-that-were-subsequently-used-to-kill-one-of-our-own/

What is the true intent of the UN Small Arms Treaty?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/12/what-is-the-true-intent-of-the-un-small-arms-treaty/

Threat of the Mexican drug cartel, illegal border-crossers and “sanctuary cities”!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/23/threat-of-the-mexican-drug-cartel-illegal-border-crossers-and-“sanctuary-cities”/

What was the true intent of Operation Closed Campus?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/04/03/what-was-the-true-intent-of-operation-closed-campus/

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Those Racist Liberal Democrats Begin Sarah Palin Style Smear Attacks on Herman Cain

The following recent videos reveal the outrageous and deplorable Islamic Infiltration Inside Our Government-You Decide:

Video: Rep. Gohmert Questions DHS Sec. Janet Napolitano Regarding A Radical Islamist!-Posted on YouTube.com-By GohmertTX01-On October 26, 2011:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=354GJU3X54Y

Video: Rep. Gohmert Speaks on Radical Islam! (Part 1)-Posted on YouTube.com-By GohmertTX01-On October 29, 2011:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x0QhMecXafw&feature=relmfu

Video: Rep. Gohmert Speaks on Radical Islam! (Part 2)-Posted on YouTube.com-By GohmertTX01-On October 29, 2011:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TaA7M4RC5OU&feature=relmfu

Video: Rep. Gohmert Speaks on Radical Islam! (Part 3)-Posted on YouTube.com-By GohmertTX01-On October 29, 2011:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HlICvlltLk0&feature=relmfu

Video: Rep. Gohmert Speaks on Radical Islam! (Part 4)-Posted on YouTube.com-By GohmertTX01-On October 29, 2011:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfuWdeMXwYA&feature=relmfu

Note: The following website and articles and/or blog posts relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. Holy Land Foundation For Relief And Development (HLF)!

Posted On DiscoverTheNetWorks.Com:

• U.S-based Islamic charity shut down by authorities in 2001 for funding the terrorist group Hamas

Established in 1988 (under the name “Occupied Land Fund”) by Shukri Abu Baker, Mohammad El-Mezain andGhassan Elashi, the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development (HLF) was a non-profit, tax-exempt, charitable trust headquartered in Richardson, Texas. It also maintained branch offices in New Jersey, California, and Illinois. Its name change took place in 1992.

Calling itself America’s largest Islamic charity, HLF purported to be a source of help for needy Palestinian Muslims in Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, and the Palestinian Authority (PA). “Our mission,” stated its website, “is to find and implement practical solutions for human suffering through humanitarian programs that impact the lives of the disadvantaged, disinherited, and displaced peoples suffering from man-made and natural disasters.” In reality, however, the Foundation was a major financier of the terrorist organization Hamas.

In its earliest days, HLF received a $200,000 cash infusion from Ghassan Elashi’s brother-in-law Musa Abu Marzook, the Hamas senior political leader and Virginia resident who would be deported in 1997 for his involvement in six terror attacks in Israel that killed 47 people. By 1989, HLF had already sent nearly $1 million to Marzook and Hamas co-founder Ahmed Yassin (to the latter through an account called the Islamic Center of Gaza—another ostensibly charitable entity used by Yassin to finance Hamas activities).

HLF’s precursor, the Occupied Land Fund, was named in a May 1991 Muslim Brotherhood document—titled “An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America”—as one of the Brotherhood’s 29 likeminded “organizations of our friends” that shared the common goal of destroying America and turning it into a Muslim nation. These “friends” were identified by the Brotherhood as groups that could help teach Muslims “that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands ... so that ... God’s religion [Islam] is made victorious over all other religions.”

Also named in the Muslim Brotherhood document were:

• Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) 
• ISNA Fiqh Committee (now known as the Fiqh Council of North America) 
• ISNA Political Awareness Committee 
• Muslim Youth of North America 
• Muslim Students Association of the U.S. and Canada 
• Association of Muslim Scientists and Engineers
• Islamic Medical Association (of North America)
• Islamic Teaching Center
• Malaysian Islamic Study Group
• Foundation for International Development
• North American Islamic Trust
• Islamic Centers Division 
• American Trust Publications
• Audio-Visual Center
• Islamic Book Service
• Islamic Circle of North America
• Muslim Arab Youth Association
• Islamic Association for Palestine
• United Association for Studies and Research
• International Institute of Islamic Thought
• Muslim Communities Association
• Association of Muslim Social Scientists (of North America) 
• Islamic Housing Cooperative
• Muslim Businessmen Association
• Islamic Education Department
• Mercy International Association
• Baitul Mal Inc.
• Islamic Information Center (of America)

Suspicious of its terrorist ties, U.S. federal authorities began monitoring the Holy Land Foundation in 1996. On September 5, 2001, federal anti-terrorism agents raided InfoCom Corporation, the company that ran the HLF website. According to defectors from the conspiracy, the HLF web server was used also by the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), the Islamic Society of North America, the Muslim Students’ Association of the U.S. and Canada, the Islamic Circle of North America, the Islamic Association for Palestine, and American Muslims for Jerusalem. As Islam scholar Stephen Schwartz writes, “All these organizations drew from the common financial and technical pool at HLF. All shared a single administrative and technical contact for the maintenance of the web server. They had been erected as political shells around the Hamas hydra-head represented by HLF.” (Support for Hamas had become illegalin 1995 as the result of an executive order by President Bill Clinton and subsequent congressional action.)

On December 4, 2001, the Bush administration seized all HLF assets and records because of its Hamas connections. Said President Bush at the time: “Hamas has obtained much of the money that it pays for murder abroad right here in the United States, money originally raised by the Holy Land Foundation. The Holy Land Foundation ... raised $13 million from people in America last year. … Money raised by the Holy Land Foundation is used by Hamas to support schools and indoctrinate children to grow up into suicide bombers. [It] is also used by Hamas to recruit suicide bombers and to support their families.” 

In July 2004, federal authorities arrested five former HLF leaders: Shukri Abu Baker (HLF’s co-founder and former President and Chief Executive); Ghassan Elashi (HLF’s co-founder and former Board Chairman and Treasurer); Mohammed El-Mezain (HLF’s co-founder and former Board Chairman); Mufid Abdulqader (the half-brother of Hamas’s supreme political leader, Khaled Mashal); and Abdulraham Odeh (HLF’s former New Jersey representative). In a 42-count indictment, these individuals were charged with providing material support for Hamas terrorists to the tune of $12.4 million over a six-year period, and more than $57 million since the late 1988. Two more ex-officials of HLF, Haitham Maghawri and Akram Mishal, managed to escape U.S. jurisdiction and are considered to be fugitives.

According to the indictment, HLF tried to hide its terrorist-financing activities from American law-enforcement by making a few small contributions to innocuous, non-Palestinian entities while reserving the vast majority of its funds for terrorists. As Shukri Abu Baker told his underlings: “We can give $100,000 to the Islamists and $5,000 to the others.” Another HLF program, masquerading as charitable support for needy families and orphans in Palestinian territories, is said to have channeled money to families whose relatives had been killed or captured while waging jihad; some of them were suicide bombers.

In December 2006, two openly pro-Castro organizations—the Humanitarian Law Project and the Center for Constitutional Rights—jointly petitioned a federal judge to dismiss many of the charges brought against HLF.

On July 23, 2007, HLF’s leaders went on trial. Seven principal individuals were charged with twelve counts of providing “material support and resources” to a foreign terrorist organization. Additionally, they faced thirteen counts of money laundering and thirteen counts of breaching the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which prohibits transactions that threaten American national security. Along with the seven named defendants, the government released a list of approximately 300 “unindicted co-conspirators” and “joint venturers.”

Among the unindicted co-conspirators were groups such as Hamas, the Council on American-Islamic Relations, INFOCOM, the Islamic Society of North America, the Muslim Arab Youth Association, the Islamic Association for Palestine, the United Association for Studies and Research, and the North American Islamic Trust. The list also included many individuals affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood and/or Hamas. Among these were Omar Ahmad, Abdallah Azzam, Yousef al-Qaradawi, Mohammad Jaghlit, Abdurahman Alamoudi, Jamal Badawi, Abdel Aziz Rantisi,Ahmed Yassin, and Mousa Abu Marzook. Thirty-nine directors, employees and representatives of HLF were also named.

On October 22, 2007, after a two-month trial and nineteen days of jury deliberation, Judge A. Joe Fish declared a mistrial because the jury had been unable to deliver unanimous verdicts and had failed to convict on a single count brought against the defendants.

When the government retried the case a year later, prosecutors made several key adjustments. Most notably, they dropped some counts against particular defendants; they called several new witnesses; and they displayed three exhibits which Israeli military officials had seized from the Palestinian Authority (PA). Those exhibits demonstrated that the PA, like the U.S. government, clearly considered HLF to be a Hamas funder; that an HLF-supported charity committee was fully controlled by Hamas; and that the defendants were well aware that whatever money they were raising in the U.S. was earmarked for Hamas.

On November 24, 2008, the jury convicted five former HLF officials—Shukri Abu-Baker, Ghassan Elashi, Mohamed El-Mezain, Mufid Abdulqader and Abdelrahman Odeh—of conspiring to provide material support to terrorists.”

Source:

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6181

II. Exposed! Muslim Brotherhood's U.S. front groups: ‘Investigation documents 'terrorists with neckties' in nation's capital!’-Posted on WND.com-On October 7, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=119427

III. Video: Stakelbeck on Terror: Muslim Brotherhood's Growing Influence!-Posted on CBN.com-On September 21, 2011:

http://www.cbn.com/media/player/index.aspx?s=/Archive/News/Stakelbeck_Terror_092011_WS&search=stakelbeckepisodes&p=1&parent=0&subnav=false

IV. Video: The Basics of Shariah Law By Lt. Gen. (Ret.) W.G. Jerry Boykin!-Posted on YouTube-By ferval59-On January 23, 2011:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G60oyejzYII&NR=1

V. Federal judge confirms CAIR is Hamas: ‘Unsealed ruling reveals 'ample evidence' tying group to terror’-Posted on WND.com-On November 23, 2010:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=232181

VI. Jihad 101:  Posted On Act! For America-Center for Security Policy-By Frank Gaffney, Jr.-On December 29, 2009:

http://www.actforamerica.org/index.php/learn/recent-news/10-newsmaster/1759-jihad-101

VII. Obama is a Useful Pawn of Radical Islam!-Posted on TeaParty.org-By Dr. Laurie Roth, PhD-On October 27, 2011:

http://www.teaparty.org/article.php?id=1567

VIII. Obama’s ineligibility: Muslim-leftist radical in the White House!-Posted on U.S. Justice Foundation-On September 14, 2011:

http://usjf.net/2011/09/obama’s-ineligibility-muslim-leftist-radical-in-the-white-house/

IX. What you haven't been told: “Most exhaustive investigation ever into Prez's background, to include his radical ties”-Posted on WND.com-On May 2, 2010:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=148037

X. Smear, Inc.: Silencing the Critics of Islamic Supremacism!-Posted on FrontPageMag.com-By Mark Tapson-On September 14, 2011:

XI. The Administration Takes on ‘Islamophobia’: ‘The White House is giving free-speech opponents a megaphone’-Posted on National Review Online-By NINA SHEA-On September 1, 2011:

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/276021/administration-takes-islamophobia-nina-shea?page=1

XII. Three Convicted in Terror-Related Cases Later Granted U.S. Citizenship by Obama Administration-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Edwin Mora-On April 29, 2011:

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/3-persons-convicted-terrorism-related-ca

XIII. DOJ Drops Charges Against Indicted Islamic Terrorist!-Posted on Judicial Watch-On October 1, 2010:

http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2010/oct/doj-drops-charges-against-indicted-islamic-terrorist

Note: The following video contains an eye-opening interview with attorney Stephen Pidgeon who claimed that he found a record that revealed that President Obama changed his name from “Barak Mounir Ubayd” to “Barack Hussein Obama” on October 14, 1982 in Skookumchuck, British Columbia-You Decide:

Video: Attorney’s Explosive Claim, Obama Changed Name in 1982!-Posted on ExposeObama.com-On June 4, 2011:

http://www.exposeobama.com/2011/06/04/video-attorneys-explosive-claim-obama-changed-name-in-1982/

Note:  What follows is a three-part series of eye-opening articles and/or blog posts regarding the infiltration of Shariah within the U.S. written by Chuck Norris-You Decide:

Holy Week, Holy Shariah (Part 1 of 3)-Posted on Human Events-By Chuck Norris-On April 19, 2011:

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=43031

US Shariah Infiltrations (Part 2 of 3)-Posted on Townhall-By Chuck Norris-On April 26, 2011:

http://townhall.com/columnists/chucknorris/2011/04/26/us_shariah_infiltrations_part_2

US Shariah Infiltrations (Part 3 of 3)-Posted on Townhall-By Chuck Norris-On May 3, 2011:

http://townhall.com/columnists/chucknorris/2011/05/03/us_shariah_infiltrations_part_3_of_3

Note:  My following blog post contains numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

The Islamic Infiltration: Inside Our Government, Armed With Our Secrets!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/15/the-islamic-infiltration-inside-our-government-armed-with-our-secrets/

Could Steps That Team Obama Has Taken Be Emboldening Terrorists?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/12/30/could-steps-that-team-obama-has-taken-be-emboldening-terrorists/

Should Americans Fear Islam?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/05/should-americans-fear-islam/

Is Shariah Law A Danger To Our U.S. National Security?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/09/16/is-shariah-law-a-danger-to-u-s-national-security/

What do American Citizens Know About “Sharia Law” and is It Something That We Should Know More About?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/26/what-do-american-citizens-know-about-“sharia-law”-and-is-it-something-that-we-should-know-more-about/

Islam’s Child Martyrs in America!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/02/12/islam’s-child-martyrs-in-america/

What are CAIRs obstructionist goals?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/03/06/6951/

Federal judge confirms CAIR is Hamas!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/11/24/federal-judge-confirms-cair-is-hamas/

Godfather of The Islamic Revolution!

What we haven’t been told about the President’s background!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/03/what-we-haven’t-been-told-about-the-president’s-background/

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

MR. HUNTSMAN TOWN HALL MEETING AS BROADCAST IN C-SPAN 3 THIS MORNING WAS A UNIQUE EXPERIENCED. THE ENTIRE ATMOSPHERE WAS UNUSUAL FOR A POLITICIAN.  MR HUNTSMAN SAT AT A TABLE RARHER THAN STANDING OR USING A DESK. THE ATMOSPHERE HE PRODUCED WAS MORE LIKE A GROUP OF FRIENDS SEATED AROUND  AND HOLDING A CASUAL DISCUSSION ABOUT THE PROBLEMS CONFRONTING OUR COUNTRY.  THERE WAS NO LECTURE TYPE OR USED CAR SALES TYPE ATTITUDE,  JUST A COMFORTABLE FEELING ABOUT THE MAN PRESENTING HIMSELF IN A FRIENDLY MANNER, THIS FORMAT WAS CONDUCIVE TO A FEELING OF CONFIDENCE AND ADMIRATION ABOUT THIS MAN. THISW WAS SO DIFFERENT FROM THE DEBATE FORMAT OR THE SALES TYPE OF PRESENTATION THAT IS USUALLY ENCOUNTERED AT THE POLITICAL GATHERING TYPE WE HAVE ALL BECOME ACCUSTOMED TO,  MR HUNTSMAN SPOKE IN A CALM MANNER WHICH GAVE THE BELIEF THAT HE WAS TALKING TO EQUALS, NOT LECTURING OR SELLING, JUST BEING AN ORDINARY TYPE PERSON.

IT WAS A REFRESHING EXPERIENCE WHEN COMPARED TO THE HIGH VOLTAGE ATMOSPHERE ENCOUNTERED AT OTHER POLITICAL EVENTS.

Quote of the Day: "A constitution is not the act of a government, but

of a people constituting a government; and government without a

constitution is power without a right. All power exercised over a

nation, must have some beginning. It must be either delegated, or

assumed. There are not other sources. All delegated power is trust,

and all assumed power is usurpation. Time does not alter the nature

and quality of either." -- Thomas Paine (1737-1809)

http://aclj.org/us-constitution/protect-montana-war-memorial-under-attack-by-atheist-group

Atheists are at it again with trying to tear down all that christians hold dear by throwing up a fuss over this being on federal land. I am sick of these trecherous people who want to tear down anything that has to do with christians.I want to get a law passed that stops these kinds of lawsuits from being considered when it comes to the heros that gave all so these idiots could actually have a voice.I say silence that voice of derision and send them packing

I recently learned President Ronald Reagan designated 1983 as the national Year of the Bible. I seriously doubt such a proclamation would pass Congress today.

President Obama has declared, “We do not consider ourselves a Christian nation”. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QIVd7YT0oWA

The liberal media regards expressing one's Christianity publicly as repulsive as showing Dracula the cross.

For those of you who do not follow football, former college football quarterback superstar, Tim Tebow is an outspoken Christian. The liberal media and pro abortion groups were furious when the story of how Tebow's pro-life mom was advised by doctors to abort him, but refused, was featured in a Super Bowl commercial. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLds7Xcs0-w

Tebow is now a pro football rookie quarterback with the Denver Broncos. Some sports analysts and media say Tebow does not have the skills needed to “make it” in the NFL. While some of the naysayers and criticism may be justified, some desire to see Tebow fail because he is so outspoken regarding his Christian faith.

My doc says exercise helps control my diabetes. That Sunday, I was at the gym on the ellipse machine watching the Denver/Miami NFL football game. It was Tebow's first start as a pro.

An elderly husband and wife couple approached the aerobic section. They visually scanned the bank of TV sets. I suspected they were looking for the Tebow game. I was correct.

I asked, “Are you folks Tebow fans?” They smiled and replied, “Yes” I said, “So am I”. The woman said, “Thank you”. Something in her voice told me their support of Tebow extended beyond football. I suspect millions across America share similar feelings about Tebow.

Rather than giving you a play by play of the game, let's say for 95% of the game, Tebow's performance was unimpressive. Miami was beating Denver 15 to zero. Then, with 2 minutes left in the game, Tebow brought his team back to tie the score. Tebow's team won the game in overtime. Wow!

When interviewed after the game about his amazing comeback and win, Tebow said the last thing I am sure the liberal media wanted to hear, “First, I would like to thank my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ...”

Folks, I yelled, “Yes!” and felt a little tearful.

Please do not get me wrong. I am not suggesting Tim Tebow walks on water. I am saying that in our culture which celebrates crudeness and the lowest common denominator, it is extremely refreshing to see this young man boldly standing up for traditional wholesome principles and values.

Unquestionably, the American left has launched a war against Christianity. We are lectured and threatened with political correctness to respect every religion under the sun except Christianity.

It is open season on trashing Christians in movies, political interviews and etc. The Christian is portrayed as the nut job, the loser or the nerd.

Rumor has it, Tebow is an extremely hard worker and a born leader; sounds similar to a fire ball from Wasilla Alaska who is also despised in the liberal media for similar reasons.

Be prepared for an all out campaign by the left, throughout his pro football career, to destroy and discredit Tim Tebow.

Thus far, Tebow has done three things to infuriate the left and secure his name permanent residency on their excrement list. First, Tebow dodged being aborted and went public with his story. Second, Tebow won his first game in the NFL and publicly thanked Jesus for it. Dem there is fightin' words to the left! Third, without being intentionally political, Tebow's life promotes Conservatism.

Culturally, we have fallen a long way from President Reagan declaring a national Year of the Bible. Such a proclamation would be impossible today. Tebow publicly thanking Jesus in a secular setting is deemed fanatical by liberal media standards in America today.

And why is the left so angry and threatened by Tebow's mom's decision not to kill him?

Congratulations Tim Tebow on your super NFL debut. Millions are praying for you. And thanks for scoring one for us Christians.

Lloyd Marcus, Proud Unhyphenated American

Chairman of The Campaign to Defeat Barack Obama.

Please help me spread my message by joining my Liberty Network.

Lloyd is singer/songwriter of the American Tea Party Anthem and author of Confessions of a Black Conservative, foreword by Michele Malkin

LloydMarcus.com