All Posts (28404)

Sort by

OORAH!!

Posted on Floyd Reports-By Ben Johnson-On November 2, 2011:

While the media have lavished attention upon the Occupy Wall Street movement (although perhaps not on every aspect of that movement), they have turned a blind eye to a march two national patriotic organizations have scheduled for Veterans Day — 11/11/2011 — calling for the immediate resignation or impeachment of Barack Obama, Joe Biden, and every official in the Obama administration.

The march on Washington is being organized by Veteran Defenders and the Patriots Union, headed by Major General Paul Vallely.

Its flyer states, “Veterans have called for the resignation or impeachment of Barack Hussein Obama, Joseph Biden, and every member of the Obama administration and they are headed to Washington, D.C. — November 11, 2011.”

Americans patriots must stand with military veterans “not just to celebrate our soldiers,” the flyer continues, “but to take our government back from anti-American thugs currently destroying the greatest nation on earth!”

The organizers hope to effect the resignation or impeachment of the president and vice president, Hillary ClintonEric HolderJanet NapolitanoLeon PanettaHilda Solis, Timothy Geithner, Arne DuncanLisa Jackson, Supreme Court justices Elena Kagan and Sonia SotomayorNancy PelosiJohn BoehnerMitch McConnell, Harry Reid, every czar, and every other member of the most corrupt administration in memory.

This rally is not merely for veterans. Veteran Defenders’s “Declaration to Restore the Constitutional Republic” states,We call upon ALL independent truckers, independent contractors, all non-union workers, all independent business owners, agents and investors, all who support free-market capitalism and the right to work, earn and own, to march together with our veterans and former service members on November 11, 2011 – Veterans Day!(Emphasis in original.)

It further states that “in the event that these individuals refuse to immediately resign in an orderly fashion,” the congressmen who voted against raising the debt ceiling must “immediately begin impeachment proceedings against every member of the Obama administration.”

To reestablish the Constitution as the law of the land, the Declaration demands that “every verifiable member of The Communist Party USA, The Socialist Party USA and The
Democratic Socialists of America be immediately publicly identified and removed from office for overtly acting against freedom, liberty and the Constitutional Republic.” This would sweep such radical leftists as Bernie Sanders and Jan Schakowsky from office. Indeed, in October 2009, the DSA released a list of 70 Congressmen who purportedly hold membership in that socialist organization alone.

It would also like to see special interest House groups, such as the Congressional Black Caucus, disbanded.

Many of the two organizations’ aims are presented in this video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=MYycZOCJv4k#

These two organizations are not the first veterans groups to support Obama’s impeachment and removal from office. The Central Florida chapter of the far-Left Veterans for Peace called for Obama’s impeachment in 2010.

Maj. Gen. Vallely (Ret.) is an outspoken patriot who has previously proposed laws reasserting states’ rights to refuse to implement unconstitutional federal legislation.

These hearty men fought bravely to preserve freedom abroad. In this cold winter of our republic’s history, they must fight again to ensure its survival at home.

Click here to learn more about the Impeach Obama CampaignClick here to sign the impeach Obama petition.”

Source:

http://floydreports.com/vets-small-businessmen-to-march-for-impeachment-on-veterans-day/comment-page-1/#comment-25071

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and video relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. 11/11/11 protesters: 'Time for talking has passed': ‘Veterans challenging Obama on legitimacy, constitutionality!’

Right On!!

Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On November 2, 2011:

Declaring that the “time for talking has passed,” organizers of a peaceful rally scheduled for Veteran’s Day in Washington are demanding the resignation of Barack Obama along with other members of his administration.

The rally is being assembled around the issues contained in a Declaration to Restore the Constitutional Republic, which sets out the goals of the organizing groups, which include the Veteran Defenders of America and its parent organization, The United States Patriots Union.

The events are scheduled to begin at the Washington Monument at 6 a.m. and continue at points around Washington, D.C., throughout the day. How many people are expected isn’t being released, nor is the membership information for the “member-only” organizations.

But they know who will not be participating:

According to Col. James Harding of the veterans organization also served by retired Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely, “It is much easier to list who is not on board at this point – leftists who have a very anti-American vision for America, people who have not yet accepted that there is no political solution now and those who have a seat at the table of corruption are not on board.”

The organizations have issued a code of conduct for the events, calling for peaceful protest and resistance. And while they acknowledge they are not likely to have the resignations in hand by the end of that day, they say there is a very important reason to rally.

“We have to start somewhere,” said Timothy Harrington, cofounder of the Patriots Union. “We are hoping to show D.C. insiders that the people have had enough. That the time for talking has passed and the time for serious action to save this nation has arrived.”

This job should already have been accomplished, the organizers point out.

“Every member of every branch of government has taken an oath to uphold and protect the Constitution and the people of the United States and it’s high time we see which of them is ready to live up to that oath.”

The crux of the issue is the still-unresolved dispute over whether Obama is eligible for the office of president, or whether he’s been usurping the authority of an office for which he fails to qualify. Following closely are the actions he’s taken while in office, from strong-arming private companies into doing what he wants to imposing amnesty by fiat on the American public.

There have been lawsuits over his eligibility, as the Constitution requires a president to be a “natural-born citizen.” The Constitution does not define the term, but texts consulted by the Founders and U.S. Supreme Court decisions indicate it refers to the offspring of two citizen parents.

Obama’s father never was a U.S. citizen, and critics argue that made him unqualified under the Constitution.

The event is calling upon all freedom-loving citizens “fed up with the corruption and tyranny in D.C. to take a stand.”

A preview of what’s to be going on:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=MYycZOCJv4k#

There should be no shortage of people willing to abide by the oaths they’ve taken to ensure the Constitution and the republic is protected, according to JB Williams, who is integral to the operations of the organizing units and a key leader in the protest planning. He says military personnel, officers, members of Congress and the judiciary, and employees of the federal government all make such an affirmation when they take their posts.

The enlisted service members oath requires obedience to orders of the president and the orders of “officers appointed over me,” but the oaths for officers, the judiciary, members of Congress and federal employees simply require support for the Constitution.

For example, the officers’ oath states, “Having been appointed an officer in the Army of the United States … [I] do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic … So help me God.”

“Amid an endless stream of conspiracy theories, a real conspiracy was under way and well-founded concerns for the true state of our union led many to one question surfacing repeatedly with increasing anxiety – ‘Why are our soldiers allegedly fighting for freedom and liberty abroad while we are being stripped of our freedom and liberty at home?” Williams said.

He said there are more than 21 million federal employees, and all of them have submitted to an oath affirming their loyalty to the Constitution.

“Violating their oath is not just cause for immediate dismissal and removal from office, it is a federal crime,” he explained.

From that set of facts comes the “Call-to-Action” scheduled for Veteran’s Day:

  • We CALL upon every member of federal, state and local government, legislative, judicial, law enforcement and military, who have taken an oath to protect and defend the constitutional republic from all enemies, foreign and domestic, to act upon those oaths for the stated purpose of restoring the constitutional republic.

  • We CALL upon ALL veterans and veteran organizations in America, who still believe in their oath to protect and defend, to unite with us at once – in this Declaration to Restore the Constitutional Republic.

  • We CALL for ALL citizens who still desire freedom and liberty, to stand with us in peaceful protest, and carry our demands to right the wrongs against our nation in the preservation of freedom, liberty, justice and the rule of law.

The list of charges which Obama and his team of government managers are being called to provide an account of includes dozens, from amnesty for illegal aliens in America, spending U.S. taxpayer money to restore Muslim mosques overseas, plans to tax contributions to U.S. churches, creating “targeted assassinations” of U.S. citizens, disgracing America by bowing for foreign tyrants and assembling a team of “czars” to dictate what happens.

The Canada Free Press decried the almost complete lack of coverage of such a significant event.

“We can read daily all about the Nazi/Communist-endorsed Occupy Wall Street (OWS) members’ public sexual depravities and their unbelievable grumbling greed about being tired of sharing gourmet food with the homeless, but nothing about a group whose noble aim it is to restore the constitutional republic,” the commentary from Judi McLeod said.

“The next Veterans Day after this one will follow the November 6, 2012, election. God only knows how long after election day it will take Obama to complete his promised fundamental transformation of America if the most anti-American president in U.S. history gets himself re-elected.

“Will he join OWS to escalate class warfare from the sidelines of defeat? Will a RINO GOP-blessed president be complicit with the power brokers who eased Obama into power? Will there even be an election?

“All these questions are foremost in the minds of veterans and patriots heading to DC. “

She continued, “To the patriots, veterans and their supporters, the Constitution, the U.S. Declaration of Independence are everything; ideals worth preserving for their children and grandchildren.”

Past efforts to take Obama to court over the eligibility dispute have proven unsuccessful, although Maricopa, Ariz., County Sheriff Joe Arpaio currently has a Cold Case Posse investigating the possibility that Obama will use a fraudulent document to try to qualify for the state’s ballot in 2012.

There also are several lawsuits pending that challenge Obama’s eligibility, but the U.S. Supreme Court repeatedly has refused to even consider the question of law at hand – whether Obama is eligible. One justice admitted the judges were avoiding the issue.

And there have been revelations that Obama supporters tried to change the requirement that a president be a natural-born citizen legislatively before Obama’s ascent to power, strongly suggesting a knowledge of a potential problem years ago.

Despite the stonewalling by official channels, a scientific survey showed fully half of Americans want Congress to investigate.

The focal point of concern for the rally?  “To date, there are no signs that anyone in Washington, D.C., intends to keep the oaths they have taken to the Constitution and to the people of the United States. Instead, they seem quite disinterested in protecting the Constitution, and are instead, directly engaged in subverting every principal and value stated in all of our founding documents.”

“We’re pulling together people who have taken an oath to protect and defend,” Williams told WND.

He said of those groups, veterans, active duty military, the judiciary, members of Congress and even federal employees, who have taken an oath to the Constitution, the “best we can tell, nobody is keeping that oath.”’

He warned that the theft of authority, if that, in fact, is what happened in 2008, will undermine the nation and could contribute to its collapse, as a future presidential candidate could cite the precedent for allowing virtually anyone, including enemies of America, to run for president.

Harding told WND the problem didn’t develop only with Obama, although his tenure has caused it to come to a head. Harding said the drift away from the constitutional republic has taken years but now has reached the point where the executive branch has “taken over the legislative branch and is making its own rules by edict.”

He said the judiciary also is “pretty much neutered,” because the judges appointed have been vetted to ensure they support the Obama cause.

The Call-to-Action cites violations of the U.S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights, unlawful use of military force, violation of international treaties, violations of the public trust and misuse of resources, bankrupting the nation, taxation without representation, confiscation of people’s goods and abuse of judicial power.

The declaration states, “No longer will we sit idly by and tolerate the utter destruction of our country, at the hands of anti-American elitists in Washington, D.C., who have mistaken the people’s peaceful tolerance for acceptance of their ill-advised behaviors. The time for all good and decent Americans to stand together, in defense of the Constitution, the republic, freedom and liberty, has arrived. The rule of constitutional law must prevail. We call upon all who have taken an oath to protect and defend, to take appropriate measures now.”

Demanded are resignations from Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, the Obama cabinet, staff and the unelected czars, as well Supreme Court justices given lifetime appointments by Obama and some members of Congress.

This is the point at which the military, judiciary, law enforcement and the federal employees are involved: They are “to direct all assets of the people of the United States toward the restoration of the constitutional republic and stand with the American citizens in compliance with their oath to protect and defend,” the declaration states. .

While individuals must “make the necessary provisions to secure and protect your families and neighborhoods in the event of economic instability and social chaos,” they also need to be prepared for more.

“In the event that the current administration or its thug supporters attempt to use government or civilian force and violence to silence the people, as in the cases of Syria, Libya, Yemen, China’s Tiananmen Square, the Bonus Army of 1932 in the United States, or the UK presently wrestling with black and Muslim violence, the people must be prepared to defend themselves against such tyrannical tactics. We cannot expect that the federal government will act in the best interest of American veterans or citizens.”

The group says Obama has committed dozens of offenses, including:

  • “Obama is a National Security threat since he definitely has questionable allegiance to the United States, not to mention his refusal to complete and release full, frank and truthful answers as to who he is. Obama has demonstrated a blatant disregard for the public safety and security;
  • “Obama and his handlers released an obvious forged birth certificate after release at least two fraudulent COLBs (Certifications of Live Birth);
  • “Obama and his incompetent advisers have wreaked economic tyranny on the American people, all the while calling for the rest of us to endure economic sacrifice;
  • “Obama has destroyed accepted administrative process by creating 32 czars who only report to him, bypassing the Congress and Cabinet;
  • “In one year, Obama and his minions doubled our national debt, which took 200 years to accumulate.
  • “Obama and his Justice Department sided with a foreign government (Mexico) when they sued the state of Arizona in order to force the continuation of illegal immigration;
  • “Obama and his henchmen proposed a 1 percent tax on all bank transactions (HR4646) to be implemented after the November 2012 elections;
  • “Obama passed ‘Dream Act’ by executive order which aids illegal aliens through ‘prosecutorial discretion’ all to garner votes for his election. The Heritage Foundation has provided extensive proof that illegal aliens and immigrants with green cards are committing rampant voter fraud;
  • and more than 50 more offenses.

In a recent commentary on WND, Vallely wasted no words: “President Obama, his appointees and czars must be replaced immediately.”

“This is the current battle that we constitutionalists, face and we must be aggressive in our efforts. We must adhere to our Constitution. Obama will continue to bypass Congress and the people in his progressive agenda because that is who he is and that is what he believes he has the power to do. Congress, you must stand tall for the American people and enjoin the Supreme Court to halt executive-branch violations of the law and our Constitution.

“Incompetence, treason, corruption and dishonesty of officials now come into play as these relate to our national security and economy, and are the rationale for demanding resignations and a change of government,” he said.

Likewise, former Congressman Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., wrote in a WND column: “The number of the president’s actions that arguably qualify as impeachable offenses is staggering. The question before the country is what to do about it.

“It is time for the House of Representatives to take its constitutional responsibility seriously and launch an impeachment investigation. The investigative committee should hold hearings, collect and weigh the evidence, and then present its findings to the Congress and the nation. “

He cited individual violations on which Obama, if found guilty, should be removed.

The first statement from a member of Congress on the issue of impeachment came from U.S. Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., who responded to this question from Think Progress: “I know Newt Gingrich has came out (sic) and said if they don’t reverse course [regarding trials for terror suspects] here, we ought to be talking about possibly impeaching either Attorney General [Eric] Holder or even President Obama to try to get them to reverse course. Do you think that is something you would support?”

Franks replied: “If it could gain the collective support, absolutely. I called for Eric Holder to repudiate the policy to try terrorists within our civil courts, or resign. So it just seems like that they have an uncanny ability to get it wrong on almost all fronts.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_yCN93ZNJEM&feature=player_embedded

WND also has reported that Jonathan Chait at The New Republic, before the 2010 election, predicted that the House would impeach Obama, but he wouldn’t be removed from office because that would require 67 votes in the Senate.

“Hear me now and believe me later. ... They won’t do it right away. And they won’t succeed in removing Obama. (You need 67 Senate votes.) But if Obama wins a second term, the House will vote to impeach him before he leaves office,” Chait wrote.

In his explanation of why he believed an impeachment could be forthcoming, Chait says the reason itself won’t matter.

“Wait, you say. What will they impeach him over? You can always find something. Mini-scandals break out regularly in Washington. Last spring, the political press erupted in a frenzy over the news that the White House had floated a potential job to prospective Senate candidate Joe Sestak. On a scale of one to 100, with one representing presidential jaywalking and 100 representing Watergate, the Sestak job offer probably rated about a 1.5. Yet it was enough that GOP Representative Darrell Issa called the incident an impeachable offense,” Chait wrote.

WND also reported when Maj. Gen. Jerry Curry, who served in Vietnam and commanded the U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command at Aberdeen Proving Ground during his long military career, said Congress should simply hand Obama an ultimatum.

“Action should be taken by the Senate and should be taken by the House,” he said. “They should serve notice on him and say, ‘Mr. President, we love you but we want to tell you something. You’re under a cloud of suspicion. We can’t continue running this country with you in charge under this cloud. Now either you clear it up or you resign from office.’”

He was answering questions on Stan Solomon’s “Talk to Solomon” show:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fO8n4Pij158&feature=player_embedded

Peter Ferrara, on the American Spectator website, also has predicted Obama’s resignation.

“I am now ready to predict that President Obama will not even make it [to 2012],” he wrote. “I predict that he will resign in discredited disgrace before the fall of 2012,” Ferrera said.

Times columnist Jeffrey T. Kuhner, who also is president of the Edmund Burke Institute, wrote, “President Obama has engaged in numerous high crimes and misdemeanors. The Democratic majority in Congress is in peril as Americans reject his agenda. Yet more must be done: Mr. Obama should be impeached.”

Kuhner continued, “He is slowly – piece by painful piece – erecting a socialist dictatorship. We are not there – yet. But he is putting America on that dangerous path. He is undermining our constitutional system of checks and balances; subverting democratic procedures and the rule of law; presiding over a corrupt, gangster regime; and assaulting the very pillars of traditional capitalism. Like Venezuela’s leftist strongman, Hugo Chavez, Mr. Obama is bent on imposing a revolution from above – one that is polarizing America along racial, political and ideological lines. Mr. Obama is the most divisive president since Richard Nixon. His policies are balkanizing the country. It’s time for him to go.”

Floyd and Mary Beth Brown, in a WND column, discussed the ImpeachObamaCampaign.com they launched.

And at the Taking America Back 2010 conference in Miami in September 2010, Floyd Brown expanded on the idea.

Brown, president of the Western Center for Journalism, said, “The Obama presidency is a disease. … Article 2, Section 4 (the impeachment clause of the Constitution) is the cure. And it’s Obama’s hatred of America that makes it absolutely imperative that we take action now.

“Barack Hussein Obama is not some do-gooder that has had his plans go astray,” Brown added. “He is not a person of good will just trying his best to make America go the right direction. He is not. Barack Hussein Obama is a liar that absolutely knows what he’s doing to the United States of America. He has a plan. He has an agenda. This man knows exactly where he’s taking us.

“Barack Obama is a very dangerous man,” said Brown. “Over the last two years, we have been watching the slow progression of what I call a bloodless coup.”

Source:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=363221

II. Vets Call For Resignations, Impeachments in Washington: ‘'Call to Action' Says Purge of Corruption Required to Restore Constitutional Republic!’-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On October 4, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=351953

III. Demand resignations and impeachment!-Posted on WND.com-By Gen. Paul E. Valley-On September 13, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=344865

IV. Video: Declaration to Restore the Republic!-Posted on YouTube.com-By arnierosnerOn October 9, 2011:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=MYycZOCJv4k#

Note:  This was a letter that was sent to the FBI Director, on or about August 2010, requesting that President Obama be investigated for numerous high crimes and misdemeanors-You Decide:

FBI Complaint Letter-Posted on Scannedretina.WordPress.com-By arnierosner-On August 23, 2010:

http://scannedretina.wordpress.com/2010/08/23/fbi-complaint-letter/

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Is it time to call for Obama's resignation!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/06/09/is-it-time-to-call-for-obamas-resignation/

Washington Times Calls for Obama’s Impeachment!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/08/31/washington-times-calls-for-obama’s-impeachment/

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought” 

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…

Fearful Intellectual Conservative Syndrome

4063405598?profile=originalI was stunned when conservative author Ann Coulter endorsed Mitt Romney for president. I love Ann. I even named her in my tribute song honoring Conservative women, “Our Girls”. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFb3zW7-tU4

 

 

Why would one of my conservative heroes select a liberal-lite to run against the Mike Tyson of political opponents. No, I am not suggesting Obama would bite off the ear of our presidential candidate, but Obama is a Chicago style no-holds-barred politician. If your opposition brings a political stick, you bring a political gun. That's the Chicago Way.

 

As Chairman of the CampaignToDefeatObama.com, I have taken heat from folks on our side angry because of our ad exposing Romney's liberal choices and tendencies. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OQoBxZZPqU

 

Folks, here is the deal. Romney is not a conservative. Yes, Romney has made some conservative choices. But, they seem to have come after he has been drug kicking and screaming to the conservative side of the street.

 

Obamacare is an Obama-nation in regards to freedom. If implemented, Obamacare will end America as we know it. A Herculean effort will be required to repeal Obama's evil socialistic mega-control monstrosity. Can we trust Romney to go “all in” to repeal Obamacare?

 

Intimidated, fearful intellectual conservatives say Obama has the bully pulpit of the White House, the majority of the media and a billion dollars on his side for re-election. In essence, they believe we have lost our country. They believe a majority of Americans are infected with entitlement mindsets and class envy disease. Obama's media manipulated ill-informed infected zombies are going to vote for the guy (Obama) who promises freebies and vows to punish the rich.

 

Driven by fear, the game plan of our smart conservative gurus is to offer a liberal-lite candidate who will also promise freebies, but not so irresponsibly; punish the rich, but not so severely.

 

I believe these conservative colleagues are suffering with Fearful Intellectual Conservative Syndrome.

 

Intellectuals in our party such as Coulter and others are rallying around Romney because they fear America will not elect a pedal-to-the-metal true conservative. They believe we need a liberal-lite to defeat Obama.

 

Meanwhile, we not-so-smart naïve tea party patriots believe a true conservative will win in a landslide.

 

From national to local elections, solid conservatism was a huge winner in 2010. Since then, the pain, suffering and economic bleeding caused by Obama and his agenda has intensified. Thus, the referendum against him will be far greater in 2012. It is crucial that we exploit this golden opportunity to challenge Obama ideologically by selecting a true conservative presidential candidate.

 

While the democrats, by far, have been the major offenders, liberalism in both parties has been taking us down the road to destruction for years. In 2012, with a true conservative Republican presidential candidate leading the charge, we can begin taking America back from both parties; pointing her in the right direction on the road to recovery.

 

We did the “liberal-lite thing” in '08 and lost. Remember a guy named John McCain? So, why on earth would we go there again?

 

We know the drill. Here is the play by play. The lib media and Republican elite convince all the “smart people” on our side that only a reasonable “moderate” like Romney can possibly beat Obama. So, out of fear, we select Romney as our 2012 presidential nominee.

 

Upon Romney officially winning the Republican nomination, the lib media turns on him. Suddenly, they declare Romney a Mormon religious nut. They release all kinds of stories about how electing Romney would equal the personification of evil in the White House.

 

And no left wing/democrat exploitation of having a black candidate would be complete without the lib media, NAACP and the Obama administration finding ways to portray Romney as a stealth KKK card carrying racist. This would be the left's 2012 presidential campaign against our “moderate” Republican candidate.

 

Since we know the left will attempt to demon-ize and destroy whomever our Republican nominee, why not run a thoroughbred “real deal” conservative?

 

We tea party patriots have more faith in our fellow Americans than do our fearful intellectual conservative colleagues. We believe entitlement mindset and class envy disease has not yet infected a critical mass of Americans. There is still time to vaccinate the infected with the cure and restore our great country to it's former glory. The vaccine/miracle cure is Conservatism spread boldly and lavishly by our 2012 presidential candidate.

 

Conservatism won a former actor presidential candidate a 44 state landslide victory in 1980 and a 49 state re-election landslide in 1984. Conservatism can win huge again in 2012.

 

Lloyd Marcus, Proud Unhyphenated American

 

Chairman of The Campaign to Defeat Barack Obama.

Please help me spread my message by joining my
Liberty Network.

Lloyd is singer/songwriter of the
American Tea Party Anthem and author of Confessions of a Black Conservative, foreword by Michele Malkin

LloydMarcus.com

Read more…

It is no surprise that we have financial problems with our

Nations revenue assessment or income tax programs! When

we have such completely greedy and short-sighted members

of congress, such as Rep. Peter DeFazio (D) Oregon, who just

appeared on the Cavuto Show today with his idea for a

proposed tax which would be set at approximately 0.2% on

each transaction. Of course, he has the endorsement of

AFL/CIO union bosses, and the liberals have jumped on

his bandwagon! I might ad that Cavuto said that his plan 

 was insane, and would result in more problems, than

any viable solutions.

 

The democrats are always quick to raise taxes and so

demented, that they are convinced that this will solve our

needs, to raise revenue. Not remotely aware, that any such

proposal will only further stagnate our sluggish markets,

and that if such, said tax is passed as legistlation, that it

will only result in these taxes being passed on to the end

user, just as all production cost are passed on to the retail

customer. All of this flies in the face of the most

knowledgeable economist assessment.


The Canadian government just conducted an exhaustive

study of these transaction tax programs and concluded by

completely rejecting all considerations of transaction tax

proposals upon final examination of the results.  Sweden

attempted a similar tax on their investment transactions

with disastous results just three years ago, and terminated

their plans after a near financial melt-down, as a result.

 

The proposal to tax financial transactions is also known as a “Tobin tax,”

after the late American economist and Nobel laureate James Tobin.

Tobin proposed a transactions tax in the early 1970s to discourage

currency speculation after the collapse of the Bretton Woods fixed-

exchange-rate system.

Read more…

The Lynching of Herman Cain by Kris Zane

The Lynching of Herman Cain

by Kris Zane

November 2, 2011

Read on Kris Zane's website: http://web.me.com/kzvideo/OBC/Lynching_of_Cain.html

 

For those of us old enough to remember the debacle of the Clarence Thomas “lynching,” many have likened Politico’s “scoop” of Herman Cain being accused of sexual harassment in the 1990s, and the subsequent “coverage” by the mainstream media, as an attempt to repeat history. Several years after the Clarence Thomas debacle, with the changing of the guard, another man, Bill Clinton, was accused of sexual impropriety; and when, like the Whac-a-Mole game, women were popping up across the United States accusing Clinton of everything from casual sexual encounters to rape and beating, the scant critical coverage was attributed to, according to Hillary Clinton, a “vast Right-wing conspiracy,” headed by one of the few news sources that were actually news sources back then, Rush Limbaugh.  Unlike the Clarence Thomas case, Bill Clinton being a liberal versus a conservative—this is the one crucible of the Left—the mainstream media circled their wagons, protecting their darling. 

 

And history is repeating itself, although this time we get to see the two ways the mainstream media treats a liberal versus a conservative, not years apart, but in “real time.” On the one hand we have Herman Cain being “exposed” by Politico’s “scoop” that Cain had been accused of sexual harassment, Politico the next day stating that Cain was flip-flopping in his responses to the accusations, and that he was in “damage control” mode, both baseless statements. On the other hand, we have the mainstream media circling the wagons in regard to Obama, specifically the “Green Jobs” scandal, of which Solyndra appears to be only the tip of the iceberg; in which millions—if not billions of dollars were fed to Obama 2008 campaign bundlers; but also more importantly the Fast and Furious scandal. Think about it: Obama and Holder oversaw a program that put thousands of taxpayer-funded assault weapons into the hands of Mexican drug cartel members, and then lied about having knowledge of it; that hundreds of Mexican citizens have been murdered with these weapons, and at least one American citizen—Border Patrol agent Brian Terry—and yet the mainstream media, like the Clinton debacle, is still circling the wagons. If the mainstream media hadn’t protected their darling, Clinton would have been viewed as what he was—a sexual predator; obstructing justice; suborning and committing perjury. If the mainstream media weren’t protecting their darling, Obama, Obama and Holder would, frankly, be impeached as accessories to murder for the hundreds of deaths in Mexico, and the murder of Brian Terry.

 

But as Bob Dylan sang back in the 1960s, the times they are a-changin’. It is interesting that the one thing (I believe) that gave Obama the push to the Presidency in 2008, and quashed all those nasty little doubts the American people were having about him—i.e., his hidden records, his dual citizenship, his unsavory connections with radicals and socialists, etc.—this one thing, the Internet, in the form of his campaign’s YouTube “town hall meetings,” (i.e., orchestrated, complete with casting companies and prepared questions and answers); this YouTube venue which carried him over the top, is the two-headed snake that now bites his heel. There are literally tens of thousands of YouTube videos covering everything from Obama’s Freudian slip about his “Muslim faith,” to the endless anomalies in his long-form birth certificate. These two subjects are not merely marginal; simply taking the highest view counts of two videos adds up to over two million views.  This is only one tenth of one percent of YouTube videos critical of Obama.

 

But there is much more than YouTube now. Instead of the lone voice of Rush Limbaugh in the ether, we have what is now rivaling (and I think crushing) the mainstream media: grassroots media, primarily where you have what amounts to conservative blogs turned news gatherers and news reporters. Would Solyndra and Fast and Furious be an issue today if it weren’t for The Daily Caller and Human Events? Would we have the hundreds of Obama documents detailing corruption, crony capitalism, and endless illegal activity if it weren’t for Judicial Watch? Would the anomalies in the Obama birth certificate, the irregularities in his Social Security number, the vast suppressing of Obama college, state senate (etc., etc., etc.) records be at the forefront of America’s doubts about Obama were it not for World Net Daily

 

But let us get back to the lynching of Herman Cain. One of the interesting aspects of the Internet that didn’t have as significant an impact as Obama 2008 campaign’s use of YouTube and mass emails was Twitter. Now Twitter is huge, and I would argue is actually the driving force of news (and, for that matter of attacks). I would call myself a student of Twitter, specifically in regard to the traffic that has occurred after the Fox/Google Republican debate, when Cain’s poll numbers began to skyrocket. Hillary Clinton said (falsely) regarding “Monicagate” that there was a vast Right-wing conspiracy to destroy her husband; but it doesn’t take a genius to decipher that Twitter has been used, in an orchestrated manner, to take down Cain. Observing the Cain traffic by the hour, nay, by the minute, you can see that a certain narrative occurs on cue; that, as quickly as a certain narrative pops up like our Wac-the-Mole game, the game is reset, and a new narrative occurs. These narratives are sometimes downright odd, other times substantive, but always orchestrated. Like the traditional mainstream media’s attack of all conservatives, the narrative began with Herman Cain being stupid and/or crazy, using, as they did with Sarah Palin, some supposed gaff or flip-flop statement. When this didn’t work, and the American public—specifically the Tea Party which has been from the beginning and until now his strongest supporter—didn’t buy this, the narrative was that the Tea Party was supporting Cain to try to cover up the fact that they were racists; that as soon as a viable candidate came upon the scene—a white candidate, that is—Herman Cain would be dropped like a hot potato. Again, the Left seeing that the Tea Party were not going to rein in their support for Cain, the narrative began that Herman Cain was an Uncle Tom; that he was coddling the white Tea Partiers; that he wove his message depending on what he thought the white Tea Partiers wanted to hear. Upon this narrative rearing its head, the Left showed their true racists colors, including the ridiculousness of the white Lawrence O’Donnell lecturing Herman Cain on how he wasn’t black enough; that during the Civil Rights years, he didn’t do enough; or Cornell West’s telling Cain to “get off the symbolic crack pipe.” For a time there was an attack on Cain’s 999 flat tax plan, of which Twitter was abuzz with citing an endless parade of economists and pundits, stating that the American public, especially the poor, would pay more in taxes under the plan. Then there was the narrative that Cain had changed his 999 plan, to a 9-0-9 plan, meaning that the poor would not have to pay taxes under his plan, charging Cain with flip-flopping. Of course, like all other narratives presented in this orchestrated assault, this was baseless. The Twitter “Uncle Tom” narrative (and the subsequent racism) falling on deaf ears, and upon more and more blacks beginning to support Cain, the Left pulled out their secret weapon, the Clarence Thomas-inspired smear campaign. Politico broke their amazingly lame “scoop,” in which they “decided” to not release details, “decided,” to make their story as vague as possible. The “victims,” unnamed, and without any details of the accusation, received “five-figure” settlements?  What are the details of the accusation? What is the background of the women? Did they bother to ask Herman Cain about their “scoop” before publishing the narrative? They then followed this up with their statements that Herman Cain had given “conflicting” responses to the accusations; that his campaign was in “damage control”—both baseless statements. Meanwhile the Left-wing media jumped on the wagon with all their fury, parroting the same. Twitter, on cue, almost to the minute, reflected the mainstream media’s attack of Cain, in this rabid, foaming at the mouth parroting.   

 

Twenty years ago with Americans getting their news from three major networks (all Left-wing), and one extreme Left-wing source (i.e., “Public” Radio), a Herman Cain, upon being pummeled by the media,  would have quietly slithered away, being pelted to death by the Left; but today with most Americans being sick and tired of the mainstream (lamestream as Sarah Palin calls it) media, contrary to the Left’s predictions, Cain has actually risen in the polls because of this baseless charge. America is sick of the Lawrence O’Donnell and Rachel Maddow type of “news” programs, even sickening of the “Right-wing” Fox, becoming disenchanted after their hatchet job on Hank Williams, Jr., and their ignoring of the Obama birth certificate and Social Security number issue.  Most Americans are now getting their news from websites outside of the mainstream. Further, a person working part-time out of their home is now part of the new mainstream media—case in point, the “I am the 53%” movement, in contradistinction to the Left’s Occupy Wall Street rabble. Or, even to the extent that a single individual like myself can write an article or produce a video that exposes Obama or supports Cain, that can potentially reach thousands, if not millions. Anyone with a computer can be a part of the new mainstream media, fighting off the lies and deceptions of the Left.

 

Most Americans are tired of the media telling them what to think; telling them what candidate they are to vote for: Both the Republican party and the Left have been telling the American public for months that Mitt Romney is the only viable candidate. Twenty years ago the American people would have complied. Today, with the mainstream media dying a quick death—I would say fighting in a sort of death throe—the sleeping giant, as Herman Cain says, the “we the people,” has awakened, and aren’t going to take it anymore, and have cut that noose that the Left put around Herman Cain’s neck.  

 

Read more…

WATCHING THIS DEBATE ON C-SPAN 2 TURNED MY STOMACH AS THE DEMOCRATIC SENATORS KEPT PLAYING THE SAME OLD SONG ABOUT THE REPUBLICANS SANDBAGGING THE PRESIDENTS PLANS.  THE REPUBLIC HOUSE HAS PASSED 15 JOBS BILLS WITH NO TAX INCREASES OR TAX SURCHARGES BUT THE DEMOCRATS REFUSE TO  LET THEM ON THE SENATE FLOOR EVEN THOUGH THEY ALL PASSED THE HOUSE WITH SUBSTANTIAL DEMOCRATIC SUPPORT. THE PUSH FOR BRIDGES, ROADS, ETC ARE FOR PROGRAMS THAT WOULD TAKE MONTHS AND YEARS TO IMPLEMENT DUE TO THE CUMBERSOM REFGULATORY PROCESS. I WATCHED THE HOUSE DEBATE IN THE HOUSE ON THE REGULATOR REFORM SUBJECT AND I RECALL HEASRING THAT THE COST OF COMPLIANCE OF THE REGULATIONS WOULD RUN OVER A MILLION DOLLARS PER PROJECT AND TAKE 2 OR MORE YEARS TO COMPLETE AND THIS WAS PROVEN BY THE LACK OF SHOVEL READY JOBS PROMISED BY OBOMA'S FIRST INFRASTRUCTURE STIMULUS.  THE DEMOCRAT PACKAGE CONTAINS A SURTAX ON THE PEOPLE WHO WOULD BE DEPENDED UPON TO PROVIDE MATERIAL AND LABOR TO COMPLETE THE JOB.  THERE IS NO GUARANTEE THAT THE INCOME FROM THE SURTAX WOULD STILL BE THERE AFTER THE COSTLY AND LENGTHY REGULATORY PROCESS, I GUESS YOU COULD SAY THAT YOU HAVE TO PAY A FEE IF YOU WANT TO GET THE JOB.

IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT THE HOUSE REGULATORY REFORM BE PASSED BEFORE ANY OTHER PLANS ARE IMPLEMENTED  IN ORDER TO MAKE THE PROJECTS MORE PALATABLE OR THERE COULD B E A  SHORTAGE OF BIDS FOR THE PROJECTS. WHO IS SANBAGGING WHO HERE AND HOW STUPID DO THE DEMOCRATS BELIEVE THE GENERAL PUBLIC IS.  I GUESS THE DEMS ARE SO USED TO HAVE THEIR FOLLOWERS  FOLLOW BLINDLY THAT THEY ARE VILIFYING ANY ONE WHO OPENS THEIR MINDS AN EYES TO WHAT IS GOING ON  

Read more…

IF A FEDERAL FLAT TAX IS INSTITUTED, IT WILL DEFINITLY IMPACT YOUR STATE TAX.  A FEDERAL FLAT TAX IS GREAT IN STATES LIKE TEXAS WHICH HAS NO STATE INCOME TAX BUT IT WOULD AFFECT THE FILING AND PROCESSING COSTS FOR YOUR STATE INCOME TAX.  THE STATES THAT DEPEND ON AN INCOME TAX FOR OPERATING REVENUE OF THE STATE HAVE A DEVELOPED INCOME TAX SYSTEM WHICH MIRRORS THE FEDERAL TAX SYSTEM. STATE INCOME TAX SYSTEMS USE THE FEDERAL TAX FORM AS A BASIS TO DETERMINE THE INCOME TAX THAT ITS CITIZENS SHOULD PAY ACCORDING TO THE TAX LAWS UNIQUE TO EACH INDIVIDUAL STATE.  THEREFOR STATE RETURNS INTERACT WITH THE FEDERAL RETURN ELECTRONICALLY. 

ELECTRONIC FILING OF FEDERAL AND STATE TAX RETURNS IS ALSO INTERCONNECTED, THE STATE RETURN IS PIGGYBACKED ON THE FEDERAL ON THE ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION OF THE TAX FORMS. THERE IS ALSO AN AUTIOMATIC ELECTRONIC COMPARISONS OF FEDERAL AND STATE RETURNS IN REGARDS TO THE INCOME ITEMS AP;PLICABLE TO EACH.  THIS SYSTEM REPLACES THE OLD SYSTEM OF INCOME COMPARISONS BETWEEN FEDERAL AND STATE WHERE AS THE FEDERAL AND STATE TAX SYSTEMS HAD A SEPERATE INCOME SHARING PROCESS  WITH EACH STATE FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL USING THE INDIVIDUALS SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER AS A BASE REFERENCE, WHICH WOULD REQUIRE BOTH THE FEDERAL AND STATE TO INVESTIGATE ANY DISCREPENCIES OF INFORMATION OF ANY INDIVIDUAL AND WHICH USED TO PICK UP ANY INDIVIDUAL WHO WOULD USE DIFFERENT IN FORMATION TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF DIFFERENCES BETWEEN FEDERAL AND STATE TAX LAWS .  THE REMOVAL OF THE CURRENT SYSTEM WOULD INCREASE THE COSTS OF BOTH THE FEDERAL AND STATE TO DETERMINE THE PROPER TAX LIABILITY FOR EACH ENTITY.  WHEN COSTS OF PROCESSING AND INFORMATION SHARING INCREASE, THOSE ADDED COSTS WILL FIND THEIR WAY INTO THE TAX LIABILITY OF EVERY INDIVIDUAL TAXPAYER.  

Read more…

What’s wrong with this picture?

Posted on Human Events-By Aaron Klein and Brenda Elliott-On October 28, 2011:

“When Sen. Barack Obama, a few days before his inauguration as our 44th President, promised an adoring crowd “the fundamental transformation of the United States of America,” few realized that he was not speaking merely of himself or of his own role as the country’s incoming chief executive.  Behind the avatar of “hope and change” lay a left-wing “progressive” movement waiting to come to power.

At first, we knew very little about this clandestine Red Army,” whose goal is the transformation of America into a socialist system.  As a matter of strategy, the “progressives” had quietly and patiently perfected the art of creating innocuous-sounding front groups, and the promotion of its policies in the guise of moderation and in the rhetoric of modest-sounding social ideals.  Before the candidacy of Obama—whose entire political career has been spent under the tutelage of the progressives, including some of its leading figures—this radical network had already succeeded over the decades in infiltrating major institutions of American power.  But with his election to the presidency, it reached the highest levels of our government.

Along the way, the progressives hijacked an entire spectrum of important social causes, from feminism and race relations to environmental and antiwar activism, each of which became subordinated to an agenda having very little to do with the actual cause at hand and everything to do with the underlying agenda of the radical reconstruction of our society.

This Red Army has taken over not merely the largest worker unions, but also the mainstream of the Democratic Party.  It has deeply penetrated the United States Congress, forming one of the most powerful caucuses on Capitol Hill.  Key legislation, including President Obama’s health care and stimulus bills, was crafted by the network’s various branches—operating both inside and outside the government.  The same network is now pushing other major measures, including defense, economic and immigration policies.

Like a conventional army, the progressive Red Army is an organized network consisting of numerous branches and divisions, deploying an appropriate battalion for a specific goal or battle at hand.  Many of these activists are openly hateful of America, or at least of the American capitalist system, including its basic document and compact, the United States Constitution.  Many others, to be fair, genuinely love this country, while believing that socialism would pave the road to a better society.  Still others are merely along for the ride, and pursue personal power and profit in the service of a new order.

While this radical network played a major part in the nomination and election of Barack Obama, it runs far deeper than the slew of “czars” in the Obama administration or the extremist personalities demonstrably tied to our President.  It is much larger than Obama himself, and will far outlast however many months of the Obama presidency yet remain.  Indeed, it is already planning how to advance its agenda following the 2012 elections, regardless of which candidate is victorious.

This Red Army shows no signs of relenting.  With the dramatic erosion of his poll numbers and the ascension of Republicans in the 112th Congress, Obama’s mandate for change may have for the time being run thin.  But these radical groups demonstrate an uncanny ability to wait patiently, like sleeper cells, for years or even decades, for the next opportunity to push their nefarious agenda while updating and perfecting the details of their well-planned, multilayered assault.

My co-author, Brenda J. Elliott, and I, in our previous book, The Manchurian President, documented President Obama’s extremist ties.  Our first book-length effort focused on unmasking Barack Obama and his radical associations.  But even before its publication, as we continued to delve into Obama’s administration, it became clear that we were uncovering a larger world of radical organizations, which are not only the force behind Obama’s “fundamental transformation of America” but are also now so well-entrenched in the institutions of American power that their influence can hardly be overstated.  In other words, in peeling off the layers of the onion that is the radical network, Brenda and I have unearthed something much larger and far more disturbing than even we, as seasoned political observers, could have anticipated.

We must take up the extremely loaded question of conspiracy.  Conspiracy is a very serious offense in the U.S. legal system, and of course this applies to conspiracy to commit a crime.  Yet the Red Army of which we write employs mostly legal means to pursue its radical agenda.  In fact, the largest part of its nefarious genius lies precisely in its employment of legal and quasi-legal stratagems to “fundamentally transform,” and even overthrow, the American system.

There is a conspiracy—albeit a mostly legal one—behind Obama’s promised “fundamental transformation of America.”  It is the radical socialist network behind the President that relentlessly pushes this agenda.  What we call the Red Army has devised the means to seize enormous instruments of political, economic and cultural power in our country, from the very presidency itself on down.

To be sure, the American people have begun awakening from their slumber, rousing from their acquiescence, and seem eager to reclaim their great, free and prosperous nation from this clutch of radical operatives.  But in order to prevail, in order to save our nation from the designs of these operatives, we must first comprehend—and then defeat—the radical network that has seized the reins of American power.”

  • Aaron Klein is a NY Times bestselling author, senior reporter for WorldNetDaily.com and host on New York’s WABC Radio.
  • Brenda J. Elliott is a NY Times bestselling author, journalist and researcher.

Source:

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=47166

Note: The following article and/or blog post and video relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. The Revolutionary Communist Party (RCP) Is Targeting Black Americans, Hispanics & Native Americans!-Posted on American Thinker-By Peter Wilson-On October 18, 2011:

http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/10/the_revolutionary_communist_partys_little_yellow_book.html

II. Obama czar's shocking communist connections: “Edited publication whose founders allegedly fed secrets to Soviet Union”-Posted on WND-By Aaron Klein-On March 3, 2010:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=126872

III. Video: ‘Marxism In America’-By Lt. General (Ret.) W.G. ‘Jerry Boykin!

http://www.morningstartv.com/oak-initiative/marxism-america

IV. Video: Former KGB Official Explains Plan Unfolding in America Right Now!-Posted on Vision to Amreica-On October 17, 2011:

http://visiontoamerica.org/4861/video-former-kgb-official-explains-plan-unfolding-in-america-right-now/

Note:  My following blog post contains numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Revolutionary Communist Party (RCP)!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/07/revolutionary-communist-party/

Obama Czar's Shocking Communist Connections!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/03/04/obama-czars-shocking-communist-connections/

The Midterm Elections and the Communist Manifesto!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/08/the-midterm-elections-and-the-communist-manifesto/

Progressives and Communists Are Out of the Closet Together!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/05/progressives-and-communists-are-out-of-the-closet-together/

Who is sponsoring the NAACP’s ‘One Nation Working Together’ rally?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/09/28/who-is-sponsoring-the-naacp’s-‘one-nation-working-together’-rally/

The Reason for the Treason!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/03/22/the-reason-for-the-treason/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

The Russian View of What Has Been Happening In America!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/22/the-russian-view-of-what-has-been-happening-in-america-2/

Note If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…

Dictator Obama

Obama feels he doesn't need congress to pass laws and all he has to do is issue executive orders.

Obama care was passed and no one knew what was in it! He offers a 27,000 page bill and expects it to be passed in two weeks and he bribes 6 senators to pass it!

He starts his own 2 week war and extends it to 7  months and now all we have to do is wait for the Muslin Brotherhood to take over as in Egypt!

He offers a jobs plan which favors only his voting constituents such as the violent union leaders lke Trumka. So he gets about 1.5 million public temporary  jobs but nothing for the 12.5 unemployed in the private sector.

Government can not run anything well and the reason is that no one stands to loose a dime if the government is run poorly.

Read more…

What’s wrong with this picture?

Posted on The Daily Caller-By Matthew Boyle, The Daily Caller-On November 1, 2011:

Democratic California Sen. Dianne Feinstein told a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing that lax gun control laws, not Obama administration malfeasance within the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (BATF), was the real problem uncovered by Operation Fast and Furious.

“My concern, Mr. Chairman, is there’s been a lot said about Fast and Furious, and perhaps mistakes were made, but I think this hunt for blame doesn’t really speak about the problem,” Feinstein said during the Tuesday hearing. “And the problem is, anybody can walk in and buy anything, .50-caliber weapons, sniper weapons, buy them in large amounts, and send them down to Mexico. So, the question really becomes, what do we do about this?”

“I’ve been here 18 years,” Feinstein continued. “I’ve watched the BATF get beaten up at every turn on the road. And, candidly, it’s just not right.”

After the hearing, Feinstein’s staff refused to answer when The Daily Caller asked how gun control laws would have prevented the abuses in Operation Fast and Furious when the law enforcement agents responsible for upholding gun laws were the individuals giving the weapons to drug cartels.

They also refused to say whether the Sen. Feinstein wanted to hold Obama administration officials accountable for shipping guns into Mexico, for Border Patrol agent Brian Terry’s murder, or for the murders of countless Mexican citizens directly resulting from the failed gun-walking program.

When TheDC asked if Sen. Feinstein cared about the program’s connections to the murder of Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent Jaime Zapata, Feinstein’s spokesman pointed to a comment she made during a March 9, 2011 hearing. Then, Feinstein did not mention any relationship between the murder and Operation Fast and Furious.

House oversight committee chairman Rep. Darrell Issa recently indicated that Attorney General Eric Holder may be withholding more information about Zapata’s murder.

During Tuesday’s hearing, Sen. Feinstein advocated for Operation Fast and Furious as a springboard from which to advocate for gun control laws, including national databases and government-controlled firearms registration. She argued that such laws would prevent future programs like Fast and Furious from reaching maturity.

“So, the question comes, what can we do?,” Feinstein asked Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer, a hearing witness. “And, I’d really rather concentrate on the constructive, rather than other things, so the questions comes: Do you believe that, if there were some form of registration when you purchase these firearms, that that would make a difference?”

Breuer, a high-ranking Obama administration official who is notable for his willingness to accept some responsibilityfor the scandal, said it would.

“Senator, we’re talking today about transnational organized crime,” Breuer said, ”and your leadership, and the chairman’s, and other senators’ shows that information — information — is the tool we need to challenge and defeat organized crime.”

“I know others disagree,” Feinstein added, “but we have very lax laws when it comes to guns and I think, to some extent, this influences BATF as to whether they have political support or not,” Feinstein said. “But, I think these numbers are shocking — and when you know the number of deaths these guns have caused, used by cartels against victims, it’s literally up in the tens of thousands.”

According to the Obama administration’s BATF, 70 percent of weapons recovered in Mexico come from the United States. Feinstein insisted those numbers are a “very deep concern for me.”

Sen. Chuck Grassley, Iowa Republican, contested the weapons-trafficking statistics Feinstein and Breuer cited, arguing that they appear to make the U.S. appear to be a more rampant source of illicit firearms than is actually the case. Grassley has been challenging those statistics since June, when he wrote a letter to then-acting BATF director Ken Melson.

“I am concerned that the selective release of certain statistical data without further clarification and categorization may inaccurately reflect the scope and source of the problem of firearms in Mexico and the DTO [drug trafficking organization] violence,” Grassley wrote to Melson in June.

At least 29 members of Congress have now called on Attorney General Eric Holder to resign over Operation Fast and Furious. With a Tuesday tweet, North Carolina Rep. Walter Jones became the latest, writing: “It’s time for Eric Holder to go!”

Source:

http://dailycaller.com/2011/11/01/sen-feinstein-lax-gun-control-is-real-problem-with-fast-and-furious/

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and videos relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. Top Justice Dept. Official Admits ‘Mistake’ in Ignoring ATF’s ‘Unacceptable Tactics!’-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Susan Jones-On November 1, 2011:

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/top-justice-dept-official-admits-mistake-ignoring-atfs-unacceptable-tactics

II. Sheriff: Time For Citizens To Arm Themselves!-Posted on Vision to America-By V2A-On October 31, 2011:

http://visiontoamerica.org/5220/sheriff-time-for-citizens-to-arm-themselves/

III. Democrats cling to their guns: ‘Obama scares women and liberals into the gun store’!-Posted by The Washington Times-On October 27, 2011:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/oct/27/democrats-cling-to-their-guns/?utm_source=RSS_Feed&utm_medium=RSS

IV. Darrell Issa’s Fast and Furious rebuke of Eric Holder is one for the ages!-Posted on The Coach Is Right-By Coach Collins-On October 30, 2011:

http://www.coachisright.com/attorney-general-holder-eviscerated-by-darrell-issa-for-fast-and-furious-crimes-3/

V. Obama’s Freedom of Unformation Act!-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Guest Writer-On October 28, 2011:

http://floydreports.com/obamas-freedom-of-unformation-act/

VI. Attorney General Holder eviscerated by Darrell Issa for Fast and Furious crimes!-Posted on The Coach Is Right-By Coach Collins-On October 27, 2011:

http://www.coachisright.com/attorney-general-holder-eviscerated-by-darrell-issa-for-fast-and-furious-crimes/

VII. Hillary Clinton: ‘No Evidence’ DOJ Sought Required License to Send Guns to Mexico in ‘Fast and Furious’!-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Fred Lucas-On October 28, 2011:

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/hillary-clinton-no-evidence-doj-sought-required-license-send-guns-mexico-fast-and

VIII. Napolitano queried on lack of ‘Fast and Furious’ probe!-Posted on Cowboy Byte-On October 27, 2011:

http://cowboybyte.com/1544/napolitano-queried-on-lack-of-‘fast-and-furious’-probe/

IX. Did Obama Accidentally Reveal Origins of Operation Fast and Furious?-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Guest Writer-On October 20, 2011:

http://floydreports.com/did-obama-accidentally-reveal-origins-of-operation-fast-and-furious/

X. Sen. Grassley to ask for resignation of highest-level person who signed off on Fast and Furious!-Posted on The Daily Caller-By Matthew Boyle, The Daily Caller-On October 13, 2011:

http://dailycaller.com/2011/10/13/sen-grassley-to-ask-for-resignation-of-highest-level-person-who-signed-off-on-fast-and-furious/

XI. Obama Spoke About "Fast & Furious" Before Holder Claimed He Knew!-Posted on RealClear Politics-On October 13, 2011:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/10/13/obama_spoke_about_fast__furious_before_holder_claimed_he_knew.html

XII. CBS Highlights ‘Fast & Furious’; ABC, NBC Place Heads in the Sand!-Posted on News Busters-By Matthew Balan-On October 4, 2011:

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/matthew-balan/2011/10/04/cbs-highlights-fast-furious-abc-nbc-place-heads-sand#ixzz1bjPhUDQc 

XIII. NRA's LaPierre: 'Fast and Furious' Was Plot Against Second Amendment!-Posted on NewsMax.com-By Martin Gould and Ashley Martella-On October 14, 2011:

http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/LaPierre-NRA-gunrunning-fastandfurious/2011/10/14/id/414545?s=al&promo_code=D441-1

XIV. Michelle Obama’s warning to gun owners!-Posted on The Daily Caller-By Chris Cox-On October 11, 2011:

http://dailycaller.com/2011/10/11/michelle-obamas-warning-to-gun-owners/

XV. Breaking: new evidence shows Hillary a mastermind behind Gunwalker!-Posted on Examiner-By Anthony Martin, Conservative Examiner-On October 10, 2011:

http://www.examiner.com/conservative-in-national/breaking-new-evidence-show-hillary-a-mastermind-behind-gunwalker

XVI. Hillary's enemies list now includes Gunwalker reporters!-Posted on Examiner-By Anthony Martin, Conservative Examiner-On October 8, 2011:

http://www.examiner.com/conservative-in-national/hillary-s-enemies-list-now-includes-gunwalker-reporters

XVII. Video: The UN Considers Gun Regulation Treaty!-Posted on ExposeObama.com-On October 2, 2011:

http://www.exposeobama.com/2011/10/02/video-the-un-considers-gun-regulation-treaty/

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Did ATF provide weapons to Mexican drug cartels that were subsequently used to kill one of our own?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/03/04/did-atf-provide-weapons-to-mexican-drug-cartels-that-were-subsequently-used-to-kill-one-of-our-own/

What is the true intent of the UN Small Arms Treaty?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/12/what-is-the-true-intent-of-the-un-small-arms-treaty/

Threat of the Mexican drug cartel, illegal border-crossers and “sanctuary cities”!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/23/threat-of-the-mexican-drug-cartel-illegal-border-crossers-and-“sanctuary-cities”/

What was the true intent of Operation Closed Campus?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/04/03/what-was-the-true-intent-of-operation-closed-campus/

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…

Just for laughs

Those Racist Liberal Democrats Begin Sarah Palin Style Smear Attacks on Herman Cain

herman-cain-sarah-palin-morph.jpg?w=500&h=634

The Difference is Herman Cain is a Black Man and unlike Barack Obama, he is 100% Black and a Conservative with Real Family Roots right here in America.  The Ole Liberal Double Standard has reared it’s ugly head once again but this time it ain’t gonna work!

Trying to make a Mountain out of a Mole Hill.  Politico puts out an article accusing Herman Cain of Sexual Harassment by two “Anonymous” Women who say they were made to feel uncomfortable.

Give me a break already.  How far of a stretch is it not to see the Blatant Racism of the Left.  Perhaps Racism only applies to Conservatives who Criticize our first Bi-Racial President?

herman-cain-energy-independence-political-poster-1304692430.jpg?w=500&h=408

But Wait

What ever happened to these New Stories that the Left Wing Obama Controlled Media chose to Ignore?

g-tdy-100120-edwards-601p-grid-6x2.jpg?w=474&h=332

Of Course the Liberal Media had a Little Trouble trying to Ignore this Story

sex-education-fail-bill-clinton-and-monica-lewinsky-political-poster-1260896390.jpg?w=500&h=411

047-journalism-rip.jpg?w=400&h=262

msnbc-fail_0.jpg?w=500&h=350

obamaostrich.jpg?w=319&h=279

piper.jpg?w=441&h=577

Read more…

Islamic Infiltration Inside Our Government

The following recent videos reveal the outrageous and deplorable Islamic Infiltration Inside Our Government-You Decide:

Video: Rep. Gohmert Questions DHS Sec. Janet Napolitano Regarding A Radical Islamist!-Posted on YouTube.com-By GohmertTX01-On October 26, 2011:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=354GJU3X54Y

Video: Rep. Gohmert Speaks on Radical Islam! (Part 1)-Posted on YouTube.com-By GohmertTX01-On October 29, 2011:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x0QhMecXafw&feature=relmfu

Video: Rep. Gohmert Speaks on Radical Islam! (Part 2)-Posted on YouTube.com-By GohmertTX01-On October 29, 2011:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TaA7M4RC5OU&feature=relmfu

Video: Rep. Gohmert Speaks on Radical Islam! (Part 3)-Posted on YouTube.com-By GohmertTX01-On October 29, 2011:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HlICvlltLk0&feature=relmfu

Video: Rep. Gohmert Speaks on Radical Islam! (Part 4)-Posted on YouTube.com-By GohmertTX01-On October 29, 2011:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfuWdeMXwYA&feature=relmfu

Note: The following website and articles and/or blog posts relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. Holy Land Foundation For Relief And Development (HLF)!

Posted On DiscoverTheNetWorks.Com:

  • U.S-based Islamic charity shut down by authorities in 2001 for funding the terrorist group Hamas

Established in 1988 (under the name “Occupied Land Fund”) by Shukri Abu Baker, Mohammad El-Mezain andGhassan Elashi, the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development (HLF) was a non-profit, tax-exempt, charitable trust headquartered in Richardson, Texas. It also maintained branch offices in New Jersey, California, and Illinois. Its name change took place in 1992.

Calling itself America’s largest Islamic charity, HLF purported to be a source of help for needy Palestinian Muslims in Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, and the Palestinian Authority (PA). “Our mission,” stated its website, “is to find and implement practical solutions for human suffering through humanitarian programs that impact the lives of the disadvantaged, disinherited, and displaced peoples suffering from man-made and natural disasters.” In reality, however, the Foundation was a major financier of the terrorist organization Hamas.

In its earliest days, HLF received a $200,000 cash infusion from Ghassan Elashi’s brother-in-law Musa Abu Marzook, the Hamas senior political leader and Virginia resident who would be deported in 1997 for his involvement in six terror attacks in Israel that killed 47 people. By 1989, HLF had already sent nearly $1 million to Marzook and Hamas co-founder Ahmed Yassin (to the latter through an account called the Islamic Center of Gaza—another ostensibly charitable entity used by Yassin to finance Hamas activities).

HLF’s precursor, the Occupied Land Fund, was named in a May 1991 Muslim Brotherhood document—titled “An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America”—as one of the Brotherhood’s 29 likeminded “organizations of our friends” that shared the common goal of destroying America and turning it into a Muslim nation. These “friends” were identified by the Brotherhood as groups that could help teach Muslims “that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands ... so that ... God’s religion [Islam] is made victorious over all other religions.”

Also named in the Muslim Brotherhood document were:

Suspicious of its terrorist ties, U.S. federal authorities began monitoring the Holy Land Foundation in 1996. On September 5, 2001, federal anti-terrorism agents raided InfoCom Corporation, the company that ran the HLF website. According to defectors from the conspiracy, the HLF web server was used also by the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), the Islamic Society of North America, the Muslim Students’ Association of the U.S. and Canada, the Islamic Circle of North America, the Islamic Association for Palestine, and American Muslims for Jerusalem. As Islam scholar Stephen Schwartz writes, “All these organizations drew from the common financial and technical pool at HLF. All shared a single administrative and technical contact for the maintenance of the web server. They had been erected as political shells around the Hamas hydra-head represented by HLF.” (Support for Hamas had become illegalin 1995 as the result of an executive order by President Bill Clinton and subsequent congressional action.)

On December 4, 2001, the Bush administration seized all HLF assets and records because of its Hamas connections. Said President Bush at the time: “Hamas has obtained much of the money that it pays for murder abroad right here in the United States, money originally raised by the Holy Land Foundation. The Holy Land Foundation ... raised $13 million from people in America last year. … Money raised by the Holy Land Foundation is used by Hamas to support schools and indoctrinate children to grow up into suicide bombers. [It] is also used by Hamas to recruit suicide bombers and to support their families.” 

In July 2004, federal authorities arrested five former HLF leaders: Shukri Abu Baker (HLF’s co-founder and former President and Chief Executive); Ghassan Elashi (HLF’s co-founder and former Board Chairman and Treasurer); Mohammed El-Mezain (HLF’s co-founder and former Board Chairman); Mufid Abdulqader (the half-brother of Hamas’s supreme political leader, Khaled Mashal); and Abdulraham Odeh (HLF’s former New Jersey representative). In a 42-count indictment, these individuals were charged with providing material support for Hamas terrorists to the tune of $12.4 million over a six-year period, and more than $57 million since the late 1988. Two more ex-officials of HLF, Haitham Maghawri and Akram Mishal, managed to escape U.S. jurisdiction and are considered to be fugitives.

According to the indictment, HLF tried to hide its terrorist-financing activities from American law-enforcement by making a few small contributions to innocuous, non-Palestinian entities while reserving the vast majority of its funds for terrorists. As Shukri Abu Baker told his underlings: “We can give $100,000 to the Islamists and $5,000 to the others.” Another HLF program, masquerading as charitable support for needy families and orphans in Palestinian territories, is said to have channeled money to families whose relatives had been killed or captured while waging jihad; some of them were suicide bombers.

In December 2006, two openly pro-Castro organizations—the Humanitarian Law Project and the Center for Constitutional Rights—jointly petitioned a federal judge to dismiss many of the charges brought against HLF.

On July 23, 2007, HLF’s leaders went on trial. Seven principal individuals were charged with twelve counts of providing “material support and resources” to a foreign terrorist organization. Additionally, they faced thirteen counts of money laundering and thirteen counts of breaching the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which prohibits transactions that threaten American national security. Along with the seven named defendants, the government released a list of approximately 300 “unindicted co-conspirators” and “joint venturers.”

Among the unindicted co-conspirators were groups such as Hamas, the Council on American-Islamic Relations, INFOCOM, the Islamic Society of North America, the Muslim Arab Youth Association, the Islamic Association for Palestine, the United Association for Studies and Research, and the North American Islamic Trust. The list also included many individuals affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood and/or Hamas. Among these were Omar Ahmad, Abdallah AzzamYousef al-QaradawiMohammad JaghlitAbdurahman AlamoudiJamal BadawiAbdel Aziz Rantisi,Ahmed Yassin, and Mousa Abu Marzook. Thirty-nine directors, employees and representatives of HLF were also named.

On October 22, 2007, after a two-month trial and nineteen days of jury deliberation, Judge A. Joe Fish declared a mistrial because the jury had been unable to deliver unanimous verdicts and had failed to convict on a single count brought against the defendants.

When the government retried the case a year later, prosecutors made several key adjustments. Most notably, they dropped some counts against particular defendants; they called several new witnesses; and they displayed three exhibits which Israeli military officials had seized from the Palestinian Authority (PA). Those exhibits demonstrated that the PA, like the U.S. government, clearly considered HLF to be a Hamas funder; that an HLF-supported charity committee was fully controlled by Hamas; and that the defendants were well aware that whatever money they were raising in the U.S. was earmarked for Hamas.

On November 24, 2008, the jury convicted five former HLF officials—Shukri Abu-Baker, Ghassan Elashi, Mohamed El-Mezain, Mufid Abdulqader and Abdelrahman Odeh—of conspiring to provide material support to terrorists.”

Source:

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6181

II. Exposed! Muslim Brotherhood's U.S. front groups: ‘Investigation documents 'terrorists with neckties' in nation's capital!’-Posted on WND.com-On October 7, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=119427

III. Video: Stakelbeck on Terror: Muslim Brotherhood's Growing Influence!-Posted on CBN.com-On September 21, 2011:

http://www.cbn.com/media/player/index.aspx?s=/Archive/News/Stakelbeck_Terror_092011_WS&search=stakelbeckepisodes&p=1&parent=0&subnav=false

IV. Video: The Basics of Shariah Law By Lt. Gen. (Ret.) W.G. Jerry Boykin!-Posted on YouTube-By ferval59-On January 23, 2011:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G60oyejzYII&NR=1

V. Federal judge confirms CAIR is Hamas: ‘Unsealed ruling reveals 'ample evidence' tying group to terror’-Posted on WND.com-On November 23, 2010:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=232181

VI. Jihad 101:  Posted On Act! For America-Center for Security Policy-By Frank Gaffney, Jr.-On December 29, 2009:

http://www.actforamerica.org/index.php/learn/recent-news/10-newsmaster/1759-jihad-101

VII. Obama is a Useful Pawn of Radical Islam!-Posted on TeaParty.org-By Dr. Laurie Roth, PhD-On October 27, 2011:

http://www.teaparty.org/article.php?id=1567

VIII. Obama’s ineligibility: Muslim-leftist radical in the White House!-Posted on U.S. Justice Foundation-On September 14, 2011:

http://usjf.net/2011/09/obama’s-ineligibility-muslim-leftist-radical-in-the-white-house/

IX. What you haven't been told: “Most exhaustive investigation ever into Prez's background, to include his radical ties”-Posted on WND.com-On May 2, 2010:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=148037

X. Smear, Inc.: Silencing the Critics of Islamic Supremacism!-Posted on FrontPageMag.com-By Mark Tapson-On September 14, 2011:

http://frontpagemag.com/2011/09/14/smear-inc-silencing-the-critics-of-islamic-supremacism/

XI. The Administration Takes on ‘Islamophobia’: ‘The White House is giving free-speech opponents a megaphone’-Posted on National Review Online-By NINA SHEA-On September 1, 2011:

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/276021/administration-takes-islamophobia-nina-shea?page=1

XII. Three Convicted in Terror-Related Cases Later Granted U.S. Citizenship by Obama Administration-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Edwin Mora-On April 29, 2011:

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/3-persons-convicted-terrorism-related-ca

XIII. DOJ Drops Charges Against Indicted Islamic Terrorist!-Posted on Judicial Watch-On October 1, 2010:

http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2010/oct/doj-drops-charges-against-indicted-islamic-terrorist

Note: The following video contains an eye-opening interview with attorney Stephen Pidgeon who claimed that he found a record that revealed that President Obama changed his name from “Barak Mounir Ubayd” to “Barack Hussein Obama” on October 14, 1982 in Skookumchuck, British Columbia-You Decide:

Video: Attorney’s Explosive Claim, Obama Changed Name in 1982!-Posted on ExposeObama.com-On June 4, 2011:

http://www.exposeobama.com/2011/06/04/video-attorneys-explosive-claim-obama-changed-name-in-1982/

Note What follows is a three-part series of eye-opening articles and/or blog posts regarding the infiltration of Shariah within the U.S. written by Chuck Norris-You Decide:

Holy Week, Holy Shariah (Part 1 of 3)-Posted on Human Events-By Chuck Norris-On April 19, 2011:

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=43031

US Shariah Infiltrations (Part 2 of 3)-Posted on Townhall-By Chuck Norris-On April 26, 2011:

http://townhall.com/columnists/chucknorris/2011/04/26/us_shariah_infiltrations_part_2

US Shariah Infiltrations (Part 3 of 3)-Posted on Townhall-By Chuck Norris-On May 3, 2011:

http://townhall.com/columnists/chucknorris/2011/05/03/us_shariah_infiltrations_part_3_of_3

Note:  My following blog post contains numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

The Islamic Infiltration: Inside Our Government, Armed With Our Secrets!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/15/the-islamic-infiltration-inside-our-government-armed-with-our-secrets/

Could Steps That Team Obama Has Taken Be Emboldening Terrorists?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/12/30/could-steps-that-team-obama-has-taken-be-emboldening-terrorists/

Should Americans Fear Islam?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/05/should-americans-fear-islam/

Is Shariah Law A Danger To Our U.S. National Security?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/09/16/is-shariah-law-a-danger-to-u-s-national-security/

What do American Citizens Know About “Sharia Law” and is It Something That We Should Know More About?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/26/what-do-american-citizens-know-about-“sharia-law”-and-is-it-something-that-we-should-know-more-about/

Islam’s Child Martyrs in America!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/02/12/islam’s-child-martyrs-in-america/

What are CAIRs obstructionist goals?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/03/06/6951/

Federal judge confirms CAIR is Hamas!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/11/24/federal-judge-confirms-cair-is-hamas/

Godfather of The Islamic Revolution!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/11/godfather-of-the-islamic-revolution/

What we haven’t been told about the President’s background!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/03/what-we-haven’t-been-told-about-the-president’s-background/

Note If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…

MR. HUNTSMAN TOWN HALL MEETING AS BROADCAST IN C-SPAN 3 THIS MORNING WAS A UNIQUE EXPERIENCED. THE ENTIRE ATMOSPHERE WAS UNUSUAL FOR A POLITICIAN.  MR HUNTSMAN SAT AT A TABLE RARHER THAN STANDING OR USING A DESK. THE ATMOSPHERE HE PRODUCED WAS MORE LIKE A GROUP OF FRIENDS SEATED AROUND  AND HOLDING A CASUAL DISCUSSION ABOUT THE PROBLEMS CONFRONTING OUR COUNTRY.  THERE WAS NO LECTURE TYPE OR USED CAR SALES TYPE ATTITUDE,  JUST A COMFORTABLE FEELING ABOUT THE MAN PRESENTING HIMSELF IN A FRIENDLY MANNER, THIS FORMAT WAS CONDUCIVE TO A FEELING OF CONFIDENCE AND ADMIRATION ABOUT THIS MAN. THISW WAS SO DIFFERENT FROM THE DEBATE FORMAT OR THE SALES TYPE OF PRESENTATION THAT IS USUALLY ENCOUNTERED AT THE POLITICAL GATHERING TYPE WE HAVE ALL BECOME ACCUSTOMED TO,  MR HUNTSMAN SPOKE IN A CALM MANNER WHICH GAVE THE BELIEF THAT HE WAS TALKING TO EQUALS, NOT LECTURING OR SELLING, JUST BEING AN ORDINARY TYPE PERSON.

IT WAS A REFRESHING EXPERIENCE WHEN COMPARED TO THE HIGH VOLTAGE ATMOSPHERE ENCOUNTERED AT OTHER POLITICAL EVENTS.

Read more…
alqueada%2Bflag.jpg










By John W. Lillpop


While celebrating the death of Muammar Gaddafi last week, supporters of President Obama were lavish in their praise of his execution of the Libyan war. Some claimed vindication of the controversial “Leading from Behind” strategy and predicted that Libya would be the new textbook model for waging “smart” war.

However, recent reports coming from Libya suggest that the kudos directed toward Obama may have been premature, at best, and down right ignorant at worst.

As reported at the reference, the ‘spoils of war’ appear to have graced those who practice terrorism:


Weekend media reports showed al-Qaida’s flag flying in central Benghazi, and noted that Libyan anti-aircraft missiles had been purchased by terror groups, but White House spokesman Jay Carney said Monday the administration has not been surprised by news reports from Libya.

“I’m not aware of anything that has been reported that has surprised us out of Libya,” Carney said during a morning press briefing.

White House officials have not responded to The Daily Caller’s request for an explanation of Carney’s statement.

The news follows the Oct. 22 announcement by the transitional Libyan leader that the country would discard current divorce laws in favor of archaic Islamic laws that allow polygamy and easy divorce for men.

A CNN report on Saturday showed al-Qaida’s black flag flying over the Benghazi courthouse, which was one of the rebellion’s starting points.”


 
Thus, the Obama ‘triumph’ in Libya may turn out to be in the same class of failure as the Obama-Biden “Summer of Recovery” of the U.S. economy in 2010:

Utter and complete failure, aggravated and made all the worse by idiotic self-congratulations and back slapping on the part of those most responsible for the failure!


God speed November 6, 2012!



Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2011/10/31/libyas-turmoil-al-qaida-presence-no-surprise-says-white-house/#ixzz1cOc3GiyG
Read more…

SURVIVAL OF SOCIAL SECURITY

Those of you who have been following my previous posts ar aware of the proposal that I have put before congress re. the taxation of social security benifits and the inequality of working citizens about the payroll contribgutions.  I had previously recieved correspondance from republican congressman Chris Gibson that these proposals had merit and deserved consideration in the 112th congress.  Yesterday I recieved corespondance from democrat congressman Paul Tonko stateing that he had authored and introduced H. R. 2708 which would remove the wage and bonus maximum of $108,600 anually subject to Social Security contributions which would put all workers on an equal level of contributing to the Social Security trust fund throughout their wage earning lifetime instead of putting the entire burden of financing S S on those with lower wage/bonus earnngs.  Congressman Tonko has  titled his bill "keeping Social Security Solvent Act" wich he claims will keep the S S system solvent for several generations.
Read more…

WE THE PEOPLE......................!

Quote of the Day: "A constitution is not the act of a government, but

of a people constituting a government; and government without a

constitution is power without a right. All power exercised over a

nation, must have some beginning. It must be either delegated, or

assumed. There are not other sources. All delegated power is trust,

and all assumed power is usurpation. Time does not alter the nature

and quality of either." -- Thomas Paine (1737-1809)

Read more…