The Lynching of Herman Cain

by Kris Zane

For those of us old enough to remember the debacle of the Clarence Thomas “lynching,” many have likened Politico’s “scoop” of Herman Cain being accused of sexual harassment in the 1990s, the new thirteen-year "affair" allegation, and the subsequent “coverage” by the mainstream media, as an attempt to repeat history. Several years after the Clarence Thomas debacle, with the changing of the guard, another man, Bill Clinton, was accused of sexual impropriety; and when, like the Whac-a-Mole game, women were popping up across the United States accusing Clinton of everything from casual sexual encounters to rape and beating, the scant critical coverage was attributed to, according to Hillary Clinton, a “vast Right-wing conspiracy,” headed by one of the few news sources that were actually news sources back then, Rush Limbaugh.  Unlike the Clarence Thomas case, Bill Clinton being a liberal versus a conservative—this is the one crucible of the Left—the mainstream media circled their wagons, protecting their darling. 

And history is repeating itself, although this time we get to see the two ways the mainstream media treats a liberal versus a conservative, not years apart, but in “real time.” On the one hand we have Herman Cain being “exposed” by Politico’s “scoop” that Cain had been accused of sexual harassment, Politico the next day stating that Cain was flip-flopping in his responses to the accusations, and that he was in “damage control” mode, both baseless statements, and the networks endless looping of Cain's "mistress" disclosing thirteen years infidelity. On the other hand, we have the mainstream media circling the wagons in regard to Obama, specifically the “Green Jobs” scandal, of which Solyndra appears to be only the tip of the iceberg; in which millions—if not billions of dollars were fed to Obama 2008 campaign bundlers; but also more importantly the Fast and Furious scandal. Think about it: Obama and Holder oversaw a program that put thousands of taxpayer-funded assault weapons into the hands of Mexican drug cartel members, and then lied about having knowledge of it; that hundreds of Mexican citizens have been murdered with these weapons, and at least one American citizen—Border Patrol agent Brian Terry—and yet the mainstream media, like the Clinton debacle, is still circling the wagons. If the mainstream media hadn’t protected their darling, Clinton would have been viewed as what he was—a sexual predator; obstructing justice; suborning and committing perjury. If the mainstream media weren’t protecting their darling, Obama, Obama and Holder would, frankly, be impeached as accessories to murder for the hundreds of deaths in Mexico, and the murder of Brian Terry.

But as Bob Dylan sang back in the 1960s, the times they are a-changin’. It is interesting that the one thing (I believe) that gave Obama the push to the Presidency in 2008, and quashed all those nasty little doubts the American people were having about him—i.e., his hidden records, his dual citizenship, his unsavory connections with radicals and socialists, etc.—this one thing, the Internet, in the form of his campaign’s YouTube “town hall meetings,” (i.e., orchestrated, complete with casting companies and prepared questions and answers); this YouTube venue which carried him over the top, is the two-headed snake that now bites his heel. There are literally tens of thousands of YouTube videos covering everything from Obama’s Freudian slip about his “Muslim faith,” to the endless anomalies in his long-form birth certificate. These two subjects are not merely marginal; simply taking the highest view counts of two videos adds up to over two million views.  This is only one tenth of one percent of YouTube videos critical of Obama.

But there is much more than YouTube now. Instead of the lone voice of Rush Limbaugh in the ether, we have what is now rivaling (and I think crushing) the mainstream media: grassroots media, primarily where you have what amounts to conservative blogs turned news gatherers and news reporters. Would Solyndra and Fast and Furious be an issue today if it weren’t for The Daily Caller and Human Events? Would we have the hundreds of Obama documents detailing corruption, crony capitalism, and endless illegal activity if it weren’t for Judicial Watch? Would the anomalies in the Obama birth certificate, the irregularities in his Social Security number, the vast suppressing of Obama college, state senate (etc., etc., etc.) records be at the forefront of America’s doubts about Obama were it not for World Net Daily? 

But let us get back to the lynching of Herman Cain. One of the interesting aspects of the Internet that didn’t have as significant an impact as Obama 2008 campaign’s use of YouTube and mass emails was Twitter. Now Twitter is huge, and I would argue is actually the driving force of news (and, for that matter of attacks). I would call myself a student of Twitter, specifically in regard to the traffic that has occurred after the Fox/Google Republican debate, when Cain’s poll numbers began to skyrocket. Hillary Clinton said (falsely) regarding “Monicagate” that there was a vast Right-wing conspiracy to destroy her husband; but it doesn’t take a genius to decipher that Twitter has been used, in an orchestrated manner, to take down Cain. Observing the Cain traffic by the hour, nay, by the minute, you can see that a certain narrative occurs on cue; that, as quickly as a certain narrative pops up like our Wac-the-Mole game, the game is reset, and a new narrative occurs. These narratives are sometimes downright odd, other times substantive, but always orchestrated. Like the traditional mainstream media’s attack of all conservatives, the narrative began with Herman Cain being stupid and/or crazy, using, as they did with Sarah Palin, some supposed gaff or flip-flop statement. When this didn’t work, and the American public—specifically the Tea Party which has been from the beginning and until now his strongest supporter—didn’t buy this, the narrative was that the Tea Party was supporting Cain to try to cover up the fact that they were racists; that as soon as a viable candidate came upon the scene—a white candidate, that is—Herman Cain would be dropped like a hot potato. Again, the Left seeing that the Tea Party were not going to rein in their support for Cain, the narrative began that Herman Cain was an Uncle Tom; that he was coddling the white Tea Partiers; that he wove his message depending on what he thought the white Tea Partiers wanted to hear. Upon this narrative rearing its head, the Left showed their true racists colors, including the ridiculousness of the white Lawrence O’Donnell lecturing Herman Cain on how he wasn’t black enough; that during the Civil Rights years, he didn’t do enough; or Cornell West’s telling Cain to “get off the symbolic crack pipe.” For a time there was an attack on Cain’s 999 flat tax plan, of which Twitter was abuzz with citing an endless parade of economists and pundits, stating that the American public, especially the poor, would pay more in taxes under the plan. Then there was the narrative that Cain had changed his 999 plan, to a 9-0-9 plan, meaning that the poor would not have to pay taxes under his plan, charging Cain with flip-flopping. Of course, like all other narratives presented in this orchestrated assault, this was baseless. The Twitter “Uncle Tom” narrative (and the subsequent racism) falling on deaf ears, and upon more and more blacks beginning to support Cain, the Left pulled out their secret weapon, the Clarence Thomas-inspired smear campaign. Politico broke their amazingly lame “scoop,” in which they “decided” to not release details, “decided,” to make their story as vague as possible. The “victims,” unnamed, and without any details of the accusation, received “five-figure” settlements?  What are the details of the accusation? What is the background of the women? Did they bother to ask Herman Cain about their “scoop” before publishing the narrative? They then followed this up with their statements that Herman Cain had given “conflicting” responses to the accusations; that his campaign was in “damage control”—both baseless statements. Meanwhile the Left-wing media jumped on the wagon with all their fury, parroting the same. Twitter, on cue, almost to the minute, reflected the mainstream media’s attack of Cain, in this rabid, foaming at the mouth parroting.   

Twenty years ago with Americans getting their news from three major networks (all Left-wing), and one extreme Left-wing source (i.e., “Public” Radio), a Herman Cain, upon being pummeled by the media,  would have quietly slithered away, being pelted to death by the Left; but today with most Americans being sick and tired of the mainstream (lamestream as Sarah Palin calls it) media, contrary to the Left’s predictions, Cain has actually risen in the polls because of this baseless charge. America is sick of the Lawrence O’Donnell and Rachel Maddow type of “news” programs, even sickening of the “Right-wing” Fox, becoming disenchanted after their hatchet job on Hank Williams, Jr., and their ignoring of the Obama birth certificate and Social Security number issue.  Most Americans are now getting their news from websites outside of the mainstream. Further, a person working part-time out of their home is now part of the new mainstream media—case in point, the “I am the 53%” movement, in contradistinction to the Left’s Occupy Wall Street rabble. Or, even to the extent that a single individual like myself can write an article or produce a video that exposes Obama or supports Cain, that can potentially reach thousands, if not millions. Anyone with a computer can be a part of the new mainstream media, fighting off the lies and deceptions of the Left.

Most Americans are tired of the media telling them what to think; telling them what candidate they are to vote for: Both the Republican party and the Left have been telling the American public for months that Mitt Romney is the only viable candidate. Twenty years ago the American people would have complied. Today, with the mainstream media dying a quick death—I would say fighting in a sort of death throe—the sleeping giant, as Herman Cain says, the “we the people,” has awakened, and aren’t going to take it anymore, and have cut that noose that the Left put around Herman Cain’s neck.  

Posted on The Patriot Post-By Nate Jackson for The Patriot Post Editorial Team-On November 30, 2011:

“The Foundation

“The natural cure for an ill-administration, in a popular or representative constitution, is a change of men.”—Alexander Hamilton

Editorial Exegesis

“It is a newspaper truism that what is good for journalism is bad for the country, and vice versa. Let’s just say that regarding the pending retirement of Congressman Barney Frank, we’re delighted to make the professional sacrifice. Few House Members have made a bigger legislative mark, and arguably no one so expensively. Mr. Frank deserves to be forever remembered—and we’ll help everyone remember him—as the nation’s leading protector of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac before their fall. For years Barney helped block meaningful reform of the mortgage giants while pushing an ‘affordable housing’ agenda that helped to enlarge the subprime mortgage industry. ‘I do think I do not want the same kind of focus on safety and soundness that we have in OCC [Office of the Comptroller of the Currency] and OTS [Office of Thrift Supervision],’ Mr. Frank said on September 25, 2003, in one of his many legendary rhetorical hits. ‘I want to roll the dice a little bit more in this situation towards subsidized housing.’ The dice came up snake-eyes for the housing market and U.S. economy. Democracy can be unfair, and for his sins Mr. Frank was rewarded with the chairmanship of the Financial Services Committee in 2009 and an opening to remake the U.S. financial industry. It was like asking Charlie Sheen to teach an anger management class. The result was Dodd-Frank, which didn’t solve the ‘too big to fail’ problem but did make banks even more subject to the wishes of Washington. The crony capitalism exemplified by Fannie and Freddie became more broadly embedded in U.S. financial markets. ... Liberals who regret Mr. Frank’s departure needn’t worry too much. The next Democrat in line to run Financial Services is California’s Maxine Waters, whose main contribution to Dodd-Frank was requiring racial-preference officers at each of the regional Federal Reserve banks. Journalists may not miss Mr. Frank after all.”—The Wall Street Journal

Upright

“If you thought Rep. Barney Frank was bad, his likely replacement is worse. Rep. Maxine Waters is Congress’ most anti-bank member—unless she owns stock in one, that is. ... When in 2003, the publicly created mortgage giants [Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac] became dangerously overleveraged with weak mortgages, Waters pushed them to underwrite even ‘more products where you have no down payments.’ She accused critics of the quotas of discriminating against minorities and the poor. ... She lobbied to exclude them and their government-mandated affordable housing charter from the ‘sweeping financial reforms.’ And she got her wish. She also got another wish: a provision exempting minority-owned banks from the new oversight. Quite interesting. Because at the same time she got that little gem added to the bill, she was under investigation for steering federal bailout money to a troubled minority-owned bank in which she and her husband held a large financial stake.”—Investor’s Business Daily

“Under a new 893-page proposal unveiled last week, automakers must hit a fleet-wide fuel economy average of 54.5 miles per gallon by 2025 -- double today’s 27.3 standard. The government says it would cost automakers $8.5 billion per year to comply, which means a spike in sticker prices of at least $2,000 to $2,800, according to official projections. ... The Obama Administration is pointing to the supposed benefits of the new standards—including a fuel savings of $1.7 trillion—but as [Heritage Foundation’s Diane] Katz writes, that number is ‘pure speculation given that actual savings would depend on the price of gasoline,’ which can’t be predicted 14 years into the future, much less next summer. ... The EPA should not be in the business of picking and choosing what kind of cars and trucks Americans can drive, and neither should President Obama.”—Heritage Foundation’s Mike Brownfield

“Last week, 5,000 files of private email correspondence among several of the world’s top climate scientists were anonymously leaked onto the Internet. Like the first ‘climategate’ leak of 2009, the latest release shows top scientists in the field fudging data, conspiring to bully and silence opponents, and displaying far less certainty about the reliability of anthropogenic global warming theory in private than they ever admit in public. The scientists include men like Michael Mann of Penn State University and Phil Jones of the University of East Anglia, both of whose reports inform what President Obama has called ‘the gold standard’ of international climate science, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).”—columnist James Delingpole

The Demo-gogues

Sometimes they get it right: “This country has never had a congressman like Barney Frank, and the House of Representatives will not be the same without him.”—Barack Obama

Blather: “Barney is a fighter for fairness in financial services and civil rights for all, including minorities and LGBT Americans. Because of his leadership, the Financial Services Committee has been one of the most productive committees in Congress. ... I hope to use my experience to continue and expand his work in the committee. I will continue to champion practical regulations, while making sure they work for consumers and the financial sector, a sector which has the right to be profitable but the obligation to be fair, two concepts which are not mutually exclusive.”—Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA)

Excuses: “If I were to run again, I would be engaged full-fledged in a campaign, which is entirely appropriate. Nobody ought to expect to get elected without a contest. But the fact that [the district] is so new makes it harder in terms of learning about new areas, introducing myself to new people. And I have other obligations; one is to continue to serve the people I currently serve.”—Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA), who is avoiding mentioning the writing on the wall for Democrats in 2012

High-minded socialist: “Over the last decade, we became a country that relied too much on what we bought and consumed.”—Barack Obama

Irony: “[N]o matter how tough things are right now, we still give thanks for that most American of blessings, the chance to determine our own destiny. The problems we face didn’t develop overnight, and we won’t solve them overnight.”—Barack Obama, the man who wants to take away the chance for each American to determine his own destiny.”

Continue Reading:

http://patriotpost.us/edition/2011/11/30/chronicle/#post-comment

Note: These are other articles and/or blog posts and videos that revealed that President Bush and Senator McCain attempted to rein in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, along with Barney Frank’s conflict of interest-You Decide:

Bush Proposed Fannie Mae / Freddie Mac Supervision In 2003-Posted on Bucks Rights-On September 16, 2008:

http://www.bucksright.com/bush-proposed-fannie-mae-freddie-mac-supervision-in-2003-1141

McCain’s attempt to fix Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac in 2005-Posted on Hot Air-On September 17, 2008:

http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/17/mccains-attempt-to-fix-fannie-mae-freddie-mac-in-2005/

Media Mum on Barney Frank’s Fannie Mae Love Connection: ‘Democratic House Financial Services Committee Chair promoted GSEs while former ‘spouse’ was Fannie Mae executive.’-Posted on Business & Media Institute-By Jeff Poor-On September 24, 2008:

http://www.businessandmedia.org/printer/2008/20080924145932.aspx

Lawmaker Accused of Fannie Mae Conflict of Interest-Posted on FoxNews.com-By Bill Sammon-On October 3, 2008:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,432501,00.html

O ‘Reilly - Barney Frank Had Affair with Fannie Mae Exec-Posted on Live Leak-On October 7, 2008:

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=f5b_1223348928

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Who or what caused the economic crisis that propelled President Obama into office?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/06/who-or-what-caused-the-economic-crisis-that-propelled-president-obama-into-office/

Who or What Was Behind the Financial Crisis?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/03/06/who’s-behind-the-financial-crisis/

The Wall Street Bailout Bill Threatens Our Bottom Line!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/20/the-wall-street-bailout-bill-threatens-our-bottom-line/

ACORN-The Community Reinvestment Act (CRA)-Automaker Labor Unions!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/22/acorn-the-community-reinvestment-act-cra-automaker-labor-unions/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

President Lincoln, a Republican, went about correcting the wrong of slavery by the Civil War.  It didn’t stop the wrong. Going to war against terrorism is not the way to stop terrorism.

It took the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s, Martin Luther King’s non-violent marches to start the ball rolling. Civil rights lawyers brought cases of abuse of minorities to the Supreme Court’s attention.

Because taxpayers have not brought their cases before the Court, I was brushed off. The Court has gone overboard in protecting the rights of minorities. What is the Tea Party but a non-violent movement? And what good is it?  Once the politicians the Tea Party supports go to Washington, it’s the same old thing.  

Because civil rights activists brought their grievances to the Court’s attention, the Court has settled on a preferred freedoms concept—preferred over taxpayer rights.  Judges, after all, are lawyers—trained to make the law whatever their clients pay them to make the law. Lawyers and politicians made government robbery the law, ostensibly for a greater good.  Unchallenged, the law becomes everlastingly more immoral, finally bringing down society. Justice Jackson wrote, “Let it not be overlooked that due process of law is not for the sole benefit of the accused.

While the accused are not forced to testify against themselves, IRS lies are the law, unless the taxpayer can prove his innocence before a biased court.  There is no better reason than the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s to allow taxpayers to use the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment to bring abuses and blunders of the tax collector to the attention of the Court.

Roosevelt’s legacy, government entitlement, millions of government dependents in one political camp, free enterprise advocates in another, and a stonewall dividing the two, the message is loud and clear. But don’t expect lawyers and politicians make the decision. They are being paid to keep the current law in place.   

The corporation that is too big to fail, that government bails out with your tax money, ostensibly, to keep the economy from melting down, is immoral. Ultimately, this kind of government will end American freedom. 

When I was a child, my parents admonished me for asking too many questions. I was curious, imaginative, and adventurous. When I was five, disobeying my parents, I crossed busy Preston Road on my tricycle and went exploring. The cops found me two hours later chatting with a yard man. At midlife, I went on a two-year boating adventure on the South Atlantic Ocean.

The more the latent inhibition, the more focused one is, the more tuned into system and order, the more easily manipulated. The more imaginative one is, the less the focused attention; they are more creative and better suited for change.  I remain with low latent inhibition.

Henry Ford, with low latent inhibition, said, If you think you can, you are right. If you think you can’t, you are right. William P. Merrill of Merrill and Lynch, with low latent inhibition, said, “Respectable men and women content with good and easy living are missing some of the most important things in life.  Unless you give yourself to some great cause you have not begun to live.”

Nothing can bring a nation down faster than immoral laws. Unless the American people awaken to the seriousness of their situation, the lawless United States will continue until America goes bankrupt. When Germany went bankrupt, Hitler took control.  The Muslim Brotherhood, formerly in support of Hitler, has taken Hitler’s place.  

International terrorism is the counteraction of what has happened in the United States: putting the government before its source of energy, the American people—who, born under the sign of Aquarius, the sign of brotherhood and fraternity, who have as their sign the water-bearer, “who spills out to mankind the life-force and spiritual energy,” says Astrologer’s Handbook.

Currently in the death throes of the Age of Pisces, Earth is moving into the Age of Aquarius. From the Lord’s prayer, “in earth as it is in heaven. . .But seek ye first the kingdom of God,”  a word to the wise.  Obama revealed his intent in his autobiographies. He is a Marxist—naturally against free enterprise and in support of the Muslim Brotherhood. They are birds of a feather.

Obama spent 20 years in Reverend Jeremiah Wright’s word of God church.  In September 2001, after the 9-11 event, in the presence of your President, Wright: “The government lied about inventing HIV virus as a means of genocide against people of color. We bombed Hiroshima. We bombed Nagasaki. And we nuked far more than the thousands in New York and the Pentagon and never batted an eye.”

I was on the high seas heading for the invasion of Japan when the bombs were dropped. They ended World War II. If I were you, I wouldn’t count on Obama to help. He doesn’t value my life. He doesn’t value America. Like his pastor for 20 years, Obama is against America and the American people.   

ITS GOING TO BE A LONG TRUDGE BACK UP,  KICK ALLTHE DEMOCRATS OUT.

What’s wrong with this picture?

Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On November 29, 2011:

“Two television spots developed by a national investment firm specializing in U.S. gold and silver coins have been rejected by major television networks, including the Fox News Channel and the Fox Business Network, for apparently political reasons.

The ads by Phoenix-based Swiss America Trading Corp., a WND advertiser, feature President Obama and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke as animated characters engaging in the potentially inflationary policy of printing paper money with abandon to stimulate the struggling economy.

Singer Pat Boone, a spokesman for Swiss America for more than 15 years, appears in the commercials as an animated announcer who concludes that investing in gold is a prudent strategy to diversify a portfolio in inflationary times.

“The Creature from Jekyll Island: A Second Look at the Federal Reserve”

Swiss America CEO Craig Smith said the intent of the ads was not to make a political statement.

The goal, he said, “was to take what we thought was a humorous approach to a timely and important economic topic in order to advertise our company and promote a new book we’ve recently published.”

Along with Fox News and Fox Business, the two commercials have been rejected by NBC, MSNBC, CNBC, ABC, CBS, CNN/HLN and the Discovery Channel.

Comcast, in rejecting the spot, told Swiss America that it “does not meet our standards on public symbol.”

Comcast’s Public Symbol Policy specifies that the “use of the name or likeness of the President of the United States and/or the Presidential Seal for endorsing commercial purposes must be authorized by the White House.”

Fox News said the “representation of public figures is something we try to avoid.”

CNN/HLN told Swiss America the commercials were “not appropriate for the current landscape.”

“The networks’ reaction shocked me,” Smith said. “It’s a threat to First Amendment rights when a commercial message is rejected not because it is inaccurate or misleading, but because it makes what is perceived to be a political statement the networks want to avoid.”

Smith told WND he was concerned that the networks were protecting Obama and Bernanke.

“All we are saying in these two commercials is what dozens of responsible professional economists are saying every day,” Smith said. “Gold investment as a responsible diversification strategy when governments printing of fiat currencies with abandon risk unleashing inflationary principles.”

Only Google TV accepted the commercials, for broadcast on the DISH Network and Direct TV satellite networks.

Google TV has planned a test in which the two ads will be broadcast 1,132 times on the DISH Network and Direct TV from Dec. 5, 2011, through Jan. 12, 2012.

Ironically, the Swiss America ads will be seen nationally via Google TV on many of the major networks that have refused to air them. While cable subscribers to Fox News and CNN/HLN will not see the ads, for example, subscribers to the DISH Network or Direct TV will see them on those networks during the test period.

“The silver lining,” said Smith “is that many of the television and cable networks who told us ‘no’ have come back saying ‘yes’ to Google TV, which will begin broadcasting the two commercials next week. We are very thankful to Google TV for helping us keep free speech alive on the television airwaves.”

In June, Smith and co-author Lowell Ponte published “The Inflation Deception: Six Ways Government Tricks Us … and Seven Ways to Stop It!” in a paperback edition.

“Welcome to the ‘inflatocracy’ – our new form of government of, by, and for inflation – in which deliberately debasing our money has become a tool of mind manipulation, wealth distribution, and secret taxation,” the publicity for the book on Amazon.com reads.

The first Swiss America commercial, seen below, plays off the theme “Helicopter Ben,” a nickname Wall Street has conferred upon Bernanke for his reputation of “helicoptering” into financial crises to dump money on a problem.

{…}

The second Swiss America commercial, seen below, evokes imagery from the classic movie “The Wizard of Oz” to portray Bernanke and Obama as “financial wizards” hiding as “the men behind the door” in an inflationary scheme to solve economic problems by printing money.

{…}

Ray Griggs, the producer of the 2010 feature film documentary “I Want Your Money,” a critical examination of the Obama administration’s economic policies, produced the two Swiss America commercials.”

Source:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=372421

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and reports reveal how George Soros, along with other liberal backers use their money to fund and/or manipulate media outlets, to include Hollywood because they see that as a powerful way to influence the American public.

It’s a strategy that Soros has been deploying extensively in media both in the United States and abroad. Since 2003, Soros has spent more than $48 million funding media properties, including the infrastructure of news - journalism schools, investigative journalism and even industry organizations:

Nearly 30 Soros-funded Media Operations Part of 'War on Fox'!-Posted on Business & Media Institute-By Dan Gainor-On June 1, 2011:

http://www.mrc.org/bmi/commentary/2011/Nearly__Sorosfunded_Media_Operations_Part_of_War_on_Fox_.html

Soros-Funded Lefty Media Reach More Than 300 Million Every Month!-Posted on Business & Media Institute-By Dan Gainor-On May 25, 2011:

http://www.mrc.org/bmi/commentary/2011/Soros_Lefty_Media_Reach_More_Than__Million_Every_Month.html

Soros Spends Over $48 Million Funding Media Organizations!-Posted on Business & Media Institute-By Dan Gainor-On May 18, 2011:

http://www.mrc.org/bmi/commentary/2011/Soros_Spends_Over__Million_Funding_Media_Organizations_.html

Over 30 Major News Organizations Linked to George Soros!-Posted on Business & Media Institute-By Dan Gainor-On May 11, 2011:

http://www.mrc.org/bmi/commentary/2011/Over__Major_News_Organizations_Linked_to_George_Soros.html

Citizen Soros Manipulating the Media!-Posted on Capital Research Center-By Matthew Vadum-On January 2011:

http://www.capitalresearch.org/pubs/pdf/v1293869054.pdf

George Soros, Movie Mogul: ‘Social Justice’ Cinema and the Sundance Institute!-Posted on Capital Research Center-By Rondi Adamson-On March 2008:

http://www.capitalresearch.org/pubs/pdf/v1204311857.pdf

Note: What follows is a “Soros Files” website that reveals other deplorable actions by the anti-American hedge fund billionaire that I believe, if not stopped now, will ultimately destroy this great country of ours as we know it:

http://sorosfiles.com/gsoros/

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Who owns our supposedly fair and balanced airwaves and news outlets?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/21/who-owns-our-supposedly-fair-and-balanced-airwaves-and-news-outlets/

What Happened to Free Speech?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/23/what-happened-to-free-speech/

Is the Fed’s concept of buying $600 billion of Treasuries just a smokescreen?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/11/03/is-the-fed’s-concept-of-buying-600-billion-of-treasuries-just-a-smokescreen/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

ASK FOX T.V NEWS AND O,RIELLY.

WE MUST RIGHT THIS SHIP NOW BEFORE WE BECOME A SECOND CLASS NATION OR WORSE YET A SOCIALIST  NATION.

We all have those around us who just can't seem to remember history, or find it easier to distort it than believe it.  Well, here's a little nugget we all  need to carry with us every day and SCREAM FROM THE ROOFTOPS---REMEMBER JANUARY 3rd, 2007!!

The day the Democrats took over was not January 22nd 2009, it was actually January 3rd 2007, the day the Democrats took over the House of Representatives and the Senate, at the very start of the 110th Congress. 

The Democratic Party controlled a majority in both chambers for the first time since the end of the 103rd Congress in 1995.

For those who are listening to the liberals propagating the fallacy that everything is "Bush's Fault", think about this: 

January 3rd, 2007, the day the Democrats took over the Senate and the Congress:
The DOW Jones closed at 12,621.77
The GDP for the previous quarter was 3.5%
The Unemployment rate was 4.6%
George Bush's Economic policies SET A RECORD of 52 STRAIGHT MONTHS of JOB CREATION! 

Remember that day...
January 3rd, 2007 was the day that BarneyFrank took over the House Financial Services Committee and Chris Dodd took over the Senate Banking Committee.
The economic meltdown that happened 15 months later was in what part of the economy? 

BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES!
THANK YOU DEMOCRATS (especially Barney ) for taking us from 13,000 DOW, 3.5 GDP and 4.6% Unemployment...to this CRISIS by (among MANY other things) dumping 5-6 TRILLION Dollars of toxic loans on the economy from YOUR Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac FIASCOES! 

(BTW: Bush asked Congress 17 times to stop Fannie & Freddie - starting in 2001 because it was financially risky for the US economy). Barney blocked it and called it a "Chicken Little Philosophy" (and the sky did fall!) 

And who took the THIRD highest pay-off from Fannie Mae AND Freddie Mac? OBAMA 

And who fought against reform of Fannie and Freddie?
OBAMA and the Democrat Congress, especially BARNEY!!!! 

So when someone tries to blame Bush...
REMEMBER JANUARY 3rd, 2007....THE DAY THE DEMOCRATS TOOK OVER!" 

Bush may have been in the car but the Democrats were in charge of the gas pedal and steering wheel they were driving the economy into the ditch. 

Budgets do not come from the White House. They come from Congress and the party that controlled Congress since January 2007 is the Democratic Party.  

Furthermore, the Democrats controlled the budget process for 2008 & 2009 as well as 2010 & 2011. 

In that first year, they had to contend with George Bush, which caused them to compromise on spending, when Bush somewhat belatedly got tough on spending increases. 

For 2009 though, Nancy Pelosi & Harry Reid bypassed George Bush entirely, passing continuing resolutions to keep government running until Barack Obama could take office. At that time, they passed a massive omnibus spending bill to complete the 2009 budget. 

And where was Barack Obama during this time? He was a member of that very Congress that passed all of these massive spending bills, and he signed the omnibus bill as President to complete 2009. Let's remember what the deficits looked like during that period:

If the Democrats inherited any deficit, it was the 2007 deficit, the last of the Republican budgets. That deficit was the lowest in five years, and the fourth straight decline in deficit spending.After that, Democrats in Congress took control of spending, and that includes Barack Obama, who voted for the budgets.

If Obama inherited anything, he inherited it from himself.

In a nutshell, what Obama is saying is "I inherited a deficit that I voted for,
And then I voted to expand that deficit four-fold since January 20th."

There is no way this will be widely publicized, unless each of us sends it on!

"The problems we face today exist because the people who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living."

 

 

HIT THEM HARD THEY ARE NOT OUR FRIENDS,  STOP SENDING THEM ANY MONEY OR SUPPLYS.  THEY HATE US.  WE DO NOT REALLY NEED THEM ANY MORE.  AND THEN GET THE HELL OUT OF AFGHANISTAN,  THE WAR THAT YOU CAN NOT WIN EVER.

WE NEED TO DUMP THE FEDERAL RESERVE IN THE COURTS ! WHEN THEY EVALUATE THE DOLLAR, WE

WILL ALL BE DEAD DUCKS !! WE NEED TO GO BACK TO THE U.S. TREASURY NOTES AS PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY WANTED TO DO - BUT WAS KILLED ! THESE

PEOPLE DO NOT FOOL AROUND . 

WHAT DOES THE TEA PARTY SAY?   MABY THEY WOULD SETTLE FOR THE  V.P/

THE FAA CRAFTING RULES FOR THE USE OF DRONE

PLANES IN THE USA ~ 11-27-2011

THAT SAYS  MERRY CHRISTMAS,  IT,S THAT SIMPLE.  CHRISTMAS IS A HOLY DAY.  NOT HAPPY HOLIDAY.

S T O P   T H E     B I L I N G U A L    E D U C AT I O N    P R O G R A M S.

YES! We pay for the illegals' education. YES! We pay for the iilegal's health care. NOW, you also want to continue paying for the bilingual programs because they are too lazy to learn English. Even the children born in the USA out of illegal aliens are attending the bilingual education programs because their parents want them to "preserve their culture and traditions".

Isn't precisely that culture what brought them here in the first place? The culture of entitlement, laziness, arrogance and destruction that we see everyday around them.

I am talking to you, American citizen: Your school district is laying real teachers off, and bringing teachers from Latin America to work in the bilingual programs. Isn't it the time to act right now?. 

Call your State Representative, your State Senator and tell them that, the illegals are not goint to vote for them anyway. Why pander to LULAC?

We, the people of the United States of America are not in a popularity contest. If they don't like it, they can go back, or try to invade other lands. Let's stop this social experiment!!!! What are you waiting for?

THAT YOU AND I.  VOTE TEA PARTY AND REPUBLICAN IN  2012.

You and I are politically well informed. But there are many Americans like my family who do not follow politics as closely as we do. Their political views are shaped by liberal media bias hit pieces, spin and sound bites.

99.9 % of my family are democrats because Marcus family traditional taught us the democrats are “for the little guy”. Republicans are “rich white racists”. Liberal media and the Democratic Party jointly support and promote this silly simple lie which still wins the democrats 95% of the black vote.

Despite me, the eldest of his five children being a black conservative tea party Republican, my 84 year old dad's negative view of Republicans remains steadfast. Dad tolerates my baffling political views because he loves me.

However, I would not be surprised if my family scheduled an intervention. A black van pulls up, a hood is thrown over my head and I'm carted off to an undisclosed location. I am denied food, water, bathroom privileges and subjected to video of Obama speeches 24/7 until I break.

It occurred to me that my family like many Americans are probably clueless regarding the truth of what it means to be a liberal and a conservative. Ironically, the majority of my family lives extremely responsible “conservative” lives. They go to work every day, serve their communities, attend church and raise their kids. And yet, the liberal media has lead them to believe the term “conservative” equals evil white racist.

So, I would like to offer my family and others a little “Conservatism 101”. For fun, let's call it “Conservatism for Dummies”.

Let us begin with a parable.

Tale of Two Dads- School is Difficult and Little Johnny Wishes to Stay Home.

Little Johnny says, “Dad I don't want to go to school. The kids are mean and the work is too hard!”

Liberal Dad replies, “I know just how you feel son. School was no picnic for me either. Stay home today”.

Conservative Dad replies, “Boy, you had better get your butt out of that bed and get ready for school. I'll talk to the principal and your teachers to work out any problems. An education is vital to your future success and happiness. I'm forcing you to go to school because I love you!”

I am not suggesting Liberal Dad does not love his child. But Liberal Dad's attempt to be his child's friend rather than a responsible parent is a spineless choice all about making himself feel good.

Patently liberal. Most liberal thinking and choices are about making themselves feel good as opposed to truly helping the people they claim to feel great compassion towards.

Conservative Dad's reply was that, not of a friend, but a responsible loving parent.

Liberalism is a religion. Despite failing whenever implemented, disciples of Liberalism faithfully believe if they can spend a little more of “other people's money”, they can bring forth their godless utopia where man is the ultimate authority. Atheists tend to embrace Liberalism.

Conservatism equals true/real compassion; rooted in common sense and honoring the human spirit. Conservatism celebrates achievement and a desire to be all one can be.

Liberalism is harmful and idiotic, while shrouded in so-called compassion. For example. Teachers at an LA school wanted Ebonics to be acceptable speech for black students. They argued that speaking Ebonics was cultural and learning English was too difficult. Black kids are not too stupid to learn to speak English correctly. Also, an inability to speak English is economically stifling.

And yet, whenever compassionate conservatives suggest learning English be required, they are branded racist by liberals.

You would think a “Liberal” is someone who is easy going, embracing a live-and-let-live attitude. In reality, liberals tend to be HUGE control freaks; arrogantly thinking themselves compassionately and intellectually superior to us common folks. This makes them best qualified to dictate how we should live our lives. Liberalism birthed Political Correctness which seeks to control what we are permitted to think, say and do.

Unquestionably, America was founded on Godly principles. Liberals want all reference to God banned from government and the public square, while demanding we display great tolerance for every other religion. Am I saying liberals tend to be anti-Christian? Yes!

Liberals are notorious for setting rules for the rest of us while exempting themselves. They want the government to demand we drive little more than lawnmowers covered with an auto body to “save the planet”. Meanwhile, they travel in limos and private jets.

In a nutshell, Liberals believe they know best. They use government to constantly invade our lives with new restrictions and controls. Government control hidden in Obamacare is the epitome of Liberalism.

I hope I have educated my family and others a little to the virtues of Conservatism and why it is best for all people.

Lloyd Marcus, Proud Unhyphenated American

Chairman of The Campaign to Defeat Barack Obama.
Lloyd is singer/songwriter of the American Tea Party Anthem and author of Confessions of a Black Conservative, foreword by Michele Malkin.
Spokesperson for Tea Party Express
Please help me spread my message by joining my Liberty Network.
LloydMarcus.com

FROM CANADA TO THE SOTHWEST,  WE NEED JOBS NOW NOT IN 2012.

DO YOU  WANT THAT TO HAPPEN TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA?????  YOU HAVE TO VOTE REPUBLICAN IN   2012.

'WE'RE NOT HIRING UNTIL OBAMA GONE'

From Google, we find that the Pledge of Allegiance, originally composed in 1892 by Francis Bellamy, a Baptist minister associated with Libertarian theology and the doctrine of social gospel, was a member of the Christian Socialist Movement. President Obama is associated with Liberation theology. His term for the doctrine is “collective salvation.” 

Libertarian and Liberation theology dates back to evangelists and missionaries from the earliest colonial days in Latin America—churchmen who questioned the Catholic Church’s way of treating the poor. They associated Jesus’ teaching—we are our brother’s keeper—with socialism.  The trouble with this kind of logic is that “we” is not confined to certain people’s collective ideology. “We” is all of us.

In 1954, in response to America’s socialist movement and Soviet Communist aggression, President Eisenhower encouraged Congress to add to the Pledge the words “under God”—with this thought: "In this way we are reaffirming the transcendence of religious faith in America's heritage and future; in this way we shall constantly strengthen those spiritual weapons which forever will be our country's most powerful resource in peace and war."

President Obama apologizes for America and pushes Marxist class warfare. America’s greatness came from being self-governed. Government control of the economy proves to be a failure. Analysts predict that America is going to run into an economic brick wall in 2012. America could become a socialist dictatorship.

Credit for the thoughts expressed herein goes to principles established in the U. S. Constitution, including the Bill of Rights, to America’s Founding Fathers who wrote it, and finally to my Creator.

I pledge my allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands: one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

Pythagoras, the father of mathematics, asserted that the discrete numbers 1 through 9 stand, macrocosmically, for universal principles. On a personal level, microcosmically, they stand for characteristics, abilities and events.

In my memoirs, An Aquarian’s Bold Venture, are in the nine progressive cycles numerology lays out. Entering my life experiences in the particular cycle where they best fit, thereby to reveal correlation with personal progress and numerology’s 9 discrete numbers, I found that the main events of my life connected. 

I’m one of America’s bottom fish—not blinded by surface reflections—who says we are each here for our own purpose, not for the good of all. Numerology’s first cycle, the pioneer striking out alone, seeking experiences which will establish a distinct identity—I was forced to change and seek a new identity—my life story progresses from that point through numerology’s cycles, all the pieces fitting.

The same as me, H.G. Wells, science fiction writer of the future, was Virgo with Aquarius Rising.  In The Rising Sign, under Aquarius Rising, astrologer Jeanne Avery: “He is the forerunner in setting style, discovering new methods and showing the rest of humanity the way,” this correlates with America’s Constitution and my bigger than life calling.

Born on July 4, 1776, the United States of America’s sign is Aquarius, the water-bearer. For this Aquarian water-bearer—my dreams all came true—in Numerology and The Divine Triangle, “the desire to apply one’s energy to universal service, when one is ready to share his or her knowledge with the rest of the world,” a great change is soon to come.  Maybe reality is not what we think it is.