All Posts (28814)

Sort by

4063377894?profile=originalOne of the most challenging duties I have as an American citizen is to sit through a Barak Obama speech. But do my duty, I will, and I did so last Thursday evening.  Sort of.  First of all, the conventional wisdom that Obama is eloquent is false. He is not eloquent, he is not a master of communication, he is not as intelligent as we are told to believe. But he is clever, and he has a snake-pit of clever advisors behind him.  Obama’s September 8 speech is simply a political set up for him to run against a “do-nothing” Congress in 2012. Clever, yes.  More clever than the American people? No.

The content of Thursday’s speech was a rehash of former “stimulus” speeches. His “American Jobs Bill” is just another infusion of tax-payer dollars into the ether of his command economy. If he has his way another $400 billion will waft into the netherworld of socialist failure, just like the previous $3.27 trillion from previous stimulus packages.  There is nothing in his AJB that would create a single lasting job.  It is an attempt to pander to large swaths of his supporters, like teachers unions, government sector unions, the Teamsters and the AFL-CIO, who would all benefit directly or indirectly from his plan. 

Obama pandered to small businesses as well with talk about a “payroll tax cut.” But  it is corporate taxes, capital gains taxes, and  personal income taxes on the small business owners who make over $200 K per year and declare their business income on their personal returns, that are killing jobs. Obama did not address those, but instead promised again to raise taxes on “those Americans who can afford to pay more.”  In his mind that includes all of those small businesses and their owners who we know are not “millionaires and billionaires” but are ordinary Americans, struggling, cutting corners, pinching pennies, and fighting the federal government at every turn just to save the jobs they have created for their employees.  As usual, Obama’s plan will kill more private sector jobs in exchange for a small rebate to households that will go to pay down debt and will have no lasting impact on the economy. He will fortify the unions, they will grow in power, and in the end, the government will be bigger, and the individual much smaller. Corporations will continue to outsource to other countries because the costs of production are impossibly large.  And small businesses will continue to shutter their doors as the specter of Obamacare looms ever closer.

One  of the most ironic aspects of Obama’s duplicity is his avoidance of the most obvious and immediate answers to our failing economy.  As a resident of Western Colorado I know that in my region of this vast country, there lies underground enough natural gas and oil resources to fuel our nation and our economy for decades, if not centuries.  Obama’s pet agencies like the EPA and DOE have essentially corked the potential for energy exploration and development in the West.  If he were to ease the regulations, tell Interior Secretary Ken Salazar to take a long vacation to Fiji, and simply open the door for Americans to take advantage of the vast energy resources underneath our feet, the economy would receive the defibrillation it needs to get pumping again.  Thousands of private sector jobs would be created, and dependence on foreign energy would be dramatically decreased.

The American people will not fall for the “run against a do-nothing congress” ploy. The president can’t stay disengaged and ineffective for another 15 months. The economy cannot bear the strain of further taxation, regulation, and statist manipulations of the free market.  If Obama was sincere he would do the following.

  • Open energy-rich regions of the United States to exploration and development
  • Slash corporate and capital gains taxes and close loop holes for his crony corporate buddies like GE
  • Cut taxes on the upper 8% of income earners, most of whom are small business owners
  • Ask congress to immediately repeal Obamacare
  • Offer  American corporations who are outsourcing or have moved overseas tax incentives to stay in country
  • Decrease the collective bargaining power of public sector unions at the federal level
  • Revisit the budget deal and adopt the Paul Ryan plan to address entitlement reform

But we know Obama is not serious about saving our economy or our standing of economic and military superiority.  He will continue to point the finger of blame, play the race card, and toy with the free markets of the greatest country the world has ever known, until he begins the longest vacation of his life in 2013.

Read more…

The Truth Hurts

President Obama walks into the Bank of America to cash a check. As he approaches the cashier he says, "Good morning, Ma'am, could you please cash this check for me"?
Cashier: "It would be my pleasure, sir. Could you please show me your ID."?
Obama: "Truthfully, I did not bring my ID with me as I didn't think there was any need to. I am President Barrack H. Obama, president of the United States of America ."
Cashier: "Yes, sir, I know who you are, but with all the regulations and monitoring of the banks because of imposters and forgers, etc., I must insist on seeing ID."
Obama: "Just ask anyone here at the bank who I am and they will tell you. Everybody knows who I am."
Cashier: "I am sorry, but these are the bank rules and I must follow them."
Obama: "I am urging you to please cash this check."
Cashier: "Look, sir, here's what we can do: one day Tiger Woods came into the bank without ID. To prove he  was Tiger Woods he pulled out his putting iron and made a beautiful shot across the bank into a cup. With that shot we knew him to be Tiger Woods and cashed his check. Another time, Andre Agassi came in without ID. He pulled out his tennis racquet and made a fabulous shot where the tennis ball landed in my cup.. With that spectacular shot we cashed his check. So, what can you do to prove that you are really the President of the United States ?"
Obama stood there thinking, and thinking, and finally says: "Honestly, there is nothing that comes to my mind. I can't think of a single thing I can do"
Cashier: "Will that be large or small bills, Mr. President?"
Read more…

Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, published in September 1925, which happened to be in the month and year of my birth, Heisenberg, Hitler’s atom bomb builder, the Allies bombed his plant to the ground leaving the United States to be first with the atom bomb, because the United States was first freedom loving people won World War II. 

 

I was on the high seas heading for the invasion of Japan’s main island when the war ended.  How much is my one life worth? Is the good of all not worth more?  Yes, but who is to know the good of all?  The religious give God, in his wisdom, the right to do anything. We don’t question. We have the insane notion that we have the right, in God’s name, to obliterate mankind. This has direct relationship with Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, which deals with the physical universe.

 

The time of my birth is related to a quantum leap in understanding the physical universe. According to Astrologer’s Handbook, since when I was born Saturn was trine Pluto, and trines mean harmonious interaction between the conscious expressions of these folks and their power potentials, and Saturn is the learning planet, Pluto the generational planet, this trine means I would have the ability to understand the laws by which subtle forces are organized, enabling me to use these laws constructively for myself and others.  This realization came to me after I studied the Constitution.

 

The odd thing about my study of the Constitution is that I felt that voices from the past were personally speaking to me. I had a cause. I was determined to beat Uncle Sam at his own game; in other words, learn my constitutional rights and act. From the time that I studied the Constitution and acted, things went right for me. Freedom loving people won World War II. We Americans have lost sight of the power that lies within us.

 

Human existence is inconsequential until we are able to distinguish the quantitative from the qualitative.  This brings to mind the destruction of the World Trade Center and loss of thousands of lives, something for freedom loving people to think about as we memorialize the tenth anniversary of 9-11.

The cutting edge of science has reached the conclusion that qualitatively the universe boils down to permanent and unchanging information. Mankind is the only life on the planet that can use this information to bring about, as well as atom bombs, technological wonders.  Surely, man’s ultimate purpose is not to destroy himself.  Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle brought into play choice in the everlasting beginning and end universe—the choice of greatness or self-annihilation.  Don’t listen to the orthodoxy.  The orthodoxy’s purpose is to enslave you. The Constitution tells us to look within and be empowered.  It worked for me. It can work for you.

 

 

 

 

Read more…
bow+to+king.jpg
08-17-06.jpg









By John W. Lillpop


How much different would America be today if Barack Obama had been president on September 11, 2001?

To begin with, he would have held an urgent press conference on the morning of September 11 to assure leaders of Muslim nations that America accepts the fact that U.S. policy in the past has often been wrong, dumb, and based on Islamaphobia.

He would even leave open the possibility that U.S. policy caused 9/11.

He would declare, emphatically, that America is NOT a Christian nation and that there would be no military retaliation against any Muslim group or nation. America is not at war with Islam, he would cry.

He would offer to personally meet with Osama bin Laden and his top Al-Quaeda staff for a chance to get to know Osama bin Laden and Al-Quaeda better and to incorporate their concerns into future American foreign policy.

He would declare that, effective immediately, diplomacy, compassion, and understanding were to replace aggression as the “American Way” to conduct foreign policy.

He would order an investigation into the 9/11 attacks to determine if Israel was behind the attacks in a cowardly attempt to discredit those who practice the Religion of Peace.

He would suspend all economic and military aid to Israel until the Israel investigation was complete.

He would rule out any military retaliation for the attacks, declaring that monies required to run a respectable war were desperately needed to provide free health care, housing, education, and general welfare for millions of “Newly Arrived Refuges,” also known by patriotic Americans as illegal aliens.

With that as a base, how would America look ten years later on 9/11/11?

President Obama would be serving his fourth term as president of the Union of Socialist American States (USAS) which would include Canada and Mexico.

Sharia would be the law of the land.

All legal and legislative proceedings in America would be conducted in Arabic and Spanish. Proceedings could be translated into English for a fee,

The rallying cry, “Let’s Roll” would be declared a call for violence against Muslims and would be a federal felony on a par with treason.

The Star Spangled Banner would be declared too violent to be our national anthem and would be replaced by “Imagine,” written by the late, John Lennon

Barack Obama: Thank God He Was NOT president on 9/11/01.
Read more…

Islamic Sharia Law Proliferates in Germany!

Coming to a neighborhood near you-soon!

The spread of Islamic Sharia law in Germany is far more advanced than previously thought, and German authorities are “powerless” to do anything about it, according to a new book about the Muslim shadow justice system in Germany.

The 236-page book titled “Judges Without Law: Islamic Parallel Justice Endangers Our Constitutional State,” which was authored by Joachim Wagner, a German legal expert and former investigative journalist for ARD German public television, says Islamic Sharia courts are now operating in all of Germany’s big cities.

This “parallel justice system” is undermining the rule of law in Germany, Wagner says, because Muslim arbiters-cum-imams are settling criminal cases out of court without the involvement of German prosecutors or lawyers before law enforcement can bring the cases to a German court.

Settlements reached by the Muslim mediators often mean perpetrators are able to avoid long prison sentences, while victims receive large sums in compensation or have their debts cancelled, in line with Sharia law, according to Wagner. In return, they are required to make sure their testimony in court does not lead to a conviction.

German police do investigate cases involving serious crimes. But parallel to that, special Muslim arbitrators, also known as “peace judges,” are commissioned by the families concerned to mediate and reach an out-of-court settlement.

In an interview with the German broadcaster Deutsche Welle, Wagner said political correctness in Germany is contributing to the problem: “I’ve studied 16 recent crime cases here with Muslim citizens involved. In almost 90% of all cases where Muslim arbitrators were commissioned, the perpetrators were acquitted by German courts or the cases were dropped altogether by the prosecution for lack of evidence. It’s an alarming finding, and it throws a bad light on our courts.”

In fact, German judges often refer and/or defer to Sharia law. For example, the Federal Social Court in Kassel recently supported the claim of a second wife for a share of her dead husband’s pension payments, which his first wife wanted to keep all to herself. The judge ruled they should share the pension.

In another case, the Administrative Appeals Court in Koblenz granted the second wife of an Iraqi living in Germany, the right to stay in the country. She had already been married to him and living in Germany for five years, after which the court said it would not be fair to send her to Iraq alone.

A judge in Cologne ruled that an Iranian man should repay his wife’s dowry of 600 gold coins to her after their divorce – referring to the Sharia which is followed in Iran. A court in Düsseldorf arrived at a similar verdict, forcing a Turkish man to repay a €30,000 ($43,000) dowry to his former daughter-in-law.

In March 2007, Judge Christa Datz-Winter, a judge at Frankfurt’s family court cited the Islamic Koran in a divorce case involving a 26-year-old German woman of Moroccan origin, who was terrified of her violent Moroccan husband, a man who had continued to threaten her despite having been ordered to stay away by the authorities. He had beaten his wife and he had allegedly threatened to kill her.

Judge Datz-Winter refused to grant the divorce, arguing that a woman who marries a Muslim should know what she is getting herself into. In her ruling, the judge quoted Sura 4, verse 34 of the Koran. She wrote that the Koran contains “both the husband’s right to use corporal punishment against a disobedient wife and the establishment of the husband’s superiority over the wife.”

In February 2011, Germany’s Federal Labor Court ruled that a Muslim supermarket employee can refuse to handle alcohol on religious grounds. The case in question involved a Muslim man who was employed in a supermarket in the northern German city of Kiel. He refused to stock shelves with alcoholic drinks, saying that his religion forbade him from any contact with alcohol, and was dismissed as a result in March 2008.

In an interview with the German newsmagazine Der Spiegel, Wagner described the Islamic shadow justice system in Germany as “very foreign, and for a German lawyer, completely incomprehensible at first. It follows its own rules. The Islamic arbitrators aren’t interested in evidence when they deliver a judgment, and unlike in German criminal law, the question of who is at fault doesn’t play much of a role.”

When Der Spiegel asked why it was wrong for two parties to try to resolve a dispute between themselves, Wagner replied: “The problem starts when the arbitrators force the justice system out of the picture, especially in the case of criminal offenses. At that point they undermine the state monopoly on violence. Islamic conflict resolution in particular, as I’ve experienced it, is often achieved through violence and threats. It’s often a dictate of power on the part of the stronger family.”

Wagner’s findings largely confirm a report published by the German Interior Ministry in 2009 which warned that Islamic groups in Germany want to live under Sharia law in Germany.

Wagner’s book comes at a time when Germany is immersed in a heated national debate over Muslim immigration. That debate was launched in August 2010 with the publication of a best-selling book titled “Germany Does Away With Itself,” which broke Germany’s long-standing taboo on discussing the impact of Muslim immigration.

Authored by Thilo Sarrazin, a renowned German banker who is also a long-time member of the center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD), the book is now on its 20th edition. At last count, more than 1.5 million copies have been sold, making it one of the most widely read titles in Germany since the Second World War.

Sarrazin’s book has resonated with vast numbers of ordinary Germans who are becoming increasingly uneasy about the social changes that are transforming Germany, largely due to the presence of millions of non-integrated Muslims in the country.

German President Christian Wulff has tried to defuse the row ignited by Sarrazin. During a keynote speech to mark the20th anniversary of German reunification on October 3, 2010, Wulff proclaimed that “Islam belongs in Germany” because of the four million Muslims who now live there. Germany has Western Europe’s second-biggest Islamic population after France, with Turks the single biggest minority.

Opinion polls, however, show broad public support for Sarrazin’s argument that many Muslim immigrants shut themselves off from Germany, do not speak German and do not share the German, European or Western worldview.

According to a poll conducted by the mass-circulation Bild am Sonntag, 89% of those surveyed say Sarrazin’s arguments are convincing. “For them, Sarrazin is somebody who is finally saying what many are thinking,” according to the pollsters.

The Friedrich Ebert Foundation, a think tank linked to the center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD), recently published a survey which found that many Germans believe their country is being “overrun” by Muslim immigrants. It also found that these views are not isolated at the extremes of German society, but are to a large degree “at the center of it.”

An opinion survey, “Perception and Acceptance of Religious Diversity,” conducted by the sociology department of the University of Münster, in partnership with the prestigious TNS Emnid political polling firm, shows that only 34% of West Germans and 26% of East Germans have a positive view of Muslims. Fewer than 5% of Germans think Islam is a tolerant religion, and only 30% say they approve of the building of mosques. The number of Germans who approve of the building of minarets or the introduction of Muslim holidays is even lower.

Fewer than 10% of West Germans and 5% of East Germans say that Islam is a peaceful religion. More than 40% of Germans believe that the practice of Islam should be vigorously restricted.

Only 20% of Germans believe that Islam is suitable for the Western world. Significantly, and more than 80% of Germans agree with the statement “that Muslims must adapt to our culture.”

As the political winds shift, so are German politicians. After initially distancing herself from Sarrazin’s views, German Chancellor Angela Merkel recently said Germany’s roots are Judeo-Christian.

She also said: “Now we obviously have Muslims in Germany. But it is important in regard to Islam that the values represented by Islam must correspond with our constitution. What applies here is the constitution, not Sharia law.”

But the proliferation of Sharia law in Germany suggests Merkel is mistaken: Sharia law now does apply in Germany.”

Source:

Posted on Hudson New York-By Soeren Kern-On September 8, 2011:

http://www.hudson-ny.org/2397/islamic-sharia-law-germany

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and videos relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. ‘No porn or prostitution’: Islamic extremists set up Sharia law controlled zones in British cities!-Posted on Daily Mail-By REBECCA CAMBER-Updated on July 28, 2011:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2019547/Anjem-Choudary-Islamic-extremists-set-Sharia-law-zones-UK-cities.html

II. Video: Geert Wilders: Deporting Millions Of Muslims May Be Necessary!-Posted on YouTube-ByIslamsTwoFaces-On July 15, 2011:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rfm1l9g8UAY&feature=related

III. Video: Geert Wilders Warning to America! (Part 1 of 2)-Posted on YouTube-By lettruthspeak-On July 13, 2011:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mnCftUO6B4M&NR=1

IV. Video: Geert Wilders Warning to America! (Part 2 of 2)-Posted on YouTube-By lettruthspeak-On July 13, 2011:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUlpIWrfAiE&feature=related 

V. A Warning to America: Geert Wilders in Nashville, Tennessee 5/12/11-Posted on Family Security Matters-Andrew Bostom-On May 13, 2011:

http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.9509/pub_detail.asp

VI. Cameron’s Multicultural Wake-Up Call: ‘The growth of Islamist extremism in the West is something even the politically correct can no longer ignore.’-Posted on The Wall Street Journal-By DOUGLAS MURRAY-On February 9, 2011:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704364004576131940794840176.html

VII. Cameron under fire: ‘British PM made distinction between Islam and Islamist extremism but faced wave of criticism nonetheless.’-Posted on JPost-On February 7, 2011:

http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Editorials/Article.aspx?id=207252

VIII. ‘We need to be a lot less tolerant towards Islamic extremists’: Cameron calls for immigrants to respect British core values-Posted on Mail Online-By JASON GROVES-On February 5, 2011:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1353902/David-Cameron-Stop-tolerating-Islamic-extremists-respect-British-core-values.html

IX. Islam Grows in Europe, Jihad Not Far Behind-Posted on Israel National News-By Chana Ya’ar-On January 23, 2011:

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/141883

X. ‘Islamization’ of Paris a Warning to the West-Posted on CBN.com-By Dale Hurd, CBN News Senior Reporter-On September 1, 2010:

http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/world/2010/August/Islamization-of-Paris-a-Warning-to-the-West/

XI. DOJ in bed with Islamic supremacist groups!-Posted on WND.com-By Pamela Geller-On September 6, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=342081

XII. Sharia Compliance in Dearborn, Mich.-Posted on The Patriot Post-By Cal Thomas (Archive)-On April 26, 2011:

http://patriotpost.us/opinion/cal-thomas/2011/04/26/sharia-compliance-in-dearborn-mich/

XIII. Islamic Law Comes to Dearborn-Posted on Big Government-By Pamela Geller-On April 22, 2011:

http://biggovernment.com/pgeller/2011/04/22/islamic-law-comes-to-dearborn/

XIV. Texas may ban courts from considering foreign laws-Posted on The Houston Chronicle-By ANNA M. TINSLEY,
FORT WORTH STAR-TELEGRAM-On April 9, 2011:

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/7514927.html

XV. Mainstreaming Radical Islam-Posted on The Patriot Update-By J. Matt Barber-On March 18, 2011:

http://patriotupdate.com/articles/mainstreaming-radical-islam-2

XVI. Florida Judge orders Muslims to follow sharia law!-Posted on a12iggymom-On March 18, 2011:

http://a12iggymom.wordpress.com/2011/03/18/florida-judge-orders-muslims-to-follow-sharia-law/

XVII. In Tennessee, the ‘Red-Green Alliance’ Defends Violent Jihad and Shariah-Posted on Big Peace-By Dave Reaboi-On March 3, 2011:

http://bigpeace.com/dreaboi/2011/03/03/in-tennessee-the-red-green-alliance-defends-violent-jihad-and-shariah/

XVIII. CAIR sues Oklahoma for banning Islamic law: ‘Unindicted terrorist co-conspirator reacts after 70% of voters approve’-Posted on WND.com-On November 4, 2010:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=224009

XIX. Voters ban judges from using international law-Posted on NewsOK-On November 2, 2010:

http://www.newsok.com/article/feed/208677

XX. U.S. Files Discrimination Lawsuits On Behalf Of Muslims-Posted on Judicial Watch-On September 2, 2010:

http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2010/sep/u-s-files-discrimination-lawsuits-behalf-muslims

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Europe's Looming Demise: Changes on the Continent Cloud Our Future!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/01/europes-looming-demise-changes-on-the-continent-cloud-our-future/

What do American Citizens Know About “Sharia Law” and is It Something That We Should Know More About?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/26/what-do-american-citizens-know-about-“sharia-law”-and-is-it-something-that-we-should-know-more-about/

Is Shariah Law A Danger To Our U.S. National Security?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/09/16/is-shariah-law-a-danger-to-u-s-national-security/

Should Americans Fear Islam?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/05/should-americans-fear-islam/

The Islamic Infiltration: Inside Our Government, Armed With Our Secrets!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/15/the-islamic-infiltration-inside-our-government-armed-with-our-secrets/

What are CAIRs obstructionist goals?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/03/06/6951/

CAIR sues Oklahoma for banning Islamic law!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/11/05/cair-sues-oklahoma-for-banning-islamic-law/

Radical Movement’s Leader Forecasts America’s Demise!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/12/11/radical-movements-leader-forecasts-americas-demise/

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…

From a guy in Texas:

From a guy in Texas:

My neighbor is a "lefty" of sorts (Obama bumper stickers, gung-ho socialized medicine, "guns should be banned", etc.). So this past spring I put this sign up in my yard after one of his anti-gun rants at a neighborhood cocktail party.

The sign wasn't up more than an hour before he called the police and wanted them to make me take down the sign. Fortunately, the officer politely informed him that it was not their job to take such
action without a court order and that he had to file a complaint "downtown" first, which would be reviewed by the city attorney to see if it violated any city, county, or state ordinances, which if there was a violation a court order would be sent to the offending party (me) to "remove the sign in seven days."

After several weeks he was informed that the sign was legal (by a quarter of an inch) and there was nothing the city could do, which obviously made him madder
.
I tried to smooth
things over by inviting him to go shooting with me and my friends at the hunt club but that seemed to make him even more angry.  I am at a loss how to reconcile our long relationship
(notice I did not say friendship), any suggestions would be welcome.



viewmail.exe?id=01372a580555f1fc82689ac679f9b2556833&threadid=H3701066146070&download=2
Absolutely love it!!!
Read more…

TO MUCH ORATORY AND NOT ENOUGH SUBSTANCE

THE PRESIDENTS SPEECH WAS AS USUAL "LET CHARLIE DO IT" HE CALLED FOR AN IMMEDIATE PASSAGE OF A JOBS BILL HE DID NOT WRITE AND DID NOT EXIST.  IN OTHER WORDS "DO AS I SAY, DONT THINK ABOUT IT, JUST DO IT" AND HE CALLS HIMSELF A BIPARTISAN AMERICAN. IT SEEMS THAT HE INSULTS THE INTELLIGENCE OF ALL AMERICANS WITH HIS ORATORITICAL SKILLS IN LECTURING.  NO HE DIDN'T DISAPOINT ME, HE JUST REINFORCED MY ORIGINAL IMPRESSION OF HIM AS AN EMPTY SUIT LECTURER.  WELL, HE IS FINDING OUT THAT THERE A LOT OF PEOPLE WHO WILL NOT FOLLOW BLINDLY, THANKS TO THE TEA PARTY MOVEMENT. LETS KEEP BOMBARDING HIM WITH OUR GOD GIVEN INDIVIDUAL INTELLECT BECAUSE THIS DISPLAY OF FREE THINKING AND THE BALLOT BOX ARE PUTTING THE FEAR OF LOSING IN THE HEARTS AND MINDS OF THOSE MINDLESS FOLLOWERS OF THE CHOSEN ONE. THATS WHY THEU KEEP ATTACKING US WITH THEIR GARBAGE MOUTHS.

HE IS ALL FOR JOB CREATION THAT WILL SATISFY HIS BIG UNION BUDDIES AND SCREW EVERYBODY EVERY BODY ELSE.

Read more…

The plain and simple truth.

Hes got his ideas …

There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: 
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. 

Please use in that order.

Bill Cosby has a great way of "distilling" things.  
Looks like he's done it again!
    


AMERICA NEEDS A CANDIDATE WITH THIS PLATFORM!!


         

I  HAVE DECIDED TO BECOME A WRITE-IN CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT IN THE YEAR 2012.
 

HERE IS MY PLATFORM: 



(1). Any use of the phrase: 'Press 1 for English'
  is immediately BANNED!!!    English  is  the official language;   speak it or wait outside of our borders until you can. 

(2). We will immediately go into a two year isolationist  attitude in order to straighten out the greedy big business posture in this country. America will allow NO imports,  and we'll do no exports.     We will use the '
Wal-Mart 's policy,  
'If  we
  ain't got it, you don't need it.' We'll make it here and sell it here! 


(3). When imports are allowed, there will be a 100% import tax on it coming in here. 



(4). All retired military personnel will be required to man one of the many observation towers located on the southern border of the United States  (six month tour). They will be under strict orders not 
 to fire on  SOUTH BOUND  aliens. 


(5). Social Security will immediately return to its original state
.   If you didn't put nuttin in, you AIN'T getting nuttin out.  Neither the President nor any other politician will be able to touch it. 


(6). Welfare. -- Checks will be handed out on Fridays, at the end of the 40 hour school week, the successful completion of a urinalysis test for drugs, and passing grades.
 


(7). Professional Athletes -- Steroids?  The FIRST time you check positive you're banned from sports ... for life. 



(8). Crime -- We will adopt the Turkish method,  i.e.,  the  first
 time you steal,  you lose your right hand.  There is no more 'life sentences'.  If convicted of murder, you will be put to death by the same method you chose for the victim you killed: gun, knife, strangulation,  etc. 

(9). One export of ours will be allowed: wheat; because the world needs to eat.  However, a bushel of wheat will be the EXACT price of a barrel of oil. 


(10).  All foreign aid, using American taxpayer money, will immediately cease and the saved money will help to pay off the national debt and, ultimately, lower taxes.  When disasters occur around the world, we'll ask The American People if they want to donate to a disaster fund, and each citizen can make the decision as to whether, or not, it's a worthy cause. 



(11). The Pledge of Allegiance will
  be said EVERY day atschool and  every day in CONGRESS. 


(12). The National Anthem  will
  be played at all appropriate ceremonies,  sporting events,  outings, etc. 


My apology is offered if I've stepped on anyone's toes .... nevertheless..... 



GOD
 BLESS AMERICA !

Sincerely,  Bill Cosby  
                                          
                                      

Please forward this to everyone you know, no matter which side of the fence they're on.
  

  
 
 

 
  To those I keep in touch with regularly - enjoy.  to those who I send to occasionally - I think of you much more often than you know. 
This was contributed to Bill Cosby in 2008. It is not written by him or does it say what he thinks. No one knows who actually wrote it but Bill Cosby if you know anything about him does not think anything like this. Although I wish that we had a candidate that would think like this. I would vote for he or she in a heartbeat. This writing is a falsehood.
 
Read more…

Disappointing Speech with Predictable Results

The President called a joint session of Congress to announce a plan with no details.  What is up with that? If you want to know the country’s response to the President’s latest plan, take a look at the stock market today. 

 

Let’s think about this for a minute.  The last time we were asked to “pass the plan” we were told that we would learn the details after it got passed, we had no idea how it would be paid for or the true costs.  How did that work out for the American people?  I’m sorry, but I will not be going back for a second helping at that buffet. 

 

Stop talking Mr. President!  No one is interested in the partisan rhetoric anymore and every time you speak the stock market plummets.

Read more…
ford.jpg










By John W. Lillpop

With 14-26 million Americans unemployed and or underemployed, one would expect an ‘attitude of gratitude’ among workers still holding jobs, especially those being paid an average of $58 per hour.

However, unionized auto workers in Detroit have grown accustomed to enjoying unreasonable wages and benefits, courtesy of thugs who operate the United Auto Workers union.

So what if the unemployment rate is 9.1 percent?

Who cares if America is plunging into a double-dip recession?

Only a fool would fall for the propaganda which admonishes those doing well to ‘pay their fair share.”

With that brazen disregard for the facts, the UAW has authorized a strike against Ford Motors, as reported, in part, at the reference:

The image of UAW workers with picket signs touting unfair wages is something that no one wants to see, but the possibility now exists thanks to a union vote that authorizes Ford workers to strike if negotiations between the auto maker and the UAW break down. While the issue of wages and negotiations with unions can be terse, this round of labor talks has a new flavor that we have not experienced in a while, and the implications of these issues may give Ford a negotiating edge.

When the government stepped in and bailed out GM and Chrysler with an infusion of cash, there were certain concessions made by the UAW. The bailout allowed the companies to survive and even revamp their businesses. It also prevented the union from striking against GM and Chrysler. Through that period, Ford became somewhat of a shining star by not taking any bailout money. Ford's reward for taking the harder route is that the UAW, in negotiations with all three makers, can strike.

This reason, while perhaps sentimental, is one key negotiating tool that Ford has in Ford's cap. The perception that the union will punish Ford, the company that did not take a bailout, would leave a stigma on the UAW that could take years to erase. It is the classic mantra that no good deed goes unpunished. This mantra is something that people in America are growing tired of, in particular because of the state of the economy.

A more fundamental reason that the author does not see a strike happening is the fact that Ford employees are the highest paid in the industry, and the "Big Three" have a higher average pay than many competitors. This makes it hard for the UAW to complain about pay, and even more difficult to complain that Ford is not paying well enough. According to The Center for Automotive Research, Ford has labor costs of $58 per hour, while Japanese competitor Toyota comes in at $55. The $3 per hour may not seem like much, but when spread over thousands of workers for tens of thousands of hours, the numbers get big quickly.

One compliant of the UAW is that merit raises and a 401(k) match were reinstated for salaried employees but not union members. However, the union neglects to state that UAW workers received profit-sharing checks averaging $5,000 in 2010. The argument that the union has is that this is a "one-time" perk and not the same as getting a merit raise.”

Thus, the media-created image of greed as a fat-cat, Republican parasite who thrives by not paying his or her fair share, needs to be updated.

Today, the greedy are dim-witted auto workers who earn six-figure incomes, vote straight Democrat, and are dumb enough to vote to strike when a bona fide economic depression is bearing down on America.

Only in America, only by Democrat puppets!


http://seekingalpha.com/article/292435-will-ford-workers-strike

Read more…

DOJ in bed with Islamic supremacist groups!

What’s wrong with this picture?

Posted on WND.com-By Pamela Geller-On September 6, 2011:

While doing research for my new book, “Stop the Islamization of America: A Practical Guide to the Resistance,” I discovered some startling information about the full extent of Muslim Brotherhood infiltration in the Department of Justice and its brazen pro-Muslim activities. And when I inquired for documentation related to these activities, the DOJ’s response to me indicated that the agency’s ties with Islamic supremacist groups in the U.S. are far more extensive than anyone has realized.

I was especially interested in DOJ actions extending certain civil-rights laws to Muslims in voting, particularly insofar as they involved the DOJ’s Lema Bashir. Essentially, they wanted to convert a religious class into a racial one, to create majority-Muslim legislative districts. Lema Bashir was at the center of Virginia’s failing to mail military ballots in time in 2008. The same mistakes were repeated in 2010, and United States military voters were heavily disenfranchised because of calculated inaction by Bashir and the DOJ throughout 2010. Disenfranchising the military vote is policy. You could make a case that bad mistakes were made in 2008, but when those same mistakes were made and made worse in 2010 by a devout Muslim who calls Israel “northern Palestine,” I submit that it is no accident, but deliberate policy.

There seemed to be no way they could withhold the documents whose existence I discovered, so on Feb. 28, 2011, I made a Freedom of Information Act request. I wrote to Nelson Hermilla, the chief of the FOIA branch of the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division.

I asked him for “all communications between any employee of the Civil Rights Division and the Islamic Society of North America [ISNA], the Council on American-Islamic Relations [CAIR], the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee [ADC], the Muslim Students Association [MSA] or any affiliated student group. In particular, but not limited to, the request includes all communications related to appearances at or sponsorships of conventions or meetings of this organizations by the Department of Justice including conferences in 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010.”

ISNA and CAIR, of course, were named unindicted co-conspirators in the Holy Land Foundation jihad terror funding case. The MSA is a Muslim Brotherhood organization. They’re the last groups the DOJ should be working with.

I also asked Hermilla to provide “transcripts of speeches delivered by Civil Rights Division political appointees or section managers at any meeting of the Islamic Society of North America, the Council on American-Islamic Relations, the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, the Muslim Students Association or any affiliated student group. If transcripts of such appearances do not exist, please provide a list of such appearances instead.” And for “resumes of all attorney and intern hires in the Civil Rights Division in which the resumes list prior employment at the Islamic Society of North America, the Council on American-Islamic Relations, the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, or the Muslim Students Association.” In addition, I requested “all travel authorization forms, expense submissions and records of payment for any Department employee to attend any convention, conference or meeting with or at the Islamic Society of North America, the Council on American-Islamic Relations, or the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee,” and “any memorandum, document, email, telephone conference record or proposal discussing the use of civil rights laws in the Housing Section, Voting Section, and Education Section to use laws enforced by these sections to bring cases or potential cases on behalf of a protected class defined as Arab or Muslim or Islamic.” I asked him to “include any documents which discuss the applicability of civil rights laws to these classes from these three sections.”

Specifically, I asked for “records relating to the meeting of the ‘Monthly Outreach Meeting’ (or a regular occurring meeting organized by the Civil Rights Division with substantially the same purpose even if it is referred to with a different name inside the Department) with Muslim and Arab groups at the Civil Rights Division. Specifically, include lists of attendees at each monthly meeting, the agenda of each meeting and any minutes or summary prepared subsequent to each meeting. Please also specifically note the meetings at which the Attorney General of the United States attended.”

I asked for all such records dating back to 2006.

I knew these documents existed, indicating broad collaboration between the Justice Department and Muslim Brotherhood groups, and this was confirmed on April 29, 2011, when the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division finally responded to my request. Nelson Hermilla wrote me that “clearly your request encompasses thousands of records. The total located on a preliminary search totals 14,100 documents. Each document likely contains numerous pages.” Hermilla also complained that “it is not clear in what manner the collection of all five-year’s records might contribute to the general public understanding.” He explained that these documents would only be made available to me if I paid $1,400.

This is astounding. I made a fairly narrow request, narrowed down to specific groups and carefully defined activity that the Civil Rights Division doesn’t even have direct jurisdiction over – “Muslim Outreach” – and they come up with 14,100 matching documents. A knowledgeable Justice Department insider told me: “You couldn’t generate 14,000 pages of documents if you asked for communications with lenders or apartment or hotels as part of the Housing Section enforcement activities. There are very few things in Civil Rights that would generate 14,000 pages of anything. It has got to be a treasure trove of information.”

Indeed. It is also remarkable that the Justice Department would deny that these records would advance “the general public understanding.” Given the increasing number of cases in which Shariah is used in American courts and the Obama Justice Department’s assistance of stealth jihad, Islamic supremacist legal initiatives, this claim is extremely flimsy.

I intend to pursue this matter until the shameful records of this infiltration are made available to the American people.”

Source:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=342081

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. King: Investigate Possible Administration Leaks to Hollywood About Bin Laden Kill!-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Edwin Mora and Fred Lucas-On August 10, 2011:

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/rep-king-investigate-claims-administrati

II. Jihadists infiltrating U.S. military?-Posted on WND.com-By Aaron Klein-On August 6, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=329229

III. Is George Soros Forging a Closer Alliance With the Muslim Brotherhood?-Posted on The Blaze-By Tiffany Gabbay-On June 30, 2011:

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/is-george-soros-forging-a-closer-alliance-with-the-muslim-brotherhood/

IV. The Obama Administration Opens Formal Contacts With the Muslim Brotherhood!-Posted on National Review Online- By Andrew C. McCarthy-On June 30, 2011:

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/270864/obama-administration-opens-formal-contacts-muslim-brotherhood-andrew-c-mccarthy

V.  Obama's Plan to Islamicize America!-Posted on Israel Today-By Victor Mordechai-On June 28, 2011:

http://www.israeltoday.co.il/tabid/178/nid/22844/language/en-US/Default.aspx

VI. Obama’s Secret Link to Hamas, Hezbollah, the Taliban, and More!-Posted on Human Events-By Buzz Patterson-On September 8, 2010:

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=38893

 VII. Count Every Military Ballot!-Posted on Big Government-By Andrew Marcus-On November 3, 2010:

http://biggovernment.com/amarcus/2010/11/03/count-every-military-ballot/

VIII. Don’t Ask Don’s Vote-Posted on The Black Sphere-By Kevin Jackson-On November 2, 2010:

http://theblacksphere.net/dont-ask-dont-vote/

IX. Despite New Law, Problems Persist With Military Vote-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Fred Lucas-On November 2, 2010:

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/despite-new-law-problems-persist-militar

X. EXCLUSIVE: Illinois Elections Officials Caught Lying About Military Ballots-Posted on Big Government-By Capitol Confidential-On October 15, 2010:

http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2010/10/15/exclusive-illinois-elections-officials-caught-lying-about-military-ballots/

XI. NY missed deadline for military ballots-Posted on WRGB CBS6 Albany-By The Associated Press-On October 11, 2010:

http://www.cbs6albany.com/news/schumer-1279215-ballots-new.html

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

The Islamic Infiltration: Inside Our Government, Armed With Our Secrets!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/15/the-islamic-infiltration-inside-our-government-armed-with-our-secrets/

What are CAIRs obstructionist goals?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/03/06/6951/

Godfather of The Islamic Revolution!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/11/godfather-of-the-islamic-revolution/

Veterans and members of our Armed Forces under attack!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/23/veterans-and-members-of-our-armed-forces-under-attack/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…

Obama's Despicable Jobs Speech

4063377040?profile=originalObama's jobs speech was reminiscent of a cliché scene in cowboy movies. A loud mouth guy stands on the steps of the jail-house and enrages the crowd to overrule the sheriff, drag out the prisoner and hang him without a trial.

 

Obama used his bully pulpit to say, in essence, if those Republican S.O. Bs do not pass my jobs bill immediately without review, they should be politically lynched. Unquestionably, Obama's speech had a bully edge to it. Pass my jobs bill NOW!

 

Obama lied about all of the freebies in his jobs bill being “paid for” just as he did to pass Obamacare.

 

In his typical manipulative deceptive fashion, Obama said several “right things” such as government getting out of the way of small business while his administration does the complete opposite.

 

The center piece of Obama's speech was his despicable signature exploitation of class envy and demoni-zation of the rich. Obama in his speech reduced the American Dream to being a union worker with good wages and benefits. Obviously, Obama considered entrepreneurs with higher aspirations to be part of the problem. How dare they seek to have more than anyone else? To each according to his needs. Scary. Very scary and evil.

 

As expected, Obama's job speech was written using the left's same old play book. We Tea Party patriots knew what Obama was going to say in his “jobs speech” before he delivered it.

 

OK class, what will be Obama's minions next move to force Republicans to pass his jobs bill NOW? I hear you yelling the correct answer. You guys are toooo cool, tooo smart and right on target! I give you all an A+. Obama's minions will proclaim everyone questioning Obama's job bill to be racist.

 

Folks, this president is divisive and evil. We must vote him out in 2012. God bless.

 

Lloyd Marcus, Proud Unhyphenated American

Co-Chairman of The Campaign to Defeat Barack Obama.

Please help me spread my message by joining my
Liberty Network.

Lloyd is singer/songwriter of the
American Tea Party Anthem and author of Confessions of a Black Conservative, foreword by Michele Malkin

LloydMarcus.com

 

 

Read more…

Obama's new game

Obama's speach was 80 percent as expected but with a new twist. He advocated spending on roads, bridges, teachers, firefighters and police which translates to unions. Throw some money at it and it will get better for a while. The problem is that it won't last. After the money is spent, the municipalities will be faced with either continuing these jobs or laying off all these new employees. The government has no way to support the unions like this without it becoming an unfunded mandate on the cities and towns. The new twist though involves how he will pay for it. True to form he doesn't want to inflame any group so he doesn't do it. Instead he says that his new deficit reduction group will figure it out. If you remember, this group of 12 is tasked with finding cuts and if they can't, ( 6 Dems and 6 Reps on the committee) the cuts will come out of defense and medicaid equally. So what do you think will happen? It looks like his plan is, by doing this, to gut defense and medicaid without ever being blamed for it. This, gutting defense, I believe has been his plan all along. The man is no leader, he throws up these I have a dream speaches and doesn't dare say I have to cut here or there in order to achieve the dream. He thinks that this way when things implode he can once again point to gridlock as the reason.
Read more…
By John W. Lillpop

During the bloody war over increasing the federal debt ceiling, President Obama warned Americans that it was ‘Time to eat your peas,” a homey reminder of the difficult times and choices that this nation faces.

In delivering his jobs speech to a Joint Session of Congress on Thursday, Obama amplified on that theme with a slight twist: Time for recycled Peas, America!

As always, Obama was eloquent and passionate.

Regrettably, the president’s words, though terrific in terms of style and oratory flare, were more of the same, tired old liberal pap that has damn near destroyed the greatest nation in the world.

His words make it clear why America’s credit rating was downgraded for the first time in U.S. history.

His failure to face reality and assume a genuine leadership role explains why our nation has slipped to fifth place in competitiveness according to the World Economic Forum’s rankings.

For years, Obama has argued against the notion of American Exceptionalism. Through his failed policies, Obama appears to be making his point, much to the chagrin and detriment of 300 million Americans.

Despite the much-touted ‘Summer of Recovery’ and failed trillion-dollar stimulus, America continues to bleed jobs:

Ford Motors Company has announced a billion-dollar construction project—in India.

General Electric is moving headquarters of a highly-successful, medical-imaging business from Waukesha, Wisconsin, to China.

The U.S. Postal Service is on the brink of collapse and has plans to lay off 120,000 employees.

While a part of the USPS problem is the loss of business to the Internet, the major problem is employee costs mandated by labor agreements with labor unions.

And so it is all across America: Unreasonable pensions and labor costs demanded by labor unions are bankrupting government municipalities and private business alike, forcing hundreds of thousands of Americans out of work.

Why, then, did the president fail to challenge greedy unionized labor members to ‘pay their fair share?’

Why not propose a ‘windfall profits tax’ on obscene, unsustainable pensions that are wreaking economic havoc from coast to coast?

Then there is the president’s mindless pandering to illegal aliens, presumably to savor favor with Hispanics.

With 16-28 million Americas underemployed and or unemployed, why is this president working to stall, or eliminate, the removal of millions of aliens who have no moral or legal basis for being in America?

Why the push for a DREAM Act for illegals when so many American citizens are suffering so?

American taxpayers subsidize illegal aliens to the tune of more than $100 billion a year. Why in the hell does this president refuse to enforce the rule of law and spare taxpayers this outrageous expense?

Most importantly, this president has waged bloody war against private enterprise and capitalism since he took office in 2009. His bitter anti-business, anti-American rhetoric has caused people who hire employees to retreat in fear and uncertainty.

His stated desire to use government to bankrupt the coal industry is a chilling reminder of how out-of-touch this man is.

With all due respect, Mr. President, America deserves better than your ‘recycled peas’ offer.
And please do not waste time blaming the Tea Party, George W. Bush, the Japanese earthquake-tsunami, or any other party.!

Perhaps America’s return to a prosperity mindset will have to wait until our Marxist community organizer is returned to the streets of Chicago in 2012?
Read more…
 
 
Ape-Man Discovery in South Africa
Might Make Perry
Into Foolish Fuddy-Duddy
 
 
 
            You might ask what the link and headline above have to do with the price of tea in China or politics in the United States?   Perhaps more than immediately meets the eye . . . .
            A noted anthropologist's child recently stumbled onto something "earth-shaking" which has now been named Australopithecus sediba or the "Southern Ape" as a nickname.  If ever there was an actual missing link:  this appears to be it. 
These Australopithecus sediba fossils (young male and older female) are dated to just short of 2 million years old and mark the first and only time that such a fossil has been labeled as both a hominid (highly advanced ape) and a hominin (of direct human lineage) by responsible anthropologists. 
The discovery was made in South Africa far, far from where Louis Leakey’s “Lucy” (Australopithecus afarensis dated to 3.2 million years ago and apparently a hominid ancestor of this recent discovery) was first discovered. Hominids like gorillas; chimpanzees; our closest living relative, the bonobo (sometimes called a "pygmy chimp"), and their extinct ancestors have been dated to roughly 6 million years ago.  No scientist is yet calling these Australopithecus sediba fossils the long-sought "missing link."  They tend to shy away from such “bold” labeling for a good twenty years after key discoveries are made, but it certainly could make Charles Darwin smile . . . what about the price of tea; or the fate of TEA Parties?
            On the contemporary front, while Texas governor Rick Perry (G.O.P. Presidential contender) performed decently in his first presidential debate and at this point looks very much like the eventual G.O.P. standard-bearer in 2012 . . . Ol' Rajjpuut suspects Mr. Perry is going to keep having the echoes of his "personal debate" with a ten-year old New Hampshire child coming back to haunt him. 
 
 
            You may remember that the kid instigated by his Mom, asked Perry about the age of the earth and about "Evolution" and was lectured by the governor who said that "It was a theory that had a lot of gaps in it."  Mr. Perry, unfortunately for Constitutional-conservatives/fiscal conservatives is clearly what's known as a social-conservative.  Mr. Perry was more than disingenuous with the child.  Yes, Governor, there are gaps in a lot of scientific knowledge, but anyone who takes the Bible 100% literally (they say it all happened precisely as written including 7-day creation in 7 24-hour days exactly where intelligent people might say that to God a day might be 1.5 billion years long or whatever) and insist upon Creationism being taught in high school biology classes in public schooling is probably not worth our votes.  Well, Mr. Perry, this discovery might well rule out 99% of the serious gaps.  We're not talking about bull-shi_ like so-called "global warming" here, Charles Darwin was a serious and thoughtful scientist and he had worlds of evidence for his beliefs about the Origin of the Species.
 
            The seemingly-unending problem with the Republican Party is that they persistently ignore the stuff that 70% of Americans can agree upon (smaller, less-intrusive federal government; lowest taxes possible; following the Constitution; necessary defense and border control; and fiscal responsibility that includes NOT bankrupting the future for our children and grand children) and persist in sounding like people who want to shove their religions down our throats (Christmas carols in PUBLIC schools where Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, atheists, agnostics and believers in Herman the Carrot God attend alongside Christians), and like they totally lack compassion; and that they want to interfere in everybody's bedroom activities.  One fact dooms them to not being able to turn this country around: 
Most sensible voters distrust social-conservatives . . . .
 
            For example, social-conservatives are typically 100% anti-abortion.  First of all abortion is the law of the land for almost 40 years now.  More importantly IF you say that no abortion is ever allowed even for
 
                        rape victims
                        incest victims
                        very young girls
                        mothers whose lives are endangered
 
then you mark yourself as a fanatic who believes that our God-given brains are not to be used to make life better; a madman who doesn't believe in human free agency/free will.  For at least 30 years this matter has been widely-polled among American voters and without fail the results are the same:  59% believe that 100% anti-abortionism is just plain WRONG!   And that rape and incest victims and very young girls who are pregnant and mothers whose lives are endangered should have a choice. 
These same polls have also consistently shown that 70% of Americans believe there are "too many abortions in America." So 70% of Americans are quite concerned about abortions and 59% of Americans believe it must come down to the woman’s choice and should be allowed in drastic circumstances like rape, etc. One more thing, since the consequences fall virtually 100% on women, we men ought to stay out of it, it is a woman's choice between her and her God.  When you have 59% of the voting public against your primary social-conservative stance, you will not get elected and you do not deserve to be elected . . . and if social-conservativism interferes, then the necessary good needing doing by fiscal- and Constitutional-conservatives cannot get done and the American future gets flushed down the toilet as the progressive mischief-makers (mostly from the Democratic Party but they’re found in both parties) keep getting elected and keep destroying our nation.
            Mr. Perry did have one problem in the debate and that problem (Social Security) and the South African Ape-Man discovery might doom us all to four more years of Barack Obama’s incompetence unless Mr. Perry grows up. Mr. Perry correctly calls Social Security as it now stands a “Ponzi Scheme.” This is 100% accurate. Just as Ponzi swindlers take a lot of money from their victims and pay out relatively little, Social Security is fundamentally bankrupt right now. Mr. Perry needs to take his message to the people and explain it very well and explain why and how Social Security must be modified if it is to ever be a success for our children. He will not get a lot of help on this. Some of his fellow Republicans will intensely attack him for this honest, forthright stance.
            What his Republican rivals will do to Mr. Perry’s position will be walk in the zoo compared to what the liberal media and the Democrats will assault him with. Mr. Perry needs to confine all future comments on Social Security to this more-easily defendable position.
A.     Social Security as it now stands is a Ponzi scheme and unless modified deeply, Social Security funding will not be there for our children and grandchildren.
B.    Social Security for those aged 50 and above should be left 95% untouched. Means-basing for the very rich recipients on Social Security is vital.
C.    Social Security’s present Ponzi nature becomes evident when we talk about those aged 49 and below. The program must be adjusted and modified greatly to insure that it is fiscally-sound for all such workers.
D.   Social Security was created back when the average American’s life span was 55 years of age and when the average American worker’s lifespan was 52 years of age (far more men than women fell under Social Security and women averaged about 59 years old at death). Today’s realities are that the average death age is closer to 85 than to 55; and that a lot more women are part of the work force. Any changes to Social Security must reflect these realities.
As far as Mr. Perry’s stance on evolution . . . Rajjpuut is reminded of the insurance fraud allowed to stand by a foolish judge. The “victim,” in a wheelchair was told by the insurance agent investigating the matter that he’d hound him till his death and would never be allowed to leave that wheelchair. The “victim” told him, “Fine but I intend to visit Mexico City and the site where the Virgin of Guadalupe encountered Mary. Don’t be surprised if a miracle takes place, my good man!” Mr. Perry needs to read up on human anthropology and on the theories about evolution and on this discovery in particular. It would be smart on the face of it; and super-smart if Mr. Perry were to “see the light.” Seeing the light means Mr. Perry probably ought to say,
 
“The scientists say the earth is 4.5 billion years old; I know nothing that disproves that. The very recent discovery of Australopithecus sediba fossils in South Africa looks like it might be what they used to call a “missing link.” If that’s so, It looks like Mr. Darwin was right and it looks like a day to God is a damn long time to us and the week of creation found in Genesis is a damn, damn, damn long time compared to a human’s lifespan.”
 
            Mr. Perry further needs to educate Americans to the TEA Party’s “Contract for America.” This fiscal- and Constitutional Conservative (with absolutely ZERO social-conservativism in it) document may be the single greatest American political document since the Bill of Rights was added to the U.S. Constitution. The more Mr. Perry persists in attacking the dismal record of Barrack Obama and on pounding home the ten planks in this incredibly visionary Contract from America platform . . . the better off America will be.
 
 
If, ignoring all this sound advice, Mr. Perry persists in unscientific thinking he’ll be pushed out of thinking peoples’ minds as a foolish hick and we’ll get more and more of Barack Obama and it’ll be his fault. Grow up, Rick Perry, grow up!
 
Ya’ll live long, strong and ornery,
Rajjpuut
Read more…
By John W. Lillpop


Most liberals consider racial profiling to be immoral, unconstitutional, and downright un-American. Especially when such practice is used to prevent another gang of young, middle-eastern males who speak Arabic from repeating the carnage of 9/11.

Or when a state like Arizona tries to protect its citizens, of all colors and creeds, from being abused and harmed by illegal aliens from Mexico and points south.

In other words, racial profiling is evil when used to protect America from harm a the hands of people of color.

However, liberal loathing of profiling disintegrates in mid-air when the practice is used to bestow special benefits to, say, illegal aliens who, because most are Hispanic, deserve gifts like the DREAM act and other pandering.

Liberal insanity on this issue reached new lows of morality when Maxine Waters openly challenged President Obama to use race in deciding who has the greater priority for getting government booty.

As reported at the reference, Ms. Waters left little doubt about where her sentiments are when she asked, “Are the unemployed in the African-American community, including almost 45 percent of its youth, as important as the people of Iowa?” Waters asked.

Wow! If that is not a plea for government action based on racial profiling, then what is?

Racial profiling: An evil from hell—unless you stand to profit!


Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0911/62979.html#ixzz1XOATBaw2


 
Read more…