Dr. Lawrence Britt has examined the fascist regimes of Hitler (Germany), Mussolini (Italy), Franco (Spain), Suharto (Indonesia) and several Latin American regimes. Britt found 14 defining characteristics common to each:

1. Powerful and Continuing Nationalism - Fascist regimes tend to make constant use of patriotic mottos, slogans, symbols, songs, and other paraphernalia. Flags are seen everywhere, as are flag symbols on clothing and in public displays.

2. Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights - Because of fear of enemies and the need for security, the people in fascist regimes are persuaded that human rights can be ignored in certain cases because of "need." The people tend to look the other way or even approve of torture, summary executions, assassinations, long incarcerations of prisoners, etc.

3. Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause - The people are rallied into a unifying patriotic frenzy over the need to eliminate a perceived common threat or foe: racial , ethnic or religious minorities; liberals; communists; socialists, terrorists, etc.

 

4. Supremacy of the Military - Even when there are widespread domestic problems, the military is given a disproportionate amount of government funding, and the domestic agenda is neglected. Soldiers and military service are glamorized.

5. Rampant Sexism - The governments of fascist nations tend to be almost exclusively male-dominated. Under fascist regimes, traditional gender roles are made more rigid. Divorce, abortion and homosexuality are suppressed and the state is represented as the ultimate guardian of the family institution.

6. Controlled Mass Media - Sometimes to media is directly controlled by the government, but in other cases, the media is indirectly controlled by government regulation, or sympathetic media spokespeople and executives. Censorship, especially in war time, is very common.

7. Obsession with National Security - Fear is used as a motivational tool by the government over the masses.

8. Religion and Government are Intertwined - Governments in fascist nations tend to use the most common religion in the nation as a tool to manipulate public opinion. Religious rhetoric and terminology is common from government leaders, even when the major tenets of the religion are diametrically opposed

to the government's policies or actions.

9. Corporate Power is Protected - The industrial and business aristocracy of a fascist nation often are the ones who put the government leaders into power, creating a mutually beneficial business/government relationship and power elite.

10. Labor Power is Suppressed - Because the organizing power of labor is the only real threat to a fascist government, labor unions are either eliminated entirely, or are severely suppressed.

11. Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts - Fascist nations tend to promote and tolerate open hostility to higher education, and academia. It is not uncommon for professors and other academics to be censored or even arrested. Free expression in the arts and letters is openly attacked.

12. Obsession with Crime and Punishment - Under fascist regimes, the police are given almost limitless power to enforce laws. The people are often willing to overlook police abuses and even forego civil liberties in the name of patriotism. There is often a national police force with virtually unlimited power in fascist nations.

13. Rampant Cronyism and Corruption - Fascist regimes almost always are governed by groups of friends and associates who appoint each other to government positions and use governmental power and authority to protect their friends from accountability. It is not uncommon in fascist regimes for national resources and even treasures to be appropriated or even outright stolen by government leaders.

14. Fraudulent Elections - Sometimes elections in fascist nations are a complete sham. Other times elections are manipulated by smear campaigns against or even assassination of opposition candidates, use of legislation to control voting numbers or political district boundaries, and manipulation of the media. Fascist nations also typically use their judiciaries to manipulate or control elections.

 

 

They Thought They Were Free

 

By Milton Mayer

http://www.thirdreich.net/Thought_They_Were_Free_nn4.html

 

"They Thought They Were Free: The Germans 1933-1945",

University of Chicago Press. Reissued in paperback, April, 1981.

 

 

As Harpers Magazine noted when the book was published in 1955 (U. of Chicago), Milton Mayerâsextraordinarily far-sighted book on the Germans is more timely today than ever·ä

 

 

This crucial book tells how and why 'decent men' became Nazis through short biographies of 10 law-abiding citizens. An American journalist of German/Jewish descent, Mr. Mayer provides a fascinating window into the lives, thoughts and emotions of a people caught up in the rush of the Nazi movement. It is a book that should make people pause and think -- not only about the Germans, but also about themselves.

 

But Then It Was Too Late

 

"What no one seemed to notice," said a colleague of mine, a philologist, "was the ever widening gap, after1933, between the government and the people. Just think how very wide this gap was to begin with, here in Germany. And it became always wider. You know it doesn't make people close to their government to be told that this is a people's government, a true democracy, or to be enrolled in civilian defense, or even to vote. All this has little, really nothing to do with knowing one is governing.

 

What happened here was the gradual habituation of the people, little by little, to being governed by surprise; to receiving decisions deliberated in secret; to believing that the situation was so complicated that the government had to act on information which the people could not understand, or so dangerous that, even if he people could understand it, it could not be released because of national security. And their sense of identification with Hitler, their trust in him, made it easier to widen this gap and reassured those who would otherwise have worried about it.

 

"This separation of government from people, this widening of the gap, took place so gradually and so insensibly, each step disguised (perhaps not even intentionally) as a temporary emergency measure or associated with true patriotic allegiance or with real social purposes. And all the crises and reforms (real reforms, too) so occupied the people that they did not see the slow motion underneath, of the whole process of government growing remoter and remoter.

 

"You will understand me when I say that my Middle High German was my life. It was all I cared about. I was a scholar, a specialist. Then, suddenly, I was plunged into all the new activity, as the universe was drawn into the new situation; meetings, conferences, interviews, ceremonies, and, above all, papers to be filled out, reports, bibliographies, lists, questionnaires. And on top of that were the demands in the community, the things in which one had to, was "expected to" participate that had not been there or had not been important before. It was all rigmarole, of course, but it consumed all one's energies, coming on top of the work one really wanted to do. You can see how easy it was, then, not to think about fundamental things. One had no time."

 

"Those," I said, "are the words of my friend the baker. "One had no time to think. There was so much going on." "Your friend the baker was right," said my colleague. "The dictatorship, and the whole process of its coming into being, was above all diverting. It provided an excuse not to think for people who did not want to think anyway. I do not speak of your "little men", your baker and so on; I speak of my colleagues and myself, learned men, mind you. Most of us did not want to think about fundamental things and never had. There was no need to. Nazism gave us some dreadful, fundamental things to think about - we were decent people - and kept us so busy with continuous changes and "crises" and so fascinated, yes, fascinated, by the machinations of the "national enemies", without and within, that we had no time to think about these dreadful things that were growing, little by little, all around us. Unconsciously, I suppose, we were grateful. Who wants to think?

 

"To live in this process is absolutely not to be able to notice it - please try to believe me - unless one has a much greater degree of political awareness, acuity, than most of us had ever had occasion to develop. Each step was so small, so inconsequential, so well explained or, on occasion, "regretted," that, unless one were detached from the whole process from the beginning, unless one understood what the whole thing was in principle, what all these "little measures" that no "patriotic German" could resent must some day lead to, one no more saw it developing from day to day than a farmer in his field sees the corn growing. One day it is over his head.

 

"How is this to be avoided, among ordinary men, even highly educated ordinary men? Frankly, I do not know. I do not see, even now. Many, many times since it all happened I have pondered that pair of great maxims, Principiis obsta and Finem respice - "Resist the beginnings" and "consider the end." But one must foresee the end in order to resist, or even see, the beginnings. One must foresee the end clearly and certainly and how is this to be done, by ordinary men or even by extraordinary men? Things might have changed here before they went as far as they did; they didn't, but they might have. And everyone counts on that might.

 

"Your "little men," your Nazi friends, were not against National Socialism in principle. Men like me, who were, are the greater offenders, not because we knew better (that would be too much to say) but because we sensed better. Pastor Niemoller spoke for the thousands and thousands of men like me when he spoke (too modestly of himself) and said that, when the Nazis attacked the Communists, he was a little uneasy, but, after all, he was not a Communist, and so he did nothing: and then they attacked the Socialists, and he was a little uneasier, but, still, he was not a Socialist, and he did nothing; and then the schools, the press, the Jews, and so on, and he was always uneasier, but still he did nothing. And then they attacked the Church, and he was a Churchman, and he did something - but then it was too late."

 

"Yes," I said.

 

"You see," my colleague went on, "one doesn't see exactly where or how to move. Believe me, this is true. Each act, each occasion, is worse than the last, but only a little worse. You wait for the next and the next. You wait for the one great shocking occasion, thinking that others, when such a shock comes, will join with you in resisting somehow. You don't want to act, or even to talk, alone; you don't want to "go out of your way to make trouble." Why not? - Well, you are not in the habit of doing it. And it is not just fear, fear of standing alone, that restrains you; it is also genuine uncertainty.

 

"Uncertainty is a very important factor, and, instead of decreasing as time goes on, it grows. Outside, in the streets, in the general community, "everyone is happy. One hears no protest, and certainly sees none. You know, in France or Italy there will be slogans against the government painted on walls and fences; in Germany, outside the great cities, perhaps, there is not even this. In the university community, in your own community, you speak privately to you colleagues, some of whom certainly feel as you do; but what do they say? They say, "It's not so bad" or "You're seeing things" or "You're an alarmist."

 

"And you are an alarmist. You are saying that this must lead to this, and you can't prove it. These are the beginnings, yes; but how do you know for sure when you don't know the end, and how do you know, or even surmise, the end? On the one hand, your enemies, the law, the regime, the Party, intimidate you. On the other, your colleagues pooh-pooh you as pessimistic or even neurotic. You are left with your close friends, who are, naturally, people who have always thought as you have.

 

"But your friends are fewer now. Some have drifted off somewhere or submerged themselves in their work. You no longer see as many as you did at meetings or gatherings. Informal groups become smaller; attendance drops off in little organizations, and the organizations themselves wither. Now, in small gatherings of your oldest friends, you feel that you are talking to yourselves, that you are isolated from the reality of things. This weakens your confidence still further and serves as a further deterrent to ö to what? It is clearer all the time that, if you are going to do anything, you must make an occasion to do it, and then you are obviously a troublemaker. So you wait, and you wait.

 

"But the one great shocking occasion, when tens or hundreds or thousands will join with you, never comes. That's the difficulty. If the last and worst act of the whole regime had come immediately after the first and the smallest, thousands, yes, millions would have been sufficiently shocked ö if, let us say, the gassing of the Jews in "43" had come immediately after the "German Firm" stickers on the windows of non-Jewish shops in "33". But of course this isn't the way it happens. In between come all the hundreds of little steps, some of them imperceptible, each of them preparing you not to be shocked by the next. Step C is not so much worse than Step B, and, if you did not make a stand at Step B, why should you at Step C? And so on to Step D.

 

"And one day, too late, your principles, if you were ever sensible of them, all rush in upon you. The burden of self deception has grown too heavy, and some minor incident, in my case my little boy, hardly more than a baby, saying "Jew swine," collapses it all at once, and you see that everything, everything, has changed and changed completely under your nose. The world you live in ö your nation, your people ö is not the world you were in at all. The forms are all there, all untouched, all reassuring, the houses, the shops, the jobs, the mealtimes, the visits, the concerts, the cinema, the holidays. But the spirit, which you never noticed because you made the lifelong mistake of identifying it with the forms, is changed. Now you live in a world of hate and fear, and the people who hate and fear do not even know it themselves; when everyone is transformed, no one is transformed. Now you live in a system which rules without responsibility even to God. The system itself could not have intended this in the beginning, but in order to sustain itself it was compelled to go all the way.

 

"You have gone almost all the way yourself. Life is a continuing process, a flow, not a succession of acts and events at all. It has flowed to a new level, carrying you with it, without any effort on your part. On this new level you live, you have been living more comfortably every day, with new morals, new principles. You have accepted things you would not have accepted five years ago, a year ago, things that your father, even in Germany, could not have imagined.

 

"Suddenly it all comes down, all at once. You see what you are, what you have done, or, more accurately, what you haven't done ( for that was all that was required of most of us: that we do nothing). You remember those early meetings of your department in the university when, if one had stood, others would have stood, perhaps, but no one stood. A small matter, a matter of hiring this man or that, and you hired this one rather than that. You remember everything now, and your heart breaks. Too late. You are compromised beyond repair.

 

"What then? You must then shoot yourself. A few did. Or "adjust" your principles. Many tried, and some, I suppose, succeeded; not I, however. Or learn to live the rest of your life with your shame. This last is the nearest there is, under the circumstances, to heroism: shame. Many Germans became this poor kind of hero, many more, I think, than the world knows or cares to know."

 

I said nothing. I thought of nothing to say.

 

"I can tell you," my colleague went on, "of a man in Leipzig, a judge. He was not a Nazi, except nominally, but he certainly wasn't an anti Nazi. He was just ö a judge. In "42" or "43", early "43", I think it was, a Jew was tried before him in a case involving, but only incidentally, relations with an "Aryan" woman. This was "race injury", something the Party was especially anxious to punish. In the case a bar, however, the judge had the power to convict the man of a "nonracial" offense and send him to an ordinary prison for a very long term, thus saving him from Party "processing" which would have meant concentration camp or, more probably, deportation and death. But the man was innocent of the "nonracial" charge, in the judge's opinion, and so, as an honorable judge, he acquitted him. Of course, the Party seized the Jew as soon as he left the courtroom.

"

"And the judge?"

 

"Yes, the judge. He could not get the case off his conscience ö a case, mind you, in which he had acquitted an innocent man. He thought that he should have convicted him and saved him from the Party, but how could he have convicted an innocent man? The thing preyed on him more and more, and he had to talk about it, first to his family, then to his friends, and then to acquaintances. (That's how I heard about it.) After the "44" Putsch they arrested him. After that, I don't know."

 

I said nothing.

 

"Once the war began," my colleague continued, "resistance, protest, criticism, complaint, all carried with them a multiplied likelihood of the greatest punishment. Mere lack of enthusiasm, or failure to show it in public, was "defeatism." You assumed that there were lists of those who would be "dealt with" later, after the victory. Goebbels was very clever here, too. He continually promised a "victory orgy" to "take care of" those who thought that their "treasonable attitude" had escaped notice. And he meant it; that was not just propaganda. And that was enough to put an end to all uncertainty.

 

"Once the war began, the government could do anything "necessary" to win it; so it was with the "final solution" of the Jewish problem, which the Nazis always talked about but never dared undertake, not even the Nazis, until war and its "necessities" gave them the knowledge that they could get away with it. The people abroad who thought that war against Hitler would help the Jews were wrong. And the people in Germany who, once the war had begun, still thought of complaining, protesting, resisting, were betting on Germany's losing the war. It was a long bet. Not many made it."

Recently I posted to a story about progressive liberals and I been thinking about this a lot and feel like it needs to be expanded on as well as discussed by others.

Our rights as Americans have slowly been erroded by liberalism. If you think about it you will also see that we the people have allowed ourselves to be part of a world that is wrong on so many levels. We freely gave up rights because we was too lazy or too busy or whatever the reason to fight for our rights.

Back in the 70's is when liberalism seems to have taken a firm foot hold. Advocacy groups started emerging for this or that. One in particular is the child abuse advocasy groups. Now dont get me wrong. I am firmly against child abuse and it angers me to hear of a child that has been abused. But we went from one extreme to another. Now because of these groups pushing for laws upon laws protecting children, we as parents or guardians are no longer able to spank a child. Yet if you ask me thats a violation of my rights as a parent, and my rights as an American. Here is why. The word of my God tells me that if I spare the rod is to spoil the child. The bible also tells me to raise a child rightious in the eyes of God. Yet the liberals seem to think they know more than God. Laws have been enacted that if I spank a child then I am a criminal. Is that not a violation of the first amendment to the constitution. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. To tell me I cant spank a child who needs a spanking and that makes me a criminal when the word of my God tells me I must is a law that violates my freedom of religion. It infringes upon my free exercise of my religion. As an American I am responsible for anything a child in my care does. Yet as an American i become a criminal if i discipline a child.

Then liberals went after God himself. Because governments fund schools they are not allowed to even mention God in a school. Is this not athiesm, the religion of no God. Schools even been reported to be teaching about the muslim faith. How is it we are able to have athiesm and muslim in schools but we cant have God in schools. Our country was founded on the principle of in God we trust. Our founding fathers firmly believed in God. When the Bill of Rights was written and the part of seperation of church and state was put in it wasnt to remove God from government, it was to prevent one religion or another from dominating government yet liberals twisted it to suit their agenda.

If we look at the recent past we have incidents such as Columbine, Sandy Hill, and others where children went to school with a gun and killed other children. People ask where was God yet fail to understand they allowed God to be thrown out of school. Would these tragadies have happened if we was allowed to spank our children, or if God wasnt thrown out of school.

Thas what liberal progress have given us. Children are growing up with no morals so to speak of, they willingly kill other children, they think the world owes them and in effect have become liberals themselves. They have really never had to work for anything and never developed the feeling of accomplishment from earning anything. They lack morals and integrity all because the liberals felt that no one should spank a child and God had no place in our lives. They have created a total self centered generation.

Then the liberals wanted our guns. The constitution is clear. A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. Does not banning any form of guns infringe the rights granted to us by the constitution?  Are not these laws unconstitutional? The liberals have argued that we are not free states. When did that happen?

The sad part of all of this is we sat back and did nothing while the liberals wiped their asses with our rights.

You have to wonder if it is too late. I dont think it is. Many of these laws can be struck down as being unconstitutional. Laws preventing a parent from disciplining a child is unconstitutional. laws banning any guns is unconstitutional. All we really need is dedicated lawyers who are also patriots to take the fight to them. We also need patriots willing to help finance these lawyers as well as send letters and emails to our elected officials telling them they are in violation of the constitution and have broken their vow to protect it. We need people to loudly proclaim that we demand our rights.

Went to Second http://www.secondspin.com/ and ordered 3rd Rock From the Sun, Seasons 1, 2, 3 and 4.  I think I'm going to survive Obama!

"It is discipline that wins wars." Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson of The Confederate States of America. Watch the movie "GODS AND GENERALS". Maybe y'all will learn a thing or two about how to combat the enemy which we call high taxes and massive federal spending. President Abraham Lincoln said: "A House divided cannot stand".

Only two days a member, and I aready see the problem with the Tea Party!!

There are too many groups within! It is not a united force! Yes, of course I believe strongly in states rights. That's what Mr. Thomas Jefferson fought so strongly for. But our main problem does not lie within our states at the moment. Our problem is on the federal level! With so many splinter groups within the Tea Party, no wonder nothing is getting done!!

So, there were a few Tea Party candidates elected in the last election. But come on! We should have FIRED  that cheapskate Obama and taken the Senate!!!

When are you people going to all come together for one single purpose? That one purpose should have been all along: LOWER TAXES/LESS GOVERNMENT WAISTE.

The Tea Party needs a strong National leadership with strong representation at all state levels which can reach out to all community members within their states to organize in a functional manner for one great purpose.

We should stand together as a STONEWALL against any who's selfish desire it may be to run our nation into the ground and make us servents to the United Nations and the New World Order!!!

I sincerely hope to see a drastic change within this Tea Party. If not, if we cannot unite as one, then I've a good mind to go ahead and withdraw my new membership and head uderground with my family!!!!!!

Begins: Monday, January 7 2013 at 8:30 AM
Location: Staging at La Quinta Capitol Inn & Dinner at Holiday Inn Lady Bird (Town) Lake
Address:
300 E. 11th Street (La Quinta) / 20 N. IH 35 (Holiday Inn)
Austin, TX 78701

Join Texas Tea Party Activists on January 7 - 8, 2013 for the opening of the 83rd Texas legislative session in Austin, Texas.  

Network with other groups, get the latest updates on key issues, gather tools for the upcoming battles in Texas AND let your Reps know how you feel about their most important vote of the session!   

This 2-day event will feature staging/networking/media training at the La Quinta Capitol Inn which is FREE to those who RSVP at:  http://womenonthewall.org/texas-speaker-showdown-ii-2013.  Hear from many of our key Texas leaders on important issues such as:  Texas budget, TTC, illegal immigration, CSCOPE, human trafficking, Obamacare and more.... (tenative agenda will be posted at:  www.womenonthewall.org). 

Pat Caddell (Fox News Analyist & pollster) will be the keynote speaker at the "Keep Texas Strong" dinner to recognize many of our Texas Tea Party Women Activists/Candidates.  Following the dinner, join Pat and others to view the BCS game (Notre Dame v. Alabama).  

We are honored to be joined by the following partner organizations and individual sponsors:  www.womenonthewall.org.

To register for the FREE staging area scroll to the "RSVP" option in the registeration section OR purchase dinner tickets at: http://womenonthewall.org/texas-speaker-showdown-ii-2013

Hotel info can be viewed at:  http://womenonthewall.org/ssii-hotel-info.

If you will be attending this event please RSVP by visting this link ATTENDING
If not please visit this link NOT Attending

THE TEA PARTY EXPRESS AND THE TEA PARTY PATRIOTS ARE ORGANIZING RIGHT NOW.

WHAT IS THIS TEA PARTY DOING, TO GET READY???????????????????

THE GOVERNMENT IS NOT BIG MOMMA !!!! 

January 4, 2013

We as a Tea Party need to accept and understand that we have to play the game with the rules used verses by the actual rules, we need to do whatever it takes to combat the dark side, we must play the rules they play!! We also must do more to be heard and seen in every way,,...ie,... I called the Putnam County NY county executives office to support not giving out gun owners bio-data and called Gannett News and hurt some feelings!! Lets go Tea Party be seen and heard every chance we get !!!

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/

Read about the travesties of justice being endured by Orly Taitz, as she fights to have Obama declared ineligible and/or elected by means of fraudulent voting.

In the latest case, Orly Taitz and Obama's lawyers were told they would have twenty minutes each to present their cases, including any and all witnesses.   Twenty minutes!!

The next day, when Orly Taitz started to all a witness, the judge said, "No witnesses". When Dr. Taitz reminded the judge of his previous order, he simply repeated, "No witnesses".

Read how these cases are revealing the power of Obama.

Consistently Hypocritical

The National Rifle Association suggestion for keeping schools safer was by putting trained, armed guards in them as a way to thwart future attacks by well-armed lunatics and crazies.

They were immediately mocked by mainstream media and labeled as "crazy" by left-wing pundits and politicians.

So, let me point out the Blatant Hypocrisy of those who have condemned this suggestion as unworkable, unwise and simply unthinkable:

I'll start with NBC's David Gregory. Gregory left out the fact that he sends HIS Children to the Quaker school Sidwell Friends where there is a Security Department consisting of 11 personnel, many of whom are Police Officers.  A number of political and media elites also send their children there. They also benefit from the full-time Secret Service protection afforded Obama's children, who attend the school, too. The others whose children attend Sidwell represent a cornucopia of voices now calling for more gun laws, stricter gun control and outright gun bans.

So, only the privileged deserve protection?

I have to ask: Would these elitist (mostly liberal thinking) consider placing their children in a school without armed guards?

Are they willing to take a chance with the lives of their kids to practice what they and others who hold his point of view (and who also have kids in elite, well-protected schools) condescendingly preach?

I doubt it...

If the elites in our country are anything, they are consistent... Consistently Hypocritical.

We care about our money, so we protect our banks with armed guards, American airports, office buildings, power plants, courthouses, sports stadiums, the President, and members of Congress who work in offices surrounded by armed Capitol Police officers.

Yet when it comes to the most beloved, innocent and vulnerable members of the American family - our children  - we as a society leave them utterly defenseless, and the monsters and predators of this world know it and exploit it.

Likewise, Congress and circles of "friendlies" to the President have managed to be exempted from Obamacare without the threat of a penalty "tax".  Consistently Hypocritical.

http://blackroberegimentpastor.blogspot.com/2013/01/obama-and-those-who-sow-to-flesh.html

“Obama And Those Who Sow To The Flesh”

You may or not recognize the flesh sowers. To help you along a little.... let's just say that these are the people who often tell others things they like to hear but there's an evil motive behind their sowing. At work, maybe you call some of these flesh sowers; “brown noser”or “suck-ups.” Perhaps it's someone you know that is always trying to “stroke” you for something they want. Come on--- you all know what and who I'm talking about here. Obama is a flesh sewer, he knows just how to make people feel empowered using words that will not inspire people to do good, his intention is just like the “suck up's” who manipulate their already twisted hearts into doing something awful. In fact, it was Obama, during the 2012 Presidential Election you heard him say things like “get revenge” and also told his supporters how much he “loves America.” He went on however to distort truth in many ways only to purposely bring divisions between genders, classes and race's across our nation.

Likewise the religious these days also sow to the flesh... you know them also. Those are the “prosperity gospel” preachers you see on TV or just up the road from you with their “mega churches.” You can hear them right ? With their phrases like “God give me mo' money !” or --- “sew a seed of $285.17 and God will bless you a hundred times over, he'll make you rich beyond what you can ever imagine.”Oh, these are also the kind of so called “pastors” who try to make you believe they are super religious also. They are “jesusfied” with their 11^th, 12^th and 13^th commandments. You knew according to them, there are thirteen commandments right ? No ? Well they sure do act that way. Here look at what they believe according to the flesh(Jesus said you shall know them by their fruit). I'm sure you have met some of them some where in life if not already seen them on your television sets....

11^th Commandment “Thou shall answer every problem only with prayer. They will insist there is no action required in ridding evil or or in doing right beyond prayer. They say things like “Let God take care of it sister.” They have also been known to say things like; “Just pray and let God handle it.” This unbiblical attitudes goes against what the Bible teaches in Ephesians 5:11 and James 2:17-20.

12^th Commandment “As a pastor, we never speak. We stay silent when we hear something we don't agree with, we let the Holy Spirit speak to people.” What a load of crap. Hosea 6, again Ephesians 5:11 and James 4:17 straightens out that lie from hell.

13^th Commandment, much like the 12^th so called commandment... “Thou shall never speak ill will of another pastor no matter what they may say or do.” Ugh ! Jesus said Himself to beware of ravenous wolves ! How will “sheep” know who belongs to the devil unless the pulpit warns the sheep ! Romans 16:17-18 and Matthew 7:15.

I remember some years ago a so called pastor(who I found our later was a documented peadophile) would usually greet me with words like “Oh great man of God, how are you today.” I would cringe inside every time he greeted me. God's Spirit inside me knew just who this man belonged to and how he was trying to appeal to my flesh. Praise the Lord I did not fall for his antics and later separated myself from him and exposed him to others.

Pastors, politicians, news casters(yes, even Fox News), anyone...no matter who it is, those that follow the flesh rather than Gospel truth, are dangerous. Dangerous you may be asking ? Yes.... dangerous ! They are such because they react to, report on behalf of, and then follow or get others to follow half-truths and lies rather than whole truth. Sadly and unfortunately, there are many such people in our world today who are easy prey of the devil and his scheme of flesh sowing. Because of increasing matters such as unforgiveness, hatred, bitterness, malice, unresolved grief and trauma all around us, these people have become easy targets for those who can and will often take advantage of them and manipulate them in doing evil. We can see the evidence of those most often who have sown to the flesh and how they sold their souls even for a couple of dollars. Just take a look at your local news some time for example, that's all it takes to see what I mean. For me personally, I've seen with my own eyes flesh sewers manipulate others all around the world... In the Philippines for example, I have seen some people there jump from one religious belief to another all depending on who is giving them the “better deal”(more cash or goods.) Like wise, look at all the people in America who voted for Obama for the simple price of a so called “free” cell phone or a few words like “revenge” or “ make them pay their fair share.” Also just like Obama, most politicians, lawyers, cops, news reporters and others engaged in “public service” have also become very good at sowing to the flesh and sadly, people believe such garbage and lies from them. Heck, In fact, you could probably refer to these types of people enlisted in our government and the news agencies as “professional flesh sowers.”

People aren't crazy these days, people are just plain and simply...dangerous. Who would think that they would sell their/our own children, families, country....even their very own souls for cash ?.... Wow ! No matter where we go it seems, people are doing it... they are allowing themselves to be suckered in to matters that do not involve truth but rather those things that for a moment anyway, makes them feel good and they don't care whom it hurts, or who it destroys.

The Christian Bible is clear. In Galatians 6:8 it states; “ For he that sows to his flesh shall of the flesh reap corruption, but he that sows to the Spirit shall of the Spirit reap everlasting life.” To many people these days play political, religious, legal and other like minded dangerous games. If you yourself have concern as to how to recognize such people involved in fleshly things...there is but only one way to recognize who these people are and that's through having a real and personal relationship with Jesus Christ as Lord and Saviour. We are in the last days and there are wolves like flesh sowers are everywhere. They will gladly try to trick you into following evil and live according to the flesh of sin. Don't be fooled folks, get to know who these ill intentioned people are. Once you find them, pray for them and make sure you tell them the truth. Until they repent of their evil actions however, warn them of their impending destruction from God's judgment, then go on to warn others of just what evil these flesh sowers are promoting to others as well.

My Biblical advice to you.

Pastor Paul Waldmiller~Black Robe Regiment Pastor

Operation SLAM — #OpSLAM Stop the Lying A** Media was introduced a little over a year ago. However, at the time, the conservatives on Twitter seemed to still be of the belief that we could rely on a fair electoral process and the Republican party to easily remove a completely failed president. Of course, with the media providing cover, parroting the lies of the administration and helping to select our candidate during the primaries, the result was another four-year term of the rapidly growing dictatorship.

We reintroduced #OpSLAM two days ago to a public that was now ready to act. Click here to read  the plan overview if you have not done so already. The concept is simple. We own about 60 percent of the buying power in America, and it is time we stopped supporting those who are working to destroy our lives, and that includes those who sponsor them.

After contacting one of my ANONYMOUS cotacts, we have a new video up to help with the cause. See below.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-GFVg7X2fo&feature=youtu.be

See this link for more information and how you can get involved in KILLING the LIBERAL MEDIA

http://gregwhoward.com/wordpress/2012/11/operation-slam-stop-the-lying-a-media/

My late Mama instructed, “Never put your business in the street”. Due to the extremely serious situation in which we find our country today, I must share my personal testimony (put my business in the street) to save America.

In 1993, I quit my 15 year position at an ABC affiliate TV station in Baltimore to pursue a new career in music. At that time, callers on the Rush Limbaugh show were losing their jobs to down-sizing. Rush encouraged them to view it as an opportunity to pursue their dreams. Inspired and with Mary's blessings, I quit my position, despite being in line for department head.

In short, Mary and I lost everything – home, cars and savings. On numerous occasions, we were financially down-for-the-count with no hope in sight. Every time, God came to our rescue with just enough to keep us going. During our several years “wilderness experience”, Mary and I grew in character, wisdom and gratitude. But most of all, we learned to trust God.

So while I am in solidarity with the frustration of fellow patriots across America regarding the reelection of Obama, the surrender of the Republicans, the transformation of what it means to be an American and the deterioration of our culture, I MUST continue fighting to restore/take back America!

I can not and will not join in your hopelessness and surrender.

My firm resolve and optimism are rooted in the Word of God. Galatians 6:9 “And let us not grow weary of doing good, for in due season we will reap, if we do not give up.”

I can not tune out the news and allow an evil Godless liberal Administration and mainstream media to treat the Constitution like toilet paper and ravish our culture. Edmund Burke said, “The only thing needed for evil to prosper is for good men to do nothing.”

Patriots, along with myself, you are good men and women whom God has prepared for such a time as this – to save America. You fought valiantly over the past four years. I totally understand and share your disappointment, anger and sadness for our country.

However, sticking your heads in the sand, is not the answer. For me to do so would feel like me telling God, “I no longer trust You. Thus, I will not continue the mission you called me to fulfill.” For me, such a decision is impossible.

I am Chairman of a new PAC, Conservative Campaign Committee, to fight back with TV ads and etc.

Brother and sister patriots, come back – get back into the battle. America is too extraordinarily precious to do otherwise. We can not simply allow them to “have it”!

Lloyd Marcus, Proud Unhyphenated American

Chairman, Conservative Campaign Committee

LloydMarcus.com

Well gee folks, when you don't have a gun you have to have something to kill with...

http://lastresistance.com/906/england-considering-ban-on-kitchen-knives/   

American Exceptionalism will no longer exist in the minds of our children.  Texas has  joined ranks with the leftist agenda in indoctrinating our children with a progressive ideology. Over 70% of Texas public schools, some private and charter have purchased and implemented the progressive curriculum,  Cscope. Cscope is based on Obama's Common Core.  Common Core advocate Linda Darling Hammond is a top education adviser to Obama and is also associated with communist revolutionary Bill Ayers.  Linda Darling Hammond has been a guest speaker at Cscope Conferences and is the quest speaker this February in California for the American Association of School Administrators (AASA) National Conference. Texas Association of School Administrators (TASA) is gearing up to attend the National Conference and hear Linda Darling Hammond speak and promote Common Core which, Texas rejected. Their fees and travel plans will be paid for with your tax dollars.

Cscope is owned by Texas Education Service Center's Curriculum Collaborative (TESCCC).  The men and women behind Cscope are the Board of Directors of TESCCC which are the directors of the Texas Education Service Centers excluding ESC 4.

Our children are not being taught about the great men and women who sacrificed their lives for this country nor or they taught that these sacrifices attribute to the FREEDOM we have been so fortunate to enjoy.Instead our children are being indoctrinated  with a pro Islamic, anti christian view. Texas students could benefit greatly from studying the lives of great men such as  Christopher Columbus, George Washington, Abe Lincoln or better yet the missionary journeys of the Apostle Paul. Unfortunately for our children Cscope writers felt it more important that 6 grade students chronicle Islamic Scholar Ibn Battuta's pilgrimage to Mecca and  Mohammad's tomb in Medina. The fact that Cscope is pushing a pro Islamic view is indisputable.  Time after time their agenda is exposed, and as soon as it is, the Cscope Reps run to pull the exposed material with a flip of a switch (due to it being an online curriculum). Fortunately there are many concerned about this indoctrination of our children that have already captured the original Cscope documents in order to verify Cscope's intentions. Here is another captured portion of a 6 grade lesson indicating Cscope reps true intentions to indoctrinate your children with a pro Islamic view.

For additional information on Cscope and it's indoctrination go to WWW.TXCSCOPEREVIEW.COM

'Fiscal cliff' legislation loaded with specials for Obama supporters

Pay careful attention to what he says.

The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam. Yet to be credible, those who condemn that slander must also condemn the hate we see when the image of Jesus Christ is desecrated, churches are destroyed, or the Holocaust is denied. Let us condemn incitement against Sufi Muslims, and Shiite pilgrims. It is time to heed the words of Gandhi: “Intolerance is itself a form of violence and an obstacle to the growth of a true democratic spirit.” Together, we must work towards a world where we are strengthened by our differences, and not defined by them. That is what America embodies, and that is the vision we will support.

Now, that’s the full paragraph so no one can claim I took him out of context.

But consider this.

It is an orthodox Christian belief that Mohammed is not a prophet. Actual Christians, as opposed to many of the supposed Christians put up by the mainstream media, believe that Christ is the only way to salvation. Believing that is slandering Mohammed. That’s just a fact. If you don’t believe me, you go into the MIddle East and proclaim Christ is the way, the truth, and the life and see what happens to your life.

Then Barack Obama went on to say “Yet to be credible, those who condemn that slander must also condemn the hate we see when the image of Jesus Christ is desecrated, churches are destroyed, or the Holocaust is denied.” Note he says we cannot “slander the prophet of Islam” but it’s only the image of Christ in the next sentence — not actually Christ himself desecrated. If this is so, why does Barack Obama’s government continue funding the National Endowment for the Arts, which funded Christ in piss, the Virgin Mary painted in dung, etc.?

Now, in point of fact, this is a major difference between Islam and Christianity. Christ came to this world as an enemy of the world and expected to be impugned. He also tells his followers that they should expect to be impugned. There is joy in being persecuted for following the Risen Lord. In Islam, if you impugn Mohammed, you get a fatwa on your butt.

And then there is the first amendment. The President of the United States tried to have it both ways in his speech.

I know there are some who ask why we don’t just ban such a video. The answer is enshrined in our laws: our Constitution protects the right to practice free speech. Here in the United States, countless publications provoke offense. Like me, the majority of Americans are Christian, and yet we do not ban blasphemy against our most sacred beliefs. Moreover, as President of our country, and Commander-in-Chief of our military, I accept that people are going to call me awful things every day, and I will always defend their right to do so. Americans have fought and died around the globe to protect the right of all people to express their views – even views that we disagree with.

We do so not because we support hateful speech, but because our Founders understood that without such protections, the capacity of each individual to express their own views, and practice their own faith, may be threatened. We do so because in a diverse society, efforts to restrict speech can become a tool to silence critics, or oppress minorities. We do so because given the power of faith in our lives, and the passion that religious differences can inflame, the strongest weapon against hateful speech is not repression, it is more speech – the voices of tolerance that rally against bigotry and blasphemy, and lift up the values of understanding and mutual respect.

I know that not all countries in this body share this understanding of the protection of free speech. Yet in 2012, at a time when anyone with a cell phone can spread offensive views around the world with the click of a button, the notion that we can control the flow of information is obsolete. The question, then, is how we respond. And on this we must agree: there is no speech that justifies mindless violence.

Just words, Mr. President? You say “there is no speech that justifies mindless violence,” but all last week you condemned a ridiculous video trailer for a movie that does not exist. Your government ran advertisements in Pakistan denouncing the video. What of free speech, Mr. President? Last week you were saying the violence was understandable given the offensive film and this week you are trying to claim it was mindless.

Oh wait, you did it again in the same speech where you said “there is no speech that justifies mindless violence”:

At times, the conflicts arise along the fault lines of faith, race or tribe; and often they arise from the difficulties of reconciling tradition and faith with the diversity and interdependence of the modern world. In every country, there are those who find different religious beliefs threatening; in every culture, those who love freedom for themselves must ask how much they are willing to tolerate freedom for others.

That is what we saw play out the last two weeks, as a crude and disgusting video sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world.

Time and again the President of the United States tries to have it both ways.

But are they just words?

The fact is, many religions do not recognize Mohammed as a prophet. In the widest swath of Islam, that denial is, in and of itself, slander. So what exactly are you saying Mr. President?

As an exit point, with all of President Obama’s statements on tolerance in his speech, we should remember that tolerance is really not a Christian virtue. As Archbishop Chaput of Philadelphia noted, “We need to remember that tolerance is not a Christian virtue. Charity, justice, mercy, prudence, honesty — these are Christian virtues. And obviously, in a diverse community, tolerance is an important working principle. But it’s never an end itself.” The Archbishop also noted that evil preaches tolerance until it is dominate and then it seeks to silence good. That’s not a statement that the President is evil in any way, shape, or form, but we should be mindful when the secular world demands tolerance for all, tolerance for all means we cannot have standards of faith to live by, because those standards obviously require we be intolerant of sins this world has embraced.

http://www.redstate.com/2012/09/25/president-obama-declares-the-future-must-not-belong-to-practicing-christians/