FOR A BETTER WORLD. AMEN.
All Posts (28831)
My hero Joe Arpaio has his posse doing some leg work that sets out to prove Obama's birth certificate is a fake. It gives us another reason to hate Obama but this whole birther issue is a distraction and a way that we can tie up time, resources and $$$ and the liberals don't have to do anything.
I suggest we dedicate our focus on maintaining the House and winning majority in the Senate. It is Congress who spends the money, Congress who makes the laws.
I won't suggest we abandon the presidency like the traitors at www.teapartyforobama.com, I'm only saying that we need to have focus and this birther issue is not going to win us the Presidency or more seats in congress.
Let's first assume that the long form is indeed a forgery:
Obama's lawyers can tie this up for years and years. He will be long forgotten and completely irrelevant by the time this ever gets to a court. There are lines of experts who will testify that the document is legitimate and only a few 'experts' who will claim it is false. It will result in nothing but more questions and no solid results. Remember I'm not talking about justice I'm talking about focus.
Now lets assume that the document is legit:
We spend all this time, money and manpower to embarrass and discredit our cause. The reason you don't hear any defense is because we are doing a great job destroying our already fragile position in the political spotlight. It wouldn't surprise me if the long form document was intentionally made to look odd just to distract us.
What we have to gain from this goose chase is so little compared to what we have to lose. Will Trump ever be able to recover from the embarrassment he suffered? He will never be more than a reality show subject. Any hope of being a national political figure with any credibility has gone out the door and it was by his own hand. Our precious Tea Party should not engage in risky, low payoff endeavors. Let's put our focus and our money on topics that will produce results.
M NOT FOR WAR BUT THE PRESIDENT OF SYERA IS A BAD MAN. TAKE HIM OUT NOW.
“The Fruit Of Wallowing In Pig Poo”
Obama was made President to open many cans of worms. How do we know? Saturn, the learning planet, moved into unfavorable alignment with Pluto, the generational planet, in the month and year Obama was elected. I learned this from Cosmos and Psyche by Richard Tarnas, a distinguished philosopher and cultural historian.
After a thirty-year study of the outer planets, Tarnas concluded that there is consistent correspondence between planetary alignments and the archetypal patterns of human history. The outer planets tell the story because the alignments remain longer than the alignments of the inner planets.
The quadrature alignment of Saturn and Pluto remain for three to four years, indicating a change after Obama completes his first term of office, after losing his re-election bid. By the way, the alignment of Saturn and Pluto is trine in my astrological chart, the very best of alignments. I'm the bearer of good news.
The can of worms Obama has just opened, contraception, is a civil rights issue. Why? Everyone has the right to use contraceptives. Why don't we have the civil right to get our hair cut? It does not involve a religious doctrine. Obama came up with contraceptives (paid for by future taxpayers) to poke his finger in the eye of Catholic doctrine. We don't have the money just now. We have to borrow it. Obama's Secretary of the Treasury says we should be willing to pay more for the privilege of being American. Rush Limbaugh asked why future taxpayers should pay for people to have safe sex. He called a female law student a slut for demanding her right to make taxpayers pay for her contraceptives; she’s prostituting herself.
Whether or not we agree on the political issue involved, the fact remains that Obama opened a new can of worms. We need real answers, not name calling. In Earth as It Is in Heaven 2012, the book of memoirs I’ve just completed gives the world real answers. My manuscript is now with Amazon’s Creativespace for editing. It will soon be available through Amazon. The good news: I cut out in 1975, on my own, to build a new life. My answers came from within. All of my dreams came true.
The cans of worms Obama was put here to open don’t go way by osmosis. They give you choices: be the victim or create the circumstance. It is your right and responsibility. Mine is not a book of theories. It is based on my real experiences.
GOVERMENT MUST ACT QUICKLY. DEMOCRATS DO NOT DRAG YOU FEET. ON THIS DESTER. FOR ONCE ACT QUICKLY.
Trojan Horse, Warning
In the near future Baraka Obama and the left, Pelosi, Reid, Biden and the rest will begin an effort to sound more and more conservative. They will do this because they know concerned Americans have had enough of their anti-American behavior. They are becoming paranoid that their grip on power is slipping away and their way of doing things simply doesn't work. Therefore they must propose some way that stands a chance of success and that is always the conservative way. Keep in mind I said they will "propose", this in no way means they will ever initiate conservative ideas. They will speak as though they embrace conservative ideas with no intention whatsoever of ever using them.
Conservatism values Freedom, Liberty and capitalism, as the American way of life. This is in direct opposition to the beliefs of Obama and the left, Capitalism and Freedom are two items on their agenda to be destroyed. Their vision for America is Totalitarian Socialism and as long as America represents Freedom, Liberty and Capitalism their vision cannot exist. All Conservatives and Patriots of our great nation must not be taken in by this administration when they start to speak with forked tong. The left are masters of lies and deceit and they will use any trick to retain power. They are not restrained by Honor, Loyalty, Ethics and Morality as Conservatives and Patriotic Americans are. We must stay alert to the deceit and trickery and point it out to all if we are to succeed in returning our America its position of Respect, Dignity and Honor it has earned.
We, as well, must turn our backs on those things we know to be wrong, indecent and immoral. Those fighting for this great nation, the Patriots, Conservatives, Veterans and all Loyal Americans must be the best of the best, stand tall and strong with no shame and plant our flag of Freedom, Justice and Liberty never to be challenged again.
Art Phillips
Could Michael Savage be right?
Posted on WND.com-On March 1, 2012:
“Noting that the cause of Andrew Breitbart’s unexpected death yesterday was being examined by the Los Angeles County Coroner’s office, talk-radio host Michael Savage raised the question of whether the conservative media powerhouse – who recently announced he had videos that could politically damage President Obama – was murdered.
On his top-rated show today, Savage played an audio clip of Breitbart telling an audience at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington last month that he had obtained videos that shed light on Obama’s ties to radicals in the early 1980s who helped propel him to the presidency.
“Maybe my overly active imagination kicked into overdrive,” Savage told his listeners of his decision to raise the question. “But you heard what Breitbart said – he has videos … we’re going to vet the president.”
Breitbart reportedly was walking near his home in Brentwood, Calif., just after midnight this morning when he collapsed. A neighbor saw him fall and called 911. Emergency crews tried to revive him and rushed him to the emergency room at the UCLA Medical Center.
It’s entirely plausible, Savage acknowledged, that Breitbart simply collapsed of a heart attack because of overwork and a reported history of health problems.
“I’m asking a crazy question,” Savage said, “but so what? We the people want an answer. This was not an ordinary man. If I don’t ask this question, I would be remiss.”
Breitbart told the CPAC crowd last month that the videos would reveal Obama during a time when he was meeting a “bunch of silver ponytails” – referring to Weather Underground terror group members Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn.
Ayers and Dohrn reportedly launched Obama’s political career with a fundraiser in their Chicago home.
Savage noted that Breitbart had dinner with Ayers and Dorhn three weeks ago at the couple’s Hyde Park residence on Chicago’s South Side, which is near Obama’s home. Breitbart was invited by Daily Caller Editor-in-Chief Tucker Carlson, who won an Internet auction for a dinner party with the couple.
“I’ve got videos – this election we’re going to vet him,” Breitbart said at CPAC, promising they would show how “racial division and class warfare are central” to the “hope and change” that Obama”sold in 2008.”
“He threatened the president at CPAC with video that could derail the president’s campaign,” Savage said.
“I pray it was natural causes, but we’ll never know the truth.”
Savage said that if Breitbart’s colleagues have the videos, they should post them as soon as possible and make them viral “or they’ll never see the light of day.”
Savage said he hadn’t spoken with Breitbart for the past two years, but he recalled the media mogul’s visited to his home in the Bay Area.
“He spoke for three straight hours,” Savage said. “I was unable to say a word.”
Savage also attended a party at Breitbart’s Los Angeles home.
“I told him two years ago to get a body guard. Never be alone in the street,” Savage said.
Savage, the author of the bestselling novel “Abuse of Power,” put on his novelist hat and speculated about ways a murderer could remain undetected by inducing a heart attack that didn’t leave any traces.
A caller from Savage’s native New York City said there’s a simple way to find out what happened.
“If the tapes come out, he died of a heart attack,” the caller said. “If the tapes don’t come out, they whacked him.”
“The Savage Nation” airs live Monday through Friday from 6 p.m. to 9 p.m. Eastern. It can be heard online through stations such as KSTE in Sacramento.”
Source:
http://www.wnd.com/2012/03/michael-savage-was-breitbart-assassinated/
Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and videos reveal Andrew Breitbart’s investigation into President Obama’s background, to include Obama’s college days and his connection to the Weather Underground’s founder Bill Ayers and his wife Bernardine Dohrn, along with his last drink talking politics and his interview with Sheriff Arpaio-You Decide:
Will We Ever Know The True Cause Of Andrew Breitbart’s Death?-Posted on Western Journalism-By JIM CAMPBELL-On March 2, 2012:
Filmmaker Steve Bannon: Breitbart’s Tapes of Obama’s College Years To Be Released In 7 To 10 Days!-Posted on The Blaze-By Billy Hallowell-On March 2, 2012:
Andrew Breitbart Talked Politics in L.A. Bar an Hour Before Dying (Exclusive)!-Posted on The Hollywood Reporter-By Matthew Belloni-On March 1, 2012:
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/andrew-breitbart-dead-la-bar-politics-296386
BREITBART’S LAST INVESTIGATION? OBAMA: ‘I’ve got videos from his college days…’-Posted on WND.com-On March 1, 2012:
http://www.wnd.com/2012/03/breitbarts-last-investigation-obama/
Shocking Video: Andrew Breitbart’s Last Interview Was With Sheriff Joe Arpaio About Obama Eligibility!-Posted on Western Journalism-By FLOYD BROWN-On March 1, 2012:
Note: The following article and/or blog post relates to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
Barack Obama, Guilty!
Posted on Floyd Reports-By Guest Writer-On October 18, 2010:
“On Tuesday, May 18, 2010, in The ATLAH Court room under the sanction of the U.S. Constitution, “We The People” spoke. Barack Obama, Michael Sovern, and the trustees of Columbia University were found guilty on 17 of the original 19 counts of Sedition, Conspiracy, Fraud, and Obstruction of Justice.
Verdicts were delivered to the Judiciary Committee of the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House, the Joint Chiefs Of Staff, and the Attorney General of the United States. Specifically for Michael Sovern and Columbia University, verdicts and a demand that Columbia’s license to operate an educational institution be revoked were sent to The New York State Attorney General, New York State Board of Regents, and the Mid-Atlantic Schools Accreditation Board.
To date, not one response has reached its way back to the prosecutor, Rev. Dr. James David Manning, with the exception of a visit from the FBI, Homeland Security, NYPD and a “heads-up” warning from an alleged CIA operative that a “hit” was placed on his life.
Dr. Manning, a black preacher from a Harlem church, has been a vocal critic of Obama ever since he appeared on the political landscape. I can relate. I, too, became a national figure speaking out against a man who struck fear in my heart that pure evil was masquerading as a presidential candidate.
Four months and $5,000.00 after the trial, the transcripts are ready for release. In fact, on Tuesday of last week, Oct. 5, after a committee meeting in Harlem, copies were released to key contacts by members attending the meeting.
Is it sheer coincidence that Obama’s National Intelligence Chief, James Clapper, was called to the White House the very next day? Or that James Jones, National Security Advisor, announced his resignation two days after that? Coincidence or an attempt at ‘damage control?’
Clapper spoke to the press and cited Obama’s deep anger over “Wikileaks.” But was it Wikileaks or guilty verdicts coming from a humble church in Harlem, just seven blocks from Columbia University?
The wheels seem to be coming off the Obama bus and I feel it is my patriotic duty to report what I know and hope I can help fill in the blanks about why things are happening the way they are. I’ll begin with excerpts from the trial transcripts and comment from my unique perspective as a Community Organizer from Hawai’i.
Count:
Eighteen. Columbia University violation of New York State Education Law Section 224. The Columbia University did violate Chapter 224, Section 2 of the Education Law of the State of New York in that it did unlawfully sell and did fraudulently make, give, and issue a diploma to Barack Hussein Obama certifying that he had completed a prescribed course of study and that he earned a Bachelor’s Degree from Columbia University. Furthermore, and in violation of Section 4 of the Education Law of the Sate of New York, Chapter 224, Columbia University did falsely make a degree which was conferred on Barack Hussein Obama and did by concealing said information aid and abet in his misrepresentations that he completed the prescribed course of study and earned a Bachelor’s degree.
There is no proof that Obama attended Columbia, but there is overwhelming evidence that he did not. Among evidence submitted at the trial is a video of Bill Hemmer, FOX News special where 400 people who attended Columbia during the years 1981-83 were interviewed and not one person knew him or had ever heard of him. Then there are the statements of Wayne Allyn Root and testimony by citizen investigators, who, after countless hours researching archives in the Butler Library, reported they were unable to find a shred of evidence that Obama ever set foot on campus. Moreover, Obama’s statements regarding his experience at Columbia, his housing and surrounding community are totally off-base according to lifelong residents of the area.
Day 4, Page 25, excerpted:
Rev. Manning: To have lived on 96th Street is a bit unseemly when you could have simply applied to the Registrar’s Office or the Community Affairs and probably gotten housing somewhere within the environs of Columbia, rather than way down on 96th Street. But I won’t charge that he didn’t live there. What I do want to state is this, is that when he talked about his experience, as you just heard him, he said, oh, yeah, I remember being in New York, Greenwich Village. Well, this is Harlem. He said nothing about 125th Street. He said nothing about the Apollo Theater. Nothing about Frank’s Restaurant or La Famile’s [ph] before Sylvia became so popular during the early ’80s. Nothing about the environs of this community, but Greenwich Village is what he talked about and Central Park.
So, it seems a bit strange to me as he pointed up that his mother and we want to also point up that he, on the campaign, stated on several occasions his mother would wake him up at 4:00 in the morning and say, buster, this is no fun for me either and feed him his breakfast and teach him. But she also wanted to expose him to Mahalia Jackson, to Dr. King and to a few others, as you saw in that piece just a few moments ago. In other words, she was pushing him towards what she believed was his roots. But when he came to an area that personifies his roots, he had no interaction with anybody within this community, such as Mahalia Jackson or Alan Clayton Powell or with Professor James Cone or Dr. Cornel West. We want to point out those distinctions about what he says and what seems to be the truth.
Obama’s interest in the Black American experience has been an exercise in lip service. He eats, breathes and lives the life of an elitist while he straddles the line between Islamic and black liberation theologies. I believe a growing number of Americans have come to understand pure evil in the form of taqiyya which Obama uses frequently to hide his Islamic faith by lying time and again calling himself a Christian. If it quacks like a duck….
One of the few people to come forward from Obama’s past and actually say anything about him is Professor John Drew, a 1979 graduate of Occidental. Drew established the Marxist student organization in 1976. While attending Cornell University as a graduate student, Drew flew to California to visit a friend and had a chance encounter with Obama and his friend Mohammad Hasan Chandu (Chandoo).
Day 3, Page 6:
Professor John Drew (testimony via pre-recorded interview, excerpted)
Drew: Well, that’s one of the surprising things about my observation, is that the young Obama I met seemed more like a Western European Marxist, without a lot of racial hatred or baggage attached to it. I think he was a fan of what is it, Fanon, and he was aware of revolution being a worldwide…
Manning: You’re talking Franz Fanon?
Drew: That’s it. Franz Fanon.
Manning: Right.
Drew: He was aware of a worldwide revolution taking place, but the funny thing is, I saw no hatred of white people. I saw no animosity towards white people in the young Barack Obama. And yet, if you read his book, Dreams of My Father, I mean, he’s talking about how he was seething with hatred for white people, and sharing the story about the black guy that tore off his own skin.
But I have to say truthfully that young Barack Obama struck me as a as kind of like a wealthy white guy, because [multiple speakers]
Manning: Now, that’s an interesting statement. Wealthy? From where?
Drew: From Hawaii. He sort of struck me as like this Hawaiian prince, is the best way to describe him. And I it never, for once it never occurred to me that he was African -American, or that he had an emotional or cultural attachment to African- American culture. And I know that’s very controversial, but that’s my true report.
I saw Obama at a party in June the next year, and I didn’t see many African -American students there. Most of his friends were white, and foreign students.
So my theory is that Barack Obama has exaggerated his connections to the African -American community, and African- American culture, as part of an effort to win election.
Manning: When he appeared or, that a friend of his, Mohammed Hasan Chandu, who obviously was an Islamic person with Islamic breeding how did those two come how would a Marxist and an Islamic believing person what common ground did they have?
Drew: Well, I think one of the things that people have forgotten is that back in the 1980s, Islam and Communism could walk hand in hand comfortably. It was seen as a good fit, to be a Communist or a Socialist, and support an Islamic religious perspective.
And that was it’s for example, if you were in Afghanistan, and the Soviet Union was there protecting you, it was possible to have Islamic religious beliefs and be a supporter of the Soviet Union within Afghanistan.
That’s my perspective on the young Barack Obama. I think he was [multiple speakers]
Manning: Did he have a girlfriend?
Drew: No. Not that I saw. I never saw him affectionate around a woman, at least at that party I went to. And I understand that’s becoming an issue now, is, people are wondering about his sexual identity. And I again, I can’t really go too far into that, except to say that I never saw him physically around a woman, or affectionate to a woman, the whole time I met him.
Manning: Yeah, well, you know, that is becoming a part of I mean, people are beginning to look now at his sexuality quite very closely. There going back to the Jeremiah Wright church, there’s been some information about his having bisexual and homosexual relations. And then there’s some accusations against him.
But I’ve not heard any woman from any school identify him, and even and some of the things that we are seeing recently about his trek at Columbia. The only persons that step forward to speak about him are all males. I mean, I’m doing a complete analysis of and there’s several people. I think Michael Wolf of Columbia, who was once the Chairman of MTV, and a few others. But they’re all men. No woman has spoken a positive or a negative word about this person. So the fact that you said he had no girlfriends
Drew: Well, it’s funny. When I met him for the very first time, I saw him get out of this sports car that was basically driven by Hasan Chandu
Manning: You’re talking about the BMW?
Drew: Yes, the BMW. And Obama got out of the car, and I met him and Chandu for the first time. And all I can say is, they were dressed extremely nice, and they were they you know how you can see where like two people are very in tune with each other? And there was an emotional connectness between them that was, I think, unusual. And I remember again, Caroline kind of whispered in my ear that you know, she could see what I was thinking. She basically said, they’re not gay.
Manning: (laughter)
Drew: So but it’s obvious that well, they looked gay.
Manning: (laughter)
Drew: But according to Caroline and apparently Chandu, those reports that he had a girlfriend at the time while he was at Occidental College.
Manning: Where is Chandu now? Do we have any idea?
Drew: Yes. He’s in New York State, and he’s apparently still active in Obama’s life. He was at that Ramadan dinner a couple of months ago, shook hands with Obama, and he’s also been like a $100,000 plus bundler [ph] for Obama’s campaign contributions. Now, Chandu was actually at Obama’s wedding, when Obama married Michelle. So he’s been a you know, he’s been a strong part of Obama’s life [multiple speakers]
Manning: What did you think about what do you think about Obama when he won the Iowa caucus, and then tricked his way through the primaries? What was going on in your mind during those times, and did anyone interview you about your association with him?
Drew: Well, and that’s, to me, has been the frustrating thing about the story, and part of it is that it took me a while.
Manning: Dr. Drew? Dr. Drew? Dr. Drew? Let me just interrupt you for one second. What I’m going to do here, because you’re such an important guest, I want to let everybody know we’re going to forego the news here at the top of the hour, and we’ll pick up the news after we’ve concluded talking with Dr. John Drew, who had the opportunity to meet with Obama while he was a student at Occidental College. Dr. Drew, who graduated from Cornell, and who is now a consultant living in Laguna Niguel, California, is speaking to us today here on the Manning Report, regarding his relationship his observations of Obama, the young Obama, who was a sophomore at the Occidental College experience in California.
We’re going to forego our news break at this time, and hang onto these very meaningful words that and insight into the life of Obama when he was just a youth.
So, Dr. Drew, you now have the microphone again. Tell us more about what you thought about him, now that he’s now running he’s graduated from Harvard, he transferred to Columbia. I’d like to know what you think about those two things. And now he’s president of the Harvard Law Review, and allegedly the President of the United States. How do you figure all that? What does that mean to you?
Drew: Well, this is actually very significant, politically and theoretically. And the larger issue is, why did my story about my connection to Barack Obama and my observations on his ideology you know, why wasn’t why didn’t that leak out in 2008, when it might have had an impact on the Presidential campaign, and why has it hit the news now, in, what, February of 2010?
And my part, what I can say is, I it didn’t I didn’t realize that Barack Obama as a senator was the same young man that I had met at Occidental College for a long time, because I thought of Senator Obama as a graduate of Harvard and Columbia. And it was only late in the season that I heard that he he didn’t spend all four years at Columbia. In fact, he had had two years, freshman year and sophomore year, at Occidental, and then he was at Columbia.
So then I had this flash of insight, that the young man I had met was the same guy. And [multiple speakers]
Manning: Did he appear to be a diligent student? One that is quite conscientious about superior grades, and channeling those grades into a mega career? Is that how he appeared to you? Drew:
[? ], you know, I get this question a lot. And again, I have to say, not at all. I the young Obama I met was primarily interested in parties, in having a good time. And he did not strike me as a above average student.
Manning: Now, let me just ask to stop you right there now, and I please hold your thoughts. I don’t want to interrupt your flow of thoughts.
Drew: No, that’s all right.
Manning: A young man interested in parties, but you saw him with no female associations. I mean, you’re young, you party, you party with young girls. I mean, you don’t you don’t think to pop over by yourself.
Drew: (laughter) Well, they liked him. He and Hasan had a big house in Eagle Rock, California, and I my understanding is, Hasan spent a lot of money on the booze and the marijuana, and it was a very attractive living arrangement at the time.
And I as I said, I went to a party there. I went to one of the parties, but apparently there were multiple parties. And the party I went to, I didn’t see Obama with a girl at all the whole time. So that’s all I can report. Buthe
Manning: What was his what was his clothing what was his attire like? Was it regular student kind of bumming around as a student? Or was he sort of well heeled?
Drew: No, no, no. He looked kind of like a fashion model at the time. It seemed like he had very quality leather jacket, high quality shirt, high quality slacks I mean, he just he looked like a young millionaire, both times I saw him.
It never occurred to Prof. Drew that Obama was African-American and actually struck him as “kind of like a wealthy white guy…”
Having grown up in Hawaii and attended public schools there, my education experience is very dissimilar to that of Obama. The average kid in Hawaii, when asked, will tell you Punahou “is the school for rich haoles” (Caucasians). Graduates of Punahou are groomed for higher education but attendance alone signifies elitism. Michelle Wi, also from Punahou, enjoyed golf activities and lessons at exclusive clubs and courses, something the muni set would not have access to. I imagine it was at Punahou that Obama fell in love with golfing. His grandmother was vice-president of Bank of Hawaii and no doubt could afford to send her live-in grandson to the most expensive “prep” school on Oahu.
His attendance at Punahou raised the first red flags for me. But one red flag after the next filled me with fear as I learned of his associations with radicals like Bill Ayers and Rashid Khalidi. I wondered, “Doesn’t anyone else see this?” It’s Columbia that invited Ahmadinejad to speak; it’s Columbia that has radical professors like Khalidi, former spokesperson for the PLO. It’s Columbia where Obama claims to have been during the years 1981-83 but no records are released and no proof. I mean, no proof that he was ever there.
Dr. Manning saw this, too, and through divine guidance was told the answers would lie within the walls of Columbia. On the final day of the trial he marched with an assorted group of people seven times around the University, and like the walls of Jericho falling, so did Columbia and the truth spilled out revealing secrets that stayed hidden for more than forty years.”
Source:
Note: What follows are pertinent excerpts from a blog post that I drafted on April 19, 2009 that revealed that a key witness in a fraud case regarding then Senator Obama’s passport was fatally shot in 2008, which I believe relates to this issue-You Decide:
Question: What happens to those individuals that may reveal negative information relating to President Obama’s eligibility?
This Washington Post article revealed that Lieutenant Q. Harris Jr., who was a key witness in a federal probe after he told federal authorities that a U.S. Department of State employee had improperly accessed passport information for presidential candidates Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton, Barack Obama and John McCain, which resulted in a series of firings that reached into the agency’s top ranks, was fatally shot-You Decide:
Key witness in passport fraud case fatally shot-Posted on The Washington Times-On April 19, 2008:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/apr/19/key-witness-in-passport-fraud-case-fatally-shot/
These are pertinent excerpts from this article:
“A key witness in a federal probe into passport information stolen from the State Department was fatally shot in front of a District church, the Metropolitan Police Department said yesterday.
Lt. Quarles Harris Jr., 24, who had been cooperating with federal investigators, was found late Thursday night slumped dead inside a car, in front of the Judah House Praise Baptist Church in Northeast, said Cmdr. Michael Anzallo, head of the department’s Criminal Investigations Division.
Cmdr. Anzallo said a police officer was patrolling the neighborhood when gunshots were heard, then Lt. Harris was found dead inside the vehicle, which investigators would describe only as a blue car.
Emergency medics pronounced him dead at the scene.
City police said they do not know whether his death was a direct result of his cooperation with federal investigators.
“We don’t have any information right now that connects his murder to that case,” Cmdr. Anzallo said.
Police say a “shot spotter” device helped an officer locate Lt. Harris.
A State Department spokeswoman yesterday declined to comment, saying the investigation into the passport fraud is ongoing.
The Washington Times reported April 5 that contractors for the State Department had improperly accessed passport information for presidential candidates Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton, Barack Obama and John McCain, which resulted in a series of firings that reached into the agency’s top ranks.
One agency employee, who was not identified in documents filed in U.S. District Court, was implicated in a credit-card fraud scheme after Lt. Harris told federal authorities he obtained “passport information from a co-conspirator who works for the U.S. Department of State.”
Note: This was another Washington Post article that relates to this issue-You Decide:
State Warns Passport Applicants Of Danger of Credit Card Fraud-Posted on The Washington Post- By Glenn Kessler-On October 31, 2008:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/30/AR2008103004716.html
These are pertinent excerpts from this article:
“The State Department has notified approximately 400 passport applicants in the D.C. area of a breach in its database security that allowed a ring of thieves to obtain confidential information so they could fraudulently use credit cards stolen from the mail, officials said.
The scheme, involving two major government agencies, came to light months ago through a fluke. On March 25, D.C. police officers on a routine patrol stopped a car on the suspicion that its windows were excessively tinted, an apparent violation of city law. Smelling marijuana, the officers searched the car and discovered that the 24-year-old driver was carrying 21 credit cards not in his name and printouts of eight passport applications—and that four of the names on the passport applications matched the names on four of the credit cards, according to documents filed in U.S. District Court.
Upon his arrest, the driver, Leiutenant Q. Harris Jr., told police that he worked with a co-conspirator who was employed by the State Department and another co-conspirator who worked for the U.S. Postal Service, court documents said. Officers on the scene called American Express about some of the cards in Harris’s possession, and were told that they had recently been used and that a fraud alert had been placed on them.
But the investigation was hampered because Harris was fatally shot while getting into his car in Northeast Washington on April 17, just days after appearing in court on fraud charges and shortly after he agreed to cooperate in the probe.
Florence Fultz, the acting managing director of the State Department’s Passport Services division, urged applicants whose passport files had been breached to “thoroughly review bank and credit card statements and obtain a copy of your personal credit card history,” according to a copy of the letter that was sent out this month. The letter informed recipients that the State Department would provide free credit monitoring for a year and would reimburse out-of-pocket expenses and lost wages resulting from identity theft. The applicant’s passport record would be flagged to issue an alert if another application is made, the letter said.
The criminal investigation has not been completed, but the scam is one more black eye for State’s passport division. Last year, the department greatly underestimated the number of passport applications it would receive and fell behind in processing them, resulting in ruined vacation plans for many Americans. Then, this year, it was discovered that workers repeatedly snooped without authorization inside the electronic passport records of entertainers, athletes and other high-profile Americans—including Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.), John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Barack Obama (D-Ill.).
The 192 million passport files maintained by the State Department contain individuals’ passport applications, which include Social Security numbers, physical descriptions, and names and places of birth of the applicants’ parents—information that is often requested by credit card companies when they activate cards sent through the mail. The files do not contain records of overseas travel or visa stamps from previous passports.
In July, the State Department’s inspector general documented a widespread lack of controls on the personal data of the 127 million Americans who hold passports, finding “a general lack of policies, procedures, guidance and training.”
Fultz, in the letter, said: “We are thoroughly examining every aspect of our information security systems and procedures to safeguard against unauthorized access of passport records.”
The State Department refused to allow any officials to discuss the case on the record, saying it is still under investigation. But in a written statement provided on the condition of anonymity, a spokesman said the department has “undertaken a number of immediate and long-term measures to significantly improve the protection of personally identifiable information to include mandatory audits, an enhanced monitoring list, improved training and a revamped reporting system. In addition, we have formed a working group to develop long-term systems solutions to improve the security of these records such as a tiered access system to all passport records.”
In another statement, the department said that a single State employee was allegedly involved in the fraud and that so far 400 individuals had been identified “whose records may have been accessed by the suspect for illicit purposes.” But, the statement added, “to the best of our knowledge, most of these individuals have not experienced identify theft.”
Officials declined to say how much money was stolen or how many people were involved in the scheme.”
Note: This was an article and/or blog post that revealed that President Elect Obama’s Intelligence Advisor was involved in a security breach in 2008-You Decide:
President-Elect’s Intelligence Advisor Involved in Security Breach!-Posted on The Right Side of Life-By Phil-On January 13, 2009:
http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=2746
These are pertinent excerpts from this article:
“Newsmax.com reported yesterday the following:
Obama’s top terrorism and intelligence adviser, John O. Brennan, heads a firm that was cited in March for breaching sensitive files in the State Department’s passport office, according to a State Department Inspector General’s report released this past July.
The security breach, first reported by the Washington Times and later confirmed by State Department spokesman Sean McCormack, involved a contract employee of Brennan’s firm, The Analysis Corp., which has earned millions of dollars providing intelligence-related consulting services to federal agencies and private companies.
During a State Department briefing on March 21, 2008, McCormack confirmed that the contractor had accessed the passport files of presidential candidates Barack Obama, Hillary Rodham Clinton, and John McCain, and that the inspector general had launched an investigation.
Sources who tracked the investigation tell Newsmax that the main target of the breach was the Obama passport file, and that the contractor accessed the file in order to “cauterize” the records of potentially embarrassing information.
“They looked at the McCain and Clinton files as well to create confusion,” one knowledgeable source told Newsmax. “But this was basically an attempt to cauterize the Obama file.”
At the time of the breach, Brennan was working as an unpaid adviser to the Obama campaign. …
The passport files include “personally identifiable information such as the applicant’s name, gender, social security number, date and place of birth, and passport number,” according to the inspector general report.
The files may contain additional information including “original copies of the associated documents,” the report added. Such documents include birth certificates, naturalization certificates, or oaths of allegiance for U.S.-born persons who adopted the citizenship of a foreign country as minors.
The Obama campaign acknowledged at its “Fight the Smears” Web site [my links here and here] that Obama was a foreign national until the age of 18, by virtue of his father’s British then Kenyan citizenship. …
However, “native citizen” is a colloquialism, not a legal term. It is not the same as “natural-born citizen,” the requirement to be president set out in Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution. …
The State Department chalked up the passport file snooping discovered in March 2008 to “imprudent curiosity” by contract employees hired to help process passport applications.
Asked by reporters during a campaign stop in Portland, Ore., to comment on the breach, Obama said that attempts to “tap into people’s personal records” were “a problem not just for me but for how our government functions.
“I expect a full and thorough investigation. It should be done in conjunction with those congressional committees that have oversight so it’s not simply an internal matter,” he added.
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice phoned Obama and personally apologized for the breach. “I told him that I myself would be very disturbed if I learned that somebody had looked into my passport file,” Rice told reporters. She phoned Clinton and McCain and offered similar apologies. …
The State Department Office of Inspector General (OIG) issued a 104-page report on the breach last July. Although it is stamped “Sensitive but Unclassified,” the report was heavily redacted in the version released to the public, with page after page blacked out entirely.
The problems posed by the breach were so serious that the inspector general recommended that the State Department conduct “vulnerability and risk assessments of all passport systems” to identify security weaknesses and suggest “a timetable for implementing corrective actions.”
Acting Assistant secretary for administration William H. Moser sent a six-page reply concurring with the recommendation, all but one paragraph of which was blacked out because of the sensitivity of the information it contained.
Had Brennan been appointed CIA director, as rumored in the Obama campaign shortly after the election, senators also would have questioned him about an article he wrote in an obscure foreign policy magazine over the summer.
The article, entitled “The Conundrum of Iran: Strengthening Moderates without Acquiescing to Belligerence,” appeared in the July issue of “The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.”
Among other recommendations, it argued that the next U.S. administration should grant political legitimacy to the terrorist organizations Hezbollah and Hamas, and should exercise “strategic patience” with Iran rather than engaging in “bellicose” rhetoric and coercive diplomacy. [emphasis mine]
An interesting site to check out is eyeball-series.org’s research into the National Counterterrorism Center.
Is it possible that there is additional documentation — to include passport information — that points in the direction (especially as emphasized, above) that the President-Elect is not a natural born citizen? Absolutely. However, at this point, we continue to sit in a position of looking at unverified, circumstantial evidence; it’s by no means enough to draw firm conclusions, but it is enough to prove, beyond reasonable doubt, the legitimacy of asking the President-Elect:
Can you prove that you are, in fact, a natural born citizen and subsequently eligible to hold the office of the American presidency?
Update: Jeff has some interesting comments about this, including the following:
From the beginning, this controversy to me has not been about Barack Obama. It’s never been a question of Democrat versus Republican, conservative versus Marxist. It’s been about the Constitution and the guidelines set forth by our founders in Article II, Section 1. It’s been about simple yet unanswered questions as to straightforward and innocuous aspects of the personal history of the man who next week will be the most powerful man in the world. Nothing groundbreaking. Just standard information generally known about high-profile world leaders, especially in this age of technology.
Good on Ken Timmerman and Newsmax for picking up on the story and bringing it out again at such an appropriate time. I had known about the breach–and may have written about it here a few months ago–but did not know that an Obama surrogate was there in the background. I may be a skeptic by nature, and I still may be unsure about the conspiratorial aspects of many of the claims put forth by Philip Berg and Leo Donofrio and Orly Taitz and others, but this just seems a little too convenient, even for me.
I know I saw a Drudge headline on this back in the beginning of 2008; a cursory search of his archives turned up nothing.
·Phil”
End of My Blog Post of April 19, 2009.
Note: My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
Why did a black preacher from Harlem have a “hit” placed on his life?
CIA Columbia Obama Cover Up!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/28/cia-columbia-obama-cover-up/
What we haven’t been told about the President’s background!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/03/what-we-haven’t-been-told-about-the-president’s-background/
The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetrated-in-american-history/
Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?
Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial. Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide:
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/23/what-happened-to-free-speech/
“Food For Thought”
God Bless the U.S.A.!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related
Semper Fi!
Jake
The Fluke contraception controversy is democrat inspired. It is yet another example of democrats promoting and trying to force all Americans to “fund” behavior many Americans would consider to be sinful. We taxpayers are minding our own business. We are, for the most part, passively ignoring America's cultural rot. But our passiveness is not enough for the democrats. They demand that we “fund” behaviors which are in conflict with the principles,values and faith of many Americans. Forty million Americans are Christians.
Ms Fluke, Americans do not care how many out-of-wedlock sexual encounters you may have. But, when you go before congress in an attempt to demonize us for not funding your activities, you are infringing on our freedom; forcing your values down our throats.
You guys on the left are “always” the aggressors. When we say “no”, your media machine attempts to portray us as the aggressive bad guys.
Also, am I weird or old-fashion for thinking it a bit shameful for a woman to go before congressional committee to basically say, I sleep around a lot and demand that taxpayers pay for my birth-control? Fluke is another prime example of how nothing is shameful any more, which is in-keeping with the Moral Relativity philosophy taught in colleges. Moral Relativity in a nut shell says nothing is right or wrong and no one has a right to judge the morality of anything.
Think about this folks. We have TV talk shows themed on finding the father of a unmarried pregnant woman's baby. The exploitative TV host tries to sound passionate. Today we have poor pregnant Sherri who has slept with 27 guys. We have brought all 27 of these scumbags on the show to discover through DNA testing who is the daddy.
Good Lord, remember when an unmarried woman was ashamed of being pregnant by her one boyfriend? Today, women who have fornicated with every male within a ten block radius of their home go on national TV and are celebrated as victims.
Ms Fluke, sleep around with whomever you please. Christians and most Americans defend your right to do so. However, the line in the sand is when you and your democrat enablers demand that we taxpayers pay for your sexual encounters.
Lloyd Marcus, Proud Unhyphenated American
WE SHOULD GET THE HELL OUT OF AFGHANISTAN TOMORROW. WE CAN NOT WIN THAT WAR. THE DEMOCRATS KNOW IT BUT THEY LIKE TO SPEND YOUR MONEY. DO LIKE RON PAUL SAID BRING HOME ALL OUR TROOPS AND THERE FAMILYS FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD. WE ARE NO LONGER THE WORLDS POLICE MEN.
We mourne Andrew Breitbart’s death. He was only forty-three, and a good servant. For some reason, I’ve been spared. I count my blessings. I should have died a long time back. I received a bigger than life calling. By understanding the mechanics of creation, we better understand our existence. It is essentially this that drives the cutting edge of science.
Science has a working machine that cost over a billion dollars, the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), an atom smasher so powerful science hopes to isolate the theoretical Higgs boson, the one indivisible particle in the universe from which every “thing” springs.
From a theorized indivisible particle comes super-novas, the greatest releases of energy in the universe. From super-novas comes the dust that creates the universe we know, including life. “And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and man became a living soul” (Genesis 2:7). Surely, there is order in the universe.
God had already said, “Let us make man in our image (Genesis 1:26)…. So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female, created he them” (Genesis 1:27). God didn’t write that. Someone before man wrote that, right? Surely you don’t believe man is the only intelligent life in the universe.
It is odd that man is the only life on the planet with the gift of reason and logic, and with this blessing don’t appear to know as much as animals. There can be only one answer. Animals do what comes natural. Man has replaced God with himself. We don’t act like animals. In the interest of peace, we let predators take our lives. Is that reasonable, or logical? Are we using the blessings God gave us? I don’t think so.
Numerologists say that God geometrizes. God created the smallest particle and from that created man. Man is given the symbol “1”, the pioneer, all alone, seeking an identity. Having identified himself, notwithstanding the law as American judges see it in several states, he seeks a female mate. She is given the symbol “2”. Together, man and woman become diversified. Numerology gives this the number “3”. These numbers identify the cycles of development. The highest number, the number “9”, is identified as selflessness. We begin with a self and end selfless, if we follow our path destiny, according to numerology. Were we consciously aware of all of this, it would be of immense help.
Before there is any “thing,” there is consciousness, since a “thing” can’t be everywhere at the same time. God is not to be personified, other than internal. This is our problem. We have personified an external god, which can only be a man.
The soul is defined as one’s immaterial essence, one’s animating principle, one’s actuating cause of life. What happens when we die? The soul and universal consciousness have no beginning or end. Who is this god who judges us when we die, and determines whether we go to heaven or a place of eternal torment? We have many choices. We don’t really know who is going to heaven and who is going to hell, in fact, if the whole thing isn’t trumped up to scare us into some arcane belief, actually some superstition.
Some believe that the Muslims who flew the airliners into the World Trade Center went to Paradise; everyone who didn’t accept Islam went to hell.
By the way, those blessed for what they did were socialist in their political philosophy. To those folks, Jesus was a socialist. But atheists, who are socialist, want to remove the steel wreckage at the World Trade Center exhibits that looks like a cross. They believe man is god, and their belief should be forced on everyone, not one grain of difference, actually, in Islam’s theology. How dare they! As for me, a non-religious person, I say that the cross at the World Trade Center is an emblem of faith in humanity, and not without good reason—that those innocents who lost their lives at the World Trade Center, died for the same reason Jesus died, and stand as a symbol of Jesus’ love.
Some people say Mormans are not Christian, admitting though, that they accept Jesus as their savior. So what do Christians have to offer that is so great? I was a born-in-sin Christian. I don't believe that. Why should we be born to feel guilty? It is a way to control us. So what does Obama do? He sticks his finger in Christianity's eye. He wants to control us. Obama says Jesus was for "collective salvation."
In The Gospel According to St. Matthew, and in great detail in my book of memoirs, In Earth as It Is in Heaven 2012, I write about what the ancients all the way to the cutting edge of science have shown as the mechanics of the universe, and from that what we can expect in the future.
Who’s gonna pay for Viagra for men or tampons, pads, and pantiliners for women? Taxpayers of course if Obama gets his way! Everything goes on our tab – including Obama’s fetish for Green Things and “God’s Country.”
We paid billions for those lousy “green companies” that didn’t create jobs yet they padded the pockets of the criminal scum. By the way another green company (Abound Solar) is hitting the dust laying off employees and taxpayers are about to lose 400 million dollars more.
They hit us for a debt ceiling increase, promising to reimburse us for that costly expense. What did we get – higher inflation, higher gas prices and a note from Congress saying poor ole Fannie’s financially strapped again due too many bonuses, too many incompetent CEO’s and back yard junk dogs. Fannie needs a little hand up amounting to the tune of 6.4 billion dollars.
No doubt we are our brother’s and sisters keeper, but there comes a point in time that little brother and little sister need to step up to the bat. Obama and DEMS say little sister wants “The Morning After Pill” so she can play around at night. I say, she can give up a couple of cokes, a bag of chips and buy it herself or if that doesn’t suit she can opt for abstinence. There comes a time that Americans must revert to “Tough Love.”
Congress treads on our freedoms and rights again – just like the Supreme Court they choose to rewrite the laws of our Nation. The Obamacare mandate forces contraception coverage on Religious Institutions who morally don’t believe in it. So Obama did a little soft shoe and pulled another skunk out of his hat.
He just sort of rewrote the mandate, bypassing the Religious Institutions and throwing the costly responsibility of contraceptives to the insurance companies. He ignored our religious beliefs and rights jamming the mandate down our throats insisting that insurance companies would have to offer the contraceptives. Guess who will foot this bill – it darn sure isn’t the insurance companies?
Today a bill was nixed by Congress that would have allowed insurers to opt out of providing contraceptive coverage if employers had religious or moral objections. Once again Congress thumbed their noses at us and stomped on our Constitution.
There’s a lesson here that all Americans need to learn. A quote from Ronald Reagan, "The problem is not that people are taxed too little, the problem is that government spends too much. To sit back hoping that someday, some way, someone will make things right is to go on feeding the crocodile, hoping he will eat you last – but eat you he will."
I say, “Let’s quit feeding the crocodiles and send them back to the Zoos from whence they came.” It’s time to “Take Back Our Country America.”
May God Bless America
As Always,
Little Tboca
IS THIS TO BE OUR OBITUARY:
THE USA
Born-1776 ~ Died-2012
Gives cause for a double-take, doesn't it! Could this be the demise of our nation? If we take
consideration of previous study done by the Scottish History Professor, Alexander Tyler in
1887, at the University of Edinburgh, about the fall of the Athenian Republic some 2000
years prior: “A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent
form of government. A democracy will continue to thrive up until the voters discover that they
can vote themselves generous gifts from the tax coffer's. From that moment on, the majority
always votes for the candidates who promise the most benefit from the public treasury, with
the result that every democracy finally collapses because of loose fiscal policy, (which is)
always followed by a dictatorship.”
“The average age of the world's great civilizations from the beginning of history, has been
about 200 years. During those years, these nations have always progressed through the
following sequence:
From bondage to spiritual faith;
From spiritual faith to great courage;
From courage to liberty;
From liberty to abundance;
From abundance to complacency;
From complacency to apathy;
From apathy to dependence;
From dependance back into bondage.”
In a more recent study performed by Professor Joseph Olson of Hamline Unversity-School of
Law in St. Paul, Minnesota, the professor revealed some very interesting facts concerning the
last Presidential election of November 2008:
1] Number of States won by candidates: Obama_19 McCain_29
2] Square miles of land won by: Obama: 580,000 Sq.M. McCain: 2,427,000 Sq M.
3] Population of counties won by: Obama: 127million McCain: 143million
4] murder rate per 100,000 pop. In counties: Obama: 13.2% McCain: 2.1%
Professor Olson concludes: “In aggregate, the map of territory, which McCain won was mostly
the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of the country. Obama's territory won mostly encompasses
those citizens, living in low income tenements and living off various forms of government welfare.”
From this conclusion, Olsen believes the United States is now somewhere between 'complacency
and apathy'phase of Professor Tyler's definition of democracy, with some forty per cent (40%) of
the nations population already having reached the 'governmental dependency' phase!
If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million criminal invaders, called 'illegal's'-
and they vote- the we can say good-bye to the USA, as we presently know it, in fewer than five
years!
Now, it is not quite over yet, so don't go 'freaking out' and screamin the end has come. Just take
a moment to remember this quote from Sir Winston Churchill: “Those who fail to learn from
history are doomed to repeat it.” So get a grip on your place in history and understand that we
are here, because our forefather's were GODLY People, who had faith to believe GOD's WORD,
and they knew that when they dedicated this land to be a Republic of Freed Men, who would be
able to continue to develop a nation that would follow the principle's of GOD! And when things
began to continue to degenerate into rebellion and lawlessness, that there would always be a
remnant that remembered how to pray; and that these same people, 'We-the-People' would begin
to gather all the People, who continue choose freedom, asking them to: “ Repent for the sins of
our nation, and ask GOD to forgive us, and continue standing in faith, as GOD hear our collective
prayers, and heals our land”; according to {2 Chron.7:14}!
Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison,
Senator John Cornyn,
Texas
It is imperative that you read and try to understand the significance of the subject matter this email addresses. I did not include Congressman Cuellar for obvious reasons, I know you understand. I want to address the ill-conceived proposal that our soldiers be put on trial by NATO for an innocent mistake they had no reason to know they were making, they are soldiers not diplomats. A mistake that no sane person would hold against them. Muslims have been burning Bibles for hundreds of years. I am Christian and I never considered murdering one of them as they have done to Christians and our soldiers. Please ask yourself and your peers what the hell has happened to this government? Is there any common sense, Honor or Dignity left anywhere in Washington DC?
Allowing such an action to advance any further than it already has, isn't simply ill-conceived, it is one of the highest forms of treason and betrayal one could commit. I am absolutely convinced I am supported by most Americans when I tell you, any individual in favor of this action is not welcome in the United States of America. This applies to the President as well as Congress.
Please don't tell me there are things I do not understand, I've heard that one too many times and it simply doesn't hold water. I have dealt with Islamic types both enemy and "friendly" day in and day out for months as a part of my duties. Though I no longer have close contact with them, I am comfortable saying, that there may be some things you do not understand as well.
Every citizen of this country knows, with no doubt whatsoever, that if one of these soldiers happened to be a Senator's or Congressman's son or daughter no mention of any trial of any kind would have ever been mentioned. These soldiers are our people, they are American citizens. Americans, true Americans, would never allow this injustice to take place. You may think I am indicating that any representative supporting this "mockery of justice" is not a true American. If you are, rest assured you are absolutely correct.
If you were being Honest when you took an oath to our Constitution you will see, to the best of your ability, that these soldiers are freed and Honored for their service by those who had any part in this insanity.
Respectfully,
Art Phillips
Constituent who voted for both of you, donated to your elections and is waiting for you to earn some of that support.
The claim that the United States is a secular nation is simply a straw man argument. Our nation was founded by God-fearing people—the evidence for which is simply overwhelming—who were not at all timid about their reliance on a Supreme Being by any name in their actions. Some were Deists (belief in a superior power–God in any guise), most were members of established orthodox churches in the colonies, and some were in fact Christian. It is accurate to say that the Judeo-Christian worldview was the foundation on which the founders built our republic. It was written into the Declaration of Independence. All of them cited God (or equivalent) in their admonitions for our budding nation. Our founders, to a man, were in essential agreement.
“It is the duty of all men in society, publicly, and at stated seasons, to worship the Supreme Being, the great Creator and Preserver of the universe. And no subject shall be hurt, molested, or restrained, in his person, liberty, or estate, for worshipping God in the manner most agreeable to the dictates of his own conscience; or for his religious profession or sentiments; provided he doth not disturb the public peace, or obstruct others in their religious worship.” –John Adams, Thoughts on Government, 1776. And this from James Madison, ‘The Father of Our Constitution’: ”We have staked the whole of all our political Institutions upon the capacity of mankind for Self-government, upon the capacity of each and all of us to govern ourselves, to control ourselves, to sustain ourselves according to The Ten Commandments of God.” This is the essential Christian worldview.
You want legal precedent? A Supreme Court ruling (1892) that “this is a Christian nation,” was followed again in 1931 with “we are a Christian people.” Indisputable.
The founders did not want freedom from religion, they wanted freedom of religion. What they were vehement about was that government was not to interfere in religion. They all stipulated that God (by any name) was part and parcel of our founding and did not feel the need to expound incessantly on the subject. This is clear in the Declaration, the Constitution, the Federalist (and Anti-Federalist) Papers, and in countless documents from the Magna Carta through and beyond the Mayflower Compact.
Those who claim that our nation does not have God (by any name) in our initial makeup are flat wrong, so why suffer the argument? Some may wish to consider a ‘living Constitution,’ but they may not alter the events leading up to its writing (recorded history) and inherent in it. If they wish to change the Constitution to ‘make it more relevant,’ the mechanism was built in by the writers: amendment. Go at it, I say, but don’t allow God-denying people to lead the charge because, (and this is important)—they are not qualified to do so because they refuse to accept the initial premise. Only those who understand the thoughts and words of our founders (even if they do not agree with them) are qualified to interpret what they meant. God may be currently out of vogue, but that does not alter history. We are not a secular nation because God is in its DNA.
Nor is it in the purview of the courts to remove God from the mix. Jefferson worried that the courts would overstep their authority and instead of interpreting the law would begin making law an oligarchy—the rule of few over many.
The body that is charged with interpreting it (our Supreme Court) cannot interpret and rule on a Constitution that it doesn’t accept in its entirety. It’s impossible—doing so is clearly unconstitutional.
Interpretation requires understanding the bases and meaning of the words themselves, not to mention the intent. The Constitution was written for a God-fearing nation, clearly evident in the writings of the founders. All of them.
So. Why would words such as “In God We Trust” be eliminated from government documents? Does eliminating them eliminate the presence of God in the very foundations of our nation? Does eliminating “under God” from the Pledge nullify God? Does pretending that God was not a factor in our founding take God out of the equation? Does trying to prove that God does not exist (an impossible task) change the facts? No to all. Pretending that our nation was not founded on a Judeo-Christian worldview does not make it so.
This is not meant to be anti-Muslim or anti-anything. It is simply a fact that cannot be changed, and trying to change it is simply anti-American and unethical. This does not suggest that Christians are superior to anyone else, or that anyone else has fewer rights than Christians. It is simply historic fact—the way it is. History cannot be changed, even by amendment. There’s no denying that what happened, happened, for whatever reason. History is immutable. Live with it. Amen.
The eye of the storm is near!
Posted on WND.com-March 1, 2012:
“NOTE: In case you missed the news conference of Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s “Cold Case Posse,” WND plans to have the entire event available in 15-minute increments beginning Friday morning at this online location.
PHOENIX – An investigative “Cold Case Posse” launched six months ago by “America’s toughest sheriff” – Joe Arpaio of Arizona’s Maricopa County – has concluded there is probable cause that the document released by the White House last year as President Obama’s birth certificate is a computer-generated forgery.
The investigative team has asked Arpaio, who is at a news conference in Phoenix live-streamed by WND TV that began at 3 p.m. Eastern time, to elevate the investigation to a criminal probe that will make available the resources of his Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office.
The posse says it has identified at least one person of interest in the alleged forgery of Obama’s birth certificate.
Arapaio, known for his strict enforcement of immigration laws, commissioned the investigative team after local citizens presented him with a petition expressing concern that Obama might not be eligible for Arizona’s presidential ballot.
In addition to the live-streaming, WND is making available to the public a report distributed to media today by Arpaio’s investigators.
GET A FREE COPY OF THE ARPAIO REPORT THAT WAS DISTRIBUTED TO PRESS TODAY
The posse, comprised of former law enforcement officers and lawyers with law enforcement experience, has interviewed dozens of witnesses and examined hundreds of documents. It also has taken numerous sworn statements from witnesses around the world.
Mike Zullo, Arpaio’s lead investigator, said his team believes the Hawaii Department of Health has engaged in a systematic effort to hide from public inspection any original 1961 birth records it may have in its possession.
“Officers of the Hawaii Department of Health and various elected Hawaiian public officials may have intentionally obscured 1961 birth records and procedures to avoid having to release to public inspection and to the examination of court-authorized forensic examiners any original Obama 1961 birth records the Hawaii Department of Health may or may not have,” Zullo said.
The investigators say the evidence contained in the computer-generated PDF file released by the White House as well as important deficiencies in the Hawaii process of certifying the long-form birth certificate establish probable cause that a forgery has been committed.
The investigation was launched after 250 members of the Surprise, Ariz., Tea Party, presented a signed petition to Arpaio in August 2011 asking him to undertake the investigation.
The Tea Party members petitioned under the premise that if a forged birth certificate was used to place Barack Obama on the 2012 Arizona presidential ballot, their rights as Maricopa County voters could be compromised.
Arpaio believes a congressional investigation might be warranted and has asked that any information relevant to the investigation held by other law enforcement agencies be forwarded to his office.
The Cold Case Posse advised Arpaio that they believe forgers committed two crimes. First, they say it appears the White House fraudulently created a forgery that it characterized as an officially produced governmental birth record. Second, the White House fraudulently presented to the residents of Maricopa County and to the American public at large a forgery represented as “proof positive” of President Obama’s authentic 1961 Hawaii long-form birth certificate.
“A continuing investigation is needed to identify the identity of the person or persons involved in creating the alleged birth certificate forgery and to determine who, if anyone, in the White House or the state of Hawaii may have authorized the forgery,” Arpaio said.
Among the evidence released at the press conference are five videos – which can be seen at the end of this article – to demonstrate why the Obama long-form birth certificate is suspected to be a computer-generated forgery.
The videos consist of step-by-step computer demonstrations using a control document. They display the testing used by the investigators to examine various claims made by supporters of the April 27 document.
The investigators contend the videos illustrate their conclusion that the features and anomalies observed on the Obama long-form birth certificate were inconsistent with features produced when a paper document is scanned, even if the scan is enhanced by Optical Character Recognition, OCR, and optimized.
Additionally, the posse says, the videos demonstrate that the Hawaii Department of Health Registrar’s name stamp and the registrar’s date stamp were computer-generated images imported into an electronic document, as opposed to rubber stamp imprints inked by hand or machine onto a paper document.
“That we were able to cast reasonable suspicions on the authenticity of the registrar stamps was especially disturbing, since these stamp imprints are designed to provide government authentication to the document itself,” Zullo said, emphasizing that if the registrar stamps are forgeries, the document itself is likely a forgery.
The investigators also chronicled a series of allegedly inconsistent and misleading representations that various Hawaii government officials have made over the past five years regarding any original birth records held by the Hawaii Department of Health.
“As I said at the beginning of the investigation, the president can put all this to rest quite easily,” Arpaio said. “All he has to do is demand the Hawaii Department of Health release to the American public and to a panel of certified court-authorized forensic examiners all original 1961 paper, microfilm and computer birth records the Hawaii Department of Health has in its possession.”
Arpaio emphasized that the Hawaii Department of Health needs to provide, as part of the full disclosure, evidence regarding the chain of custody of all Obama birth records, including paper, microfilm and electronic records to eliminate the possibility that a forger or forgers may have tampered with the birth records.
The sheriff said the president should also authorize Honolulu’s Kapi’olani Hospital, the birth hospital listed on the Obama long-form birth certificate, to release any hospital patient records for Stanley Ann Dunham Obama, his mother, and for the newly born Barack Obama, to provide corroboration for the records held in the Hawaii Department of Health vault.
“Absent the authentic Hawaii Department of Health 1961 birth records for Barack Obama, there is no other credible proof supporting the idea or belief that President Barack Obama was born in Hawaii, as he and the White House have consistently asserted,” Zullo said.
“In fact, absent the authentication of Hawaii Department of Health 1961 birth records for Barack Obama, there is no other proof he was born anywhere within the United States.”
In addition, investigators say they have developed credible evidence that President Obama’s Selective Service card was a forgery, based on an examination of the postal date stamp on the document. Also, records of Immigration and Naturalization Service cards filled out by passengers arriving on international flights originating outside the United States in the month of August 1961, examined at the National Archives in Washington, D.C., are missing records for the week of President Obama’s birth.
Videos connected to the investigation:
1. Introduction – Regular Scan:
{…}
2. Layers, Stamp & Noise
{…}
3. OCR Theory
{…}
4. Optimization
{…}
5. Conclusion
{…}
6. Selective Service
{…}
Source:
http://www.wnd.com/2012/03/sheriff-joes-posse-probable-cause-obama-certificate-a-fraud/
Note: The following articles and/or blog posts relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
I. Sheriff Arpaio: Obama birth certificate a ‘forgery!’-Posted on The Washington Times-By Stephen Dinan, The Washington Times-On March 1, 2012:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/mar/1/sheriff-arpaio-obama-birth-certificate-forgery/
II. Media Releases on Obama Birth Fraud!-Posted on Obama Ballot Challenge-By GeorgeM-On March 1, 2012:
http://obamaballotchallenge.com/media-releases-on-obama-birth-fraud
III. VITAL RECORDS INDICATE OBAMA NOT BORN IN HAWAII HOSPITAL! (Part 1)-Posted on The Daily Pen-By by Penbrook Johannson of THE DAILY PEN-On February 9, 2012:
http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/2012/02/vital-records-indicate-obama-not-born.html
IV. VITAL RECORDS INDICATE OBAMA NOT BORN IN HAWAII HOSPITAL! (Part 2)-Posted on The Daily Pen-By Penbrook Johannson and Dan Crosby of THE DAILY PEN-On February 29, 2012:
http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/2012/02/vital-records-indicate-obama-not-born_29.html
Note: Americans are waking up!
Americans across the country are starting to wake up to the fact that President Obama is constitutionally ineligible to hold the office of President, as substantiated by his newly released long-form Certificate of Live Birth, which shows that his father was in fact born in Kenya in 1936. At the time, Kenya was a British colony. Therefore Obama Senior was a British subject by birth (due to the fact that he was born within British-controlled territory). When President Obama was born in 1961, he acquired British nationality by descent, because his father was a British subject by birth. When Kenya gained its independence from Great Britain in 1963, President Obama became a citizen of the newly-formed nation.
Sources:
http://www.wnd.com/2011/12/375625/#f2cd597738
http://constitutionalreset.ning.com/video/atty-dr-herb-titus-obama-not-a-natural-born-citizen
http://people.mags.net/tonchen/birthers.htm
http://obamaballotchallenge.com/natural-born-citizenship-and-history-timeline
Additionally, Several new organizations, to include active websites, were established to educate and mobilize the American public on the significance of “natural born Citizen” and the 2012 Election, along with an initiative to assist ordinary registered voting citizens wishing to challenge President Obama’s constitutional eligibility and name placement on their state’s 2012 primary presidential ballot. The team that established and maintains this website is currently compiling election laws from all 50 states and in the near future will be providing forms, along with sample letters that registered voters can use to file a complaint. Also included is pertinent information regarding those lawsuits and/or complaints that have been filed by state, to include my own.
Sources:
http://obamaballotchallenge.com/superpac-founder-explains-mission-of-natural-born-citizen-pac
http://obamaballotchallenge.com/obama-ballot-challenge-founder-interviewed-by-post-email
http://obamaballotchallenge.com/retired-marine-captain-files-obama-ballot-challenge-in-new-mexico
Word of Caution: Although its great that many Americans are now beginning to wake up and are actively taking some action to have President Obama taken off the 2012 Presidential Election Ballots we need to keep in mind that those individuals with unlimited sources and/or resources, to include the deep pockets of anti-American George Soros, our own local and national elected officials and others, with the help of the MSM, who have spent years planning and successively perpetrating what I now believe could be the greatest fraud in American history are not going to go down without a fight and thus, as a result, I also believe that now more than ever we need to stick together as Americans (it's no longer Democrat or Republican) at this crucial time when our country and/or Republic needs us more than ever to see this thru. A Republic for which so many Americans have and continue to give their all to uphold and defend.
So the question is: Are you going to be part of the problem by continuing to keep your head in the sand hoping this issue goes away by itself or are you going to be part of the solution by stepping up to the plate and doing what ever it takes to uphold and defend our Republic before its too late?-You Decide.
Continue Reading:
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetrated-in-american-history/
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/04/29/could-the-president’s-newly-released-colb-be-a-forgery/
“Food For Thought”
God Bless Sheriff Arpaio & His Posse-God Bless the U.S.A.!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related
Semper Fi!
Jake
What is anyones opinion on BSL. Im currently a Pit Bull Mommy and a very responsible one at that, and Im hearing and reading more about this breed specific legislation and saw video and photos of what happened in Denver, It broke my heart. Im generally not an outspoken person, but the day comes that anyones comes and tries to take my dog from me will be a cold day in hell. I thought I lived in a free country where because of irresponsible, uncaring dog owners, I have to pay for their wrong doing and lose someone thats as big and important part of my life as my children......
I just saw the Tea party command center as I'm a Christian Conservative who lives in liberal leftist NYC many years, a corrupt cursed city only nice to visit and hoping to leave at the right time.
As my degree is in political science Obama is TRAPPED in 2-3 areas. one is his aid to millions of illegal aliens which most voters want expelled and the other area is his phoney health care he forced on most voters that now hate Obama as a fraud. any comments by e-mail to me at
eric tortoise112002@yahoo.com
LARGEST DEBET IN THE HISTORY OF THIS ONCE GREAT COUNTRY, OVER TWENTY MILLION PEOPLE OUT OF WORK OR HAVE GIVEN UP LOOKING FOR WORK, THE GAS PRICES HAVE DOUBLED. WE OWE MORE THAN WE CAN EVER PAY CHINA. THE DEMOCRATS TELL US WAIT TO SEE WHAT WE WILL DO TO YOU IN THE NEXT FOUR YEARS. YO FOOLS YOU WILL BE SOCIALISTS. PLEASE DO NOT LET THIS HAPPEN. VOTE WITH YOUR HEART VOTE REPUBLICAN THIS FALL. GOD BLESS ALL OF YOU.