All Posts (28831)

Sort by

Khalid Sheik Mohammed who planned 9/11 is an American who attended college at North Carolina A&T. He was Radicalized while in college at North Carolina A&T. Prior to that he would have been considered "moderate". Khalid Sheik Mohammed ..... aka KSM is "NOT" an Arab. He is an African American. It appears many of the so called Muslums in USA are African American.
, So we have home grown American Muslums, who for the most part are African Americans.
Now we have an African American President who is African American who radicalized with hate for his country.
Obama could be a Serial Killer and the African Americans would vote for him just because he is 1/2 black. This is really pathetic on the part of American African Americans. They see no shame is their 95% suport of Obama.
They will never gain respect nor self respect till they wake up and denounce Obama for the Radical that he is.
I would support any African American who is President as long as he is a principled and devout American.

This is an American tragedy.
I balme it soley on the Democrats who have held the African Americans down and kept them in Gheto for all the years with no hope. Only to bring them out and offer them a beer on election day so they would come out and vote Democratic and then put them back into the ghettos. The really sad thing is this is true.
The Blacks have alway sbeen where the Democrats could "control them". a) either is gehttos or b) now in government jobs. Both let Dems control their lives.
African Americans deserve more than this. They deserve the opportunity that everyone has.

Read more…

Posted on The Post & Email-By Sharon Rondeau-On May 3, 2011:

“(May 3, 2011) — A report which is quickly gaining traction on the web suggests that Obama did not want to take out Osama bin Laden but was overridden by senior military commanders who ordered Navy Seals to carry out the successful operation.

Several reports lead back to Ulsterman, a writer claiming to have direct contact with a White House insider who has been revealing the machinations of the Obama regime and discord among senior executive branch officials.  Ulsterman’s report of May 2, 2011 indicated that Obama and his adviser, Valerie Jarrett, did not want the military to kill Osama bin Laden and that Obama did not issue the order to do so.

Before Obama revealed an image purported to be a certified copy of his original birth certificate from Hawaii on April 27, Ulsterman had covered the eligibility question and other issues such as Obama’s Marxist background.  Media sourcesconcede that those who doubted Obama’s eligibility might still not be convinced because of questions surrounding his possible Indonesian citizenship and the need for authentication of the image released last Wednesday.

Mainstream editorials masquerading as news reports say that Obama “had ordered a successful mission to kill Osama bin Laden” that “was a political coup that will yield him benefits for months, perhaps years, to come.”  They state that Obama gave the order which resulted in bin Laden’s death.  A third report stated that “According to administration officials, the president took an increasingly hands-on role during the past two months – chairing nearly a half dozen national security meetings – as U.S. forces inched closer to launching the mission. Obama said that he authorized the operation last week, and gave the final orders Sunday.”

One report states that Obama was golfing but cut short his usual 18-hole session to return to the White House for a final meeting.  Was he summoned by senior military members, or did he head the meeting?  Why did he walk into the Oval Office in golf shoes?

The military members who killed bin Laden are reportedly “an elite special forces group unofficially called Seal Team 6.”

Blogger Nobarack has published a long-form birth certificate from Hawaii which contains a section at the bottom not found in Obama’s release.

The official statement issued by the White House said that “in the earliest days of the administration, the President formally instructed the intelligence community and his counterterrorism advisors to make the pursuit of Osama bin Laden, as the leader of al Qaeda, as a top priority.”

The leader of Hamas condemned bin Laden’s assassination, labeling bin Laden “a Holy Warrior.”

If the military acted on its own, without an order from Obama, what, if anything, does that mean in regard to Obama’s continued presence in the White House?

Does the military regard Obama as legitimate?  Obama refused to answer Lt. Col. Terry Lakin’s questions and military officers sent Lakin to Ft. Leavenworth rather than allow him discovery.  Last week, Obama released an image of an alleged birth certificate, the authenticity of which was questioned immediately.

The Post & Email contacted LCDR Walter Francis Fitzpatrick, III regarding the recent Ulsterman story.

LCDR FITZPATRICK: I read the report, and it is completely consistent with what I would expect to have happen.

MRS. RONDEAU: It is?

LCDR FITZPATRICK: Yes, and the significance of this is enormous.  You might not remember this, but I do, about the Somali pirates that took the Maersk Alabama.  They boarded the ship and took hostages, and they got into the lifeboat.  Then the U.S.S. Bainbridge came onto the scene, a U.S. Navy ship, and eventually a couple of Navy Seals picked these clowns off in the lifeboat.  The Somali pirates were shot dead after having kidnapped the captain of the ship.

The pirates reported themselves as being from Somalia, and they went out and captured the merchantman named Maersk Alabama.  It ended up that they were in the lifeboat.  The crew of the Alabama fought back, and these guys got away with the captain of the ship.  The Navy came onto the scene, and the ship had Navy Seals on board.  There were Navy Seals who took the shots and killed the men in the lifeboat who had held the captain captive.

Obama hadn’t wanted those guys shot; he didn’t want the Seals to take the shot.  But they did, and Obama was furious.

Then soon after that, there were three Navy Seals who were brought up on charges from a separate incident.  They were going to court-martial these guys.  I had it all over The Jaghunter that they were going to court-martial them.  They backed away from it, but Obama had the Seals and himself at cross-purposes, and they have been for a long time.

Then you get this information last night, and it’s consistent.  If the Seals had an opportunity to go after bin Laden and they were told not to from the White House, and they said, “No, we’re going in anyway,” that’s a very big deal.  I do not believe that the Seals would have their name tied to this unless they were really the unit that took out Osama bin Laden.  You don’t just cavalierly assign or name the Seals in an operation like that.  I believe they were involved, and the person whose name I gave you is directly tied into this warfare community in a way that I’m not and would be able to tell you more about what he is hearing.  But it came in last night; I’m looking at it…I’ve told you before that there are people in the military and there are people in every other federal organization that we’ve talked about who know that Mr. Obama is an outlaw.  There are people in the military who are really ticked-off about that, and this is completely in keeping with the kind of attitude that is invested in military men and women who believe that Obama is an unconstitutional commander-in-chief and, at the same time, have had enough of this political game.  They had a chance to take out Osama bin Laden, and they’re not going to take any nonsense from the White House; they’re just going to go in and do it.

Now as this story unfolds, and it will, that notion is going to build and build and build.  It will be interesting to see who the personalities are who are involved in this.

I believe that Mr. Obama is in descent.  I believe that he is on his way out the door.  Another aspect to this which is consistent with what I think is going on is that I believe that people in the military know that he’s not going to last very much longer and that he’s not the commander-in-chief.  He’s a fake.  If they had a shot to take Osama bin Laden and they went to the White House to get permission to do that and the answer came back, “No,” then it was “Excuse me, but you aren’t the head of the ship anymore.”

I put it up at The Jaghunter, and I haven’t had this kind of traffic for a long, long time.  It’s going viral.  The story has been picked up by a lot of people.  It’s making the rounds.

Mr. Obama was born in Mombasa, Kenya.  He’s not lawfully holding office in the White House, and there are military people who know that and they do not recognize his authority.  They also recognize that Mr. Obama is committing acts of treason against this country, and what you saw within the last week was, “We’ve had enough of you and your decisions and the people who are in the White House.”  In other words, the military knows enough, and the Seals community would be just that group of people.  They don’t take prisoners; these guys mean what they say and say what they mean.  From what I understand, there was increased intelligence coming out of interrogations at Guantanamo Bay; that’s run by the Navy.  And you know there are Seals down at Gitmo.

So this makes complete sense to me.  This is the United States Armed Forces standing up to Mr. Obama and saying to him, “You’re not my commander-in-chief.”

MRS. RONDEAU: I had to read your story twice.  After the second time, I realized there was a larger ramification if the military acted on its own to take out bin Laden.

LCDR FITZPATRICK: These are people in the military who are standing up and saying, “You’re not my commander-in-chief.”  They’re ticked off about Terry Lakin being locked up; they’re ticked off about how our government has been running; they’re ticked off about all of the things that you and I are ticked off about.  And this is one segment of the military that doesn’t take nonsense from anyone.  If I felt bad about anything that was in the narrative, I wouldn’t have published it, but I read it and had it up instantly.  It laid it all out, and this is the way that the military works.

MRS. RONDEAU: Would you say that you have expected this as things have been building up?

LCDR FITZPATRICK: I expected something as a flashback.  I expected that at some point, somewhere, someone in the military was going to stand up and say, “Mr. Obama, you can go to Hades.  We’ve had enough.”  And this opportunity was just too big a deal to follow his orders.  Because they went to the White House to get permission and didn’t receive it – it wasn’t that they expected to receive it; they knew what the answer was going to be, and they were going to act on what they knew – going after OBL was a really big deal.  He really was a threat to the national security, and there are military people who recognize that and were willing to risk their careers to take out Osama bin Laden because they realize that that is more important than their careers, and they probably realize also that if Obama tried to take them out at this point, that it would just accelerate his decline.

I’ll tell you something else:  I think it’s being leaked because people in the military want Obama gone.  This iscompletely in keeping with everything that you would expect to have happen.  It makes sense to me.  This was just one order that they could not accept.  They knew they had the guy; they had the intel; they acted on it; they said, “We don’t care what Obama says; we’re going to take this guy out.”  And then they did, and they don’t care what happens to them now.  And I don’t think anything is going to happen.  By the time I got this, Obama has already taken credit for this.  “Oh, yeah, we meant to do this all the time.”  So Obama is not going to go after any military commander, and then the information was leaked.  So they know they have Obama cross-wired.  Obama is stuck right now and the military knows that.  It’s been leaked out.  These are the kinds of conversations that would go on in the environment we have today.

MRS. RONDEAU: What do you think will happen from here?

LCDR FITZPATRICK: I think it will build from here.  I think that the information has been leaked so that it will build from here.  I think that there are military men and women who are really ticked off about Obama having gone into Libya.

MRS. RONDEAU: Does that mean that some of them still read or understand the U.S. Constitution?

LCDR FITZPATRICK: Yes, there are military commanders whom I know, and this was an opportunity for them to step in and say, “We’re going to take the shot.”  This is something that Obama can’t stop.  And this is a message for Mr. Obama, which is that he’s not in control of his armed forces anymore, and that is a very, very, very significant detail. That’s huge.  If they don’t recognize Mr. Obama as the commander-in-chief, then all that can happen for Mr. Obama is bad.  There are going to have to be other military people to make the same observation,and they’re going to have to make this publicly.

It is also consistent with what you’ve been writing and what I’ve been picking up on.  Mr. Obama is found out.  The military knows that Mr. Obama is an outlaw.  They know that he is not commander-in-chief.  That document that he put out on the internet the other day is a fake.  Now imagine that you’re in the United States Armed Forces today, and you see this, and you’re a military commander, a senior officer, and you know what’s been going out there and what’s been said about this, and you know that it’s been an issue building and building and building…See, Mr. Obama cannot get away from the fact that he has now tried to pull the wool over our eyes again.

The military has been challenged, as you know, with Operation American Freedom.  Every single military man and woman, whatever their rank, if they took the oath to the Constitution of the United States, they have an obligation to do something about finding out whether Mr. Obama is legit.  That was written two years ago.  Now, don’t you think that their obligation is multiplied by a very large number?

You have people in the military who are intelligence experts who are going to their boss and saying, “Excuse me, but that ‘document’ that was put out on the internet is a fraud.”  The military commanders are now forced into a situation where they either have to act as they have acted or risk going along with this Mr. Obama for a while longer.  I don’t think anybody in the military who’s in a position to know better is going to go along with this man anymore.  He’s just crossed a line that he can’t back over.

Now, any military commander can stand up and say, “We know that he is a fake.”

Continue Reading: http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/05/03/did-the-u-s-military-act-on-its-own-authority-to-kill-bin-laden/

Obama didn't kill Osama, Our brave SEALs did-Posted on Facebook:

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Obama-didnt-kill-Osama-Our-brave-SEALs-did/147951165275044

Skulking Towards Bin Laden: Obama Overridden  By Military And Intel Officials In Takeout Of OBL?-Posted on Atlas Shrugs-On May 3, 2011:

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2011/05/skulking-towards-bin-laden-obama-overridden-by-military-and-intel-officials-in-takeout-of-obl.html

Update: White House Insider: Obama Hesitated – Panetta Issued Order to Kill Osama Bin Laden-Posted on Socyberty.com-By Ulsterman-On May 3, 2011:

http://socyberty.com/issues/white-house-insider-obama-hesitated-panetta-issued-order-to-kill-osama-bin-laden/

Today’s Questions for the President-Posted on National Review Online-By Peter Kirsanow-On May 9, 2011:

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/266716/todays-questions-president-peter-kirsanow

Note:  We, as God, family and country loving Americans, must keep our eyes on the ball and not be distracted by the relentless propaganda being fed to us on a daily basis as part of this President and his minion’s transformation strategy.

My following blog post contains numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

The Military Pays the Price for Obama’s Agenda!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/08/11/the-military-pays-the-price-for-obama’s-agenda/

Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts, please copy the web site and paste on your browser.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered controversial is being censored-what happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…
 
            
            Those so-called "democracy-loving and freedom seeking" Egyptian revolutionaries who got all the press two months ago are now burning out Coptic Christians (10% of Egypt's population) and signing agreements with the terrorist group Hamas . . . suddenly the mainstream American media doesn't have time to cover them . . . nor to mention that the Muslim Brotherhood seeking the upper hand in Libya has already achieved the upper hand in Egypt.  Our old strongman ally in Egypt, Mr. Mubarak will prove to be a saint by comparison to the radical elements that Obama is supporting everywhere.
 
           The "Gaza Freedom Flotilla" (which attempted to run an Israeli naval blockade a year ago) funded by a  radical feminist-Marxist organization Code Pink; and planned by Bill Ayers and his wife Bernadette Dorn (you remember them, the bomb makers) celebrates its first anniversary this May 15, 2011 and is planning to re-create that event in SPADES.  What else is so special about this date?
 
 
Radical Left Joins with Radical Islam
to Initiate “THE Revolution” 
 
 
 
            As reported right here in Rajjpuut’s Folly several times already in the past year . . . “THE Revolution” is underway. “THE Revolution,” you say, “Hold it, hold it, when did this start? Why wasn’t I informed? . . . er’ what revolution?” Note to self:  ignorance is not bliss. Long-form headline:   The Radical Left has Now Joined with Radical Islam to Initiate “THE Revolution” NOT Only Here in the United States, but Around the World . . . these moves are a culmination of several trends long in evidence . . . details to follow, and for those interested in marking your calendar: May 15, 2011 is the key date . . . .
 
ITEM: If you’ve been plotting something for at least 65 years and been piling up successes furtively under the cover of dark, you must become pretty emboldened to finally come out into the open in the bright light of day . . . that’s the story for socialist and communist Americans and the union LEADERS who are right now openly calling for and planning open revolt.

ITEM:  Those so-called "democracy-loving and freedom seeking" Egyptian revolutionaries who got all the press two months ago are now burning out Coptic Christians (10% of Egypt's population) and signing agreements with the terrorist group Hamas . . . suddenly the mainstream American media doesn't have time to cover them . . . nor to mention that the Muslim Brotherhood seeking the upper hand in Libya has already achieved the upper hand in Egypt.  Our old strongman ally in Egypt, Mr. Mubarak will prove to be a saint by comparison to the radical elements that Obama is supporting everywhere across the Middle East.
 
ITEM: if you’ve got a grievance 63 years in the boiling (since the creation of Israel, the Jewish State) and been pretty damn violent about it the whole time without success, you’ll welcome anyone who promises to join with you in common cause . . . that’s the story for the Islamic Jihadists who since Sayyid Qutb first came to Greeley, Colorado (see: The Looming Tower: Al-Qaeda and the Road to 9/11) to attend the University of Northern Colorado (then called “Colorado State College of Education”) shortly after publishing his first book Social Justice in Islam have been looking for a chance to martyr themselves to bring about an Islamic Caliphate and Mohammed’s Paradise on Earth. Qutb succeeded in 1966 and before his hanging remarked, “Thank God!   I performed Jihad for fifteen years to earn this martyrdom.”
 
ITEM: Osama Bin Laden, founded Al Qaeda in August, 1988, (even before the defeat of the Soviet Union in Afghanistan less than a year later; largely accomplished thanks to huge cash and weapons influxes and military training from the United States) but the organization was kept a secret. That date is important because already at that date Bin Laden had his eye on western targets even while the war with the Soviets was still raging. Even at that date the ultimate goal was world conquest for Islam. That goal has NOT changed. 
            A believer whenever possible in pure Muslim activism, Bin Laden (a Saudi) went to King Fahd of Saudi Arabia in late 1990 asking to be allowed to free Kuwait from the conquest of Saddam Hussein with a purely Islamic military from many Arabian nations. He was sent away. 
When Bush #1 sent in the coalition forces to neutralize and defeat Saddam Hussein’s forces, Bin Laden was aghast that “infidels” could be invited onto sacred Islamic territory to defeat Muslims. He publicly denounced Saudi Arabia's dependence on the U.S. military, saying that the presence of foreign troops in the "land of the two mosques" (the Holy Cities of Mecca and Medina in Saudi Arabia) profaned sacred soil.  Not liking to have their monarch criticized publicly, the Saudis tried to catch and silence Bin Laden. Soon after U.S. troops were allowed on Saudi soil, Bin Laden’s organization in Saudi Arabia was raided by Saudi secret police and information released to the American FBI which on November 8, 1990 led to a raid on the New Jersey home of El Sayyid Nosair, a man with numerous Al Qaeda ties, which uncovered a great deal of evidence of terrorist plots against America including plans to blow up New York City (NYC) skyscrapers.  Just a few months later, in 1991 Osama publicly declared unilateral war against the United States.   The Arab world knew about this. The CIA and top level politicians knew about this; you were never told. 
            Despite Bin Laden’s declaration of war and the information discovered from the Nosair raid, the first World Trade Center bombing in 1993 was a partial success for Al Qaeda. The CIA and top level politicians, of course, knew all about all of this; again you were never told. During the next decade Osama and his buddies were responsible for attacks all around the world; most notably for several dozen terrorist attacks in the Middle East, Africa and Asia; and for blowing a hole in the side of the American destroyer USS Cole at port in Yemen in 1998; he and Ayman al-Zawahir co-signed a fatwa that same year declaring the killing of North Americans and their allies “an individual duty for every Muslim”; and most infamously for the September 11, 2001 attacks on the twin towers of the World Trade Center and on the Pentagon in Washington. D.C. Note to self: it does not take two to make a war . . . .
 
ITEM: “THE Revolution,” (like the attacks from Al Qaeda) constitutes a war whether you like it or not or whether or not you’re even aware of it. You now -- in this blog -- have been given information that the main launch point for highly visible and irrefutable assaults upon you, our Constitution and the American way of life is May 15, 2011. Up to now “THE Revolution” has been going on all around you for forty-four years. 
The ground for the battlefield was originally scouted and prepared by self-proclaimed “neo-Marxist” Saul Alinsky of Chicago with his two books Reveille for Radicals (1946); and Rules for Radicals (1971). The two were how-to primers on radical activism aimed at community organizers in big cities. Alinsky dedicated Rules for Radicals to Lucifer (a.k.a. “Satan”) . . . that dedication has been removed in modern editions but there are still plenty of the old books around and Rajjpuut checked one out of the library less than six years ago, yep “Satan with a starting capital of just one snake” who “won his own kingdom” was lauded as “the first radical.”  Alinsky “tactics” (sometimes called “street theater”) were seen all over the New Left movement of the late 60’s and early 70’s. Some thought they were too “tame.” 
Most notable among these were terrorist Bill Ayers and his wife Bernadette Dorn/Dohrn (both spellings are very common and she’s also given her first name often as ‘Bernadine’) who once they left the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS -- because they were “too busy examining each other’s navels”) joined the Weather Underground sometimes called the Weathermen for whom they made and planted bombs during that era killing and maiming some police and others and losing more than a few Weathermen to incompetence.  Both Ayers and Dorn are still alive; both are close friends of the President of the United States; more on those two later.
ITEM: “Tactics” is how you wage war on a day-by-day basis. “Strategy” is what the long-range goals of the daily tactics aim to accomplish. With Alinsky’s ugly tactics now well-polished, what the progressive- (we must ‘progress’ beyond the ‘outdated and ill-conceived Constitution’ if we are ever to make ‘progress’ toward Utopia on earth) leftists needed now was a grand strategy defining how to make the goal (takeover of the United States and destruction of Capitalism) over time become a reality. Two Columbia University (NYC) Marxist professors Richard Andrew Cloward and his wife Frances Fox Piven provided that strategy with their May 2, 1966 article in The Nation magazine The Weight of the Poor: a Strategy to End Poverty. Suddenly everything fell into place.   Almost immediately the ideas they espoused became known as “Cloward-Piven Strategy” and C-P Strategy has remained the radical left’s most powerful, albeit slow, strategic idea ever since.
 
ITEM: The theme of the article was that the poor should be used as shock-troopers and only by making the rest of the nation fear them could the poor gain their rightful economic equality. The intermediate goal should be according to Cloward and Piven GNI (a guaranteed national income).   The basis for their strategy was that Democratic President Lyndon B. Johnson had the previous year not only got us into war in Southeast Asia; created the two government spending boondoggles Medicare; and Medicaid (with a state side as well as a federal one which now constitute UNfunded liabilities of $75 TRillion); but also launched a “War on Poverty” dramatically expanding old and adding new welfare programs. Cloward and Piven decided that with Alinsky street tactics they could dramatically increase the number of welfare recipients, virtually bankrupt the nation and then get the Democratic Party (where they owned the most influence) to pass a GNI law  . . . POOF! SNAP! Abracadabra! ending poverty and advancing the revolution, they thought, dramatically virtually overnight.
 
ITEM: It took them part of eight years to know semi-success. The full story is found here in a recent Rajjpuut’s Folly in its painfully-detailed entirety:
 
 
The short version is: After creating something called the NWRO in 1967 with Black militant George Wiley, Cloward and Piven crapped in their own nest by bankrupting NYC which was bailed out by the federal government in 1975; and almost bankrupted the State of New York and many other states and big cities by doubling welfare rolls by 1970 from eight to sixteen million recipients. 
C&P and Wiley declared victory even though GNI was never seriously discussed in Congress. They publicly bragged about the great thing they’d done. They told their followers to now concentrate their attention on voter registration and federal housing. In 1977, one of the first things the new progressive president, Jimmy Carter, did was pass a bill called CRA ’77 (the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977) forcing lenders to knowingly make bad loans to unqualified would-be home owners. Wade Rathke, a Wiley Lieutenant sent to Arkansas in 1970 was in 1977 assigned to be the lead in creating a model organization in Arkansas to follow-up 0n the new C&P marching orders while taking advantage of CRA ’77 with C-P Strategies just as they had originally done with the welfare laws. Again the full version of events is found here:
 
 
 
ITEM: The nutshell version is that ACORN (Arkansas Community Organizations for Reform Now) was created in 1977. Using voter fraud** they elected an up and coming young Arkansas lieutenant governor to governor in 1978 and kept him in that post for 12 of the next 14 years until getting him elected president in 1972. Along the way they perfected their voter registration shenanigans and housing corruptions Alinsky-style so well that Rathke’s organization was expanded to every state and renamed (Associations of Community Organizations for Reform Now). They were so successful on the housing front that just by them operating in Arkansas they began to change the face of federal housing very quickly. In 1975 only one in every 404 home loans in the country was considered “suspect.” Typically, this suspect loan was made at 3% down payment to someone considered a very good risk such as an ex-military officer going to college on the GI Bill. After ACORN got involved (just in Arkansas, remember) by 1985 one in every 196 home loans was “suspect” and over half of those suspect loans were CRA ’77 loans in Arkansas and in other states that ACORN had recently spread to. These Arkansas loans were made to absolutely unqualified buyers.
 
ITEM: after five expansions of CRA ’77 (four expansions by ACORN president Bill Clinton alone) the financial meltdown of 2007 would hit the country like a kidney kick from a mule. As for Barack Obama, he was not only a community organizer in Chicago . . . he was also:
 
A.     An ACORN attorney in 1994, '95 and '96 shaking down home mortgage companies not only for bad loans now; but for long-range promises of bad loan quotas for the future and even donations to ACORN itself.
B.    An attorney-professor teaching both Constitutional Law and Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals in Chicago.
 
ITEM: After two legislative expansions of CRA ’77 in 1995 Bill Clinton (he also made a huge regulatory expansion of CRA ‘77 in 1993; and passed the Motor-Voter Act^^ in 1993 with Cloward and Piven standing behind him in the official photo) paid off his ACORN allies handsomely with a steroid-version legislative expansion of CRA ’77 in 1998. By 2005 more than one in three home loans was now suspect (34%) many of them made at 0.0% down payment for homes costing over $300,000 made to virtually homeless## clients.   The full details again should be known by every voting American:
 
 
That brings us almost up to date: So what exactly do we mean by “THE Revolution” and why do we say May 15, 2011 is so important? The answer to that question goes back roughly a year ago. About that time, the “near-ground-zero mosque was floated as a trial balloon to see if the American Mainstream media would back it and they did. Shariah Law in America as a viable option has been pressed by the extreme left and Eric Holder’s INJustice Department since that time. On the other end in early spring, 2010, several powerful American Union personalities and other prominent American leftists visited a few European capitals and roughly 17-18 Middle Eastern predominantly Muslim countries. They arranged discussions about forming a coalition to destroy what they hate most -- American Capitalism. Out of that discussion came the wave of so-called Democratic revolts across the Middle East; the so-called “Gaza Freedom Flotilla” blockade run; Shariah$$ Law- acceptability being promoted (it’s actually already part of law in some places in Europe); and plans to unite because “the enemy of my enemy is my friend.” 
What we mean by “THE Revolution" is exactly the same thing the left has meant by “THE Revolution" since before Alinsky, Ayers, Cloward, Piven, Wiley and others could talk. It means the downfall of the United States of America; the expansion of leftist efforts in many countries and introduction of a global government believing as they, the leftists do. By the way, the Jihadist will be fine with just the downfall of the United States but they want an Islamic Caliphate and to behead all who fail to capitulate to Islam on some glorious day in the future. But you knew all that . . . here’s what you didn’t know:
 
Item: The so-called Gaza Freedom Flotilla funded by a feminine Marxist organization called Code Pink; and planned by Bill Ayers and his wife Bernadette Dorn (you remember them, the bomb makers) celebrates its first anniversary this May 15, 2011. 
This was the first known incidence of leftists in America and radical Jihadist Muslims joining forces. They (a group of Jihadist members of the Muslim Brotherhood (an organization that first became serious in Egypt under Sayyid Qutb) attempted to run the Israeli naval blockade (aimed at preventing arms and other military supplies getting to Gaza and to Jihadists elsewhere) and although the violence that naturally followed was at each step of the way begun and escalated by the Jihadists (each of whom had made video wills for their relatives before sailing that were captured by Israeli agents) the mainstream-lamestream media in America covered the whole affair as if it was an Israeli-provoked atrocity. Naturally the Arab press went hog-wild with the story . . . oh, sorry; Muslims don’t go hog-wild, so uh, camel-wild . . . 
Among other results of this evil-vile collaboration:  Mubarak is out and the “Democracy” that follows looks to be a Jihadocracy for Egypt similar to what rules now in Iran with no more enforcement of the (neutral toward) Israel peace agreement or the Trade (with Israel) agreements that Mubarak had long upheld despite their unpopularity among his people; there are now serious uprisings in almost all the Muslim Middle East; and the old version of Moammar Gadhafi is now looking pretty good as America seriously contemplates funding the Jihadist rebels out to oust his despotic butt. Anyway the first anniversary of that blockade-run attempt (May 15, 2011) will see a confluence of openly atrocious events in the Middle East and in America. Four in particular need to be exposed right now: 
            #1 Code Pink, Ayers and Dorn again are uniting once again for a repeat of the blockade-running event on May 15, 2011.
            #2 As SEIU Union bigwig Stephen Lerner promised (it’s all on videotape at my Rajjpuut’s Folly blog site in a different blog): 
 
 
the assault on the American banking system he’s planned . . . and designed to deal the ultimate crippling blow to capitalism is scheduled for May 15, 2011.
            #3 A whole range of nasty union demonstrations are scheduled to coincide with . . . wait for it . . . May 15, 2011.   The Union movement has now gone global (Workers of the world unite!) and far more Marxist. Go to the websites of the AFL-CIO or SEIU and see all their propaganda about all the countries “standing with Wisconsin.” They believe that Capitalism is on the ropes and all they have to do now is keep attacking the free market system until they can land a haymaker . . . and move their twisted statist philosophies into the forefront.
            #4 A restoration of lost land in which Muslim Arabs on all sides of Israel are supposed to simply walk into the country and “reclaim their acreage” is also scheduled for, yep, you guessed it . . . May 15, 2011. Beware the Ides of May.
 
Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,
Rajjpuut
 
** ACORN ran a very successful voter registration drive across Arkansas; unfortunately, those who signed up as Republicans never had their paperwork delivered to the voting authorities and that’s how young William Jefferson Clinton won the state governorship in 1978. He lost the post in 1980 during the Reagan landslide, but got elected the next twelve years before becoming our first ACORN president.
^^ Motor-Voter was called “a twelve-lane highway to voter fraud” by those who understood it.
## After Clinton’s Steroid-expansion of CRA ‘77 legislatively in 1998, ACORN found it much easier to put unqualified home loan recipients into $440,000 homes in 1999 than they could into $110,000 homes five or six years earlier. These folks were typically:
A.      Without jobs
B.     Lacking decent credit ratings
C.      Often without even a rental history
D.     Welfare recipients, and especially . . . .
E.      People whose only “income” was food stamps
F.      Even illegal aliens
 
Even though this blog involves a lot of reading, every educated American voter should know the full details here: 
 
 
$$ That means things like total control and oppression of women and the burkha requirement; and solely “mosque activities” of Shariah law be allowed and left alone as long as only Muslims are involved. In other words the U.S. Constitution would NOT apply to Muslims in the country.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Read more…


 

Greenspan, Bernanke
Exacerbate
Meltdown Problems
 
 
The leaders of the United States Federal Reserve banking system have trotted out the enormous chutzpah required to actually sue the leading German bank for doing a tiny part of what our Federal Reserve allowed and even encouraged here in this country. Putting the matter into the simplest terms, the Fed would like Deutsche Bank to repay a few Billion dollars because they claim that the FED lost money when DB didn’t pay enough attention to whether people receiving home loans in Germany actually had jobs or not.
 We say “chutzpah” (what the British call “cheek”) in describing our Fed Banking because meanwhile, here in the United States the Fed completely ignored for over thirty years far worse banking practices which nearly brought about the complete collapse of the American financial system and that today threatens to give the country stagflation and eventually run-away inflation.  Fed Chief Alan “Don’t-you-dare-tie-me-to-the-meltdown” Greenspan even went so far as to lead the cheerleading for the tricky straw that broke the camel’s back: unregulated derivative investment. To be specific, the Federal Reserve under Alan Greenspan and Ben Bernanke has for years given a wink and a nod to and ignored the impact of . . . .
A)   The Jimmy Carter 1977 Community Reinvestment Act (CRA ’77) and five expansions of it (four by Clinton; one by Bush, Sr.) between 1992 and 1998 that created the sub-prime lending crisis by forcing banks and mortgage companies to knowingly make very ill-advised home loans.
B)   The activities of ACORN in browbeating and shaking down mortgage lenders and banks to accelerate the evils of CRA ’77 and the sub-prime lending crisis.
C)   The shift in mortgage banking from 1975 when one in every four hundred-four loans was “suspect” (administered at 3% down payment or less); to 1985 when one in every one hundred-ninety-six such loans was suspect; to 1995 when one in just seven loans was suspect; to 2005 when worse than one in three such loans (34%) was highly suspect, granted often without any down payment at all.
D) The final Clinton steroid version expansion of CRA legislation in 1998 which made it easier for ACORN to get unqualified loan-seekers into $450,000 homes in 1999 than it had been to get such people into $110,000 to $120,000 homes a decade earlier.
E)   The final ACORN assault on the nation’s home mortgage industry by abusing the CRA laws to get houses for people . . . .
1)     Without jobs
2)    Without good credit ratings
3)    Without rental histories
4)    With only food stamps to list as “income”
5)    Enrolled in other welfare programs
       6)    and even for Illegal aliens 
 
 
F. Fed Chief Alan Greenspan heartily approved the onslaught of derivative investments saying they “held the key to eliminating financial downturns in the future.” Of course, it was derivatives of lumped-together junk mortgages that proved to be the final nail in the financial melt-down coffin which collapsed so many large financial institutes . . . you’re a great man, Alan, a truly great man.
G.    Once retired from his post as Fed Chief, Greenspan worked as a special consultant to . . . wait for it . . . Deutsche Bank . . . that’s right . . . .
H.     In a speech in February, 2004, Greenspan suggested that more home-seekers should take out ARMs (Adjustable Rate Mortgages) after he’d deliberately held the nation’s interest rates artificially low for a decade . . . in effect, sabotaging the individual lenders almost as much as the CRA laws were sabotaging the nation
I.           According to Wikipedia,  in referring to the part Greenspan played in allowing the financial-meltdown, Matt Taibbi called Greenspan a vain "classic con man" and a undistinguished economist who, through political savvy, "flattered and bullshitted his way up the Matterhorn of American power and then, once he got to the top, feverishly jacked himself off to the attention of Wall Street for 20 consecutive years." Taibbi said Greenspan had "established himself as an infallible oracle, and a lot of it had to do with his ability to seduce key media figures, sometimes literally." Taibbi reported a Wall Street term called the "Greenspan put" which "meant that every time the banks blew up a speculative bubble, they could go back to the Fed and borrow money at zero or one or two percent, and then start the game all over", thereby making it "almost impossible" for the banks to lose money. The chapter Taibbi dedicated to Greenspan in his book Griftopia bore the title The Biggest A__hole in the Universe.
J.  Even now as the nation seeks to fight its way back to prosperity, present Fed Chief Ben Bernanke is inflating the currency and denying at every juncture that he’s doing so. The rising price of gas and food is 95% Bumbling Ben’s fault and only 5% due to other extraneous factors.
In fairness to Greenspan it must be said that for the first ten years of CRA ’77 legislation he was not the Fed Chief, Paul Volcker was. In fairness to Volcker, none-zero-nada-zip-not one of the five CRA ’77 expansions to come was law when Volcker was in office . . . and ACORN in those days was largely confined to Clinton’s Arkansas (It began life in 1977, as the “Arkansas Community Organizations for Reform Now”) so the percent of suspect loans in the entire country only doubled in the first decade vs. multiplying by 28-fold under Greenspan. Greenspan never once notified the nation of the immense danger from this cancerous assault upon the nation’s mortgage system or reminded progressive lawmakers of the harm they were doing. Ronald Reagan deserves huge censure for putting a man of such monumental incompetence into such a power seat.
Credit Default Swaps and other derivatives were praised on several occasions by Greenspan as valuable instruments that would make severe financial downturns impossible. In March, 1999, he said, “ . . . I am quite confident that market participants will continue to increase their reliance on derivatives to unbundle risks and thereby enhance the process of wealth creation.” In another speech he opined that “derivatives have increased the standard of living globally.” How could such an idiot get any job in the financial industry? Just about any asinine investment works in a wide-open bull market; the key to understanding dangers is to see what happens in a severe downturn when everybody wants to sell and get out all at once.
The ultimate Greenspan lunacy was uttered in 2004 when he summed up the value of derivatives for protecting the financial markets: “Not only have individual financial institutions become less vulnerable to shocks from underlying risk factors, but also the financial system as a whole has become more resilient.”
So now our FED has the ironic gall to criticize and bring suit against a German bank for a sin perhaps 1/10,000 the size of our own failings which brought the entire world to the brink of financial cataclysm. Good job, Bernanke, good job.
 
 
Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,
Rajjpuut
Read more…

 

 
 
“It really can’t be called ‘Islamophobia’ -- the terrorists really do want to kill us all.”                                     
                                 Rajjpuut
 
"I would have preferred a lot less discussion out of the White House,”
 
             Former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld
 
 
“The Man Who Killed Usama Bin Laden”
Giving Away the Entire INTEL Farm?
 
Rajjpuut has been saying this for eight days now, former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld started saying it Sunday. It’s not a popular thought, but since it’s true it ought to be heard loud and clear . . . Barack Obama has adopted a very unprofessional, nay a very amateurish position with regard to the “treasure trove of intelligence” gathered from the Navy SEAL raid that killed Usama Bin Laden. Supposedly, this is the largest gathering of information ever made available to the U.S. intelligence community according to our loud-mouth National Security advisors . . . but even Senator John Kerry has said, "We need to shut up . . . “ in a statement while on the Face the Nation television program.
 IF Obama’s predecessor George W. Bush had sent in the SEALs on this successful raid, it’s highly likely that Bush would have acted far more discreet and professionally with the information. Mr. Obama does not believe we’re in a “War on Terror” and the simplest and wisest paths are therefore, seemingly beyond his ken, for example, the World War II dictum that “Loose lips sink ships.” Why was Barack Obama in such an all-fired hurry? Two reasons jump out at any intelligent observer: A) immediate political gain and B) a silly outreach to Muslims by showing them that Obama had been killed and now Obama would be buried in some semblance of Islamic respect. (Didn’t Mr. Obama once tell us that “terrorists are not Muslims” . . . if that’s true, why the rush to show that we’ll honor Bin Laden’s body like that of a practicing good Muslim?). Like Obama’s commandment to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), that one of his primary goals now was to reach out to the Islamic world** . . . Mr. Obama has certainly got his priorities on backwards again.
Mr. Poker-Face Barack is seemingly turning his cards up for all the world including our most deadly enemies to see and is abandoning even the most obvious sound advice from childhoold:  “That’s for me to know and you to find out . . .” Mr. Obama doesn’t seem to understand that great INTEL in the War on Terror (or should we call it “the War on man-caused disasters?”) is like being dealt two aces in Hold-em poker . . . something you don’t want your opponents to find out about or even suspect until it’s far too late.   And, by the way, Mr. Obama, the war is still going on and two aces don’t always win, and far too often lose . . . all in all for parts of nine days now we’ve seen the actions of a very naïve “leader” . . . and a very weird sort of Muslim^^ outreach.
 
ITEM: Under George W. Bush, we the American citizens probably still would not have found out that Usama Bin Laden was dead, and only about now, rumors would have started appearing on terrorist websites. The crucial eight or nine days of “surprise” might well have seen us successful capture and or kill several more terrorists in Bin Laden’s Al Qaeda network and even capture one or more other “treasure troves” of actionable information and other key INTEL.
ITEM:   In sick contrast, about as soon as President Obama knew for sure that Bin Laden was dead, he was already writing speeches and planning to reveal the facts to America. Aiming, it seems for short-term political gain at the cost of long-term advantage in the War on Terror.
ITEM: We’ve had more information released about this raid then about all the thousands of successful CIA activities since 9/11 put together. Our methods and our threat to the Al Qaeda network have been greatly compromised.
ITEM: Some in the Democratic Party and the liberal-leaning lamesteam-mainstream media have suggested that this success has made Barack Obama invincible in the 2012 re-election campaign by taking away his opponents’ claim that he’s soft-on-terrorism. Rajjpuut would remind you that one success does not win a war (a War on Terrorism; nor an election campaign) and that when looked at intelligently, all of this well-publicized bravado has done little but to give aid and comfort to our enemies. 
ITEM: One liberal pundit, Susan Estrich, said, “. . . the one thing that conservatives cannot rant and rave about is what has been their most predictable refrain since the Cold War: national security. Of all the things President Obama has done to conservatives in America, this may be the cruelest. He has taken away their national security argument.”
She continued, “Democrats are supposed to be ‘weak’ on foreign policy, the kind of people who love to talk about the UN instead of unilateral action; of diplomacy, not airpower; of bringing the troops home, not sending more to serve abroad. It is because Democrats are supposed to be (and, some would say, often are) so many of those things that they end up wandering around tank factories wearing silly hats. It is because they don't want to be called any of those things that the party would jump to nominate a candidate with military experience, even if he had more experience opposing military positions than serving in them.
Rajjpuut couldn’t disagree more . . . everything Obama has done, other than ordering the raid itself (which was highly commendable), has marked him as an abject amateur. He obviously doesn’t understand that intelligence is far stronger when your enemies have no idea what you know rather than when you’re boasting about it day after day. He’s been given the strongest hand ever offered to an American President against terrorism and it’s fair to say he’s busily p_ssing it away. Bill Clinton and  George Bush would never have fallen into this stupid behavior.
 
ITEM: Since Mr. Obama’s Justice Department under Eric Holder is now investigating CIA members (for torture) and since it has banned water-boarding and other enhanced interrogation techniques (tying the CIA’s hands) the United States faces the War on Terror (which will surely not end with Usama Bin Laden’s death) greatly disarmed.
ITEM: Even about now, after the Al Qaeda network was beginning to broadcast rumors or even the fact that a raid upon Pakistan had allowed America to kill the “great Usama,” no one would yet, or ever, be told that we’d capture large numbers of cell phone #s; laptops; and an “intelligence trove equal to a small college library.” People captured in further raids brought about with INTEL from the Usama prime raid would have already allowed a deeper spreading of chaos into the Al Qaeda network.
ITEM: Usama and his wives would have been transported to a safe-house and debriefing would have begun immediately. Osama Bin Laden would be alive in our custody and under waterboarding and other enhanced intelligence techniques and he would be adding to the treasure trove of intel.
ITEM: Mr. Obama, it’s really NOT ‘Islamophobia’ when the terrorists really do want to kill us all. Rajjpuut would have preferred not to have known that Bin Laden was dead and that we killed him until it was no longer beneficial to our troops and our CIA to hide that fact.  After, say, seven or eight more high level Al Qaeda operatives were captured or killed seems at a minimum a nice duration for “secret-keeping” before showing the picture of the dead Bin Laden and revealing that a raid took place and he was killed . . . but you, Mr. Obama, kept the secret for the half an hour necessary to get a speech written when you got to use the word “I” twenty-four separate times. There is no “I” in common sense, Sir.
 
ITEM: Since last week, administration officials have held a series of briefings to go over virtually all the details of the raid, review the decade-long investigation that led to it and to disclose some information about the evidence seized from the compound. The White House last week indicated it would stop providing details about the raid itself -- officials have since kept their comments mostly to the subject of the evidence being analyzed by the CIA.  How much of this should be given freely to Al Qaeda? ZERO-ZILCH-NADA . . . Rumsfeld said,   "The more information that goes out about intelligence, the greater the risks to our people and the less likelihood we're going to be able to capture and/or kill some of the people who would result from the intelligence take here," Rumsfeld told Face the Nation,  "I would have preferred a lot less discussion out of the White House,” Rumsfeld emphasized. AMEN. 
 
 
Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,
Rajjpuut
 
 
**Obama made it clear to the nation and it was further revealed when NASA Administrator Charles Bolden said in an interview with Al Jazeera, the Muslim newspaper, that his “foremost” mission as director of the space agency is to improve relations with the Muslim world. “(President Obama) wanted me to find a way to reach out to the Muslim world and engage much more with dominantly Muslim nations to help them feel good about their historic contribution to science … and math and engineering,” This while cancelling several space missions and the successful shuttle program . . . great priorities, Mr. President!
 
^^ While ignoring to mention the Egyptian uprisings (during the last three weeks) aimed against that nation’s 10% Coptic Christian population, Mr. Obama let it be known that the “Holy Quran” had been consulted as far as the treatment of the terrorist’s body as a whole aircraft carrier’s crew stood in dress uniform at attention during a ceremony for Usama Bin Laden conducted in English and Arabian before his body was allowed to slip into the ocean. Mr. Obama, your sensibilities to Islam are very insensitive to me.
 
 
  
Read more…

America in Transition

MSN) – “Osama bin Laden warned in the final tape he recorded before being killed by American commandos there will be no US security without Palestine security.” By all means, let us give Palestine security.  Sorry Israel, we have to look out for ourselves.

 

The blogs here say Obama is un-American.  Unfortunately, if the election were held today there is not a Republican who could beat Obama.  Republicans are as guilty as Democrats for a spineless America.  America’s future hangs by a thread and no leader has an answer of how, or even if we will ever return to constitutional government.  Don’t be fooled by what you read. It can happen; it is going to happen. For a undeniable fact, America is heading full steam for moral, spiritual, and fiscal bankruptcy, and finally third world status.

 

Barack Obama ran for President with the promise to transform America. His plan now reveals itself to be a socialist  America, himself the dictator of another banana republic. 

 

My thoughts at www.mymiraclemessage.com tell the story of a different outcome at the next election, a story you don’t hear.  Both Obama’s and my story are personal, and with far-reaching implications.  Obama’s story is well known; mine is not.  Mine is all-American; Obama’s is not. 

 

Not a single soul in Congress is calling Obama’s hand.  Remember Obama’s contender, a Republican, at the last election called Obama a nice man—could not find a bad thing to say about the lying fraud.  And the Republican Speaker of the House is there because the Tea Party put him there.  He’s also a traitor to our cause.  So don’t go on the results of the mid-term election. The Republicans threw the last presidential election and they will do the same again. The fate of the nation is in our hands.  We’ve got to pick the right man. Be prepared for hard times and the faith that you can overcome.

 

My story began in Flower Mound, Texas in 1975, on Good Friday, the day Christ was hung from a cross. My business enterprise was on the rocks and my wife was divorcing me.  At age 49, my life was over.  I blamed Uncle Sam. I was one angry dude.  

 

In 1973, I happened upon Edward S. Corwin’s essay The “Higher Law” Background of American Constitutional Law. Corwin was a law professor. He published his essay in 1925, the year of my birth. After reading said essay, I went to the country law library to study constitutional law and the legal procedure for taking the IRS to court, where I would be one on one. I thought wrongly.  When I studied the Constitution, I felt that voices from the past were speaking to me.  My anger was sublimated by a bigger than life calling. I was in control; the IRS went crazy; I went public.  The IRS ate crow on the front page.  Uncle Sam is still robbing the American people. Where would the self-serving swindlers in Washington be if it were not for federal income tax.  I proved that federal income tax is the biggest fraud of all times.  Osama bin Laden hated America because federal income tax turned America into a beast. Thousands of Americans lost their lives, and what does Obama do? He turned his back on us at ground zero the other day.  Our lives are worth nothing to this man.

 

I cut from the herd on Good Friday 1975, arriving in Miami, Florida on Easter Sunday for the first day of my new life, but unconscious of the meaning.  I was born again, not from a Christian’s point of view, but in a universal point of view.

 

Twenty-five years later, I decided to write my memoirs. One morning, first thing, I penned my thoughts on a yellow pad, the same as now.  It became a daily undertaking.  Eleven years of mind search has put me in touch with the self I knew not. 

 

Why I was reborn and others are not is the question.  The answer is lack of action.  We know the problem but we don’t act.  We are taught to go with the flow and don’t make waves.  We’ve changed to become herds grazing in green pastures, while wolves are preparing to devour us.

 

Shortly after my departure, by chance, I met an astrologer and asked him to make my astrological chart. His description of my positive side did not fit, naturally, because I’d not lived the life I was meant to live.  I’d lived according to my oppositions. 

 

Uranus is my ruling planet. When I was in my forties, Uranus had transited to a position opposing itself when I was born.  This indicated a change in my life.  When I was forty-nine, I departed my old life and never looked back.   I became an individual in my own right.  I left my mark.

 

Call it capitalist—reliance on self. Don’t be confused by what you read.  In and of itself, capitalism is not in any way connected with greed, not anymore than socialism is connected with generosity. Obama’s social director told young students that her favorite leader was Mao.  Mao murdered millions.  Mao’s response: “We can afford it.” Obama is engaged in class warfare. With Obama in control, your life is worth zero.  The good of all is all that counts; that is, in Obama’s notion of what is good.  Let me tell you that Obama’s idea is not the way it works. We live in a do-it-yourself world, the one and only way it works.

 

I went to sea, and of all places in the Bermuda Triangle where hundreds of ships and aircraft have disappeared without a trace.  When you are on a small boat on the vast ocean, which in minutes can become life threatening, and there is no one but you, who do you turn to for help?  I looked within for help. God’s hand was on my wheel.  In a storm at sea, with God’s help, I sailed my sloop Bold Venture through the tempest to safety.  The three friends with me called it a miracle. 

 

For someone who cut from the herd, in all saving seven lives, including my own, from a watery grave, indeed, it was miraculous, my time at sea.  I returned to conventional life the person I was meant to be. The miracles continued. For one, I found the right mate to spend the rest of my life with.  All I can say is that from a failed life, now my life could not be any better. Was it the luck of the draw?  The choice is yours, man’s answers or God’s answers, Obama’s socialism or the Constitution.

My 57 blogs at www.mymiraclemessage.com, my latest early morning thoughts, tell the story of how this loser turned his life around.  The thousands of favorable comments to my blogs here tell you that energy is building for a change that neither the Republicans, Obama, the Tea Party, or anyone else with a voice envisions.  

You don’t have to join to comment on my blogs. Very few comments have come on my latest blogs.  Apparently, most are coming from people who have been referred to my blogs, perhaps by Twitter or the like.  There are far too many comments to read. Also, I’m receiving thousands of emails that go to junk mail.

On my blog, “About America’s Lost Soul,” today Suchecki55@gmail.com  says: “Nice post. Thank you.”

Levi Dittrich  today, on “America’s Dysfunctional Government,”  says: “Ran across your website when I was looking for knowledge for our site. Obviously, this may not be at all relative, nonetheless, it’s amusing how one can reach a website accidentally and discover one’s self looking through something totally different but just as valuable. I tend to get distracted a too often because of this.”

What this says is that actually what is out of control is control. One on one communication is having an impact on our thinking.  When the potential reaches a certain point, you know what happens. Lightning strikes.

Read more…

Obama’s Attack on Private Industry!

Posted on The Heritage Foundation-On May 9, 2011:

You might think that a U.S. company’s decision to expand its manufacturing facilities and create 1,000 new jobs here at home — rather than overseas — would be hailed by the Obama Administration as a step in the right direction, especially with nine percent unemployment. You’d be wrong. Instead, President Barack Obama’s National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) is doing all it can to throw a wrench in the machinery of private industry.

The story begins with Boeing Corporation’s decision to build a new assembly plant in Charleston, South Carolina, in order to produce the 787 Dreamliner, the company’s fastest selling airliner. (To date, Boeing has 800 planes on order.) The NLRB, which is charged with remedying unfair labor practices, got wind of the decision and last month filed a complaint against Boeing, alleging that the company decided to build the plant in South Carolina out of retaliation for union strikes at its Washington state facilities.

Those locations have caused difficulties for Boeing. The International Association of Machinists (IAM) regularly goes on strike during contract negotiations, causing Boeing to miss orders and costing it billions in lost business. Boeing considered building its new plant in Washington, but the IAM refused to sign a long-term no-strike agreement. That played a role in Boeing’s decision to expand into South Carolina, a right-to-work state with a good business and tax climate, as Heritage’s Rea Hederman, Jr., and James Sherk explain.

The NLRB’s actions are drawing strong criticism from Republicans in the U.S Senate. ”It’s clearly outside of the authority of this federal government to be threatening and bullying and trying to intimidate companies like Boeing who should have the freedom to locate their plants anywhere they want. It’s intimidation,” Senator Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) said Wednesday. DeMint joined with 18 senators in writing a letter to the president last week condemning the NLRB’s complaint:

“We consider this an attack on millions of workers in 22 right-to-work states, as well as a government-led act of intimidation against American companies that should have the freedom to choose to build plants in right-to-work states.

If the NLRB prevails, it will only encourage companies to make their investments in foreign nations, moving jobs and economic growth overseas. America will not win the future if Washington penalizes workers in states that have discovered winning economic strategies.”

But in a White House where the cozy relationship between big labor and big government couldn’t be any closer, the NLRB’s moves are just the Obama administration’s latest effort to come to the defense of the union machine. And it’s also a direct shot at private industry’s freedom to make fundamental business decisions, which has serious consequences for the U.S. economy. Hederman and Sherk write:

“If the Obama Administration succeeds, it will chill business investment. Unions raise business costs and discourage employers from investing and expanding. Studies consistently show that unionized employers create fewer jobs than non-union employers. Forcing businesses to invest in states with bad business climates will cause them to scale back their investments. It might create a few more jobs for union members, but will mean fewer jobs and higher unemployment in the economy overall.”

President Obama has remained silent on the issue, with a White House official maintaining that the NLRB’s complaint is an “independent agency’s enforcement action.” Governor Nikki Haley (R-S.C.) isn’t satisfied and has a pointed question for the president, as National Review Online reports.

“I want to ask him why he is allowing unelected bureaucrats to come in and do the unions’ dirty work on the backs of our businesses . . . It’s hurting the jobs in South Carolina and every other right-to-work state. He owes us an answer.”

The answer to Haley’s question can be found in the Obama-big labor alliance. If the Obama NLRB prevails, it will have struck a significant blow against right-to-work states by significantly expanding labor’s ability to dictate where companies do business, all while solidifying their base of political power. The losers, unfortunately, will be private industry, job seekers and the U.S. economy.”

Source:

http://blog.heritage.org/2011/05/09/morning-bell-obamas-attack-on-private-industry/?utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Morning%2BBell

Note:  We, as God, family and country loving Americans, must keep our eyes on the ball and not be distracted by the relentless propaganda being fed to us on a daily basis as part of this President and his minion’s transformation strategy.

My following blog post contains numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts, please copy the web site and paste on your browser.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered controversial is being censored-what happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…

A member stated on another blog on this site their concern about how our children are being educated to be immoral and anti-American. Their question was soo good I decided to make it a blog topic.

 

My response: I think what you are saying is the parents have lost control over the education of their children. As a result non-American values have seeped in. 

Let’s look at it this way. In 1970 there were 125,000 school districts, now there are less than 25,000 school district with an expanding population since 1970, therefore, our school districts have been 'Super-Sized" 'i.e. bigger is better!? 

However, what this 'big' approach does is exclude parent input in the education of their children and children in their area.  A person must be a millionaire to run for a School District seat . 

Not only that, but, are the children in downtown Detroit the same as in rural Virginia?  NO, therefore, the parents should assist in the creation of the 'type' of education their children should receive 'as per' their local upbringing.

The Gov't believes all children everywhere must be treated the same and the Gov't knows best how to do that, therefore, parents should keep out of the way.

All I can say is: If bigger is best, Miss America would be 900 pounds! lol

Parents MUST downsize school districts, take control of their children’s education and fire the gov't. Then and only then can Citizens control the school districts, thereby controlling what is being taught.

Want pray in schools? Vote on it. What to teach gun safety? Vote on it. Want to teach farming or social skills? Vote on it.

Or is this too much power for the sheep to brandish?  

Read more…

Did you catch this terrific article under the video entitled "Social Justice in Schools...........".  If you did not it is repeated here for your perusal!  One of the ladies in one of the other videos asked a very important question: she asked if we were becoming a nation of sheep?  My question is are we on our way to being sheered?  They certainly sheered us financially in the past several years!  What other sheering do they have in mind?

 

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

 

WAKE UP AMERICA BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE!

Read more…

The U.S. was a Republic with a limited government, but for the past 60 years we have been moving leftward across the spectrum towards total government with each new piece of socialist legislation.  What was considered conservative 60 years ago is now considered far right crazy radical.  The public has been brainwashed thoroughly by the media and the socialists and the big money boys who are behind the socialist movement.  You would think they would be against the socialist movement but not so.  The socialist movement provides them an opportunity to ultimately grab control of the government and to implement their one world government wherein they are sitting in the cat bird seat dictating to the population who at that point in time have become no better than slaves.  The bottom line is that both the democrats and the republicans are pushing the socialist agenda on purpose or unknowingly.  The politicans know what is going on and as FDR once said "In politics, nothing happens by accident.  If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way."  Why did they push our factories out of the country?  They want us to think that it was a coincident and that no one really understood the terrible unemployment ramifications.  If anyone believes that I have a bridge for sale for a bargain basement price.   Why did they establish the Federal Reserve?  So we can pay interest on the money and run up the debt?  Who gets this interest money that we pay on the debt?  Why are we continually pushed into more and more debt?  Who benefits from this increasing debt?  We need to seriously think about these things and to discuss them with our associates. 

When someone like Sarah Palin stands up for God, Pro Life and Country it blows them away.  They can't handle it.  But the reverse was true 60 years ago.  If you were anti-God or anti-baby you were considered a screwball and would be shunned.  The socialists are winning!  They are achieving one victory after another!  The end result will be tragedy for allHistorically, socialism leads to tragedy, death and destruction.  Remember WWII!  We all need to wake up and make each other aware that we are all being cooked slowly in the socialist crock pot even though it is warm and comfy in there for the time being.  But eventually we will be thoroughly cooked and served up to the One Worlders to be devoured and enslaved.

WAKE UP AMERICA BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE!  Wake up and pray with all your might to the Lord God to save us from these misguided socialists.  God can do anything!  He can stop them in their tracks and even reverse their thinking and ideas but the price to be paid is our intense and never ending adoration, praise and worship of our beloved and merciful Creator.  Eventually He will hear our prays and pleas and he will deliver but not until we humble ourselves and become obedient to His Commandments.  These revolutionaries have the money but God is more powerful than any amount of money they can bring to bear in their socialistic efforts.  They have brainwashed two generations of college graduates who are now confused.  It takes years to unravel the socialist propaganda that was fed to them piecemeal over the past 60 years.  It is hard for them to think for themselves and to reject the wonderful opportunities that are presented to them by those who have the money.  No revolution was ever successful without a huge amount of financing from those who want to achieve control.  But no amount of money can defeat God the Almighty and All Powerful.  His love and support are free.  His mercy and assistance know no end.  We need to wake up and turn our lives over to Him in order to save ourselves and our loved one from future destruction that is closing in on us daily.  Why are the socialist against the Churches?  They know that they cannot ultimately control those who have a deep and abiding faith in the Almighty.  That is why historically in their past revolutions they have destroyed Churches, killed Priests, Ministers and Rabbis without hesitation.  That is why they are always on the outlook for any little mistake that the Churches may make and they are not adverse to making up charges or expanding and blowing up existing human errors made by Church going folks.  Pray...Pray...Pray...

WAKE UP AMERICA BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE!

Read more…

Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On May 8, 2011:

HONOLULU, Hawaii – A private investigator claims employees of the state Department of Health forged three Hawaiian birth certificates for Barack Obama to “screw with birthers.”

Takeyuki Irei told WND one document placed the birth at Kapiolani hospital, another at Queens Medical Center and a third in Kenya.

The 57-year-old detective, who has been a P.I. since the 1980s, said he was stunned when he discovered that the purported copy of Obama’s original birth certificate released by the White House was more or less an exact image of one of the forgeries.

Jerome Corsi’s new book, “Where’s the Birth Certificate?,” is now available for immediate shipping, autographed by the author, only from the WND Superstore.

Irei said he was provided a copy of the document indicating a Queens birthplace but ascribed no importance to it. He explained that he was focused on finding evidence that Obama was born in Kenya, which he thought would provide a financial windfall.

He also said a likeness of the certificate indicating a Kenyan birthplace was published more than a year ago by a website that presented itself as a Hawaiian news organization. Later, it spread virally even though it was rejected as fraudulent by investigators, because the purported signature of Obama’s maternal grandmother, Madelyn Dunham, was misspelled.

He also said a likeness of the certificate indicating a Kenyan birthplace was published more than a year ago by a website that presented itself as a Hawaiian news organization. Later, it spread virally even though it was rejected as fraudulent by investigators, because the purported signature of Obama’s maternal grandmother, Madelyn Dunham, was misspelled.

The image released by the White House was trumpeted as “proof positive” Obama was born in Hawaii in an announcement accompanied by a rare presidential statement on the issue.

However, few other officials were talking. Hawaii authorities ordered WND not to contact the state employee identified as the source of the phony certificates. Also, WND learned the state’s employees had been ordered not to respond to WND questions.

Officials at Kapiolani also refused WND permission to ask questions of anyone at the hospital. Spokesman Shawn Nakamoto told WND the hospital would not respond to anyone at “your organization.”

Likewise, officials at Punahou High School, where Obama graduated, also refused WND access to information that often is available, such as copies of student newspapers.

Irei explained the state employee told him the fake records were kept in a vault in Room 303 of the Hawaii Department of Health. The room, next to the director’s office, is well known and holds files such as the records of residents of the Kalaupapa leper colony on the island of Molokai.

But Irei pointed out that the obviously fraudulent Kenya-birth document published by the Aloha Reporter website contains markings that appear to coincide with markings found on the document recently released by the White House.

Among other things, the “Certificate of Live Birth” on the Reporter page says the birthplace was “Kenya; Registered Honolulu HRS 338-17-8 per Grandmother.”

The document lists the race for the father, “Barack Hussein Obama Sr.,” as “Negro-African.”

But it was the document released by the White House April 27 that stunned Irei.

He said the document indicating Obama’s birth as Kapiolani looks just like the Queens Medical Center document he had previously possessed, except the hospital name and the doctor’s name were different.

“When I saw the birth certificate the White House released, I realized the story had changed from Obama being born at Queens, to him being born at Kapiolani,” the detective told WND. “In 2008, when I first got the birth certificate, all the news reports [were] that Obama had been born at Queens.”

As WND reported, United Press International and Snopes stated at one time that Obama had been born in Queens Medical Center.

But after a WND story on the topic was published, both sites suddenly changed the birth hospital to Honolulu’sKapiolani Medical Center for Women and Children.

At the time, Snopes sent WND a statement reading, “A number of readers have written to us to point out that Wikipedia previously updated their Obama-related entries to resolve the same discrepancy, so we included a similar clarification in our latest round of updates.”

WND requested confirmation from the state Department of Health that the image released by the White House is an accurate representation of the original Hawaii records. Spokeswoman Janice Okubo referred the question to Donalyn DelaCruz in the office of Gov. Neil Abercrombie. DelaCruz did not respond to a WND request.

WND also requested comment from the White House but did not receive a response.

Two retired police officers in Honolulu, who asked not to be identified for security reasons, also told WND they believe the White House document is a forgery, and they are trying to identify who created it.

Irei said he discounted the worth of the copy of the Queens document he obtained, as he thought the “money” would be in documenting a Kenyan birth.

He said he became convinced that Obama was not born in Hawaii because he believed the online “Certification of Live Birth” posted by the Obama campaign was faked, and he could not understand Obama’s vehement refusal to allow his records to be released.

If there was documentation of a Hawaii birth, he reasoned, Obama would have no reason to conceal information and would have authorized the release of his records.

He said he and a partner began searching for evidence that Obama might have been born in Kenya. They approached the state employees, asking for help.

Irei said the initial documentation he obtained from the Department of Health employee was the birth certificate indicating Obama was born at Queens. The doctor was listed as John Ohtani, whom Irei remembered as the doctor who also had delivered his own son, Chad, in 1980.

WND confirmed that Ohtani practiced at Queens during the years in questions. He has since died.

Irei said he kept the copy of the Queens document on file until about two months ago when his office was being repainted. The folder holding the birth certificate was among some 20 boxes of old records that were destroyed in the cleanup.

“I thought the money would be in proving Obama was born in Kenya,” he said.

“I wish I knew what I had, and I wish I kept it. We thought because the birth certificate we had was fake, it wasn’t worth any money. I wish we knew what we had,” he said.

“Whoever forged these birth certificates wanted to cover all angles,” he said. “Even making a birth certificate that showed Obama was born in Kenya that was an obvious forgery. The grandmother’s name was forged.”

Irei said the question still remains, “Where was Obama born and who has his real birth certificate?”

The authenticity of the image released by the White House has also been challenged by numerous document specialists.

Moreover, there remains a long list of other unanswered questions. Former Health Department chief Chiyome Fukino, according to NBC News reporter Michael Isikoff, said she had seen the original birth certificate prior to Obama’s public document release and that it was “half typed and half handwritten,” a statement that clearly conflicts with what the president actually released, which was typewritten.

Nevertheless, the White House has expressed confidence the document it released would answer all of the questions about Obama’s presidential eligibility. But those who contend the country’s founders meant to exclude dual citizens from the presidency say the document actually proves Obama’s ineligibility, since it lists Barack Obama Sr. as the father, but he never was a U.S. citizen.

The president himself even affirmed parental citizenship was a constitutional issue when he co-sponsored a resolution to address Sen. John McCain’s presidential eligibility that implied a “natural born Citizen” must be born of “American citizen” parents.

Hawaii says it has Obama’s original long-form birth certificate in a bound volume in a secure vault. Department of Health spokeswoman Okubo explained to WND that the original was copied onto “safety paper,” and copies were sent to the president.

The White House then posted at image of the copy on this website and made copies to hand out to the press corps.

The document was analyzed by Ivan Zatkovich of Tampa-based eComp Consultants, which consults on intellectual property for telecommunications, web publishing and ecommerce and has provided services for corporations such as McGraw-Hill, Houghton-Mifflin, Citicorp and Amazon.com. Zatkovich has 28 years experience in computer science and document management. For more than 10 years he has been an expert witness in federal court in both criminal and civil litigation.

He contended that the multiple layers of the PDF document are anomalous.

“When a paper document is scanned on a scanner and saved as a PDF file it normally contains only a single layer of graphical information. The PDF that appears on the White House website however, contains multiple layers of graphic information. Multiple layers usually appear in a document like this when it is being edited or modified in some fashion,” his report said.

“It is possible to take a single layer PDF and inadvertently create multiple layers, without changing the image in any fashion. But that does not appear to be the case here. The multiple layers in the PDF document are a result of changes made to the image.”

Zatkovich told WND that the White House image “has specific content extracted from that base layer and enhanced.”

He said, “This was done through an explicit operation to edit and/or enhance the printing in the document. There is no ambiguity here. There was an explicit action by a person to modify the document. … Mostly like to enhance the legibility, but still an explicit action none the less.”

He explained the analysis he did was similar to the analysis that routinely is done on evidentiary documents for cell phones and computers in cases involving child porn, fraud and murder cases.

“The content clearly indicates that the document was knowingly and explicitly edited and modified before it was placed on the web,” he said.

Note: Media interested in interviewing Jerome Corsi beginning next Tuesday when his book is officially released shouldemail media@wnd.com.

WND Editor Joseph Farah is available to discuss today’s breaking stories on eligibility. Contact media@wnd.com.”

Source:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=295369

Note:  My following blog post contains numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Could the President’s newly released COLB be a forgery?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/04/29/could-the-president’s-newly-released-colb-be-a-forgery/

Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts, please copy the web site and paste on your browser.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered controversial is being censored-what happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…

Posted on Saving Our Parish-By Thomas G. Kane: 

You know the destruction of Christian churches is becoming common practice in today’s world.  It is just as disturbing and sad as ever, but we have become desensitized to it.  If you check the news of the last couple weeks you will read of Christian churches destroyed in Egypt, Iraq, Kosovo (28 in three days and 75 in a year), Nigeria, Turkey,  Ukraine, Indonesia (1,700 in the last 15 years) Burma, India and even  France and Greece. 

Twenty percent of the Catholic Churches on the Gulf Coast were destroyed by Hurricane Katrina.   We have heard of the destruction of churches during the various wars and incidents of  armed conflict and some countries have suffered greatly in their developing histories as the result of religious persecution. 

The Irish most notably had almost all of their churches brought to ruin by the English during their various invasions and persecutions.  The English even went so far as to outlaw the Catholic Faith and subject religious members and the faithful to death.   The Irish, as did other persecuted people, cherished the ruins of their churches and rebuilt them or rebuilt beside them, but always holding the ground and remains of those destroyed churches as hallowed, protected and things to be preserved.

I guess we did the same with that little church called the Alamo in San Antonio.  Today’s violence is primarily non-Christian faiths versus Christian faiths and people, but the past also dealt with Christian nation versus Christian nation, with often the same savageness and disastrous impact. 

During my military career I was lucky enough to be assigned briefly to a very devout country which cherished its Catholic faith and churches--Lithuania. The Lithuanian people are over 90 percent Roman Catholic.  They have been in the footpath of conquest. The French, the Germans and most recently the Soviet Union, who along with the Nazis, tried to erase this Catholic culture, but all failed.  Their faith meant more to them than anything.  

The Soviets did not provide any funding or support to the Lithuanian people in their preservation of their churches, but these people, the poorest of the, poor saved and preserved their churches.  They were and are things of beauty.  Napoleon during his conquest was so in awe of St. Anne’s Church in Vilnius that had he succeeded in his attack of Russia, he planned to bring it brick by brick back to France.

The Lithuanian people initially are a bit reserved.  When the “wall” fell in Berlin and US aid and troops under the Partnership for Peace spread into the Baltic and former Soviet Countries, they were distrustful of us as well.  We were in uniforms, as had been the Germans and Russians.  It was not until they witnessed our acts of kindness and upon entering their church, saw me genuflect and make the sign of the cross, that they welcomed me into the international Body of  the Church that has no borders. I was hugged and kissed and treated like a hero all for entering a church and recognizing what that church meant to them and to me. These people kept their faith and the symbols of their faith alive against overwhelming odds and difficulties. 

We have grown to accept a world of intolerance that places us against one another and leads us to question our Christian ideals and the possibility of men of different religions and political philosophies living together in peace, but we always knew that this would be a difficult thing.  We pray for peace and have faith that such may be possible through the example of Christ.  

What is always the most difficult thing to accept are the attacks from within; the true danger and threat to our Christian faith.  Heresy, Division, hypocrisy,violations of the tenants of our faith and abuses by those empowered to lead us in our faith.  These are not new things and the Church has battled these evils for centuries, convening councils and synods to address issues that split the faith.  We had basic principles and practices which we lived by and a code of canon law. 

God has often sent special people to lead us through these tough times and challenges to our faith--Francis of Assisi, Theresa of Avila, Thomas Aquinas, Augustine, Bonaventure and several others.  More recent examples would be Kateri Tekakwitha, Mother Theresa, John Paul II and now Pope Benedict XVI.  They provided symbols and examples of our faith which gave us something to cling to and face the challenges that would come.

Who would have thought that we would be battling to save our church in the United States of  America and in the little town of Corning, New York?  The threat here is just as real as the threat faced by the Lithuanian and Irish people and those who have seen their churches destroyed by forces from the outside.   Our faith must remain strong against all threats both external and internal and we must stand for what we know is right, the faith given to us by our fathers and Christ Himself as displayed through his Church.

We cannot afford to lose any more symbols or examples of our faith in a world that would destroy our faith and our God if given the chance. We truly are battling the forces of evil. We must make our leaders aware of our opinions, our faith in them and that we have been taught to know the value of our church and faith, and trust that they will not abandon us when we ask for their aid and support.

As a soldier I was always trained to trust in my leadership and I guess I am doing that once again. When you see something wrong, you just have a duty to speak out and hope you will be heard, but in the end follow the orders of your superiors unless it is unlawful or immoral.  Thomas G. Kane”

Source:

http://www.savingourparish.com/The_Destruction_of_Churches_from_a_Soldier.pdf

NoteMy following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Faith of Our Forefathers!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/09/faith-of-our-forefathers/

Have the “power elite” and pseudo-experts covertly sold us corruption disguised as freedom?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/09/have-the-“power-elite”-and-pseudo-experts-covertly-sold-us-corruption-disguised-as-freedom/

Restoring Honor In America!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/08/29/restoring-honor-in-america/

Does Europe have a future?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/09/does-europe-have-a-future/

Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts, please copy the web site and paste on your browser.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered controversial is being censored-what happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…

Posted on Israel National News-By Chana Ya'ar-On May 8, 2011:

Fear of Islam by at least some Americans was obvious Friday on a flight between two states in the southeastern United States.

Two Muslim clerics were pulled off a plane flying from Tennessee to North Carolina. The imams, who were on their way to a conference on Islamaphobia sponsored by the North American Imams Federation, were both wearing traditional attire.

Both are religious leaders in Memphis Muslim communities. Masudur Rahman is also a professor at the University of Memphis. He and Mohamed Zaghloul contacted the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) after they were asked to leave by Transportation Security Authority (TSA) personnel because passengers were “uncomfortable.”

CAIR spokesman Ibrahim Hooper told CNN, “They went through security, even went through secondary security, got on the plane and were taxiing out.”  But the plane never made it into the air, he said, because the pilot said passengers didn’t want to fly with the two Muslim clerics in the plane. 

“TSA came on and pulled them off and said the pilot was refusing to fly with them because passengers were uncomfortable with them.” Delta, which owns Atlantic Southeast Airlines, sent officials to re-screen the two clerics, and found them to be no threat. 

The Delta officials tried to return the two men to the plane and even interviewed passengers on the flight to try and see what the problem was. They even offered to place uncomfortable passengers on an alternative flight if they wished, but no one wanted to leave, Hooper said.

However, “the pilot absolutely refused, and ultimately took off,” without the two clerics, Hooper reported.

The airline refused to say why the two men were pulled off the flight, but said they were offered the opportunity to board another flight. A terse statement from the airline said, “Atlantic Southeast Airlines flight 5452 from Memphis to Charlotte returned to the gate to allow for additional screening of a passenger and the passenger’s companion. 

“We take security and safety very seriously. The event is currently under investigation, and we apologize for any inconvenience that this may have caused.”

Source:

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/143978#replies

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Should Americans Fear Islam?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/05/should-americans-fear-islam/

What are CAIRs obstructionist goals?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/03/06/6951/

Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts, please copy the web site and paste on your browser.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered controversial is being censored-what happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…

Has anyone wondered what was before the Big Bang?  From nothing you get nothing.  Here’s a fit that you don’t hear.  You be the judge. The time-space universe is events and the time it takes to get from one event to another.  The Big Bang commenced with time in a millionth of a second and millions of events in the space the size of a pinhead. 

 

If you want to know about something you examine the parts. That’s what quantum physicists do.  What they determine is the beginning of our reality, a dimension of infinite possibility and an observer.  Our minds interact with matter to form our reality.  An idea, having no form by itself, but giving figure and form to shapeless matter, becomes the manifestation. Plutarch (40-120 A.D.)  “And God said (Gen 1:26), Let us make man in our image.”  Our image?

 

Who or what was the original observer?  Some say there are parallel universes.  Where is your consciousness? It is in a state, without boundary. You set the boundary.   If you were a passenger on a plane that went down, let us say in northern Canada, and it was a hundred miles to the nearest town, I dare say your conscious awareness would immediately expand.  

 

When I was 49, I made a clean break with my past life.  When I departed, everyone I knew thought I’d lost my mind. Numerology tells us the number 1 represents the pioneer striking out alone seeking the experience that will establish its distinct identity.  In Numerology and The Divine Triangle, the number 7 being my “Path of Destiny” number, “You psychically separate the true from the false and can discover and reveal some of the mysteries of life to a waiting world.”  Also, the number 9, the highest number, represents selflessness, a love for all.  “It desires to apply its energy to universal service. It bestows an impersonal but just view of life. This is the artist and thinker who has developed skills through the preceding cycles and is now ready to share his or her knowledge to the rest of the world.”  I’m in my twilight of life. My aim is to share what I’ve learned.

 

I’m Virgo with Aquarius rising. Astrologer Jeanne Avery: “He is a forerunner in setting style, discovering new methods, and showing the rest of humanity the way.”

 

On the day of departure from my old life in Texas, Good Friday 1975, the day Christians commemorate as the day Christ was crucified, found me arriving in Miami, Florida on Easter Sunday, the day Christ rose from the dead. Quite an event when you think about it, the first day of my new life.  I went to sea. During my two years at sea, I saved seven lives from a watery grave, one being my own. Saving lives is what Jesus did during his time on earth. 

 

I wasn’t a Christian. Strange that I would find Jesus involved in my life.  But I had studied the U. S. Constitution before my departure, during which time I felt that voices from the past were speaking to me.  I felt a bigger than life calling.   Coincidentally, on July 4, 1776, America’s Independence Day,  America was born under the sign of Aquarius.   Astrologer Jeanne Avery speaking of Aquarius, “He can brand himself a maverick or an oddball. He screams the world, ‘Don’t fence me in.’ The universe is his playground.”   Whatever, upon my departure from my old life, I was reborn.  Jefferson, who authored the Declaration of Independence, wasn’t a Christian. He believed in nature’s God and natural law, one nation under God.

 

Curious of what Jesus said, I turned to The Gospel According to St. Matthew.  In Chapter Two, I learned that the three wise men followed the Star of Bethlehem to the place of Christ’s birth and worshipped him.  The three wise men were Persian astrologers.  In the beginning of civilization, Persian wise men drew a circle and divided it into twelve equal pie shaped parts, giving each part a sign, one being Aquarius.  They called it the zodiac. 

 

Kings were advised by wise men.  King Herod called upon the Persian wise men to tell him where Jesus was so he could worship the new king of Jews.  Joseph and Mary escaped to Egypt with Jesus, we read. King Herod killed all the babies in Bethlehem two years and younger. 

 

In Chapter 6, we read that Jesus, in his Sermon on the Mount, said “in earth as it is in heaven,” followed by, “But seek ye first the kingdom of God.”  Earth and heaven are places. Where is the kingdom of God?  Is God way out there somewhere in the vastness of a place called Heaven?  If so, how could we know God and his plan for us?  By reading what Jesus said, instead of listening  to someone tell me what he said, I question the idea that only a privileged few know God’s plan for us.  Religious authorities tell us we are sinners. We must beg forgiveness in order to get to Heaven, and leave a donation before we leave our place of worship. Sounds pretty commercial to me.

 

The Bible tells us that Jesus turned over the money changers’ tables in the temple.  The money changers were exchanging silver and gold coins for worthless temple money so the faithful could purchase a priest blessed animal to be sacrificed, thereby giving the donor a heavenly address when he died.  What’s the difference in any faith based idea with nothing substantive to back it? It is OK if you call it a religion.  Any other remedy with nothing to back it is against the law.

 

The benefactors of buying your way to Heaven took Jesus to the Roman governor, who washed his hands and let the priests have their choice, Jesus or a convicted murderer of who to be crucified.  The priests shouted “Jesus” and the crowd yelled the same.    So why am I a sinner?  Why should the authorities speak for me?  Christianity is not a good fit for me. But you go ahead and believe I’m a sinner.  It doesn’t bother me.  I know I’m not.

 

Jesus was born at the beginning of the Age of Pisces.  In Astrologer’s Handbook, we read that Pisces is a sensitive sign and those born under it unconsciously absorb the thoughts of others. I would add the orthodoxy’s ideas. As a rule, we read, they don’t have strong willpower.  I recall that Jesus told his disciples that before the rooster crowed, they would deny him three times. Yep, they were Pisceans.

 

Astrologers tell us that the Age of Pisces is now ending and being replaced by the age of Aquarius.  We read in Astrologer’s Handbook  that individuals born under this sign of brotherhood and fraternity have for their symbol the water-bearer.  The sign of Pisces has for its symbol two attached fish swimming in opposite directions.  Jesus said we are our brother’s keeper.  What that means is a matter of opinion, which I don’t share unless you are speaking in spiritual terms. Christian Obama and his  government dependent following calls it collective salvation—or after me you come first. The courts refer to it as “preferred freedoms.”  We have treated our brothers very badly.  To be fair, we must now redistribute.  How generous Obama and his brethren are with other people’s money.  It is almost too much to bear. Who need enemies when we have Christians like these. Arizona is asking how we exist on what  good Christian Obama leaves us.

 

In The Physics of Consciousness, quantum physicist and brain doctor Evan Harris Walker said, “the structure of the universe finally comes around to the same result (the result I see, too).  Whether to understand the interconnections of will, to understand the most basic facts in quantum theory, or to discover the beginnings of the Big Bang universe, each path leads to the fact that there must exist a supreme Consciousness out of which everything else springs. . . “Faith was never meant to be blind faith.” In truth, we are learning at last “wonders hidden in what you already knew.”

 

On the back cover of Cosmos and Psyche, “distinguished philosopher and cultural historian Richard Tarnas demonstrates the existence of an astonishingly consistent correspondence between planetary alignments and archetypal patterns of human history and biography.”  In the book, we read, under  World Wars, Cold War, and September 11, and therein under the The Saturn-Pluto Cycle, that in November 2008 to December 2011 that the alignments of those planets are square.   When square, it means widespread indulgence, decadence, naiveté, denial, and inflation.  Obama was elected in November 2008.

 

I was born with Saturn trine Pluto.  That is the very best of alignments. Astrologer’s Handbook: “This trine gives the natives the ability to understand the laws by which subtle forces are organized, enabling them to use these laws consciously or unconsciously.”

 

Last February, I decided to start my own Web site. I’ve since entered 57 blogs and received over 4,000 comments, most decidedly favorable.  You wouldn’t think that, not with my far-out philosophy.  A  new energy is building.  You know what happens when the potential reaches a certain point.  Lightning strikes.  Be prepared.  Your world is going to change so much that you would think you are on another planet.

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

Read more…

Is Obama Economy Making You Poor?

Posted on Conservative Byte-By Floyd and Mary Beth Brown-On May 7, 2011:

While Barack Obama spends his time running victory laps around the country over the killing of Osama Bin Laden, the American economy is careening toward a dangerous cliff. Royal Weddings, Obama’s multiple birth certificates, and absurd arguments about the NFL lockout dominate the news while daily Americans get poorer.

Obamanomics is a disaster. A greater disaster hasn’t been visited on the United States in our economic history because we are taking no substantial steps toward recovery. The real news, which should be screaming from every television and newspaper isn’t pro Obama, therefore, it is ignored.

Here are the stories on which we should be focusing. The US dollar has slumped to a record low against major currencies. Since we have devastated our manufacturing base over the last two decades, this will result in Americans paying substantially more for goods on the store shelves in retailers from Walmart to Costco.

The outlook for the recovery has diminished to almost zero. If you subtract the impact of inflation, many economists believe we are actually still in a recession. When I talk to my friends and neighbors outside of Washington DC, we unanimously agree we are still in recession.

Here are some statistics, which will help you understand the pain. More Americans are on food stamps today than at any other time in history. That’s right-the most in history. The number of persons on food stamps is 44.2 million according a recent report from the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Those not on food stamps feel a different pain when they buy groceries. We see unbelievably high prices at the grocery store. The cost of living in the U.S. rose at its fastest pace since December 2009 in the 12 months ended in March. Wheat, meat, vegetables and other grains are all surging in price.

But if you don’t have a job, it is hard to shop for groceries.

Bloomberg reported this week, “Applications for jobless benefits jumped by 43,000 to 474,000 in the week ended April 30, the most since August, Labor Department figures showed today.” This is a serious darkening in the employment clouds just as the recovery was supposed to be broadening.

The unprecedented easy money policies from the Federal Reserve haven’t helped the real economy. Sure, they did pump enough billions of dollars into Wall Street Banks and Government Agencies to make sure the leather loafer wearing crowds in New York City and Washington DC are still swimming in cash. But for the majority of Americans, they have felt only the pain of higher food and energy prices from the misallocation of dollars.

This week, as we fueled a rental car near the San Diego airport, we paid fifteen dollars for three gallons of gasoline. At these prices, Americans are spending as much as $100 a week just to fuel the car to commute to work. Why hasn’t the president cleared the decks to deal with this energy crisis? It is a crisis when it costs as much to commute to work as you make in take home pay. Many Americans are already at this tipping point. Obama mutters on about windmills and electric cars. We need off shore drilling and increased production to ease this pain.

At least open the Strategic Petroleum Reserve to bring down prices in the short term.

While the nation shudders under unmanageable regulatory and monetary burdens, Obama is oblivious. Obama is flying from city to city collecting cash for his re-election drive. And don’t let us forget he is spending over a hundred thousand dollars to a teleprompter coach.

And we thought standing and delivering a prepared text in front of a teleprompter was a skill he had already mastered.How about a coach on how to manage the American economy? Obama’s priorities are obvious, and they aren’t on helping everyday Americans, but his buddies and himself.”

Source:

http://conservativebyte.com/2011/05/obama-economy-is-making-you-poor/

Note:  We, as God, family and country loving Americans, must keep our eyes on the ball and not be distracted by the relentless propaganda being fed to us on a daily basis as part of this President and his minion’s transformation strategy.

My following blog post contains numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts, please copy the web site and paste on your browser.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered controversial is being censored-what happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…

Assuming for the moment that our valiant and courageous Seals did, indeed, kill Osama Bin Laden, as reported,  moments after Barack Hussein released his clearly forged  Long Form "Certificate of Live Birth" and while the U.S. Justice Foundation's Gary Kreep was brilliantly arguing his impeachment before the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, then it would appear that this act, by our "sitting"  Commander In Chief, alone, should warrant Barack Hussein's impeachment!   If this attack and death truly happened,  than clearly, our Seals' knowledge of Bin Laden's whereabouts and planing  for this attack had been months, if not years, in the making!  

 

For our sitting Commander In chief to ORDER  a Strike of this political magnitude timed purely for political capitol and with no regard for the the Safety and Reputation of The United States, would be yet another act  this man has perpetrated, in a long line of such actions,  to bring down our Republic and make us into a third world socialist dictatorship. 

 

It would appear to be  impossible for the Timing of this assault to have been in the best interests of The United States of America, as Ordered by our sitting professional "community organizer" who has surrounded himself with equally radical "organizers" none of whom have any real world experience in anything other than orchestrating socially disruptive behavior to promote a "progressive" agenda in this country.   Any benefit to the United States of America out of this Order by  our "sitting" Commander in Chief" would have been coincidental -- and I do not believe in coincidence. 

 

I would not at all be surprised if Barack Hussein perpetrated yet another round of National Terrorism by islamic Extremists on our country -- which I suspect he will handle in the same manner he is currently handling the daily crossings of illegal alien criminals streaming into our country  across our unprotected Arizona border, by suing State officials dedicated to protecting the safety of the American People and ordering Federal officials not to do their jobs.

 

People, in my opinion we have no time left to get rid of this man and his followers.

Read more…

What Do Conservatives Want?

Posted on Patriot Udpate-By Ann-Marie Murrell-On May 7, 2011:

I recently saw a headline that said, ‘Trump’s Popularity Leaves Political Analysts Perplexed.’

Seriously?  Where are those analysts working, Mars?  What don’t they get about it?  I’m thinking these guys need a little education about what makes politicians super-popular with Americans in 2011.

Basically it boils down to two things:  A politician in America becomes popular by simply speaking out on issues other politicians are afraid of and not backing down when opposition tries to force them to.

It’s the reason people have taken so strongly to men like Col. Allen West and Herman Cain.  While everyone else has been completely namby-pamby and politically correct about Islam, both these men have addressed it in ways Americans want and need to hear.  Despite the president’s preferences for all-things-Muslim, West videos go viral because he flat-out says Islam IS a threat.  Period.  West and Cain both have stated this clearly and succinctly, which is why they have such a huge following.

Arizona Governor Jan Brewer is popular because she bravely stood up for her state in trying to provide more border security, despite strong opposition from the Obama administration.   She could have cowered and disappeared after Obama and his gang started vilifying her regarding SB-1070; instead she kept on fighting and kept the public involved, telling them straight-out that the president had turned his back on Arizona.  They not only turned their back on her, they completely ganged up on her (with the help of scary Mexico) by suing her state.  Yet she still never backed down—and THAT is why she’s so popular.

Gov. Chris Christie became popular because of the Town Hall video in which he did a face-off with a teacher about unions.  He said, ‘We can’t afford this anymore!’ and he didn’t back down (and still hasn’t).  So Christie’s fiscal responsibility and common-sense approach to unions is the reason people like him.

Louisiana’s Gov. Bobby Jindal also stood up to the Obama administration during the BP oil spill.  Jindal bravely told the American public, ‘The president isn’t doing enough!’ while he worked nonstop in the trenches with his people.  That is why he’s popular.

Rep. Michelle Bachmann is popular because of her tireless work with the Tea Party and because she talks to every media source available about fiscal responsibility and how to cut our out-of-control budget.  I first became aware of Bachmann about a year ago when I saw her in a viral YouTube video in which she was talking about people who were losing their car dealerships if they didn’t support nationalized GM.  People fell in love with her when she called this type of bullying ‘Gangster Government’.

Sarah Palin is popular among Conservatives because she loves God, her family and her country—in that order–and isn’t afraid to say so.  Despite constant criticism and unrelenting, brutal (and mostly very personal) scrutiny from the left, Palin has stayed true to who she is and won’t back down on the issues.

Rep. Paul Ryan is popular because instead of taking a scalpel to the budget, he’s trying to use a much-needed chainsaw to cut away the dead wood.  Same with Rep. Marco Rubio and other freshmen politicians who realize the only way to make a real name for themselves politically is to stay true to their campaign promises and to remember that the American Conservative public is watching their every move with eagle-eyes.  Unlike the old-school GOP, these new Congressmen seem to have a greater understanding that America is fed up with politics-as-usual.  We’ve almost lost our country because of apathy and indifference, and they know we aren’t going to take it anymore.

This brings me to the pièce de résistance and the most recent cause for political strategists everywhere to scratch their heads until they’re almost bleeding:  Donald Trump.

To be honest, I’ve never been crazy about The Donald.  The first time I ever heard about him was in the 90’s when he very publicly dumped (and trashed) his ex-wife Ivana, followed by the young chippy he left her for, Marla Maples.  Lots of juicy drama ensued, including his huge bankruptcy, his purchase of the cheesy Miss Universe Pageant and then in 2004 he became a TV star with his show, ‘The Apprentice’.  Soap opera material, for sure.  Donald was basically a joke, with his insane-crazy hair (what the heck IS that mess on his head??) and his strange orangey makeup with too-white concealor under his eyes…

But then, crazy-like-a-fox Trump started speaking out for America.  He asked the ONE QUESTION that has caused regular people to be called ‘Birthers.’  Just when people were giving up on the issue—realizing it would take someone very rich and powerful to uncover the truth about the birth certificate issue—there he was, one of the richest and most powerful men in the universe.  Trump, completely alone, stood up and asked the question we ALL want to know:  “Where’s the birth certificate?”

He could have stopped there, but he also started talking—as a successful businessman– about fiscal responsibility and working to break our dependency with China.  He spoke about the crazy moratoriums on oil drilling in America and he said that we WOULD drill here if he were President.

THESE are the reasons, political analysts from Mars, why Donald Trump and other outspoken politicians are so popular with the American public.  I know there are other issues attached to Trump; his political contributions, some shady dealings with shady people.  But if this man, with his crazy hair and New York-y cadence, can unravel the mystery of the elusive birth certificate and prove once and for all who Barack Hussein Obama really is, he WILL stand a good chance of winning the presidency in 2012 because that’s how we roll in America.  We tend to LIKE people who respect us and our wishes; we LIKE people who defend the greatness of our country and are willing to FIGHT to save her.Not many of the people the ‘analysts’ are trying to force on us are worthy of that loyalty and respect, and yes, it IS that simple.”

Source:

http://patriotupdate.com/articles/what-conservatives-want

Note: My following blog post relates to this issue-You Decide:

The Russian View of What Has Been Happening In America!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/23/the-russian-view-of-what-has-been-happening-in-america/

“Food For Thought”

“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…

US Shariah Infiltrations!

What follows is a three-part series of articles and/or blog posts regarding the infiltration of Sharia within the U.S., which were written by Chuck Norris:

US Shariah Infiltrations (Part 3 of 3):

Posted on Townhall-By Chuck Norris-On May 3, 2011:

Five years ago, Donald Van Duyn, then the deputy assistant director of the FBI’s counterterrorism division, warned us:“Islamic radicalization ... (exists) nationwide. Key to the success of stopping the spread of radicalization is identifying patterns and trends in the early stages.” Van Duyn was exactly right.

In Part 2, I showed five examples of Shariah infiltration in U.S. domestic violence, jurisprudence, commerce and government access and legislation. As you read these next five points of evidence in my top 10, ask yourself: Are there any “patterns and trends” emerging here, as well?

5) We should not be naive to foreign Islamic extremists’ work within our country—a vast network that the FBI has documented well. Just one example of a bubble that surfaced from that underground network occurred during the raid and seizure of secret documents at the Annandale, Va., house of one extremist leader, Ismail Selim Elbarasse. As documented in P. David Gaubatz and Paul Sperry’s investigative expose, “Muslim Mafia,” one letter found there was written by Mohammed Akram Adlouni, a Muslim Brotherhood boss. It described the plans for U.S. takeover and replacing the Constitution with Shariah. Under the heading “The role of the Muslim Brother in North America,” it states: “The Ikhwan must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within, and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by the hands of believers, so that it is eliminated and Allah’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”

4) To win that internal war, extremists recruit not only adults but also youths within the U.S. The Muslim American Society, which the Chicago Tribune linked to the Muslim Brotherhood, is an example. Seven years ago, a Tribune report documented how “over the last 40 years, small groups of devout Muslim men have gathered in homes in U.S. cities to ... (address) their ultimate goal, one so controversial that it is a key reason they have operated in secrecy: to create Muslim states overseas and, they hope, someday in America as well.” It went on to say that MAS “spending often is aimed at schools, teachers and children. ... The group has conducted teacher training programs, issued curriculum guides and established youth centers. ... Part of the Chicago chapter’s Web site is devoted to teens. It includes reading materials that say Muslims have a duty to help form Islamic governments worldwide and should be prepared to take up arms to do so.”

Source:

http://townhall.com/columnists/chucknorris/2011/05/03/us_shariah_infiltrations_part_3_of_3

Holy Week, Holy Shariah (Part 1 of 3)-Posted on Human Events-By Chuck Norris-On April 19, 2011:

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=43031

US Shariah Infiltrations (Part 2 of 3)-Posted on Townhall-By Chuck Norris-On April 26, 2011:

http://townhall.com/columnists/chucknorris/2011/04/26/us_shariah_infiltrations_part_2

NoteMy following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Islam’s Child Martyrs in America!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/02/12/islam’s-child-martyrs-in-america/

Should Americans Fear Islam?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/05/should-americans-fear-islam/

Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts, please copy the web site and paste on your browser.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered controversial is being censored-what happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…

Posted on The Blaze-By Jonathon M. Seidl-On May 6, 2011:

The killing of Osama bin Laden was a great victory for the U.S. intelligence community, but it may well be the last one because of the Obama administration’s refusal to use tough tactics such as waterboarding on terror suspects, former U.S. Attorney General Michael Mukasey warns.

The information that led U.S. agents to bin Laden could not have been obtained without stringent interrogation methods, Mukasey writes in The Wall Street Journal.

“Consider how the intelligence that led to bin Laden came to hand. It began with a disclosure from Khalid Sheikh Mohammed [KSM], who broke like a dam under the pressure of harsh interrogation techniques that included waterboarding. He loosed a torrent of information — including eventually the nickname of a trusted courier of bin Laden,” writes Mukasey, who was the nation’s top law enforcement officer under President George W. Bush from 2007 to 2009.

The Obama administration prevents intelligence officers from doing their work to the best of their ability, he said.

“Policies put in place by the very administration that presided over this splendid success promise fewer such successes in the future. Those policies make it unlikely that we'll be able to get information from those whose identities are disclosed by the material seized from bin Laden. The administration also hounds our intelligence gatherers in ways that can only demoralize them,” he said in the opinion piece published Friday.

Practices such as waterboarding, in which a suspect’s head is held underwater until he believes he is drowning, are used only in extreme cases in which agents know the prisoners have vital information, Mukasey said.

“The harsh techniques themselves were used selectively against only a small number of hard-core prisoners who successfully resisted other forms of interrogation, and then only with the explicit authorization of the director of the CIA. Of the thousands of unlawful combatants captured by the U.S., fewer than 100 were detained and questioned in the CIA program. Of those, fewer than one-third were subjected to any of these techniques,” he said.

Mukasey quoted former CIA Director Michael Hayden as saying that, “as late as 2006, even with the growing success of other intelligence tools, fully half of the government's knowledge about the structure and activities of [al-Qaida] came from those interrogations.”

Far from resorting to illegal methods to obtain information, Muksaey said, the Bush administration “put these techniques in place only after rigorous analysis by the Justice Department, which concluded that they were lawful.”

The Bush administration's decision to call these methods “enhanced interrogation techniques,” which he described as “absurdly antiseptic,” gave rise to unfounded suspicions that the phrase must be a euphemism for something truly beyond the pale.

The former attorney general said that, in April 2009, the Obama administration released previously classified Justice Department documents on the interrogation techniques — “thereby disclosing them to our enemies and assuring that they could never be used again.”

The current administration, in deciding to turn interrogation duties over to the FBI instead of the CIA, had not ensured that its new policies were properly in place, Mukasey said.

Thus, he said, when Omar Faruq Abdulmutallab was caught trying to blow up a plane over Detroit on Christmas Day 2009 with explosives hidden in his underwear, no one was quite sure how to handle him. The Nigerian national was read his Miranda rights, like an ordinary criminal suspect, but “no one had yet gotten around to implementing the new program.”

Although the administration had not yet determined how to handle terror suspects, it had found time to pursue investigations against CIA employees who already had been cleared of any wrongdoing, Mukasey said.

“Yet the Justice Department, revealing its priorities, had gotten around to reopening investigations into the conduct of a half-dozen CIA employees alleged to have used undue force against suspected terrorist,” Mukasey wrote in the WSJ.

Those investigations had been closed formally two years earlier, with no charges filed. Years later, he said, the investigations drag on with no charges in sight, with “prosecutors chasing allegations down rabbit holes, with the CIA along with the rest of the intelligence community left demoralized.”

Source:

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/former-intelligence-agent-terror-group-hezbollah-has-infiltrated-our-southern-border/

NoteMy following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to and/or support this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Middle Eastern illegals find easy entrance into U.S. from Mexico!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/30/middle-eastern-illegals-find-easy-entrance-into-u-s-from-mexico/

Are Intelligence Personnel Empowered to Employ Their Ingenuity and Resourcefulness to Connect The Dots?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/08/are-intelligence-personnel-empowered-to-employ-their-ingenuity-and-resourcefulness-to-connect-the-dots/

Could Steps That Team Obama Has Taken Be Emboldening Terrorists?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/12/30/could-steps-that-team-obama-has-taken-be-emboldening-terrorists/

Does Human Rights Law Apply to Terrorists?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/07/does-human-rights-law-apply-to-terrorists/

Why should terrorists be given the extraordinary protections that you and I have as American citizens?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/03/why-should-terrorists-be-given-the-extraordinary-protections-that-you-and-i-have-as-american-citizens/

When Did the American People Elect Eric Holder Commander in Chief?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/02/05/when-did-the-american-people-elect-eric-holder-commander-in-chief/

Obama and Holder’s Hidden Agenda!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/11/14/obama-and-holders-hidden-agenda/

Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts, please copy the web site and paste on your browser.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered controversial is being censored-what happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…

Posted on The Heritage Foundation-On May 6, 2011:

Despite the good news this week about Osama bin Laden’s demise, all is not rosy for President Barack Obama — at least in the eyes of the American people. The approval of his handling of the economy hit an all-time low with only 34 percent of Americans giving him a thumbs up, according to a CBS/New York Times poll.

Looking for a reason why? According to the Labor Department’s monthly jobs report, unemployment rose from 8.8 percent to 9 percent in April. And though the U.S. economy added 244,000 jobs, beating expectations, the bad news is that when the bar for success is set so low, even increasing unemployment and decent job growth can seem like a silver lining on a dark and stormy cloud. Or if you want another metaphor, try “lipstick on a pig.”

There are other storm clouds in America’s economic picture. New claims for jobless benefits shot through the roof to 474,000 last week, increasing by 43,000, according to a Labor Department report. That’s its highest point since last summer. For the fourth month in a row, labor force participation rate remained flat and jobs are still difficult to find. Meanwhile, gas prices are topping out at $4 per gallon. All in all, the American people sensed what the statistics would show: The U.S. economy continues to drag, and they know full well whom and what is to blame — President Obama and his failed stimulus economic policies.

Just over two years ago, the president launched his much-vaunted stimulus and said his plan would create 3.3 million net jobs by 2010. It didn’t happen, and the American people have been stuck with an unemployment rate hovering around nine percent, not to mention the cost of a $787 billion stimulus that has been much less than stimulating. The Heritage Foundation’s JD Foster explains:

“At best, stimulus efforts based on government spending and tax cuts with little or no incentive effects have done no harm. At best. It is quite possible most of these efforts over the past couple of years have slowed the recovery while adding hundreds of billions of dollars to the national debt.”

Now America is saddled with the price tag and calls by the president to increase the debt ceiling past its $14.3 trillion mark — all so the spending parade can continue. In reality, it’s the spending that’s the problem. To pay for it, the president has proposed tax increases that will only slow growth as the economy is struggling to recover. Heritage’s Curtis Dubay writes:

“These enormous tax hikes will slow down economic growth because they will transfer resources from the productive hands of the private sector to the wasteful hands of Congress, raise energy prices, and reduce incentives to work, save, and invest.”

Rather than helping the economy get on its feet by tearing off the bonds that are hampering its growth, President Obama has added new loads to drag it down. Regulations, uncertainty and bad tax policy are holding back growth, and now — as the United States nears the debt limit — it’s staring down even more spending that will only make matters worse.

The American people know the real problem behind the economic mess. It’s the spending. And no amount of makeup will make the president’s economic pig look better than it really is.

Source:

http://blog.heritage.org/2011/05/06/morning-bell-its-just-lipstick-on-a-pig-mr-president/?utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Morning%2BBell

NoteMy following blog post contains numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to and/or support this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts, please copy the web site and paste on your browser.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered controversial is being censored-what happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…