Some very good comparisons between Bush and Obama. Enjoy!
http://personalliberty.com/2013/04/04/what-if-george-w-bush-were-president/
All Posts (29900)
Sort by
The libs in their ignorance and arrogance are attempting to lay the blame on repubs and consv. People , it is time to push back! Start looking for articles like this one and than commenting , in particular to the libs, give them the facts - they are responsible for this and all future destruction created by obama! If you follow go the the link this article exists on you will see idiots who are obviously libs doing what libs always do - blaming anyone but themselves. Loudly and firmly remind them who created the sequester and why it went into affect. At the end of your comments please quote obama "And you made it happen!"
Cancer clinics are turning away thousands of Medicare patients. Blame the sequester.
Ralph V. Boccia of the Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders runs a cancer clinic that is in danger of losing funding due to the sequester cuts. (Sarah L. Voisin/The Washington Post)
Cancer clinics across the country have begun turning away thousands of Medicare patients, blaming the sequester budget cuts.
Oncologists say the reduced funding, which took effect for Medicare on April 1, makes it impossible to administer expensive chemotherapy drugs while staying afloat financially.
Patients at these clinics would need to seek treatment elsewhere, such as at hospitals that might not have the capacity to accommodate them.
“If we treated the patients receiving the most expensive drugs, we’d be out of business in six months to a year,” said Jeff Vacirca, chief executive of North Shore Hematology Oncology Associates in New York. “The drugs we’re going to lose money on we’re not going to administer right now.”
After an emergency meeting Tuesday, Vacirca’s clinics decided that they would no longer see one-third of their 16,000 Medicare patients.
“A lot of us are in disbelief that this is happening,” he said. “It’s a choice between seeing these patients and staying in business.”
Some who have been pushing the federal government to spend less on health care say this is not the right approach.
“I don’t think there was an intention to disrupt care or move it into a more expensive setting,” said Cathy Schoen, senior vice president of the Commonwealth Fund, which recently released a plan for cutting $2 trillion in health spending. “If that’s the case, we’re being penny-wise and a pound-foolish with these cuts.”
Legislators meant to partially shield Medicare from the automatic budget cuts triggered by the sequester, limiting the program to a 2 percent reduction — a fraction of the cuts seen by other federal programs.
But oncologists say the cut is unexpectedly damaging for cancer patients because of the way those treatments are covered.
Medications for seniors are usually covered under the optional Medicare Part D, which includes private insurance. But because cancer drugs must be administered by a physician, they are among a handful of pharmaceuticals paid for by Part B, which covers doctor visits and is subject to the sequester cut.
The federal government typically pays community oncologists for the average sales price of a chemotherapy drug, plus 6 percent to cover the cost of storing and administering the medication.
Since oncologists cannot change the drug prices, they argue that the entire 2 percent cut will have to come out of that 6 percent overhead. That would make it more akin to a double-digit pay cut.
“If you get cut on the service side, you can either absorb it or make do with fewer nurses,” said Ted Okon, director of the Community Oncology Alliance, which advocates for hundreds of cancer clinics nationwide. “This is a drug that we’re purchasing. The costs don’t change and you can’t do without it. There isn’t really wiggle room.”
Okon’s group has sent letters to legislators urging them to exempt cancer drugs from the sequester or, as a back-up, only shave 2 percent off the money they receive to administer the medications.
Doctors at the Charleston Cancer Center in South Carolina began informing patients weeks ago that, due to the sequester cuts, they would soon need to seek treatment elsewhere.
“We don’t sugar-coat things, we’re cancer doctors,” Charles Holladay, a doctor at the clinic, said. “We tell them that if we don’t go this course, it’s just a matter of time before we go out of business.”
Cancer patients turned away from local oncology clinics may seek care at hospitals, which also deliver chemotherapy treatments.
The care will likely be more expensive: One study from actuarial firm Milliman found that chemotherapy delivered in a hospital setting costs the federal government an average of $6,500 more annually than care delivered in a community clinic.
Those costs can trickle down to patients, who are responsible for picking up a certain amount of the medical bills. Milliman found that Medicare patients ended up with an average of $650 more in out-of-pocket costs when they were seen only in a hospital setting.
It is still unclear whether hospitals have the capacity to absorb these patients. The same Milliman report found that the majority of Medicare patients — 66 percent — receive treatment in a community oncology clinic, instead of a hospital.
Non-profit hospitals will likely have an easier time bearing the brunt of the sequester cuts. A federal program known as 340B requires pharmaceutical companies to give double-digit discounts to hospitals that treat low-income and uninsured patients.
Eastern Connecticut Health Network began preparing for additional volume after a local oncology practice sent out notice that it would stop seeing certain cancer patients.
“What we’re trying to do in the hospital is prepare for this,” ECHN spokesman Eric Berthel said. “We’re making sure we have access to the pharmaceutical companies and that we have appropriate staff on hand. We’re hoping the oncology practice will be successful in renegotiating this. It’s so fresh, so we’re pretty unsure.”
Some cancer clinics are counting on the federal government to provide relief, and continuing to see patients they expect to lose money on.
“We’re hoping that something will change, as legislators see the impact of this,” Ralph Boccia, director of the Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders in Bethesda, Md., said. “I don’t think we could keep going, without a change, for more than a couple of months.”
An analysis prepared by his clinic estimates that, if the full 2 percent cut takes effect, between 50 and 70 percent of the drugs it administers would become money losers.
Boccia estimates that 55 percent of his patients are covered by Medicare, making any changes to reimbursement rates difficult to weather.
“When I look at the numbers, they don’t add up,” he said. “Business 101 says we can’t stay open if we don’t cover our costs.”
The reality of "abortion" has left me tormented , horrified, shocked and in despair. I don't know what America is anymore, I don't know what Americans are anymore and I continue to think , perhaps our day of judgement has come, worse yet , I am hoping it has come. There are millions of Americans out there who condone and revel in their "right" to murder and torture infants who are trapped in the womb of evil incarnate. I am not talking about the first month or two of the infants life in the womb. I am talking about infants that after mother and Dr fail to murder them inside the womb and fail are born alive! Babies born alive, moving in agony and fighting for life, struggling for life giving air as the mother and Dr look on. The infants are placed on a metal tray and left there to breathe their last.
I don't think we are worth saving anymore , I think Americans have become sick, twisted , demented animals who have rotted inside from their self serving , selfish attitudes. This society is darkly sick, evil and I honestly do not know if recovery is possible and if it is are the people of this nation worth fighting for. I don't know right now.
GOP Senate Chances Good
By DICK MORRIS
Published on TheHill.com on April 2, 2013
Printer-Friendly Version
Having blown five likely Senate wins on bad candidates and worse consulting, it is best not to count chickens before they hatch, but the prospects for Republican gains in the Senate in 2014 are brightening. And there is a solid shot at regaining control.
Two seats seem poised to fall into Republican laps. In West Virginia, the retirement of Democratic Sen. Jay Rockefeller leaves a void that Republican Congresswoman Shelley Moore Capito seems likely to fill. Moore Capito is the daughter of longtime West Virginia Gov. Arch Moore (a former client), who remained popular even after his conviction and imprisonment on corruption charges. It's hard to see any Democrat beating her.
The retirement of South Dakota's Democratic Sen. Tim Johnson also creates a vacancy in a heavily Republican state. Republican candidates are likely to be either former Gov. Mike Rounds or at-large Rep. Kristi Noem. The Democratic nominee will probably be Stephanie Herseth Sandlin, the three-term at-large former congresswoman Noem beat in 2010. Before Johnson retired, Public Policy Polling had Rounds 11 points ahead of him and 5 up on Sandlin. Noem was 4 points ahead of Johnson and 1 behind Sandlin. We all need to remember how at-large Congressman Rick Berg managed to mess up his shot at the Senate in North Dakota last year, costing the Republicans an expected pickup; we can't take anything for granted, but South Dakota looks good for the GOP at this time.
In Arkansas, Democratic incumbent Mark Pryor is not retiring -- not voluntarily anyway -- but Basswood Research has him running 8 points behind newly elected Republican Rep. Tom Cotton. Pryor's job approval is dead even, at 36-36. As Arkansas has shifted from 3:1 Democratic to 4:0 Republican in its congressional delegation over the past two cycles, and after former Democratic Sen. Blanche Lincoln was trounced in 2010, Pryor's incumbency rests uneasy.
Beyond those three seats, Republicans are hungrily eyeing Sen. Tom Harkin's vacancy in Iowa, and have legitimate shots at Democratic incumbents in Alaska, Louisiana, Montana and North Carolina -- red states all.
Republicans should hang on to all their vacancies, but Republican Susan Collins of Maine could be endangered as she seeks another term.
The lessons of 2010 and 2012 loom large. The Republican Party threw away five likely Senate wins -- in Nevada, Delaware, and Colorado in 2010 and in Indiana and Missouri in 2012. In each case, a strong Tea Party conservative beat a mainstream Republican in the primaries and then blew the general election -- in Indiana, Missouri and Delaware by asinine comments, and in Nevada and Colorado by incompetent campaigns.
But remember that, without the Tea Party, we would never have won 68 seats in the House in 2010. So we shouldn't reject all Tea Party insurgents, but rather be more sensible in our choice of candidates.
To win, Republicans must end the Democratic hegemony among Latino voters. The GOP performance on immigration reform will tell the story.
And Republicans must stop saying stupid things about abortion. In the narrow sense, we must make sure that we defeat in primaries any candidate who favors a ban on abortion in the case of rape. Such a nominee would be too far to the right to be elected in any of these swing states.
In a larger sense, Republican nominees should move away from the legal front on abortion and toward the practical way to vindicate a pro-life agenda. After 40 years of Roe under Republican courts, let's all realize that it is not about to be overturned under President Obama. Let's instead emphasize our determination to reduce the number of abortions by birth control, abstinence education, counseling, adoption incentives and parental notification and consent. We have lowered the number of abortions from 1.4 million to 800,000 in the past two decades. We should set a goal of getting it under 500,000 -- a goal both mainstream liberals and conservatives can unite to accomplish.
The prospects are bright for 2014 if we can heed the admonition of the cartoon character Pogo: "we have met the enemy and he is us!"
NumbersUSA Media Response jeremy beck AP bans "illegal immigrant"...is "sovereignty" next? Mindy, You may have heard the outrageous news that the Associated Press has dropped "illegal immigrant" from its vocabulary -- unless it appears in quotes. They have also dropped "illegal alien," "illegals," and "undocumented." CONTACT THE ASSOCIATED PRESS: AP Style Book: stylebook@ap.org Tom Kent, Head of AP's Style Book: tkent@ap.org If you wish to multiply your message, google "illegal immigrant ap" and click on any of the media links to leave comments. If the media wants to use the legal terminology, they can use "unlawful alien." This is what one NumbersUSA member wrote to the AP: "You have made a very foolish and shortsighted decision in banning the use of "illegal immigrant." In effect you have declared that American citizenship is an obsolete concept. "This is a step back, not a step forward, for social justice as well as for honesty in journalism. "The reasoning you offer to distinguish between entering the U.S. illegally and being an illegal immigrant is strained, and has no basis in logic, fact, or the law of the United States. "If there is no such thing as an illegal immigrant, there is no such thing as a lawful citizen. "That is the plain fact which you are trying to obscure. "In the spirit of Theodore Hesburgh and Barbara Jordan on immigration policy, I urge you to reverse your unfortunate and misguided decision." Pro-amnesty lobbies have been pressuring the media to drop "illegal immigrant" for years but have stepped up their efforts in recent months. Their next target is the New York Times. The Times' Public Editor reports that the paper is also considering dropping "illegal immigrant." You can contact the Times' Public Editor, Margaret Sullivan, at: public@nytimes.com As this video from the Media Research Center shows, language matters in the immigration debate. Voters who don't know the difference between "undocumented workers" and "illegal immigrants" are more likely to say they support some form of amnesty. jeremy
WHEN DID THE conversation become all about money? It didn’t start out that way. Sure, we wanted to evoke the Founding Fathers and the American Revolutionary spirit, so we thought of the Boston Tea Party, and the Taxed Enough, Already, movement got started.
But it wasn’t really about money. It was about Good and Evil.
When the discussion was about Good and Evil, we knew who we were. We were the good guys. Our rallies were famous for lawn chairs, portable barbecues, funny hats and relaxed attitudes.
When the speakers were finished, they would more than likely pull up a chair under somebody’s sun shade and share a hamburger. In the midst of almost total governmental darkness, we laughed and joked and shook hands all the way to a House majority and a filibusterable Senate.
Then it got grim.
Somehow, it always gets grim. Conservatives are distinguished for being decent people, and far too often this leads us into talking about what the other guy wants to talk about. The result is that the other guy gets to dominate the conversation.
The other guy, this time around (and pretty much always), is mammon.
“Mammon,” too-often translated simply, “money,” is more than money: it is the secular world system of money-driven power. It is the system that regards, “it makes money,” as a moral statement, and thereby subordinates morality to the profit motive. It is the system that opposes God, because God tends to get in our way.
God tells us we cannot serve both Him and mammon (Matthew 6:24). The reason for that is that, if we serve God, everything—including the profit motive—is subordinated to morality. And not just any old morality, not a morality that we make up for ourselves, but Godly morality: the sort that holds the integrity of the family—every family—sacred, and sees human beings—all human beings—as living icons of Christ, however scarred those icons might be. Godly morality proclaims the dignity and the intended Divine destiny of man, and hence the inestimable value of every life.
If we reduce all of that to “fiscal responsibility,” we find ourselves, albeit inadvertently, playing the opposition’s game, on the opposition’s field, with the opposition’s borrowed equipment.
So, how’s that working for us?
Where is that easy-going good nature the TEA Party movement started with? Where is that ebullient confidence we all had, that came from being part of something not just logical and sensible, but Right—not as in Right and Left, but as in Right and Wrong. When did our determined optimism turn to angry defensiveness?
When did we start losing?
I think it was when we began to redefine “patriotism,” away from preserving our Godly and moral culture and toward preserving our bankroll.
The result is that we’re beginning to look just like the Left. “Our” media are all full of “scare-selling,” to try to get our attention (and sell us protection against The Inevitable Disaster), supermarket-tabloid scandal-mongering, (as if that were the only way to hold our interest) and nasty, even profane blather on our discussion groups.
This isn’t how we started. This isn’t how we won. This is how we started losing.
We need to get back to saying what we want to say, our way, in our words, without embarrassment and without letting the Left set the rules for the conversation.
Recently, a conservative conference was announced. Some didn’t want to have anything to do with the moral conversation, so it split into two “conservative” conferences. I frankly hope no-one attends the “fiscal-only” conference, because we just don’t need any more selling-out to mammon.
America has never been an immoral nation. It has never been an amoral nation. It has never been an atheistic nation. It has been a Christian nation for its entire life, until the Left sucker-pinched us in the 60’s and began to dominate the cultural conversation. If we are truly conservative Americans, we will work to rebuild the country that became the greatest nation on earth, and we will stop caving in to the demands of the Left that we join them in tearing down the moral foundation upon which our every strength—including our fiscal strength—was built.
Folks the "progressives" had a diabolical reason for the 17th amendment ! It made it easier to convince the sheeple that it would give them more power by directly electing their Senators when in reality it usurped their power and nationalized the Senate ! They had to have this amendment to proceed with their evil plan to centralize the government . It makes it easier to demagogue the sheeple, if you don't believe me read some of the comments of those opposed to repealing it. It is imperative we educate our followers and join the campaign to restore federalism ! One of the fundamental presumptions of the U.S. Constitution is this: when governmental power is consolidated and unlimited it is unresponsive to the needs of the governed. The framers originally sought to prevent the overreach of government by creating an elegant framework to distribute power as widely as possible through a structured competition of natural self-interests. It is for this reason that the framers preserved the integrity of the states, these independent but united “laboratories of democracy”, and it is this federal system that the 17th Amendment (which provides for the direct, popular election of U.S. Senators) destroyed. This amendment has resulted in, as the framers predicted, a national government with influence, power and control unchecked by any political mechanism. This unlimited structure threatens the uniquely American way of life and the solvency of the national government. Http://www.restorefederalism.org/ | |||
THIS IS WHY R.I.C.O IS RELAVENT
Destroying Our Military from Within
August 25, 2012
By Alan Caruba
Destroying Our Military from Within
By Alan Caruba
“Of the four wars in my lifetime, none came about because the U.S. was too strong.” — Ronald Reagan
If you want to know how President
Obama feels about the U.S. military, consider that in all the years since D-Day 1945 there have been three occasions when a President failed to go to the D-Day Monument that honors the soldiers killed during the Invasion.
The occasions were:1. Barack Obama 2010
2. Barack Obama 2011
3. Barack Obama 2012
For the past 68 years, all Presidents, except Obama, have paid tribute to the fallen soldiers killed on D-Day. This year, instead of honoring the soldiers, he made a campaign trip on Air Force 1 to California to raise funds for his reelection.
The U.S. military has been systematically weakened from within by a combination of idiotic and duplicitous decisions that suggest how far the nation has come from the fundamental understanding that an enemy must be destroyed with sufficient devastation as to never contemplate attacking us or our allies again.
World War Two was a success because both Germany and Japan were required to sign instruments of unconditional surrender. Both nations are now our allies. Even Vietnam where the U.S. blundered into a civil war and was ultimately forced to withdraw now has normalized diplomatic relations and welcomes U.S. investment.
The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan remain inconclusive due to a combination of timid rules of engagement and the transformation of our military’s mission into “nation-building” that have yielded unsatisfactory results.
The military force that distinguished America as a super power at the mid-point of the last century now is facing draconian funding reductions from a Congress unwilling to make hard decisions about our historic debt. A July Wall Street Journal editorial, “The Coming Defense Crack-Up”, warned the automatic sequestration, “If implemented, the Pentagon budget would be cut by another 9% (or $492 billion) over the next decade, on top of the $487 billion in cuts that are already planned. Defense accounts for the largest share of total sequestration, or 42. 6% m according to the Congressional Budget Office.”
“The sequestration cuts would leave the defense budget some 30% smaller in 10 years.” Does anyone believe that the world will be any safer in two years or ten years? Or that weakening our defense will make us safer in a world bristling with nuclear arms and other weapons of mass destruction?
The greatest force for the defense of the nation and for freedom in the world is being reduced by a Congress and a White House who refuse to recognize the threats that exist in a dangerous world.
© Alan Caruba, 2012
Force the Showdown Between State and Federal Authority on our terms
Protect our already invaded and trampled borders.
The showdown must begin in Texas, Arizona and New Mexico where there are conservative governors.
The prerequisites to the showdown, if possible, are for the state legislatures to;
- Authorize State, not Federal, prisons to use those incarcerated to work for the state in whatever capacity they are fit to perform
- Authorize the governors of their state the ability to secede from the U.S. if the Federal government denies their right to protect themselves from foreign invaders
- Authorize the governor to mobilize state police, militia and private citizens to defend the state if Federal troops, either FEMA or the military, is mobilized against the State in violation of the Federal and State constitutions
If the prerequisites cannot be met then the individual governors will need to step up and be leaders to ensure the protection of their citizens.
Build tent cities along the border to house all State inmates and/or volunteers. By volunteers I believe thousands of retired patriots will come to help.
All inmates can do something even if it is prepare food or paperwork. Then deliver supplies to the border and divide the workforce into three shifts and build the wall 24 X 7 on State land with motion detectors, listening devices and hidden cameras until it is complete.
Ask the citizens to volunteer or donate money and the response will be tremendous from within and without the State. When the Federal government tries to stop them with court orders or mandates from the attorney general’s office, ignore them.
The premise is although the Federal government has the responsibility to protect our National borders the States have the right and constitutional mandate to protect their citizens.
When the Federal government mobilizes troops or FEMA to stop the work then execute authorizations 2 & 3 above or let leaders lead without authorization.
The showdown between Federal and State laws and constitutions will have begun and conservatives whether gun owners or not will rally behind these States and come in droves to help defend against a tyrannical government trying to deny citizens protection from foreign invaders.
The Federal government will either back down or the next revolution to overthrow a tyrannical government will begin.
The Authority for this insurrection is found in the:
Constitution
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
Article 1, Section 10
No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.
Article 4, Section 4
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened), against domestic Violence.
Amendments to the Constitution
Amendment 2 - A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Amendment 9 - The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Amendment 10 - The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
Declaration of Independence
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
I present some of the reasons to throw off such government:
- He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
- He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance. Government employees have risen drastically in number
- For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent: Obamacare
- For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury: (This would be for the U.S. citizens killed by drones without due process of the law)
- For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
- He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us. (This is is the government tries to stop the states from protecting their citizens)
After the babies are murdered and it is accepted as NORMAL who would be next? YOU! ME! Old people, people with low IQ's, minorities, people with different ideas, people who won't be SHEEPLE led by the nose of the One World Government crazies, people who love God and follow God and question the replacement of God by Governments, people who question the wisdom of the progressives/socialist/communists. WHO IS NEXT BECAUSE IT WON'T STOP WITH THE MURDER OF THE HOLY INNOCENTS. IF YOU THINK IT WILL YOUR DREAMING. WE MUST STOP ABORTIONS AND WE SHOULD HAVE DONE IT 30 YEARS AGO. THE QUESTION IS WHAT ARE YOU DOING TO END ABORTION? WAKE UP AMERICA BEFORE THEY ABORT YOU!
 |
|
| Will you be there? The New Fair Deal: Action Day on Tax Day |
| On April 15th, activists from across America will converge on Washington in support of a new compact between taxpayers and the government that represents them. The past four years have seen a Washington that picks winners and losers through the tax code. It’s time to end the cronyism, backroom deals, and political favoritism. It’s time the American people get a New Fair Deal. Let’s make Tax Day a celebration of the values that made America great: opportunity and limited government. Eight Congressmen are introducing legislation to cut spending, reform the tax code, and bring back a government that lives within its means. Join us on the steps of the nation’s capital as we kick-off the New Fair Deal. Endorse The New Fair Deal Here: RSVP to The New Fair Deal: Action Day on Tax Day! |
BANKS & “GOVERNMENTS”
FORECLOSED WORLDWIDE
The One People’s Public Trust (OPPT) announced the foreclosure of the world’s banks and “governments” on
December 25th 2012 stemming from prior investigation into massive fraud across the entire system: http://
www.scribd.com/doc/118067922/PARADIGM-DOCUMENT-FROM-THE-TREASURY-FINANCEAGINDUSTRIESTRASSE-
21-CH-6055ALPNACH-DORF-SWITZERLAND.
What happened?
The OPPT posed to the world’s Banks and Governments:
1. that they had by deceptive acts and practices been stealing from the people for hundreds of years, and;
2. nothing stood between the Creator and each of the Creator’s creations,
and gave due opportunity to rebut both statements. They could not and did not. To understand this fully please read
the Declaration of Facts at http://www.peoplestrust1776.org/ > UCC Filings > 2012 ptII > Declaration of Facts. Here
are two excerpts:
Government Charters Cancelled: (Refer: DECLARATION OF FACTS: UCC Doc # 2012127914 Nov 28 2012)
“...That any and all CHARTERS, inclusive of The United States Federal Government, UNITED STATES, “STATE
of ...", Inclusive of any and all abbreviations, idem sonans, or other legal, financial or managerial forms, any and
all international equivalents, inclusive of any and all OFFICES, inclusive of any and all OFFICERS, PUBLIC
SERVANTS, EXECUTIVE ORDERS, TREATIES, CONSTITUTIONS, MEMBERSHIP, ACTS, and any and all
other contracts and agreements made thereunder and thereby, are now, void, worthless, or otherwise cancelled,
unrebutted; ...”
Bank Charters Cancelled: (Refer: TRUE BILL: WA DC UCC Doc# 2012114776 Oct 24 2012)
“Declared and ordered irrevocably cancelled; any and all charters for Bank of International Settlements (BIS)
members thereto and thereof including all beneficiaries, including all certain states of body owning, operating,
aiding and abetting private money systems, issuing, collection, legal enforcement systems, operating SLAVERY
SYSTEMS …commandeering lawful value by unlawful representation...”
Orders to Cease and Desist:
Attention is drawn to DECLARATION AND ORDER: UCC Doc # 2012096074, Sept. 09 2012, duly reconfirmed and
ratified by COMMERCIAL BILL UCC Doc. No. 2012114586 and TRUE BILL UCC Doc. No.2012 114776 which states:
Volunteers within the military ... “to arrest and take into custody any and all certain states of body, their agents,
officers, and other actors, regardless of domicil by choice, owning, operating, aiding and abetting private money
systems, issuing, collection, legal enforcement systems, operating SLAVERY SYSTEMS against the several
states citizens, ...”, and “Repossess all private money systems, tracking, transferring, issuing, collection, legal
enforcement systems operating SLAVERY SYSTEMS...”
“...all beings of the creator shall forthwith assist all Public Servants identified herein, to implement, protect,
preserve and complete this ORDER by all means of the creator and created as stated herein, by, with, and
under your full personal liability...”
Search document numbers listed at the Washington DC UCC Registry: https://gov.propertyinfo.com/DC-Washington/
What does this mean to you?
Are you paying a “debt” to a foreclosed entity..? e.g. mortgage, credit card, car loan?
OPPT has foreclosed on hierarchy. No one stands between you and your creator... not even “Government”.
Because a CEASE AND DESIST order exists, you are free to offer terms and conditions to individuals acting on behalf
of a foreclosed Bank or “Government”, by issuing a Courtesy Notice.
What does this mean to Banks & “Governments”?
All beings now act in the capacity of individual entities without a corporate safety net and with full personal liability for
each and EVERY ACTION THEY TAKE under common law, protected and preserved by public policy UCC 1-103, and
Universal law, the governing law laid out in the OPPT UCC filings. (Refer: WA DC UCC Ref Doc # 2012113593)
Should any individual pursue any actions on behalf of a foreclosed Bank or “Government”, causing another individual
any damage as herein described, they in their individual and unlimited capacity are absolutely liable. Such actions may
result in the receipt of a Courtesy Notice.
Courtesy Notice
The Courtesy Notice contains the information of this flyer and offers terms and conditions for future dealings.
Whereas Banks and “Governments” have been foreclosed worldwide... Acts, Statutes, Codes, Courts, Executive
Orders etc were thereby foreclosed, thus without a lawfully binding contract - individual to individual, no instrument
exists to compel performance.
The Courtesy Notice offers new terms to any individual of a foreclosed entity for their acceptance and the method of
acceptance is clearly defined.
Individuals are now downloading and sending Courtesy Notices worldwide; 64,000 were downloaded in the first two
days following release in early Feb 2013. See www.oppt-in.com
What is the UCC - Where and to whom does it apply?
The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) is the ‘bible’ of commerce and used world wide, but sometimes in disguise.
UCC is not taught in law schools; it is used in high level banking and government corporations. Accordingly most
lawyers, attorneys and magistrates know nothing about UCC and will argue it has no application.
1. Executive Order 13037 dated 04 Mar 1997 defined humans as capital. See: http://
americankabuki.blogspot.com.au/2013/03/us-citizens-defined-as-property-of.html
2. UCC Doc # 0000000181425776 filed 12 Aug 2011 evidences sale of US citizens in transaction between The
Federal Reserve System and The United States Department of the Treasury 1789 for $14.3 trillion. (Linked above)
3. UCC Doc #2001059388 evidences the template the Federal Reserve Bank of New York uses to secure the
collateral in major banks around the world... including chattel paper, goods and the unborn young of animals. See
http://www.mediafire.com/view/?3yh79cjnzcwzu0s
Those who would regard the UCC as irrelevant outside the US are thereby claiming former funding arrangements with
the Federal Reserve Bank of New York null and void.
Due Diligence
Given the usage of UCC filings in the upper levels of “government” and banks worldwide, due diligence is a necessity.
If there is a dispute, error, or falsity make AND deliver a duly verified sworn DECLARATION OF REBUTTAL to the
duly verified, sworn and REGISTERED OPPT DECLARATION OF FACTS, point by point, with specificity and
particularity, with full responsibility and liability, under the penalty of perjury under any law you identify, that the
forgoing is true and accurate, signed by your wet-ink signature.
To date, no such rebuttal has been registered.
Further Research
Radio shows:
http://oppt-in.com/opptinradio/
http://oppt-in.com/thecollectiveimagination/
All People Declared Free of Debt (Refer Notice of Declaration of Absolute Truth UCC# 2013032035)
The final filing of the OPPT occurred on March 18, 2013. This document terminated all remaining man-made entities
and returned all people of this planet to absolute freedom. In this document the creator is referred to as "absolute
essence" and all creations people are referred to as "absolute essence embodied".
Article VI states..."I duly verify, with full responsibility and liability, by DECLARATION OF ORDER, that eternal
essence IS made transparent and known by the DO'ing of any and all embodiment of eternal essence in eternal
essence's universe, IS free and free of debt, unrebutted."
This means THERE IS NO DEBT.
You have no debt... No one has debt... it is done.
I have heard nothing about how recognising gays as a married couple will entitle them to many government
benefits and handouts...more DEM bought votes...
Two peer-reviewed research articles in the social sciences, released June 10, 2012, challenge the claim made by same-sex parenting researchers over the last decade that parents engaged in same-sex relationships do just as well as other parents at raising children. This claim, that there are “no differences” in outcomes between the two kinds of parenting, is undermined by new evidence that these papers present. http://www.familystructurestudies.com/summary
Open Letter to Parents of Public Schooled Children
Posted on March 15, 2013 by Heather Patenaude
This fall as you buy your school supplies, tennis shoes, and backpacks, make sure you do your homework on the shift that has taken place within the halls of public schools across this nation. Common Core State Standards (CCSS) are creating a dark future for education and parents must educate themselves on these new standards and their radical implications.
What you need to know about CCSS:
1) These standards claim to be “rigorous” and will prepare your child for “college and career”. But upon review you will find that these standards will prepare your child with empty skill sets and will teach them what to think, not how to think. They will also foster “teach to the test” practices!
2) These standards claim to be “state led”, but this is one of the largest myths of CCSS. Truth is CCSS were initiated by private interests in Washington, DC, without any representation from the states. Eventually the creators realized the need to present a façade of state involvement and therefore enlisted the National Governors Association (NGA) (a trade association that doesn’t include all governors) and the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO), another DC-based trade association. Neither of these groups had a grant of authority from any particular state or states to write the standards. The bulk of the creative work was done by Achieve, Inc., a DC-based nonprofit that includes many progressive education reformers who have been advocating national standards and curriculum for decades. Massive funding for all this came from private interests such as the Gates Foundation.
3) The Race to the Top (RTTT) stimulus funds and No Child Left Behind waivers were available ONLY to states signing on to CCSS. This specific requirement was inserted by the Department of Education and was not a part of the stimulus bill language as passed by Congress. Through the RTTT applications, Governors and State School Superintendents signed onto CCSS without input from state legislatures, state school boards, parents, or taxpayers. This commitment to implement CCSS made before the standards were even written. (First round RTTT applications were due January 2010, first draft of CCSS arrived March 2010.) So they agreed to them sight unseen!
4) CCSS will cost states millions of dollars and this will fall on the backs of the taxpayers. This is a massive unfunded mandate. (Anyone already have high property taxes?!?) Most states have not even done a “cost analysis”, but with yearly computerized testing and teacher training, CCSS carries a hefty price tag!
5) There will be a massive data tracking system on each child with over 400 points of information collected. This information can be shared among organizations and companies and parents don’t have to be informed about what data is being collecting. They will collect information such as: your child’s academic records, health care history, disciplinary record, family income range, family voting status, and religious affiliation, to name a few. Big brother will be watching your child from preschool till college (P20 Longitudinal Data System). You, the parent, are UNABLE to opt your child out of this tracking system.
6) As a parent you will have no voice. If you are unhappy with what is being taught, you can’t go to your school board, your principal or even your state senator. No one can change the standards of your state. This is “education without representation”! Removing states power of education is unconstitutional and should make the Patriot in your rise up and fight to remove CCSS from your state!
Please don’t take my word for it, do your own homework. CCSS are one giant step towards nationalized curriculum! Truth in American Education (www.truthinamericaneducation.com) is a broad based community of contributors working to educate others on the implications of Common Core. (Myths vs. Truthhttp://truthinamericaneducation.com/common-core-state-standards/myths-verses-facts/)
Thank you for your time,
Posted on March 15, 2013 by Heather Patenaude
This fall as you buy your school supplies, tennis shoes, and backpacks, make sure you do your homework on the shift that has taken place within the halls of public schools across this nation. Common Core State Standards (CCSS) are creating a dark future for education and parents must educate themselves on these new standards and their radical implications.
What you need to know about CCSS:
1) These standards claim to be “rigorous” and will prepare your child for “college and career”. But upon review you will find that these standards will prepare your child with empty skill sets and will teach them what to think, not how to think. They will also foster “teach to the test” practices!
2) These standards claim to be “state led”, but this is one of the largest myths of CCSS. Truth is CCSS were initiated by private interests in Washington, DC, without any representation from the states. Eventually the creators realized the need to present a façade of state involvement and therefore enlisted the National Governors Association (NGA) (a trade association that doesn’t include all governors) and the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO), another DC-based trade association. Neither of these groups had a grant of authority from any particular state or states to write the standards. The bulk of the creative work was done by Achieve, Inc., a DC-based nonprofit that includes many progressive education reformers who have been advocating national standards and curriculum for decades. Massive funding for all this came from private interests such as the Gates Foundation.
3) The Race to the Top (RTTT) stimulus funds and No Child Left Behind waivers were available ONLY to states signing on to CCSS. This specific requirement was inserted by the Department of Education and was not a part of the stimulus bill language as passed by Congress. Through the RTTT applications, Governors and State School Superintendents signed onto CCSS without input from state legislatures, state school boards, parents, or taxpayers. This commitment to implement CCSS made before the standards were even written. (First round RTTT applications were due January 2010, first draft of CCSS arrived March 2010.) So they agreed to them sight unseen!
4) CCSS will cost states millions of dollars and this will fall on the backs of the taxpayers. This is a massive unfunded mandate. (Anyone already have high property taxes?!?) Most states have not even done a “cost analysis”, but with yearly computerized testing and teacher training, CCSS carries a hefty price tag!
5) There will be a massive data tracking system on each child with over 400 points of information collected. This information can be shared among organizations and companies and parents don’t have to be informed about what data is being collecting. They will collect information such as: your child’s academic records, health care history, disciplinary record, family income range, family voting status, and religious affiliation, to name a few. Big brother will be watching your child from preschool till college (P20 Longitudinal Data System). You, the parent, are UNABLE to opt your child out of this tracking system.
6) As a parent you will have no voice. If you are unhappy with what is being taught, you can’t go to your school board, your principal or even your state senator. No one can change the standards of your state. This is “education without representation”! Removing states power of education is unconstitutional and should make the Patriot in your rise up and fight to remove CCSS from your state!
Please don’t take my word for it, do your own homework. CCSS are one giant step towards nationalized curriculum! Truth in American Education (www.truthinamericaneducation.com) is a broad based community of contributors working to educate others on the implications of Common Core. (Myths vs. Truthhttp://truthinamericaneducation.com/common-core-state-standards/myths-verses-facts/)
Thank you for your time,
And it gets worse. Research fellow Joy Pullmann at the Heartland Institute points to a February Department of Education report on its data-mining plans that contemplates the use of creepy student-monitoring techniques such as “functional magnetic resonance imaging” and “using cameras to judge facial expressions, an electronic seat that judges posture, a pressure-sensitive computer mouse and a biometric wrap on kids’ wrists.”
The DOE report exposes the big lie that Common Core is about raising academic standards. The report instead reveals Common Core’s progressive designs to measure and track children’s “competencies” in “recognizing bias in sources,” “flexibility,” “cultural awareness and competence,” “appreciation for diversity,” “empathy,” “perspective taking, trust, [and] service orientation.”The good news: A grassroots revolt outside the Beltway bubble is swelling. Families are taking their children’s academic and privacy matters out of the snoopercrats’ grip and into their own hands. You can now download a Common Core opt-out form to submit to your school district, courtesy of the group Truth in American Education. Http://truthinamericaneducation.com/uncategorized/ccss-parent-opt-out-form/
Barbara is white, sixty-something and writes Christian musicals. She told a mutual friend, “Lloyd is a good guy, but I disagree with his association with the Tea Party.” Shocked, our friend shared Barbara's concern with me. I thought, “Barbara, you ARE the Tea Party.”
My friend Barbara is representative of the mainstream media's despicable evil slander of millions of well informed, decent hardworking Americans who love their country and reject it being transformed into a socialist kingdom in which government controls every aspect of their lives.
Who are these Tea Party people, their profile? When I first began touring the country on Tea Party Express, the attendees were mostly middle-aged whites. Many, trying to be “good people”, voted for America's first black presidential candidate. But, as Obama began implementing his big government socialist agenda, they realized their error.
I was one of probably five blacks in America who did not vote for Obama. When Obama told Joe the Plumber he wanted to “spread the wealth around”, a little voice in my brain said, “Danger! Danger Will Robinson! This guy (Obama) is a socialist!”
At those first tea party rallies when the movement was new, many whites in attendance still felt extremely uncomfortable opposing Obama. Countless times I was told by patriots, fighting back their tears, that their opposition to Obama had nothing to do with his race and everything to do with his agenda. I knew they were sincere.
This is why the mainstream media's relentless slander of these good people, attempting to portray them as mobs of racist violent haters, so infuriated me.
Tea Party attendees are the salt of the earth Americans. They have jobs. They have businesses and families which they bring to the rallies. They love their country. They have kids in the U.S. Military. Many attend church. They do not hate minorities. They do not suppress women. As a matter of fact, many Tea Party group leaders and organizers are women. Tea Party folks want every American who is willing to work for it to achieve their American Dream. Pure and simple...end of subject.
My friend Barbara who fell for the MSM lie that the Tea Party is nothing more than a massive hate group would fit right in if she ever attended a Tea Party event.
When the Occupy Wall Street Movement emerged, once again the MSM slapped the Tea Party in the face by praising OWS as the morally superior Left's answer to the Tea Party. Well excuse me, but no one has been raped, robbed, beaten or arrested at a tea party; all of which are regular occurrences at OWS gatherings.
OWS dumped a bucket of feces in a bank lobby along with numerous incidents of destruction of property.
One point seven million tea party folks gathered in DC to protest Obamacare leaving the park cleaner than when they arrived.
The profile of blacks who attend Tea Party rallies. As I said, when the Tea Party movement first began, I was a rare black face in the crowds. Over the years, more blacks began showing up. Excited and curious, I would interview them,“What made you show up today?”
Interestingly, the blacks in attendance were either entrepreneurs/business people or they served in the U.S. Military and had witnessed the negative effects of socialism abroad.
Foolishly sacrificing principles to court misinformed voters, the GOP has joined the MSM's gang assault on the Tea Party. Their mantra is, “The Tea Party is extreme!”
I struggle to maintain my composure upon hearing low-info idiots parroting the MSM's claim that the Tea Party is extreme. Will someone please tell me what is “extreme” about expecting our government to function according to the U.S. Constitution? What is extreme about not sheepishly going along with government dismantling our God given freedoms and liberty?
Despite being badly bruised and abused from all sides, the Tea Party is the only hope for restoring America back to the vision of our Founding Fathers.
Who are these tea party guys, really?
I suspect millions of Americans who have never attended a Tea Party event love their country – still believe success is achieved via hard work rather than government redistribution – still believe marriage should remain between one man and one woman – believe government does not have authority to override the 2nd Amendment to disarm us or force us to fund behaviors which go against our religious convictions.
If you are one such American, the Tea Party is you.
Lloyd Marcus, Proud Unhyphenated American
Chairman, Conservative Campaign Committee
LloydMarcus.com
THIS IS A REAL AND PRESENT DANGER...THIS ARTICLE IS ABOUT THE SAME ORGANIZATION THAT REDEFINED HOMOSEXUALITY, PEDOPHILIA,FROM ABHORRENT CONDITIONS THAT SHOULD BE TREATED TO NORMAL IN THE LATE 60'S EARLY 70'S....
S E L A H
S E L A H
Obamacare and the DSM-5: Be Afraid; Be Very Afraid
In the case of those who pose the most dire threat to Obama's designs - Christians - these will certainly be targeted Obamacare and the DSM-5: Be Afraid; Be Very Afraid One of the many quaint media of...
Psychiatrists Laying Groundwork To Declare Religion As Mental Illness
NEWSMAX ARTICLE
Step #1 in disarming the people legally is pass a law saying that anyone suffering from mental illness is forbidden from owning firearms. Step #2 will be declaring anyone who trusts in Jesus Christ and believes that He is going to return for His Church is mentally ill. Step #3 will be a global religion approved by the state. It begins…
From Time: Religion can be a source of comfort that improves well-being. But some kinds of religiosity could be a sign of deeper mental health issues.
Seeing their kids more eager to pray than play video games, most parents would shout, “Hallelujah” or whatever their expression of joy. And they should. Research shows that religion can be a positive force in the lives of children, just as can be for adults. “Religion,” says Bill Hathaway, a clinical psychologist of religion and Dean of the School of Psychology and Counseling at Regent University, “is related to the child having a higher sense of self esteem, better academic adjustment and lower rates of substance abuse and delinquent or criminal behavior.”
So if your child is immersed in scripture after school and prays regularly throughout the day, you may breathe a sigh of relief. She’s such a good girl. My boy is okay.
Or maybe not. Your child’s devotion may be a great thing, but there are some kids whose religious observances require a deeper look.
For these children, an overzealous practice of their family faith — or even another faith — may be a sign of an underlying mental health issue or a coping mechanism for dealing with unaddressed trauma or stress.
Therapists in private practice report that they are seeing children and teens across a range of faiths whose religious practice can be problematic. The amount of time they spend praying, or in other acts of spiritual practice, is not as important, they say, as the quality of this devotion, and whether it helps the children or instead isolates them and undermines their schoolwork and relationships. Children with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), for example, may rigidly repeat holy verses, say Hail Mary’s or focus on other rituals less out of a deeper sense of faith but more as an expression of their disorder. “It looks positive but could be negative,” says Stephanie Mihalas, a UCLA professor and licensed clinical psychologist.
Such ritualistic behavior, she says, may also reflect a child’s way of coping with anxiety, and in reality could be no more spiritual than fanatical hand washing or dreading to walk on cracks. “These kids fear that if they don’t obey their religious rules perfectly,” explains Carole Lierberman, MD, a psychiatrist in Beverly Hills, “God will punish them.”
Some children suffer from scrupulosity, a form of OCD that involves a feeling of guilt and shame. Sufferers obsessively worry that they have committed blasphemy, been impure or otherwise sinned. They tend to focus on certain rules or rituals rather than the whole of their faith. They worry that God will never forgive them. And this can signal the onset of depression or anxiety, says John Duffy, a Chicago area clinical psychologist specializing in adolescents. “Kids who have made ‘mistakes’ with sex or drug use,” he says, “may have trouble forgiving themselves.”
Such fastidiousness to religious practices may not seem so harmful, but extreme behavior such as delusions or hallucinations may be a sign of serious mental illness. Seeing and hearing things that are not there can be symptoms of manic-depressive, bipolar disorder, or early onset schizophrenia. But parents may be less attuned to such unhealthy behavior when it occurs under the guise of faith.
It’s not unusual that children in families where marital discord, harsh discipline, abuse, or addiction are present, perform rituals for protection. If they know their parents approve of religion, says Lieberman, “they try to be good little children and stay below the radar of the family chaos or parents’ rage.” Or, as Mihalas has seen, some children push their already observant parents to be even stricter, fearing that catastrophe will strike otherwise.
When does religiosity raise these red flags? The crucial test focuses on how the kids are functioning in the rest of their lives. Are they doing well at school, playing sports or music, socializing with friends? If so, then their faith is probably a source of strength and resilience. If, however, the religious practices and rituals seem to be overtaking their daily lives, and displacing their normal activities, experts suggest taking steps to understand what’s triggering the focus on faith. source – Time
Roadside Bombs In Topeka
Though the numbers and nomenclature might differ subtly depending upon the respective branch of the military, the following is a guide with respect to the assemblage of soldiers: a squad consists of 8-13; a platoon is made up of 26-64; a company, 80-225 and is commanded by either a captain or major; a battalion has from 300-1300 under the auspices of a colonel; a regiment or brigade is comprised of 3000 to 5000 and overseen by a brigadier general; a division has 10,000-15,000 and is guided by a major general; 20,000 to 45,000 comprises a corps (pronounced “core” not “corpse”, Mr. President) and is commanded by a lieutenant general. There are four distinct categories which rise above those listed and drift into military esoterica, but for the average person these are terms we hear frequently and this outline provides a reference.
Janet Napolitano has established the equivalent of a “Corps” in less than four years. It must be one of those “just add water” type things. Experience: nebulous. Qualifications: negotiable. Mission: suspect. Goal: domination through intimidation. Demands: Itchy trigger finger and a bully complex.
Cliches and isolated instances aside, the military is a well-run organization and overseen by disciplined and highly educated personnel steeped in general and advanced principles of management in addition to military strategy. Its commanders oversee expenditures which comprise approximately 20% of the country’s budget, excluding immediate and unforeseen needs of war, and the decisions which must be made involving life and death would make the average CEO certain to have an ample supply of Depends nearby. In short, the responsibility and impact of the military on and for our country is immense.
I do not reference the military industrial complex as the cavalierly sardonic liberal who fails to understand the very reason they can run their mouth is because of the bravery and sacrifice of generations who served, and instead state it as such in order to describe its scope, for in addition to the 20% of the national budget, there are civilian contractors who benefit as well from the needs of the military regarding assets that are researched, developed, and ultimately procured, and those roots seek water in so many aspects of the economy one would need a flow-chart of unimaginable proportions to begin to comprehend how integral the military is to commerce specifically, and of our lives in general.
It is no accident that our country has the best military in the world, because it is the end-product of decades upon decades of refinement, filled with practices which further tradition, and as an entity writ large it is to be admired, not only for its ongoing defense of the country but as a catalyst for spurring research, technology, and commerce.
Funny thing. Janet Napolitano has established the equivalent of a “Corps” in less than four years. It must be one of those “just add water” type things. Experience: nebulous. Qualifications: negotiable. Mission: suspect. Goal: domination through intimidation. Demands: Itchy trigger finger and a bully complex. She has amassed a personal army at the largesse of Mr. Obama, who has insulated her from scrutiny and allowed her to dismiss Congress and stare down oversight members with the glare of an executioner and the cold blooded demeanor of a reptile. She now controls 2700 MRAP’s, which stands for Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehicles, used principally in Iraq and Afghanistan to protect soldiers from IED’s, or improvised explosive devices more commonly known as roadside bombs. Of the 10,000 such vehicles manufactured in the last four years at over $500 million apiece, she has managed to acquire over 25% of them for “domestic use.” Additionally, as an amendment to last week’s commentary that erroneously stated she had amassed over a billion hollow point rounds of ammunition, that number now stands at over two billion, enough to wage a conventional war for a mind-warping 26 years.
Something is wrong here, people. Something is radically, fundamentally, and severely flawed.
Certainly, inner city crime remains high and those statistics skew more wildly thanks to the ineptitude of flaming Rahm Emmanuel, but, 2700 MRAP’s? For what, roadside bombs in Topeka? A ten man militia group in Laramie? How about the hollow point arsenal? The military can’t use hollow points because they are deemed too inhumane for war. Something grotesquely sinister is afoot and it is targeting US citizens while Mr. Obama is fixated upon disemboweling the military, stripping it of resources as of this writing, and determined to slash its budget. Police departments are back-ordered on ammunition requests for up to a year and are being forced to barter among themselves, yet there’s no let up in the accumulation of lethal force at “Homeland Security”, a misnomer which grows with every passing day, for it has been elevated and armed to wage a domestic war against citizens with such enormous resources that the military and police would arguably be neutered. Aside from the ominous and chilling amount of assets at her disposal, where have oversight committees been while this gruesome arsenal has grown? She didn’t acquire this hideous amount of armament and ammunition overnight, so Congress was, either, sniveling and scared to challenge the administration or was comatose. Neither is acceptable.
Don’t we already have a National Guard? There is no fathomable purpose under any scenario whatsoever wherein the usage of military assets by this “corps” is intended to produce anything fruitful or protect citizens, and instead, it smells sinister to a point that it rivals Nazi Germany in its scope and ultimate potential. There is no logical explanation that is acceptable, even when Napolitano deigns to snarl at Congress. The training of the brown shirts cannot compare to the readiness and sophistication of the military, and there cannot be a war strategy, unless the interpretation of conflict is to attack and control innocent citizens. The omnipotent arrogance of the Director as an extension of the executive branch portends unthinkable doom, for law enforcement and martial law differ greatly. Soldiers? Hardly. Just because I wear a #4 Green Bay Packers jersey down at the park, it doesn’t make me Brett Favre.
I have received countless expressions of concern for my well-being for writing critically of this administration, which speaks volumes about the air of fear and intimidation upon with Mr. Obama and his minions pride themselves. The last I checked, I still live in the United States and am entitled to First Amendment protection regarding freedom of speech. No threats have been made toward the circus people in the White House, and all predictions and extrapolations are based on empirical data. Calling someone an inept ideological puppet is not prohibited nor is pointing out that someone’s wife dresses like she works in a Filipino hump-hump bar, and there is no violation of law for explaining that a pointed head fits nicely in a dunce cap.
The reality is that the spine of the country for years has been the military, which could easily be complemented by achieving energy independence. Obama is intent upon gutting one and steadfastly refuses to develop the other while building a “citizens army” of unprecedented proportions.
Where did this guy come from, and what is his game? Too me, it’s all too “transparent.”
*********************
http://www.reagancoalition.com/articles/2013/20130401001-ny-bill-life.html
During the 1989 Tiananmen Square protest in Beijing China..the "old men in the polit bureau" realized the "Regional Forces" would not "gun down" unarmed protesters or "run them down" with tank as seen worldwide, as the young protester defiantly stood in the path of an on coming columb of tanks eventually climing upon one to plead with the crew....the world was amazed that in "Red China" this would be possible. Here comes the twist...China represent about 20% of the world's population and there is no one "countrywide" language ie. Mandarin, Cantonese, and several others. The "Ole Men" replaced the "Regional Force" with an "Army from the Mongolian province. Without a "common language" and no family ties to the local population...BOOM! INSTANT SLAUGHTER!!!...
This "foreign presence on our shores" is exactly that...how much "mercy", "pity,compassion will these "U.N. MERCENARIES" SHOW OUR PEOPLE???
A POINT WAS MADE IN THE VIDEO THAT ALL THE VARIOUS NATIONAL GUARDS THAT WOULD POSSIBLY "OPPOSE" SUCH A MOVE HAVE BEEN STRIPPED OF "ALL OF THEIR HEAVY EQUIPMENT" IT HAS BEEN LEFT IN "AFGANISTAN" BECAUSE OF SEQUESTRATION MAKES IT "TO EXPENSIVE"{ TO RETURN TO THE STATES FROM WHICH THEY CAME....GOVERNORS OF SEVERAL STATES ARE FORMING JOINT MILITAS SCAVAGING FOR PROPER ARMAMENTS....READ THE FOLLOWING AND PASS IT ON
S E L A H
RUSSIAN TROOPS IN US NATIONAL PARKS
This is a story that needs widespread dissemination...shouting from every roof top in the country...it was posted on the "WESTERN CENTER JOURNALISM"
SITE THE BYLINE:
Are America’s treasured National Parks being co-opted
Apr 01, 2013 01:25 pm | Suzanne Eovaldi
Led by the New World Order under the guise of designating them World Heritage Sites, thus allowing foreign troops and United Nations agencies to take over our country in a soft coup d’etat? A blogger has photographed heavily equipped armored vehicles carrying the “Special Response Team” logo in and around the Great Smoky Mountains National Heritage site in Gatlinburg, TN. (1) ”It is a deadly serious piece of equipment never before used inside the US until now,” says the blogger “Sherrie” who then adds, “The vehicles don’t come more heavily armored.”
Sherrie has put up several pictures of these in-country tanks which she said she saw on and near Interstate 75 when she was traveling back roads near Winchester, Richmond, KY, and lists Rt. # 627 as an area of interest. “This spot is (around) the US Army Chemical Depot” which covers 14,000 acres in Kentucky backwoods,” the blogger says on the video which the Liberty web site is putting up for general viewing. She mentions chemical weapons involving 523 tons of nerve agents and shows aerial photography of train tracks going up to several buildings in this compound! “I’m not sure what they are,” she says, positing the notion of a possible FEMA camp in the Kentucky woods.
Now in addition to sighting of MRAP vehicles, “Sherrie” tells readers that “Russians were stopping and questioning people in the Gatlinburg, Smoky Mountain Parks region.” She quotes a high ranking individual in a local area state militia organization who she says she trusts as being truthful. The scenario developed when these apparently foreign troops wearing DHS uniforms with the Eagle insignia tried to enter Tennessee from Kentucky. “They were NOT Americans. . .appeared to be Russian or Eastern European!”
The Tennessee State Guard is being formulated as part of the 22 state Governors’ Militia Organization of volunteers which answers only to the Governors, not to the Federal government. (2) What has developed is the confiscation of equipment belong to National Guard Units nationwide. Trucks and other equipment sent to Iraq are not being replaced or returned to the states by the federal government because it is “too expensive” to transport the vehicles and equipment back into the country. This has prompted 22 governors to form State Militia Units paid for by the states and thus kept out of the reach of the federal government. (2)
Has the Division of Homeland Security partnered with the United Nations One World military apparatus with a sleight of hand operation known as World Heritage Site designation? The observant blogger lists these US treasures also as being so designated: Statue of Liberty, Everglades, Mammoth Cave, Yellowstone, Yosemite, all former National Parks. Folks, this designation and UN involvement coincides with the ten region DHS map of the United States! Has this under-the-radar give away of America already taken place, thus allowing the constitutionally prohibited onus of foreign troops being stationed on American soil? What is your Congress doing about this?
