ACTION

Wouldn’t find this at Tea Party Rally!

Posted on Big Governemtn-By Brandon Darby-On October 29, 2011:

“As the Occupy manifestation of the “Global Peace and Justice Movement” begins to decay and break down into the predictable anarchy, violence and arrests, it is becoming clear that the protests pose special dangers for women.

{…}

Even the left has begun to admit it. The Nation tries to laud the role of women in Occupy Wall Street but can’t avoid the truth:

“The dozen women I spoke to for this story—most of them queer-identified and/or women of color—have witnessed varying amounts of offensive behavior, such as unwanted touching or use of casually misogynist language, within the movement…

Ashwini Hardikar, one protest participant, recently wrote a powerful blog post about two such experiences that occurred within an hour: a male protester giving her an unwanted hug, who then expressed shock when she responded (loudly) that she found his hug unwelcome and intrusive, and a young man chanting “Lady Liberty is a whore” and defending himself when she questioned his language. This kind of explaining and educating can be exhausting for women.”

Here are a just a few recent incidents:

• A 14-year-old runaway was allegedly sexually assaulted at Occupy Dallas.
• A 19-year-old student activist was allegedly raped at Occupy Cleveland.
• A man was arrested on charges of indecent exposure to children at Occupy Seattle.
• A female reporter was threatened by activists at Occupy Oakland.

And even more attacks are listed in John Nolte’s “rap sheet” on the Occupy protests. The threats to women are not confined to the periphery of the Occupy movement but exist at the heart of the main Occupy Wall Street protest in New York.

As the Washington Times noted this morning:

Crime in Occupy Wall Street’s encampment Zucotti Park might be worse than the public realizes. According to The New York Post, crime at the park, which included a homeless man allegedly pulling a knife during an argument as well as claims of sexual assaults, is so out of control many protesters have resorted to a “stop snitching” rule. In fact, reports The Post, one NYPD officer said, that much of the crime goes unreported as a result. “What’s happening in there is staying in there,” said the New York City cop.

Despite these concerns, Occupy has been discouraging victims of sexual assaults from consulting police. In New York, organizers have created a group called “Safer Spaces OWS” that attempts to deal with threats to women “without involving the police or the court system unless the person wants that.” At the same time, the Occupy movement has used idealized images of women to promote itself and attract new recruits. The contradiction is striking.

Some on the left are beginning to criticize attempts by some Occupy organizers to blame the victims for speaking out—such as Jezebel:

It’s also true that people who aren’t in charge can be asked to subsume their interests to those of the group as a whole — or even demonized if they speak up in ways perceived to discredit the group. That happened to the Cleveland victim when one protester (prominently featured on the local news) accused her of being a plant.

There have been a few improvements at some Occupy protests, partly in response to increased media attention to sexual crimes. For example, after news emerged that Occupy Baltimore had been discouraging women from approaching police with complaints of assault, the organizers changed their policy, according to the Baltimore Sun:

Gone is controversial language that said the protesters would rather handle complaints amongst themselves, and that while they wouldn’t prevent someone from going to police, they would prefer not to involve law enforcement.

The memo now reads, in part:

“Instances of sexual abuse and assault will be handled according to the expressed desires of the victim. The Security and Medical teams are equipped with a list of resources, including contact information for the police, hospitals, sexual assault hotlines, and women’s shelters. In these instances, #Occupy Baltimore welcomes the involvement of the Baltimore City Police and encourages victims to report crimes.”

The media has tended to treat incidents of sexual assault at Occupy protests as isolated cases, because few journalists want to acknowledge the radical heart of the movement. It should be no surprise that an event thrown by anarchists has turned into anarchy. Those on the left who have acknowledged the problem have made a small step in the right direction, but they continue to miss the obvious solutions, because they would prefer to blame social conditions like patriarchy and racism for women’s vulnerability at Occupy.

The reality is that ideological underpinnings of the Occupy movement–such as collectivism, “consensus” decision making, and antipathy towards law enforcement—often lend themselves to the disorder that predators see as opportunity. Far from “empowering” women, the Occupy movement’s anarchist and socialist principles and policies are exposing female activists to greater danger. They cannot maintain order because they are in the midst of rebelling against it.

There can be no more excuses. It’s time for common sense to trump ideology. If the organizers of Occupy are incapable of preserving law and order among the participants, the public authorities must assert themselves. One victim more is one too many.”

Source:

http://biggovernment.com/bdarby/2011/10/29/occupy-movement-is-unsafe-for-women-attacks-and-threats-show-dangers-of-anarchist-organizing/

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and videos relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. Learning from Hamas: How #Occupy Uses Human Shields–Veterans, Women, the Young, the Old, the Disabled!-Posted on Big Government-By Joel B. Pollak-On October 27, 2011:

http://biggovernment.com/jpollak/2011/10/27/learning-from-hamas-how-occupy-is-using-human-shields-veterans-the-young-the-old-the-disabled/

II. Video: Rush’s Report On Occupier’s Socialist Movement!-Posted on MRCTV-On October 28, 2011:

http://www.mrc.org/mrctv-rush.html

III. Flyer Found At Occupy Phoenix Ponders: ‘When Should You Shoot A Cop?’-Posted on The Blaze-By Mike Opelka-On October 28, 2011:

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/alleged-flyer-at-occupy-phoenix-ponders-when-should-you-shoot-a-cop/

IV. Iran Rallies in Support of U.S. Protesters, Urges U.N. to Probe Police Response!-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Patrick Goodenough-On October 27, 2011:

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/iran-rallies-support-us-protesters-urges-un-probe-police-response

V. Did The NYPD Police Commissioner Meet With George Soros in Secret?-Posted on The Blaze-By Buck Sexton-On October 26, 2011:

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/did-the-nypd-police-commissioner-meet-with-george-soros-in-secret/comment-page-3/#comment-2134537

VI. Obama ‘Sowing Social Unrest’ Across The Country!-Posted on Politico-By SEUNG MIN KIM-On October 26, 2011:

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1011/66887.html

VII. Former Obama Adviser Takes Credit For ‘Intellectual Foundation’ Of Occupy Wall Street!-Posted on The Blaze-By Becket Adams-On October 25, 2011:

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/elizabeth-warren-takes-credit-for-intellectual-foundation-of-occupy-wall-street/

VIII. Officials Fear Health Conditions At ‘Occupy Boston’ Ripe For Disaster!-Posted on Boston Herald-By Laurel J. Sweet, Dave Wedge and John Zaremba-On October 26, 2011:

http://bostonherald.com/news/regional/view/2011_1026occupational_hazards_health_conditions_ripe_for_disaster_officials_say/srvc=home&position=0

IX. Full-Bown Riots Erupt As Occupy Oakland Gets Out Of Control Overnight!-Posted on The Blaze-ByJonathon M. Seidl-On October 26, 2011:

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/full-blown-riots-erupt-as-occupy-oakland-gets-out-of-control-overnight/

X. Rioting in Downtown Oakland as Occupiers Clash with Police!-Posted on PJ Media-By Zombie-On October 25, 2011:

http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2011/10/25/rioting-in-downtown-oakland-as-occupiers-clash-with-police/

XI. Video: Oakland Police Department Threatened!-Posted on YouTube.com-By pokesomi-On October 25, 2011: 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ieeNvciXULM&feature=player_embedded

XII. Video: President Obama & Democrats Shamefully Support Occupy Wall Street!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8UtYQ2zKmk

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Is President Obama inciting riots across the US?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/23/is-president-obama-inciting-riots-across-the-us/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

What follows is a series of research reports published by the Heritage Foundation under the title “Understanding America” that explore how the United States’ commitment to the universal truths of human equality and the right to self-government, as proclaimed in the “Declaration of Independence,” requires a vigilant defense of the cause of liberty, both at home and abroad-Excellent Educational Reading-You Decide:

Why is America Exceptional?-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-By Matthew Spalding,  Ph.D.-On October 1, 2010:

http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2010/09/why-is-america-exceptional

What Is America’s Role in the World?-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-By Marion Smith-On November 16, 2010:

http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2010/11/What-Is-America-s-Role-in-the-World

Why Does Sovereignty Matter to America?-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-By Steven Groves-On December 3, 2010:

http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2010/12/Why-Does-Sovereignty-Matter-to-America?utm_source=strategicmktg&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=understandingamerica

Why Does Religious Freedom Matter?-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-By Jennifer Marshall-On December 20, 2010:

http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2010/12/Why-Does-Religious-Freedom-Matter?utm_source=strategicmktg&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=understandingamerica

Why Provide for the Common Defense?-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-By Mackenzie Eaglen-On January 19, 2011:

http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2011/01/Why-Provide-for-the-Common-Defense

How Must America Practice Diplomacy?-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-By Theodore Bromund-On March 3, 2011:

http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2011/03/How-Must-America-Practice-Diplomacy

Why Does Economic Freedom Matter?-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-By Kim R. Holmes, Ph.D. andMatthew Spalding, Ph.D.-On April 7, 2011:

http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2011/04/Why-Does-Economic-Freedom-Matter

Who Makes American Foreign Policy?-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-By Baker Spring-On April 29, 2011:

http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2011/04/Who-Makes-American-Foreign-Policy

How Should Americans Think About Human Rights?-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-By Kim R. Holmes, Ph.D.-On June 13, 2011:

http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2011/06/How-Should-America-Think-About-Human-Rights

How Should Americans Think About International Organizations?-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-ByBrett Schaefer-On October 26, 2011:

http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2011/10/How-Should-Americans-Think-About-International-Organizations?utm_source=strategicmktg&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=understandingamerica

Note:  The following website contains must see videos of interviews by Peter Robinson-Uncommon Knowledge that were conducted with numerous individuals (e.g., Larry Arnn; Paul Ryan; Andrew Breitbart; etc.)-Excellent Educational Viewing-You Decide: 

Uncommon Knowledge: Interviews By Peter Robinson-Produced by Hoover Institution and Presented by Human Events:

http://www.humanevents.com/UncommonKnowledge.php

Note:  My following blog posts contains numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this issue-You Decide:

Where Is America Today?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/26/where-is-america-today-2/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

DAHH!

Posted on FoxNews.com-By James Rosen-On October 28, 2011:

“From the first stirrings of change in the Middle East nine months ago, optimism at the prospect of 100 million young people rising up to seize their democratic freedoms has been tempered by fear in Western capitals that radical Islamists might also rise up and try to hijack the so-called Arab Spring.

And now, many analysts say, that fear has been realized.

In Tunisia, where the epic season of unrest began, last Sunday’s historic elections appear to have resulted in an Islamist group winning a governing majority.

In Libya, an ex-terrorist once jailed by the Central Intelligence Agency now runs the country’s foremost military organization, and new political leaders speak openly of enacting Sharia, the ultra-harsh code of Islamic law.

And in Egypt, where the world’s oldest civilization is bracing for elections next month, rioters have recently forced the evacuation of the Israeli embassy and waged vicious attacks on Coptic Christians.

Worrisome in their own right, these developments also raise difficult questions, in an already contentious political season, about the conduct of President Obama and his national security team: Has the White House done all it could to steer the Arab Spring in the right direction? Have events to date strengthened U.S. security – or left America weakened abroad, with Islamic fundamentalism ascendant?

At a House Foreign Affairs Committee hearing on Thursday, Rep. Dan Burton, R-Ind., told Secretary of State Hillary Clinton the Mideast “really worries me,” and asked what the Obama administration “plans to do to make sure that we don’t have a radical government taking over those places.”

“Revolutions are unpredictable phenomena,” Clinton replied. “I think a lot of the leaders are saying the right things and some are saying things that do give pause to us….We’re going to do all that we can within our power to basically try to influence outcomes. But, you know, the historic wind sweeping the Middle East and North Africa were not of our making.”

Jamie Smith, a former CIA officer who has made three fact-finding trips to Libya this year, warns that the sense of unity that bound the country’s disparate rebel groups during their eight-month revolt has evaporated since MuammarQaddafi fell from power.

In the dictator’s place, Smith says, the oil-rich but woefully mismanaged North African state is relying on the Transitional National Council, made up of inexperienced ex-rebels, and the Tripoli Military Council, headed by Abdel Hakim Belhaj. The latter was once head of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), which the U.S. State Departmentclassifies as a foreign terrorist organization.

It is unlikely that Belhaj’s loyalties to the United States run strong: Smith notes that the CIA captured Belhaj in 2004, briefly held him in Thailand, and ultimately returned him to the custody of Qaddafi in Libya, where the former LIFG fighter languished in prison until his release last year.

“So now you’ve got a radical Islamist terrorist leader who is running the most powerful military group in Libya,” said Smith, a veteran of the U.S. war in Afghanistan. “In that area of the world, the people with the biggest guns make the rules. And this guy has got the guns. And he’s going to make the rules.”

Not all veteran analysts of the Mideast see the TNC’s embrace of Sharia as an imminent threat, nor the broader trend in the Arab Spring as hopelessly dark for American interests.

Patrick Clawson of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy draws encouragement from the fact that the region’s revolutions, by and large, have not been marked by strong expressions of anti-Western or anti-Israel sentiment. And he suggested that Washington can work reasonably well with governments whose legal codes do not mirror our own.

“The Saudi government has been perhaps the most vigorous applier of Sharia law throughout the Muslim world for decades, and yet Saudi Arabia and the United States have had a pretty close relationship on national security issues,” Clawson told Fox News. “And that’s very different than a secular revolutionary government like that in Syria, which certainly doesn’t apply Sharia law, but which has been happy to sponsor terrorist attacks against Americans.”

Some conservatives, however, are inclined to blame the Obama administration for mishandling the Mideast upheaval.

Frank Gaffney, a former Reagan-era Defense Department official who now leads the Washington-based Center for Security Policy, expands his definition of the Arab Spring to include the Iranian uprising of June 2009, which the regime in Tehran used lethal force to suppress.

Gaffney contrasts the Obama administration’s fairly cautious response to that event – framed, at the time, as part of the president’s attempt to “engage” Iran – with Obama’s swift call for the resignation of Hosni Mubarak during the Egyptian revolution this year.

“The president of the United States in both cases did the bidding of the Islamists, who wanted to preserve the regime in Iran and who wanted to remove the regime in Egypt,” Gaffney told Fox News. “And I think that quite apart from what his intentions were, in so doing, he made all the more predictable this very unhappy outcome that I think is playing out before our eyes.”

The next shoe to drop in the region will likely be the Nov. 28 elections in Egypt. U.S. officials are bracing for a strong showing by the Muslim Brotherhood, the Islamist group that boasts a long history of organized opposition to the Mubarak regime, and whose foreign offshoots include Hamas.”

Source:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/10/28/arab-spring-optimism-gives-way-to-fear-islamic-rise/

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. Iran Hails Tunisian Election Result, Predicts Islamist Victories in Egypt, Libya!

Posted on CNSNews.com-By Patrick Goodenough-On October 27, 2011:

“(CNSNews.com) – Welcoming the apparent victory of an Islamist party in Tunisia, Iran’s leadership is predicting similar results when Egyptians and Libyans get to vote in their first elections after overthrowing dictators in what Tehran has branded the 2011 “Islamic awakening.”

As of Wednesday evening, the “moderate Islamist” Ennahda party had won 65 of the 159 seats announced in the 217-seat constituent assembly, which will be tasked with drafting a new constitution for Tunisia.

Ennahda said it would nominate its secretary-general, Hamadi Jbeli, as prime minister. An engineer and journalist, Jbeli was imprisoned for 15 years by the regime of ousted President Zine el Abidine Ben Ali for membership in a banned organization and “attempting to change the nature of the state.”

Ennahda leaders have pledged to plot a moderate course, and during the election campaign cited as a model the Islamist parties ruling Turkey and Malaysia rather than the Taliban or Saudi leaders.

Analysts also note that secular parties will also be present in the constituent assembly (the party taking second place in the results so far is the centrist Congress Party for the Republic, which has expressed cautious interest in forming a coalition with Ennahda.

Despite those indications, Iran is characterizing the election outcome as a victory for the Islamist tendency.

“As the wave of Islamic awaking started to rise in Tunisia, we also observed that the first election was held in this country, and the Ennahda party gained a relative victory in the election,” Ali Akbar Velayati, a former foreign minister who now serves as senior advisor to supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said on Wednesday.

“The result of the election in Tunisia will positively affect regional developments,” Velayati added, predicting that “we will observe the victory of Islamists in future elections in Egypt and Libya.”

Also welcoming the Tunisian results, parliamentary speaker Ali Larijani said they reflected Tunisians’ enthusiasm for upholding Islamic principles.

He described Tunisia as the “flag-bearer of [the] Islamic awakening” and promised that Iran’s parliament would support the “awakening movements” in both Tunisia and Libya, ensuring that regional cooperation would be a foreign policy priority for Tehran.

From the outset, Khamenei and other Iranian leaders have argued that the protests some call the “Arab spring” are in fact part of an “Islamic awakening” inspired by Iran’s 1979 revolution, a movement that promises to undermine U.S. and Israeli interests in the region. (The uprising is Syria, a key ally, is generally not mentioned in this context.)

The anticipated rise of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt has been viewed positively by Iran, which had chilly relations with President Hosni Mubarak and loathed his predecessor, Anwar Sadat, for signing a peace treaty with Israel.

Egypt-Iran ties were also strained over Cairo’s support for Iraq during the Iran-Iraq war. Egypt gave ousted Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi a state burial in 1980, and after Sadat was assassinated the following year, Iran infuriated Egypt by naming a street in Tehran for the leader of the assassination plot. Iran later became a key sponsor of Hamas, the Palestinian offshoot of Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood, Mubarak’s rival.

According to published reports, in one of the classified State Department cables leaked last year, a U.S. diplomat in Cairo reported in 2009 that Mubarak had “a visceral hatred for the Islamic Republic, referring repeatedly to Iranians as ‘liars,’ and denouncing them for seeking to destabilize Egypt and the region.”

Tehran had somewhat better relations with Muammar Gaddafi’s regime in Libya, although the still-unresolved disappearance of an Iranian-born, Lebanese Shi’ite leader during an official visit to Libya in 1978 caused some tensions. Some believe Moussa Sadr was secretly jailed by Gaddafi and may still be alive.

Despite opposing the NATO operation that helped the anti-Gaddafi forces, Iran established contacts with the rebels (now the transitional government) in the early months of the uprising.

After rebel forces overran the government compound in Tripoli in August Iran congratulated “the Muslim people of Libya,” disclosed that it had been “discreetly” helping the rebels with humanitarian aid, and invited the head of the National Transitional Council (NTC) to visit Tehran “at an opportune time.”

In September, Iran voted in favor of Libya’s United Nations seat being given to the NTC, in the process breaking with customary allies like Venezuela, Bolivia and Cuba.

Following Gaddafi’s death, Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi this week sent a message to the NTC hailing Libya’s “total liberation” and expressing the hope Libyans would install “a regime based on religious democracy while preserving the independence and stability of the country with no influence or interference by foreign forces,” the Mehr news agency reported.

On Wednesday, Tehran’s foreign ministry said Salehi would visit Tripoli soon at the invitation of the NTC.”

Source:

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/iran-hails-tunisian-election-result-predicts-islamist-victories-egypt-libya

II. Obama is a Useful Pawn of Radical Islam!-Posted on TeaParty.org-By Dr. Laurie Roth, PhD-On October 27, 2011:

http://www.teaparty.org/article.php?id=1567

III. Nation of Islam leader slams Gadhafi’s ‘assassination,’ says rejoicing will turn to sorrow!-Posted on The Washington Post-By The Associated Press-Updated On October 26, 2011:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/on-faith/national-of-islam-leader-slams-gadhafis-assassination-says-rejoicing-will-turn-to-sorrow/2011/10/26/gIQAF5wiHM_story.html

IV. Gaffney: Rise of Sharia Law Will Bring War to the Middle East!-Posted on NewsMax.com-By Martin Gould and Kathleen Walter-On October 24, 2011:

http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/gaffney-islamist-war-israel/2011/10/24/id/415578?s=al&promo_code=D544-1

V. Obama’s Secret Link to Hamas-Posted on Human Events-By Buzz Patterson-On September 8, 2010:

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=38893

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Godfather of The Islamic Revolution!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/11/godfather-of-the-islamic-revolution/

Is President Obama in on the Uprising in Egypt?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/01/is-president-obama-in-on-the-uprising-in-egypt/

Is Israel the next Arab Facebook Campaign?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/03/30/is-israel-the-next-arab-facebook-campaign/

The President Must Stop Voting “Present” on Iran!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/02/12/the-president-must-stop-voting-“present”-on-iran/

What we haven’t been told about the President’s background!

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

During the height of the Occupy Movement frenzy that has gripped the nation and held the so-called “news media” in a lover’s trance, Rush Limbaugh took to the airwaves at the EIB headquarters and delivered the best, most complete expose' on what is really happening in cities around our nation…

In just a matter of moments, Rush laid bare the Occupy movement in all of its sordid HD color -- the cursing of our military, our flag and the police; rants against Jews and Israel; calls to overthrow capitalism; and a positively insane idea that Islam stands for social justice!

How did Rush do it?

He sourced the Media Research Center’s MRCTV, where our reporters have gathered and posted more than 70 videos of the Occupy Movement alone -- completely free of liberal bias!

This is where the truth is found … the truth the Obama- controlled media doesn’t want you to know regarding the seedy, Soros-backed, socialist underbelly of the Occupy Movement.

Go here now to watch Rush expose the Occupy movement with video from MRCTV.

• + The “Conveyor Belt of Truth”

• For conservative talk leaders like Rush Limbaugh and others, MRC represents a kind of conveyor belt of truth. We sent reporters to these events because we knew the liberal media wasn’t telling the truth.

• The media is desperate to have you believe that The Occupy movement is all about average citizens protesting -- just like the Tea Parties. In reality, that couldn’t be further from the truth!

• However, a recent poll suggests that The Occupy movement is now twice as popular at the Tea Party!

We are losing the fight for our culture and way of life.

That’s why Brent needs to know right now if he can count on you in the days, weeks and months leading to what may be the most important election that our nation has ever seen.

Like our videos exposing the true nature of the Occupy movement, there is so much more that we must do to bring to light the lies and deceit being fed to the American people, but we are completely dependent on the financial support of friends like you.

Take a moment to answer our call right now by clicking below and making your very best tax-deductible gift to the MRC.

Special Matching Challenge Will Double Your Gift!

http://psychodd1.blogspot.com/2011/10/i-recently-went-head-to-head-with.html

My feelings on this subject are extreme and firm.

Everyone wants change, wants honesty, morality, and God back in the Government.

Well, to get there you have to find true Patriots, everyday people who want to serve their country and their are plenty out there.

GOOOH has the way to go about finding those people and getting them on the ballots.  

We are not a political party or affiliated with any.  We are a grassroots movement to change the way we select people to run for office.  

NO MORE CAREER POLITICIANS, just plain folk who want to roll up their sleeves and go to work bringing this country back to being the great country it was.  To stop foreign countries from buying up our country, products and industry.

GO check out GOOOH, read, listen join and go to work to accomplish this.  It won't be easy, it won't happen overnight but it can be done.

We are having our first round on nominations and elections on NOV 5, starting in Texas.

Tea Party members you have something very much in common with a group named GOOOH - Get Out Of Our House Congress.  

You are fighting for the same changes that we are.

GOooh has the tool to make it happen.  

We have the answer to how to find Honest, Moral, God Fearing People, who support and believe in our Constitution and Bills of Rights.  

Go to the site www.goooh.com read and learn about us then sign up and participate in our Citizen Nomination for Congress process.

With all the revelations coming out concerning this "administration" ( I can't even make myself capitalize that), here's some good reporting from the Ulsterman Report.  How it is that this miscreant, miserable Islamofascist is allowed to get away with everything he has, and continues to do, is absolutely incredible, and completely maddening.  Our elected officials in the hallowed halls of Congress refuse to address ANY of the real issues that should have been spotlighted from DAY ONE of the 2008 campaign, and every single day after the abortionofliberty swearing in of the Usurper in Jan. 2009.  Good info here;

http://theulstermanreport.com/2011/10/25/white-house-insider-%E2%80%9Cpresident-obama-gets-off-on-it%E2%80%9D/

We are doing good work here, and there's so much more to do.  As soon as I post this, I am fixing to send an absolute blast-mail to my reps ONCE AGAIN.  How long, oh Lord, how long????????????

A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and he carries his banners openly. But the traitor moves among those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the galleys, heard in the very hall of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor—he speaks in the accents familiar to his victims, and wears their face and their garment, and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation—he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of a city—he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to be feared." ......Cicero, 42 B.C.E

Subject: Repeal the Patriot Act

I want the Patriot Act repealed.

It is beyond time for the repeal of the Patriot Act, and 'We the People' request the

restoration of our rights according to the Fourth Amendment of our Constitution

of the Republic of the United States of America!   Give it up for our people in

CONGRESS~ Get 'er DONE!

Please don't try to fix the REAL ID Act. Please, just repeal it.

Pray tell the reason(s) for the delay of this most ridiculous legislation from being repealed.

I hear more and more protest to this illegitimate attack on our states rights. It is never

going to be ratified by the majority of our fifty states, and I am hearing more and more

protest mounting daily.

No one is willing to submit to such tactics, that are going to impede, deny, or put every

law-biding citizen into a category similar to our criminal element. And if this allowed to

be activated, the criminals will have more freedoms than any citizen that is presumed

lawful and willing to live in a police state.

Dear Fellow Patriots:

Please support the cause to get our country back. Following website and video provides you with the specifics of how you can help:

Veteran Defenders of America’s Declaration To Restore The Constitutional Republic:

http://www.veterandefenders.org/

Video: Declaration to Restore the Republic!-Posted on YouTube.com-By arnierosnerOn October 9, 2011:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=MYycZOCJv4k#

God Bless You-God Bless America.

Semper Fi!

Jake

OORAH!

Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On October 27, 2011:

“Just when the White House probably thought those pesky lawsuits seeking a court determination that Barack Obama fails to meet the Constitution’s eligibility requirements for a president were finished, something new has appeared on the horizon.

Or in this case, the court docket.

The Liberty Legal Foundation has filed a pair of lawsuits in state and federal courts that don’t ask anything about Obama’s birth or for any determination from the court about his eligibility. Or his birth certificate, for that matter.

Instead, they name the national Democratic Party as a defendant, and ask the court to enjoin officials there from certifying that Obama is eligible for the office for the 2012 election.

“This complaint does not request or require this court to find that President Obama is not qualified to hold the office ofpresident of the United States. Instead, this complaint is directed toward defining the term ‘natural-born citizen’ under the Constitution of the United States, and toward negligence or intentional misrepresentations of the Democratic Party.

“This complaint requests this court to affirm the Supreme Court’s definition of ‘natural-born citizen’ as ‘all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens.’”

That definition comes from the U.S. Supreme Court’s opinion in Minor v. Happersett from 1875.

“This complaint does not request any injunction against any state or federal government official. Instead this complaint asserts that the private entity, Defendant Democratic Party, intends to act negligently or fraudulently in a manner that will cause irreparable harm to the plaintiffs, to the states, and to the citizens of the United States.”

It continues, “Because Mr. Obama has admitted that his father was not a U.S. citizen, and because this fact has been confirmed by the U.S. State Department, any reasonable person with knowledge of these facts would doubt Mr. Obama’s constitutional qualifications. Therefore, any representation by the Democratic Party certifying said qualifications would be negligent, absent further evidence verifying Mr. Obama’s natural-born status.

“Plaintiffs further request an injunction prohibiting the Democratic Party from making any representation to any state official asserting, implying, or assuming that Mr. Obama is qualified to hold the office of president, absent a showing by the party sufficient to prove that said representation is not negligent.”

Van Irion, lead counsel for Liberty Legal Foundation, told WND that one lawsuit was filed in federal court in Arizona to focus on the question of defining the term “natural-born citizen” under the Constitution.

“We picked the Arizona court for several reasons, but the main one being that it is part of the 9^th Circuit. The 9^thCircuit has indicated in dicta that an FEC-registered presidential candidate would have standing for this type of suit,” he said. The organization is working with John Dummett, a Liberty Legal Foundation member who is a candidate for the office of president in the 2012 election.

Irion said the other lawsuit was filed in state court in Tennessee.

“The focus of the state-court suit is to prevent certification to the Tennessee secretary of state. This suit puts greater emphasis on the negligent misrepresentation/fraud aspects of a certification from the DNC. It includes more facts regarding Obama’s Indonesian dual citizenship and fraudulent Social Security Number,” he said.

Other lawsuits also are planned, he said.

Irion said that an injunction obtained through the legal actions would deprive Obama of Democrat Party certification.

“Without such certification from the party, Obama will not appear on any ballot in the 2012 general election,” his organization said in an announcement about the cases.

“Neither lawsuit discusses Obama’s place of birth or his birth certificate. These issues are completely irrelevant to the argument. LLF’s lawsuit simply points out that the Supreme Court has defined ‘natural-born citizen’ as a person born to two parents who were both U.S. citizens at the time of the natural-born citizen’s birth. Obama’s father was never a U.S. citizen. Therefore, Obama can never be a natural-born citizen. His place of birth is irrelevant,” the group said.

“LLF has learned that all states rely upon the truthfulness of representations made by the political parties that their candidates are qualified to hold the federal office for which they are nominated. By naming the National Democratic Party as the defendant LLF not only targets the entity responsible for vetting the Democratic candidate, LLF also avoids taking on any state or federal government.

“The Democratic Party is a private entity, without any government immunities or government procedural advantages,” the group said.

LLF also reported it learned that presidential candidates that are registered with the Federal Election Commission have standing to ask a court to keep another candidate off the ballot. Consequently LLF partnered with FEC-registered Dummett, a conservative Republican who believes that the Constitution should be followed.

While WND has reported that Maricopa, Ariz., County Sheriff Joe Arpaio has launched a formal law enforcementinvestigation that Obama may submit fraudulent documentation to be put on the state’s election ballot in 2012, there also are other developments, too.

WND also has reported on an investigation that revealed a major online court opinion resource, Justia.com, allegedly edited references to the Minor v. Happersett court decision from dozens on documents it posted online.

The issue developed when a Leo Donofrio, a New Jersey attorney who brought the first legal challenge to Barack Obama’s occupancy in the Oval Office to the U.S. Supreme Court, published a report revealing that references to a U.S. Supreme Court decision addressing the definition of “natural-born citizen” were altered at Justia.com.

The Minor v. Happersett case is significant because it is one of very few references in the nation’s archives that addresses the definition of “natural-born citizen,” a requirement imposed by the U.S. Constitution on only the U.S. president.

That case states:

The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.”

There have been multiple court and other challenges to Obama’s occupancy in the Oval Office. Essentially they have argued that he either isn’t eligible because he wasn’t born in Hawaii as he’s said, or that he was never qualified because his father was a Kenyan citizen, giving Barack Obama dual citizenship (the U.S. and the United Kingdom) at his birth. Those people argue that the Founders, with their requirement that the president be a “natural-born citizen,” disqualified dual citizens.

The White House in April released an image of a “Certificate of Live Birth” from the state of Hawaii in support of Obama’s claim that he was born in the state. However, many computer, imaging, document and technology experts have stated it appears to be a forgery.

The image that the new lawsuits contend is irrelevant:

http://whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf”

Source:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=360813

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and video relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. No Certification Without Verification!

Posted on Liberty Legal Foundation-On October 25, 2011:

“On 10/25/11 Liberty Legal Foundation filed two simultaneous lawsuits against the Democratic Party. Both lawsuits request injunctions prohibiting the Party from certifying that Obama is Constitutionally qualified to run for the office of President in the 2012 election. Without such a certification from the Party, Obama will not appear on any ballot in the 2012 general election. (Tennessee TN Complaint) (Federal DNC Complaint)

Neither lawsuit discuss Obama’s place of birth or his birth certificate. These issues are completely irrelevant to our argument. LLF’s lawsuit simply points out that the Supreme Court has defined “natural-born citizen” as a person born to two parents who were both U.S. citizens at the time of the natural-born citizen’s birth. Obama’s father was never a U.S. citizen. Therefore, Obama can never be a natural-born citizen. His place of birth is irrelevant.

Despite numerous legal challenges, no case to date has been able to get a hearing on the merits related to Obama’s natural-born status. We have studied all of these cases in order learn from the rulings and avoid the pitfalls that stopped those lawsuits. We learned that the only entity remaining that can be held responsible for vetting a candidate’s qualifications to hold office, is the political party that nominates the candidate. All states rely upon the truthfulness of representations by the political parties, that their candidates are qualified to hold the federal office for which they are nominated. By naming the National Democratic Party as the defendant we not only target the entity responsible for vetting their candidate, we also avoid taking on any state or federal government. The Democratic Party is a private entity, without any government immunities or government procedural advantages.

We also learned that Presidential candidates that are registered with the Federal Election Commission have standing to ask a court to keep another candidate off the ballot. That’s why two of our lead plaintiffs are FEC-registered Presidential Candidates.

Because we have lead plaintiffs that are Presidential Candidates, and because those plaintiffs are also Liberty Legal members, Liberty Legal has standing to sue as well. If one plaintiff has standing to sue, all plaintiffs have standing to sue.

You can join our lawsuit as a class member and be part of this challenge! We have a class for all people that object to having a Presidential candidate appear on the ballot who is not Constitutionally qualified to hold the office. If you agree that the Constitution should be followed, please add your voice to ours. Please join our class action lawsuit to protect the legitimacy of the ballot.

JOIN US TODAY!

• To learn more about our strategy, go to this link: http://www.libertylegalfoundation.net/certification-class-action/the-cca-strategy/”

Source:

http://www.libertylegalfoundation.net/1209/no-certification-without-verification/

II. Class Action Complaint For Declaratory and Injunctive Relief!-Posted on LibertyLegalFoundation.net-On October 25, 2011:

http://www.libertylegalfoundation.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Federal-DNC-Complaint.pdf

III. Eligibility Rulings Vanish From Net!-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On October 23, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=358645

IV. 25 U.S. Supreme Court Opinions That Defined “Natural Born Citizen” Were Sabotaged In The Run Up To The ’08 Presidential Election!-Posted on Natural Born Citizen-By Leo Donofrio, Esq.-On October 20, 2011:

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2011/10/20/justia-com-surgically-removed-minor-v-happersett-from-25-supreme-court-opinions-in-run-up-to-08-election/

V. JustiaGate!-Posted on Examiner-By Dianna Cotter, Portland Civil Rights Examiner-On October 20, 2011:

http://www.examiner.com/civil-rights-in-portland/justiagate

VI. Citizenship Jeopardy!-Posted on American Thinker-By Cindy Simpson-On October 18, 2011:

http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/10/citizenship_jeopardy.html

VII. Video: How The Internet Archive Changed Computer Source Code of NYS Board Of Elections!-Posted on YouTube.com-By pixelpatriot-On October 21, 2011:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3qGY17DWMlM

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetrated-in-american-history/

Could the President’s newly released COLB be a forgery?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/04/29/could-the-president’s-newly-released-colb-be-a-forgery/

Was there a conspiracy to put Obama in the White House?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/03/03/was-there-a-conspiracy-to-put-obama-in-the-white-house-2/

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

From the mists of the past, we have the words of Lincoln (who I'm not generally a huge fan of, truth be told) as if he were speaking directly to the current narcissist destroying this Republic:

MORE THAN A CLEVER PIECE OF ART ! ! ! So I said to him, "Barack, I know Abe Lincoln,  And you ain't Abe Lincoln ." Obama has made numerous attempts to quote Lincoln.  So why doesn’t he use this Lincoln quote: You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich.  You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.  You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift.  You cannot lift the wage earner up by pulling the wage payer down.  You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred.  You cannot build character and courage by taking away people's initiative and independence.  You cannot help people permanently by doing for them, what they could and should do for themselves.

Honest Illegals