All Posts (29662)

Sort by

Bull Feces

Will somebody please explain this Sequester "stuff to me? I have several questions.

First, think about this..........

With actual spending going UP, why is the sky falling?

  • Both SIDES!
  • Even though both sides have admitted that the massive, self-imposed cuts will be devastating to the country's economy, neither of them have taken true and meaningful action when it comes to actually doing anything about the impending cuts.

Why, with $15 Billion MORE spending, will the economy die?

Why, with $15 Billion MORE spending,  will hundreds of thousands of jobs be lost?

Why, with $15 Billion MORE spending, will National Security disintegrate?

Why, with $15 Billion MORE spending, will National Parks go down the tubes?

Why, with $15 Billion MORE spending, won't politicians tell the truth?

I smell something!

Read more…

I am very angry at the Christian community for sitting on their butts because they could not vote for a Mormon. As with many Christians, they are arguing about what the dog has said as opposed to saying "Hey! why is the dog talking in the first place?

We have a communist regime in the White House and if these communist criminals should happen to succeed in disarming law-abiding citizens, you know, the Patriotic Americans who would give their lives so the Christians can comfortable sit and preach fluffy words in freedom and without fear. If the communist regime succeeds, they will come after the Christians first, that is their ultimate goal. Any political talk from the pulpit should be, we Christians need to neuter Obama, not try to work with him. I used to push for impeaching Obama but then we’d end up with Biden and I’m afraid that would be far worse.

Do the Christians realize that Christians and Communist will never live in peace together, I don't care how much you trust in God to protect you. Have you ever noticed it's always the living that trust and believe God will protect them. Do believe that any of the people murdered by a communist regime trusted in God to protect them? Let's ask them what they think about trusting God. Oh wait, we can't. Because some communist or criminal dirt bag had a gun and they did not.

The Christian community is completely confused on what real trust in God actually is. As far as I am concerned the Christian community has utterly failed to stand watch over our Constitution and protect the rights of all citizens under it's jurisdiction. Yes, I am also guilty of the same thing, but I’m now working to reverse the outright destruction of our Constitution. The Constitution has become my Bible, so that should explain where I’m coming from. The Bible is not the supreme law of America as many Christians believe, the Constitution is the supreme law and that’s by God's design. However, George Washington said, “it is impossible to rightly govern a nation without God and the Bible.The Christian community better get it through their heads, as opposed to a bullet, the Constitution is what gives them their courage to actually spend time with Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. Let same Christians preach this non-issue crap in Iran and lets see what happens. If any of you Christians are offended by my words, get over it. I’m more offended that many Christians sat on their warm pews and allowed a Communist to be re-elected. Romney may have not been the best for America, but at least he wasn’t a communist and hell-bent on destroying America.

Read more…

Nero Obama

The Emperor Nero, had a compulsion to be in front of crowds of people who worshiped him like a Movie star or Rock star today. He was a crowd pleas-er and anything that went wrong during his 13 years as Emperor was always someones fault (like his predecessor or the Senate) other than his. In fact Nero had a secret kill list of those that plotted against him and would get the people behind him before doing away with them.

Nero, only put people in charge of things as a front, he needed to control everything. so the people he appointed were unqualified or yes men.

 

Nero also devalued the money in Rome. By secretly having the silver dinar's infused with copper to pay for his building projects (Stimulus or Investment of Infrastructure). Gee, just like today where we have Quantitative Easing by printing more money. The effect that Nero had was people lost faith in the money they earned. Are we on the same road?

Finally the people woke up, and Nero ended his own life (with the help of a aid).

 

 

How do you think Obama will be remembered long after we are gone? Remember while Nero was alive everyone thought he was wonderful. Except St. John when he wrote "Revelations."

Source Unknown.

To my knowledge this is not Copyrighted

Read more…

 

                        Well, here we go again with the “common sense” gun control laws.  Republican Senators are about to do their normal surrender of our rights again.  A “bi-partisan” Gang of Howmany http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/senators-near-a-deal-on-background-checks-for-most-private-gun-sales/2013/02/23/d55e5f4a-7d0c-11e2-82e8-61a46c2cde3d_story.html  is sitting down behind closed doors to decide how to subvert the Constitution of the United States of America, AGAIN!!!  It matters not that We the People pay them to govern according to our Constitution, they have decided they know better than “us peasants” what is in our best interest and what will be allowed.

Read More:

http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2013/02/god-guts-and-guns-defeating-the-common-sense-gun-control-lie/

Read more…

Join me this Wednesday Feb. 27th as we welcome two great guest, Todd Woods the author of the economic thriller Currency and Chuck Morse of USA Radio Network. The air time is 8pm to 10pm Wed. Feb. 27th and the call in number is 347-327-9601!
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/the-truth-is-out-there1/2013/02/28/the-truth-is-out-there--voice-of-the-people

Read more…

The Sequester Scam

The Sequester SCAM

Meatcleaver fearmongering.

YOUR government is SCAMMING YOU!

Your Government is scaring the crap out of you… with LIES!

Here are some facts:

  • FY2012 ACTUAL Spending = $3.279 Trillion
  • FY2013 Budgeted Spending = $3.796 Trillion
  • The INCREASE  in SPENDING = $67 BILLION
  • The Sequester Funds = $85 Billion …. Or $18 Billion more than spending
    • So…. We should see $18 Billion of actual spending versus 2012… RIGHT?
    • Scroll down…. There’s more

 

 

 

SO… with ACTUAL SPENDING at $15 BILLION MORE, President Obama has described doomsday scenarios with hundreds of thousands of jobs lost


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/02/22/on-sequester-worse-better-for-obama/#ixzz2LxkVbRGN

 

  • WHAAAAAT???? With $15Billion MORE spending, the sequestration will cost hundreds of thousands of jobs….. HE SAID IT!

Will you ever give up drinking the swill from this fraud?

Call or email your Politician and raise hell!... including those that jumping on obama’s bandwagon as well as the sluggos who are laying back doing nothing on behalf of truth!

Click Here to Email Politicians

I just did!

Read more…

An idea to unite the right and stop the enemy.

OK, everyone who hates obama, and I'm convinced that's around 75% of the population, wants him out but the so-called republicans are divided, right? Some like me think a third party is the way to go, others want to stick with what I call the Titanic of politics, the GOP.

Someone tell me why this wouldn't work to bring the conservative thinking people together:

The establishment republicans run their candidate as usual. The New Tea Party, or something like it runs a truly conservative candidate, ala Col. Allen West, or Sarah Palin, Michelle Bachman, or Dr. Ben Carson the neurosurgeon. 

Here's the catch. *The stated policy of the conservative party is that they will run as hard as they can to win over America. All true conservatives like me will be able to vote for someone who hasn't been selected by the likes of Boehner and Rove. The GOP can run their typical unelectable candidate, Dole, McCain, Romney. Two weeks before the election if the conservative party isn't in contention based on a mutually agreed upon polling service, they pledge to swing their votes over to the Republicans and withdraw their candidate! That way, no votes end up going to supporting the likes of this hunk of garbage we have in there now and all of us can unite behind one candidate while still voting our conscience.

Now, if that sounds too unreasonable, or if you can't get on board with that, we are truly doomed because right now the left is rolling over us and the Constitution like a bull dozer.

We need something bold. Why not this? If you agree that it's worth a try, please spread it around. I'm so sick of liberalism and it's tentacles, not to mention islam while I'm at it. Liberalism is at the heart of the vast majority of our decline! 

Michael Quinn

Read more…

Reject Hagel

Gentlemen:

I am sending you this message today in strong opposition of Chuck Hagel's nomination as Secretary of Defense.

 

Despite Hagel's exemplary service in the U.S. military, it is

  • his anti-semitic remarks about Israel,
  •  his willingness to talk to our enemies,
  • his naive and dangerous "nuclear zero" policies and
  • his lack of leadership experience

that make him a very poor candidate for the role of Secretary of Defense.

 

America needs a strong, unflinching leader who not only understands the different world arenas and their unique challenges, but possesses the necessary skill set to walk the delicate balance and make the difficult decisions that could impact us all.

 

In my opinion, Chuck Hagel is not the right man for this key role,

and I urge you to strongly oppose Chuck Hagel's confirmation as Secretary of Defense.

 

Read more…

Erosion and the Constution

Erosion of the Constitution

 

I will begin by allegorically defining erosion.  The Grand Canyon was formed out of solid rock by water over eons of time.  Water ‘eroded’ a small obstructing hill into a chasm over a mile deep. Erosion may be insidious, but it is also ruthless.  A term that might be applied to the power mad in Washington of today.

 

Many people refer to FDR’s New Deal as the start of the erosion of the Constitution by our government.  I submit that it began much earlier than that.  Take a look at Grant’s administration and his use of carpet baggers during the Restoration following the Civil Was.  I could take you on a long and boring walk through many presidencies, but being the kind and gentle soul I am I will spare you that tedium.

 

So how about some things closer to our time?  OK that should be easy.  Let’s start with the Supreme court hearings during the Carter term.  The media began to make an epithet of the phrase “Strict Constructionist” when referring to candidates that believed the constitution means just what it says.  Skipping over many other worthy examples we come to what, in my opinion, is the single greatest practicing threat to the constitution the so called “Patriot Act” that ended with the formation of the Department of Homeland Security.  This “act” was envisioned by Bush as way to imprison foreign terrorist whether on our soil or some one else's.  You see the constitution strictly prohibits the incarceration of American citizens without that little thing called Habeas Corpus.  Basically that is the right to appear before a judge.  It does not so protect our non-indigenous enemies, nor should it.  The case could be made that it doesn’t even protect a foreign national committing a lesser crime on our soil, but we habitually and rightfully extend that courtesy to them.

 

Now the Department of Homeland Security (Insecurity?) has decided that our mental property is not a Constitutionally protected asset to the point of saying that they have the right to search and seize your Emails, thoughts committed to hard disc, Text messages, listed phone numbers and anything else they deem ‘potentially subversive’ without either probable cause or a warrent.  Particularly if it is within one hundred miles of ANY border.  I wonder who decided to stop at the one hundred mile point?  Why limit themselves?

 

In addition we are now subject to spying from the skies by our own government and threatened with murder for being in the company of a non convicted suspected person.  The CIA and FBI has taken the right to open our mail, listen in on our conversations, invade our homes without warrants and on and on and on.

 

A Constitutional Republic?  Not lately.  I submit to you that most of this is caused by you and me.  We have allowed the country to be taken over by the power hungry politician that is much more concerned with keeping his/her POWER than governing in a constitutional manner.

Read more…

 by Admin online

 

State Sen. Dan Patrick, chairman of the senate education committee, told Fox News he is very disturbed by the photograph as well as reports that students were exposed to a story that blamed Egypt’s turmoil on democracy – rather than the Muslim Brotherhood.

“Parents are very sensitive to any issue that seems to be anti-American – that blames democracy for some sort of trouble in the world,” he said.

A Texas mom became outraged after she discovered a Facebook photo of her child wearing Islamic garb.

The lesson on Islam was taught in a world geography class at Lumberton High School. 

READ MORE AT http://cufaba.blogspot.com/2013/02/state-investigation-launched-after.html

Read more…

Sequester: And now, the rest of the story

Subject: Some interesting info on how the sequester came about. Note the author!--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Obama’s sequester deal-changerBy Bob Woodward, Published: February 22Bob Woodward (woodwardb@washpost.com) is an associate editor of The Post. His latest book is “The Price of Politics.” Evelyn M. Duffy contributed to this column.Misunderstanding, misstatements and all the classic contortions of partisan message management surround the sequester, the term for the $85 billion in ugly and largely irrational federal spending cuts set by law to begin Friday.What is the non-budget wonk to make of this? Who is responsible? What really happened?The finger-pointing began during the third presidential debate last fall, on Oct. 22, when President Obama blamed Congress. “The sequester is not something that I’ve proposed,” Obama said. “It is something that Congress has proposed.”The White House chief of staff at the time, Jack Lew, who had been budget director during the negotiations that set up the sequester in 2011, backed up the president two days later.“There was an insistence on the part of Republicans in Congress for there to be some automatic trigger,” Lew said while campaigning in Florida. It “was very much rooted in the Republican congressional insistence that there be an automatic measure.”The president and Lew had this wrong. My extensive reporting for my book “The Price of Politics” shows that the automatic spending cuts were initiated by the White House and were the brainchild of Lew and White House congressional relations chief Rob Nabors — probably the foremost experts on budget issues in the senior ranks of the federal government.Obama personally approved of the plan for Lew and Nabors to propose the sequester to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.). They did so at 2:30 p.m. July 27, 2011, according to interviews with two senior White House aides who were directly involved.Nabors has told others that they checked with the president before going to see Reid. A mandatory sequester was the only action-forcing mechanism they could devise. Nabors has said, “We didn’t actually think it would be that hard to convince them” — Reid and the Republicans — to adopt the sequester. “It really was the only thing we had. There was not a lot of other options left on the table.”A majority of Republicans did vote for the Budget Control Act that summer, which included the sequester. Key Republican staffers said they didn’t even initially know what a sequester was — because the concept stemmed from the budget wars of the 1980s, when they were not in government.At the Feb. 13 Senate Finance Committee hearing on Lew’s nomination to become Treasury secretary, Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.) asked Lew about the account in my book: “Woodward credits you with originating the plan for sequestration. Was he right or wrong?”“It’s a little more complicated than that,” Lew responded, “and even in his account, it was a little more complicated than that. We were in a negotiation where the failure would have meant the default of the government of the United States.”“Did you make the suggestion?” Burr asked.“Well, what I did was said that with all other options closed, we needed to look for an option where we could agree on how to resolve our differences. And we went back to the 1984 plan that Senator [Phil] Gramm and Senator [Warren] Rudman worked on and said that that would be a basis for having a consequence that would be so unacceptable to everyone that we would be able to get action.”In other words, yes.But then Burr asked about the president’s statement during the presidential debate, that the Republicans originated it.Lew, being a good lawyer and a loyal presidential adviser, then shifted to denial mode: “Senator, the demand for an enforcement mechanism was not something that the administration was pushing at that moment.”That statement was not accurate.On Tuesday, Obama appeared at the White House with a group of police officers and firefighters to denounce the sequester as a “meat-cleaver approach” that would jeopardize military readiness and investments in education, energy and readiness. He also said it would cost jobs. But, the president said, the substitute would have to include new revenue through tax reform.At noon that same day, White House press secretary Jay Carney shifted position and accepted sequester paternity.“The sequester was something that was discussed,” Carney said. Walking back the earlier statements, he added carefully, “and as has been reported, it was an idea that the White House put forward.”This was an acknowledgment that the president and Lew had been wrong.Why does this matter?First, months of White House dissembling further eroded any semblance of trust between Obama and congressional Republicans. (The Republicans are by no means blameless and have had their own episodes of denial and bald-faced message management.)Second, Lew testified during his confirmation hearing that the Republicans would not go along with new revenue in the portion of the deficit-reduction plan that became the sequester. Reinforcing Lew’s point, a senior White House official said Friday, “The sequester was an option we were forced to take because the Republicans would not do tax increases.”In fact, the final deal reached between Vice President Biden and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) in 2011 included an agreement that there would be no tax increases in the sequester in exchange for what the president was insisting on: an agreement that the nation’s debt ceiling would be increased for 18 months, so Obama would not have to go through another such negotiation in 2012, when he was running for reelection.So when the president asks that a substitute for the sequester include not just spending cuts but also new revenue, he is moving the goal posts. His call for a balanced approach is reasonable, and he makes a strong case that those in the top income brackets could and should pay more. But that was not the deal he made.Read more from PostOpinions: Bob Woodward: Time for our leaders to delegate on the budget Robert J. Samuelson: The lowdown on Lew Jennifer Rubin: Jack Lew’s truth problem Eugene Robinson: The sequester madness© The Washington Post Company
Read more…

My grand daughter posted this video on face book, she thought it was "AWSOM" needless to say grandpa thought it was crap! her teacher ha drecomanded to the kids if your feeling depressed or bullied watch this video. GEEES! what a bunch of Bul shit! I felt like killing myself after a few minutes of watching it.

 

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltun92DfnPY

Read more…

The Sequester Lie

 

                         The big deal they are making over this sequester nonsense is giving me a headache.  I have made this point on several social network site discussions so I thought I would put it all together on one place.  Obama, his cabinet minions, and all of the members of Congress come out and say; Social Security checks will stop, meat plants will shut down, the FBI won’t be able to track terrorists, the Border Patrol won’t be able to secure the borders, airports will shut down, pony rides in national parks will end, the sun won’t come up on March 2, and on and on and on adnauseum.  And the RINO’s in Congress aren’t doing any better.

Read More:

http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2013/02/the-sequester-lie/

Read more…

Federal Gov't Moves to Disam Vets

Federal Government Moves to Disarm Veterans

soldiergirl
  • 467
    Share

It’s no secret that the Department of Homeland Security considers returning veterans a threat to the established order. They said as much back in 2009 when they wrote in a report exposed by Alex Jones and the alternative media: “Returning veterans possess combat skills and experience that are attractive to right-wing extremists… DHS/I&A is concerned that right-wing extremists will attempt to recruit and radicalize veterans in order to boost their violent capacities.”

SPECIAL: Join TeaParty.org to Fund “Youth Firearms Training Initiative”

Following the case of veteran Brandon Raub, who was abducted and held in a psychiatric ward for Facebook posts the government considered subversive, police in Ohio seized a veteran’s guns after he was adjudged to be mentally incompetent despite the fact a Veterans Administration psychiatric evaluation determined he was not mentally ill...(MORE)

 

=================            ======================          ===================

Please, someone tell me what I am missing in this article.

The Feds run to disarm the veterans who are returning from Iraq and Afghanistan because they believe these vets will be a threat to them because they have combat skills, so they want to take their guns away.  OK, do I understand this so far?

However, when the Feds disarm these vets, the right-wing nuts as they call us will arm them again.  I don't personally know anyone who has a lot of fire arms, but I know they exist.  These people are out there in somewhere in the United States.

I do know that Conservatives who love these comrads as much as I do will give them all the guns, ammo, knives, etc. to dress them up, head to feet, so what is the point of disarming these vets in the first place, I wonder??

 

Read more…

http://www.augustforecast.com/2009/01/27/obama_trilateral_commission_endgame/

The above web site contains the following:

As pre­vi­ously noted in Pawns of the Global Elite, Barack Obama was groomed for the pres­i­dency by key mem­bers of the Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sion. Most notably, it was Zbig­niew Brzezinski, co-founder of the Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sion with David Rock­e­feller in 1973, who was Obama’s prin­cipal for­eign policy advisor.

The pre-election atten­tion is rem­i­nis­cent of Brzezinski’s tutoring of Jimmy Carter prior to Carter‘s land­slide elec­tion in 1976.

For anyone who doubts the Commission’s con­tin­uing influ­ence on Obama, con­sider that he has already appointed no less than eleven mem­bers of the Com­mis­sion to top-level and key posi­tions in his Administration.

According to offi­cial Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sion mem­ber­ship lists, there are only 87 mem­bers from the United States (the other 337 mem­bers are from other regions). Thus, in less than two weeks since his inau­gu­ra­tion, Obama’s appoint­ments encom­pass more than 12% of Commission’s entire U.S. membership.

Is this a mere coin­ci­dence or is it a con­tin­u­a­tion of dom­i­nance over the Exec­u­tive Branch since 1976? (For impor­tant back­ground, read The Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sion: Usurping Sov­er­eignty.)

  • Sec­re­tary of Trea­sury, Tim Gei­thner
  • Ambas­sador to the United Nations, Susan Rice
  • National Secu­rity Advisor, Gen. James L. Jones
  • Deputy National Secu­rity Advisor, Thomas Donilon
  • Chairman, Eco­nomic Recovery Com­mittee, Paul Volker
  • Director of National Intel­li­gence, Admiral Dennis C. Blair
  • Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of State, Asia & Pacific,  Kurt M. Campbell
  • Deputy Sec­re­tary of State, James Stein­berg
  • State Depart­ment, Spe­cial Envoy, Richard Haass
  • State Depart­ment, Spe­cial Envoy, Dennis Ross
  • State Depart­ment, Spe­cial Envoy, Richard Hol­brooke

There are many other inci­dental links to the Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sion, for instance,

Sec­re­tary of State Hillary Clinton is mar­ried to Com­mis­sion member William Jef­ferson Clinton.

Gei­thner‘s informal group of advi­sors include E. Gerald Cor­rigan, Paul Volker, Alan Greenspan and Peter G. Peterson, among others. His first job after col­lege was with Henry Kissinger at Kissinger Associates.

Brent Scow­croft has been an unof­fi­cial advisor to Obama and was mentor to Defense Sec­re­tary Robert Gates.

Robert Zoelick is cur­rently pres­i­dent of the World Bank

Lau­rence Sum­mers, White House Eco­nomic Advisor, was men­tored by former Trea­sury Sec­re­tary Robert Rubin during the Clinton administration.

There are many other such links, but these are enough for you to get the idea of what’s going on here.

Ana­lyze the positions

Notice that five of the Tri­lat­eral appointees involve the State Depart­ment, where for­eign policy is cre­ated and imple­mented. Hillary Clinton is cer­tainly in line with these poli­cies because her hus­band, Bill Clinton, is also a member.

What is more impor­tant than eco­nomic recovery? Paul Volker is the answer.

What is more impor­tant than national intel­li­gence? Gen. James Jones, Thomas Donilon and Adm. Dennis Blair hold the top three positions.

What is more impor­tant than the Trea­sury and the saving of our finan­cial system? Tim­othy Gei­thner says he has the answers.

The State Depart­ment is vir­tu­ally dom­i­nated by Tri­lat­erals: Kurt Camp­bell, James Stein­berg, Richard Haass, Dennis Ross and Richard Hol­brooke.

This leaves Susan Rice, Ambas­sador to the United Nations. The U.N. is the chosen instru­ment for ulti­mate global gov­er­nance. Rice will help to sub­vert the U.S. into the U.N. umbrella of vassal states.

Con­flict of interest

Since 1973, the Com­mis­sion has met reg­u­larly in ple­nary ses­sions to dis­cuss policy posi­tion papers devel­oped by its mem­bers. Poli­cies are debated in order to achieve con­sen­suses. Respec­tive mem­bers return to their own coun­tries to imple­ment poli­cies con­sis­tent with those consensuses.

The orig­inal stated pur­pose of the Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sion was to create a “New Inter­na­tional Eco­nomic Order.” Its cur­rent state­ment has mor­phed into fos­tering a closer coop­er­a­tion among these core demo­c­ratic indus­tri­al­ized areas of the world with shared lead­er­ship respon­si­bil­i­ties in the wider inter­na­tional system.” (See The Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sion web site)

U.S. Tri­lat­eral mem­bers imple­ment poli­cies deter­mined by a majority of non-Americans that most often work against the best inter­ests of the country.

“How,” you say?

Since the admin­is­tra­tion of Jimmy Carter, Tri­lat­erals held these mas­sively influ­en­tial positions:

  • Six out of eight World Bank pres­i­dents, including the cur­rent appointee, Robert Zoelick
  • Eight out of ten U.S. Trade Representatives
  • Pres­i­dent and/or Vice-President of every elected admin­is­tra­tion (except for Obama/Biden)
  • Seven out of twelve Sec­re­taries of State
  • Nine out of twelve Sec­re­taries of Defense

Is this sinking in? Are you grasping the enor­mity of it?

Endgame is at hand

For the Tri­lat­eral crowd, the game is about over. The recent reemer­gence of orig­inal mem­bers Henry Kissinger, Zbig­niew Brzezinski, Brent Scow­croft and Paul Volker serves to rein­force the con­clu­sion that the New Inter­na­tional Eco­nomic Order is near.

The Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sion and its mem­bers have engi­neered the global eco­nomic, trade and finan­cial system that is cur­rently in a state of total chaos.

Does that mean that they have lost? Hardly.

As I recently wrote in Chorus call for New World Order, they are using the crisis to destroy what remains of national sov­er­eignty, so that a New World Order can finally and per­ma­nently be put into place.

Con­clu­sion

The Obama pres­i­dency is a disin­gen­uous fraud. He was elected by promising to bring change, yet from the start change was never envi­sioned. He was care­fully groomed and financed by the Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sion and their friends.

In short, Obama is merely the con­tin­u­a­tion of dis­as­trous, non-American poli­cies that have brought eco­nomic ruin upon us and the rest of the world. The Obama expe­ri­ence rivals that of Jimmy Carter, whose cam­paign slogan was “I will never lie to you.”

When the Demo­crat base finally real­izes that it has been conned again (Bill Clinton and Al Gore were mem­bers), per­haps it will unleash a real polit­ical rev­o­lu­tion that will oust Tri­lat­eral politi­cians, oper­a­tives and poli­cies from the shores of our country.

If the reader is a Demo­crat, be aware that many Repub­li­cans and con­ser­v­a­tives are still licking their wounds after finally real­izing that George Bush and Dick Cheney worked the same con on them for a dis­as­trous eight years of the same policies!

Read more…

ABORTION IS MURDER!

Americans have lost track of the sacredness of the U.S. Constitution and their religious teachings.  Too many do not believe in sin and do not understand the nature of sin.  Too many do not fear God.  Too many are pushing the envelope regarding God's willingness to forgive their sins.  One day He will say:  "Enough is enough" and drop the veil of His Divine protection.  WAKE UP AMERICA...DO NOT OFFEND GOD!

Read more…

 WHAT OF THOSE THAT DIED BEFORE THEY EVER COLLECTED SOCIAL SECURITY .

The following is an email floating around on the Internet regarding Social
Security Fraud as seen from the eyes of a woman who lost two husbands before
they were able to retire.

Read this slowly so it sinks in!!!
 
KEEP PASSING THIS AROUND UNTIL EVERY ONE HAS HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO READ
IT... THIS IS SURE SOMETHING TO THINK ABOUT!!!!
 
THE ONLY THING WRONG WITH THE GOVERNMENT'S CALCULATION OF AVAILABLE SOCIAL
SECURITY IS THEY FORGOT TO FIGURE IN THE PEOPLE WHO DIED BEFORE THEY EVER
COLLECTED A SOCIAL SECURITY CHECK!!!
 
WHERE DID THAT MONEY GO?
 
Remember, not only did you and I contribute to Social Security but your
employer did, too. It totaled 15% of your income before taxes. If you
averaged only $30K over your working life, that's close to $220,500. Read
that again. Did you see where the Government paid in one single penny? We
are talking about the money you and your employer put in a Government bank
to insure you and I that we would have a retirement check from the money we
put in, not the Government. Now they are calling the money we put in an
entitlement when we reach the age to take it back. If you calculate the
future invested value of $4,500 per year (yours & your employer's
contribution) at a simple 5% interest (less than what the govt. pays on the
money that it borrows), after 49 years of working you'd have $892,919.98.
 
If you took out only 3% per year, you'd receive $26,787.60 per year and it
would last better than 30 years (until you're 95 if you retire at age 65)
and that's with no interest paid on that final amount on deposit! If you
bought an annuity and it paid 4% per year, you'd have a lifetime income of
$2,976.40 per month.
 
Another thing with me.... I have two deceased husbands who died in their
50's, (one was 51 and the other one was 59 before one percent of their
social security could be drawn. I worked all my life and am drawing 100% on
my own social security). Their S.S. money will never have one cent drawn
from what they paid into S.S. all their lives.
 
THE FOLKS IN WASHINGTON HAVE PULLED OFF A BIGGER PONZI SCHEME THAN BERNIE
MADOFF EVER DID.
 
Entitlement my foot, I paid cash for my social security insurance! Just
because they borrowed the money for other government spending, doesn't make
my benefits some kind of charity or handout!!
 
Remember Congressional benefits? --- free healthcare, outrageous retirement
packages, 67 paid holidays, three weeks paid vacation, unlimited paid sick
days. Now that's welfare, and they have the nerve to call my social security
retirement payments entitlements?
 
We're "broke" and we can't help our own Seniors, Veterans, Orphans, or
 
Homeless. Yet in the last few months we have provided aid to Haiti, Chile
and Turkey. And now Pakistan......home of bin Laden. Literally, BILLIONS of
DOLLARS!!!
 
Our retired seniors living on a 'fixed S.S. income' receive no additional
federal aid nor do they get any financial breaks, while our government 
pour hundreds of billions of $$$ and tons of food to foreign countries!
 
They call Social Security and Medicare an entitlement even though most of us
have been paying for it all our working lives, and now, when it's time for
us to collect, the government is running out of money. Why did the
government borrow from it in the first place? It was supposed to be in a
locked box, not part of the general fund.
 
Sad isn't it?  99% of people won't have the guts to forward this. I'm in the 1% -- I just
did.
Read more…

A flagrant horn blowing

Among other things, I am the webmaster and proud member of the Nicholas County West Virginia Tea Party.

Recently  I added the Constitution and all of the amendments thereto to the web site and spent many hours constructing and annotating a table of contents for each.  Want to look something up in one of the amendments or perhaps the Constitution itself?  Just click the link in the table of contents and it will take you right to the described portion in which you are interested.  

I sure hope this doesn't violate some rule here.  If it does just let me know and I will remove it.

If you do drop by please let me know what you think in one of our comment boxes.

Our web site

Read more…