ALSO STAY OUT OF THE IRAN PROBLEM, YOUR TOO LATE, WE SHOULD HAVE ACTED 2 OR 3 YEARS AGO.
All Posts (27801)
THE DEMOCRATS WANT US TO GO BROKE SO THEY CAN TURN US GOOD PEOPLE SOCIALISTS, AND WE CAN NOT DO A THING.
GOOGLE MAPS HAS REVEALED GIANT GRID PATTERNS
IN THE GOBI DESERT, AT THE CHINESE MILITARY MISSILE TEST RANGES ! THEY ARE THE GRIDS OF AMERICAN CITES ? ARE THE CHINESE SIGHTING IN ON
AMERICAN CITY GRIDS, AT THESE MISSILE TEST RANGES ? WHERE IS MR. OBAMA, PLAYING FOOTSIES ~
WITH THE CHINESE !! WASHINGTON, D.C. ????
WE HAVE BEEN LISTENING TO THE DEBATES AND LEARNING ABOUT THE PAST ACCOMPLISHMENTS OF EACH OF THE CANDIDATES BUT WHAT ABOUT THE 2011 ACOMPLISHMENTS? HAVE THEY IMPLEMENTED ANY OF THE ASPECTS OF THEIR PLANS WITH ACTION. THEY ALL HAVE HAD SOME GOVERNMENT EXPERIENCE BUT HAVE THEY USED THE CONNECTIONS FROM THAT EXPERIENCE TO TRY TO GET SOME THING DONE ABOUT OUR CURRENT PROBLEMS?
I AM PRESENTING THIS THIS CHALLENGE IN AN EFFORT TO BECOME BETTER INFORMED ABOUT THE LEADERSDHIP POTENTIAL OF THE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES AND AS AN UNBIASED OBSERVER TRYING TO DECIDE WHICH WOULD BE THE BEST PRESIDENT IN LEADERSHIP AND ACCOMPLISHMENT POTENTIAL.
HERMAN CAIN HAS WORKED FOR THE FED AND IF HE WAS EFFECTIVE, HE PROBABLY MADE SOME POWERFUL CONNECTIONS WITHIN GOVERNMENT CIRCLES, HAS HE USED THOSE CONNECTIONS TO TRY GET SOME LEGISLATIVE ACTION ON ANY PART5S OF HIS OVERALL PLAN FOR AMERICA? IF SO HERMAN TELL US ABOUT THEM.
GOVERNOR PERRY HAS DONE A WONDERFUL JOB IN ATTRACTING LARGE BUSINESS TO LOCATE IN A RIGHT TO WORK STATE WITHOUT A STATE INCOME OR CORPORATE INCOME TAX AND IS CONTENDING WITH BORDER PROBLEMS ON A DAILY BASSIS, BUT HAS HE INSTITUTED ANY NEW TEXAS POLICY WHICH WOULD REMOVE THE INCENTIVES FOR PEOPLE TO ENTER OUR COUNTRY ILEGALLY?
HE HAS ADMITTED TO INSTITUTING ONE STATE POLICY WHICH IS ACTUALLY AN INCENTIVE FOR ILLEGAL ENTRY, BUT WHAT ABOUT THE EXTRA COSTS INVOLVED FOR EDUCATION AND STATE OFFERED WELFARE PROGRAMS. WHERE ARE THE POLICY REQUIRING PROOF OF LEGAL ENTRY TO QUALIFY FOR ENTRY INTO ANY OF THOSE PROGRAMS. TELL US ABOUT THE THINGS YOU ARE DOING NOW GOVERNOR.
GOVERNOR HUNTSMAN HAS DONE A MARVELOUS JOB FOR UTAH ALSO BUT MANY OF THE NATIONAL PROBLEMS PLAGUING THE COUNTRY HAVE NEGATIVE EFFECTS ON HIS STATE, HAS HE INITIATED ANY STATE INITIATIVES TO LIMIT THOSE NEGATIVE EFFECTS. SHOW US THAT YOU ARE A MAN OF ACTION GOVERNOR.
GONGRESSMAN RON PAUL, YOU TOLD US THAT YOU WANT TO ABOLISH THE FED, DO YOU HAVE ANY PENDING LEGISLATION TO EITHER LIMIT THE POWER OF THE FED OR TO ABLOLISH IT?. AS A CONGRESSMAN, HAVE YOU SIGNED TO CONGRESSWOMAN BACHMANS LEGISLATION TO REPEAL OBOMACARE AND DOD FRANK? DO YOU HAVE ANY PENDING LEGISLATION WHICH WOULD AFFECT THE THINGS YOU TELL US ABOUT ON THE DEBATES? LET US, THE PEOPLE SEE HOW YOU ARE LEADING.
RICK SANTORUM YOU HAVE SERVED PENSYLVANIA WELL OVER THE YEARS AND YOU KNOW HOW THE CONGRESS WORKS, HAVE YOU TAKEN ADVANTAGE OF THAT KNOWLEDGE AND INFLUENCE TO WORK AT GETTING THE 15+ JOBS BILL THAT THE HOUSE HAS PASSED INTO COMMITTEE AND ON THE SENATE SCHEDULE FOR A VOTE?
MR ROMNEY, YOU HAVE BUILT A ENVIOUS RECORD AS GOVERNOR. STATESMAN, BUSINESS MAN, SAVIOUR OF THE OLYMPICS,ETC. YOU ARE ONE OF TWO CANDIDATES WHO COULD HAVE THE MOST INFLUENCE WITHIN GOVERNMENT CIRCLES AND YOU HAVE PRODUCED A VERY COMPREHENSIVE AND COMPLEX PLAN FOR AMERICA BUT WHAT HAVE YOU DONE WITH IT? HAVE YOU USED YOUR INFLUENCE TO PREMOTE ANY OF THE ASPECTS OF YOUR PLAN IN THE CURRENT CONGRESS? TELL US WHAT YOU ARE DOING BEFORE ELECTION TO HELP GET OUR COUNTRY BACK ON TRACK.
NEWT GINGRICH, YOU ARE PROBABLY THE MOST ACOMPLISHED AND KNOWLEDGABLE MAN ON THE STAGE, YOU HAVE EARNED A TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF RESPECT ON BOTH SIDES OF THE AISLE SO WHY ARE YOU JUST SITTING AROUND TALKING ABOUT YOUR SUCESSES, I AM DISAPOINTED IN YOUR LACK OF ACTION CURRENTLY. YOU, MORE THAN ANY OF THE OTHER CANDIDATES COULD HAVE HEATED THINGS UP FOR THE MEMBERS OF CONGRESS TO GET SOMETHING DONE. WHERE IS THE WARRIOR THAT WE ALL HAVE ADMIRED FOR YEARS?
CONGRESSWOMAN BACHMAN, IT APPEARS THAT YOU ARE THE ONLY ONE OF THIS GROUP WHO HAS THE COURAGE TO STEP AND WORK AT GETTING SOME OF YOUR BELIEFS ACTED ON WITH YOUR APPEAL OF OBOMACARE AND DODD/FRANK. WORKING TO GET THOSE PROPOSALS ADVANCED IS A MONUMENTAL TASK AND IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN HOW EFFECTIVE YOU CAN BE.
AND YOU ARE TO BE COMMENDED FOR THE VALIANT EFFORT YOU ARE PUTTING FORTH.
JUST MABY ISERAL CAN DO SOMETHING TO STOP IRAN, WE HAVE TO GET OUT OF AFGHANISTAN NOW NO ONE EVEN RUSSIA HAS BEAT THE AFGHANISTAN, WHEN WILL OUR COUNTRY LEARN/?
From film director Frank Miller ref the OWS movement..... Took the words right out of my mouth. Well put....
"Everybody’s been too damn polite about this nonsense:
The “Occupy” movement, whether displaying itself on Wall Street or in the streets of Oakland (which has, with unspeakable cowardice, embraced it) is anything but an exercise of our blessed First Amendment. “Occupy” is nothing but a pack of louts, thieves, and rapists, an unruly mob, fed by Woodstock-era nostalgia and putrid false righteousness. These clowns can do nothing but harm America.
“Occupy” is nothing short of a clumsy, poorly-expressed attempt at anarchy, to the extent that the “movement” – HAH! Some “movement”, except if the word “bowel” is attached - is anything more than an ugly fashion statement by a bunch of iPhone, iPad wielding spoiled brats who should stop getting in the way of working people and find jobs for themselves.
This is no popular uprising. This is garbage. And goodness knows they’re spewing their garbage – both politically and physically – every which way they can find.
Wake up, pond scum. America is at war against a ruthless enemy.
Maybe, between bouts of self-pity and all the other tasty tidbits of narcissism you’ve been served up in your sheltered, comfy little worlds, you’ve heard terms like al-Qaeda and Islamicism.
And this enemy of mine — not of yours, apparently - must be getting a dark chuckle, if not an outright horselaugh - out of your vain, childish, self-destructive spectacle.
In the name of decency, go home to your parents, you losers. Go back to your mommas’ basements and play with your Lords Of Warcraft.
Or better yet, enlist for the real thing. Maybe our military could whip some of you into shape.
They might not let you babies keep your iPhones, though. Try to soldier on."
Schmucks.
FM
In part (1) the evolution of Liberalism, Socialism and Communism were sort of lumped together showing, but it shows how our youth many years ago were being brainwashed by many different factions. The innocence of our youth made them the perfect victims for those on the left.
Liberalism, Socialism and Communism have created the “Lost Generation.” It was very subtle at first and rather hard to pinpoint just how they infiltrated our Government, our schools, our Colleges, our Supreme Court and our homes. Let’s dissect the brain washed Liberal News Media in an effort to see why they’ve turned into a demonizing faction in our USA – the lost sheep and the lost generation.
All three of these ideologies mentioned are closely connected by certain beliefs; therefore they share a common link or connection with each other. First, they consider all Americans too ignorant and stupid to live independently and be their own counsel.
Second, notice how Obama’s ”better than thou” demeanor is just like Saul Alinskys, George Soros, Bill Ayers & wife Bernadine Dohrn, Cass Sunstein, Eric Holder (AG), Lisa Jackson(EPA), Richard Trumpka (AFL-CIO). They actually believe they’re a superior race and have been endowed the authority to control us. Our White House has been infiltrated with these Liberalists!
Third, they hate groups of people like the Tea Parties, who are fighting to restore our Nation. They want to remove the 2nd Amendment and disarm the citizens of the USA. If they in fact disarm our Nation, we will be totally dependent upon the Government.
Fourth, they fear “God,” and keep trying to remove “God” from our schools, our courtrooms, our Federal buildings, our coins and our Constitution. They’ve been trying to wipe “God” off the map for many moons. God’s not afraid of the Church card they keep jerking out of their pocket. Nope, “God” is alive and well and isn’t about to leave his kids alone in their fight to “take back their Country.”
The Liberal News Media has been spawn by those who wish to take over our Country; they’ve evolved into a bunch of brainless puppets unable to exist on their own. They’re the masters of X-rated regurgitated chewed up and re-edited fiction in an attempt to keep Americans distracted, while they continue gnawing away at our rights and freedoms
Their hatred has no limits as they continue their rampage against the Tea Parties, calling them terrorists, racists, Wahhabis, tea baggers, suicide bombers and the list just rambles on- remember they fear groups of people who meet together to restore our Nation.
They’re pros at using the Church card, the race card and the terrorist card when the going gets tough, but they’re starting to lose traction. They’re losing steam – God’s alive and well, the race card looks like Obama’s last year’s fake birth certificate; the one that was layered and photo shopped. The terrorist card is sort of their wild card specifically used for any person or groups of people who disagree with their ideology.
The worst error the Liberals could have made was to compare the Wall Street Protestors to our Nation’s Tea Parties – this strategy backfired on them! The OWS Protestors are just another generation of lost sheep, who have no respect for themselves or others. They are raping, destroying property, creating unsanitary conditions, and doing drugs and don’t have a clue why they are protesting. They are dangerous because of the puppeteers orchestrating their movement!
The tea parties are our “freedom fighters, they don’t kill, destroy other’s property, throw stones, cans and make threats. They will continue their peaceful march to “Take Back Our Country,” from those who will and have harmed our Nation, our children and our grandchildren.
The Liberal News Media are the robots pre-programed for the destruction of America; they are fed daily by the puppeteers and thrive on lies, propaganda and corruption. They’ve not only lost their way, like the OWS – they are the LOST GENERATION.
May God Bless America
As Always,
Little Tboca
Part (1) Liberal News Media
by little tboca
I’ve written many articles about the Liberal News Media their lies, propaganda and vile responses about our Churches, “God,” our Constitution, our rights and freedoms and their relentless attempt to destroy our great Patriots of 2011. Today, I thank God for giving the Tea Party movement the wisdom and strength to restore our Nation’s once strong foundation.
I understand why generations of youth are so confused, disoriented and incapable of being productive young adults with high self- esteem – I realized that they are the product of the Radicals who infiltrated our Government, our schools and our Country.
Now, it’s apparent the OWS protestors are an offspring of the lost generations. They’re unable to function, to think on their own and don’t have a clue about our Nation, our Constitution, our freedoms, our rights – they’re not only lost, they are dangerous to themselves and our Country. They are the sheep controlled, not in control!
The Liberal News media is the result of the New Left of the 60’s and 70’s, which was the time of the Hippie movement and college protests. They are the end product or the result of the Saul Alinsky, Frank Davis, Bill Ayers and wife Bernadine Dohrn (Weatherman Underground terrorists), and many others starting back way before the 40’s.
Now we’re living in the dangerous radical world of Code Pink: Obama, Hamas, Muslim Brotherhood., Obama, George Soros and 100’s of radical Community organizations who are continuing to brainwash our youth. Many of our children have developed a total dependency on these corrupt mentors and leaders.
It’s sad to realize the baby boomers of which I am one, was too busy playing around in our sandbox until the sand was all gone. We allowed the once strong family unit to disintegrate as we developed a politically correct attitude allowing the “norm” to change over the years.
The hi-tech revolution started and we were promised less working hours and more time with our families and children – that didn’t happen; we had longer hours and less family time.
Latch key kids came on the scene; parents helped the Radicals destroy our beautiful educational system via one lawsuit after another until we the people totally derailed our teachers, school superintendents and basically set our kids free and at the mercy of the Radicals. We allowed dangerous people in our Supreme Court who re-write laws, not interpret them.
As years passed we were locked into a fish bowl chasing material possessions, trying to keep up with the Jones’s and the “norm” continued to change. Television revolved from wholesome family entertainment to crime, violence, sex and sleazy shows like Jerry Springer’s.
The Liberal News Media sneaked in our backdoors and took control of our lives.
We become accustom to “shacking up,” because everyone seemed to be doing it. We used TV, Computer and high tech gadgets to help raise our kids and keep them occupied.
We delegated teachers, child care facilities and College Professors to raise and mentor our kids. We let Susie talk us in to high heels, revealing clothes, excessive make up and jewelry because we thought trinkets, toys and gifts would make up for lost time with our kids. Inadvertently we changed roles with our kids – they ran the show, dictated the rules and we became victims.
We contributed to the lost generations that we’re seeing in the OWS Protestors and we helped create the Liberal News Media who are unable of function or think on their own.
The greatest movement that’s happened in many years is the Tea Party movement and they will “take back our Country,” restore our Constitution, protect our borders, restore our rights and freedoms and most of all they will rebuild the family unit for the family unit is the strength and the heart of our Nation.
They will once again become mentors, disciplinarians and offer guidance to their children, their grandchildren and future generations. They will prevail for a small group of people can change the world – look what the Nazarene did 2000 years ago!
May God Bless America
As Always,
Little Tboca
Views: 1043
THE CAIN ACCUSERS ARE NOW FIVE.FOUR MORE IT GETS TO NINE. SO HE COULD CHANGE HIS SLOGAN TO 9-9-9-9-GET IT 9999.
What’s new?
Posted on American Thinker-By Matt Patterson-August 18, 2011:
“Years from now, historians may regard the 2008 election of Barack Obama as an inscrutable and disturbing phenomenon, a baffling breed of mass hysteria akin perhaps to the witch craze of the Middle Ages. How, they will wonder, did a man so devoid of professional accomplishment beguile so many into thinking he could manage the world’s largest economy, direct the world’s most powerful military, execute the world’s most consequential job?
Imagine a future historian examining Obama’s pre-presidential life: ushered into and through the Ivy League despite unremarkable grades and test scores along the way; a cushy non-job as a “community organizer”; a brief career as a state legislator devoid of legislative achievement (and in fact nearly devoid of his attention, so often did he vote “present”); and finally an unaccomplished single term in United States Senate, the entirety of which was devoted to his presidential ambitions. He left no academic legacy in academia, authored no signature legislation as legislator.
And then there is the matter of his troubling associations: the white-hating, America-loathing preacher who for decades served as Obama’s “spiritual mentor”; a real-life, actual terrorist who served as Obama’s colleague and political sponsor. It is easy to imagine a future historian looking at it all and asking: how on Earth was such a man elected president?
Not content to wait for history, the incomparable Norman Podhoretz addressed the question recently in the Wall Street Journal:
“To be sure, no white candidate who had close associations with an outspoken hater of America like Jeremiah Wright and an unrepentant terrorist like Bill Ayers would have lasted a single day. But because Mr. Obama was black, and therefore entitled in the eyes of liberaldom to have hung out with protesters against various American injustices, even if they were a bit extreme, he was given a pass.”
Let that sink in: Obama was given a pass—held to a lower standard—because of the color of his skin. Podhoretz continues:
“And in any case, what did such ancient history matter when he was also articulate and elegant and (as he himself had said) “non-threatening,” all of which gave him a fighting chance to become the first black president and thereby to lay the curse of racism to rest?”
Podhoretz puts his finger, I think, on the animating pulse of the Obama phenomenon—affirmative action. Not in the legal sense, of course. But certainly in the motivating sentiment behind all affirmative action laws and regulations, which are designed primarily to make white people, and especially white liberals, feel good about themselves.
Unfortunately, minorities often suffer so that whites can pat themselves on the back. Liberals routinely admit minorities to schools for which they are not qualified, yet take no responsibility for the inevitable poor performance and high drop-out rates which follow. Liberals don’t care if these minority students fail; liberals aren’t around to witness the emotional devastation and deflated self esteem resulting from the racist policy that is affirmative action. Yes, racist. Holding someone to a separate standard merely because of the color of his skin—that’s affirmative action in a nutshell, and if that isn’t racism, then nothing is. And that is what America did to Obama.
True, Obama himself was never troubled by his lack of achievements, but why would he be? As many have noted, Obama was told he was good enough for Columbia despite undistinguished grades at Occidental; he was told he was good enough for the US Senate despite a mediocre record in Illinois; he was told he was good enough to be president despite no record at all in the Senate. All his life, every step of the way, Obama was told he was good enough for the next step, in spite of ample evidence to the contrary. What could this breed if not the sort of empty narcissism on display every time Obama speaks?
In 2008, many who agreed that he lacked executive qualifications nonetheless raved about Obama’s oratory skills, intellect, and cool character. Those people—conservatives included—ought now to be deeply embarrassed. The man thinks and speaks in the hoariest of clichés, and that’s when he has his teleprompter in front of him; when the prompter is absent he can barely think or speak at all. Not one original idea has ever issued from his mouth—it’s all warmed-over Marxism of the kind that has failed over and over again for 100 years.
And what about his character? Obama is constantly blaming anything and everything else for his troubles. Bush did it; it was bad luck; I inherited this mess. It is embarrassing to see a president so willing to advertise his own powerlessness, so comfortable with his own incompetence. But really, what were we to expect? The man has never been responsible for anything, so how do we expect him to act responsibly?
In short: our president is a small and small-minded man, with neither the temperament nor the intellect to handle his job. When you understand that, and only when you understand that, will the current erosion of liberty and prosperity make sense. It could not have gone otherwise with such a man in the Oval Office.
But hey, at least we got to feel good about ourselves for a little while. And really, isn’t that all that matters these days?
See also: The Era of Confronting Obama at Public Events
Update:
Author’s Note. A lot of readers have written in asking me how I came to the conclusion that Obama was an unremarkable student and that he benefited from affirmative action. Three reasons:
1) As reported by The New York Sun: “A spokesman for the university, Brian Connolly, confirmed that Mr. Obama spent two years at Columbia College and graduated in 1983 with a major in political science. He did not receive honors...” In spite of not receiving honors as an undergrad, Obama was nevertheless admitted to Harvard Law. Why?
2) Obama himself has written he was a poor student as a young man. As the Baltimore Sun reported, in:
“’Obama’s book ‘Dreams from My Father,’....the president recalled a time in his life...when he started to drift away from the path of success. ‘I had learned not to care,’ Obama wrote. ‘... Pot had helped, and booze; maybe a little blow when you could afford it.’ But his mother confronted him about his behavior. ‘Don’t you think you’re being a little casual about your future?” she asked him, according to the book. ‘... One of your friends was just arrested for drug possession. Your grades are slipping. You haven’t even started on your college applications.’”
3) Most damning to me is the president’s unwillingness to make his transcripts public. If Obama had really been a stellar student with impeccable grades as an undergrad, is there any doubt they would have been made public by now and trumpeted on the front page of the New York Times as proof of his brilliance? To me it all adds up to affirmative action.”
Source:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/08/obama_the_affirmative_action_president.html
Note: The following article and/or blog post relates to this issue-You Decide:
The Era of Confronting Obama at Public Events!
Posted on American Thinker-By J.R. Dunn-On August 18, 2011:
“So here we have “former-Bush official Brad Blakeman” being quoted by the media as attacking Tea Party stalwart Ryan Rhodes over Rhodes’s confrontation with Obama. It seems that every time we see the term “former Bush,” “former Reagan,” and for all I know “former Coolidge” official, it involves some venerable GOP figure calling airstrikes in on his or her own unit. I guess it’s slow down at the shuffleboard court.
It’s possible to read all sorts of things into this, none of them good. About the gentlest would be that Blakeman is missing the point. Ryan is the farthest thing in the world from a political vagabond. As the founder of the Iowa Tea Party, he is a crucial figure in one of the most important political movements of the past half-century. He confronted Obama not because voices told him to or to get his picture in the paper, but to issue a rebuke, a necessary rebuke. Obama had it coming for all sorts of reasons above and beyond the issue at hand. (Joe Biden’s charming reference to the Tea Parties as “terrorists,” an incident that seems to have evaded Blakeman’s attention.) In a just world, he’d be hearing the same thing at every whistle-stop, fundraiser, campaign speech, and vacation cookout from now until Krugman’s aggressive aliens arrive from Tau Ceti. Ryan is to be applauded for doing something few would dare attempt, and bringing it off with considerable panache.
Blakeman is, of course, making the argument that we should “respect the office, and not the man.” A perfectly legitimate stance, in normal times and dealing with normal politicians. But since we are dealing with neither, it has been reduced to something recited by rote. The times being what they are, extraordinary measures are called for. If a man were to force his way into a schoolroom and begin flinging children out the window, we would be appalled—unless that man was aware that the school was ablaze and there was no other way out of the building.
Blakeman overlooks the simple truth that you can respect the office only as much as the incumbent does. If the officeholder violates public trust, which can occur in any number of ways, from leaping on interns to appointing cronies to extralegal positions, the question of respect as such becomes moot. Some behavior cannot and should not be tolerated. If it were Caligula and Cesare Borgia in the Oval Office, I’m quite sure that Blakeman would not call for abject respect for either. Obama, to be just, is comparable to neither of them in iniquity, but the principle holds. You may call it an exaggeration for effect, the literary version of Ryan’s action.
The third point is that America’s liberals drew first blood and now have to take whatever comes. It has been generations since a Democrat or liberal or leftist has behaved in the political arena according to any tradition of decency, honor, or gentility. Barry Goldwater was an honest man and a politician of the highest standards. If you were to look for his equal today, in either house on either side of the aisle, you would come up with no one. And yet, when he ran for president in 1964, the entire liberal establishment cut loose with an unmatched campaign of slander. Goldwater was a Nazi, an extremist, a paranoid schizophrenic, a maniac out to trigger a nuclear war. And it wasn’t fringe publications making these accusations—it was the New York Times and the Big Three broadcast networks. The men involved in that campaign—including the great American Voice of Reason, Bill Moyers—went on to lengthy, lucrative, and influential careers. Not a single one ever apologized; not a single one ever explained himself; not a single one was even confronted over his role.
The liberals have never backed off. To this day, children in America’s schools are taught that the deranged Ronald Reagan tried to start WWIII and was halted only by the actions of the heroic Mikhail Gorbachev. (You doubt this? Ask your kids.) George W. Bush was forced to fight an international war while the loyal opposition derided him as a Nazi, a subnormal, a mass murderer, and we could go for several pages. One novel, an award-winning film, and at least two plays calling for his assassination were written, produced, and released. Anyone suggesting the same as regards Barack Obama would wind up (at the very least) explaining himself in detail and at length to large men in dark suits, and possibly worse. In our day the two political doctrines have been carefully divided and separated according to very simple criteria: with liberal Democrats every last comma of the rules of etiquette must be followed with punctilio. With the GOP, anything goes.
Which brings us to the last two years, in which the final shreds of civilized behavior were trampled in the left’s eagerness to get at the enemy. A mother of a disabled child was attacked nationwide, in all major media outlets, for giving birth to and raising that child. Forget about everything else Sarah Palin has endured—the attacks on her other children, the petty legal hassles, the rumors about her marriage, the fake photos, the betrayals from her own side, and so on. Concentrate on that one element. When I was young, anyone who degraded a woman in such circumstances would have been fired, possibly physically beaten, blacklisted from his industry, and forced out of town, or even out of the country, in order to earn even the lowest type of living. Today they get booked on The View. That’s how far we’ve fallen—disabled kids, and their mothers, are fair game in the millennial United States.
And now we’re hearing much the same about Rick Perry and Michele Bachmann. I’m not sure how this will work out. Perry shoots his own coyotes when called upon, and Bachmann...well, she has that glint in her eye, the one that reads much the same as a sign saying, “DANGER - UNEXPLODED BOMB.” You learn not to antagonize girls of a certain type as early as high school. Can we assume that America’s liberals went to high school?
The point is that it was the liberals who tore up the rule book, flouted tradition, and violated every established tenet of behavior. When you act this way, you open a door, and you have to accept whatever comes through that door. The rules and traditions that might have protected you are no longer around to be appealed to.
Obama will be lucky if he is not faced with such a confrontation every week from now until the 2012 election. He will receive much more and much worse in the way of invective and insult before then. And he will have earned it.
Blakeman is not wrong in calling for a higher level of behavior. But he is mistaken in speaking as if such a world actually exists, as if life in the millennial United States consists of men doffing their panamas every time they pass a woman, that each street corner is equipped with an Eagle Scout awaiting random old ladies, and that politicians shaking hands and calling each “old boy” really means something. This is not the case, and to pretend otherwise, in an environment as debased and toxic as the one in which we live, is to accept humiliation and defeat. Perhaps we may see a rebirth of politesse and manners at some point to come. Nothing is impossible, and the social world often shifts between extremes. But I can tell you this: it will never happen if this country’s liberals continue getting their way.”
- J.R. Dunn is consulting editor of American Thinker and the author of Death by Liberalism.
Source:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/08/the_era_of_confronting_obama_at_public_events.html
Question: Was President Obama ready for the presidency?
The following articles and/or blog posts and videos seem to answer this question-You Decide:
I. A Personality Profile of Barack Obama’s Leadership!
Posted on The National Ledger-By Chuck Norris-On October 22, 2008:
“Obama will not lose his bid for the presidency because of his connections to Ayers, ACORN or socialist politics. In fact, he won’t lose it because of his stand on any issue. The coup de grace for Obama’s presidential election downfall will come only through convincing the American public of his lack of decisive leadership under pressure.
I’m not just talking about facing rogue nations or terrorist thugs. I’m referring to making major choices in conflict. Indecisiveness is his greatest weakness, and it’s one this country cannot afford at this time in its history.
Interestingly, a while back, the Unit for the Study of Personality in Politics, at St. John’s University and the College of St. Benedict, did a professional personality profile “for anticipating Obama’s likely leadership style as chief executive, thereby providing a basis for inferring the character and tenor of a prospective Obama presidency.” The study concluded:
“The combination of Ambitious, Accommodating, and Outgoing patterns in Obama’s profile suggests a (SET ITAL)confident conciliator (END ITAL) personality composite. Leaders with this personality prototype, though self-assured and ambitious, are characteristically gracious, considerate, and benevolent. They are energetic, charming, and agreeable, with a special knack for settling differences, favoring mediation and compromise over force or coercion as a strategy for resolving conflict. They are driven primarily by a need for achievement and also have strong affiliation needs, but a low need for power.”
While most might laud Obama’s personality as a needed polar opposite to George W. Bush’s, I pose to you that Obama’s “accommodating-conciliator-favoring-compromise” personality pendulum swing is way too far to the other side. Even Obama’s voting record proves that.
His own Democratic colleagues have a difficult time understanding why, when he was an Illinois state senator, he voted “present” (instead of “yes” or “no”) 129 times, including a number of noncommittal tallies on issues such as gun rights and abortion.
You also have heard that Obama doesn’t have any executive experience, whether it be running a government or a business. I would pose to you the reason is simply that he’s not comfortable making executive decisions. An“executive conciliator” overly depends upon others, at times compromising judgment and needed action in order to appease the masses. Proof of that was seen in how Obama handled his and our “emergency” economic decisions.
A few months ago, Obama did not turn to Warren Buffett for counsel on the housing crisis. As The Washington Post reported July 16, he turned to Franklin Raines, the former Fannie Mae chief executive officer and six-year money manipulator. The Post said Raines took “calls from Barack Obama’s presidential campaign seeking his advice on mortgage and housing policy matters.”
And consider Obama’s handling of the “emergency” bailout crisis. During the first go-round of the bailout, while McCain was certain of his stand, Obama wouldn’t say where he stood because he was afraid it would be a wrong or unpopular stand. Only after most of his political cronies were bribed in favor of the bailout did Obama give it his stamp of approval. If he cannot take decisive action as a senator in the greatest nation on earth, how in the world is he going to make critical and emergency decisions as the president?
Obama’s inability to draw and hold hard lines is the primary reason he repeatedly struggles with—and caves and morphs into—the polls or people in front of him. More than any other politician in history, he has flip-flopped on a host of critical issues: Iraq, Iran, gay rights, NAFTA, abortion, race, religion, gun control, etc. It’s one thing to be political, but it’s quite another to be a chronic people pleaser under pressure. Swaying based on political expediency is not a leadership quality we need in tough times. Sooner or later, that character flaw will bite Obama big-time—and us if we elect him president.
I’m not saying Obama has no continued future in politics. He just needs more experience in life to weed out those character deficiencies. That’s why I’m asking Americans to look afresh at these questions: Is Obama crisis-leadership qualified? Will he truly be ready Jan. 20 to assume the helm of our country?
Actually, those leadership questions have been answered already by three leading Democrats (before they could tastethe perks from their alignment with the Democratic presidential nominee). Obama’s own running mate, Sen. Joe Biden, replied only months ago about whether Obama is ready for the presidency: “Right now I don’t believe he is. The presidency is not something that lends itself to on-the-job training.” Then he later told George Stephanopoulos, “I stand by the statement.” Biden was right.
Before Obama was her party’s choice, Hillary Clinton repeatedly proved him to be an indecisive waffler who couldn’t or wouldn’t be pinned down on any issues. Hillary was right.
Even former President Bill Clinton dodged having to give an affirmative answer to an ABC correspondent when asked whether Obama is ready to be president by saying, “You can argue that no one is ready to be president.” Another smooth answer, Bill. The fact is he totally understands that Obama is not ready.
America is in one of its toughest hours—a market meltdown, the worst fiscal environment since the Great Depression—an economic 9/11, if you will. Do we really believe we can be delivered by an indecisive people pleaser as our country’s CEO?”
Source:
http://www.nationalledger.com/artman/publish/article_272623354.shtml
II. Video: Barack Obama Makes Shocking Confession!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BnLozS-TnM&feature=related
III. Barack Obama, Forever Sizing Up!
Posted on The New York Times-By Jodi Kantor-On October 25, 2008:
These are excerpts from this article and/or blog post:
“But in the Oval Office, Mr. Obama would have a new set of deficits. Just 47 years old and only four years into a national political career, he has never run anything larger than his campaign. He began his run for president while he was still getting lost in Washington, a city he does not yet know well. His promises are as vast as his résumé is short, and some of his pledges are competing ones: progressive rule and centrist red-blue fusion; wholesale transformation and down-to-earth pragmatism.”
“Barack Obama’s lowest moment as a community organizer in the 1980s came when he brought the executive director of the Chicago Housing Authority to Altgeld Gardens, a decrepit housing project, to hear complaints about asbestos. Seven hundred residents grew restless waiting for the tardy director. When he finally appeared, the meeting grew so raucous that the director fled after 15 minutes, to chants of “No more rent!”
“Mr. Obama’s message of change can be hard to pin down, and he has spent his entire career searching for the right way to fulfill his desire for broad social renewal.
First he became a community organizer, thinking change would flow from citizens upward; then he tried the law, which, as he learned from teaching legal history, was a highly imperfect instrument. Since then he has set his sights on changing government institutions, one higher than the next. Even in the Senate, he told a reporter, it was possible to have a career that was “not particularly useful.”
“Critics have used the Rezko incident to question Mr. Obama’s reputation as a reformer, to argue he has few core beliefs. They cite a proposal he made in the Senate for stringent reporting requirements concerning nuclear plant leaks, which he then softened after Republican colleagues and energy executives complained. The bill died in committee. Or the time he joined a bipartisan coalition on immigration reform but backed away when labor groups protested. That legislation collapsed, too…..”
…Most of all, his critics point to his “present” votes in the Illinois Legislature, in which he did not choose sides, avoiding difficult matters like trying juveniles as adults. At least 36 times (out of thousands of votes) Mr. Obama was the only senator to vote “present,” or one of just a few…
… He won the presidency of the Harvard Law Review in part because, weeks before voting, he made a speech in favor of affirmative action that so eloquently summarized the objections to it that the Review’s conservatives decided he felt their concerns deeply…”
Source:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/26/weekinreview/26kantor.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin
IV. Obama’s Prime-Time Appeal To Voters!-Posted on CBSNews.com-On October 29, 2008:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/10/29/politics/main4557333.shtml
V. Which Promises Will Obama Attempt First?-Posted on CBSNews.com-By Wyatt Andrews-On February 11, 2009:
VI. Are We Home Alone?
Posted on The New York Times-By Thomas L. Friedman-On March 21, 2009:
“I ran into an Indian businessman friend last week and he said something to me that really struck a chord: “This is the first time I’ve ever visited the United States when I feel like you’re acting like an immature democracy.”
You know what he meant: We’re in a once-a-century financial crisis, and yet we’ve actually descended into politics worse than usual. There don’t seem to be any adults at the top — nobody acting larger than the moment, nobody being impelled by anything deeper than the last news cycle.
Instead, Congress is slapping together punitive tax laws overnight like some Banana Republic, our president is getting in trouble cracking jokes on Jay Leno comparing his bowling skills to a Special Olympian, and the opposition party is behaving as if its only priority is to deflate President Obama’s popularity.
I saw Eric Cantor, a Republican House leader, on CNBC the other day, and the entire interview consisted of him trying to exploit the A.I.G. situation for partisan gain without one constructive thought. I just kept staring at him and thinking:“Do you not have kids? Do you not have a pension that you’re worried about? Do you live in some gated community where all the banks will be O.K., even if our biggest banks go under? Do you think your party automatically wins if the country loses? What are you thinking?”
If you want to guarantee that America becomes a mediocre nation, then just keep vilifying every public figure struggling to find a way out of this crisis who stumbles once — like Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner or A.I.G.’s $1-a-year fill-in C.E.O., Ed Liddy — and you’ll ensure that no capable person enlists in government. You will ensure that every bank that has taken public money will try to get rid of it as fast it can, so as not to come under scrutiny, even though that would weaken their balance sheets and make them less able to lend money. And you will ensure that we’ll never get out of this banking crisis, because the solution depends on getting private money funds to team up with the government to buy up toxic assets — and fund managers are growing terrified of any collaboration with government.
President Obama missed a huge teaching opportunity with A.I.G. Those bonuses were an outrage. The public’s anger was justified. But rather than fanning those flames and letting Congress run riot, the president should have said: “I’ll handle this.”
He should have gone on national TV and had the fireside chat with the country that is long overdue. That’s a talk where he lays out exactly how deep the crisis we are in is, exactly how much sacrifice we’re all going to have to make to get out of it, and then calls on those A.I.G. brokers — and everyone else who, in our rush to heal our banking system, may have gotten bonuses they did not deserve — and tells them that their president is asking them to return their bonuses “for the sake of the country.”
Had Mr. Obama given A.I.G.’s American brokers a reputation to live up to, a great national mission to join, I’d bet anything we’d have gotten most of our money back voluntarily.
Inspiring conduct has so much more of an impact than coercing it. And it would have elevated the president to where he belongs — above the angry gaggle in Congress.
“There is nothing more powerful than inspirational leadership that unleashes principled behavior for a great cause,” said Dov Seidman, the C.E.O. of LRN, which helps companies build ethical cultures, and the author of the book “How.”
What makes a company or a government “sustainable,” he added, is not when it adds more coercive rules and regulations to control behaviors. “It is when its employees or citizens are propelled by values and principles to do the right things, no matter how difficult the situation,” said Seidman. “Laws tell you what you can do. Values inspire in you what you should do. It’s a leader’s job to inspire in us those values.”
Right now we have an absence of inspirational leadership. From business we hear about institutions too big to fail — no matter how reckless. From bankers we hear about contracts too sacred to break — no matter how inappropriate.
And from our immature elected officials we hear about how it was all “the other guy’s fault.” I’ve never talked to more people in one week who told me, “You know, I listen to the news, and I get really depressed.”
Well, help may finally be on the way: one reason we’ve been sidetracked talking about bonuses is because the big issue — the real issue — the president’s comprehensive plan to remove the toxic assets from our ailing banks, which is the key to our economic recovery, has taken a long time to hammer out.
So all kinds of lesser issues and clowns have ballooned in importance and only confused people in the vacuum.
Hopefully, that plan will be out by Monday, and hopefully the president will pull the country together behind it, and hopefully the lawmakers who have to approve it will remember that this is not a time for politics as usual — and thatour country, alas, is not too big to fail. Hopefully …”
Source:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/22/opinion/22friedman.html?emc=tnt&tntemail1=y
VII. Obama the Polarizer!
Posted on RealClearPolitics-By Jay Cost-On May 11, 2010:
“In January, 2007 Barack Obama declared his candidacy for the presidency with these words:
“It’s not the magnitude of our problems that concerns me the most. It’s the smallness of our politics. America’s faced big problems before. But today, our leaders in Washington seem incapable of working together in a practical, common sense way. Politics has become so bitter and partisan, so gummed up by money and influence, that we can’t tackle the big problems that demand solutions. And that’s what we have to change first. We have to change our politics, and come together around our common interests and concerns as Americans.”
Today, Gallup reports:
“(Obama’s) first-year ratings were the most polarized for a president in Gallup history, with an average 65-point gap between Republicans and Democrats. Obama’s approval ratings have become slightly more polarized thus far in his second year in office, with an average 69-point gap between Democrats (83%) and Republicans (14%) since late January.”
This is a big deal. The first quote is the principal reason Barack Obama ran for President. At a minimum, it was his first public argument for why he thought the country should elect him, as opposed to the dozen or so other candidates who would enter the race. It remained a critically important idea throughout his candidacy. Remember, the Obama campaign was an “audacious” act of line-jumping within the Democratic Party. His justification was that the country couldn’t afford to keep playing the same old political games. The hook of his candidacy was: America, do you reallywant to do Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton?
Yet here we are, breaking records for polarization. How did that happen? Why has Obama failed to do what he promised?
I think there are two big reasons.
First, Obama’s implicit claim throughout his candidacy was that public divisiveness was somehow a failure of leadership. This was mostly nonsense. This country has been divided over cultural issues since at least 1973 andRoe v. Wade. It has been divided on fiscal issues since Reagan cut taxes in 1981; this ended the hidden tax of bracket creep, but meant that legislators had to make hard choices between more spending and lower taxes. It has been divided on foreign policy issues since the Bush Administration’s response to 9/11.
These are all real things. They are not rhetorical wrinkles that a Jon Favreau speech can iron out. Obama’s choices have mostly been liberal (with the notable exceptions of dealing with Iraq and Afghanistan). His speechwriters have endeavored to present his choices as win-wins, but their words have failed to persuade because the President’s choices are rarely in fact win-wins. They usually favor one worldview or set of interests over others. Favor one side enough times and the losers will start to see what’s going on, “eloquent” speeches aside.
Second, insofar as leadership could bridge the many divides in this country, this President has never been in a good position to exercise it. He owes too much to others. You don’t win a nomination battle like the Clinton-Obama smackdown without making a bunch of promises. Remember that neither Clinton nor Obama secured enough delegates through the primaries and caucuses; Obama needed the superdelegates, chief among them being Speaker Nancy Pelosi (easily the most powerful Democrat in the country prior to the President’s inauguration). There is a long line of constituent groups in the Democratic Party who certainly needed assurances about what an Obama presidency would look like. So long as reelection remains to be secured, these groups at least have to be monitored if not placated. And so, in a time of great divisiveness, the people with the closest connection to the 44th President are consistently on one side of the aisle. The left side.
This feature of the Obama presidency came through most clearly on health care. Obama talked a good game about bipartisan compromise, but at no point did I get the impression that he was willing to ditch a guy like George Miller (a far left liberal in the House) to pick up a moderate Republican like Delaware’s Mike Castle. Indeed, George Miller was one of the key authors of the health care bill in the House! There’s no practical way you can get George Miller and Mike Castle to work together on a comprehensive overhaul of the American health care system. They are just too far apart ideologically. So, the question is: whose vote do you value more? Obama’s answer has been crystal clear in his deeds, if not his words.
Of course, presidents have to tend to their party coalitions. That’s the way its been since the 1790s; John Adams did a lousy job of dealing with the arch-Federalists, and Alexander Hamilton eventually stabbed him in the back. Ever since then, the role of the President as manager of his party has been pretty straightforward. It’s hard to begrudge Obama for trying to manage his party. What’s more, politicians hate to assign losers, so they try to convince us that everybody’s a winner. It’s predictable that Obama would try his hand at this as well. Sure, he promised during the campaign that he’d talk clearly about the hard choices - but anybody who believed that, at least after he ditched public financing of his campaign for nakedly political purposes, was simply looking for a reason to vote for him.
But why won’t he simply own his polarizing presidency? He made the choices he has made, and the consequences have been predictable, so he should own them. But no. As far as he’s concerned, he is the bipartisan bridge builder he promised to be. It’s those damned lying liars on the other side who have distorted his record!
As Matt Welch noted over at Reason, he’s “working the refs.”
“[Obama’s] message...is clear, clever, and wrong. The boom in opinionated, interconnected media is a challenge to our very democracy (it isn’t). News needs to be hermetically sealed from opinion (it doesn’t). The primary purpose of media consumption should be empowerment (if there was a primary purpose for media consumption, I sure as hell wouldn’t trust a president to identify it). And the most dangerous purveyor of untruths is the 24/7 echo chamber...
While hypocritical (given the president’s own slippery relationship with the truth) this critique is strategically clever. For those still inclined to believe it, the message reinforces Obama’s fading image as a truth-telling, above-it-all academic (see the Michigan speech in particular for a bunch of we need to get beyond the tired debate about big-vs.-small-government claptrap). And for the straight-journalism types this is a soothing tongue-bath from the Sensible Centrist in Chief that reinforces their own self-pity/importance and gives them even more motivation to go after the real lying liars: The ones who noisily and hyperbolically oppose the policies of the most powerful man on earth.”
I think this is dead on, and it fits into the point I’m making here. The President could acknowledge that his policies are truly divisive. He could claim that while he respects the objections of the opposition, he believes that in the long run his way of thinking will be vindicated. That would be the grown-up thing to do. That would be real leadership. Instead, he implies that if only we got rid of the right wing talk machine, the public would see that every last one of his policies has been a win-win.
Enough is enough, Mr. President. You’re a polarizing leader in a polarized age. Own it.”
Source:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/horseraceblog/2010/05/obama_the_polarizer.html
Note: What follows is a must see five video series that contain an eye-opening interview conducted by Peter Robinson with Andrew Breitbart, a publisher, columnist, and blogger, who is the founder of Breitbart.com, Breitbart.tv,Big Government, Big Hollywood, Big Journalism, and Big Peace. He is also the author of his latest book titled “Righteous Indignation”.
Also included is a book review of Andrew Breitbart’s new book that reveals the history of Socialism in America, beginning with early worship of Jean-Jacques Rousseau (who actually came before Karl Marx) to the scary Frankfurt School at Columbia University and that Marxism started in universities, government and the media, which he claims is America’s worst enemy, along with “13 Rules for Conservative Activists” and much more:
Left & Right with Andrew Breitbart: ‘Andrew Breitbart describes his liberal origins’ (Chapter 1 of 5)-Posted on National Review Online-On June 13, 2011:
http://tv.nationalreview.com/uncommonknowledge/post/?q=MDBjZjcxOWI2ZDQ1MzVhMjc0Y2FhYWFlODNmNDhlYWI=
Left & Right with Andrew Breitbart: ‘Andrew Breitbart illustrates the Democrat-Media Complex.’ (Chapter 2 of 5)-Posted on National Review Online-On June 14, 2011:
http://tv.nationalreview.com/uncommonknowledge/post/?q=YWQ5NGY1MzY4NzA4MjJmNTkwNmZmNDk3N2Y4N2I3YjE=
Left & Right with Andrew Breitbart: ‘Andrew Breitbart accepts some blame for the Huffington Post.’ (Chapter 3 of 5)-Posted on National Review Online-On June 15, 2011:
http://tv.nationalreview.com/uncommonknowledge/post/?q=MjZmN2U0ZGIzMjc2NGU1MmQwYjQ0YTJlZTdkNDA4YzM=
Left & Right with Andrew Breitbart: ‘Andrew Breitbart reveals his one “Ah ha!” moment.’ (Chapter 4 of 5)-Posted on National Review Online-On June 16, 2011:
http://tv.nationalreview.com/uncommonknowledge/post/?q=NjlhZGJiYzVhM2U1OWRmYjM5NjJkMTUyNTE1ZDBlY2Y=
Left & Right with Andrew Breitbart: ‘Andrew Breitbart lists his rules.’ (Chapter 5 of 5)-Posted on National Review Online-On June 17, 2011:
http://tv.nationalreview.com/uncommonknowledge/post/?q=ODE4OGZmNWMzYzk3NWJjZmMyNjU0M2U3OTk2YzYyYzc=
Book Review: Andrew Breitbart’s Righteous Indignation!-Posted on The Patriot Update-By Ann-Marie Murrell-On May 23, 2011:
http://patriotupdate.com/articles/book-review-andrew-breitbart’s-righteous-indignation
Note: The following articles and/or blog posts provide us with some excellent resources that we should arm ourselves with for the battle that is ahead of us, along with some thought provoking pointers of what we need to do to keep the left and their handmaidens in the corrupt and criminally negligent media from choosing our next President, who must be a smart, fierce, brave, courageous and America loving patriot that will lead us in tackling those issues that are extremely critical to our nation at this historic juncture, which are: foreign policy, Iran, Israel, national security and the economy-You Decide:
A survey of the plans to 'halt the bleeding' before it's too late!-Posted on WND.com-On November 9, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=365865
We Must Not Choose Obama Lite: Courageous Foreign Policy Leadership Must Define GOP Nominee!-Posted on Big Government-By Pamela Geller-On November 8, 2011:
Note: My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
Extensive Research Into Senator Obama’s Background Completed on November 3, 2008:
The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetrated-in-american-history/
Obama the Polarizer!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/13/obama-the-polarizer/
Are we witnessing an absence of inspirational leadership or lack of leadership skills?
President and DOJ have contributed to the racial mess in our country!
Is Being An Empathetic Liberal Minority The New Prerequisite for Being a Supreme Court Justice?
Who owns our supposedly fair and balanced airwaves and news outlets?
Supreme Court to Strike Down Obamacare!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/03/27/supreme-court-to-strike-down-obamacare/
Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?
Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial. Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.
“Food For Thought”
God Bless the U.S.A.!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related
Semper Fi!
Jake
DROP OUR SUPER POWER STATUS, THE MONEY WE SPEND DEFENDING THE WORLD, CAN BE USED ON OUR DEBT AND ON PEOPLE HERE AT HOME. FACE IT CHINA HAS PASSED US FOR THE MOMENT.
Priorities have always been a focus from Day 1 of the Tea Party movement, and every other Patriot movement in the real world since '08, some before that time. The focus has often differed from region to region, usually according to time constraints, localization of issues and a whole slew of other factors.
Dear Fellow Patriots:
I like many of you took the opportunity to pay tribute to our brave men and women who have unselfishly and honorably served this great country of ours as members of our armed forces, especially those who have fought and died to uphold those freedoms that sadly too many Americans take for granted. I believe that some Americans are either confused or have no idea who our true American freedom fighters are. I discovered that the following video does a meticulous job of explaining who they are and why-You Decide:
Video: Veterans Day Tribute (For Freedom)!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XkLVNWZbkKg&feature=related
Note: The following articles and/or blog posts also reveal the true American Patriots, along with revealing that across our nation, there is a sharp division between two groups of Americans marching to very different drummers.
The author of the article and/or blog post is not referring to the current politics of disparity promoting class warfare between the 35 percent of statists (dependents who label themselves “99 Percenters”), and the other 65 percent who are hard-working and self-reliant American citizens. The former are busy fomenting socialist protests in urban centers across our nation while the latter are busy working and caring for their families and communities.
Rather, the division he notes is made plain by the vivid contrast in character between two groups—those on the frontlines in defense of Liberty versus those who seek to subvert it.
On the right side of Liberty, we have American Patriots in uniform who, since the dawn of our great nation, have put their lives, fortunes and sacred honor on the line “to Support and Defend” the Liberty enshrined in our Constitution.
On the wrong side of history, we have Leftist cadres loyal to Barack Hussein Obama, who seek to supplant republican Liberty and its principle expression of free enterprise with socialist democracy. Although the so-called “99 Percenters” are marching to Obama’s beat, their protests are trivial compared to the endemic threat to Liberty posed by the rest of the Leftist hegemony in control of our central government-You Decide:
The Most Noble of American Patriots!-Posted on Patriot Post-By Mark Alexander-On November 10, 2011:
http://patriotpost.us/alexander/2011/11/10/the-most-noble-of-american-patriots/
Occupy Wall Street–Best Thing That Could Happen To The Tea Party!-Posted by AWD-On October 24, 2011:
http://angrywhitedude.com/2011/10/occupy-wall-street-best-thing-that-could-happen-to-the-tea-party/
Question: Have you wondered why there was a deliberate and/or blatant media black out of an event that was organized by some of America’s most noble Patriots, which took place on Veterans’ Day in Washington, D.C.?
While the media has lavished attention upon the Occupy Wall Street movement (although perhaps not on every aspect of that movement), they have turned a blind eye to a march that two national patriotic organizations scheduled for Veterans’ Day calling for the immediate resignation or impeachment of Barack Obama, Joe Biden, and every official in the Obama administration.
The march was organized by Veteran Defenders of America and the U.S. Patriots Union, LLC, which is headed by Major General Paul Vallely.
An undisclosed number of American Veterans and former service members came together to prepare and present this Call-to-Action on behalf of the U.S. Constitution, the Republic, the Rule of Law and equal justice for all freedom loving citizens of the United States of America. Acting together as one, via The Veteran Defenders of America, co-sponsored by a civilian patriot group The United States Patriots Union, LLC, they issued the following CALL for peaceful disobedience:
1. We CALL upon every member of federal, state and local government, legislative, judicial, law enforcement and military, who have taken an oath to protect and defend the Constitutional Republic from all enemies, foreign and domestic, to act upon those oaths for the stated purpose of restoring the Constitutional Republic.
2. We CALL upon ALL veterans and veteran organizations in America, who still believe in their oath to protect and defend, to unite with us at once - in this Declaration to Restore the Constitutional Republic.
3. We CALL for ALL citizens who still desire freedom and liberty, to stand with us in peaceful protest, and carry our demands to right the wrongs against our nation in the preservation of freedom, liberty, justice and the rule of law.
Source:
http://www.veterandefenders.org/DECLARATION-RESTORE-THE-CONSTITUTIONAL-REPUBLIC.pdf
Note: The following are just a few of the numerous articles and/or blog posts that announced and/or mentioned the event, along with a video that meticulously lays out the “Declaration to Restore the Republic”:
Vets Call For Resignations, Impeachments in Washington: ‘'Call to Action' Says Purge of Corruption Required to Restore Constitutional Republic!’-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On October 4, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=351953
Video: Declaration to Restore the Republic!-Posted on YouTube.com-By arnierosnerOn October 9, 2011:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=MYycZOCJv4k#
11/11/11 protesters: 'Time for talking has passed': ‘Veterans challenging Obama on legitimacy, constitutionality!’-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On November 2, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=363221
Vets, Small Businessmen to March for Impeachment on Veterans Day!-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Ben Johnson-On November 2, 2011:
Impeach Obama Protest Will Greet Obama in San Diego!-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Ben Johnson-On November 11, 2011:
http://floydreports.com/impeach-obama-protest-will-greet-obama-in-san-diego/
Note: The following eye opening article and/or blog post and video revealed that Retired Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely, the chief of Stand Up America, a national security expert and Fox News contributor, recently stated that the “Certificate of Live Birth” released on April 27, 2011 by the White House as “proof positive” of President Obama’s Hawaiian birth is a forgery, but that the FBI is covering the fraud and no one in Congress is willing to tackle the situation because of fears of a “black backlash” if the failings of the nation’s first black president are revealed-You Decide:
Ex-CIA: ‘Forged document’ released as birth certificate!-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On June 15, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=311433
Video: Major General Vallely: CIA Agents Say Obama Birth Certificate Fraudulent!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTMv2XAUHP4&feature=player_embedded
Question: What happened to freedom of speech and/or freedom of expression in America?
This eye-opening and thought provoking report, along with just a few of the numerous other articles and/or blog posts and videos out there that reveal that there has been an ongoing attack of our First Amendment protections of free speech and a free and independent press on multiple fronts for many years-You Decide:
What Happened to Free Speech? ‘The attack on the First Amendment protections of free speech and a free and independent press has happened on multiple fronts!’-Posted on The Trashing of America-By The Jeremiah Project:
http://www.jeremiahproject.com/trashingamerica/freespeech.html
Video: Pamela Geller: “We are at war and the enemy is the media!”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dpn0hRDWdNQ&feature=player_embedded
Network TV show portraying this as 'all-American': ‘'Danger is in the deception and obfuscation of the truth!'-Posted on WND.com-By Michael Carl-On November 10, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=365949
Google Is Still Watching You!-Posted on National Review Online- By Daniel Gelernter-On November 14, 2011:
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/283098/google-still-watching-you-daniel-gelernter
1st Amendment under Muslim Brotherhood attack!-Posted by Joseph Farah, Editor and Chief Executive Officer, WND.com-On November 13, 2011:
AttackWatch.com Is the Administration’s Latest Propaganda Arm!-Posted on Human Events-By David Limbaugh-On September 18, 2011:
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=46267
Obama vs. GPS!-Posted on National Review Online- By Arthur Herman-On September 21, 2011:
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/277939/obama-vs-gps-arthur-herman
John Kerry: Media Has ‘Responsibility’ To ‘Not Give Equal Time’ To Tea Party!-Posted on The Blaze-By Jonathon M. Seidl-On August 5, 2011:
Government to Monitor Social Networks For “Extremist Propaganda!”-Posted on Prison Planet-By Paul Joseph Watson, Prison Planet.com-On August 4, 2011:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/government-to-monitor-social-networks-for-extremist-propaganda.html
Blasting a Politician Could Mean Jail Time!-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On August 1, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=328961
Shut Out: White House Punishes Boston Herald For Paper’s Romney Coverage!-Posted on The Blaze-By Jonathon M. Seidl-On May 18, 2011:
The Judas Media!-Posted on Floyd Reports-Guest Writer-On April 27, 2011:
Obama’s War on Free Speech Heats Up!-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Guest Writer-On March 8, 2011:
Look who wants 500% bump in funding for government media: ‘State adviser, Marxist also want more FCC control of airwaves’-Posted on WND.com-By Aaron Klein-On January 1, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=245217
Video: Is Obama Considering a Patriot Act for the Internet?-Posted on ExposeObama.com-On December 15, 2010:
Free Speech “Schizophrenia”: Left Claims to Support Freedom and Openness, Yet Up in Arms that Andrew Breitbart Might Express an Opinion on ABC News!-Posted on The National Center for Public Policy Research-On November 1, 2010:
http://www.nationalcenter.org/P21PR-Breitbart_Media_Matters_110110.html
Shadow Party: Daily Kos Wants to Googlebomb Republicans into Electoral Oblivion-Posted on Pajamas Media-By Bryan Preston-On October 8, 2010:
TV’s Tea Party Travesty: “How ABC, CBS and NBC Have Dismissed and Disparaged the Tea Party Movement!”-Special Report Posted on The Media Research Center-By Rich Noyes, Research Director, The Media Research Center-On April 13, 2010:
http://www.mrc.org/specialreports/uploads/teapartytravesty.pdf
Don't Let The Government Slow Internet Progress!-Posted on InternetFreedomCoalition.Org-On October 25, 2009:
http://www.internetfreedomcoalition.org/
Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and reports reveal how George Soros, along with other liberal backers use their money to fund and/or manipulate media outlets, to include Hollywood because they see that as a powerful way to influence the American public.
It’s a strategy that Soros has been deploying extensively in media both in the United States and abroad. Since 2003, Soros has spent more than $48 million funding media properties, including the infrastructure of news - journalism schools, investigative journalism and even industry organizations.
Also included is an article and/or blog post that reveals George Soros’ hidden agenda-You Decide:
Nearly 30 Soros-funded Media Operations Part of 'War on Fox'!- Posted on Business & Media Institute-By Dan Gainor-On June 1, 2011:
http://www.mrc.org/bmi/commentary/2011/Nearly__Sorosfunded_Media_Operations_Part_of_War_on_Fox_.html
Soros-Funded Lefty Media Reach More Than 300 Million Every Month!-Posted on Business & Media Institute-By Dan Gainor-On May 25, 2011:
http://www.mrc.org/bmi/commentary/2011/Soros_Lefty_Media_Reach_More_Than__Million_Every_Month.html
Soros Spends Over $48 Million Funding Media Organizations!-Posted on Business & Media Institute-By Dan Gainor-On May 18, 2011:
http://www.mrc.org/bmi/commentary/2011/Soros_Spends_Over__Million_Funding_Media_Organizations_.html
Over 30 Major News Organizations Linked to George Soros!-Posted on Business & Media Institute-By Dan Gainor-On May 11, 2011:
http://www.mrc.org/bmi/commentary/2011/Over__Major_News_Organizations_Linked_to_George_Soros.html
Citizen Soros Manipulating the Media!-Posted on Capital Research Center-By Matthew Vadum-On January 2011:
http://www.capitalresearch.org/pubs/pdf/v1293869054.pdf
George Soros, Movie Mogul: ‘Social Justice’ Cinema and the Sundance Institute!-Posted on Capital Research Center-By Rondi Adamson-On March 20o8:
http://www.capitalresearch.org/pubs/pdf/v1204311857.pdf
The Hidden Soros Agenda: Drugs, Money, the Media, and Political Power!-Posted on AIM-By Cliff Kincaid-On October 27, 2004:
http://www.aim.org/special-report/the-hidden-soros-agenda-drugs-money-the-media-and-political-power/
Note: The following articles and/or blog posts reveal that: (1) White House officials have been busy re-writing our nation’s Constitution since the inauguration of President Obama; (2) George Soros’s money is being used to by-off the Secretaries of State before the next Presidential election as a means of tipping the elections in all 50 states; and (3) George Soros is meddling with the courts in attempts of buying Leftwing judges -You Decide:
George Soros assault on U.S. Constitution: ‘White House officials involved in rewriting nation’s founding document’!-Posted on WND.com-By Aaron Klein-On March 27, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=280277
George Soros’ Money Could Tip Elections in All 50 States!-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Michael Oberndorf-On July 1, 2011:
http://floydreports.com/george-soros-money-could-tip-elections-in-all-50-states/
Soros meddles in courts, attempts to buy Leftwing judges!-Posted on National Examiner-By Anthony Martin-On June 27, 2011:
Note: The following article and/or blog post reveals the connection between George Soros and President Obama-You Decide:
The Obama-Soros Connection!-Posted on Human Events-By LtCol Buzz Patterson-On September 9, 2010:
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=38917
Note: My following blog posts contain numerous other articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetrated-in-american-history/
Is it time to call for Obama's resignation!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/06/09/is-it-time-to-call-for-obamas-resignation/
Veterans and members of our Armed Forces under attack!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/23/veterans-and-members-of-our-armed-forces-under-attack/
The Military Pays the Price for Obama's Agenda!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/08/11/the-military-pays-the-price-for-obama’s-agenda/
It’s Getting Very Serious Now!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/15/it’s-getting-very-serious-now/
Congress report concedes Obama eligibility unvetted!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/congress-report-concedes-obama-eligibility-unvetted/
DC knows that Obama is ineligible for office!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/27/dc-knows-that-obama-is-ineligible-for-office/
What Happened to Free Speech?
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/23/what-happened-to-free-speech/
How ABC, CBS and NBC Have Dismissed and Disparaged the Tea Party Movement!
The FCC Should Not Interfere With The Internet!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/13/the-fcc-should-not-interfere-with-the-internet/
Who owns our supposedly fair and balanced airwaves and news outlets?
Have the “power elite” and pseudo-experts covertly sold us corruption disguised as freedom?
Is President Obama inciting riots across the US?
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/23/is-president-obama-inciting-riots-across-the-us/
Are We Witnessing Narcissism At Work?
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/10/27/are-we-witnessing-narcissism-at-work/
Massive Voter Fraud-Again!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/25/massive-voter-fraud-again/
Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?
Where Is America Today?
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/26/where-is-america-today-2/
Is History Repeating Itself?
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/09/20/is-history-repeating-itself/
Washington Times Calls for Obama’s Impeachment!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/08/31/washington-times-calls-for-obama’s-impeachment/
Extensive Research Into Senator Obama’s Background Completed on November 3, 2008:
Note: My following blog post contains articles from the Russian newspaper ‘Pravda’ that reveal the Russian’s view of what has been happening in America since President Obama’s inauguration. If these articles and/or blog posts don’t put chills down your spine then it confirms what the Russians are saying about Americans being a passive, hapless sheeple-You Decide:
The Russian View of What Has Been Happening In America!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/23/the-russian-view-of-what-has-been-happening-in-america/
Note: The following video reveals that the biggest threat in America today is un-informed American public, along with my blog post that contains numerous articles and /or blog posts and videos that forewarned us of what to expect if Obama got elected-You Decide:
Video: What’s the Biggest Threat in America?-Posted on The Patriot Update-On September 27, 2011:
http://patriotupdate.com/videos/whats-the-biggest-threat-in-america
Were We Forewarned About What to Expect If President Obama Got Elected?
Note: The following articles and/or blog posts provide us with some excellent resources that we should arm ourselves with for the battle that is ahead of us, along with some pointers of what we need to do to keep the left and their handmaidens in the corrupt and criminally negligent media from choosing our next President, who must be a smart, fierce, brave, courageous and America loving patriot that will lead us in tackling those issues that are extremely critical to our nation at this historic juncture, which are: foreign policy, Iran, Israel, national security and the economy-You Decide:
A survey of the plans to 'halt the bleeding' before it's too late!-Posted on WND.com-On November 9, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=365865
We Must Not Choose Obama Lite: Courageous Foreign Policy Leadership Must Define GOP Nominee!-Posted on Big Government-By Pamela Geller-On November 8, 2011:
The Era of Confronting Obama at Public Events!-Posted on American Thinker-By J.R. Dunn-On August 18, 2011:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/08/the_era_of_confronting_obama_at_public_events.html
Video: Allen West to Media, “Stop Being Afraid of this President” who is “Destroying this Country”!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=RAl_13DtQ1w
Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial. Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.
“Food For Thought”
God Bless the U.S.A.!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related
Semper Fi!
Jake
By John W. Lillpop
Back when the Occupy Wall Street hysteria was first gaining traction as a national movement, left-wing anarchists with attitude, including the likes of Barack Obama, were quick to embrace the movement as grass-roots affirmation of Obama’s anti-capitalism call for redistribution of wealth.
It was a gala, “Take that Plumber Joe!” moment for zany moon bats who envisioned a tsunami of public outrage that would sweep the Tea Party and all of the GOP out to sea, leaving behind a solid encampment of freaks who do not work, who relieve themselves whenever and wherever they wish without regard for stench or sanitation, and who, above all else, considered Tea to be a lethal mind-altering substance, preferring instead to trust their fortunes to good dope and cheap booze.
Foremost among those embracing the OWS was none other than California’s very own Nancy Pelosi who actually sought divine intervention of behalf of the OWS crowd.
As reported at the reference, Princess Nancy called for divine blessings on the disorganized, smelly, and unkempt vagrants:
During a press conference Thursday afternoon, House minority leader Nancy Pelosi praised those participating in the "Occupy Wall Street" protests. "God bless them," Pelosi said, "for their spontaneity. It's independent ... it's young, it's spontaneous, and it's focused. And it's going to be effective."Ever since Princess Pelosi issued her supplication, the OWS movement has “matured” into a one that now includes rape, murder and other unintended consequences.
"The message of the protesters is a message for the establishment everyplace," said the House Democrats' leader. "No longer will the recklessness of some on Wall Street cause massive joblessness on Main Street."
Pelosi did not comment on--and was not asked about--the law-breaking that occurred during the protest over the weekend. About 700 protesters were arrested by New York City police after the protesters "swarmed the Brooklyn Bridge and shut down a lane of traffic for several hours," according to CBS News.”
The burning question for Pelosi: Still praying for OWS, Princess??
ITS CREATER BILL EANE JUST PASSED AWAY, SAY A PRAYER FOR BILL KEANE.
HERMAN CAIN ALSO VERY GOOD. THEY ARE ALL BETTER THAN WHAT WE NOW HAVE.
What's new?
Posted on Western Journalism-By FLOYD BROWN-On November 12, 2011:
“America’s mainstream media is hard at work on the Obama re-election effort. Nonstop reporting on the Herman Cain allegations, the break-up of the European Union and Occupy Everything is quietly building a playing field or political environment to empower Obama’s excuses.
Here is how it works.
The media has taken a great field of GOP candidates and made them look like a sequel to the Hollywood blockbuster Dumb and Dumber. Each success frontrunner has been mowed down to size by outlandish and journalistically unethical reporting, combined with a nonstop series of debates that produce highlight reels of gotcha questions these so-called reporters never ask Obama.
Obama in contrast simply travels the world at government expense, teleprompter in hand giving well-crafted speeches written by others. The softball questions lofted his way are intended more to boost him than share with Americans the true story of how tough it really is living in the Obama socialist economy.
So we will try to ask some questions here the media should be asking Obama in person.
Mr. Obama: The United States Census Bureau reports that in 84 percent of our largest metropolitan areas, the percentage of “very poor” people increased during 2010, do your policies share any blame for this disaster?
Mr. Obama: The number of people who fell into poverty in 2010, 2.6 million people, was the largest recorded increase since records were first kept in 1959, the number of “poor” has risen from 11.3 percent in 2000 to 15.1 percent today, do you think you could do a better job of stewarding the economy?
Mr. Obama: During 2010, the poverty rate for children hit 22 percent; in at least 314 American counties, a minimum of 30 percent of children live with daily food insecurity; school lunch programs are an indispensible part of the daily food intake for more than 20 million children. Why do you think children are doing so much worse during your tenure in office than during the George W. Bush administrations?
Mr. Obama: More than 45 million Americans live on food stamps. Since the Democrats took control of Congress in 2007, the number of people on food stamps has jumped 74 percent; current projections say that approximately 50 percent of all American children will live on food stamps at some point before he or she reaches 18. How do you intend to empower people to get off these government programs before we have a debt crisis like Europe?
Mr. Obama: One in six Americans now depends on some kind of federal anti-poverty program; food pantries and soup kitchens are serving 46 percent more Americans than they were in 2006; there may be as many as 500,000 American children who are homeless in our country today. How do you explain the continuing collapse in America’s economy as more of your legislative agenda has been made into law?
Mr. Obama: When you see that your prescription for what ails the economy is failing when will you change direction?
Instead of forcing Obama to give Americans answers, we have a media that focuses on destroying any Republican that has the potential to really challenge him. They report heavily on stories that empower Obama’s biggest excuses. Excuses such as: this disaster was caused by George W. Bush don’t blame me, Europe’s problems have become our problems, this is global, don’t blame me. And the classic, if only the wealthy paid their fair share we wouldn’t have these problems, don’t blame me.
The common message shared by Obama and his minions in the media is clear. Obama doesn’t own this economic apocalypse. Collectively they shout, it is someone else’s fault. In the meantime the economic collapse is morphing into a cataclysmic, systemic failure.
In the end we almost expect Obama to smile as he chants in unison with the Occupy crowd, “our failure is America’s fault.”
Source:
Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and video relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
I. Sen. Grassley: US Teeters on Brink of Fiscal Armageddon!-Posted on NewsMax.com-By Jim Meyers and Kathleen Walter-On November 9, 2011:
II. U.S. Approaches $15 Trillion Debt Limit!-Posted on ABCNews.go.com-By Matthew Jaffe-On November 4, 2011:
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/11/u-s-approaches-15-trillion-debt-limit/
III. America's Success Owes Much to the British Empire!-Posted on NewsMax.com-By David Limbaugh-On November 4, 2011:
IV. Lipsky: Obama Making Same Mistakes That Led to Great Depression!-Posted on NewsMax.com-By Forrest Jones and Kathleen Walter-On October 26, 2011:
V. Video: Reagan Predicts America’s Socialist Crisis!
http://visiontoamerica.org/5364/video-reagan-predicts-americas-socialist-crisis/
Note: The following article and/or blog post reveals how the Main Stream Media is assisting President Obama and minions to bring down capitalist America, as the propaganda machine of the neo-fascist Left-You Decide:
The Judas Media!-Posted on Floyd Reports-Guest Writer-On April 27, 2011:
Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and reports reveal how George Soros, along with other liberal backers use their money to fund and/or manipulate media outlets, to include Hollywood because they see that as a powerful way to influence the American public.
It’s a strategy that Soros has been deploying extensively in media both in the United States and abroad. Since 2003, Soros has spent more than $48 million funding media properties, including the infrastructure of news - journalism schools, investigative journalism and even industry organizations-You Decide:
Nearly 30 Soros-funded Media Operations Part of 'War on Fox'!- Posted on Business & Media Institute-By Dan Gainor-On June 1, 2011:
http://www.mrc.org/bmi/commentary/2011/Nearly__Sorosfunded_Media_Operations_Part_of_War_on_Fox_.html
Soros-Funded Lefty Media Reach More Than 300 Million Every Month!-Posted on Business & Media Institute-By Dan Gainor-On May 25, 2011:
http://www.mrc.org/bmi/commentary/2011/Soros_Lefty_Media_Reach_More_Than__Million_Every_Month.html
Soros Spends Over $48 Million Funding Media Organizations!-Posted on Business & Media Institute-By Dan Gainor-On May 18, 2011:
http://www.mrc.org/bmi/commentary/2011/Soros_Spends_Over__Million_Funding_Media_Organizations_.html
Over 30 Major News Organizations Linked to George Soros!-Posted on Business & Media Institute-By Dan Gainor-On May 11, 2011:
http://www.mrc.org/bmi/commentary/2011/Over__Major_News_Organizations_Linked_to_George_Soros.html
Citizen Soros Manipulating the Media!-Posted on Capital Research Center-By Matthew Vadum-On January 2011:
http://www.capitalresearch.org/pubs/pdf/v1293869054.pdf
George Soros, Movie Mogul: ‘Social Justice’ Cinema and the Sundance Institute!-Posted on Capital Research Center-By Rondi Adamson-On March 20o8:
http://www.capitalresearch.org/pubs/pdf/v1204311857.pdf
The Hidden Soros Agenda: Drugs, Money, the Media, and Political Power!-Posted on AIM-By Cliff Kincaid-On October 27, 2004:
http://www.aim.org/special-report/the-hidden-soros-agenda-drugs-money-the-media-and-political-power/
Note: My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
Who owns our supposedly fair and balanced airwaves and news outlets?
Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?
Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial. Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.
“Food For Thought”
God Bless the U.S.A.!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related
Semper Fi!
Jake
What’s wrong with this picture?
Posted on The Blaze-By Madeleine Morgenstern-On November 11, 2011:
“The mayor of Richmond, Calif. plans to skip her city’s Veterans Day memorial events to attend an Occupy rally, a choice that’s prompting anger and criticism.
Mayor Gayle McLaughlin will miss a Veterans Day salute Friday in favor of an Occupy Richmond “public speak out,”the San Jose Mercury News reported.
McLaughlin defended her decision, telling the newspaper that the city is not sponsoring the Veterans Day event, and the rally she will attend will honor Scott Olsen, the Iraq war veteran injured at an Occupy Oakland rally last month. Richmond and Oakland, both in the San Francisco Bay Area, are about 12 miles apart.
“I choose to honor our veterans, not only on Veteran’s Day, but daily, by supporting an end to military warfare to prevent further fighting and dying in needless wars,” she said in an email. “I am a strong supporter of Veterans for Peace and Iraq Vets Against the War.”
McLaughlin, a member of the Green Party elected to a second term last year, has been supportive of the Occupy Wall Street movement since its inception. In a message on her website dated Nov. 6, she said since it “burst onto the scene, calling for an end to corporate domination all over the globe…[w]e, in Richmond, are part of this movement and have everything to gain from it.”
Her website also notes former White House “green jobs czar” Van Jones spoke at her 2010 re-election campaign kickoff.
According to the San Francisco Chronicle, she marched in Occupy Oakland’s “general strike” earlier this month — the same march that turned into violent rioting. Asked whether she would support Friday’s protesters if they decide to stay and camp after their rally, she told the Chronicle: “Yeah, I would stand with them for that. I stand with this movement.”
A message on her website urged Richmond residents to attend the Occupy rally as well, scheduled for 11 a.m. — the same time as the Veterans Day events.
Jeff Rubin, a Veterans Day memorial organizer, told the San Jose Mercury News the mayor has “very little respect for the country and traditions” and wondered whether the date of the rally was picked on purpose — a decision McLaughlin said had nothing to do with.
“As mayor, she has a responsibility to everyone in our community,” Rubin said. “Not only the disenfranchised and the unemployed, but to the veterans as well.”
Michael Klasno, director of Gold Star Dads of America, called the mayor’s choice a “slap in the face” to veterans and to grieving parents like himself.
“You don’t blow off the veterans of the United States for anybody, and you certainly don’t blow if off for Occupy Wall Street,” he said. “As somebody who’s paid the ultimate sacrifice, that to me is beyond the pale.”
But McLaughlin countered that exercising freedom is respectful of veterans.
“I think a good way to show respect for our veterans is to put all our energy into promoting the values that veterans fought for and some of them died for,” she said.”
Source:
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/california-mayor-will-skip-veterans-day-memorial-for-occupy-rally/
Question: Could it be true that some of our country’s Senators and Congressmen conspired with radical leftist groups who were committed to America’s defeat in Iraq and thereby provided aid and support to our nation’s radical Islamic enemies?
The following article and/or blog post provides us with undisputable evidence that in 2004 Senator Barbara Boxer and Congressman Henry Waxman were conspiring with radical leftist groups who were committed to America’s defeat in Iraq and were actively providing aid and support to our nation’s radical Islamic enemies who were killing our own brothers and sisters-What’s wrong with this picture?-You Decide:
Treason in America: Move Over ‘Hanoi Jane’ – Meet ‘Baghdad Barbara,’ ‘Weasel Waxman,’ and ‘Jihad Jodie!’
Posted on Big Peace-By Lt. Col. Robert “Buzz” Patterson-On October 15, 2010:
“In November and December of 2004, U.S. Marines were involved in the heaviest urban combat since the Vietnam War as they went house-to-house rooting out insurgents in the terror stronghold of Fallujah, Iraq. In all, fifty-one brave Americans would be killed and 560 wounded in the battle that would be the bloodiest of the Iraq War but one which would eventually turn the tide toward victory in Iraq and signal a significant defeat for America’s radical Islamic enemies.
Shockingly and tragically, at the same time our servicemen were staring into the eyes of evil, Senator Barbara Boxer and Congressman Henry Waxman were conspiring with radical leftist groups Code Pink and Global Exchange. Groups who were committed to America’s defeat in Iraq and were providing aid and support to our nation’s enemies. In December 2004, Boxer and Waxman (along with fellow congressmen Dennis Kucinich of Ohio and Raul Grijalva of Arizona) signed letters of diplomatic courtesy to the U.S. Embassy in Amman, Jordan, facilitating the transfer of more than $600,000 in cash and supplies to the insurgents and their families who were fighting and murdering U.S. servicemen and contractors in Fallujah. Henry Waxman’s letter, dated December 14, 2004, was addressed to American Consul General Daniel Goodspeed and requested assistance on behalf of radical anti-war groups Palisadians for Peace and Global Exchange.
{…}
As I detail in my newest book, Conduct Unbecoming: How Barack is Destroying the Military and Endangering Our Security, Global Exchange and its sister group Code Pink are anti-military organizations intent on undermining America in its war against radical Islamic fundamentalism. Code Pink was founded in Santa Monica, CA in November, 2002 by American radicals Jodie Evans, Medea Benjamin, and Diane Wilson. Evans is the leader of Code Pink which is closely aligned with Medea Benjamin’s group Global Exchange.
Don’t know Jodie Evans? Barack Obama, Barbara Boxer, and Henry Waxman do… and you need to as well.
Since 9/11, Evans and Code Pink have worked ceaselessly to undermine America’s efforts in the war against radical Islam and in the U.S. military’s involvement in combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. Before U.S. forces had even commenced military operations in Iraq in March 2003, Evans and Code Pink established the Iraq Occupation Watch (IOW) with an office in Baghdad with the specific intent to undermine the U.S. forces in Iraq by encouraging soldiers to seek discharges, claim “conscientious objector” status, or go A.W.O.L. (absent without leave). They also attempted to drum up false reports of American “war crimes” in an effort to influence international media to condemn the U.S. military action.
More egregiously, and in what can only be termed “treason,” it was only a year later that a team of American leftists, including Evans and Benjamin, personally delivered $600,000 in cash and supplies to the very insurgents the Marines had been fighting against – quite literally giving aid and comfort to America’s enemies in a time of war. It was an article published at Islam Online which confirmed that Senator Boxer and Representative Waxman had written their letters of “diplomatic courtesy” addressed to the American ambassador to facilitate the transport of this aid by Code Pink and Global Exchange through Jordanian customs.
The letters from Boxer and Waxman, according to the January 4, 2005 article written by Islam Online correspondent Adam Wild Aba, were needed in order to successfully deliver supplies to the Iraqi people. The U.S. military and the Iraqi Provisional Government were refusing access to the battlefields for obvious reasons. Since January, 2005, until Tuesday of this week, the Islam Online article and its link were active online. With the growing buzz on the internet about the complicity of Boxer, Waxman, and Code Pink, Islam Online removed the link (at whose request remains uncertain). A screen shot of the article taken before the link was removed appears here:
{…}
In a press conference in Amman following the transfer of the aid and money to the insurgents, Benjamin crowed to reporters, “I don’t know of any other case in history in which the parents of fallen soldiers collected medicine… for the families of the ‘other side’… It is a reflection of a growing movement in the United States … opposed to the unjust nature of this war.”
Thanks to her help, the Code Pink website praises their favorite senator as “our beloved Barbara Boxer.” Code Pink’s website praises Boxer here.
But Jodie Evans isn’t just some left-wing California whacko, she’s well known in California’s progressive circles, a former staff member for Governor Jerry Brown, and a key fundraiser and “bundler” for President Barack Obama.
Barack Obama’s first major event after announcing his long-shot run for the presidency in February 2007 was a Hollywood fundraiser co-hosted by Evans. Along with her partner and ex-husband Max Palevsky, and Dreamworks braintrust Steven Spielberg, David Geffen, and Jeffry Katzenberg, Evans successfully pulled together the rich and the radical in Los Angeles to support the emerging wunderkind. A few weeks ago she hosted a similar fundraiser for California Democrat gubernatorial candidate Jerry Brown at her Santa Monica home.
It is too bad Ms. Evans didn’t use her fundraising talents and Hollywood connections to help America’s fighting men and women along the way. Instead, she turned against them with the support of Boxer and Waxman. And, now, with no clear record of who specifically was given the more than $600,000 in cash and goods that the groups brought into the warzone, concerned families of soldiers killed while fighting in the War on Terror and patriotic Americans are beginning to ask the questions that should have been raised years ago.
Capt. Benjamin Gifford (USMC), an Iraq and Afghanistan war veteran was infuriated after learning that Boxer and Waxman contributed to the Code Pink mission behind enemy lines. Gifford, whose younger brother, Micah, was killed while serving in Iraq in 2006, has demanded an explanation from the two high-power Democrats. “My brother Micah gave his life for his country. He knew he was doing the right thing,” Gifford said. “I don’t understand how Barbara Boxer and Henry Waxman can possibly think that what they allowed was in the best interest of our nation.”
Chuck Wilkerson, the Republican candidate running against Waxman this election cycle, has described Waxman’s action in helping provide aid to a declared enemy as “outrageous” and “beyond belief.” In an official statement released Wednesday, Wilkerson said, “It’s bad enough that Congressman Waxman voted against funding our troops in combat, but to actively support those opposing forces who killed our own brothers and sisters is beyond forgiveness. This borders on treason.” Wilkerson, a Marine veteran himself, fought in Korea during the 1952 conflict.
In the final days of a difficult reelection bid, Barbara Boxer is attempting to emphasize veteran’s issues in a feckless attempt to deflect criticism of her long history of undermining the U.S. military. It’s time, however, to reveal her true animus towards all things military.
Barbara Boxer and Henry Waxman have conspired with some of the most radical and anti-American elements of our society and have done so at the expense of our fine young man and women in uniform. Our troops deserve so much better than Baghdad Barbara, Weasel Waxman, and Jihad Jodie.”
Source:
Note: We’ve had four terrorist attacks in less than a year, two of which succeeded in killing people and another two that failed only because of the incompetence of the terrorist. Iran is a year or less away from getting a nuclear weapon. Turkey is rapidly sliding towards Islamism. North Korea is doing their best to restart the Korean War.
And what does Barbara Boxer think is the greatest national-security threat facing us in the next generation? Carbon dioxide.
While organizations like Hizb ut-Tahrir are recruiting Muslim boys and teens for jihad and holding conferences, and our soldiers and citizens are at risk due to increased Islamic terrorism, here’s what Senator Barbara Boxer had to say is the greatest threat to our military, which goes to show how completely out of touch with reality some of our politicians are-You Decide:
Boxer: Greatest national security threat is carbon dioxide!-Posted on YouTube.com-By CQblogger-On June 10, 2010:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KJJB7zFsFFE
Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and video relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
I. Revealed: How Obama was playing golf until 20 minutes before Navy SEALs began mission to take out Bin Laden!-Posted on Mail Online-By DANIEL BATES-On November 7, 2011:
II. NATO Not Confirming That U.S. Helicopter in Afghanistan Flew Into Taliban Trap!-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Edwin Mora-On August 9, 2011:
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/nato-not-confirming-us-chopper-shot-down
III. Video: America DEMANDS a U.S. Congressional Investigation Into Leaking the Deaths of SEAL TEAM 6 Members!-Posted on YouTube.com-By jmarkcampbell-On August 8, 2011:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fega1aM-ax8&feature=player_embedded
IV. Family of Murdered Border Agent (Former Marine) Breaks Silence, Lashes Out at Holder!-Posted on FoxNews.com-By William Lajeunesse-On November 11, 2011:
Note: My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
The Military Pays the Price for Obama’s Agenda!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/08/11/the-military-pays-the-price-for-obama’s-agenda/
Veterans and members of our Armed Forces under attack!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/23/veterans-and-members-of-our-armed-forces-under-attack/
Rules of Engagement Killing Marines and U.S. Soldiers!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/12/14/rules-of-engagement-killing-marines-and-u-s-soldiers/
Treason in America: Move Over ‘Hanoi Jane’!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/16/treason-in-america-move-over-‘hanoi-jane’/
Is President Obama inciting riots across the US?
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/23/is-president-obama-inciting-riots-across-the-us/
Should Americans Fear Islam?
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/05/should-americans-fear-islam/
Islam’s Child Martyrs in America!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/02/12/islam’s-child-martyrs-in-america/
Did ATF provide weapons to Mexican drug cartels that were subsequently used to kill one of our own?
Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?
Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial. Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.
“Food For Thought”
God Bless the U.S.A.!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related
Semper Fi!
Jake
Posted on Saucy American in NZ-By Lisa G in NZ-On April 20, 2010:
“Older information:
The Republican Party was formed in 1854 specifically to oppose the Democrats, and for more than 150 years, they have done everything they could to block the Democrat agenda. In their abuses of power, they have even used threats and military violence to thwart the Democrat Party’s attempts to make this a progressive country. As you read the following Republican atrocities that span three centuries, imagine if you will, what a far different nation the United States would be had not the Republicans been around to block the Democrats’ efforts.
March 20, 1854 Opponents of Democrats’ pro-slavery policies meet in Ripon, Wisconsin to establish the Republican Party
May 30, 1854 Democrat President Franklin Pierce signs Democrats’ Kansas-Nebraska Act, expanding slavery into U.S. territories; opponents unite to form the Republican Party
June 16, 1854 Newspaper editor Horace Greeley calls on opponents of slavery to unite in the Republican Party
July 6, 1854 First state Republican Party officially organized in Jackson, Michigan, to oppose Democrats’ pro-slavery policies
February 11, 1856 Republican Montgomery Blair argues before U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of his client, the slave Dred Scott; later served in President Lincoln’s Cabinet
February 22, 1856 First national meeting of the Republican Party, in Pittsburgh, to coordinate opposition to Democrats’ pro-slavery policies
March 27, 1856 First meeting of Republican National Committee in Washington, DC to oppose Democrats’ pro-slavery policies
May 22, 1856 For denouncing Democrats’ pro-slavery policy, Republican U.S. Senator Charles Sumner (R-MA) is beaten nearly to death on floor of Senate by U.S. Rep. Preston Brooks (D-SC), takes three years to recover
March 6, 1857 Republican Supreme Court Justice John McLean issues strenuous dissent from decision by 7 Democrats in infamous Dred Scott case that African-Americans had no rights “which any white man was bound to respect”
June 26, 1857 Abraham Lincoln declares Republican position that slavery is “cruelly wrong,” while Democrats “cultivate and excite hatred” for blacks
And in more recent times:
September 15, 1981 President Ronald Reagan establishes the White House Initiative on Historically Black Colleges and Universities, to increase African-American participation in federal education programs
June 29, 1982 President Ronald Reagan signs 25-year extension of 1965 Voting Rights Act
August 10, 1988 President Ronald Reagan signs Civil Liberties Act of 1988, compensating Japanese-Americans for deprivation of civil rights and property during World War II internment ordered by FDR
November 21, 1991 President George H. W. Bush signs Civil Rights Act of 1991 to strengthen federal civil rights legislation
August 20, 1996 Bill authored by U.S. Rep. Susan Molinari (R-NY) to prohibit racial discrimination in adoptions, part of Republicans’ Contract With America, becomes law
April 26, 1999 Legislation authored by U.S. Senator Spencer Abraham (R-MI) awarding Congressional Gold Medal to civil rights pioneer Rosa Parks is transmitted to President
January 25, 2001 U.S. Senate Republican Policy Committee declares school choice to be “Educational Emancipation”
March 19, 2003 Republican U.S. Representatives of Hispanic and Portuguese descent form Congressional Hispanic Conference
May 23, 2003 U.S. Senator Sam Brownback (R-KS) introduces bill to establish National Museum of African American History and Culture
February 26, 2004 Hispanic Republican U.S. Rep. Henry Bonilla (R-TX) condemns racist comments by U.S. Rep. Corrine Brown (D-FL); she had called Asst. Secretary of State Roger Noriega and several Hispanic Congressmen “a bunch of white men...you all look alike to me”
Also the The Klu Klux Klan was created by the democrats for the express reason of terrorizing blacks and republicans in the south to prevent them from voting, and that every known Klansman that were members of congress have been democrats.”
Read the rest here. So WHO are the REAL racists again?
Source:
http://saucyusa.blogspot.com/2010/04/astonishing-history-of-democrat-racism.html
Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and videos relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide
I. Blacks Still 'Played' and Controlled by Tired Old Democrat Paradigms!-Posted on American Thinker-By Lloyd Marcus-On November 11, 2011:
II. Video: Herman Cain: Blacks Brainwashed into Supporting Democrats!-Posted on Vision to America-On September 29, 2011:
http://visiontoamerica.org/4424/herman-cain-blacks-brainwashed-into-supporting-democrats/
III. Video: Barbara from Harlem - Patriot Powderkeg!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Og2xv2cnaQ&feature=player_embedded#
IV. Black Activists Object to Extremist Rhetoric From Obama and Supporters in Defense of Expensive Jobs Bill!-Posted on The National Center for Public Policy Research-On October 17, 2011:
http://www.nationalcenter.org/P21PR-Jobs_101711.html
V. Obama’s Racial Crisis: ‘Our post-racial president has set race relations back decades’!-Posted on National Review Online-By VICTOR DAVIS HANSON-On September 28, 2011:
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/278526/obama-s-racial-crisis-victor-davis-hanson
VI. Black Pastor Sues Obama & Democratic Party for Racism!-Posted on The Patriot Update-By Ann-Marie Murrell-On September 25, 2011:
http://patriotupdate.com/articles/black-pastor-sues-obama-democratic-party-for-racism
VII. Video: Tea Party Racism: Rev. Perryman Says Enough!-Posted on YouTube.com-By RevWaynePerryman-On September 18, 2009:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ThzM22US-Jo&NR=1
VIII. Black Activists Condemn NAACP Resolution Against Tea Party Movement-Posted on National Center for Public Policy Research-On July 12, 2010:
http://www.nationalcenter.org/P21PR-NAACP_071210.html
IX. Blacks File Class Action Racial Discrimination Suit Against Obama & Democrats!-Posted on The Frederick Douglas Foundation-On September 11, 2011:
http://www.icontact-archive.com/vYs-Zyo3vj9g_57o0kqV3gG521zwvWdH?w=2
X. ‘Game Change’: New Book Reveals 2008 Campaigns’ Messy Moments-“From Obama to Palin, a New Book Raises Candidates’ Moments to Forget!”-Posted on ABCNews.Com-By DAVID KERLEY and KRISTINA WONG-On January 10, 2010:
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/game-change-obama-palin-book-reveals-2008-candidates/story?id=9525711
XI. Op-Ed: Allen West “The Liberal Roots of Harry Reid’s “Negro Talk” Comment”-Posted on HHR-By By Lt. Col. Allen West-On January 10, 2010:
XII. Black Activists Respond to Reid’s Racial Remarks!-Posted National Center for Public Policy Research-On January 10, 2010:
http://www.nationalcenter.org/P21PR-Reid_Race_011010.html
XIII. Harry Reid Thinks ‘Hispanic Republican’ Is an Oxymoron, or Something!-Posted on News Buster-By NB Staff (Bio | Archive)-On August 11, 2010:
XIV. Astonishing History of Democrat Racism!-Posted on thechristianconservative-On April 14, 2009:
http://thechristianconservative.wordpress.com/2010/04/14/astonishing-history-of-democrat-racism/
XV. United States History of Racism Against Blacks!-Posted on Sports Refuge-By Bearsownpackers-On April 4, 2009:
http://www.sportsrefuge.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=44330
XVI. Obama the Polarizer-Posted on RealClearPolitics RealClearPolitics HorseRaceBlog-By Jay Cost-On May 11, 2010:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/horseraceblog/2010/05/obama_the_polarizer.html
XVII. Video: Jesse Lee Peterson-Obama Hates the White Man and he is a dangerous man!-Posted on YouTube.com-By psam4711-On June 25, 2009:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xgpVQvqD1vQ&feature=related
Note: The following articles and/or blog posts reveal that House Democrats are saying that anyone that disagrees with the disgusting direction that this country is headed under this President, his administration and congress is a racist-You Decide:
Democrats Sense Racism Is Driving Obama Critics-Posted On Politics Dailey-On September 14, 2009:
http://www.politicsdaily.com/2009/09/14/democrats-sense-racism-driving-obama-critics/
Are Tea Parties Racist? “Sifting through the anti-Obama-hysteria”-Posted On Reason.Com-By Matt Welch-On December 2009 Issue:
http://reason.com/archives/2009/11/16/are-tea-parties-racist1
Sorry, Democrats, Racism Isn’t Everywhere-Opinion posted on NYDailyNews.Com-By MICHAEL MEYERS-On September 16, 2009:
Note: My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
President and DOJ have contributed to the racial mess in our country!
The Racial Mess!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/08/08/the-racial-mess/
Obama is fomenting a race war?
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/01/obama-is-fomenting-a-race-war/
'Game Change': New Book Reveals 2008 Campaigns' Messy Moments-To Include Racism!
Restoring Honor In America!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/08/29/restoring-honor-in-america/
Are We Witnessing Narcissism At Work?
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/10/27/are-we-witnessing-narcissism-at-work/
Do Alinsky’s Rules Define This Administration’s Governing Style?
Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?
Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial. Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.
“Food For Thought”
God Bless the U.S.A.!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related
Semper Fi!
Jake