All Posts (28560)

Sort by

goodauds

What would it take to form an arm of the Tea Party, perhaps called One for All whose objective is to get an addition to our constitution saying something like the following?

Proposed 28th Amendment to the United States Constitution: "Congress shall make no law that applies to the citizens of the United States that does not apply equally to the Senators and/or Representatives; and, Congress shall make no law that applies to the Senators and/or Representatives that does not apply equally to the citizens of the United States ."

Read more…

Dr. Orly Taitz on Tea Party Radio

Make sure to join us on Tea Party Radio Wednesday evening @ 9 pm EST!  Attorney Orly Taitz will be joining us for what should be a very interesting program.  Dr. Taitz has been all over the eligibility issue now for over 3 years, and has been at the forefront of the most valid-and-controversial issue this nation has ever seen...an ineligible foreigner in the White House, with the exception of Chester Arthur, and Chester Arthur was not a Communist/Marxist/Islamofascist/community organizer.  Tell your friends, get on your blogs, whatever...Dr. Taitz will be filling us in on her latest excursion to Hawaii with Doug Voght, who was on the program just over a month ago talking about his analysis of the forged BC and how it was done with Adobe Illustrator, among other things.  This is one hour you don't want to miss!

Link to the show from the Command page, or go to www.blogtalkradio.com/teapartyorg

Our call-in # is 1-646-200-4032.  

C ya then!

Jim Seigfreid

co-host Tea Party Radio

Read more…

 

 

Obama's LIES Get Out of Hand

 

   Last poll out:  48% of Americans give President Obama POOR marks on the economy and 16% gave him a fair rating; while in another only 17% say “we’re headed in the right direction,” yet mainstream-media (MSM) “journalists” waxed orgasmic praising his recent speech comparing himself to Teddy Roosevelt.  The MSM ignored its responsibilities and its homework again.  Of his 40+ claims in Osawatomie, KS, historical research backs up:  one.   There is strong connection between Mr. Obama and TR, America’s first Progressive president, who did some good, virtually all outside Constitutionally-required processes (Panama Canal land grab; national parks; naval expansion) during his imperial Obama-like presidency.  Roosevelt’s 1912 Bull-Moose third party (officially “Progressive Party”) opposed and lost to ultra-progressive big-spender Woodrow Wilson who brought us Federal Reserve Banking and the IRS.

 

 

   Obama’s speech ignored all capitalism’s benefits; proclaiming free market capitalism NEVER worked”: thus absolutely rewriting history and LYING to us, Mr. President.  You mentioned several decades illustrating the “failure of capitalism” and denying innovation and success by free markets and supply-side economics implying that the progressive-controlled decades NOT mentioned by you were great successes economically.  Really now??   Weren’t the late 19-teens, the 1930’s, and 1970’s:  economic disasters?  On the other hand, the decades you labeled “failures” were superbly prosperous, for example, dramatic reductions in government size, spending, taxes and debt by Harding/Coolidge quickly ended Wilson’s 1919-21 depression; America boomed.  Auto production rose 191%;   (state) highway construction mileage increased 1,030%; airplane travel expanded 7,100%; and despite sound money the average person’s salary in eight years rose 38% . . . without punishing the rich.

 

   You don’t trust these verifiable statistics?  Marxist bigwig Leon Trotsky was ecstatic about $18 per month average American apartments with telephones, private toilets/baths, gas ranges, elevators, electric lights, etc. NOT found in Europe.  EVIL capitalism’s a rising tide lifting all boats so the typical poor in America have computers, dishwashers, and color TVs.  America, the world’s first Constitutional Meritocracy, is a shining beacon for Planet Earth.

 

 

Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,

Rajjpuut

Read more…

Rick santorim bragged about winning hisn legislative views in aq democratic congress while Michele Bachman has not won her legislative basttles.  What Mr Santorim fails to note is that the congress he served in was in a differnt time with a different cast of characters.  For all of the time that Michele Bachman had to deal with a congress dominated by presidential puppet Harry Read in the Senate and mistress Nancy and her dungeon of slaves.  This was a legislative atmosphere that was impossable for a good christian legislator to win anything. If Senator Santorim had those two to deaL with, it is very doubtful that he would even be allowed to propose any meaningfull legislation.

Read more…

POLITICAL IMAGEING DEMEANER THE CANDIDATES

All the prospective candidates hire experts who specialize in political imageing, they will mold the candidate into an image that will satisfy the political establishment.

So how much of the real person are we allowed to see.  Sarah Palin tried to rebel against the hiding her light under a bushel full of political gambits, for some reason the political excperts dont want us to know much about a candidates core values. what do we know about the real Newt Gingrich, He has been in the political arena for so long, does he know where and what the real Newt Gingrich is all about or has the real Newt Gingrich been buried in politics for so long it no longer exists. What do we know about the real Mitt Romney, he has been on a merry go round for so many years, does Mitt Romney even know what the real Mitt Romney is all about.  What do we know about Ron Paul, we know he is an extreme Libertarian, but what does an extreme anything know about the realities of life as we know them to be. An extremist always lives in a single dementioned dream world so how could he be real to the extent that we could ever know about the real Ron Paul. The same can be said about Santorim, Huntsman, Pawlenty, etc.  They have all been politically imaged to the point that we can't know them.

But when I see and listen to Michele Bachman, I get the sense that what I see  and hear  is the real deal she   speaks  and carries herself in a manner consistent to the core beliefs that she so eloquently express's.  I do not beleive that there can be any doubt about where she is coming from.  I hope and pray that she will not allow herself to be politically imaged by the so called experts because I like and admire what I see.

Oboma has been politically imaged to the point that even he does not know who or what he is and his hypocritic behavior shows it.

Read more…

WE’RE GOING TO CHALLENGE THEM IN EVERY STATE!

Heads-Up:  

ObamaBallotChallenge.com is a website that was recently founded by Capt. Pamela Barnett (Ret.), which includes an initiative to assist ordinary registered voting citizens wishing to challenge Obama’s constitutional eligibility and name placement on the presidential ballot for 2012.  She and her team are currently compiling election laws from all 50 states and will be providing forms and sample letters, which registered voters can use to file a complaint.

What follows are pertinent excerpts from a recently published blog by Sharon Rondeau titled “WE’RE GOING TO CHALLENGE THEM IN EVERY STATE”:

“…Captain Barnett has recently appeared on The Roth Radio Show and the Andrea Shea King Radio Show to detail her plan to challenge Obama’s eligibility based on the claim that he is not a “natural born Citizen” as required by Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution.  Barnett also operates the website “Unlawful President” and will be releasing a book entitled Never Vetted, the first chapter of which was published on the internet at no charge for informational and educational purposes.

We cannot wait for Congress, the federal judiciary, or the Department of Justice to enforce the law regarding Obama’s eligibility. They have failed us.  The Obama State Ballot Challenge puts the power back into the hands of the people.  It gives any voter a course of action to take to ensure that the Constitutionally ineligible Obama is not re-elected.

Filing a ballot complaint to keep Obama off the ballot in their state is free, easy, and doesn’t require an attorney.  This process gives instant “standing” to the complainant to have their ballot complaint heard on the merits. The complaint absolutely needs to be filed within the legal time frame for their state. 

The Obama State Ballot Challenge staff will offer assistance with complaints to those who request it.

If in the future the administrative complaint is rejected, we hope that our strategic partner, the ART2 SuperPAC, will have a legal fund to assist those who need it.

It is the goal of Obama State Ballot Challenge to inspire citizens to file complaints in every state so that the American citizens might finally receive justice against the Un-Constitutional, usurper Barack Obama…  and to ensure that he will not be re-elected by finally having the mandate of the Supreme Court in Minor v. Happersett enforced within the several states….

Barnett also said that hearings concerning ballot challenges normally take place within 30 days after the complaint is filed.

Continue Reading:

http://obamaballotchallenge.com/obama-ballot-challenge-founder-interviewed-by-post-email

Note: For your information, you can read my recent letter to our NM Secretary of State that was published on the above website here:

http://obamaballotchallenge.com/retired-marine-captain-files-obama-ballot-challenge-in-new-mexico

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…

Dear Fellow Patriots:

What follows is a letter that I recently forwarded to our NM Secretary of State requesting her guidance and/or assistance in the removal of President Obama from the NM 2012 Primary Presidential Election Ballot:

“December 13, 2011

Mrs. Dianna J. Duran

New Mexico Secretary of State

325 Don Gaspar, Suite 300

Santa Fe, NM 87503

Phone: (505) 827-3600

Fax: (505) 827-8081

Dear Mrs. Duran:

I wanted to start off by thanking you for your office’s speedy response to my recent request for a copy of the ‘New Mexico 2010 Candidate Guide’ that deals with instructions for removing a candidate from the 2012 primary election ballot.

Upon receipt, I immediately took the opportunity to review specific sections within the guide that provided me with the ‘General Eligibility Requirements That Apply to All Offices’ and the‘Duties of Each Elected Office,’ to include the office of the President of the United States and have taken the liberty of including pertinent excerpts from specific pages of subject guide below: 

Page 14:

“GENERAL ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS THAT APPLY TO ALL OFFICES

“(Section 1-8-18(A) and 1-4-16(B) NMSA 1978)

No person shall become a candidate for nomination by a political party or have his/her name printed on the election ballot unless the record of voter registration shows:

  • Affiliation with that political party on the date of the governor’s proclamation for the primary election (the 2012 primary election proclamation will be issuedby January 30, 2010)…
  • Every person appearing as a candidate on the primary or general election ballot shall be a candidate only under the name and party affiliation indicated on the certificate of voter registration on the date of the governor’s proclamation...”

Page 15:

“SPECIFIC ELEGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS AND DUTIES

President of the United States

In addition to the general requirements, to serve as President of the United States, a person:

  • Must be a natural born citizen;
  • Must be a resident with within the United States for fourteen years; and
  • Must be at least thirty-five years of age. (U.S. Const. Art. II Sec. 1)”

As an American citizen of the United States and a native New Mexican, I am now hereby requesting that your office provide me with some direction and/or guidance that would assist me in getting President Obama removed from the 2012 presidential primary election ballot over allegations of fraud in that I now believe that “he does not meet the minimum Constitutional qualification requirements set forth in Article II, Section I, Clause V concerning the natural born citizen status. 

Please be advised that, although I am not an attorney or have little or no legal background, I have arrived at this determination only after conducting my own extensive research into this extremely disturbing matter, which revealed that it is now undisputed that President Obama’s father was not a U.S. citizen and therefore he can never be a ‘natural-born citizen,’ as that term was defined by a  ‘1875 U.S. Supreme Court decision, Minor v. Happersett’ in which the court defined “natural-born citizens” as ‘all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens.’

The following information, which includes numerous sources, will hopefully provide you with what I believe to be a preponderance of undisputable evidence that seems to collectively prove that President Obama in fact may be ineligible to hold the office of President of the United State and Commander-In-Chief of our armed forces:

On or about April 27, 2011, the White House released a pdf copy of President Obama’s long-form ‘Certificate of Live Birth’, which I believe substantiated his dual nationality in that when he was born in Hawaii in 1961 he acquired British nationality by descent because his father was a British subject by birth and when Kenya gained its independence from Great Britain in 1963, President Obama became a citizen of the newly-formed nation. 

Below is a pdf copy of President Obama’s ‘Certificate of Live Birth’ that was released by the White House:

http://whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf

On or about November 29, 2011is was revealed that there are numerous state ballots with President Obama’s name that are facing legal challenges across the country. They are claiming that, while he is listed as the only Democratic candidate, he must be removed from the 2012 presidential primary election ballot over allegations of fraud in that “he does not meet the minimum qualifications as set forth in Article II, Section I, Clause V concerning the natural born citizen status.”

Source:

Ballots with Obama’s name facing more legal challenges!-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On November 29, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=372849#ixzz1gKfJA2bY

On or about December 7, 2011, it was revealed that there was a class action complaint that was recently filed against the National Democratic Party by the Liberty Legal Foundation (LLF) challenging President Obama’s eligibility. The allegations are that “he does not meet the minimum qualifications as set forth in Article II, Section I, Clause V concerning the natural born citizen status.”

The LLF’s lawsuit cites the 1875 U.S. Supreme Court decision, Minor v. Happersett, in which the court defined “natural-born citizens” as “all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens.”

The LLF’s motion for preliminary injunction further states, “Because it is undisputed that Mr. Obama’s father was not a U.S. citizen, Mr. Obama can never be a natural-born citizen, as that term was defined by the U.S. Supreme Court and therefore Mr. Obama cannot meet the constitutional requirements to hold the office of President and alleges that any representation by the Democratic Party that President Obama is constitutionally qualified to hold the office of President would constitute “negligent misrepresentation or fraud.”

Source:

Liberty Legal Foundation serves DNC with Obama eligibility complaint!-Posted on Examiner-By Linda Bentley, Maricopa County Crime Examiner-On December 7, 2011:

http://www.examiner.com/crime-in-phoenix/liberty-legal-foundation-serves-dnc-with-obama-eligibility-complaint?CID=examiner_alerts_article#ixzz1ftSzDuaz

On or about December 1, 2011, it was revealed that an Obama Presidential Eligibility Introductory Primer, which was initially published on or about June of 2009, has been recently revised and published. This primer reveals that President Obama has further substantiated his dual nationality, which he acquired at birth, when the White House released his supposedly new long-form birth certificate on or about April 27, 2011. The author does a meticulous job of introducing President Obama’s eligibility controversy, in a question-and-answer format, for a non-technical general audience and has supposedly double-checked the facts presented, along with citing their sources, and believes them to be correct.

Source:

Obama Presidential Eligibility - An Introductory Primer!-Posted on PeoplesMag.net-By Stephen Tonchen-Revised on December 1, 2011:

http://people.mags.net/tonchen/birthers.htm

Finally, and only after much thought, I have also taken the liberty of including the attached letter that I recently forwarded to our NM U.S. Congressman Tom Udall, which I believe will provide you with additional supporting information regarding this extremely disturbing matter.

I look forward to hearing from your office regarding this disturbing matter, which I believe is extremely time sensitive due to the fact the 2012 Primary Election Proclamation will be issued by our Governor on or about January 30, 2012, as noted on the ‘2012 Candidate Guide.’

Thank you again for the excellent and professional job that you are doing as our Secretary of State.

May you and your loved ones have a “Merry Christmas” and a “Happy and Prosperous New Year.”

Respectfully yours,

Jake L. Martinez

Letter To NM U.S. Senator Tom Udall:

“December 12, 2011

The Honorable Tom Udall

United States Senate

110 Hart Senate Office Building

Washington, DC 20510-3101

Dear Senator Udall:

Thank you again for your speedy response regarding the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act. I again appreciate hearing from you regarding this disturbing issue.

Since my letter to you of December 7, 2011, it was revealed that our former New Mexico Governor, Bill Richardson, recently faced new reports of a federal grand jury into his alleged violations of campaign finance laws. Investigators are supposedly now probing how his close allies steered more than $2 billion of public money into investment funds run by money managers who in turn agreed to pay millions of dollars in consulting fees to high-profile Democratic fundraisers and his other supporters.

Source:

http://townhall.com/columnists/michellemalkin/2011/12/09/holder_blago_richardson_triangle_of_sleaze

If proven to be true, I guess that our New Mexico tax payers not only took a hit when some of our elected officials in Congress took part in the insider stock market trading practices, but now we discover that our own Governor’s close allies may have been steering more than $2 billion of our public money into investment funds that were allegedly run by money managers who in turn agreed to pay millions of dollars in consulting fees to high-profile Democratic fundraisers and his other supporters. If this is not a great example of crony-capitalism, which is literally destroying our Capitalist system in America, I don’t know what is.

Although, I truly appreciate your speedy response to my letter of December 7, 2011 regarding the insider stock market trading issue, I again find myself wondering why there was no mention in your letter regarding Agenda 21, which is supposedly a voluntary plan that was adopted at the 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. It calls on governments to intervene and regulate nearly every potential impact that human activity could have on the environment, which translates into restrictive zoning policies that are aimed at deterring suburban growth. An action that is ultimately suppressing our housing supply, driving up home prices and, in turn imposing unnecessary costs, especially on middle- and lower-income households.

Sources:

Agenda 21 and the Threat in Your Backyard!-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-By Mike Brownfield-On December 5, 2011:

http://blog.heritage.org/2011/12/05/morning-bell-agenda-21-and-the-threat-in-your-backyard/?utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Morning%2BBell

Video: How your community is implementing Agenda 21!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CEHWsdimVO4&feature=player_embedded

Additionally, what was suspiciously missing in your letter was your response to my numerous other issues that I’ve shared with you in the recent past that I believe are just as important because they are systemically eroding our “Constitution,” and “Bill of Rights”, which, if left un-attended, will ultimately destroy this great country of ours.  

Be that as it may, after having some time to step back and look at the big picture, I’ve realized that, as we prepare for our upcoming 2012 Presidential Election, there is an issue that I’ve previously presented to you in the recent past that is currently heating up around our country, which I believe is even more important in size and scope because it deals with the question of whether or not our President is even eligible to hold the office of President and Commander-In-Chief of our Armed Forces. 

I, like many Americans across our country, believe that there is a preponderance of undisputable evidence being revealed on a daily basis by extremely reliable sources that may collectively prove that he in fact is ineligible to hold office, which would surely be the greatest fraud that has been perpetrated in American history. 

This issue literally keeps me up at night because, if true, I believe that it would literally spark civil unrest across our country, which would ultimately destroy what I consider to be the greatest country on earth.  And, it is for this reason that I would like to take the liberty of providing you with the following information and sources, which seem to provide us with the undisputable evidence that I mentioned above and again graciously ask that you give me your take regarding this extremely disturbing and time sensitive issue:

On or about March 2, 2010, it was revealed that Sarah P. Herlihy, an associate attorney specializing in litigation at the Chicago law firm Kirkland & Ellis LLP, which is a law firm with ties to Obama, published an essay in the Chicago-Kent Law review on February 22, 2006 entitled “Amending the Natural Born Citizen Requirement: Globalization as the Impetus and the Obstacle” that floated the idea of a “takeover” of our government by a foreign power. Herlihy’s essay was widely disseminated on the internet during the 2008 presidential campaign as rumors surfaced that Obama and possibly McCain did not meet the “natural born Citizen” requirement laid out in Article II, Section 1, paragraph 5 of the U.S. Constitution.

Source:

Was there a conspiracy to put Obama in the White House?-Posted on The Post & EMail-By Sharon Rondeau-On March 2, 2010:

http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/03/02/was-there-a-conspiracy-to-put-obama-in-the-white-house/

On or about December 12, 2009, it was revealed in detail that there were foreign influences of George Soros during then Senator Obama’s 2008 Presidential Election Campaign, to include who covered up his Islamic background and the connections and players in the campaign of misinformation waged by numerous Obama supporters.

Source:

Who ran cover for Obama’s Islamic background? ‘Tracing The Politics And The Money Behind Obama’s Campaign!’-Posted on Post & Email-by John Charlton-On December 12, 2009:

http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/12/look-who-ran-cover-for-obamas-islamic-background/

On or about April 24, 2010, it was revealed that members from all three branches of the Federal government, to include members of the US Supreme Court, already know that Barack Hussein Obama is ineligible for the office of President. Additionally, National leaders are also aware that he is not a “natural born citizen” of the United States of America, and therefore, is ineligible for the office he currently holds:

Source:

DC Knows that Obama is Ineligible for Office: ‘The certification of constitutional qualification for the office of president!’-Posted on CanadaFreePress.com-By JB Williams-On April 24, 2010:

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/22221

On or about June 10, 2010, it was revealed that Mr. Tim Adams, a college instructor, who worked as a senior elections clerk for the city and county of Honolulu from May 2008 through September 2008, made a stunning claim that President Obama was definitely not born in Hawaii as the White House maintains, and that a long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate for him did not even exist in the Aloha State.

Source:

Hawaii Elections Clerk: Obama birth not here – Official who oversaw ballots in 2008 race says long-form birth certificate non-existent!-Posted on WND.com-By Joe Kovacs-On June 10, 2010:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=165041

On or about November 8, 2010, it was exposed that the White House had posted a congressional document on the internet that confirmed that no one, to include Congress, the states, or election officials bothered to check then Senator Obama’s eligibility to be our president.

Source:

Congress report concedes Obama eligibility unvetted: ‘There is no specific federal agency’ to review candidates for federal office!-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On November 8, 2010:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=225561

On or about January 24, 2011, it was revealed that Mr. Adams had signed an affidavit, on or about January 20, 2011, swearing that he was told by his supervisors in Hawaii that no long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate existed for Barack Obama Jr. in Hawaii and that neither Queens Medical Center nor Kapi’olani Medical Center in Honolulu had any record of Obama having been born in their medical facilities.

Source:

Hawaii official now swears: No Obama birth certificate!-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On January 24, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=254401#ixzz1PT0rwcGl

On or about May 31, 2011, it was revealed that President Obama’s “Certificate of Live Birth” that was released by the White House, on or about April 27, 2011, was found to be fraudulent by an international expert on scanners and document-imaging software who filed a 22-page criminal complaint with the FBI to that effect.

Sources:

Criminal complaint charges Obama birth record ‘forged’! (Part 1)-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On May 31, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=305705

Criminal complaint details birth-certificate ‘forgery’! (Part 2)-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On June 5, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=306953

Why did Obama release electronic birth certificate? (Part 3)-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On June 7, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=308277

On or about June 12, 2011, it was revealed that there was overwhelming evidence that we in fact have a fraud and a usurper that resides in the people’s White House, despite the overt lack of journalistic investigating on the part of the American press. The new evidence indicates that the conspiracy to carry out that fraud was much broader than originally thought, which includes a forty-year story that requires a book, not a column, to tell because the evidence suggests that our President was being groomed from a very young age for the moment in history that would end American supremacy in the world, and usher in a new era of Global Marxist Governance.

Source: 

The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!-Posted on The Post & Email-By JB Williams-On June 12, 2011:

http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/06/07/evidence-broadens-obama-natural-born-conspiracy/

On or about June 13, 2011, retired Maj. Gen. Paul Valley revealed that the “Certificate of Live Birth” that was released by the White House, on or about April 27, 2011, as “proof positive” of President Obama’s Hawaiian birth was a forgery, but that the FBI was covering the fraud and no one in Congress was willing to tackle the situation because of fears of a “black backlash,” if the failings of the nation’s first black president were revealed.

Source:

Ex-CIA: ‘Forged document’ released as birth certificate!-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On June 15, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=311433

On or about October 20, 2011, Leo Donofrio, a New Jersey attorney who brought the first legal challenge to Barack Obama’s occupancy in the Oval Office to the U.S. Supreme Court, published a report that revealed that 25 U.S. Supreme Court Opinions that defined “Natural Born Citizen” were sabotaged in the run up to the ’08 Presidential Election.

Source:

25 U.S. Supreme Court Opinions That Defined “Natural Born Citizen” Were Sabotaged In The Run Up To The ’08 Presidential Election!-Posted on Natural Born Citizen-By Leo Donofrio, Esq.-On October 20, 2011:

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2011/10/20/justia-com-surgically-removed-minor-v-happersett-from-25-supreme-court-opinions-in-run-up-to-08-election/ 

On or about October 20, 2011, it was revealed that someone had been incredibly busy in June 2008 working on an illegal front invisible to the public by searching and altering Supreme Court Cases published at Justia.com, which cite the only case in American history – Minor v. Happersett (1875) – to directly construe Article 2 Section 1’s natural-born citizen clause in determining a citizenship issue as part of its holding and precedent. In this unanimous decision, the Supreme Court defined a “native or natural-born citizen” as a person born in the US to parents who were both citizens, a definition that excludes President Obama from eligibility. 

Source:

JustiaGate!-Posted on Examiner-By Dianna Cotter, Portland Civil Rights Examiner-On October 20, 2011:

http://www.examiner.com/civil-rights-in-portland/justiagate

On or about November 29, 2011, is was revealed that there are numerous state ballots with President Obama’s name that were facing legal challenges across the country. They are claiming that, while he is listed as the only Democratic candidate, he must be removed from the 2012 presidential primary election ballot over allegations of fraud in that “he does not meet the minimum qualifications as set forth in Article II, Section I, Clause V concerning the natural born citizen status.”

Source:

Ballots with Obama’s name facing more legal challenges!-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On November 29, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=372849#ixzz1gKfJA2bY

On or about November 30, 2011, it was revealed that the Congressional Research Service (CRS), the research arm of Congress, had launched a defense of President Obama’s presidential eligibility with a 50-page report that has been described as a “polemic aimed at convincing readers” Obama meets the requirements to be president.

Source:

Congressional staff gives Constitution new meaning: ‘Researchers target ‘eligibility,’ say ‘native born’ really is ‘natural born!’-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On November 30, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=373085

On or about November 30, 2011, it was also revealed that Jack Maskell, a legislative attorney with the Congressional Research Service (CRS), issued yet another in a series of reports on presidential eligibility that appears aimed at providing members of Congress with talking points to respond to constituents contending that Barack Hussein Obama is not a “natural born citizen” within the meaning of Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution, along with redefining the eligibility clause by equating “native born” with the constitutional “natural born” citizen.

Source:

Congressional ‘scholar’ shilling for Obama!-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On November 30, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=372977

On or about December 1, 2011, it was revealed that an Obama Presidential Eligibility Introductory Primer, which was initially published on or about June of 2009, has been recently revised and published. This primer reveals that President Obama has further substantiated his dual nationality, which he acquired at birth, when the White House released his supposedly new long-form birth certificate on or about April 27, 2011. The author does a meticulous job of introducing President Obama’s eligibility controversy, in a question-and-answer format, for a non-technical general audience and has supposedly double-checked the facts presented, along with citing their sources, and believes them to be correct.

Source:

Obama Presidential Eligibility - An Introductory Primer!-Posted on PeoplesMag.net-By Stephen Tonchen-Revised on December 1, 2011:

http://people.mags.net/tonchen/birthers.htm

On or about December 7, 2011, it was revealed that there was a class action complaint that was recently filed against the National Democratic Party by the Liberty Legal Foundation (LLF) challenging President Obama’s eligibility. The allegations are that “he does not meet the minimum qualifications as set forth in Article II Section I Clause V concerning the natural born citizen status.”

The LLF’s lawsuit cites the 1875 U.S. Supreme Court decision, Minor v. Happersett, in which the court defined “natural-born citizens” as “all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens.”

The LLF’s motion for preliminary injunction further states, “Because it is undisputed that Mr. Obama’s father was not a U.S. citizen, Mr. Obama can never be a natural-born citizen, as that term was defined by the U.S. Supreme Court and therefore Mr. Obama cannot meet the constitutional requirements to hold the office of President and alleges that any representation by the Democratic Party that President Obama is constitutionally qualified to hold the office of President would constitute “negligent misrepresentation or fraud.”

Source:

Liberty Legal Foundation serves DNC with Obama eligibility complaint!-Posted on Examiner-By Linda Bentley, Maricopa County Crime Examiner-On December 7, 2011:

http://www.examiner.com/crime-in-phoenix/liberty-legal-foundation-serves-dnc-with-obama-eligibility-complaint?CID=examiner_alerts_article#ixzz1ftSzDuaz

As I’ve mentioned to you in the past, I am not a politician and thus am not known for always being politically correct because I call it as I see it.  I also come from a long line of family members that are Veterans. Four out of my six male siblings honorably served their country and my father was a WWII Veteran, who survived the Battle of the Bulge, but lost the battle with his PTSD symptoms at the young age of fifty-nine.  My two eldest sons honorably served their country as Marines.  My eldest son participated in the first Gulf War as a Marine and Iraqi Freedom as a weekend warrior with the Air National Guard. Additionally, I lost many a friend during the Viet Nam War that fought and died to uphold our “Constitutional Rights” and the freedom that sadly too many Americans take for granted.  As a result, I have to admit that I tend to get extremely concerned when I see politicians, regardless of political affiliation, sex, race, color (in the Marine Corps we were all green), creed, ethnic origin or religion, doing things and/or taking actions that I see as a threat to the freedom and/or rights given us under our “Constitution” and “Bill of Rights”, which millions of Americans have died and continue to die to this date to uphold them.

Please feel free to contact me at my home address listed below, if you should have any questions regarding any of this information.

I look forward to hearing from you regarding this disturbing and time sensitive issue.

Thank you again for all you continue to do for our Veterans, our state and our country.

May you and your loved ones have a “Merry Christmas” and a “Happy and Prosperous New Year.”

God Bless You and God Bless America.

Respectfully,

Jake L. Martinez

Captain-USMC-Retired

Automatic Electronic Response Received From Senator Udall’s Office Regarding My Email Above:

Thank you for your message!

I look forward to reviewing your comments and questions.

Before you leave, I hope you'll explore my website. On this page, you can learn more about the work that I've been doing on important issues and legislation as your U.S. Senator.”

Note:  My following blog post contains numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetrated-in-american-history/

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…

{IT IS TIME FOR GOD's PEOPLE, TO REPENT AND PRAY ACCORDING TO [2 Chron. 7:14] !   'WE the People' need

to see GOD Intervene on our behalf; and heal our nation}

Here are some disturbing excerpts from a Presidential Memorandum signed by Barak Obama last week:
>"I declared before heads of state gathered at the United Nations, ‘no country should deny people their rights because of who they love, which is why we must stand up for the rights of gays and lesbians everywhere.”
“Under my Administration, agencies engaged abroad have already begun taking action to promote the fundamental human rights of LGBT [Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans-gender] persons everywhere. Our deep commitment to the advancing the human rights of all people is strengthened when we (as the United States) bring our tools to bear to vigorously advance this goal."<
Under the guise of promoting “human rights,” President Obama has issued a memorandum outlining seven specific actions that the Department of State and other federal agencies will be required to implement on a global scale “to ensure that U.S. diplomacy and foreign assistance promote and protect the human rights of LGBT persons.”
Under Obama’s mandate, federal agencies are directed to offer moral, legal, and financial support to national and international organizations which support LGBT advancement – while preferential expedition and asylum will be offered to LGBT people allegedly forced to flee persecution in their home countries.
There is already mounting international backlash and disapproval from leaders of countries where sodomy or homosexuality is banned by law, which includes most of the Middle East, Africa, Latin America, and Oceania.
++Obama’s directive will use YOUR tax dollars to advance the LGBT agenda globally!
Among Obama’s presidential mandates:
* “To combat discrimination, homophobia, and intolerance on the basis of LGBT status or conduct.”  (Force acceptance of homosexuality whether a country wants to or not)
* “The Federal Government has the ability to identify and expedite resettlement of highly vulnerable [LGBT] persons with urgent protection needs.” (Grant preferential asylum to those who claim LGBT status)
* “Ensure the Federal Government's swift and meaningful response to serious incidents that threaten the human rights of LGBT persons abroad.”  (Presumably, such a “response” could include U.S. military and/or police action)
* “Broaden the number of countries willing to support and defend LGBT issues in the multilateral arena.”  (Using United States pressure to advance the LGBT agenda by recruiting core “allies” in the community of nations)
All federal agencies involved in Obama’s initiative are to file a report within 180 days of the December 6th announcement and submit subsequent annual reports to the Department of State, which will also be reviewed by the President.
In short, our President is dictating that government agencies with foreign operations direct their workers to advance the LGBT agenda and then submit regular reports to him on how the effort is progressing.

Under President Obama and his pro-homosexual administration, the forced reception of the radical LGBT agenda into our culture (including our military) – and now international society – is happening at unprecedented levels.  And we, the American taxpayers, are shouldering the expense of all this pro-homosexual activism!
Our tax dollars have been hijacked to promote homosexuality around the globe whether the American people agree with such an outrageous program or not!
The double standard in this international activism is mindboggling.
This “human rights” zeal on the part of President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton is focused on a small, radical minority of the global population while vast numbers of people in this world are suffering persecution on an unimaginably large scale.
According to a December, 2010 report published by Charisma Magazine…
“Nearly all human-rights groups and Western government agencies that monitor the plight of Christians worldwide agree: Between 200 million and 230 million believers face daily threats of murder, beating, imprisonment and torture, and a further 350 million to 400 million encounter discrimination in areas such as jobs and housing. A conservative estimate of the number of Christians killed for their faith each year is around 150,000.”
Yet the federal government has defunded the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom this year, presumably due to budgetary limitations.  And could you imagine President Barack Obama launching an initiative to end world-wide persecution of Christians with the same enthusiasm he has invested in this Presidential Memorandum on LGBT “human rights”?

It is difficult to find a ballpark number of homosexuals who were actually persecuted or killed world-wide last year, although most reports indicate it would be a very small fraction of the number of Christians suffering the same fate. And as of May 2011, it is reported that seventy-five countries criminalize consensual sexual acts between adults of the same sex!
Internationally, churches are being bombed, Christians are denied the right to assemble, and believers are persecuted and put to death…while the Obama administration turns a blind eye to these catastrophic international events and initiates programs to promote the homosexual lifestyle!
The Obama Administration has launched a full-scale global campaign to promote the LGBT agenda while continuing to push it in America.
Given the flood of new attacks empowered by the Obama administration’s  pro-homosexual actions and manipulation of the legal system, we must continue fighting this cultural battle in both the courtroom and the court of public opinion. .
We MUST band together to counter the advance of radical homosexual activists whose goals, among others, is to redefine marriage and family. This is perhaps the greatest “culture war” of our generation – and it’s escalating at a breathtaking pace!
We must also confront and expose the horrific deception and disinformation these radicals are spreading!  The pro-homosexual advance is being paved with outright lies about the practice of homosexuality, misleading “facts” about their movement, and fraudulent use of taxpayer funds obtained by cynically presenting their cause as a “civil rights” or “human rights” movement!

Read more…

Motivated Yet? Think About It....

You know, we all do a lot of talking.  Many of us take a lot of action in many and varied places and venues.  We are dedicated to preserving this nation and our Founding Principles, and will do just about anything we possibly can to accomplish that.  Many of us belong to local Tea Party groups, some of us have been on the front lines in forming local Tea Party groups, and many of us do more than that, specifically many who are also HERE at Tea Party.org.  We blog.  We write our Congress-critters.  Our local legislators.  Our newspapers, magazines, and on...and we are on a mission.  WE MUST restore this nation to our Constitutional Founding Principles, and we know that we have a very long, up-hill battle ahead of us.  To know thine enemy is half the battle.  Dr. Walter Williams points it out quite well:

 

 DR. WILLIAMS predicts that Obama can not  lose the 2012 election.
 
 IN  ADDITION TO THE VOTING BLOCKS HE MENTIONS, THERE IS ANOTHER HUGE  GROUP:  THE NEARLY ONE-HALF OF ALL ADULTS DO NOT PAY ANY TAXES  AND, IN FACT, MOST OF THEM RECEIVE MONEY FROM THE GOVERNMENT. THESE  PEOPLE DO NOT WANT TO "SHAKE THE BOAT" TO DO ANYTHING TO STOP  THE FLOW OF TAXPAYER MONEY TO THEMSELVES. 
  

 Dr. Williams  prediction:  Maybe you have read some newspaper articles  written by Dr. Williams a conservative economist who happens to be  Black. He has taught at several Universities and is currently  teaching at George Mason University .

 

   
    

    No Matter  What


 By Dr. Walter  Williams
 
   Can  President Obama be defeated in 2012?  No.  He  can't.    I am going on record as saying that  President Barak Obama will win a second term.
 
 The media won't tell  you this because a good election campaign means hundreds of  millions (or in Obama's case billions) of dollars to them in  advertising.
 
 But the truth is,  there simply are no conditions under which Barak Obama can be  defeated in 2012.
  The  quality of the Republican candidate doesn't matter.   Obama gets reelected.  Nine percent unemployment?   No problem.  Obama will win.  Gas  prices moving toward five  dollars a gallon?  He still wins.  The economy soars  or goes into the gutter.  Obama wins.  War in the Middle East ?  He wins a second term.
 
 America's role as the  leading Superpower disappears?  Hurrah for Barak  Obama!  The US government rushes toward bankruptcy, the  dollar continues to sink on world markets and  the price of daily goods and services soars due to inflation  fueled by Obama's extraordinary deficit spending?  Obama  wins handily.
 
   You are  crazy Williams.  Don't you understand how volatile  politics can be when overall economic, government, and world  conditions are declining?  Sure I do.
 
 And that's why I know  Obama will win.  The American people are notoriously  ignorant of economics.  And economics is the key to why  Obama should be defeated.
 
 Even when Obama's  policies lead the nation to final ruin, the majority of the  American people are going to believe the bait-and-switch  tactics Obama and his supporters in the media will use to explain why it isn't his fault.  After all, things were much worse than understood when he took  office.
 
 Obama's reelection is  really a very, very simple math problem.

Consider the  following:
 
 1) Blacks will vote  for Obama blindly.  Period.  Doesn't matter what he  does.  It's a race thing.  He's one of  us,
      
  2)  College educated women will vote for Obama.  Though they  will be offended by this, they swoon at his oratory.   It's really not more complex than  that,

 

 3)  Liberals will vote for Obama.  He is their great  hope,
  
  4)  Democrats will vote for Obama.  He is the leader of their  party and his coattails will carry them to victory nationwide,
  
  5)  Hispanics will vote for Obama.  He is the path to  citizenship for those who are illegal and Hispanic leaders  recognize the political clout they carry in the Democratic  Party, 
 
  6) Union  members will vote overwhelmingly for Obama.  He is their  key to money and power in business, state and local  politics, 
 
  7) Big  Business will support Obama.  They already have.  He  has almost $1 Billion dollars in his reelection purse gained  largely from his connections with Big Business and  is gaining more everyday.  Big Business loves Obama  because he gives them access to taxpayer money so long as they  support his social and political  agenda, 
 
  8) The  media love him.  They may attack the people who work for  him, but they love him.  After all, to not love him would  be racist, 
 
  9) Most  other minorities and special interest groups will vote for  him.  Oddly, the overwhelming majority of Jews and  Muslims will support him because they won't vote  Republican.  American Indians will  support him.  Obviously homosexuals tend to vote  Democratic.  And lastly,
 
 10) Approximately half  of independents will vote for Obama.  And he doesn't need  anywhere near that number because he has all of the groups  previously mentioned.  The President will win an  overwhelming victory in 2012.  
 
  --  Dr.  Walter  Williams


              

Obituary-Very  Interesting!

 

 

 Born  1776, Died 2008  
 
 It  doesn't hurt to read this several times.
 

Professor  Joseph Olson of Hamline   University School of Law in St.. Paul , Minnesota , points out  some interesting facts concerning the last  Presidential  election: 
 

Number of  States won by: Obama:19 McCain:  29  


  • Square miles  of land won by: Obama:580,000 McCain:  2,427,000  
  •  
  • Population  of counties won by: Obama:127 million McCain: 143  million  
  •  
  • Murder rate  per 100,000 residents in counties won by: Obama: 13.2  McCain: 2.1

Professor  Olson adds: "In aggregate, the map of the territory McCain won  was mostly the land owned  by the taxpaying citizens of the  country.

Obama  territory mostly encompassed  those citizens living in low  income tenements and  living off various forms of government  welfare..."

Olson believes the United States is  now somewhere between the "complacency and apathy" phase of  Professor Tyler's definition of democracy, with some forty  percent of the nation's population already having reached the  "governmental dependency" phase.  

If Congress  grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million criminal  invaders called illegal's - and they vote - then we can say  goodbye to the USA in fewer  than five years.  

Read more…

Dear Fellow Patriots:

What follows is a letter that I recently forwarded to my NM U.S. Senator Tom Udall regarding what I consider to be the “Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History”:

"December 12, 2011

The Honorable Tom Udall

United States Senate

110 Hart Senate Office Building

Washington, DC 20510-3101

Dear Senator Udall:

Thank you again for your speedy response regarding the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act. I again appreciate hearing from you regarding this disturbing issue.

Since my letter to you of December 7, 2011, it was revealed that our former New Mexico Governor, Bill Richardson, recently faced new reports of a federal grand jury into his alleged violations of campaign finance laws. Investigators are supposedly now probing how his close allies steered more than $2 billion of public money into investment funds run by money managers who in turn agreed to pay millions of dollars in consulting fees to high-profile Democratic fundraisers and his other supporters.

Source:

http://townhall.com/columnists/michellemalkin/2011/12/09/holder_blago_richardson_triangle_of_sleaze

If proven to be true, I guess that our New Mexico tax payers not only took a hit when some of our elected officials in Congress took part in the insider stock market trading practices, but now we discover that our own Governor’s close allies may have been steering more than $2 billion of our public money into investment funds that were allegedly run by money managers who in turn agreed to pay millions of dollars in consulting fees to high-profile Democratic fundraisers and his other supporters. If this is not a great example of crony-capitalism, which is literally destroying our Capitalist system in America, I don’t know what is.

Although, I truly appreciate your speedy response to my letter of December 7, 2011 regarding the insider stock market trading issue, I again find myself wondering why there was no mention in your letter regarding Agenda 21, which is supposedly a voluntary plan that was adopted at the 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. It calls on governments to intervene and regulate nearly every potential impact that human activity could have on the environment, which translates into restrictive zoning policies that are aimed at deterring suburban growth. An action that is ultimately suppressing our housing supply, driving up home prices and, in turn imposing unnecessary costs, especially on middle- and lower-income households.

Sources:

Agenda 21 and the Threat in Your Backyard!-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-By Mike Brownfield-On December 5, 2011:

http://blog.heritage.org/2011/12/05/morning-bell-agenda-21-and-the-threat-in-your-backyard/?utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Morning%2BBell

Video: How your community is implementing Agenda 21!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CEHWsdimVO4&feature=player_embedded

Additionally, what was suspiciously missing in your letter was your response to my numerous other issues that I’ve shared with you in the recent past that I believe are just as important because they are systemically eroding our “Constitution,” and “Bill of Rights”, which, if left un-attended, will ultimately destroy this great country of ours.  

Be that as it may, after having some time to step back and look at the big picture, I’ve realized that, as we prepare for our upcoming 2012 Presidential Election, there is an issue that I’ve previously presented to you in the recent past that is currently heating up around our country, which I believe is even more important in size and scope because it deals with the question of whether or not our President is even eligible to hold the office of President and Commander-In-Chief of our Armed Forces. 

I, like many Americans across our country, believe that there is a preponderance of undisputable evidence being revealed on a daily basis by extremely reliable sources that may collectively prove that he in fact is ineligible to hold office, which would surely be the greatest fraud that has been perpetrated in American history. 

This issue literally keeps me up at night because, if true, I believe that it would literally spark civil unrest across our country, which would ultimately destroy what I consider to be the greatest country on earth.  And, it is for this reason that I would like to take the liberty of providing you with the following information and sources, which seem to provide us with the undisputable evidence that I mentioned above and again graciously ask that you give me your take regarding this extremely disturbing and time sensitive issue:

On or about March 2, 2010, it was revealed that Sarah P. Herlihy, an associate attorney specializing in litigation at the Chicago law firm Kirkland & Ellis LLP, which is a law firm with ties to Obama, published an essay in the Chicago-Kent Law review on February 22, 2006 entitled “Amending the Natural Born Citizen Requirement: Globalization as the Impetus and the Obstacle” that floated the idea of a “takeover” of our government by a foreign power. Herlihy’s essay was widely disseminated on the internet during the 2008 presidential campaign as rumors surfaced that Obama and possibly McCain did not meet the “natural born Citizen” requirement laid out in Article II, Section 1, paragraph 5 of the U.S. Constitution:

Source:

Was there a conspiracy to put Obama in the White House?-Posted on The Post & EMail-By Sharon Rondeau-On March 2, 2010:

http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/03/02/was-there-a-conspiracy-to-put-obama-in-the-white-house/

On or about December 12, 2009, it was revealed in detail that there were foreign influences of George Soros during then Senator Obama’s 2008 Presidential Election Campaign, to include who covered up his Islamic background and the connections and players in the campaign of misinformation waged by numerous Obama supporters:

Source:

Who ran cover for Obama’s Islamic background? ‘Tracing The Politics And The Money Behind Obama’s Campaign!’-Posted on Post & Email-by John Charlton-On December 12, 2009:

http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/12/look-who-ran-cover-for-obamas-islamic-background/

On or about April 24, 2010, it was revealed that members from all three branches of the Federal government, to include members of the US Supreme Court, already know that Barack Hussein Obama is ineligible for the office of President. Additionally, National leaders are also aware that he is not a “natural born citizen” of the United States of America, and therefore, is ineligible for the office he currently holds:

Source:

DC Knows that Obama is Ineligible for Office: ‘The certification of constitutional qualification for the office of president!’-Posted on CanadaFreePress.com-By JB Williams-On April 24, 2010:

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/22221

On or about June 10, 2010, it was revealed that Mr. Tim Adams, a college instructor, who worked as a senior elections clerk for the city and county of Honolulu from May 2008 through September 2008, made a stunning claim that President Obama was definitely not born in Hawaii as the White House maintains, and that a long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate for him did not even exist in the Aloha State.

Source:

Hawaii Elections Clerk: Obama birth not here – Official who oversaw ballots in 2008 race says long-form birth certificate non-existent!-Posted on WND.com-By Joe Kovacs-On June 10, 2010:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=165041

On or about November 8, 2010, it was exposed that the White House had posted a congressional document on the internet that confirmed that no one, to include Congress, the states, or election officials bothered to check then Senator Obama’s eligibility to be our president.

Source:

Congress report concedes Obama eligibility unvetted: ‘There is no specific federal agency’ to review candidates for federal office!-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On November 8, 2010:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=225561

On or about January 24, 2011, it was revealed that Mr. Adams had signed an affidavit, on or about January 20, 2011, swearing that he was told by his supervisors in Hawaii that no long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate existed for Barack Obama Jr. in Hawaii and that neither Queens Medical Center nor Kapi’olani Medical Center in Honolulu had any record of Obama having been born in their medical facilities.

Source:

Hawaii official now swears: No Obama birth certificate!-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On January 24, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=254401#ixzz1PT0rwcGl

On or about May 31, 2011, it was revealed that President Obama’s “Certificate of Live Birth” that was released by the White House, on or about April 27, 2011, was found to be fraudulent by an international expert on scanners and document-imaging software who filed a 22-page criminal complaint with the FBI to that effect.

Sources:

Criminal complaint charges Obama birth record ‘forged’! (Part 1)-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On May 31, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=305705

Criminal complaint details birth-certificate ‘forgery’! (Part 2)-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On June 5, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=306953

Why did Obama release electronic birth certificate? (Part 3)-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On June 7, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=308277

On or about June 12, 2011, it was revealed that there was overwhelming evidence that we in fact have a fraud and a usurper that resides in the people’s White House, despite the overt lack of journalistic investigating on the part of the American press. The new evidence indicates that the conspiracy to carry out that fraud was much broader than originally thought, which includes a forty-year story that requires a book, not a column, to tell because the evidence suggests that our President was being groomed from a very young age for the moment in history that would end American supremacy in the world, and usher in a new era of Global Marxist Governance.

Source:

The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!-Posted on The Post & Email-By JB Williams-On June 12, 2011:

http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/06/07/evidence-broadens-obama-natural-born-conspiracy/

On or about June 13, 2011, retired Maj. Gen. Paul Valley revealed that the “Certificate of Live Birth” that was released by the White House, on or about April 27, 2011, as “proof positive” of President Obama’s Hawaiian birth was a forgery, but that the FBI was covering the fraud and no one in Congress was willing to tackle the situation because of fears of a “black backlash,” if the failings of the nation’s first black president were revealed.

Source:

Ex-CIA: ‘Forged document’ released as birth certificate!-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On June 15, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=311433

On or about October 20, 2011, Leo Donofrio, a New Jersey attorney who brought the first legal challenge to Barack Obama’s occupancy in the Oval Office to the U.S. Supreme Court, published a report that revealed that 25 U.S. Supreme Court Opinions that defined “Natural Born Citizen” were sabotaged in the run up to the ’08 Presidential Election.

Source:

25 U.S. Supreme Court Opinions That Defined “Natural Born Citizen” Were Sabotaged In The Run Up To The ’08 Presidential Election!-Posted on Natural Born Citizen-By Leo Donofrio, Esq.-On October 20, 2011:

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2011/10/20/justia-com-surgically-removed-minor-v-happersett-from-25-supreme-court-opinions-in-run-up-to-08-election/

On or about October 20, 2011, it was revealed that someone had been incredibly busy in June 2008 working on an illegal front invisible to the public by searching and altering Supreme Court Cases published at Justia.com, which cite the only case in American history – Minor v. Happersett (1875) – to directly construe Article 2 Section 1’s natural-born citizen clause in determining a citizenship issue as part of its holding and precedent. In this unanimous decision, the Supreme Court defined a “native or natural-born citizen” as a person born in the US to parents who were both citizens, a definition that excludes President Obama from eligibility:

Source:

JustiaGate!-Posted on Examiner-By Dianna Cotter, Portland Civil Rights Examiner-On October 20, 2011:

http://www.examiner.com/civil-rights-in-portland/justiagate

On or about November 29, 2011is was revealed that there are numerous state ballots with President Obama’s name that were facing legal challenges across the country. They are claiming that, while he is listed as the only Democratic candidate, he must be removed from the 2012 presidential primary election ballot over allegations of fraud in that “he does not meet the minimum qualifications as set forth in Article II, Section I, Clause V concerning the natural born citizen status.”

Source:

Ballots with Obama’s name facing more legal challenges!-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On November 29, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=372849#ixzz1gKfJA2bY

On or about November 30, 2011, it was revealed that the Congressional Research Service (CRS), the research arm of Congress, had launched a defense of President Obama’s presidential eligibility with a 50-page report that has been described as a “polemic aimed at convincing readers” Obama meets the requirements to be president.

Source:

Congressional staff gives Constitution new meaning: ‘Researchers target ‘eligibility,’ say ‘native born’ really is ‘natural born!’-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On November 30, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=373085

On or about November 30, 2011, it was also revealed that Jack Maskell, a legislative attorney with the Congressional Research Service (CRS), issued yet another in a series of reports on presidential eligibility that appears aimed at providing members of Congress with talking points to respond to constituents contending that Barack Hussein Obama is not a “natural born citizen” within the meaning of Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution, along with redefining the eligibility clause by equating “native born” with the constitutional “natural born” citizen.

Source:

Congressional ‘scholar’ shilling for Obama!-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On November 30, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=372977

On or about December 1, 2011, it was revealed that an Obama Presidential Eligibility Introductory Primer, which was initially published on or about June of 2009, has been recently revised and published. This primer reveals that President Obama has further substantiated his dual nationality, which he acquired at birth, when the White House released his supposedly new long-form birth certificate on or about April 27, 2011. The author does a meticulous job of introducing President Obama’s eligibility controversy, in a question-and-answer format, for a non-technical general audience and has supposedly double-checked the facts presented, along with citing their sources, and believes them to be correct.

Source:

Obama Presidential Eligibility - An Introductory Primer!-Posted on PeoplesMag.net-By Stephen Tonchen-Revised on December 1, 2011:

http://people.mags.net/tonchen/birthers.htm

On or about December 7, 2011, it was revealed that there was a class action complaint that was recently filed against the National Democratic Party by the Liberty Legal Foundation (LLF) challenging President Obama’s eligibility. The allegations are that “he does not meet the minimum qualifications as set forth in Article II Section I Clause V concerning the natural born citizen status.”

The LLF’s lawsuit cites the 1875 U.S. Supreme Court decision, Minor v. Happersett, in which the court defined “natural-born citizens” as “all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens.”

The LLF’s motion for preliminary injunction further states, “Because it is undisputed that Mr. Obama’s father was not a U.S. citizen, Mr. Obama can never be a natural-born citizen, as that term was defined by the U.S. Supreme Court and therefore Mr. Obama cannot meet the constitutional requirements to hold the office of President and alleges that any representation by the Democratic Party that President Obama is constitutionally qualified to hold the office of President would constitute “negligent misrepresentation or fraud.”

Source:

Liberty Legal Foundation serves DNC with Obama eligibility complaint!-Posted on Examiner-By Linda Bentley, Maricopa County Crime Examiner-On December 7, 2011:

http://www.examiner.com/crime-in-phoenix/liberty-legal-foundation-serves-dnc-with-obama-eligibility-complaint?CID=examiner_alerts_article#ixzz1ftSzDuaz

As I’ve mentioned to you in the past, I am not a politician and thus am not known for always being politically correct because I call it as I see it.  I also come from a long line of family members that are Veterans. Four out of my six male siblings honorably served their country and my father was a WWII Veteran, who survived the Battle of the Bulge, but lost the battle with his PTSD symptoms at the young age of fifty-nine.  My two eldest sons honorably served their country as Marines.  My eldest son participated in the first Gulf War as a Marine and Iraqi Freedom as a weekend warrior with the Air National Guard. Additionally, I lost many a friend during the Viet Nam War that fought and died to uphold our “Constitutional Rights” and the freedom that sadly too many Americans take for granted.  As a result, I have to admit that I tend to get extremely concerned when I see politicians, regardless of political affiliation, sex, race, color (in the Marine Corps we were all green), creed, ethnic origin or religion, doing things and/or taking actions that I see as a threat to the freedom and/or rights given us under our “Constitution” and “Bill of Rights”, which millions of Americans have died to uphold.

Please feel free to contact me at my home address listed below, if you should have any questions regarding any of this information.

I look forward to hearing from you regarding this disturbing and time sensitive issue.

Thank you again for all you continue to do for our Veterans, our state and our country.

May you and your loved ones have a “Merry Christmas” and a “Happy and Prosperous New Year.”

God Bless You and God Bless America.

Respectfully,

Jake L. Martinez

Captain-USMC-Retired”

Automatic Electronic Response Received From Senator Udall’s Office Regarding My Email Above:

Thank you for your message!

I look forward to reviewing your comments and questions.

Before you leave, I hope you'll explore my website. On this page, you can learn more about the work that I've been doing on important issues and legislation as your U.S. Senator.”

Note: Again-I would like to mention that that I am not senile enough to believe that any of my NM Representatives will ever respond to this disturbing issue, which I believe is even more important in size and scope than any of the others that I’ve presented to them to date because it deals with the question of whether or not our President is even eligible to hold the office of President and Commander-In-Chief of our Armed Forces.  And you can rest assured that their non-response will never discourage or stop me from corresponding with them because, as I’ve also mentioned before, I honestly couldn't live with myself if I did what so many other Americans seem to be doing at this crucial time when our Republic needs us more than ever, which is to take the easy road by sticking my head in the sand hoping that this and other disturbing issues that I believe will eventually destroy this great country of ours would all go away like a bad nightmarish dream-not going to happen!  

Note:  My following blog post contains numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetrated-in-american-history/

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…

Are you a ‘Renaissance’ Patriot?

Ben Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, Samuel Adams, and George Washington, do these names make you proud to be an American?

 

What makes them a Renaissance Patriot? If we look at what these founding Fathers had in common could we stack up?

All these Heroes had different back grounds before and during the American Revolution, some had a formal education while others were self educated.

 

Of them I think Mr. Benjamin Franklin was the most rounded of them all in the terms of a ‘Renaissance Man’.

 

Mr. Franklin was a self educated person, having started working at a young age as an apprentice for his Uncle at a print shop.

 

Although very few historians actually touch on the work experience young Mr. Franklin did, you would have to imagine that the work was physically demanding even at that time period in American history.

 

Mr. Franklin was famous for different things, discovering electricity, inventing the ‘pot belly stove’ are among his accomplishments, he was also instrumental in the writing of the US Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States of America.

 

These are a few of Mr. Franklin’s varied accomplishments; our historians will embellish or reduce his work towards making this the Greatest Nation in the history of the world.

 

My question still stands: “Are you a Renaissance patriot?’

 

Most people today have at least two years of college (I do) and have a few talents.

 

Unlike Mr. Franklin’s time we do very little hunting and gathering for our survival (unless you call shopping at the local super stores hunting and gathering) because our society has innovated to a point where all our needs are produced and brought to us by others in the Free Market system we have created over the centuries.

 

“I have little doubt that if a disaster hit this Great Country that a lot of people would not survive past two weeks.”

 

My reasoning for this statement?

 

Because on a whole our society has moved from the ‘hunter/gather’ society to a higher plain of existence, where food and shelter is provided for monetary gain by other individuals.

 

I am not saying that this is wrong what I am saying is that we as a society have lost some of the things that makes our Fore Fathers and Founding Fathers the Renaissance Men of their time.

 

I doubt seriously more than 0.01% of the US population could hunt for food or more than 0.1% could actually till the soil, plant the seeds, and harvest the crop that they grow.

 

Of course the cautious person will have stockpiled (do not confuse this with hoarding) enough food for a minimum of two months along with the necessities for survival in the event of a disaster.

 

This type of planning is wise because a natural disaster can strike anywhere at any time and those that denounce “being prepared” as unpatriotic or even criminal are just stupid.

 

These are the people that would vote for a tax increase on you to pay for their survival or would try to take what you have when a disaster strikes. (During the flooding of New Orleans in 2005 shop owners were disarmed by the local police, then the thieves broke in to shops and stole what ever they wanted. They were not looking for food and survival goods no they were stealing TVs, stereos, and anything else that they took a fancy to.)

 

A modern day Renaissance person would have varied talents such as the ability to hunt or gather the food and materials to survive.

 

Other talents that would be handy would be the use of non powered tools; can you use an ax properly? Do you own wood working tools such as a hammer, saw, maybe a plane?

 

If your car broke down could you fix it? (I hate to say this but if a car made after 1991 broke down electronically you could not fix it, neither could I and I am a certified Computer Technician). Such as: could you remove a starter and repair it if failed?

 

If the USA was attacked by a belligerent nation could you survive with out your computer, cell phone, or other electronic devices?

 

This is not a scare tactic but a reality in the world of today. There are enemies of this Great Nation that have plans to take out any electronic device that is not shielded or hardened in such a way that electro magnetic impulse (EMP) will not affect it. (Are you aware that a car built prior to 1984, and not modified to have an ‘electronic’ ignition, will survive an EMP attack?)

 

When you bought that fancy new telephone with all those neat new features did you happen to keep that old rotary dial phone? Your fancy new phone will not survive an EMP attack but that old rotary phone will and so will 90% of the phone lines in the USA. (Garage sales anyone?)

 

The more people that have those ‘Renaissance’ talents we as the Greatest Nation this world has know will be able to over come natural disasters and attacks by enemies foreign and domestic.

 

Considering the state of affairs in the USA and the world today would you consider learning a few of these talents that would insure your families’ survival in the advent of a natural disaster or an attack from a foreign or domestic source?

A Renaissance Patriot would …

Read more…

Personal Power

Are All The Conservatives Dead?
Our very country and freedom has been at stake since the Obama regime took over, backed by progressive leftists transforming us into a Marxist Dictatorship 5 steps at a time. Was this the ‘change’ some of you signed up for?
 

In numerology, the number 8 represents assuming power, for now we’ve achieved personal responsibility for our lives. In the 8 cycle, recognition and financial rewards are bestowed in business. We now have reached the point when we can reap what we’ve sown.  We’ve learned to view life in broad terms. The quality of life expands to new plateaus, giving one more drive, more perseverance to go to the very top of whatever one chooses to do.  

When you take everything into consideration, the power to produce anything at all must come from order, and all the way back to the universe.  Order comes from a state of conscious awareness. We give the source of conscious awareness the name “God.”

We humans, consciously aware of more than any other life form on the planet, are aware of ordered liberty—the freedom to be individual as long as we don’t bring harm to others.

We realize that some control must be delegated to government. We Americans, after declaring our independence from England’s government, spent years in the designing of our Constitution.  It called for a balance of power in government, a government of the people, for the people.

“We, the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America,” we, the people, did hold our Constitution to be a sacred trust.  What about now?

With regard to numerology’s 8, the Court’s test as to a right was whether the right at issue was “of the very essence of a scheme of ordered liberty,” by reason that neither liberty nor justice would exist if such a right were sacrificed.

During the Great Depression in the United States, Franklin D. Roosevelt was elected President. In 1933, Roosevelt: “While it isn’t written in the Constitution, nevertheless, it is the inherent duty of the Federal Government to keep its citizen’s from starvation.”  In 1937, Roosevelt went on to assert: “The balance of power between the three great branches of the Federal Government has been tipped out of balance by the Court in direct contradiction of the high purposes of the framers of the Constitution. We have reached the point where we must take action to save the Constitution from the Court.” 

It took four years to come from the inherent duty of government to keep citizens from starvation to saving the Constitution from the Court.  Justice Stone, dissenting in the Roosevelt idea of redistribution of income, “Expenditures would fail of their purpose and thus lose their constitutional sanction if the terms of payment were not such that by their influence on the action of the recipients the permitted end would be attained. . . It is a contradiction in terms to say that there is power to spend for the national welfare, while rejecting any power to impose conditions reasonably adapted to the attainment of the end which alone would justify the expenditure.”  Justice Stone was a prophet.

Justice Brandeis, a Roosevelt appointee, was a prophet. Asserted Brandeis: “Property is only a means. It has been a frequent error of our Court that they have made the means an end.”

The present law in the United States is that in the constitutional scheme of separation of powers, and the deference owed by the federal judiciary to the other two branches of government within the scheme present an absolute bar to taxpayers suits challenging the validity of federal spending programs.

The United States has given itself the authority, if deemed necessary, to take in tax the entire productivity of the American people. The Warren Court, in 1968, disagreed with this idea. It ruled that if the taxpayer had a personal stake in the outcome, he had the constitutional right to challenge.  As yet, the Court has never seen a case wherein a taxpayer had a personal stake in the outcome, and why? The IRS is given the authority to make limitless mistakes. It goes with the territory. Attorney General Holder is an example.

As defined in Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, the individual’s soul is his immaterial essence, animating principle or actuating cause. Once you are free to think for yourself, have awakened your soul, your human awareness released, numerology defines as cycles of development, now that we’ve arrived at the personal power cycle, the United States challenging, it goes back to fundamental law, which significantly involves personal discipline.

Personal discipline involves the individual’s ability to make sense. I began with Law Professor Edward S. Corwin’s The “Higher Law” Background of American Constitutional Law.   

In  “The Higher Law,” Ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle “advanced in Ethics the concept of ‘natural justice,’ ‘Of political justice,’ he wrote, ‘part is natural part legal—natural, that which everywhere has the same force and does not exist by people’s thinking this or that; legal, that which is originally indifferent. . .’ That is to say, the essential ingredient of the justice which is enforced by the state is not of the state’s own contrivance; it is a discovery from nature and a transcript of its constancy.”

“The discovery that custom was neither immutable nor invariable even among the Greek city states impelled the Sophists to the conclusion that justice was either merely ‘the interests of the strong,’ or at best a convention entered upon by men purely on considerations of expediency and terminable on like considerations. Ultimately, indeed, the two ideas boil down to the same thing, since it is impossible to regard as convenient that which cannot maintain, while that which can do so will in the long run be shaped to the interests of its sustainers.”  What could be truer of America’s makers and keepers of the law?

 If America’s lawyers are correct, numerology’s eighth cycle is null and void. “We are our brother’s keeper” is distorted by those who use their reasoning ability to empower themselves at everyone else’s cost—and it is as easy as falling off a log. People don’t know the law. By knowing the law—and using it for my personal benefit—America’s lawyers were not prepared. I reversed the process.  America’s lawyers hung themselves with their own rope. 

In The “Higher Law,” Aristotle advanced this idea: “even the best of men in authority are liable to be corrupted by passion. We may conclude then that the law is reason without passion and it is therefore preferable to any individual.” So know this: no matter what they say, they are not in their positions of power and control to protect your God-given rights.  Most are lawyers. They make and keep the law for their own benefit. And whose fault is it?

 If we knew the power we individually possess to cope, do you think Congress would remain doing nothing to solve the nation’s growing out of control spending?  Would the big spenders be able to keep President Obama supplied with the power to turn America into a socialist dictatorship? Would the Federal Reserve Bank and Wall Street be able to continue ripping off taxpayers?  Would fraud, waste, and mismanagement be tolerated? Do you think union workers could remain commanding far higher wages and benefits? Or do you think all of the above named abuses of taxpayers would end if we all knew the law? 

A lawyer told me it would cost big money to take my $1,500 tax issue to court, and even if I won, no judge would grant the lawyer more than a small fraction of his cost. Why do we need lawyers? What are they doing for us?   The law is designed by the powerful for the powerful. What would America’s makers and keepers of the law do if working people, because they had a personal stake in the outcome, took their tax issues to court?  If they knew the law, they could do this without a lawyer.  It takes time and study, but it doesn’t take a superior brain to know the law.  I proved that. If working people knew the law, the powers that be would not be able to rob workers of their rights.  

The escaped slave, Dred Scott, was heard by the Supreme Court, but remained a slave.  In the estimation of those who make and keep the law, my personal stake must be sacrificed for the good of all—the idea that without all of society pulling together none of us could survive. Judges are not going to stick their necks out for us if we don’t demand our rights. They would have long ago stopped lawmakers from feathering their own nests at our expense if we’d have taken the self-serving frauds to court.

Story said: “The Constitution was, from its very origin, contemplated to be the frame of a national government of special and enumerated powers and not of general and unlimited powers. A power to lay taxes for the common defense and general welfare of the United States is not in common sense a general power.  It is limited to those objects. It cannot constitutionally transcend them.”  We need to inform President Obama, in a meaningful way in a meaningful place, the voting booth, that his transformation is unconstitutional; he is not fit to be President.

My case was before the Supreme Court. It was not heard.  Was it for the good of all that America had black slaves? They were essential to the South’s economy.  Was bailing out Wall Street at taxpayer expense essential?  We are far better off without slaves. Why not tell America’s lawyers to take a hike; we’ll handle our own cases from now on?  It would take little time to balance the national budget.  We’d be doing posterity a great favor.  

My new life began by cutting from the herd and going on my own—by establishing a new identity—by learning who I really was. It was not for the sake of learning the law but for taking action to protect what I considered to be my inalienable right to enjoy the fruits of my labor. The IRS called me a Fifth Amendment freak. They knew how to deal with me. They ended eating their humble pie. If we’d have known the law and acted, the quality of life would have expanded to new plateaus, giving people more drive, more perseverance to go to the very top of whatever they chose to do.

The Reverend Jeremiah Wright and Barack Hussein Obama have their answer.  Wright goddamned America. Obama favors the Muslim Brotherhood and “collective salvation.” They need to get a life. We need to get a life.

I awakened this morning with a vision similar to a television screen not on a station, just dancing black lines with a background of grey. A hand appeared in the middle of the scene that turned into fire.  It’s an omen.

Read more…

Backing for President

Tea Party:

I joined this party hoping it would be a departure from the Republican Party and their dismal showing in past elections. They showed very poor selections for canadates and had very bad platforms. The Tea Party is an improvement in most cases, but still lacking in getting behind a canadate and putting its weight behind the person.

It looks like the Republican Party is narrowing down to two choices at the moment. They may be Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney. Gingrich is a retread and flawed in his life and performance. Romney lacks international experience and is questionable when it comes to domestic matters. I suggest that the Tea Party take a close look at Jon Huntsman. He has experience in both domestic and foreign affairs. He was the Governor of a State and Ambassador to China. He has a personality that outgoing, friendly and can work well with other parties and countries. In short he presents himself well.

I would like to see the Tea Party get behind Huntsman and give him a much needed push that will put him higher in the pools before elections. It would be a big service to the Country and give the Tea Party a much needed boost in public opinion.

David Chisman

Read more…