THE DRUG WAR HAS CLAIMED THE LIVES OF 10 COPS IN MEXICO, NEAR HIGH SCHOOL !
TODAY.
All Posts (27645)
Sort by
VERY DISTURBING!!!
CONGRESSMAN BOB ETHERIDGE, DEM, NC DIST 2 ASSAULTS STUDENT ON WASHINGTON STREET. So this is what it now comes to..share this so America can see the truth.
PHONE 202-225-4531 FAX 202-225-5662
TERM. EXPIRES: NOV 2010
When i read that the Tea party wants money for fax blast.. I have to ask one simple question. Why..?
What good do Faxes do.. No one in Washington gives a damn.. What did all the phone calls and faxes do to stop Obama care... Who in Washington really cares what we think..?
Use the money to defeat the liberal candidates.. use the money to buy TV adds.. but don't waist it on Fax machines that are set up to automatically dump the faxes in the trash...
I will not donate for that...
The U.S. Governmemt is going to sue the State of
Arizona over the state law. They are working on
it now. What a waste of more tax payers money.
Instead of moving forward ---.
We are a “Do It Yourself” form of self-governance. The U.S. Constitution is a document of absolute authority guaranteeing individual rights.
As a Republic we elect those in whom we have placed our trust to transact business on our behalf.
The true power is in the ‘People’ first, the U.S. Constitution second, and from there, flows into the various branches of government, while some defined powers flow to the States.
A Faith Based Conservative is a Citizen who frames his or her ideas, actions and deeds based upon a foundation of Judaic/Christian values. The theological base of the Citizenry is of less importance if the national foundation remains the same. Our national decisions must be predicated upon consulting God first, the U.S. Constitution second, and lastly those we have empowered to do our bidding. Based upon what God says, keeping in harmony with the U.S. Constitution and giving guidance to our elected officials, we will grow healthy as a nation, not just progress for progression sake.
We The People can change, the U.S. Constitution can change and we can change those we have placed in power. Furthermore, our basis can be altered from a Judaic/Christian foundation to Islamic, Human Secular and any combination of governmental or theological frameworks.
However, the further we stray from the original premise set forth by our Founding Fathers further the core of our nation becomes more divergent, yielding a different national persona. These changes I speak of can manifest at a very fast pace, as per the change witnessed from 1933 to 1945 in Germany, the results were disastrous to the world.
Therefore, with God as our master, the U.S. Constitution as our road map we can empower those we have placed in authority.
Are we a nation of individuals, do we choose to grow and stay the course set before us in 1776?
What Say Ye?
Dear Tea Party Members, Now that you signed up in support of the organization, that is only the first step. Can not sit back and just look. We are looking for feed back, on
what is going on in your State, County and town right now.
We are in a stuggle with the Left wing and the Terrorism in the U.S. and the world. You can not sit back and do nothing. You will find that you have lost your Liberty and your money for your self and your kids. Do not look to Washington right now.
So let us hear from you, what is up setting you ( or pissing you off ). Or what is good in your State or Town right now.
This is only the start, to get the right people in Washington
and to get the wrong people out ! But we have to know what is going on in your part of the country.
Clock Ticks Down on the American Experiment
Even though it somehow “didn’t rate a mention” in Time magazine’s 100 most important newsmakers of 2009, the fact is that the TEA (Taxed Enough Already and Taken Enough Abuse) Party is the single most important political dynamic in America today. The TEA Party has the ability to make or break America. The most important negative trends leading toward “breaking” the country are these:
1. There is no united TEA Party forwarding important goals and blocking destructive ones. For example some want to make the TEA Party a third party running in opposition to Republicans and Democrats which means that political funding must be pursued and the likelihood is that the TEA Party under those circumstances will divide conservative votes and ensure the continuation of Progressive dominance** of the Democratic Party and of the nation.
2. The incredibly important “Contract FROM America” has been virtually ignored. Rajjpuut firmly believes that next to the Magna Carta, the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution, this is the most important document emphasizing human liberty ever written. Certainly it’s the most important such document in our turbulent times – and it’s being ignored by the TEA Party rather than made into PSA (public service announcements) educating the rest of America exactly what the TEA Party stands for. For example if you visit the link:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/14/tea-party-contract-from-a_n_537515.html
you'll find a pretty good slide show on the "Contract From America" but it's kind of sick when the best information in the most attractive form on the most important single TEA Party activity in its history has to be found on the Huffington Post, no? All TEA Party sites ought to have a TEA Party 13 slide presentation explaining how the contract came about and the 10 items in the contract starting with #1 "Protect the Constitution" fully explained.
3. Some effort by the ultra-right Republicans to “co-opt the TEA Party” for their own ultra-conservative SOCIAL programs emphasizing abortion; creationism; blurring of church and state separation and the paramountcy of Christianity which endangers the ability of all Conservatives (including Independents and Democrats) to agree on the VITAL matters mentioned below . . . .
On the other hand, thus far the TEA Party has demonstrated mostly a potential for greatly benefitting and perhaps saving the nation. The movement has reflected logic, NON-VIOLENCE and the traditional American grit and libertarianism associated with the FOUNDING FATHERS . . . and MUST continue to do so, if it is to continue to work as a constructive and salutatory force in the nation. The most vital truths right now are these for the United States of America, the country has . . . .
A. A Constitutional crisis that truly requires constitutional-conservatives to step up
B. A taxation, deficits, National Debt and government-spending crisis that truly requires fiscal-conservatives to step up
C. A jobs and overall economic crisis that truly requires fiscal-conservatives to step up
D. A philosophical crisis featuring a battle to the death with a socialist/marxist president intent on fundamentally transforming America into another Cuba . . . this battle requires fiscal-conservatives and constitutional conservatives to truly step up and to unite in common cause.
At present roughly 97% of Republican-conservatives ; 68% of conservative Independents and 52% of conservative Democrats agree that we are in crisis mode. That is a dominating force IF allowed to remain united. In the past this conservative force has never been fully united. Why?
In the past, the Right-wing of the Republican Party has insisted upon four things that irritate some Independent conservatives quite a bit and virtually all Democratic conservatives totally:
1. An absolute ban on abortions even where the life of the mother is in question; cases of rape or incest; or even when extremely young girls become pregnant. This is the single largest and most emotional issue. Unless CONSERVATIVES can agree to leave this issue a matter of personal faith (and abortion IS and has been the law of the land for almost 40 years now) they will continue to cancel each other's votes and make elections of Barack Obamas and other serious radicals from the progressive wing of the Democratic Party into a regular event.
2. Refusal to acknowledge complete separation of church and state. For example, saying it's all right and "normal" to teach Christmas carols in PUBLIC schools attended by Jews, Buddhists, Muslims, atheists, etc. (Obviously what's taught in private religious-oriented schools is a totally different matter.) Anyone who can't see that the founding fathers would be aghast at 1. the government being involved in educationa at all and 2. people insisting that something paid for by the government could fly in the face of separation of church and state needs to familiarize themselves with the Founding Fathers; the doctrine of full separation of church ande state; and with the positions of Independent and Democratic Conservatives on this all-important matter and ask themselves how deeply do they want Barack Obama to win in 2012; achieve 20 million new voting illegal aliens and finish off the American Republic?
3. Attempting to institute the teaching of creationism in PUBLIC school science classes in opposition to evolution. Same criticism by the Founding Fathers mentioned in the preceeding paragraph applies. Why is the government involved in funding schoools? Why do some people insist that items of the Christian faith should be pushed down the throats of people of other religions where the government is funding things? . . . and there is the other question, of why people can call everybody else's creation story a "myth" but insist that the Judeo-Christian creation story is 100% literally true even though often many of the same events show up?
4. A stance on individual differences that allows the Democratic Party to label with some accuracy the extreme-right as racist and the entire Republican Party as a regional (for the south) party and not a national party. Within reason, a "live-and-let-live" libertarianism is the only stance that makes sense. Clearly 85% of Americans, while they may accept gay unions are opposed to gay "marriage" and certainly to gays adopting children . . . the conservatives need to forget their differences (eliminate the negatives) and accentuate their positive agreements. 'tis the only hope for America.
Ya’ll live long, strong and ornery,
Rajjpuut
** specifically, David Plouffe’s been brought back to control the national Democratic effort. Reading the leftist blogsites, clearly the Democratic plan is simple and they believe it will do surprisingly well this November:
1. Using their huge e-mail list, aim to “re-energize” and bring back at least 90% of the first time and other voters that elected Barack Obama in 2008.
2. Blame Bush for the nation’s ills.
3. Blame Republicans as the “Party of No” for obstructing the president’s policies which would have otherwise, they’ll say, already have cured the country’s problems.
4. Use what they call the “divisive TEA Party effect” to split the conservative vote and to make the opponents of Democrats run on policies that are well to the right of center which, they believe, will alienate the voters greatly.
Rajjpuut, personally, believes the Dems have badly misjudged the electorate’s emotions and except for the possibility of #3, IF the TEA Party chooses candidates rather than revealing their “Contract from America” via PSAs and serving their natural role as “king-makers” the progressive Dems and progressive Republicans are cruising for a bruising. So, clearly, the TEA Party needs to
1. Publicize its main document repeatedly
2. Avoid the ultra-right Republicans
3. Concentrate on fiscally and constitutionally conservative issues such as those in the “Contract FROM America.”
4. Stay independent, logical, Non-violent and simply honest and patriotic and allow the Progressives enough rope to hang themselves.
5. Also emphasize the Obama economic record, the Obama anti-Americanism and the Obama transformation toward socialism at every opportunity. Help conservative Republicans and conservative Independents and Conservative Democrats get elected by running essentially against Barack Obama.
U-Tube Video Puts the Question
to Gullible American Voters
As you may know, in keeping with his pledge to "fundamentally transform America," Barack Obama has failed to live up to his pledge to keep unemployment figures under 8%. Currently he’s glorying in a recent report that shows that 443,000 new jobs were created last month. Not mentioning that 411,000 of them were temporary government census worker positions. One thing also not mentioned is that despite the nation’s job woes, Obama has seen to the expansion of government employment undercutting the private sector and killing the creation of REAL (productive) jobs. While the private sector has lost over 4.3 million jobs on Obama’s watch the public sector has expanded by over 460,000 jobs.
Note in some studies, when it comes to permanent jobs, the Federal government pays up to $12 MORE per hour for the same job as a private sector employer will and offers “through-the-roof” benefits and the option of retirement at age 52 with accordingly through-the roof lifetime benefits and extreme high retirement pay closely akin to what the union workers in Greece were getting before that country’s collapse. Throw in his Obamacare health "reform" program and his attempts at job-killing cap and trade legislation and anyone with a brain ought to be able to see that on performance alone, he is radically restructuring this country and destroying our children's and grandchildren's future. As if all that were not bad enough:
U-tube pulled the original, must be communists running their site, so go to:
http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/a-video-barack-obama- does-not-want-you-to-see/blog-345923/ will work, but you may need to select it, copy and paste in your address bar
Rajjpuut has watched this ten-minute video four times and while he's NOT deeply impressed with the spirit of the first 30 seconds of it, he's done a lot of research and concurs with roughly 99%** of the facts and about 92% of the spirit of this video. Every American voter ought to see the video check it out with their own research and make up their own minds. If you feel as strongly as Rajjpuut does about the implications of the first two paragraphs of this blog and the clear socialistic pattern shown in the video, he’d be honored if you’d pass it on to your e-mail list. Thank you.
Ya’ll live long, strong and ornery,
Rajjpuut
** The video is overly aggressive at the start and woefully inadequate in a few other places later. For example talking about weaknesses: Rajjpuut does not like at all the many “birther implications” in this video . . . yes there is a “technically” strong argument. However, in the true spirit of things, no matter how evil and screwed up his mother was (she was making these decisions for him during his childhood not him making them for her) he was born to an American woman and in “spirit” is an American citizen.
Some places that Rajjpuut sees the video dropping the ball are these: he would describe the religion of both Obama’s mother and birth-father as either “none” or atheism. Most importantly the video doesn’t reveal enough about Barak (without a ‘c’), Sr.’s communism which was conveniently NOT mentioned in Barack, Jr’s first autobiography “Dreams from My Father.” That can be found here:
http://www.politico.com/static/PPM41_eastafrica.html
Notice the reference therein to “scientific socialism – inter alia communism” on the first page of the article; and later discussion of the benefits of “100% taxation”; takeover and nationalization of foreign businesses in Kenya; need for redistribution of wealth out of Kenyan Asian and Kenyan White hands to benefit Kenyan Blacks and the whole litany of desires of a typical “fellow traveller” (died-in-the-wool communist).
Is anyone else almost frustrated to tears by the actions of our executive and legislative branches? Did it cross Pelosi or Obama's mind that there is a 13 trillion dollar deficit in this country! How do they respond? By passing or (backdooring would be more appropriate) a trillion dollar healthcare spending bill against the will of an overwhelming majority! This is democracy? This is "transparency"? This is criminal! We fought wars to keep other government's from exerting their will upon us and now look! These arrogant baffons Pelosi and Obama are single handedly flipping the bird to the sacrifices made by our veterans and forefathers in their defense of OUR liberty. The American revolution was fought over a 3% tax rate, and now look! Obama is robbing Peter to pay Paul! Only problem is, what happens when Peter runs out of money? Look at Greece!
I was taught to work hard for what ever it is in life that I wanted. Now 1/3 of my hard earned paycheck goes to corporate bailouts, healthcare (which i already had cause I busted my butt to have a decent job in life), paying OTHER PEOPLES MORTGAGES! and other handouts. I get up early and bust my behind daily so Obama can take my cash and give to those sitting on there a**es all day!
To top it all off, this spineless jellyfish can't even stand up and defend our allies because someone might get their feelings hurt. The world is now running amuck due to the floudering weakness and lack of leadership in this country. Let's be nice to Iran and the terrorists trying to kill us! Is he for real? So far Obama's kumbaya approach has done nothing but make terrorists believe we are a softer target, and we have been very lucky that recent plots have not gone down as planned. I do not believe that luck makes for effective national security plan!
Obama has officially replaced Jimmy Carter as a national joke! He speaks out against a law he never even read, He uses his office to host celebrities and championship teams while the world becomes increasingly unsafer, oil ruins the gulf of Mexico and hard working American's are thrown over a barrel to pay for the useless. UGH! I could go on forever but someone in this country has to actually work for his money!
Harvard Study Reveals: Incumbents KILL jobs
FACTS are Facts, Incumbent Spending KILLS jobs***
OH, my GOD! OH, my GOD! OH, my GOD! OH, my GOD! Rajjpuut, who distrusts big government mightily, has seldom enjoyed writing anything as much as this blog . . . . it began with a recent Rasmussen poll that said that only 18% of likely voters believed that additional government spending would help the economy. Were they right, those 18%? Certainly our president acts like he believes they’re right. Where to find the truth, where to turn?
Truth is crucially important to the well-being of a democratic-republic. Unfortunately, the newspaper of today is quickly becoming a dinosaur. Meanwhile, only one among the large broadcast TV news organizations is actually trusted more than doubted (FOX News) according to media polls from the last few years. Six important things that clearly can be and must be said about mainstream “lamestream media” today (whether broadcast or print media) are:
1. They love talking to politicians and celebrities in other fields like sports and entertainment.
2. They seem to believe it’s impossible to learn much about government from everyday citizens.
3. They actually believe that a politician and what he/she has to say is “important news” to the detriment of actually chasing down real news about the pain politicians bring into our daily lives and reading and studing proposed laws.
4. They have virtually no curiosity and believe almost anything a liberal or progressive politician tells them and doubt virtually everything a conservative politician utters. And, thus lacking that all-essential curiosity . . . .
5. Add little of value to the American scene. The so-called “Fourth Estate” has degenerated into public relations helpers for the political class (politicians and those whose jobs or livelihood are enhanced by politicians).
6. They have long ago forgotten what real journalism is about.
Rajjpuut intends to remind them what journalism is all about. Let’s take a look at their “a-curiosity” or “in-curiosity” a bit closer . . . at their tendency to believe what politicians they favor tell them and what Americans themselves believe about incumbents. One of the biggest reasons that term limits for congressmen has been an unpopular item is the perpetual editorial you’ll see about the need to maintain the status quo and support a district’s rep or state’s senator because that incumbent is seen as valuable. The idea that virtually all idiot mainstream media hold dear is that incumbency translates into tangible benefits that can be measured economically and in prestige. A one-word definition of that economic and prestige benefit? PORK!
Of course that old wives’ tale is based upon the most common economic myth of all, that private sector jobs can be efficiently and profitably be created by actions that politicians make. Bah humbug! This myth is the bedrock foundation of that idiotic notion known as “Keynesian Economics.” Keynesians consistently claim to have refuted the commonsense proposition that if 75% of all tax dollars were returned to the taxpayers and politicians had to live within a sound budget on the other 25%, this country would see a resurgence of unbelievable proportions . . . an economic miracle that would within half a decade eliminate our national debt and within four decades wipe out all the non-funded obligations. More on proving that later . . . but lets talk about PORK . . . .
While it might be true that PORK helps some, let’s say 3-4% of the populace, it’s undeniable that PORK and other unwise government spending boondoggles and government interference boondoggles (GSBs and GIBs) depreciates the lives of 96% of all American businesses and individuals. However, that last sentence is totally at odds with the myth we’ve been talking about. This myth about the value to a district of an incumbent representative and therefore the need to continually re-elect him is the single greatest driving force behind the swallowing-whole of the private sector by the government . . . . which occurred slowly since 1933, but which has accelerated under progressive politicians from LBJ to the present . . . to be concise every president except Ronald Reagan.
You remember Ronald Reagan, the fellow in office when the Berlin Wall came down and 21 million new jobs were created? And remember this, Reagan was obstructed by Democratic majorities in the house of representatives (the Contract with America in 1994, was the first time that Republicans held a majority there since 1954) for all eight years. He was forced to compromise with the Democrats and let through a huge shipload (whatever) of unwise spending bills to get his tax cuts approved. And Reagan wasn’t proud of the deficits and debt created on his watch . . . but what else could he do? The decade of the 90’s became the second most productive in history given the impetus of Reagan’s years (the most productive was the Roaring 20’s – more on that in a moment).
Four months ago, three Harvard professors at that university’s School of Business (Lauren Cohen, Joshua Coval and Christopher Malloy) were researching the “Benefits of PORK myth.” By the way, ‘tis a well known fact that in large part, our universities are dominated by left-wing professors and even our business schools presumably are mostly believers in the Keynesian myths that the Nobel Prize people find so enthralling . . . so it’s utterly REFRESHING to find real curiosity among professors about government activities. Anyway, back to the chase: the threesome named above were examing correlations between “politically-connected firms and powerful legislative chairmen” when the rock they tripped over turned out to be the ultimate gold nugget of truth. In a phrase their serendipity kicked up the troublesome fact that GOVERNMENT SPENDING KILLS JOBS or as Mark Hemingway at Beltway Confidential put it . . . WHEN GOVERNMENT SPENDING GROWS, THE PRIVATE SECTOR SHRINKS. And as they got deeper into it, they concluded that SPENDING by INCUMBENT POLITICIANS KILLS JOBS. You can look over their research (finished three months back) here:
http://www.utahwfc.org/2010_papers/power.pdf
Or here:
http://www.people.hbs.edu/cmalloy/pdffiles/envaloy.pdf
Their study examining government earmark and budget data from the past four decades – found this trend to be consistent across all variables. Specifically, it affected both large and small firms in large and small states, and it followed the ascension of committee chairmen in both the House and Senate. The study found also that damage to the private sector was “partially reversed” when the committee chairmen either lost their seats or retired.
Let us be clear here, these three professors did what journalists should have long ago done, they went to study the assumption (in logic known as the “premise”) that as a state’s congressional delegation grew in stature and power in Washington, D.C., local businesses would benefit from the increased federal spending sure to come their way . . . but they discovered that the opposite was true. Indeed, companies experienced lower sales and downsized, cutback, retooled and retrenched by cutting payroll, R&D budgets, and virtually all other expenses. Their study showed that as incumbency acculated following a congressman’s ascendancy to the chairmanship of important committees, the average firm in his state cut back capital expenditures by roughly 15 percent.
Now Rajjpuut can hear the scared liberals and progressives in particular screaming, “But, but, that’s . . . just one study.” That’s true. One study that cries out for term limits for politicians and limited government and utter fiscal responsibility.
Here’s a slightly related study:
http://www.icis.com/blogs/green-chemicals/2009/04/the-price-of-green-jobs-learn.html
This link is about a study in which a government spending boondggle took Spain from a booming economy with 3% unemployment 13-14 years ago, to being only behind Greece among struggling European countries and to 17.8% unemployment last year and almost 21% this year. How? By forcing their country into a green jobs commitment similar to what President Obama is now proposing. Obviously, the Spanish citizens are NOT better off because of government spending and government interference. Notice those words in italics “by forcing.” No matter what country you live in, politicians tend to accumulate power and status as they accumulate “tenure.” As power nears abolute power, corruptness such as the PORK in the Harvard study and the “forcible rape” of Spain grow more and more probable. Power can corrupt. Absolute power virtually always does corrupt . . . .
Ya’ll live long, strong and ornery,
Rajjpuut
*** three brief essays to convince anyone who “buys into” common sense are:
http://www.econlib.org/library/Essays/rdPncl1.html
the most famous essay in economics but one the Keynesians pretend doesn’t exist
http://jim.com/econ/chap02p1.html
is “The Broken Window” parable
http://jim.com/econ/chap01p3.html
is the “one lesson”
is the entire book “Economics in one Lesson” from which the broken window and one lesson come
Obama, Gore, Joel Rogers Killing U.S.
#12
Up to 90% of the European cap and trade is a fraud according to Europol, the European criminal intelligence agency. "The European Union Emission Trading System has been the victim of fraudulent traders in the past 18 months," said the investigative agency in a statement. "This resulted in losses of approximately five billion euros for several national tax revenues." The agency, based in The Hague, added that it estimated "in some countries, up to 90 percent of the whole market volume was caused by fraudulent activities." Europol officials aired these conclusions after a raid six months ago.
http://www.energydaily.com/reports/Tax_fraud_loses_EU_carbon_trading_billions_Europol_999.html
#11
31,000 American scientists have signed a petition denying the legitimacy of global-warming as real science. Over 9,000 of these scientists hold Ph.D.s. Cap and Trade is intended to solve a problem that doesn’t exist.
http://www.petitionproject.org/
#10
Mr. Obama admitted to the San Francisco Chronicle his policies will “bankrupt the coal industry.”
http://www.nowpublic.com/tech-biz/obama-tells-sf-chronicle-he-will-bankrupt-coal-industry
#9
Global warming has been proven to be a hoax. Even the ultra-liberal London Times, long-time champion of man-caused global warming has run scathing stories about the fraudulent science being done by the East Anglia University Climate Research Unit (CRU) upon which global-warming theory was based.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article6936289.ece
#8
It would mean the end of the American Republic. It would mean the end of free-market capitalism. It would mean the end of the best and freest society the world has ever known. The book, Obama’s first autobiography “Dreams from My Father,” Obama’s first autobiography that the media refused to read and investigate tells us what the end product he is seeking will look like. Here are the words of father (Barak, without a ‘c’ Senior) and son . . . notice the reference to the advisibility and benefits of “100% taxes” and the old man’s reverence for “scientific socialism - iter alia - communism.”
http://www.politico.com/static/PPM41_eastafrica.html
#7
Mr. Obama has admitted “the price of electricity will necessarily skyrocket” under his cap and trade policies.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/may/10/try-going-back-to-1875/
#6
Even discounting inflation already underway, Cap and Trade when fully implemented will raise the cost of all American goods and services 67%. CCX (more below) President Richard Sandor admitted that Cap and Trade was a “$10 TRillion industry” (not mentioning its an industry that produces no goods and services but just “taxes” those who do). Slapping a $10 TRillion industry on top of a $15 TRillion economy means that costs will rise and produce a $25 TRillion economy without one single more product or service produced . . . thus prices will rise by 67% on average.
http://justincofield.typepad.com/my-blog/2010/05/digging-into-the-cap-trade-story.html
#5
Phil Jones, director of CRU, at the center of the global-warming hoax, besides saying he “considered killing himself” when news of the hoax came out admitted they had deliberately thrown away data so that no other scientists could “replicate their research” or discover and prove their fraud.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article7017922.ece
#4
Mr. Obama, Al Gore, Joel Rogers, Richard Sandor and about fifteen to twenty more of their progressive/marxist intimates and ten different progressive foundations have set up the Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX) which will make most of them multi-billionaires, billionaires and multi-millionaires at least . . . they have, in short an incredible conflict of interest in pushing this bill.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30767965/ccx
http://www.stopliberallies.com/more-on-the-ccx-carbon-trading-scandal-633.html click on the “CCX scandal” pages 1-4
#3
The leader of this conspiracy, Canadian billionaire (ex-U.N. bigwig and environmental kook) Maurice Strong, exposed the group’s purpose in 1990 when he wrote,
“. . . what if a small group of . . . world leaders were to conclude that the principal risk to the Earth comes from the actions of the rich countries? In order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn't the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn't it our responsibility to bring this about? . . .”
Strong has said he was discussing the plot of a novel he was going to write. Well Michael Chricton (of “Jurassic Park,” “Andromeda Strain” and a dozen other “technology-run-amuck” techno-thrillers set out to write the same novel. Only difference, when Crichton (who is a research junkie) was done studying the matter he had written a novel about a conspiracy to dominate the world based upon fraudulent global warming data, fraudulently manipulated which the Climate-Gate Scandal has shown to actually be the case . . . . His 2005 novel “State of Fear” is actually an expose of the global-warming hoax and several characters resembling Strong, Joel Rogers, Al Gore, Richard Sandor and Barack Obama play major roles in the novel.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_of_Fear
http://www.libertyjuice.com/2010/05/06/crime-inc/
http://mediamatters.org/print/blog/201005130001
#2
Joel Rogers, the mastermind of the nuts and bolts (Creator of the Apollo Alliance and “the New Green Deal”) behind the whole conspiracy and the CCX rip-off has admitted that even if we brought the entire American economy to the level of 1900, the effect on global temperatures would be minimal (0.2 degrees) by 2100 and their stated aim of bringing the world’s carbon emissions back to 1980 level is impossible but that the whole thing is actually a power grab.
http://www.fusionfx.net/index.php/2010/04/30/crime-inc-joel-rogers-the-new-green-deal/
And now the top #1 Reason to Reject Obama’s Cap and Trade bill:
#1
Obama has threatened to create five million green-tech jobs. Spain, which about 13-14 years ago was the #1 booming economy in the European Union with only 3% unemployment did a study of what went wrong with their green-initiative. Today Spain has 21% unemployment and the worst economy in Europe except for Greece; many companies have left Spain.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M9Cr4q4CiCs video is a year old, made when Spanish unemployment stood at 17.8%
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/jun/4/green-new-deal-is-a-raw-deal-for-the-us/
Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,
Rajjpuut
QUESTION 1: Why was the former Director of MMS (Mineral's Management Service - Elizabeth Birnbaum) fired the morning she was totestify before Congress?
QUESTION 2: Why did MMS give BP an inspection exemption 10 days before the spill?
QUESTION 3: How much $$ did BP give to the Obama Campaign?
America's Future Could Be VERY BLEAK
#11
31,000 American scientists have signed a petition denying the legitimacy of global-warming as real science. Over 9,000 of these scientists hold Ph.D.s. Cap and Trade is intended to solve a problem that doesn’t exist.
http://www.petitionproject.org/
#10
Mr. Obama admitted to the San Francisco Chronicle his policies will “bankrupt the coal industry.”
http://www.nowpublic.com/tech-biz/obama-tells-sf-chronicle-he-will-bankrupt-coal-industry
#9
Global warming has been proven to be a hoax. Even the ultra-liberal London Times, long-time champion of man-caused global warming has run scathing stories about the fraudulent science being done by the East Anglia University Climate Research Unit (CRU) upon which global-warming theory was based.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article6936289.ece
#8
It would mean the end of the American Republic. It would mean the end of free-market capitalism. It would mean the end of the best and freest society the world has ever known. The book, Obama’s first autobiography “Dreams from My Father,” Obama’s first autobiography that the media refused to read and investigate tells us what the end product he is seeking will look like. Here are the words of father (Barak, without a ‘c’ Senior) and son . . . notice the reference to the advisibility and benefits of “100% taxes” and the old man’s reverence for “scientific socialism - iter alia - communism.”
http://www.politico.com/static/PPM41_eastafrica.html
#7
Mr. Obama has admitted “the price of electricity will necessarily skyrocket” under his cap and trade policies.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/may/10/try-going-back-to-1875/
#6
Even discounting inflation already underway, Cap and Trade when fully implemented will raise the cost of all American goods and services 67%. CCX (more below) President Richard Sandor admitted that Cap and Trade was a “$10 TRillion industry” (not mentioning its an industry that produces no goods and services but just “taxes” those who do). Slapping a $10 TRillion industry on top of a $15 TRillion economy means that costs will rise and produce a $25 TRillion economy without one single more product or service produced . . . thus prices will rise by 67% on average.
http://justincofield.typepad.com/my-blog/2010/05/digging-into-the-cap-trade-story.html
#5
Phil Jones, director of CRU, at the center of the global-warming hoax, besides saying he “considered killing himself” when news of the hoax came out admitted they had deliberately thrown away data so that no other scientists could “replicate their research” or discover and prove their fraud.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article7017922.ece
#4
Mr. Obama, Al Gore, Joel Rogers, Richard Sandor and about fifteen to twenty more of their progressive/marxist intimates and ten different progressive foundations have set up the Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX) which will make most of them multi-billionaires, billionaires and multi-millionaires at least . . . they have, in short an incredible conflict of interest in pushing this bill.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30767965/ccx
http://www.stopliberallies.com/more-on-the-ccx-carbon-trading-scandal-633.html click on the “CCX scandal” pages 1-4
#3
The leader of this conspiracy, Canadian billionaire (ex-U.N. bigwig and environmental kook) Maurice Strong, exposed the group’s purpose in 1990 when he wrote,
“. . . what if a small group of . . . world leaders were to conclude that the principal risk to the Earth comes from the actions of the rich countries? In order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn't the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn't it our responsibility to bring this about? . . .”
Strong has said he was discussing the plot of a novel he was going to write. Well Michael Chricton (of “Jurassic Park,” “Andromeda Strain” and a dozen other “technology-run-amuck” techno-thrillers set out to write the same novel. Only difference, when Crichton (who is a research junkie) was done studying the matter he had written a novel about a conspiracy to dominate the world based upon fraudulent global warming data, fraudulently manipulated which the Climate-Gate Scandal has shown to actually be the case . . . . His 2005 novel “State of Fear” is actually an expose of the global-warming hoax and several characters resembling Strong, Joel Rogers, Al Gore, Richard Sandor and Barack Obama play major roles in the novel.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_of_Fear
http://mediamatters.org/print/blog/201005130001
#2
Joel Rogers, the mastermind of the nuts and bolts (Creator of the Apollo Alliance and “the New Green Deal”) behind the whole conspiracy and the CCX rip-off has admitted that even if we brought the entire American economy to the level of 1900, the effect on global temperatures would be minimal (0.2 degrees) by 2100 and their stated aim of bringing the world’s carbon emissions back to 1980 level is impossible but that the whole thing is actually a power grab.
http://mediamatters.org/print/blog/201005130001 the whole video is 56 minutes long, Rogers starts talking about minute 31:30 so slide the control to that point and listen to the “great man” talk . . . .
And now the top #1 Reason to Reject Obama’s Cap and Trade bill:
#1
Obama has threatened to create five million green-tech jobs. Spain, which about 13-14 years ago was the #1 booming economy in the European Union with only 3% unemployment did a study of what went wrong with their green-initiative. Today Spain has 21% unemployment and the worst economy in Europe except for Greece; many companies have left Spain.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M9Cr4q4CiCs video is a year old when
Spanish unemployment stood at 17.8%
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/jun/4/green-new-deal-is-a-raw-deal-for-the-us/
Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,
Rajjpuut
NEW YORK STATE MAY GO BANKRUPT, NEXT WEEK.
if both partys can not work together -
Budget two months late, now !
Author: Brian D. Hill
Source: USWGO Alternative News
Days ago I wasn't working on keeping news updated because I was busy dealing with pending threats against my web site by my web host. Thatis why I have been having problems, and I'm not constantly being liedto by customer support, they keep punishing me quietly every time Icomplain to them that I can't get my backup files because of a problemon their end, and now they lied to me after sending me this letter.
In case our web host is monitoring us to look for excuses to bring down our website we bleeped out the name of our web host attacking us.
Dear Brian Hill,
We have been monitoring your account's resource usage on the server for the past several days and would like to notify you of the followingmetrics. Although no action has been taken at this time, your usage isof concern to the server's integrity and reliability.
The current type of usage of your account falls against our Terms of Service and Acceptable Usage Policy. You can not use the space providedto you under our hosting accounts for storage/backup purposes. We haveidentified that the directories listed below contain data that israrely accessed and fall within our storage/backup policy limitation.
At this moment, your site is comprised of 50376 megabytes with the following folders holding the data referred to above:
50376 - ./uswgo
We need your cooperation in finding a remedy. Depending on your specific case, we generally recommend one or more of the followingsolutions:
- Remove files from directories mentioned above
- If you have many sites hosted on one account: Split the sites throughout more accounts
- Upgrade your account to our DedicatedClass
If you do need assistance in identifying the files or removing them, please don't hesitate to respond to this email.
Please note that we employ some of the best servers in the shared web hosting industry and this notification should be treated asidentification that your site(s), as they are right now, are employingresources in a way that cannot reside on a regular shared web hostingserver. For your convenience, we strongly suggest that when lookingaway from ****** for web hosting that you look for solutions that are aclear upgrade to a regular shared web hosting environment if you do notplan on taking corrective measures.
Important: Please respond to this email with a course of action or a remedy within the next 24 hours or we may be forced to suspend your account.
Thank you for your attention and understanding,
****** Server Operations
so@******.com
The reason I am writing this despite the risk of having my site shut down by my host I am exposing this so they give me a apology for mytreatment by technical support.
I know it's a lie about my resource usage and the only reason I had many backup files stored on there was because they capped my speeds soI gained proof and after I told their support staff that I have proofthey lied about the speed caps they penalized me some more by notallowing me to backup my website anymore and they are ready to pull thetrigger against my website.
I am now gathering as much evidence on their misconduct as I can so if they hold my website hostage I can sue them for damages against myhard work and my website. Even if I win the possible lawsuit in thefuture it may mean the end for USWGO.
We remain under forms of law without substance—constructions: legal frauds. Hitler was legal. Moreover, knowing our selfish ways, we remain on a guilt trip, afraid, under supernatural gods, all of whom are manmade. We remain in Einstein’s E=MC2 physical world, an impossibility. We’ve yet to comprehend the “Higher Law.”
The month and year of my birth, September 1925, a new world order was born—new ordered liberty, it has been revealed to me. The new order will assure liberty and justice for all. Why my assurance and not others? Challenging Einstein’s theories, physicist Werner Heisenberg, in September 1925, the birth of a new age, published his uncertainty principle, the forerunner of quantum mechanics. Heisenberg was Hitler’s atom bomb builder. The atom bomb ushered in the atomic age, along with increasing purpose, “which runs through and links together the ages, from the beginning of the life of man to the end in eternity,” says Rev. C. I. Scofield, editor of the Scofield Reference Bible. St. Augustine said, “Distinguish the ages and the Scriptures harmonize.” Anything can be proved by the Bible if one takes isolated passages. Take the whole divine revelation into account, says Scofield, and the Scriptures bring to mind the “Higher Law” and unity.
I read The “Higher Law” Background of American Constitutional Law (by the way, published in the year of my birth, 1925), authored by Law Professor Edward S. Corwin. I had a bigger than life calling. I felt that voices of the past were speaking to me, directing my future. The path of my destiny began in 1925. By 1975, my life was over. At the time, it was either do or die. Both my second marriage and business enterprise were on the rocks. I departed from my old life, starting with a two year sea adventure, during which time miracles occurred. While at sea, I was reborn the person I was meant to be. I departed my life at sea captain of my ship.
Without legal help, I took my tax case to the U.S. Supreme Court. While the federal judiciary ignored my constitutional claims—the federal government is too big to fail—the press was interested. The IRS, once exposed for the fraud it is, admitted that it had “mistakenly” taxed me for eleven years. Uncle Sam never deliberately wrongs a citizen. It is always a mistake. Nevertheless, quite deliberately, Uncle Sam cheated this pauper out of his sweat. Next it will be concentration camps.
World War II didn’t end Nazi justice. U.S. courts allow the Gestapo IRS to make limitless mistakes. There are precepts of law that have perpetual necessity, among all nations, and which cannot be broken without dire consequences. You are witnessing the dire consequences of having allowed “Higher Law” to be ignored. Runaway government and communist revolutionaries are taking over your lives.
It is all written in the stars. We’re at the confluence to two great rivers of thought—Piscean thought and Aquarian thought. The Age of Pisces is fading into the past; we are entering the Age of Aquarius. The sign of Pisces, two attached fish swimming in opposite directions, reminds us of the Jewish Promised Land, and thousands of years of holy war. Sure thing guys! God will protect you. Remember the Holocaust? Get real! The sign of Aquarius is the water-bearer to humanity, water, the life force and spiritual energy. Currently, the clinging past is taking off its mask. Word is out that by summer blood will be flowing on American streets. America’s fate is unclear. I wouldn’t depend of America. America, according to President Barrack Hussein Obama, the product of a Jew-bashing church, is to be fundamentally transformed into what? Anyone not liking the Obama transformation will be sent to reeducation camps, and eliminated if they absolutely refuse to like it. We’ve seen this kind of thinking over and over again. It’s the only way to get full control of the people. As Mao said, we can spare a few million.
In Cosmos and Psyche, distinguished philosopher and cultural historian Richard Tarnas demonstrates the existence of an astonishingly consistent correspondence between planetary alignments and the archetypal patterns of human history. We read that in November 2008 (the month and year that Obama was elected), Saturn, the learning planet and Pluto, the generation planet, went into unfavorable alignment, and will remain so for four years. It marks the end of an era, writes Tarnas. It’s cyclic, “a cycle of crises and contraction.” It always means “the destruction of an earlier mode of life that in retrospect may seem to have been marked by widespread indulgence, decadence, naiveté, denial, and inflation.” What do we know? Zilch! Man doesn’t decide what goes on the universe. Look to man and become a slave.
Shortly after my departure from my old life, an astrologer created my astrological birth chart. I’m Virgo with Aquarius rising. Astrologer Jeanne Avery, in The Rising Sign, under “Aquarius Rising,” wrote, “He becomes the water-bearer by walking to the beat of a different drummer. He may be the person to bring back information that has been lost to civilization for centuries. The person with Aquarius on the rise can be very avant-garde. He is a forerunner in setting style, discovering new methods, and showing the rest of humanity the way.”
My chart shows that my Saturn was trine Pluto when I was born. That’s the very best of alignments. Astrologer’s Handbook: “This trine gives the natives the ability to understand the laws by which subtle forces are organized. . . It favors those who work in such fields as physics, the occult, magic, astrology, or systems of meditation. . . They are able to work slowly and make fundamental and irrevocable changes in their own and others’ lives.”
The ancient sages of India said, so is the microcosm, so is the macrocosm. If you want to know how something works you take it apart. That’s what quantum physicists do. They study the microcosmic and come up with answers that do not fit at all with what we’ve been taught. For decades neuroscientists, psychologists, and an array of brain researchers have been struggling in vain to explain consciousness. Quantum physicist and brain researcher Dr. Evan Harris Walker maintains that consciousness is in the mix of things; that there are immutable laws that govern the movements of the universe, “but these laws leave open a range of happenings that are left to the selection of the mind.”
Walker: “It has only been with the advent of quantum theory that we have discovered proof that we exist as something more than pieces of matter. In the development of quantum theory, the observer emerges as a co-equal in the foundry of creation. . . The tests of Bell’s theorem have shown us that objective reality as it has been conceived is not the true fabric of reality.”
No such thing as objective reality, we are all subjective? What we observe becomes our reality? Whoever heard of such a thing! This is totally contrary to what the establishment teaches. Walker: “The observer interacts with matter. Consciousness, the substance of this newfound reality that defines the observer, has fundamental existence. It is the quantum mind that is the basic reality.”
Drives are innate. All sentient life has drives. Man’s power and control is mindless drive. Aquarius is the sign of all encompassing brotherhood and fraternity—one world under one god we can all believe in, without coercive devices, without central control: each with his own destiny, each with his own inner power.
I read The “Higher Law” Background of American Constitutional Law. Sequentially, first I felt that voices of the past were speaking to me; then I had a bigger than life calling; I departed my old life, was reborn, and now life is as good as it gets. That the quantum mind is the basic reality clearly says we need to go back to constitutional government. Here’s the clincher: The United States of America was born under the sign of Aquarius.
Welcome to the Age of Aquarius.
