ACTION

Extra Extra Read ALL About It! "The Captain's AMERICA" Online Newspaper. ALL Conservative, ALL The Time, 24/7, 365 Days A Year...
 

Hay DNC it is not the republican who calling for impeachment it is the American people  so get your story right because we will let all know the true by keep calling for his impeachment

Matt Bruce, Host of The Captain's AMERICA Radio Show, will be in Englewood, FL on Tuesday January 14th with his "FIRE & BRIMSTONE Tea Party Tour." The event starts @ 6:30 PM ET and will be held at the Suncoast Worship Church, 881 South River Rd in Englewood. Hear what group is actually benefiting the most from Obamacare, what really happened in Benghazi, how our Country's being taken apart 'piece by piece' by the Progressive Left and why 2014 is the time to band together to STOP what's been affecting ALL of us here in America. The purpose of our lecture series is to inform and inspire all attending plus accurately inform them about things they are not being told the truth about. Everyone is welcome to attend, admission is FREE and we'd LOVE to see you there! We especially want to invite all of our Radio listeners who hear us opining on Salem Radio AM 930 WLSS Sarasota. For all those who live in Manatee, Sarasota, Desoto, Hardee & Charlotte Counties join us for an interesting & stimulating discussion as we talk about how to take our Country back in 2014 at the voting booth. Hope to see YOU there! Meanwhile, you can check us out by going to: http://thecaptainsamerica.talkspot.com ...

Congratulations America, we did it! Thanks to your passionate push back, A&E networks rescinded its suspension of Duck Dynasty patriarch Phil Robertson. One thing to take away from the Duck Dynasty controversy is that no one knows enough or can predict the future well enough to be a pessimist.

Conservative intellectuals (smart people) read negative political tea leaves which lead them to conclude that all is lost; Obama and his army of liberal socialist/progressives have all the power. They do everything right to further their agenda while we bumbling conservatives do everything wrong.

I simply can not subscribe to negative predictions of the future. No one knows what tomorrow may bring. Secondly, 60 something years of living has taught me to trust God.

For example, who could have predicted that a scruffy bearded duck hunter would inspire mega-millions of Americans to push back and win a major battle in the war against the tyranny of political correctness? Phil's victory over political correctness zealots reminds me of the scripture that says, “God uses the foolish things of this world to confound the wise.” (1Cor. 1:27) Unquestionably, the arrogant elitist aggressors on the left were blown away by America rallying around Phil.

Another unforeseen gift hidden in the left's feverish overplayed attack on Phil is that it has opened the eyes of millions of Americans to the truth that the left truly have launched a war on religious faith and traditional family values.

Thanks to Phil holding firm to his beliefs, Americans are organizing to push back against the left's assaults on not just religious freedom, but liberty in general. Once passive Americans are joining the fight; signing petitions and more.

In the midst of the left (NAACP, GLAD and NOW) rising up with pitch-forks demanding the head of Phil Robertson for quoting the Bible, I noticed that Kathy Griffin, queen of poking her finger in the eye of Christians will again co-host CNN's New Years Eve coverage. Ms Griffin told Jesus to “S*** it” in her Emmy award acceptance speech.

Unlike the left's hysterical demands that Phil Robertson be fired, I am not suggesting that CNN not employ the services of Ms Griffin. I am merely shining the light of truth, exposing the left's blatant selective outrage and hypocrisy.

Ask yourself folks, would Ms Griffin be ringing in the new year on CNN had her disrespectful comments been directed at Mohammed? I shutter just thinking of the consequences.

So why has the left deemed it OK to dis my Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ? I ask, WDJD (what did Jesus do) to inspire such hate and disrespect from the left?

Not to stray too far off topic, I just want to express my gratitude and excitement over the much needed shot in the arm that Phil's victory has given the Tea Party movement.

And one last thing. Well meaning folks on our side have been criticizing Phil; his interpretation of scripture and so on. While such observations may or may not be true, there are a plethora of vicious left-wing pundits ripping Phil to threads with exaggerations, distortions and lies.

Displaying manhood and backbone that has become rare in America, Phil courageously took a stand against political correctness for us; our principles and values. Therefore, I will not dare criticize him. I choose to view my Phil Robertson glass half full.

Thanks again brother Phil. You are appreciated and respected more than you will ever know.

Lloyd Marcus, Proud Unhyphenated American
Chairman: Conservative Campaign Committee
LloydMarcus.com

It’s rather difficult to realize that the Old Democratic Party believed in the Jeffersonian Democracy – they believed in our Constitution, very limited executive authority, state’s rights and civil liberties. 

They realized that our economy would flourish with limited business and commerce regulations – they believed in very limited control of businesses and commerce.  Those were the good old days when some staunch Patriots weren’t afraid to stand up and fight the devil toe to toe. 

As time went on and our Nation suffered through the Great Depression and Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal, the Democrats did an absolute about face favoring big government taking control of businesses and a nanny state.  They became lax on the Constitution sort of taking on an attitude, “We’ll do as we please, thank you.”

Then we had the GOP (Grand Old Party) who believed in fiscal responsibility, also free enterprise and they did not like the welfare state idea at all.  They truly were a grand old party pretty much dominating the Democrats for 70 years plus until, like the Democrats they lost their way.  No longer were they public servants – they became political leeches.

The Grand Old Party eventually eroded leaving a bunch of misfits who concentrated on keeping their cushy positions in the White House while America was attacked from all sides by the Socialist, Communists and Liberals.

 GOP joined the politically correct crowd and turned their once strong party into a grasshopper elite club jumping from one side to the other without protecting our Nation and Americans – they are the " has beens" who talked a good talk, but didn’t walk the walk. 

Tis true that the Jefferson crowd and the Grand Old Party were made up of a few good men who believed in our Constitution, limited Executive control and limited regulations on businesses and commerce, but both parties self -destructed and  now America we have a big mess on our hands. 

History is repeating itself and in 2014 we have a few good men and some awesome women who believe in limited Government, secured borders, a budget, our Military, limited control of businesses and commerce along with our freedoms and rights as handed down to us by our forefathers in a roadmap called a Constitution.

The sad part of this story is this – these Patriots are being beaten up unmercifully by Democrats, the Old Republican establishment and the Liberal News media.  These brave men and women realize that our Nation is tottering on a weak foundation – they know that the Obama Administration with the able assistance of the Democrats, Old Republican establishment and Liberal News media have kept Americans divided and distracted for five years.

As I’ve said many times,  the war is on our turf, we must stand up and fight for our Nation and our children.  Let’s not leave a fallen Nation for our children, but a legacy that they can wrap their arms around and embrace with pride. 

Support these few brave men and women in their fight to “take back our country America.”  It’s time to restore our freedom, our families and put our Nation back as “One Nation under God with Liberty and Justice for All.” 

Americans it’s up to us to support these Patriots, take back our Government and run our Country.  We’ve been AWOL for too many years and now it’s time to fight for the greatest Nation in the World – let’s be the Nation on the hill that all eyes are upon… 

As Always,

Little Tboca

First, you survived being born to mothers who smoked and/or drank while they carried us. They took aspirin, ate blue cheese dressing, tuna from a tin, and didn't get tested for diabetes. Then after that trauma, your baby cots were covered with bright colored lead-based paints. You had no childproof lids on medicine bottles, doors or cabinets and when you rode your bikes, you had no helmets, not to mention, the risks you took hitchhiking..

As children, you would ride in cars with no seat belts or air bags. Riding in the back of a van - loose - was always great fun. You drank water from the garden hosepipe and NOT from a bottle. You shared one soft drink with four friends, from one bottle and NO ONE actually died from this. You ate cakes, white bread and real butter and drank pop with sugar in it, but you weren't overweight because...... YOU WERE ALWAYS OUTSIDE PLAYING!! You would leave home in the morning and play all day, as long as we were back when the streetlights came on. No one was able to reach you all day. And you were OK. You would spend hours building your go-carts out of scraps and then ride down the hill, only to find out you forgot the brakes. After running into the bushes a few times, you learned to solve the problem.

You did not have Playstations, Nintendo's, X-boxes, no video games at all, no 99 channels on cable, no video tape movies, no surround sound, no mobile phones, no text messaging, no personal computers, no Internet or Internet chat rooms..........YOU HAD FRIENDS and you went outside and found them! You fell out of trees, got cut, broke bones and teeth and there were no lawsuits from these accidents you played with worms(well most boys did) and mud pies made from dirt, and the worms did not live in us forever.

You made up games with sticks and tennis balls and although you were told it would happen, you did not poke out any eyes. You rode bikes or walked to a friend's house and knocked on the door or rang the bell, or just yelled for them! Local teams had tryouts and not everyone made the team.

Those who didn't had to learn to deal with disappointment. Imagine that!! The idea of a parent bailing you out if you broke the law was unheard of. They actually sided with the law! This generation has produced some of the best risk-takers, problem solvers and inventors ever! The past 50 years have been an explosion of innovation and new ideas. You had freedom, failure, success and responsibility, and you learned HOW TO DEAL WITH IT ALL! And YOU are one of them!

CONGRATULATIONS! You might want to share this with others who have had the luck to grow up as kids, before the lawyers and the government regulated our lives for our own good. And while you are at it, forward it to your kids so they will know how brave their parents were.

                        Why is it that the Democrat Party, Republican Party, the media, homosexual groups like GLAAD, pro-abortion groups, and all other liberals who spout vile things about the TEA Party and Christians never have one word of criticism about Islam?????   A Christian can’t decline to bake a cake without national outrage but homosexuals being hanged for “aberrant sexual behavior” in Moslem nations bring no response.   If I called a homosexual any “defamatory name or term” such as “teabagger” I would immediately be inundated with the harshest of criticism but Moslems glue a man’s private parts closed and fill him with food and water until he is about to explode then hangs this same person and not a word is heard from the left wing homosexual crowd.

Read More:

http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2013/12/when-will-glaad-criticize-islam-like-they-do-phil-robertson-2/

                        I watched the movie “Rendition” a few nights ago and began thinking about the situation in our nation today.  The movie is about an Egyptian man who has lived in the United States for 20 years, moving here when he was 14. He is a college educated chemical engineer, married, with a young son and a pregnant wife.  He has some relatives who have the same last name as a known terrorist so he is kidnapped by the CIA upon his return to the United States from South Africa.  When questioned by the CIA counter terrorism branch he denies any knowledge of terrorists, past terrorist attacks, or plans for future attacks.  As a result of his denial he is put on a plane and taken to a country in the Middle East (which I surmised to be Egypt) and is given to the nation’s secret police for questioning.  He is subjected to beatings, water boarding, and electric shock torture.  He finally gives up names of “co-conspirators” and is thrown back into a very small cell.

Read More:

http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2013/12/rendition-fact-or-fiction-totalitarian-government-is-here/

Duck Dynasty  Phil Robertson back in on - Photo Credit - M Christian Post

With hundreds of thousands of supportive petition signatures, emails, social media site complaints and millions of viewers supporting Phil Robertson, A&E seemingly caved in to the 1st Amendment and biblical values by ending the Duck Commander’s suspension, according to Fox News.

The A&E Network was raking in hundreds of millions of dollars and Wal-Mart which had been distributing Duck Dynasty products was making over $200 million from the show. So it seemed only a matter of time before the large green economic line gave into the hard biblical and constitutional line that had been drawn in the Louisiana red dirt by Phil Robertson.

The A&E Network released a statement affirming that it “would resume filming “Duck Dynasty” with Phil Robertson and the rest of his family next spring,” according to Fox News.

Robertson had been suspended from his number one rated cable show which drew in 12 million plus viewers. The network suspended Robertson due to alleged “anti-gay and racists” comments that were taken from his GQ magazine interview. The Rainbow PUSH Coalition organization as well as the LGBT organization GLAAD were offended and demanded Phil Robertson be relieved of his Duck Whistle and more.

Click to read more )

I joined Tea Party and low and behold the IRS sent me a bill for $1400, undeclared income from my 2011 return. I could have used that extra income if I had gottrn it. Anyone else having this problem?

http://guardianlv.com/2013/12/walmart-installs-obamacare-rfid-chip-scanning-health-machines/

( Apocalypse)
The end begins, the time has come, no peace within the nations.
Dictators rule, freedoms gone, no hope for generations.

 The man revealed, his number sealed, within the head and hand.
For all must take a chip implant, or face a final stand.

Tears that flow are cried in vain, and death is all around.
The bodies that were piled up, are laying on the ground.

 Hunger pushing all who live, a planet in starvation.
The plan to gain, more control, deplete the population.

 Wars that reign, and famines spread disease to plague the people.
Though they try, they can't escape an earth that's filled with evil.

 The horses rode, the viles poured, the seals have now been broken.
The truth revealed from blood that spilled just as The Word had spoken.

now all the kings are gathered there in the valley of Jezreel
from every land and nation ,and the one that came from hell

to fight a final battle with the King that rains on high
and all the saints are with him that had joined him in the sky

with eyes of fire he speaks the word and consumes their very soul
that purifies the earth so it to can be whole

a thousand years of peace begins and all things are made new
because the one that loves us most is faithful and is true .

Copyright © 2012 John Wright

 Jesse Jackson showed up out of the blue this week to add his two cents on the Duck Dynasty controversy. It is over now, for the most part, as A&E unsuspended Phil Robertson and Duck Dynasty will continue on the air with a new season. Reverend Jackson, his Rainbow PUSH Coalition and GLAAD were demanding to meet with network execs, along with Cracker Barrel's CEO, to discuss the future of all "Duck Dynasty" memorabilia or content. Cracker Barrel had pulled Duck Dynasty merchandise, but then put it back rather quickly as their customer complaints and Duck Dynasty supporters were overwhelming. Jackson said "These statements uttered by Robertson are more offensive than the bus driver in Montgomery, Alabama, more than 59 years ago.....At least the bus driver, who ordered Rosa Parks to surrender her seat to a white person, was following state law. Robertson's statements were uttered freely and openly without cover of the law, within a context of what he seemed to believe was 'white privilege.'" Ummmm, actually, Robertson's comments were and are protected by a little thing we like to call the US Constitution and, in particular, the First Amendment, which protects both speech AND religion. Now this is just my theory, but I suspect the reason GLAAD would  join forces with Jackson and his Rainbow PUSH Coalition is so GLAAD could learn the ways Jackson used to extort businesses for many many years. Jackson would go to a business where a "racial" issue had occurred, and would come away from each meeting, saying that the company was truly repentant and should be forgiven. Of course, the business always seemed to conveniently "donate" a large sum of money to Jackson's Rainbow Coalition. Jackson had to fund his organization somehow. So fanning the flames of racism always kept money flowing into his organization. A tactic which people like Al Sharpton still try to use as they continue to fan the flames of racism. Where we see flames, they see money.  GLAAD, who had immediately attempted to use this situation as an opportunity to  raise funds  by sending out fund raising letters, probably hoped to pocket a little bit of extortion money from A&E, Cracker Barrel, or any other Duck Dynasty sponsor that they could. The good news is that the issues was resolved and  A&E, Cracker Barrel or any of the sponsors met with Jackson or GLAAD. For that, I am glad.

THIS IS LONG BUT VITAL FOR AMERICANS TO KNOW ESPICALLY PATROIT ATTORNYS! From the Free Republic.

Elevengun
I AM PATROIT

One Stone, Two Powers: How Chief Justice Roberts Saved America

"So David triumphed over the Philistine with a sling and a stone; without a sword in his hand, he struck down the Philistine and killed him." - 1 Samuel 17:50

-----------------------------------------

Many people are very angry at Chief Justice John Roberts for his ruling that Obamacare is Constitutional as a tax. They are outraged at what they see as his validation of the complete usurpation of Constitutional protections, and terrified that America has been effectively destroyed. Some of them are even talking "revolution," and asking each other in person, and in print, "what are you prepared to do"?

Well this analysis of the Roberts ruling asks the same thing, but in a different context. What are you prepared to do? Are you, for example, prepared to read? Are you prepared to learn? Are you prepared to entertain the concept that you might be wrong about Roberts - about what he actually ruled, about what he actually meant, about what he actually did, and why the rest of the Court would not stand with him?

Because if you aren't, then don't bother reading any further. Beware: this analysis pops bubbles - hard. Here's a taste of what I mean:

You know all the yowling and screaming about how Roberts changed a penalty into a tax? In his ruling, Roberts quoted Obamacare itself, at Title 26, § 5000A (g) (1), which reads:

The penalty provided by this section ... shall be assessed and collected in the same manner as an assessable penalty under subchapter B of chapter 68.

Then Roberts did this amazing, totally judicial thing that no one else can possibly do except someone with his vast power at their fingertips - he actually looked up the law that Obamacare quoted. And when he did, he found that subchapter B of chapter 68, specifically at § 6671 (a), says:

The penalties and liabilities provided by this subchapter shall be ... assessed and collected in the same manner as taxes. ...any reference in this title to "tax" imposed by this title shall be deemed also to refer to the penalties and liabilities provided by this subchapter.

Then, after reading these actual laws cited by Obamacare itself, Roberts made this blockbuster observation: "The requirement to pay is found in the Internal Revenue Code and enforced by the IRS, which-as we previously explained-must assess and collect it "in the same manner as taxes."

Let's see, Roberts said the penalty must be assessed and collected "in the same manner as taxes" after reading that Obamacare itself invokes § 6671 (a) - which literally and specifically states the penalty must be assessed and collected "in the same manner as taxes."

Wow, that's a radical ruling.

And what exactly is § 6671 (a)? It a part of the Internal Revenue Code that was there before Obamacare was even created! All Obamacare did was point to it, and say "use that."

So why weren't Americans enraged about how § 6671 (a) equates the treatment of penalties as taxes before Obamacare?

People can disagree with him if they want, but how the hell can anyone say Roberts is "legislating from the bench" when he simply repeats back pre-existing tax law that Obamacare references for itself? Of course, the answer to that question is simple - no one actually looked up the laws before they decided that their country had been "destroyed." Yet they're ready to fight a "revolution" over it!

A revolution for what - to make new laws that they still won't read?

If you want to get angry, get angry about how the other eight Justices didn't point out this simple fact about penalties already being treated as taxes. After all, that's what judges are supposed to do - right? Point out what the law is, rather than what anyone wants it to be? Right? And isn't that exactly what the Chief Justice did here?

Maybe that's why he's Chief Justice - he gets to read the actual laws. Maybe all the other Justices have to listen to the media to find out how they should rule.

So you're warned: this analysis is not for the squeamish. But if you really want to learn what Roberts did, and why he did it, and what the Obamacare tax laws actually mean (as opposed to what you thought they meant), read on.

And you can start by understanding this:

• Chief Justice Roberts limited the Constitutionality of Obamacare to ONLY those statutorily-defined "persons" upon whom the income tax is imposed.

• 95% of the American population are NOT those statutorily-defined "persons."

• Therefore, Obamacare does NOT apply to 95% of the American population.

Don't believe me? Then like I said, read on.

-----------------------------------------

Point #1: Imposed Means Enforced - Part 1

Taxes, whether "voluntary" or not, are subject to enforcement. If a tax can't be enforced, it's not a tax.

That's why the income tax law, Title 26, Chapter 1, Section 1, starts out with: "There is hereby imposed on the taxable income of every individual..."

And the Obamacare law, Title 26, § 5000A, (b) (1) starts out with: "...there is hereby imposed on the taxpayer who is an applicable individual a penalty..."

Notice the mutual use of the word "imposed"? It means enforced by the government.

Point #2: Obamacare is Part of the Income Tax Laws

Obamacare, at Title 26, § 5000A, (b) (2) states: "Any penalty imposed by this section ... shall be included with a taxpayer's return under chapter 1..."

Chapter 1 of Title 26 (the Internal Revenue Code) is where the income tax is imposed. Title 26 is also where Obamacare is found. So when Obamacare penalties (which enable it to be imposed and therefore enforced) are specified within Obamacare itself to be part of the income tax return, they are also thereby making those penalties subject to the income tax enforcement laws of Title 26.

Point #3: Obamacare is Written to Deceive

In his ruling, Roberts observed that Obamacare specified that it's penalty "shall be assessed and collected in the same manner as an assessable penalty under subchapter B of chapter 68," which in turn specifies that those penalties "shall be assessed and collected in the same manner as taxes." Then he notes that the authority for those acts are found in "§6201 (assessment authority); §6301 (collection authority)," which are the same authorities used for assessing and collecting income taxes.

Then Roberts says something very curious. He says: "That interpretation is consistent with the remainder of §5000A(g), which instructs the Secretary on the tools he may use to collect the penalty. See §5000A(g)(2)(A) (barring criminal prosecutions); §5000A(g)(2)(B) (prohibiting the Secretary from using notices of lien and levies)."

Look what stands out - what Roberts is saying are "tools that may be used to collect the penalty" are actually, if you look at his parenthetical descriptions, denials of the tools necessary to collect the penalty. The first refers to "barring criminal prosecutions," and the second refers to "prohibiting the Secretary from using notices of lien and levies."

So how are they "tools that may be used to collect the penalty"? And besides, just how is the Obamacare tax penalty going to be collected, if both criminal prosecutions and liens and levies cannot be used to go get it?

Roberts is drawing our attention to these statutes. Let's look at them.

Title 26, § 5000A (g) (2) says:

Notwithstanding any other provision of law-

(A) In the case of any failure by a taxpayer to timely pay any penalty imposed by this section, such taxpayer shall not be subject to any criminal prosecution or penalty with respect to such failure.

(B) The Secretary shall not (i) file notice of lien with respect to any property of a taxpayer by reason of any failure to pay the penalty imposed by this section, or (ii) levy on any such property with respect to such failure.

Section (A) has to do with "barring criminal prosecutions." Sounds nice - but what does it apply to? A failure to "timely pay" a penalty.

Guess what? Failure to timely pay a penalty is NOT a criminal act. Usually, it invokes further penalties and interest. Only if you fail to pay altogether could the situation reach criminal status, and even then, it would have to be willful. Otherwise, the penalties and interest would just continue to pile up. "Willful failure to pay" is not "failure to timely pay." So since the ONLY criminal charge that § 5000A (g) (2) (A) protects a taxpayer from doesn't exist, the entire statute is a fraud. It's meant to make people think Obamacare is harmless, and that deliberately putting off paying its penalty won't make anyone subject to criminal charges. But this isn't true.

How about Section (B)? Well, a levy is a seizure of property. For that to happen, a lien has to be filed first, specifying what property is to be seized, and that due process has been followed. After the lien has been filed, but before the levy is made upon the property, a notice of lien is sent to the taxpayer who owns the property the government intends to seize through levy, to let them know that the lien has been filed against them.

Now what does (B)(i) say? That a "notice of lien" shall not be filed. Well, notices of lien aren't filed, except as copies of the mailing that was made to the taxpayer. Liens are filed - that's the functional act. Not "notices of lien." Filing a "notice of lien" is NOT the same thing as filing a "lien," because it does NOT legally enable a levy. It's literally just a "notice" that an actual "lien" has been filed. And it's supposed to be mailed, not "filed." So when (B)(i) forbids it to be filed, well good - because it's not supposed to be anyway! Yet this was obviously written to make you to think it's talking about actual liens, when it says "notices of lien" - when it's not.

How about (B)(ii), where it is specified that no "levy on any such property" shall be made. Well, what "such" property? None other than the property in (B)(i) of course, that was specified in the "notice of lien." But wait a second - you can't legally levy property from just a "notice of lien" anyway! You need a real lien to levy property! So this section, once again, is saying that something illegal will not be done by the government - specifically, that no property will seized with just a "notice of lien" to back up the levy. Hey, thanks a lot.

So what are we left with here? What did Roberts draw our attention to, when he specified laws in Obamacare that he said are tools to collect the penalty, when they seemed to be tools to prevent the collection of the penalty? He did nothing less than to indicate that these prevention tools are no such thing - that they block nothing, and that the only actual tools that are indicated enable the full collection powers of Title 26 tax laws to be used (i.e., it's a fully functional Death Star). And not just those directed by "subchapter B of chapter 68," but also criminal penalties, and lien and levy powers. Even worse, both of these were cited by Obamacare not only to mislead the public, but also to establish a judicially noticeable reference to legitimize their usage against the public.

Roberts deliberately drew attention to this. And in doing so, he effectively said, "watch out - read carefully, this ruling is dealing with a law that was written to deceive. You have to be very careful in your reading of both it and my ruling if you want to understand what everything means."

Then, concerning enforcement, he showed that nothing in Obamacare blocks the usage of Subchapter B of Chapter 68, Criminal, or Lien & Levy powers against taxpayers to collect Obamacare penalties.

And most importantly, Obamacare is written to deceive.

Point #4: "Person" has Different Legal Definitions for Different Purposes

So what else is Obamacare being deceptive about?

Well, when Chief Justice Roberts referenced Obamacare's use of "subchapter B of chapter 68," he cited a statute from within that subchapter to support his interpretation of its usage - specifically, he cited §6671(a).

If you look up §6671(a), you'll find that it does, indeed, support Robert's interpretation.

You also find, underneath it, §6671(b) - right where the Chief Justice wanted you to find it.

Title 26, Chapter 68, Subchapter B, § 6671 (b) states:

• The term "person", as used in this subchapter, includes an officer or employee of a corporation, or a member or employee of a partnership, who as such officer, employee, or member is under a duty to perform the act in respect of which the violation occurs.

That's a very important definition of "person." But before we get into that subject - remember those other two enforcement tools that were supposedly banned from use, but actually were not, discussed above in Point #3? The first was criminal enforcement. The second was lien and levy powers.

Criminal enforcement is found in Chapter 75 of Title 26. Thus, the definition of "person" for the purposes of criminal enforcement is found in that chapter. Specifically, it is found in Title 26, Chapter 75, § 7343, which reads:

• The term '"person"' as used in this chapter includes an officer or employee of a corporation, or a member or employee of a partnership, who as such officer, employee, or member is under a duty to perform the act in respect of which the violation occurs.

Finally, lien and levy powers are found in the chapters 63 and 64 specified by Chief Justice Roberts in his ruling, where he references them as the "assessment § 6201 (a)" and "collection § 6301" chapters, respectively. Now, liens are only useful to enable levies, so definitions for levy powers also reference lien powers. And in the levy chapter (64), at § 6332 (f), we find the following definition of "person":

• The term "person," as used in subsection (a), includes an officer or employee of a corporation or a member or employee of a partnership, who as such officer, employee, or member is under a duty to surrender the property or rights to property, or to discharge the obligation.

Take a moment at this point, to compare the three definitions of "person" cited from references from Robert's ruling listed above, that are found in three different enforcement sections of Title 26.

They are identical.

Yet, if you look up the general Title 26 definition of "person" in § 7701 (a) (1), you'll find:

"The term "person" shall be construed to mean and include an individual, a trust, estate, partnership, association, company or corporation."

Notice that generally speaking, for the entirety of Title 26, the term "person" also means the term 'individual.' That's why when the income tax laws and Obamacare laws address 'individuals' and 'persons,' they have identical meanings.

But compare: the general definition of "person" in § 7701 (a) (1) above says it's just "an individual, a trust, estate, partnership, association, company or corporation." That's it - no fine print.

But the definition of "person" for enforcement purposes in the above cited §§ 6671 (b), 7343 and 6332 (f) are way, way, way more narrow. To be that 'person,' you have to be:

1) An officer or employee of a listed type of corporation; AND 2) Under a duty to perform an act; AND 3) In respect of said act, a violation occurs.

That's a lot more specific than just being an "individual, a trust, estate, partnership, association, company or corporation."

So what does this difference in the definitions of the term "person" mean? It means that the definition of "person" the government can punish for tax violations, is NOT the same definition of "person" that is used in the rest of Title 26.

More specifically, it means that the only "persons" the government can impose tax violation enforcements against, are officers or employees of a corporation, who have a duty to act in some way regarding tax laws on behalf of their corporation, and who violate those tax laws on behalf of the corporation they officially represent.

Do you represent a corporation in an official capacity to the government, on behalf of that corporation's tax obligations? If not, then you are not a §§ 6671 (b), 7343 and 6332 (f) "person" who can be liable for violating the tax enforcement laws.

And by direct reference through Obamacare itself, the enforcement laws that the government would use to go after "persons" it claims are violating Obamacare taxes OR penalties OR fines are also found in §§ 6671 (b), 7343 and 6332 (f).

So if you are not that definition of "person," (which is repeated three different times in Title 26 to make absolutely clear exactly who it is talking about), then you are NOT liable for any other taxes which make use of the enforcement provisions linked to that definition, including income tax OR Obamacare.

And in his ruling, Chief Justice Roberts deliberately cited a law which, if you actually look it up, is right next to the enforcement definition of "person" for Chapter 68, Subchapter B, and he also indicated that further enforcement definitions should be sought for the fully applicable criminal, and lien and levy, chapters of Title 26 - all of which turned out to be identical enforcement definitions for the term "person."

That extraordinary sequence of events is no accident - it is a communication.

Point #5: Taxpayers are Individuals are Persons

So if the definition of "person" is so important, why do both the income tax laws and Obamacare laws refer to individuals?

To confuse you, of course!

And in any event, they both refer to taxpayers.

Think of it this way - persons or individuals may be subject to the enforcement of a particular tax, depending on a lot of things. Taxpayers, however, are persons or individuals who are subject to the enforcement of a particular tax.

That's why Title 26, § 7701 (a) states: The term "taxpayer" means any person subject to any internal revenue tax.

So it's clear that both individuals and persons may be subject to tax, depending on what definitions of those terms apply to them.

IF they are liable, THEN they are referred to as "taxpayers."

That's why both the income tax statutes and the Obamacare statutes make so much use of the term "taxpayers." When they are talking about someone who might be subject to the tax, then they use the terms "person" or "individual." But when they are talking about someone who absolutely is subject to the tax, then they use the term "taxpayer."

Point #6: Imposed Means Enforced - Part 2

Both the income tax, and Obamacare, start out by saying "a tax is imposed." Not "a tax is made," or a "tax exists," or just "a tax."

And imposed means enforced: If it can't be enforced, it can't be imposed.

So if it can't be enforced against your definition of "person," it can't be imposed on you.

Even (and especially), if you fit the general definition of "person" or "individual," but not the enforcement definition of "person."

And if it can't be imposed on you, you can't be a taxpayer for it.

And if you're not a taxpayer for it...

... it doesn't apply to you.

Point #7: News Flash - The Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court Knows All of This

But if he knows it, then why didn't he say it?

Well, he did say it. Specifically, Roberts wrote: "The Federal Government does not have the power to order people to buy health insurance. Section 5000A would therefore be unconstitutional if read as a command. The Federal Government does have the power to impose a tax on those without health insurance. Section 5000A is therefore constitutional, because it can reasonably be read as a tax."

Did you catch it?

This is the paragraph that drives everyone crazy. This is the paragraph that makes everyone scream that Roberts is crazy. But apply what has been explained above, to what Roberts wrote. He's talking about what "The Federal Government" has "the power" to do. And as has been explained, you have to ask yourself: do what, to whom?

He says: "the power to order people to buy" Then he says: "the power to impose a tax on those"

He's differentiating! "People" are not the same as "those!"

Order people - the government does NOT have the power to "order" a free people.

Impose tax on those - the government DOES have the power to "impose" on "those," because: "THOSE" are TAXPAYERS!

Taxpayers are - literally by triple definition - imposed persons subject to enforcement via the detailed descriptions provided in §§ 6671 (b), 7343 and 6332 (f) of Title 26, specifically: 1) An officer or employee of a listed type of corporation; AND 2) Under a duty to perform an act; AND 3) In respect of said act, a violation occurs.

And, regarding "those 'persons,'" - and ONLY "those 'persons,'" - Chief Justice Roberts ruled that Obamacare IS Constitutional:

"The Federal Government does have the power to impose a tax on those without health insurance."

HOWEVER, he also specifically ruled that against the people (as in We The People), Obamacare is NOT constitutional:

"The Federal Government does not have the power to order people to buy health insurance."

Roberts specifically protected the constitutional freedom of the American People, right in front of their eyes, according to the actual meaning of the actual tax laws...

...after ruling against any other constitutional clause that could serve to confuse the tax issues.

And THAT is why no other Justice would support him -

Because in Doing So, He Isolated and Exposed The Secret of LIMITED Tax Liability!

Point #8: The Two Powers

If you've come this far, and didn't know this material beforehand, you might be in a bit of a shock at this point. Basically, the reason that Obamacare doesn't apply to 95% of Americans is because it can only be enforced against people responsible for running corporations - not normal people simply working and living on their own personal behalf. And more, those limitations on the enforcement laws don't come out of Obamacare. Rather, they're a part of the income tax laws that have been there all along, and that Obamacare has attached itself to, in order to make use of them.

Can this really be possible? It would mean that there are two separate enforcement powers held by the Federal government - one for corporation "persons," and one for non-corporate, regular human-being-type, natural persons. And that a giant scam has taken place by the government using legally defined terms such as "person," and "individual," and "taxpayer," in order to confuse these identities, and especially to hide the two different powers of government.

Well, let's look at Chief Justice Roberts again, and see what he said about this subject. In his ruling, Roberts wrote:

"This case concerns two powers that the Constitution does grant the Federal Government, but which must be read carefully to avoid creating a general federal authority akin to the police power."

Now that's a hell of a thing to say, isn't it? "This case concerns two powers." If you disregard the analysis presented above, then ask yourself - what two powers?

After all, isn't that why the country has been ripping itself to shreds over Robert's ruling, because it's only taking into account a single power - that of the Federal government? You might say, well, there's the powers of the Commerce Clause and the Necessary and Proper Clause that Roberts threw out, when he kept the taxing power in. But that's three powers total, not two. So what's the difference between them? How do you turn three powers into two? And for that matter, why should there be multiple powers in the first place? Don't we have only one government?

No, we don't. We have two "governments," in fact. Two completely separate "governments," under one Constitution.

The first "government" is the original one. It deals with human beings acting as human beings and nothing else. That government has to deal with a position derived from those human beings. And those human beings are acknowledged as possessing God-given natural rights, that existed before the "government" was created, and which cannot be removed by that "government," because it simply does not have the authority.

The second "government," however, is exactly the opposite of the first one. The second "government" creates, controls and runs corporations. The very word "incorporate" means "give body to," or "bring into existence." And because that "government" creates corporations, it owns those corporation completely - because of the fact that it is their creator.

Thus legally, corporations are slaves to the "government" that created them, by definition. They are created, live in obedience to, and die at the command of that "government" - including paying taxes to that "government." And the rules that that "government" can make for those corporations are literally unlimited, because those corporations have no rights. They only have privileges that are granted to them by their creator "government," privileges which can be changed or terminated at any time, solely at the pleasure of that "government."

Functionally, those are the two "governments" which comprise the two main Federal jurisdictional powers of our one constitutional Republic. And thus, they are the "two powers" to which Roberts is referring. And he acknowledges them both as constitutionally legitimate.

But he also warns that it is extremely dangerous to mix them up. In fact, he points out that if you mix them up, you can end up with what he calls " a general federal authority akin to the police power."

But isn't that exactly what everyone is afraid Roberts has actually done with his ruling?

Yet here he is specifically warning everyone against making that interpretation of his ruling, and teaching that the way to avoid that terrible mistake is to "read carefully."

So that's what this analysis is - a very, very careful reading. It is not my interpretation of Roberts. It is my careful reading of what Roberts actually said, per his specific instructions.

Two governmental powers exist. Roberts said so, and warned against confusing them. For the Chief Justice said that if we mix them up, WE will create - by our very ignorance - "a general federal authority akin to the police power."

So what does that mean? It means enabling the Federal government, through Obamacare, to start treating We The People of inalienable human rights, like wholly-owned government-privileged corporations, for everything.

Point #9: Bait and Switch and Presumption

But wait a second, (I imagine you say again). What about forcing everyone to pay income tax already? If Obamacare doesn't apply to 95% of Americans because it is imposed by corporate income tax enforcement laws, then how the hell does the government get away with applying those same corporate income tax enforcement laws to non-corporate, regular human people-persons for the income tax?

Answer: You volunteer to be treated as a corporation.

Remember in his ruling that Roberts said that "without a careful reading" you can create "a general federal authority akin to the police power" concerning Obamacare?

Well concerning the income tax, most Americans have NOT made a "careful reading" of the tax laws, and therefore HAVE created a specific "federal authority akin to the police power" concerning the subject of income taxes.

You see, as free human beings, we have the right to make contracts. And there is such a thing as a presumed contract. What the government has done is argued to the courts - and the courts have agreed - that the government is not responsible for people's legal ignorance, and that if they act in such a way as to functionally volunteer to be treated as a corporation, then the government gets to treat them like a corporation.
Even worse, courts have agreed that neither they, nor other government officials, have to tell you you're being treated as a corporation, under the interpretation that you don't need to be told, since you volunteered in the first place.

And then, to top it off, the government has created rules to make it extremely difficult, if not impossible, for you to not be treated like a corporation anymore, by presuming that until you have proven you're not a corporation, they get to pound down on you just as if you were a corporation that was faking being a human being. As a result, you can actually be convicted for fraud, and go to jail, for demanding you not be treated as if you were a corporation!

That's the way it is.

So the technical answer is no, 95% of Americans don't have to pay the income tax, because it's enforcement mechanisms specify that only corporations, or people responsible for corporations, are subject to income tax enforcement.

The practical answer, however, is that without a lot of money and legal representation, the government will use the presumption that you are a corporation against you to seize your money and property, and throw you in jail, long before you can get through all the court hearings necessary for them to admit that you are a non-corporate human being-type person. Or they will simply show you that that's what they are going to do to you, unless you sign a document agreeing that you are, in fact, a corporation, and agree that you've been a very, very bad corporation, and that you deserve to pay all sorts of fines in order to stay out of jail.

That's the way it is.

So DO NOT THINK you can use the information in this analysis - even by quoting Chief Justice John Roberts of the United States Supreme Court - to stop paying income taxes.

It. Won't. Work.

The IRS will simply STOMP you into oblivion, because legally, they get to treat you under the presumption that you are a corporation - and they don't have to acknowledge any "presumed corporations" that try to claim they are not corporations.

In fact, the technical legal name for that particular argument is "frivolous."

That's right, according to tax laws, interpretations and rulings, pointing out that you are a human being who does not fit the specifications of the actual income tax enforcement laws, is frivolous.

Not "funny-frivolous."

But rather, "go-to-jail-frivolous."

Read carefully: you're warned.

Point #10: Generalization - A Bridge Too Far

Contrary to what most people think, judges can't just go rule on something if they think it is wrong. They have to wait for an appropriate case to come to them, and sometimes it never does. Also, cases themselves have all sorts of issues and parts to them. Sometimes a case will seem to be about one thing, but it's actually about another. So for the purposes of what it seems to be about, it's useless. And if political operatives have decided that certain types of cases will be ruled against their interests by certain judges, every effort will be made by those operatives to keep those cases out of those courts. Thus a judge can wait a whole career, and never rule on what he or she wants to rule on.

The opposite is also true. Sometimes a case shows up, and a judge realizes - this is it, now or never. Another opportunity may never come, or come too late to matter. So they act.

That, I believe, is what Chief Justice Roberts has done with his Obamacare ruling. If he waited longer to make this ruling, Obamacare would be in another form, and perhaps not so amenable to exposure for what it really is. Or, such a vast bureaucracy will have been formed by the time he got to rule on it, that enormous damage to the country would have been done in the mean time. Or he simply might not have gotten to be the swing vote, and would have been out-voted no matter what his position was.

So he chose this, and he chose now.

But what did he actually do?

Simply put, he raised the alarm about something that goes far, far beyond Obamacare. In fact, it goes straight to the heart of why everyone is so upset. Roberts not only drew attention to the fact that, by simply positioning anything they want as a tax, the government can force anyone to do anything at any time - he certified that concept as constitutional. And by doing that, he made sure the vulnerability of the country to totally legal tyranny would not go away. For even if Obamacare was repealed, his ruling would still stand, and Congress could just try again with something else.

But why would Roberts do such a thing? After all, he actually warned against the creation of "a general federal authority akin to the police power." And he also said elsewhere in his ruling, "our respect for Congress's policy judgments thus can never extend so far as to disavow restraints on federal power that the Constitution carefully constructed." Yet after saying these things, he then went and enabled them!

Except he didn't. Because he pointed out - subtly, but clearly, for those who follow his hints as I have here - that these powers Congress is trying to use against the People do not, in fact, apply to them, but only to corporations.

But the man is a Federal judge - the TOP Federal judge. Do you think, even for a moment, Roberts isn't fully aware of what the IRS "legally" does to people who try to use Roberts own argument against them?

Of course he does.

That's why he wrote the argument. Because now HE wrote this argument - not YOU.

And that matters. Because by definition, the Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court is not frivolous. Even by the interpretations of the IRS.

You see, Roberts jammed the machine. And scared the shit out of the entire Federal government by doing it. That's why no other Justice would join him - he terrified them.

And he did it because it was the only way he could find to halt the unstoppable expansion of a process that was originally promised by Congress to be limited only to the income tax - but technically could be applied to anything.

What was that process?

• The ability of the Federal government, to presume that natural human person Americans had volunteered to be treated as corporations under the law;

• The ability of the Federal government to do this without telling them that such a presumption had been made against them;

• The ability of the Federal government to use this presumption to deny Americans their inalienable constitutional rights by replacing them with government-controlled corporate privileges;

• And finally, the ability of the Federal government to not tell Americans how to get out of that presumption without being harmed by trying to do so.

When Obamacare came up as a tax law, Roberts - and all the Justices - knew what this meant. It meant Congress had gone back on their promise to presume this terrible corporate tax power upon people only for the purpose of the income tax, and use it for everything. Because Obamacare was the generalization of this principle that opened the door to its infinite use. As long as the only application of these tax laws were for income taxes, that single application stood as a kind of protection. But with a second application, the principle became generalized, and with that, the door swung open.

But the real problem was that it was legal. Yet Roberts did not make it legal - it was made legal before Roberts was even born. People have a constitutional right to contract. Contracts can be presumed by behavior. Ignorance of the law is not an excuse. It's all there - but in its application to tax laws, and now Obamacare (and with that literally everything else), it has become diabolical.

So what was Roberts to do? Throw it out? If he did that, it would come back. Congress is obviously licking it's chops over expanding this principle of empowerment through tax enforcement. Obamacare, or something like it, or something else, would come back again, and again, and again - and each time it would be, technically, constitutional.

So Roberts decided to make a stand. Like John Hancock signing his name big enough on the Declaration of Independence to make sure the King saw it, Chief Justice Roberts ensured with the signing of his Obamacare ruling that unless everyone works together, no one is ever going home to freedom again. Because the only way out of this problem is for Americans to know about it, understand it, and craft a constitutional protection against it.

Not against corporations.

But against people being treated as corporations, and losing their rights, through presumption.

Remember Pelosi gloating that you'd have to pass Obamacare to see what was in it? She was telling you the truth about the government's use of presumption. The government presumes that you've voluntarily surrendered your humanity for corporate status, and then passes bills without telling you what's in them, because you have no right to know what your corporate masters are doing until they want to tell you. Even then, they don't have to tell you - Pelosi didn't say she'd explain it, just that you could read it, if it was passed.

That's what happens if you fight the IRS, too - they are allowed to presume the corporate laws apply to you, and that you therefore have to pay the tax before you can challenge the tax in court. But then, if you pay and fight, the government doesn't have to tell you you're being treated as a volunteer corporation. Instead, they rule that your claims of humanity are frivolous because you're obeying corporate laws and standing in a corporate administrative court. This secret presumption been repeatedly ruled as Constitutional. You just don't know about it.

So you can see why those who would convert the entirety of the Constitution into tax laws, are drunk on the mechanism of presumption. That's why Pelosi replied, when asked if Obamacare was Constitutional, "Are you serious!? Are you serious!?" Look at her reply legally: she mocked the question as frivolous, because in doing so she limited her response to only incorporated "persons"!

And remember, she was saying this as Speaker of the House of Representatives. In other words, she wasn't without authority when she said it. She specifically invoked the power of secret presumption by using contempt, in order to hide behind it's legal protections. Government employees use this indemnification technique all the time, because the people don't know it's a legal statement!

Before Obamacare, secret presumption meant income tax. Now, it means people forced to face death panels and perform abortions against their religious beliefs - when they don't actually have to!

That's why SECRET PRESUMPTION is the monumental problem Roberts has chosen to expose with his courageous ruling. And he did it now because our country is poised on the edge of a precipice - right now. Compared to the absolute catastrophe of generalizing the secret taxing authority presumption, all the hell of Obamacare is merely one example, with an infinite number of the same kinds of tax laws right behind it, waiting only for Congress to vote.

But Roberts also showed the SOLUTION to the problem, when he wrote, "The Framers created a Federal Government of limited powers, and assigned to this Court the duty of enforcing those limits. But the Court does not express any opinion on the wisdom of the Affordable Care Act. Under the Constitution, that judgment is reserved to the people."

Only the People can put a Constitutional Stop to the government's currently LEGAL use of the secret presumption of corporate status against human beings. Robert's can't do that himself. But in a single astonishing ruling, Chief Justice Roberts has warned the American People of what is being done to them, how it is being done, and the immanent danger of its expansion of use.

What the American People will now do about this problem remains to be seen. One thing is sure, though - the more people who know about it, the better. Peaceful change can only come from knowledge. So pass the word.

God Bless America.

Copyright July 4th, 2012. All rights reserved. Permission given for non-profit distribution only.

http://links.heritage.org/ct/16677568:18258405458:m:1:218627131:C116A2D0DA3CE0D1EA76D9E228E53A4B:r> Your Money in Pictures: The Top 5 Charts of 2013

To those who neglected to vote last year, or just didn’t bother getting informed, instead just voting for “the cool candidate”:

Behold: one of those you've handed America over to.

Megyn Kelly, leading reporter on the outrages of ObamaCare, broke the stories of 5 million people losing their insurance, with a hundred million more cancellations to come. Twice she’s interviewed Ezekiel Emanuel, whom she identified as the Architect of ObamaCare, an epithet he seemed to accept.

Her interview with Emanuel centered on the cancellations, which were plainly hardwired into the law and subsequent regulations. His demeanor was that of a controlling bureaucrat who had little patience with Megyn, who refused to recognize his right to control.

Her interviews were spot-on in revealing the type of person who is now on the bridge of the SS America—clearly steaming full speed into iceberg-studded waters—not the captain, but surely one of the senior officers.

What she did not touch on is the philosophy driving the radical law now spreading its dark shadow over our lives.

I contend that if revealed, that philosophy would be utterly alien to human sensibilities prevailing since man first stood erect. Even Neanderthals (who were not actually human) are known to have taken care of their elderly and sick.

Dr. Emanuel is an oncologist, a professor and chair of the Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy at the University of Pennsylvania. From January 2009 to January 2011, he served as special advisor for health policy to the White House. Thus the epithet: Architect of ObamaCare.

Just what is his philosophy, the apparent underpinning of ObamaCare?

In 2009, he was the principle author of a paper entitled “Principles for allocation of scarce medical interventions.” Notice the word “scarce.” That should set off alarm bells in the savvy, because scarce is what they intend to make medical care—at least for, um, certain groups.

This will likely be our Brave New World’s method of keeping down health care expenses.

The paper compares ways to allocate this soon-to-be scarce commodity.

One point it makes is that the usual rule of thumb has been “Other things being equal, we should always save five lives rather than one.”

But the paper counters with “However, other things are rarely equal. Some lives have

been shorter than others; 20-year-olds have lived less than 70-year-olds. Similarly, some lives can be extended longer than others.”

What then should we do?

The paper concludes: “Rather than saving the most lives, prognosis allocation aims to save the most life-years.” It says that, when choosing among sick people, “the complete lives system … “prioritizes younger people who have not yet lived a complete life and will be unlikely to do so without aid.”

The theory proposes that “age-based priority for receiving scarce medical interventions” must give most of the available medical care to those between the ages of about 15 and 54.

The rest should presumably do without. Or, just take a painkiller.

Just thought you might want a hint of where those we’ve elected mean to bring us, once minutiae like “The Website” have been corrected.

For your own edification, I advise you to read the entire paper and reflect on three things. First, those in control—Orwell’s pigs—will not be subjected to this kind of calculation. Emanuel himself was born in 1957. Second: this chilling methodology completely ignores the concept of precious human life.

Finally, think how much simpler it would be to simply do our best to save everyone and let God make the decisions on human life.

http://www.ncpa.org/pdfs/PIIS0140673609601379.pdf

WAR FOR WHAT?

The military industrial complex, a phrase which, at one time, I thought un-America.  I was very young at that time in my life.  Now one of the benefits of age, wisdom, has allowed me to focus on reality, ugly as it may be.  I am a Patriot of my country, The United States of America, I am willing to fight for my nation and if necessary to die protecting it.  I am not willing to fight or sacrifice anything for the profits of others and that is what the "military industrial complex" is all about.  The cause of war for profit has never been as evident as it is now under our current government.  There is no doubt that Islam seeks our destruction. However, events of the past four years, events like, Extortion Seventeen and Benghazi to mention only two, have exposed the truth.  Our military is not being used to protect America, our Constitution, Freedom or Liberty, it is being used to protect the elites and their control over the every individuals lives.  Common sense dictates that, when one year you are fighting an enemy and the next year you are protecting that very same enemy and supplying them with weapons, your intention is not for the good of your nation.  I simply want Americans to realize that they are being used, lied to and their sons and daughters are dying for nothing more than the greed of an elite class which is currently committing Grand Treason against their nation and its Constitution.

Elevengun
I AM PATRIOT

Cap Black  

New Orleans world famous Canal Street has an equal opportunity crime zone, its 1100th block, where Black drug dealers openly, flagrantly sell to a rainbow coalition of users with minimal police interference.

Side walks are the usual store front, with more discreet transactions occurring behind the closed box office of the Loew's State Theatre, along with serving as a de facto bathroom ( quite ripe on warm days ) and even a raunchy rendezvous for sex. 

Last week, I walked past a jubilant group of young dealers on the corner of Rampart & Canal filming themselves with a camera phone while rapping and waving money???

Somehow I don't think equal opportunity for Black drug dealers was what Martin Luther King, Jr. & company had in mind.

DHS Insider Gives Final Warning

By Doug Hagmann

http://beforeitsnews.com/opinion-conservative/2013/12/dhs-insider-gives-final-warning-2779452.html 

By Douglas J.  Hagmann

27 December 2013: Under the cover and amid the distraction of the Christmas bustle, I had my last “official” contact with a source inside the Department of Homeland Security known as “Rosebud” in my writings. My source is leaving his position, retiring along with numerous others choosing to leave this bureaucratic monstrosity. For this contact, my source took unprecedented measures to be certain that our contact was far off the radar of prying government eyes and ears. I was stunned at the lengths he employed, and even found myself somewhat annoyed by the inconvenience that his cloak-and-dagger approach caused. It was necessary, according to my source, because all department heads under FEMA and DHS are under orders to identify anyone disclosing any information for termination and potential criminal prosecution.  

“DHS is like a prison environment, complete with prison snitches,” he said, referring to the search for leaks and leakers. And the warden is obsessed. Ask anyone in DHS. No one trusts anyone else and whatever sources might be left are shutting up. The threats that have been made far exceed anything I’ve ever seen. Good people are afraid for their lives and the lives of their families. We’ve all been threatened. They see the writing on the wall and are leaving. It’s not a joke and not hype.”

The following is a narrative from my source, prefaced with the instructions to “take it or leave it,” and “disregard it at your own peril.” He added that it’s now up to each American to act on the information themselves or suffer the consequences. “I’ve resigned myself to the fact that most [Americans] will never be convinced of the reality that is taking place right in front of them.”

The plan explained

“According to every internal document I’ve seen and read, and from the few people I’ve spoken with who understand what’s going on, preparations have been finalized to respond to a crisis of unprecedented magnitude within the United States. The response will include the use of lethal force against U.S. citizens under the instructions of Barack Obama.”  But why?

“‘It’s the economy, stupid,’” he began, paraphrasing a campaign slogan coined by James Carville for Bill Clinton’s 1992 campaign.  ”Just as I disclosed in our first meeting, the crisis will be rooted in an economic collapse. I told you last year, at a time when gold and silver were setting record highs, one specific indicator that time is very short. It is the final ‘smack down’ of the metals, gold and silver, that will presage the orchestrated economic collapse that is being planned by the bankers of Wall Street. Everybody needs to understand that this is a deliberate collapse of the U.S. economy with the oversight of the White House and the full knowledge of the Justice Department.  Everyone seems to be waiting for some big, history making event that will signal the start of the collapse. The fact is that the collapse has already started. It’s incremental, like a snowball rolling down a hill. It gets bigger and rolls faster. Well, this snowball is well on its way down the hill.”

“I don’t mean to sound repetitive, by I can’t stress this enough. Contrary to what you hear, we’re already in an economic collapse, except that most people haven’t a clue. The ‘big bang’ comes at the end, when people they wake up one morning and can’t log in to their bank accounts, can’t use their ATM cards, and find out that their private pension funds and other assets have been confiscated,” he stated.

“I’ve seen documentation of multiple scenarios created outside of DHS. Different plans and back-up plans. Also, please understand that I deliberately used the word ‘created,’ as this is a completely manufactured event.  In the end it won’t be presented that way, which is extremely important for everyone to understand. What is coming will be blamed on some unforeseen event out of everyone’s control, that few saw coming or thought would actually happen. Then, another event will take place concurrent with this event, or immediately after it, to confuse and compound an already explosive situation.” I asked for specifics.

“As I said, there are several scenarios and I don’t know them all. I know one calls for a cyber-attack by an external threat, which will then be compounded by something far removed from everyone’s own radar. But it’s all a ruse, or a pretext. The threat is from within,” he stated. “Before people can regain their footing, a second event will be triggered.” Again, I asked for specifics.

“I’ve seen one operational plan that refers to the federal government’s response to a significant terrorist attack on U.S. soil. Information at these levels is compartmentalized. I don’t have specifics, just plans for the response. The response will be controls and restrictions on travel, business, and every aspect of our lives, especially gun ownership and speech that incites people against the government. I guess some people would call it Martial Law, and they would not be incorrect. But understand that this will be a process deployed in stages. How quickly of a process remains to be seen.”

The mechanics explained

As I said, people continue to look for something big to happen first, followed by a militaristic response by the federal government against U.S. citizens. Based on what I’ve seen, I don’t believe it will happen this way, although there is one unthinkable exception. That exception would involve a ‘decapitation’ of our leadership, but I’ve seen nothing even remotely suggestive of that. But I’ve heard and even read articles where that is mentioned. Frankly, though, that’s always been a threat. I suppose that if the leadership is deemed useless, or becomes a liability to the larger agenda in some manner,  it could happen. The precedent exists. Let’s pray that it’s not the case now.”

“I don’t think anyone except the initiated few know the precise series of events or the exact timing, just a general overview and an equally general time period. I think we’re in that period now, as DHS has their planned responses finalized. Also, the metals are important because it’s real money, not Ponzi fiat currency. The U.S. has no inventory of gold, so the prices are manipulated down to cause a sell-off of the physical assets. China is on a buying spree of gold, and other countries want their inventory back. The very people causing the prices to drop are the ones who are also buying the metals at fire sale prices. They will emerge extremely wealthy when the prices rise after the U.S. currency becomes wallpaper. A little research will identify who these people and organizations are.”

“I’d like to add a bit of perspective that might help explain the events as I described. Do you remember former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld announcing that the Pentagon was unable to account for $2.3 trillion in the defense budget? That was on September 10, 2001, the day before the attacks of 9/11. Some suggest that 9/11 was  orchestrated, in part to cover up the missing money, which is ludicrous. The result, however, was that suddenly the accounting issue took a back seat because of the attacks. The result will be the same. That’s a perfect example of the mechanics of what we are about to experience. It’s going to take years to sort out, and when it’s finally sorted out, the damage will have long been done.”

“Please note a few final things. The relationship that exists between DHS today and the executive branch is well beyond alarming. DHS and other organizations have become the private army of the Oval Office. The NSA, and I’ve got contacts there, is taking orders from the Oval Office. The IRS is under the virtual control of the Oval Office in a manner that would make Nixon cower. Even though all roads appear to lead to the Oval Office, they lead through the Oval Office. It’s not just Obama, but the men behind him, the people who put him there. The people who put him there are the ones who created him.” I asked who created him.

“First, ask yourself why there was such an all out effort to marginalize anyone talking about Obama’s eligibility in 2008. Even so-called conservatives pundits fell for the lie that such questions were nothing more than a diversion. They were following a specific drumbeat. That should tell every rational adult that he is a creation of the globalists who have no allegiance to any political party. He is the product of decades of planning, made for this very time in our history. He was selected to oversee the events I just disclosed. Who has that ability? He’s a product of our own intelligence agencies working with the globalists. He should be exhibit ‘A’ to illustrate the need to enforce the Logan Act. Need I say more?”

As often said by another of my sources, the U.S. is a captured operation. The lie is bigger than most people realize or are willing to confront. That is, until there is no other option. By then, it might be too late.

The post DHS insider gives final warning appeared first on Northeast Intelligence Network.

Source: http://www.homelandsecurityus.com/archives/10236

The Coming Chinese Invasion of America

Dave Hodges

http://beforeitsnews.com/war-and-conflict/2013/12/the-coming-chinese-invasion-of-america-2449886.html

Dave Hodges

The Common Sense Show

Contrary to what the power brokers would have you believe in order that you’ll give up your pension, cut your wages, and settle for the life that people live in a third world country, the globalists want you to believe that your nation is broke and there is nothing you can do about it.

America is not broke, in fact the opposite is true. The United States of America is awash in an unimaginable amount of mineral wealth. What belongs to the people has been transferred, in the greatest theft in world history, from the workers and consumers to the government as well as the banks and the portfolios of the criminal elite gangsters which control the politicians with insider-trading and outright bribes. The banks are able to loan against the value at a ratio of 9 to 1 in this modern day version of fractional reserve banking. However, the biggest theft of American assets is literally happening right below our noses. The banks will soon forsake their holdings as the government, as I am being told, will move to nationalize every bit of mineral resource wealth in this country under Executive Order 13603.

Today just 400 Americans have more wealth than half of all Americans combined. Despite this grim statistic which reveals the wealth imbalance in this country, our nation has never been wealthier.

Far beneath the ground, the federal government and its bankster puppeteers, own the rights to mineral and energy leases, from which they receive royalties, rents, and bonus payments, states the Institute for Energy Research, an industry group. According to their estimates, government states that the assets are worth $128 trillion. That’s almost eight times the national debt.

“These resources could be leased to third parties and could subsequently earn the state and national government  huge royalties, rents, and bonus payments that estimates could total almost $150 billion over 10 years, just for the oil and gas leases alone”.  Then why isn’t this being done? Simple, ask yourself who would lose money if this were to come to fruition? These vast resources have been promised to the Chinese and they are moving to take possession. Already, the Chinese are in Hawaii to take possession of what gold America has left. Speculation abounds that this is why Obama is in Hawaii to personally supervise the transfer and to arrange for the transfer of mineral wealth..

Many of my military sources tell me that a series of international “inland ports” will be created in conjunction with known mineral rich areas and control of these areas will be handed off to the Chinese. Further, the Chinese military will be stationed around these inland ports to ensure safety and security of the Chinese investment and its mining and geological personnel. This will be the foothold of their invasion force. For reasons to be discussed in the latter part of this article, there is a much more ominous reason why the Chinese troops will soon be a common occurrence on American soil. This will constitute only the beginning of the short-range take over the Chinese have planned for America.

Confirmation of the fact that the Chinese will soon be taking possession of American mineral resources,  comes from a former  CIA agent. On December 22, 2013, I interviewed Nobel Peace Prize nominee and the man who delivered the message which ended the Iranian Hostage Crisis, Dr. Jim Garrow, who was indeed a 43 year deep-cover CIA agent.

During the course of my interview with Dr. Garrow, he unequivocally stated that China will be taking control of our mineral rich land resources in repayment for the tremendous debt the United States owes China. This would be a revelation that some will challenge because the “bury my head in the sand crowd” is frightened by Dr. Garrow’s revelations, except, I reported the existence of as well as the estimated dollar amount of this mineral wealth on February 6, 2013, on my website and shortly after that, I aired these facts on the Dan Cofall Show airing in Dallas/Ft. Worth on station 1190AM  a short time later. The entire Garrow interview can heard here.

America’s Debt

As it has been widely reported, America has three levels of debt which needs to examined in context with this stunning revelation of largely unknown mineral wealth:

1. National Deficit of $17 trillion dollars
2. Unfunded liabilities ($238 trillion dollars) in the form of Social Security, Medicare, etc.
3. Derivatives debt estimated at between $1 quadrillion to $1.5 trillion dollars.

As one can clearly see, we can pay off our immediate bills and cover more than half of our unfunded liabilities. The derivatives debt should be repudiated because it is the result of illegal banker investments. America has the ability to stem the debt tide. With the development of these assets along with getting rid of the parasitic Federal Reserve, America could be back on the path of national prosperity. However, this does not fit into the globalist agenda which seeks to totally destroy America as well as most of the people within the country.

America and the Globalist Agenda

The globalists goal is to establish a one world government and a one world economic system (which is nearly complete as I write these words) which is ruled with extreme authoritarianism and brutality in a futuristic version of neo-feudalism.  To accomplish these goals, there can be no Bill of Rights and American prosperity must be obliterated. This is what we are in the midst of at this time as America is being torn down brick by brick.

As I have written, America is one false flag event away from a genocidal version of martial law. The Chinese military constitutes one of the flavors of the martial law occupation forces. Giving away America’s mineral resources to China accomplishes a number of goals. First, America will never financially recover from the death blow delivered by Hank Paulson, George W. Bush and the so-called bailouts of 2008. Secondly, the presence of Chinese soldiers on our soil will soon become so commonplace, most of the American sheep will scarcely notice and when martial law is declared, the Chinese will be “invited” to help. Third, when a major false flag event happens (e.g. the use of earthquake weapons in the New Madrid fault to initiate a tsunami in the Gulf of Mexico because of their connected plate tectonics), the Chinese troops and their allies (i.e. to be discussed in future articles) will be rolled out in a form of a brutal genocidal martial law. Step and back and look at what was just written. Between steps two and three, there will be a financial collapse of this country. Simultaneously, a power grid take down will be initiated unless the military can continue to thwart Obama just as they did when America averted a grid take down in November because of military intervention.

I have written about various alphabet soup agency people and their families who have gone into hiding in specially prepared enclaves with their colleagues in anticipation to what is coming. Many, including one FEMA family that I knew personally, have repeatedly spoken about  the taking down of the power grid. For DHS head, Janet Napolitano knows what’s coming as she stated in her farewell address, “It is not a matter of if, but when the power grid will be taken down”.  Congressman Trent Franks (R-AZ) has been issuing the same exact warnings.

In the next article, more dots will be connected as to what is coming. The Fantasy Football and the Dancing with the Stars crowd will never know what hit them and we cannot  help them. However, you have a chance to save yourself if you begin to prepare right now, which is also a topic of a future article. In the meantime, store food, water, sanitation equipment and plenty of guns and ammunition. Do not forget to form alliances with other families when possible. For more information click here. 

NEW - OBAMACARE NOW TERMINATED OFFlCIALLY(issues such as anonymous, gay marriage, polygamy, racial intermixing, psychiatry/psychology or mind control, war on white race and much more are explained) !! BREAKING NEWS !!! NEWS THAT SHUTTERED AND INDEFINITELY DESTROYED OBAMACARE !!! NO NEED FOR YOU TO WORRY ANY LONGER ABOUT OBAMA'S HEALTH INSURANCE !!! YOU HAVE NOW BETTER OPTIONS TO CHOSE FROM !!! FREEDOM HEALTHCARE VS OBAMACARE FOR YOU AND YOUR FAMILY AT LAST !!! IT ALL ENDED AT 10:00 HOURS WITH VIDEO 100 !!!

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x18rgmy

ISSUE LEGITIMATE ARREST WARRANT FOR OBAMA'S HIS GENOCIDAL CRIMINALLY INSANE BEHAVIOR !! DEMAND TRIALS !!!

WHY WAS MANDELA'S OFFlClAL DEATH DELAYED !!? DID WWll EVER ENDED !!? WHAT lS YOUR JOB ABROAD AND AT HOME !!?

OBAMA'S MENTAL WARDS AGAINST PERSECUTED WHITES(US citizens) !!! PSYCHIATRY CASE(war) AGAINST ME PERSONALLY !!! Learn first hand about what to do and what not in case state(s) goes after you due to political persecution. Something that will become more and more frequent(often) news !!! Learn how to fight back and much much more - all explained here !!! WHERE 70 YEARS OLD NEWS DIES OUT(Mandela's Titanic/Concordia news or exactly why Mandela's official death was postponed to the date when I released my last video 99 as seen bellow) !!! NOT TIME TO MOURN AFTER OLD GENOCIDAL TERRORIST WHO HAVE SLAUGHTERED OVER 80.000 SOUTH AFRICAN WHITES, BUT INSTEAD TO CELEBRATE !!! OUR TIME HAVE COME !!!

VIDEO 96(ultimate truth about birthers, wikileaks, and NSA scandal etc. Learn how 70 years old news died out !!!).
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x17rfp3

VIDEO 97(learn to survive).
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x17ulwk

VIDEO 98(did WWII ever ended !!? Are you listed suspect !!? Do you suffer from disease which never was openly declared, but is there !!? Do you know what your REAL job is at home and abroad !!?).
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x17xck9

VIDEO 99(learn to survive and destroy them - indefinitely).
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x180zhh

READ THE WHOLE THING RIGHT HERE...

http://psychiatryagainstme.blogspot.com/

VISIT GLOBALPATRIOTS INDEX AT http://globalpatriotsindex.blogspot.com OR http://globalpatriots.tk WHERE REAL NEWS(nuclear news) IS AND NOT 70 YEARS OLD LIE(diarrhea) !!!

Related to WHITES ARE NOT WELCOME IN AMERICA ANY LONGER !! https://www.dailymotion.com/video/xleq3o OUT OF AMERICA WITH WHITES NOW !! WE DON'T NEED YOU ANY MORE !! OBAMA'S HEALTH CARE RECORDED LIVE IN 2009 !! EXILING WHITES(US citizens) WITH EXTREME PREJUDICE AND IMPORTING NON WHITES IMMIGRATION REQUIREMENTS FREE !!

MY YOUTUBE user Avsec Bostjan WAS SHUT DOWN (since March 2012, I was not allowed to log in because self elected terrorist ZIONIST US Government, have used one with copyrights to all of my 77 videos which I created for 6 months on what one was closed = gangsters talking about copyrights or NSA spying scandal issues !!?) TOGETHER WITH PRIMARY E-MAIL & BLOGS FOR THE SAKE OF CENSORSHIP REGARDING ABDUCTIONS/ MK-ULTRA/ FORCED BRAIN IMPLANTS/ HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION/ BLACKLISTING/ FORCEFUL UNEMPLOYMENT AND ASSASSINATIONS !! ALL AGAINST WHITES (under "NAZI" lie).

FOR BETTER WORLD !!! FOR BETTER TOMORROW !!! FOR THE END OF THE WHITE GENOCIDE !!! FOR THE END OF THE WHITE SLAVERY !!! Meet or updates = https://www.facebook.com/loki.nagrind

I SUPPORT DEMAND FOR INDEPENDENT SOUTH AFRICAN BOERS STATE ! THERE WAS 3000 + AMERICANS KILLED ON 9/11 WHILE IN AFRICA, WHITES HAVE HAD SUFFERED GENOCIDE EQUIVALENT TO 27 OF 9/11s(Not just killed, but often burned/cooked alive = babies/children).

https://www.facebook.com/SAVEBOERS

GET INVOLVED NOW !!!

VIDEO VIEW COUNTERS ARE NO LONGER BLOCKED(frozen) MORE THAN JUST OFTEN, BUT IN FACT EVEN DEDUCTED FROM ON EVERY FEW HOURS(see on how many websites have I posted what you read here and compare their view counters with info that you are about to see under my videos... I have even caught them deducting view numbers on every few hours) !!! POLITICAL MADNESS AT ITS HIGHEST LEVELS SINCE WWII AND LIFE THREATS TOO NUMEROUS TO EVEN COUNT !!! IT IS KNOWN AS FREE WORLD OR SO CALLED "DEMOCRACIES"(white genocide project since WWII) !!! TALKING TO US ABOUT TOLERANCE AND HATE ISSUES !! YEAH, AHHHAA !!! CRIMINALLY INSANE IS WHAT THEY ARE !!! CRIMINALLY INSANE !!!

During the next three months the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, estimates that the US Treasury will be defrauded $14 to $16 billion by tax frauds.  Each tax season 30 million tax filers (not taxpayers) share in a $60 billion dollar money pie called Earned Income Tax Credit.  What started out in 1975 as an admirable idea and expanded by Ronald Reagan to assist low-income parents has morphed into a gigantic fraud that threatens the safety of ALL Americans courtesy of the incompetency within the walls of the Internal Revenue Service.

Sincere Apology to Military Families

Before beginning my discussion I want to apologize to military families, relatives and friends that have suffered losses in the Iraq/Afghanistan Wars.  My purpose isn’t to bring pain to those who have lost loved ones but rather to: Stop the Madness called the Internal Revenue Service.

How The IRS Is Defrauded

Jane Doe (mother of two) claims $14,420 income from an imaginary cleaning business on her tax return.  Since Jane doesn't have a business, she doesn’t need to purchase any brooms, dust pans, cleaning supplies or mops.  For Jane’s efforts, she qualifies for federal tax credits of $6,900. Before the US Treasury deposits a tax refund of $4,900 into her bank account, they make a deposit into Jane Doe’s social security retirement account for $2,000.  From start to finish, Jane can complete her phantom tax return using phantom income in 15 minutes! 

IRS Sent $46 Million in Tax Refunds to a Single Atlanta Address

Forrest Gump memorialized the line “I’m Not a Smart Man”.  I think it’s safe to say that even Forrest Gump would agree that issuing 23,994 tax refunds totaling $46 million to unauthorized alien workers  isn’t very smart.  Forrest wasn’t aware how accurate the phrase “Mama always said stupid is as stupid does” would apply when describing the IRS. http://cnsnews.com/news/article/irs-sent-46378040-refunds-23994-unauthorized-aliens-1-atlanta-address

$5,000 Cash Refund or 10 IED’s

The IRS should consider offering EITC tax frauds the choice of receiving $5,000 cash or 10 IED's (improvised explosive devices).  Terrorists shouldn't have to be burdened (tongue-in-cheek) with going to the bank and having to negotiate the purchase of IED’s.  If terrorists are responsible for only ½ of 1% of the estimated 8 million fraudulent EITC tax returns, it represents tax fraud of $200 million.  The internet shows the average cost of an IED is $500.  Stated another way, the US Treasury may be responsible for annually funding 400,000 IED’s! 

Potential Terrorist Tax Refund Fraud

60% of Iraq War Casualties Caused by IED’s

The Washington Post reported that 60% of US combat casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan were the result of improvised explosive devices.  That means that approximately 2,000 troops have been killed and another 20,000 wounded by IED’s. http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/improvised-explosive-devices-are-here-to-stay/2013/05/17/8d9c9d7c-be64-11e2-9b09-1638acc3942e_story.html

US Citizens Indicted for Selling Approx. 20,000 Computers to Iran

The Department of Justice indicted two Dallas businessmen for selling $12 million in computers to Iran. (http://www.fbi.gov/dallas/press-releases/2013/dallas-area-businessmen-charged-in-plot-involving-illegal-export-of-approximately-12-million-worth-of-computers-to-iran).  In addition the DOJ charged a pair of California individuals for selling $5 million in computer equipment to Iran.  http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2012/May/12-nsd-629.html

Leading al Qaeda Members Based in Iran

CNN reported the 9/11 Commission found that of the 19 hijackers, "8 to 10 of the 14 Saudi "muscle" operatives traveled into or out of Iran between October 2000 and February 2001."  According to reporter Peter Bergen, Iran has been a safe haven to al Qaeda for over ten years.

Tax Fraud Technology Monitored by France and Germany

I issued a press release entitled "Tax Technology Would Save IRS $3.7 Billion in Next 60 Days".  The article had 881 readers.  This included 75 from the counties of France and Germany.  Why would those countries be so interested in learning about EITC tax fraud technology in the United States?

Why is the IRS Afraid to Use FREE Technology to Protect Troops?

The Supreme Court has said that if you willfully defraud the US government by filing false tax returns you can be deported. One year ago I offered to test 30 million EITC tax returns in 30 minutes…   for FREE.  The IRS said they couldn’t accept my offer unless I resubmitted my entire proposal.  Since tax season was commencing the following month, there wasn’t any chance that the IRS would have approved my “free offer” in order to save taxpayers $3.7 billion.

Tea Party Scandal is Small Potatoes Compared to Massive IRS Corruption

During the last year the IRS:  1) lied about conducting $3 billion tax fraud investigation, 2) broke business promises, 3) violated federal laws, 4) was caught in a sting operation that proved IRS was taking credit for conducting phantom investigations, 5) snubbed Congressional inquiries, 6) was guilty of conversion when government workers cashed paychecks for work never performed and 7) committed honest services fraud (federal felony) by failing to provide the public with the intangible right of honest service.  I asked the US Department of Justice Tax Division for help to investigate potential felonies committed by IRS employees. They responded eight months later and stated that the DOJ “lacks jurisdiction over the alleged offenses”.  As long as the fox is in charge of the hen house, the farmer will never find out the truth about his missing chickens or an explanation on why the fox has feathers coming out of his mouth.

Congress Needs to Connect the Dots to Terrorism

Back in 1980 when I filed my tax return it wasn’t unusual to wait 8 weeks for a refund in the mail.  Technological advancements allow folks to receive their refunds in 7 to 10 days.  I suspect a huge number of tax frauds need to pay off their Christmas charges.  Why does getting money in the pockets of Black Friday shoppers take precedence over American troops?  The IRS has morphed into the largest fraudulent legal entity in the United States.  I estimate that of the $250 billion paid in tax refunds during the next three months $50 billion will be placed in the hands of tax frauds, career criminals and world terrorist.   

Time for National Sales Tax to Protect Americans

I’m one of the few people in the US that can play the IRS fraud card and back it up.  My dealings with the IRS over the last three years can be summed up with 5 words: powerful, manipulative, dangerous, incompetent and unlawful.  I’ve been a CPA for over 30 years and I’m Certified in Financial Forensics.  I’ve accumulated irrefutable evidence that the IRS is committing felonies. The recent Congressional hearings haven’t accomplished anything.  The Tea Party needs to use its power and influence and demand Congress dismantle the IRS because their severe level of incompetency threatens the safety of American troops and safety of ALL US citizens.  Let’s get Congress working on a national sales tax that would take the place of filing a tax return for anyone earning less than $250,000/yr.  This would accomplish four things: 1) allow everyone to pay their fair share, 2) prevent US Treasury from being defrauded $50 billion, 3) reduce the IRS workforce from 100,000 to 10,000 and 4) allow military parents the peace of mind knowing that the IRS isn’t funding weapons that could be used to kill their children.