All Posts (29693)

Sort by

I see no other hope, in what’s coming down the line against the American people, then to stand and fight. But first, before that fight begins, we must first start on our knees in prayer.

There is no doubt, the communist regime presently sitting in the White House is usurping power to fully disarm the American people. I have down the part of clinging to my gun and a few words about clinging to the real Jesus and not just the Bible. The Jesus projected by the institutionalized Christian church today is not real.

The teachings of Jesus, even though greatly modified, survived the mystery cults of their birth-time, the ignorance and superstition of the dark ages, and are even now slowly triumphing over the materialism, mechanism, and secularism of the twentieth century. And such times of great testing and threatened defeat are always times of great revelation.

We are very close to a real revival. However, religion does need new leaders, spiritual men and women who will dare to depend solely on Jesus and his incomparable teachings. If Christianity persists in neglecting its spiritual mission while it continues to busy itself with social and material problems, the spiritual renaissance must await the coming of these new teachers of Jesus’ religion who will be exclusively devoted to the spiritual regeneration of men. And then will these spirit-born souls quickly supply the leadership and inspiration requisite for the social, moral, economic, and political reorganization of the world.

Selfish men and women simply will not pay such a price for even the greatest spiritual treasure ever offered mortal man. Only when man has become sufficiently disillusioned by the sorrowful disappointments attendant upon the foolish and deceptive pursuits of selfishness, and subsequent to the discovery of the barrenness of formalized religion, will he be disposed to turn wholeheartedly to the gospel of the kingdom, the religion of Jesus of Nazareth.

Religion is only an exalted humanism until it is made divine by the discovery of the reality of the presence of God in personal experience. Jesus’ gospel is strictly; the fatherhood of God and the brotherhood of man. The Christian church is failing mankind because it preaches the Gospel about Jesus, about his death, burial and resurrection. The Christian church will succeed only when it begins teaching the presence of God in personal experience through the fatherhood of God and the brotherhood of man.

Read more…

President Obama On High Gas Prices: 'Use Less Oil'

 

----------------------------
images+(6)+2+obama+visa.jpg----------------------------
 
President Obama talks SC topics with Live 5's Debi Chard
By Philip Weiss
-       GAS PRICES: "Gas prices continue to be an ongoing problem," said Obama. "I'm proud of the fact that under my administration, oil production is higher than it has been in a decade or more. We have seen a doubling of fuel
Read more…

OK I am comiing out of the closet.   I have become a birther over the last few months.   Anyone with so much to hide he will spend an estimated seven million dollars ($7,000,000) to be sure it stays hidden from the American public makes me think he may have something to hide about who he is.   No verifiable birth certificate (the one on his web site has been proven in several venues to be a phony) no school records, traveling to Pakistan in 1981 when no AMERICAN citizen was allowed to travel there all just makes me suspicious.    Yeah.  Suspicious.

By the way, just where did a community organizer and first term senator get even one million????

This is copied from the filing attorney's web site.

President  Harrison J. Bounel

February 15, 2013  by Bob  Livingston

Who is Harrison J. Bounel? According  to the 2009 tax return submitted by President Barack Obama he’s the  President of the United States. All nine U.S. Supreme Court Justices arescheduled to discuss this anomaly  today.

The case in  question is Edward Noonan, et al v. Deborah  Bowen, California Secretary of State, and the  Justices are finally looking at it thanks to the dogged determination of Orly  Taitz. The case calls into question many  of the documents Obama (Bounel, Soetoro, Soebarkah, etc.) has used and/or  released as authentic since he came on the national scene. The case contends  that the documents — birth certificate, Social Security number, Selective  Service registration, etc. — are fakes or forgeries. If that’s the case, Obama  should not have been on the California ballot in 2008 and, therefore, should not  have received the State’s electoral votes.

Four of the nine  Justices must vote to move the case forward. We’ll see.

Meantime, on Feb.  4, Kathleen O’Leary, presiding judge of the 4th District Court of  Appeal, reinstated the appeal of Taitz v. Obama et al filed by Taitz when  she ran for Senate.   That case involves evidence of 1.5 million invalid voter  registrations in the State of California.   The appeal also involves Obama’s lack  of legitimacy to hold the office of President based on his forged IDs, stolen  Connecticut Social Security number, the fact the last name he’s using is not  legally his and his fraudulent claim to be the U.S.  citizen.

Evidence in the  case includes:

  • A certified copy of the passport   records of Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, showing her son’s legal last   name to be Soebarkah, not Obama.

     

  • Obama’s school records from   Indonesia, showing his citizenship to be Indonesian.

     

  • Sworn   affidavits of top law enforcement experts and investigators, showing Obama’s   birth certificate and Selective Service certificate are forgeries and that the   Social Security number used by Obama on his 2009 tax returns as posted on   WhiteHouse.gov was fraudulent.   (The SSN failed when checked through both   E-Verify and the Social Security Number Verification   Service.)

On another legal  front, Obama defaulted in the case of Grinols et al v. Obama et al on  Jan. 30 when he failed to file a response within 21 days of being served notice  of the suit. This case also involves Obama’s phony SSN.

Read more…

DEPORT THE ILLEGAL ALIEN

  • Obama was born in Kenya longer version

    Obama was born in Kenya longer version


    Kenyan Ambassador to America is proud that a Kenyan is in the White House and that Obama was one of the first Western educated Kenyans, just like his Kenyan father. | 2:35 | 3 years ago | youtube.com
  • Michelle Obama Admits Barack Hussein Obama's Home Country is Kenya

    Michelle Obama Admits Barack Hussein Obama's Home Country is Kenya


    Support this video if it makes you wonder... I think "2016 Obama's America" the movie might lend some understanding to his perspective on the world... it just debuted ... | 00:31 | 2 years ago | youtube.com
  • Barack Obama was born in Kenya ~ Here is your proof or are they ...

    Barack Obama was born in Kenya ~ Here is your proof or are they ...


    Barack Obama was born in Kenya ~ Here is your proof or are they ALL LYING? | 4:39 | 1 year ago | liveleak.com
  • Obama ADMITS Born in Kenya!!!

    Obama ADMITS Born in Kenya!!!


    Barack Obama claims he was born in Kenya! We now have Michelle and Barry admitting he was born in Kenya. | 00:21 | 2 years ago | youtube.com
  • Sarah Obama Reveals Barack Obama Was Born In Kenya

    Sarah Obama Reveals Barack Obama Was Born In Kenya


    Two Interviews of Sarah Obama (Barack's Kenyan Paternal Grandmother) claiming Barack Obama was born in Kenya. The first interview was done from her home in Kenya ... | 4 years ago | youtube.com
  • Obama Born in Kenya?

    Obama Born in Kenya?


    Why did Obama as ,a Senator, campaign for Odinga? | 1:42 | 4 years ago | liveleak.com
  • Affidavit and Tape-Proof Obama Born in Kenya

    Affidavit and Tape-Proof Obama Born in Kenya


    This is part of the evidence submitted to the Supreme Court. I had a computer voice read the affidavit that was submitted with the tape, to the Court. The tape is ... | 4 years ago | youtube.com
  • Proof Obama Admits He Was Born In Kenya

    Proof Obama Admits He Was Born In Kenya


    Not Natural Born -- TRUTH MATTERS https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwhKuunp8D8&feature=pl%ADayer_embedded Obama, the jig is up http://www.sonorannews.com/archives/2010 ... | 8:25 | 3 years ago | youtube.com
  • Obama Admits Born in Kenya - Part 2 HARD EVIDENCE

    Obama Admits Born in Kenya - Part 2 HARD EVIDENCE


    Obama wrote this biography of himself to promote his first book back in 1991. Again, this was written in 1991 before he was even thought of as a competitive ... | 00:55 | 2 months ago | youtube.com
  • Obama Born in Kenya, Publish Proof 1991 Acton & Dystel

    Obama Born in Kenya, Publish Proof 1991 Acton & Dystel


    http://www.atlah.org The Manning Report Exclusive - Obama's Literary Agent in 1991 Booklet: 'Born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii' Recorded on 17 May 2012 ... | 15:18 | 7 months ago | youtube.com
  • Barack Hussein Obama Admits "Born In Kenya"

    Barack Hussein Obama Admits "Born In Kenya"


    Obama says it himself, he was born in Kenya. | 10:58 | 1 year ago | youtube.com
  • Obama home country is Kenya

    Obama home country is Kenya


    Michelle Obama states Obama home country is Kenya. This is from Barack Hussein Obama's wife. English Dictionary Home Country noun Definition 1. the country in which a ... | 00:08 | 2 years ago | youtube.com
  • Obama Grandmother audio: Barack Born in Kenya

    Obama Grandmother audio: Barack Born in Kenya


    This is the audio of a telephone conversation with Sarah Hussein Obama, this time, with the transcript following along with the audio- where she says she was there ... | 5:10 | 4 years ago | youtube.com
  • Birthers Vindicated: Obama Born in Kenya!

    Birthers Vindicated: Obama Born in Kenya!


    Alex Jones covers the new smoking gun evidence that proves Obama was born in Kenya! http://www.infowars.com/ http://www.prisonplanet.tv/ http://twitter.com ... | 7:35 | 7 months ago | youtube.com
  • Grandmother says Obama born in Kenya

    Grandmother says Obama born in Kenya


    Obama's grandmother says he was born in Kenya | 4 years ago | youtube.com
  • Kenyan Ambassador admits Obama born in Kenya

    Kenyan Ambassador admits Obama born in Kenya


    Kenyan Ambassador admits Obama born in Kenya The Mike In The Morning show on WRIF radio, in Detroit, Michigan, called the Kenyan Embassy, and spoke to the Kenyan ... | 2:20 | 4 years ago | youtube.com
  • Obama Actually Born In Kenya!?

    Obama Actually Born In Kenya!?


    New evidence surfaced that Obama could possibly have been born in Kenya! Is this just a typo that was never caught or the truth? | 1:35 | 7 months ago | youtube.com
  • Obama confesses I was born in KENYA; NOT US or Hawaii

    Obama confesses I was born in KENYA; NOT US or Hawaii


    Courtesy youtube user NCTruthSeeler. | 1:25 | 1 year ago | youtube.com
  • Michelle Obama Saying That Barack Obama (Barry Soetoro) Was Born ...

    Michelle Obama Saying That Barack Obama (Barry Soetoro) Was Born ...


    This is Michelle Obama speaking at the LGBT Conference. Well, here it is. There IS NO DENYING the truth now. Michelle Obama ADMITS in a speech to Democrats that ... | 3:00 | 2 years ago | youtube.com
  • Obama: BREAKING PROOF! OBAMA BORN IN KENYA - Long Form BC A FRAUD ...

    Obama: BREAKING PROOF! OBAMA BORN IN KENYA - Long Form BC A FRAUD ...


    Obama: BREAKING PROOF! OBAMA BORN IN KENYA - Long Form BC A FRAUD? - May 31, 2011 ORIGINAL WND ARTICLE HERE! http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=303165 ... | wat.tv
  • Marine: 1980 In Hi. Obama Told Me He Was Born In Kenya And Wanted ...

    Marine: 1980 In Hi. Obama Told Me He Was Born In Kenya And Wanted ...


    Jim "Race Bannon" Bancroft- Obama in 1980 said he was born in Mombasa, Kenya - The stunning admission was made to a member of the U.S. Marine Corps, in a chance ... | 5:23 | 7 months ago | youtube.com
  • OBAMA Born in KENYA - Blackmailed by Clinton's. Signed Laws ...

    OBAMA Born in KENYA - Blackmailed by Clinton's. Signed Laws ...


    OBAMA Born in KENYA - Blackmailed by Clinton's. Signed Laws & Executive Orders should be VOID The establishment media hastily seized on yesterday's explosive story ... | 7:33 | 7 months ago | youtube.com
  • Barack Obama Born in Kenya?

    Barack Obama Born in Kenya?


    Everybody in Kenya seems to know something about Barack Obama, that Americans don't know! Hear what they have to say about Barack Obama's religion and where he was ... | 4 years ago | myspace.com
  • Barack Obama Born in Kenya?

    Barack Obama Born in Kenya?


    Everybody in Kenya seems to know something about Barack Obama, that Americans don't know! Hear what they have to say about Barack Obama's religion and where he was ... | 4 years ago | dailymotion.com
  • BARACK OBAMA - BORN IN KENYA - The Documentary - STUN NING!

    BARACK OBAMA - BORN IN KENYA - The Documentary - STUN NING!


    The one video documentary you MUST see to understand the basis of Barack Obama's ineligibility to hold the office of President of the U nited States~ Shocking primary ... | 10:00 | 2 years ago | youtube.com
  • BREAKING PROOF! OBAMA BORN IN KENYA - Long Form BC A FRAUD?

    BREAKING PROOF! OBAMA BORN IN KENYA - Long Form BC A FRAUD?


    ORIGINAL WND ARTICLE HERE! http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=303165 yt:crop=16:9 Hear Carl Gallups (Narrator of this video) on Live talk radio on NW FL ... | 4:12 | 1 year ago | youtube.com
  • Senator Obama Admits to a Live Audience He's From KENYA???


    I'll be the first to admit that this could have been easily edited.I would like to find and am currently searching for, the full video of this speech please link to ... | 8 months ago | youtube.com
  • Alex Jones - Dr. Jerome Corsi - Obama born in Kenya

    Alex Jones - Dr. Jerome Corsi - Obama born in Kenya


    Exclusive interview with Dr. Jerome Corsi about Obama the Manchurian President, born in Kenya. Filmed 5-20-12 One must be born a 'natural born citizen' of the United ... | 49:45 | 7 months ago | youtube.com
  • On Hardball, Liddy claims Obama is an "illegal alien" born in Kenya

    On Hardball, Liddy claims Obama is an "illegal alien" born in Kenya


    Liddy falsely claimed there is a "sworn statement from the stepgrandmother" saying Obama was born in Kenya: http://mediamatters.org/research/200907230054 | 5:29 | 3 years ago | youtube.com
  • Obama Born in Kenya The Real Birth Certificate Finally!!!!!

    Obama Born in Kenya The Real Birth Certificate Finally!!!!!


    True birth place of obama | 4 months ago | youtube.com
  • Alex Jones - Dr. Jerome Corsi - Obama born in Kenya

    Alex Jones - Dr. Jerome Corsi - Obama born in Kenya


    Exclusive interview with Dr. Jerome Corsi about Obama the Manchurian President, born in Kenya. Filmed 5-20-12 One must be born a 'natural born citizen' of the United ... | 49:45 | 7 months ago | youtube.com
  • On Hardball, Liddy claims Obama is an "illegal alien" born in Kenya

    On Hardball, Liddy claims Obama is an "illegal alien" born in Kenya


    Liddy falsely claimed there is a "sworn statement from the stepgrandmother" saying Obama was born in Kenya: http://mediamatters.org/research/200907230054 | 5:29 | 3 years ago | youtube.com
  • Barack Obama Born in Kenya?

    Barack Obama Born in Kenya?


    Everybody in Kenya seems to know something about Barack Obama, that Americans don't know! Hear what they have to say about Barack Obama's religion and where he was ... | 1:42 | 4 years ago | liveleak.com
  • Obama Born in Kenya The Real Birth Certificate Finally!!!!!

    Obama Born in Kenya The Real Birth Certificate Finally!!!!!


    True birth place of obama | 4 months ago | youtube.com
  • Michelle Obama admits Barack born in kenya.wmv

    Michelle Obama admits Barack born in kenya.wmv


    No description available. | 2 years ago | youtube.com
  • Obama Born In Kenya Proof!

    Obama Born In Kenya Proof!


    Please rate, comment and subscribe. www.infowars.com Who is Barack Obama? The question remains contentious, but a new smoking gun piece of evidence makes certain that ... | 7 months ago | youtube.com
  • Obama born in Kenya?

    Obama born in Kenya?


    A short clip where Barry says he is more popular in the place of his birth lol. | 00:21 | 1 year ago | liveleak.com
  • Ann Coulter: Unnamed Source In Kenya Says Obama Was Born In Kenya

    Ann Coulter: Unnamed Source In Kenya Says Obama Was Born In Kenya


    Ann Coulter on Fox News: Unnamed Source In Kenya Says Obama Was Born In Kenya - http://www.BirtherReport.com | 5 months ago | youtube.com
  • Sarah Obama Reveals Barack Obama Was Born In Kenya

    Sarah Obama Reveals Barack Obama Was Born In Kenya


    Two Interviews of Sarah Obama (Barack's Kenyan Paternal Grandmother) claiming Barack was born in Kenya. The first interview done from her home Kenya after the third | vxv.com
  • Barack Obama - Born in Kenya II

    Barack Obama - Born in Kenya II


    Hear it direct from Obama's grandmother, who is beautiful, candid and very lucid. Everybody in Kenya seems to know something about Barack Obama, that Americans don't ... | 2:00 | 4 years ago | liveleak.com
  • Obama says he's not American and born in Kenya (mirror)

    Obama says he's not American and born in Kenya (mirror)


    The single most damning video ever released with Obama clearly saying he's not an American and he was born in Kenya. This should be mirrored and saved on all ... | 2 years ago | youtube.com
  • Obama Born In Kenya

    Obama Born In Kenya


    No description available. | 5 months ago | youtube.com
  • Affidavit and Tape-proof Obama Born In Kenya

    Affidavit and Tape-proof Obama Born In Kenya


    Affidavit and Tape-Proof Obama Born in Kenya, Obama Not Born In Kenya - McRae / Berg Full Clip of Grandmother, Obama BORN IN KENYA Confirmed by Kenyan Ambassador ... | 00:09 | wn.com
  • Obama's Kenyan Roots

    Obama's Kenyan Roots


    Jan 2008 There are no proper roads leading to the village of Nyangoma-Kogelo. Facilities are basic. But it's here that one of Barack Obama's most committed supporters ... | 3:19 | 4 years ago | youtube.com
  • Michael Savage: Obama Born in Kenya

    Michael Savage: Obama Born in Kenya


    A 1991 promotional booklet from Obama's literary agent claims that Barack was born in Kenya aired 5/17/2012 | 2:33 | 7 months ago | youtube.com
  • BARACK OBAMA - BORN IN KENYA - STUNNING PROOF!.flv

    BARACK OBAMA - BORN IN KENYA - STUNNING PROOF!.flv


    Not my vid - I am just redistributing it. The problem with living a lie, is it's hard to keep your 'facts' straight. This isn't a worry when you tell nothing but the ... | 6 months ago | youtube.com
  • Obama Grandmother audio: Barack is Born in Kenya

    Obama Grandmother audio: Barack is Born in Kenya


    This is the audio of a telephone conversation with Sarah Hussein Obama, this time, with the transcript following along with the audio- where she says she was there ... | 5:09 | 4 years ago | liveleak.com
  • "Obama Born In Kenya"

    "Obama Born In Kenya"


    Alex Jones | 5 months ago | youtube.com
  • Obama "Born In Kenya"!!!!!

    Obama "Born In Kenya"!!!!!


    The Vetting - Exclusive - Obama's Literary Agent in 1991 Booklet: 'Born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii': http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/05 ... | 7 months ago | youtube.com
  • Obama Said He Was Born in Kenya Up Until 2007

    Obama Said He Was Born in Kenya Up Until 2007


    That's right Barack Obama PR firm was telling the m

Read more…

loss of communications

I have a simple queastion I'm just a simple unarticulate 69 yr.old male American and at the risk of being labled a simpleton my question is : What happens if the Feds find a way if they havn't already to cut off our ability to communicate with one another? There seems to me to be variety of consiquences. What do we do ? or more importantly how do we stop it ?

Read more…

Edward Gibbon, the great British historian who chronicled the rise and fall of the first great Western civilization stated the following: 

In the end, more than freedom, they wanted security. They wanted a comfortable life and they lost it all – security, comfort, and freedom. When the Athenians finally wanted not to give to society but for society to give to them, when the freedom they wished for most was freedom from responsibility, then Athens ceased to be free and was never free again.
Read more…

DHS Supplier Provides Shooting Targets of American Gun Owners

Company produces cardboard cut-outs of “non-traditional threats”: Pregnant women, elderly & children

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
February 19, 2013

A provider of “realistic” shooting targets to the Department of Homeland Security and other federal agencies has created a line of “non-traditional threat” targets that include pregnant women, mothers in playgrounds and elderly American gun owners.

undefined

Law Enforcement Targets, Inc. is a 21-year designer and full service provider of training targets for the DHS, the Justice Department and thousands of law enforcement agencies throughout the country.

The company’s website offers a line of “No More Hesitation” targets ”designed to give officers the experience of dealing with deadly force shooting scenarios with subjects that are not the norm during training.” The targets are, “meant to help the transition for officers who are faced with these highly unusual targets for the first time.”

The targets include “pregnant woman threat,” “older man with shotgun,” “older man in home with shotgun,” “older woman with gun,” “young school aged girl,” “young mother on playground,” and “little boy with real gun.”

Why are top training target suppliers for the government supplying the likes of the DHS with “non-traditional threat” targets of children, pregnant women, mothers in playgrounds, and elderly American gun owners unless there is a demand for such items?

This is particularly alarming given the fact that the Department of Homeland Security has purchased roughly 2 billion rounds of ammunition over the course of the last year, enough to wage a near 30 year war.

In comparison, during the height of active battle operations in Iraq, US soldiers used 5.5 million rounds of ammunition a month.

The DHS also purchased no less than 7,000 fully automatic assault rifles last September, labeling them “Personal Defense Weapons.”

The fact that targets of armed pregnant women, children, mothers in playgrounds, and American gun owners in general are being represented as “non traditional threats” “for the first time” is deeply concerning given the admitted preparations for civil unrest undertaken by Homeland Security as well as other federal agencies.

A leaked US Army Military Police training manual for “Civil Disturbance Operations” also outlines how military assets are to be used domestically to quell riots, confiscate firearms and even kill Americans on U.S. soil during mass civil unrest.

This also dovetails with the continuing characterization of Americans who are “suspicious of centralized federal authority,” and “reverent of individual liberty” as “extreme right-wing” terrorists by DHS-funded studies.

The US military trained last year to take on another “unusual target” – zombies – which some fear is just a ruse to get troops used to engaging crowds of people with deadly force. As Alex Jones documented in his film Police State 2000, numerous “urban warfare” training drills stretching back well over a decade have revolved around incarcerating and battling the American people on domestic soil.

See the other “non-traditional threats” that are being provided in the form of shooting targets to the DHS and thousands of law enforcement agencies below.

Note: The website containing these targets has crashed since this article was published, but this graphic shows a screenshot of the page with the URL visible.

undefined

undefined

undefined

*********************

Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News.

http://www.infowars.com/dhs-supplier-provides-shooting-targets-of-american-gun-owners/

Read more…

It is amazing how quickly the focus in DC can change from fiscal matters to something entirely different.  Politicians remind me of three-year old children – easily distracted.  Never mind the huge deficits and fiscal crisis we have on our hands which has not been addressed in over twelve years!  I know – let’s talk about federal immigration reform or better yet, federal gun control laws… whatever is viewed as the next crisis is the one to which attention is given.  Reminds me of the old political saying – “Never let a good crisis go to waste”.

I wrote an e-mail to my House Representative a few weeks ago asking him to vote NO on the $50.4 billion dollar bill to approve aid to Hurricane Sandy victims because a large portion of the bill included spending for items that had absolutely nothing to do with aiding the storm victims.  In addition, there were no offsetting spending cuts.  The House could not even approve to cut spending to cover 1/3 of the cost of this bill.

As one of my favorite Washington DC correspondents, Jamie Dupree, posted on his blog: “While many Republicans wanted a smaller disaster relief bill, some of them refused to embrace a plan to pay for 1/3 of the plan, by using an across the board budget cut of 1.63% to trim $17 billion.  “Are we willing and able to do without anything?” asked a frustrated Rep. Mick Mulvaney (R-SC), who saw 71 of his fellow Republicans vote against the offsetting budget cuts.  The move reinforced arguments by Democrats that the GOP loves to talk about cutting the budget and saving money, but doesn’t follow through.”

Think about this as it relates to your household budget.  Let’s say a disaster strikes – strong winds damage your home’s shingles and you need to have new shingles put on your roof.  Your insurance policy will cover the cost of replacing the shingles, BUT will require you to pay a $2,000 deductible.  The first item most of us would do is look at our budget and see what we need to cut in order to account for that unexpected $2,000 outlay.  Perhaps we have savings and can tap into that, have a line-of-credit and can borrow the funds, or can do the work ourselves.  Of course, we may decide to look for a second job and try to increase our revenue stream to pay for the $2,000, but putting these options aside, normal folks look to what they can cut to make up for this new “required” expense.  We may look at cutting entertainment or budgeted funds for clothes or simply decide not to get the roof fixed at this time.

Let’s face facts, neither Republicans nor Democrats are serious about budget cuts or reining in government spending.  Their actions over the previous twelve years (Bush and Obama administrations) make this evidently clear.  Our politicians are in the business of keeping our government growing – why do you think the seat of government continues to attract those looking for work?  A large % of the government’s spending manages to stay in DC – how convenient!

The choices we face in each election are pretty much as follows:

Vote Democrat for unbridled spending – after all for many Democrats there is no fiscal crisis – just keep raising the debt ceiling and borrowing funds – eventually the economy will come around and with the tax increases just introduced and the savings from Obamacare, enough revenue will be generated to deal with it (FAT CHANCE)!

But a vote for Republicans is just as bad – big talk about budget cuts when they can be used to criticize Democrats, but then go forward with huge increases in spending on military and other Republican favored programs.

The U.S. government has an enormous spending problem and I believe very few if any, of those who represent us on the Hill give a damn!

Read more…

 

With all of the support given to Chris Dorner after his murder spree I find myself looking for a person I can call a hero for “standing up for himself”.  I found him in Tulsa, Oklahoma of all                         places.  The Tulsa story didn’t get the same publicity Dorner garnered but the story is essentially the same.  Dorner is in the process of being canonized by leftists across this nation for murdering people who had nothing to do with his firing from the Los Angeles Police Department over questions of conduct.  I don’t know for sure why he was fired, and no one probably ever will know as the truth won’t be allowed to see the light of day.  The Los Angeles Police Department will cover their tracks and whitewash the affair, as will supporters of the actions taken by Dorner.  No one cares what the truth is, only that their side wins.  It doesn’t help that the LAPD took to tossing a hail of bullets at anyone driving a pickup truck in California without bothering to find out who was in the vehicle, but that is another issue. 

Read More:

http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2013/02/chris-dorner-jake-england-mass-murderers-or-folk-heroes/

Read more…

Political Affiliations Of Mass Killers

"Why is it the progressive liberal who steals guns then goes and kills movie goers and children in school has never been a NRA member?"

 

Ft Hood - Registered Democrat- Muslim

Columbine - Too young to vote - both families were registered democrats and progressive liberals

VA Tech - Wrote hate mail to Pres Bush and to his staff. Registered Democrat

Colorado Theater - Registered Democrat, staff worker on the Obama campaign, occupy wall street participant, progressive liberal

Connecticut School Shooter - Registered Democrat, hated  Christians

 

Common thread is that all of these shooters were progressive liberal democrats."

 

Interesting...isn't it?  Maybe we should ban Democrats instead of guns!

 

Read more…

 

No more privacy and no where you can go to enjoy your personal privacy.  Now you know who's watching you and just how much they can see from a drone.  The real question is who is watching the watchers to ensure they do not violate our rights.

We must take a stand against this invasion of privacy under the guise of Homeland Security.  Contact your congressman and senator immediately to demand they take action against spying on US citizens now.  The time to take a stand is now because our constitutional rights depend on our vigilance every day.   

 

 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=od6kWBjh4Kc&feature=player_embedded

Read more…

Department of Homeland Security

When lines of authority are blurred, power naturally defaults to the highest level.  The states are not ‘partners’ with the federal government in matters that require state authority over their jurisdiction.

From the Legal Information Institute;

Jurisdiction-The term jurisdiction is really synonymous with the word “power”

Jurisdiction is the territory within which a court or government agency may properly exercise its power

State and local policing is a jurisdictional matter and the states and local governments have conceded their authority in this.  Informational jurisdiction is no exception and in fact leads physical control.

What is revealed in this IACP Nov. 2012 article is that the Department of Homeland Security has funded an international non-governmental organization, the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP), to manage the operational issues of the endeavor; Targeted Interstate Photo Sharing (TIPS).

“The DHS S&T has funded the IACP Technology Center to provide a practitioner group to advise Nlets on operational issues. These experienced practitioners will provide input on how this technology can be used in the field.”

What that means is that we are in trouble. 

The IACP is an international, non-governmental organization accredited by the United Nations and has been instrumental in bringing about profound changes to our nation politically, technologically and culturally.  There has been a great paradigm shift in our nation since 9-11 that spans all agencies of government.  This shift affects every aspect of our lives and has practically decimated the US Constitution and Bill of Rights.  US citizens, regardless of their political persuasion, are united in astonishment as they witness the slash and burn abrogation of one cherished right after another.

There is no sector of our society left untouched by the new paradigm and each has its own specialists attending to the transformation in their particular realm.  In the realm of policing, it is the IACP who is in charge of nurturing and tending this transformation.

Here is just one example;

Intelligence Led Policing and Fusion Centers: How the IACP Helped the USA to Cross the Rubicon

Unfortunately there’s  no solution in legislation, no real willingness by enough of our elected representatives to do what they took an oath to do; to protect our liberty I do still recommend that you contact your state representative and tell them if you have concerns about open access to your data contained in the state Dept. of Public Safety database.  Tell them that you expect them to protect your personal information from being freely shared and used on a whim to track and spy on you.  They need to hear concerns from their constituents.

It is clear that we cannot stop the government from sharing this information in ways that will hurt our ability to control our own lives.   If we want to protect ourselves we must remove our biometrics from the system by either not giving it to them in the first place or taking legal action to remove it.

 

Read more…

ARE WE POST-STATIST?

*CALL ME POST-STATIST*
by Jim Babka
for The Zero Aggression Project

I'm not liberal, conservative, green, libertarian, or socialist. I prefer
being called [LINK: http://www.downsizedcfoundation.org/blog/our-lexicon-poststatist]
"Post-Statist."Â That means, I envision a day when political domination is held in low regard, like communism and monarchy presently are. For many years, I believed that the size and scope of the government was the problem. I worked to [LINK: http://www.DownsizeDC.org/] "Downsize DC."Â Directionally, that was correct, but it avoids the BACkbone problems, which is that [LINK:
http://www.downsizedcfoundation.org/blog/our-lexicon-the-state] The State is a...
· Bullying
· Abusive
· Cartel
*BULLYING*
The State has one power -- coercion. It either bribes or threatens human beings, compelling them to do things that they would not otherwise choose to do on their own. Statists imagine all the wonderful things that could happen if the coercion was intensified. They never calculate the costs.

*What if what passes for dialogue in this country was focused not on
self-serving, partisan bickering points, but was, instead, an evaluation of all the real costs of statist schemes, both hidden and evident?*

*ABUSIVE*

People turn to The State because they think it's an effective short-cut to social progress and security. Indeed, The State has two powers that attract reformers.

First, politicians have tons of money with which to bribe the behaviors
that are politically preferred, and that's because they're very good at
stealing it. They are further supported by cronies who want their share of the loot.

Second, bureaucrats back those threats with real violence. Ignore their
edicts at your peril. Armed men and women will show up to take your
property or your liberty. Resist and they'll take your life! Â

*CARTEL*

The State is a [LINK:
http://www.downsizedcfoundation.org/blog/our-lexicon-the-violent-monopoly]
"Violent Monopoly." Who else can require you to "patronize" their business?

Imagine, you don't like the hamburger you just received. Maybe you ordered it without onions, but it came with them. You can complain. In business, the customer is right. Maybe they apologize and replace the order. Perhaps they discount your bill. Even then, you have the choice to never darken the door of the establishment ever again.Â

On the other hand, how many IRS agents or FDA regulators say, "The citizen is always right?"

As Perry Willis has observed...
/You have more power as a customer than you do as a citizen./

Therefore, the size of The State is the smaller problem by comparison with the BACkbone problems. And if "governments" are supposed to protect and enhance rights, then...
*The bullying, abusive, cartel-like behavior disqualifies The State from
being an actual government.*
None of us would voluntarily sign all of our rights and reservations away, especially to someone who might be working against our interests. Even the masochist would want the control of a "safe word." Such control eludes the citizen. What's your safe word -- your escape -- when politicians or bureaucrats bully you?

All the democratic version of The State can offer you is, "Elect better
people." Suggesting that you have to convince 50%, plus one of your
neighbors to "give" you relief is hardly an outlet. The problem is
compounded when we see how rigged the system is in favor of the very power that oppresses your rights of conscience and happiness. So instead...

SIMPLY imagine an END to the Bullying, the Abuse, and the Cartel. Imagine instead that government is a service, accountable to the consumer. That's what the Post-Statist does.

If you found this article valuable please share it. /You can follow Jim
Babka on Twitter @JimBabka/

[LINK: https://secure.downsizedcfoundation.org/contribute/] If you like what you've read here, please support the Zero Aggression Project with a donation via the Downsize DC Foundation.

Â

--------------------

Copyright (c) 2013 by Jim Babka. Permission to distribute this blog post for educational purposes is granted, if done with attribution to the author and the Downsize DC Foundation. Permission to use for commercial purposes is denied.

This message is an educational service of the Downsize DC Foundation.Please share it with others. Please tell your friends that they can receive similar material in the future by subscribing to our free email newsletter, [LINK: https://secure.downsizedcfoundation.org/newsletter/]

This offering by Rev. Jerry L. Robertson

Read more…

The New American Gestapo is already a fact.

The American Gestapo is already here!

  The American Gestapo is already here and it was built with your permission and your tax dollars!  Yep, The Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

Created after the 9-11 attacks in 2001 the DHS was created  and charged with the primary responsibilities of protecting the United States of America and U.S. territories (including Protectorates) from and responding to terrorist attacks, man-made accidents, and natural disasters.

Back during Obummer’s first run for the White House while making a speech in Denver,  Then Senator Obama stated that he wanted to see a governmental police force as well equipped and armed as all of our armed forces combined.  For some reason he has never spoken of that again.  It is rumored that his advisors jumped all over him for making it in the first place.

Now consider the following facts:  There are DHS offices in every state in the Union; There are DHS offices in over 125 counties in those states; Obummer has begun firing any top ranking general that won’t pledge to fire on American citizens if ordered to do so.  He has already “retired” three of them:  The budget announced for DHS is in the $100,000,000,000 range or one hundred billion dollars of your money each year. The 2010 fiscal year budget was $98,800,000,000 I have never heard of any budget decreasing for any department of the government with the exception of the Military budget of course.

One more example of why we should never trust our government and grant them a blank check without VERY specific instructions.

They took that check and, among other things did a few things that are unconstitutional.  Let’s take a look at one of them before I move on to today’s topic.

The Fourth Amendment to our Constitution, reads – “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”  Would you believe that your DHS has decided that amendment does not pertain within 100 miles of any border in the good old USA?  That means if you live in almost anywhere in the state of Florida you can be searched and your private property seized on the whim of an agent of your DHS.  (You might want to check on the history of the Gestapo at this point) How about NYNY or all of Rhode Island; all of the upper peninsula and more of Michigan; there is even a special proviso that takes in almost the entire states of Pennsylvania. Texas and New Mexico. Just go around the US map and wherever the US stops mark off 100 miles and you are no longer protected by the fourth amendment by DHS fiat.

Now let’s add in a few more facts just to clear things up a little more.  Non-military departments of your government have already purchased enough ammunition to wage a war similar to the one in Iraq for SEVEN YEARS.  Do as I did and look up the number of rounds of ammunition used per month in Iraq by our soldiers and do the math.  Oh , I forgot to mention the reason they espouse for the purchase:” To maintain the qualification with various weapons their agents are required to qualify on each year.  In other words, target practice.  Literally billions of rounds of ammunition already purchased for target practice.  This doesn’t even begin to talk about all of the new military style weapons purchased.  You know the ones I mean.  Those listed in Feinstein’s bill plus many of the fully automatic ones manufactred.

DHS IS your new secret police.  Aren’t you proud?

Read more…

4063664531?profile=original            America’s Abortion may end with North Dakota Personhood Law

History may mark February 7th as the day that Personhood for the unborn was established. This is the day that provided the unborn at conception the God given right to life bestowed upon all since the beginning of creation. This is a significant step in the continuing evolution of sanctioning the protection of life which has been riddled by abortion rights activists since the infamous 1973 Roe v. Wade U.S. Supreme Court decision.

Forty years and 55 million plus deaths of the unborn who committed no crime except to be conceived in God’s image were murdered. This was accomplished because of a court and society that would protect a tree frog’s existence above a human life. These murders may soon be put to a stop with the North Dakota Personhood Measure that passed in the State Senate. When it is established that a fetus has U.S. 14th Amendment constitutional protection, abortion ends in America!

Often times in the history of monumental movements, they often have their genesis in the hearts and souls of the faithful who are unwilling to witness or permit the undoing of basic rights. The aptly named Personhood Constitutional Amendment initiative would codify the constitutional protections and absolute rights afforded all citizens of North Dakota and equally apply them to human embryos.

This is not just a momentary battle that supporters of life will wait to see what will happen in North Dakota’s House. The fact is that, in North Dakota as well as other states that are considering Personhood laws; the war for life should and can be won on the local battleground of state turf. These legislators, unlike their federal congressional counterparts, are not afraid to stand up to protect their religious values and principles, under the heat of unceasing liberal mass media contempt.

At the very core of the right to life is the imbalance that exists in continuing to treat the right to exist and to be born as incidental and given no more value than extinguishing the life of a common earth worm. The rights of the mother is given weight not as the carrier of life, but the right to her privacy to do as she pleases, which includes state sanctioned murder.

Yet for forty years the growing tearful cries of fathers who will never be, and mothers who are now filled with regret because of abortion. Their mournful regret is coupled with birthrights of the unborn, sheered away by abortion clinics.

( click to read more )

Read more…
Does God give us the “right” to keep and bear arms?Posted by Jake Baker on January 22, 2013 at 10:30pmView BlogWhere does God Give Us the Right To Keep and Bear Arms?First, let me begin by defining government. According to the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, the American government is tri-partied. It consists of We The People, the States, and the Federal Government (not national which implies power over the people instead of a federal government, which is assigned certain tasks to complete on our behalf).This is an important concept as concerns both U.S. and biblical law. Government is not just the federal government or the state government, it is us all of us.Therefore, all duties of government belong to us all. However, we tender to the federal and state governments certain duties to be carried out on behalf of the whole government, which includes us. So, when someone says that only government should have guns, remember we are one-third of the government structure in this country.Further, we are the first nation in the history of this earth which had no subjects. Every other nation considered their heads of state as rulers and the people as its subjects. Even Great Britain had—and still has—as a basis of government, the concept of their people as subjects. As Americans we have never subjects. We are free men who are citizens and government is subject to us and to our designs, not the other way around.Our history includes numerous wars with Great Britain, beginning with the Revolutionary War. That war was fought for a number of reasons, including religious persecution. However, the catalyst for the commencement of hostilities was the British hubris believing they could simply march in and take our guns. Men bled and died; fortunes were committed and lost; families destroyed, and lives forever changed, but in the end, America prevailed and history was forever changed.This land remained free for a number of spiritual reasons, but also because we believed that every man should be armed. We the People were the government and to disarm us was to disarm the United States.Now, with the same imperial hubris, the strutting peacocks calling themselves “representatives” fire about legislation that pretends as if we have no history. They assume to themselves the position of royalty—not loyalty—in assuming they can pass gun control or confiscation legislation and steal the rights of We the People granted under the Second Amendment.How would the nation feel if we decided tomorrow to end their rights under the First Amendment? What if government declared tomorrow that everybody has to be a Mormon and no one is allowed to criticize the President, the Congress or the Courts? Would they then say it is not an infringement, just a defining, or would there be an outcry that shattered every glass in the great halls of Washington D.C.? I suspect the latter.Obviously, there have been stains on our history, such as those left by the blood guilt of slavery, but even that, after a long hellish century, was cured by the second Great Awakening as men of faith and compassion refused any longer to tolerate the ungodly, cruelty, and horrors of slavery. In the end the might of righteousness prevailed and the scourge of slavery was ended.But it was the preaching of men such as George Whitefield (sometimes referred to as Whitfield), Charles Spurgeon, Charles Grandison Finney, and Jonathan Edwards that planted the seeds of faith and spiritual courage in the hearts of what would become the Christian Abolitionist movement. And this rare blend of compassion, courage and righteous indignation fueled what would become a demand for justice for all people, with an understanding that if one man was enslaved, then all were enslaved because We The People is all of us, united as one of the three branches of government.Remember, in those days the army was comprised of the militias of the several states. It was We The People who often brought their own arms to the conflict that engaged in the bloody four year conflict that claimed the lives of 650,000 Americans. Remarkably, that was the same number of slaves that were present in the United States at the height of slavery. That amounts to one death for each man stolen from his land and brought here to the states as slaves.So, were they right to take up arms to end slavery in America? More importantly, in the larger sense, are we today—their progeny—right in our demand to keep and bear arms? Do we truly have God-given rights protected by the U.S. Constitution; and more importantly, are these truly God-given rights in the light of scriptures?The first answer is easy. Yes, we are both allowed and, in fact, I would argue we are expected to keep and bear arms.The Militia Act of 1792"Passed May 8, 1792, provided for the organization of the state militias. It conscripted every "free able-bodied white male citizen" between the ages of 18 and 45 into a local militia company. Militia members were to arm themselves with a musket, bayonet and belt, two spare flints, a cartridge box with 24 bullets, and a knapsack. Men owning rifles were required to provide a powder horn, 1/4 pound of gun powder, 20 rifle balls, a shooting pouch, and a knapsack. Some occupations were exempt, such as congressmen, stagecoach drivers, and ferryboatmen. Otherwise, men were required to report for training twice a year, usually in the Spring and Fall.The militias were divided into "divisions, brigades, regiments, battalions, and companies" as the state legislatures would direct. The provisions of the first Act governing the calling up of the militia by the President in case of invasion or obstruction to law enforcement were continued in the second Act. Court martial proceedings were authorized by the statute against militia members who disobeyed orders."(Source: Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Militia_Acts_of_1792)Further, the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states: “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”The definition in Webster’s 1828 dictionary defines infringed as “broken, violated: transgresses. Clearly the Founding Fathers believed that everyone should be armed.“Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance; they are the people’s liberty’s teeth.” - George WashingtonI will proceed no further with the hundreds of quotes that could be applied, but suffice it to say, both history and the law support our unabridged right to keep and bear arms – of any sort – without limitation. We are the government. We are not subjects of the government that may be stripped of our rights.We The People are one-third of the government. You cannot strip this third of government of guns while allowing the other two-thirds to keep theirs. That would be as unlawful as Congress attempting to control the executive or judicial branches of the federal government.So this discussion once again asks: Does God give us the right to keep and bear arms?What about the sixth commandment which is oft quoted, “Thou shalt not kill.” Does that on its face not annul the right to keep and bear arms? Let’s look and see what the commandment really says.The Hebrew word used for “kill” is ratsach. The word literally means to murder or shed innocent blood. Therefore, the command is not prohibition against killing, but against murder or the shedding of innocent blood.In point of fact, scripture demands the death of murderers because murder requires the scales of justice to be balanced by the blood of the murderer. That is why we can be both prolife and pro-death penalty. Both are just.Therefore, the sixth commandment is not a prohibition against keeping and bearing arms; nor is it a prohibition against shooting a home invader in the dark of night —someone who presents deadly force or even for the defense of others.Let’s look at Psalm 82:3 and 4 where we are commanded to: “Defend the poor and fatherless: do justice to the afflicted and needy. Deliver the poor and needy: rid them out of the hand of the wicked.”The Psalmist says that to do otherwise is judging unjustly. If the wicked are strong and we are to deliver them—to rid them from the wicked hand—how are we to do it?Here is what the Lord commanded David in 1 Samuel 30 when his family was kidnapped and his goods stolen:8 "And David enquired at the Lord, saying, Shall I pursue after this troop? shall I overtake them? And he answered him, Pursue: for thou shalt surely overtake them, and without fail recover all.9 So David went, he and the six hundred men that were with him, and came to the brook Besor, where those that were left behind stayed.10 But David pursued, he and four hundred men: for two hundred abode behind, which were so faint that they could not go over the brook Besor.11 And they found an Egyptian in the field, and brought him to David, and gave him bread, and he did eat; and they made him drink water;12 And they gave him a piece of a cake of figs, and two clusters of raisins: and when he had eaten, his spirit came again to him: for he had eaten no bread, nor drunk any water, three days and three nights.13 And David said unto him, To whom belongest thou? and whence art thou? And he said, I am a young man of Egypt, servant to an Amalekite; and my master left me, because three days agone I fell sick.14 We made an invasion upon the south of the Cherethites, and upon the coast which belongeth to Judah, and upon the south of Caleb; and we burned Ziklag with fire.15 And David said to him, Canst thou bring me down to this company? And he said, Swear unto me by God, that thou wilt neither kill me, nor deliver me into the hands of my master, and I will bring thee down to this company.16 And when he had brought him down, behold, they were spread abroad upon all the earth, eating and drinking, and dancing, because of all the great spoil that they had taken out of the land of the Philistines, and out of the land of Judah.17 And David smote them from the twilight even unto the evening of the next day: and there escaped not a man of them, save four hundred young men, which rode upon camels, and fled.18 And David recovered all that the Amalekites had carried away: and David rescued his two wives.19 And there was nothing lacking to them, neither small nor great, neither sons nor daughters, neither spoil, nor any thing that they had taken to them: David recovered all."How well do you think this same David would have done against Goliath had he not been armed with a deadly weapon. He certainly was nowhere near physically strong enough to take on the almost 10 foot tall giant. No, he need personal protection. He rejected military hardware, armor, sword and shield and opted instead for personal protection, a “handgun” if you will. He killed Goliath and saved his people from the Philistines.There are times when only force will do. Here is the Lord’s commandment in Exodus 22: 2 “ If a thief be found breaking up, and be smitten that he die, there shall no blood be shed for him.”But one might ask, What about the New Testament? Are we not commanded to love, forgive and turn the other cheek?Yes, we are, but we are not commanded to be enslaved by weakness. If we are enslaved without any means to protect ourselves, how do we deliver the hand of the oppressed from the hand of the wicked? No, Yeshua says in Luke 22:36: “[Christ] said to them, 'But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one.”Paul says in 1 Timothy 5:8: “8 But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel.”This passage is a very wide intent. The words “provide not” are all inclusive. This passage does not define provision as food and shelter. No, this passage is purposely open ended. It means total provision, including protection from whatever may come. It is foolish not to assume that whatever means of protection it takes to guard ones family is both legitimate and required.For Paul declares that one who provides not for his family has “denied the faith and is worse than an infidel.” Infidel means someone who is outside the faith. Yahweh forbid that we get caught falling short of this mandate to protect our families. We then are charged to protect our household by whatever means necessary, be it “assault” rifle, or hand gun, or any other weapon essential to the protection of our family.Others will remind us that our protection is in the strength of the Lord for he will provide all things. Does that mean we sit down, do nothing, and expect a roof to magically appear over our heads, food to mystically appear on our tables, and money to wondrously show up in our pockets?What foolishness! We work to provide a home, food, income and, yes, guns and ammo that we might be able to care for our loved ones needs, comfort, and safety, while keeping in mind that we are also responsible for delivering the downtrodden from the oppressor.What about turning the other cheek? Just as in the example above, where the thief is breaking in, we are allowed to use deadly force when it is required. However, turning the other cheek is applicable for insults, theft, when no life threatening force is presented, etc. Romans 12 says that we turn the other cheek saving room for the wrath of God. Romans 13 describes government as that wrath and it carries not the sword in vain. For they (government) are to be a rewarder of good and a terror to evil. In fact, that is the test to determine if an entity is just corrupt power or government.We often hear quoted Romans 13:1-2:"Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God. 2 Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation."There are two problems with the way this quote is often used. First, one must continue reading the rest of the passage which says:3 "For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same: 4 For he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil."But if what is called “government” is not following the command to be a terror to evil and not a terror to good, not being a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil,” then it is not government by this definition and must be opposed. Disobedience to tyrants is obedience to Yahweh.The second problem with this quote is the verbiage. In this passage the word “power” is mistranslated. Historically we need to remember that King James was at that time in history usurping a throne that was not his. He had the power to ascend the throne, but not the authority. Therefore, he often use synonymously the words power and authority.The word that was translated “power” is not the Greek word dynamis which means power (as in dynamite) but the word exousia which means power derived from just authority. Therefore, we are to be subject only to power derived from just authority. If the entity calling itself government does not derive its power from just authority, then it is just tyranny — not government.The federal branch of American government attemptingto disarm one-third of the American governmentis not government, but tyranny.Therefore, I must conclude that any attempt to disarm the people in any way, is sedition because it is in violation of our history, deprives one-third of the government—the people—of a right inherent to all, and despotically limits armaments to only two parts of government. Further, it nullifies the ability to carry out the divine command to one-third of the American government—the people—to deliver the poor and oppressed from the hand of the wicked. Additionally such a disarmament dramatically reduces or eliminates one’s ability to protect their family, home and nation.As a citizen we are bound to protect this nation against all enemies, both foreign and domestic. Any attempt to disarm We the People of this country is immoral, illegal and therefore violates the First Amendment as well as the Second Amendment, in addition to violating the commandments in the holy scriptures. To disarm the people is at once an act of war, and, in fact, a coup d'état. It is treason and sedition against the government of the United States, comprised of We The People.Finally, any home that is not prepared to protect its children, women, aged, infirmed, or weak is living in an unbiblical state of wanton disregard of a Biblical edict, historical precedent, and common sense. As a result, we have not only been given the “right” by Yahweh to keep and bear arms, we have been given the obligation to keep and bear arms both as a spiritual matter and as a matter of U.S. law and historical understanding.
Read more…